‘Not Going to Be Silenced by This’: Sex-Plea Co-Ed Responds to Limbaugh on Ed Show
- Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:33am by
Mytheos Holt
- Print »
- Email »
Tonight, the much-maligned Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke made her first appearance since testifying before Congress on the necessity of government mandated contraception. Appearing on Ed Schultz’s “The Ed Show,” Fluke was asked specifically to comment on radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh’s recent attacks on her for being a “slut” who wants taxpayers to pay for her sexual exploits.
Limbaugh doubled down on those comments today, telling Fluke and her supporters that if they want taxpayers to pay for them to have sex, they should post homemade porn as compensation. He also asked rhetorically, “Can you imagine if you’re her parents how proud of Sandra Fluke you would be?”
Fluke’s response can be seen below, as well as in the following block quote:
I guess my reaction is the reaction a lot of women have when they’ve been called these names. Initially you’re stunned but then, very quickly, you’re outraged because this is, historically, the kind of language that is used to silence women, especially women who stand up and say that these are their reproductive health care needs and this is what they need. And what’s been amazing to me today is the outpouring of support. Everyone from members of Congress to Georgetown faculty to so many women who’ve contacted me, and I think it’s clear from what they’ve said that they’re not going to be silenced by this.
H/T: Mediaite.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 710 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 563 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 384 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 376 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 364 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 376 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 384 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 314 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 149 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 376 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (1328)
Dirty Harry
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:16am“Thank you for having me,” Ms. Fluke said. Evidently a LOT of people are having her.
Report Post »VerySeniorCitizen
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:29amFor all those who have mothers, sisters, daughters, aunts, friends, etc. THIS can be the result of the lack of medically necessary contraceptives.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRC0nsjtKQ
Tell me you don’t care!
Crazy Times
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:29amI dont care about her sex life.
SHE is the one who put her sex life out TO CONGRESS! It is not something she wanted to keep quiet and was exposed.
I do care that she wants “the collective” to pay for her ways.
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:30amYou know….I think this is outrageous….If she can afford to go to law school then she can afford her own contraceptives….pay your own way…get it…your sex life is not anybodies business….and it should stay that way…………..I don’t care how much it cost you…..or anyone else…..the gov. has no right to dictate to the American people to pay for everthing in your life and that‘s what it’s coming to….WAKE UP!
Report Post »libtardian-refugee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:33amStill think she needs a paper bag over her head. A least an attractive student would make this whole story believable
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:50am.
LMAO Do Ya’ll see the Phallic Symbol behind her left shoulder……….
I think The Rest of Us need to sign a letter to make sure her sex tape stays hidden………
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:53amThe scariest thing. Someday she will be practicing law !!!!
Report Post »BreeZee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:53amIf your not having sex to procreate you are having it for recreation. Now obumma wants me to pay (thru taxes) for women to have recreational sex. Does that make POTUS a pimp? Isn’t prostitution recreational sex?
Report Post »If obumma is going to pay for “recreational anything”, where is my free rounds of recreational golf?
If women having sex is a health issue, then playing golf is a mens health issue.
Is obumma going to pay for your recreational bungee jumping? mountain climbing? racing? snow boarding?…..
BubbaCoop
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:57amVERYSENIORCITIZEN wrote “lack of medically necessary contraceptives”
This “lack” does not exist. I can’t drive 1,000 feet in my town without passing a store that carries some sort of contraceptive. This a manufactured issue. No one wants to make contraception illegal. No one wants to make it harder to get. But give me ONE good reason someone else should have to pay for YOURS?
Report Post »Zipit
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:01amPOTUS the pimp!!!!! Beautiful………
Report Post »little big man
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:05amI think what most people are missing is that Rush didn’t come out and say Ms Fluke is a slut. Rush said what do you call a person who has that much sex “a Slut”
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:07amAnother poster girl for the democratic party…a promiscuous young lady who things the tax payers should fund her misconduct..vote for Obama and soon sharia law will put her in her place..wake up young lady the democrat’s are just using you to promote there communist agenda..
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:15amThe Blaze needs to interview her parents..see what they think.
Report Post »VerySeniorCitizen
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:21am@CRAZYTIMES
OK, Just as Rush didn’t bother to learn the story of this testimony before demeaning this woman – so you couldn’t/wouldn’t/didn’t take the time to watch the link! I understand that time is short. If you are a woman then your life might also be short if life saving medications are refused to women. This woman said NOTHING about her own sex life – NOR did she discuss the sex life of any of the women she spoke about. She spoke about contraceptives being used to stop cancers and to keep women’s reproductive system healthy enough so that they CAN have babies.
Report Post »VerySeniorCitizen
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:31amBUBBACOOP. Of course you can pass hundreds of drug stores – but you still can‘t get women’s contraception without a prescription.
And WHY, WHY, WHY does everyone on this thread believe (falsely, I might add) that this whole thing is about sex – just because Rush says it is. IT IS NOT. While 99% of women (of all faiths) have used contraceptives for various reasons, 15% of them are prescribed these medications for skin rashes to monthly pain to ovarian cycts to prevention of uterine cancer – and yes, to prevent pregnancy. This testimony WAS NOT about preventing pregnancy. Watch the testimony!
Report Post »NeoFan
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:35amSomeone needs to tell her she can’t get pregnant from a women.
Report Post »B-Neil
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:36amWhy do we have to pay extra for EYE and DENTAL care and the President says Women can play for free??? I guess its fair though. We keep electing those Gangsta Players. GOD BLESS ALL FREE AMERICANS
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:46am@ VerySeniorCitizen
Let me state this as frank as possible… I DON’T CARE!
Nor should anyone. What someone does with their body, or what they choose to insert into their body is their choice. With that in mind, they need to support their own choices financially… Even if diseases are prevented with the ingestion of birth control, it is the individuals responsibility to obtain and take it. It is not societies job, nor the job of a private institution or employer to provide it.
If college women are too poor to afford it, then maybe they should look to a part time job to pay for it. And don’t give me this BS that they are in law school. I have friends who went to med school and worked as waiters to pay for costs of living and their own health concerns. Their is nothing preventing any of these women access to the contraception save their own lack of motivation and discipline to gain it through effort. Instead they want everything given to them. It is another sign of the entitlement mentality that is killing this nation. She is going to school to be a lawyer, so I would think she would have the intelligence to understand that she is fully capable.
This is much like a grown adult eating fast food and clogging their arteries… It is their choice. It is something they must pay for. The government needs to keep out of it. The only thing the government can and should do is help educate people of the issues.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:54am@ little big man
Who cares what Rush says? We live in a country of free speech, and he has a right to his opinion. Technically, by the estimates she gives, these girl are having sex 2.74 times a day. That’s a little excessive if you ask me…. With all that time fornicating, the might find time to get a part time job and pay it for themselves. Heck, at $1000 a year, they only need $20 a week. That is 2-3 hours working a week.
Hey, if they have sex 1.25 times a day, and put in the extra effort to work to obtain the money, they would have the best of their world, not be freeloading on the system, and be at less risk of an STD. And may I remind you no contraception is 100% safe or preventive.
However, Rush is correct. Men and women who have that much sex are sluts (men can be that too folks – you just place male at the front of the word).
Report Post »SquidVetOhio
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:54am@VERYSENIORCITIZEN
Nobody’s talking about denying anyone contraception. This is about YOU forcing ME to buy it for you. How about asking the guy you’re about to bed to buy it for you? Good lord people! Does anyone else see how stupid this is? If you’re going to lie down and fornicate with some schmuck, pay for it yourself!
Report Post »Forward
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:55amAt this point the implementation of the contraceptive mandate has been handed off to the insurance industry. If the insurance plans follow the approach they have used on other “drugs”, Ms. Fluke and her compatriots will find that it will actually be much harder to obtain their “covered” contraception as the pharmacy benefit managers will start with a question to the referrring physician “Why is this drug required.“ If the answer is NOT one of the serious health issues raised earlier in this thread then I would expect the insurance to deny the claim as it is NOT required for ”health”.
Certainly there will be a substantial increase in diagnosed endometriosis (since this actually requires prescribed contraceptives) and treatment of pre-cancerous conditions and this is good. It will also result in a major furor as insurance plans will be able to ask questions about sex practices of the beneficiaries, much as they ask similar questions about people who use other maintenance drugs like insulin. This is a significant issue which those who seek to have others pay for their recreation have not thought through. Again, unintended consequences will bury their agenda. Unfortunately, those consequences take time to manifest themselves.
Report Post »freeus
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:01amI am “outraged” that Sandra Fluke pretends to be a spokeswoman for women! “Contraception” is a fabricated issue. Don’t be deceived, “Ms.” Fluke is the political pawn of Nancy Pelosi and the radical feminists in an attempt to bolster President Obama waning support with women and expand Government.
Report Post »Rush should be able to respond to the sickening side show Ms. Fluke put on before Congress. I can’t believe they allowed her to testify!
HappyStretchedThin
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:03am@ VerySenior
Report Post »You persist in twisting the facts even while claiming they need to be set straight.
No one is trying to prevent women from getting whatever medications they need for medical purposes.
The debate is NOT about health care, but about who pays for it.
Access to contraception exists within reach of even a poor law student’s budget, and if a female student feels strongly about needing the contraception method to be the kind that requires a prescription, the cost of the doctor’s visit and medication are TOTALLY within her rights and abilities to invest in, if she so desires.
Which makes all of your points logic-less and disingenuous.
Rush didn’t demean a woman, but rather used her example and testimony to illustrate a policy, just as SHE HERSELF was doing as invited by Pelosi. His implication that her “need” for contraception was purely based on her own desires for sex forces those who react to demonstrate the accuracy of the assumption. Contraception IS about sex! You can claim hormone drugs have other uses, but that doesn’t take away from their core use–to absolve women from the risks consequent to sex. Let them decide how to handle those risks themselves, and not require anyone to pay for such choices either way–that is the conservative position you must mis-characterize in order to make your illogical points.
Baddoggy
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:03amI need Viagra. Please pay for it so i can have a 4 hour erection and make wifeypoo happy…
Report Post »midwesthippie
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:10am…@WATCH…soon she will be a congresswoman(D). seriously…how stupid of the (right) to fall into the media trap. haven’t you guys learned how to play “nice” in the sandbox. rush (stupid) and glennpatstu (stupid) have made her a media superstar. congrats
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:15am@ Baddoggy
Harumph!
Report Post »encinom
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:17amFLuke should be on the phone with her attorneys and suing Rush and Beck and the CNS reporter for slander and libel.
Disagree with a stated postion, to come out and lie about what a person said, and make yourself look like high school punk is not journalism.
So Beck, if for what ever reason your daughter needs to take medication used for contraceptives are you going to go on the air and call her a whore and a slut? According to you, Pat and Rush she is.
Report Post »Matty85
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:18amMy god, you people are ridiculous. We have no idea if she’s sexually active or not and many use contraception for other reasons, not just that, look it up. And the “I shouldn’t pay for others decisions” can be used with anything. Why should I pay for GUYS to take Viagra because they want to have sex?
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:22amRush is not only making Ms. Joan of Arc famous, but when she sues him he will make her quite wealthy.
TEA
Report Post »stablepar
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:25amthat probably isn”t a fluke
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:30am@ encinom
But you fail to acknowledge that Glenn and Rush are not journalists. They are not reporters. They are commentators. Nor does Fluke have a leg to stand on in court. She is placing herself in the public stage. Nor did Glenn or Rush call her personally a slut. They simply called her straw man argument (female college student needing $1000 a year to pay for contraception) a slut.
There is a big difference, any Georgetown lawyer to be could see that.
Report Post »Who would Jesus bomb?
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:33amOne thing is for sure. Someone needs to pay for this crosseyed betty’s contraception, because we do not need any offspring from this. In fact, it should be made law than anyone this stupid not be allowed to procreate.
