US
Nudist Group Wants Part of Coney Island to Be Clothing Optional
- Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:18am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
Start spreading the nudes!
A group of skinny dippers wants to set aside a piece of Coney Island Beach so they can get a full-frontal tan, but the city says the bathers need to keep their shirts — and especially their pants — on.
The American Association for Nude Recreation says the People’s Playground would be the ideal spot for newbie nudies to take a “nakation” — or to just hang out in the buff — because of its accessibility.
Popular Stories
Does Misstated Marathon Claim Prove Paul Ryan Is Dishonest? (POLL) 711 Comments
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 563 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 387 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 376 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 364 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 376 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 387 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 315 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 149 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 376 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (47)
babylonvi
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 5:16pmI think the EPA would get involved if that lady decided to remove her clothes.
Report Post »Obeckian1984
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 6:37pmJust move your camp to an airport
Report Post »plenty of naked body pics there
hempstead1944
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 3:59pmThis is sooooo unimportant !!!!
Report Post »Momtage
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 12:52pmUnbelievable! Can’t these exhibitionists just stay in their own backyards and get a full frontal tan rather than forcing other people to view their private parts? Of course they can. So who’s stopping them? Nobody. It’s not about getting a complete tan: it’s about being in public and the sick thrill of forcing others to see them. And I would bet there are few that anybody would even be curious to see naked much less forced to!
It’s obvious these thrive off shocking people to satisfy some psycho sexual fantasy about exposing themselves publicly. These people are sick puppies. Nudists also bring their children into their sickness by having them also partake in their sinfulness of public nudity and indecent exposure. Now THAT is child abuse, not letting your kids have a burger and fries occassionally.
Michelle Obama should speak to kiddie nudist camps and the pervs that seek them out for pediphilia, not attacking fast foods and “food deserts.” She strikes at gnats when evil abounds all around…..like her husband, for instance!
Report Post »Stu Cozza
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 11:28amIf nudity becomes OK on that beach, the beach should be named for Anthony’s Weiner.
Report Post »Hisemiester
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 10:14amThe people in NYC elected a mayor and board who passed the gay marriage law. Now these same evil people have a foot in the door. What now? Nudity on the beaches. When that is accomplished, nudity in the streets and lawful rape. Satan and his minions are on a run today. Obama opened the door and the minions of hell have taken control. Hunker down folks, it only gets worse. God was chased out of the country and now you are naked in the world. You have no protection against these evil ones.
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 9:41amoh why not. (sarcasm On )…………. obama’s stench has fouled everything else. obama has every class of degenerate known to man in his private “czars” cabinet, entire State regions have gone insane with degeneracy, the liberal Judges are all revealing how degenerate they are, and “”The 45 Declared Goals of Communsit Take-Over of America (1963)”" states #26: promote homosexualtry and degeneracy as “normal”.
Report Post »MrObvious
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 9:14amAnd a child shall walk upon the beach and say “Hello naked people”. :)
Report Post »awizard
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 8:06amGood choice, not on “Public Property”. Our ‘Culture’ and ‘Civilization’ in general does not support that sort of thing … “In Public” …
Report Post »bubbacantdance
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 7:25amThere already are plenty of places (beaches, camps, entire communities) around the country where people can legally and safely go nude. There are places to go that specialize in things that certain people want, regardless of how strange it might seem. Choose one of these places and go! The Walmart concept of “I can get anything I want in one place” works for retail in Walmart. The regular world that we all share with our families, isn’t like that. Quit trying to force me and my family to submit to your freedoms. Part of living in freedom is that we must give up a degree of freedom for the sake of everyone else’s freedoms.
Report Post »FedUpWithLeft
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 6:57amWhy don’t everyone put there clothes back on the way it should be. That can of worms has really grown and it will keep on growing with all the loons in this country.
Report Post »The Catbird
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 6:48amSorry, but my experience shows that those most likely to be nudists are the ones who should be the most covered up. Old, crinkly lib-hippies… Oh ick!
Report Post »love the kids
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 6:59amIt’s funny that they can pass gay marriage, something very un-natural, but then take issue with something that everyone does everysingle day, be naked. Remember, everyone is naked underneath, but less that 20% are gay. Where are these peoples rights? Why do you hate nudists so much?
Report Post »Gypsy123
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 5:03amAll the people I have met that are in this group are fat old hippies gross. I don’t want to spend the day throwing up at the beach.
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:41amBoy Satan is running rampant, it is something new everyday. Give them a maximum prison with high walls and they can do whatever they want.. where all they have to do is look at each other and spare the innocent from seeing them.
Report Post »Mannax
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 6:45amI have to say that being “naked” is not evil. That being said, 90% of the people at a nude beach, I do not want to see naked for any reason, much less them slowly turning themselves into an old leather handbag.
