Politics

Obama Omits ‘Creator’ From ‘Inalienable Rights’…Again

Just one week after President Barack Obama came under fire for omitting man’s “Creator” as the source of his “inalienable rights” — as described in the U.S. Declaration of Independence — he’s done it again. This time, the president was delivering remarks at a Democratic Party fundraiser in New York City, raising money for his party’s midterm election races.Obama Omits Creator From Inalienable Rights...Again

During the Sept. 22 fundraiser at New York’s Roosevelt Hotel, President Obama told the audience:

[I]f we stay true to our values, if we believe that all people are created equal and everybody is endowed with certain inalienable rights and we’re going to make those words live, and we’re going to give everybody opportunity, everybody a ladder into the middle class, every child able to go as far as their dreams will take them — if we stay true to that, then we’re going to be able to maintain the energy and the focus, the fight, the gumption to get stuff done.”

Referring to “those words,” the president encourages his audience to remember the Declaration of Independence, but once again fails to mention one of the documents most central ideas — that man’s rights come from God, not government.  Instead, the president interprets the meaning behind the Declaration as one that grants government the authority to dole out “opportunity.”

When the president spoke to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s Annual Awards Gala on Sept. 15, many speculated he had inadvertently left out the word “Creator” when loosely quoting from the Declaration of Independence. “We hold these truths to be self-evident,” Obama said at that event, “that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights: life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That’s what makes us unique.”

Fox News’ Bret Baier later reported that the White House clarified the remarks, claiming  President Obama “went off script and adlibbed when he made that mistake.”

With the same omission made just one week later, it seems the latest “mistake” may have been intentional.

Comments (382)

1 2 3 ... 12
  • attitudijudi
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:11pm

    It is so bad for me that every time he is on TV I turn the channel so I don’t have to listen to the crap he shovels. I get too pissed off! He is now gathering all his communist friends in Washington this weekend. This man is like a teacher you hated in school. You have to tolerate them because you cannot do a thing about it and you want them out of the you life.

    Report Post »  
  • Cristadda
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:10pm

    At least we remember what we learned in grammar school, that we are a nation founded on the principles of God not just politics as a means to an end. I‘m sorry that our elected president didn’t learn that in his world travels but the rest of us have learned this from first grade on. We know that we trust in God, he never got to learn that at during his foreign studies.

    Report Post »  
  • Psychosis
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:09pm

    God help this country this is going to get bad. I predict a “situation” in the near future between now and 2012 elections that will give the president an excuse to install marshal law, and revoke our rights as they are stated under our constitution. please go to http://blackquillandink.com/ and read EXTRA: OBAMA SUSPENDS CIVIL RIGHTS l

    Psychosis  
    • printdesignchicago.com
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:22pm

      i tend to agree with you that something along those lines is coming down the pipeline

      Report Post » printdesignchicago.com  
    • Will NV
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:43pm

      That is why they needed billions to provide supplies ands weapons for hi private army

      Report Post »  
    • janddjohnson
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 10:13pm

      If that happens I believe there will be an uprising.

      Report Post » Deanna in Missouri  
    • TrueGrit
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 6:26am

      Folks…
      I’ve mentioned martial law and more several times before.
      These new rallies in DC are meant to stir and create crisis.
      It’s coming much faster than the master plan had anticipated since the awakening
      of the ‘Homers’…
      and on a side note-responding to the anti Beck group is foolish and wasteful.
      GIADG is obvoiusly one of the union people or whitehouse staff or a plain fool

      Report Post »  
  • CitizenJob
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:08pm

    First, nevermind the troll.

    Second, I predict this president will be impeached in 2012.

    Report Post » CitizenJob  
  • Marylou7
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:07pm

    It was intentional the first and second time. He has done everything in his power to let people know how he feels about our God but no one is listening. This was a fact he let known in many ways even before he was elected President. Obama tells the truth over and over again but he says it so eloquently that everyone thinks he must be mis-speaking. A man that speaks that well could not be so evil in his intent, well he can. Once and for all, this man does not see the world the same way the average American does. Listen to him very carefully and take him at his word. Example: Utility bills will necessarily skyrocket, Jesus’ sermon on the mount is radical, it is good to re-distribute wealth, etc.

    Report Post » Marylou7  
  • gbeck2012
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:07pm

    actually, i think hitler would be more evil if he was still alive. but he isn’t, so i have to agree with your conclusion.

