Neo-Nazis in Brooklyn? You Have to See The Photographs
- Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:45am by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »
A Brooklyn, N.Y. neighborhood is apparently home to a small hotbed of neo-Nazism — a group of young Polish men who have organized themselves under symbols of hatred and anti-Semitism.
According to the Daily Mail, the predominantly Polish neighborhood of Greenpoint counts among its residents these “neo-Nazis who walk the streets, just like anybody else, and are fiercely proud of their beliefs.”

Image source: Adam Krause, adamkrausephoto.com

Image source: Adam Krause, adamkrausephoto.com
Krause told the Daily Mail he first noticed the insignia on a man’s T-shirt at the gym. He went up to the man and told him he didn’t agree with what he was wearing, but said he found it interesting and wanted to photograph him.
“It took a lot of coordination, but I introduced myself to them and showed them my work and obviously there was some sort of interest for them as well,” Krause said.
What followed was a series of photos offering a look at the seemingly incongruous juxtaposition of swastikas mere miles from Manhattan.

Image source: Adam Krause, adamkrausephoto.com

Image source: Adam Krause, adamkrausephoto.com
Speaking with the Daily Mail, Krause would not go into detail about who the men are or the history of neo-Nazism in the area.
“If the photos ask more questions than give answers, that’s good,” he said.
The Greenpoint Gazette detailed an uptick of hateful and anti-Semitic graffiti in the neighborhood as far back as 2009:
According to longtime community members, the upsurge of anti-Semitic graffiti is a symptom of a larger systemic problem in Greenpoint, a neighborhood characterized by its large Polish population. As the neighborhood gentrifies—and those who initially settled it are being displaced—intolerance tends to increase.
According to the Daily Mail, swastika stud earrings recently nearly sold out at one local shop, suggesting a demand to identify with such a movement.
Still, a writer at Gawker– and a friend of Krause — noted: “As a mutual friend pointed out when Krause first showed us the photos, it seems this is more a group of angry young men who are confusing polish nationalism with anti-Semitism than any sort of active organization that poses a threat.”
View more of Krause’s photos here.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (231)
agayoume
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:15pmI need to be educated in America. Where I went to school, the Nazis were depicted as LEFT WING SOCIALISTS yet here in America they are defined as right wing conservatives. And the democrat party was the party of racists and endorsed slavery in the South however judging from the media, one would conclude its the republicans who are guilty of those vices. Was I wrongly educated???????
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:33pmHate bubble up all over the world. I’m not surprised to find new old ways to express it.
However, I’m not 100% convinced that it’s due explicitly to prejudice.
Many people, right now, are bewildered by their (our) government insanity at every level of government, right down to running a bankrupt Postal Service, even though it “IS” a DISASTER. Foreign Policy? A DISASTER. Fiscal and Monetary Policy? A DISASTER. Social Policy? A DISASTER. Education? A Total DISASTER. IT continues.
Without some comprehension of why insanity reigns, insanity “IS” bred. It’s a set. You can’t act insane and expect non insane out come. That’s, well, insane.
Report Post »Unix
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:56pmYou are correctly educated…NAZI – National Socilists in Germany were left wingers, just to the right of communists. This I know for a fact.
The southern Democratic party was responsible for the KKK…however since the 1860′s the parties have switched…the Democrats back then were conservatives and the Repulicans were more liberal.
At least that is my basic understanding.
Report Post »natstew
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:01pmAGAYOUME, you were educated in the “New History” taught in the U.S. Governmet re-education centers.
Report Post »SoNick
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:09pm@agayoume
Report Post »If you were told that the Nazis were left wing, then you were grossly misinformed. The Nazis were an ultra-right wing party. Starting in 1933, the first people Hitler sent to concentrations camps were his biggest political opponents: Communists and Social Democrats. Yes, that was before they started rounding up Jews. In fact, Dachau was built exclusively for the purpose of detaining Communists.
gooeylewie
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:37pm@UNIX
no the parties did not switch, how does that make any sense? The Democrats just found that they couldn’t keep their plantation going through overt oppression, instead they would oppress through the starvation of will through entitlements and dependency. They just have way better PR then the Republicans. The progressives muddied up the distinction between the two parties.
@SONICK
Socialism is a left wing ideology. The acronym NAZI is used today to obscure the Socialism of the NAZIs, same with the Niemoller poem “first they came fro the Socialists” replaced the original “first they came for the Communists”
If Nazism is a far right ideology, then by what metric are you using to gauge the position along the left/right axis?
Communism (far left) is a totalitarianist state where the individual has little to no rights that contradict with the collective.
Anarchy (far right) is complete and utter lack of rules, law, order, etc.
As a matter of fact, Fascism comes form the Roman word fascio meaning a bundle of sticks – typically with an axe tied to one end. The idea being that a single stick and be broken easily, but when many are bound together under Socialism (left wing) they are strong.
Report Post »Lordchamp
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:42pmNo, you are correct. It was the Democrats that were for slavery and in fact, it was Woodrow Wilson that brought back segregation in the military after the Republicans had finally worked to get them their deserved rights after the civil war.
It was from then until the Republicans yet again worked to get the civil rights laws changed in the 1960′s before segregation could again be changed.
Yes, we have allowed the democrats/liberals/progressives to take over and change history by not standing up and proving them wrong with the facts.
Way past time for that to end and have history set straight.
Report Post »jcldwl
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:46pmThey(leftists/educators/media) keep you confused because they fail to tell you the truth. Nazis and Commies are both left of center. Nothing they stand for represents the right/conservatives of America. They both are evil political ideas that only and I mean only the leftist socialists and communitsts of this country can agree with. They have nothing in common with the conservatives of this great Republic.
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:49pmNo, Sonics, you’ve got it wrong.The “correct” lefties always went after their deviant ideological brethren. whether in Soviet Union, or in Nazi Germany. Consider hunt for Trotsky and his adherents, for instance, or other “deviants”, like Bukharin who himself was the main player in the hunt for Trotsky. The purges within the Party ranks were also a reflection of striving for ideological purity (beside the consolidation of power element), as defined at the time. Same thing you find if you look at Spanish Civil War, Parisian Commune, or even French Revolution of 1790′s, where the more correct left butchered the less correct one with a reckless abandon.
From the Nazi Party POV, Communists were a considerable threat, because they offered a similar ideological roadmap. Social Democrats were a target because they held a substantial sway over unions which Nazis intended to absorb.
In our modern times, we see something similar in Islam, The sunni and shia branches are both a part of Islam, but given chances, they go after each other throats.
