Newt Gingrich Floats Sarah Palin for Potential VP Slot, Cabinet Secretary
- Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:22pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »

AP
GOP presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich is sinking in the polls but nevertheless said he would consider former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as a potential vice presidential running mate.
“I am a great admirer of hers and she was a remarkable reform governor of Alaska, she’s somebody who I think brings a great deal to the possibility of helping in government and that would be one of the possibilities,” the former House Speaker said in response to a question about Palin during a tele-town hall Wednesday.
He didn’t stop there — Gingrich also suggested the 2008 GOP vice presidential candidate could be a good pick for “some very important cabinet positions.”
“There are also some very important cabinet positions that she could fill very, very well,” he said. “I can’t imagine anybody who would do a better job of driving us to an energy solution than Gov. Palin, for example. Tell her that she would certainly be on the list of one of the people we would consider.”
Palin has held off on endorsing anyone in the GOP race, saying earlier this month she’s not willing to do so “with the field as it stands.”
Listen to the audio below, via Mediaite:




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (232)
Rational Man
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:55amDesparate for the conservative vote there Newt?
Report Post »AhLeahIris
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:35amDesperate for the conservative vote? You Betcha! They all are: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1OI
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:49amNewt would make a good Democratic Governor in some place like Californis. I dunno, is Bernie Sanders retiring? He could do well in that role.
If Newt is a conservative, then I am ashamed to be called one. He is a Big Government RINO. Sarah Palin couldn’t even get him the nomination. It would be worse than 2008.
Report Post »silentwatcher
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 4:41amdon’t do it Palin…..you’re known by the company you keep. You still have a future in politics…..go with Paul but stay away from Newt. I mean, hey, look at his record,,,,,,,proven dishonesty.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 5:40amStay home, Palin!
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 6:00amMisleading headline, BLAZE. Manipulative story. But it serves to get people to associate Gingrich and Palin (now doesn’t that just remind you of Mc Cain and Palin?–you know, the ones who LOST to Obama?), which is not a great idea for Gingrich at this time. Palin would not bring along any votes which would otherwise go to Obama– NO WAY. He did not “float” the VP idea– the interviewer did– and Gingrich graciously answered, right away mentioning the Cabinet idea to detract from the VP idea. Thumbs down on this one.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 6:35am@GetLife – I have NO idea how you found the headline misleading. I went back and re-read the story twice and the headline matches it completely. Keyword in the headline – “FLOATS” -
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 7:24amThe self-proclaimed “great intellectual” is barking up the Palin tree? Oh my!! Yummy!!
Report Post »KeystoneState
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 7:35amWhat a political whore this man is to try to fool the right in this way. Disgusting. If Sarah goes along with this, any respect I have remaining for her is LOST! I thought Nancy was your main squeeze there Newt!
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 8:02amBreaking News from Newsmax.com
Rev. Wildmon Urges Christians to Back Newt Gingrich, Says Election Most
Report Post »Critical , and Thomas Sewell, a highly respect professor, endorses Newt. Conservatives must stop bashing the Republican candidates and get off the Paul bandwagon (Charles Krauthamer says Paul is to the left of Obama). People do have honest conversions. I don’t know who is the best candidate at this point, but we have to beat Obama and stop believing all the trash that the MSM is putting out there. Anyone is better that Obama.
NHwinter
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 8:16amThere are no guarantees, no matter whom the Republicans vote for in the primaries. Why not vote for the candidate who has shown the best track record of accomplishments, both in office and in the debates? That is Newt Gingrich. With all his shortcomings, his record shows that he knows how to get the job done in Washington. Thomas Sowell
Report Post »jnobfan
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 8:28amNewt doesn’t want the job. Coming out with SP for VP should be a big fat clue. I like SP but she is red meat for the media and Newt knows it. His plan to run for POTUS was a very smart business decision that has worked extremely well. He now will want to slip away and let the serious people go about the business of campaining. He and SP have figured out that being Ann Coulter is much more fun than being a politician. Pays pretty well too.
Report Post »Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 9:15amdo you Blazers really want this guy ???
