Obama Executive Orders Impose New Gun Rules
- Posted on July 12, 2011 at 6:51am by
Buck Sexton
- Print »
- Email »
A few days ago, the Blaze reported on the low-key plans of the Obama administration to increase the penalties for certain gun law violations, and add steps to the background checks for legal gun ownership.
Today the administration’s plans are beginning to come into effect. Through an Executive Order, the Obama administration is implementing new restrictions on the sale of certain weapons in border states, and increasing the penalties for violating certain firearms laws.
Fox News is reporting on the purpose of the gun control executive orders:
“In an effort to stem the illicit flow of weapons into Mexico, the Justice Department announced Monday that all gun shops in four Southwest border states will be required to alert the federal government to frequent buyers of high-powered rifles.
Under the new policy, federal firearms licensees in Texas, California, Arizona and New Mexico must report purchases of two or more of some types of rifles by the same person in a five-day span. The requirement applies to purchases of semi-automatic rifles that have detachable magazines and a caliber of greater than .22.
ATF estimates it will generate 18,000 reports a year. ATF will retain the information and if no investigative leads have been realized after two years, it will be purged.”
The Daily Beast seems to have the inside track on more Executive Orders, however, claiming recent conversations with administration officials. TDB says the upcoming Executive Orders will have more impact than what Fox outlines above, including:
“A national electronic system designed to make background checks for handgun buyers simpler and faster, leaving an electronic paper trail. [And] Tougher sentencing guidelines for straw buyers that Holder’s department pushed through procedural hoops at the U.S. Sentencing Commission earlier this year.”
The Executive Orders come in the middle of the “Fast and Furious” scandal currently plaguing the administration. Already, there is talk on Capitol Hill of a cover-up at the highest levels of government, and it appears to some that the administration was feeding the lethal problem of firearms trafficking it ostensibly intended to address with “Fast and Furious.”
The question remains- if these Executive Orders are ‘common sense’ measures as the administration claims, why not let Congress enact them as laws? And if they are minor tweaks to existing law as others claim, are they necessary at all?
As background, here is a short clip of Obama in 2004 on gun control. He agrees that the second amendment means…something, but beyond that, the details get hazy.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (884)
Sicialian Eyeball
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:21amCreate a crisis and then impose new laws to further take away my rights. Obama communism 101.
Report Post »Delta_River_Folk
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:48amThis has to be the biggest farce.
1) About a year ago claim that gun makers are sending weapons to Mexico
2) About 6 months ago you get caught your your pants down, because the DOJ was sending guns to Mexico
3) Now this crap
Obumer must think we are complete idiots, or he is right and we are complete idots
Cobra Blue
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:06amBe patient and buy once a month…that will keep you off the radar screen initially. Also, buy from individuals. They will keep trying to keep guns out of our hands. Good luck Obama. You are going to need it….and a lot of it. One thing is for certain…when the fighting starts it want end until its over. Too much anger building in the American people.
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:09amObama,Bush the D.O.J. and the ATF manufactured a problem and Obama is now using Unconstitutional powers to create and unConstitutional regulation.
Report Post »2cd The right of the people to keep and bare arms shall NOT be infringed.
Obama is trying to impose and infringement and doing without going through the PEOPLE’S HOUSE(CONGRESS) in yet another dictator move. It’s time for a million man gun owner march on the Capital we need to send a message to this wannbe dictator. We also need to send a message to Congress that it’s their job to keep the the President in check and make him uphold his oath or remove him.
southernORcobra
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:11amImpeach now!!!
Report Post »Ironeagle
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:13amExactly correct.
Report Post »Shiroi Raion
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:15amBingo!
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:18amAnd, it’s not even communism cloaked in something else; it’s flat-out, in-your-face!
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:20amThe boat is sinking and now we are counting how many life boats to put on it!
Report Post »StonyBurk
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:26amPrince and the pauper . You can take a Community Organizer-aka black agitator from a college campus and dress him in a fancy suit and tell the world he is the FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT of the USA — you can even school him in American politics as a Senator -but the affect of refined education on minds of peculiar structure remains something the community organizers just can’t control. You can take a man like Obama and put him in the WhiteHouse–and the only thing he has held onto is his Communistic devotion to fundamentally change America. And he‘s acting like every idiot ever won the big money lottery and didn’t have a clue how to keep what he ‘d won.I’d invite him over for a beer on the lawn– But all the other bums that have been by just puke on my deck or pee in the yard like the dogs.
Report Post »DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:31amAnd you all just take it. Maybe you can vote in 2012 and that will fix everything.
Report Post »obama-mecca-me-sick
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:35amDo the new laws apply to everyone except the Obama administration selling guns to our enemies? Disarm Americans , arm our enemies and make us sitting ducks for people that want to kill us. Its obvious the Obama administration is not on Americas side. IMPEACH! IMPEACH! IMPEACH!!
Report Post »VTDave
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:39am@smithclar3nc3
Report Post »When was the last time that congress could really be considered the “PEOPLE’S HOUSE(CONGRESS)”? We are in the mess we are in now because Congress was not doing the Peoples business but doing their own side deals.
DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:47am@snow
Report Post »The did try his orders in court. The oil moratorium; Obama lost and he did ignore the court. Instead we gave money to Brazil to drill in the same waters. Waters that were being drilled in only because the gov told oil companies they could not drill in shallow water. They gov told BP where they could drill, then there was a crisis which needed a solution. This is Hegel‘s philosophy at it’s finest.
Secret Squirrel
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:04am.
Just think how Obama will decimate the Constitution
after he is re-elected and has nothing to fear.
What part of “…shall not be infringed.” can’t he understand?
Report Post »smithclar3nc3
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:04amVTDAVE,
Report Post »I consider Congress the people’s house because we can vote them out and put the right people in…the onlly problem is the current two party system lives little chance of getting the right one in place.
But as we can plainly see a progressive left and a progressive right is is killing the country. It reminds me of the south park episode where they voted on a gaint douche or turd sandwich for school mascot.
With game changers like the tea party growing there is hope of a shrinking government. The alternative is full on revolution and that will be the hail mary if all else fails. Millions are waking up and seeing America and what government is doing to destroy it let’s hope they vote with ballots and there will be no need for voting with bullets.
Emrys
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:28amSo now the government, which has sent illicit weapons into the hands of Mexican criminals (supposedly to track them), is taking out the competition by creating more hoops for gun sellers and buyers on the borders to jump through. Makes sense. Arm the criminals, disarm Americans; more chaos created. Good job Mr. President, you’ve weakened America once more.
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:28amDitto – to about all the comments. I just hope enough of us have finally “got it” AND are active in fighting/exposing/educating/praying!!! My husband bought his first gun just recently and learning how to shoot, etc. And he is not the “type” that likes to shoot or whatever and is a very realistic, common sense guy. So when he did that, that alarmed me even more. He sees the danger & what’s happening. Rush says he’s like a “one man wrecking ball” – causes so much division, anger, frustration, destruction, class warfare – more than has ever been done I think.
Report Post »mikem1969
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:37amAs I said when all this began 6+ months ago, they created this ‘crisis’ so they can start finding ways to keep us from owning guns. Just wait until they put out the laws governing the sale of guns to people with mental problems. The gun shops will be forced to ask your political affiliation and if you are anything other than liberal or progressive, you will be considered to have a mental illness and not able to own a gun. Then the obama police will come knock on your door to take the rest of the guns you already own.
Report Post »MatawanAl
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:49amI agree with you 100%, this bastard is nothing but a left wing radical hell bent on destroying our country.