Report Post »SoNick
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:02pmThis could go on forever. The problem is that the political spectrum is not merely a left/right (x) axis. there is also a up/down (y) axis to the equation. To get a better understanding of this, you should search for “political spectrum” in Google images and you’ll get a clearer picture. At their extremes, left and right eventually meet in an authoritarian nightmare. Yes, Fascists and Nazis believed in a strong government. And herein lies the problem: Americans view the left/right opposition in very simple terms (i.e.; left: big government. Right: small government) and this is not how most political scientists and historians classify it. Also, the political spectrum of europe, especially that of the early 20th century, is very different from the American one. Still, Nazis espoused a majority of historically “right” principles: Ultra nationalism, traditionalism, conservatism, anti-communism, social order, etc. But then again, they also believed that Government should be involved in big national projects (like the Autobahn), bringing affordable goods to the people (such as the Volkswagen, which literally means “car of the people”) and providing for the general welfare of its citizens, which are usually associated with the left. I would like it if you could point me to a reputable History book that states Nazis were a left wing party.
Report Post »keaton
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:02pmMaybe they feel embolden when an anti-semetic president goes after Jews under the code words 1%, the rich, millionaires and billionaires!
Report Post »AmericanFightingMan1
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:11pmNazis were socialists and leftists. No doubt.
Some argue here that nazis were right wing because they first targeted communists (ie., other leftists). But you have to remember, as any political organization claws its way to the top, its first victims are not its ultimate opponents, but those who are close and their competitors!
Remember, the nazis first went after fellow brown shirts. The night of the long knives I believe it is called. Hitler had his former allies killed. Why? They were competitors. Next, other leftists, communists, etc.
Ultimately, Hitler had his sights set on those who loved freedom, liberty and Christianity. But those were tough adversaries. He had to knock the others out first, and then consolidate power to take on his ultimate foe; God, Jesus and freedom-loving people.
This is PRECISELY what the left in the US is doing. This is what Lenin, Trotsky, Marx, Hitler, Stalin, etc. have done. Their aim is taking out good people who love freedom and God. You can frame the argument how you wish in terms of God vs Devil or Dictator vs. Liberty or Left vs. Right. But in the end, the Nazi were leftists.
Report Post »AmericanFightingMan1
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:13pmAnd I apologize TWOBYFOUR, since you wrote essentially the same thing I did. I missed that, but it is encouraging since we saw the same thing. Again, my apologies.
Report Post »Unix
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:16pmLookit, NAZI were fascists and had a dictator, they were also a blood cult, the arian nation, white, blonde and blue eyed offspring were the goal…they were FAR LEFT as with all tyrannical govt’s. The fascists held ownership of private industry, but tolerated private industry. The Communists are the farthest LEFT, where they have total ownership of everything, and had a dictator. All of you who think differently are uneducated. Just go look for the Unions, the posters, the flags, etc, communists and fascists (NAZI) are socialist LEFT, my God the indoctrination and misinformation is incredible. Both Communism and NAZI Fascism are FAR LEFT dictatorial ideologies, and no one can tell me any different. Pick up any history book for world history written pre-1960, because that is when the revisionist history books started coming out. This is a travesty you people do not know this.
And I am correct about the civil war era Democrats and Republicans, do some research, also pre-1960 history books. Much stuff on the net is drivvel.
Report Post »Unix
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:19pmBTW the political spectrum is a linear thing:
Tyranny (Dictator/Police State) Anarchy (Total chaos)
+———————————————————————————————————————————————-+
Left Right
Anything else is a bastardization of the spectrum. Get educated.
Report Post »Unix
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:24pmSonic you are cross-eyed and ill-informed. the NAZI’s teamed up with the Communists at first to gain control, they locked up the Capitalists, then the Jews. they signed a non-agression treaty with the Communist Russia…ugh, then broke it and attacked them. It was the blood cult of the Third Reich to rule the world with white, blone and blue eyed peoples…all others were inferior races! Hitler was half Jew, and he hated his mother, and that caused him to hate the Jews and other races. The paperhanger (Hitler) was a racist left wing dictator, who controlled with the iron fist, and waged war on all mongrel societies. Get educated please.
Report Post »SoNick
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:29pmSince you all seem so confident in your understanding of the history of the World, I think I’m gonna sit this one out and let you guys prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that Obama is actually the reincarnation of Hitler. Have fun y’all!
oh, in closing… UNIX: now that I’ve seen your completely illogical explanation of the political spectrum, I understand why your world view is so narrow. You have chosen a very good screen name, as you can only comprehend binary thinking
Report Post »Unix
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:31pmThe blaze does not respect ‘spaces’, sorry: I hope this turns out better.
Tyranny (Dictator/Police State)…………………………………………………………. Anarchy (Total chaos)
Report Post »+———————————————————————————————————————————-+
Left…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..Right
Communism/Socialism/Fascism…………………………………………………………………..Anything goes
Unix
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:36pmMaybe this time it will work:
Tyranny (Dictator/Police State)……………………. Anarchy (Total chaos)
+———————————————————————————————-+
Left………………………………………………………………………..Right
Communism/Socialism/Fascism…………………………..Anything goes
Sonic, please do sit it out, you are trying hard to confuse people with your uneducated crud. America is set up just left of Anarchy. We are a center right country.
Report Post »Unix
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:39pmLastly, Obama is a Marxist, educated yourself by reading Dreams From My Father. Redistribution of Wealth is a marxist ideal, he is no Hitler. No one ever said that here, only you, so bugger off to huff n puff compost to join your leftist brethren and spew your lies to each other.
Report Post »NOTHNBUTTRUTH
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:59pmThe left has tried to pass any negativity from THEIR past onto the Republican Conservatives through the controlled media.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:15pmThere is absolutely no doubt that the Nazi party (known as the National Socialist German Workers’ Party) was socialist in nature.
Some of the things they associated with “Jewry” included capitalism, democracy, and industrialization. The liberals have been working feverishly since WWII to associate the right wing with Nazis in order to advance the narrative that Republicans are inherently racist.
Guess what, it worked. Millions of people, many conservatives included, continue to be bamboozled into thinking that the Nazi party was a right wing movement.
Report Post »Jacque
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:25pmThe republican party in America was formed as the anti-slavery party, the demoncrat party was the pro-slavery party. Currently the media in American is controlled by the govt. and they will let you know only what dictator b.o. wants you to know. Anything that fits his marxist agenda.
Anyone but obumma 2012
Report Post »hammhome
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:29pmLiberals in the US have defined Nazi’s as “right-wing”, but that is just misdirection, based upon the fact that the Nazi’s were against the Soviets. Nazi’s (ad neo-nazi’s) were/are socialist totalitarians with their own version of utopian idealism that they want to foist on everybody else. That makes them liberal. “right-wing” in the US describes freedom loving individualists who love the US Constitution and want government to leave them alone. I don’t know that Europe has any party that approximates the conservative movement in America. Read Jonah Goldberg’s book, “Liberal-Fascism”
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:18pm@gooeylewie
Anarchy (far right) is complete and utter lack of rules, law, order, etc.