Report Post »NAFTA and GATT — In 1993, Gingrich proved himself invaluable to Clinton and the Democrats in Congress when he garnered enough Republican support to pass the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the precursor for development of an eventual North American Union, following the same trajectory that has occurred in Europe with the emergence of the EU. (See the October 15, 2007 “North American Union” issue of The New American, especially “NAFTA: It’s Not Just About Trade” by Gary Benoit.) The next year he followed suit by supporting the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO). As Minority Whip, he could have postponed the lame-duck vote on GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) that subjected Americans to the WTO. Gingrich’s Benedict Arnold act helped to hand over the power to regulate foreign commerce, a power reserved in the Constitution to Congress alone, to an internationally controlled body, making America’s economic interests entirely at the mercy of the WTO.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/2396-newt-gingrich-the-establishments-conservative
Tower7_TRUTH
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 9:19amthe fake crying set up by Newts Republican buddy, now Using Palin
If she wants any credibility then she better decline quickly……
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 9:44am@FLIPPER :”I wonder if Newt would consider being Sarah’s VP?” Sarah isn’t that stupid…I would lose all respect for her if she got herself anywhere Newt..I would never have known just what a traitor progressive Communist Newt is if he hadn’t decided to run..never would have checked his record..We all need to start vetting the records of our Congressmen and Senate and fire any one of them who are not upholding our Constitution and who are selling us out..We all need to take responsibilty for this..We need to educate educate educate and get people broken from the main stream media brainwashing scam of which FAUX NEWS is now a part…Vote for the Constitution…the Constitution set up under God and Jesus Christ.
Report Post »Wolf
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 10:04am@NWWinter… and who is this Rev Wildemon that I should pay attention to what he says? Sounds like a moron to me.
Report Post »junkmaninohio
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 10:32amIt won’t matter! The Establishment Republicans are too stupid to be the majority party. Obama will win reelection through massive voter fraud protected by Eric Holder’s DOJ and $1 Billion in campaign cash on hand.
Report Post »junkmaninohio
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 10:35amWon’t matter one bit. Obama will win reelection through massive voter fraud and $1 Billion in the bank. Republicans have proven they are too stupid to be the majority party.
Report Post »MonkeyBeagle
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 11:10amSo Fake, Newt Thinks WE ARE DUMB. Happy New Year everyone http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BWD9GWHGiI
Report Post »ninja
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 11:16amto NHWINTER: you are mistaken if you think just anyone is better than Odumba. It is that mindset that has led us to where we are today. Another big government/constitution ignoring candidate will still lead us over the brink, only a little slower than Odumba. It all depends upon the people, not the politicians. When WE THE PEOPLE decide to turn the bus around , instead of just slowing its speed or slightly altering its course, we will be making a real difference. Newt & Romney are just John McLame in a less-unattractive package. A vote for the establishment RINO is a wasted vote; whether he/she wins or not. It guarantees more of the same big govt policies & big govt candidates.
Report Post »K. Iandoli
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 11:41amMy thought too, He is trying to get the Tea Party Vote. Nice try, see right through that one.
Report Post »Sleazy Hippo
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 11:43amThese two POSERS (fake candidates) could really clean up with promotion sales if nominated!
Report Post »And if elected…Priceless!
Hey! Does the Straw Ballot include a discount at Amazon for their “Presidential” writings collection? They could compile quite a Library. They could hold book signing appearances whenever a new Bill was ready to be passed. They are good at that, but Calista might injure Sarah with her razor-sharp hairdo.
NHwinter
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:20pmWOLF – Wildmon, founder of the American Family Association, is one of the nation’s most respected Christian leaders and has been at the forefront for decades in fighting for traditional values against a rising tide of secularism.
Read more on Newsmax.com: Rev. Wildmon Urges Christians to Pick Gingrich in Most Crucial Election
NINJA – who exactyly do you support? I will still take anyone over Obama. We are all trying to figure out who is best. Give us your candidate!!! I haven’t made up my mind yet.
Report Post »OneTermPresident
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:53pm@RATIONAL MAN… I see you still haven’t put capital I and a capital R in front of your avatar.