Report Post »Robert-CA
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:29amNooooooooooooooooooo
Report Post »blue_sky
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:12amRon Paul suggested that US government sells its land, property and gold to American people to pay the debt while the dollar still has some value. Then Americans will have more Capital and will be more jobs over time. If we wait and print more paper money, the government will be forced to sell the land and gold to Chinese bankers.
The point is, with more land in American hands, many interest groups could enjoy their lifestyle without bother the taxpayer.
Report Post »Alex2245
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:12amThe United Nations are changing their hats from blue to green and coming to any nation that has climate change problems!
Report Post »http://theintelhub.com/2011/07/20/un-may-switch-blue-helmets-to-green-then-launch-climate-change-peacekeeping-wars/
Diane TX
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:16amAlex,
I’m of the mindset that “climate change” is just another word for weather.
Report Post »End The Fed
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 4:41amDamn it! We use to call the UN troops “smurfs” while in the Army. What do you call’em with green brain buckets?
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:08amIt’s OK by me, (I’m not a prude), BUT only with my conditions.
1. No one over 23 years of age will be allowed.
Report Post »2. No one who’s body weight is not perfect for their body height will be allowed.
3. No one with unsightly cellulite will be allowed.
4. No one who’s naked body is unpleasant to view, will be allowed.
abbygirl1994
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:37amOh brother… are you a liberal???
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:49am@ ABBY,
Nope. I just don’t want my eyes to burn out of their sockets.
Report Post »conservativeagent
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 6:13amI’ll second the HWP requirement.
Report Post »texasfarmer
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:19pmThat pretty much rules out everyone now at the beach. Work for me.
Report Post »pcj
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 8:11pmJust like the old joke: What’s the best birth control for old people? Nudity….
Report Post »sweetnsalty
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:01amUsually the only ones who like to go nude are the over weight.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:02amIf you’re fat, please put your clothes back on.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:03amAlso, if you’re a dude, please put your clothes back on.
Report Post »bkfirvine
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:24amAlso, if you’re a fat chick, please put your clothes back on.
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:38amAnd all those that are prejudice sit down and shut up! We are all God’s children!
Report Post »blue_sky
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:57amI do not like any idea of “group rights” at the expense of taxpayer’s money. If you want special rules, chip in and buy your won land at the shore.
Politicians should protect individual liberty, not group rights and special interests. Nowadays our eyes are open. We finally have a yardstick to measure the liberty – “What would Ron Paul say on this?”
Report Post »blue_sky
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:05amSure Nudists can rent or buy a private land and with permission of the owner do what they please.
Report Post »Private property is part of individual liberty.
solaveritas
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:57amYou must ask several questions:
1. Is there something inherently WRONG about nudity among a crowd of like-minded people?
2. Will WRONG things necessarily happen if it is allowed to happen?
3. Is there any reason the freedom to be nude can’t be accommodated in a way that those who object (ie. are an undeniable result of life conditioning and can’t change their attitudes) are not forced to be confronted with the nudity?
If the answer to all those questions is “no”, then, well, “let freedom ring!”
Report Post »blue_sky
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:59amDo not create special interest zones on private property. Next step will be gay section, feminist section, latin police trade union section.
Report Post »blue_sky
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 2:00amoops, on Public property – and yes, do what you want on private property or rented.
Report Post »Momtage
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:03pmSorry, but ye do err. Yes is the correct answer to all the questions you posed. But only one of a moral mindset answers yes. The inverse is thus true as well.
As stated, nudists can be nude in the privacy of their own property, but their thrill requires public exposure. There are laws to protect the public from indecency even if it is at a designated “camp” of sorts which should be outlawed on the basis of long established moral codes in this country. I don’t think our Founders would have considered public nudity a right!
This is what’s wrong with Liberatianism. It lacks a moral code thus denying that free-for-alls infringe on others’ rights. Where does it stop? So should pediphiles be allowed to practice their sickness as long as it “isn’t hurting anyone else?” How about prositution, drugs, ax murdering, human sacrifice, etc?
Libertarianism is a very slippery slope that when analyzed is wholly illogical and should be rejected by a moral people.
Report Post »LinkedIn G
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:37amWomen can legally go topless in New York City ?
Report Post »quicker
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 6:11amNy state passed a law I think inthe 80s ,That anywhere a man could go topless a woman could too.This was done so ugly women could maybe find a mate,as the only women I had seen topless there were ugly.
Report Post »GRAMPA-D-NH
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:36amNot a good idea with Nathan’s hot dog eating contest nearby.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:35amTwisted and brain damaged ,I have no other explanation.
Report Post »Ron_WA
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:31amNice try. Private beaches no problem. Public beaches: never.
Now, maybe a secluded, isolated public beach which has been specifically designated for adults only nude sun bathing – maybe … of course it will need to be full of coral & down a very thorny, steep, rocky path … :)
Report Post »Smokey_Bojangles
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 1:30amNext to it will be a Rain Coats no Pants only Beach.
Report Post »