New Discovery: Globular Clusters Composed of Ancient Stars
- Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:30am by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »
The European Southern Observatory’s VISTA survey telescope recently discovered two clusters of very old stars inside our Milky Way galaxy.
These ‘globular clusters’ join only 158 other known clusters under this distinction in our galaxy, making them a relatively rare find. A globular cluster, according to Space.com, is composed of at least 100,000 stars and are among the oldest in the universe.
Although the cluster on the far right of the below image (UKS 1) steals the show, but scientists discovered using Vista survey data the fainter cluster in the center of the image (VVV CL001).
On the right lies the globular star cluster UKS 1 and on the left lies a much less conspicuous new discovery, VVV CL001 — a previously unknown globular, one of just 160 known globular clusters in the Milky Way. The new globular appears as a faint grouping of stars about 25% of the width of the image from the left edge, and about 60% of the way from bottom to top. (Photo: ESO/D. Minniti/VVV Team)
The team found a second globular cluster (VVV CL002), which is the closest known to the center of the Milky Way (see below).
Group of faint stars near the center of this image is a newly found globular cluster. (Photo: ESO/D. Minniti/VVV Team)
The VISTA Variables in the Via Lactea (VVV) survey team found these new clusters as part of their study of the central parts of the Milky Way in infrared light.
Watch this video from Space.com that shows the difference between visible light and the infrared version that was able to locate these new clusters:
According to the release, UKS 1, which outshines the two new globular clusters, was previously the dimmest cluster in the Milky Way. Due to absorption and reddening of starlight by interstellar dust, these objects can only be seen in infrared light and VISTA, the world’s largest survey telescope, is ideally suited to searching for new clusters hidden behind dust in the central parts of the Milky Way
Comments (64)
Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 709 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 561 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 381 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 371 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 363 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 371 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 381 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 305 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 149 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 371 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
MUDFLAPS
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 5:19pmwhich dot is it???
Report Post »whywonder
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:48pmWhy is story on the blaze? Beckers don’t believe in science particuarily when it comes out of some socialist country.
Report Post »Tired-of-fools
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:35pmI wonder if these are the “sustainable stars” that the red headed dope from OWS was talking about in that video from the other day. He said that they would power our cars. How do we get them? Someone should find the dope and ask.
Report Post »hi
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:01pmWe see stars die but we have never seen a new star. That is because it is mathematically impossible. They were created. Evolutionists cannot scientifically explain how stars formed. Their theories are severely flawed mathematically and go against the laws of physics.
See Walt Brown, PhD from MIT for explanation. Compelling Evidence for Flood
Report Post »WSGAC
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:46pmEvidence for the Flood? Can you give us a date for the Flood then?
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:56pmLook at M-42 through a decent telescope.
You’ve now seen stars in the process of being created.
This has nothing to do with evolution, it has to do with simple facts.
Report Post »Abysmal
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:58pmOf course evolutionists cannot scientifically explain how stars are formed – this is completely outside their field of study. It is astrophysicists that take on this endeavor.
Also, did you know that creationists also cannot scientifically explain how stars are formed? It’s true!
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:21amI hate not knowing about space and what’s beyond beyond…….. one of the reasons I believe in GOD. No scientist can explain the UNIVERSE and outer space, so I call it HEAVEN.
Report Post »hi
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:02amJust the fact that there is a galaxy and it hasn’t flung apart by now shows that the universe is young. The stars are not ancient as claimed.
Report Post »Evolutionists invented dark matter because they couldn’t explain the intact galaxies. There is not enough matter to hold the galaxies together so dark matter which is not observed nor detected solves the problem and is the “glue” which holds them together…..
Instead of deducting “young” from the facts, they refute it with fairy tales to hold onto their millions of years stupidity.
hi
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:11amPS If they admit that the universe is young as observed scientifically, it disproves evolution They need millions of years for their theory of “nothing magically turning into people” to work.
Report Post »BobtheMoron
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:38amYou can’t deduct from facts. However, you may deduce form the facts. Deduct is to reduce, deduce is to infer. You, Mullet Heads, need to work on your grammar. As for any nasty responses, Bite me!
