Norway Massacre Suspect Patronized Prostitutes; Says Liberal Mom Helped ‘Feminize’ Him
- Posted on July 25, 2011 at 1:39am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
OSLO, Norway (AP) — Anders Behring Breivik said he was a boy when his life’s path began to turn. It was during the first Gulf War, when a Muslim friend cheered at reports of missile attacks against American forces.
“I was completely ignorant at the time and apolitical but his total lack of respect for my culture (and Western culture in general) actually sparked by interest and passion for it,” the suspect in Norway’s bombing and mass shooting wrote in his 1,500-page manifesto.
The 32-year-old Norwegian said it was the NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999 that “tipped the scales” for him because he sympathized with Serbia’s crackdown on ethnic Albanian Muslims in Kosovo. A year later he said he realized that what he called the “Islamization of Europe” couldn’t be stopped by peaceful means.
Police and Breivik’s lawyer says he confessed to, but denied criminal responsibility for, Friday’s bombing at government headquarters in Oslo and the mass shooting later that day at an island summer camp organized by the youth wing of the ruling Labor Party. At least 93 people were killed in the attacks.
Breivik’s manifesto chronicled events that deepened his contempt for Muslims and “Marxists” he blamed for making Europe multicultural. He suggested his friends didn’t even know what he was up to, and comments from several people who had contact with the quiet blond man indicate he was right.
From September 2009 through October 2010, Breivik posted more than 70 times on Dokument.no, a Norwegian site with critical views on Islam and immigration. In one comment, he entertained the idea of a European Tea Party movement.
In December of 2009, Breivik showed up at a meeting organized by the website’s staff.
“He was a bit strange. As one could see from his postings, he had obviously read a lot but not really digesting it,” said Hans Rustad, the editor of the website.
But Rustad said he “hadn’t the faintest idea” about Breivik’s murderous plans.
“Other people have the same views on the Net and they don’t go out and become mass murderers. So how can you tell?” Rustad told The Associated Press.
In the document Breivik styles himself as a Christian conservative, patriot and nationalist. He looks down on neo-Nazis as “underprivileged racist skinheads with a short temper.”
Part of Breivik’s manifesto was taken almost word for word from the first few pages of the anti-technology manifesto written by “Unabomber” Ted Kaczynski, who is in federal prison for mail bombs that killed three people and injured 23 others across the U.S. from the 1970s to the 1990s.
Breivik did not cite Kaczynski, though he did for many other people whose writings he used.
Breivik changed a Kaczynski screed on leftism and what he considered to be leftists’ “feelings of inferiority” — mainly by substituting the words “multiculturalism” or “cultural Marxism” for “leftism.”
For instance, Kaczynski wrote: “One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.”
Breivik’s manifesto reads: “One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is multiculturalism, so a discussion of the psychology of multiculturalists can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of Western Europe in general.”
Breivik called his upbringing in a middle-class home in Oslo privileged even though his parents divorced when he was 1 and he lost contact with his father in his teens. His parents split when the family lived in London, where his father, Jens Breivik, was a diplomat at the Norwegian Embassy in London. A spokesman for the embassy, Stein Iversen, confirmed that Jens Breivik was employed at the embassy in the late 1970s, but wouldn’t discuss his relationship with the Oslo suspect.
Breivik said both parents supported Norway’s center-left Labor Party, which he viewed as infiltrated by Marxists.
His mother won a custody battle, but Breivik said he regularly visited his father and his new wife in France, where they lived, until his father cut off contact when Breivik was 15. The father told Norwegian newspaper VG that they lost touch in 1995, but that it was his son who wanted to cut off contact.
“We’ve never lived together, but we had some contact in his childhood,” the older Breivik, who VG said is now retired in France, was quoted as saying. “When he was young he was an ordinary boy, but reclusive. He wasn’t interested in politics at the time.”
