Business

No Spin Zone? O‘Reilly Asks Romney if Obama Is ’a Socialist’ & He Says…

“Is he a socialist?” asks FOX News’s blunt television host Bill O’Reilly.

“I prefer to use the term that ‘he’s just over his head,’” the former governor of Massachusetts responds with what he must have thought was a safe answer.

“Yeah, but you gotta’ look at his economic plan, and that economic plan was top down, federal leadership getting us out of the recession — we spent trillions of dollars–and people say, ‘Listen, the guy’s a socialist!‘ It’s class warfare; that‘s what he’s going to wage against you if you get the nomination,” O’Reilly says, gesturing towards Romney.

“You’re a rich guy, you’re out of touch,” the host adds.

Concluding his prediction that Romney should prepare for “class warfare” should he earn the GOP nomination, Bill O’Reilly repeats the question.

“Is he a socialist?”

“You know, I consider him a ‘big government’ liberal democrat. I think as you look at his policies, you conclude that he thinks Europe got it right and we got it wrong,” Romney answered, again avoiding the question.

“I think Europe got it wrong. I think Europe is not working in Europe and I’ll battle him on that day in and day out,” Romney added.

Watch the O’Reilly interview:


While some analysts would applaud Romney’s refusal to out-and-out accuse the president of being a “socialist,” other commentators would disagree with this tactic.

Back in March, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh said the following:

So the presidential campaign, here’s the question. You got an incumbent, Barack Hussein Obama. Does the Republican nominee focus on what we all believe to be true, the guy’s got a different view of the American tradition than all the rest of us? Do we say…Obama as anti-traditional American values, do we say this guy is a socialist, this guy’s models consist of Marx and Alinsky, do we go that way, do we point that out?

Or do we say to ourselves, you know what, most people don’t want to think that about their president. There‘s such reverence for the office that people don’t want to think that even if they admit that they made a mistake in voting for the guy, they don‘t want to think that they’ve elected somebody who is essentially an enemy of traditional American founding values…

In other words, do we depersonalize this and strictly focus the reelection campaign in the opposition to Obama on policy or do we go full bore and warn the American people why his policies are what they are?

I dare say that if you are of the camp that wants to hear the Republican presidential nominee talk about the guy’s a socialist, the guy doesn’t believe in traditional American founding values, that you’re gonna be sad and disappointed. You’re not gonna have a candidate say that. The candidate is gonna accept that Obama’s a legitimate American politician, a legitimate president, just got totally cockeyed policies. We’re gonna hear policy this, policy that, that‘s why we’re in the dumper.

Based on the widespread assumption that Mitt Romney will be the GOP presidential nominee, and based on his answers during the O’Reilly segment, it would appear that Limbaugh’s prediction was spot-on accurate.

Comments (504)

1 2 3 ... 11
  • DeHypnotizeAmerica
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:23am

    Glenn Beck shold interview Roy Masters http://www.fhu.com/aboutroy.html

    America’s first radio counselor

    In 1960 Roy Masters started America’s first conservative talk radio show on KTYM in Los Angeles, California. Roy Masters and his “Advice Line” radio program continue today as an institution on radio. “Advice Line” is currently broadcast nationwide on a 190 radio stations and available via the internet.

    Report Post » DeHypnotizeAmerica  
  • TRONINTHEMORNING
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:20am

    Ah, Mitt, you flip-flopping flip-flopper. And ZERO guts. You don’t deserve to run the country.

    Report Post »  
    • Top_Down
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:32am

      Romney has been proven to be just as consistent as all the other candidates. Way more consistent than Gingrich and perry, and just as much as Ron Paul and Bachmann. Santorum is probably the most consistent.

      Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:38am

      @TRON

      I agree .. we don’t need another McLame either giving the election to Obama .. we need A FIGHTER .. who will say what he means and mean what he says … if he can’t say Obama IS a socialist … geez … I would have gone one better and called him what he really is .. a MARXIST!

      TEA!

      Report Post »  
    • ed0315
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:46am

      Right, but Obama does?

      Report Post » ed0315  
    • TRONINTHEMORNING
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:49am

      Well said, CATB!