——————
Anarchism (as a political ideology) has always been radical left. Anarchists and commies had some major disagreements as to process, not ideology. They both wanted to end communism in favor of a “classless society.” As TWOBYFOUR pointed out, they simply considered themselves to follow “purer” communism than the Marxists:
“Anarchism is often considered to be a radical left-wing ideology, and much of anarchist economics and anarchist legal philosophy reflect anti-statist interpretations of communism, collectivism, syndicalism or participatory economics….The central tendency of anarchism as a mass social movement has been represented by anarcho-communism and anarcho-syndicalism, with individualist anarchism being primarily a literary phenomenon…” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism
“Anarchism is an offshoot from the world socialist movement of the 19th century. Anarchism was of little importance until the spread of socialist ideals. At the time large numbers of Europeans were immigrating to the United States, introducing radical socialist and anarchist thought to the American labor movement and political discourse…. [T]hey [anarchists] insisted that as in Europe, violence was acceptable to overthrow capitalism.”
Report Post »http://histclo.com/essay/war/com/soc/soc.html”
watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:25pmThe attempt to assign modern day labels to past political situations and parties is in danger of presentism (look it up if you don’t know what it means). It is difficult to assign the NAZIs as left as we understand left or right as we understand right. Making the situation even more difficult is the fact that even the NAZIs morphed into an authoritarian/dictator political system with one man essentially calling the shots. The ideals NAZIs espoused to gain power were more right leaning, nationalism, national pride, etc. However with regard to social governmental roles the leaned much farther to the left because government dictated everything from the church to the bakery to the military. Neither modern day right or left should take offense to this description because it really is not an implication of modern day right or left. I hope this helps.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:42pm@TWOBYFOUR
I thought the Nazis were right-wing, until I researched more on Glenn’s claim that Hitler and the Muslims were close allies. Any thoughts?
@GOOEYLEWIE
Report Post »I have come to the conclusion that all totalitarian states are left, period. Totalitarianism is the antithesis of Constitutional (rule of law) freedom, which is at the other extreme of the X-axis. The error lies in thinking the ideology at the very end of the right side has to be extremely bad too. On the contrary, it is extremely good. Look at it as the dichotomy of good vs. evil on the moral scale, or God vs. Satan on the spiritual realm. Constitutional freedom (not to be confused with Ron Paul’s libertarian anarchism) is the political system America alone has been successful at implementing as a system of governance and it was, indeed, inspired by God himself for a godly nation. Now that POS in the WH is taking it away from us.
sasquatch08
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:13pm@UNIX:
You are correct. In Hitlers personal notes he noted that the large portion of red on the Nazi flag was put there specifically in an attempt to sway communists to join the Nazi party.
Hitler also regarded communists and a threat to Nazism, but at the same time their closest brethren.
It’s interesting to note that Hitler did indeed become a dictator which is pretty far to the right, BUT people are correct, Nazi’s are national socialists and Hitler, nor his government ever referred to themselves as “fascists”. That term was used by the Spanish and Italian governments to describe themselves, but never by the Reich.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:37pmDang! I just spotted an error in my first post:
Anarchism (as a political ideology) has always been radical left. Anarchists and commies had some major disagreements as to process, not ideology. They both wanted to end communism in favor of a “classless society.”
Correction: “They both wanted to end CAPITALISM in favor of a ”classless society.”
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:45pm@sasquatch08
Report Post »It’s interesting to note that Hitler did indeed become a dictator which is pretty far to the right…
—–
Huh? Is that an error or an insane statement?
MYBLAZER
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:44pmRight/Left, Tyranny/Anarchy, Good/Evil………In the garden of eden, God told Adam that he could eat from any tree in the garden, except from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
So this is what we get. Passionate people on both sides thinking they are right and the other side has to be wrong. WAR!!!!
Jesus Christ is LIFE and LIFE abundantly!
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:46pmThe sad fact is, these are misguided youth, who were promised their shot at the American dream, and for a myriad of reasons, they have recognized that dream has been stolen from them.
Report Post »Their fallacy is, they place the blame at the feet of people based on their ethnicity, when the fact is, it is our own government which is the culprit. Our elected officials, who went to Washington, and proceeded to serve… THEMSELVES and THEIR FRIENDS. Those people have eroded our freedoms, and pushed the American dream further and further out of reach. Placing barriers between those aspiring to the American dream, and the actual achievement of that dream, makes it easier for those who have achieved it to prosper even more. It makes it easier for them to avoid and eliminate potential competitors. It also allows elected representatives to convince themselves and others that they ate actually doing something thus justifying their own existence.
When were the last 4 laws passed that INCREASED our freedoms???????
Bluefish49
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:55pmAs a southerner in the construction field I have worked projects in northern states and I can say without reservation that the south cannot hold a candle to northern raceism….they just hate everyone.
Report Post »drago
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:12pm@Unix
Report Post »drago
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:14pmOk, lets try this again, Unix, the parties never switched, thats another myth created by the progressives, aka commies…..
Report Post »dasbunker
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:17pmThe Nazi’ are right wing; the communist’s are left wing.
Report Post »The Russian’s (left wing) killed far many Poles than the Germans did in the Second World War.
The Russian’s had a pact with Hitler where they would take the eastern half of Poland when the Germans attacked in 1939.
After the German invasion of Russia, the Soviets quickly took over the eastern half of Poland.
Stupid Russians
When the Poles in Warsaw rose up against the German’s in 1944, The Russian army stood by 20-30 miles away and did not intervene. At this time the Russian’s had the Germans on the ropes.
However Stalin saw this as a perfect opportunity to rid himself of any pro democracy movement to intervene with his future conquest of Eastern Europe.
Stalin simply let the Germans do his dirty work.
This is how the left operates.
Joe Stalin and his band of misfit LEFTIST made Adolph Hitler look like a Sunday school teacher.
In America the right wants to empower people to govern their own lives within the boundaries of law.
The left wants to control all aspects of life thru their decrees.
God bless America.
Stop the Usurper Obummer from ruining our country anny further in 2012
M1A2_Tanker
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:29pm“this is not how most political scientists and historians classify it.”
And here is where you have been so utterly confused! Anyone who steps forth with such grand lies is either incapable of understanding and speaking on the particular subject or out to enforce the re-writing of History. I believe you are a combination of the two but I am leaning heavily on the latter.
Report Post »M1A2_Tanker
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:44pmBluefish49
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:55pm
“As a southerner in the construction field I have worked projects in northern states and I can say without reservation that the south cannot hold a candle to northern raceism….they just hate everyone.”
I was born and raised in Colorado I moved to Arkansas when I got out of the service at age 27, five years later I still have NEVER heard a white Arkansan use the word N*****. Only Blacks. The hippy Liberals in CO though are the most racist MF’ers I have ever come across. I have done a lot of construction in the ski town’s, IE: Aspen, Eagle, Vail, etc, etc. Worked on the homes of famous Liberal star’s and they are the worst! Micheal Douglas showed up one day with a whole roasted pig and about a 10 coarse meal with staff and paid for all the booze too………
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:43pmKryptonite,
I respect your opinion, however….
