Nancy Pelosi Wants to Change First Amendment to Allow Regulation of Corporate Speech
- Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:32pm by
Mytheos Holt
- Print »
- Email »
The Democratic party’s temper tantrum over Citizens United v. FEC has ratcheted up to a new level – now, instead of arguing that the ruling is wrong and the constitution doesn’t protect corporate speech, they’re arguing that the first amendment does protect corporate speech, so they’re going to change it! At least this time, they’re following the process prescribed by the Founders. The problem is, if you listen to Pelosi‘s explanation for why they’re doing it, it’s a bit…strange:
The bill in question is called the “Peoples’ Rights Amendment,” and its goal is to explicitly allow Congress to regulate corporate speech however it wants:
Section 1. We the people who ordain and establish this Constitution intend the rights protected by this Constitution to be the rights of natural persons.
Section 2. People, person, or persons as used in this Constitution does not include corporations, limited liability companies or other corporate entities established by the laws of any state, the United States, or any foreign state, and such corporate entities are subject to such regulation as the people, through their elected state and federal representatives, deem reasonable and are otherwise consistent with the powers of Congress and the States under this Constitution.
Section 3. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to limit the people’s rights of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, free exercise of religion, and such other rights of the people, which rights are inalienable.
Here are some of the bill’s sponsors trying their best to explain the rationale behind the bill:
“I‘ve introduced a People’s Rights Amendment, which is very simple and straightforward,” Rep. Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.) said at the forum. “It would make clear that all corporate entities, for-profit and non-profit alike, are not people with constitutional rights.
“It treats all corporations, including incorporated unions and nonprofits, in the same way, as artificial creatures of the state that we, the people, govern, not the other way around,” said McGovern.
Rep. Donna Edwards (D.-Md.) explained the basic principle this move to amend the Constitution is advancing.
“In Citizens United, what the court said is that Congress has no authority to regulate this kind of political speech,” said Edwards. “And so all of these constitutional amendments go to this question of giving Congress the authority that the Supreme Court, I think wrongly, decided isn‘t within Congress’s constitutional–our constitutional purview.”
Apparently this bill is Phase I of an attempt to resurrect the defunct DISCLOSE Act.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (425)
ginger3350
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:50pmFancy Nancy just loves to hear herself speak, doesn’t she? She‘s just relieved that she doesn’t have to race Wiener to any given microphone anymore. Although Debbie Bad Hair Day Shultz gives her some competition!
Report Post »decendentof56
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:07pmLets see, Nancy. NOW you want to regulate Corporate speech and donations.
You didn’t utter a peep- you thought free-speech was just fine- when the racist blacks were calling for G Zimmerman’s head. No, not a peep from you….or Eric Holder….or B Obama….or members of the CBC.
Someday, you traitor, your speech will be silenced.
If the millions and millions of campaign dollars from corp’s are stopped it works to your agenda, doesn’t it?
The radical environ‘s will still pour hundreds of millions into the DNC’s coffers since they are tax-free org’s. How convienent, Nancy!
Itsjusttim
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:08pmHere‘s what’s going to happen. They are going to bleed the middle-class dry of their wealth, which will wipe out people’s motivation at the same time, simultaneously America will lose the world reserve currency status, and all you lazy minded slobs won’t be able to print your way out of dwelling in your mind. Then, because of your wicked way of thinking that has indebted your great grand kids will come full circle. Because since you don’t love your grand kids enough to not kill their spirit in the future, you will really act like animals in the present.
Report Post »lordjosh
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:11pmJim McGovern (D.-Mass.) said that this amendment will allow the government to treat corporations “as artificial creatures of the state that we, the people, govern”.
Report Post »Thats socialism and therefore anti-American.
BarackStalin
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:23pmTim,
I don’t have any kids…screw everyone else’s grandkids
Let’s burn this mammer jammer down!
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:26pmAmericans are so bastardy detached from their own children that pay a daddy doctor 10,000 dollars to deliver their own children for them because they don’t have the gall to deal with the water and blood. You don’t even deserve a nation to call home.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:28pmBarackStalin,
Report Post »I’m not going to burn it down, and they already burned it down, it just hasn’t drifted like dust in the wind yet.
kiddopup
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:29pmNo kidding and when did she ever think she worked for us she is one of the most vile members
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:31pmIf you can’t deal with the water and blood in the birth of your own beloved children, then what water and blood can you deal with? No wonder America is a pill popping nation.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:33pmlordjosh
Report Post »Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:11pm
Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.) said that this amendment will allow the government to treat corporations “as artificial creatures of the state that we, the people, govern”.
