Politics

Obama to Fox News’ Ed Henry: ‘I Didn’t Know You Were the Spokesperson for Mitt Romney’

Call it a simple joke or part of a more calculated attack campaign on GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, but a curious statement by President Barack Obama‘s during today’s press conference is making headlines.

(Related: Henry responds to Megyn Kelly over Obama’s ribbing)

The quick quip was prefaced by a question from Fox News’ Ed Henry. “I wanted to get your first reaction to the Iranian terror plot,” Henry said. “What specific steps will you take to hold Iran accountable, especially when Mitt Romney said last week, quote, ‘If you do not want America to be the strongest nation on earth, I am not your president. You have that president today.’”

Obama’s response, “I didn’t know you were the spokesperson for Mitt Romney,” brought laughter from Henry’s peers. Watch the incident unfold, below:

Again, this very well could have been something that came organically and in the moment. But some politicos are claiming that the president’s re-election campaign is setting its sights on Mitt Romney.

Below, see a Fox News interview with Romney campaign manager Eric Fehrnstrom, during which the president’s purported Romney-targeting is addressed:

Obama’s joke may be indicative of an assumption within his campaign that Mitt Romney will end up being the inevitable 2012 Republican candidate for the presidency.

We’ll have to wait and see what the White House has to say next about Romney, but Obama campaign architect David Axelrod’s tweets only add fuel to the fire:

Barack Obama Says He Didnt Know Fox News Ed Henry Is Mitt Romney Spokesperson

Barack Obama Says He Didnt Know Fox News Ed Henry Is Mitt Romney Spokesperson

Comments (426)

1 2 3 ... 10
  • marklross
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:03pm

    Øbama chooses his words just like he makes decisions. See how he does it here: http://youtu.be/nElEjVrXa7s

    Report Post » marklross  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:07pm

      This is just propaganda from the ESTABLISHMENT of Dems and Repubs trying to make it look like they are on different teams, but setting up the spotlight on their candidates. Ron Paul 2012. Forget FED CHAIRMAN Cain who thought the economy was making GREAT PROGRESS just 2 weeks before the collapse. He also didn’t want to audit the FED but is now flip flopping because RON called him out. CYA Cain….Whose next on the carousel?….Newt! step right up…. When will we learn there is only one here that really stands for freedom and against corruption. RON PAUL

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:18pm

      Here is proof

      CAIN VS PAUL WHO do you believe???

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=brzhfkFFm_Q

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Lesterp
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:24pm

      Put down the hash pipe jmiller, Ron will never get elected!

      Report Post » Lesterp  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:32pm

      I have never touched a “hash pipe”. The only reason he MIGHT not is because media refuse to give him any press. Look what happened to cain as soon as they gave him a little. He exploded. For months, he was “unelectable” but now that we have cut down the establishments #2 (perry) they have to promote their #3 choice Cain. Just a little media hype is all he needed for cool aid drinkers to jump on board for an additional revenue stream of a sales tax.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:36pm

      Everyone needs to know Romney is a fair candidate, just as Conservative as Cain, more than Perry but not as much as Santorum or Bachmann. The president is going after him and they have enlisted MSNBC in it to smear Romney about his so-called ‘advisers.’

      We need to vet all of our candidates with the truth, not media spin. This is why I turn to http://www.thedailycandidate.com. It gives equal time for each candidate.

      Report Post »  
    • sbenard
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:39pm

      JMiller

      I got cut off. Here’s the rest of my comment:
      People see that and they think, “If that’s what his supporters are like, I want NOTHING to do with Ron Paul!” They’re painting themselves as a bunch of wacky Ron Paul groupies. People run as fast from him as possible simply because of the nutty comments and fanaticism of his supporters. This is my own observation, but several of my other friends have observed the same.

      While I agree with Ron Paul on virtually all economic issues, he is way off base in ignoring the threat of a nuclear Iran. He is also misguided in his desire to legalize every vice known to humanity. He would transform us into “Amsterdam America”, with a porn shop, a crack house, and a brothel on every street corner, all in the name of “freedom”. News: Addiction is NOT freedom! Marijuana is only the beginning point for this friend of mine and his fellow Ron Paul fanatics. Some are near anarchists! No thanks! That’s no environment in which to try to raise children!

      And that’s one reason why I will NEVER support or vote for Ron Paul. His “followers” are the best reason NOT to vote for Prophet Paul!

      Report Post » sbenard  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:46pm

      I appreciate your comment. I am not the type of guy who gets easily excited about politics. I almost didn’t even look into candidates this year as I suspected there would be no one with any credibility. When I looked into all of the candidates I was very displeased to find they all were hypocrites. But then I discovered that Ron Paul had been speaking and even predicting things that I personally believe in. I have never endorsed any other candidate in my life. There is a reason people are excited about Paul, because they feel they can believe what he says. He is trying to deminish the role of the President, not make it bigger. I see it kind of like Glenn’s following. People that have not listened to GB look at his supporters and write them off because of their excitement. Sorry that turns some off, but for me, if it weren’t for those who have worked to post info to back their claims, I would not have been able to make an informed decisions

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Claudia42
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:57pm

      Reply to JMiller: Ron Paul is the extremist extremist. He is not electable regardless of how you followers flood the place with your comments. I only hope you will put as much energy in electing whomever is selected by the people that can defeat Obummer!

      Report Post » Claudia42  
    • mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:58pm

      Sorry guys Ron Paul is just as much a hypocrite as the rest of these politicians. They all make mistakes, they all flipflop, and they all do things that are underhanded.

      Here are a few on Ron Paul’s hypocricies/negatives: Gold Standard, Earmarks, Abortion, Gay Rights, even part of auditing the fed.

      Report Post »  
    • mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:00pm

      continued….

      This is a sad fact but true. They don’t even have to mean to do it.

      But they are no where near Obama, any of them.

      Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:07pm

      I will not vote for anyone other than paul. Please link your negatives of Paul’s flip flops that you accuse him of. And as far as the negatives post a link that explains what paul’s stance is on them. People say that we need to stop talking to Iran and then turn and call Paul who wants to continue talks and a “golden rule” foreingn policy isolationist Look into it. If you still feel the same, that is your CHOICE. I agree, addiction is not freedom. But neither are laws that make drug cartels so powerful that terrorists go to them for help. Laws don’t make people moral, we need to stop relying on government and start relying on JESUS.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:24pm

      @sbenard

      Thank you for the thoughtful and articulate post explaining how so many of us think and feel about that subject.
      I hope you don’t mind, but I pasted your post elsewhere, where we are having that very disscussion about Ron Paul and the Paulistinians…..(sounds like a ’60s rock band in Yugoslavia)

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • Emrys
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:37pm

      A petty man became a petty president.

