NYC Mayor Wants Stricter Federal Gun Control After Rash of Shootings
- Posted on September 6, 2011 at 1:37am by
Buck Sexton
- Print »
- Email »
Labor day weekend in New York City saw a surge in gun-related violence over the weekend that resulted in 10 deaths, and now Mayor Bloomberg has asked for the federal government to pile on to some of the strictest local anti-gun legislation in the country.
There were 14 separate shooting incidents over the weekend, and violence injured a reported 50 people, according to the Wall Street Journal. A lone gunman was reportedly responsible for shooting eight people at a party in a backyard in the Bronx on Sunday. Among his eight victims, the shooter hit an 11-year-old boy and two girls ages 13 and 14.
Gunfire even erupted within earshot of New York City Mayor Bloomberg on Sunday, as he was marching in the West Indian Day parade in Brooklyn, according to the NY Post. A number of shootings occurred at or near the parade, which is supposed to be a celebration of West Indian (Caribbean) culture, food, and music.
Bloomberg responded to the spate of gun violence on the steps outside the Christian Cultural Center in Brooklyn, and claimed that:
“we cannot tolerate it, there are just too many guns on the streets and we have to do something about it.”
The Big Apple‘s Mayor didn’t leave any doubt as to what he had in mind when he said ‘do something.’ Bloomberg went called for direct federal government intervention to prevent gun possession in New York. On the issue of tackling the gun crime surge, the Mayor said:
“We need the federal government to step up. Both ends of Pennsylvania Ave., both sides of the aisle.”
New York already has among the strictest gun control laws in the country. Currently, possession of an unlicensed handgun requires mandatory jail time (even for an NFL celebrity like Plaxico Burress).
As it is, law-abiding citizens have a near-impossble time acquiring a handgun permit in the city that never sleeps. Technically a “may issue” state for firearms, some legal analysts believe New York is really more of a “no issue” state- unless you have connections.
This end-run around the 2nd Amendment in New York City began over a century ago as a result of corrupt, liberal politicians pandering to anti-immigrant sentiment.
The hundred-year-old Sullivan Law (also called the Sullivan Act) was initially a Tammany Hall patronage measure that allowed favored constituents of corrupt politicians to carry concealed handguns. Under the Sullivan Law, the police- not the Constitution- would determine who could and could not concealed carry a firearm in New York. Simple possession of more common weapons- razors, brass knuckles, or dagger, for example- was a felony, whereas possession of a firearm without license was a misdemeanor.
A series of similar gun legislation followed suit in urban areas across the country.
Fast forward a century: the current state of New York City’s handgun laws are so Byzantine, it appears almost impossible for law-abiding gun owners to comply with, or even understand them.
Perhaps that’s the point.
Meanwhile, in the aftermath of a tragic weekend, the same tired ant-gun politics emerge. Anyone want to place a bet on how many of the violent perpetrators were carrying guns illegally in the first place?
These criminals risked substantial jail time the moment they walked out their front door. Adding a federal penalty would hardly change their minds.
Further infringement on legal gun ownership is not the answer.
But it seems City Hall has already decided to pretend it is.




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (332)
Mathchopper
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 3:02amHow many of these shootings involved more than ONE gun?. See-e-e… gun control IS working! Liberalism is a mental disorder which cannot be cured. WHEN GUNS ARE OUTLAWED, ONLY OUTLAWS WILL HAVE GUNS. And with their disorder, the libs will never understand that. Only Revolutionary War II will cure it.
Report Post »Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 4:07amOne of the first things the Nazis did was to disarm the Jews and the general population. It worked too. No one could defend themselves against the totalitarian regime.
Report Post »Coyotethree
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 5:25amTeddy Kennedy’s car had a higher body count than any of my privately owned firearms.
Therefore, the Feds should step in and remove all driver’s licenses from the Kennedy family. Bloomberg’s logic is irrefutable and unassailable on this point.
Report Post »M 4 Colt
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 5:47amGee, the day that mayor Bloomberg walks around that city without an armed team of undercover cops to protect him and his family is the day that i would be willing to give up my guns in that town but since he has more money then god he thinks he is more important then any other citizen of New York city.
As always this is the double standard that the liberals put forward, only the elite are smart enough and important enough to have guns, us “little people” just have to take what the elite gods allow us to have. I for one can‘t wait for this ass’s term of mayor to end.