_______________
Corporations are already creatures created by the laws of the State where they are incorporated under. Corporations are not persons, but artifical entities. Individual have rights, corporations shouldn’t.
83plus
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:33pmDoes the Oath of Office mean ANYTHING to her?
Report Post »encinom
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:39pm83plus
Report Post »Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:33pm
Does the Oath of Office mean ANYTHING to her?
_______________
Huh, she is listening to the people who sent her to Washington and proposed an Amendment to the Constitution to deal with a Supreme Court Ruling, that even legal scholars say was wrong. She is following her oath.
Itsjusttim
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:39pmAmerica is about as Christian as a duck in a lake.
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:41pm83 – You don’t know the answer to that?
http://www.commieblaster.com
Report Post »Gold Coin & Economic News
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:44pmDoes this mean Congress and Nancy Pelosi’s big ol pie hole would not get free speech either, since they are made up entities? I’d almost be for it if we could silence this gas bag.
Report Post »http://www.congressinsiders.com/2011/11/congressional-inside-trader-nancy-pelosi-is-a-liar/
seeker9
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:46pmTo borrow Nabcy’s own words: “Are you serious. Are you serious?”
Report Post »Hands off the Constitution. You have no idea of what the Founders intended.
Inlightofthings
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:55pmTimmy…medicate please…
Report Post »rawmilker
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:55pmShe knows the conservatives are runnin & gunnin for them in NOV and are going to take the hill, they’ll pull every dirty trick in the book to retain power.
Keep your filthy, slimey paws off of our 1st amendment you corrupt looney biatch!
Report Post »drbage
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:56pmPresident Obama, Rep. Pelosi, McGovern, Wasserman Schultz etal why don’t you just come clean and admit that they REAL reason that you dislike the Citizens United decision is that it took away your monopoly on the two original SuperPacs–unions and the media.
Report Post »Silversmith
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 8:00pmI think changing Pelosi would be a lot easier and more beneficial for the country.
Silversmith
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 8:01pmShe must have the votes to force it or she would not have brought it up. Would this amendment be needed if the Government owned all the corporations like in the USSR.
Report Post »Inlightofthings
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 8:08pmTEAM:
Report Post »She has no such votes and no support. She is throwing out the proverbial “red herring” ie distraction. It’s all she has and the best she can do…there is no support for her as she is baggage.
83plus
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 8:52pm@encinom
I remember learning about the constitution; I remember learning about the checks and balances. They were put there for a reason; I don’t want to see them be corrupted, ignored and/or violated.
Now, do you have a problem that?
Report Post »INOGAWD
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 9:13pmObama has this _itch around to keep the attention off his azz..
Report Post »The Botox has had adverse effects on this slimeballs brain…
Time to send nancy to the farm…What a stupid ******************
I sure HOPE someone does a full investigation on this corrupt
administration after they slither off after November…
NHwinter
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 9:16pmItsjusttim – You make the most all encompassing statements I’ve ever read. People are individuals, don’t lump everyone together. You couldn’t possibly know about every single person in America. You discredit yourself.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 9:51pmPersonally, I don’t think corporations are people, as Mitt has said. I’m more in favor of the “We the People” concept. The United States has a problem if corporations can get people elected by the influence the can bring to bear with the millions of bucks in their deep pockets, even when the people who work for the corporation disagree. There is no Democracy when the owner of a large company can spend unlimited amounts of money to elect the person of their choice. The Founders wouldn’t approve.
Report Post »INOGAWD
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 9:55pmI didn’t know a person could sweat with that much Botox in her face ???
Report Post »Her BOSS has been given close to a Billion $$$ and she is Pis*en’ and
Moaning about the Money Romney has,,,,,,,GOOD GAWD.. there is NO
END to this Bitc**es Hypocrisy…Does she really know what’s in the
Constitution ?? Think Not..
ProbIemSoIver
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 10:22pmWait Nancy.
Better check yourself, before you wreck yourself.
The “Government” is a Corporation. This is a historical, verifiable fact.
You have become a Private Company and a subsidiary of the Mother Corporation. This is a Fact. Here is the evidence.
Report Post »http://www.manta.com/c/mmnynbm/representative-nancy-pelosi
Pelling1020
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 10:32pmShe would probably go for combining the 1st and 2nd amendments then she could shoot those CEO’s who try to “stand their ground”.
