Politics

Newt: ‘Romney Would Buy the Election if He Could’

Newt: Romney Would Buy the Election if He Could

Even though he finished a distant forth in the latest Des Moines Register poll released Saturday, the same poll he topped only one month ago, Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich still believes the race in Iowa is far from over despite the state’s first-in-the-nation caucuses set to kick-off in only two days.

While fileding questions from reporters after Sunday mass, the former Speaker of the House took a jab at poll leader Mitt Romney. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports on Gingrich’s sharp words about the Romney campaign:

“’You figure out between 2007 and 2008 and 2011 and 2012 how many dollars per vote Romney has spent and it will rival [New York City Mayor Michael] Bloomberg,’ Gingrich told reporters after attending a service at Saint Ambrose Cathedral. Bloomberg, Gingrich added, ‘did buy an election. Romney would buy the election if he could.’”

While Romney has had a good deal more money to spend than Gingrich, POLITICO’s Alexander Burns notes that Romney has actually not spent as much this cycle when compared to his 2008 campaign, and there is no indication that he self-funded in the first three quarters of the year.

In the final poll before the Iowa caucuses released Saturday night by the Register, Romney came in first with 24 percent support with Gingrich finishing fourth with 12 percent. The former Speaker of House seemed unfazed by the poll which accurately predicted the state’s 2008 caucus winners.

“The most accurate part of the poll is that 41 percent could change their opinion, and I think that is an understatement,” Gingrich said Sunday. “This is wide open. I think the next 2 ½ days are going to be fascinating.”

 

Comments (128)

1 2 3
  • GadsdenGurl
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:43pm

    And so would PROGRESSIVE NEWT, end of story. Americans should REJECT both these progressive globalist warmongering HACKS.

    Report Post » GadsdenGurl  
    • ddg7
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 8:11pm

      Amen!

      Report Post »  
    • Chappy123
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 8:22pm

      So, who is left?

      Report Post »  
    • Captain Crunch
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 8:29pm

      Sarah Palin and Donald Trump

      Report Post »  
    • jzs
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 9:38pm

      Romney believed in global warming before he didn’t.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • Cosmos102
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 9:41pm

      Romney probably would buy the election if he could. He must have some serious cash cuz he won’t release his income tax statements.

      Love Gingrich’s straight talk. The man says it like it is.

      Report Post » Cosmos102  
    • jzs
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 9:42pm

      Yeah, well, Newt would buy the election if he could.

      But my question is, why won’t Romney releast his tax returns? My guess is that he paid less tax than you, but that’s just a guess.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 10:03pm

      yeah, exactly… so would you Newt… Romney pretty much tried.. look at his contributors and compare the number of total contributions to the amount of dollars collected… can anyone say “Vested Interest”?

      Report Post »  
    • NOBAMA201258
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 10:42pm

      Obama is buying it as we speak, people! Wake the hell up, heathens!

      Report Post »  
    • Return2Freedom
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 11:48pm

      lol… and do what? Vote for Obama? It is not likely we will find a candidate that we agree on everything they stand for. However, I would vote for any of our primary candidates over Barrack Obama.

      Report Post » Return2Freedom  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 12:04am

      I wanted to post. Thanks for beating me to it : ) Happy New Year.

      Report Post »  
    • TXPilot
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 12:45am

      I bet both Newt and Romney would buy the election if they could….on another note, I bet there are also thousands of people out there that wish they could just buy food and pay their electric bills. I have the distinct feeling, that no matter who wins the election in November, we are all gonna lose…..Enjoy the ride folks, because Rome is burning, while the only real choice we will all get, is which brand of gasoline to throw on the fire.

      Report Post » TXPilot  
    • The10thAmendment
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 1:11am

      It’s very possible that Romney would buy the election if he could. It’s more than possible that the commie gingrich would STEAL it given the opportunity. Like he’s trying to do in Virginia against the will of the people there.