He learned about Breivik’s massacre on the Internet. “I was reading online newspapers and then I suddenly saw his name and picture on the net,” he told VG. “It was a shock to find out. I haven’t gotten over it yet.”
Breivik’s mother lives in an ivy-covered brick apartment building in western Oslo, currently protected by police. Neighbors said they hadn’t seen her since a few days before the shooting. Police said they‘ve spoken to her and that she didn’t know of her son’s plans.
In his manifesto, Breivik said he had no negative experiences from his childhood, though he had issues with his mother being a “moderate feminist.”
“I do not approve of the super-liberal, matriarchal upbringing though as it completely lacked discipline and has contributed to feminize me to a certain degree,” he said.
But Breivik claims he never lacked courage: “If anyone threatened me or my friends, regardless if we were at a disadvantage, we would rather face our foes than submit and lose face.” He said that attitude was atypical among ethnic Norwegians, who had a tendency to “sissy out.”
In Internet postings attributed to Breivik on Norwegian websites, he blamed Europe’s left-wing parties for destroying the continent’s Christian heritage by allowing mass immigration of Muslims.
He said he came in contact with like-minded individuals across Europe, and together they formed a military order inspired by the Knights Templar crusaders. Their goal was to seize power in Europe by 2083 in a string of coups d’etat. Norwegian police couldn’t say whether the group existed.
Two European security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the investigation said they were familiar with increased Internet chatter from individuals claiming they belonged to a group called the new Knights Templar.
Breivik said he also tried to get engaged in domestic politics, in the Progress Party, an a populist opposition party which calls for stricter immigration controls. He claims he was a popular party member who almost got elected to the Oslo City Council seven years ago.
“That’s just something he imagined,” said Joeran Kallmyr, whom Breivik described as his “rival” in the party.
Breivik attended only five or six party meetings during those two years and left the party quietly, said Kallmyr, now a vice mayor of Oslo.
“He was very quiet, almost shy. He seemed like a well-educated man. He was very well dressed and very polite. He wore a tie all the time,” Kallmyr said. “I couldn’t see any signs that he was coming apart.”
Kallmyr said he only had one conversation with Breivik, a forgettable chat about Breivik’s business. According to Breivik’s manifesto, he was the director of Anders Behring Breivik ENK at the time, a business he describes as a “front” and a “milking cow” to finance “resistance/liberation related military operations.”
He describes elsewhere in the document how he used his own companies to secure bank loans and credit to fund his attack.
Breivik, who detailed his preparations for the attacks in eerie detail, also anticipated the hostility he would face, even from his friends and family, if he survived his “mission” and was brought to trial.
Jack Levin, a professor at Northeastern University who has written a number of books on mass murderers, said that part could be part of the motivation for the manifesto.
“He talks about visiting prostitutes and taking steroids. Why would he say such negative things about himself? I think what he’s doing is — this humanizes him,” Levin said. “He‘s trying to tell people he’s not a monster, that he’s a person with frailties and weaknesses like everybody else. It makes the killer look like a victim rather than a villain.”
___
Associated Press writer Sylvia Hui in London contributed to this report.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (168)
spikebu
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:38amI don’t think of killing kids when I think of getting rid of radical muslims. Lots of pigs do come to mind.
Report Post »Fight for America
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:29amReminds me of a drama queen who blames everyone but himself. If he owned a parakeet, it will eventually get some of the flack. He wanted his 15 minutes of fame and to get his “gorgeous” face and body photos all over the Internet.
Using his dislike of multiculteralism and Muslims as an excuse. A lot of people can be unhappy with multiculteralism and/or Islamic influence and takeover. I can almost imagine him at home alone getting his jollies thinking about the coverage he would get.