Report Post »Balthazor
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:36am@encinom: I typically prefer to not respond to your points, since I am pretty sure you are nothing more than a dingaling little troll who gets his jollies out of poking this little nest of hornets. But seriously, you, of all people, suggesting that this chick should sue for libel? I don‘t think I’ve seen more than three posts from you ever where you didn’t call someone a racist. So…it’s ok for you to so casually call people racists, but these guys should be sued for calling this chick a whore. Nice standards.
Report Post »little big man
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:39am“Not Going to Be Silenced by This’: Sex-Plea Co-Ed Responds ”
_________________________________________________________________________________
Okay if she won’t be silenced can we at least get her to close her legs?.
Report Post »Thors Hammer
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:42amWhy is it the responsibility of everyone that is not having sex with her to provide the condom? From high school forward, if I wanted to play I had to pay – for protection (from disease and unwanted pregnancy) What is wrong with the Ivy League men? They can’t afford a condom? Then do it by hand!
Report Post »Clive
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:50amahhh. birth control. what a great use of our governments legislative time. why bother with important things like the economy, jobs, energy prices…. lets all talk about birth control, and play right into the dems hands.
the GOP is sinking itself, again.
Report Post »aragona
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:55amOn GB’s radio program they did the math and $3,000 in contraceptives equates to sex about 3 times per day. So, as a woman I have to say, yeah, she seems like a slut to me.
Even more importantly, no one paid for my contraceptives and I don’t want to pay for hers.
Report Post »MIBUGNU2
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:57amEd Shlutz, “The Right can’t use that word, that’s My word”..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YriSB0nwzgw
We havn’t forgotten Big Guy !!!!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:00amJOHNNYMIDNIGHT…the first red flag is “government mandated contraception”. A frightening precendent. More immediately though…no one in this circle of liberal enablers this idiot of a law student surrounds herself with has had the wherewithall to tell her and her apparently over-sexed sorority sisters that she can go to a government funded clinic and obtain all the things she’s demanding we pay for her for “free” (yes I know…“free” as defined by a liberal). It’s as you stated, she and her ilk couldn’t be arsed to go to these clinics..they want it all handed to them, there and then…without lifting a finger (pun intended).
Report Post »conservideo
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:01amVERYSENIORCITIZEN – OK, It‘s not that we don’t care. It‘s that it’s not the tax payers‘ responsibility to pay for everyone’s healthcare, nor is it the right of the government to mandate religious organizations to cover contraceptive coverage. Those people can find another school or take another job that will cover such things. End of story. You’re either FOR the constitution or AGAINST it. These things ARE and black and white as suggested.
Report Post »tmplarnite
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:01amGeee…I wonder if she makes house calls…I’ll fork over some birth control dollars…if she can slip me into her…’er schedule?
Report Post »MIBUGNU2
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:04am@MONICNE
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:22am
Rush is not only making Ms. Joan of Arc famous, but when she sues him he will make her quite wealthy.
Did Laura sue Pig Ed Shlutz ????
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YriSB0nwzgw
MIBUGNU2
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:09amThis Poor Little Libotard can now play the victim role …
Report Post »they all play it so well..Thanks Ed, your so nice…….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YriSB0nwzgw
VerySeniorCitizen
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:11am@SQUIDVETOHIO
OK, squid, do you understand the word INSURANCE. No? Maybe I have the same auto insurance company that you have – soooooooooo, I OBJECT to paying for your accident – after all, you were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Does that sound reasonable.
Insurance companies take money from thousands of people for a specific purpose – in this case ‘health insurance’. When someone has a problem the money is taken from the pool of customers to cover the cost of fixing the one who has suffered harm or illness. So, at the end of the year you DO NOT get your money back – because that was the agreement you made with the insurance company.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:12amMONACNE…your unsettling and automatic inclusion of “TEA” in every post you offer aside. Have you always been this deluded? Limbaugh already provided a clarification the first time he called old two-bag Flukey a sl#t. At this point it’s being said in a jockular vein. Certainly coarse and provocative, but nonetheless, jokingly. Two-Bag Fluke would have any case thrown out in court if she attempted it. By the way, she’s a terrible lawyer already. She apparently is clueless to the knowledge that she and her over-sexed crew of co-eds can obtain all the things she’s demanding you and I pay for from government funded clinics that will proved them for “free”. Ok….“free” as far you’re concerned as a glassy-eyed, pathetically stunted , cretinous liberal.
Report Post »Balthazor
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:12am@VerySeniorCitizen: first of all I find it very, VERY hard to believe that anyone’s contraception could cost more than their job pays. Unless she’s working a half an hour a week. I’m not buying that for a minute. But let‘s assume it’s true. I’m still wondering why I should care, much less pay for it. Doesn’t this chick have family? If she can’t SURVIVE!!!!!! without this contraception, why aren‘t her parent’s concerned enough about their daughter’s very life to foot the bill for her contraception? Why does it become ANYONE else’s responsibility to cover the costs of her contraception?
Life is tough. Poor girl has medical issues? So do a lot of people who don’t go crying to the taxpayers to cover their expenses.
Report Post »KPEdwards
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:13amFirst off, and I don’t think it can be stressed enough: *IT’S NOT ABOUT SEX*
You can quote all the 2.74′s, and ‘oh I found this on the internet prices you’d like. The pill is real medication for real medical conditions.
Secondly, none of you are paying for this. She’s paying for this – all of the students are paying for this. Either directly or through their tuition. Where did this even come from that it was money coming from you? Is the very idea of health insurance too collectivist for you guys? Have you gotten so obsessed with the individual that you can’t stand the idea of pooling money together to benefit the individual in times of need?
Report Post »tallguyjgg
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:13amVERY SENIOR CITIZEN
I have asthma.. I spend around $100 a month on my medication for asthma. I am not asking the govermnment nor anyone else to pay for my medication. If I do not have my medication, I could have an asthma attack and die. What s the difference in me paying for MY medication and someone getting their medication for free? I dont care what disease it prevents. My GF has ovairian cists and see needs the BC to help disolve and prevent these from growing. She pays foir that. WHY DO YOU PEOPLE BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD PAY FOR EVERYTHING!!! GET A JOB AND PAY FOR THINGS YOURSELF!!!!!!
Report Post »So
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:20amFluke is an embarrassment to women. She should be ashamed. How could she sit there with a straight face and claim she needs free contraceptives? How about free food, clothing, and rent? Why go to college at all? Just get on the dole! Complete idiocy.
Whatever fame she gets will not be good. She will be remembered for her twilight zone antics. Going to a prestigious university and asking for handouts. I bet she purchases many luxury items. But we the taxpayer must pay for her contraceptives? Be responsible for once! She looks like a miserable moron.
This is all smoke and mirrors anyway. It’s a plank in Obamacare. Their theory: by providing “free” contraceptives they are reducing the number of people on healthcare.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:21amVERYSENIORCITIZEN….but this isn’t about contraception is it sport? It’s about the first amendment. You liberals keep trying to hijack the argument but you’re not going to be allowed to do it. Are you as benighted as old two-bag Flukey? Apparently you both are not aware of the fact that Fluke and her over-sexed sorority sisters can go to ANY government funded clinic and obtain all the things she’s demanding for “free”. Now granted “free” is being used in the stupid liberal sense here but we have to say “free” or else you liberal idiots get all flustered and demand “rights” this and “rights” that and all these “rigths” have to be for free. By the way…if the statement “government mandated contrecption” doesn’t terrify you…..you’re a bigger idiot than I thought you were.
Report Post »AProudConservative
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:24amNot only did she say “Thank you for having me”, Eddie said “I think I should have to appoligize FOR you”. Whats going on here? Is she having sex with Eddie? How many sex partners does she have? And who would want to have sex with a pig like Eddie?
Report Post »VerySeniorCitizen
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:24am@HAPPYSTRETCHEDTHIN
(Rush didn’t demean a woman, but rather used her example and testimony to illustrate a policy, just as SHE HERSELF was doing as invited by Pelosi) – Rush NEVER BOTHERED TO LEARN THE STORY before calling this woman a slut – simply because that is what Rush – who constantly demeans women at every possible occasion.
(His implication that her “need” for contraception was purely based on her own desires for sex forces those who react to demonstrate the accuracy of the assumption). If you had bothered to learn the story you would have noted that she mentioned NOTHING about HER need for anything except answers)
(Contraception IS about sex! You can claim hormone drugs have other uses, but that doesn’t take away from their core use–to absolve women from the risks consequent to sex). OR THE MEN who don’t seem too concerned about women protecting themselves agains uterine cancer or tumors. Who the hell cares – They are ONLY women!
(Let them decide how to handle those risks themselves, and not require anyone to pay for such choices either way–that is the conservative position). OK, so MY conservative position is that MY auto insurance maoney should NOT help pay for your accident. After all, I didn’t cause the accident.
Do you come from a family of idiots – or are you the very first to reach that goal??
Report Post »VerySeniorCitizen
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:25amAnybody hear that advertizers are already pulling their ads from Rush’s program – BIGTIME!!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:32amTwo-bag Fluke keeps implying some kind of “strength” she’s exhibiting in demanding someone else pay for her contraceptives. I’m sorry have I missed something? Where is the strength in demanding someone else pay for your sex life? I guess it falls into her laughable assertion that her friend who went to purchase contraceptives at the pharmacy and was refused the sale based on their not being covered felt “powerless”. Apparently these “strong” women don’t have the “power” to pull out mum or dad’s credit card at pharmacies..they only have this “power” when purchasing the latest Apple gadget or going on Spring Break vacations to Florida. I think it’s perfect that Two-bag Flukey is talking about how men belittle women on Eddie Schlitz’s variety show while Eddie himself had to make a public apology after calling Michelle Bachmann the same thing Flukey is bleating about from Limbaugh. Liberals are such idiots. Such groupthink cretins…they just can’t help themselves. I‘d love someone to play Eddie Schlitz’s tirade at Bachmann to two-bag Fluke. She doesnt’ come across as the brightest.
Report Post »tobeheard
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:36amReally?? And how many sexual partners have you had or your buddies?
Report Post »arfarb55
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:38amThis is just too funny. LMAO! Good one!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:40amVERYSENIORCITIZEN….you display that irritating liberal charactistic of taking one small facet of the much broader picture and bleating and entreating and pulling on heartstrings and appealing to emotions with it incessantly. In your skewed and disingenous mind…these contraceptives two-bag Fluke is demanding are to save women’s lives from various forms of female cancers. The truth of course is that the overwhelming number of women using these are not taking contraceptives for these things..they’re taking them to prevent pregnancies so as to accomodate their sexual proclivities. To add insult to your injury…ALL these girls that Fluke is so “passionately” speaking on behalf of can obtain ALL the things she’s demanding from ANY government funded clinic for “free”. I hate using “free” in the liberal definition of the term..but to prevent you’re descending into another tear jerking, emotion appealing hissy fit I’ll accomodate you on that.
Report Post »midwesthippie
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:42am…i find it hilarious that you all are upset over BC when you have been voting for progressives (R)(D) for decades and now my generation has 16 trillion in debt…thanks you bunch of hypocrites.
Report Post »db321
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:48amThis was orchestrated to demonize the Catholics Church, Christians and Jews – and the Liberals are doing it to get votes. The Battle line has been drawn – The Devils glad and God’s mad.
Take your stand – a vote for Obama is a vote “against” God, America, Morality, Values, Virtues, and Decency. Your choice – just remember we “All” will be judge one day by God for our actions, words, deeds and yes votes. Weather you believe God exist or not. Obama can’t save you!
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:49am@ M I Buggin U
Ed made a sincere public apology to Laura, went off the air for 48 hours to atone, and seems to actually regret his shameful statements on air. Look like some political entertainers have consciences and dignity.
TEA
Report Post »CatB
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:56am@DIRTY HARRY ….
right on right on!
What a sl_t .. and I am a woman …. so there b iotch
Report Post »larryj1978
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:11pm“Matty85
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:18am
My god, you people are ridiculous. We have no idea if she’s sexually active or not and many use contraception for other reasons, not just that, look it up. And the “I shouldn’t pay for others decisions” can be used with anything. Why should I pay for GUYS to take Viagra because they want to have sex?”