Report Post »WAKE UP AMERICA.
@ Coyote2
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:16amOdumba is not man enough to personally come and take my gun from my hand. He would have to send some of his stooges to kill me first.
Report Post »N37BU6
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:41amSo NOW you’re all conspiracy theorists… but Bush was still a “great” president.
So close, yet so far.
TEIN
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:44amThis order only works against law abiding citizens!!!! When the Fed government is the trafficker, and those who break the law don’t care and will get the guns from illegal means, how is this law common sense?? This Pres. would not know common sense if it bit him in a common sense area!!!
Report Post »I support God's Israel!
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:45amI knew this day was coming, so I prepared 5 YEARS ago. My guns are safe and so are my bullets, so when martial law goes into affect, my guns and ammo will be worth more than gold to those who believe in our 2nd Amendment rights belonging to the average law-abiding American citizen ;-) Love it when a plan comes together.
Try as he may, Obama cannot stop the American people. WE ARE SMART. WE ARE WISE (a bit late, but still wise). WE ARE CAUTIOUS YET OPTIMISTIC. WE KNOW WHAT IS COMING. WE ARE PREPARED. If I were you and you can afford it, start buying reloading equipment (powder, etc.) as THAT WILL BE THE NEXT THING THEY WILL MAKE DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TO BUY. START STOCKING UP NOW OR YOU CAN KISS YOUR SAFETY AND RIGHTS GOODBYE. Right now, the good guys with guns outnumber the bad guys. In 2 years, the bad guys with guns will outnumber the good guys. DO YOU NEED TO BE TOLD WHAT TO DO NOW? Or, are you one of those people who think you have plenty of time? OH DUH.
SavvyCowboy
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:49am@ Sicialian Eyeball – Obamunism / Communism 101 is right on. The first thing Hitler, Mao, Lenin and others did was take away the citizens’ right to own weapons/guns.
Report Post »Bum thrower
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:09amhttp://www.NRA-ILA.com ….send them a donation and join the NRA, and your state Rifle Association….
support the economy; buy a gun, and ammo!!
Report Post »Curioso
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:20amWhat makes them think that just enforcing this in border states would have any effect on anything. The criminals will just get there weapons from another country. There is no shortage of gun runners in the world. With the amount of money that the drug lords and organized criminals have at there disposal they could just set up their own factories and and make all the guns they want. It is a wonder they have not been doing that already. Just my 2 cents.
Report Post »docmd
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:22amThe one thing that will keep AMERICA FREE unlike the UK where the citizens can not own guns ! Quoting Charlton Hestan “They can have my gun when they pry it from my cold dead hands !”
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:38am@ smithclar3nc3
You said this very well and is worth repeating!!
BO is now using Unconstitutional powers to create and unConstitutional regulation.
Report Post »2cd The right of the people to keep and bare arms shall NOT be infringed.
Obama is trying to impose and infringement and doing without going through the PEOPLE’S HOUSE(CONGRESS) in yet another dictator move.
Ryan Beaulieu
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:48amMakes perfect sense to take away rights, limit freedom, and create new laws. We all know that criminals are always detoured by the law so passing new laws, regulations, and policies stops crime and illegal activity.
/sarcasm
Report Post »AzDebi
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:51amLying bunch of hypocrites! God will remedy this situation! Keep praying America!
Report Post »altops
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:20pmI thought and was taught that executive orders were internal memorandum/ commands for the operations of the executive branch, how did that tool of administration come to have the weight of law for John Q. Public? I say it doesn’t and for him to use them as such is a treasomous act, as well as abiding them…
Report Post »marthasusan40
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:24pmGlenn Beck has been saying this would happen for two years…..create a crisis and put fear in the American public…then take away their guns…..American Wake UP!
Report Post »Mike Z4000
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:29pmIMPEACH OBAMA NOW AND CONVICT IN THE SENATE FOR TREASON!!!!
Arrest Eric Holder and try him for “Conspiracy to commit Murder” for his part in “Fast and Furious” and “Gunrunner”. American have been murdered with those guns.
Report Post »bellsandbells
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:40pmYes, you can say we are idiots because people STILL have not woken up enough to get involved and DO SOMETHING about it. I try to talk to people about what is happening and about EXECUTIVE ORDERS and I get the “deer in the headlights” response.
Report Post »Stone Cold Truth
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:41pmIt’s like they planned this hoping no one would find out they caused the guns to be sent to Mexican cartels, but when we did find out they said,”screw it, we’ll do it anyways.” This was CLEARLY ochestrated in my opinion.
Report Post »tptex
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:44pm“In an effort to stem the illicit flow of weapons into Mexico,”….all the DOJ has to do is Cease And Desist. What a load of crap this guy is shoveling.
Report Post »buster2
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:45pmYes lets initiate gun control over the guns that the ATF, AG Holder and Obama’s administration sent over to Mexico. If you can’t find a crisis, create a crisis and push more socialism and government control on the citizens of the U.S.
Report Post »BUDDY LITTLE
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:47pmCOBRA, I understand your logic ,lets find a way around it?But we have done this so much ,with so many of our constitutional rights.EXAMPLE We cant pray at Graduation, reason its in a school?Way around it, lets have it in a church ,but we cant display a CROSS it might offend?Way around,COVER THE CROSS!! We are compromising all of our freedoms away! If we continue this compromise rather than UNITE and take a stand ,we should shut the hell up and roll over.
Report Post »karen162
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:47pmI agree! Are these new Federal Laws going to pertain to the Obama Administration as they tell the firearms dealers to, “Go ahead and sell to them….really. Go on!”
I don’t take kindly to being set up!
Report Post »Imprimis
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:48pmIt is worse than that….that’s bad enough. But for the U.S. governments’ top attorney to be part of a plot to create a crisis which costs American lives is CRIMINAL. He should not only be out of a job but he needs to be prosecuted. There are no words to express what I feel for this Thugocracy. Where is the military???? These people need to be escorted to the border. Hondorus did it..what? we can’t? Heck, where’s the Congress? the supremes? the American people? The media EVEN FOX is too silent on evil that is all around ; in every country… All people will be serfs…no, not smurfs, SERFS…you do the work and they’ll give you what they want…they being; any ism out there COMRADE
Report Post »Gabriel Faulk
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:59pmNow we know why he wanted to task the FBI/DEA on tracking guns given to Mexican cartels, just so he could blame the guns when they end up being used against US citizens. He says he wants to monitor large caliber rifles but he inculdes 22 cal. in that definition. Since when is a 22 a large caliber weapon? I say then bring on the MHR 17 cal. with extra and increased clip sizes.
Report Post »imreddog
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:01pmSince when did this SOB have the power to unilaterally make laws. I don’t see that in the Constitution. It is way past time to remove Obama from office.
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:02pmany executive order that over rides the second amendment does not have to be obeyed. all laws orders etc that nullify any part of the second amendement are unconstitutional period. the second amendment was meant for use against just such an order. load up folks.
Report Post »Jmcaul
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:22pm@Delta: “Obumer must think we are complete idiots, or he is right and we are complete idots” either that or he is suicidal.
Report Post »SavingtheRepublic.com
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:22pm^____^____^
Someone explain to me and others why the actions of the ATF. DOJ and more than likely by the direction from the oval office is not a treasonous act? Or could their actions be defined by Congress under Article 3 Sec 3 as treasonous as they have done with those committing sedition and espionage. This is how it starts kids…
‘First they came for the guns… ‘
Report Post »SavingtheRepublic.com
lachman61
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:25pmI Could not said it any better….