Report Post »joe3
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 7:50amread up on the profile of mass murderers, he fits it exactly, and it explains why he did what he did, he was trying to out do other mass murderers. its not his politics, and letting him speak and make excuses is not necessary, he is delusional, weather he was a communist, fascist, druid, catholic, muslim, atheist, it means nothing, he would have done it regardless. it has nothing to do with his politics, he may think it does, the fact is that this guy was a ticking time bomb. it is going to be used for political reasons by labeling him a terrorist. he is a terrorist by default, he is a mass murderer by compulsion. did he have a handler who guided him? i think norway should water board his ass and find out. experts on mass murderers who the government uses in this case know his politics had nothing to do with his compulsion to go out and out do the mass murderer who came before him, they are letting the narrative of the white al quaida go in the media to play into their anti gun, anti tea party agenda. the tea party is breaking loose world wide, and it is a threat to the power structure. they will let what this mass murderer has done demonize the movement to turn their terror fighting machine on this growing movement. this is easy to figure out once you understand what motivates a mass murderer to kill. it has nothing to do with muslims or his country or europe. he just can not help it.
Report Post »txbigfoot
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 8:09amThey can rectal exam this guy and his thoughts until the cows come home but bottom line is he was a whack job.
Report Post »And, he is no more right wing than the man in the moon. His philosophy is more left if you read about him. I think the blaze did a report on this but I cant find it.
I Love Howie Carr
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 8:24amI agree, and why’s he mad at his mom? Where’s his dad? It‘s somehow her fault that he didn’t have a more “masculine” upbringing? What did he want her to do, grow a pair?
Report Post »GiGi80
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 8:37am@ILoveHowieCarr
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8658439/Norway-killer-Father-speaks-of-absolute-horror-at-Anders-Breivik-crimes.html
Report Post »joe3
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 9:07amhttp://www.prlog.org/10014476-prevention-is-the-cure-profile-of-mass-murderer.html
prevention is the cure- profile of mass murderers
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 10:31amLet’s not lose sight of the fact that he shot up a camp which was advocating the boycotting of Israel and let’s remember that the Jewish Media falsely portrayed the radical leftist Jared Laughner, who is Jewish, as a “extreme right-winger” and “anti-Semite.” They portrayed the militant self-described “anti-racist,” bisexual, cross dressing Columbine killers (one of whom was Jewish) as “right-wingers” and “neo-Nazis.” So it was predictable that the Jewish Media would have a field day with Anders Breivik.
The Media is simply lying when it calls Breivik a “nationalist,” right-winger,“ ”fundamentalist Christian,“ ”White Supremecist,“ ”White Nationalist,“ and of course ”Neo-Nazi.” None of these are even close to being accurate. The Media is even using a Facebook profile that was made AFTER the killers name was released and is an obvious fake.
It appears that Breivik may have actually been the Norwegian equivalent of an American “Neo-Con.“ On his favorite website he even denounced the excellent Flemish party Vlaams Belang as ”racist,” and anti-gay.
Breivik said all “cultural conservatives,” including the English Defense League and the American TEA Party movement, need to adopt three things to be on his “level.“ The three attributes that Breivik said they need to adopt is being ”anti-racist,“ ”pro-gay,“ and ”pro-Israel.”
So maybe he was just another rabid Zionist doing the work of the Mossad??
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 10:34amLet’s not lose sight of the fact that he shot up a camp which was advocating the boycotting of Israel and let’s remember that the Jewish Media falsely portrayed the radical leftist Jared Laughner, who is Jewish, as a “extreme right-winger” and “anti-Semite.” They portrayed the militant self-described “anti-racist,” bisexual, cross dressing Columbine killers (one of whom was Jewish) as “right-wingers” and “neo-Nazis.” So it was predictable that the Jewish Media would have a field day with Anders Breivik.
The Media is simply lying when it calls Breivik a “nationalist,” right-winger,“ ”fundamentalist Christian,“ ”White Supremecist,“ ”White Nationalist,“ and of course ”Neo-Nazi.” None of these are even close to being accurate. The Media is even using a Facebook profile that was made AFTER the killers name was released and is an obvious fake.
It appears that Breivik may have actually been the Norwegian equivalent of an American “Neo-Con.“ On his favorite website he even denounced the excellent Flemish party Vlaams Belang as ”racist,” and anti-gay.