Matty85 do you realize that viagra has other uses besides erectile dysfunction? You have no idea if the people using it are sexually active. Look it up!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:12pmLOL…that’s it MONACNE…spin baby…spin. Idiot.
Report Post »So
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:21pmAs a woman, I say, “Shut the he** up, Fluke. Cross your legs. End of problem.” Or another suggestion is cross your legs until you can afford your sex.
You are an embarrassment. Please. Go away quickly and hope no one remembers you (in time). You look like a jackass. This is not the issue you make it out to be. Contraception is affordable and available. You are in an elite class, Fluke asking for handouts.
You are the fluke, Fluke.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:21pmThere‘s a surreal quality to the fact that here’s Two-Bag Fluke appearing on Eddie Schlitz’ comedy hour, bleating the usual lefty blather about “demeaning women” while Schlitz himself launched into an unhinged tirade at Michelle Bachmann calling her the very names Flukey is saying Limbaugh is calling her. Only in the groupthink, talking point addled, delusional, self appreciating world of liberal land can you see this extraordinary phenomenon take place. Here we are looking at two complete idiots. One a blow hard liberal bomb hurler with a penchant for launching into unhinged tirades at any given time. The other a self-absorbed, self-important, “acivist” lawyer that‘s too stupid to know she can get all that she’s demanding from a government funded clinic in her city. A snapshot of the madness of liberalism if there ever was one.
Report Post »Rob in Katy
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:26pm@VERYSENIORCITIZEN
It is called a rubber, and it works just as well as “female” contraception and is only $0.50 per use. Have the guy boning her pick up the the tab for the rubbers, why should we have to do so?
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:29pm@ KPEdwards
Her tuition pays for this?
You seriously jest. You are expecting a religious institution to pay for her contraception? Really… So, what gives the government a right to dictate doctrine of a religion?
Last I saw, there is a separation of church and state. Why should a church be forced to pay for something that they do not support and consider a sin? Now if you state that the Government has a right because it aids the campus with financial aid for tuition, then the Government gets the money through taxes. Which my friend, I pay… I pay 28% each and every year and take only the standard deductions. I do not claim charity I give or anything else. So yes… We are paying for it.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:31pm@ AvengerK
I stand corrected! :P
Awesome points.
Report Post »So
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:35pmContraception is an issue because it’s an election year. Plain and simple. That and it’s a plank in Obamacare.
Dems want to paint Republicans as the heartless group. Wahh, wahh, wahhh. Such a big hearted group to give more of our money away to people that don’t even need it.
Can’t wait to vote this year!
Report Post »cboyd54
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:39pm@VerySeniorCitizen: This is not a case of “medically necessary” contraceptives. What would make contraception medically necessary? This young woman wants to have sex and wants the US tax payer via the US government to pay for her protection so she can. I don’t want to do that any more than I want to supply an alcoholic with booze with my tax dollars. What about her personal responsibility? If she can’t afford contraception, she might want to consider a more responsible way of life or she might consider walking into a planned parenthood office where they will give them to her at little or no charge. Since when is something like this my responsibility? As a senior citizen, you should know better. If you make certain choices, you, not someone else, should be responsible and accountable for those choices.
Report Post »Gary
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:40pm@VerySenior
Report Post »I see what you did there
Well played Sir, Well played
red1
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:42pmIf girls had been as accommodating as her when I was in law school, I wouldn’t have had to spend that $5000/year on pron and hookers.
Report Post »Zenzazin
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:11pmit is obvious that most of you have either not heard what Ms. Fluke actually said, or you are too simpleminded to understand that her own personal sex life has nothing to do with what she said. all you are doing is making it very clear just how backwards your thought processes are.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:16pmHoly cr*p .. this broad is 30 years old .. and still thinks like a baby … everything for me!!!
Report Post »VerySeniorCitizen
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:21pm@ All of you Jerks on this thread who haven’t bothered to research this story, don’t care about women and believe that Rush and Glenn are the greatest thing since sliced bread – and believe everything they say, and are oblivious of everything else.!
What part of the word INSURANCE do you NOT you understand??? Lets get rid of the FDIC, put AIG out of business, if fact put ALL Insurance companies out of business, discontinue ALL financial aid of any kind to any corporation or individual. EVERYONE pays for EVERYTHING on their own – including their house when its hit by a tornado, their car when it is rammed by a truck, your family member when hit with a devastating illness, your child when diagnosed with (name your own problem), your town when it goes bankrupt. etc. etc.
CONGRATULATIONS!!! You have now ‘taken your country back’ – to the Sixteenth Century – BEFORE the Constitution was written. Bunch of S.T.U.P.I.D., heartless, psycopaths.
How VERY Christian of you all!!!!! Think on that!
Report Post »Balthazor
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:21pm@Zenzazin: what’s there not to understand? She complained that college women can’t afford the $3000 it costs them to have protected sex during their time at the university. People like Rush are pointing out that the only way one can rack up that kind of contraception bill is by having enormous amounts of sex. So it stands to reason that either the women at Georgetown are indeed having enormous amounts of sex OR….she’s just simply lying and making up a figure out of thin air.
So it seems like our choices are to believe that either the students at Georgetown are screwing like rabbits and expecting everyone else to pay for it, or that Ms. Fluke is a liar and, in fact, committing perjury.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:22pm@ Zenzazin
Obviously, you are too simpleminded to read all the comments. Many have stated the attacks are not on her, but her straw man argument of “other females”.
Quite trying to make the issue about the persons making the statement and actually stick to the issue. Instead of adding to the conversation (even if it is in opposition to the statements of the majority), you attack the person making them. Ah, unfortunately we do not stay silent in the face of this progressive tactic…
Quite switching the issue. Why should we pay for her sex life or her (the straw man) good health? Can she (the straw man) get a job to pay for the contraception? Can she (the straw man) have less sex a week and spend that time to makes the $20 to afford the contraception/person health medicine?
I fail to see her point that she (the straw man) can’t AFFORD it. The straw man is obviously making bad choices and wanting me to pay for it. Sorry, those are the facts Jack.
Report Post »red1
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:30pm@VerySeniorCitizen
Would you consider the possibility that it is YOU who does nott understand insurance? Listen to this:
http://www.breitbart.tv/theyre-using-insurance-for-communism-ann-couter-rocks-cpac/
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:30pmZENZAZIN…is sarcasm lost on you? There’s nothing noble about demanding someone else pay for your contraception. And let’s not mince words here…most women use it to prevent pregnancies, not to prevent cancers etc. The vulgarity of demanding that someone else pay for the sexual proclivities and their consequences of college girls is completely lost on you? Furthermore your idiot of a spokeswoman is apparently ignorant to the fact that she and her oversexed crew of co-eds can go to any government funded clinic in her city and get the “free” stuff she’s demanding including screenings. To add further insult to you attempt to impose any kind of nobility on this cretinous “acitivist” not-quite-a-lawyer….she’s on a show with Ed Schultz bleating about how women are spoken about when old Eddie himself launched into a tirade about Michelle Bachmann using the same verbiage Limbaugh used. Fluke is an under-informed liberal idiot and Schultz is a duplicitous, hypocritical snake. Go ahead champ..defend that.
Report Post »Rightthinker
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:38pmI‘d first like to say that I’m growing REALLY tired of the feminist myth being reported as news-that contraceptives are somehow “healthy” for a human being to use. If one doesn’t wish to allow God to control their family size, then natural family planning is healthy. It’s funny to me how these people are the same people SCREAMING for “green” and “food” legislation, because it isn’t “healthy” enough..yet, they are just fine and dandy with loading young girls’ bodies up with chemicals that have warning labels as long as my arm.
Additionally, the “side effect” list includes failure of contraceptives to prevent pregnancy, which for this culture almost always means abortion..another “not healthy” and very dangerous act that is peddled as a “health need”.
There are such lies associated with our birth control/anti-life culture, and so rarely does anyone call them on it. This is a great article here: http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/life/side_effect_how_the_pill_alter.aspx
The feminists will stop at nothing to see Sanger and Engel’s vision fulfilled. They’ll lie to do it, they’ll kill to do it, and then they’ll demand we pay for them to do it.
Come Lord Jesus Come!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:39pmit didn’t take much to send you into fits of stupidity did it VERYSENIORCITIZEN? There is no way to convince any rational human being that this is about cancer prevention. Most women use contraception to prevent pregnances…that‘s the stark glaring truth isn’t it champ? I’ll repeat it for you sport….Little miss activist-not-quite-a-lawyer can go to ANY government funded clinic in her city to get all the things she’s bleating about. Is this just too much effort for you and her? I would bet she can afford the best Apple equipment (and their accompanying subscriptions) and spring break trips to Florida though.
Report Post »Marci
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:44pmWhen will Sandra get a grip and understand that taxpayer funded contraception and abortion are NOT a right?
Report Post »jzs
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:50pmIf Republicans would like to get the female vote this fall, calling a young woman a “slut” is probably not the way to do that.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:50pm@ VerySeniorCitizen
Well, what part of Insurance do you not understand, Hater (used as a noun)?
Insurance: coverage by contract whereby one party undertakes to indemnify or guarantee another against loss by a specified contingency or peril.
The contingency or peril is not a payment plan, but a just in case scenario. You do not buy car insurance so that they pay for your gas, general repairs, and maintenance. you buy it is the event that you have an accident. All other preventative and functionality of the car is the owners responsibility. It is the same with Healthcare. Insurance was never a payment plan, but to insure the person against an unexpected issue. Why do you think that overweight and elderly people are refused or pay higher premiums? They are more susceptible to medial assistance do to conditions that arise from their age or habits.
When they pay for condoms, they can pay for my salad and gym membership… You are wrong. Face up to it and quite justifying her and your laziness to take care of yourself. Quit expecting society to spoon feed you and wipe your arse. Heck, I even say take away your social security VerySeniorCitizen. You are responsible for your retirement, not the government and not society.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:58pm@ Ave. N Gerk:
“…she’s on a show with Ed Schultz bleating about how women are spoken about when old Eddie himself launched into a tirade about Michelle Bachmann using the same verbiage Limbaugh used…”
ver·bi·age: noun: many words and especially many hard words used to say very little
OK Mister; produce the “same verbiage” tirade you refer to above, or remain a loser boy. (You did refer to, “Michele Bachmann” didn’t you?). You seem like a nice playful kid, a real master debater.
TEA
Report Post »db321
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:00pmWow! I thought that it was a dozen roses and a few dinners – if I would have know that young Women would jump in the sack if you just would offer to pay for their Birth Control Pills. If I was in College today – I would have a trunk full of Birth Control pills – with a big magnetic sign on the side – FREE BIRTH CONTROL PILLS – I CARE ABOUT WOMEN HEALTH.
Obama is a genius! He knew that something, that is already easily assessable would over night get 99% of the Women in America to vote for him and in the process demonize Mother Mary, the Catholic Church.
I’m a mild NASCAR fan – but if Danica Patrick tries to demonize men and conservatives because of some phony belief that men don‘t care about women’s health – I am done with Go Daddy and NASCAR.
Obama may be able to fool 99% of the women – I’m not fooled! – Husbands – go home and ask your wife who she consider voting for – don’t be surprise if she now is an Obama supporter. No body loves your wife more than Obama does. It is an old Clinton strategy – he used on Soccer Moms – now it’s Birth Control Moms. Brilliant!
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:00pmLOL…very good JZS…what did Ed Schultz call Michelle Bachmann again?
Report Post »USACommoner
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:09pmSenior Citizen: WHERE in this country do you see a LACK of contraceptives…?????? NO ONE is denying ANYONE access to birth control! We’re just refusing to PAY for it. Get your head outta your @ss!
