Technology

Navy Announces New Material to Make Warheads Even Deadlier

The Office of Naval Research (ONR) announced this week that it has developed a new material for warhead casings that will increase the lethal effect and likelihood of hit on an enemy target.

This material — high-density reactive material (HDRM) — would, according to an ONR press release (via Science Daily), replace steel without compromising strength or design. HDRM integrates explosives with the warhead casing and allows for chemical release after impact, increasing its lethal effect.

New Material Increases Lethality and Accuracy of Warheads

(Office of Naval Research)

“Recent testing and demonstrations have consistently shown that the new casings can be integrated into naval missiles and are durable enough to withstand both high acceleration of missile launch and the forces exposed to during the detonation event,” said Dr. Clifford Bedford, ONR’s energy conversion program officer, in the press release announcement August 10. “The HDRM fragments can penetrate a target’s skin, followed by a rapid and sustained combustion/explosion.”

The press release states that HDRM has the strength of aluminum alloys but the density of steel, which is important for existing weapons to maintain accuracy of a hit.

Comments (75)

  • Uriel
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 11:00pm

    “Navy Announces New Material to Make Warheads Even Deadlier”

    Uh, … Why?

    When’s the last time we bombed an actual enemy? (oh Libyans, sure … Al Qaeda, no, never, never.)

    Does this pass muster under our Rules of Engagement?

    Report Post »  
    • teamarcheson
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 11:10pm

      Another weapon our government will use against American citizens when the Black Revolution is launched.

       
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on August 13, 2011 at 1:34am

      Oh boy! More death from government!

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on August 13, 2011 at 8:46am

      GhostOfJefferson

      Deterrent. No one has used any of the deadly weapons we’ve developed since WWII. You have no evidence to present otherwise so stop with the keyboard cowboy comments.

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • CulperGang
      Posted on August 14, 2011 at 12:03pm

      Uriel you said it right. Time to use weapons for what they were intended for: Enemy combatants. Annihilate and leave. “War” is now nothing more than a leveling of civilians NOT the actual aggressors. The mightiest army and we didn’t wipe the CHIcoms out in Nam. We haven’t wiped out Jihadist, oh come on …the will is not there. A handful are making millions/billions, that is what these so called ‘wars of freedom” are really about.. War has now been debased to making money: bought with BLOOD of US soldiers. The US army is not the defender of “freedom” for US citizens, it is merely a “world police” for the Bilderbergers. An abuse of the US military by the politicians. Time to remove abusive politicians. They are dregs of humanity.

      Report Post » CulperGang  
    • Chris
      Posted on August 14, 2011 at 12:14pm

      Sorry to disagree with you all, but anything to keep our military ahead of those who want us dead is a good thing. I want our military to have every possible advantage over our enemies or potential enemies. My uh-why response is to why would they reveal it.

      Report Post »  
    • capitalismrocks
      Posted on August 14, 2011 at 12:20pm

      Precisely — Our weapons are really for deterrent – a little known just recently revealed fact came out last year that Russia planned a nuclear strike on China and that the Nixon admin threatened the Soviets with a full scale retaliatory strike and mind you…. we were not friendly at all with China at the time…. the Soviets backed down.

      Quit frankly we should’ve carpet bombed the entire Tora Bora region with low yield tactical nukes after 9/11 and destroyed the entire region, it would‘ve been a firm show of strength to the terrorists and the world that we just don’t play games, there would‘nt have been a 10 year way there and most likely Saddam would’ve been far more willing to surrender and have the US and Allies go into Iraq and remove him as well. People complain about how bad we were for dropping the two nukes on Japan, but when you look at the long dragged out wars in Iraq/Afghan, it might’ve been better just to have gotten it over and done with, using a few small nukes… the world hates us now anyway, so dropping them 10 years ago would’ve have made the world hate us anymore, we would’ve saved near 5,000 US soldiers lives and over a trillion in spending. The terrorists would all be hiding in their caves dying of radiation poisoning and the world would be a lot safer then it is today.

      Report Post » capitalismrocks  
    • 57states
      Posted on August 14, 2011 at 5:56pm

      WW3 is right around the corner

      Report Post » 57states  
    • Middle Finger
      Posted on August 14, 2011 at 8:29pm

      @capitalismrocks: That is why Nixon could always go to China! I also agree on the use of a nuclear resonse after 911.

      Report Post » Middle Finger  
    • ChicagosMonster
      Posted on August 15, 2011 at 5:00am

      @Capitalismrocks

      The fact that you advocate using nuclear weapons against a country with no military, air force, or navy makes me sick.

      Your avatar makes me doubly so. Please, never seek office.

      Report Post » ChicagosMonster  
  • beentheredonethatsoiknow
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 10:45pm

    I hope this stuff never gets into the hands of the Obama administration!

    Report Post »  
  • rightwinglefty
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 9:20pm

    Maybe we can give this technology to The Chinese in a gesture of peace and friendship. What a wonderful notion that would be. Order another Peace Prize for Obama.

    Report Post » rightwinglefty  
  • Soothsayer
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 8:09pm

    I bet you it will not even dent a liberals head though.

     
    • Dkoonz
      Posted on August 13, 2011 at 12:11am

      Now that is funny.

      Report Post » Dkoonz  
    • BrotherWill
      Posted on August 13, 2011 at 2:02am

      Or Ron Paul cultists.

      Report Post » BrotherWill  
    • Gorp
      Posted on August 13, 2011 at 2:16am

      And if it does penetrate there’s nothing in there to hurt anyway. It will just make a huge sucking sound from the vacuum being filled.

      Report Post » Gorp  
    • Enuff Zenuff
      Posted on August 13, 2011 at 4:15am

      Second that!