      Report Post »  
    • Bjan
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:37pm

      I did not vote for Obama and will not in 2012 but Obama is right when he said FOX is speaking FOR Romney. 90 % of the media is for Obama and 9% is for Romney(FOX) and 1% is divided. Fox will try to destroy any Republican that runs against Romney. Romney is part of GOP establishment and so is Fox.

      Report Post »  
    • docvet
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:37pm

      People, people. Easy! I enjoy the discussion, but remember, when a voter enters the booth and pulls the curtain, he/she is alone with their thought processes and any button can be pushed or name checked on the paper ballot. I have a hunch there will be some supprises. A lot of voters are fed up with the same old political BS, lies and half-truths. Many are looking for a Christie style person who will tell it like it is without bending the info to fit the situation. Cain comes pretty close and sorry, but I see Paul as a libertarian isolationist (scary).

      Report Post »  
    • booger71
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:40pm

      I don’t like 27 year professional politicians who ask for plenty of pork for their own districts, and who have pretty accomplished nothing for 27 years except show up to vote

      Report Post » booger71  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:52pm

      JMILLER_42 said “I will not vote for anyone other than paul.“ thus illiustrating what SBENARD described a folks ”painting themselves as a bunch of wacky Ron Paul groupies.” Whatever term — “Paulbots”; “Paulites”; “groupies” — the point is that Ron Paul is a candidate the reminds me of Lyndon LaRouche as regards the intensity of his supporters/followers. I have supported 4 candidates (Rick Santorum, Michelle Bachman, Mitt Romney, and Herman Cain — in that sequence (plus I was kind of hopeful about Rick Perry for a while)) this election sequence. The idea that a particular candidate is the only ONE in the United States who could be a better President that Obumbler is simply incredible. Any candidate who has fanatical devotees is scary. Paul and Obumbler are the only ones on the scene at the moment.

      Report Post »  
    • PoliticalJunkieToo
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:08pm

      mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:36pm

      Everyone needs to know Romney is a fair candidate, just as Conservative as Cain, more than Perry but not as much as Santorum or Bachmann.
      _________
      I NEVER laughed so hard in my life. What a load of crock!!!

      http://massresistance.org/romney/

      http://massresistance.org/docs/marriage/romney/record/

      Report Post »  
    • PoliticalJunkieToo
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:09pm

      docvet
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:37pm

      People, people. Easy! I enjoy the discussion, but remember, when a voter enters the booth and pulls the curtain, he/she is alone with their thought processes and any button can be pushed or name checked on the paper ballot. I have a hunch there will be some supprises.
      _________

      The only surprise will be how many conservatives do NOT vote for Romney – me included.

      Report Post »  
    • drphil69
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:10pm

      ABO – Anybody But Obama

      Romney as conservative as Cain?? No. Read Cain’s background. Grew up poor, parents worked hard and long. He is nearly a rocket scientist… not sure if that is good or bad… Romney is the obvious establishment choice, and I believe the Republican establishment is actually worse than Democrats, as they are the wolves in sheep’s clothing. They say cut spending but then raise it, they say smaller govt but then make it bigger. At least with Dems you know what you’re getting!

      Ron Paul? No way. Naive on foreign affairs… to say the least. Remember that Iran put a satellite into orbit, note their nuclear bomb ambitions, and understand that a nuke detonated high in our atmosphere would destroy a huge part of our power grid, including all vehicle electronic systems, so no cars, no tv, no power, no fuel…(therefore no food in the markets) for months? years? No matter how small, we cannot take that risk.

      Newt – tough call. I used to joke that I was just to the right of Newt politically, that was when he was speaker. The global warming nonsense, sitting on the couch with Pelosi, and the fact he has been in DC for so long are big negatives. He is great at explaining things, the consummate professor.

      Bachmann – like her, but she is basically done at this point.

      Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:12pm

      Chuck that just illistrates that you haven’t done your research and will vote for whoever looks good in their campaign hat. I will only vote for Paul because he is the one who represents my beliefs. I will not compromise on them and vote for someone who I believe will be more of the same.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • chazman
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:15pm

      … do those of you here remember how you felt when you heard the O.J. Simpson verdict? Imagine that feeling 10 fold if OBAMMY is re-elected … we must stick together with our candidate to defeat the jug-earred little tyrant. The future of America depends on us!

      Report Post »  
    • PoliticalJunkieToo
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:16pm

      NOBAMA201258
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:43pm

      obama seems like he‘s afraid of Romney guess it’s time for the Moronic Socialist Neurotic Broadcast Company to amp up their attacks on Mitt! chris mattews,maddow and the other looney left AH
      __________
      The LSM is PUSHING FOR Romney.

      Eric Bolling on The Five looked straight at Juan Williams and interrupted Juan Williams who PRAISING Romney AGAIN and said to him – LIBERALS are ALWAYS PROMOTING ROMNEY which just makes it a reason not to vote for that RINO. YES – HE SAID RINO.

      As for NBC in the tank for Obama, with the EXCEPTION of Eric Bolling and Lou Dobbs, EVERY SINGLE Fox News Anchor (OReilly/Smith/Van Sustern etc and Republican Political Commentator ( Perino/Krauthammer/Rove ALL OF THEM is in the tank for Romney. So Fox cannot throw stones at NBC.

      REAL conservatives CHEERED when Dennis Miller said he endorsed Herman Cain.

      Report Post »  
    • mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:25pm

      Don’t throw platitudes, how is Romney a liberal.

      He wasn’t with RomneyCare: http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2006/01/mitts-fit
      So let’s throw that argument out the window. Why is he… LIBERAL?

      Report Post »  
    • mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:29pm

      TO ALL THOSE WHO THINK ROMNEY IS A LIBERAL STATE YOUR REASONING:

      1) RomneyCare as the governor wrote it was not liberal. If you think it was, why?
      2) He has changed his mind on issues just as much as the next candidate
      3) He does not believe in man-made global warming, no he hasn’t even changed this stance since the 2008 election. At that time he also said he doesn’t know and has stated multiple time it is cyclical.

      Explain your accusations…

      Report Post »  
    • mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:35pm

      Paul, I was not attacking Paul I was stating a fact that he has changed positions… not to say it wasn’t for a good reason but he has changed. Example: Gold standard. He stated earlier this year to sell the gold in Ft. Knox, getting rid of that gold means we would not get back to the gold standard.