Report Post »mrdbcooper
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:25pmSicialian Eyeball
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:21am
Create a crisis and then impose new laws to further take away my rights. Obama communism 101.
Report Post »
THIS POST SHOULD BE PRINTED UNDER EVERYTHING REORTED ABOUT CHAIRMAN MAO OBAMA
Report Post »spikehb
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:32pmThis is outrageous! I hope it doesn’t distract from the pro baseball steroid persecutions. Look at all the Washington critters rising up in outrage to secure our rights. If you find more than 5, let me know.
Report Post »ICEDRAGONNITE
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:34pmDoes this rise to TREASON?
Report Post »ProgressivesArePoison
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:34pmBingo. “Create a problem then solve the problem.” Marxism 101. The 0bama regime wanted to enact gun control, so they needed to be able to say “Hey, look at all the American guns ending up in Mexico!”. The regime ITSELF IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IT!.
To anyone who doubts the Gulf oil rig was an accident, think again. It was sabotaged by our government. The 0bama regime needed an excuse to KILL DOMESTIC OIL DRILLING, so the massive spill was caused to justify it. Note the delay in 0bama’s response to the spill: 60 DAYS so it would intentionally GET WORSE.
Report Post »Marci
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:48pmHe thinks unilaterally confiscating weapons would be subject to constitutional challenge—but heck, no problem, we’ll do it bit by bit and piece by piece. AND….welcome to your new America every one. DESPITE the fact that Fast and Furious is being blown into sunlight, they do THIS? No congressional approval, corruption at the highest levels, and then brazen executive orders that essentially say “the people do not matter, deal with my tyranny”. IMPEACHMENT. Will the glazed eyed moonbats wake up in time or are we just going to have to push them out of the way and do what needs to be done?
Report Post »LVNPATRIOT
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:59pmThe people of Germany gleefully handed their country to Adolf Hitler and we all know how that turned out. The United States of America did the same thing to Obama in 2008 and we all see where this country is headed. This administration is trying to cause a rebellion among the american people so they can declare marshall law and Obama will become the dictator he already thinks he is!!!
Report Post »oldoldtimer
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 2:04pmWho is going to stop Obama? Congress? He alreay ignores them and the courts. We have a dictator.
Report Post »erecon67
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 2:15pmCouldn’t agree more..“he” is leading us into direct communism.
Report Post »BOUGHT YOUR SILO YET?
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 2:17pm@N37BU6-
I think you are wrong. A lot of people was supportive of the Bush administration but have changed their views considerably. Admittedly, I am one of those people. I don’t believe that Bush damaged the country as badly as Obama, but I do not believe that MANY US presidents, dating back decades, upheld the constitution. It is not the people’s fault that they did not see this coming until now when the powers-that-be have purposefully distorted history to influence their beliefs and otherwise behaviors. For many of us, it not a double standard, its just we have been in the dark for so long regarding the intentions of our leaders.
Report Post »Rygg
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 2:17pmYeah whatever makes us defenseless for when the Chinese come to claim their loan. And as for the death of the ATF agent, it rests on Obeyme’s head, not just the cartels. As a veteran of living in Phoenix, I am tired of Obeyme and Caldarons tidy little agreement that must exist for the return of the billions in US currency the cartels hold. Why else would SB1070 get directly interfered with? Janet Napolitano, you are a sell out and a horrible “person”. I hope they all rot. Same goes for you Hitlery! I will not do what they say, no matter how they say it, enforce it, or how many times. You’d have to be an idiot.
Report Post »bumpkin
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 2:38pmActually, I expect Obama has his MB friends in Mexico, channeling guns back to the Middle Eastern terrorist groups as fast as they can ship them, and his earlier OK of Holder’s filth was to arm his MB pals while he sat in the esteemed Oval office and thought up more lies to tell us all. One thing about this narcissist: he is fearless in his massive egotism.
Report Post »UPSETVET
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 3:02pmApparently our elected Congress and Senate have lost their legislative power which they have voluntarily, without any opposition, surrenderd to the executive branch of our government. President Obama is not looking out for our best interest interpreting the US Constitution in accordance with his own personal agenda. He is abusing his executive powers by making our US Constitutional rights subject to interpretation of his executive laws.
The ATF, with the approval of the DOJ, illegally sold firearms to drug cartels in Mexico that have been used to kill thousands of Mexican citizens and some American citizens on American soil. The head of the ATF was forced to resign, yet Eric Holder remains calmly seated in his office protected by the POTUS. He’s a criminal and a traitor that should be removed immediately from the office of the Attorney General, prosecuted and imprisoned for his crimes.
Executive Orders signed by the POTUS can not and should not be obeyed or enforced if they conflict with the US Constitution. Obama took a sworn oath to preserve, protect and defend the US Constitution from all enemies domestic or foreign. With his “executive orders” that are in direct discord and conflict with the US Constitution Obama has become a domestic enemy of the US Constitution that he swore to preserve, protect and defend.
Report Post »satostud
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 3:17pmYou got it. I am certain we will see many more “crisis” with this administration.
Report Post »KJenkinsAF
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 3:29pmNot idiot’s just apathetic. He’s counting on the majority of people (not gun owners) to not give a crap. Sadly he may be right. He’s slowly, by executive fiat eroding the 2nd Amendment. So much for “Swearing to defend the Constitution”. POS.
Report Post »bobgarbe
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 3:31pmSometimes I am asked, “What does Oath Keepers do?” The answer I like to give is, “Just about everything.” Oath Keepers is a melding of like minded citizens, veterans and active duty police, military, firefighters and other first responders who have taken the “Oath” with a combined experience that most folks will be coming to when the “manure hits the fan.” We know, through experiences, what to do when needed because collectively we have done it.
Report Post »Come to the Ohio meeting (near Lancaster) and fellowship with like minded brothers and sisters. Learn our agenda for the future. Saturday, July 23 for the meeting. Campers come on Friday through Sunday.
RSVP to: OKOhio6@aol.com for details.
Steve Frasure, President, Ohio Oath Keepers.
Ham Radio operators 146.400 simplex when you get close and we will guide you in.
Out of the Ashes
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 3:33pmCobra, he is looking at doing the same executive order crap for individual purchases. See what crisis he formulates next.
Report Post »Disnylv
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 3:49pmWhat a bozo
Report Post »siewerdenhassen
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 4:00pmDamn strait it is time for a million man march!!!!!!! I expect this man will be putting us in mass graves soon!!!!!!!!!!! We need to organize!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »cessna152
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 4:14pm-Liberal 2 years ago: “That’s crazy talk… Obama will never take your guns.You’re Inciting hate and violence”
-Liberal 1 year ago: “”That’s crazy talk… Obama will never take your guns.You’re Inciting hate and violence”
-Liberal now: “That’s crazy talk… Obama will never take your guns.You’re Inciting hate and violence”
-Liberal as conservatives are being rounded up for slaughter: “That’s crazy talk… Obama will never take your guns.You’re Inciting hate and violence”
Liberal after all guns are collected, Conservatives killed and liberals being targeted “”That’s crazy talk… Obama will never take your guns.You’re Inciting hate and violence”
Moral of story… they are STUPID!
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 4:17pmBastard.
Report Post »ayobro
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 4:18pmday took our jobs!
