Muffingate Debunked? Hotel Company Says Fed Gov‘t Didn’t Pay $16 Per Muffin
- Posted on September 23, 2011 at 7:59am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »

WASHINGTON (The Blaze/AP) — The government did not pay $16 apiece for breakfast muffins at a Justice Department conference, no matter what the department’s inspector general thinks.
So says Hilton Worldwide, which hosted the 2009 legal training conference in Washington. Even the IG’s own report issued this week acknowledges that for the price paid, they also got some free fruit and drinks.
Hilton Worldwide, which manages and franchises hotels including the Capital Hilton where the conference took place, says the price included not only breakfast baked goods but also fresh fruit, coffee, tea, soft drinks, tax and tips. It says the report misinterpreted its invoices, which often use shorthand and don’t reflect the full menu and service provided.
The IG’s report allocates $4,200 for the muffins but also noted 15 gallons of complimentary coffee, 30 gallons of complimentary ice tea and 200 pieces of free fruit included in the overall price of $39,360. The question is — were these additional elements really “complimentary” or were they folded into the overall cost per person? Below, see a screen shot from the IG report:

The IG says that the total cost per person at the reception was $14.74 – 2 cents over the allowable Justice Department limit. Totaling up the items in the IG’s report, the 534 attendees over five days were given 1,150 pastries, 1,350 pieces of candy and fruit, 1,250 cups of coffee and tea and 250 soft drinks.
The IG’s audit of excessive spending at 10 Justice Department conferences was one of those news stories that make the public sit up and take notice. Once again, the profligate government was overspending. But it wasn’t billions. Or even millions. It was muffins at $16 apiece, according to the IG’s office.
The report referenced the $16 muffins half a dozen times and it said their cost was one of many food items that “appeared extravagant and potentially wasteful.”
Not so, Hilton Worldwide said in a statement Thursday.
“In Washington, the contracted breakfast included fresh fruit, coffee, juice, muffins, tax and gratuity, for an inclusive price of $16 per person,” Hilton Worldwide said in a statement.
“Dining receipts are often abbreviated and do not reflect the full pre-contracted menu and service provided, as is the case with recent media reports of breakfast items approved for some government meetings,” Hilton Worldwide’s statement added.
On Thursday night, IG spokesman Jay Lerner said that “we stand by our report.” This may strike some as interesting, considering that Hilton has essentially given the government an “out” and a potential opportunity for good publicity. Either the government is striking to be open and honest or the report, itself, is flawed. Regardless of which is true, it’s likely that officials are trying to avoid bad press — something that a flawed report could also create.
Bill O’Reilly recaps the initial scandal based in the IG report below:
In its report, the IG’s office said the cost of the muffins was one of many food items that “appeared extravagant and potentially wasteful.”
“Many individual food and beverage items listed on conference invoices and paid by the” Executive Office for Immigration Review for a legal training conference “were very costly,” said the IG report. “The EOIR spent $4,200 on 250 muffins and $2,880 on 300 cookies and brownies. By itemizing these costs, we determined that, with service and gratuity, muffins cost over $16 each and cookies and brownies cost almost $10 each.”



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (96)
kentuckypatriot
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 9:02amWonder what kind of tip the servers got? geez, Probably enough to pay all their monthly bills!
Report Post »jzs
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 10:15amIf you add the cost all the lawyers involved with this Republican witch hunt, the cost per muffin probably was $16.
Report Post »Resist We Much
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 10:28amGood point JZS! We could have saved all that money used on the “witch hunt” to pay for 2% of the cost of another Obama vacation. Or get Michelle another $40,000 bracelet…
Report Post »Rashomon
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 10:49am“overall price of $39,360.” divided by 534 total people = $73.71 per person.
“The IG says that the total cost per person at the reception was $14.74″ using what? gov math?
Report Post »jzs
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 11:08amResist, we have to first pay for the 879 days that Bush took on vacation. Bush broke Reagan’s record for most vacation taken by a President, for you trivia fans. Look it up
And, if you want to make stuff up, we have to pay for the two million dollars necklace that Barbara Bush got from taxpayers funds, money left over from unspent money Reagan allocated to to buy weapons for the Iranians.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 11:16amSo we have one of two possiblities either Hilton charged the DOJ 16.00 for a muffin or Hilton is now trying to cover up the fact they charged 16.00 a muffin because the DOJ had no idea that they did….
Report Post »Because the budget reports shows 16.00 per muffin.
Resist We Much
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 11:39am@JZS,
Oh, cool. Did I say I was a Bush fan? You can have that fiscal socialist if you like. I guess two wrongs make a right for you then? Bush took too many vacations so it’s alright if Obama does?
