Government

NLRB Sued For Suing Boeing

NLRB Sued For Suing BoeingWashington-based Judicial Watch, a conservative legal watchdog group, is reportedly taking aim at the National Labor Relations Board.

The group announced Tuesday that it was filing suit under the Freedom of Information Act in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia , for documents related to the NLRB’s case against the airplane manufacturer Boeing. Judicial Watch believes that the agency took action against Boeing for political reasons. The Hill reports on Judicial Watch’s investigation into the connection between NLRB and the White House:

“With its July 14, 2011, FOIA request and related lawsuit Judicial Watch seeks records of internal communications between officials, officers, and employees of the NLRB related to Boeing and the agency’s decision to file a lawsuit,’ Judicial Watch said in a statement announcing the lawsuit. ‘Judicial Watch also seeks records of communication between the NLRB and the Obama White House, the Internal Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, the AFL-CIO, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and any other third party trade union, among others.’

The NLRB’s complaint against Boeing argues that the company decided to build a plant in South Carolina — a right-to-work state — to retaliate for labor strikes at its existing facilities in Washington state.”

NLRB has already failed to comply with the subpoena issued by Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Rep. Darrell Issa for documents related to the case last week, leading the California congressman to call the board a “rouge agency.”

The NLRB has made allegations that the aircraft maker illegally shifted work from union plants in Washington state to a new non-union factory in South Carolina. Conservatives argue that NLRB and the Obama administration are trying to tell Boeing how to run its business, and are an ally of organized labor to the point that “whatever labor wants, labor gets.”

Comments (111)

1 2 3
  • Brae
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 3:32am

    Hooray!!!!

    Report Post » Brae  
    • Armed Patriot
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 7:10am

      Good job Judicial Watch!!! Its nice to know some lawyers out there dont just sit back and accept the reality of a tyrannical government. They actually fight against it, because we dont know how to.

      Report Post » Armed Patriot  
    • spurjimmy
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 7:56am

      The attorneys in this country are having a boom with this administration. Fed suing states, states suing fed, tort lawyers dominating the cable networks with suits against drug companies, asbestos and all manner of class action suits. Don’t most attorneys and their organizations support liberal politicians? Come to think of it, aren’t most in Congress attorneys?

      Report Post »  
    • carbonyes
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 2:57pm

      Go get’em Judicial Watch. There is justice, and sometimes it’s orchestrated from up above. If the truth be known, it’s always orchestrated from up above. You would think them poor suckers on the left would wake up and realize that they are fighting a losing battle. That is what happens when you walk in darkness. There is no light to illuminate their paths.

      Report Post »  
  • yooyanks
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 3:20am

    People need to keep in mind that it doesn‘t matter if they didn’t lay anybody off because of the new plant. It doesn’t even matter that Boeing built a non-union workshop in another state. What matters, and what Boeing is guilty of, is that they said they were going to build it due to the union and the strikes. That is the problem, is the retaliatory nature of it. If they had kept their mouths shut and didn’t go neener neener neener to the union, this would be a non issue.
    I would know.. I’m one of the union workers who heard them do this. They posted it in newspapers and on television.

    Report Post »  
    • HisNameWasRobertPaulson
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 3:29am

      You are full of crap. You aren’t entitled to didly.

      Report Post »  
    • Brae
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 3:35am

      Since when is the Union protected under Federal law and how?

      Report Post » Brae  
    • yooyanks
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 3:50am

      @youare… exactly how am I full of crap? And what did I say I was entitled to?
      Nice to show your complete ignorance, but your assumptions are misguided at best. I simply stated what was fact. The complaint is what this site and the news media outlets gloss over. Did Boeing retaliate and act in bad faith? The answer is yes.
      You simply no nothing.

      Report Post »  
    • yooyanks
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 3:52am

      HisNameWasRobertPaulson

      You know nothing about this, yet you make asinine assumptions.

      Report Post »  
    • Crusty Buttocks
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 4:09am

      Actually all that is germane is whether union members lost their jobs. None did, so Boeing has complied with the law.

      Boeing has every right to tell the union that they will get no more jobs until the unions stop their extremest activities.