This guy is so bold that he will probably be just like that other elite ass from Chicago, mayor Daley that his city has hand gun laws just as bad as New York, Daley demanded the city of Chicago provide him with a 3 man under cover team of cops to protect him and his family 24 hours a day at tax payers expense and i don’t look for Bloomberg to be any different when he leaves office.
I am very lucky that i live in a state that still understands the Constitution and does NOT try to keep its citizens from carrying hand guns, as a matter of fact you don‘t even need a permit to carry a concealed hand gun here and we also have a VERY STRONG castle doctrine law that allows us to not only protect our family’s but also our homes and thats the way it’s supposed to be in this country, not like in Nazi Chicago and New York.
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 6:23amI was wondering the same thing. When he can claim to have a way to keep the guns out of the hands of criminals instead of trying to keep honest people from owning one, then I might listen. Right now it sounds like he only wants criminals to have guns. Because if they put that many restirictions on me, I’ll get one illegally.
Report Post »HKS
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 6:29amMaybe law enforcement could keep the people in jail that are doing the shooting, that could work. Laws won’t stop a crook from getting a gun, take the revolving door of the courthouse and that could be a start. So it would appear to me that the problem he is talking about is he himself and his leadership shortcomings. I suppose a competent mayor could help as well.
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 6:50amthe idiots can write all the gun laws they want they still do not override the second amendment. carry anywhere you want in the u.s. and use the gun against those who try and take them from you. that i guess will be your neighbourhood cop who may be your next door neighbour. it is not going to be good.
Report Post »chazman
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:18am… an armed society is a polite society …
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:42amWhat percentage of these crimes were committed by those on welfare or other lib programs?
What percentage were listeners of rap music?
How many of these criminals used stolen guns?
How many of these shootings involved know criminals that already have a rap sheet as long as my leg?
How many of these shooters were NRA members?
How manh of these shooters are minorities?
How many of these shooters sell drugs, or dable in other criminal activities?
How many of these shooters would love to have a disarmed public, so they could do as they please then next time they go on a rampage?
How many of these shooters are products of the modern day public school, where creation and the ten commandments are shunned, but evolution and “if it feels good, do it” is the rule of the day?
How many of these shooters grew up on MTV and violent video games?
How many of these shooters where home schooled, attended sunday school, and prayed and read the Bible in the home with both a mother and father?
How many of these shooters voted for Obama? and will continue to vote for Obama?
How many of these shooters have even a basic knowledge of our constitution?
How many of these shooters are muslim?
How many of these shooters were spanked when they were growing up?
Report Post »Gold Coin & Economic News
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:56amWait, why don‘t we just make a law that says people aren’t allowed to shoot other people for no good reason. Wouldn’t that work?
Report Post »Bum thrower
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 8:16amIn Gonzales, TX, in 1835 the towns people had a cannon. The mexicans demanded that they give it up…..Texans had a ‘tea party’ with a banner, that said: “Come and Take it”…..we know how that deal turned out for the ‘Meskins’…………..LOL
Report Post »Clean House
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 8:54amNew York already has strict Gun Laws. It’s working as good as Hope & Change.
Report Post »one years food ration like glenn says
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 9:04am(even for an NFL celebrity like Plaxico Burress). <<< Why not because he is a star ? come on blaze you shouldn't even print that .. Anyway , Bloomingidiot has it backwards as usual, he needs to lift the restrictions that way no one will know who is carrying a gun and would think twice about using theirs to commit crimes.. Whatever, what do you expect from a knee jerking liberal idiot ? This guy was voted into office as a republican.. Oh how the times have changed.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 9:28amLooks like Bloomberg is starting to fear for his own life. Yep, make sure that law abiding citizens can’t own any guns, because the criminals will always have them. That’s okay Bloomy, that’ just a liitle less protection that you might have.
Report Post »chazman
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 9:34am… hey Bloomingidiotberg! I phart in your general direction …
Report Post »sbeejustsaying
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 9:49amGun control is not to protect the citizens. Remember when the gov.says “We’re here to help you” they mean the opposite.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGVAQOUi6ec
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 10:05amExactly, New York has the strictist gun control laws which basicly means New York has the most per capitia defensless citizery.
Report Post »What part of criminal doesn’t the idiot liberals get.
Laws only affect the law abiding criminals will always find away to get guns.
If want to stop crime especially violent crime the criminal justice system needs to be revamp. Violent criminals should recieve the same fate as thier victims and with the same indifference to their suffering that they showed society.
angiea
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 10:06amAnd if there is a surge of Rapes, should we outlaw penis’s? Cut ‘em of, cut ‘em all off!