      Report Post »  
    • NYLDS
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:07am

      Before you mouth off, do your research, and be specific. Name calling does nothing to educate and nothing to further your assertions other than prove you have nothing to stand on. Bellow is a link to what I believe is a fair assessment of Mitt’s record based on articles, interviews, debates. I also believe that his explanations during the recent Iowa debate outline how he could say things like wanting to have abortion safe and legal – because it was under the umbrella of being the governor of Massachussetts, and therefore required to uphold and maintain the law of the idiots who voted those kinds of butchering laws in, even though he was “personally against it”. See for yourself. The guys who assembled this website, I think, did a fantastic job. Good luck and God speed.

      http://www.thedailycandidate.com/projects/nov/abortion/abortion_forum.html

      Report Post »  
    • The10thAmendment
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:27am

      Romney is a lowlife POS with nothing but a French Socialist agenda, so spare me your mouth puppet symposium of Romney because he happens to share your same faith NYLDS.

      Romney is so similar in lack of principle and character that supporting that clown is no different than supporting Obama.

      Report Post » The10thAmendment  
    • American Soldier (Separated)
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:35pm

      Romney as consistent as Ron Paul?!

      Now I’ve heard it all!

      Report Post » American Soldier (Separated)  
    • 4114stephanie
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:39pm

      Mitt and Newt are progressives; Ron Paul is a true Libertarian with a foreign policy that would be detrimental to our way of life; Santorum is the only truly GOOD REPUBLICan candidate. A Rick Santorum – Allen West ticket should be our little secret.. support them secretly and let the socialists think that we are falling for their progressives!! hehe

      Report Post » 4114stephanie  
    • c0mm0nsense
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 4:50pm

      4114stephanie
      Allen West? He supported the National Defense Act. Did you not see the interview with Glenn here on the Blaze?

      Report Post » c0mm0nsense  
    • 4114stephanie
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 5:28pm

      @Common Sense
      I did not see that… I will check it out. So hard to find someone to trust these days..
      I still feel that Santorum is trustworthy!

      Report Post » 4114stephanie  
  • barber2
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:16am

    Think Romney displays just the cleverness that it will take to overcome the character assassination , distortions, and lies that the Democrats will have in the mine field of Campaign 2012. Just like the Trolls who post all of their annoying or Jason Levin style phony comments on the Blaze, the Left is a Master Manipulator, ala Saul Alinski and his favorite ” radical,” Satan! Lies and Deception.

    Report Post »  
    • rock-n-roll-rebel
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:23am

      Very good point Barber2, we do have to keep in mind what the ultimate goal is here but what I have been looking at is how harshly the republican establishment is attacking Gingrich. Makes me wonder why they are so afraid of him.

      Report Post » rock-n-roll-rebel  
    • rock-n-roll-rebel
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:27am

      cont… and lets face it Gingrich would make Obama seem like a lost child in a debate.

      Report Post » rock-n-roll-rebel  
    • smackdown33
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:28am

      So, we get Romney and gain what? Romney would be Alinsky’s pick for a GOP contender. It’s a win win proposition.

      Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:40am

      I don’t think so .. .having someone who wouldn’t take him on last time .. didn’t work out so well … remember McLame?

      Report Post »  
    • Thatsitivehadenough
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:42am

      I knew I wouldn’t vote for Romney before I read this. Now know that I absolutely won’t vote for him after I read it too.

      Anyone who can’t call Obama a socialist is either a socialist or a fool.

      Report Post » Thatsitivehadenough  
    • americanfirst
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:56am

      I disagree. I think Romney is a conservative through and through. I believe him to be fair and accountable which is how he strives to govern and yes who he is, what his values are, who he is striving to be play a great deal into that.
      To be sure the American public wants someone to voice their case against a man who is currently usurping the office of the presidency. A man who along with democratic leaders have sought and succeeded in many ways to consolidate power unto themselves to pursue a global-socialist agenda to bring the US economy and society down from it‘s sound origins to the world’s standards in an effort to level the playing field.
      Our concerns are the obvious ones to all…
      Mitt Romney is a good man. He is also the better man. He will likely also be the better leader. We would like to see him deal with Obama and those that have so blatantly abused their power by publicly denouncing them, illegitimizing their authority and the policies they have enacted to damage us as a nation. We want the wrongs rectified.
      Mitt is a balance and principled centered man unlike we have seen in a very long time. We understand his dispositions and clearly know he is a man of integrity that will consistently strive for the higher ground. He has my respect.
      Tempering that reality with our need for justice in light of the last 3+ years IS the balancing act!
      Mitt Romney 2012!