Report Post »HippoNips
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 4:02pmGingrich is a conservative and most like Reagan
He was endorsed this week by the ffamed conservative economist Prof. Thomas Sowell, whose been debating and defending conservative economic principles for decades.
Gingrich aslo got the endorsement of Art Laffer this week….hes Reagans economic advisor
And Reagan’s conservative son…Michael Reagan
Ron Pauls endorsement? Acmedinajad
Report Post »Romney’s? meghan mcaain and christian odonnell
MYHEROISRON
Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:35am… Sarah already made one mistake with McCain, Newt. She’s not that stupid to make another with you.
Report Post »Bete Noire
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:30amAbsolutely nothing but whorish attempt by Gingrich to pull Palin/Tea Party support before Iowa. He can’t afford to slip to 4th in Iowa or he is done and he knows it.
Just another one of Newt’s arrogant pronouncements that he thinks “the little people” are not clever enough to see through. What an arrogant sonofabitch.
Report Post »Cosmos102
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:37amAny candidate who chooses Palin for V.P. would be making the right choice in my opinion. She brings solid Conservatism to the ticket. Newt’s a smart man.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:56amI would lose any respect that I might have for her if she accepted.
Report Post »Detroit paperboy
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:59amI got twenty bucks , says he forgot to tell Sarah about this …..
Report Post »Bete Noire
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:12amCOSMOS – I never said anything negative about Palin – simply that Newt is being a whore throwing her name around to attract votes.
Report Post »Cosmos102
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:23amHi Bete.
It’s cool. I’m just adding my 2 cents.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 8:36amI wonder if Newt would concider being Sarah’s VP ?
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 10:15am@ASHSTOASHES
Report Post »That was somewhat in Jest
Sarah would need to pick someone like herself
Who says what they mean an mean what they say.
Kinda leaves Newt Out I like his intellect but Wishy- Washy
on to many issues.
Maybe Marco Rubio or Allen West ?
Fighters who will stand up to Obama an his Minions !
Sleazy Hippo
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 11:46amHow do you think Sarah was selected for VP last time? Same thing! And yes, McCain did think the American electorate was too simple minded to see through the fact she was only selected to be the anti-Hillary, (who was being floated as the DemonRat VP choice).
Report Post »PJL
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:28amBoy getting desperate, with Palin name dropping…Not going to happen.
Report Post »13th Generation American
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:18amPeace is our right, we should seek it all all cost
Report Post »decendentof56
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 6:36amPeace is not your “right” any more than food stamps, freedom, or owning your own home are “rights.” You have to fight to maintain peace, fight for your freedom, and get an education so you can have a job to earn the money to buy a home. The education and job will take care of the food stamp issue.
Report Post »JustPeachy
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:18amI think Newt is trying to pull a McCain, although we all know how that turned out! She wasn’t enough power to get that dingy over the line!
I don’t think she could do it for old Newt, either–sorry, Newt!
As for Palin, I think it would be a very bad move for her, too. Her association with McCain did her no political favors–it would be the same with Newt.
I have a hunch about ANOTHER candidate and a possible VP choice, but I won’t even say it because while I may be very wrong, I could be very right and I don‘t want to even take a chance at ruining a good strategy if that’s what may be planned.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:38amJUSTPEACHY..I think I know what you are thinking..but time will tell..there’s another good one that could run with that candidate. But 2 libertarians would be a pretty good guess.
Report Post »Lars Skipole
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:12amI would have no respect for Sarah if she hooked up with Newt. I would think Santorum, Bachmann, or Perry, but I dont know with their chances are. I would be afraid Perry would make another stupid mistake, especially.
Report Post »KangarooJack
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:06amSpare me- Honestly, spare me.
The Nwet of the 80′s {which I recall} comes flaring back…gee, doubt Palin even knows about this. Friend of all and partners with many….{sigh}
I need a hero and so far…not so much….
Report Post »softunderbelly
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 4:05amGive Santorum a hard look. Although I don‘t think he’ll get the nod, I‘m almost certain he wouldn’t disappoint.