Report Post »ByDawnsEarlyLight
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:15amSo why cant 450 billion years be ‘young’? I would think that in the grand scheme of things 450 billion years would be the equivalent of a galactic sneeze, or heavenly hiccup if you will, lol. To us mere mortals thought, it is definitely ancient, as our lifespans would probably not even register on the meter. And Bob feel free to correct my grammar and everyone else anytime, I’m always up to learning.
Report Post »WSGAC
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:58pmThe Universe is NOT young, and we know this observationally. Simply go outsitde and fix your telescope on the Andromeda Galaxy. The light you see from Andromeda originated from Andromeda. The galaxy is nearly 2.5 million light years away. Consequently, the light that hits the back of your eye started its journey at least that long ago. Unless of course, God decided to create the light as not originating from Andromeda itself, but that would be deceptive. This is always the problem with young earth creationist nutjobs. Inevitably they have to explain a young universe through deceptive means, and a God of deceptive means.
Report Post »Abysmal
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:40pmAstrophysicists invented dark matter as a hypothesis to explain a phenomenon that is not yet fully understood. This is not uncommon in science, and is an intentional practice designed to investigate new ideas. For example, when Dmitri Mendeleev published his periodic table of elements, he left gaps in places where patterns suggested there may have been undiscovered elements. He was also able to hypothesize on the properties of those undiscovered elements. In this case, Dmitri’s hypotheses were useful, as many of his predictions held to be true. If the existence of dark matter turns out to be inaccurate, it will be replaced with one or more alternate hypotheses to be discussed and tested. Hooray, Science!
By the way, dark matter is mainly hypothesized to exist as an explanation for the acceleration of the expansion of the universe. The current popular theory that resolves how galaxies are held together is that each one has a black hole at its center (similar to how stars hold planetary systems together).
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:39ammmmm love eating milky way bars and drinking Dr. Pepper…it’s all I could afford to live on when I went to college. Better than a Pepsi and a moon pie. It separated the classes. One was lower middle class and the other, respectively, was upper lower class indulgence. lol jimho
Report Post »Carter John
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:14am“In the beginning God created the earth.” The more we learn about science the more we prove the Bible, the more we learn about archaeology the more we prove the Bible. The greatest of our scientists have declared multiple times in their lives their love for God. If the people who we herald as the forefront of the humanist revolution deny it, what does that say of us?
Report Post »joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:38amCarter John, the opposite of your statement is true. The more we learn the less we need superstition. The very concept that if something excists, somebody must have created it is simply primitive thinking. You owe it to yourself to at least watch the series “How the Universe Was Made.” That will get you started on your journey out of the wilderness of superstition and false belief.
Report Post »ByDawnsEarlyLight
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:34amWhereas i agree that science and archeology have been able to pinoint events that could explain certain biblical catastrophes, I do not believe it negates anything in the bible. The message of Sodom and Gamorah(spelling?), was not that god will smite down and obliterate anything he doesnt agree with it was a message of personal responsibility, and taking care of yourself and yours in the event you may need to get the hell outta dodge.
Report Post »And Joe mabey you should check out the ‘Bible for Dummies’ and learn not to take things so literally and get a grasp of the deeper meaning of things like faith, a little spirituality never hurt anyone, just ask any deeply spiritual buddhist, hindu, wiccan, muslim and YES christian. Have a lovely day all. :D
joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:50amBydawnsearly, I have no use for the supernatural fantasies of others. Living a good life and being fair and decent to others that cross my path has wroked out pretty well for me. I don’t need to scare little kids and tell them they are sinners and assemble in an untaxed building once a week for a dose of brainwashing. Spirituality is bunk. Being a decent human being is really where it’s at.
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:59amIn the beginning, God…….
Report Post »joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:39amIn the beginning, there was no beginning and there was no god.
Report Post »ByDawnsEarlyLight
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:06pmWhover used the bible and the word sinner to jack you up as a child, Joe, was a real SOB and I wish I could kick his/her ass for you. But the fact of the matter is THIS, you are being neither ‘fair’ nor ‘decent’ to anyone on this post, your relentless disrespect, intolerance and vitriol used against people in this posting has opened up a level of pity in my heart I usually reserve for severely abused children and animals, may you truly find peace in your life some day.