Report Post »Constantine Ivanov
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:10pmShe has indicated what that “LOT” means (or, in other words: how many copulations she wants): just divide the total sum she mentioned that we the people must spend on her contraception (over $3,000) by their retail cost of one contraceptive pill (from $9 for Trinessa, aka generic Tricyclen, at Target pharmacy, to $84 for Loestrin 24 at Kmart pharmacy, a month; see http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/09/contraceptive-pill-prices-huge-price-range.html, also from $15 to $50, see http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/birth-control-pill-4228.htm), and you’ll come up with impressive numbers.
Report Post »With such a non-stop copulation, when did this 5lu7 study law?
USAMEDIC3008
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:14pmWell Fluke me..
Report Post »Tx Spud Bar
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:20pmWhere do I start.Ok, so this woman wants someone else to foot the bill not her,to go out and be as loose as she wants without any repercussions.HEY LADY DOES PLANNED PARENTHOOD RING A BELL.All these libs treat pregnancy like a disease.Miss Fluke how can you with a strait face tell us you see the pain on women’s faces because they pay for their own birth control pills.I tell you what If you pay for my designated driver every time I want to let my hair down,I buy you a morning after pill.?????
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:22pmObummer has just called this woman FLUKE giving her congrats.OMG are we NOT BROKE? Iran anyone? POTUS CALLS this woman????
Democrappers want this contraceptive issue FRONT and CENTER.
Georgie Stuffalotupus must BE SO PROUD—-He was probably paid to bring this up at the debate.
Czar of Diversion NEEDS a RAISE—-Contraception??? with so many people out of WORK?
Fluke is being used but no doubt she will have a job because she became Obummer’s mouthpiece.
OMG 2012!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »stloocardsfan
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:23pmLol
Report Post »HappyStretchedThin
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:35pm@Johnny Midnight
Report Post »Thanks for helping @VerySillyCitizen understand the basics of insurance since he‘s once again spouting that the rest of us don’t understand something while demonstrating in the very post that he is the one who doesn’t understand it. I’m afraid you need to go further though. Not only is insurance designed for ACCIDENTS, not preventative maintenance, but @NearlySenileCitizen is even FURTHER off the logic train than that. S/he can’t somehow distinguish between an insurance PAYOUT, and in insurance PREMIUM. We who have insurance know that a premium is what we pay for the right to be covered in case of an accident, not what the company pays because it’s been contracted to do so. When we pay our premiums, we trust the company will fairly honor its contract with everyone regardless of the conditions of the accident, but we don‘t pay premiums for policies we don’t want or need. And we certainly don’t use govt to force to impose everyone buy the same policy and pay the same premium. That would be Obamacare.
@VeryMessedupCitizen
Let’s get serious for a second here. Do you, or do you not believe that sex is a choice two people make? Does sex have risks? Who is responsible for them if so? There’s other uses for contraception, fine! No one‘s saying a doctor shouldn’t prescribe for those. But contra conception of WHAT do you think those drugs were designed? By your own numbers, I remind you, 85% of cases ARE about sex. Why do you want ME to pay?
snooop1e
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:38pmWhile I wouldn’t use the language that Rush has chosen to use his points are valid. She is testifying that she has sex so often that she cannot possibly afford to pay for the artificial contraception herself so she wants tax payers to subsidize the cost of her having sex. Is this a twilight zone episode? Since when did it become the responsibility of Christians to subsidize people for having sex? Imagine me testifying that not having sex causes me stress and makes it hard for me to concentrate at work which causes me to miss work several times a week so I should receive tax payer funded subsidies to offset my lack of income during the periods when I miss work. We have officially lost our minds. Lord have mercy….
Report Post »snooop1e
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:46pmP.S. Has anyone considered the fact that in order for universal healthcare (aka Obamacare) to work they have to reduce the number of people needing healthcare? Every child prevented from being born or murdered in the womb (or shortly after birth) reduces the overall cost of Obamacare. Wake up America it’s 1984……..
Report Post »IntheKnowOG
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:54pm@ VerySeniorCitizen
You are very wrong. Ortho costs $50.00 per month without a prescription. That’s $600.00 per year. It is even cheaper in 90 day supply format available at more than 1 online pharmacy. You are lying, Encinom is lying, the LEFT is lying to run cover for the multiple failures of the Obama regime. Congratulations, you are now the NAZI party.
Report Post »siliconvalleydon
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:03pmRush is just bummed out because no one would ever have sex with him. Do all you people here lock your girlfriends in chastity belts? Sex is normal part of life. From the degree of anger I see in here I’ll bet a bunch of you are taking blood pressure medicine. I pay for insurance, I would much rather pay to make sure someone has a healthy and active sex life than have a bunch of people blowing a gasket over stuff like this. We could probably all save money if a lot of you got a little once and a while.
Report Post »MemphisViking
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:06pmClive – While the economy is important, I don’t mind Congress taking time out of their busy schedule to protect our Constitutional rights.
Veryseniorcitizen – So we just hate women, right? What’s the matter, race card in the shop?
Report Post »Nick84
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:07pmHas anyone on here actually listened to her testimony?
Report Post »Uranium Wedge
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:08pmHey Fluke… Would you please put a bag over your so we can get this over with.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:12pm@ snooop1e
You are correct. Just know that Plan Parenting was created by a eugenics supporter, Margaret Sanger.
http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/special_issues/population/the_negro_project.htm
And it is targeted towards the black community, on purpose! However, Progressives these days want to clean the gene pool anyway they can. They will also pull the cord on granny if they could. Oh wait…. That is what Obamacare is for…
Report Post »johng4700
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:15pmMs. Fluke and her friends are choosing to have sex. If they can’t afford it while attending school stop having sex, and then they will have extra money as well as extra time to study. I can’t believe how ridiculous this is. Wanting the people to subsidize the sexual activities of children. That’s right, “children”, If they don’t have the sense to prioritize, they should go home with mommy and daddy.
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:20pmThe very fact that we are debating this shows we are losing…wasting time on this BS that we know is BS. Why not debate “beer is expensive and it’s my right to get drunk…taxpayers should pay for it”?We could on and on…it’s a distraction pure and simple! We are debating this cr@p and forgetting what’s really happening “Rome is burning”!!!!
Report Post »ginger3350
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:31pmShe’s stunned? Or does she just think that because she’s promiscuous every other female on college campus is too? By the way, isn’t this what Planned Parenthood is for? Free birth control, right? Isn’t that how they tout their mission to the American public? There is almost always a P.P. near every college campus for this exact reason. I would like to know how this person was chosen to appear before congress. It smells like another set-up by the White House; and the staged phone call from Oblamer right before going on BSNBC is a little too convenient. Stinks all around.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:32pm@ siliconvalleydon
At what point is not wanting to pay for someone else’s contraception come to not wanting contraception?
Wow… I mean., most people here support contraception… I do. I use a glove myself when conducting love. However, I pay for mine. Why should women not? Because of CANCER? Well, how about the Government paying for my broccoli & water?
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/bladder.htm
Actually, let me pay for that myself too so I know exactly what i am getting. I’d hate to eat government regulated genetically modified broccoli and water.
Report Post »BSdetector
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:32pmThe insurance company should pay for all the booze and drugs that witch feeds to her johns too.
Don’t question me, its about reproductive RIGHTS!!
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:37pm@ cessna152
Rome is burning, but we can’t do anything until November 6th. Well, we could rally… But plan for Occupy to show up and force violence and a seen.
Report Post »RightWrite
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:41pmAlinsky — those dumb Leftists. Remember when they called our Sarah the C-word? It’s Alinsky turned back on those lefties, and they can’t take it.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 3:54pm@ BSdetector
[Quote] “The insurance company should pay for all the booze and drugs that witch feeds to her johns too.
Don’t question me, its about reproductive RIGHTS!!”
By johns, are you stating me? Because it would take a brewery or two for me to go where 2.74 men a day over three years went… Remember you are not only sleeping with her but all her partners. Wait! That was her straw man…. Then it goes for the straw man too!
LMAO
Report Post »redact3d
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:16pmI like what libertarianrefugee said… i agree too because if she was a really attractive it’d be clear that she needs help paying for contraception. In this case though, if she really is having that much sex she‘s paying somebody or she’s lying…. i mean for that type of girl to get laid as much as she says, she would have to be reaaallly slutty and she said she wasn’t, so…
Report Post »VanceUppercut
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:19pm@VerySeniorCitizen
Report Post »Just wanted to express support from another rational human being.
sWampy
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:25pmBirth control pills have been shown to greatly increase the chances of heart attacks in women, blood clots, strokes, breast cancer, etc. Leave it to morons on the left to want them freely given out because they reduce the chances of ovarian cancer by a % or 2. Let’s throw out the baby with the bath water.
Report Post »flrick
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:52pmWell, if she’s going to get her sex subsidized by uncle sam, I want equal treatment. I can’t afford to pay for sex all the time. If uncle sam doesn’t pay for it, I’m being denied access! I want what’s coming to me. And not some skanky, street corner, genital warts, whore like fluke either. I want the high end escort service. Uncle sammy has deep pockets, and I’m ENTITLED!!!!!!! >sarc. (just so the dopey libs don’t take this seriously!)
Report Post »jel2dr
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:52pmI find it ironic that Ed Schultz of all people is going after Rush for “this language.” Isn’t this the same guy who was reprimanded for calling Ann Coulter a slut?
And in the way of fairness, if the government starts paying for women‘s contraceptives shouldn’t they start paying for men’s porn subscriptions?
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:01pmIt‘s just too bad that women’s lib killed chivalry, back in the day, the man supplied the condoms. The only thing the women used to pay for was a piece of Dentine Gum in case the condom broke…
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:18pm@ VanceUppercut
{Quote} “@VerySeniorCitizen
Just wanted to express support from another rational human being.”
So, anyone who thinks differently then you is irrational? Really?
Okay… Seeing are you are in the giving mode… Can I spare $1000 from you and VerySeniorCitizens to pay for my condoms? After all males are carriers of the gene will pass it to their female children… I might have it… Or do I need the pill to stop that?
I mean, you are only thinking of protecting the little girls right? Meanwhile, I’ll be able to get down on your dime. Woo-hoo!
PS This is in sarcasm. I wouldn’t want a handout from anyone. However, if you have some work I could do, I would gladly do it for the $1000 (provide I agree with what you are expecting for the $1000). Then i will buy my own condom.
Your position = Socialism/Communism/Progressivism Which limits freedom, as I have no choice but to pay for someone else’s vices and livelihood.
My position = Capitalism Which the person provides a service or product to be able to afford their choice. If they can’t afford, they simply have to work harder. You all it slavery, I call it willing contribution to society. You get out what you put in. No more no less.
Yours… you get out depending what everyone else puts in… If it is not enough you ration or you exterminate a few undesirables (IE non-productive). Just ask Russia and other communist countries how that works.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:24pm@ Ookspay
Thank you for making me laugh! I literally have a tear! God bless you!
PS Chivalry is not dead… The Progressives just consider it Male Chauvinism, which makes it very scarce. Plus many young girls these days are less for the chivalry and more for the chauvinism these days… I don’t understand where and when that started.
Guess I am use to the, “You’re too good for me. I don’t deserve a guy like you.” But that might just be them letting me down softly… lol
Report Post »mattmo79
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:26pmHey Fluke, hump your brains out everyday, just don’t ask that we the people need to pay for your contraception or anything else for that matters that relates to your sexual activities!!
Report Post »siliconvalleydon
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:28pmWhat is with most of you people with the “I don’t want to pay for it?” She goes to an expensive private university and you do not pay for her health insurance. The bulk of you are probably from the welfare states with the huge divorce rates. Over 50% of children born to women under 30 are born to single mothers. The less educated women (most of them are white Christians) are the most likely to have kids without being married. Do you all think that is a good thing? You can’t stop your own daughters from having sex, do you really want them to have a kid without a husband?
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:32pmI couldn’t comment until just now because I had to choke back the vomit in my throat when I heard she got a call from BHO our Dear Leader incharge of screwing us royally. That skank MSM Mitchell woman talking to her like she is such a victim is just amazing…this woman whats to be a Lawyer? Geesh! She is good, she’ll do well at tearing this country apart from her little place in it. Hopefully she turns around and shes what a tool she has been.