Report Post »UPSETVET
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 4:20pmFor those of you who still think Obama respects your US Constitutional rights and would never send US Military Forces to police US citizens and enforce his laws, think again. King George of England didn’t hesitate to send the English Army to police and enforce his laws that English Colonialist were not obeying to his satisfction. The result was the Revolutionary War and the death of 25,000 Americans. When President Abraham Lincoln concluded that US Southern States weren’t in compliance with his laws he called for and Army of 75,000 troops to force the South into submission. The result was the American Civil War and the death of 600,000 Americans ( North & South). Why would anyone doubt history repeating itself ? Have you forgotten the Army troops that fired upon WW I American Army Veterans that were peaceably protesting in Washington for their veteran’s rights. Serveral US Army veterans were killed. Have you forgotten that President Eisenhower sent American Army troops to Little Rock Arkansas to enforce his law against puplic school segregration ? Executive Orders signed by President Obama to force States into compliance of his un-Constitutional laws will be enforced by US Military Forces of which he is the Commander in Chief. ” I don’t believe American troops would fire on American civilians”. Tell that to the families of the Ohio Kent State University students who were fired upon and killed by US Military Forces. History always repeats itself and it’s always ug
Report Post »Pelling1020
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 5:35pmThis is the beginning of draconian rules implemented by exec. order. I’s just a matter of time when the exec. orders will in effect portend real gun control and if BHO is re-elected we all will be turning in our firearms.
Report Post »LB
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 5:41pm@Delta Didn’t you hear he did call us idiots, yesterday in his press conf. This is smoke and mirrors. They create the problem ( fast and furious ) then implement the so called solution to get what they want. Impeach for not upholding the constitution.
Report Post »VanGrungy
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 6:06pm“Tell that to the families of the Ohio Kent State University students who were fired upon and killed by US Military Forces”
Ummm I guess you didn’t hear about the recently released audio tape that proves the SDS agitators were armed and shooting..
btw.. ROTC isn’t the US Military…
Report Post »Aidan MacAnBhaird
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 6:45pmWe have the right to bear arms, if Obama agrees or not, but there is a lot of time between now & when (if) he is out of office. Its good to voice our opinions here on thhese pages, but we must obviously take our conversations outside these virtual walls. If each of us spent time helping young voters understand todays’ current events, we will have a far better outcome in this next election.
Report Post »In the meantime, ammo will obviously be his next big target, so help the economy; stockup. Even a brick of ammo a month is better than none. May God help us until this USA hatin race & class baiter is out of office!
LOOKINGFROMTHERIGHT
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:20pmThis is the appropriate response from the man who got his hand caught in the cookie jar with operation Gun Runner.
Report Post »Mite43
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:52pmWe all want to blame someone for the mess this country is in. Look in the mirror! We keep putting the same ones back in office, Polosi, Reed, Barney Frank, just to name a few. We the people are to blame for this mess. We need to clean house and senate of all the dead wood and old folks just hanging on to milk the system, like Charlie Rangle. We wanted change so bad that we put in anyone but Bush. We folks how do you like the change(Short Change that is). We have a person in the White House that wants to bring down this great country, and make it a socialistic. Just look at all the ANTI-American people he has around him telling him what to do.Yes we the people are to blame for this mess. Vote this mess out the next voting cycle. Clean house from top to bottom, leave no mess behind.First the Guns, then your freedom of speech will be next, if you don’t agree with them you could end up in jail. Nazi Germany did it in WW2, Nazi America under Obama will be next. Stand-up and speak-up for your rights before it is to late.
Report Post »Meyvn
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:17pmThis man is abusing power.
Report Post »autoteck1
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:54pmIt has been the motus operandi of this administration F–K the constitution, I am above the law ! Impeach this Treasonist pig! Imprison him and all his left wing socialist “comrads” in crime. all the czars, backroom advisors, ect. especialy George Sourose !
Report Post »@ Coyote2
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:20pm@ISUPPORTGODSISRAHELL
Report Post »Which side of your mouth are you blowing out of. By supporting Israhell you are supporting gun control
http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-is-behind-gun-control/
Thomas Paine
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:29pmObama Nazism 101
Report Post »TIMBERBLACK
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:51pmMy thoughts completely… it was under his watch that the border sell occured and now he wants to retrict my use and ability to buy addn sell………..
Report Post »It is not legal law abiding citizens that are the problem. You can pass all the laws you want and it doesn’t help the law abiders….. We have every right to protect ourselves and that is what Obama and his group want to stop. However my biggest issue with all of this (and much more) is WHY is congress sitting by allowing Obama to run over them…. you can not tell me that they are all behind destroying out nation ? Where is the rest of Washington, why are they keeping quiet while he makes them useless???
ILUVJESUS
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 12:52amYeah, that’s How they do it. The American people are mentally asleep while their rights are being stolen.
Report Post »Marci
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 4:09amWow. Very brazen isn’t he? Cause the problem, create the solution. Even when his crooked administration is currently under the microscope for illegally doing what they did. This one isn’t going away.
Report Post »VotersOfNY
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 7:21amNo I’m not a complete idiot. The people that voted for this Liar in Chief are the idiots: I didn’t vote for this bum. I knew what a liar and bum Obozo was from day one. I would have voted for Son of Sam before I voted for Obozo and will again in 2012. You should to if you want a US of A. He wants to destroy this country and that is the ONLY thing he is doing a good job at. Wake up People!!
Report Post »UPSETVET
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 7:35amREPLY TO SICILIAN EYEBALL
I agree with you completely. This under the table move by President Obama and Attoney General Eric Holder is right out of the Communist Guide Book. It’s also the fulfillmen of an old Arab Proverb (Americanized) that says ,”If you let a camel stick it‘s nose under the tent flap and there’s no opposition, the hump and the rump will soon follow”. Obama’s Executive Orders are “water testers” to see just how far he can go without without ANY opposition and or action from Congress and the Senate. It appears he can go as far as he wants to go and NOTHING or NOBODY can stop him.
While the US Congress and Senate stand idly by without any formal opposition President Barack Obama, by his “Executive Orders” is legislating new laws and penalties. Soon US unemployment in the Washington DC will have a notable increase as the US Congress, Senate and Supreme Court are declare obsolete and abolished by another one of Obama’s “Executive Orders”. THAT ONE will PROBABLY get the attention of Congress and the Senate but by then it will be too late for American Democracy and Capitalism. They’ll be repalced by a Dictatorship and Communism. Just like Hitler spelled it out to the Jews in his book “Mein Kampft” Obama has spelled it out to all Americans in his book “Dreams From My Father”.
Report Post »Jackers
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 9:16amSo keeping our southern border wide open and exposing us to rampant crime and corruption is okay, but having guns to protect ourselves from all of this open-border crime and corruption is not…
Has this government gone insane?
Report Post »blanco5
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 9:18amI’m glad that the ar-15 is only a .22 caliber…..
Report Post »tower7femacamp
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 10:08amhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbLU9tdDwxo
Report Post »TomFerrari
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 10:56amThis does NOTHING to fix the problem that HE created with Fast & Furious!
It ONLY infringes upon the rights of legal gun owners.
This will not stand constitutional muster.
We need a few test cases ASAP!!
This guy thinks he was elected KING!
We’ve got DECADES to go to fix this country.
We need to raise a LARGE generation of conservative, HONEST voters.
Then, and ONLY then, can we adequately amend the Constitution to CLARIFY and TRULY LIMIT in IRON-CLAD legalese, the LIMITED powers of government.
We have only just BEGUN, but, Begun – WE HAVE!!
Report Post »the hawk
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 12:35pmLEAVE THE LAW-MAKING to Congress and Senate ! Damn it! Dicktatior wanna-be !
Report Post »Maggie in Indiana
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 2:59pmWell said
Report Post »JH_Smokey
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 5:51pmWill Rogers said this many years ago:
Report Post »I suppose Congress ought to get their pay raise, after all, they aren’t fit for any honest work.