      Report Post »  
    • JLGunner
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:22am

      @ rock I would love to see a Gingrich / obama debate. You are right though, we need to keep our eye on the prize and that being the end of obama, his 40 czars and his huge government machine. Getting our country back on track will happen overnight.

      Report Post » JLGunner  
    • RejectFalseIcons
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 1:13pm

      Here is the quintessential difference between ron paul supporters and republicans.

      Republicans want obama stopped. Ron Paul supporters want a constitutional government.

      If Ron Paul will stop Obama, but Mitt/Newt/Michele/Rick/Jon/Rick won’t return us to a constitutional government, doesn’t that mean that the wisest choice for a nominee is Ron Paul? He will serve the interest of both groups.

      Ron Paul’s supporters are not willing to compromise a constitutional government on the short term for continued unconstitutional rule on the long term. Republicans just want the current president out. Establishment Republicans want Obama out but a continued support for unconstitutional government.

      So you have to ask yourself. Are you a Republican? If so, are you a Ron Paul republican, and advocate constitutional government – or are you an Establishment Republican and you want to see progressive socialism continue?

      If you don’t want either, which are you more comfortable with? A constitutional government, or socialism?

      This is the simplest way to reason to your choice. Before you ask, there is no such thing as a compromise between consitutional and unconstitutional. It is one or the other – you must choose to preserve our constitution by supporting the candidate that will absolutely adhere to it, or to let it fade even further by voting for anyone else.

      Report Post » RejectFalseIcons  
    • barber2
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 4:40pm

      Think they are afraid that he will have an intemperate melt- down as he had in the past. Or that the Lefty Media will either cause or create just that. Think Mitt has a better record of being more Obama “cool.”

      Report Post »  
  • thegreatcarnac
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:14am

    Obama is definitely a socialist, even communist. He is a racist. He is illegal and an illegal president. The fact that Romney will not even call obama a socialist is very telling. Romney does not have what it takes to combat this worm unless he toughens up.

    Report Post »  
    • Top_Down
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:27am

      No, it shows he is great with strategy. He knows the left and independents will use that against him and it may hurt his chances of beating Obama. Interesting that candidates usually work on their base in the primary and then flip-flop to gain the independents. Romney set himself up in the middle to win both sides, not having to flip-flop, but be honest to both sides.

      This is a strategy that may hurt him with some on the right, but most of those wouldn’t vote for him anyway. This is why the independents are favoring him. Plus Romney has Obama’s record to eviscerate the President and has attacked him un-mercifully. That is why Romney is the only one to get a response from Obama, such as Romney helped Obama reconsider his Hawaii vacation and foreign policy rhetoric.

      Report Post »  
    • flipper1073
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 2:10pm

      TOP-DOWN
      that makes no sense how can you win the GOP nomination
      without the rightwing base ? With democrats an moderate independents ?
      That might work in the General but not in the Primaries

      Report Post » flipper1073  
  • Scottainc
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:12am

    Come on Romney, you are running for the top spot, MAKE the CALL.
    Sound it out, you can say it SO-CIAL-IST.

    Report Post »  
    • oldguy49
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:17am

      romney is not much better……..if we don’t get a serious conservative, if we let the establishment run a candidate in on us we are f$%#@# they all talk a good game but look at how they were before they began there run………last chance people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • Marine25
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 6:20pm

      The reason Romney won’t call Obama a socialist is that he knows the definition of socialist, so he would be lying to call him one. No one posting here seems to know the meaning of the word socialist. So add “socialist” to the list of words not understood by those here at The Blaze, the list includes socialist, communist, Nazi, Fascist, unconstitutional, conservative, impeachment, teason and natural-born. 10th grade history students know the definitions of these words. But this new breed of “conservative” certainly does not. Perhaps it is why our primary is full of historical gaffes, name-calling and general buffoonery. These candidates are playing to the new base of the Republican Party. The old base, 50 times larger than this tea-party wing, is going to leave us without saying goodbye (as they started to in ‘08) if our party is hijacked further to the wing-nut, reactionary, bigoted, nationalistic extreme right. Tough to win a general election when average middle-American voters think we are led by buffoons and cranks. Educated Americans are smart enough to know Obama is not a socialist or a fascist and realize that comparing him to Adolph Hitler and the Third Reich is intellectually and historically irresponsible. The tea-party calls such educated Americans “elite”, for it seems to this new race of “conservatives”, “elite” actually means “smarter than we are”. Read a book, try a dictionary, it won’t kill you. If you don’t, it will kill the GOP as