      Another example is earmarks: He says he is a fiscal conservative but then he tries to keep earmarks. These are not constitutional. The constitution says that the funds are to be appropriated, that is true, but that is why we have appropriation bills to distribute funds through the congress and not use them as bribes in a bill.

      Another example is he likes to place earmarks and little favors in bills that he does not ‘want’ to pass. Arguement is that if they are going to pass anyway why not make some money off of it for the district. That is underhanded.

      At the same time he may have reasons to do or say some of these things but he is no more perfect or void of these act than any other candidate we have.

      There are more items but this is enough to make the point that they are all politicians and humans and so flawed.

      Report Post »  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:39pm

      @ JMILLER Changing support does not indicate a lack of doing “homework” — it reflects the concept of a candidate’s electibility. If every candidate had an equal amount of votes and my vote would decide the Republican nominee, then I would nominate Santorum — IF I felt he would beat Obumbler. I am worried that he would lose to Obumbler, plus he isn’t polling well . . . sooo . . . I am expecting to vote for Cain in the primary. Fanatics have the egocentrism to think that their vote will determine and/or show something about THEM others see the political process for what it is and see the political process as it actually functions. I remember 1992 and what Thomas Sowell (and my wife before him — but she never gets credit ;) ) said: Bush didn’t DESERVE to be re-elected, but America didn’t DESERVE to have Clinton for President. The Perot voters gave us Clinton. Maybe the Paul voters will give us four more years of Obumbler. An anticipatory (and sarcastic) “Thanks, Guys!” goes out to you.

      Report Post »  
    • rosecityken
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:43pm

      @jmiller_42 i think the “establishment choice” 1, 2 and 3 are romney and that is fairly obvious…perry had the tea party but in my opinion lost it when he called us HEARTLESS for not offering illegals in-state tuition rates…when kids from other states pay more than that. at least he lost me on that one, i wont be voting for him. Also in my opinion herman cain is getting the tea party nod , because he has real world experience from the ground up, he has a common sense answers to complicated problems and is HONEST when he doesnt. i think you are seeing that people are not sold on romney and wont be force fed or nominee by the dems, media and our president…..i mean its bad enough that the rest of the country has to watch the left wing of the republican party force the conservative candidates out of the race before most of our primarys…thank the northeast for Mcain in ‘08. early primary’s yay!

      Report Post » rosecityken  
    • mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 6:17pm

      Question: Why do people like Rush Limbaugh call Romney an establishment candidate. The establishment were looking for alternatives including Rick Perry and Chris Christie ahead of Romney. The establish wanted someone else. More Tea Party freshman are endorsing Romney than any other candidate.

      Some may say Romney is not a Conservative but what makes him not a conservative. He wants a strong border, great on immigration. He is a fiscal conservative. A federalist. He doesn’t believe in man-made Global Warming, he has stated that he doesn’t know. And the other candidates have not been asked if the earth is warmer now than a few years ago. No he does not have a strong opinion against Global Warming but is uncertainty not conservative? Fights for free-market values. What is your definition of a conservative. Because when it comes to these issues Perry is less Conservative than Romney.

      Something to think about. He wasn’t wanted by the establishment, yet he is called an establishment candidate (now he is after Christie and Perry are out or almost out of the running.) Under most definitions of conservativism he is conservative. Where is the disconnect in the message.

      Report Post »  
    • ltb
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 6:26pm

      My skin crawls when I hear Obama’s voice. Seriously.

      Report Post » ltb  
    • frankr77
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 6:52pm

      Herman Cain will be the republican nominee, not Mitt Romney. How many people agree?

      Report Post »  
    • AmericanPatriot01
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 8:29pm

      I’m not a follower of any polititian. I am a thinking individual with a firm grasp on reality.

      Romney = Establishment Rep. Progressive, Flip Flopper, LIAR!! FRAUD!!
      Bachman = too worried about being popular
      Perry = Possible Closet Globalist and will turn out to be a RINO (Bush Repeat) catering to the establishment
      Herman Cain = Shill for the FED, has no political experience, 999=666, but good intentions?
      Gingrich = Joke, Choke, Progressive RINO
      Huntsman = Democrat in Republican clothing (Obvious)
      Santorum = RINO idealog
      Ron Paul = Restoring the Constitution, Small Government, Free Markets and HAS A PLAN with SOLUTIONS! Strait from the constitution and the founding principals. The ONLY candidate that has ANY integrity whatsoever and will be the ONLY one to actually do what needs to be done without question!!

      WAKE UP!!

      Report Post » AmericanPatriot01  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 8:52pm

      Chuck, I understand you want to get Obama out, but I don’t think just putting someone else in with an R in front of their name, but wants more government. is worth it. Bush ran up the debt faster than any other president before him, but at least he had that R to discredit all of us real conservatives that believe in limited government. Mark down these predictions.

      Romney wins- Government will explode and he will have the lowest approval rating, maybe even worse than Obama

      Cain- Will not understand why America goes down hill when he charges us another 9% on all of our purchases while continuing to tax our income. Will not bring accountability to or end the Fed. When he leaves office we will be in more debt than when he came in. Democrats will have a field day with him.

      Perry- See Romney only even worse

      Bachmann- Will do ok on most things when it comes to economy. Will police the world and start 2 more wars, which will mean more debt, and then economy will go down hill.

      Santorum- See Bachmann but add 2 extra wars

      Newt- Will be caught up in some sort of controversy his entire presidency and not really get anything worthwhile accomplished. Debt won’t explode but will increase.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Ballot_Box_Revolution
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 9:01pm

      As much as i dislike Odumber, i have to say there was nothing wrong with what was said (top video). That is the response I would expect. It is a press meeting, the reporter could have said “another candidate has been quoted as saying.”

      I smell some money in that guys pocket….but it is what it is, he had a right to ask the question, and Odumbers words were not as harsh as i was expecting…..

      Report Post » Ballot_Box_Revolution  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 9:03pm

      RP supports are part of anti-America movement http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Gi2l0gWJBUE#!

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • Ballot_Box_Revolution
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 9:12pm

      And I don’t think Romney has won over the tea party Mr. Axelrod. I only know of one person in my personal life (***all I can go by now days…) that favors Romney.

      ***and really it makes sense to look around you and compare things to the news and see if they match up…Another thing funny is I don’t know one single person who favors Obama…and i know quite a few that voted him in…reality doesn’t match the news. Before the media completely crumbled you could compare the polls to what was going on around you, and they came close to matching. Not one time in the past 3 elections that i have been a part of have i not known people for one candidate or another….but i know not one single person who is happy with Obama, or plans on voting for him, and that strkes me as odd that his poll numbers are as high as they are (not that they are super high)…

      Report Post » Ballot_Box_Revolution  
    • banjarmon
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 9:13pm

      Neithe BO or Mit for potus….Cain is my choice of those running HE IS NO RINO!!!

