Government

Obama Invokes George Washington in Debt Speech: He ‘Grappled’ With Taxes, Too

It seems President Obama is pulling out all the stops as he tries to sell his deficit reduction plan to the American people. During his speech in the Rose Garden today, he invoked the spirit if George Washington, saying that the nation’s first president also struggled with the tax debate.

CNSNews.com has the transcript:

“George Washington grappled with the problem” of taxes, Obama said. “He (George Washington) said, ‘Towards the payment of debts, there must be revenue, and to have revenue, there must be taxes. And no taxes can be devised which are not more or less inconvenient and unpleasant.’

“But he understood that dealing with the debt is — his choice of words — ‘always a choice of difficulties.‘ He also knew that public servants weren’t elected to do what is easy; they weren’t elected to do what was politically advantageous. It’s our responsibility to put country before party. It‘s our responsibility to do what’s right for the future. And that’s what this debate is about.”

You can watch video of the comments below:

You can read more about the proposal and view the entire speech here.

Comments (207)

  • Draya
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:50pm

    Does he remember what the Revolutionary War was fought for? No more Taxes!

    Report Post » Draya  
    • TH30PH1LUS
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:55pm

      Poor, noble Obama – doing what is difficult. Making those hard but righteous choices. What a guy.

      Report Post » TH30PH1LUS  
    • chips1
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:56pm

      Don’t you mean”that’s what the Revolutionary War wiill be fought for”?

      Report Post »  
    • standuppeople
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:25pm

      What was the tax rate at that time? Was it an income tax? Was it a flat rate? Was anyone exempt? Go back to the tax code of George Washington–good idea!

      Report Post »  
    • Lloyd Drako
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:53pm

      The Revolution was not about no more taxes, it was about no more taxation without representation. Some of the Patriot governments imposed taxes of their own as well as borrowing and printing to cover the cost of the struggle against the British.

      Report Post » Lloyd Drako  
    • ashley74
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 4:37pm

      He knows not of that war, afterall there was no union boss or union men involved with that war. So he doesn’t think it important at all.

      Report Post » ashley74  
    • Large Eagle
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 4:57pm

      Draya – Right on!!!!!!!!!!!

      He should read GW‘s farewell address and maybe our foriegn affairs would n’t be in caous. I think he is lying – help me fact check this clown.
      I’ll be back

      Report Post »  
    • gramma b
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 5:00pm

      It nauseates me to hear this creep comparing himself to Washington. Washington was a man of immense character and achievement, who loved this country and loved freedom.

      Report Post »  
    • Any_One_But_Obama
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 5:14pm

      DID YOU SEE FORBES RIP WARREN BUFFETT AND OBAMA‘S ’DEFICIT, TAX AND SPEND PLAN’…

      Here it is: http://www.americanparchment.com/video/2011/sep/forbes_hikes_buffett.html

      Report Post » Any_One_But_Obama  
    • The10thAmendment
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 5:39pm

      This Fool in Chief needs to be exorcized from America.

      Report Post » The10thAmendment  
    • Doctor Nordo
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 5:45pm

      Actually, it was “no taxation without representation.” You seem to have forgotten that last bit.

      Report Post » Doctor Nordo  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 5:46pm

      Tea Party ring a bell Barry? No taxation without representation Barry?
      I knew Barry was spinning today but when he invoked the same tag he used in 2008..”line-by-line” I knew he wasn’t serious. He‘s so desperate that he’s recycling the lines he used in the 2008 campaign. We’re looking at failed presidency. The country has switched off to him.

      Report Post »  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 5:50pm

      I watched as much as I could of Barry’s speech today, I mostly just read the transcripts, I can’t stand to listen to him any more. When he used the very same tag he used in 2008- “go through line-by-line” I knew Barry was just pulling the nation’s chain today. He’s actually recycling the same lies he used in the 2008 campaign. We’re looking at a failed presidency. The country has switched off to him.

      Report Post »  
    • IronSights
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 5:57pm

      It’s always good to hear from the distorter and chief. Someone should review the constitution and show him for WHAT purpose taxes can be collected for. Epic FAIL as a president.

      Report Post » IronSights  
    • AOL_REFUGEE
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 6:26pm

      Obimbo isn’t “grappling”; taxes are a knee-jerk reflex for him.

