NewtGingrich.com Redirects Visitors to Tiffany & Co. & Anti-Gingrich News Articles
- Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:28pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »
An enemy of Newt Gingrich appears to have put NewtGingrich.com to intriguing use. Those who wish to visit the site are now being redirected to a roulette of negative stories and web sites poking fun at the former Speaker of the House.
The development began to spread on Twitter around 11:30 a.m. on Wednesday morning, with users sharing where they had been redirected when trying to visit his site. Each redirect is a separate reference to baggage from Gingrich’s often-rehashed past. Here are a few redirects we got:
- Tiffany & Co. web site: Referencing Gingrich’s onetime outstanding debt to the jeweler.
- A Travel Guide to Greece: In reference to the Speaker’s luxurious Adriatic vacation in the midst of the campaign this past summer.
- Freddie Mac Website: Poking fun at Gingrich’s much-criticized multi-million dollar tenure at the government sponsored mortgage buyer.
- A Washington Post story entitled “Gingrich Presidential Campaign Implodes”
- A story from The Atlantic entitled “Gingrich’s Campaign Still Looks an Awful Lot Like a Book Tour”
Gingrich’s official campaign website in Newt.org, but it hindsight it appears the Speaker may have been wise to secure NewtGingrich.com considering his long history in Washington accompanied by outspoken foes.
The Business Insider notes that “The Gingrich Group” controlled the domain name from 2001-2002, but then it became home to an internet slot website. The domain name is registered anonymously.
NPR reports that the Democratic group American Bridge 21st Century, claims that it owns the name though it doesn‘t say it’s behind the redirects. It posted a Craigslist ad putting the site up for sale.
“We thought of giving it away, but we wouldn’t want to be accused of being socialists. So, make your best offer. We’re asking for $1 million, but we’d be happy to accept $500,000 in bling. Heck in the spirit of Christmas we might even let it go for $10,000.”
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 710 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 562 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 383 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 375 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 364 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 375 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 383 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 312 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 149 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 375 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (105)
Redmanblackdog
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 4:51pmNewt is the only Speaker of the House in modern times that balanced the budget. Huh, lets see, 15 trillion dollars in debt. Gee, how did he ever do it with big government? When your horse is sick you get a vet, when your pipes leak you get a plumber. When you need the Budget Balanced, do ya think Newt might be able to do it again? The only Speaker in modern times to balance the budget. No, lets not get Newt. How about Nancy, she only added 5 trillion.
Report Post »derrickc
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:26pmthis might change your mind:
newtcantwin.com
Lets nominate someone who will allow us to talk about the issues and not all of their baggage.
Report Post »The-Real-Enrico
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:37pmNo one wants Nancy. I know for fact that Newt will do a better job than Obama as you know too.
The thing is why would we want Romney or Newt Gingrich? We have more conservative choices. Why reach at the bottom of the barrell?
Did you think John McCain was the better conservative in the race last time?
Report Post »garyM
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 9:21pm@derrickc
Report Post »If you read up on the guy that runs that site, you might vhange your mind, I think his name is John Zeigler, do a search. He is a fellow talk show host of Beck’s! More info about him if you look hard enough! He made much money off Youtube videos too!
Ruler4You
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:14amI wonder if this will help Ron Paul out with his news letter problems? He says he has nothing to do with it as a news letter and doesn’t even read it.
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 4:11pmNewt’s done. His polls are starting to decline. He was never gunna stay at the top for long once people started to remember what a big government progressive he is. It’s down to Paul vs Romney now.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 4:29pmO’Reilly should have warned Gingrich/Bachmann/Santorum as well:
O’Reilly Warns Mitt Romney: Bombing Iran “starts World War III”
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/10280-oreilly-warns-romney-bombing-iran-qstarts-world-war-iiiq
Report Post »drhunt
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:01pmNope….you’re wrong.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:14am@ Churchill
Report Post »Ever hear of Rick Santorum?. He won statewide in the Northeast AS A CONSERVATIVE. Latest poll in Iowa has him at 10% (tied with Perry). If conservatives in Iowa wake up, then Conservative Rick Santorum will win in Iowa. As far as “electability” goes — I see no reason why Santorum would have any less chance than Gingrich, Paul or Romney. Why NOT a real conservative candidate for President?