      Report Post » The10thAmendment  
    • reform
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 2:39am

      I think you missed his point or have you not noticed the super packs from Mitt Romney and Ron Paul are the ones spending all this money to disgraced the man. So we have 2 on the ballot as of now Mitt Romney and Ron Paul one is the establishment and the other won’t garner 10% of the vote. So the question is if Newt Gingrich is the person that the powers that be want in office and is polling better than Mitt Romney why would they want to keep him off the ballot? The Supreme Court did us no justice when they allowed the super packs the strength that they received. and most say that he should uphold the 11th commandment of Reagan question is why should the man be able to defend himself. Personally I seen the same thing happen first to Sarah Palin and then Herman Cain and now it is the full out assault on Newt Gingrich, through my eyes it seems the establishment have become very on uneasy on knowing that Newt Gingrich could possibly be the nominee. Bid he or does he still have some harebrained ideas that have come back to haunt him absolutely do I agree with everything or his positions no but I do know the people in the Senate and House of Representatives are running scared of a possible Gingrich presidency! For he does know that the people in this country are angry just like they were in 1994 and he didn’t get any help from the Republicans to push measures forward think about that, for they have not changed but have expanded further.

      Report Post »  
    • reform
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 2:51am

      Cosmo for your information Mitt Romney estimated worth between 260 and $280 million dollars. He’s like Obama is he afraid to release his tax burden or his charitable contributions? We seen how much Joe Biden has donated to charity what is Mitt Romney trying to hide personally I could care less if he was worth 1 billion. everybody likes the uses Morman religion and can’t get above 25% of the Republican vote, makes you think that it is not the religion holding him back it is his many stances that he has changed over the course of years. Having lived in Michigan when his father was governor his dad did a pretty good job for the people of Michigan but then again that was in a completely different era that this country faces now.

      Report Post »  
    • Jackers
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 8:43am

      And so would you if you could, Mr. Newt…

      Report Post » Jackers  
    • G.W. Dobbs
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:01am

      All the Politians would BUY OFFICE if they could. Jon Corzine of N.J. spent 60+ Million dolllars to get elected to the Senant, 20 Million of his own money. WHY? Because Corzine knew it was a GOOD INVESTMENT. We need to put TERM LIMITS on all elected and curtail their pay and benefits as well as holding them accountable for using Inside Knowledge to become Millionaires.

      Report Post »  
    • greysnake
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 10:28am

      Newt is such a progressive,he is endorsed by commies like Art Laffer and Thomas Sowell.Poor glenn drank the koolaide on this election,I pray the rest of you think for yourselves.I also pray glenn endorses romney so he can do for him what he did for bachmann.

      Report Post » greysnake  
    • JRook
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 12:06pm

      Neither of them has to. They both have big corporations and wealthy individuals who will buy it for them. You know the ones that own them and all the other politicians.

      Report Post »  
    • Bucky007
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 12:51pm

      Good Grief…
      Has the World ever seen a Bigger Whiner than Newt?

      Hey Newt, instead of bitching, explain to us, with specificity and in great detail, which ads, the Pacs, Romney, Perry, or Paul have run, which are not true?

      Mitt will at least address in detail anything attacks thrown his way.

      Chris Wallace of Fox called you a whiner, and ABC said everything in the ads are true.

      Newt is arguing “process”. The gloves are about to come off, and Mitt and his team is ready, for this unhealthy, fat, crybaby. The lean mean Romney machine will pummel the Humpty Dumpty doe-boy into the mat.

      Newt, did you take money, millions, from fanny and freddie or not?
      Newt, did you sit with Nancy Pelosi and promote cap and trade or not?
      Newt, did you attack Capitalism, or not?
      Newt, do any of your former House members endorse you or not?
      Newt, did you fool around on your sick wives and then marry your mistress”, or not?

      You did it to yourself Newt. You are “unfit” to be President. Hit the bricks.is the biggest whiner I’ve ever seen.

      Mitt is a free market Capitalist who will fix this Country. He has moved more to the right.
      He is the only one who can beat Obama.
      You ignorant people need to become pragmatic so that we can win.
      Wise up, Idealogues, wise up.

      Report Post »  
    • The Jewish Avenger
      Posted on February 23, 2012 at 12:35pm

      I would buy the presidency if I could! Then claim it on my taxes under CHARITY

      Report Post » The Jewish Avenger  
  • waluman353
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:39pm

    t cant believe the ignorance of the people out there….your country is being taken apart peice by peice…your being robbed daily by the federal reserve..you are all locked into the system with devalued home loans..the establishment weakens you and spreads the military so thin…no money ..no jobs..the fed lends over 16 trillion to banks..on top of being over 16 trillion in debt..every candidate is bought (like romneys bigest contributer is goldman sacs) YOU HAVE ONE CHOICE AND ONE CHOICE ONLY..RON PAUL!!! .if you dont see it that way than you havent examined the situation our country is in…most peolple dont even know that they lost there bill of rights YESTERDAY!…call it what you want and if you think you are educated because you watch fox news or read blaze articles you are going to be in for a serious reality check this year. ..you have one chance to save our country and constitution that is to vote for ron paul because A VOTE FOR RON PAUL IS A VOTE FOR FREEDOM!
    SAVE YOUR COUNTRY WHILE YOU STILL HAVE ONE.