Report Post »Or if there’s a surge in hangings, do we OUTLAW ROPE!
There is a REASON the FEDS don’t want you and me to have Guns — so We the People CAN”T Protect Ourselves AGAINST THEM ! ( THEM — defnition is a Government full of THUGS )
– Hitler has come to America, Wake Up!
DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 10:15amThere should be no gun control laws pertaining to any free citizen. There absolutely should be no state gun laws of any kind. It is a federal issue only. “Shall not infringe” is pretty d**n clear. It’s quite simple, you are either in prison or you are free to buy any gun or ammo that any U.S. military person or piggish, brownshirt “cop” has. The point of the 2nd amendment was not for hunting and it was not a privilege. It was the right of every free man to keep the government fearful of crossing us. A right cannot be taken away or infringed in ANY way unless you are imprisoned and ONLY for the time you are imprisoned.
I have never been in prison, I simply believe in punishment that fits the crime. If a person can repay their debt, then the debt IS PAID and they have a right… A RIGHT… to defend themselves and put fear into the government. The government is supposed to fear us, NOT the other way around.
“When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”
Report Post »robert
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 10:18amNYC doesn’t have a gun problem, they have a black problem. Until this dork Bloomberg realizes that there will be crime and killings at an accelerated pace.
And, since he will never admit to it, he will continue to have out-of-control crime and killings.
Get ready fo civil war. Be prepared.
Report Post »PaBowHunter
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:02pmOnly an arrogant liberal progressive would call for MORE gun control due to a rash of gun related violence in a city which has the MOST stringent gun control already in place.
Moron……
Report Post »scrooge
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:12pmA liberal jew calling for my second amendment rights be infringed. How novel.
Maybe they should go somewhere like Poland and leave my country alone!
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 4:41pm@RANGERP
Excellent questions.
Report Post »Blessed 2 B American
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 4:47pm“This year will go down in history. For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer now, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future.” – - – Adolph Hitler, 1935
Need one say more about GUN CONTROL!
Report Post »Coulterr
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 5:02pmPerhaps Bloomberg should take a look at the resultas of his current anti-gun efforts. Seems to me all the wrong people are armed without much fear of encountering an armed victim.
Proposed solution: Apply therecent Supreme Court decisions (Heller and McDonald decisions) and restore the rights of the law-abiding citizens of NYC.
Report Post »iamHeidi
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:28pmI was wondering how many registered gun owners were involved in these shootings?
Report Post »korbin
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:43pmWow just when I get a minuscule amount of hope for this country I get shidt on. I can careless about nyc however I do care about our constitution. Every time I read a story such as this, I go in debt if you get my drift. These dumb arses are contributing to the legal and smart citizens to stockpile everything. The unfortunate part is where to hide them all and ensure they can be had when needed before Buthole obama concocts some fake crisis to enact marshal law. When they start coming for our LEGAL firearms just make sure you cache some they can’t find. I know of many people who since Obutthole took office have never has as much ammo/firearms etc all caused by the almost certain confiscation they are planning. Don’t be a sheep, e mail every congress man/woman /fwank etc with your voice. Be heard before its to late. Complain all you want but if you don’t get involved what right do you have? The NRA is a great resource for contacting your state reps. Sign up for their legislative updates and you will be able to click on a link and tell them out of step idiots your not going to take it.
Report Post »SFsuper49er
Posted on September 7, 2011 at 2:36amYou are exactly right my man….. Now! Only the criminals carry guns! Liberals are the stupidest people on the earth….. and this so called Sullivan Act is unconstitutional because the 2nd amendment clearly says this right shall not be infringed yet they take the right from you anyway! Not me….. I would never live there. I visited there once. That place is a nut house….
Report Post »fedupv2
Posted on September 7, 2011 at 4:02pmI saw this story too late, and I hope that Bloomberg makes his case by disarming his body guards so that he can show “I talk and I act”. He is not in more danger than other people he disarmed.
Report Post »CrazyChuck
Posted on September 8, 2011 at 9:28amAmen
Report Post »Capt. Ron
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:54amHe should be tared and feathered for being so stupid.
Report Post »mpefster50
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 5:15amSounds like he wants another term as Dictator of NYC. You can’t trust these people they are out of syn with reality.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 5:50amCapn Ron makes more sense than the mayor himself.
Report Post »Banning guns only takes the guns away from the good guys.
Only an idiot would think criminals would ALSO not have them.
