Obama Losing to Romney in 2012 Presidential Poll; Palin Would Win GOP Primary
- Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:29pm by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
It may be early, and even “too close to call,” but Mitt Romney is currently beating Barack Obama in the latest 2012 presidential poll.
According to a Qunnipiac University poll of likely registered voters released Monday, the former Massachusetts governor leads Obama 45-44 percent. The lead, however, does fall within the two point margin of error.
Still, in encouraging news for the Romney camp, he leads Obama in one of the most important voter categories — independents. That group backed Romney over Obama 46-35 percent.
Obama also lost independent voters to former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who leads the president 47 percent-40 percent in that voting block.
The poll also shows that Americans do not believe Obama deserves a second term: respondents voted 49-43 to deny him re-election.
Among other top GOP contenders, Huckabee trails Obama 46-44 percent and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is behind by eight points, 48 percent-40 percent.
Still, the poll suggests Palin would win the GOP nomination.
“In a mythical Republican primary Ms. Palin gets 19 percent, including 25 percent of GOP women,” the poll says, “followed by Romney with 18 percent, Huckabee at 17 percent, Gingrich at 15 percent, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty at 6 percent and Daniels, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour and Sen. John Thune of South Dakota at 2 percent each.”
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 564 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 391 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 382 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 365 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 321 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 382 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 391 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 321 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 150 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 382 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (470)
Joisey
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:11pmHow come Bobby Jindal wasn’t in that poll?
Report Post »neverending
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 6:42pmBecause the sarah wannabees poll it according to their wants.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 11:35pmBecause everyone assumes he won’t run. He’s only said like a thousand times that he has no interest in running for POTUS.
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 12:03amTO: Jimt, packers1, chamara, GadsdenGurl, wodiej, BocaBaby,
I agree with all of you. Sarah is my number one choice because I know the truth about her and what she has been able to accomplish. The one item that impresses me more than any other about her has to do with her taking on both Democrats and Republicans while she was Governor. If you were not FOR Alaska, just looking out for yourself, she made darn sure you were pushed aside. That’s the kind of honest, public servant, non-politician we need in DC.
But lets not kid ourselves, we are going to have to work hard for her. We will be in good company so it should be quite enjoyable.
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »clockwatcher
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:10pmSarah Palin nice lady. Please don’t run for president, you are as clueless as the Black Jimmy Carter. We need a good leader not a moose hunter.
Report Post »chamara
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:38pmThat’s a pretty arrogant remark. How do you figure she‘s clueless and are you trying to say that Jimmy Carter captured the pubic’s imagination. She has worked tirelessly for the cause, and for that alone she deserves accolades. I‘m not sure either if she’s right for the presidential spot. At the moment, though, no one has stepped out onto the stage that can really fire up the ranks (except Sarah) and you’ve just got to have that. Hopefully, while she keeps up the momentum, that person will appear or we’re toast. By the way, it takes a lot of skill, cunning and patience to be a moose hunter – not bad qualities for a leader, don’t you think.
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:37pmHere, here Chamara
Report Post »qpwo
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:39pmIf the economy is the most important issue, then let‘s go with a candidate who doesn’t allow herself to be used by liberals to scare away the independent vote by constantly talking about social issues. Allowing herself to be used in this way is part of why I would agree she’s not all that bright.
Report Post »karprin
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 3:17pmHow true. I don’t know how anyone using a common reality show to promote themselves could be considered a serious candidate for President. She’s attractive and high spirited but she is also a buffoon. The left and center see it and many people from the right see it as well. As much as you might not agree with Obama one thing most thinking people can see is that he is no idiot. If she is the only candidate the Republicans can put forth then expect 4 more years of Obama.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 24, 2010 at 1:02amqpwo,
As a Conservative, I want a president that talks about morals. Its something dearly lacking in this country and to have a candidate that lives a moral life is a HUGE plus for me.
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »Huckabee Gingrich 12
Posted on November 24, 2010 at 4:54pm@CHAMARA
Report Post »In Alaska you could pretty much walk up to a moose and shoot it between the eyes. If a dead cat was a deadly weapon, one swing would take down three of them. Not a lot of “cunning” goin’ on there. I’ve had one walk up to me before, albeit not during hunting season.
wodiej
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:08pmI think if Palin polished her speaking skills a bit and did some weekly radio addresses about in depth policy, her polling against Obama would go up. I believe she is completely capable to beat Obama and would be a fine President. But perception is everything.
If she won the nomination her polling numbers would also go up because there would be no other contenders in the field.
Right now, the ball is in Sarah Palin’s court and my instincts say she already has a great adviser.
If we are going to turn this country around it will take a very strong constitutional, common sense and unconventional conservative to do it. If Palin was a guy, I venture to guess she would be beating the socks off of Obama in polling.
Report Post »GadsdenGurl
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:18pmThe press never focused on Palin’s many accomplishments. It‘s quite a lot for an ordinary person who wasn’t helped by Soros and Rockefeller money or Kissinger or the Annenbergs like do nothing Obama.
Report Post »Bigbird1960
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:06pmPlease no Romney people.,He is as selfish and dirty as it gets. He tied an Irish Setter in a dog crate to the roof of the car for a twelve hour highway trip. The guy is a filthy animal with magic underwear.
