Media

October Surprise: Limbaugh Announces ‘Reverse Operation Chaos’

Comments (81)

1 2
  • General K
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 8:14pm

    Hillary is just another sock puppet for Soros I hear Soros paid for Clintons daughters wedding, look it up. Same difference.

    Report Post »  
  • Diamond Girl
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 7:19pm

    I heard this today…he had me chucklin’…most of the Loony-Leftists won‘t even get what the hell he’s talking about.

    Report Post » Diamond Girl  
  • reconmarine
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 7:17pm

    Just so everyone knows, part of the Soros gang has been tasked with flooding all of the conservative blogs and news blogs with their venom and garbage. Expect alot more trolls than usual. It’s the liberal way.

    Report Post »  
  • clhathaway
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 6:45pm

    This is a dumb story. It has Zero chance of success because no one wanting Hilary for President is going to vote against Dems and for Republicans. It worked in the primary because Republicans could cross over and play spoiler just like Dems do.

    Besides, wouldn’t Obama have a stronger hand for relection if he can campaign against the ruling Republicans? If Hilary wants him to be more unpopular in 2012she should hope he carries ALL the blaim for the next two years.

    Report Post »  
  • PhoenixThunder
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 6:03pm

    Vote your ideals, give strategy a rest.

    Report Post » PhoenixThunder  
  • steve-o-con
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:49pm

    Rush is so slick! What a great idea!

    Report Post » steve-o-con  
  • Jezreel
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:44pm

    Jump from the frying pan into the fire?!!

    Report Post »  
  • Beetle1971
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:39pm

    Rush is a political strategy genius. I don‘t know why every one here thinks he’s nuts cause he’s so right. Think about it if the democrats win this election and they continue on there current course which leaves Hillary out to dry. If they lose people will start to blame Obama and will think we should have voted for Hillary. Glen Beck said something similar not to long ago about how people are starting to see Obama as far to radical so they will put in some one who will say, “I’m not as crazy as that guy.” Which very well will be Hillary. Rush knows what the democrats are thinking and he knows they won’t vote republican just to screw over Obama. They very well could leave him out to dry though. He’s looking at the long term strategy not just Nov. 2nd.

    Report Post »  
    • General K
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 8:16pm

      None better than Dick Morris the GOP should hire him and let him mastermind a trouncing of the left for many years to come. What are they thinking?

      Report Post »  
  • JenniferNB
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:26pm

    It is legitimate and not illegal. Considering there is voter fraud running rampant on the left. They will never know if they can win on their own merit because they have to do it in a corrupt fashion. Considering they are under investigation in Cincinnati for busing high school seniors to “teach” them how to vote. they gave them ballots with just the green candidates name on it. This could be going on at many many many places!!!

    Report Post »  
  • mlakester
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:20pm

    …if it had been Hillary that got elected in 2008, the progressives’ destructive agenda would have been accomplished a whole lot faster. Not that Obama isn’t doing the job…but Hillary has the experience and the know-how to have done it way quicker. Get them ALL outta DC…don‘t just replace them with ’a lesser evil’.

    Report Post »  
  • Spyder
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:07pm

    In a very partisan political environment, like we’ve seen in the past 20 years where elections are so closely decided by almost a 50-50 margin. So currently, having Obama vs. (Republican Candidate) vs. (Other small party candidates) = Approx. 50%-40%-10%, including the independent votes that go for their chosen parties. However, when you split the democrat vote intake for their party’s ticket, now you have Obama or Hillary vs. (Republican Candidate) vs. (Other small party candidates) = 25%, 25% – 40% – 10%. It makes it almost twice as hard for both Obama and Hillary to reach the level of support that a solely backed Republican candidate can in a presidential election. This is obviously a very simplistic explanation, but it points out the type of strategy being used here. Perhaps a variation of the ‘Monty Hall” problem?