Dustyluv
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 6:54amThen he would outlaw tar and feathers…
Report Post »N5DVC
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:05pmI am so tired of this guy’s meddling outside his jurisdiction! He can screw the citizens that elected him – they deserve it. But his MAIG org and his ‘sting’ operations in other states ****** me off.
Report Post »If his opinions about people who lawfully own guns were anywhere close to right, he’d have been shot dead long ago.
SREGN
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:44pmHey Bloomberg, here’s a clue: Gun laws will get rid of guns just like drug laws got rid of drugs and the War On Poverty got rid of poor people. Moron.
Report Post »WeeDontNeedNoSteenkingBadges
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 10:16pmNYC Mayor Bloomberg … co-conspirator in the 14 separate shooting incidents over the weekend (violence injured a reported 50 people, according to the Wall Street Journal). He (and his supporting Progressives [communists]) should be arrested, tried, and hung for treason against America and the “Law Of The Land” U.S. Constitution.
“There must have been 50 or 60 shots fired,” said witness Dana Kellstrom, 25. “I saw two people shot down on the ground. It was incredible. I ran for my life.” -NY Daily News 9/5/11
If Bloomberg hadn’t disarmed everyone else (yep, him, and the long, anti-American tradition of Liberals Progressives), the shooter would’ve been grounded after the first few shots!
Report Post »SHOWMESTATEGUY
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:52amEverytime New York City elects a liberal they get the same result. High crime, budget problems, city services problems, etc. They have elected black mayors, white mayors, Jewish mayors and the result is the same if they are liberal. Problems, problems, problems. New York City is on a slide to the bottom. She could be our next Detroit.
Report Post »Blessed 2 B American
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 3:41amWhere’s Guilliani now that they really need him? Oh, that’s right Guilliani is a Republican!
NYC the next Detroit? Has a good ring to it!
When you look around the US… all of the big cities that are real shyt holes are run by Demokrtas!
America has become a big shyt hole in the last few years! Oh! It’s been run by Demokrtas too!
There seems to be a common demonator here… Demokrtas!
Report Post »Mil-Dot
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:01am@Blessed
Report Post »You are right about the liberal cities. Look at Houston. Remember how they welcomed the Katrina “victims” with open arms? Now, their eyes are open to the size of saucers. LoL ha ha….
bcshealy
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 12:55pmI agree, State Guy! It was a different — better — NYC when Guiliani was mayor. NYC is the last city (well, behind D.C.) I would want to visit because of leaders like him. And the 9-11 activities they plan are a farce and an insult to those who lost their lives in 2001. I’d rather watch a local observation where — gasp! — prayer and the American flag are proudly supported.
Report Post »Kangana
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:52amI love it. They‘re practically illegal but they aren’t practically illegal enough? Should they make guns more practically illegaler?
Maybe if guns were easier for law abiding citizens to get then some of these victims could’ve defended themselves.
Report Post »one years food ration like glenn says
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 9:08amExactly,when he first pulled the gun maybe only one person would’ve gotten shot at the party, instead of the eight..
Report Post »SHOWMESTATEGUY
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:40amHe might start by asking the federal government to stop sending guns to the Mexican drug cartels.
Report Post »cloudsofwar
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:29ammaybe bloomberg has his own fast and furious in nyc. give the criminals the guns and then say there are too many guns on the street. we have to do something.
Report Post »rbosque
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:38amWhy to go Bloomberg! Disarming the citizens so they can be victims will only encourage more violence and stricter gun laws! Blood is on your hands you jerk!
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:35amBy “gun control” does the mayor mean that he wants to see 1/2 MOA groups at 300 yards?
Report Post »Liberty1791
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:34amGuns dont kill. Bad people do. Lets ban bad people. Ohh and by the way… you’ll never get our guns FCKRS!
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:28amMayor Bloomberg is creating “open season” on law abiding citizens. Here’s why.
Criminals don’t obey Laws. Law abiding Citizens, do.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:22amMr Mayor, as the article states very clearly that the citizens of your city are made to do the near impossible to obtain a firearm of any kind. And for some reason in the depths of the socialist madness you work from, you think the laws are not strict enough already?
Why would crooks and criminals, who already are violating the laws, stop just because the feds work to create harsher and harsher penalties to lawful citizens and eventually seize the arms anyways if Mr Obama has his way.
Let the citizens have the firearms, and be able to defend themselves as we do in AZ, the streets may be messy for a time, yet the number of crooks would be thinned out considerably and the streets become much safer.
