Politics
O‘Donnell Tells Hannity She Won’t Do Anymore ‘National Media’ Interviews
- Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:12am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 567 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 394 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 384 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 368 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 324 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 384 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 394 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 324 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 150 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 384 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (97)
RobR
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 8:15amGreat move on her part. This revelation will get her detracters at the lame street media to incessantly whine and incinuate about it. Giving her unlimited free air time, name recognition, for the next 6 weeks…….all without spending one thin dime of her limited campaign warchest……rather brilliant strategy if you ask me.
Report Post »wodiej
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 8:57amI agree too.
Report Post »Daybreaker
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 8:03amIt is beyond pitiful that this gal has received the assault against her that she has. I’m a working man who realized it better to invest in my family, working for their betterment and holding true to my values.
It is time we try to find politicians willing to do that for our nation.
Switching to parties when it is expedient for them. Allowing groups with insane idea‘s and a check book to get policies to pass that were counter productive to ’traditional values’ and the enrichment of the economy where all would prosper from it.
It at least seems to me that Christine O‘ Donnell has some core belief’s and the guts to say what she believe’s and (dare I say this) want’s to stand up for reasonable policies.
This ‘service’ economy is a scam, there isn’t hardly any wealth production in America anymore.
(Ah, no Obama, you really can’t spend your way to prosperity.) Christine knows this; according to her interview she believes in tax cuts to get the economy moving again, what a novel idea. Hasn’t this worked before?
She has actually placed the needs of others before herself and then did a great public service running against Biden. Does anyone in the congress even think like that?
She ended up having to sell her home to pay bills. Went through some tough financial times…anyone familiar with that? Sounds like we need that kind of experience in DC.
This time she beat a Democrat in Republican clothing and the only thing the media is saying is ”well, she will cost the Republicans the Senate.” We just might lose one here or there, yet we should hold to our beliefs. If we don’t, who will?
A short term loss is better than bondage under marxism, fascism, socialism or anything else. It‘s refreshing to at least see someone who is honest about there views and doesn’t need to hide them.
They call her extreme. Amazing.
I heard nothing extreme out of her. She ‘dabbled’ in witchcraft, when she was a teen. She now has a mature faith that has developed over the years, maybe they’ll call that extemist religious views.
Ah, wait. Didn’t Coons dabble into marxism. Has he renounced that? Is that now mainstream?
It is shameful that we would even consider this race not close (maybe not now, but don’t Americans still love a good horse race) I may not be able to vote for her, but I will open my meger wallet and contribute a few bucks, will for Angle also.
I will at least do what I can. I‘ve watched whenever American’s get scared they run to the ‘conservatives’ to fix things up. Then idiots like Obama and Carter start doing their best to stuff their destructive brand of ‘progressivness’ down our throats. They’ve done it for years, slow but sure. Labelling good conservative people as exteme.
Look what they’ve done to California. Once California had a robust economy. They’ve gotten crazy stupid eviromental policies initiated without the consent of the people using bureaucratic machinery (a.k.a. California Air Resources Board) to cripple our economy. Isn’t that happening now in DC.
Truth is, California doesnt’ have a water shortage problem either, we have a water storage problem. All this brought on by the progressive enviromentalist’s, bureaucracies without any voter input. Torn down dams that provide what I believe to be ‘very green’ hydroelectricity. Now where is California?
In one of Barbra Boxers ad’s she said, ” I’m Barbra Boxer and I approved this message, because I want to see ‘Made in the USA’ on the label again.” It makes me gag. She‘s been in the Senate for twenty years and it’s only gotten worse! Jobs have left not just this state, but this country. She should get fired, just for having the gall to say that in her ad.What has she done?
It is time to stop the craziness. We ‘traditionalists’ are the only thing standing in the way. They will not stop until they control all aspects of our lives. I feel like we’re constantly under attack for eating hamburgers and everything else. Maybe because we are.
Don’t let Christine go down without a fight, open your wallet. We are one nation, we must stand together.
Report Post »mcellu
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:53amI think she’s making a mistake. She’s only got a few weeks until the election and she needs to get her name out there. Nat’l media may not get her votes but it MAY get her some campaign contributions from around the country that will help her to get votes. I’m still dsappointed that “Tea Party” candidtates felt they needed to seek a Republican nomination. We need independent candidates.
Report Post »yep
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 9:05amShe still has contributions rolling in. As of right now she has 2,222,530 donated. I think that is pretty good. She doesn’t need the government media to raise money. http://christine2010.com/
Report Post »Artist4Palin
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:47amNeither the Balza nor Hannity go deep with this interview or any interview. Is Chris Coons still a practicing Communist Marxist Lover?.
Report Post »I do not care about the gossip of who Christine dated in her teens.
Is Coons a communist? Is the Marxist Maoist White House with all of its Czars going to campaign for Coons? Does Coons fit in with the group in the White House?