DrFrost
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 4:13pmWe‘re definitely seeing a dip in Newt’s numbers because of negative attacks but I suspect he’s going to weather them and recover. His only competition is Romney and Paul.
Romney has trust issues with the republican base. If he did what he says he would do, he’d be a great president. But this isn’t my first rodeo. I know that a politician who actually does what he says he‘ll do is a rare thing indeed and there’s no reason for me to believe Romney is that rare breed. If he does get elected… I have no idea what kind of president he would be (though surely we can all agree he’d be much better than Obama).
A lot of republicans will not vote for Paul because of various issues. One is foreign policy but another is that not all republicans are libertarians. I love his ideas on domestic policy but I can only give him a “B” on debate skills and I’m not sure how well he would work with congress to get things done. Overall, I think he’d be a good president domestically if he got elected.
Newt has great conservative credentials. He’s also done a lot of things that are not consistent with conservative ideals. It’s a mixed record. His nay sayers point out the latter and his supporters point out the former. Personally, I think he’d be a fairly conservative president. What I’m confident on, however, is that he will balance the budget and get things done.
For me it’s going to be a choice between Paul and Gingrich.
Report Post »mike san diego
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:41pmalrighty then…the domain is for sale…WHY DOESN’T NEWT GINGRICH BUY IT? the guy is easily capable of buying the damn thing. if he is the free marketeer he claims to be the thing would be done by 8:30 a.m.
the owner says he might take $10,000…for a guy like newt that needs to take control of the message that is a bargain. his baggage has baggage. and those bag shave skeletons in their baggage closets
Report Post »elosogrande
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:39pmThis is perfect! It opens the door to doing the same thing to every liberal Democrat running for office in 2012. No one should complain, unless it’s for stealing their tactics.
Report Post »screamineagle
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:26pmWell, The More I See The Dirty Tactics Being Hurled At Newt,,, Helps Settle It With Me
Report Post »Paul – A NutJob’
Romney – A NorthEastern Establishment Same Old Same Old Repub
SO,,,, With That Said,, There Is Fear From The “Establishment” Repubs, The Democraps,,, The Leftist ,,, That Newt Is Going To Be A Factor,,, So,,, I WIll Now Support Newt,,, I WIll NOT Leave My Home To Vote For Romney,,, Same As What We Have Now…. Big Government,,, Centrist,,,,,, And The “Establishment, Good Old Boys” Are Scared Of Newt,,, That Bodes Well For Me,, And When I See The Republican Centruist Nervous,,,, That Is Good…. So,, KEEP Slinging Mud,,, You WIll Help Cement The Tea Party Conservatives….Sweet
fullblownjackass
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:44pmAnyone voting for Newt is STUPID! So much crap was given to Obombya about his connections to a terrorist and a Black Lib Theology preacher but no one is looking too closely at Newt. How about his socialist best friends the Tofflers. Remember in Toffler’s book The Third Wave (a book that Newt put on a required reading list for congress when he was speaker) Toffler pronounced that the constitution was obsolete, oppressive, and in turn should die and be replaced. Newt said to understand him you have to understand Tofflers works. Newt is crazy and dangerous! So go ahead vote for Newt and be no better than the Obama Zombies that vote for anyone the news media props up.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:20pmObama Care = Romney Care There is no such thing as Gingrich Care
During a Debate with Obama Romney will have this argument…. Romneycare is not ObamaCare !! It is a State issue !!!
Obama’s response would be the folllowing……
So Mitt you think the States should take up healthcare. I don’t think 50 verisons of Romneycare will save money. I installed Obama Care so everyone in the country will have the SAME healthcare. I have one program and with you as president you will have 50 programs, how does that shrink government?