Of course, for the socialists who want the harsh laws on the lawful citizens, if you take the guns away then there is nothing left to stop the government from becoming a true and unmerciful tryanny.
Report Post »http://artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm (cat folk art)
noah2854
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:16ambloomberg is a gay in the closet and he needs to let it out so he will be more happy .
Report Post »Red Max
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:14amFunny how the state with some of the strictest gun laws, a criminal/criminals can shoot 47 people in a weekend; while states that permit CCW permits have a low crime rate. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2011/09/05/2011-09-05_nine_people_shot_in_12_hours_in_brooklyn_on_the_heels_of_shocking_24hour_weekend.html
Report Post »turkey13
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 10:02amHere in smalltown Oklahoma the turkey that shot 8 people ar a party would have 5 to 10 people shoot back at him. My sons and daughter in laws all have carry permits and usually are packing, I at a minium have a judge in my pocket loaded with 45 and 410 shot gun shells
Report Post »SavingtheRepublic.com
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:13am~^~v~~^~~v~^~
Heres an idea, start enforcing the laws on the books. Better yet add some teeth to those existing laws and make the consequences/ punishment of using a gun in a crime extremely severe.
Bloomberg and the socialist proggies of NY of course will not think logically they will instead look at ways to disarm law abiding gun owners and make it now impossible to own a gun while they pressure DC to copy what they have already done to the entire nation. Im surprised he didnt flat out say guns are being trafficked from the border up to NYC in some pathetic attempt to tie Fast & Furious to this and try to legitimize it!! :)
Proggies do not have the brain cells to comprehend that criminals do not follow laws its why they are criminals. There is a vid out there if I can find it Ill post it that us sarcastic of criminals talking about how the laws work for them.
Just one more example of the desire to not let a good crisis go to waste. 2nd Amendment is a our last line of defense we cannot lose it… http://SavingtheRepublic.com
Report Post »1st a Father
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:28amYou can never make it impossible to possess a gun, there are just to many of them out there; which is the way it should be. If you want to prevent crime, have more guns and those trained to use them. Would those 8 people have been killed if several of the party attendees had had guns. Or better yet, if the perpetrator had known there were other guns present beside his own.
Makes sense to me that he may have actually chosen not to go to disrupt the party. Don’t you?
Report Post »sissykatz
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:30amThat sad excuse of a Mayor he need to have more GUNS NOT LESS. he would have those shot and killed today that did the shooting if he allowed guns. Just think how much it would have saved that town. We could save the cost of trial upkeep in jail. Just the cost of a bullet and a pine box for each
Report Post »person and problem solved. He does no understand the criminals won’t try as many things if they think it is consequences. After we shoot a couple and put them in pine boxes in the middle of time square. They would know next time. He catches and they get a real talking to and put back on the street.No wonder they keep going back. If the Mayor does not shut up about the Building the Mosque, and keeping first reaponders out of celebration for 9/11 and not having any ministers there to pray.
It may not be his problem much longer anyway. Because someone is going to quiten him for us.
TSUNAMI-22
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:43amPray ‘ole Ruth Bader Ginsburg doesn’t kick the bucket before Obama gets ousted.
Report Post »M 4 Colt
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 6:02amTsunnami 22, Ruth Ginsberg is a BIG TIME liberal, so if she did in fact kick the bucket it would be a wash because Obama would just replace her with another liberal.
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 6:46pm@ M 4 Colt
Tsunnami 22, Ruth Ginsberg is a BIG TIME liberal, so if she did in fact kick the bucket it would be a wash because Obama would just replace her with another liberal.
Report Post »~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not quite a wash. Remember, they are appointed for life. It would be a crying shame to have an old liberal replaced with another BIG-TIME young liberal. When a conservative president gets elected and Ginsburg (or any other lib justice passes away) they might get replaced with a conservative justice in favor of 2nd Amendment rights.
squeaker
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:11amHey Mayor Blunder-berg — I’m sure the DOJ and other dc thugs are behind this…. by the way… dui’s are up this weekend…. better restrict booze… Oh and car crashes are increasing… better ban cars…… Man…. You guys are sooo smart…
Oh… and oh dammmmn….. liberals, labor leaders, vice presidents and other right wing nuts are threatening tea party folks and other good americans….. better ban the liberal gov tooo….. Hey… Now I see clearly… ban the liberals and all will be ok…!!!
talk about another “manufactured disaster”…. How weird is that…? You progressives just keep getting sneakier and sneakier…. Hey… Mr Spooky Dude… are you there too…????