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:06pmobama and the dems are OUT in 2012, period.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 7:31pmDon’t be too sure – where have I heard that before? They know more ways to steal an election then were ever written!!
Report Post »Truth be told
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:03pmFull of herself? Would anybody on this blog like to get a turn on the slime line? Come on, don’t let the MSM brainwash you. By November 2012 things are going to be very different than they are now regarding our Ms. Palin so don’t be so quick to count her out.
Report Post »Marylou7
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:55pmOnly an idiot would discount her. This lady is exactly what we need.
Report Post »dougiedoug
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 5:32pmAnd why is she what we need? Accomplishments? So she’s good at firing up people to vote….good at speeches….basically a walking talking point……wait are we talking about Obama or Palin? There exactly the same, just on opposite sides. Lets go for experience this time, shall we?
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 6:00pmlets see..wants less government than any politician in america other than ron paul
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 11:41pmbostonchris,
Paul may want smaller government more than any other candidate, but he has no chance of winning either the primary or a general. He would however make an incredible advisor to a popular conservative president.
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 11:43pmdougiedoug,
Go back up on this thread above you and read about her accomplishments. Sarah has many!
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »mark t
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:00pmI still say Sara get’s people fired up to vote, so what if she’s polorizing what do we have now, the most polorized this country has ever been Sara will make head’s roll, that’s what we need!!!!!
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:52pmYou’re right. We need heads to roll, and swiftly.
Report Post »qpwo
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:27pmThe only heads that will roll if Palin gets in will be our own. She’s too goofy and easily side-tracked from the economy to getting involved in social issues.
Report Post »Lantern
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:56pmMAYBE too early?? Let’s wait another year before doing polls.
Report Post »Waggedy Wabbit
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:46pmToo many eating themselves alive over this——-just what the LEFTIES want!! FOCUS PEOPLE FOCUS!!! Watch and listen,jack one in—just to be ready.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 6:41pmYes please – can we just have a rest from polls, polls and more polls – sick of tired of them. We need a leader.
Report Post »mark t
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:54pmromney still defend’s his healthcare mandate in Mass. do you think he would repeal obomacare?
Report Post »LibertyGoddess
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:33pmI don’t like Mitt 100%, but I will be the first to defend his record. Romneycare is nothing like Obamacare. It was structured differently and was changed once he was out of office. The state took a .025 tax on gas to pay for premiums for those 20% who were not insured in the state. There was nothing unconstitutional, no power grab, and no mandates, just a plan to save on the state paying out for the uninsured.
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:26pmits still progressive
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:44pmDang you, Bostonchris, I had it all figured out!
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 5:54pmhe signed bill
Report Post »we didnt buy insurance
we got money taken out of our refunds
what rhymes with mitt and flushes down the toilet???
ccr
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 10:35pmI’m with Libertygoddess………….Romney does NOT like obamacare because it is FEDERAL and not done on a state level. The states are the ones that should be working through and finding solutions. The states with the best ideas, lower taxes, best education…….will have people moving to fill the tax base. The health care program that Romney pushed……..has been “remodeled” by liberal Dems since he left office.
Huckabee is a huckster because he was not truthful about his smearing of Romney’s religion. Any Baptist preacher that was a big speaker at the big Baptist convention in Salt Lake City several years ago, DOES know enough about Mormons to stir up negative and contentious feelings towards Mitt. Shame on a “religious” Huckabee furthering his own agenda/aspirations. That showed, to me, a tremendous lack of character.
There are a NUMBER of capable and patriotic citizens that would certainly be miles better than the current. But let’s remember, WE cannot be backstabbing, hateful, critical and condemning of Palin, Romney, Paul, Christie, Gingrich etc., etc. We will have our own opinions…….but, PLEASE, let’s be CIVIL, constructive, united as possible and prayerful! We don’t need a lot of “in fighting”. We TRULY do need an inspired leader for this country. BUT……..we NEED all KINDS and MANY conservatives in MANY areas! Thanks to ALL of those promoting conservative issues around the country!
Report Post »ccr
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 11:45pmI realized I was hypocritical……….in being sarcastic about Huckabee. Because of the reason stated, I do not hold Mike Huckabee in a position of respect. I should have not called him “Huckster”…… If truly his motive is to promote conservatism in an honest and respectful way, I would support him if he were to be the candidate. I personally think we have stronger candidates with less baggage, but I would support if I felt of sincere honesty and respect in the upcoming months.
I would call on others to move past the propaganda (I call it that because I believe the truth is mingled in inaccuracies and deliberate distortions) of Romney’s so called flipping. There are a NUMBER of others who have flipped on issues as well………BUT……..the propaganda has not been there. Let us look honestly and fairly while looking at records of a man who has shown great leadership and skill in fiscal responsibility in tenuous situations (saving companies….yes, people DO lose jobs oftentimes when trying to save companies. It IS a fact of the free enterprise system. Don’t like it? Perhaps moving to a more socialist country would be better…….AND then saving the Olympics.) We DO NEED an experienced leader to help us make the difficult choices that would lie ahead. I do not know if Romney is THE answer, but I am certainly not going to ignore the many positive things he has done because of the much propaganda against him. I will try to be fair and balanced.