Report Post »WSGAC
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:00pmJoe, you obviously have a flawed understanding of “infinite” if you actually believe your nonsense!
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:55amBad headline is bad.
How is this news? Were they composed of fresh spanking new stars previously? No.
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:54amIsn’t that way cool? It made my soul sing when I read that.
The thought came to mind, “GOD loves all HIS creations and finds special places for them.“ HIS ”world” is not disposable as ours is. HE cherishes HIS creations….
THANK YOU, GOD!
Report Post »wakeup1
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:52amSHHHH. dont tell the Democraps ….or they will find something there to TAX!
Report Post »Kara_ite
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 6:44amIs not God in the height of heaven? And behold the topmost of the stars, how high they are!
Thick clouds are a covering to Him, that He seeth not; and He walketh in the circuit of heaven.’
I remember studying the Qur’an and the Hadiths, the so called For Profit Mohammad taught that the earth was flat, I guess his wooden headed moon god forgot to tell him that the Jews had a book that said the earth was round (spherical).
Report Post »joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:39amAs religions go, the Muslims have one of the worst.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:07amjoei234,
Report Post »The more you learn about “How the Universe Works”, the more you should realize that some intelligent first cause made it to work that way.
joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:27amQuite the opposite qpwillie. The more mysteries that science explains, the less power superstition has over people.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:59amjoei234,
Report Post »It’s not superstition. If you learn who the god of the Bible actually claimed himself to be in Exodus 3:14, you’ll see that Yahweh is a very scientific concept. Of course, you’d have to look beyond the modern translations of what was actually said (ie “I am the very Ayah” instead of “I am that I am” [and that's all what I am. I'm Popeye the sailor man.]” which is not what he actually said.
joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 11:55amGod never said anything to anyone, because god is not real and has never existed. If god did exist, it would have been simple to make that known. I can think of several ways to do so without trying. The entire narrative of Christianity is simplistic, flawed and nonsensical and I reject it out of hand. Mormonsim is even more ridiculous. That Maureen Dowd article on it is excellent. Hitchins also laid out the absurdity of Mormonism in his recent article. THINK. Religion cannot stand the glare of common sense. It’s all a scam.
Report Post »Mivoyses
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 6:44amTo those posters who brought up god.
Report Post »So just because we don’t know something yet, or don’t have answers to some questions we have to create a “god”?
I thought we left the caves a while ago.
qpwillie
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:06amWhy does it disturb you so?
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:24amI didn’t create a god, God created me.
Report Post »novelator
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:31amIf you really want absolute proof that God exists, the proof has been sitting there in your pretty little head since you first discovered two spoonfuls of Mommy’s pudding are better than one.
Mathematics.
Mathematics is a universal language that bridges all other languages here on this planet. Everything we know and do here is predicated on our understanding of math. And we’re born with this basic knowledge that one piece of candy plus one piece of candy equals more than just one piece of candy.
Mathematics is the only language everyone on this planet speaks. The workings of the entire Universe, indeed, even down to the cells of your body, can be explained, thus proven or disproved, by math. All our modern conveniences–math. Even to the earliest recorded time of Man’s existence, Man did not exist without math–think seasons. Without math, none of us survive.
So, then you have to ask yourself, who created Mathematics, this universal language? Why are we all born knowing it, innately, no one tells us, we just know instinctively? And then, if you’re the least bit honest with yourself or others, if you have that kind of courage, you have to admit that, at a minimum, there being this mathematical underpinning to the entire Universe, even a set of finite rules the make up a foundation, the base foundation of all Existence, there must also be a Mind behind it all.
God is a mathematical certainty, if you dare, because God made math and gave it to us all. If n
Report Post »novelator
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:35amIf not God, who?
Who created Mathematics and instilled it inside of us all?
Report Post »joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:37amHere we go again with the hocus pocus. All of you should watch the series “How the Universe Works.” It may help clear up a lot of misconceptions you’re burdened with.