I’m not making anything up. You can look up the $40,000 diamond cuffs for yourself, Mr. Google.
Report Post »Nasado
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:06pm@Rashomon
Report Post »Actually, that was the cost per person for the entire 5 days they were there so it equals out to $14 and some change per day. Not that $16 for a muffin, coffee, and some fruit is pretty obsurd but the math is correct.
MHP
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:13pmNope jzs
That was the hotel bill itself. The Hilton confirms that.
You need to go back to 1st grade and learn how to read.
Report Post »Jim in Houston
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:13pmJZ the Huff & Puff wants you back, they miss their idiot.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:29pmResist, Obama has taken 1/3 as many vacation days as Bush did over the same period, and half as much as Reagan. He’s taken about 20 days a year, which is less than I get.
So how many days do you think a President should get, if 20 a year is excessive? And exactly when did your concern for the vacation days Presidents take develop? Like – just a guess – around January of 2008?
The jewelry was borrowed from jewlry designer Katie Decker. Sorry, I guess you’ll have to find something else to hate her for. But wait, even if she did own the jewlry, is that a crime? Why is it that you hate the rich if they are Obama, but love the others?
Report Post »Bullhorn Guy
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 2:52pm@JZS “Like – just a guess – around January of 2008?”
Why would he take an interest in it during the last year of Bush’s presidency? I don’t get it…
Report Post »Kevin
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 3:34pmBig difference between the vacations Bush took and the ones Obama takes. Bush took his “vacations” at a place HE owned, and often conducted government business while there. Obummy has taken vacations to to places that cost the tax payers. AND Obummy’s vacations always seem to come during times of national crises or just before important legislation needs to be passed.
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 5:17pm@jzs…..you should change your screen name to “****”.
Report Post »Resist We Much
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:26pm@ JZS. There is a big money difference between Bush spending time at HIS ranch in Texas where he also held press conferences and worked vs Michelle taking 40 of her friends to Spain and renting out some of the best suites in town. Or Michelle traveling to Martha‘s Vinyard in a separate plane because she couldn’t wait to get there only 4 hours before Barack did. Everything the Obamas do has to be the most lavish, expensive party. But, regardless… You say Bush took too much time off. I agree. He sucked as a president. I don’t “hate the rich”. I hate hypocrisy! If the Obamas want to spent all of THEIR money, great! They just need to shut the hell up about telling ME I need to tighten my belt and “we need to spread the wealth around cause it’s good for everybody” while they party in style on our dime during a big recession.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on September 24, 2011 at 2:14amResist Much, Republicans get these factoids stuck in their brain. Presidents and First ladies vacations on their own dime except for Secret Service protection.
Q: Did Michelle Obama and her daughters use taxpayer money to take a European vacation?
A: The first lady, her mother and her children did stay in Europe for a private vacation after the president completed an overseas trip on official business. However, no taxpayer money was used for the first family’s personal expenses.
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/07/michelles-european-vacation/
And, because you don‘t follow the news you don’t realize that the stimulus gave you a tax break. One third of the stimulus, so hated by Republicans was tax breaks for you and me.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/10/jon-stewart/stewart-claims-stimulus-bill-one-third-tax-cuts/
President Obama’s jobs plan also gives you a tax break. I’m not sure of your income level Resist, but the administration want YOU and me to have money to spend, because that’s what stimulates the economy, not tax bremillionaires millionairs. Nobody is asking you to “tighten your belt.” nonsenseure nonsence. The best thing for the economy is to put money into your hands and mine, and for you and me, to spend it.
Report Post »Resist We Much
Posted on September 24, 2011 at 5:11am@ JZS Well, if a reliable source like Katie McCormick Lelyveld, Michelle Obama’s press secretary, told FactCheck.org in an e-mail: “All personal travel and expenses incurred were paid for personally.” then that settles it. Lol!
No I guess I just DON’T realize that the stimulus gave me a tax break. It’s almost as if I have less money to spend! But, maybe I’m just not “poor” enough (and I ain’t rich either). It’s a good thing that stimulus was passed though… It created all kinds of shovel ready jobs that prompted the president to say, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVonk_OqEUU The economy is, well as bad as ever, but if we hadn‘t had the stimulus we’d all be living in cardboard boxes by now… right.