    Report Post » Spyder  
  • teahugger
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:05pm

    The original operation chaos worked because the people he was ecouraging to vote for Hillary were his listeners. Why would any democrats either a) listen to him or b) do anything he says? My concern is that the democrats will do the opposite of what he proposes and show up in droves at the polls! But he is a pretty smart fellow, so I will assume he has thought this through and knows what he’s doing (I hope)

    Report Post » teahugger  
    • WISEPENNY
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 6:52pm

      It is a brilliant idea, but some of you dumb-o-crats don‘t even know when you’re being made fun of. LOL

      Report Post »  
  • WISEPENNY
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:58pm

    Giving that some thought, that is a brilliant strategy! The Democrats are set to lose big on Nov. 2. There is no way around that. By the Hillary supporters to abstain from their vote, to send a clear message to BHO, that would also send a clear message to Hillary, as well. It would actually be her duty to rally the DNC to save it from extinction altogether, because 2012 election results will find the Republicans replacing the President, along with several more Senators on that dreadful day. On second thought, Democrats, never mind what Rush just said. I like the idea of only a handful of democrats left, at best, after 11/02/2012.

    Report Post »  
  • Zombee
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:56pm

    You Kennedy Democrats that are tired of the socilaist/progressives that have hijacked your party…this may be you last chance to save it. Democrats may not like the messenger but message has great merit. You may actually thank Rush Limbaugh some day for this . Democrats the balls in your court.

    Report Post » Zombee  
  • DE411Q25
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:44pm

    Hillary??????The dumbest idea ever brought forward. Get rid of the whole bunch, the Administration and all it’s “hanger on’s” as well, including all of Obummer’s appointees, csars etc. And clean Congress as well while at it. Otherwise there is little hope for a free America. November 3 is your chance and only chance.!

    Report Post »  
  • Masamune
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:34pm

    I’ll do anything to help divide the Democrats. It would be even better if she ran as a third party candidate. Go Rush!

    Report Post »  
  • Sunnyr
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:32pm

    There is not a nickle’s worth of difference in Hillary and Obozo. They are both Progressive Saul-Alinsky-loving Nutwads. I would drop dead before I would ever vote for Hillary OR Obozo!

    I like Rush but I am NOT a Ditto-Head. Sorry, El-Rushbo.

    Report Post » Sunnyr  
    • WISEPENNY
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:00pm

      So, are you saying that you are a democrat, though?

      Report Post »  
    • bringdough
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:23pm

      Presidents that have a primary challenge normally do not win. It weakens them too much. Ford in 76, Carter in 80, Bush in 92. That is the reason this is such a great idea.

      Report Post »  
    • Doc_Slammin
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 6:46pm

      I‘m not a ’ditto-head’ either, but there is a reason to Rush‘s madness you haven’t ascertained. Divide and conquer. It‘s the Democrat’s own playbook being used against them.

      Report Post » Doc_Slammin  
  • jacobstroubles
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:28pm

    This weekend might be a really good weekend to get as much food/water as you can.
    Beat the rush!

    Report Post »  
  • caitlynsdad
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:24pm

    I have long thought that Hillary Clinton was going to run in 2012 on the “See I Told You So” platform. What better time for her to announce so publicly than January or February 2011, when she can best be able to say, “See what Obama has led to: A Republican Majority in Congress!”

    That’s not necessarily the best turn of events from the conservative perspective, of course, because Hillary would be tougher to beat in 2012 than Obama. Republican nominee would not be able to run against the past 4 years as easily; Hillary could say, “See, but the past four years would have turned out much differently with me in the White House, and now you don’t have to accept the far-out Tea Party as the only alternative. I, Hillary Clinton, am the Third Way.”

    Report Post » caitlynsdad  
    • woodsdog
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:56pm

      Well I guess she could say that, but would anybody believe her? I wouldn’t. She’s a lefty through and through. No one should forget that. Could you see her and Pelosi? Cat fight???