Breivik said all “cultural conservatives,” including the English Defense League and the American TEA Party movement, need to adopt three things to be on his “level.“ The three attributes that Breivik said they need to adopt is being ”anti-racist,“ ”pro-gay,“ and ”pro-Israel.”
So maybe he was just another rabid Zionist doing the work of the Mossad?
Report Post »Cesium
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:29pm@tech Common, just admit you’re a Nazi…
Report Post »snidley-whiplash
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 11:52pmThey raise their filthy heads again Trolls SUCK
Report Post »To all Mr. Hankeys’ (Trolls)
Wow, all these troll’s crawling out from under the rocks! Now they spell their monikers backwards or whichever way they choose to do, only to confuse themselves. Not confused here; they now speak from their a$$, from where their mouths used to be. Their comments are like farts in the wind and like crap they really stink. Trolls=Mr. Hankey and please address them as such.
Example: MONICNE / ENCINOM
ShirleyValentine
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:29amThe real solution is to dissolve the United Nations, please watch: A Hard Look at the United Nations by John F. McManus http://vimeo.com/21426660
Report Post »sodacrackers2
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 10:00amI agree that the UN has to go; they are out of control, and absolute power does corrup absolutely!
Report Post »Vital
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:29amSo basically this guy was a Pagan and wanted his country to go back to the old ways and culture?
Report Post »Tired_of_the_lies
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 9:21amNo, he is a Christofascist terrorist.
Nuff said…
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 9:39amWhat do you mean by callilng him a pagan? Does it mean because you don’t believe in islam or communism that you are a pagan? A pagan is someone who does not believe that Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of God , and has not accepted Him as Lord and Saviour.
Report Post »LeftyLieDetector
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 9:52amMost of the EU member states are Christofascist. Your point??
So he’s a practicing Christian because some hacked/faked Facebook page said so?? Hilarious!
Report Post »Lloyd Drako
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 11:13amBreivik calls himself a “Christian,” but doesn’t seem to go in much for Biblical quotations, end-times speculations or theopolitical constructions.
For him, it seems, “Christian” mostly means “authentically European” or “not Muslim.”
But he hates multiculturalism, Marxism, and feminism–how does that not make him right-wing?
I would add, he is “right wing” of the sort that “stands by Israel,” apparently not an old-school Eujropean fascist anti-Semite.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 11:55amNo, he’s just another crazy liberal.
Report Post »LeftyLieDetector
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:27amAnother great piece by Bruce Bawer (journalist in Norway) about these attacks: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/a-double-tragedy-for-norway/?singlepage=true
Report Post »Ronko
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:21amI kinda feel sorry for him and I agree that Islam is a huge problem but he’s still a murderer.
Report Post »chazman
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:45amNorway, Sweden and Finland are all countries full of Marxist sheep. The Marxist people there would rather roll over and die than face a deadly threat and try to survive. We are Americans, and we are exceptional. I will wade into a deadly threat and die to protect my own without very little thought about it. I don’t want to kill, but I will … this Norwegian, however, is a murderer, and a filthy sheep. Baaahhh …
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 7:57amI agree, I almost feel sorry for him. He has some points that I agree with, like the feminists feminizing our men, the Muslims taking over, but that doesn’t excuse what he did. I may share some of those feelings, but I guess that’s the difference between him and an American. We don’t think first of massacre, we form a Tea Party and make changes through re-election. Sad that he didn’t think he had any other choice.
Report Post »RightUnite
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:10amSeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee???? This is what liberalism does to your mind…..
Report Post »Legal Immigrant
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 5:09amHe reminds me of this now. An upperclass priviliged twit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSqkdcT25ss
Report Post »spikebu
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 5:59amMonty Python Twit?
Report Post »Legal Immigrant
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 5:06amhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSqkdcT25ss
Sums it up for me.