      Report Post »  
    • yooyanks
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 4:27am

      @CrustyButtocks
      Boeing didn’t comply with the law. What is so hard to comprehend? When you retaliate and don’t bargain in good faith, and tell the union that you‘re tired of the strikes and you’re going to build a non-union shop, and then do it. That is why the NLRB went after them. If they had said nothing to the union about it.. then the NLRB wouldn’t have anything.
      BTW, don’t believe all you read. Boeing couldn’t deliver a bunch of planes anyway do to supplier issues on galleys. No galleys, no deliveries. Not having to meet payroll while your supplier catches up benefits Boeing, not the workers.

      Report Post »  
    • megansmom
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 4:28am

      When they tried to unionize the plant my husband ran in he just told them flat out, go ahead it‘s your right but remember it’s also my right to shut this plant down and farm out the work.
      So why isn‘t it’s Boeing,s right to build a nonunion factory so they can get some work done? All the union has ever done for us now that my husband works for a different company he had to join one, make him wait 10 years for a promotion when the people they were protecting should have been fired, decreased and down graded our benefits, threatened my husband when he said no way to a strike and then again when he refused to vote the way they wanted him to.

      Report Post »  
    • Dr Vel
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 4:32am

      As long as this is still America a private company has the right to build plants no matter whether you worthless evil union thugs like it or not. You are destroying the country for all of us.

      Report Post »  
    • yooyanks
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 4:51am

      megansmom:
      Boeing has the right to build a non union plant. Heck, in fact I hear talk that they are wanting to build some plants in Poland. Nothing says Made in America like Boeing built in Poland.
      The problem that I keep trying to illustrate, and I’m obviously doing a poor job of, is that it’s not that they built a non-union shop, it’s that they bragged about it, and used it as a club. There are rules in place for negotiations.. they violated them, and now they have the NLRB calling them on it.
      BTW, I‘m in the union as it’s a closed shop, but I’m not pro union. So I’m obviously in the awkward position of defending the union and siding with the NLRB. But truth is truth regardless of the personal angle. Boeing did it, Boeing got called on it, and let the chips fall where they may.

      Report Post »  
    • yooyanks
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 4:57am

      Dr Vel:
      Really? Name calling? Have I called anyone a name? You don’t know me from anyone. I’m a vet. I’m a member of Oathkeepers. I’m an independent voter, mostly a Reagan Conservative. I’m not pro union. But being attacked gives me a glimpse of what the left see’s of the right. You do a disservice to our cause by assuming, wrongly of course, that I’m some Union loving liberal, when I’m the exact opposite.
      Now say you’re sorry. Or are you 13 years old and not mature enough?

      Report Post »  
    • chazman
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 5:26am

      … ya want a job? Get the he11 out of the unions! America can’t afford their corrupt, marxist ideology anymore!

      Report Post »  
    • Edward C
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 5:40am

      @YOOYANKS: Perhaps you would convince people that Boeing did this intentionally as retaliation if you would provide links to the newspaper articles you mention as well as a reference to the law they broke. It seems you have a credibility issue here.

      Report Post »  
    • yooyanks
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 6:01am

      @Edward. yep, that’s a good idea. I’ll hunt around for some.

      Report Post »  
    • yooyanks
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 6:31am

      Here’s one article. However, as a 23 year Boeing employee who is none to happy with the union, or unions in general, I really don’t like being in the position to defend the union. However since I was there, saw on the news about Boeing being unhappy with the labor disputes, listening to Sir Richard Branson bellyache about not getting his Virgin planes delivered on time. (of course we had them ready and sitting on the ramp, and he chose to delay taking delivery of them) and how they were going to move production of the 787 to a friendlier business climate, and using it as a club against the union… it still falls under a violation of the NLRB. Like I said on a previous post. Truth is truth, and I left out my own personal feelings on it.
      Here’s the link: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2010141430_boeing27.html

      Report Post »  
    • yooyanks
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 6:44am

      @Edward. I posted a link to an article, it hasn’t shown up yet. It’s amazing how difficult it sometimes is to go back into the archives and find stuff.
      As for credibility.. it doesn’t really matter to me what people think. People just need to be clear on what the NLRB complaint was, and if the company actually did violate. It’s pretty much as simple as that. Did the company do, what the complaint said it did? I say yes it did.
      It doesn’t matter if people think that Boeing should be able to build wherever they want. It doesn‘t matter that people don’t like the unions. All of that is irrelevant. In a court of law, it’s not going to come down to any of that, but what the charge is, and proof that the charge is valid. Relationships between Boeing and the union have been strained as long as I have been here. Don’t go thinking that this is a kind and benevolent company. It has changed since the merger with MD, and not as most would say for the better. It’s less about the product or the people, than stock price and dividends.