      Report Post » banjarmon  
    • WeDontNeedNoSteeeenkinBadges
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 9:14pm

      ” Obama to Fox News’ Ed Henry: ‘I Didn’t Know You Were the Spokesperson for Mitt Romney’ ”

      Of course you didn’t … real news organizations are not spokesmen for political groups. But, of course, your experience is different … with your propaganda media outlets.

      So, we excuse your ignorance. (BTW, where’s your “birth” “certificate”? No excuse for not having one of those. In fact, you’re UNDER ARREST. Put your hands slowly on the desk and make no sudden movements.)

      Report Post » WeDontNeedNoSteeeenkinBadges  
    • Professional Infidel
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 9:18pm

      miller pass that pipe over to me.

      Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 9:47pm

      Here you go professional take a hit of this :) Warning, it’s some STRONG stuff!!!!
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uc0T1kMc1d4

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • jzs
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 10:05pm

      The reporter deserved to be taken down a notch. Part of his question was legitimate: how does the President plan to respond to the terrorist threat initiated by Iran? Obviously, after two days, the President can’t give a detailed answer. What people don’t see is that the diplomats are working behind the scenes to come up with a coordinated plan among our allies, while tracking down information on the terrorists. That takes awhile. But still, it’s legitimate to ask how the United States is going to respond.

      But his comments beyond that was not journalism, it was a FOX guy trying to get a raise. Basically it was “my guy says he tough and you’re not” despite the almost daily news of top level Al Quaeda guys being killed or captured, and the capture of this particular terrorist. The only people who think that is journalism are the uninformed and poorly educated, people who think candidates like Donald Trump and Michelle Bachman actual have the abilility to be the leader of the most powerful nation in the world.

      Report Post » jzs  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 10:47pm

      @Madd-Hatter

      Here are Romney’s 9 flip flops again I showed in the other post were proven flip flops. Do I need to post Romney‘s quotes again proving he’s a flip flopper? How do you justify voting for someone who has flipped flopped 9 times? 

      -For cap n trade, now against it
      -Pro Choice, now Pro Life
      -Romneycare, now obamacare is wrong
      -For Auto Bailouts, then against it
      -For campaign spending limits, now against it
      -For Tarp and now against it
      -Against Captial gains tax cut, now for them
      -For stem cell research and now against it
      -For Amnesty, now against it

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 11:00pm

      @SBenard

      Your argument is a Progressive tactic and shows ignorance or as Cain would say, lack of knowledge and you just do not understand. How about you call up the Ron Paul camp so they can explain to you that Ron Paul is not a Prophet nor seen or thought as one. 

      You are openly trying to associate extremism to Ron Paul supporters because of their enthusiasm for him? That is silly…Aren’t supporters suppose to be enthusiastic?…That is like saying the TEA Party is racist because BO is black and they are enthusiastically protesting Government. It is simply an attempt to discredit. 

      You and your views are the exact reason there are so many support Ron Paul. You think you know better then everyone else. You think you can and should tell everyone else what to do. Instead of worrying about you and your morally you believe it is your job to tell joeblow how to be moral. You as described in your rant are the very progressives Glenn Beck showed is destroying our freedoms…Am I a BeckBot now as called by Progressives? Thank you for showing exactly who you are. 

      I hope Ron Paul runs 3rd party and believe he would gain 40% while Progressive BO and the Progressive Republican candidate fight over the Progressive vote and get roughly 30% apiece or so. 

      To criticize those who stand on principle, whether you can agree with their principle, is nothing but an attempt to smear and a tactic of Progressives as shown by Glenn Beck.

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • cous1933
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 11:16pm

      Typical of every instance of Ron Paul being brought into the discussion, the Ron Paul supporters are the more rational and civil in their arguments while the Ron Paul critics resort to name calling or pejorative accusations (e.g. in just this first part of this thread JMiller has already been accused by two different posters of using drugs), misrepresentations of Paul (anyone who calls Paul a flip-flopper or naive has zero credibility), and collectivist nonsense (implying all or most Paul supporters are cult-like, drug addicted jerks).

      Any objective person who would take the time to review all of the posts on both sides of the Ron Paul debate would clearly see that the majority of Pauls supporters are intelligent, rational, and civil, while the majority of Pauls critics seem to think that the best debate tactic is to call the opponent names.

      There is no doubt that Pauls supporters are devoted to his cause, but I think that is because Liberty and Constitutionality is a cause worthy of devotion. I also believe it is true that Paul is the only candidate that can truly be trusted to shrink the federal government.

      Report Post » cous1933  
    • theaveng
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 11:49pm

      >>>”Ron will never get elected!”

      Then I might as well not vote if the choice is between Fed-loving Obama or Fed-loving Cain. That isn’t a change… it’s just more of the same ole sheeeet.

      Report Post »  
    • its_time_to_arrest_our_government
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 12:17am

      follow the constitution and throw anyone out who don’t by bringing them up on charges of treason. we the people have been letting them get away with breaking the law and letting them walk for way too long they no longer fear us. this needs to change. all it takes is someone swearing out a complaint to law enforcement and making sure we elect only sheriffs who will bring them up on those charges.we the people need to demand it.

      Report Post »  
    • nationalcalvin
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 12:21am

      @Mad_Hatter

      I don‘t know if your that uninformed about Mitt Romney or if you’re deliberatly trying to mislead people about Mitt Romney.

      -Romneycare was setup by him to recieve half of it’s funding from the Federal Government. So I don‘t really see it as being a States rights issue if I have to help fund other peoples healthcare in a state that I don’t even live in.

      -Romney believed in a national mandate to buy health insurance in 2007 when he was running for president.

      -He has said on tape he believes humans contribute to global warming this year.

      -On 12-7-05 he said “These carbon emmission limits will provide real and immediate progress in the battle to improve our enviornment”
      “The first and only State to set CO2 emmissions limits on power plants”
      “I will not create jobs or hold jobs that kill peolpe and that plant, that plant kills people”

      -He was for amnesty. He supported John Mcains comprehensive immigration reform.

      -He supported the Brady Bill.

      -When he was running for Governor of a liberal state he was pro-choice. When he decided he was going to run for president he suddenly became pro-life.