Report Post »obamophobe
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:12amThe manifesto is a hoax. The evil is real.
Report Post »sodacrackers2
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 10:09amAbsolutely!
Report Post »Brasil2520
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 3:54amSo the guy on the left is the guy from ABBA, in the middle it’s Natalee Holloway, so the old woman on the end, that’s the prostitute ?
Report Post »spikebu
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:45amNot funny.
Report Post »Dustoff
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 1:12pmDumb statement at best.
Report Post »conservativewoman
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 3:05amI have always believed that Liberal men have been feminized. This guy admits it and one of
Report Post »the reasons he was angry. Maybe that is why he took up the use of steroids, which drove his
anger about his country’s problems over the top.
TelepromoterNChief
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 3:37amHe was a pervert.
No different than any other liberal.
Same liberals who champion the destruction of this country. They seek to embrace any lifestyle that will deconstruct the Divine plan of a home.
Report Post »spikebu
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:36amI’m a man who has been turned into a woman by the women around me. Really? My boys, who were raised around very strong women, seem to have put out more testosterone than progesterone. If there were a threat, they would stand in front of me and my daughter. Not that we girls are helpless. We are very proficient with guns and knives. Men are more able in battle. You are bigger and stronger. That‘s who you’re supposed to be! Perhaps if we allow the enemy to think we are as weak as them, we can take them out with a dusty rag? I think our enemy has been taught (in school) everything should be “fair”. Yeah. Well “All is not fair in love and war”.
Report Post »Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 5:34amI must admit that I agree Liberalism is so unnatural that it creates mental problems for those who are trapped in it (i.e. all their friends, family, social circles are ALL EXTREME liberals). One has to twist their natural brain so much to adhere to liberal lies that anyone can go nuts.
Report Post »hillbillyinny
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:23amA strong woman is not necessarily a woman who castigates (or worse!) men. Strong women can bring out the best in boys and men if they understand God’s purpose for the sexes. Strong women can “survive” on their own (although, may not want to!) but realize that to thrive, men and women were put in this world for a multitude of complementary reasons.
The change over the last 100 years or so to using so much of our “knowledge” or “intellect” has produced a portion of people who think about everything, but don’t really understand how to act on their thoughts appropriately. When you have been taught pacifism no matter what, you may end up striking out in shear frustration, especially if that frustration is fueled by outside forces (homone therapy).
All of what we see in this and many other things IS sin in the world. If everyone was living in the full, nonadgendaed love of God and Truth, Heaven would be on earth. Let us be “strong in the Lord,“ and ”love our neighbor as ourselves,” while praying that God will open the eyes and ears of many who are blind and deaf to real life!
Report Post »southernloyalty
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:52amPlease explain something to me. If christians can never act in any form of violence, then how do they stop others from completely wiping them out. I know people say jesus would never do this or that, but is it a christian’s duty to try and be jesus and sacrifice themselves. I mean if you have to use violence to protect yourself or your nation its still violence isn’t it, and didn’t jesus preach against all violence. So technically christianity itself is a suicidal religion if you have a group of people willing to wipe you out. Maybe this guy saw it as if he was sacrificing himself so other christians could freely worship without be discriminated against by the marxist government. Too me it sounds like most self proclaimed christians would rather roll over and slowly be wiped out than to stand up for themselves. Correct me if I’m completely wrong here.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 3:03amUnfortunatly you are right in that many christians are willing to just roll over and die — the one thing to understand in the bible, and many centuries of misteaching have distorted the message considerably is that the commandment “You shall not kill” actually reads in the Hebrew “You shall not murder.”
I know Jesus always taught about peaceful means of changing matters; the fact though as I still hold and understand the old and the new, as the commandments have not been done away with, the door is open to self defense and defense of your families and friends.
Murder is the deliberate taking of a life, not in self defense, but deliberate assaulting with intend of causing death. As I have explained many times to fellow pastors; I will not initiate hostilites, and will strive to work for change peacefully, yet if the time comes for the defense of self or family or others, then so be it…I will not initiate, I will end it though.