    Report Post »  
    • Chappy123
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 8:26pm

      Thanks but, i’m not real sure that we do! May be a few years to late.

      Report Post »  
    • William Hemenway
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 9:01pm

      Please SHUT UP your as crazy as that old man go dig a bunker or something and prepare for the rapture ya fruit cake

      Report Post »  
    • reform
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 2:43am

      I’m to take you serious the last election cycle I looked at Ron Paul I dug deep into him and what I found I could not support the man these last articles about his past stances are so true, sorry that you continue to fall for his little cult. Yes I looked into the John Birch Society and the many others Alex Jones‘s of the world so don’t tell me I get my news from Fox or here on the blaze, and don‘t try to discredit my integrity or intelligence you back who you want if that’s what you believe.

      Report Post »  
    • reform
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 3:01am

      353 I respect your opinion but what say you that the Senate or House of Representatives did absolutely nothing about the 16 trillion lent to foreign banks, and you seriously think that one man will miraculously change this overnight? From reading your blogs you are well informed but for me the only real change will come when we have constitutional conservatives representing us in the Senate and House of Representatives and until that change happens we will continue down the path of destruction so therefore it is we the voters who have allowed this to continue on.

      Report Post »  
  • Clara88
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:02pm

    I don‘t like Romney at all and don’t like Newt too much either but HEY you gotta agree…It WORKED for Obama…didn’t it????

    Report Post » Clara88  
    • johnannegalt
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:15pm

      Ugh Romney is such a thug. Atleast Newt proved himself capable in 1994 and has a bit of experience.

      Now, for the candidate we want but can’t have.. http://markamerica.com/2011/12/30/the-candidate-we-want-but-cant-have/

      Report Post » johnannegalt  
    • Clara88
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:24pm

      I voted for Sarah LAST time NOT McCain…she is AWESOME

      Report Post » Clara88  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:25pm

      @John

      And that makes him even more qualified to be a whiner. He’s doing ORP (Occupy Republican Primary) in order to draw sympathy because of the disparity between his income as a career politician and Romney’s as a career Capitalist (Economic Freedom Fighter.) Romney is the 1% and Newt the 99%. Sniffle sniffle.

      Report Post »  
  • DianaRae
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:39pm

    Newt’s campaign is unorganized & incompetent. He whines when he doesn’t get on the VA ballot (but went to Hawaii & does a book tour)?

    Then he resorts to attacks once again using this liberal strategy – “Class Warfare.” Newt’s already used liberal strategies slamming Capitalism before, so I’m not surprised one bit on this.

    Report Post » DianaRae  
    • gogogoff
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:51pm

      I must agree, when he told Romney to give back his profits, I was shocked.

      Report Post »  
    • DRSAVAGE24
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:59pm

      What happened to Newt running a classy, polite campaign? This just goes to show that if you‘re a slimy politician you can’t run a clean campaign because eventually your opponents will start telling the truth about you and you’ll have to fight back. This is what we can expect from Obama in the general election as well. He can’t run a classy campaign because he is a dirtbag marxist. He has to get voters to vote against the Republican, not for him.

      Report Post »  
    • William Hemenway
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 9:03pm

      It is no different when Newt as a person running a company was told it was lobbying it was not and that was his point

      Report Post »  
    • reform
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 3:12am

      No Dr. Savage I guess he should just stand there and let everybody slap him in the face, he tried to do his best in all the debates which I had watched and not ruthlessly go after the fellow candidates, but now that time draws near and the attacks more often I’d be more inclined to do the same thing would you not? For the most part his primary focus was on Barack Obama and not his fellow candidates why is it okay for some candidates or their associates to go after somebody but it‘s not okay to defend yourself that’s real liberty. For me there is not one of them on the stage that adhere to all of what I believe it, as some say that is that the process of how we nominate our representative or is it. The main focus should have been all along how bad the present person holding office is doing and and how they will differ from him to change this country’s course. We have given the press more than enough to go after our elected candidate and not enough on our president policies as of now.