      Report Post » Enuff Zenuff  
  • kralspaces
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 7:47pm

    This how new commerical products come about. How much nano technology was referenced in this project.

    Report Post » kralspaces  
  • MUDFLAPS
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 6:28pm

    Wow something that will never get past the ovamit administration.

    Report Post »  
    • avenger
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 7:02pm

      wow..great stuff..can I get this in hand grenades…

      Report Post »  
  • Tony Sanchez
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 5:26pm

    We need handheld EMP dischargers so that I can destroy my neighbors stereo when it gets too loud!

    Report Post » Tony Sanchez  
  • Knight Commander
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 5:03pm

    The way to peace is to prepare for war….

    Report Post »  
  • heyjim55
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 4:50pm

    The recent announcements by the military involving new weapons systems is due to a request by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to get these new weapons completed sooner rather than later. There are a few more weapon systems that I can not share right now that will be announced in the coming months once the final testing is completed. I know of two that are game changers and when announced it will rile up the Chinese.

    Report Post »  
    • designbyinspiration
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 10:57pm

      That is almost always a good thing. I’m a out 100% sure we will never attack China or Russia, but not so sure about the inverse. Good to hear, thank you.

      Report Post »  
  • leary1
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 4:41pm

    I hope we can give this technology to Israel, you know …to…a…test it….yea thats the ticket !!!

    Report Post »  
    • Wes Hardin
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 6:13pm

      They used our DIME weapons to slaughter the Palestinians.

      Report Post »  
    • RabidPatriot
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 6:51pm

      If by “Palestinians” you actually mean “rocket launching, explosive vest wearing, homicide bomber, women and children targeting, PLO/Hamas/Hezbollah terrorists” then you are right. If you meant something else then your probably an anti-Jewish bigot. After reading some of your other posts, it’s obvious your some kind left-wing bigot or troll.

      Report Post » RabidPatriot  
    • Rob in Katy
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 10:57pm

      Question about Palestine:
      When was Palestine founded?
      Who was the first ruler/president/shah or Palestine, or one prior to Arafat?
      What was the name of the Palestine currency? Who’s picture was on it?
      What is the native language of Palestine?

      Oh, that’s right there never was a state of Palestine!

      Report Post »  
    • Chris
      Posted on August 14, 2011 at 12:19pm

      Rob, how about the fact that the so-called West Bank is made up of Sumaria and JUDEA. Hmmm. wonder what the origin of the name Judea is?

      Report Post »  
  • Hephzibah
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 4:36pm

    I think we should make them more fun, too, by soaking them in pig fat first. Just sayin’.

    Report Post » Hephzibah  
  • Falcon11
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 4:33pm

    Can we deploy them along the Mexican border?

    Report Post »  
  • Kaoscontrol
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 4:07pm

    We didn’t sell it to China….Barry, Hillary and Bill GAVE it to the Chinese in exchange for campaign donations.

    Report Post » Kaoscontrol  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 4:06pm

    We’ll never develop it, when the “super committee” fails to reach a consensus, it will be part of the D.O.D. cuts. They’ll sell it to the Chinese to fund Obamacare.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
  • planotexan
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 3:57pm

    My question is ‘why do we make this a news story?‘ Wouldn’t it be better to keep this under wraps and surprise the recipients…perhaps common sense is only a Texas thing.

    Report Post »  
    • InversionTheory
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 4:07pm

      If this is what we ADMIT to having, imagine the stuff that’s classified.

      Report Post »  
    • MonroeFan
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 4:28pm

      Might as well add the launch code for the missiles as well. Loose tongues sink ships… but I guess that doesn’t happen any more.

      Report Post »  
    • eagle2715
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 4:52pm

      Released probably because countermeasures are innefective, or we want someone to build a countermeasure system to this so it leaves it vulnerable to another type of weapon system…..

      It’s “loose lips sink ships” BTW…

      Report Post » eagle2715  
    • Qoheleth
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 6:50pm

      @Inversiontheory: absolutely correct. There are leaks, unfortunately, but generally the stuff that’s put out there is either one- or two-generations ago technology or things like this that, even if you know the general idea, you still don’t know how to make it. The constituent materials and manufacturing process; now _that’s_ what you need to keep under wraps.

      Report Post » Qoheleth  
  • ed1066
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 3:34pm

    Let’s hope the administration allows the military to actually use these to win the war in Afghanistan, instead of making our soldiers go door to door with empty rifle chambers trying to “win hearts and minds”…

    Report Post »  
  • heavyduty
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 3:21pm

    If they don’t lose it.

    Report Post »  
  • thegodfather
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 3:15pm

    That’s why America kicks ass…we have the best toys

    Report Post » thegodfather  
  • Revere2
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 3:12pm

    I think Iran should swallow a few!!

    Report Post » Revere2  
  • Conservitive Ticker
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 3:06pm

    Sounds like the perfect ordinance for the Falcon HTV-2, Load them up, and make them disappear.

    Report Post » Conservitive Ticker  
  • JLGunner
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 2:55pm

    loadem’ up, the middle east is waiting.

    Report Post » JLGunner  
  • aerorepairo
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 2:54pm

    Isn’t this the stuff that they use on their Carrier Killers munitions?

    Report Post » aerorepairo  
  • bobcattf5
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 2:49pm

    the chinese sold it already

    Report Post »  
  • bobcattf5
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 2:48pm

    To bad the Chinese already sold it!!!!

    Report Post »  
  • Dustoff
    Posted on August 12, 2011 at 2:44pm

    Sweet.

    Report Post » Dustoff  
    • BOMUSTGO
      Posted on August 12, 2011 at 2:51pm

      We used a “delay” element for the fuzes in Mk-82 (500 pound) and Mk-84 (2000 pound) bombs so they would detonate after penetrating so many levels of a building.

      Report Post » BOMUSTGO  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In