Force must always be the absolute last option.
Report Post »conservativewoman
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 3:13am@SOUTHERNLOYALTY
Report Post »The 6th commandment has been mistranslated to Thou shall not Kill. It is actually “Thou Shall Not Murder” which is a big difference. As a Christian man it is your duty to protect your family and loved ones. To murder means to kill innocents. Killing in self-defense is not murder.
ckokkola
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:19amEc 3:1 To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:
Report Post »Ec 3:2 A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted;
Ec 3:3 A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up;
Ec 3:4 A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance;
Ec 3:5 A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together; a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing;
Ec 3:6 A time to get, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away;
Ec 3:7 A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;
Ec 3:8 A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.
Mil-Dot
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:32am@Southern
Report Post »You are exactly correct. It is the old double standard. If muslims use violence, they are freedom fighters. If Christians or Jews use violence, they are murderers and Zionists freaks. I don’t care what any lib prog has to say. Their opinions mean NOTHING to me.
spikebu
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:48amYou are completely wrong here.
Report Post »spikebu
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:56amWe can act in war. Have you ever read the Bible?
Report Post »dr_funk
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:57amThe second coming of Christ is prophesied as a total-war, all-out smackdown of epic and bloody proportions.
Report Post »Ephelia
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 5:38amSome Christian groups are actually pacifists, and would die rather than fight, but most Christians are not like that, and do engage in war and self-protection.
But you’re right, it is hard to reconcile the pacificism of Jesus with the necessity to fight on occasion. I don’t know if anyone has really solved it.
We are told to forgive our enemies. Does that include bin Laden and Saddam Hussein? Remember, these guys were babies and toddlers at one time, surely they were innocent then.
If the chance had come to me, I would have killed bin Laden without hesitation. I would forgive him in my heart and shoot him dead.
I think of it this way: a good Christian is welcome to be killed rather than kill. However, not to stand by while SOMEONE ELSE gets killed. It’s not good to be a pacifist on behalf of people who depend on you, like your family or your countrymen. To stand by and say “sorry, I’m a Christian” while they die? I don’t think so.
However, I don’t think anyone has really resolved the pacifism of Jesus with the reality of war. There are a few areas in which Jesus sets a standard that is too high for anyone to really meet. After all, we are all sinners, and maybe war is just another sin that Jesus must bear for us.
I am a Christian but not a pacifist. I stood behind the wars in Kuwait and in Afghanistan as necessary to prevent worse disasters. I admire and honor our soldiers wholeheartedly.
Maybe another poster knows the solution.
Report Post »spikebu
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 5:57amYou are completely wrong. Your views of Christianity are warped. I am a Christian who will fight to the bloody bone for what I believe. I will never force my beliefs on you. I will fight to retain my beliefs and yours, also. You can believe in the Man in the Moon. I will fight for your freedom to believe. Understand, I believe in God. I need the same freedom.
Report Post »spikebu
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:13amPlease explain the Christians may never act in violence part. I’m a little fuzzy on that. Have you ever read the Bible? Try that first. Then explain all the no violence to me. Some of us are warriors. Just how it is. God wouldn‘t have made warriors if He didn’t expect violence.
Report Post »spikebu
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:32amEphelia…Do you believe God knows you? Pacifism? Only if it’s what you want. He’s in your heart. He knows your mind. You are strong. Let Him lead.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 9:50amThe people won’t be able to defend themselves once the left has disarmed the populace. That is what the left does. Think obama and holder sending guns down into Mexico to hammas drug cartels, then orchestrating by executive order the tightening down of gun laws. If they have their way, there will be no resistance whatsoever. Then all of the power and all of the money will be in their hands. They can wipe us out at will. Doesn’t matter. We are just in earth suits anyway. What matters is our relationship to Jesus. He’s the one we will stand before on judgment day.