Mitt’s only response would be…. ” I’ve spent my life in the private sector.” – 4 years in the public sector.
Checkmate…. Obama wins.
Obama feels it is the Federal Governments Job to provide Healthcare.
Romney Feels it is the State Governments Job to provide Healthcare.
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:18amHave you ever heard of the “Fairness Doctrine”?
Did you know that Newt Gingrich co-sponsored the original Fairness Doctrine bill that was VETOED BY REAGAN.
Don’t you find it interesting that you have not heard ONE WORD about this or ONE QUESTION to Gingrich about this issue from Hannity, Rush, and all the other so called ‘truth tellers’ on radio & t.v.?
http://kleinonline.wnd.com/2011/12/03/newt-misleading-voters-on-fairness-doctrine-claims-to-vocally-oppose-but-sponsored-original-bill/
Anyone who thinks Gingrich will be a reliable conservative if elected should have their head examined
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:14pmHey, anyone heard of
“ N E W T C A R E ”
Didn’t think so.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:32pmLeading a Republican Congress is quite a bit different from being Governor with a purely liberal legislature. I‘m not sure if you’re aware, but governors do not actually write the legislation. Romney signed over 800 vetoes, almost 100% of which were overturned by the legislature.
The narrative is that “75% of his judge appointments were leftists.” The reality is that he managed to get 9 conservative judges appointed in the deepest blue state in the nation. The democrat judges he appointed had strong records of enforcing rule of law. Of course, his enemies aren’t interested in facts.
Go look at his record as governor instead of spewing the same worn out narrative that the liberals have been pushing since 2007.
Report Post »drhunt
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:06pm@FreedomPurveryor….Glenn certainly doesn’t have all the answers, and I use him only to begin research in particular areas of interest. Being SOTH is certainly a LOT different then Governor…that much of what you wrote is true. The Speaker is a MUCH more difficult position, because they are dealing with ALL Congresspeople from across this country representing their constituencies. Some SERIOUS arm twisting goes on behind closed doors, on members of BOTH Parties. In the end, Newt’s accomplishments were noteworthy, in a conservative sense. This race is FAR from being over…
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:23amGingrich is THE ONLY CANDIDATE who supported a FEDERAL HEALTHCARE MANDATE.
WAKE UP ALL YOU IGNORANT UNINFORMED PEOPLE:
We had no trouble finding evidence of Gingrich’s support for health-insurance mandates.
In 1993, the former speaker appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” saying: “I am for people, individuals — exactly like automobile insurance — individuals having health insurance and being required to have health insurance.”
Gingrich reiterated that point in 2005 during an interview on NPR’s “Talk of the Nation.”
“Our goal has to be for 100 percent of the country to be in the insurance system,” he said. “So that means finding ways through tax credits and through vouchers so that every American can buy insurance, including, I think, a requirement that if you’re above a certain level of income, you have to either have insurance or post a bond.”
In Gingrich’s 2009 book, “Real Change: the Fight for America’s Future,” he wrote:
“Those who oppose the concept of insurance should be forced to post a bond to cover costs. Allowing individuals to pass their health costs on to others reinforces the attitude that their health is not their problem and adds to the irresponsible, unhealthy behaviors that bankrupt the current system.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/newt-gingrichs-changing-stance-on-health-care-mandates-fact-checker-biography/2011/12/09/gIQAVl0lkO_blog.html
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:12pmWell Glenn and the Blaze have done a fine job attacking Newt.
I’d love to see a redirect to Alcoholics Anonymous when you search for Glenn Beck.
You should be ashamed for how you S M E A R E D Gingrich. All your attacks against Newt are they type of tactics you see from the Left.
You have given the LEFT a long awaited Vacation and have been doing their Job for them. So sad..
Romney says he is a progressive, and appointed liberal Judges, instituted RomneyCare, and refuses to call Obama a socialist. Sad you see this as your leader.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:25pmLike many others on this site, you clearly haven’t paid attention to Glenn Beck at all. He has never supported Romney, and before Newt’s rise in the polls he regularly attacked him. So many assumptions, so little actual knowledge.