    Report Post »  
  • GrassRootBeer
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:06pm

    The agenda to remove God from society is clearer every time he speaks. It‘s ’separation of church and state’, not ‘separation of GOD and state’. There’s a BIG difference.

    Report Post » GrassRootBeer  
  • critters13
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:06pm

    obama

    Report Post »  
  • suzirice1979
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:05pm

    Why the hate? If you don’t like Glenn, fine. Just agree to disagree. There’s no need to be hateful.

    Report Post »  
  • broker0101
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:05pm

    Just for my records, what is the amount of “melanin in the skin” that triggers the “assassinate” reaction from the Right?

    Report Post » broker0101  
  • I am 'We the People
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:05pm

    We the people know where our rights come from. We know of the men who held the flag to their death at the battle of Fort McHenry; one of the key battles for our independence. We the People of the States, United for the Freedom and Liberty of America, know our rights, where they came from, and the cost to keep them. We are more then willing to pay that cost; again, and again, and again. The cost to cross us is much greater.

    Report Post » I am 'We the People  
    • Joseph_Plumb_Martin
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:19pm

      Fort McHenry happened during the War of Idependence?

      Report Post » Joseph_Plumb_Martin  
    • GnomeChomsky
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:50pm

      haha you beat me to it joseph. I guess he learned that at Beck U

      Report Post »  
    • I am 'We the People
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:58pm

      The war of 1812 was for our independence. The British came back to claim what they thought was their property. That war was faught against the whole might of britain, who were not divided on two fronts at the time.

      “With the recent defeat of Napoleon the previous year, thousands of British troops along with many seasoned officers, including Major General Robert Ross, were deployed to America to undertake a major campaign on America’s East Coast. In August, 1814, British forces sailed from the Royal Naval Dockyard in Bermuda to attack the U.S. capital of Washington, D. C..[7] On August 24, the British Army had overrun confused American defenders at the Battle of Bladensburg and marched into Washington, which had been abandoned by the military. After burning and looting the White House, Capitol, Treasury, War Department and other public buildings and forcing the destruction of the Washington Navy Yard, the British carted public and private possessions back to their ships. President James Madison and the entire government fled the city; Madison wandered around Virginia and Maryland for several days. The British also sent a fleet up the Potomac to threaten the prosperous ports of Alexandria and Georgetown, which lie just west of Washington, and cut off Washington’s water access. The mere appearance of the fleet cowed American defenders into fleeing from Fort Warburton without firing a shot, and undefended Alexandria surrendered. The British spent several days looting hundreds of tons of merchandise from city merchants, then turned their attention north to Baltimore, where they hoped to strike a knockout blow against the demoralized Americans. Baltimore was a busy port and was thought by the British to harbor many of the privateers who were raiding British shipping. The British planned a combined operation, with Major-General Robert Ross launching a land attack at North Point, and Vice-Admiral Sir Alexander Cochrane laying siege to Fort McHenry, which was the point defensive installation in Baltimore Harbor.”

      “At Fort McHenry, some 1,000 soldiers under the command of Major George Armistead awaited the British naval bombardment. Their defense was augmented by the sinking of a line of American merchant ships at the adjacent entrance to Baltimore Harbor in order to further thwart the passage of British ships.

      The attack began on September 13, as the British fleet of some nineteen ships began pounding the fort with Congreve rockets (from rocket vessel HMS Erebus) and mortar shells (from bomb vessels Terror, Volcano, Meteor, Devastation, and Aetna). After an initial exchange of fire, the British fleet withdrew to just beyond the range of Fort McHenry’s cannons and continued to bombard the American redoubts for the next 25 hours. Although 1,500 to 1,800 cannonballs were launched at the fort, damage was light due to recent fortification that had been completed prior to the battle.”

      “After nightfall, Cochrane ordered a landing to be made by small boats to the shore just west of the fort, away from the harbor opening on which the fort’s defense was concentrated. He hoped that the landing party might slip past Fort McHenry and draw Smith’s army away from the main British land assault on the city’s eastern border. Operating in darkness and in foul weather, Armistead’s guns opened fire onto the landing party and the diversionary attack failed.[6] On the morning of September 14, the 30 ft (9.1 m) × 42 ft oversized American flag, which had been made a few months before by local flagmaker Mary Pickersgill and her 13-year-old daughter, was raised over Fort McHenry (replacing the tattered storm flag which had flown during battle).