Report Post »seeker9
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 10:56pm@JZS
Report Post »Corporations are not individual people, they are a group of people, just like any other group of people. Groups of people would include unions, PACs, corporations, clubs, etc. The groups are afforded rights under the law just as individuals. Otherwise one could rob a group with impunity. If you have a way to get ALL groups out of political fund raising, I’ll listen. Just carving out the ones you do not agree with is just a case of silencing free speech.
PATTY HENRY
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 11:17pmOver my dead body.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 1:33am@jzs,
“The United States has a problem if corporations can get people elected by the influence the can bring to bear with the millions of bucks in their deep pockets, even when the people who work for the corporation disagree.”
Influence isn’t the same as coercion – no one is making people vote the way the corporations tell them.
Also, corporations are tools, and maybe some of these tools are used for communication; Just because those WITH a sign can communicate more prominently than those WITHOUT signs, doesn’t mean that the owners of the sign lose the right to agree amongst themselves as to how their sign should be used.
There’s no such thing as “corporate speech”; The owners are communicating BY WAY OF the corporate structure. The owners are communicating. They have a right to free speech.
As for the people who work for the corporation: they aren’t Management. By virtue of their employment agreement, they have agreed that they don’t get a say in how Management
“There is no Democracy when the owner of a large company can spend unlimited amounts of money to elect the person of their choice. The Founders wouldn’t approve.”
Money doesn’t elect people. Again, no one is coercing anyone to do what the corporation is telling them.
In fact, Pelosi is the one trying to silence speech under color of authority.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 2:26amJZS,
You know, it just happens to be legal here in this country.
The Supreme Court made that clear.
Are you saying that they ruled incorrectly?
I think founding fathers would shun you, among other things, but I will not offend your delicate sensibilities.
Report Post »blattack
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 7:31amNancy P, Its not up to you to change anything in The Constitution…Just leave it alone. 1st & 2nd amendment RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE. Go back to SF
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 7:49amPeople need to wake f8ck the D. or R. that prefixes these candidates. Everyone of them are stripping freedoms at break neck speed. It time to dump the entire lot of them along with D.C if necessary.
Report Post »These tyrants including the President and Romney believe that the government should have the right toi silence anyone they want and detatin them without charges indefinantly read the NDAA that Obama signed.
And them everyone what Washington has become.
poverty.sucks
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 2:49pmPelosi should first gag her self before silencing others.
Report Post »Make them stop
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 6:02pmSnob, she may be a fifthy pirate ******. Just sayin.
Report Post »whatdhesay
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 7:10pmI like to refer to her as “Debbie Was-a -man Schultz”
Report Post »Mike Z4000
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 8:19amThe shame is that Nancy Pelosi described the Founders creation as a “democracy”!!! Isn’t is sad that someone in her position and positions she has held, who cites the Constitution often doesn’t know that the founders deplored a democracy. This woman is so out of touch that she doesn’t know that the Founders created a Republic. She is delusional!
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 9:32amShe is fancy!
Report Post »mattmo79
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 11:57amNancy is certainly an expert on oozing slime!! Interesting that the Libs didn’t have ANY problem with corporate spending when the corporations allowed to spend money on elections were Unions!!
Report Post »Sunnyy
Posted on April 21, 2012 at 2:12pmIt took all I had to get thru that clip…PEOPLE elected her?!
Report Post »barber2
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:50pmBesides being totally wrong about the Constitution and what the Founders intended, she looks like she is “on” something. She looks like she has been tranquilized or “ zombified ” – like all of our Democrat anti-capitalists. Guess waging the Democrat ‘s War on Capitalism is taking its toll on her .
Report Post »Restored One
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:03pmHer mouth kept moving when nothing was coming out. I thought of Anita Dunn and the tongue. I also had flash backs of what it looks like after someone snorts a fat rail. ICK!
Report Post »encinom
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:29pmThe Founder’s intended to give Corporations the same rights and living humans?
Report Post »Inlightofthings
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:41pmOK Encinom…
Report Post »Your position on SEIU, UAW, AFL-CIO, CAW etc etc…all corporations. Shut up or put up…
oneshiner
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:43pmAll I can say about this woman (I say loosely) is: If she’s for it, I’m against it……….if she’s against it, I’m for it. “nough said.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:45pmEncinom-
Report Post »Corporations are groups of people. Like Unions. Are they going to regulate union speech as well?
jimtrees
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:50pmJust like obama care. She really listened to the people there, didn’t she?