      Report Post »  
  • USAloveitorleaveit
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:11am

    Sure wish Mitt would just call it like it is instead of ”sugar coating it”. Why not say the guy is a socialist or communist with muslim sympathies, and his goal is to destroy the USA as we know it. By now the independants and moderate democrats ( who are not union thugs and the welfare class ), should be ready to ackknowledge he is destroying our economy, our military, our morals, and everything else we hold near and dear.

    Report Post »  
    • smackdown33
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:16am

      Romney should say, “Yes, Obama is a socialist, just like me!”

      Report Post »  
  • macpappy
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:11am

    The founders of this country did NOT place our security in the hands of God. Where did you get that happy crappy from. The security of this country is assured by the Congress directing the Military to secure it.
    Nevermind your link, your comment was enough.

    Report Post » macpappy  
    • WakingSheep
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 1:33pm

      Did the founders plan on having the U.S. military policing the streets?

      Report Post »  
    • Poggle The Stick
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 8:53pm

      Mitt Romney: “Yes, such would be pollitically correct, and it would be nessesary for the American people.”

      Report Post » Poggle The Stick  
  • IslandMama
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:10am

    If we are going to straighten out this mess, we need God back in America. The only way to invite God back is to choose a candidate that is inherently, truly Christian. I am not saying this because Romney is a Mormon; I happen to believe (and I know a lot of you do not) that Mormons are Christians. However, I am saying this based on how the candidates act and how they conduct themselves. The only ones possibly Christian enough to help us are Michele Bachman (by far), maybe Rick Santorum (don’t know enough about him yet), and maybe, maybe Ron Paul. I really think Bachman is our best bet if we focus on Christian values and fundamentals. She has proven she cannot be bought and she has a high standard of moral values that shine through in everything she does. It‘s not about who’s the best politician. It’s about who will do what God wants done. Let’s keep that in mind and let Him direct our paths.

    Report Post »  
    • Top_Down
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:20am

      If you want to talk about conducting themselves then Romney should be there. He opposed every piece of pro-abortion legislation that came passed his desk. He fought with the Catholic Church and evangelical groups to fight the Contraception pill and gay marriage. He even sued the legislature to vote on allowing the people vote on banning gay marriage, that was his personal lawsuit and gay marriage ban. He has always fought on the side of life and traditional marriage. That is his record, for that reason he should definitely be part of that list.

      Romney has fought for pro-life and pro-traditional marriage causes throughout his whole time in office. Thank goodness he saw the errors of his ways when it came to taking government out of restricting abortions. He once fought to keep government out until he saw how much Roe v. Wade cheapened life. This is why the Catholic church in Massachusetts and many evangelical leaders stood behind him throughout his administration. The Pilot Catholic News wrote about this, his conversion and they are the ones to know since they were some that worked beside him in Mass.

      Report Post »  
    • AmericanStrega
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:00am

      The GOP isn’t going to allow Bachman, Santorium (SP), Ron Paul, or anyone else but Romney to be the GOP candidate. He‘s the one they want and he’s the one we’re going to be stuck with. I don’t like him, but I detest Obama more. Mind you, I think Romney is Obama-Lite, but I will vote for Romney simply because Obama has to go. Now, I really don’t think Obama will ever be out of office. I‘ve typed it before and I’ll type it again: If Obama is voted out there will be riots in the streets of the bigger cities and Obama will declare Marshal Law. This will void the election results and make Obama the first American dictator.

      Report Post »  
    • Gary Fishaholic
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:21am

      Good post thank you I agree and would like to see Michelle Bachman or Rick Santorum get out front so more people can get behind them. Although I do believe that any of the other candidates would be better than what we have now.