      Brooke had been instructed not to attack the American positions around Baltimore unless he was certain they could be taken. Seeing that Cochrane had failed to subdue the fort and that he was heavily outnumbered by the American regulars and militia, Brooke withdrew from his positions, and returned to the fleet which would set sail for New Orleans.”

      “An American lawyer and amateur poet, Francis Scott Key, was on a mercy mission for the release of Dr. William Beanes, a prisoner of the British. Key showed the British letters from wounded British officers praising the care they received from Dr. Beanes. The British agreed to release Beanes, but Key and Beanes had to stay with the British until the attack on Baltimore was over. Key watched the proceedings from a truce ship in the Patapsco River. On the morning of the 14th, Key saw the American flag waving above Fort McHenry. Inspired, he began jotting down verses on the back of a letter he was carrying. He composed the words to the tune of an old British drinking song, “Anacreontic Song.” When Key reached Baltimore, his poem was printed on pamphlets by the Baltimore American. His poem was originally called “Defense of Ft. McHenry.“ The song eventually became known as ”The Star-Spangled Banner.” Congress made it the national anthem in 1931.

      Colonel Brooke’s troops withdrew, and Admiral Cochrane’s fleet sailed off to regroup before his next assault on America at New Orleans, Louisiana. Armistead was soon promoted to lieutenant colonel. Much weakened by the arduous preparations for the battle, he died at age 38, only three years after the battle.

      The battle is commemorated in the Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine.”

      Report Post » I am 'We the People  
    • I am 'We the People
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 8:13pm

      I did not say “war of independence” for that reason…if you insist on the lamblastment of words and phrases I did not use, your own idiocy will show for all to see.

      Report Post » I am 'We the People  
    • I am 'We the People
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 8:15pm

      I did not say the phrase, “war of independence”, because I was not speaking of that war – if you insist on the lambastment of words and phrases I did not use, your own idiocy will shine for all to repudate.

      Report Post » I am 'We the People  
    • GnomeChomsky
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 9:45pm

      Sorry, you are wrong once again. We declared war on them, we invaded their territory in Canada, and they were fighting two wars at once.Napoleon wasn’t defeated until 1814 and the war ended in Feb. of 1815, that sounds to me like 2 years of a 2 1/2 year long war. I suggest you recheck your source. How priceless and fitting you then go on to misspell Sarah Palin’s botched word.

      Report Post »  
    • Joseph_Plumb_Martin
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 12:06am

      GnomeChomsky,You beat me to it this time.

      Report Post » Joseph_Plumb_Martin  
    • I am 'We the People
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 1:52am

      I was wondering if you would catch the pasquinade on Sarah Palin. Both of you should, not allow yourselves to be caught in such a easy trap. Also, you should read up on history if you are to make statements of fact. I stated Napolean was defeated, did I say that it was his final defeat? No? Well then where do you get the notion, that had I spoken with such language? Let me explain: Napolean was defeated a number of times. “Following the end of the armistice, Napoleon seemed to have regained the initiative at Dresden (August 1813), where he defeated a numerically superior Coalition army and inflicted enormous casualties, while the French army sustained relatively few. However, the failures of his marshals and a slow resumption of the offensive on his part cost him any advantage that this victory might have secured. At the Battle of Leipzig in Saxony (16–19 October 1813), also called the “Battle of the Nations”, 191,000 French fought more than 300,000 Allies, and the defeated French had to retreat into France. Napoleon then fought a series of battles, including the Battle of Arcis-sur-Aube, in France itself, but the overwhelming numbers of the Allies steadily forced him back. His remaining ally Denmark-Norway became isolated and fell to the coalition.”

      Your claims and idiocy are starting to show, Joseph_Plumb_Martin and GnomeChomsky, you sirs, do not know what you are talking about; and you sirs are frankly wrong once again. In this game of words, I am afraid you are, unwittingly, outmatched. Your ‘air’ of pedagogical knowledge has now been shown to be just that, air. Do not trifle with more nonsensical drivel; it is you who should check your sources.