Report Post »Elliesr
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:01amI like Sarah Palin but I believe it’s a big mistake to pick her for VP, look at what happened last time and we surely don’t want another repeat & four more years of Obama. A cabinet position is a different story.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:46amMost of us didn’t vote for McRino. We voted for Palin and against Obama.
Report Post »2008‘s Republican loss was NOT Palin’s fault!
Whoever she runs with is benefited.
She has the conservative vote.
Gingrich?…..not so much!
ashestoashes
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:53am@RATIONALMAN I voted for Palin too..a lady came to me and said she could not vote for Mcain because “what if McCain died and Palin was left in charge?’ Yeah..wouldn’t that have been a shame.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:01amThe press did denomize her..or rather dumbized her..but that is the Saul Alinsky method..but really..look at what she had to run with..McCain was somewhat braindead..He had worked for Soros..McCain was nothing but a liberal in Republican clothing..The man was a spineless sap.. I saw one lady fearful that Obama was an Arab…he took her hand and lovingly reassured her that not to worry..that Mr. Obama was a good family man and that if he won..she would be in good hands..He got a standing boo on that one..He actually seemed to obey every command from the team Obama ..he jumped when the Obama team said jump//He catered to their every whelm..like he was owned by them. I saw that Sarah was stifled..I saw her biting her tongue a lot..After they have done what they have to her..I don’t know that she would stand a chance..but I sure like the woman.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:42am@ Ashes
Report Post »I was thinking the same thing — “McCain is quite old, he might leave the scene in a year and it would be President Palin” I voted for Sarah Palin. As for Gingrich: he‘s not conservative and he’s not so old.
Cause4Liberty
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 4:10am@ashes. I was watching a Saturday Night Live special on VH1. They had a 2008 episode 3 days before the election where McCain appeared on the show with Tina Fay acting as Sarah Palin. It was almost sickening to watch and see that he knew he wasnt going to win.
Newt is desperate.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 8:55amSarah Palin did not lose the election in 2008
Report Post »John McCain did by muzzleing Sarah (read Going Rogue)
If She had been at the top of the ticket Obama would still be a Senator.
Everyone I know Held their nose an voted McCain because of Sarah.
Sarah Palin is not what’s wrong with the Republican Party.
She‘s the Cure to what’s wrong with the Party.
louise
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 9:14amFlipper
One thing I can say about Palin, she sure knows how to market herself. She is her own ‘brand’….and she knows how to keep her face and name in the spotlight.
I do not think that reality tv stars who need to brush up on history and geography is what America needs to be restored, though. Same thing with the nonsense with Trump.
RON PAUL 2012
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 9:54am@ LOIUSE
1st off Sarah was right about Paul Revere
2nd she never said she could see Russia from her house.
that was the Twit from SNL.
Her TV show was great an Promoted Alaska the State She LOVES.
I‘m suprised you didn’t mention her Quitting like the rest of the Trolls.
We know the truth about that LIE too.
Those lies might work on MSNBC but notsomuch here.
You end with RON PAUL 2012
Report Post »I like Ron but he won’t be the Nominee an even if he was
Obama an his minions would TEAR HIM TO PIECES .
We need a Fighter to beat Obama in 2012
An it ain’t Mitt or Ron sorry.
ashestoashes
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 10:33am@CHUCK STEIN..He is not so old..yes I know…I don’t even know how we have allowed people like him to be in positions of power..He has come to the forfront..we need to get him out of power..I wonder if there is such a thing as an honest politician? We need to hold them accountable for what they do and make sure that they are abiding by our Constitution. I believe Sarah and Paul are honest..but then again,,they aren’t the establishment quo.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 10:37am@CAUSE4LIBERTY..I had no respect for McCain at all..I knew how he disrespected Sarah..She was the only one who gave him any credibility at all..She was enough to scare the socks off of Obama..I remember when he went to Clinton..and in a summation of what Sean Hannity said. of Obama to Clinton..”Please help me Godfather..what to do?”
Report Post »louise
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 11:12amFlipper
I can see you are a fan of Palin. I am not. I never mentioned SNL which is normal for me since that is not watched in our home. I was thinking of the Glenn Beck interview where she said North Korea was our ally. Beck corrected her.