Anarchism is a state of existence shared by both the extreme left and extreme right. As a life-long Libertarian, I can tell you that I have encountered my share of Anarchists within the party.
They believe in a government in name only, no borders, no law but the law of nature (eat or be eaten, kill or be killed, survival of the fittest). Complete freedom to do as you feel necessary and best provides your right to pursue happiness. It is not a desired state now openly supported by the party, but at one time it was considered.
There are still some remnants hanging on that believe that if you own a business and do not want to serve blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Women, Blue eyed aliens with purple spots, that it is well within your right to do so. These people are not only Anarchists but often white supremacists and the Neo Nazis feed their hate. These are the ones you will see hanging with the likes of OWS. They are not Constitutional Libertarians, they are not Paleo Libertarians they are Anarchists and often cannot wait for the big collapse.
The sooner we acknowledge their existence the easier it is to cut it off at the knees. Be very careful, if you are a Libertarian long enough you will run into these people. Be prepared for it.
Report Post »VanceUppercut
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:48pmCheesus H. Crust! Now Nazi’s/Fascists are “far left”. That‘s today’s edition of “rewriting history with conservatives”.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 12:28amVance,
I guess it depends how you are measuring it. From the viewpoint that the conservative right wants smaller government with less power and the Liberal left wants to expand government powers.. then yes Fascists are left, as National SOCIALISM (Nazis) would require us to expand the size of government for it to work.
If however you are from Europe which has never experienced minimal government, then your idea of right and left is less total government and total government respectively.
Report Post »BSdetector
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 7:12amAny system with a Dictator = Left. PERIOD.
Freedom, self governance, free markets = Right.
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 7:54amNazis? What About The Moslems?
Most of the members of the American Nazi Party are law enforcement informers plants. If not for the law enforcement paying all the dues to the Nazi Party, it would have ended generations ago.
Report Post »Thomas Paine
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 10:46amJames Burnham, a former Trotskyite who served with the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) during the World War II and later contributed to the National Review, described the Nazi regime’s economic planning. Burnham pointed out how the original “workers revolution” of Marxism had in fact become a managerial revolution in all societies were Socialism had been embraced. Writing in 1940, Burnham noted,
“ Outright state ownership and operation, advancing in all fields, are particularly ascendant in the extensive areas of new enterprise opened up during the Nazi rule….virtually all economic enterprise is subject to rigid state control; and it is control which we have seen to be decisive in relation to the instruments of production. Legal forms, even income privileges, are in the end subordinate to de facto control.
Even where private owners still exist in Germany, the decisions about “their” property are not in their hands. They do not decide what to make or not to make. They do not establish prices or bargain about wages. They are not at liberty to buy the raw materials they might choose nor to seek the most profitable markets. They cannot, as a rule, decide how to invest or not invest their surplus funds. In short, they are no longer owners, no longer effective capitalists…
The regulation of production in Germany is no longer left to the market. What is to be produced, and how much, is decided, deliberately, by groups of men, by the state boards and bureaus
Report Post »Michael61
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 11:16am@UNIX. Democrats and Republicans switched parties in 1860s??? Not really…
Democrats supported slavery, Republicans ended it.
Democrats filibustered Equal Women voting rights act of 1919, Republicans voted for it.
Democrats filibustered Equal Civil Rights act of 1964, Republicans voted for it.
Abraham Lincoln was a Republican.
Martin Luther King was a Republican.
KKK Kleagle was a Democrat (late Senator Robert Byrd), as well as the majority of KKK members.
Are you asking why minorities vote 99% for Democrats today?
Democrat party changed their spots (or rather pretended to change their spots):
I’ll have them n*g**rs voting Democratic for 200 years. – Lyndon B. Johnson
And I am not even a Republican. I prefer Minarchism.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 7:28pm@AXELPHANTOM
“Anarchism is a state of existence shared by both the extreme left and extreme right. They believe in a government in name only, no borders, no law but the law of nature (eat or be eaten, kill or be killed, survival of the fittest).”
—-
What you describe appears to be more along the lines of philosophical anarchism, which is politically unfeasible given that a lawless society only works in theory. Thus its proponents have never had a far-reaching impact on complex societies. It’s akin to, although not entirely the same as isolated native tribes with a communal social structure that anthropologists claim practice “real” successful communism.
I don’t know if you are a Christian, but having a relationship with God helps us discern the spiritual source behind world ideologies. The right-left clash on earth simply mirrors the one taking place in the heavens. Survival of the fittest is not a right-wing concept, because it is devoid of God. It does not instill or promote love, hope or charity, whether at the core of RP’s moral anarchism and isolationism or Obama’s Marxism. (CONT.)
Report Post »M1A2_Tanker
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 7:32pmJus’ breakin it down, Barney style, for those who obviously need it.
As in: The TEA Party does not attract racist’s. Some racist are attracted to some views of the TEA Party. As in: Sen. Robert Byrd was a racist who was attracted to view(s) of the Democratic Party. Not as in: The Democratic Party attracts racist’s.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 7:32pm@AxelPhantom (CONT.)
I’d like to know why you view your friends as being on the “extreme right,” since it was precisely the point of contention between Anarchist commies and Marxist commies, i.e., the former advocated a direct leap from capitalism to a stateless society (govt. in name only).
I am not a libertarian because I do not believe in “doing your own thing.” That is the Biblical definition of sin, even when it purportedly does not hurt anyone else. It is also a lie, because “doing your own thing” is rooted in selfishness and at the very least hurts your loved ones. It can also hurt a whole nation, case in pt., Obama and most of Congress. True freedom springs from submission to God AND to the leadership of men who fear Him and lead by example. If that is God’s design, who are we to rebel against it? It was the model of governance that made us the most blessed nation on Earth.
Report Post »judymac10
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 3:14pmI’m confused too. The Nazi’s rounded up polish people and the Jews and killed them.
Report Post »I’m sure just as many poles died in concentration camps along with the Jews.
Look4DBigPicture
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 3:22pmPerhaps this will help answer questions about forms of government.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODJfwa9XKZQ
Report Post »Black_Dynamite
Posted on March 7, 2012 at 10:39amBrooklyn Nazis, I hate Brooklyn Nazis they are worse than Illinois Nazis where are the Blues Brothers and the Bluesmobile when you need them.
http://www.zazzle.com/jacinto888
Report Post »scruffycat
Posted on March 7, 2012 at 11:20amNAZISIM TODAY is about White Pride and a disgust with being overrun by the colored apelike masses. I think that is what they take away from the 3rd Reich. Maybe they should call it the 4th Reich.
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on March 7, 2012 at 8:42pmNYC is the melting pot for EVERYTHING! Not shocked!
Report Post »neverfinal
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 9:03amYes, In America the left wing is Democratic, National Socialist for big government and NO FREEDOMS.