Now this guy is going to make null and void our constitutional rights? Next thing you know, he’ll be bowing to other world leaders… Oh wait, he did that already!
Wilkins
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 11:12pmClearly the biggest enabler of illegally purchased and smuggled weapons in this case is the US federal government, through the DoJ and with other agencies complicit. Time to disarm the DoJ and all its affiliates. Clearly they haven’t demonstrated they can be trusted with weapons.
Don’t worry DoJ, the armed militia (citizenry) will keep you safe. Government doesn’t need its own guns.
Report Post »wildbillsooner74
Posted on July 14, 2011 at 12:56amFirst thing he is trampling on the 2nd Ammendment and our congress is letting him get by with it. Second thing if they want to shut down guns going to Mexico they should dispose of the ATF. Obama is the biggest gun runner to Mexico not the common citizen!
Report Post »McFergus
Posted on July 14, 2011 at 2:48amTypical liberal bullcrap.. Corruption and reaction. Use corrupt means to cause events to pass laws to strip OUR RIGHTS again…
Report Post »VALD
Posted on July 14, 2011 at 3:02pmObama and company can’t do the following and they have proven it over and over.
1. Drug trafficking
2. Illegals coming a crossed the border
3. Control guns
nothing like a proven track record!!!!
Report Post »Woody WoodBecker
Posted on July 17, 2011 at 4:11pmVote for anybody but Obama 2012 campaign officially begins today.
Report Post »Jmlewis573
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 8:32amYou are exactly right… PROBLEM.. REACTION… SOLUTION!!! First they supply them with illegal guns, then they take away our ability to defend ourselves against these guns (problem solved). They are expecting us to cry to them for protection, actually they want us to demand protection. Because apparently they don’t plan to build a moat with alligators in it, and one can only assume with all the deaths on the border that the obligation to protect does not count for the US. So now that they have stacked the deck in their favor through gun laws placed on law abiding citizens and giving guns to the killers. It’s just a matter of time before we see the solution. AND THAT MY FRIENDS SHOULD SCARE US ALL
Report Post »Jmlewis573
Posted on July 21, 2011 at 8:43amObama makes it sound like the criminals go to the gun store and deal with all that red tape. Silly me, I thought they got their guns off the black market. Oh, and of course the red tape-less side of our government.
Report Post »marchon
Posted on March 7, 2012 at 2:32pmYes! I believe your assumption is absolutely correct. Further, I would ask everyone to listen to the first part of the video again – intently – because in the first two lines he says, in his response to the question – What is your position on gun control? Quote “I think that the 2nd amendment means something.” (Something? Is that the best he’s got? He doesn’t say I think it is important. He doesn’t say I think it is a right of the People. He doesn’t say it is one of our freedoms guaranteed under law. Instead this master of the Constitution says he it means “something”. He then goes on to say, “I think that if the government were to confiscate everybodys guns unilaterally that I think that would be subject to Constitutional challenge.” He is speaking after the fact – after the government confiscated the guns – then it would be subject to Constitutional challenge. That means in court. We the People would need to petition the Supreme Court to get our rights – our guns – back. Obama is truly America’s biggest threat. Forget Iran – I believe Obama is on a focused mission in line with his change to the NDAA wording that can detain American citizens indefinately, and it has nothing to do with protecting this country or its citizens, rather to protect the government from us.
Report Post »ecunningham1984
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:21amthe right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
How f’n hard is it to understand??? Just like everything else this administration does it boils down to 2 things. Either they are illiterate, ignorant or just plain stupid, or they wish to perform an end around on the constitution at every bend of the road. There is no authority for the Executive branch, Judicial Branch or Legislative Branch of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to tell me that I can’t buy 1000 rifles of any fire rate let alone 2 within 5 days. Can’t wait for these marxists to have the door hit them in the ass on the way out.
Report Post »furnatic
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:50amHere’s the problem. I do support the right to bear arms, however, word for word, the 2nd Amd. can be interprated in such a way where we wouldn’t be allowed to have weapons at all.
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
All this law says is that if you go out and buy a couple AR-15s in a week, you are flagged. If you just like collecting weapons and are truly not sending them to cartels in Mexico, then you shouldn’t have a thing to worry about.
Report Post »So stop trying to find excuses to call the administration “Marxist” without any real justification. Otherwise, we can all call Bush, and most others before him Marxist too.
Texas Grasshopper
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:23am@ furnatic
So your okay that a “ group of people ”, ( who conduct operations in this Country and Forieng Countries delibertaly Arming them , knowing those weopons will kill civilian in this Country and other countries , agianst the Laws of this Country ) regulating under force of law what you can do to protect your family and youself ? really …..are you really okay with that ? I am not trying to undermine you ..just trying to express another point of view …..The 2nd Admend. IS very clear my friend ….
Report Post »DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:56amA regulated militia is not a qualifier or disqualifies ownership, first of all. Moreover, the second amendment CLEARLY states that a militia is NEEDED so that we remain free. Why? Because without one we instead get a federalized “national guard”, police state and the government we have today. You make the assumption that the security of a free state is past tense and not continually needed for all time. The fact that we have a federalized national guard and that militias are constantly discouraged or maligned, is the first violation of the second amendment. It’s actually quite simple if you stop “interpreting”:
When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.
Report Post »Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826)
sWampy
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:05amGet it right, he’s a Fascists, not a Marxists.
Report Post »rose-ellen
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:18amEven under the brutal regime of sadam husein,the people were allowed to bear arms[hence their ability to resist invasion and occupation]But the constittion is like the bible and the second amendment can be interpreted any way you like[a milita-what's that ,a police deptment, a national guard, a state milia, an individual-you can interpret it any way you like.].The constituion does not protect ,guarantee or safeguard any ineliable right or freedom as words and sentences are open to interpretation.The zeitgeist [just enough people in positions of power and influence] determine what is permissible and what is not.
David286 - FL
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:20am@furnatic ” First they came for the communists,
and I didn‘t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn‘t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn‘t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.”
~Pastor Martin Niemöller~
Just because it doesn‘t effect you directly right now doesn’t mean they won’t be coming for you in the near future. The “If you don’t have anything to hide…then you won’t mind if I violate your rights” is the typical way of taking away your rights without you even realizing it and that‘s because it’s done so much that when someone says no and tries to exercise their rights their rights are forcefully take away and the sheeple say “well if he didn’t have anything to hide”. Whether you use them or not NEVER give up liberties!!!
Report Post »wildbluyonder11
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:28am@furnatic. I’d question your “support” for the Second Amendment seeing as you obviously have no idea what it means if you think that it can somehow be interpreted to mean that we can have no guns at all. You also seem to be one of those people that believe that laws actually stop criminals, by your tired old argument of “if you’re not doing anything wrong, then you have nothing to worry about”. What I do have to worry about is that this administration and other Democratic administrations before it seem hell-bent on taking away our Second Amendment rights one law, one executive order, one tax, one “Assault Weapons Ban” at a time. So, furnatic, if you truly are a supporter of the Second Amendment, then pull your head out of the sand and take a stand. Or stand aside while those of us who are willing lead the way.
Report Post »The Gooch
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:32amFurnatic:
Report Post »That is a lawyer’s semantic shenanigans on display to dismis the 2nd Amendmet, especially when reviewing the purpose of the 2nd Amendment thru the writings of the founders and their contemporaries.
http://www.guncite.com/gc2ndpur.html
Like it or not, the founders recognized govt. as the greatest enemy to freedom and FIRMLY asserted that it is in the peoples‘ best interest to remain armed if and when it became necessay to defend one’s self against tyranny.