      Report Post » Gary Fishaholic  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:10am

    Obama is both a SOCIALIST and a PROGRESSIVE in addition to a RADICAL. One more reason that Romney should not be voted for is that he will not call a spade for a spade, you have to make a stand for or against at some point for what is THERE and is REAL.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • AmeriCat
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:32am

      a Progressive….with shades of socialism.
      and when one listens closely to Romney….so is he.

      And….even though it is for a different self-serving, rather than ideological, reason,
      the end-game is the same.

      Report Post »  
    • AmericanStrega
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:07am

      So if Romney becomes the GOP candidate will you not vote for him? Will you write in the person you want? If you do that it will put Obama right back into the WH. Not that I think he’ll ever be out (see my previous post).

      Report Post »  
    • audiemurphy
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:21pm

      opinions are like cat buts all cat people have one.
      Romney is in politics as are all running so tree is going to be some politicking going on which is exactly what his non response is.
      I though u were smarter than that but then I never did meet a cat I thought was smart.

      Report Post » audiemurphy  
  • P8riot
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:10am

    If Romney becomes President, his job is not to name-call, but to fix the problems of the country. He made the right move by not calling Obama a socialist. He took the high road and those who take the high road always win in the end.

    Report Post » P8riot  
    • P8riot
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:18am

      Its the same reason the great Ronald Reagan never called his successor, Jimmy Carter, a socialist. Jimmy Carter was a bigger socialist than Obama is! Romney took the same high road Reagan took. Did that make Reagan a RINO???

      Report Post » P8riot  
    • barber2
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:25am

      I agree. All of the hot heads who love to rant here are either Lefty Trolls trying to stir up disunity in the Republican Party or else just plain foolish. Go read some Saul Alinski and see the tactics these Lefties use. They have run, in the NYT for one, a character assassination of EVERY potential Republican candidate. Think Romney should take the high road. Have his people put out some good videos showing the Democrats IN THEIR OWN WORDS saying all of the junk they have: Biden’s gaffs/ lies. Obama’s class baiting, anti-rich rhetoric…. Police acting stupidly… tons of examples out there!

      Report Post »  
    • audiemurphy
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:23pm

      well said !!!

      Report Post » audiemurphy  
  • BoomSlander
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:10am

    If you think Obama is a socialist you should ask a socialist what they think. They’ll laugh at you. He’s no more socialist than Bush, Clinton, or many others. People need to educate themselves on what socialism is instead of listening to O’Reilly.

    Report Post »  
    • KeithOlberdink
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:30am

      I’d say obozo is totalatarian fascist. I think that fits the bill nicely.

      Report Post » KeithOlberdink  
  • Twiinz
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:08am

    I think the reason Newt is doing well in the polls with the Tea Party and others is that he has the spine to call Obama what he is. A Marxist/Socialist, Appeaser, Liberal …… Only Newt and Bachman are strong enough to stand up to the left and the media. I am sick of milk toast moderate politicians being afraid to say the truth. Say it loud and proud. Be FOR America and FOR the Constitution. STOP with the wimpy “let’s not be partisan” crap. We are in a fight for the very being of this great Nation. The democraps are partisan about everything. They spout tolerance but attack all things Christian or Conservative. We don’t need to work with them. We need to DEFEAT them. Why is it that the women of the GOP like Palin and Bachman seem to have a bigger pair than many of the men??

    Report Post » Twiinz  
    • AmeriCat
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:00am

      Yes, Gingrich’s overt FAKE expressions of disagreement and anger
      ……directed at Obama…..
      are THE reason, probably the ONLY reason,
      the Tea Party has jumped on Newt’s bandwagon.

      That has become even more important than actual policy…
      which is a non-thinking, gut-leading approach.
      Senseless…but that is what is happening.

      Wake up, Tea Party!
      You’re starting to drink kool aid of a different brand.
      TEA…..now required to be stronger than ever….

      Report Post »  
  • liberalsarealiens
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:08am

    RINO Romney will never call BO a sociaist because he is a “big gov. ” kind of guy himself. DONT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE AGAIN PEOPLE!