Report Post »The Republicans are right wing, for limited government and freedom and Liberty to peruse happiness and freedoms given by God and our Constitution. Intended for very limited government control over ones life. We were never intended to be a Democracy, we are a Republic with only a small touch of democracy, intended to just keep evil power hungry men honest. That is what the battle within the US is all about. Obama is ignoring our Constitutional Republic and running us like a Democracy. We are not like other Countries. That is what makes us special and free. A Democracy is big government control and no freedom.
elrond3737
Posted on March 8, 2012 at 10:03pmAmerican schools are wrong.I teach HS History so I know. The text books list the Nazis as Right wing. They try & say if you are to far to the right you are a Nazi & to far to the left a communist. Way overly simple. But, when you look at them (Nazi) they are left wing in their ideologies & practices. The have 2 main differences & yes, I oversimplify.
1.Nazi’s left the elites in power…co-opted them. Smart people who knew how to run things. In affect much of the social structure was left alone except at the extreme top. Commies stripped the elite & middle class of their property & made it all the states.
2.Nazism is Nationalistic(tends towards racism)& Communism is Inter-nationalistic(tends towards classism). Never mind that during WW2 the Soviets made the war into a patriotic war(copy the Nazis) a& the Nazis tried to recruit the rest of Europe to fight the Soviets (copy the commie).
As far as the Nazis rounding up and killing the commies, that had more to do with Power than ideology. In fact Hitler once commented that Nazism and Communism were essentially the same when it came to economics. Both believe in a strong central Gov, are anti-religion, and believe that people have no rights that don’t come from gov. Beck is right,both R leftist in origin.
A true right wing American is strongly social conservative and believes in minimalistic government. A strong believer in God, Constitution, 2nd amendment, family values…low taxes and such. Not much like a Nazi
Report Post »Dave.the.Blaze
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:14pmWhat is new or surprising about this? Neo-Nazis, the KKK, race-baitors of all strips have been a part of America forever. Whether anyone here wants to admit it or not, the Tea Party movement has brought more than a few out from under their rocks. It’s the old nativist “take back our country” theme that comes up from time to time in the US.
Report Post »Geobaldi
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:29pmAnd it’s something we have to entertain if we really want to uphold free speech in America. Hell, the Nazis were printing propaganda over here before and during WWII then sending it over there….
Report Post »Long Live Dixie
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:35pmYou are stupid.Blame the Tea Party for everything you freakin’ *******!
Report Post »Dave.the.Blaze
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:38pmGeobaldi, I agree. As ugly as it is, we have to tolerate this crap as free speech. I’d rather the racists be out in the open.
Report Post »Dave.the.Blaze
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:43pmNot for everything, Dixie. I can support the Tea Party ideas of balanced budgets and limited government, but it has attracted the ugly nativist crowd.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:51pmJew haters are predominantly found among:
Report Post »a) The Obama pro-Palestinian machine
b) OWS Occupiers
c) Ron Paul supporters
Br@dley
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:57pm@kryptonite, everything you posted is incorrect.
are you
a. stupid
b. uninformed
c. misinformed
either way, you should stop posting your nonsense. makes you seem a bit retarded.
Report Post »JBee449
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:16pmDave, you are wrong to infer that wanting to “take back the country” is “nativist.” And it’s a flat-out lie to align Tea Partiers with racism — a blatant attempt to smear the Tea Partiers with the race card and play into the Liberal narrative. There is nothing in the Tea Party’s core values of Limited Government, Fiscal Responsibility and Free Markets that translates to racism or nativism. We welcome everyone, of ALL races, ALL faiths, ALL communities, to stand with us to protect Liberty for ALL. And by the way, “ALL” means every person in this land, not just picking and choosing groups for favored status as Democrats like to do.
Report Post »Dave.the.Blaze
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:27pmJBEE, I agree with some of what you say, and I‘m not attempting to paint all Tea Party adherents as racists because that’s clearly not true. But I do stand by my belief that because the “movement” doesn’t have any formal structure or leaders (probably a blessing and a curse in some ways) it has attracted some extreme elements. Perhaps that can be said of any part, Democrat, Republican, Tea, etc.
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:30pmBr@dley, Kryptonite has a point, statistically. Please provide detailed rebuttal, without oblique name-calling.
Report Post »Lordchamp
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:59pmDave please show some proof of where ANY tea party gathering has accepted any of these radicals into their midst. They have ALWAYS condemned them and have nothing to do with them.
Just because they are in the news does not mean it has anything to do with the tea party movement in the least.
Your rational has no basis other than mere opinion.
I dare say you would find MUCH more evidence of their presence in OWS mobs than you would ever find around any tea party gathering.
Which again points to the fact that they are on the left of American society along with the communist, marxist, fascist, and socialist.
Report Post »JBee449
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:44pmDave: I appreciate your approach; you’re a calm debater which is refreshing. So where I think we disagree is in making a leap straight to the Tea Party from an article about Neo-Nazis. Sure, all groups have their extremists. But I just don’t think you can point to any solid proof of racism or nativism, either within the Tea Party, or spurred by the Tea Party. It’s just not there. The only place it exists is in the mind of the left. As someone else said, Nazis were ardent socialists and there are undeniable parallels to the modern Left. I’m not saying, in any way, that the Left are Nazis. I’m just pointing out how silly it is to jump straight to the Tea Party any time New-Nazis come up. Thanks for your discussion Dave.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:48pmBr@dley
Report Post »everything you posted is incorrect.
either way, you should stop posting your nonsense. makes you seem a bit retarded.
—-
What pained you a whole lot, the Ron Paul inclusion? The KKK did endorse him, didn’t they? Or do you want to argue for Obama and the OWS?
Br@dley
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:12pmwhat pains me is people who think they are clever when i reality only refurgitate talking points.
do you have any firsthand knowledge of OWS? didn’t think so.
do you have any firsthand knowledge of israel/palestine or the mid east ingeneral? didn’t think so.
and the demagoguery of ron paul/rp supporters is not only asinine, but old.
btw, wo cares whom the kkk endorses? prescott bush endorse freaking hitler, so was GW a nazi? guilt by association is a tool of the feeble-minded.
enjoy voting for romney and losing to obama because your infantile name calling and alienation of independents/ron paul supporters. but the again, i‘m sure you will blame us for obama’s 2nd term.
read a book and actually leaarn something sir. engage in dialouge with people you don’t think you agree with. you may find that we have more in common than the “conservative” propagandists would have you believe.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:13pmBr@dley
wo cares whom the kkk endorses? prescott bush endorse freaking hitler, so was GW a nazi? guilt by association is a tool of the feeble-minded.
——–
First off, learn to read before you engage in senseless attacks. I never said Ron Paul was a Nazi. Go back and reread my comment. I said there were Jew-haters who supported Ron Paul. That was in reply to someone who claimed there were Nazis in the Tea Party. So spare me your diatribe, dodo.