      Report Post »  
    • Simonne
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 12:30pm

      If he had the money, he would have negative ads either. Look at his past because he is definitely not a clean cut guy. Romney should never apologize for being rich. He couldn’t save all companies but he saved alot of them, such as Staples & they were able to expand & hire people. I’m so sick of Newt, the whine ass. Why doesn’t he just campaign because his whining is annoying.

      Report Post »  
  • nonofmybiznez
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:32pm

    Let me ask you…did you wake up to the truth of what is going on immediately or did it take time for you to see the light? Have you ever changed your mind about what the truth really is when you saw the facts?

    Report Post » nonofmybiznez  
  • marion
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:28pm

    I wonder how the question was worded in order for him to answer in such a way. Even though I do agree with Newt, he seemed to be explaining how things are going against him vice trying to do an acusatory statement.

    At this point in time, given the amount of money that can both be raised and spent by candidates, there should now be a top dollar limit a candidate can spend in a local area, state, and overall, including PAC money, just to keep the most money candidate from being able to capitalize and flood a market with ads. It was never foreseen a candidate would in this day and age be able to make this kind of money to campaign with, so it does need to be limited.

    Report Post »  
    • READRIGHTHERE
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:33pm

      I would feel that way too if I were a Bleeding Heart Liberal Democrat who was screaming for fairness. But I am not. I feel we need someone who actually understands the economy, not in terms of how “unfair” it is to be poor in this country, but someone who understands how to make things grow and produce and succeed. If by nature of his naturally acquired skills he also has a full wallet, and he is willing to spend it on his campaign, let him. Ads may be effective in convincing the light minded as to who should be president, but in this party at least, we should all be able to decided for ourselves based on what we have learned while seeking out information from multiple sources in this process.

      Romney / Paul 2012

      Report Post »  
    • wbalzley
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:06am

      @ReadRightHere: There is a STRONG correlation between the amount of money spent on political advertiseing and final election results. There is also evidence showing that negative campaign ads work better than positive ones…I guess that means most people in the USA are weak-minded?

      Report Post »  
  • qpwillie
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:22pm

    To a great extent, the only way to get the election is to buy it. How many poor people do you see in the running?

    Report Post » qpwillie  
  • RightThinking1
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:21pm

    Newt, on the other hand, would not…, and yet, and yet….., he is spending every dime that he can lay his hand on.

    Report Post »  
  • greezy1
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:20pm

    Good news…..Obama seems to be selling!!!!!!

    Report Post »  
  • thegreatcarnac
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:13pm

    That is what is wrong with the country now. Somewhere out there is a man, (a politician or not), that could run this country like a well-oiled clock. He can probably speak well and inspire the nation. People like this will never be president. They cannot acquire enough money. In the modern era of this country the presidential elections all have be bought in one way or another.

    Report Post »  
  • Tankertony
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:12pm

    Probably 2,345,857,112 humans would buy the position , ‘if they could’.
    Would Mitt Romney? I’m more inclined to say yes. But does that really matter?

    Report Post » Tankertony  
  • sgtstubbs
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:08pm

    The main thing is not to let the Senate or House become Democratic foothold.

    Report Post » sgtstubbs  
    • Lucy Larue
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:17pm

      SGTSTUBBS,
      You sir are dead on.
      Your post is the truest on this entire thread!
      Merci!

      Report Post »  
    • RightThinking1
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:35pm

      I am fully as concerned about that as the Presidential election. If the bickerers don’t get over this pretty quickly, they are going to cause moderate and swing voters to either stay away from the polls, or worse, much worse, vote (shudder) Dem.
      I am appalled when I hear Libertarians say that they simply won‘t vote if Paul isn’t the candidate. Listen up folks…, this election is NOT about ‘voting you conscience’, it is about who is going to be controlling the selection of judges, who is going to controlling spending, who is going to be issuing executive orders, who is going to be selecting the heads of DOJ, DOE, etc, etc.
      Carter, Clinton, and Obama (and Dem Congresses) have already done nearly irreparable damage via bad policies, bad judges, bad fiscal decisions, etc., etc.
      Snap out of it. Fight for your guy, but get out and VOTE for the most conservative people on the ballot. We might be fighting a rear-guard action, but we are still fighting. And I, at least, intend to continue.