    Report Post » liberalsarealiens  
  • AhLeahIris
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:04am

    This is the reason Mr. Romney just won’t cut it: http://wp.me/p1HGwx-1Ly

    Report Post » AhLeahIris  
  • Stoic one
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:02am

    And it is because you do not have the testes to say “obama is a Socialist” you will not have my vote in the First poll called the PRIMARIES.

    Report Post » Stoic one  
    • Vickie Dhaene
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 12:38pm

      Your right. This PC is BS. If Romney can not call him out now, he never will.
      I will not vote for RINO ROMNEY.

      Report Post »  
  • LovingAmerica
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:00am

    If Mitt Romneycare is our candidate, we can expect another John McCain – same song – second verse. Lilly-livered and cowardly, afraid to confront Obama on the issues. Mitt will hand Obama the election on a silver platter in the very same manner as McCain. Romneycare/Obamacare – there is little difference between these two socialist progressives anyway.

    Report Post »  
    • futureatstake
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:18am

      Thank you! I have been preaching your sentiment to my friends and family ever since Romney declared. When are we going to stop compromising on our core convictions in order to nominate the most “Electable” candidate. Put the most qualified and principled candidate up against Obama win or loose.

      Report Post »  
    • thegrassroots
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:34am

      Romney is spineless and wishy-washy and he doesn’t have it in him to confront BHO. That’s why the liberal media keeps putting Romney as the front runner in the polls. The libs are HOPING Romney is the Republican candidate.

      Any one of the other candidates will / are confronting BHO head on and BHO’s scared of them. BHO knows Romney’s a changes-direction-with-the-wind kinda guy, just like he is. BHO’s just better at devious than Romney is and, therefore, BHO believes he can beat Romney.

      Imho, the primaries could show some surprises. Even tho the media keeps talking up Newt vs Romney, Grassroots America might have some better ideas. We haven’t heard the last from Bachmann and Santorum. And, Perry can’t be counted out either. A dark horse could come galloping to the front. Interesting To Watch!

      Report Post »  
  • quarter horseman
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:00am

    Yes Rush is correct, the GOP will not attack this socialist bass terd, and call him for what he is.

    Report Post » quarter horseman  
  • lukerw
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:59am

    If “Socialist” is a Dirty Word… then, Romney does not want to use it against someone… because he is a PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST!

    Report Post » lukerw  
  • semihardrock
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:59am

    THE ENTIRE USA is a Socialist Structure so the question is irrelevent as this candidate will ONLY be running for The King of The Land of Socialism (which in the end will be Communism)

    Each ILLUSION OF FREEDOM is Government Control……One done financially and implementing “Laws” to the masses AND the other by the barrel of a gun.

    Report Post » semihardrock  
    • Beckofile
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:28am

      You are so correct. When I studied political science in the indoctrination station we studied Marx and Communism. I just remember thinking back then that the USA was closer to following the teachings of Socialis then the USSR or China

      Report Post » Beckofile  
  • singleparent
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:59am

    mitt newt or obama all the same…anyone who think‘s differently are fool’ing themselves… you are not going to turn this country back to what it used to be and stand for by vote’ing. we are screw’ed !!

    Report Post »  
  • arta
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:53am

    Want to understand Bill O’Reilly ? 20% of Fox News stock is owned by the king of saudi arabia and another 8% is owned by one of his nephew princes and who knows how much is owned by other muslim terrorists. And if anyone thinks that they don’t influence news content then then simply need to remove their head from their dark smelly place……

    Report Post »  
    • scriptor_clm
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:03am

      And exactly what does your comment have to do with the above article?

      Report Post » scriptor_clm  
    • Plutos_Pal
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:04am

      And the Saudis would be anti-Obama why? Muslims love the guy. I think you’re the one with your head in your “dark smelly place”.

      Report Post »  
    • SmallGovBigGuns
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:05am

      so your implying the “GOP” news source is backed by terrorists and this is somehow influencing how GOPers think for the worse…. YET GOPers are more prone to think foreign intervention in the middle east is neccessary? So your saying the terrorists are backing fox to teach us GOPer sheep that we shouldnt trust the middle east… wow really good logic at trying to prove fox is evil moron.

      Report Post »  
    • macpappy
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:07am

      And that has what to do with the subject at hand?