      Report Post »  
    • Armed Patriot
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 7:15am

      Sorry union dude. I side with Boeing. If it were up to me I would declare all unions illegal and a violation of the RICO act. Get a job based on your own personal work skills, work ethic, and level of production value. You might be the best/fastest, you might be the worst/slowest. Either way, you dont get collective bargaining or union protection.

      Report Post » Armed Patriot  
    • loriann12
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 7:22am

      What people like you need to understand is businesses have a right to build wherever they want. If the unions were doing their job, they wouldn’t interfer unless a company was mistreating their employees. Not paying them twice as much as a non-union worker is not a reason to picket. Have you seen how much these union people make? Have you seen the retirement benefits? I have. I knew people who worked for Boeing in Illinois. You can‘t blame a plant for wanting to start one that’s non-union. They can hire twice as many people for the same pay, and the people will not be hurting financially, plus they’ll be more grateful than the union pukes who think everything should be handed to them and they can get drunk or high on the job.

      Report Post »  
    • yooyanks
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 7:35am

      @armedpatriot and others… I’ve tried to explain. I’ve posted a link. I‘ve said I’m not in favor of unions. But it is obvious to me, that not a one of you idiots read what I posted. I’m done. No wonder the lefties all think those of us on the right are stupid.
      Now let me guess… you all will pick up on the “he called us idiots” and nothing else. Try reading a post completely and understanding it before you provide your .02 worth of unrelated diatribe.

      Report Post »  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 7:58am

      Just imagine . A Private company wanting to move to a state where the employees are not shutting down the site because the coffee is too hot, or the 30 union workers? that have to be called in to change 1 lightbulb. If you spent more time cleaning the Socialists and Communists out of your union management this probably would not have happened.

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • Bluefish49
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 8:05am

      The last strike cost Boeing millions in lost revenue…I worked as a construction manager on the Boeing IRC Plant (Interiors) in Ladson SC. If Boeing is so anti union tell me why even in a right to work state that many of the trades where union shop trades i.e.-United Iron Workers and Elecrical to name the largest…oh but this never makes the news. The Liberial Media also doesn’t say that Boeing added jobs in Everett Washington during the construction phase in South Carolina…but with unions it’s never enough..face it…Boeing called your bluff and you lost. I also promise that the jets coming out of South Carolina will far exceed the quality of anything coming out of a union facility.

      Report Post »  
    • the_ancient
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 8:25am

      I I were boeing I would contact 100% of my Production to Airbus and fire all of you union SOB’s

      Report Post » the_ancient  
    • imontou
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 8:32am

      Watch, now they will build another plant in china. Wont that make you happy. And I wouldn’t even blame them.

      Report Post » imontou  
    • bandi9
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 8:59am

      agreed, you are full of it. you dont seem to have any idea just how despised your ilk are becoming to the general population. just a bunch of spoiled cry babies throwing tantrums.

      Report Post »  
    • Mustangrider
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 9:45am

      There seems to be a large discrepancy between what yanks calls retaliation and what most reasonable people call a sound business decision, at least they wanted to keep their business in the USA. It’s a business executives job to operate his business efficiently and make money for his stockholders, if unions won’t allow that to happen they should be replaced. This is a battle of ideology: socialist communism vs capitalist freedom. Unions have no business dictating business policy to their employers, if they don’t like their pay then Quit!!

      Report Post »  
    • BOUGHT YOUR SILO YET?
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 9:46am

      People on this board need to be very careful who they attack. Some employees do not have a choice. The project my husband works on is going to be eliminated because other departments went over their budget. The only way to stay employed is take a position within a department that is strictly union. Attack the government- yes. Attack the unions- yes. But don’t attack people that are forced into a union!