Report Post »LuigiCorelli
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:54pmWhy don’t they get it? Why doesn’t anybody get it? NO Romney. NO Huckabee. Nobody who has already tried and lost. Nobody who is from the old school of Washington DC. NO NO NO!
Report Post »We need fresh ideas and new, outsider blood in DC. No lobbyist wannabe’s. No twenty term career politicians. No more freakin political hacks. We need real citizens in our government. We want nothing to do with any politics as usual. Trim the fat. Lose the pork. Start the engines all over again and give America back to Americans. They are the ones who made it work and they are the ones who will get it back on track. If the only difference between our early days and today is slavery, then that’s great! We don‘t have slavery anymore and we won’t. That is, unless we allow the progressives to continue to destroy everything we’ve built up to now.
As an aside: I am frankly getting tired of the racial overtones of the political arguments. Why would you believe Obama would not support slavery? Don’t African-Americans learn their own history of how they came to the New World? Who do you think sold the Africans to the slave traders? Their own people! So, why do you believe they wouldn’t do that today? In fact they do. There are numerous examples of slave trade, torture, murder, and other atrocities where there are absolutely no white people involved. This is why we must be careful of the race card, and the stereotypes. People really are just people, no matter what color. They will be just as loving or just as evil towards one another as anyone else. We are after all, only human. But we are…ALL human.
docvet
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:09pmMaybe you are right, but we need someone who has a political governing track record. Not just a new face. That is what we have now and he has to be the first and last amateur in the white house (although, as I think of it, George Washington could be considered an amateur).
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:45pmDidn’t we just give a community leader a spin. I really don’t want someone that is clueless as president, we already got that. Leadership is a skill.
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:28pmI know what you mean about slavery. It’s as old as time. As old as the human race. People get stuck on slavery as being a black and white thing, and it has been that, but through the ages it’s mostly been people enslaving their own first.
Report Post »And slavery goes way beyond endentured servants to working the fields…Slavery is the power of life over another human being. Communism holds the power of life over the people, sexual slavery holds the power to live over the slave, abortion truly holds the power of life over the weakest of all. It all starts as a people holding the power of life over their own.
BetterDays
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:52pmMy Vote goes to Chris Christie of New Jersey. He’s the only good thing out of Jersey in the Last 100 years!
Report Post »pap pap
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:39pmWhat about The Soprano’s ?
Report Post »nooffensebut
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:49pmIf you know anyone in the South, please tell them not to vote for Huckabee. I do not want Obama to win or for Mike to let out all of America’s murderers. Romney would make an excellent president, and he can actually win.
Report Post »Psychosis
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:19pmwhat are you talking about? what makes you think huckabee would release all of the murderers?
Report Post »nooffensebut
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:05pmI guess DuMond was only a rapist when Huckabee released him. I should have said that Huckabee will release all of the rapists. Pardon me.
Report Post »espdude
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:48pmJindall/Palin in 2012
Report Post »oldasdirt
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:16pmOr Jindall/Bachman?
Report Post »SamuelChase
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:38pmPalin / West 2012 , I honestly think this ticket could take it. Palin has the executive experience, and Allen West would be a great vice president. Plus, it sets up Allen West for 2020 :). Thoughts?
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:42pmJindal/Bachmann!! Perfect.
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:06pmAllen West… the military officer? I just don’t know that Palin could ever get elected.
Report Post »The Vengislator
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:04pmJindal, Bachmann, Palin, Coburn, etc…? None of them could defeat me.
Report Post »I‘m just hoping Mike Huckabee doesn’t run.
qpwo
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:08pmPalin? I have nothing against her personally nor politically, but we have so many good potential candidates – DeMint, Bachman, Christie, Rubio – why would you go with someone less intelligent who‘s bound to pull an O’Donnel?
Report Post »qpwo
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:23pmWhen you say Jindall/Palin I think Dumb/Dumber. Perhaps it’s unfair to call Jindall dumb, but he certainly is meek. As for Palin, she’s an egomaniac. Get out of the spotlight already and let DeMint or Bachman lead.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 2:46pmSamuelChase,
Actually that would be the perfect ticket. Any and all negatives that people may dream up could easily be swiped away with this combo. I like it!
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »SND97
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:48pmIn the latest PNN Poll My dog sparky beats Obama 55-45 %. Good choice. SPARKY 2012
Report Post »wodiej
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:55pmomg…lmao
Report Post »Anonimouse
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:01pmWho’s a good boy?!!
Report Post »ohmyhec
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:44pmAgree with most of you. There needs to be a new face for the Republican Party. Not Sarah, Not Mitt, Not Mike and especially not Newt. It needs to be someone who has a very good reputation and a deeply involved background check. lol
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:08pmJohn McCain ………….. Just Kidding
Report Post »knotaclu
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:51pmHerman Cain
Report Post »MrButcher
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:44pmThese are not very good choices. I’d rather we run someone who is deceased like Thomas Jefferson against Obama (he’ll win despite being dead) and just have a vacant presidency for the 4 years beyond 2012.
We need a president who will, literally, get out of the way.
Report Post »snowleopard3200 {mix art}
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:56pmYes, we need someone who will put American people first, formost, and always.
Report Post »nsblues
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:59pmThomas Jefferson might also help the Republicans close the gap in the “dead” demographic
Report Post »MrButcher
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:29pmsolidarity amongst dead voters!!!
good point.