Report Post »The-Real-Enrico
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 4:58pmGlenn Beck never to this date supported Romney. Glenn has regularly attack Romney when was the front runner. Romney never had the tea parties support. Glenn didn’t that of a big deal because as we all know that Romney is not conservative.
Glenn is making Newt a big deal because for some reason the tea party/conservatives is for some reason starting to back good IL’ big government progressive Newt.
We don’t want ether of them.
Report Post »ROMNEY2012
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 11:32amRomney knows Obama is a Socialist but he wants to win independents and moderates,
Throwing around a term like “Socialist” that most Americans don’t even understand is not going to help any Republican win the election.
Here is a suggestion:
Ask 10 average people these questions and this is how they will respond:
1. “Do you think Obama is a Socialist?” = Most will respond “What is a Socialist?”
2. “Do you think Obama is a BIG GOVERMNENT LIBERAL?” = Most will respond “YES”.
Do you get it now?
Romney is using language that can actually help him win a general election rather than throwing red meat to dunces who only want to hear heated rhetoric.
Report Post »sgtstubbs
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:56pmI would rather live under a President with baggage than one that would sell the Consitution down the drain.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:00pmNeocons for Lewd Newt 2012!!!!!
Report Post »bhohater
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:22pmLet’s face it, Newt is as conservative a candidate as we’re ever going to get. The libs must think he stands a good chance of beating Obummer or they wouldn’t be throwing everything at him but his kitchen sink. Who gives a s— if he splurged at Tiffany’s, it was his money wasn’t it?
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 4:22pmHe isn’t a conservative by my standards.
He’s a big government progressive who wants to execute people for smoking marijuana.
http://www.drudge.com/news/151436/gingrich-sought-execute-pot-smokers
HE‘S ABSOLUTELY NUTS and you’re absolutely nuts if you support him.
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 4:31pmThat comment proves just how little you know about Gingrich. Look up his comments re the constitution. Am I going insane or are people actually considering voting for Newt?
Report Post »The-Real-Enrico
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 5:06pmYou get what you ask for. If you are dumb enough to ask the lesser of two evils you are going to get it.
We have choices. No to NEWT, No to ROMNEY! Are we that dumb? I should I say you know what I don’t a conservative can win so I should vote for Obama?
Does that make sense? Vote for a actual conservative. Not just whoever polling well or able talk look or talk well on stage. Those are called actors.
Report Post »Daveed
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:49pmNothing but control hounds. Never letting things take that natural course with truthful honest debate of ideas. Always gotta control and hedge their bets to the point it seems like a mental illness with these revoultionaries who want everyone to be just like them OR ELSE!
Report Post »Misha
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:36pmTrolls know no other way than to attack any which way they please.
Report Post »LastingLiberty
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:33pmLibs Motto: When you can’t beat them, hack ‘em.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:26pmHow could this happen to anyone really serious about running for pres?
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:28pmHe has a really outragious past! Of course this can happen if you are a big government guy trying to flip-flop for whatever the flavor of the day is.
Report Post »Locked
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:53pmIt can’t; Gingrich is not a serious candidate.
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:57pmAgreed.
Any public figure would be wise to secure any domain that is their name or nickname. There are ways to assure that it is renewed so you never lose control of it.
MAJOR faux pas on Newt’s part!
I certainly own mine!
RESTORING LOVE July 26 27 28 2012 … BE THERE !
Report Post »http://www.Meetup.com/MercuryOneHQ
relyabill
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:22pmLiberals know Newt crushes Obama. They are beyond scared.
Notice how the MSM didn’t report Ron Paul calling our traitor a hero? Why would that be? Ron Pauls foreign policy ideals makes it unable to even consider him.
Romney can’t sell it. He doesn’t even think Obama is a Socialist. He’s a political Pinata. If Romney had a backbone and could debate under pressure he would deserve a second glance but reality is he doesn‘t and can’t.