To foolishly assert the 2nd Amendment establishes the right to have a military is disingenuous. Why would a govt. ever have to assert it can and will defend itselt? That should be considered redundant when considering what is that govts. are set up to do.
This is the same nonsense that leftists and nihilists want to use to redefine marriage: Language can have numerous meanings, you gotta advance, smarter/better/more enlightened people get to make the rules, you’re too dumb to have a voice at the table… blah, blah, blah.
Check out the link in this post… or don’t. I don’t give a p!ss what you do as I readily recognize I do not have the power or mandate to change intractable partisans and embracers of legalistic mental gymnastics.
Here’s a simple litmus test: Is the Bill of Rights set up to protect the common man or govt.? You wanna play games with how and when govt. can step on you? Well, govt. will GLADLY make that decision for you.
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:33amCurrently the malitia of the United States is composed of all men between the ages of 18-47 who have been disciplined (trained) is the use of firearms and the National Guard.
Unfortunately, most, not all, of the non-National Guard portion of the malitia has at the core hate group thinking, primarily against Jews, blacks and latinos.
The focus of the malitia should be the same as our military–to protect and defend the Constituion of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic.
Report Post »DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:54am@dismayed
The National Guard… the NATIONAL guard, is NOT militia in any way shape or form. Not even remotely close. The militia is/was armed CITIZENS. Whose rights shall not be infringed? THE PEOPLE’S. Not, the national guard’s right.
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 12: “[The Congress shall have the power] “to raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years.”
No permanent standing army is permitted. Thus the police are a clear violation. The need for a militia of PEOPLE is needed because there are to be no PERMANENT standing armies. The second amendment is a GUARANTEE that there should be no gun CONTROL laws for free men(not incarcerated). It is also a REQUIREMENT that there should be militia usage; not that a militia is a requirement for arming yourself. I have the greatest respect for those that serve in the armed forces(not police) and do not wish to malign them.
“the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you” –Obama
“No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” -Jefferson
I agree with both.
Report Post »Texas Grasshopper
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:39amtwo issue …mexican trucks allowed now allowed to work insde the US ( texas and other states ) and this Gun Edict issued by Obama, I called Gov. Perry Office ….didnt even take my name …not good ….called my Local Rep ….and I have to Draft the Laws that I would like to see enacted in 2013 to protect ourselves form this tyranny and submit them to ;
angus.luppton@senate.state.tx.us
? WTF !!!! …….
Why …why why why …..I am disgusted …….
Report Post »Curioso
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:57am@ furnatic
Report Post »Here is a little quote on the original intent of the second amendment.
FYI
“As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.” (Tench Coxe in ‘Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution’ under the Pseudonym ‘A Pennsylvanian’ in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1)
Free American
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:01pmFurnac is in denial & needs to look up Marxism. Marxism is Lucifarian in origin. Marxism is Progressivism is Socialism is Communism is Globalism is Fascism is Lucifarianism!
Report Post »With the “Relativism”, “Existentialism” and “Deconstructionism” of the Progressive Fabian Marxist, which have their roots in Nazi ideology, the Constitution can be interpreted in as many different ways as there are readers to interpret it in their own image,… subject to change! Read your Constitution and know what it means according to (Noah) webster or they’ll define it for you!!! If they can define the Constitution, that which binds them, are they not left unbound?!?!?
The Constitution is NOT a Magna Carte where the King is tempararily allowing a measure of Liberty to “his” peasants. It”s 180 degrees to the opposite! It is the “Will of an already Free People” to its servant, limiting its authorized powers. By definition this administration and their agenda is Marxist, is Globalist, is Communist. What they did to GM and its bond holders? Fascist!
Curioso
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:12pm@Free American
Report Post »I could not agree more thank you for the post.
76 (I'm offended that you're offended)
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:33pmSo Furnatic,
I assume you would be open to random home inspections, how else can we be absolutely sure the citizenry are in compliance?…Your family can stand in the kitchen at gunpoint until you are cleared of any infringements. I mean if you have nothing to hide there’s nothing to worry about right?
Report Post »old white guy
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:11pmyou do realise that the average american even the gun owners do not have the ability or guts to kill their fellow citizens. dictators count on this and use it to their advantage. to kill you have to want you freedom and i mean WANT your freedom. i have said it in the past when commies take over it will be your neighbour the policeman you will fight. can you do it????
Report Post »Stone Cold Truth
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:18pmHere’s the problem. I do support the right to bear arms, however, word for word, the 2nd Amd. can be interprated in such a way where we wouldn’t be allowed to have weapons at all.
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
All this law says is that if you go out and buy a couple AR-15s in a week, you are flagged. If you just like collecting weapons and are truly not sending them to cartels in Mexico, then you shouldn’t have a thing to worry about.
So stop trying to find excuses to call the administration “Marxist” without any real justification. Otherwise, we can all call Bush, and most others before him Marxist too.
Well Obama IS ACTUALLY a marxist at heart, so….. it’s kind of legit to say that. Bush did some dumb stuff catering to the one world sympathetic crowd he is prone to associate with, but he wasn’t a marxist educated youth with a radical 1960s agenda for America. If anything Bush was gullable, not a marxist. Granted this particular order isn’t the end of gun rights altogether, it is a starting point with questionable motives and results. If the results of gun controlled cities like Chicago, Detroit, and New York are any indicator of how well people like Obama can “protect” us then I’d rather keep my gun rights complete and protect myself. I can prove that restrictions like these are useless, but it’s a lengthy read.
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 2:33pmPresident Bush, through his Attorney General John Ashcroft, publically stated that the 2nd Amendment guaranteed an ‘individual right’. President Bush and a republican controlled congress allowed the onerous Semi-Auto Ban, passed by a democrap controlled govenment, to sunset. Republicans have steadfastly supported the 2nd Amendment.
Fear a politician, political party or government that fears an armed citizenry.
Since the 2nd Amendment is in straightforward english, its misinterpretation can only be purposeful. Distilling what the Founders had to say about the 2nd Amendment in their many statements about it:
A well regulated (trained) militia (the whole of the people), being necessary to the security of a free state (nation), the right of the people (individual citizens) to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Before the democrap party went completely marxist, this is what a democrap had to say about it:
“Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms…. The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America but which historically has proven to be always possible. ” – Senator Hubert H. Humphrey
1982 investigation by the Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary:
http://www.constitution.org/mil/rkba1982.
Report Post »BOUGHT YOUR SILO YET?
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 2:42pmOld White Guy-
I have considered your viewpoint many times. And while only a few short years ago I could honestly say that I could never get that angered or threaten, today, I am quite certain that if it comes to that I believe I could. I have decided that life would NOT be worth living if freedom was not apart of it. The tipping point will definitely be the 2nd amendment. Once the people are disarmed they will have no protection and every aspect of life will be at the whim of their leaders. The powers-that-be are systematically taking away the peoples ability to protect themselves. I fear that the disarmament of citizens is so slow and stealth-like; however, that many people will not realize it until it is too late. The question of weather or not they have the guts to fight will be made moot.
Report Post »blanco5
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 9:23amThe morons in the whitehouse don’t realize the AR-15 (that little black rifle that looks so “scary”) is only .22 caliber…. therefore not affected by this order…. thank God for stupidity….
Report Post »benrush
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 6:52pmThe militia is not the national guard. And it doesn’t matter anyway. The infringement has already occurred and he is attempting to commit more infringement.