      Report Post » BOUGHT YOUR SILO YET?  
    • knockered
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 11:56am

      All the companies that now employ union thugs should do everybody a favor and close their doors and reopen as a non union shop. Unions are old hat and not needed anymore. They think it’s ok to strike and damage the company that put money in their pockets, what fools. I worked for a military aircraft builder that had the union contract come due 2 months before the companies government review was due and they would not renew the contract if the company was on strike. The company was firced to give into union demands to avoid losing the contract. Needless to say the company went out of business. Screw the unions….

      Report Post »  
    • smithclar3nc3
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 12:56pm

      Hey yoo,
      If I ran company with the apy and benefits boeing has I too would shut down shop and move the company to a right to works sate instead of dealing and re-dealing wiy=th the unions.
      By the way it‘s free country in case someone ddin’t tell the little commie union guys. If your in union and don’t like your job. If I‘m running a business and don’t like being extorted by the unions everytime Ithe contract is up I move. FREE COUNTRY

      Report Post »  
    • Stay The Course
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 5:03pm

      Recommend Boeing packup and leave U.S. all together give GOD DAMN unions the finger. Thats what unions do best send manufacturing over seas!!!

      Report Post »  
    • 97Miner
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 6:10pm

      What you seem to forget, Yooyanks, is that as an American company, Boeing has a RIGHT to do business where ever, and when ever, they want!

      And why are you not being honest? The strikes against the company was only one of MANY reasons Boeing decided to move.

      You‘re lucky to keep any job you have and it’s probably only because you are a union member and they CAN’T fire you!

      Finally, answer this: How was the union harmed? Did union members in WA lose their jobs? Did any of them lose benefits? NNNNNOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!! Are there more union employees today than there were when Boeing decided to build in SC? YYYYEEEEESSSSSSSS!

      Your GREED will be your undoing. Good riddance.

      Report Post » 97Miner  
    • JohnHW
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 6:34pm

      There is a rule, put out by the NLRB, that says a PRIVATE company cannot build a plant in a right-to-work state if the purpose is so that they don’t have to have a union. Of course, that rule is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. There is no LAW passed by the U.S. Congress and signed by the President that gives the NLRB the authority to make that rule. But the current administration and its union backers don’t give a damn about the law.

      I hope Boeing sues that union, the NLRB, and anyone who breaks a LAW. The unions have got to be put back into their place – look after the welfare of the worker in having the safest place to work, to keep a worker from being fired if the cause is not there, etc. The unions now will gladly put a company into jeopardy of going backrupt just to get a couple of cents more. If that puts the company out of being able to sell a profit at a profit, well, the owners can take money from their pockets to pay to keep the union workers being paid higher than normal wages.

      Report Post » JohnHW  
    • Balladeer
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 9:45pm

      show me your ‘alleged right’ to be overpaid for doing little.. the company can build a plne anywhere they don’t have to lick YOUR boots

      Report Post » Balladeer  
    • cemerius
      Posted on August 19, 2011 at 8:29am

      If, unions were so awesome why do they have to use “strong-arm” tactics to get members? Free-Choice works but the unions have to stack the deck wherever they go!!!

      Report Post » cemerius  
    • SpeaknUp
      Posted on August 19, 2011 at 12:57pm

      Heaven help us all the day it becomes a crime for a business to so “NO” to union labor. There is no “human right” to have a job. That “right” is a fabrication of government control. To give the right to one person to HAVE a job, you must in turn force another to provide that job. This is not the activity of a free society.

      Report Post » SpeaknUp  
    • R2
      Posted on August 19, 2011 at 1:32pm

      So, Who are you and the unions to tell people how to run their company?? Would you prefer(and this is what I would do) They move the entire company to some other country, then where would you work?? You would be out on your a*ss.

      The unions are no longer useful, they are obsolete and need to go. YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.

      Big deal you heard them big deal you read about it. They are entitled to make money, and they are entitled to do that anyway they want.

      It sucks when someone else is entitled huh.

      Report Post »  
  • RepubliCorp
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 3:00am

    Coming soon, it will be against the law to have a non union shop

    Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • Marylou7
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 5:40am

      THEN shame on us. We are currently in this shameful situation because good people did NOTHING.