=> “read a book and actually leaarn something sir. engage in dialouge with people you don’t think you agree with”
How about if you follow your own advice. You haven’t shown you are capable of engaging in reasoned dialogue. You go into a tantrum because you think I have called your cult leader a Nazi. That sounds pretty puerile to me.
=> “do you have any firsthand knowledge of OWS? didn’t think so.
Report Post »do you have any firsthand knowledge of israel/palestine or the mid east ingeneral? didn’t think so.”
—
First off, don’t ask me, if you are going to reply for me. Or is that your concept of a dialogue? Second, are you implying that I can only discuss topics which I have “firsthand knowledge of?” Do you realize how ludicrous that is? I never hear that line of reasoning except from left-wing radicals. They typically resort to that crock as an intimidation tactic. (CONT.)
kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:08pmBr@dley (CONT.)
You obviously don’t have “firsthand knowledge” of me and I am not about to give it to you, regardless of how many dumb epithets you furiously key. You don’t faze me, pal. OWS anti-Semitic signs and comments are all over the Internet. Here’s one from a talk radio host who shares his firsthand experiences: http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/28/ows-supporters-are-doing-a-poor-job-of-convincing-me-that-theyre-not-anti-semites/
There are other firsthand accounts attesting to the presence of Jew-haters in OWS rallies, like this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY1t-HHTcAQ
You can be dismissive all day long, but there was zero tolerance for that kind of speech at Tea Party rallies.
As for Obama being anti-Israel, both his actions and words attest to the fact. Here’s a glaring example: Only an anti-Israel person would insist that Israel go back to the 1967 borders. In fact, Obama did little more than echo Hamas & Friends. Thankfully, Bibi gave the Muslim-in-Chief the middle finger salute. Does that hurt as well? Gathering from your two replies, I may have very well run into one of those full-fledged radicals defiling our nation nowadays.
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 1:36amjew haters predomiately found among ron paul supporters. your words.
as far as a tantrum, you consumed two whole dialouge boxes ranting, and have yet to submit any logical argument or supporting evidence.
you want to know the differenece between OWS and tea party. tea party was mainly a homogeneous group of middle aged white folks. OWS was a more diverse and youthful (and pissed off) movement .
tea party had 1 day rallies
OWS was actualy civil disobedience.
get a clue, if given direction and not demagogued, OWS could have help to effectuate real positive change in this country. but you republicans are content to die a slow, embarrassing death since you seem intent on alienting the youth of america.
Report Post »Br@dley
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 1:39amoh, and cult leader?
you going to the new “restoring whateverthehell” cult rally?
Report Post »did you follow your beck messiah to israel too?
pathetic really….
Fried Okra
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 3:28pmExcellent posts kryptonite! Good job…
Report Post »NICHOLAS.STL
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:12pmAll is fair in love and war. Let the games begin!
Report Post »Geobaldi
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:03pmOk, how many people find it historically ironic that Polish people are becoming neo-Nazis?
Report Post »Miami
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:07pmVery,
It goes to show the ignorance and stupidity of these “people”
db321
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:09pmIf I was that Ugly – I would cover my face.
Remember, the Jews was not armed in Germany – America is. Overcoming this has Soros scratching his head.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:12pm@ Miami
As being of Polish descent. I am deeply offended by your jest. Just shows how bigoted our society still is.
Report Post »AndiAndiAndi
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:19pmThat was the 1st thing I noticed! Just watched the movie “The Way Back”. Good show about Poland, Russia basically communism and how screwed Poland was. Russians invade from the East and Hitler invades from the West.
Report Post »Unix
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:59pmya, considering the NAZI’s decimated Poland and their peoples…sad fact is we have a bunch of uneducated folks running around spewing hate and lies…America has fallen into bad times, and it will get much worse before it gets any better. Communism is headed our way, if not already here, as you can see with all of the mandates coming out of DC.
Report Post »Endstatism
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:27pmHistorically in Poland there has been a undercurrent of anti Semitism . Not to say that all those of Polish descent are anti Semites. Just saying that attitude has been present for many years
Report Post »Watchyer6
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:51pmApparently, none of these morons has a clue about what the Nazi’s did to Poland. BTW, I think one of these guys goes by the handle “The_Jerk.”
Report Post »Twobyfour
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:08pmWatchyer6, LOL! I think you’ve nailed it with The_Jerk!
When I came to Canada in 1984, it was surprising to me how many Polish immigrants were openly racists (few and far in between were not). Not necessarily anti-semitic, but set against any distinct racial group (bare the whites). It was puzzling to me. I attributed it to being underdogs and having a need to have some even more underdoggy folks to deride. But maybe it was something else. I haven’t seen such a pronounced racism in any other group, though some mild form of bigotry was not an exception. For the most part, it was animosity towards “evil” brethren, like Croats vs Serbs, or such.
Report Post »Lordchamp
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:10pmSo Johnny you don’t think these people are wrong for being anti-Semitic and bringing back the hate of the nazis?
He wasn’t talking about all Polish people, merely the ones in this article who are instigating hated and bigotry.
I would expect Polish to be offended if people DIDN’T stand up and disagree with these people based on how they were treated by the nazis in past history.
Report Post »Miami
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:24pmJohnnyMidknight
Are you a Nazi…?
Report Post »GIRL
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:43pmPerhaps they’ve learned a version of Polish history as warped as the American history being taught now.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:59pm2×4
You are correct. Many Polish did become anti-Semites after the war.
Poland has a history of being open to many societies. Unlike most of Europe at the time Jews were given representation in government and were respected members of society as they quite often owned the shops of commerce.
That was until the socialist mentality of “Hate the Rich” started to infiltrate. Next to the land owning Szlachta (nobles) the Jews were much better off than the peasantry. The Szlachta, liked the Jews as they were very good at commerce and management. They hired them to manage estates, keep their books and acquire hard to get goods. .
When 1939 rolled around. The Ukrainians hated the Poles and their “agents” the Jews. Bolshevics hated the Szlachta (bourgeoisie), the peasants and the wealthier Jews. Poor Jews hated richer Jews and the Szlachta. The peasants hated the Boleshevics and the Szlachta, just in different gradations. The peasants hated both the Szlachta and the Jews and the Ukrainian peasants hated the Polish peasants and visa-versa. The Russians hated the Poles. You can see where it was insanity.
And where did it start but by classification by wealth…
Many Jews were appointed by the Communists to replace Poles who had been “removed from office” in government and universities. The people who replaced those killed by the communists were blamed. Both sides had to choose Nazi or Communist. It was an ugly, ugly time.
Report Post »patriotj
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:54pmThere are “Neo-Nazi” factions everywhere unfortunately. They are just small-minded idiots who need to grow up. What comes as a surprise (sort of) is that these men are POLISH. Do they even realize that the Nazis considered the Poles (and other Eastern Europeans) as barely human? Why would you choose to associate with a group of bigots who would not even consider you really human? Why would you choose to associate with a group who exterminated many, many ethnic Poles?