I disagree with your statement that Obama would tear Ron Paul apart. Americans know who is able to defend Liberty and what is meant by Constitutionally correct domestic, economic, and foreign policy. Paul would tear Obama apart because Obama knows nothing about what the constitution allows and does not allow government to do. And Paul would do it humbly and with class.So who do you think would win that debate….the Constitutionalist, or the Progressive…..?
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:38pm@ LOIUSE
Sorry about the North vs South thing I didn’t hear that one
Everyone makes mistakes (57 states comes to mind)
in answer to your question Constitutionalist Everytime.
but Obama is will unlease his minions to Destory Ron Paul
They will paint him as a racist /( his newsletters ) to get the black vote.
They will call him a antisemite / to get the Jewish vote.
They will make him look like the Crazy Uncle in the attic to
the uninformed (Ross Perot)
I like most of what he says I just don’t believe he will win the Nomination.
or the election.
The establishment wants Romney but he won’t FIGHT Obama
Heck They’ll spend 2hr debate patting each other on the back !
We need a FIGHTER because Obama’s going to use every dirty trick in the book.
We need a LEADER in 2012 an I think Sarah’s that leader.
Report Post »So can we respectfully agree to disagree ?
louise
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:15pmFlipper, yes we can respectfully disagree with one another. you are right about the progressives (both democrat and republican) trying to paint Ron Paul as someone who should be kept in an attic someplace. They do this because they know that it is the records of the candidates that people look at. Their records up against his record. It is no contest.
Here is a letter that his wife Carol wrote about he husband. I think you might enjoy reading it. Happy New Year
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/paul-carol1.html
Report Post »conservativewoman
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:59pmAnother great reason why I like Newt. I think Sarah would make a great VP or head of the Department of Energy.
Report Post »Great minds think alike.
jzs
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:18amNewt says, ““I am a great admirer of hers and she was a remarkable reform governor of Alaska…” Actually she served only a half term as governor of Alaska and then quit. Right wingers agree that she quit for the the good of the state. Those on the left also agree that it was best for the state for her to quit. Everybody agrees that it was a good thing that Sarah Palin quit the governorship, the left, the right, and the citizens of Alaska. So, having failed there, I agree she should be VP or have a cabinet position in the most powerful nation in the world.
Of course I don’t really. I think it’s absurd. That was sarcasm. But I do hope that President Obama runs against Gingrich instead of Romney. That would be an easier contest.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:50amYou think Newt is a great mind? have you ever looked at Newts record and how he has helped the American people..Newt is not a man of the people..he is a man who has put it to the American people.
Report Post »He’s big government
He supports the UN
He is behind one of the biggest government land grabs in history
and now the government has plans to grab millions of acres spanning 11 states/
newt is for policing the world and spending a trillion each year to do it.
Newt was behind the Global Warming Scam..
Newt is for taxing you into oblivion
You really need to research Newt.
MeteoricLimbo
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:44am@conservativewoman
Report Post »I would have to agree with you and frankly I am curious as to why the “field” is waging war on each other and not the enemy. A man is judged by what he has done and not by elevating himself by running the other guy down from my perspective.
Baddoggy
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:54amConservative woman…You need to change your name to RINOwoman if you support Newt. He is not a conservative. You have been brainwashed lady. Newt is a big government say what he thinks you want to hear politician. If you took all the BS out of him he would float away…
Report Post »Wake up America.
reform
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 6:50amJZS you really need to learn a little bit more about Sarah Palin, you and I know the reason why you are against the woman don’t we? And please don‘t pretend like you don’t know what I am talking about.
Report Post »reform
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 7:02amWho in our Senate or House of Representatives is not big government? Is it the president that writes the bills? When people wake up and know that our battle is to fight and get conservatives to replace what we have in there now then we will not win the battle, we can say that Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck is the president for all that matters. The way I see it the president submits a budget the president is also the leader of the free world, but when you have people representing you and adhering to the Constitution the president becomes irrelevant does it not. And when people are in office that represent you and adhere to the Constitution that becomes the winning ticket, for if you have a moral majority they can then override his veto. Until we realize this and literally demand they hear us at this time it‘s only right to leave them a message no matter how long they’ve been in office that their time will be up. Out of context you have Nancy Pelosi daughter making a statement that her mother wants to leave but the special interest groups will not allow her if they all get this message that we won’t tolerate it and they can be replaced then and only then will things change. My vote is for Mickey Mouse!