      Report Post » Marylou7  
  • Swamp1943
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 2:52am

    There is one crucial bit of information missing here. Boeing wasn’t moving, or eliminating jobs. They were building an additional manufacturing facility, that employed additional workers. So, the suggestion that they were “moving jobs” is incorrect. They simply chose, as all American citizens are entitled to, to establish an entirely new work site, with additional workers. Bottom line, they weren’t firing anyone, or eliminating jobs.

    Report Post »  
  • Smoke Ranch
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 2:32am

    What does anyone expect. The so called stimulus was a union pay back, the auto take over was pay back to the UAW, all these government paid for “green jobs” are designed for union workers and this telling Boeing where to do business is a union pay back. This is the government telling private business what and where they HAVE to do business. There is a freedom issue here and the government is in the wrong.

    Report Post » Smoke Ranch  
  • TexasKnight
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 2:28am

    I am a firm believer in Union rights. I myself am in a union, and have been a local president. I am also for corporate rights. No union should over step it’s bounds. Unions have the right to strike, remove their services and protest. The company has the right to hire non-union replacements or build their factories elsewhere. Unions must keep in mind, that if they request more than it cost them to be replaced, they will be.
    Personally, I hope they clean the clock of the corrupt NAZI organization that is the NLRB. Remember this is exactly what NAZIsm is. Allow private ownership of companies, but fully control what they can do by the government.

    Report Post » TexasKnight  
    • Marnin
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 2:37am

      the incredible thing about this is that no union jobs will be lost. This isnt moving the plant from seattle to SC, it is just building a new plant there were they won’t have work interruptions every 3-4 yrs. That is what makes this whole thing rediculous. No jobs will be lost or moved, they just chose to build another plant in a location that wouldnt create work outages that they have had in washington..

      Report Post »  
  • arvadadan
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 2:10am

    How Wisconsin is taking care of the union problem most interesting reading, union is laying off 40 per cent of its staff, because of expected dues losses…
    http://blog.heartland.org/2011/08/econ-101-for-teachers/

    Report Post » arvadadan  
  • shabe
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 1:57am

    Wow, unbelievable that the NLRB is going after Boeing for moving work to another state. This government continues to stick it’s nose in places it has absolutely no business in. And people wonder why business continues to look for alternatives? Kudos to Judicial Watch for going after these anti free enterprise thugs.

    Report Post »  
  • alkuz
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 1:50am

    I must point that Federal Judges have life tenure. They are only removed by impeachment by The Hhouse and conviction bt 2/3 of The Senate.

    Report Post »  
  • DaveOregon
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 1:19am

    If the NRLB will ignore congress – why can’t Boeing just ignore the NRLB? Fairs, fair, right? Same with Obummer – he ignores the Federal courts on Obummercare – so why should not Texas and Oklahoma, etc just ignore EPA and Interior Dept and just drill away! Let’s see Obummer call out the National Guard – and let them meet up against the Texas and Oklahoma State police, Rangers, etc. Man – that would be a show! Your really think NG would fire on American’s over EPA rules????

    Report Post »  
    • TexasKnight
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 2:22am

      Unfortunately it is not the state they would come after. Any company that ignored the EPA would be bankrupted. The EPA would lock up their accounts and sue them. With BO stinking up the white house, dont doubt that they would do this.

      Report Post » TexasKnight  
    • Mage
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 5:39pm

      In the past National Guard troops would be under the direct control of that states governer for in state operaitions such as during Katrina. I was a member of the OK Army National Guard and Operation Red Thunder during that time. Just recently congress aproved a measure allowing the president to take control of troops that for the last 200 years answered to the governer as comander and chief. Obama has to get control of states and their troops. http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=170453 Its frightning.

      Report Post »  
  • lonewolf57
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 1:09am

    Obama is’nt the head of nothing.He never has been.He’s a boy on a expensive ride for the taxpayer

    I hope everybody has learned the lesson.Never elect Presidents on skin color or past indiscrections.

    Report Post » lonewolf57  
  • lonewolf57
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 1:03am

    Hey,you Union people move down to Mexico and South America.Start anew.Lets just see how your brand of Freedom,Liberty and Justice pans out.I’m serious.