Just. Plain. Stupid.
Report Post »Geobaldi
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:04pmWell said!
Report Post »Miami
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:05pmThere are stupid people everywhere
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:43pmThose who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Report Post »edmundburk
Posted on March 7, 2012 at 8:53pmNazism is NOT a logical policital system it is hitler worship at best.
Report Post »thomas242007
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:36pmWhy do we allow idiots like Nation of islam, black panthers, nazi party and other groups like that even in our country theyre all racisist fools and need to get over whatever problem they have, idiots
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:49pmBecause we shouldn’t be involved in mandating against stupidity. I prefer these idiots wear their ignorance on their sleeve, so that objective, rational people can have something to laugh at.
Report Post »ronin_6
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:00pmBecause we are stronger than they are. It is because we allow them that we as a nation and as a people are what we are, that shining beacon of tolerance and free will. The govt, either local or federal has no moral or legal authority to curtail their existence. Thank God for that. With out that we would resemble nazi Germany or any Islamic nation.
Report Post »Southerner01
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:20pmWe allow them because once it is ok to ban beliefs because they are wrong, how long before we get a government who views our beliefs as wrong? It’s a slippery slope. Once it is ok to decide who’s views are acceptable, then someone may decide yours and mine are not.
Report Post »Crazy Times
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:19pmIn the third photo, looks as if there is some religious painting hanging on the wall of the house he is in…
… he should paid more attention to that himself…
Report Post »khandahar&jalalabad
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:51pmHe’s such a badass as his cute kitty cat walks in, what a d-bag.
Report Post »Geobaldi
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:19pmWell, historically speaking, if you look above the bulkheads of German submarines in WWII it says ‘God is with us’ ( GOTT MIT UNS, I’m not sure that is exactly the translation, ‘God with us’), it also showed up on belt buckles and stuff as well. They weren’t against religion, mind you I’m not defending the Nazis, but there were certain things said during the war that weren’t 100% true. It is essential to demonize your enemy to your own populous in order to keep them in line and propaganda is one of the most effective tools for doing that. Kind of a necessary evil in war times.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:42pm@Geobaldi
Report Post »They weren’t against religion,
——–
Christians were persecuted and sent to concentration camps, almost like the Jews. I say almost, because Jews were experimented upon in really horrific ways. Hitler did find a firm ally in the Vatican, though.
jackact
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:18pmNeo-nazis in Brooklyn…
Report Post »What about Muslim terrorists in Camden, NJ?
You remember America, the ones dancing in celebration on rooftops
moments after 911.
Crazy Times
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:16pm“Nazis- I hate these guys!” – Indiana Jones
Report Post »HTuttle
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:11pmThere are more backwards people in Brooklyn than in the deepest Appalachian backwater.
Report Post »Rayblue
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:09pmI don’t trust anyone whose boot is bigger than their head.
Report Post »Not that I trust anyone at all, but looking like a nazi bigfoot is weird.
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:59pmAnyone who wears a mask knows they are doing something wrong. They are also cowards.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:21pmI do find it interesting that the white supremacists in this country feel a need to hide their faces but the black and hispanic supremacists don’t.
Report Post »NealPatrick
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:59pmGonozo has a point….. given the nature of this administration‘s DOJ and it’s manager- Holder – the application of laws is not equal across various “anarchist” or, I hate to use the term, “hate groups.”
Report Post »chubby
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:57pmI find it truly amazing that all of these groups, whether they be here in the US as in OWS or overseas, have one thing that certainly does stand out and that is the fact that those protesting all feel the need to cover their faces.
Report Post »If you are a true believer in whatever it is you are protesting about should you not have the guts to show your face?
Amazing!
TEARS FOR AMERICA
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:57pmThe demonic spirit of Nazism has never died and raises up it‘s ugly head to further it’s agenda of death and if we are not all vigilant, it will overtake the world again.
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:48pmI “love” the middle photo depicting the “Neo-Nazi”, Beer on the table, Bad azz angry look and in the back ground is a picture of Jesus’ birth in the manger.
Put there on purpose? I believe so to make it seem that all Christians are crazy, right wing Nazis. I call this more propaganda….
Report Post »KPEdwards
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:59pm… or it could be pointing out the difference between the two.
Report Post »saneromeo
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:47pmYet another group of morons “proud” of their beliefs, but hiding behind masks. It is staggering that people can be so small. And in one photo there is a picture of Jesus on the background wall, does this idiot not know that Christ was a Jew? This is disgusting, reprehensible, and devoid of any intelligence. I weep for my country…
Report Post »tweetybird
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:23pmWhy do people like this always cover their faces? You may be able to hide your face from your neighbors…..but you will never be able to hide from God.
Report Post »Calm Voice of Reason
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:22pmJust want to point out before the dogs start howling that being critical of Israel’s policies as a sovereign government is not the same as being anti-Semitic. Just because our current administration, OWS protestors, or any group you might name have opinions that are in opposition to those policies does not make them any bit closer to sharing Nazi ideology.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:35pmWhich Israel policies are you talking about exactly?
Report Post »Calm Voice of Reason
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:44pm@Ubethechange: I think that a large amount of criticism is leveled at Israel for continuing its expansive development into the West Bank, for one. I think it’s possible for one to dig into some of the comments on the Blaze wherein the Obama admin. or the OWS are accused of being “hateful” to the Jews and you can often find that what is really happening is reasonable (even if you disagree) criticism of Israel as a nation, rather than as a religious tradition. I will not deny antisemitism exists, but I would be hesitant to leap to that conclusion whenever someone brings the subject up.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:54pmIslamic Lies & Myth no 20 “Jerusalem is a Holy city to Islam” The name Jerusalem is not even mentioned anywhere in the Quran. The word Palestinian comes from the race Philistines who are originally from the Island of Crete. What is there today are Arabs who came from neighbouring countries. There is no distinct Palestinian race among the Arabs today. Theyare Arabs plain and simple.
Judea and Samaria should not be referred to as the West Bank. Do you know why they call it the West Bank? Technically, what is the West Bank? I don’t think anybody in America knows. No Israeli calls it the West Bank because there’s no such place as the West Bank. The real name is Judea and Samaria, Judea comes from the name Judah.
The term West Bank dates from the establishment of the kingdom of Jordan on the east bank of the Jordan in 1922. It refers to Judea and Samaria by their location on the west bank of the Jordan River and is an attempt by the Arab world to link them to Jordan, although they were originally slated to be part of the state of Israel. Jordan has given up all demands for Judea and Samaria, which it occupied from 1949-1967, when they were united with Israel after Jordan attacked the Jewish state in the Six Day War. (cont)
Report Post »jdare
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:04pmAnd blaming your short comings and misery on someone who had nothing to do with it and doesn’t affect your life in anyway accomplishes what?