Report Post »bertr
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:52pmwhile i despise pretty much everything Nancy Pelosi stands for, at first glace it doesnt appear out of the realm of debate. I do like that it reaffirms that indivuals rights are inalienable and out of the authority of the government to affect.
Report Post »Inlightofthings
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:54pmEncinom…another one if you dare…
Report Post »Romney was vilified for calling corporations “people”. Fact is, over 80% of US businesses are incorporated as “S” corporations which tax at the individual…personal tax rate level. I’m open to fact checks…
Mark0331
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 8:04pm…..enicnom?you there?encinom?..hey, where did you go?…oh, thats right, FACTS scared you off…I love the Blaze, always somebody there to give it to the clueless trolls..way to go!!
Report Post »encinom
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 8:26pmInlightofthings
Report Post »Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:54pm
Encinom…another one if you dare…
Romney was vilified for calling corporations “people”. Fact is, over 80% of US businesses are incorporated as “S” corporations which tax at the individual…personal tax rate level. I’m open to fact checks…
_____________________
CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE. Romney is a fool. Tax Lawyers and Accountants taking advantage of GOP loop holes does not make a corporation a natural person. The GOP and Tea Baggers are proving so they truly stand with and its not the People, but with the big dollar donors and corporate lobbists.
DIR
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 9:45pmYea Nancy’s on somthing. It‘s a half dozen of Rachel Ray’s secret recipe Deviled Huevos Rancheros, sun ripened for maxium effect (her weapons of choice). If you pull her finger she’ll go off like a huge party favor, well more like a small nuclear device. The problem with Nancy though is it doesn‘t matter if she’s eaten the deviled eggs or not, she is just plain full of hot nasty gas. Every time she opens her mouth she sounds like a woopie cushion going off, of course with her nasty smelling breath as a bonus.
Report Post »INOGAWD
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 10:42pmWe ALL know the SLIME that‘s ooooozing it’s called “palooooosi”…….
Report Post »Go back to Mexifornia, We have seen way toooooo much of YOU !!!
Realist4U
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 11:38pmI am waiting with bated breath, to hear…♫ Ding! Dong! The Witch is Dead, The Witch is Dead..Ding! Dong! The Wicked Witch is Dead…Somebody “Please” throw a bucket of water on the Wicked Witch of The West!
Report Post »this1can
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 12:48amI think Satan has moved into all of their souls they lost the love if they ever had it. Love/Pray
Report Post »doyley64
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 12:59am@ENCINOM
take away the people from a corporation and what do you have ?
a bunch of empty buildings, some machinery, equipment, and inventory.
I think it would be quite difficult to regulate the free speech on these things since they don’t talk.
use the smart your mama gave you or go away, TROLL.
Report Post »Bill Rowland
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 7:06amFancy Nancy (The Queen of Botox) is still mad about losing her free airplane. Now she wants to get everybody upset over this amendment (it will never be ratified by the states). Its just another distracxtion by the Dems to get us away from the real issues of this campaign. There will be a lot more of these distractions during the coming months. Sweet Old Barack and his boys are experts at this and at hollering at those who disagree with them.
Remember WATCH THE OTHER HAND!!
OMG 2012
Report Post »Inlightofthings
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 12:51pmENCINO:
Sorry,
But in the black and white of tax code they are classified as an individual under sub-chapter S. So get it figured out. Those same companies make up about the same % of all jobs here in the U.S. The corporations you refer to do support a typical 80/20 rule. You never answered this one:
OK Encinom…
Report Post »Your position on SEIU, UAW, AFL-CIO, CAW etc etc…all corporations. Shut up or put up…
Buddy The Dog
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 1:50pmencinom
to answer your question……YES that was the intent….Corporations were NOT to be a SEPERATE Stake Holder in the new country
the Constitution was LIMITED to 3 groups or Stake Holders
The States…..which had formed their Own governments
Report Post »The People….the Citizens of the States
The Federal Government……the Uniting Central Government
Therightsofbilly
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 3:43pmEncinom,
We’ll play the game your way.
The SCOTUS says that they are people.
Nuff said?
Report Post »IDONTTHINKSO
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:49pmWith what she has stated, I understand it as, radio hosts, pubic speakers, tea parties, and preachers! Something like that right?
Report Post »Free_Thinker
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:03pmJust conservative radio hosts and public speakers.