Study the 5000 year leap book and then follow it up with “The Making of America” as a chaser.
We have a heritage of freedom and liberty that extends back to and beyond the separation from Britain.
Report Post »marchon
Posted on March 7, 2012 at 3:00pmFurnatic’s post here responds that there is no threat – when in actuality there is a very real threat from this administration. While Furnatic was busy trying to interpret the 2nd amendment wording as whether it even applied to citizens – which it does – Obama says in his first complete sentence on the video that “He thinks the 2nd amendment means ‘something’. He doesn‘t even place an emphasis on the word ’something’ to give the vague wording any importance. He chooses just ‘something’. Is he even saying it is ‘something’ he agrees with, or is it ‘something’ he disgrees with? Just ‘something’. So much for the Constitutional scholars weighty response to the question about what his position on gun control is. He chooses his words carefully. There is much evidence that Obama has an agenda – bolstered by his repeated actions that assault our freedoms ensured under the Constitution as in his addition of language in NDAA which was wholly unnecessary and puts American citizens at risk for indefinate detention. Pay attention to all he does, the groups he selects to go after, the church for one, how one action builds against another, the divisions he creates. He couldn’t do a worse job if he tried. And that’s the point.
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:19am.
Why the wait and limit? If I change my name to SpankDaJose’ I can get a Free Machine Gun from Eric Holder…………
An unarmed people are easy to control………….
Report Post »drago
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:17amGood one Spank!
Report Post »stinkybisquit
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:19amInto four border states. Isn’t that discrimination? What about all those guns flowing into Canada through Maine, New York, North Dakota? And isn’t this an admission that illegal crossings (both ways) over the Mexican border is a problem?
Report Post »SpankDaMonkey
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:28am.
Report Post »I feel Violated……….
old white guy
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 1:49pmi think you have it wrong. the guns tend to go south not north.
Report Post »Pelling1020
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 6:55pmListen,
The 4 border states are moot. Just go one more state up or over and buy. Once they figure that out they will make the exec. order throughout the states.
Report Post »B_rad
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:18amWe need the GOP candidates to sign a pledge that they’ll issue one executive order: A ban on, and nullification of, all executive orders. If not, Congress needs to act to stop this over-reach of power and force the Supreme Court to rule on executive orders, finally declaring them UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Report Post »Cuthalu
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:43amExactly. It is even more of importance for us conservatives or independants to NEVER let any president write any more excutive orders. It is especially worse when it is one of our own, a conservative who is signing excutive orders because we get comfortable if it is one of our own and tend to make excuses for them doing it. No, it needs to end across the board no matter the politican party of the president doing it. Remain firm in our beliefs and in liberty!
Report Post »psst
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 8:58amB_Rad said:Congress needs to act to stop this over-reach of power and force the Supreme Court to rule on executive orders, finally declaring them UNCONSTITUTIONAL..
Report Post »–
Um! Are you talking about the repub controlled House and the repub leaders in the Senate?
If Soetoro told them to use their fingers as toilet paper they would want to know if he meant just one finger or all fingers, and if it is only one, which one?
SamIamTwo
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:10amBINGO, but I don’t hear a bloody word from any conservative on the hill…I am sick and tired of the REPs being quiet on these topics…they should be mounting a serious effort to go after the clown who has violated more than one law…you know the DEMs would.
Report Post »TRILO
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:03amThat will never happen. Both parties like their executive orders and czars. As always they only complain when it is the other party using them.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:04amexecutive orders are unconstitutional. end of story.
Report Post »JPShrugger
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:43pmCongress has more important things to do, like keeping steroids out of baseball, and making sure we use the right light bulbs.
Report Post »One Man One Voice
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:16amEveryone in this administration, from this president on down, needs to be impeached or arrested for being in direct violation of their oaths of office.
Report Post »does this burka make me look fat?
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:47amOath??? What’s that???
Report Post »Bonsmom
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 12:59pmThe problem with impeachment is that the House is responsible for writing up the charges under the Articles of Impeachment but the Senate has the SOLE responsibility to carry out an impeachment trial……I doubt that Harry Ried will ever even consider it.
Report Post »This was another set-up, a manufactured ‘crisis’ to add restrictions to our Second Amendment Rights.
The dealers CALLED the ATF with their concerns about the purchases of these weapons and were told to just go ahead with the sales. When those who purchased the guns were seen prior to crossing the border into Mexico, the ATF agents were instructed to allow them to proceed by_______?!?!? The Department of Justice?!?
It is an irrefutable truth that; POLITITIANS PREFER UNARMED PEASANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cherynn
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:16amSieg Heil mien Fuehrer!
Report Post »mhanderson1234
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:16amYou people on the border need to stop cutting into my business “obamie got guns”. What a JERK!
Report Post »BIGJAYINPA
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:25amDoes that mean the BATF has to report to the BATF when they authorize illeagal sales???…Just askin’
Report Post »TexasCommonSense
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:15amThe stores should begin by reporting the ATF for purchasing 1750 guns and sending them to Mexico.
Report Post »TAKOMASAK
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:41amWho are they gonna call? Those you would normally call are the instigators of the problem!
Report Post »Texas Grasshopper
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:18amI called all my local Reps…..all they could say is well ther is nothing we can do .., we are trying , it is an uphill battle , what the hell are the Polititians there for ? Why do I have to Draft Laws MYSELF to stop MEXICAN NATIONAL from taking more Jobs from us ? Hell we are SWAMPED with foriegners !!!! I am sick and tired of being sick and tired !!!! Even Texas is collasping because of the Politicians !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Perry claim of Jobs is $ 8.00 per hour Carpenter Wages …but I cant compete with Illegals ….
Report Post »101
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 4:01pmThe Executive Orders is just a (new carry out policy) Eric Holder (bag boy) will help carry the guns out!
Report Post »Eastremontave
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:14amOooh! The Constitutional scholar waxes eloquent on the second amendment. Mr. President, the second amendment is in place to provide for the watering of the Liberty tree should it be required.
Report Post »Pallamus
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:21amObama is no Constitutional scholar. He was never a professor, either. This man child is knee deep and doesn’t know what in hades he is doing, period!
Report Post »Jack2011
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:00amHe was NEVER a Constitutional professor or even a professor BUT AN ASSISTANT. There is a big difference between a teacher and an ASSISTANT teacher also.
That said, Obama should start his gun agenda by throwing his attorney general in prison for selling guns to Mexicans which killed hundreds, if not thousands of Mexicans and even Americans. And, if Obama knew about it, he should step down and face a trial also.
Report Post »Godfather.1
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 11:45pmActually, he was a professor. Oh, wait, the University of Chicago must be making that up. He was never really a professor, they’re just saying he was to cover him. Give me a break.
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media
Also executive order does not prevent anyone from buying guns, it just amps up the background checks and helps to ensure that criminals don’t get guns. If you read the executive order you would understand that. Then again, since you are Glenn Beck fans, you obviously don’t read.
Report Post »mikenleeds
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:13amhe ..thinks.. the second amendment means something?? why does he have to think about it at all , it s written down
Report Post »TwoLazy
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:12amFrequent buyers, Oh you mean like the BATF? GIMME A BREAK “O”
This clown is trying to legislate via exectutive orders? how’s that done?
Congress .. wake the hell up people.
Had enough yet?
Report Post »Brasil2520
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:28amA report today from Newark, that the city wants to mandate that small restaurants hire armed guards or must close early, this is due to a police officer that got killed at night at a fried chicken restaurant, this goes to show just how bad crime is, it also show‘s who really control’s the streets, not us.