But most of the dead voters are “helped out” by the unions so perhaps if we ran Jimmy Hoffa the union dead voter “helpers” would be more inclined to vote for him over Obama. It doesn’t matter which dead person we run the results will be the same. We could run Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels as his VP (maybe not they we’re/aren’t US citizens.)
The good thing about dead people is we don’t have to listen to them give speeches that insult our intelligence. Plus this idea isn’t without precedent. Earlier this month Jenny Oropeza won re-election to the california state senate despite having died two weeks before the election.
Perhaps what we really need to do is declare national bankruptcy, dissolve the federal gov’t, let the 50 states become 50 countries and allow them to get themselves together and in order then reconvene in 5-10 years and see if we want to reform the union and start all over.
just an idea.
Report Post »Mary M. Tebbe
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:43pmI’m a conservative Republican, and none of them get my vote. The Republicans are going to have to do better than that.
Report Post »Steverino
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:50pmAny ideas, Mary? I’d be interested in seeing them…
Report Post »Mary M. Tebbe
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:55pmsteverino: I’ve been studying Sen. Tom Coburn for quite some time. I think he’s one of the best out there. I also like Mike Pence, and I think Paul Ryan would be good in a Republican administration.
Report Post »knotaclu
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:29pmI agree Mary. I like Palin, Romney, Huck, etc. but I dont want to vote for any of them. My 1st choice is Herman Cain and I hope he runs. A black conservative that is a true American, how sweet is that?
Report Post »neverending
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 7:28pmThey sure are or we will just have more of the same.
Report Post »Nicole in Boston
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:41pmGlenn and the guys brought this up on the show today, but why do all articles refer to Sarah as “Ms. Palin”. I have a feeling she would prefer to be called “Mrs. Palin” since that is her married name, and she doesn’t show any intention of hiding or disregarding Todd
Report Post »qpwo
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:30pmWho cares???? Why do people get side-tracked into defending this woman when it’s our country that needs our attention. Get out of the way Palin so good people can focus on the country instead of fighting off attacks on your intelligence, looks, family, etc!
Report Post »seanpatriot
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:40pmDarn, I wasn’t first at all
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:49pmYou’re so funny Seanpatriot ;)
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:51pmHey but you were first the other day…
Report Post »seanpatriot
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:40pmFIRST, AND I SAY JINDALL SHOULD Run
Report Post »qpwo
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:19pmJindall is so wishy-washy. Where has he been while the DeMints and Bachmans were out there fighting? He’s a wuss.
Report Post »Barry Soetoro
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:29pmJindal is not a natural born citizen. Despite being born in the U.S., he does not have TWO U.S. citizen parents and is no more eligible to run than I am. It’s doubtful Americans would fall for this again.
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:39pmIf Obama continues on the path he’s on, my dog will be able to win in 2012.
Report Post »snowleopard3200 {mix art}
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:52pmIf Obama keeps going the way he is then a picture of himself will be able to win. Not such a bad idea after all.
Report Post »Highland
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:39pmPlease, no Huck.
Report Post »sportlock
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:02pmChris Christie 2012 for common sense soluions to Americas problems that America via political correctness, brings on itself..
Report Post »Jimt
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:28pmChristie is not a conservative.
Report Post »He is good at bashing the public employee unions, but liberal on all other issues, including tax and cap.
roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:33pmChris Christie adamantly refused in the last interview I saw him in, and I believed him. He’s the one I definately would vote for without reserve, but he’s not in the game.
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:54pmTAX AND CAP!! I didn’t see that one! I have a tear rolling down my cheek- Maybe Jindal/Bachmann is the only way to go…
Report Post »123abc
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:39pmPalin would be a great candidate but she is too polarizing. Do not put her up on the 2012 ticket – unless you want obama to win again. Personally I don’t think we can handle another 4 years of the community organizers “leadership”.
Report Post »jeanpennie
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:55pmI agree completely. I love what she stands for and that she refuses to drop out of the public eye despite the best attempts by many, but there are too many people (Republicans and Independents) who really dislike her and refuse to vote for her (or a ballot with her name on it). She can best influence by going around the country and speaking to young people and other audiences and keeping her PAC $$ active for good candidates.
Report Post »James
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:56pmI like Sarah Palin but am not sure she is the best candidate out there.
I also don’t think she is polarizing at all. I think she is a normal person with fairly mainstream views that a lot of American’s support. Any polarizing is the fault of the MSM and rabid lefties who have a blind and misguided hatred for the woman.
Whether you like or agree with Sarah Palin, it is hard to make the case that she is nealry as offensive or divisive as many liberals make her out to be.
Barak Obama and his progressive base are infinitely more polarizing that Sarah Palin could ever be.
http://carzyconservative.wordpress.com/
Report Post »Jimt
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:06pm@James
Sarah Palin is only “polarizing” because the media portray (!) her as “polarizing” and portray (!) her as “far right” to frighten off voters.
But in reality ,Sarah Palin is mainstream ;almost every position she has is supported by the MAJORITY of America.
Sarah Palin is standing with the MAJORITY (!)of Americans who feel the same way she does on healtcare , abortion, smaller government , lower taxes , energy independence and securing the border.