Report Post »fmadsen
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:49pmShe can read the U.S, Constitution and follow the provisions to seek an amendment. This will keep the ‘Wicked Witch of the West’ busy chasing a cause that will go nowhere.
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 8:05pmSend her to France… they know how to deal with Queens & Princess’
Report Post »Patriot of My America
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 8:15pmHere is a little factoid. This old bag of bones is in her 70′s and though she seems to be in good health. Every day she wakes up is a gift.. She is likely to tip over any time. And that is a beautiful thought. I relish the idea that socialist regressive paid entertainer ( woman paid for services ) is actually closer to the total dirt nap than not. I care not that she is not Christian and will spend eternity in a place reserved for special evil people. I am sure that there is a Political Demon there with special instructions to make her serve as she wished to make us serve her. That is what makes me smile. Now just substitute the Nancy name with Sir Harry Reid. He is also in that same age range. It will also be a great day that when that homosexual sounding, ( acting ) bag of hammers will also be side by side with all the great socialist’s in that special place for all eternity. I hope we have the chance to inflict American Justice, but if not God’s Justice will also be of great comfort knowing that enough to allow me to sleep well. However we need to run interference just the same. either we get it done, Or God’s Will be done. Justice is Justice. And Judgement is Judgement !!
Report Post »cherishedemblems
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:49pmThat’s what the founding fathers had in mind…except when it comes to Gay Marriage. Then let the courts decide…what a witch!!!
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:48pmOf course she does!
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:48pmIf corporations aren’t people, how do they have speech to regulate in the first place?
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:55pmthe board (the collective) decides what the entity will say. the board not the corporation should be accountable for the decisions and actions.
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:47pmI have two words: Bull Sh—t.
Report Post »Paul
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 9:38pmI have two words for that piece of trash too…
Guess what they are….
Report Post »captaincameron
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:47pmBitch, step away from the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:57pmand WE THE PEOPLE!
Report Post »encinom
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:41pmCatB
Report Post »Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:57pm
and WE THE PEOPLE!
———————————–
No where does the Constitution say WE THE CORPORATIONS.
doyley64
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 1:07amSORRY ENCINOM, the supreme court has already decided corporations are people.
now it’s time for you to go back to the basement and play your xbox .
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 7:50amEncinoman, What do you think the shareholders and employees of corporations are, dogs? Or as Barry calls them, delicious meals?
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:46pmPelosi needs to be stripped of her office; she cannot have it both ways, she is a true flip flopper for when things go against her party and the Progressives cause of destruction of the nation. Impeach her from office with all due haste.
Report Post »catfantastic
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:03pmI fully agree and the whole lot of obama’s minions! Every time she opens her mouth along with debbie wasserman shultz, i just cringe, just like they are living on a different planet. They both sound like blithering idiots, but then again look at joe biden!
Report Post »johnnymack
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:45pmThis woman is truly dangerous. I hope the light of truth will disinfect this virus…
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:45pmThe general populations of Americans only like it when they wipe their butt with the Constitution when it benefits all Americans like with highways and such or medicaid and medicare.
Report Post »Itsjusttim
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:54pmYou just like it when they wipe “Your butt” with the Constitution. I don’t think Americans even deserve a Constitution.
Itsjusttim
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:57pmI think Americans deserve a completely collapsed system to make them realize just how big of animals they really are.
Report Post »scuba13
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:57pmThose pills just don’t seem to be working. You’re still a babbling fool.
Report Post »jbrote47
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:58pmYou must have one hell of a headache being so stupid.
Report Post »RANGER1965
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:50pmDude!~
You sound like Kenny Rogers on a bender. Let’s put the down the bottle, pills, pot, and coke. Take a deeeeeeeeeeeeep breath…
And try to string together a few sentences that have some coherence, and might relate to the issue at hand.
Your writing is so dysfunctional that no one can understand your babbling.
Here’s a better idea. Go get about 72 hours of drug free sleep. Eat a good breakfast. And try again.
Ranger
Report Post »doyley64
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 1:19amRanger, that made me LMAO for at least a full minute. I am still chuckling.
Report Post »Mark0331
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:44pmBela Lugosi rises from the grave….The people who work for this ‘lady’ must laugh and roll their eyes and say “Yes Nancy, right away Nancy” then go home, laugh at what a moron they work for, then head to the bank to cash their paycheck….
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:55pmThis woman would like to get her nasty hands on it. The last thing we ever want to do is let Conress have this power that she wants. It would probably blow up in her face this Nov. but the Republicans would be just as bad.