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • smackdown33
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:12am

      Must be why O’Reilly is a contributor to the Jewish World Review, and why Fox always presents its stable of neocon Jews like Krauthammer, Kristol, Goldberg… . Fox News President Peter Chernin is Jewish. Murdoch’s father was half Jewish.
      Facts go against your claim.

      Report Post »  
  • GhostOfJefferson
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:51am

    “I think as you look at his policies, you conclude that he thinks Europe got it right and we got it wrong,” Romney answered, again avoiding the question.”

    I really despise politicians. He tried to not appear to say yes, while saying yes, where you could not accuse him of saying yes.

    “Europe got it right/wrong” means got what right/wrong? Socialism, guys, c’mon. Geesh.

    Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
  • Ookspay
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:51am

    Hey Mitt how about saying “why yes Bill, he is a socialist” ? This kid glove nicey-nice Mormon crap is gonna get our A$$ kicked, again!

    Report Post » Ookspay  
    • sawbuck
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 11:26am

      Didn’t John McCain take this kind approach..?

      That’s the way to do it …Stay on point….
      You don’t want to be-friend any potential , future business associates . Or take this opportunity to make a stand against mandated health-care that YOU.. were guilty of and you continuously say, you where wrong and now “You see the error of your ways” and that you have Changed …LIAR…!
      You had your chance to tell the world the difference ,on your views , between socialism and “the new Mitt” ideology. I’m so sick of people saying he learned from his mistakes. But out of his own mouth..!
      You had a chance Mr. Romney…to show the difference between “the New Mitt Romney” and B.H.O. on socialism.
      And you blew it ….!
      Obama’s team and his media minions ,will drag you through the all you can eat
      Socialist-salad-bar . Like I said before He’s Obama-Lite..!
      Just another False-Patriot-Elitist trying to grab the GOP nomination .
      That way He will have a …Seat at the table …!
      Just like…. John McCain…When he graciously excepts defeat !

      Report Post » sawbuck  
    • dshevlin
      Posted on December 21, 2011 at 1:16am

      OOKSPAY – You have good sight. I love the neighborhood example to @ScottSCOBIG above! That is it. Reality. Okie From Muskogee needs some additional facts, he has only read the Ron Paul script book to you! I get a kick out of people like him. All those wars we intervened in, Iraq vs. Kuwait, Iraq vs. Iran, Iraq vs. Saudi Arabia, took all their oil. HA! Well where is it? The interventions were about defending our allies. Ron Paul says don‘t look at what’s happening to them. Pretend it’s not there. War is out there, there are enemies trying to kill us & Israel everyday. Totally clueless people with this no more war crap. Sounds great but it is not logical.. Let’s hope neither Romney or Paul is the nominee or like you say, we will get our a$$’s kicked big time.

      Report Post »  
  • macpappy
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:47am

    If you ever needed a reason to drop this clown as a candidate, this interview gave us a good one. He can not even make himself say the words…Obama is a Socialist. That my friends is because Romney is a socialist also.

    Report Post » macpappy  
    • Bum thrower
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:52am

      His name is misspelled: it’s R I N O…….

      Report Post »  
    • old white guy
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:56am

      failure to talk about obama’s socialist policies and his commie ties will result in a loss for conservatives. there is more than enough truth out there to bury obama.

      Report Post »  
    • smackdown33
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:56am

      The neocons at Fox News are working for the liberal from Mass., Romney. Fox is becoming the MSNBC of the GOP.

      Report Post »  
    • Buck Shane
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:14am

      If Romney is the Rep candidate, I will not vote for him. ROMNEYCARE!

      Report Post » Buck Shane  
    • macpappy
      Posted on December 20, 2011 at 10:15am

      @smackdown3
      Exactly, it is driving me crazy. I thought this election should be a foregone conclusion, but with the defection of Fox, it is going to be a long row to hoe. I am so disapointed in foxnews, it is evedent that for the last year and a half they are towing the liberal line. Pushing Romney on us is unforgiveable.

      Report Post » macpappy  
  • IMPEACHBHO
    Posted on December 20, 2011 at 9:46am

    He is a Marxist.
    http://youtu.be/7kqVZUCRth0?t=9m50s

    Report Post » IMPEACHBHO  
1 2 3 ... 11

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love