      Report Post » I am 'We the People  
    • I am 'We the People
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 2:00am

      Let me also add, that while we did declare war on Britain; Britain did not recognize our indepenence. So, once again I show that we were fighting for indepenence. What a sad world you must live in – to be so stuck in paradigms that you must defend yourself till you are, proverbially, blue in the face and throwing a fit on the ground. Time to grow up Mr. nay-sayer, you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

      Report Post » I am 'We the People  
    • Joseph_Plumb_Martin
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 2:12am

      First off I never attacked Palin,I happen to support her.http://shealahcraighead.photoshelter.com/gallery-img-show/2009-12-08-CO-Colorado-Springs/G0000xPWSo_kdxiE/?P_ID=P0000lMKdCzN08e8&_bqG=417&_bqH=eJzLM3UJyctLDjKtMvX3Ngw3rUgvqzAJCQ5Oqky2MjIwsrAyNbCyco_3dLF1NwCCioDw4Pz47JSKTFe1AJBoAEg0×9c7xbnKz8Ai1ULN3TPe3dHHxzUoEpsmAGVlIbc-&I_ID=I0000uboLB19zlyM

      And Napoleon was still in the field fighting until he was sent to Elba after the war in Europe was over,so yes the British were still fighting him as late as 1814.

      And according to the Treaty of Paris 1783 Article 1:
      His Brittanic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz., New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and independent states, that he treats with them as such, and for himself, his heirs, and successors, relinquishes all claims to the government, propriety, and territorial rights of the same and every part thereof.

      Report Post » Joseph_Plumb_Martin  
    • I am 'We the People
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 2:16am

      Let me also add that, in my second post on this subtopic, I stated ‘the war was fought…’, when I had meaning to say ‘the battle was fought…’. That is the battle at Fort McHenry.

      I apologize for this confusion, but it is a slip of the ‘pen’, that I will endeavor not to do. I unfortunately cannot ask my editor to verify these notes and rantings of mine.

      Report Post » I am 'We the People  
    • I am 'We the People
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 2:03pm

      Although the treaty of paris existed, it had be in great part, ignored.
      “From the end of the American Revolution in 1783, the United States had been irritated by the failure of the British to withdraw from American territory along the Great Lakes; their backing of the Indians on America’s frontiers; and their unwillingness to sign commercial agreements favorable to the United States.

      American resentment grew during the French Revolutionary Wars (1792-1802) and the Napoleonic Wars (1803-15), in which Britain and France were the main combatants.

      In time, France came to dominate much of the continent of Europe, while Britain remained supreme on the seas. The two powers also fought each other commercially: Britain attempted to blockade the continent of Europe, and France tried to prevent the sale of British goods in French possessions. During the 1790s, French and British maritime policies produced several crises with the United States, but after 1803 the difficulties became much more serious. The British Orders in Council of 1807 tried to channel all neutral trade to continental Europe through Great Britain, and France’s Berlin and Milan decrees of 1806 and 1807 declared Britain in a state of blockade and condemned neutral shipping that obeyed British regulations (see CONTINENTAL SYSTEM). The United States believed its rights on the seas as a neutral were being violated by both nations, but British maritime policies were resented more because Britain dominated the seas. Also, the British claimed the right to take from American merchant ships any British sailors who were serving on them. Frequently, they also took Americans. This practice of impressment became a major grievance.

      The United States at first attempted to change the policies of the European powers by economic means. In 1807, after the British ship Leopard fired on the American frigate CHESAPEAKE, President Thomas Jefferson urged and Congress passed an EMBARGO ACT banning all American ships from foreign trade. The embargo failed to change British and French policies but devastated New England shipping. Later and weaker economic measures were also unsuccessful.

      Failing in peaceful efforts and facing an economic depression, some Americansbegan to argue for a declaration of war to redeem the national honor. The Congress that was elected in 1810 and met in November 1811 included a group known as the War Hawks who demanded war against Great Britain. These men were all Democratic-Republicans and mostly from the West and South. Among their leaders were John C. Calhoun of South Carolina, Henry Clay of Kentucky, and Felix Grundy of Tennessee. They argued that American honor could be saved and British policies changed by an invasion of Canada. The FEDERALIST PARTY, representing New England shippers who foresaw the ruination of their trade, opposed war.

      Napoleon’s announcement in 1810 of the revocation of his decrees was followed by British refusals to repeal their orders, and pressures for war increased. On June 18, 1812, President James MADISON signed a declaration of war that Congress–with substantial opposition–had passed at his request. Unknown to Americans, Britain had finally, two days earlier, announced that it would revoke its orders.”

      While, the lip service was given to effect our independence, the acts of Britain demonstrated the lack of respect for this country and it’s independence.