Gingrich will lead us on the right path. A path I demand for my kids and grandkids. This is the most important election of our lifetimes.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:27pmPath you want for you kids huh. Wow. Want you kiddo’s to grow up in the NWO huh?
Report Post »Gingrich is a big government guy who would like a one world government.
See my comment below.
V-MAN MACE
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:28pmThey should redirect his site to http://www.LewdGingrich.com and display all of his adulterous affairs.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:01pmRelyabill, You don’t think much of your kids and grandkids, huh? “Why have you come to hate your family so much?
Report Post »Churchill
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 4:36pmYou’re on a different planet. The libs would love nothing more than to go up against Gingrich. He’d be easy picking for them with all of his baggage and flip flops. Do you honestly see Gingrich beating Obama? Have you even looked at the polls? Some of you Newt supporters have lost the plot. Are you even Conservatives? I don’t understand how you can be a Conservative and support Newt?
Report Post »batteredyoungpatriot
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:12pmHahaha I have to repect the creativity of this. I cant wait to see what newt.xxx has to offer. Lol
Report Post »knighttemplar999
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:09pmYou’re a multimillionaire and yet too cheap to pay the $10 a year for a domain name? It’s a .com name for crying out loud.
Report Post »manjodad
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:08pmSay what you want about Gingrich‘s record but if all you’ve got is negative campaign ads and redirecting queries to negative stories, then I want no part of that. You know, I am not really sure who I would vote for at this time. However, what I am sure of is that the negative stories especially by Romney and Paul campaigns are fast turning me away from both of those candidtates. Discuss your differences without throwing mud. That dog don’t hunt anymore.
Report Post »The-Real-Enrico
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:23pm@MANJODAD
I do agree with you to a point. I would never want vote for Romney for any reason tho.
I do believe someone needs to and should be calling Newt out and Romney too. Mud does not need to be thrown but the true does.
The truth about Newt and Romney is that they are not conservatives. We do need truth to be thrown at all times in all places with every way possible.
I just don’t like fakes and lies.
Report Post »DianaRae
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:24pmExcept, this is just a minuscule prelude to what the DNC is going to be tossing at the candidate that wins. It is best to get it all out now so there are no surprises, no stones left unturned.
The DNC has a billion $ budget for it’s attack it will make these ads look like love fests.
Report Post »The-Real-Enrico
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:24pmI do agree with you to a point. I would never want vote for Romney for any reason tho.
I do believe someone needs to and should be calling Newt out and Romney too. Mud does not need to be thrown but the true does.
The truth about Newt and Romney is that they are not conservatives. We do need truth to be thrown at all times in all places with every way possible.
I just don’t like fakes and lies.
Report Post »Holland
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:25pmI completely agree. I may have to rethink my vote on Newt. I have thought, from the beginning, Newt was one candidate I didn’t have to give much thought about….I didn’t like his past….but the more Mitt and Paul attack, the more I’m looking, listening and reconsidering.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:38pmHis past is negative. It is his past though and the truth.
Report Post »manjodad
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:43pmI don’t care so much about what they have done as to what they will do. Yes, our past is important but it is the smart man or woman who learns from their mistakes. Newt at least has acknowledged that he has made some bad choices, as has Romney ala abortion. Paul makes it sound like he never did anything wrong yet but then talks about what he would do in the future re foreign policy, he sounds like Martian who just landed on Earth. I have always liked Santorum but he needs to get off the social conservatism kick and tell us more about what he would do as president especially regarding the economy. I also like Bachmann but she did all the negative campaigning in the last debate, possibly because she doesn’t have money. Perry, likewise has done good things in Texas and his plan for the economy and taxes is sound but sometines he sounds like he has had way to much sugar. I know where we have been, what I want is to know how any of these candidates are going to make us whole again. When it comes to my vote, I want to use it for the person with the best idea for the future.