Report Post »sodacrackers2
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 10:16amChristians will fight to the death to protect their loved ones from harm. Whereas, some other so-called religions would rather just kill anyone who refuses to submit to them. In other words, Christians are willing to die for their faith; Islamists are willing to kill for their faith.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:46amHe was a nut. To label him politically as left-wing or right-wing is beyond thought. He was a nut.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 3:09amIndeed, a nut, no matter how he looks or his philosophy is detailed or anything is indeed a nut.
Report Post »http://artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm (cat folk art; new added)
Brasil2520
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:37am“He was very well dressed and very polite”
If we look at the early years of Hitler, he peacefully protested and got shot by the Army doing it, then went to jail, wrote a book, got voted into government, that’s how you do it folks.
But to start killing kids ? I don’t get it. Not even Adolf was that crazy, Breivik could have run for office and made changes from inside the government, look at what Adolf did in the early years of his administration, pulled Germany out of the world depression, by starting many government jobs programs like road construction, the autobahn, helping car companies like VW, (sound familier?)
Now Breivik has made progressive – multi-culturalism look good, a senseless killing that backfired.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 10:28amVery interesting post. Hitler started with 7 or 8 guys in a beer hall while Germany was stil on the eve of destruction! Never too late in America.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 12:01pmWonder if this guys mom’s feminizing of his liberal but had anything to do with this.
Yes, the Nazis met in a “gay” bar.
It was no coincidence that homosexuals were among those who founded the Nazi Party. In fact, the party grew out of a number of groups in Germany which were centers of homosexual activity and activism. Many of the characteristic rituals, symbols, activities and philosophies we associate with Nazism came from these organizations or from contemporary homosexuals. The extended-arm “Sieg Heil” salute, for example, was a ritual of the Wandervoegel (“Wandering Birds” or “Rovers”), a male youth society which became the German equivalent of the Boy Scouts. The Wandervoegel was started in the late 1800s by a group of homosexual teenagers. Its first adult leader, Karl Fischer, called himself “der Fuehrer” (“the Leader”) (Koch:25f). Hans Blueher, a homosexual Nazi philosopher and important early member of the Wandervoegel, incited a sensation in 1912 with publication of The German Wandervoegel Movement as an Erotic Phenomenon, which told how the movement had become one in which young boys could be introduced into the homosexual lifestyle (Rector:39f). The Wandervoegel and other youth organizations were later merged into the Hitler Youth (which itself became known among the populace as the “**** Youth” because of rampant homosexuality. – Rector:52).
Report Post »Many of the Nazi emblems, such as the swastika, the double lightning bo
Diane TX
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:26am@ Exrepublisheep,
It’s quite amazing how uninformed you are about “who” are actually Tea Party Members. The original Tea Party was formed around the concept – Tax Enough Already. These people consists of people from all walks of life. Many are Independents (unaffiliated voters) and Democrats who eschew the idea of “Progressives”.
The current Democrat Party that is currently in Congress, is not the Party of JFK. They are “Progressives”. Hillary Clinton claims to be a Progressive, instead of being a Democrat. You can claim that the Tea Party controls the Republican Party, but the Progressives overtook the Democrat Party, long before the Tea Party even existed.
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:30amHmm, this rely thingy isn‘t working out the way I’d expect it to work.
Report Post »DGeezy11
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:35am“cough” Taxed Enough Already “cough”
Report Post »Christian Kalgaard
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:23amI notice that the picture of the mother (and the sister?) is being presented as though it depicts the prostitutes. classy.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:47amNo. it is presented as the “Mom [who] helped feminize him”. That was in the title of the story too.
Report Post »Jaels_Song
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:16amThis guy is not a Christian, listen to his own words, and make sure you get this out to who ever you network with:
Report Post »BREAKING! Norway Shooter Is an EVOLUTIONIST/PAGAN – his own words! Not a Christian! Imagine that! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_8IVS-x0E8&feature=autoshare
Christian Kalgaard
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:23amthanks for sharing. Yes, he does not appear to be a Christian, but of course the Anti-christian media is putting its own spin on this.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:35amHis Christianity is merely a cultural identifier to him. He shows zero evidence that he knows or cares what it teaches and how it should direct his moral choices.