      Report Post » AOL_REFUGEE  
    • IntransigentMind
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 6:57pm

      Yeah, he’s more like Benedict Arnold:
      http://markamerica.com/2011/09/19/barack-obamas-desperately-phony-deficit-reduction-plan/

      Report Post »  
    • johnannegalt
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 8:11pm

      LOL! Exactly.. Mark America as usual sums it up well.. http://markamerica.com/2011/09/19/barack-obamas-desperately-phony-deficit-reduction-plan/

      Report Post » johnannegalt  
    • INOGAWD
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 8:33pm

      This worm is not worthy of mentioning Washington’s name..

      Report Post » INOGAWD  
    • INOGAWD
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 8:40pm

      Bama will grapple, with being a Lame Duck President during 2012…

      Report Post » INOGAWD  
    • jollylama
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 8:46pm

      Isn’t this the same liar who also twisted the words of Jesus?. interesting.. Øbama’s actions proves that he is anti-american, anti-washington and anti-christ.

      Report Post »  
    • antiencenom
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 9:06pm

      You’re beautiful Ashley

      Report Post » antiencenom  
    • kraphtsman
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 10:52pm

      This loser invoking the name of George Washington to justify ANYTHING he’s done while occupying the office of President ( for which he has proven himself to be TOTALLY unqualified ), is a joke !

      Obama and his socialist/commie economic advisers wouldn’t be able to balance a simple checkbook, let alone the U.S. economy. All these mental midgets know how to do is tax and spend, spend, spend…. and then go out and tax and spend a whole lot more What a bunch of incompetent and arrogant JERKS you stupid Democrat and “independent” sheeple elected !!!

      Report Post »  
    • mowspower
      Posted on September 20, 2011 at 12:18am

      That is what he is counting on. Look at his executive orders……In the event of emergency…blah…blah he needs an emergency….he is running out of time

      Report Post » mowspower  
    • AOL_REFUGEE
      Posted on September 20, 2011 at 12:53am

      Yes. Yes, thank you. Thank you very much, Mr. President Nimrod Obama.

      Report Post » AOL_REFUGEE  
    • rangerp
      Posted on September 20, 2011 at 8:01am

      George Washington did not allow gays to serve in our military, nor did he embrace socialism, nor did he attend mulsim school, nor did he side with the enemies of our nations and turn his back on Jews.

      Obama is the opposite of Washington.

      Report Post » rangerp  
    • dirtydog1776
      Posted on September 20, 2011 at 11:58am

      Sorry, the Revolutionary War was not to end taxes, but to end taxation without representation. Please review your history.

      Today we have a Congress and a President that neither represents us, nor listens to us. They are a power unto themselves.

      Report Post » dirtydog1776  
  • Vernon Black
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:48pm

    TAX and SPEND….The Leftists won‘t STOP until they claim ALL wealth is the Government’s and YOU should get only what YOU need…(ie What they say you NEED)….Sounds familiar???, It’s Marxism…
    Communism…Socialism…Different names, same disease!!!!………

    And YOU want 4 more years of this???

    Report Post » Vernon Black  
    • kickagrandma
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:32pm

      I don’t want ONE more day of it much less a whole `nuther year.

      Report Post »  
    • Obama>Jesus
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 8:30pm

      A great system that has been proven to work, unlike the broken shamble of capitalism.

      Don’t like my opinion? Tell me so at scott.ian2010@gmail.com, and we’ll have a nice political discussion.
      TEA SUCKS 2012

      Report Post » Obama>Jesus  
  • banjarmon
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:47pm

    If BO had lived when George lived…I bet George would have KICKED BO in the Delaware!!!

    Report Post » banjarmon  
  • Mandors
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:44pm

    Obama is an idiot.

    THERE WAS NO INCOME TAX DURING WASHINGTON’S TIME. Income mostly came from tariffs which were on FOREIGN good!!!!

    Report Post » Mandors  
    • Lloyd Drako
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:56pm

      If memory serves, there was also a whiskey tax to which some folks took armed exception. Washington swiftly taught them a lesson.

      Report Post » Lloyd Drako  
    • Blackhawk1
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 4:22pm

      The tax was a part of treasury secretary Alexander Hamilton’s program to pay off the national debt. The issue fueled support for the new opposition Democratic Republican Party (Republican Party), which repealed the tax when it came to power in Washington in 1801. The whiskey tax was repealed after Thomas Jefferson’s Republican Party, which opposed Hamilton’s Federalist Party, came to power in 1800.

      Go figure, even back then we had Liberals like Hamilton that wanted more taxes to support their wasteful spending.