    Now after your GONE,the USA will THRIVE once again,without leeches/vampires/bloodsuckers.Democrats.Progressives,Liberals.GIT

    Report Post » lonewolf57  
  • lonewolf57
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 12:55am

    Send your $ to Judicial Watch.Every little bit helps.Boeing can also take their business to another Country.People needing jobs are everywhere.

    Report Post » lonewolf57  
  • Deep_Thoughts
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 12:53am

    As someone who has been in 2 unions, i can tell you its nothing but corruption and extortion…..

    Report Post » Deep_Thoughts  
    • db321
      Posted on August 18, 2011 at 1:10am

      You think – With untethered Obama by the Lib Media it has gotten way worst.

      Report Post » db321  
  • Rogue
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 12:24am

    Seriously, they must have to wipe the hard drives clean every night at the White House.

    Report Post » Rogue  
  • markthespark
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 12:14am

    And the POTUS wonders why business is not hiring; maybe he should not be suing successful businesses and telling them what to do! Who in their right mind would invest with this crowd in the Whitehouse?

    Report Post »  
  • HorseCrazy
    Posted on August 18, 2011 at 12:09am

    good! as a gal from the lame state of washington I was so happy when boeing grew a pair and stopped giving in to the unions repeated demands here and took off to open new business in North Carolina. These fools in the machinist union were protesting in front of an area with a food bank during record high unemployment. It doesnt get stupider. I am glad someone is sticking up for Boeing and suing NLRB for their communist tacticts. So tired of this my state has almost 10% employment if the union wasnt like this, boeing would have stayed and many people I know would gladly have taken their jobs.

    Report Post »  
  • NuffSaid
    Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:51pm

    Well, I think if this bunch Obama lickey’s came to Texas, we might treat ‘em purty ugly. I’d say these NLRB peckerwoods are almost treacherous, I mean, treasonous.

    Report Post »  
  • Blazer123
    Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:48pm

    Next week’s headline: “Boeing under investigation by DOJ”

    Report Post »  
  • abbygirl1994
    Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:34pm

    I am waiting for the unions to fall off the face of the earth… evil and corruption.. and those who are their minions are as bad.. apparently they don’t give a flying crap about America.. or they would be fighting against the corruption. Trumpka is nothing more than another Jimmy Hoffa and we all know what happened to him.. gone from the face of the earth!!!!!!! Probably had his feet encased in cement and thrown in the ocean!!

    Report Post » abbygirl1994  
  • dwh320
    Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:21pm

    Keep exposing the lies of Obama and his army of Union thugs at the NLAB. If there is a fund to donate to to help in this fight please provide the link and I will contribute.

    Report Post » dwh320  
    • ALL4FREEDOM
      Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:44pm

      Contact the National Right to Work Committee, 8001 Braddock Road, Springfield, VA 22160. Phone 800.325.7892. They have been fighting these b@st@rds for years, with significant success, and can use all the help they can get.

      Report Post »  
  • UBETHECHANGE
    Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:19pm

    The truth needs to come out and those involved need to be fired/impeached and prosecuted. No more lies and political treason! No more gangsta government! We need to take America back!

    Report Post »  
  • relagassa
    Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:15pm

    Think you mean “rogue” , which is bad and not “rouge” which is a cosmetc skin coloring (not bad). I believe the NLRB process, motivation and decision is bad; it is corrupt!

    Report Post »  
  • miketheartist
    Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:09pm

    They fight for the unions!

    http://fav.me/d3ki843

    http://www.miketheartist.net

    Report Post » miketheartist  
  • 82dAirborne
    Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:05pm

    If every “rouge agency” in our government gets sued we are going to need more courts!!

    Report Post » 82dAirborne  
    • I.Gaspar
      Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:14pm

      Let’s not forget all the rogue judges that have been slipped into the judicial system by the leftists. We need to replace them.

      Report Post »  
    • Quagaar Warrior
      Posted on August 17, 2011 at 11:55pm

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      We’ll also need to build more prisons. And with all of those corrupt Democrats & RINOs being convicted & sentenced, that alone would create enough jobs to bring the unemployment rate down to almost 0%.
      Ahhhh! The perfect job creating stimulus!!!
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      Report Post »  
1 2 3

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love