Stop the TMZ type of news coverage.
###
AstupidAmerican
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:20amWhy give the rabid dog’s a hand to bite? Keep it local.
Report Post »hydeparkspirit
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:10amI support her because she might actually add some balance to Congress and vote on bills in as a conservative and /or libertarian. She might understand “statesmanship” should rule over politics, once a person is elected to office. At this point, her personal life is her own business.
Report Post »RojBlake
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 6:54amI watched the interview last night, if she was telling the truth she’s EXACTLY the kind of person you want in DC; as long as she knows that there is a huge difference in the kind of charity that she obviously practices & Government policy disguised as charity.
Her explinations of the various issues that have been brought up against her seem to make sense & are believeable, I hope the people of Delaware give her a chance & do thier own homework…if they do I think she’s got a good shot at being elected.
Report Post »treven
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:26amIs it just me, or in todays media do:
Report Post »1) Conservatives not get a calm and resonable setting to explain their misquoted/out of context statements while
2) Liberals have their well thought out but now politcally slanderous statements defended by same said media?
RojBlake
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:29amIt’s not just you.
Report Post »SummerB
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 6:49amI think she did very well. We’ve all done some things when we were young that we look back on now & call crazy or foolish. I think she is polished, highly articulate & is very comfortable in her own skin. And quite, frankly, all I care about is that she would vote on bills in Congress as a libertarian; her personal life is her own business. Her opponent came back from abroad (sorry, don’t recall what country he spent time in other than it began with an “A”) & said that he returned as a Marxist &, although he was happy to back in America, it caused him to view America in less than a favorable light — another Progressive.
Report Post »RojBlake
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:12amI agree, I think it speaks volumes that a man can return from Africa (Kenya if I remember corectly) with a “less than favorable view” of the US, & he’s EVEN NOMINATED for the US Senate?!?
How is someone who doesn’t even like the US going to help enact policy that will help the US & its citizens?
I realize that most of the clowns in DC don’t take thier oaths seriously, but how can the people of this country elect represenitives that “don’t like America”; won’t salute the US Flag etc.
Every time someone like that gets elected, I want to scream.
Don‘t folks realize that if thier represenitives don’t like/respect the country, what motivation do they have in positively representing you?
This is why part of CA are turning into a dustbowl & people are starving to protect a fish; why we have a moratorium on oil drilling while at the same time giving money to Mexico to drill for oil; why the EPA can declare “plant food” a pollutant etc.
There is room for disagreement, but one of the first “litmus tests” for anyone elected to office (in my opinion) should be that “America comes first”. Because we are electing represenitives that are working on behalf of the US Citizenry, & the US consists of “WE THE PEOPLE”, doesn’t it follow that if your not a “fan of the US” you’re not going to have the best interest of the people in your heart & mind?
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 6:44amIt makes me scratch my head in wonder how the drive-by media wants to paint her as the “extremist”, yet ignores that he is a self-proclaimed marxist? Do they really believe WE THE PEOPLE are that stupid?
Report Post »Clarion Caller
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 6:34amShe had a great interview with Hannity.Now her Marxist opponent needs to be exposed.He nearly bankrupted the county he manages, and took property taxes up 25%.
Report Post »DeaconBlues
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 6:03amt Psychosis:
You have missed the point entirely, and your post is poorly thought out even if I HAD been comparing O’Donnell to anyone – “Not doing coke” and “not being a marxist” are not fundamental pillars upon which the Democratic party has built their entire narrative, whereas Chrsitanity DOES fill that role for the Republican party. Again, though, that was never the point; the point is that the Right in both the media and in politics routinely attack people for not being, or even not SEEMING Christian, but here we are presented with a Republican who is an admitted witch. That’s okay, apparently, because she’s a member of the party.
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:48amAdmitted witch? Where did you get that? Hyping does not make it true.
Report Post »DeaconBlues
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 8:28amI got it from when she said it. Just now. A witch is someone who practices witchcraft. Having “dabbled into” witchcraft most assuredly counts for this discussion, since the point I’m making is that the Right has a very clear double standard for what deserves outcry (Obama doesn’t seem Christian enough) and what does not (O’Donnell was a witch).
Report Post »PuddinSkins
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 10:58amShe never admitted to being a witch, not once. Now you are putting words in her mouth.
I really don’t think you are getting the point. I completely understand your point about Obama, I believe you are correct. But you don‘t see the point we are making about O’Donnell. Maybe you are the hypocrite here?