To the liberals that love diversity so much, why don’t you move to Newark ? You’re not racist are you.?
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:05amHe owns the agencies that bust people.
Obama has violated the constitution more than once, and nothing not a word do I hear from the new conservatives we voted in…what’s up with that…and why aren’t there immediate mass commercials being released as soon as bozo violates the law??????
You know if it was a REP president, they’d be kicking and screaming before the ink hand dried on the EO.
Report Post »florida123
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:11amRepeal the Patriot Act NOW!!
Report Post »RIGHTHOOK
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:11amThis pretty much sums it up: “Already, there is talk on Capitol Hill of a cover-up at the highest levels of government, and it appears to some that the administration was feeding the lethal problem of firearms trafficking……………………”
Report Post »But BHO and his team are so righteous…..how could this be? What a travesty this administration continues to be.
florida123
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:11amThe states must act! They have the rights to throw out this unconstitutional executive order! We must get rid of the Patriot Act. This is how Dictator Odumbo is pulling off all these executive orders!
Report Post »liberalsarealiens
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:10amFrom my cold dead fingers! Speaks for me!
Report Post »EZDOZIT
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:54amObama has Third World Dictator DNA. Who’s your daddy?
Report Post »Ronald Wilson
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:08amAll states or none. Equal protection.
Report Post »stinkybisquit
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:21amNevada soon to see a surge in the sales of firearms.
Report Post »time4termlimits
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:08amAs people predicted when the “Fast and Furious” controversy began, this was designed to set the stage for increased gun control laws for American citizens. The totalitarianism of this government is becoming more clear every day. This will continue until serious efforts are made to invalidate the 2nd Amendment.
Isn’t it interesting that the more states approve more pro-gun laws, the federal government steps up its effort to enact more regulation. I wonder who will come out on top when it is all over. I predict many gun owners will allow themselves to be disarmed. Will you?
Report Post »ISeeDanger.com
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:09amJust wait until he wins re-election.
Report Post »It’s going to be bad.
http://www.ISeeDanger.com
Pallamus
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:27amI can tell you who will win that battle, the States! :) States are not obliged to execute and/or enforce executive orders unless they are laws enacted by Congress. The president is over reaching his executive mandate, and executive orders only stand in federal matters. Again, States are not obligated if they feel that their laws are enough. This man child is simply trying to trump State’s rights. The guy is an idiot!
Report Post »exladycop
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:30pmNo, I won’t. But when threatened by jail, I believe some will cave. The problem we have right now is that we’re not unified. As individuals, we are spread all over 50 states. The government will come after us individually and that is the problem. I believe neighbor will turn in neighbor for whatever incentive the gov’t gives them. With all the data the gov’t collects and stores in its databases, they know who has what and how many. It will be a matter of going underground to survive. Most of America is apathetic and asleep at the wheel. They’re looking for their next meal and where to entertain themselves. They haven’t considered “what if”. As Rome fell, America is going and fast. God help us.
Report Post »buzdburd
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 3:28pm@ExLady-Thank you for your service.
Report Post »That said, real Americans won’t turn in other Americans.
And ex-cops won’t turn on law-abiding citizens.
Neither will the National Guard or the Military turn on law-abiding citizens.
There may be a civil war, but Conservatives will prevail because Libs are to weak-kneed and limp wristed to fight.
Galvanized
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:05amMy take is that four states (Texas, California, Arizona and New Mexico) no longer have “equal justice under the law”.
Report Post »With Executive Orders like this, we are looking more like a dictatorship than a representative republic.
Texas Grasshopper
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:55ammaybe thier is a silver lining ….feds have used the Commerce clause to regulate “ everything” wasnt this clause done to protect states instead of punishing states ? ..In mind mind they can no longer use the Commerce Clause to regulae Guns ( or Heathcare ) ….still waking up but can you guys follow the though ?
Report Post »JohnBirch
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:05amOnly Congress can Enact Laws, not the Executive Branch alone.
OBama will try anything. Smoke and Mirrors, folks!
Report Post »grannygg30
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 1:36amIf only congress can enact laws …why the up roar over the gun issue…didn’t see the same uproar when americans have been sent into battlefields in three countries……and congress didn’t enact the order……thousands of lives are more important then an arsenal…
Report Post »Viet Vet
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 1:24pmApples and oranges, granny.
Report Post »HapHazard
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:03amFirst, create a crisis. Then solve the crisis, enacting the regulations you wanted to enact before the crisis.
Report Post »kcSnoWhitePATRIOT
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 2:56pmEver the “Community Organizer” uBama is… As a student of Saul Alinsky, Barry Hussein has surpassed the teacher and “We the People” are witnessing the fruits of his studies. It sickens me every day to read about, or watch the news (FNC ONLY!) and learn what the Usurper has done on THIS day in the twisted-history he is creating… Has any other President (maybe Woodrow Wilson) EVER taken this many Liberties and Freedoms AWAY from “We the People” by executive order as this fraud-in-chief? I want to SCREAM at Congress: “ASK FOR, no, DEMAND HIS RESIGNATION! The Birth Certificate is a FAKE, he had dual citizenship at birth and is an UnConstitutional POTUS!!! Thus rendering his LETHAL Legislation, exec. orders, et al…NULL and *frikk’n* VOID… PLEASE!”
High Crimes and Treason are only TWO of the charges Barry Hussein should face!
Report Post »100 Million Patriots Standing
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 3:30pmAt the risk of sounding redundant- I believe that Obama’s implementation of the UN Agenda 21 is what is going on. It all fits like a puzzel. One world governance, whereas no more wars, so no guns needed except for the leaders to keep order. And the biggest reason, guns are unsustainable, a danger to the elite ruling class staying in power to keep us under wraps. guns threaten the environmental movement and Globalism.
Report Post »lisalake
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 7:01amremember New Orleans after Katrina…..
Report Post »HogansHero
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:44amAlso remember all of the other communist revolutions throughout history. New Orleans was just a feeling out party. Their goal is in sight. A couple of more moves here and there and it can all begin.
Report Post »Bluefish49
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 6:59amAnd now it begins….watch the other hand.
Report Post »Bowmaster
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 6:59amSoon, the jackbooted thugs in black will be knocking on our doors to help us!
Report Post »Ain’t it great?
GOTT-EM-MAUSER
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:20amYessir, you are correct. NOW would be the time to buy stock in whatever Company supplies the Feds with Body Bags. They’re going to be buying lots and lots of them to put their Pig Boys in here shortly.
Report Post »Dismayed Veteran
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:52amThe “pig boys” will probably be the US military. A few good men will aggessively resist an illegal order to confiscate our firearms. Some will passively resist. Most will do as ordered. The My Lai Massacre is the poster child for obeying illegal orders.
The US military does not have a history of mutiny or mass refusal to obey what are illegal orders. When you pull the trigger and pull it you will, keep in mind who you will be shooting.
Report Post »Bullcop34
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 10:20amThose boys that want to follow an illegal order will get only one chance. It will be the deciding point in there minds when they get the order and then fall in to move on a community. In essence, they will have just signed their own death warrant. God help us all if it comes to that.
Report Post »Gypsy123
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 6:59amTake the guns out of the hands of the law abiding to give them to the MS 13 and Illegals in Mexico What a country
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on July 12, 2011 at 9:38amDumbo and Holder should be charge murder for the death of border agents killed with the guns “They” sold to drug dealers. That would be “common sense”. Dumbo and Holder are the loop holes………& a few other holes come to mind.
Report Post »smokie
Posted on July 13, 2011 at 4:05pmExactly what I thought.
Report Post »