Truth be told
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:09pmIf Palin hadn’t left the Alaska Governor seat and got into the face of the American public and stayed in the public eye with all her efforts to defeat the Democrats, we‘d still have the Dem’s in charge of everything. Don’t kid yourself. She’s a power house and will not take a back seat for anyone, even Karl Rove. Yes, Sarah Palin is a very strong candidate and we will see some real leaps forward for her with the public in the next year and a half.
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:24pmI agree, 123: Palin should remain Kingmaker as a prominent force in the political world- just too many people despise her for her to ever become President…JIMT makes a compelling case, but I’m for CEO Romney still. (I was depressed for a week when McCain won the primary last go-around, but we did get our beloved Sarah out of it)
Report Post »If Romney can clearly explain that flop of state healthcare of his and denounce the fed h/care I think he could bump out barry by a landslide. GO MITT!!
Jimt
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:33pm@roseofsharon
Governor Palin’s “business experience” comes with the negotiations and dealings she has had with one of the most powerful industries in the world: the energy industry. This includes the negotiations on what will be the largest private infrastructure project in North American history. Governor Palin has successfully negotiated new tax structures, lease deals and other issues that arise in the Alaska energy industry.
At the end of the day, Governor Palin negotiated billion dollar deals with one of the toughest industries in the world.
If you want to talk about her tenure in AK, you may want to consider her balanced budgets. She left the state with an $8 billion rainy day fund and a $1 billion education fund and a budget smaller than her predecessor’s. She broke up the Corrupt B*stards Club of Republican politicians and oil company execs than ran Alaska and reset the system used for reimbursing Alaska for the use of its resources. Then there’s the gas pipeline that was talked about for decades and she got passed
WSJ Editorial page editor Paul Gigot said Gov. Palin “has demonstrated a sophisticated understanding of monetary policy” in this Opinion Journal Video broadcast November 9, 2010. Columnist Daniel Henninger harkened back to Gov. Palin’s first Washington Speakers Bureau speech delivered in Hong Kong, in which “she correctly analyzed the causes of the financial crisis, the government causes, including easy credit from the Fed. This is a consistent message for her. This speech is not something out of the blue.”
http://online.wsj.com/video/opinion-journal-palin-vs-bernanke/6A8B3973-6069-464E-B48B-4D4564C96DE5.html
Report Post »Cotswolds
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:50pmWhile I don’t prefer either of the two, I could find my way to voting for Palin. I will vote 3rd party if the repubs put up Romney.
Report Post »VTSickFreak
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:02pmThe MSM and media made Sarah a polarizing figure because they know she is a great candidate. They have told us who they truly fear. It’s Sarah!!! Do you see them turning themselves upside down and inside out over anyone else? Chris Christie is the only other. Those two are our only choices if we want true conservatism in the 2012 election. The MSM and media have already signaled through their action and inaction that they are somewhat accepting of the other Republican candidates.
bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:20pmeverybody agrees that palin wouldnt make a good president…then who out there will everybody says shes not capable.. then who are you suggesting..you cant just dismiss palin and not give a suggestion or say that i we’re waiting for the next george washington .. if thats what your saying then your a progressive..or just to scared to say romney either way your part of the problem and not the sollution…i hope everyone gets the picture
Report Post »verdonne
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:25pmAll this negative stuff about a woman just because the progressive establishment fears her and has done everything in its power to revile her……I for one would much rather take a chance on Palin than any of the Republican backed establishment elites. We need some fresh air in Washington.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 6:40pmShe will never beat obama – she thinks if she keeps saying she can long enough it might make a difference – she is still unqualified – we already have one of those in the whitehouse now.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 12:54amTruth be told,
More than any other RINO, Rove needs to take a back seat to all Conservative candidates, cause the one thing Rove is NOT, is a true Conservative. He’s more of a Conservative lite.
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:02amverdonne,
Amen!
Report Post »qpwo
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:17pmPalin has good common sense and that’s about all. She’s turning into an egomaniac, making it all about her. Look at her daughter on DWTS and tell me anyone genetically related to her could be smart enough to run the country. We have options – DeMint, Rubio, Bachman, Christie – let‘s get behind someone we don’t have to defend by comparing them favorably to some idiot on the other side.
Report Post »mrclean
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:41pmDeMint/Rubio 2012
Report Post »Muslim in Chief
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:36pmWhy would Palin even bother getting involved? She would only suck votes away from the GOP candiadte, and give us another four years of the Liar in Chief. Palin should really just stay out of it. She is full of her own self worth at this point. Don’t get me wrong, I like Palin, but as a candiadte for President….not too sure
Report Post »neverending
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:42pmFull of herself for sure.
Report Post »Anonimouse
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:49pmShe’s brighter than most of the elected officials in DC. Have you ever considered that you are simply falling for the media narrative about Palin?
Report Post »dkhartman
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:53pmI really like Palin but I agree. At this point if she ran, we’d have another 4 years with the big O. NO THANK YOU!
Report Post »wodiej
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:54pmyou think she is full of herself but you like her? Who wouldn‘t run for President and have a high opinion of themselves or they wouldn’t friggin’ run.
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:07pman all-American Woman in charge of America, and thsi particular mama grizz at that.. we’d be MORE heavily ARMED, our Homes would be safe and our national checkbook would be balanced.