      I find it hard to believe that anyone could support such a man for President. Someone who would say anything just to get elected. I would most likely support any of the other Rebublican canidates in the field running for President even Ron Paul, but I would never vote for Mitt Romney. Simply because I have no idea of what th

      Report Post »  
    • Protoham
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 12:28am

      As an Independent I don’t get to vote in the primary, but I have no problem supporting any of the Republican candidates. However, it is very important that whoever is nominated be elected over Obama. We can not survive 4 more years of what is going on.

      Report Post »  
    • The10thAmendment
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 6:37am

      Herman Cain will win the nomination for the GOP. He will select either Ron Paul, or Newt Gingrich as his running mate.

      Report Post » The10thAmendment  
    • LarryofArabia
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:17am

      JMiller_42; okay, maybe not a hash pipe. Then how about the hippy lettuce? R Paul has no chance. Ever.Besides that, the conversation is about Barry. Stay foucused. The point is, Barry and the first frau (and her very ‘lady-like’ sized 14 air-jordans) need to find a new address. Period.

      p.s. do you think she rode horses too much as a kid? See the way she walks – - or is that just me? Just sayin’

      Report Post »  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 8:36am

      Just google RP flip flops sheesh.

      I think RP son is more electable. JIMHO

      Anyhoo not matter what the outcome is of this runoff, I will not ever vote for a democrat.

      If RP wins the runoff, I will vote for him as president…it does not matter…you better not try to set up a third party…history tells us we lose if we do…and I can not stand another Obama term as president…

      You guys are nuts. Bickering over this and that…say it at the ballot box and STFU. We all know no one is going to convert the other on the net. It is too impersonal and too exhaustive. I’ve been on the net since the days of DARPA when it was used for government purposes before they rolled it out to the commercial side…bad ideal, too easy to manipulate the masses. JIMHO

      Tango Down
      Stay Chill
      Sam

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • zorro
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 9:02am

      mad_hatter….I respectfully disagree with you assesment of Romney. I speak only for myself here. I voted for McCain even though I knew he was a terrible candidate. My vote for Mccain was nothing but a “non-vote” for Obama. I won’t do that again. Romney is worse. If Romney is the candidate for 2012, I’ll be staying home on election day.

      Report Post »  
    • kbs03
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 2:29pm

      Oh my God! Our president is so thin-skinned that you can see right through him, and it is an ugly sight. We need to get this socialist (or worse) idiot out of office in 2013, if he hasn’t destroyed our country by then. The main-stream media should be ashamed–but then they are the lap dogs who got this sorry piece of crap elected.

      Report Post »  
    • RayOne
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:21pm

      He behaved as if the only opinion or concern is one that lives in Washington, DC.
      He should apologize to that reporter.

      Report Post » RayOne  
  • momprayn
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:59pm

    Just showing his “true colors” — smart alec. He can’t stand anyone who questions him – can’t think of much to say without his telepromter. Both he and his wife are the most unclassy, non-Presidential, treasonous, racist, hateful, lying, clueless dangerous people we’ve ever had in my humble opinion.
    Bravo for Ed – glad he’s able to ask his usual pertinent questions – not afraid to ask. Thanks!

    Report Post »  
    • marine249
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:23pm

      smart azz

      Report Post »  
    • Islesfordian
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:27pm

      If a reporter had asked that kind of question of Bush I would have called him a jackass. So I have to say the same of Ed. It was a stupid question that only served to make Obama look good.

      Report Post » Islesfordian  
    • NOBAMA201258
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:43pm

      obama seems like he‘s afraid of Romney guess it’s time for the Moronic Socialist Neurotic Broadcast Company to amp up their attacks on Mitt! chris mattews,maddow and the other looney left AH so-called reporters are going to attack just like they did to Sarah Palin! Where is the objectivity? At least the other news outlets pretend to be once in a while! Must be tough right now without a clear front-runner they will have to wait til the nominee is chosen to really unleash the salivating dogs on them meanwhile olameo gets his customary free pass from the media!!!

      Report Post »  
    • kathleenlee
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:41pm

      I couldn’t have said it better myself. Well done!!! I also might add, where is the FBI?? They are supposed to be the police of the Republic. This president swore to protect and defend the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic…Well he has broken that promise and should be arrested for treason. I wonder if a citizen of the United States can affect a citizens arrest against a sitting president? After all he works for us…If he follows through with passing parts of his stimulus jobs bill by executive order, I fully intend to arrest him for usurping congress’s authority. But if the FBI had any guts, they would do it for me. They did it in the 40’s and 50’s when they arrested communists found working inside the federal government. We now have a sitting president who is a Marxist and 70 sitting members of congress who are card carrying members of the American Socialist Party. The FBI used to be a proud police force who loved this Republic. Wonder why today they won’t do their jobs. Are they all socialists now?

      Report Post » kathleenlee  
    • Magyar
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 9:12pm

      @momprayn …Couldn’t have said better myself—so I won’t!

      Report Post »  
  • JD Carp
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:57pm

    He won’t do anything about Iran, he’s too chicken and destroYING America so he can be Nero is his first priority.

    Report Post » JD Carp  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:35pm

      Obama is only concerned with fund raising and campaigning at this point, he is no longer governing. He’ll do absolutely nothing about Iran unless political pressure forces him to make some kind of gesture for the news to use.

      Report Post »  
    • NOBAMA201258
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:25pm

      He‘s just too busy kissing michelle’s ever widening ass!! Wonder if he likes baby’s big back

      Report Post »  
    • Drives Like Jehu
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:30pm

      AH…never fear…comrade nero-bama will increase SANCTIONS against iran for the 666th time; that will force them into submission! (Sort of reminds me of those loser radical muslims declaring jihad upon jihad upon jihad upon jihad upon…)

      Report Post » Drives Like Jehu  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:39pm

      Obama is only concerned with fund raising and campaigning at this point, he is no longer governing.
      _________________________
      This is why I think we should have a 6 year presidential term with no reelection.
      These guys take the last 18 months of their 1st term off and campaign for reelection. How bogus is that?

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
  • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:52pm

    Arrogant crybabies. A good way to make enemies of the press is to make them look stupid.

    Report Post » Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
  • mad_hatter
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:52pm

    This was my blog post…

    RUSH LIMBAUGH AND MARK LEVIN NEED TO STOP SPREADING MSNBC-OBAMA PROPOGANDA

    They don‘t know it is propoganda but they are both pushing a story by MSNBC that Romney’s close adviser was sent to Obama to talk to him about ObamaCare. MSNBC claims they just found out through WH logs that an ‘adviser’ of Romney’s met with Obama on health care. This is a recycled story. Remember the 2009-2010 White House logs came out months ago. The Boston Globe and HuffPo were spreading this around back in March. Then it was disproven.