Report Post »Unix
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:58pmThis fluke is a slut, let her have her sex and get the venerial deseases she deserves, just dont ask me to pay for your whoring way biotch!
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:58pmTHIS WOMAN IS OUT OF HER MIND AND RUSH IS RIGHT……….SHE’S A SLUT. Oh, poor women who suffer because they can’t afford birth control. BLAH! That’s a bunch of BULL.
They can afford to drink, smoke and get drugs, but can’t afford anything to help themselves instead of asking all of us to provide birth control?????? Keep your dam legs closed idiot woman.
Report Post »ivan90
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:01pm@veryseniorcitizen – using the use of contraceptions as cancer preventors is shameful and comical at the same time. What liberals want is everything “free”. Free meaning someone else pays for it. You can lecture everyone all you want, talking down to people like we don’t understand. The problem is we do understand. And that’s what is scary to the hardcore left. Once again, no one is trying to take away contraception, we just don’t believe we should have to pay it.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:07pm@ siliconvalleydon
Your argument about poor women and single mothers does not absolve the fact that it is their choice.
If it was my daughter? I would hope she would keep the child, as the grandfather I would help anyway I could. That is what FAMILY does! My father was a single parent and raised two boys. A woman can do the same. As for education? That is a personal choice as well. Someone can go get an education. A GED is only a test a way. There is no excuse for not applying one’s self save laziness. Anything is achievable to those who strive and work.
Besides, no contraception is 100% reliable. You can simple refrain from sex and avoid a pregnancy all together. But, you my friend follow the doctrine of the Lord of the Flies. Keep doing what “feels good” and watch your ideal society crumble as the chains of slavery are locked around your neck.
“Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have … The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases.”
Report Post »Thomas Jefferson
3rd president of US (1743 – 1826) and co-author to the US Constitution.
3monkeysmomma
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:08pmMs. Fluke, take some advice from a slightly older and wiser lady.
1. Don’t sleep with any guy who is too broke or too cheap to pay for your birth control.
Report Post »2. Birth control doesn’t always work (which is why I had a third child rather late in life)
3. Closing your legs is totally free and 100% effiective.
Zenzazin
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:18pmall of your responses to what i posted further solidifies my claim. you really have NO understanding of what Fluke what saying at all. She was not talking about women and their sexual proclivities at all. No where did she even allude to the hypothetical situation of having so much sex she couldn’t afford it. She even mentioned a friend of hers who had to have an ovary removed because she could not afford the birth control pill, which would have provided necessary medical treatment to the condition. All of you who keep acting like this woman is trying to get tax payers to underwrite her sex-life as so far off-base it is verging on hilarity. This IS a medical issue for thousand if not millions of women in OUR country. Who are any of you to decided what medicine a woman can and can’t have, especially when our taxes and gov‘t WON’T be paying for it OR forcing religious institutions to pay for it. For people who tend to be so against big government, the irony that you would use the gov’t to DENY people something they need (say what you want, birth control pills DO have multiple medical uses) is overwhelming. reading the inane, inaccurate and uncritical thought on here kills brain cells.
Report Post »Watchdog101
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:23pmDear Mr. President and Ms. Pelosi, it is in the best interest for my Mental Health that I have alot of sex. It’s just a “man” thing, but now that I am claiming this is a medical necessity, I believe that your new health care plan should have to pay for my Condoms. I like the best brands by the way. While we are on health issues regarding sex, I think you should pay for my dates also because sometimes my dates lead me to sex which of course is a health issue. BTW, I like to look good for my dates, so I think your Healthcare Bill should also pay for my Hairstylist, since my wanting to have sex is a healthcare issue. I like to take my dates in a nice car also, which leads to a better date, which could lead to sex, so now that my car is heathcare issue, I think you need to get me one of those fancy cars you used our tax payer money to fund, the Fiskar, only about $90K. I’m sure you can afford it, since all of this about my having sex is a healthcare issue. HAS EVERYONE ON THIS PLANET GONE MAD ??????
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:24pm@ Zenzazin
The only one denying her and her friend is them. They can get it at a free clinic off campus, or go get a job and buy BC at Walmart with no prescription at $0.96 a month… That is about $10 a year… not $1000. Please be honest. No one but they are cause for their suffering.
Report Post »kfalcon22000
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:24pmWhere are the serious questioners? She would have been exposed for a fool had I been able to ask her just a few question.
1. Were you aware that the college was a private Catholic university?
2. Were you aware that they inform you what the tenets they believe in are?
3. Are you aware that fornication is against their tenets?
4. Why did you not choose a non-Catholic university if you wanted to have sex?
That is all it would have taken.
Report Post »themetrick
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:47pmMixing a person’s right and privileged to have sex outside of marriage with the right to be free from any consequences that may occur due to that choice is ridiculous. Why is it so hard for people to accept that fact that just because they are free to do whatever they want doesn‘t mean there isn’t direct side affect. It is possible to have an intimate relationship that doesn‘t involve sex and it doesn’t have to be considered prude. I am very nervous about the way society is going to make abstinence exception to the rule and not the norm. I fear for the pressure my kids will face having to stand up to wanting to share one of the most wonderful things our bodies have to offer with only the person they have committed to share the consequences with.
Report Post »johnannegalt
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:07pmLOL… She’s so silly.. —> http://www.markamerica.com/2012/03/02/sandra-flukes-irrational-demand/
Report Post »johnannegalt
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:09pmAlso.. “When you invite the world into your bedroom, don’t expect the world to withhold comments. When you invite government to fund healthcare, there will be no holding back the ultimate encroachment into personal privacy. There’s no ambiguity here. ” cont.. —> http://www.markamerica.com/2012/03/02/inviting-government-into-the-bedroom/
Mark America hits the nail on the head yet again! :D
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:13pmI care that my kids are responsible. I dont care if your kids are until they affect me and guess what you say pay? No way!!!
Just like abortion buddy, get out of her body? GET OUT OF MY WALLET!
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:15pmPOTUS
Pimpin’
Report Post »Out
The
U.
S.
The Jewish Avenger
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:18pmShe spoke about contraceptives…
“being used to stop cancers and to keep women’s reproductive system healthy enough so that they CAN have babies.”
Anything REAL you can link to in order to back that claim up
Note: I said REAL.
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:21pmWhile 99% of women (of all faiths) have used contraceptives for various reason
Now I know your an Obama zombie robot:
That was such a tainted survey… boy are you a sucker…
Right should provide proof….nah you find it… find out WHO was removed from the survey…
Report Post »The Jewish Avenger
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:26pmVerySeniorCitizen
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:21pm
@ All of you Jerks on this thread who haven’t bothered to research this story…
You havent researched anything and insurance is for people who get ill. Preventive medicine is PRIVILEGED insurance. She wants preventive medicine, by her own insurance preventing getting pregnant is not a right nor an illness.
It is you that have failed to provide anything but a biased ill informed rant and the further I read the more I see you losing your composure. Your nothing short of a ranting troll at this point… but we like to play at times. Apparently, you are the ball…. LOL
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:24pmYeah, well hon, you brought it up distinctly to get “free” contraceptives, at my expense, for your personal enjoyment. Pay for your own damned pills, and stop with the typical feminist “outraged” whining you’re echoing as was taught to you by your little cult of victimization.
Pull your own weight or get the hell out of the way, you’ll get no free ride from me.
Report Post »GhostOfJefferson
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:27pm@VerySenior
Birth control pills are a schedule 1 carcinogen, you know that right?
How did women “survive” prior to the pill, if as you claim, they’re somehow necessary now and required in order to “make it long enough to have children”.
God, what pathetic crap you people let yourselves be distracted by. It’s no wonder you believe in progressivism.
Report Post »mils
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:31pmHAHAHA….
Report Post »Okay, I agree with Rush. the left has said much much worse things about women on the right…and no one gets upset..Rush is losting advertisers over this.
WE NEED TO STAND WITH RUSH ON THIS…His language was not the best, but better than things BILL MAHER AND MANY OTHER ON THE LEFT HAVE USED AGAINST CONSERVATIVE WOMEN!!!
I do not in anyway agree with sandra fluke…she needs an aspirin
calonzap
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:43pmLMAO – I do believe that you’re probably right.
Report Post »jonnyfontain
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:55pmThis girl is a lesbian, all of her classmates say so. All we need to do is expose her being gay and that will screw the obama administration big time! She is GAY!!!! She doesn’t need contraception!
Report Post »cosette
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:25pmA condom costs about a quarter. If this sex fiend doesn’t have a quarter she has bigger problems than looking forward to her next enhanced sexual experience. BTW What an embarrassment to her family.
Report Post »cosette
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:38pm@ Very Senior… I had taken “the pill” prior to my second pregnancy. After the birth I hemorrhaged for 2 weeks. I damn near died. I required 16 pints of blood. After which my physician refused would not write another prescription for the pill. He blamed my condition on that very contraceptive, he also told me there were studies that linked it to breast cancer. I researched his claims in various medical periodicals that proved him correct. That was 43 years ago. I had a close friend who I begged to get off the pill. She didn’t, she developed breast cancer, fortunately it was caught in time. Her doctor attributed it to her prolonged use of the pill, that was 8 years ago. I believe any medication that alters the natural functioning of the body is harmful, I have sons. If I had a daughter I would advise against it.
Report Post »CWPrequired
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:56pm$1000 says she comes out of the closet in less than a year.
Report Post »Leader1776
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:59pm@VerySeniorCitizen
Report Post »Oral contraceptives (TODAY’S VERSIONS) put women at a significantly higher risk for blood clots and embolisms. This trollop has no idea or thought about women’s health. She is a left leaning hater. nothing more complex.
jzs
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:45pmLike most Republicans, I’m standing with Rush! This issue is a winner in the November elections. Speak it far, speak it loud. This woman is a slut as Rush said, and she should be held up for public ridicule as the sinner and idiot she is. Her parents too.
Republicans, lend me your ears! Let us stand together as one! This “woman”, this ignorant female, the lesser of the two genders btw, this so called “person”, who would speak out in favor of insurance coverage of birth control, shows what ******** are advocating, which is nothing less turning the US into a socialistic Saddam and Gomorrah. It doesn’t matter that many states already have these laws, this is Obama, someone whose darker side is evident for all to see for Christ’s sake.
Report Post »sbenard
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:07pmShe should have said that to her Mom, but that would be hypocrisy, wouldn’t it!
Report Post »Jas0n
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:10pmSeriously, looks like a man! No BC needed here!
Report Post »FreshlyWoken
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:25pmLol
Report Post »McNamara
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:45pmThat was an excellent comment! LMAO
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 12:01am@ JZS….psst Saddam is the dead once ruler of Iraq. Sodom is the culture from biblical times. You probable just got carried away with your emotions…You know what with typing and thinking at the same time.
Report Post »Herecomestrouble
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 12:39amOh, please, VerySeniorCitizen, this isn‘t about contraception as much as it is about gov’t control of everyone and every entity. Ms. Fluke, et al need to keep their knees together or take responsibility for their promiscuity. Evidence shows that these hormones are used predominantly for preventing pregnancy, with a small percentage used for fibrosis, etc.
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:35amHas any one thought of telling Ms. Fluke to go fluke Herself? Don’t have to worry about getting pregnant, saves money as she would not need condoms, and there is a double meaning, ion that we really don’t want to hear about either her personal problems or her personal life.
Send her over to The Inquirer, as their readers might want to take their time reading about her saucy, personal life.
Report Post »blamelessace5
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:36amCrushing debt still seems more important….just saying.
Report Post »freeus
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:56amSo what is next, Sandra? Are we going to have to pay for your tampons?