Report Post »knighttemplar999
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:57pmbeauty and the beast
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:01amSarah is not a beast.
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:56pmOf course he’s a “great admirer” of Palin. His ship’s sinking and he needs something to plug the holes.
RON PAUL 2012!
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:01amHe just likes her caboose.
Report Post »johnokee1
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:12amI appreciate Ron Pauls committment to getting government out of our business, however his foriegn policy is very childish. He isn’t thinking clearly. Even if we stop bombing and warring with the Arabs, their ethos is world domination and they will not stop until every infidel is converted to Islam,
I wish I could have a mix of Paul, Santorum and Trump in the running. That is probably impossible since it means that at least one politician would need to be firing on all cylanders.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:14amThe dream team! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4DRZP9JgBA
Report Post »William Hemenway
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:50amRon Paul supporters might as well just vote for Obama you are all mindless tools and by tools I mean Richard craniums be a little more realistic and help the country not some wack job who blames America for 911
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:05amYes, William. Mindless tools who are willing to have a civil conversation, only to have people like yourself who can only express themselves through insults and chest beating. Very mature of you.
JOHN, I understand your concern about those who want to forcibly convert the whole globe. But, I beleive that the majority of Muslims don’t think that way. Oh well difference of opinion. Have a Happy New Year.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:14am@JOHN You think Ron Paul’s foreign policy is crazy? Do you realize that we are 16 trillion in debt and that Obama has just put in for another 1.5 trillion to keep the government from shutting down? When do you think that might happen John? Do you know what will happen when it does? We won’t be having to worry about staying at war because we will not even be able to defend ourselves..The military has been advised that in the event of a collapse that the American people are to be viewed as terrorists..(Fema Camps )Martial Law..UN Obama is set to sign the Iindefinite detention bill in which they can kidnap you from the street and keep you in Guantanamo Bay without charges or trial and torture you indefinitely..Have you heard of Agenda 21..government officials just met at the World Summit to discuss 100 new ways to tax you. The Constitution is the only thing to stop foreign theocracies from overtaking us..Paul wants to build our military here..and if Congress decides we need to go to war..get in..win..get out..no cold wars..China doesn’t war..Sweden doesn’t war..China could give us a good run for our money because she isn’t in the hole spending trillions every year..Stop watching tv news. They don’s tell you the truth and they withhold things from you ..It’s called brainwashing.
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:37amDo you really think they have the power to take over the world? They fight among themselves, much less have the ability to unite and conquer the world. Anyone who believes that they can some how take over the world is the one with childish thoughts. Go to sleep or the boggy man will get you! Oh no!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 10:53am@WILLIAM You say Paul supporters believe that we are to blame for 9/11..Those were the findiings of the CIA investigations.. as far as Muslims overtaking the world..how do you propose that they will do that..It is my understanding that we have been welcoming them here since 1964..We now have one for President..he was a Senator before becoming President was he not? WHen he became President ..300-350 jobs opened for them in government. and under Obama’s watch..we have received most likely over 2 million more muslim immigrants..Do you think that these wars have kept them out? Paul wants to close our borders…no more immigration..the Constituition would keep at bay our greatest enemies..the theocracies of Communism and Islam…
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:56pmRon Paul says he might not support his rivals for the Republican presidential nomination. In an interview Friday with Bloomberg News, the Texas congressman said the other GOP contenders represent the “status quo” and do not differ much from Democrats. Paul says he would have trouble backing any of them and wants to wait and see if they adopt any of his priorities, such as auditing the Federal Reserve. ( unrelated to article)
Report Post »pwatkins