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:32pmThe Philistines were a warlike, sea people whose origins may have been Minoa, an island off Greece, and who lived on the southern coast of Israel, far from Judea and Samaria, during the time of the Bible after their attack on Egypt failed. They were the Jews’ worst enemy during the time of the Judges and Kings, but were absorbed into conquering empires and disappeared as a distinct people by the 5th century B.C.E.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:36pmThe Nazis and Muslims did share a common goal in WWII. Now, of course, Nazis are OUT, and the balance of power has shifted in favor of the commies and their socialist-anarchist buddies; so, yes, Obama and OWS support Islamists in their goal to see Israel wiped off the map. Obama just doesn’t voice it openly. As per usual, he uses/funds proxies — the Arab Spring and Hamas — to get his dirty work done.
Report Post »http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100423145706AANgoWN
Calm Voice of Reason
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:22pmMy point being only that a person can be critical of a policy of the government of Israel without being antisemitic.
Report Post »jungle J
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:17pmthis is what multi culturalism breeds….only the sane understand. otsu
Report Post »momrules
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:08pmNew Black Panthers, Nation of Islam, KKK, Nazis……….all different but all the same.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:23pmsomeone will pit one against the other…… just see
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:44pm@Republicorp – indeed, and the one to do so will be Soros when they are no longer of any use to him. Its bad enough the ones we have here in Phoenix, talk about madness given human form.
Report Post »TBIR
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:51pmYou forgot Beckbots
Report Post »ellietoo
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:07pmAs I recall Poland was pretty much destroyed by Hitler and his anti semitic gang. Too many people are being fed a lot of lies about Jews by our national media. The same type of propaganda spread by Hitler and his mob back in the 30′s. It is OK to hate in this country as long as you are hating the same group that the people in power are hating. Our state department considers the president of Israel to be the most dangerous man in the world. It is time to clean house at our state department.
Report Post »Elena2010
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:30pmAnd many in Poland at the time were anti-Jewish and were only too happy to see Jews murdered by Nazis. The same was true in Ukraine and other parts of Eastern Europe. Waffen-SS battalions were recruited in the Ukraine to fight the hated Soviets and Jews. Some served as Death Head guards at the camps. It was not long before the Poles discovered that the Nazis viewed them as “untermensch,” even as they viewed Jews that way.
It pays to love not hate. In the End, love wins and you may as well side w/God now.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:03pmThis is where our lack of study in schools of European history is really apparent.
When the Communists over-ran Poland and Ukraine on September 15 of 1939 they took many Poles who were positions of power at universities and in government and (after imprisoning or killing them) replaced them with “non” Poles, be they Russian, Ukrainian or Jewish. It was the Russian version of genocide, so yes many Poles began to place the Jews squarely on the side wih the Russians.
The Nazis on the other hand who invaded on the September 1, 1939 were already rounding up Jews. If you were a Jew in Poland you had to pick sides, who are you logically going to go with?
Many Poles saw both armies as the enemy (neither were Polish) but they hated the Russians more as the Russians had been persecuting them for over 100 years at that point (partitions etc). and now had an active policy of extermination of the Poles. Again, which side are you going to go with?
Just as the Jews decided for reasons of survival to support the Communists, many Poles for the same reasons “supported” the Nazis.
To say that these are “Polish” people who are Nazis is a confusion. The real Poles stood for Poland, and with the Polish underground, and the government in exile. Not for the Communists or the Nazis. That being said, you did what was needed to survive.
These are not Poles, they are Americans, I don’t care what neighborhood they came from.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:12pm@AxelPhantom
Report Post »Outstanding post!
momprayn
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:05pmYes, this stuff on the rise. To all Jews – it’s not only these people, PLEASE realize that the present Admin. is also filled with hatred toward Jews (and whites, Christians, etc.). They are very racist and enemies to the free market capitalism of America and are in the process of destroying it. Maybe you thought the Dems in the “old days” were the ones that would “help” you – but that is no longer the case. The Dems have been taken over by these hateful radical “utopians”. They are not your friends. In fact, Dems are historically more racist than Repubs. Check for yourself — they perpetuated the lie of the opposite and too many believed it. If you choose, keep your other “liberalism” stuff, but please, whatever you do, do NOT vote for them in the fall – (IF we have them at all).
More info on Obama:
http://commieblaster.com/obama/index.html
Some info on Obama: http://www.commieblaster.com
Report Post »cemerius
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:03pmWasn’t Poland the first country to fall to hitler? Imean the Fench actually held out longer to the Blitzkreig!!! Being of a German heritage individuals like this make me SICK!!! Their ideas are founded in quasi truths and stereo types, this is how they “justify” their actions!!! Judge a person by their character NOT the color of their skin!!! Nazism is just a political party like the democrats are, the true German people were unfortunately cow towed or blissfully ignorant…..
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:15pmBless their pointy little heads
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:58pmThe Polish and Ukrainians had been largely disarmed by the Boleshevics in 1923 during the purges. (Poland didn’t exist as a country from 1795-1918 due to the partitioning) There had been many “Uprisings” against the Russians that continued until WWII broke out and their “Army” had been raveged by the forced inscription for 100 years of many young men into the Red Army.
The government was exiled in 1939 and operated its home army, the Armia Krajowa, first from France and then from London where it remained until 1990.
So yes the Polish army fell quickly.
Report Post »HUSSAR
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:53pmNo sir Poland wasn’t the 1st country to fall to Hitler, Poland was the one that caused Britain and France to declare war on Germany, effectively signifying the beginning of WWII. Austria and Czechoslovakia among others were invaded and annexed by Hitlers Germany. Poland surrounded by Germany and Russia ( numerically and technologically inferior ) lasted about 4 weeks where as France one of the worlds super powers of the time surrendered just 6 weeks after the German invasion. So I’m still comfortable picking on the French :) …especially since the French were in direct violation of the Franco-Polish Military Alliance signed mere few month prior to the German invasion.
Report Post »But you couldn’t be more right…Judge a person by their character NOT the color of their skin.
kryptonite
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:04pm@cemerius
Report Post »the true German people were unfortunately cow towed or blissfully ignorant….
——–
“True German people” meaning non-Jews? lol! They were blissful all right, but not ignorant. Their bliss ended when Hitler’s lunacy met with true resistance and that started to affect their pockets.
thegreatcarnac
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:54amSeems old adolf is peeping up out of the ditch he was burned in.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:50amHey, part of the OWS crowd! They wear masks and seem to hate Jews too.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:57amRon Paul supporters too!
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:59pmThe Dems have tried to cultivate a voting block with Black, Hispanics and the White lame and lazy over the years using various methods to keep them on the “plantation” so to speak.
These Poles and others will find a home in the Ron Paul Revolution and will be welcomed with open arms! Send money they’ll be asked… but don’t expect Paul to endorse this type of ideology… it’s primary time again you see… it wouldn’t be right… not at this particular time…. but there’s always tomorrow… as there was not so long ago… in the not so distant past…
Report Post »