Christianity in Norway and Scandinavia in general is truly moribund. It is shrinking in Euraope and impotent in Europe overall, but Scandinavia is the worst. I don’t know of any strong resisting strands left.
Report Post »ckokkola
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:21amMost definitely not a Christian. A true Christian would never do such a horrible thing. And neither would they visit a prostitute and defile themselves.
Report Post »ckokkola
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:23amJesus said, “By their fruits you shall know them”. Well the fruits of his labor are bad and no good tree can produce bad fruit and no bad tree can produce good fruit.
Report Post »BOUGHT YOUR SILO YET?
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:14amBizarre.
Report Post »cowpatty
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 10:42amman, never thot about a silo. i’ve got room for one, tho.
Report Post »LeftyLieDetector
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:12amA feminist Neo-Nazi, eh? Only in Europe…
Report Post »beckwasfox
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 1:21pmRush calls the feminists in the U.S. Feminazis. Pretty funny way of tweaking the N.A.G.s.
Report Post »Exrepublisheep
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:03amHe entertained the idea of a european tea-party movement. Says a lot.
Report Post »Non-regulator
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:13amCompare America’s (yes a great nation) Tea Party protests to, oh, let’s say the Weather Underground, and you will see how foolish that comparison is.
Report Post »Jaels_Song
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:20amSince when did being ‘foolish’ ever stop a liberal?
BREAKING! Norway Shooter Is an EVOLUTIONIST/PAGAN – his own words! Not a Christian! Imagine that! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_8IVS-x0E8&feature=autoshare
He isn’t a Christian, listen to him in his own words, when finished, share the link. Do what our media won’t factually report for us. These days, we are the media.
Report Post »LeftyLieDetector
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 4:35amHe also thought he was the Uni-Bomber’s mother. Your point??
If the real Tea-Party was there, they would have cleaned up his mess (from the explosion) already and left the area better than what they found it.
Leftist turds only know destruction and keeping it that way.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 6:44amHe obviously knows as little about the Tea Party as he does about Christianity.
Report Post »GiGi80
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 8:17am@Islefordian
http://themaineteaparty.com/profiles/blogs/man-of-the-year-2011
Report Post »LeftyLieDetector
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 9:58amAnybody could have made that crude site, you simpleton. We all know the left in this country has gone way out of its way to put words in their mouth, to create fake news stories, and to carry fake signs at their rallies. They would do anything to bring along their fascist views/dreams, by any means necessary. The Tea Party doesn’t have one leader or one voice.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 10:42amGigi80, This guy just signed up to the maine Tea Party/Refounders site a week ago. I’m a member of the Maine Tea Party and have never heard of him. He sounds like a plant. Typical leftist tactic.
Report Post »mossbrain
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:02amworst case of roid rage ever.
Report Post »Christian Kalgaard
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:00am“He talks about visiting prostitutes and taking steroids”
How does that fit into the “fundamentalist Christian” narrative????
Report Post »GiGi80
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 8:14amHmmm . . . perhaps Jimmy Swaggart or Ted Haggard could answer that.
Report Post »cromag11b
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 10:55amRight, a Conservative Christian making the news has to be for getting caught with a homosexual prostitute and/or narcotics.
Report Post »bikerr
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 1:46amThem liberals will really mess you up when they are in power!
Report Post »Baikonur
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 1:46amOMG, so that‘s where Natalee Holloway’s been all this time!
Report Post »Brasil2520
Posted on July 25, 2011 at 2:04amI didn’t want to make a joke of what happened on the first day, but now its not “too soon”
When I first saw an older picture of Breivik, I thought, that’s the guy from ABBA !
Report Post »