    Jon Gruber was not a healthcare adviser, he was a consultant from MIT. He met with Romney one time. He is an modelling economist, he puts out economic models for MIT and he ran the numbers for the state of Massachusetts, it was he that underestimated the cost of RomneyCare. He is a Democrat adviser, called the Democrat Party‘s ’most influential healthcare expert’ in 2007.

    Yes Romney did praise him for his Econometric Model for the health care bill (that was before they found out that it was a bad model) but Jon did not advise him on the policies themselves. That was done by Edmund Haislmaier from Heritage Foundation. Edmund wrote a great article about the bill back in 2006 and the conservative model it was (Google: Mitt’s Fit – its on the Heritage Foundation archive)

    You can disagree with him but spreading liberal propoganda like this will ensure Obama’s re-election

    Report Post »  
    • libertytreecaretaker
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:02pm

      What true conservative would ever come up with a big government program at any level of government? Romney is a Progressive Republican. He is what he is and you can’t change that fact!

      Report Post »  
    • americanfirst
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:32pm

      Mitt Romney/Allen West 2012

      Report Post »  
    • mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:33pm

      Read the article I cited. RomneyCare was designed to deregulate the govt out of the industry. The Connector or health exchange was created to be business oriented. The mandate as it was proposed was ‘you pay for insurance or you pay the bill. The state was going to give the poor vouchers to buy private insurance (medicaid office wouldn’t allow this). This is what the media is spinning because they want Universal Healthcare. This is why we need to know this and get it out. The bill was based off free-market values. When Romney received it, even though under threats, he still vetoed 7 sections of the bill. Read the bill those sections are marked as Governor Vetoed section***.

      Read the Heritage Foundation Article on this called Mitt’s Fit, ( http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2006/01/mitts-fit ) then read a few other articles about this in their archive… completely different story than the media is telling us. Then go ahead and read the 76-page, its dry but I have done it. Not nearly as hard as ObamaCare’s 2400+ pages of legal-eeze.

      Report Post »  
    • Polwatcher
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:37pm

      The number of real conservatives in Massechusetts is small. The only way for a Repub to get elected there is to be a progressive.

      Report Post »  
    • mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:43pm

      As part of my post, I am not endorsing Romney, yet. I like all fairly equally but the truth has to come out. Romney is as conservative as Cain and Gingrich, more than Perry, and less than Bachmann and Santorum. I don‘t know how to measure Ron Paul’s conservativism, he is all libertarian.

      Report Post »  
    • mad_hatter
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:47pm

      No it is to be a conservative during a bad economy, be a businessman and (this is the only real negative) you have to promise to keep the status quo when it comes to abortion and gay marriage. He vetoed many bill keeping it the status quo but that meant the gay marriage bill they tried to pass was vetoed (then it went to the courts and Romney fought it again), and the morning after pill Romney also vetoed (the veto was overturned, so Romney wrote a bill protecting faith based hospitals so they weren’t forced to provide them. The smart thing about taking the status quo when you have a 85% liberal legislature is the fact that they can’t further progressivism in these cases either. He kept the status quo and was attacked on it on almost a daily basis. But the economy there flourished. Less tax subsidies and he took a deficit of $3 billion and made it into a $2 billion rainy day fund.

      Report Post »  
    • slr4528
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:03pm

      I know Axelrod and his PR machine uses the same talking points about Romney over and over again on all of the news blogs, and they are trying to prevent Romney from getting the GOP nomination.

      I think Limbaugh and Levin want 4 more years of big ratings so they actually want 4 more years of Obama or else what would they talk about?

      Cain will be an easy candidate for Obama to defeat. Polls show Obama leads Cain and Perry by 12 points and is tied with Romney.

      Cain’s national sales tax and income tax scheme and zero experience with foreign affairs and zero experience in government will equal 4 more years of Obama.

      Report Post »  
    • netmail
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:07pm

      2012 is the year America will decide if it wants socialism or revised conservatism. If conservatives win all the big prizes, any leader who doesn’t measure up to agreed upon conservative standards will be rooted out and kicked to the curb. If this isn’t the way it goes, it is the way it SHOULD go. Idealistic? Sure thing, why not?

      Report Post »  
    • slr4528
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:12pm

      I am a healthcare consultant that travels across the U.S. to various hospitals, and I know like you, the truth about Romneycare. That is why I burst a blood vessel every time someone equates it to Obamacare or universal healthcare. I am extremely disappointed that conservative talk show hosts have not put forth effort to get the truth out regarding Romneycare.

      My husband is convinced that if Romney practiced the accepted GOP version of Christianity then all of the conservatives would be defending Romney instead of throwing him under the bus to the liberal wolves.

      Report Post »  
    • Blackhawk1
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:18pm

      The biggest problem with Romneycare is Obama loves it, Huffpo readers love it and healthcare costs in Mass are the highest in the country. If liberals love it you know it can’t possibly be good for taxpayers. Any Republican that is a Governor of a liberal state like Mass is a RHINO! If he isn’t he never would have been Gov of Mass.

      Report Post » Blackhawk1  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:40pm

      Romney / Rubio 2012 !!!

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • JJ Coolay
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:43pm

      Republican H____ In Name Only.

      What does the “H” stand for????

      Report Post » JJ Coolay  
    • slr4528
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:32pm

      @BlackHawk1-The reason why the costs of Romneycare soared is because the liberal legislature added costly amendments to the original Romneycare bill. Romney vetoed the amendments but since the liberal legislature had an 87% majority they over rode Romney’s vetos.

      Romney signed the bill in April of 2006 and Romney’s last day in office was in January 2007. There have been additional amendments to the Romneycare bill since Romney’s departure from office by the Democratic Governor Duval Patrick and the liberal legislature. This is probably why costs have soared.

      Moral of the story-If you are a Republican governor and you wish to run for President some day make sure that you govern a conservative state, otherwise people will assign the liberal legislature‘s agenda with the conservative governor’s agenda and label you a RINO.

      Maybe Republicans shouldn’t even bother governing liberal states and just let the liberals take them over.

      I am really fed up and angry with people calling Romney a RINO when he is just as conservative as Cain and Gingrich. Gingrich,Demint and the Heritage foundation even lauded Romney’s bill as a fine piece of conservative legislation.

      After all Romney is not requesting a mandatory national sales tax to be applied to all goods and services. A sales tax in addition to an income tax. A revenue stream that will be used and abused by future Democratic administrations who love to spend.