      Also, with the French pushed back in late 1813, the battle against America came to full head. Yes, Napoleon was not defeated fully till 1815, but there was a small reprise while he gathered his armies again. Other than a few skirmishes, early in the year, in Spain, Holland, and Italy due to factions that were not under Napoleons direct control – there was a general cease-fire in Europe till 1815.

      The point was:
      1. While we did divide Britains troops early on in the war of 1812, the battle at Fort McHenry was fought with almost complete attention to us.
      2. While we did declare war – it was because of the military blockade, the practice of impressment, and the standing armies along the great lakes, all ignoring our neutrality and sovereignty.

      I used the word independence – let me give it’s definition and maybe we can clear this up:
      Independence – Independency
      1. Not subject to another’s authority or jurisdiction; autonomous
      2. Freedom from the control, influence, support, aid, or the like, of others.
      3. A territory not under the control of any other power.

      The British did try to usurp control of our action both on the sea and on our own land, hence the war of 1812.

      Thank you for your interest.

      Report Post » I am 'We the People  
  • cheezwhiz
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:04pm

    Atleast he didn’t say that our rights come from allah…maybe next time
    ;-)

    Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • kontrarian
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 9:47pm

      He’s a werewolf; crosses have to be covered so they can’t do any damage.

      Report Post »  
    • Mithra
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 11:51pm

      Maybe they do :(

      Report Post »  
  • Navyveteran
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:04pm

    spoken like somebody straight from a demagogue from the left. I even bet you called bush hitler as well, just to show how ignorant you are.

    Report Post »  
  • woodywoodcock
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:04pm

    It just seems like it is not a mistake any more. Why can’t he say creator “GOD”? Can Obama say In God we trust or will he leave that out too.

    Report Post » woodywoodcock  
    • CatB
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 11:13pm

      Maybe he is afraid of lightening bolts!

      Report Post »  
    • Mithra
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 11:49pm

      In god we trust, others pay cash!

      Report Post »  
    • Orion the truth hunter
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 1:00am

      Well, since Mr. Spock has already been mentioned, might I point out that in the episode “The Omega Glory” Mr. Spock was thought to be “the evil one’s servant” because he could not recite the Yang (Yankee) holy text (The Constitution). It was stated that if the “evil one” recited that holy text, he would burn with fire. Perhaps that is the problem here. BTW, Freedom was a Yang worship word.

      Report Post »  
  • ME
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:02pm

    yea he is a christian, I’ll buy that for a dollar :)

    I am like totally convinced totally – Airhead McCain

    Report Post » ME  
    • Ccbn213
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 9:15pm

      Apparently he wasn’t informed of the Muslim guest speaker that Sunday.

      Report Post »  
  • tjdavid21444
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:02pm

    OK, GBIAD, I’ll bite. You’ve made a statement, how about some facts to back it up? How many countries has Glenn Beck attacked? How many people has Glenn Beck sent to the gas chamber? How many people has Glenn Beck forced to work in labor camps? How many people has Glenn Beck tortured? Hmmmm? If you’re going to throw out statements like that, you’d best be ready to back them up with something more than non-sequitirs. Unless you enjoy removing all doubt that you’re a complete tool.

    Report Post »  
  • broker0101
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:01pm

    This has become an obvious, intentional “tweak” of the Right. President Obama omits what the Left will certainly describe as “one little word”, and the media can then attack and demean what they will describe as the “radical” Right’s over-reaction. Sorry, but I for one am not taking the bait.

    Report Post » broker0101  
  • KansasPatriot
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:01pm

    To paraphrase the immortal words of Mr.Spock: Fool us once shame on you; fool us twice, shame on us. Do we have to be beat over the head to understand who this man is. He won’t acknowledge his Creator; he’s not of the Creator.

    Report Post » KansasPatriot  
  • captainron
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:00pm

    He probably doesn’t know what “inalienable” means…… rights cannot be taken away, and they can only be given by a creator.

    Report Post » captainron  
    • Joseph_Plumb_Martin
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:15pm

      I don’t know Stalin was pretty good at taking away and granting rights when he felt like it.Besides if only a creator can give rights,why did he us the Articles of Confedration first?

      Report Post » Joseph_Plumb_Martin  
    • Eagle07
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 8:58pm

      probably thinks inalienable means inside a Mexican

      Report Post »  
  • RKade
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:00pm

    LOL what blind minion you are.