According to the oh, so conservative AP, “The 10 percent of households with the highest incomes pay more than half of all federal taxes. They pay more than 70 percent of federal income taxes, according to the Congressional Budget Office.” I guess Obama lied about Buffet. Maybe you can get that factoid stuck in your brain.
http://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-rich-taxed-less-secretaries-070642868.html
This article will give you links directly to the IRS should you choose to skim through all the numbers..
http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/250.html
Report Post »Resist We Much
Posted on September 24, 2011 at 5:18am@ JZS So, how much MORE should these “evil” rich guys pay!? They DO stimulate the economy. A prosperous Rolls Royce company doesn’t stimulate the economy or create jobs? Rich people buy those cars you know. I don’t recall buying any economy stimulating products that were produced by the bum on the street corner. You wanna get rid of loopholes for companies like GE? Cool! Me too. How about a flat tax?
Now we are getting into novel writing territory. The posts get longer and longer…
We can sit here and go back and forth all day. The bottom line is that progressivism is gutting the engine that makes America run. And as the years go by and we continue down this socialist path, unemployment goes up and inflation skyrockets and more riots are started over here and in socialist Europe, you can find other excuses as to why the true conservative minority is screwing it all up.
Report Post »Resist We Much
Posted on September 24, 2011 at 5:40amYou know… I think that if I ever do become a billionaire, I’ll just be a hypocrite and tell every liberal I meet that, “We really should spread my wealth around. I really wish I was taxed more… But since I’m not, I have to drinking another $1000 bottle of Pinot Noir. Cheers!” Then they will love me and leave me alone.
Report Post »Resist We Much
Posted on September 24, 2011 at 7:49amOne last thing here… I’ve been checking out your beloved, untarnished and completely unbiased and the last word in everything website, factcheck.org and it’s run by the Annenberg Foundation. Obama was a community organizer for the Annenberg folks along with terrorist Bill Ayers… nice.
This from totally conservative leaning CNN:
“A review of board minutes and records by CNN show Obama crossed paths repeatedly with Ayers at board meetings of the Annenberg Challenge Project.”
http://articles.cnn.com/2008-10-07/politics/obama.ayers_1_ayers-and-obama-senior-obama-adviser-stanley-kurtz?_s=PM:POLITICS
You can download the original grant application submitted by Bill Ayers here:
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4322/inside-the-obama-ayers-chicago-annenberg-challenge-records/
One director of the factcheck.org site is Kathleen Hall Jamieson who wrote “Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment” so she’s obviously a centrist and the rest of the crew over at factcheck.org doesn’t seem much better. So, there you go! Totally a FACTS website and nothing else. But, I’m sure you already knew about all this stuff JZS. After all you pay attention to the news and I don’t…
Report Post »Ch
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 9:02amThe ****** cost was figured into the cost of refreshments.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 9:10amToo bad there was not someone to say to them after eating most of the muffins “Uh guys, what is this thing crawling around in the muffins….”
Report Post »JustPeachy
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:54amWHATEVER they paid is too much. It’s time they began practicing themselves what they preach.
WE ARE OUT OF MONEY.
Make your own #$!!!***& muffins, pack a lunch, use GoToMeeting! Now if you want to spend your OWN money on $16.00 muffins–fine–go right ahead! But spending more of taxpayer’s money on stuffing your fat faces with muffins, candy, and sodas no longer cuts it.
So don’t come whining now to us saying you were “unfairly accused” – the muffins didn’t cost “that much” – frankly, my dears, we don’t give a damn! Next time, buy your OWN muffins!
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 9:05amThe DOJ has to support SEIU. The cost of Muffins and candy and fruit, coffee tea and soft drinks, was probably $3.50 and the donation to Barry’s “Screw America Four More Years” reelection bid was $12.50 per item. Nov 2012 can’t come fast enough.
Report Post »livinglarge
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:53amThe cost of food at hotels can be very pricey. When you include the cost of food, tax, gratuity and service charges, that $2.00 muffin becomes $10.00. Anyone can go to hotel and get a price sheet to see cost of muffins, cookies, coffee, soft drinks, etc. and you will be surprised to see how costly it is. It is actually cheaper to order room service instead of from banquet menu. We do that often at our meetings to cut cost. Anyone out there that has been to a function at hotel or conference should inquire to cost of items…shocking.
Report Post »Countrygirl1362
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 9:51amMost people cannot afford to go to a hotel at all and our govt. is wasting money like this. This is just another slap in the face to those that go without so the govt. workers don’t have to go without. We all give up things, when will the govt. start doing the same.
Report Post »DJR
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:53amSo they jack the price up of a muffin that I can buy for $1 up to $16 and say they’re gave them free fruit & drinks. Let’s take the FREE stuff out of the picture, they still paid $16 a muffin!
Report Post »ruffnex
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 10:50amThe fruit, etc. was COMPLEMENTARY??????????? HA HA
Report Post »AB5r
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:51amJust imagine how much the hotel would charge for that if they were using American citizens for labor!