Report Post »G.W. Dobbs
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:09pmI completely AGREE with you. Palin is a nice, attractive Lady but NOT PRESIDENTIAL material. Lou Dobbs or Glenn Beck or Judge Napalitono would be better. I liked Mitt until he recently said,
Report Post »“the next Presidency will NOT be about Health Care but about the Economy”. Dors he not realize
the two are part of the same whole? Please!
Joseph28
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:25pmLooking like some more Republican Cannibalism to me. Might I add that as of now Palin STILL has more Executive experience than Obama has in his 2 years as President. I‘d also add that Palin’s quality in said Executive positions trumps Obama’s in every way
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:27pmI don’t want her as president. Sorry, to me she is great cheerleader but I don’t want her as quarterback. & To “TRUTH BE TOLD” I don’t watch MSM
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:29pmFull of herself, really? I just don’t see that.
Report Post »ozchambers
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:38pmI like Palin, but sadly the media has done too big a smear job on her that has been bought by too many for her to win. She would get ZERO votes from anyone calling themselves Democrats, close to zero votes from those calling themselves independents, and wouldnt even get all of the votes from those calling themselves Republicans. Its a pathetic, disgusting truth that while the MSM hasnt stripped her of her power to rally support for candidates or steer national debate, they have effectively stripped her of the ability to be elected POTUS.
Report Post »Romney & Huckabee are all weak ineffective candidates in my opinion who will not inspire. This is a perilous time for our nation and Americans are looking for strong, BOLD candidates with serious ideas that match the seriousness of our situation. Candidates who TRULY understand and arent afraid to speak the unvarnished truth and who can communicate how their solutions are VITAL to saving our Republic. This isnt bandaid and hydrogen peroxide time, this is triage time. We need new visionary leaders who truly LOVE the Constitution, Free Enterprise Capitalism and Freedom as the founders understood it.
Names like Bauchman, Ryan, Rubio, Paul, DeMint, West are the kind of leaders who just might be able to stabilize a hemorrhaging Republic and get us on the path to long term recovery.
bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:08pmanyone who dislikes palin at this point should be considered a progressive period.
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:15pmas long as she does what she says shes gonna do who cares if shes full of herself..as far as i‘m concerned every polititian is full of themselves if thats the best opinion that can hold her back from running we’re just gonna make this a popularity contest and thats what got us into this mess.. lets get one thing straight where not voting for prom king or queen.. we already did that…and palin is a patriot and should run to raise the bar for these other dingbats..and if she wins the country will be all the better for it….isnt that what its all about people.. where not in high school anymore…wake up
Report Post »BocaBaby
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 6:28pmPalin is the only one that I really truly trust. Romney I would NEVER trust.
PALIN 2012
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 11:55pmAnonimouse,
The idea you throw out is a great theory, one that I subscribe to. I agree with you that too many people have allowed the media to decide for them what Sarah is all about. The left, the leftist media, and RINO supporters do NOT like her, and to some extent they are afraid of her, so they have been non-stop brutal with her. None of those people influence me as to whom I’m going to vote for. Heck, I wouldn’t let them influence me concerning anything because I know it would be a lie.
Besides, I am totally convinced she could beat Obama easily.
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »qpwo
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:09pmI completely agree – Palin is letting all of this go to her head and will now undo whatever good she’s done for the country by sticking herself in the middle of things.
Report Post »James
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 2:57pm@Joseph28
I agree with you 100%. There is no way every Republican, conservative, independent, and moderate will be satisfied with the Republican nominee in 2012. Sarah Palin has a real chance at getting nominated and, if that is the case, we need to rally behind her and get her elected.
She may not be the best but she will be better than Obama for sure, I would vote for the clerck at the Circle K by my house before I would vote for Obama or not vote at all.
Report Post »NancyPalousy
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:36pmAny of the Palin’s could beat him…
Report Post »snowleopard3200 {mix art}
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 1:55pmPersonally what matters to me is the best candidate will uphold the mandate of the people of this country, reign in the government, and stick to the constitution. One who also will reign in the out of control spending and focus also on getting the debt under control and work to elimination of it.
No it will not be easy, yet they said going to the moon was impossible, and Americans did it. They said the Panama Canal would never be done, we did it. They say impossible, Americans make it happen…
sportlock
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:00pmChris Christie 2012 !!!!!!
Report Post »Jimt
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:02pmSarah Palin is in lock-step with the American people on the majority of the issues: immigration, health care reform,off shore drilling, extending the Bush tax cuts,the mosque at Ground Zero, etc. Regarding gravitas, Governor Palin has written, spoken, and commented on issues ranging from the devaluing of the US dollar to the bureaucratization of health care to the Obama administration’s stance on Israel to the overreach of the EPA. She is comfortable discussing social, economic, environmental, regulatory, foreign, and national security issues.
With regards to leadership, Governor Palin has led a town, a state, and has co-led a family. She has private sector experience in working in journalism and her family’s fishing business. She has public sector experience with her time as city councilwoman, mayor, and governor. She has experience with negotiations between the public and the private sector with her work on AGIA. She worked across party lines with ethics reform legislation. Since stepping aside from the Governor’s office, she has been the leading voice of conservatism. When other supposed leaders are busy sticking their finger in the wind or sitting on the fence when it comes to current policy, Governor Palin has stood strongly for conservative values and commonsense.