      Report Post »  
    • caitlynsdad
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 10:13pm

      Her and Pelosi? Yeah, but under this scenario it would probably be Boehner as Speaker of the House. I wouldn’t believe Hillary either, with that line … but those independent fence-sitters with a post up their butt could believe anything.

      Report Post » caitlynsdad  
    • Taquoshi
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 12:56am

      Woodsdog -

      Oooohhh, catfight? Could be interesting. Will it include hair pulling, and scratching? Or how about mud wrestling? Okay, too messy, I understand. Maybe brooms at twenty paces? When do the tickets go on sale?

      Report Post » Taquoshi  
  • General K
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:22pm

    Hillary is a progressive, get rid of her too.

    Report Post »  
    • Bevaboo
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:39pm

      Agreed, it would have been the same difference if she had won the presidency instead of Obama. Lest we forget, she was in charge of trying to implement universal health care under Bill Clinton.

      Report Post » Bevaboo  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:40pm

      Rush should not be giving free publicity to Hillary …ofcourse its his show but its our country that she is destroying as Hussain’s team-member.
      She is not given too much daily coverage in the kneepads media. Why does Rush keep giving her air-time ? If its not to expose her activities on our country’s behalf using our money , she doesn’t deserve any free campaign time. Not in 2010 atleast

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
  • HillCountryPatriot
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:16pm

    Rush is Right!!! As usual.

    Seriously, I was thinking the same thing the other day about Democrat and Independent voters that drank the kool-aid in 2008. How much buyer’s remorse is really out there? What are they willing to do for their country? Their best bet is to put up a Clinton again.

    MegaDittos Rush!!!

    Report Post » Hill Country Patriot  
  • cheezwhiz
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:14pm

    Whats wrong with you Rush ? You got a thing for Hillary ?
    She is a just another left-wing alinskyite who is throwing around US taxpayer money on muslims , as a down payment for cash in return , from muslims all over the world. How is that any different than Hussain ?
    She is even more dangerous for our country because she is not alone. She has Bill Clinton.

    Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:29pm

      and how can we forget her bitter demeanor and vindictive disposition !!
      How is a bitter avenger in mom-jeans any different from a bitter avenger in pant-suit ?

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • RantNationDotCom
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 12:44pm

      He‘s trying to get democrats who supported Hillary in ’08 to stay home on Nov. 2nd. It‘s not like he’s going to support Hillary in 2012 except to defeat Obama in the democratic primary, if there is one. When the primaries are over, he’ll be supporting the republican, but don’t tell anyone. It’s a secret. ;o)

      Report Post » RantNationDotCom  
  • Awakenow
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:12pm

    I havee a better idea, democrats we welcome you to a party that will listen to the governed vote republican/indeprndent. After all did the democrats pay you one iota of attention? This is our country, yours mine our children‘s and their children’s lets ‘start thinking of it that way and not left or right. Term limits are way over due, get rid of the political class, ALL OF THEM.

    Report Post » Awakenow  
    • Bauervision
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:07pm

      I agree about term limits, for instance, here is one fries my ass: The Constitution clearly says that the House can run for terms, 2 years and recurring. It says the Senate is 6 years…….period. Why would they go through all the versions they did, comb over every word, not to include “recurring”? I think they were saying something that has been looked over for WAY too long.
      6 years and out!

      Report Post » Bauervision  
    • Bauervision
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:12pm

      here’s the actual wording:
      Section 2 – The House
      The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year…

      Section 3 – The Senate
      The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State,
      ….for six Years;

      Seems to be pretty clear to me. Why didn’t they say “every 6 years”? Because they wanted term limits!

      Report Post » Bauervision  
    • Orion the truth hunter
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 6:12pm

      Bauervision, at the time it was written, senators were selected by the states, not by popular vote.

      Report Post »  
    • CollateralDamage
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 9:49pm

      @ Orion/ Bauer: It was the 17th Amendment that said that the State Legislature no longer elects Senators to Congress as representatives of the States. Before this, the States elected Senators to Represent them. Now States have NO representation in the Federal Government. The popular election of Senators is why we all of these unfunded mandates on the states, and why we are all going broke.