Report Post »Teabunny
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:43pmCorporations are not people. and Money is not speech. If corporations were people, why do they not have voter id cards, state id cards, or social security numbers? what is their gender?
Report Post »AnGFern
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:12pmcor·po·ra·tion [kawr-puh-rey-shuhn] noun
1. an association of individuals, created by law or under authority of law, having a continuous existence independent of the existences of its members, and powers and liabilities distinct from those of its members. See also municipal corporation, public corporation.
2. ( initial capital letter ) the group of principal officials of a borough or other municipal division in England.
3. any group of persons united or regarded as united in one body.
Duh…sounds like they are made up of people to me…..Take away the people, you have nothing living or producing.
I agree money is not speech, but it does provide access to speech (i.e. buy pen, paper, email access, transportation, hiring of experts, court fees, etc, but not for bribes, in which case, throw the briber and bribee in jail).
Report Post »encinom
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 8:29pmA Person is not created by law, nor is a person nearly immortal. Corporation are tools, nothing more. A individual has rights not his computer.
Report Post »tzion
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 9:45pm@Encinom
Report Post »So would the government be allowed to regulate what your computer does? By regulating the tool you inevitably regulate what the tool’s owner can do with it. As long as I’m not using it to violate the rights of someone else, I should be able to use the tool I own as I see fit.
Inlightofthings
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 1:02pmENCINOM
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 8:29pm
“A Person is not created by law…”
OKAY Encinom: But a law CAN destroy a person ie ROE v WADE. Just who do you have wiping the drool from your month as you pass through life with sever dementia…
Report Post »Pat_in_NC
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:43pmYes, the capitalists must be muzzled.
Report Post »infortheride
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:42pmShe needs to be strung up for treason
Report Post »rawmilker
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:44pmAfter she is waterboarded…
Report Post »FloridaFarmGirl
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:42pmHow does this thing keep getting voted back in?
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:44pmSan Francisco come to mind?
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:47pmThere is something more going on here; when the Democrats and Progressives suddenly start wanting to do something like this they have many ulterior motives, nothing good will come from this if it gets passed.
Report Post »SHOESHINEBOY
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:49pmCalifornia Communists – They always obey the State Dictators to keep them in office..
Report Post »Realman30
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:52pmShe embodies everything wrong about that God forsaken city.
Report Post »Tom70
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:41pmOnly if we can only if we can be assured that this hag is sent home on herown money and she stays there.
Report Post »doyley64
Posted on April 20, 2012 at 1:26amI’ll pay for the ticket. To heck with her own money.
Report Post »jspec33
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:41pmNo she’s not a communist. Nothing to see here.
Report Post »football lady
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 8:54pmNo, she’s a fool.
Report Post »GODBLESSOURCOUNTRY
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:40pmLet it go Pelosi…
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:39pmIt will die in the house. Next.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:39pmOur founders had an idea, it was called democracy? Sorry woman, our founders put together a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy.
Report Post »just my opinion maybe not yours
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:12pmNo our founders called it a REPUBLIC!!!
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:50pmAfter this election, if Obummer wins, it will all be over. If they get the house back, then it is full speed ahead to communism. If not, OBonzo will double down on bypassing congress all together, and the result will be the same. If Obommy does not win, then there will be riots claiming the election was stolen.Still, the election is this country’s last chance.
Report Post »rawmilker
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:51pmamen RJJ!
Report Post »momsense
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:39pmThis moron is going so far down that the flames will burn for years. If corporations are individuals for taxation purposes, then they have the same rights as persons.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:38pmIn my opinion this goes over like a turd in a punch bowl.
Report Post »football lady
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:38pmCould someone put duct tape over her ugly mouth so we can control HER speech.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 6:44pmOh Hell no! Let her keep showing what a total idiot she really is. Too bad her idiot constituency keeps her in office though.
Report Post »catfantastic
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:11pmI agree with you…she and Debbie Wasserman Shultz make a good pair. They both sound like blithering idiots. I have a favorite expression…It Is Better To Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool, then to Open your Mouth and remove all Doubt!!!!
Report Post »cantbelieveallthisgarbagecouldhappenwhodoislap
Posted on April 19, 2012 at 7:27pmplease dont confuse all californians for voting That witch in,MY VOTE IS STOLEN BY LA and bayarea nut jobs,I have only met one person here that admits to voting for her,and that was a hippy that grew up in satancisco.
Report Post »