      Report Post » Blackhawk1  
    • Lloyd Drako
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 4:52pm

      Hamilton and the Federalists didn’t want to pay off the national debt, they wanted to see that it was properly funded so the credit of the nation would not suffer. (Only Andrew Jackson was foolish enough to pay the thing off entirely!) Hamilton envisaged a developed nation, capable of defending its territory against enemy invasion and its economy against foreign competition–both at the time chiefly British. What Jefferson and the Republicans envisaged was a huge amorphous landmass occupied almost entirely by farmers, with its territory defended–if that is the word–by a miniscule army and navy, little “infrastructure” (to use the mot du jour), little manufacturing beyond simple handicrafts, and consequently little hope of surviving in the world as it developed in the 19th century. If Hamilton’s vision had not prevailed, with interruptions, the US might well have suffered the fate of Mexico or the Boer republics in the face of land-grabbing European imperialists.

      Report Post » Lloyd Drako  
    • CPT_GCF
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 5:19pm

      Actually Drako, it was broken up before Washington could get there. It did, however, show what a burdened people could do to protest; it also showed public opinion very well when Jefferson beat Hamilton the next election.

      Report Post »  
    • KangarooJack
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 11:35pm

      Thank Goodness for people who actually know History!

      Report Post » KangarooJack  
  • HellPhish89
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:42pm

    too bad there are taxes already. lots of them in fact… with ~50% not paying a dime. little hint: its not the rich that arent paying.

    Report Post »  
  • Alvin691
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:39pm

    Did anyone catch the laughter during his speech?

    Report Post »  
    • spirited
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:50pm

      Yes.

      What (exactly) was funny?

      Report Post » spirited  
    • k53lh
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 4:09pm

      Yes, The income tax was not radified until Feb. 12/1913.

      Report Post »  
  • Mandors
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:38pm

    Tax and spend is not the hard way. It is impossible to “grapple” with what you want do anyway.

    Barry is a sleaze bag.

    Report Post » Mandors  
  • thegreatcarnac
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:38pm

    Next..the little lying Kenyan will be going around with a white Washingtonian wig on and saying he knew Washington personally.

    Report Post »  
    • Godfather.1
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:40pm

      Probably not, however, Glenn will likely take your suggestion and act it out on his new show.

      Report Post »  
  • welovetheUSA
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:37pm

    George is turning over in his grave…………..Obama is a bloody idiot, period.

    Report Post » welovetheUSA  
  • rettpr295
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:37pm

    What an complete jerk. If you look at his proposal he wants to start eliminating mortgage interest deductions and not just on the very wealthy. For the love of christ why can’t he just resign and we can put this progressive social experiment in our past and move this country forward. Can’t wait to kick his butt and lots of other Dimocrats to the curb in 2012

    Report Post »  
    • DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:04pm

      I don’t like Obama one bit. Actually I can’t stand the guy. But why do you need an interest deduction on a personal choice to buy a home through a mortgage? Why should I subsidize your debt?

      Report Post » DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)  
    • spirited
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:53pm

      Don’t forget his proud statements of

      >working with ACORN.

      Report Post » spirited  
    • Lloyd Drako
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 4:20pm

      DTom, good point. Close all loopholes, end all deductions, make everyone–and I do mean everyone–pay at least nominal income tax, and make tax rates flat(ter). Get a mortgage to buy a house, not to get a tax break. Drill for oil or develop green energy because you think it’s a good, profitable idea, not to get a tax writeoff. Contribute to charity because you’re in a charitable mood, not to lower your taxable income. Tax people, not corporations. A lemonade stand, a small business profit, a CEO’s salary or capital gains: it’s all income, and if we’re going to have income taxes, it all should be taxed

      Report Post » Lloyd Drako  
    • crazedbanshee
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 4:46pm

      If we didnt have income taxes we wouldn’t have this issue. Tax goods as they are purchased, period. What is more fair than that? Everyone would pay their “fair share”.

      @DTOM – Your an idiot. You are not subsidizing anthing, it is a tax deduction. It lowers the amount of income the person pays taxes on. Not a single cent of that money was ever yours. Pull your head out of you @ss and stop thinking like a progressive.

      Report Post »  
    • Lloyd Drako
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 4:55pm

      Perhaps DTom is a renter? If he earns the same amount annually as someone who has a mortgage, he pays marginally more so that person can pay marginally less. I take it that is what he meant.

      Report Post » Lloyd Drako  
  • thegreatcarnac
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:36pm

    The nation has had it’s credit rating lowered. I believe that was the first time in history. The littel communist is still asking for more and more spending. He know this nation’s economy is on the ropes and that is what he has been trying to do for 3 years. He is a communist traitor and he is tying to destroy us through our economy so he can substitued socialism. Is there not one fool in D.C. that would come out and say the obvious??