      Report Post »  
    • DRSAVAGE24
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:57pm

      @RightThinking: I‘m appalled when establishment Republicans like Newt Gingrich say they won’t vote for Ron Paul if he is the nominee. It’s not just “Paulites” who say they won’t vote for the establishment. The establishment is saying it won’t support Paul.

      Additionally, I’m a Ron Paul supporter, but I could stomach voting for Michele Bachmann, maybe even Rick Santorum, if they were the nominee. I think many Paul supporters would agree with me that at least those two seem to have some honesty and integrity and some small government credentials. Romney and Gingrich literally are Obama-light. If your choice for president is no better than the guy currently there, why should a freedom-minded conservative vote for Gingrich or Romney? So our team wins and we get a Democrat with an ‘R’ behind his name in the White House? No thanks, the whole tea party movement spawned from a disgust with both parties. We’re fed up with the pandering and the lip service. We want someone we can trust to cut the size of government and get it out of our lives. That’s why Ron Paul is clearly the best candidate.

      Report Post »  
  • sgtstubbs
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:07pm

    Seem everyone of them would “buy” the election to me. I am really torn between Newt and Paul or you could say anyone except the one we have…

    Report Post » sgtstubbs  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:13pm

      Exactly. Another bone-headed remark by the “oh-so-intellectual” Newt.

      Report Post »  
  • Mr. Oshawott
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:54pm

    It all comes down to this: we vote for either returning to the Constitution and bringing back liberty, or we vote for more tyranny and government-sponsored corruption. One candidate is serious in abiding by it and defending it, the other candidates running against him (neo-conservatives) are for simply preserving the two-party status quo.

    Report Post » Mr. Oshawott  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 2:38am

      LAKE JACKSON, Texas (AP) — The last time Ron Paul’s congressional district was redrawn, he ended up with NASA’s Johnson Space Center as a new neighbor. A group of Houston businessmen soon invited their new congressman for a primer on the value of the space shuttle.

      Paul’s reply came in a note they thought was a joke. “He told them space travel isn’t in the Constitution,”

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • wbalzley
      Posted on January 2, 2012 at 6:12am

      I wonder, if we build colonies on the Moon and Mars, does the constitution give the government power to regulate inter-PLANETARY commerce?

      Report Post »  
  • PJL
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:52pm

    Newt you’re a Jerk. You have bought your way though Washington. Hypocrite!

    Report Post » PJL  
    • Lucy Larue
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:15pm

      PJL,
      Sad to see so many BLAZER’s sucking their Kool-Aid from the Republican Establishment straw.
      Is Karl Rove your hero?
      You post in hyperbole with no facts.
      Why is Newt Gingrich a hypocrite? Why?

      Of course Mitt Romney is not a hypocrite. Oh no….,not Mitt.
      Get your learn on PJL. Get your learn on. UGH!

      “We have met the enemy and HE is US”! POGO

      Report Post »  
  • c0mm0nsense
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:52pm

    Newt is so well thought of in his home state of Virginia, he failed to get enough support for his name to be on the ballot. Now Santorum, Bachmann, Perry, Huntsmen and Newt ( the 1 who is wanting to call judges up to congress for making law) Wants a judge to put them all on the VA ballot. What is the old saying ? Birds of a feather, flock together.

    Report Post » c0mm0nsense  
  • Dumbwhiteguy
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:44pm

    I think they are going to collapse the system before the next election. Evil 10,000 times hilter is on the way. We have no trust in the system and the people we have in charge now are not the Americans that we think they are. Look at this selection of czars. None of the people are at all interested in advancing the progress in the true light for the United States.

    When people think progressive they think progress. It is not the progress as we know it. It is evil progress. Unless you know who the enemy is the revelotion will be usless. It will take another 100 years for people to rise back up. Look at Iran. This was a measuring stick for the progressives and illuminati to see if the people could rise up against the regime, and they couldn’t.

    Like syria, they will let the people get killed and see how it is accepted because they are going to do the same over here. There is no one left to come to our aid. Our society has guns and that is why they need to pit us against each other, so the ones that aren’t killed in the first round, can be rounded up.

    The illuminati needs our country and canada to feed the slaves for the new world order.