With regards to political achievements, in three legislative sessions as Governor, in addition to what has already been mentioned, she forward funded education, passed major ethics reform, revamped the oil taxation code to make it more inline with the Alaska constitution, and increased funding for children with special needs. She rejected stimulus funds that were unsustainable and had strings attached. She stood firmly for the 10th amendment on numerous occasions and was a constant proponent of energy independence. She took on the Establishment of both parties and won.
She holds the Republican Party accountable for less spending, less debt, and to reduce the size of government.
When other supposed leaders are busy sticking their finger in the wind or sitting on the fence when it comes to current policy, Governor Palin has stood strongly for conservative values and commonsense.
packers1
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:20pmSarah Palin is the next Ronald Reagon and that is the reason the Right and Left fear her. She loves her country not like the idiot in the white house. Obama hates Americans and hates America.
We are the enemy to the White House.
13thgenerati0namerican
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:26pmMy friend Dan Foster said that China has a better government than the US currently has, and I agree. We need to follow the lead of the country that owns our debt and try to become more like them.
Huckabee Gingrich 12
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:31pmThis is exactly why Gov. Palin should stay the hell out of it! We need a nominee whom can WIN, and she ain’t it. Please, ladies and gentlemen, get behind Mike Huckabee. He CAN beat Obama, but only if he’s nominated. Gov. Huckabee is our best chance to beat Obama and get the whole country prosperous again. Chuck Norris gets it. Why don’t you?
bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:32pmif you believe these polls your a dummy…plain and simple..take this crap and flush it down the toilet..romneys nothing but a silver spoon boy..flush him down the toilet with that poll that was taken..you’ll get better information looking at a stripper poll.. dont be a dummy and keep listening to these people…they get paid and people like the romneys can pay them through any third party..right now romneys sitting in his gated mansion licking his lips.
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:33pmdont talk crazy china has more slaves than the 1800s
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:35pmromneys just a spin off of bush and obama..if he gets elected im moving to mars
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:36pmwe’ve been electing millionaire presidents since the beginning of time ..when are we gonna wake up?
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:36pmOh please, China’s government numbers their citizens. We need our own government back- the one that catipulted the world into a better way of life. If we become Socialists the rest of the world will have no one. Get a clue.
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:46pmBOSTONCHRIS: Besides being a millionaire (which I could care less about) what is it about Romney that bothers you? Will he not admit Romneycare was a mistake?
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:56pmhe’ll be buddy buddy with the bankers..i could care less that hes a millionaire..but hes not self made..hes an out of touch silver spooner..went to school with future bankers..
Report Post »Laura
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:56pmMy litmus test for any Republican candidate: Who can I be sure would put country first and would not subject America to backroom deals? Sarah is the only one I can count on. Her record of governing in Alaska has proven this time and time again. That’s why both sides fear her. She’s got my vote.
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 2:58pmalso rose we number our people too…..ss numbers
Report Post »tobywil2
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:03pmMr. Romney is just another Rino. If he were elected president, we just have more years of George Bush’s and creeping tyranny. The last thing we need is another four years of a Rino. Ayn Rand was once asked if she were a conservative, my answer was, “there’s nothing left to conserve, I am a Radical for Capitalism.“ What we need in the White House is a ”radical for capitalism.” not another Rino. Unfortunately, there was no “radical for capitalism” considered in this poll. Of those considered, either Sarah Palin or Mr. Gingrich is probably the best choice.
Before a decision has to be made, maybe we’ll find a modern George Washington or Benjamin Franklin that can be entrusted with our future, someone, who will restore Capitalism and the greatness that was the United States. http://commonsense21c.com/
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:05pmromneys just trying to jump on the tea party bandwagon…hes running on what everyones sayin already and his $1000000 haircut..he’s a rino..cant stand him……..you want real change ? we need a fed watch dog like ron paul…i know it sounds unrealistic cause he doesnt have big money behind him but its really our best option…we gonna be using our money for toilet paper soon cause toilet paper will be worth more in gold…………wake up people….we’re very intelligent but these people are playing us like fools
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:12pmtheres no one in america that epitomizes the legacy of george washington like ron paul..i agree that Mrs Palin is in a close second to him…
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:12pmboston, you made me stop for a minute there- first thought: driver’s licenses too, they’re just documents with #s… but not the same. then, we still have our names though! but still… you kind of got me on this one. i’m hoping soc sec phases out with these two oldest generations.
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:21pmcheck this out the fed
only ron paul can shut them down….please youtube gerald celente alex jones national inflation association nia.com education is our best weapon…this information is more powerful than a nuke…..all you need is some time to look
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:22pmanother good one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQv-sdMCClQ&feature=pyv&ad=5953390594&kw=federal%20reserve another video for all my friends here
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:26pmcheck out those videos i put up..i just made another friend today..thanks rose
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:33pmwhy will social security phase out ??oh yes the grand plan of population control..ahh the good old days of baby boomers parents when money didnt restrict them from having as many babies as there freedom would allow..now it seems our money on average could only afford only a half baby..thanks federal reserve i’ll send you a christmas card(that i’ll make of scrap paper of course)..true rose we still have our names but they did nudge us into taking on a few numbers…maybe they’ll nudge us out of our names also……nothing will surprise me these days..