Report Post »manjodad
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:46pm@Dianarae What you say is true, but I think this time around people are getting fed up with the attack ads. People say Newt is the smartest guy in the room and I think that is precisely why he said he was going to stay positive because he is smart enough to know that negatives will mean very little in this election at least to all those who are not far right or far left.
Report Post »manjodad
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:53pmBy the way, you can easily tell which of you are Pauly parrots. You spew the parrot lines as if you are reading from a playbook. At least most of the candidates have actually done something in their careers. Paul has done nothing other than clamor about the Fed and to claim that the US is the elephant in the room. According to him, the rest of world are all wonderful and it is the US that is the problem. Obama may have his head in the sand, but sometimes I think that Paul has his up a very different and dark place that I shall not mention.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:40pmYour right I am a “Pauly Parrot” i guess. He has done nothing but support liberty, freedom, and the U.S. Constitution. Santorem, Bachman, Perry, and especially Romney or Gingrich have supported legislation and ideas that might as well shred the Constitution. I have read into their past. I have some idea of their future. If you really believe we have to bomb everybody in the world and force our way of life on them, if the future for our country is to get rid of the Constitution, if the future for this country is not individual responsibility and freedom; then cast your vote for Santorem, Bachman, Perry, Romney, or Gingrich. Their past has proven what they really stand for. They will continue endless wars with an determined and disguised enemy. The idea of waging war on an idea is obsurd.
Report Post »They are criminals but now we have gotten so scared of the “terrorists” we will continue to bomb and invade other contries. To make things even better for the GOP/Obama future; they now have NDAA.
NDAA along with the Patriot Act and the Homegrown terrorism act of 2007 really shows the kind of future america is in for. People believe we are America and we will never change. Well i say to you WAKE UP! We have changed. If we elect another “lesser of two evils”; this country is lost and the Constitution is gone completely. You will probably laugh at how obsurd that is but like i said; I have read their past hence I have some reality of their future.
WakingSheep
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:43pmOh and by the way you are right about one thing. I actually have three playbooks though.
Report Post »They are called the Declaration of Independence, The U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of rights.
The-Real-Enrico
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:06pmI swear half of the people on this site are crazy. Obama wouldn’t care enough mess with that slime Newt.
It is more than likely anyone of the left machine and or anybody else who can’t stand that two faced intellectual snob.
No more big government no more rhinos!
Report Post »THX-1138
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:03pmYawn. I’ll never vote for him anyway…
Report Post »booger71
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:20pmSo you will vote Nobama then huh?
Report Post »Ssenkrad
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:29pm@Booger A vote for Gingrich IS a vote for Obama. Gingrich will simply continue the same progressive policies that Obama has, just like the President before him, and the President before him, and so on. Out of all the Republican candidates, Gingrich is the absolute bottom of the barrel; he is the personification of what is wrong with our government. He is the glib snake whispering in your ear, telling you to take a bite of the big government apple.
Report Post »cjays
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:59pmThey can’t run on policy so they turn to character assasination. Too bad we are on there dirty little tricks!
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:04pmThe harder and dirtier the left is on Newt, the more credibility they give him.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:10pmAre you blind? They can’t run on policy?! The guy is a globalist!
Report Post »See my comment below:
The-Real-Enrico
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:12pmFunny. Newt needs to first have character for them to assassinate it. The left and the right does not like him.
Newt Gingrich is not a conservative. Yes he could beat Obama but so could everyone else. Why do or would you want Newt be the one to beat him is the question?
Do your own reseach and find out. Don’t just listen to sound bites.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:56pmDid anybody commenting on this story even read his baggage before they commented?
Am i going to be a communist or Obama lover for stating anything negative against Newt?
Well, the proof is in his past. I didn’t make these decisions he did. You just have to look.