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:58amZENZAZEN, obvious we don’t have to worry about killing any brain cells in your head, as you hava to have a brain first. Go trolling out in the ocean. It‘s big enough so we don’t have to worry about hearing from you for some time. While you are out there trolling, take a few books for you and learn about the subject matter that you have just commented upon. Maybe you’ll make more sense next time you make an appearance.
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 2:19amVERYSENIORCITIZEN, seems like you and Gloria Steinem should get together, or at least become pen pals. You both hate men; you both have inferiority complexes; you are both flaming liberal loons, although she may have matured and moved to the right a tad; you both don’t know what you are talking about, and you in particular might check yourself in for a check up from the neck up.
Hopefully they find some gray matter up there.
Report Post »carbonyes
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 2:40amAs far as the Bamster goes, what a Nerd! If he thinks he’s going to gain political capital from his call to Miss Fluke, he is actually going to worse than stub his toe, maybe even break his ankle, then he will not be able to play hoops or golf for awhile.
Report Post »You see, Odumbo, he just don’t get it. Somethings are better left alone. Get it Mr. president – “left” alone. The liberal “left” always tries to make an issue where there is none, or make a mountain out of a mole hill. This is a loser for Obama, just as Obamacare is, for it focuses the attention, once again on Obamacare and if the Republicans are smart, which unfortunately many are not, especially the John McCain types, they will take this and run with it, for it continues to expose the control issues and tremendous costs associated with the implementation of Obamacare.
Obamacare must be a seminal issue along with the economy and jobs, for they are interrelated, for Obamacare is both a jobs killer and an economy killer, which is part of Obama’s masked agenda to turn this country into a banana republic. Add cap and trade and the border issue, and beat that drum through the November election, and Obammy is duck soup, without the duck.
Instead of the Republican candidates pounding on one another, focus on Obama and the issues that he is dead in the water on, and pound them day after day, and the candidate that actually gets it, can communicate it to the American people and can perceptibly follow through, will win.
bleuze
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 2:55amI wonder if she is single. If so, then she is a slut!
Report Post »GETLIFE
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 3:12amHow can any self-respecting woman be out there promoting dependence on the GOVERNMENT for contraception! This woman is monumentally naive. Talk about the dumbing down of America!
Report Post »Georgetown must be so proud….
GETLIFE
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 3:20amCARBONYES, actually what she is promoting is the taking away of the independence of women concerning contraception/reproduction–by promoting government control/ regulation.
Report Post »She is not a man-hater, she is a woman-hater.
jzs
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 3:26amHand, the post was sarcastic. Frankly I had to look up the spelling on “Gomorrah.“ I realize that you would know more than many about the correct meaning and spelling of the word ”sodomy”, but, you know, thanks anyway.
Report Post »thetreyman
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 6:52amWOW, how far in the weeds we let them take us.
Report Post »nosycophant
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:37amI wonder if she could afford a tramp stamp on her own or do we have to provide that as well?
Report Post »TAMPAGIRL
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:42amthis is all about obamacare…..the less births the more money we will saved…….all these women want insurance companies to cover for free……..nothing is free…..the cost will be past to the policy holders…..obama mandating the insurance companies to cover at 100% who is he to dictate this to the companies… is obama going to make certain these women who receive free contraceptives actually take the pill everyday and not to miss a dose or else the inevitable will happen a pregnancy? women also DO get pregnant while on the pill. FREE BIRTH CONTROL MIGHT EVEN CONTRIBUTE TO INCREASE STD’S ….HEPATIS HIV etc………what is that going to cost obamacare????…….
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:19am@ jzs
Actually JZS, this is a winning issue for conservatives. Let me put it this way. Why would we ever want government to MANDATE what an private institution or insurance company MUST offer? What precedence does it set. Church forced to give contraception due to claims of cancer prevention. How son until they force people to eat broccoli and drink water to reduce “the risk of obesity and cancer” that place an overburden on the medical system to make it too expensive for Obamacare to be given to every individual.
See, the issue is, once they get in the foot of the door of dictating what we do, it will never stop. Instead, it will lead to non-coverage by the government to those who don’t follow their model. A government big enough everything you need is big enough to take it away. Thomas Jefferson warned us of this. And you may think I am lying, but you only have to read what Progressive Eugenicists wrote in the early 20th century. Plan Parenthood was started by Margaret Sanger to deplete the undesirables from the human race. That is the sick, horrific truth.
http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/eugenics-progressivism%E2%80%99s-ultimate-social-engineering/
Also, Minimum Wage was designed by the progressive economists to weed out undesirables in order have them fade away (IE die). Economists knew that companies would demand certain productivity for the higher, baseline wages.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:27am@ jzs
Then, they force the private productive to give the unemployed (undesirable workers – their label not mine) welfare. It is meant to collapse a system. Plan and simple, to bankrupt it. The minimum wage and vast numbers of regulations, keeps workers well over paid and force main cheap laborers of lower skill set to go unemployed. It is a purposeful design flow. Then our workers also face issues with competition from cheaper labor across seas. But I digress. See, what the left fails to acknowledge is a truth depiction of the basic model of economics:
SUPPLY & DEMAND
No matter what nerfed system you go by, you will never get past this #1 economic principle. Sure, your daydream world of everyone gets equal to their need and give according to their ability sounds all rainbow and unicorn farts… But the fact is unicorns don’t exist and the rainbow must exist from an impending storm (as rain is needed to form one). This is why Communism always fails, and why socialism always collapse into communism.
Once a populace learns it can get for free without productivity, the number of freeloaders increase and the levels of productivity drops. This is what Greece and America (and most of the SOCIALIST world – that’s right we are socialist and not free market capitalism) are suffering today. With lower productivity means lower supply. Money spread evenly, would mean equal access. However, the supply does not exist to cover the demand.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:36am@ JZS
So, if supply never meets demand, what happens? Say it with me class…. A shortage exists… How do shortages compensate? Inflation of prices or rationing. Both are rationing factors. See, in communism they ration. The government WILL choose who gets it first and it is all equally given after the elites get it first. They will sacrifice the undesirables. The undesirables are powerless do to the power structure of a big government with power in few hands. Otherwise, government need to force productivity levels to meet demand, which is slave labor. You will be forced to work to the point of breaking to produce enough for the masses. Meanwhile, those that cannot work are allowed to exist off the work of the working class. How long before people falsely claim disabilities… You can’t have that, because it breaks the system… So they will simply quench the disabled for the good of the many.
Capitalism bets this by creating incentives for productivity… You are productive, you can afford the healthcare, the BC, the food you need to survive. The determining factor is you. If prices go up, you work harder to achieve that level of access. But what Progressive do not see is that increased productivity means more supply is available. With more supply available, prices will lower and make it more affordable to the masses thus requiring less burden on society.
Report Post »JohnnyMidknight
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:50am@ JZS
Now… Do you trust everyone JZS? Would you trust a stranger with your life? Why would you give government the ability to dictate your existence? What do they owe you? What interest do they have in your life?
The honest answer is they don’t. Human are self centered by nature. There are those who are less than others, but when the stuff hits the fan… We are all self centered. When it comes to survival, we fight for it… Government knows this and it is why the progressive wants no guns in the hands of citizens. otherwise we out number them. They can not enforce their will. You should never trust the government. Even if government was Mother Theresa, you have to realize some day, a darker power will take that place that will abuse power.
This was understood by the philosophers of Greece thousands of years ago… Just read Plato’s The Republic. Republics fall to democracies which fall to anarchy which fall to dictatorships which become republics. It is a circular pattern of a society that forgets history. It is why he states the Republic is the best form of government
This is why we (America) were fashioned in a republic with a semi democratic election process. Otherwise, you get these progressive views in control, i bring you the Fabian Society’s Bernard Shaw:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQvsf2MUKRQ
I warn you, watch who you choose as bed fellows and make allegiances to.
Report Post »notrobert
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:32amSorry very senior, but I agree with Dirty Harry. If the bimbo keeps her mind on her studies and her legs closed she will have nothing in the world to worry about. If she does, however, not have the ability to contain her horny tendencies(like guys must when a girl says “no”) then she can either make the guy provide a condom or go to the drug store and buy a supply…maybe use her beer money??? Geeze, have we really gotten to the point of funding females to be sluts?
Report Post »FNTM
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:46amEveryone realize that you can buy a years worth of contraceptive pills for $60 or so at Walmart. Ok, you wtill have to pay for the Doctor’s exam. Condoms aren‘t much more and with them you don’t need that pesky exam. My wife and I were wondering if that $3000 Ms Fluke was stating included a couple of anticipated abortions at her local planned parenthood clinic. Otherwise her numbers simply aren’t adding up.
Report Post »SpeckChaser
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 10:47amJZS
In the name of consistency, do you believe government should provide free ammo in addition to contraception?
Like sex, we have the right to exercise our 2‘nd amendment rights. Doing so excessively leads to high ammo costs most can’t afford, infringing on this right.
Do you believe the government should provide free ammo as to guarantee that right or do you pick and choose when that standard applies based on your political beliefs?
Report Post »Bum thrower
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:08amIf she wants me to pay for her sex, I want a ‘piece’ of it!! If I gotta pay, I wanna play!!
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:34amO’Reilly pronounced her name F-L-U-K. O’Reilly is a stickler for word pronounciation and he should know. I’m sure her schoolmates feel the same. I‘m also sure that her parents are very proud of their very liberated girl just as Lewinski’s parents were. She does remind me of Lewinski. (Lewinski never found a man to marry.) Isn’t that what this is all about? I’m sure she will be well accepted and receptive of her male friends until she gets a little older.
Report Post »stillapatriot
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 12:40pmto veryseniorcitizen”
Don’t care about what? Pretty open ended question i must say. Look do I think this young lady should have been called names to get the point across that she is asking tax payers to pay for something they shouldn’t? No, name calling is not the way to win this arguement! Had we simply attacked her policy and its weaknesses we would be ahead instead of trying to defend our position and justify the name calling. Come on people we have to stay on target and stay civil or we will do what just happened. WE HAVE NOW CREATED A VICTIM FOR THE LEFT WING TO RESCUE,ALL THE BLEEDING HEARTS GATHER AROUND POOR LITTLE FLUKE. Please she is wrong and that is what we should stick to no matter what..
thinkwithme
Report Post »stillapatriot.
Xyskalla
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:10pmShe wants the taxpayer to pay so she can have sex?
Well, I want the taxpayer to pay so I can have sex, too. My wife lives in an Asian country and isn’t allowed to come to the USA yet, so I think the taxpayer should pay for my time off work, and for my plane tickets so I can have sex, too. That’s fair, isn’t it?
Report Post »Gary S
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:17pmIf you want to “chitti-chitti, bang-bang”, do it on your own dime.
Report Post »anOpinion
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:27pmPlease don’t be silenced Fluke; keep talking and keep making you and your liberal friends a laughing stock.
Report Post »MakeItSo
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 3:23pmThis isn’t about contraception. It’s about ENTERTAINMENT!!! Why should anyone pay for someone else’s entertainment?!
Report Post »JBARRANCHAZ
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 4:14pmI asked my g/f about this, she said “slut is kind of strong, but she clearly has an agenda.”
Planned Parenthood. The good little liberal should have gone to PP for free contraception.
This story is all part of a ploy to get stupid people (men and women) to think that the right doesn’t want them to have access to birth control.
I wish someone would have asked her if she had the HPV vacine.
Report Post »Look4DBigPicture
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:35pm@VerySeniorCitizen….This is pure poppycock. Birth control pills cost anywhere from $15-$50 per month without insurance, and most doctors have free samples to give away to those in need. It’s time these spoiled Georgetown girls have a little self restraint by staying away from the Coach or Gucci bags so they have the funds to buy their contraception. Not only are there free women’s health clinics all over DC, I would think their parents could help out with this small expense if it’s truly for health reasons … don’t cha think?
Report Post »JOCASSEEJO
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 9:32pmShe’s not too smart for a “lawyer-wannabe” – doesn‘t she know that she doesn’t need contraception for lesbian sex?
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 11:58pmCarbonyes………..Good Post
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 12:02amDo you know what else she can’t afford??????????