    Report Post »  
  • ME
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:00pm

    yea you win the most intelligent post award (sarcasm)

    did you thonk that all up on you own arent you just special? spelled for your level

    please break your arm patting yours self on the back

    ME  
  • outwest
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 6:55pm

    Let’s face it, as arrogant as this guy is, he don‘t need no stinkin’ creator. May God have mercy on our souls.

    Report Post »  
  • LSX
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 6:54pm

    What part of “intentional” does the lame stream media not understand?

    .

    Report Post » LSX  
    • Freedomwatcherguy
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 9:20pm

      So, we now know it is intentional, but the question is why? However tempting it may be to ascribe sinister motivations couldn‘t it just be that it isn’t PC to acknowledge a Creator anymore and he would never say anything that isn’t PC? But….Considering how evil PC is, I guess that is a sinister motive!

      Report Post »  
    • ILFarmer
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 11:07pm

      The Media should be saying “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.”
      Obama may have been able to get away with it once, but repeating the offense? sorry, if you want to keep believing that it wasn’t intentional, go a head, but you’ll be wrong.

      Next we’ll be hearing him say he IS God or is GREATER than God. It’s then that I hope that God looks at him and strikes him down where he stands.

      Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 11:12pm

      THE MSM will ignore it .. and the “uninformed lazy” who listen to them will never know the truth … of course that is getting to be less and less … more people are turning to Fox News and the truth!

      Report Post »  
    • ticktockoma
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 4:48pm

      BS to PC. PC is not freedom of speach. You‘re being told what you can’t say aloud.

      Report Post » ticktockoma  
  • GlennBeckIsADemagogue
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 6:53pm

    Add your comments

    GlennBeckIsADemagogue  
    • ME
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:03pm

      Well here you said something at least accurate:) nice job keep trying you will get it:)

      Report Post » ME  
    • Beckofile
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:50pm

      You know nothing about what you support. I am sorry to your children and family. They are either hampered by the same thought or embarrassssssed by your child like behavior?

      Report Post » Beckofile  
    • Waiting4George
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 9:16pm

      So, in light of the recent DOJ Civil Rights Commission Whistleblower hearings, does Obama really mean some of us are more endowed than others?

      Report Post »  
    • Steverino
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 12:01am

      GBIAD – Haven’t seen you in awhile. We’ve all missed your scathingly brilliant input. Welcome back!

      Report Post »  
  • dressseller
    Posted on September 27, 2010 at 6:51pm

    Could his intent be any more clear? Your RIGHTS COME FROM THE GOVERNMENT!!

    Report Post »  
    • VTSickFreak
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 7:04pm

      In Obama’s world we have no RIGHTS, just ENTITLEMENTS dictated by the POLITICAL RULING CLASS.

      Report Post » VTSickFreak  
    • starman70
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 8:39pm

      If I remember my history correctly, Hitler did the same thing and so did Stalin, Mao, Castro and eery other dictator throught history.

      Basically, if you are in, you’re granted every priviledge imaginable but if you are one of the common herd, you have only those priviledges granted to you by the government (Dictator).

      It‘s too bad that more Americans can’t see through Obama and his communist appointees and czars.
      Of course, they have been dumbed down by the school systems (Controlled by the Socialist Deprtment of Education). Many people are waking up. They are researching more and more about the founding on America, the principles on whichthis country was founded and will show up at the polls a better educated electorate.

      Go Glenn, Keep exposing the skullduggery from both parties!

      Report Post »  
    • oldoldtimer
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 9:26pm

      Read the second paragraph of the declaration of Independence to see what we should do about it. It is very plain what course of action we can take. If voting does not work then this par explains what will.

      Report Post »  
    • Hugh Williams
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 9:39pm

      And what is given by the goverment can be taken away by the goverment.

      Report Post » Hugh Williams  
    • CatB
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 11:09pm

      Wow … for the “smartest man” he certainly should know the “words” .. The CREATOR is not the problem … OBAMA IS!

      Report Post »  
    • JD Carp
      Posted on September 27, 2010 at 11:25pm

      If that doesn’t scare the crap out of you what will. Someone needs to point out God in the founding denouements for him.

      Report Post » JD Carp  
    • capitalideals
      Posted on September 28, 2010 at 10:42am

      Van Jones stated Obama’s position perfectly: the government runs your life, not you.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 12

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love