    Report Post »  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:32pm

    Mr Obama is no George Washington
    Mr Obama is no founding father type.
    Mr Obama is in the image of Pres Wilson
    Mr Obama is a Radical Progressive.

    Mr Obama needs to resign, face criminal trials for his actions and if found guilty serve his remaining life in a prison.

    Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • fatjack
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:47pm

      Bingo

      It’s coming!………………..Are you ready?

      Report Post » fatjack  
    • eyestoseeearstohear
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:48pm

      RIGHT ON SNOW!

      Obama NEEDS to be impeached for TREASON.
      The Fast & Furious AND Solyndra are AMPLE REASONS.
      He has FAILED to keep America Safe, his RECKLESS US Financial mishandling,
      failure to govern according to the US Constitution, ineligibity to be POTUS, falisfication of
      BC & withholding of his vital records, is just a beginning of where & why he should be
      impeached.

      Report Post »  
    • ilovethiscountry
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:11pm

      I couldn’t have said it better!

      Report Post »  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 5:59pm

      Obama‘s not fit to spit shine Washington’s boots.

      Report Post »  
  • RightPolitically
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:32pm

    He shouldn’t bring up George Washington who, more than likely, is turning over in his grave watching this guy destroy the country that he and others fought to create.

    Report Post » RightPolitically  
  • Ducky 1
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:31pm

    Wish this man really understood who the real George Washington was!!

    Report Post » Ducky 1  
  • Conservative New Yorker
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:30pm

    Now he’ comparing himself to George Washington (In addition to Lincoln, Reagan, FDR, etc). Sheesh.

    I would totally agree with him if he compared himself with Hitler (yeah, I said it, for all you trolls- truth hurts, huh?), Stalin, Mao, etc.

    Report Post »  
    • eyestoseeearstohear
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:41pm

      Obama ISN’T WORTHY to even wipe the CRACKS of Wahington, Lincoln or Reagan.

      AND, you’re RIGHT about Hitler, Stalin and Mao…

      I would only include one more – SATAN.
      Those are the one’s Obama would comfortably be in equal company.

      So, THERE…I’ve said it TOO,
      adding to the painful suffering of the TROLLS ON HERE, TOO!

      Keep up the good work of the truth, CONSERVATIVE NEW YORKER.

      Report Post »  
    • Conservative New Yorker
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:32pm

      You too Eyestoseeearstohear, fellow patriot!

      Report Post »  
    • LadyLibertykicksASS
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 4:23pm

      yes indeed….I’ll drink to that!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
  • byehlik
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:29pm

    This Marxist can take a long hike off a short pier. “Fair” Taxes is everyone paying the same percentage. Including the 45% of the public that pay nothing! The “Fair” tax, consumption tax, is the only way out of this mess, Marxist!

    Report Post » byehlik  
  • randy
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:29pm

    OMG12 = OBAMA MUST GO in 2012
    What a GD liar!

    Report Post » randy  
  • GENEPAGLIARI
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:28pm

    Also, he (George Washington) didn’t blame it on Bush.

    Report Post »  
  • Kara_ite
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:28pm

    OMG – This Communist wants more money? Just say, “NO”, to this evil man who wants to apologise for everything we stand for. Have the military arrest him in the middle of the night and drop him in Mexico. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/06/more_on_the_honduran_military.html

    Report Post » Kara_ite  
  • jrfox
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:28pm

    This shows what O knows about our history! There was no income taxes until about 100 years ago!

    Report Post »  
    • Godfather.1
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:39pm

      Apparently you know nothing about grammar. Furthermore, the fact that he is now talking about income taxes in no way means that he misunderstands history. His analogy was sound. George Washington struggled with how to raise revenue and how to pay the government’s bills, it doesn’t matter what taxes he was discussing back then, the dilemma is the same.

      Report Post »  
  • prescotm
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:28pm

    Same old song just a different verse! Just go away and make everyone happy!!

    Report Post »  
  • flametronix
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:27pm

    it was one hundred years after washington that income tax came in to law?

    Report Post »  
  • vennoye
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:27pm

    OH pleeeeeze!! This occupant of the oval office just has no shame………just shams!!

    Report Post » vennoye  
  • GENEPAGLIARI
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:27pm

    WERE his lips moving? ‘Nuff said.

    Report Post »  
  • hauschild
    Posted on September 19, 2011 at 2:24pm

    Obama = Liar

    Report Post »  
    • AJAYW
      Posted on September 19, 2011 at 3:57pm

      Would much rather lie,spin,blame,down grade others when he’s the problem impeach the SOB

      Report Post »  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In