Lip Wax!
I think I see a little Mustache….
Report Post »wildjoker5
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:15amI want the government to mandate the insurance company to cover my second amendment right to bear arms. The preventative cost of keeping my family safe from home intruders far out seeds the cost of having a baby. Everything from stopping the payments for a funeral, to stopping the reembursment of stolen goods, a gun or two with the bullets must be covered, and this is actually in the constitution as a God given right, unlike this faux right to have sex while being protected from their idea of a punishent, child birth.
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:41amI like that, base line on one rifle, one shotgun AND one pistol per member in household. . . . Now then, since firearms technically includes rockets, mortars and grenade launchers. . ..As to transport and maintainence. vehicles or aircraft?
Report Post »I_am_a_53percenter
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:43amGood one!
Report Post »Tyson
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:36amGreat idea, since the RIGHT to bear arms is list ed in the constitution I want the tax payers to provide me with a new AR-10. Let’s compromise, we’ll give them free birth control they give us free guns. I LIKE IT!
Report Post »SgtB
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:41am@ Mayetytwo Barreett,
The 2nd does not say “firearms”, it says “arms”. Please stop trying to limit my right to keep and bear ARMS to just firearms. That is not what the framers said, it isn’t what I agree with, and it severely limits all of our rights. For instance, if you wield a knife, you bear arms but not a firearm. If you wield a baseball bat in self defense you bear arms, but not a firearm. If you wield a taser, pepper spray, machete, a trained dog, a sturdy d-cell maglite, or even something like a nuclear weapon; you are bearing arms, but not a firearm.
There is a saying in the Corps; “one mind, any weapon”. The reality of this statement is that any object can become a weapon. Remember the magic trick with a pencil in the last Batman? Most would not consider a pencil a deadly weapon, but you can sure as hell use it as one.
My point is that ignorant people like yourself are destroying our God given rights through your own misguided interpretation and understanding of our Constitution.
Report Post »wildjoker5
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:50amI get to choose the “arms” I want to bear, just like they are choosing pills over rubbers.
I also believe a few teen pregnancies will be prevented with a father and a shotgun ready to meet the next potential boyfriend. So they are like contraception tool.
Report Post »ORION3
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 9:28amI concur. With three daugthers of dating age, I prefer the father with guns contraceptive strategy. I’ll pay for my own thank you.
Report Post »AmazingGrace8
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:52amYour second post about the father & the shot gun reminds me of The Batchelor show. Ben meets the parents and one girl’s dad makes a comment that he would not approve of his daughter, if she was chosen, to “Shack-Up” before marriage like alot of these couples have done. Ben had that “real-sick-look-on-his-face” and funny, the girl was one of Ben’s favorite and she did not get a rose. The gal flies to Switzerland and asks Ben to really clarify to her why he did not chose her…Ben does a “tap-dance” reason and then the girl (she probably knew why) said, she makes up her mind about what she does in her life…but Ben knew he could not “Shack-Up” with this girl before marriage because of the MORALS of this girl’s father. Very refreshing to see a dad protecting his daughter and perhaps down-the-road this girl will realize to chose a husband with high morals like her dad. Probably sounds “corny” & “old-fashioned” but sure wish tv stations would show the announcement from years ago….girl & boy about to have sex and both have been sexually active and then shows their sex partner and then what they had and so on….the bedroom sure got crowded…both are having sex with hundreds of partners…dominos effect. Probably won’t bother them now-a-days.
Report Post »flrick
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:06pmLiberals think the right to “bare arms” means wearing a short-sleeved shirt.
Report Post »johnannegalt
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:10pm“As long as people are going to try to redistribute their private burdens onto the public account, there should be no claim whatsoever that the demand-makers can avoid public judgment. They’re inviting them.” —Mark America http://www.markamerica.com/2012/03/02/inviting-government-into-the-bedroom/
Report Post »NancyBee
Posted on March 4, 2012 at 12:09amFlrick………….lol that was funny
Report Post »kentuckypatriot
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:14amNews flash Ms Fluke… we won’t be silenced either! We will continue to stand up for our rights as taxpayers, our values, and our morals. What part of NO FREE CONTRACEPTION don’t you understand???
Report Post »quicker
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:10amDear Missy little Suzy Fluke,if you can`t afford to pay ,DON`T PLAY…..
Report Post »jcldwl
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:48amWhat’s funny is she said to congress it costs her $3000.00 for birth control. So she obviously is not practicing safe sex, just pregnancy prevention. If she was practicing safe sex the bill for condoms would be much cheaper. Of course I don’t know what kind of birth control costs $3000.00 so I think she should be investigated for lying to congress. Or perhaps $3000.00 is the amount the people who prepped her intend to make the birth control handout of our tax dollars.
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:25amRobbing Peter to pay for peter
Report Post »auntbea
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 5:47pmYou should see what else they are teaching her at Georgetown! My grandson went there – he used to be a really nice kid…..
Report Post »the wireworker
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:57pmthe saddest part of this whole thing is how the lamestream media can change the topic of conversation taking the focus off of hussein obama destroying our country to contraception being a right ( i know: our lamestream media has never discussed hussein obama destroying our country)
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:10amMasturbation is the answer. We need to teach these poor girls to pleasure themselves until they are in the financial position to afford their own birth control. We could set up a collection of sex toys and distribute them to the girls at Georgetown through the school nurse.
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:16amI fell out of my chair reading that……
Report Post »Pat Alexander
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:27amThe perfect solution !!
Good one, really good….
She looks like a guy ???
Report Post »Mil-Dot
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:29amThe prog chicks are truely amazing. They never want to run out of other people’s money. They never run out of things to buy for themselves and other progs using the earnings of others.
Report Post »InversionTheory
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:29amI believe Jocelyn Elders was fired for saying that.
She appeared in the episode of Penn and Teller’s show on Showtime about safe sex and she said something like… Masturbation is the safest form of sex and you’re always doing it with someone you love.
Report Post »snooop1e
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:50pmIf your left hand causes you to sin cut it off. Just saying……think about it…..
Report Post »sacwoodpusher
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:06pmOral sex works too!
Report Post »oneshiner
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:15pmSACWOODPUSHER: Bill Clinton though it wasn’t sex. Is is, is? That’s when the morals of young
Report Post »women really started down hill and all the kids began thinking sex was simply a part of life, marriage or no marriage. I almost forgive those planning to marry and can’t wait, but I have problems with women
who think sex is a sport and sleep (ha) with any Tom, Dick and Harry.
This is not morally right for those loose women to expect the tax payer to pay for their sins.
GumRock
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 10:22pmI think that’s a Great idea !
We need our government official’s
Like the ones searching kids Lunch bag’s in kindergarten
to get over to Georgetown and give Proper masturbation technique
to the Collage Students,
a Life Skill they will get more use of once there schooling is over,
and they Join OWS because they cant get a Job .
By the way .. Who are all Guys that are tagging this Free Nook~Nook
Report Post »without even leaving a tip. or at least
Have a Rubber in the pocket, when there turn is up
love the kids
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:06amI still don‘t understand why the health care bill won’t provide free condoms to either sex instead of the pill to women only? Don‘t the Democrats and the President care about men’s reproductive rights???
Report Post »Condoms are much more safe than the pill, besides, men don’t know if the woman is actually taking the pill.
grandmaof5
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:04amThis has nothing to do with women’s healthcare and everything to do with wanting someone else to pay for her being a slut. Why doesn’t she just become a prostitute and she will be able to afford contraception – oh wait, she already is. She wants to be paid so she can have sex. Her parents must be so proud!
Report Post »9111315
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:34amShe needs to take some business classes and learn to include the cost of her business supplies in the price of her product.
Problem solved.
Report Post »Jeff1000
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:46amDon’t lose sight that this is really about silencing the church and assualting the Constitution. Don’t fall for this Alinsky type of diversion.
Report Post »Oilbama
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:03amYou got that right, if she can open her legs for everyone,
she should be able to open her purse as well.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:58amMy thought also .. Parents MUST be proud .. they either raised a slut .. or allowed the state too .. either way … she is a slut!
Report Post »Zenzazin
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:15pmmaybe you should watch the video of what she said again, since you really don’t seem to understand at all
Report Post »bigbear_awake
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:01amthen they can sue when it fails them right
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:56amGiven a natural sense for extrapolation. . In 4 years this same woman will be in front of congress looking for public assistance for breast augmentation, 8 yrs. the facelift. 12 ye=rs. a redux of both.. Why can’t she just move to Merryland and have her huswifner, get is paid for on her insurance.
Report Post »caladesi
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:55amlet’s raise the premiums the military and military retirees pay for health care and pass some of those savings to contraception for horny college students…..that makes sense,doesn’t it????
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:04amEither that, or have a “swingers night” at the VA hospital
Report Post »jasmer
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:13amOf course it does! In a horrific, miserable way, that is.
Military training generally results in patriotism, ambition, and initiative.
College training of the skank’s sort generally results in dependency and the adaptation of Progressive views. In some ways, they try to achieve greater uniformity than the military does!
Report Post »acdcguy
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:55amDuring a commercial on O’Reilly, I just happened to flip over to Ed Show, which is rare, but only wanted to see if he would be talking about Andrew Breitbart. Then I saw this spectacle. I could not believe what I was watching. When Ed showed the Dems letter to Boehner requesting that he condemn Rush for his comments, I couldn’t take it anymore and flipped back. She deserves what she gets!!!
Report Post »dnewton
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:55amThe Democrats are used to putting anybody up on a committee meeting with any idea, be it Global Warming, the evils of food additives, fracking, or any subject with the word “children” in it and pretending they just got a mandate to go nuts with other people’s money. Rarely has anyone gotten the negative treatment that Ms Fluke has gotten. I think that the Senate, being out of touch, misread the public again. She is not being “silenced”, because of her personal plumbing. If we can not knock down a bad idea, just because a woman had it, then women should not be able to criticize the supreme court for rendering a majority male ruling either, even if it pertains to women’s bodies.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 11:46amACDC….what’s even funnier is that Eddie Schlitz had to make a public apology for calling Michelle Bachmann the same names Two-Bag Fluke is saying belittle women. The left just can’t help itself..it‘s a snake eating it’s own tail. A groupthink troupe of self-appreciating, self-applauding,talking point spouting, empty headed monkeys and their keepers grind the organ while they all dance to the same tune. How surreal is that? Fluke is attacking Limbaugh for precisely the same thing Eddie Schlitz was forcedto make a public apology for. Unbloodybelievable in it’s idiocy. Then again..Fluke doesn’t strike me as a very bright woman.
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:53amShe will want the goverment to pay for her tampons next – he(( its a cost to her every month
Report Post »jujubeebee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:58amDon’t laugh. That is next.
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:05amAnd U ain’t believin”what comes after that!!!!!
Report Post »doomytram
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:15amEd Schultz show said what? Relevancy. Enough Said, but Tampons, Femine Napkins, what is next?
Report Post »Look4DBigPicture
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:43pmYeah … next the gov’t will demand that insurance companies pay for toilet paper for preventative health purposes. There’s no end to the liberals insanity and sense of entitlement.
Report Post »Temporal
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:53amTypical entitlement mentality. They want to exercise their “right” to engage in certain conduct, then demand that someone else foot the bill.
Report Post »Typical leftist press, if you object to footing the bill, you’re attacking their “rights.”
jujubeebee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:59amtheir right to rip us off.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:37amFluke should start a group “Sluts Unite” or the “Penis Pals”
Report Post »She is nothing more than demorat hack…… and the Catholic church should call her out
Outlaw_Josey_Wales
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 1:58pmSandra Fluke thinks her health insurance should pay for her pre-existing sluty-condition.
Report Post »TEARS FOR AMERICA
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:52amFluke is endangering the Community with the probable spread of disease, heard of AIDS? All it takes is a one-timer with someone infected as so many can testify to. Rather than glorify her sexuality you would think think HHS would say “whoa, wait a minute” but like Planned Parenthood, the agenda is not one of abstinence or caution, but abandonment-just look at their tax-supported site! It drips deception to young, impressionable minds.