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:09amRon Paul says he would have trouble backing any of them and I bet that feeling is mutual from all of the other candidates and the majority of the US….but of course I am sure our enemies abroad love Ron Paul. I am against the Federal Reserve too, but don’t want to risk our security as a nation to gain one good thing from a president, when there is much more to worry about. Paul is a failure on the one thing the POTUS should be in place for, to protect American lives.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:29amPWatkins, I am voting for Paul and I will tell you why. I do not listen to the media hacks anymore. They are lying to you. I have become so disappointed in our news channels, all, as I never see any truth from them anymore. It is just a ratings game with them. War gets them good ratings. War makes big money for the companies in line with the establishment. We have had two families that have been in charge for over three decades in Washingtons most powerful positions. Bushes and Clintons. I am concerned that that does not concern anyone here on The Blaze. You think Romney or Gingrich who have been in league with these same people are going to do anything different than what has been being done? How safe do you feel at this time in history? Do you feel safer today than say, twenty years ago? Progressive big government people. Do not let them fool you. Paul offers a chance to try to turn 180 degrees in the opposite direction, back to all of us experiencing what it was like to actually have individual liberty again, which we have not had for some time. Everyone says his economic policy is right on, the best of all the candidates, but oh, his foreign policy is scary. How has the current foreign policy done for you? Just look at this and get back to me: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=351761#ooid=VtMWZ2MjoZHMco4i8lZolGtHwphRu_Xt This is Pauls foreign policy in a nutshell. We are broke! We cannot afford to continue. Time is running out.
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:40amHow well will be fare in defense of our nation if our economy and currency collapses?
You can worry about the boggy man in the sand box all night long, I’m more worried of the roof collapsing on my head while I sleep.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:02amWatch this video, Paul = Reagan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FdwxnjV-nM
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 3:00amLoved the video West Coast.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 3:36am2012 ron paul/jesse ventura 2012
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDBbh4lNxaY
Why have one Nut? when two makes a set
RepubliCorp
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 3:47amWEST COAST PATRIOT “Watch this video, Paul = Reagan”
Report Post »Here is another letter from Paul ( I am sure Paul never read it and will lie and say he didn’t write it) “I want to totally disassociate myself from the policies that have given us unprecedented deficits, massive monetary inflation, indiscriminate military spending, an irrational and unconstitutional foreign policy, zooming foreign aid, the exaltation of international banking, and the attack on our personal liberties and privacy,” Paul wrote in a letter offering advice to the Republican party: not a letter about the Obama administration — a letter about the Reagan administration. Paul is not a conservative…..Paul =Kook
novelator
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 8:21amRepublicorp wrote: Why have one Nut? when two makes a set
At least there’d finally be a real pair in Washington, unlike both parties of the “newtered” Congress and White House we have now…
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:53pmA bad idea is like a good turd, they both float.
And witches, because they are made from wood.
Report Post »nowhereman
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:53pmIceberg ahead!!!!!
Report Post »pwatkins
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:51pmNewt is definately out of bounds here, bc he is reaching for straws to hang in there with the tea party. I really can’t see Palin supporting Newt much less being his VP. I see her standing more with Perry, Santorum, or Bachmann, but who knows what will happen…wouldn’t be surprised by anything. I am hoping to see Perry/Palin in 2012.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:58pmI see your point.
Report Post »jeezpeeps
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:20amI like Palin… but to think she wouldn’t run with Newt..??? She ran with McCain.
Report Post »Larry
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:50pmThere were plenty of folks who voted for the ticket of Mc Cain/Palin simply because they liked Palin. I believe that Newt is simply trying the same tactic.
Report Post »GUNNSUP
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:42amMcLame…what a joke that guy turned out to be. I believe he took one to many shots to the head in that NVA prison camp. God Bless him for his service, but he is one sorry ass excuse for a R senator. He knows they have pissed us of & thats why they are trying to get this NDAA bill signed into law…..They know they are part of the problem and the people want some heads to roll! Maybe literally……
Report Post »shall not be infringed
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:46pmI don’t think that Sarah would be able or willing to lower her morals/standards enough to be Newts VP.