Report Post »booger71
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:50amOnly if the muffins had some herb in them would they be close to being worth $16
Report Post »Mandors
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:50amIt was probably $16 per person for breakfast. 250 x $16 = $4000. $4200/250 = $16.80. Which for a catered event at a hotel is not that bad.
I hate fake numbers. This report stinks, and the authors should be fired. There is plenty of overpaying in Washington and mischaracterizations like this don’t help.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 9:17amHead up Rectum
Report Post »Discord
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:48amlol
Report Post »Spendstop
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:47amTo bad they did not serve 20 dollar hot dogs for lunch. We could have had weinergate part 2
Report Post »lovenfl3
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:53amThen they would have asked, “you want a bun with that?” Of course the bun would cost $8 each. Don’t even ask for ketchup. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HPgnuiPGLM
Report Post »EP46
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:46amCould this money have been used to buy breakfast for the people obama says are dying in the streets because they have no health coverage ? You know, like here is your last meal. People, like ELECTED OFFICIALS, who live off tax payer ‘welfare’ can so easily spend money that they ‘steal’.
Report Post »cknapp
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:45amThe problem is that Comptrollers in the Government have no idea that muffins should not cost anywhere near sixteen dollars. If you can bamboozle them on the price of a muffin, how do they know what a jet fighter or battleship is really worth?
Craig Knapp
Report Post »Age 50
Posting Anonymously is for Wimps!
NOBALONEY
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:42amAdministration clinging to it’s muffins, solar panels, and arms giveaways.
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:42amMaybe those were the “Other Kind Of Muffins”.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:39am.
Report Post »I love to eat a good muffin………
mikenleeds
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:37amking obama and the rest of the dum-o-rat party does nt care what anything cost , to them it s all free and us tax payers have to pay for it
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:35amCake for breakfast? Oh Lordy, don’t let Moochelle know about this!!!
Moochelle Antoinette: “How dare they eat muffins?!?! Oh, wait. They were overpriced and taxpayers footed the bill? Carry on then….”
Report Post »Sleazy Hippo
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 9:12amI have never been to a retirement ceremony on a military base that did not have ample refreshments and catered meals, it is just part of having a successful event.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 9:14amYou have probably never been to a retirement ceremony of any kind, let alone a military one. Continue your grazing, water mammal.
Report Post »Sleazy Hippo
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 10:03amI never forget that what we do not know about reality is awesome.
As a former brat with tons of experience living on US Military bases, do you refute that retirement ceremonies are not catered to within pennies of the federal allowance for “per-guest” refreshments?
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:33amLuxury Hilton? With tip? Government paying bill? I believe it.
Report Post »christos
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:27am……More evidence they are financially incompetent,reckless and unconscionable,have they ever heard of video conferencing fire them,where is the oversight and accountability,the muffins look horrible also,,,,,,TA,,,,,, YEAH they have a strong case they care about the poor don’t they Shameful/waste.
Report Post »Obama Snake Oil Co
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:32amTo President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature
It is now official that the majority of you are corrupt morons:
a.. The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775. You have had 234 years
to get it right and it is broke.
b.. Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 74 years to get it
right and it is broke.
c.. Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 71 years to get it right
and it is broke.
d.. War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 45 years to get it right;
$1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to “the
poor” and they only want more..
e.. Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 44 years
to get it right and they are broke.
f.. Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 39 years to get it right
and it is broke.
g.. The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence
on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion
a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 32 years to get it right
and it is an abysmal failure.
You have FAILED in every “government service” you have shoved down our
throats while overspending our tax dollars.
AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED
Report Post »WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM ??
EP46
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:54am@Snake…great post. Also it has been over 50 yrs. since government forced school integration began and each decade has resulted in lower educational standards at a higher cost.
Report Post »woodyb
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 11:34am@ SNAKE OIL –
BEST POST I have seen on this site –
Report Post »Blame lies with BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:26amCome on with plain bagels and cream cheese. Muffins are too sweet and what Michelle O say? You know she’s watching what we eat!
Report Post »Don’t suppose she would allow the cream cheese either. }:
Commiehater4
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:24amI love muffins, but I draw the line at £2.50
Report Post »Commiehater4
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:23amMuffins are nice, but I wouldn’t pay more than £2.50 for a muffin, which I suppose is about $4
Report Post »slvrserfr
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:19am$16 or $17 a muffin – its still excessive careless government spending no matter how you look at it.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:27amIt does not matter what the DOJ says, the matter is still they got charged too much for the muffins, and now seem to be entering desperate spin control for getting caught. Muffingate lives on.
Report Post »AzCowboy
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:15amI don’t get a muffin for showing up for work?
Report Post »ares338
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 8:08amMuffins?…I don‘t need no stinkin’ muffins!
Report Post »