Report Post »Mil-Dot
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:30amMan, these prog chicks are truely amazing. They never want to run out of other people’s money. They never run out of things to buy for themselves and other progs using the earnings of others.
Report Post »jedi.kep
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:51am“reproductive health care”?
Here’s health care that totally FREE. Close your legs. Practice abstinence. Show some restraint like a good little human and stop living like an animal that has no self control.
Report Post »TowerOfBabble
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:50amWhy doesn’t she get sterilized, I‘m sure that’s covered by her plan.
Report Post »jujubeebee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:58amShe wants to “choose” when she can have kids and keep her options open for after law school. If she can afford law school then she can afford the pill. And if she thinks she cannot…then she needs to postpone law school…work a year and save her own money to pay for her own activities.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:43amor just get paid for her God given talent
Report Post »ambwoster
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:52amI think she does get paid for what she does after all how does she pay for school, I think this lady has soo much time for sex maybe she should study
Report Post »jujubeebee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:49amHer “needs” should not be the financial burden of others. This is greed to think that the rest of us, male or female, should have to pay for her birth control….or thus pay her to have all the sex you wants while spending her own money for law school. Maybe she should put off law school and work for a year and put that money in the bank so she can afford her pills?
Report Post »jujubeebee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:56amtypo “she” wants.
She can bring it on if she wants but don’t expect the other side to sit silent. She will be called a greedy slut who wants others to pay for her sex because that is what she is.
Report Post »Marine25
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:48amMr. Limbaugh just called every woman who uses her health insurance to afford contraception a “slut” and a prostitute.
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:59amYeah, and
Report Post »PinTwister
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:59amIt’s already FREE !! you dumb a$$ … just go to your local health dept.
Report Post »militarybrat1
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:10amNo, he was saying if she wants the taxpayers to pay for it she is a prostittute. That was her defense, sexual (contraception) freedom. Well, I am a female, grew up poor, went on contraceptive medicine for more than sexual freedom, but medicinal purposes. Guess what, I found a way to pay for that too. I have no right to force slavery on another person to pay for my needs. If‘s that’s what you want then it will never stop. Other peoples needs will always be more important than yours, therefore, you will HAVE to work harder and longer for each according to his needs. She can go to a differend college. No one forced her to go there. She sought them out in order to CHANGE their policy. No one put a gun to her head to go there. I am so tired of this. How about the economy, studpid.
Report Post »Choctaw25
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:26am@Marine25 What part of she wants “all of us to pay” for her being a scank don’t you understand. Did the Corps take away your brain?
Report Post »For a Law student, she is the dumbist student I have ever heard. The standards for getting into Law School must really be dropping to the bottom of the barrel.
Rush was spot on with his comments and observations, as usual.
Mil-Dot
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:30amUnbelievable. These prog chicks are truely amazing. They never want to run out of other people’s money. They never run out of things to buy for themselves and other progs using the earnings of others.
Report Post »Gypsy One
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:09pmThat was not my understanding. I believe he accurately referred to Fluke who apprently loves to ….
Report Post »Pacman116
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:48amThis woman has some serious entitlement issues. You wanna have pre-marital sex? Fine. But expecting someone to fund your habit is about an assinine request as I’ve ever seen/heard. Get off your butt (no pun intended), get a job, and pay for what you want. It would ALMOST be understandable if this were a woman down on her luck and on welfare or something. But this is nothing more than a spoiled brat that thinks she is owed something. Grow up young lady. Life gets much harder than what you’re experiencing right now. I can promise you that. Geesh!!
Report Post »zman61
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 12:30pmit must be the end of days as I find myself agreeing with a Clemson fan!!!
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:48amThis woman doesn’t look attractive enough to be able to manage to connive a man into having sex with her.
Report Post »Mateytwo Barreett
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:01amAs theold saying goes “I NEVER went to bed with an ugly woman- But when I woke up……..”
Report Post »bs_detector
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:18amIs it just me or does she seem to have the personality of a piece of bread? And not even some kind of interesting bread like marbled rye or pumpernickel, but just plain old white bread. She almost seemed like a programmed automaton while she was talking in that clip.
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:46amWe have a budget. We can pay for women to have free casual sex, or we can pay for ovarian cancer treatment. Any woman can make this choice. This woman says her choice is free sex. I think she is the one who hates women.
Report Post »TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:38amThis woman as you call her is a tool used by Nancy Pelosi whose hearing she was speaking to–remember Nancy Pelosi the fanatic who tries to emulate Winston Churchill in persevering. Although all seem fine in remarks she can have all the sex she wants who on earth will want to marry someone with no morals? However that is beside the point. This is not about women’s rights, it is about FREEDOM OF RELIGION. The articles reads she has lots of support in Congress. Well of course she does (yesterday the Senate tabled Roy Blunt’s bill and guess which Senator (R) voted with Dems to table it? Olympia Snow (R).
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:45amBless this young Joan of Arc.
TEA
Report Post »Mil-Dot
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:44amThese prog chicks are really amazing. They never want to run out of other people’s money. There’s never of a shortage of things to buy for themselves and other progs using the earnings of others.
Report Post »SoundStride
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:43amAll I need to fix her problem and all the “Welfare Broodmares” is : one tube of Krazy Glue® and one McDonalds straw® insert then glue hold 20sec. problem solved.
Report Post »Average_Joseph
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:41amIf it walks like a duck….
Report Post »MYHEROISRON
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:51amHey Fluke! Ya didn’t think this one out very well! Rush got ya by the short hairs, as well as the rest of you stupid, liberal progressive marxists’, such as NAZI Pelosi and that dumb azz George Stephi … and OBAMMY! Nobody cares about contraception! Its a non-issue, except for the lousy libs and we know it! Its a smoke screen, plain and simple, and NAZI PELOSI, along with the rest of them, will throw you under the bus! Yer a stupid little girl messin’ with things you know nothing about!
Report Post »DesertRose1960
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:07am@Myheroisron, Really, this is nothing but name calling, and if you think that you’ve proved your point about how stupid Liberals are, you really need to reread your own posts. You‘ve been wound up and you’re doing a great job of yelling at the wrong target. Your pocket is being picked, but you’re too distracted to see it. Contraception is an issue, Teapublicans are trying to get “personhood’ amendments into the law in several states, once in place, personhood amendments will then allow them to take away hormonal contraceptives by making them illegal. A large number of women who take the pill are marrried, many are taking it for non-contraceptive purposes, too. It is an issue.
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:19amDesertrose:
LIAR
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 2:06pmLOL….see that “these aren‘t the droids you’re looking for”mind trick by TOKYOROSE? Apparently contraceptives are not to prevent pregnances as is the overwhelming use of them…they’re for preventing cancers and “stuff”. Do you believe your own drivel TOKYOROSE?
Report Post »VanceUppercut
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:12pm@MYHEROISRON
Report Post »Marxists are not Nazi’s, and if you had even a basic understanding political theory you would know why.
Matrix22
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 4:14pmDesert, you are an idiot. Conservatives have NO INTEREST in taking away anyone’s contraception. My wife takes it, as do many many others, so do you REALLY think that is the goal? This is ONLY about our ability and the ability of churches to choose how they behave and what they believe. Even staunch conservative Catholics who are totally opposed to contraception aren’t trying ban it! They just don‘t want to be forced to pay for someone else to do something they don’t believe in!
Report Post »Republic Under God
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:49pmMs. Fluke mentions a friend who had to have her ovary removed due to an Ovarian Cyst that grw unchecked. The remedy for the cyst was birth control pills (I think because of the hormones in them). The fact is that the pills are prescribed for more than preventing pregnancy. This whole point gets lost int he shuffle.
I am no fan of Birth Control pills, I think they are terrible for a women’s health. Hormones and fake hormones are terrible for women and I convinced my FIancee not to take them when she was prescribed them to deal with an issue (not related to preventing pregnancy).
Why is this portion of the debate not being legitimized by right wing media?
I mean are there alternative treatments? Was this oversight and is Limbaugh’s labeling this woman as hypersexual a distraction?
I am afraid these guys are losing integrity in my eyes. These are the same tactics employed byt he left, all the straw men and red herrings. We are supposed to be better than that. All of you are supposed to be better than that. Then again a bunch of Tea partiers are throwing their weight behind big government candidates like Santorum and Gingrich. I am about to turn my Tea Party badge in. We either got co-opted, or were never real to begin with.
Report Post »Republic Under God
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 8:04pmOkay, I am with you all on the unconstitutionality of this mandate. Both on the enumerated powers clause for any business and on the 1st amendment for religious-based institutions in particular.
What I am not getting is why a legitimte discussion about the real medical uses for birth control are being swept under the rug by the right wing pundits. It‘s like that aspect of the pill doesn’t exist in the right wing media world.
Dessert, are there no alternatives to birth control (besides holistic since – UNFORTUNATLY – holistic is beyond the scope of health insurance)?
This does not quite sway me ont he constitutionality of the mandates, but I think it is a legitimate concern for women and I can see why women might feel a bit encroached upon by the rigth wiog (those that, like Ms. Fluke, express this concern).
Report Post »eddvoss
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:41amSo she goes in front of Congress and complains that she has to pay for protection against getting pregnant or an STD, because of the amount of sex she is having, and Limbaugh is evil because he calls her on it?
Report Post »jujubeebee
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 6:52amExactly! If she doesn’t like the name she is called maybe she should stop the activity. She is a greedy slut who wants the rest of us to chip in and pay for her activity. She can’t wear a hallo.
Report Post »DesertRose1960
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:01amHormonal birth control does not protect one from an STD, she is talking about the third of women who take it to avoid things like ovarian cysts, which nearly killed her friend and other hormonal imbalance problems, like the one that plagued my friend. I was offered birth control as a 14 year old virgin because I had severe acne and debiliatating cramps. I didn’t take the pill because my mother objected to me taking birth control. This is an issue of women’s health that has been turned into another way to demean women. Why is a woman prevented from having access to a medicine because it offends the morality of her employer? What if a Muslim were to prevent a non-Muslim woman from getting some sort of medication because it was against Halal? If you insist on making this about religious values, why does the Catholic Church get to decide for someone who isn’t Catholic?
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:23amDesertrose
LIAR
This is about you using gov’t to force me to pay for other people to get something for free.
Report Post »Stop lying. Nobody is stopping you from buying your own birthcontrol. If you can’t afford, get a second job. Or third. Or fourth. Remember, you want us out of your uterus? Or is that only when there is someone else‘s body you chose to create and now want to destroy because we didn’t pay for your pill?
Choctaw25
Posted on March 2, 2012 at 7:40am@DesertRose1960; reading “your” post makes my point that Barry will be re-elected in a landslide, because you and America just don’t get it. You missed the entire point of the conversation. We have run out of using other peoples money to pay for other peoples STUFF.
Report Post »Just pay for my birth control pills now and I PROMISE I won’t ask you the taxpayer to pay for anything else ever again.
Barry is going to win again, you dummies.
blamelessace5
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 1:41amDesert rose
Well they own most of the hospitals sooooo i feel they can do what they want, with there hospitals.
And i agree “keep the gov,t out of my overies but i do want u to pay for my birth control.”
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 8:17amI would like to know her whole history. Who did she work for between college & law school?
What leftist organization did she join in college?
Report Post »Look4DBigPicture
Posted on March 3, 2012 at 7:57pm@DesertRose1960…The Catholics get to say no to non-Catholic students, because the mandate would require them to ultimately pay for it. Even with the waiver, most Catholic institutions hire insurance companies to administer claims on the insurance money the institution provides. Besides, birth control pills are not expensive, so this entire discussion is rather silly.
I‘m more concerned about knowing what the Obama administration is doing while we’re wasting out time talking about contraception. Those demrats are good at creating chaotic diversions, especially when they’re up to no good.
Report Post »