Report Post »unsafe
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 1:19amShe did with Mcain! and she is the only reason I voted for the rino.At less Newt would be no hard bars with Obama and would let Sarah go after him ,like Mccain won’t. Ron Paul is off his rocker, Perry just god bless his little sole,M.B. like her but she needs more the just getting on the health care bill and all of her kids she started turning me off , Romeny is a Obama light, and the others just jumps all over the place. But Newt is smart to pick Sarah a very good choice. Just as long as the O freak goes down.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 9:28am@UNSAFE
Report Post »I think your right about Newt an Sarah they would both go after Obama.
Problem is Romney Won‘t He couldn’t even bring himself to call Obama
A Socialist on O‘Reilly even though we all know He’s A Marxist/ Communist.
(much worse than socialist)
Obama is going to run the Nastiest Campaign Ever seen.
We need a FIGHTER .not another McCain !
FreedomWatch
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:43pmSarha needs a high ranking cabinet position that allows her an opportunity to gain some experience – Sec of State would not be her calling by Director Sec State would work…
Report Post »go2gym
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:52pmShe bought a house in Arizona, and Arizona Senator John Kyl is retiring. Just an observation.
Report Post »go2gym
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:42pmPlease float that idea out of mind.
Report Post »Californiasodbuster
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:37pmThey sound good to me, i have my a ss covered with both hands, bring on the hate.
Report Post »LovingAmerica
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:36pmI cannot believe Sara would make the same mistake twice. Newt is just dreaming.
Report Post »William Hemenway
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:54amI can’t believe Newt would make that mistake she only appeals to the base the rest of the country hates her because of left wing media but they still hate her
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 2:55am@William Hemenway
Report Post »Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:54am
I can’t believe Newt would make that mistake she only appeals to the base the rest of the country hates her because of left wing media but they still hate her
****
What you don’t realize is HER BASE IS WAY BIGGER THAN THAT “Lil Clique ” THE REST OF THE COUNTRY & THE LSM! ! She‘s the ONLY one who’s constantly got to move her speeches to a BIGGER venue, in the political realm. Not at all like jb & bo, who have a majority of the seats vacant even going out and bringing in college kids. I KNOW DEMOCRATS, INDEPENDENTS, AND REPUBS (not RINO’s) WHO ALL LOVE HER! WE JUST HAVE TO GET HER OFF mccAIN’S & THE RINO repub’s leash, and let her have at them!
flipper1073
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 11:43am@ William
Report Post »may I call you Bill ?
If Sarah Palin were to rent Hawkeye Stadium next Tuesday Night
for a Restoring America Rally
The Republican Party would have to cancel the Caucuses.
Because most Republicans would be at the Rally.
OK the Paul people might stay home or go to a 3rd Party.
The People of America LOVE Sarah Palin
The MSM an The Washington DC Elites Hate her / Fear her.
which is ONE of the reasons The People Like her.
They don’t like the MSM or The Washington DC Establishment/ Elites
Maxim Crux
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:35pmHe is an admirer of hers because she is far more popular and much more genuine
Report Post »roadhog
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:33pmNewt Better check with his Tifenany Wife She Controls Him. This sould Drive the Liberal Communists Nuts.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:40pmI honestly don’t think that Sarah would work with a cr@@k like Newt.
Report Post »KeystoneState
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:44pmOh please, stop! Newt, most of us are not fools! We don’t want you!
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:33pmI‘m sure several candidates would appreciate Palin’s endorsement–or any other help she would provide. But, what does Sarah think? WWSD???
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:38pmSarah is the next President and Newt can get in if he stops being so old school big government. Go Sarah, you don’t need to be 2nd to anyone. We will support you to the death. We pledge our lives.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 8:12pmSarah and Bachmann. In any order would be fine with me. Newt is a RINO and Sarah won’t fall for another one like McCain.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:25pmNOW EVERY STUPID CLOWN on the blaze is gonna jump on the newt dinghy when he’s playing them like a guitar.
Report Post »txwheels
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:32pmSHEEESH! Even though I don’t like Newt, I at least thought he had a little common sense, but I guess not.
Report Post »P C BE DAMNED
Posted on December 30, 2011 at 11:40pmtx
Report Post »Shut the f up, fool.
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on December 31, 2011 at 12:06amOr he could play us like your favorite instrument, the skin flute.
Report Post »