Newt is: A member of the Council on Foreign Relations(CFR)(Globalists), He is a supporter of the U.N., He is a supporter of a health care mandate, He is a supporter of the Patriot Act and both un-Constitutional WARS, He believes in a broader and more overbearing government. He supported TARP, He supported the bailouts and profited from them. He supported the Contract with America which was never even looked at again after passing. Then there is the big boost to his wealth as the Speaker of the House. In 1994 when put in that position he was worth around $600,000; when he left that position he was worth over $7,000,000. He was lobying. Electing Newt will be no different than having Obama in the White House. The list of baggage goes on and on and on. Romneys and Santorams list are not much better. Ron Paul is the only hope we have of restoring our Constitutional Republic and at this point in the game it might be too late anyway. They passed the National Defense Authorization Act through the senate with a 93-7 vote. We only have one chance to get this right otherwise the Republic is gone.
Ron Paul 2012!!
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:10pmNo, not taking the bait. I agree with you on Newt, but could never vote for Paul. It is getting very ugly, just the way Obummer likes it.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:18pmOf course you’re an 0bama lover.
It’s not surprising that you would be against Newt. You’re against EVERYBODY who is not Ron Paul. You will refuse to help anybody get elected but Ron Paul or 0bama. When Ron Paul doesn’t get the nomination, you’ll help 0bama so you have no right to gripe about what anybody calls you.
Report Post »THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:21pm“The reality is Ron Paul is poised to become a major figure in the Republican Party if his momentum continues and he’s able to win in Iowa,” said GOP strategist Steve Schmidt, who managed the campaign of Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the party’s 2008 nominee.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:22pmSo is Angelina Jolie, so what?
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:28pmYou dont have to worry about Newt, he is his own worst enemy. Its Paul and Romney now.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:37pmOh yeah,
Report Post »Loving Newt would be no different than loving Obama.
Your right though; I do support Ron Paul to the fullest!
The candidates can really catch my attention when they start talking about freedom, liberty, and the U.S. Constitution. Then start doing a little research and hey guess what; Ron Paul apparently has been voting per the Constitution his whole public service life.
So i guess if your saying i love Obama because i won’t support anybody else but Ron; Then yes your right. I love OBAMA!
Like i said though; Romney and Gingrich both have a scary past that is very similar to Obama’s.
All of their beliefs are founded on larger government, higher taxes, and keeping the public under their thumb.
I support the true champion of the Constitution. Ron Paul 2012!
qpwillie
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:53pm@WakingSheep
What you’re trying to hide is the fact that it has nothing to do with Newt or Romney. The truth is, it doesn‘t matter to you which candidate it is if it’s not Ron Paul. Therefore, you will be perfectly happy to help 0bama get reelected when you don’t get exactly what you want.
Just be honest!!
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:18pmQP “Willie”
Silly “Willie”, you are so full a crap you’re stopped up.
Ron Paul supporters are not helping Obama get re-elected. Saying as such shows how full of crap you are. It almost sounds like you are trying to get some to vote for Obama. You must support Obama.
QP Willie supports Obama!!!
ATTENTION RON PAUL SUPPORTERS: PLEASE POST QP WILLIE LOVES OBAMA AFTER EACH OF QP WILLIE’S POSTS.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:24pm@Okie from Muskogee
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
Report Post »Is that your attempt for the day?
My Faith
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 4:09pmQP Willie loves Obama.
Report Post »Okie from Muskogee
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 4:20pm@QP“Willie”
Attempt? Get over yourself. You are as arrogant as Obama aren’t you…..
QP “Willie” you are not as smart as you think you are and in fact I think you are a coward because you won’t be honest with other posters and tell them how you support Obama.
You never post for anyone and always post against Ron Paul saying Ron Paul supporters will get Obama elected or that we should vote for Obama. That’s just stupid and if you really believe it you are STUPID. The only ones helping Obama get elected are his supporters like YOU.
QP Willie loves Obama and voted for Obama!!!