Report Post »paulusmaximus
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:15amIt was a three day holiday in NYC. Take out the one incident and it was a slow shoot you neighbor day weekend for NYC!
Report Post »simply one voice
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:09amBloomberg has every law on the book possible and more to curb all gun violence. Yet, with his corrupt city government, corrupt police forces, corrupt judges, he thinks he can make law abiding citizens outside of his Fascist city bow to his, Obamas, Soros’s, Hillary’s Nato corrupted, South Korean corrupt politician based Agenda 21 and the New World Order to tear apart the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution,well, they’re WRONG.
We need to kick all these people out of office immediately and give the U.N. it’s walking papers before we level that evil building down into smoldering ashes.
Just a kind reminder on this lovely Labor Day, 2011.
Report Post »letthetruthbetold
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:09amHey Mr. Mayor, I’m pretty sure not ONE of the victims had a fighting chance….wanna know why? CAUSE THEY COULDN’T CARRY GUNS TO PROTECT THEMSELVES!!! …BIG GIANT DUH!!! Yeah, go ahead, take more guns away from law abiding citizens and see who takes over. You idiot. Wake the hell up.
Report Post »jsl55
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:40pmHe and the other progressive fascists will take over. That is their plan.
Report Post »UPSIDEDOWN FLAG....DISTRESS start flying them
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:06amIts all downhill now
Report Post »Kurty C Wipe
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:21am2012 IF we have another election…………..
Report Post »Bush was the set up pitcher, Barry is the closer.
vennoye
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:04amProblem is in NYC. What right does Bloomberg have to say what the rest of the country needs to do? Seems like his own regulations are not working…….so he wants the rest of the country to abide by them.
Report Post »Country_of_Arizona
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:03amhey Bloomie you HUMP–why don’t_cha take a vayKa down in mexico I hear they have a real tight and strong gun control on those nasty law abiding bastards. Oh and by the way your visa and your storm trooping thugs have been revoked—so no stopping in Arizona U FERRET FACE HUMP!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »Force2bewreckin
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:02amFast and furious 2. Cause the problem then take the guns.
Report Post »capitalismrocks
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:01amInteresting how this is coming just before the “non-violent” Sept 17th DAY OF RAGE protest set to be the centerpiece of anarchy on Wall St in NYC and supposedly to occur in all major cities across the Nation…..
Report Post »jsl55
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 7:35pmThe Day of Rage is September 17? Darn, I’ll be at the IDPA meet practicing my firearm self-defence skills.
Report Post »TH30PH1LUS
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 1:56amEarth to Mayor Bloomberg: criminals don’t care about your precious laws.
Report Post »revel222
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:09amDitto!! NO MORE FEDERAL LAWS!!!! Your laws don’t mean didley to the criminals. Put more secret cops on the streets, do more undercover operations and let your cops do their jobs without tying their hands with your bureacratic bull crap. Don’t use this as an excuse to make more federal laws. Do we look stupid to you?
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:13amAnd I don’t care about his ideology. He is a idiot. I am tired of people thinking they can infringe on my right, or any other law-abiding citizen’s inalienable right to bear arms, due to the actions of a fringe criminal element.
Report Post »SatanOwnsTheMedia
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 9:58pmGreat comment
Report Post »ezeewhiz
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 1:56amAs Americans our Constitution states we have the right to bear arms. When our goverment in directly responsible for creating conditions where folks use violence at the drop of the hat, stricter gun laws will not solve that problem! That is not the answer. A personal respect for life and property simply can not be put in place by the goverment.
Report Post »bullcrapbuster
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 1:47amThe liberal power brokers want our guns real bad.
Report Post »notsofast
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 4:08amAnd they are coming for them. I knew when I read this headline on Drudge that the call for gun control would be louder than loud and a “new call” to ban guns. there will be something that the Feds will use to justify their actions to take your guns. Wonder if it gonna be the Unions treating to “off” the republicans and those “sons of bitches”. Interesting isn’t it.
Report Post »BuffaloBill69
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 5:15pmHillary, Barak and Eric want our guns real bad. If the Internet and cell services go down at the same time, get home in a hurry and load up!
Report Post »LibertyWon
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 1:43amHow many of the victims were armed and had a fighting chance?
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on September 6, 2011 at 2:02amHow many of the shooters were registered owners?
Report Post »How many were black?
93% of gun crimes here in the U.S.A. are committed by black criminal thugs !