Report Post »roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:40pmwow- alot to look at boston. thanks.
Report Post »America_First
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:47pmA freeze dried “Turd” cold beat yobama…aka anyone but yobama…it took 8…this turd did in less then 2!!!!!!!
Check this out…How stupid is stupid…and we wonder why America is in the fix it is…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNZczIgVXjg
Dam I disliked GW…but I do miss him…
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:55pmno problem rose…hope you pass it on…and hope all the other patriots here watch too
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 3:57pmthats what glenns been watching..hes on the right track..his shows have been a mrror image of that info
Report Post »bostonchris
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:05pmamerica first—-haha i saw that one this guys on some kind of psych meds
Report Post »walkwithme1966
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:45pmActually as a progressive Democrat – I hope sister Sarah does run because Obama will win in a landslide – and oh the presidential debates will be great!! Run Sarah Run!! http://maboulette.wordpress.com
roseofsharon
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:55pmHey runfromme44yrsold: we’ll get it together and get your people out… hold on for the ride, you’ll see
Report Post »Kaen
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 4:59pmFirst off…we shouldn’t be electing ANYONE that actually wants to be President…thats the whole problem…that makes them AMBITIOUS POLITICIANS who think WAY too much about themselves.
“We the People” need to form a “Write-In Candidate Initiative” for the primaries in EVERY state to elect Gov. Chris Christie even if he doesn’t want to be president. George Washington didn’t want to be king, George Washington didn’t want to be president, he only agreed after it was assured to him that eventually, he could step down and someone else could take over and look what a wonderful president he was.
The first, and biggest problem with ANYONE that wants to be president is the fact that they WANT to be president.
http://thefreeamerica.blogspot.com/
Report Post »Bruce
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 6:16pmOnce again “Huckabee Gingrich 12” wants us to continue to follow the loosing way by suggesting a true conservative to stay out of the race for a pair of RINOs that helped us into this mess to begin with. Tea Party people have clearly sent a message that the old system of sounding conservative and voting progressive like Mr. Huckabee and Mr. Gingrich is over. If “Huckabee Gingrich 12” wants to stand in the middle of the road, I suggest he watches out for the Tea Party Express!
Report Post »Doc_Slammin
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 7:24pm@13thgenerati0namerican says, “My friend Dan Foster said that China has a better government than the US currently has, and I agree. We need to follow the lead of the country that owns our debt and try to become more like them.”
Why don’t you and your buddy Dan Foster move to China and see the difference between the two instead of studying from afar.
Report Post »jim1flyer
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 7:59pmI think I could beat him and I’m clueless!
Report Post »bulletsinthegun
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 9:47pmright on righrt on
Report Post »silveracer44
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 10:32pmRon Paul!! Please people!!
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 11:24pmsportlock,
Even Christie himself says he’s not ready yet, so I have a good solution. We put in a Palin/Christie team for 8 years and have Christie run for the presidency after two terms of Palin. That way we get two good Conservatives running the country, and Christie gets all the experience he could ever want and ease right into the top bannana position.
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 11:28pmHuckabee Gingrich 12,
You have mocked Sarah so much that I would make sure your choices are overlooked. You’re judgement cannot be trusted!
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 22, 2010 at 11:34pmroseofsharon,
For me Romneycare is the big negative, then there are a bunch of minor issues that have to do with him doing things that were done soley for political gain. These made him do a good bit of flip-flopping and that to me is a sign of a weak leader. I’m not a complete idiot though, if he were to win his partys nomination I would probably vote for him. With one exception…. If Sarah was to run as an Independent Party candidate, then she would get my full support and the GOP could kiss me goodbye.
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »mimitweetin
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 7:50amHell, I’m willing to put my dog up against Obama. He’ll work for biscuts!
Report Post »stacciole
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 12:48pmI would vote for any of these but my dream team would be Rubio and West. My apologies for all Florida but I think they would win nationally.
Report Post »mrclean
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 1:36pm@ozchambers
Totally agree with you on possible candidates. What’s your take on a DeMint/Rubio 2012 ticket? It could work for our country even though Rubio is a relative newbie. It’s early and perhaps a few more will surface in the next 6 months.
Report Post »James
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 2:34pmAnyone could beat him.
Report Post »James
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 2:43pm@walkwithme1966
I have heard a lot of liberals say the same thing you do but I don’t understand why. Why is it you want Palin to run? Do you think Obama would have a hard time beating anyone else?
Unless Obama moves to the center like Clinto did, Palin will beat him in a landslide bigger than when Reagan beat Carter.
http://crazyconservative.wordpress.com/
Report Post »ozz
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 5:12pm@13thgenerati0namerican Follow China’s example? So you are saying we should have a national socialist government like Nazi Germany. What a great idea!! Allow me to escort you to the gas chambers first. We are still light years ahead of them. Why would we chose regression? If you like China so much then you live here why?
Report Post »_waTson_
Posted on November 23, 2010 at 6:31pmokay folks, I love Sarah Palin but NOT as President. In my eyes there is only one logical person for the job in 2012 and that is .. drumroll
.
.
.
.
..
..
..
GLENN BECK yes I said it and I HOPE HE DOES IT!
Report Post »