      Report Post »  
    • Defends the TRUTH
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 9:01pm

      YeAH….well, the only way we got this duffuss in office is because there are a bunch of idiots in this country who hope for this incredible CHANGE….Nice…real…NICE Change we gots goin on…..

      Report Post »  
  • libertytreecaretaker
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:51pm

    Obama is scared to death of republicans! He sounded paranoid and angry. We can through him out with anyone we put up against him. So lets not send a progressive like Romney!

    Report Post »  
  • ColoradoMaverick
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:49pm

    Ed Henry: Don’t you know that the media is supposed to be the spokesperson for Obama only. He doesn’t like competition you know!

    Report Post » ColoradoMaverick  
    • mils
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:55pm

      This appears to be true. Too bad Ed wants to do to America.did not answer back…Obama makes comments and no none says anything back to he man.

      He is a bad president..and quite possibly a bad person in reference to what he wants to do to America…and if we allow this man back in office we cannot complain when he burns our constitution

      We, as conservatives, need to start answering back

      Report Post »  
    • mils
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:57pm

      Also, by repeating a remark…how did that qualify as being a “spokesmman”?…i didn’t understand the quip .? Obama is angry and paranoid these days

      Report Post »  
  • planejet
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:15pm

    It is becoming increasingly apparent “someone/thing“ wants us to be faced with the usual ”voting for the lesser of two evils.”
    The only choice at this point and I may add the best choice is Herman Cain.

    Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:46pm

      Cain/Rubio 2012!

      TEA!

      Report Post »  
    • libertytreecaretaker
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:52pm

      Cain/ Rubio or Cain/Giengrich

      Report Post »  
    • Mandors
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:13pm

      Well, if that happens, then put on your big boy pants and choose the lesser of two evils.

      Report Post » Mandors  
    • squonk1pb
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:41pm

      @PlaneJet, @CATB …Cain/West would be great, as would Cain/Rubio.

      @LibertyTree … I don’t think Cain/Gingrich would work (unless one moves), as they are both from GA.

      BHO must go.

      Report Post » squonk1pb  
  • Junter
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:15pm

    He has to attack Romney, he can’t attack Cain with the usual lefty false claims of racial bias.

    Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:49pm

      Which makes CAIN an EXCELLENT CANDIDATE (although they are trying .. they are failing miserably) .. along with many other things including 9-9-9. Shake up the status quo and tax system!

      Cain/Rubio 2012!

      TEA!

      Report Post »  
    • TomFerrari
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:17pm

      9-9-9 just scares me something AWFUL without a Constitutional Amendment to LIMIT it!
      It creates a new tax source, and we all KNOW that Congress will QUICKLY turn 9-9-9 into 10-10-10 into 14-17-14 to 20-23-25 to 36-24-36 !

      NO new tax revenue sources without a Constitutional Amendment for a balanced budget, zero based budgeting, and, a budget limited to some % of GDP.
      OH, and I want that Constitutional Amendment to keeps Congress’ hands off of any remaining entitlement programs – REAL LOCK-BOXES !
      I’d also like it to require that we SAVE (in another lock-box) 15% above our expenses. That can be used to pay down the deficit / pay off our loans, THEN, it can be our Genesis 41:36 (7th yr) reserves, ONLY to be used in national emergency, declared by 2/3 or even 3/4 majority of Congress.

      Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:31pm

      Congress will have to sponsor and pass anything anyway. Cain is just suggesting a 9-9-9 plan. It is the Congress that will have to make the law and with hope, it will he a largely Republican congress and Senate that will write responsible laws.

      Report Post » Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
    • Islesfordian
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:33pm

      Tom, what prevents Congress from raising everybody’s tax to 50% right now? Fear of the public. The more transparent the tax the more power the public has to threaten the politicians who seek to raise it. The income tax rose gradually and unevenly, first on the rich and then on the rest. It was eased by all the gimmics that will be taken away in Cain’s plan.

      What will stop Congress from raising 9 9 9 to 49 49 49 is YOU, and everybody else who will KNOW how much that tax will hurt THEM and not just the other guys. A flat tax is much harder to raise in stealth an d politicians like to do things secretly.

      Report Post » Islesfordian  
    • fatjack
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:06pm

      TomFerrari
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:17pm

      9-9-9 just scares me something AWFUL without a Constitutional Amendment to LIMIT it!
      ———————————————————————————————————————————–
      Tom, 9.99 is a great sound bite, so was Hope and Change. Yeah it scares the willies out of me too.

      Report Post » fatjack  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 6:14pm

      @ ISLESFORDIAN
      Well said. Plus, support for Herman Cain is more than the 9-9-9 plan. Mr. Cain is a straight-shooting problem solver. He engenders confidence that he will adopt policies that will work — certainly not any more proven-wrong Keynesian tricks. Yup, Cainsian economics has great promise.

      Report Post »  
  • bloodrage
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:15pm

    I did not know that you had be be the spokesman of a public figure to quote them. Nice try Barry, what else do you got.

    Report Post » bloodrage  
    • Islesfordian
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:58pm

      If that reporter was speaking for Romney he blew it. I found it a stupid question, as all questions are that ask someone to respond to something someone else said about him. It’s like being in sixth grade. What Mit said was irrelevant to what Obama will do in responce to Iran.

      I still like Fox, can barely tolerate Romney (if I have to) and can‘t wait to kick Obama’s hind end out of there, but that question made me sympathetic to the President. Not bright.

      Report Post » Islesfordian  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 9:39pm

      11) Thou Shalt Not Question The One

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
  • jakartaman
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:14pm

    Who is watching Barry’s “news” conferences.
    I bet if they put a clock on barry’s TV time – it would be quadrupled what W had in 8 years.
    I can’t stand to look or hear him – he is dead man walking and he along with everyone else knows it.

    Report Post »  
  • InterestingStuff
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:13pm

    And who is Obama the spokesperson for? The American people or big business? Decide for yourself
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_CTNSAc_IU

    Report Post »  
  • Taxpayer550
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:08pm

    Ed Henry hit a nerve! Our beloved Failure-In-Chief doesn’t like to be reminded of his faults.

    Report Post » Taxpayer550  
    • CatB
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:46pm

      AH Yes .. the narcissist in Chief

      Report Post »  
  • kickagrandma
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:08pm

    Great question, Ed Henry!

    Yet another non-reply from the liar-in-chief.

    Keep uncovering them, GOD. Thank YOU for clarifying our vision so we are seeing what IS there and whose they all are. In JESUS’ NAME, amen.