Report Post »Mia Cav
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:03amMIVOYSES: That is the most brillant treatis on God I have ever read! Thank you!
Report Post »joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 8:34amThink about this: Who would have a truer understanding of the world: an ancient group of illiterate bronze age people or modern humans? Ancient people generated concepts to explain things as best they could. For modern people to accept their answers above their own is simply foolish and lazy. As understanding and information increases, new and more valid ideas and consepts follow and they should not be discounted. We‘re approaching a time where religion is irrelevant and when we’re finally there globally, it will be a positive step forward for everyone.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:22amjoei234,
Where did the big bang occur? Time and space are products of the big bang so it couldn’t have been in empty space. Scientists say it was infinitely hot. There were no molecules to react so how could it have been hot? Heat is also a product of the universe.
If one quark had acted differently, the whole universe thing wouldn’t have worked. Study what scientists call the “fine tuning” of the universe.
I believe the whole thing requires an intelligent first cause. The term for that in ancient Hebrew would be “Yahweh”.
Report Post »Stoic one
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 9:31amNOVELATOR
nicely said.
Report Post »joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:12pmGod is a man made idea and nothing more. If you think it’s all real, you are wrong. It’s not. Sorry.
Report Post »mikee1
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 6:37amSee UFO INTERLOPERS and other UFO tales at Barnes and Noble NOOK and Amazon Kindle.
Report Post »Mop
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 6:15amNice! I love Astronomy :)
Report Post »MARCH4HIM
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 5:48amThis is how ……..GOD ….does …….ARTWORKS
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 5:32am“Globular Clusters Composed of Ancient Stars” the movie….
Starring…. Susan Sarandon and Martin Sheen.
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:55amYea, wont they be surprised when they wake up on the other side of life on earth. hope they get a chance to read the Book before it becomes too late for them. There is always hope while you are alive.
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 10:31amI’m taking it that the ancient stars are Sarandon and Sheen… and the Globular Clusters are a metaphor for the left? Lol.
Report Post »Tired-of-fools
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:57pmThe only problem is that George Burns is no longer with us to play God.
Report Post »C.Gallicchio
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 2:51amWOO-HOO a great shot of the Milky Way. have to use this one as my new desktop background.
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:10amGreat idea (setting as background)…I was tired of my other one anyway.
Report Post »PATRIOTGRUNT
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:59amCome on Blaze (Liz) here you go again. Still can’t get your facts straight. YOU ARE WRONG. You have forgotten to count the cluster in my pants. That makes it 161 Clusters . Got to go. Got to scratch the new found Cluster.
Report Post »knighttemplar999
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:42amI have to be more careful of what I eat. I just flushed some globular clusters and judging by the mammoth size of them and the difficulty of the ‘birthing process’ those globular clusters are very old indeed.
Report Post »Gratitude
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:55amHow can there be any doubt that there is a Creator.
Report Post »Albert Einstein:
“In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views.”
“I‘m not an atheist and I don’t think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangements of the books, but doesn’t know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God.”
Ferrarello
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:06amI’am writing that down.
Report Post »Lumbar Spine
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:46amGee…I wonder how old God’s universe is.
Report Post »Cat
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 6:14amInfinity in all dimensions.
Report Post »Eliasim
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:43amDo people know why we are on earth instead of living oh I don’t know, like on the moon for example? Because it sucks. And besides, God isn’t going to let people leave earth to poison other planets anyways.
Report Post »Latter-Day-Soldier
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 5:58amIt’s liberal social policies that keep us Earth bound. Latest example: Obama ordering N.A.S.A. to make muslims feel good about their “contributions” to the world and regulating our astronauts to back seat passengers on Russian rockets.
Report Post »The only “poisoning” I see is the Liberal mentality poisoning the human mind.
banjarmon
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 12:42amGod’s universe is Awesome!!!
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 7:48amThat it is brother, that it is.
Report Post »joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:53pmYou should Zeus’ Universe!
Report Post »joei234
Posted on October 20, 2011 at 1:54pmYou gotta see Pan’s Universe. Amazing.
Report Post »