    Report Post »  
    • saranda
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:28pm

      Aptly chosen name. Do you have to renew your tin foil hat each new years? Or does the old one have staying power?

      Report Post »  
  • garyM
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:39pm

    Romney/Huntsman 2012.
    Hope you Romney fans can swallow two democrats on the same ticket!
    Why wouldn’t Romney pick Huntsman, you can see they all stick together!

    Report Post »  
  • Baddoggy
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:08pm

    Choose a side…

    Founding Fathers and the Constitution OR
    RINO Republicans and the same old crap like this…

    That is the FACT about this election!

    Report Post » Baddoggy  
  • NickDeringer
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:08pm

    Newt would buy the White Houses if he coudl and then turn around and sell it to the highest bidder.

    Report Post » NickDeringer  
    • rock-n-roll-rebel
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:35pm

      I think that Newt has such a high opinion of himself that he would balance the budget and take what he wanted himself in the process, not to mention selling us out and continuing the road to Euro-socialisim while he is at it. A slower train to the same station. Romney is nothing more than a puppet to the republican party and would continue the same route as well. The only choice in this race is Rep. Paul if not we will have to see what independents are running because I won’t vote for either one of these RINOS either.

      Report Post » rock-n-roll-rebel  
    • Lucy Larue
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:03pm

      NICKDERINGER,
      I think that you are wrong in your post.
      Those that think like you have drunk from the Kool-Aid of the Republican Establishment.
      Of course as I read the posts on this thread you are not alone in your imbibing of establishment Kool-Aid.

      I would suggest to all who are buying the swill to get their learn on.

      Churchill was reviled and despised by the Parliamentarian Establishment . They embraced Chamberlain.

      Churchill saved England!

      Report Post »  
    • NickDeringer
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 7:37pm

      @Lucy Larue
      Newt Gingrich is the most estblishment guy in the race. Worse yet, he’s willing to support Nancy Pelosi and the DEMOCRAT establishment.

      Newt will not be the nominee.

      Report Post » NickDeringer  
  • CatB
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:07pm

    Isn’t that what Obama plans on doing? .. that and stealing the rest … 1 billion dollars … donation lottery …illegals telephone hotline so they can get a drivers license and vote…. etc.

    Report Post »  
    • 2theADDLED
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:04pm

      That is exactly what Barry is doing threatening vote for me or I will throw grandma off a cliff or that we will have dirtier water and air. Cut Foodstamps and SS playing off the fear of the people and some buy into it but that is exactly what he is doing.

      Report Post »  
    • 2theADDLED
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:27pm

      Romney is trying to buy his votes but not finding many takers who trust him.
      Give it up Mitt people just don’t trust or like you.

      Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 8:00pm

      OMG … Obama MUST GO!

      Report Post »  
  • Citizen1
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:01pm

    WHAT?
    Isn‘t that’s how its done?
    Come on America… them that have the gold make the rules AND buy the elections!
    Vote Status Quo …. Mit Romney

    VOTE to Legalize and Enforce the Constitution >>>> VOTE RON PAUL 2012

    Report Post »  
    • Lucy Larue
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:53pm

      CITIZEN1,
      Ron Paul does great damage. He is Ralph Nader on freaking STEROIDS!
      If he ever attained his quest for the White House he would be as bad as President Dunham.
      WAKE UP!

      Report Post »  
  • youguysready_letsroll
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:00pm

    Newt could afford to buy the election with the money he made off of Freddie Mac

    Report Post » youguysready_letsroll  
  • bhelmet
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:56pm

    And Newt wouldn’t/isn’t?

    Report Post » bhelmet  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on January 1, 2012 at 4:53pm

    NYC mayor Bloomberg bought his, why wouldn’t Romney? He’s trying, by the way.

    Report Post »  
    • Steelhead
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 5:19pm

      newtty is just trying to make a living -selling books , making movies,running for prez.. I loved his twofer crying and floating Palin as a VP on the same day. the old dog has ran out of tricks and now blames others for his shortcomings ,

      Report Post » Steelhead  
    • TRONINTHEMORNING
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:33pm

      I sooo agree STEALHEAD.

      Report Post »  
    • TRONINTHEMORNING
      Posted on January 1, 2012 at 6:33pm

      Sorry, spelled your name wrong…STEELHEAD. My bad.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love