    Report Post »  
    • JRook
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:15pm

      Actually he did answer the quetion…but perhaps he should have said we have confirmed reports that Iran has WMDs and we will be invading them just as soon as we are done in Iraq. There are answers you might not like and there are lies and liars.

      Report Post »  
    • fatjack
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:52pm

      JRook, from that picture it looks as if obama is shooting you the bird.

      Report Post » fatjack  
    • Obama_Sham
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:13pm

      No, he will go in to Iran under the guise that he is “supporting NATO”…

      Report Post » Obama_Sham  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 4:44pm

      Obammy will go to Iran , Just like he went to Lybia. It will be a long distance romance with his Islamic bud ACHMcWackjob

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
  • sobeit
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:08pm

    I watched this news conference live on FOX and the POTUS points the finger as usual with lies about the Republican Party not working with him to create jobs. Seems like he stopped blaming Bush, but now he blames the republican party for everything. I really can’t stand the integrity of this man.

    Report Post »  
    • biohazard23
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:13pm

      “I really can’t stand the staggering lack of integrity of this man-child.” There, fixed it for ya! :).

      Report Post » biohazard23  
    • Delta D-5-3
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:13pm

      This guy NEVER had any integrity. He’s an arrogent, out of touch Mao loving…..well, you get the idea.

      Report Post » Delta D-5-3  
    • perfectlyaged
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:13pm

      Hey Obama…here is where the Republican job bills are stalled….

      In Letter to President Obama, Speaker Boehner & Leader Cantor Highlight Jobs Bills Stalled in Democrat-Led Senate, Areas for Potential Bipartisan Cooperation

      WASHINGTON, DC (Sep 6) House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) sent the following letter to President Obama today highlighting several House-passed jobs bills that remain stalled in the Democrat-led Senate and outlining potential opportunities for Congress and the White House to work together this fall on jobs.

      Report Post »  
  • NewLife56
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:07pm

    Well barrack ole buddy, we dodn’t know you were a spokesman for George Soros, but we figured out a long time ago you were an *******

    Report Post » NewLife56  
  • I SPY
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:07pm

    Obama’s new campaign slogan = ‘RUNNING SCARED’

    Report Post » I SPY  
    • CatB
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:56pm

      LOL .. now he will try to claim native American status … Indian name === “Running Scared”

      TEA!

      Report Post »  
  • gmoneytx
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:07pm

    Presidente` deflector!

    Report Post » gmoneytx  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:07pm

    .
    That little nervous grin said it all………….

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
  • Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:07pm

    Ugh….Mitt freakin’ Romney? Good Lord, we’re scroomed.

    Report Post » Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:14pm

      It does seem to me that FNC is firmly in the Romney camp. Keep dismissing Cain FNC, you’re going to look stupid when he wins.

      Report Post » Gonzo  
    • Islesfordian
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 3:53pm

      It actually works good for Cain, because it makes Obama unload early on Romney’s weaknesses to tear him down. I think Romney has really soft spots and if Obama exposes them early it will dent the aura of inevitability the GOP establishment is trying to erect around him. Cain can then step in and put Ronmey out of his (our) misery and give Obama a fight he doesn’t know how to counter.

      Report Post » Islesfordian  
    • KidCharlemagne
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:12pm

      Gonzo
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:14pm

      It does seem to me that FNC is firmly in the Romney camp. Keep dismissing Cain FNC, you’re going to look stupid when he wins.
      ===========================================

      Romney seems to be firmly behind Cain’s candidacy though:

      Romney’s favorite 2012 candidate
      October 6, 2011
      Romney has taken numerous swipes at Perry during the debates, but he’s lavished praise on another candidate: Herman Cain.

      He’s lauded him as the other GOP hopeful who has “actually worked in the real economy” and said Cain brought up an “absolutely key point” about health care and is “right” on the issue.
      http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1011/Romneys_favorite_2012_candidate.html

      Report Post »  
  • teapartyconservatism
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:06pm

    Had enough of Obama’s ego maniacal arrogance yet?

    Oh don’t worry Fox Barry, the voters tired of politics as usual will see to it that there’s lots of pink slips for every poitician who ignored your intelligibility by failing to honor their sworn oath to support and defend the Constitution!

    Here’s the new and improved blog providing the facts repressed by politicians and the media, on how to be certain if Obama really is ineligible and what Congress knows about it! http://teapartyconservatism.blogspot.com

    Report Post » teapartyconservatism  
    • PoliticalJunkieToo
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 5:19pm

      Had enough of Obama’s ego maniacal arrogance yet?
      _______
      Yes. But I don‘t want it replaced with Mitt Romney’s.

      Report Post »  
    • not2bherd
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 11:30am

      Constitution for the United States of America, Article 2, Section 1, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,…”

      The point the writers refer to is an explanatory clause in the sentence, “at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”. All who resided in the states at the time were to be considered as citizens. After that point “natural born” was to be the litmus.

      The blog isn’t too clear on it.

      Report Post »  
  • Theleftisda
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:05pm

    Obama and the demonrats are getting desperate /this should be fun watching them implode

    Report Post » Theleftisda  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:05pm

    I can’t stand Obama but, that was a pretty loaded question. The first half of the question would have been adequate. So far, I’m not a huge Ed Henry fan either.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
  • biohazard23
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:01pm

    he should have said, “I didn’t know you were the spokesperson for Mitt Romney, but that’s just one of many, many things I don’t know such as how to govern, how to bring people together, how to kick start the economy, how to keep Moochelle from eating all the Twinkies in the kitchen, how to stop hating the white half of myself…….”

    Report Post » biohazard23  
    • ACLUHater
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:09pm

      EVERYTHING that comes out of Dumbo’s mouth is calculated.

      Report Post »  
    • Delta D-5-3
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:09pm

      And Henry should have replyed……I’m sorry Mr. President, I didn’t know you were a spokesmen for George Soros.

      Report Post » Delta D-5-3  
    • SHOESHINEBOY
      Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:58pm

      But we all knew Lord Barry is the spokesman for the Communist/Socilaist/Marxist Union Soros destroy America platform…(formally known as the democrats)

      Report Post »  
  • HKS
    Posted on October 13, 2011 at 2:01pm

    I read it as striking a nerve and couldn’t think of any other way to strike back. He was embarrassed, as well he should be.

    Report Post » HKS  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on October 14, 2011 at 5:30am

      Expect the spoiled “boy king” to get even snarkier and more testy as the election draws nearer.
      He’s a punk!

      Report Post » Rational Man  
1 2 3 ... 10

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love