      REPEAL 17th AMENDMENT !!!

      Report Post » Collateral Damage  
    • Doc_Slammin
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 6:34pm

      I hear this ‘term limits’ argument thrown around here ceaselessly. This only guarantees one thing, that incumbents leave office no matter what their performance. So where is the reward for publicly elected officials to do anything the constituency wants?

      All you’ve done is given notice to these officials that they have a certain time period to achieve their personal agendas while at the same time telling them they have no chance at re-election. Again, where is the motivation for candidates to work for the public?

      You already have the power to exercise term limitations with your vote.

      Report Post » Doc_Slammin  
  • joseph Fawcett
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:01pm

    This sounds like Rush is dividing the Dems. But he is right about Hillery.

    http://www.josephfawcettart.com western artist

    joseph Fawcett  
  • FreedomOfSpeech
    Posted on October 22, 2010 at 3:55pm

    I am angry today. Free speech is under attack everywhere we look.

    Obama is now burning books like the Nazis.

    Reverse Operation Chaos. Rock On.

    FreedomOfSpeech  
    • snowleopard3200
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:00pm

      Good Luck to Reverse Operation Chaos.

      May oru nation live on.

      http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm (mix art)

      Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • FreedomOfSpeech
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:02pm

      I’m not affiliated with a political party but I would take Hilary any day over the Kenyan-born usurper in office now.

      FreedomOfSpeech  
    • snowleopard3200
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:17pm

      @Freedomofspeech

      Understandable. I just want people in the DC that are able to do the job, and support the fact they work for the People of America and keep the Constitution as the daily reminder of what they can and cannot do.

      We need to change things peacefully, and if violence is suggested as the solution, then the game is over if we go for it. Anyone doubts this, remember, the old Roman Republic was a Republic until violence begat violence then it turned into a dictatorship as did the bloodbath of the French Revolution where a persons rights mattered for nothing – just what was good for the whole.

      http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm (mix art)

      Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • walkwithme1966
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:18pm

      This is the stupidest idea I have ever heard – I am a Hillary Democrat and I won’t do anything Rush told me or suggested I do. I swear he is on drugs again! http://maboulette.wordpress.com

      walkwithme1966  
    • Maybe the GEESE Know More than the BEES Know
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 4:34pm

      we‘re proud members of the ORIGINAL ’Operation Chaos’!!
      beat them at the ballot box!! (or don‘t if you are a proud member of ’Reverse Operation Chaos’)

      http://www.facebook.com/pages/Its-Time-to-Support-Fox-News-Glenn-Beck/161352563885889

      Report Post » Maybe the GEESE Know More than the BEES Know  
    • moonpeace
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 5:35pm

      WALKWITHME1966: You are so wrong. Much more stupid than that was the idea that Obama would be able to lead our country. What a terrible mistake we made. The color of a man’s skin does not a good President make.

      Report Post » moonpeace  
    • nosycophant
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 9:28pm

      Long live mix art with pointy heads, can you draw me one with pointy hat to cover pointy head and God preserve our freedoms.

      Report Post »  
    • missbosslady
      Posted on October 22, 2010 at 11:38pm

      walkwithme, you are truly one of the most obtuse bloggers that I have suffered. Good grief!

      I‘ll bet that you can’t remember the last time you had an original thought, or the last time that you DIDN’T have a knee jerk reaction to anything political.

      Bah-bah, little liberal sheep.

      You are tedious, predictable and sharp as a marble.

      Report Post »  
    • Taquoshi
      Posted on October 23, 2010 at 12:51am

      Walk with me 1966 -

      No thanks, I’ll stick to the other side of the street, particularly after you may have committed libel -

      “I swear he is on drugs again! ”

      Personally, I don’t mind different opinions, but making statements like that could conceivably land you in court, if not in jail or result in your having to pay a monetary fine.

      Report Post » Taquoshi  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love