Report Post »GilbertAcct
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 4:53pmQPWillie… Let’s use some logic. You are an “anybody but Obama” guy right? Okay, I’ll assume that for now. You also hate Paulbots because you say they won’t vote for anyone except Paul, and you argue that they will get Obama re-elected by writing Paul’s name in and taking, maybe 5% from the Republicans, right? So given the stubbornness of the Paulies (and the fact that people like you who go around name calling just make us support RP even more stubbornly), it can be assumed that they will “ruin” it for a Romney or Gingrich, right? Given all these factors, if you are truly “anybody but Obama”, you would logically try to get Ron Paul nominated. If the republicans are truly Obama haters, but they have to deal with the principled Paul voters and their propensity to change the election, the only choice they have is to get behind Paul.
My assumptions are arguable of course, but if they were true, then you would logically have to support Paul. However, I have the feeling that you hate Paul so much, you would not vote for him against Obama, thus making you a hypocrite. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:48pm@QPWillie
I will post what i posted above to manjodad. These are my beliefs and I don’t support RP because i want to get Obama re-elected. Idiot.
Your right I am a “Pauly Parrot” i guess. He has done nothing but support liberty, freedom, and the U.S. Constitution. Santorem, Bachman, Perry, and especially Romney or Gingrich have supported legislation and ideas that might as well shred the Constitution. I have read into their past. I have some idea of their future. If you really believe we have to bomb everybody in the world and force our way of life on them, if the future for our country is to get rid of the Constitution, if the future for this country is not individual responsibility and freedom; then cast your vote for Santorem, Bachman, Perry, Romney, or Gingrich. Their past has proven what they really stand for. They will continue endless wars with an determined and disguised enemy. The idea of waging war on an idea is obsurd.
Report Post »They are criminals but now we have gotten so scared of the “terrorists” we will continue to bomb and invade other contries. To make things even better for the GOP/Obama future; they now have NDAA.
NDAA along with the Patriot Act and the Homegrown terrorism act of 2007 really shows the kind of future america is in for. People believe we are America and we will never change. Well i say to you WAKE UP! We have changed. If we elect another “lesser of two evils”; this country is lost and the Constitution is gone completely.
WakingSheep
Posted on December 22, 2011 at 1:50pmYou will probably laugh at how obsurd that is but like i said; I have read their past hence I have some reality of their future.
There ya go QPWillie.
oh yeah,
QPWillie loves Obama!!!
and
RON PAUL 2012!!!
Report Post »FEISTY
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:55pmThey’re all lowlifes. I hope Newt wins and ****** on all of them.
Report Post »momrules
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:43pmThis has to be either Obama or Romney. I personally think either one is capable of being this underhanded.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:53pmWhy does this have the stink of Obama’s little internet troll Jesse Lee?
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:21pmAt this point, being as we have not chosen a candidate yet, I would take a hard look at the GOP establishment when discussing dirty tricks against Newt.
Report Post »Gita
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:36pmWho is responsible for this web site? A no brainer, IMHO, Barack Insane Obama and his minions!
Report Post »musicory
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:40pmEver been to seanhannity.com? =]
Report Post »lildrummerboy
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:05pm@musicory…just went there…eeeesh! someone really dislikes conservatives
Report Post »pap pap
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:35pmI guess we can’t expect the left to start playing fair after all this time ???
Report Post »CatB
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:40pmNewt just sided with Obama and the Dems on the social security tax 2 month extension .. GTH .. Newty. We don’t need another whimpy candidate …
TEA!
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:14pmCatb, I just checked on your statement on Newt and the payroll tax extension. Sheesh. In two seconds I see where he blasted the senate for approving the extension, and then now he is urging the house to give in on this crazy idea of only a two month extension. Kind of reminds me of how he blasted Ryan’s deficit plan as right wing social engineering. Newt is a smart guy, but not very disciplined, not to mention all over the map.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:25pmCatb has become a little Bachmann, just making the stuff up in her head.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 2:43pmPlay fair? It’s the truth and not even half of it.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 3:03pmNo Newt did not side with them. Read Newts comments.
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:32pmnewt-the man who wanted so bad to be president. see ya later mr potato head
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:36pmI smell a rove , err rat
Report Post »