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 5:56amThanks to the additional personal negative attacks from republican commentators like Rove and Krauthammer, Christine O’Donnell was put in a hole from the get-go by the democrat personal propaganda machine. As she explained on Hannity, the IRS made a gross error on her taxes and then quickly corrected it; she had too many pro bono clients and had a temporary financial problem, got behind on her mortgage, and sold the home to correct. Most high schoolers do stupid things, many much worse than date a witch. So where’s the beef? The beef was that she is not part of the pedigree’d republican establishment. I hope the public is not too busy to now finally learn the truth about these matters and vote for her on Nov. 2. Just think, her opponent, Coons, is an admitted Marxist, wacko liberal big government, big spender, big taxes man… a pet of Reid (and Pelosi). I thought the Delaware folks were fed up with all that. Delaware now has a choice….will they choose bigger government Marxist Coons or smaller government O’Donnell?
Report Post »DeaconBlues
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 5:37amStrange how forgiving the Right is with an admitted witch – it is almost as though they don’t actually care about Christianity and instead just use it to collect votes/ratings, then dispense with it as soon as it becomes inconvenient to a unified party.
Report Post »Psychosis
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 5:50amnot much different in our acceptance of obama when he said he did coke when he was younger or her competitor claiming to be a marxist? oh ya i forgot ….she was a teenager and they were adults hmmmmmmmmm fair comparison you have there …….idiot
Report Post »Polwatcher
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 6:00amWith all due respects, come on, she was a high schooler when she dated that guy that dabbled in witchcraft. B.O. hung around with terrorists and commies most of his life.
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:06amWhat did you do in your teens? Anything you regret? If not, you’re rare. You would prefer to have Reid‘s ’pet’, the bearded marxist in our senate? Give me a break!
Report Post »treven
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:12amI don’t see how “dabbled in witchcraft” equates to being an admitted witch. If someone takes a couple of bong hits in high school, would you call them a stoner?
Report Post »DeaconBlues
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 8:05amYou’ve missed the point. I don’t care that she “made a mistake” when she was a teenager. The issue is the hypocrisy of the Right. They constantly decry, for example, Barack Obama for not “seeming” Christian enough, even though he routinely goes to church and always has. Meanwhile, here we have this Republican who admits to having practiced witchcraft; where is the outcry? It is probably unfair to suggest that all Republicans look at their religion as a tool to rake in votes – but I don‘t think it’s unfair to suggest that they clearly do not hold their own members to the same standards that they do their opponents, because doing so would be politically inconvenient.
Report Post »PuddinSkins
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 10:55amDeacon, you still don’t get it. She didn’t become a Christian spokesperson until later. She has said she regrets doing what she did, I believe her. I also believe Obama when he says he only did cocaine the one time. I have never brought up the cocaine issue about O, and conservatives that do are hypocrites, I agree with you there. There isn’t any outrage because she said she regrets the witchcraft dabbling, plus it was done long before she became an activist for Christianity. Do you see the point or not?
Report Post »Prospero
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 11:00amDeaconblues blathers idiotically: “Strange how forgiving the Right is with an admitted witch”
Heh heh heh! “Admitted witch”, roflmao!
I guess all that Ouija board stuff we did at slumber parties when I was a kid disqualifies me, as well. You have to be one desperate, sorry individual to actually employ some little girl pretending to witchcraft as a kid (just as popular as wanting a pony, as any father knows, among little girls) as a criticism.
Perhaps you should familiarize yourself a bit more thoroughly with the opposite gender, troll. Might give you something a bit more rewarding to do with your time than foment discord on Conservative websites. Just saying…
Report Post »Marylou7
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 4:58amYou go Christine! She stated that she would do local news, just not national and I don’t blame her. The national media is only looking for a gotcha moment anyway.
Report Post »TexasWax
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 4:05amA ‘simple’ not so bright person that will stand ground aligned with the values of the tea party is better than a conservative progressive, career politician, really smart over thinking intellectual, liberal…. any day, period. LOL They have one who thinks an island will tip over from too many people- voting their agenda, why not one who thinks human mice (or WTF ever it is) area a reality in symmetrical opposed balance.
Report Post »AsianForTeaPartyConservative
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 3:05amChristine should attack ferociously against that Marxist candidate. She must expose the socialist agenda, their globalism ideology, their de-development of America, Their goal to destroy America. We must contribute more funds for her campaign so they can put out more ads exposing their hidden agenda. We must help Christine O’Donnell as much as possible. Don’t listen to the pundits, we the people will put her into office, because if anything she listens to the people, and will fight for our core American values and protect our constitution.
Report Post »AsianForTeaPartyConservative
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:56amIf O’Donnell loses, it can only mean either Delaware voters are ignorant or people in Delaware are mostly socialist. Being liberal can only lead to a zombie mentality.
Report Post »Psychosis
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:44am@ BEACONFORTRUTH you are missing the point jobs have been forced over seas by unions and some have chosen of their own volition, and i did not blame it all on Obama watch the videos and then comment. you will learn that many presidents in recent history have been a puppet just as Obama is now. your missing the whole point. OBAMA IS JUST THE MOST RECENT TOOL BEING USED
Report Post »BeaconForTruth
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 3:08amSo unions are to blame? I’m not going to defend, because some are corrupt, but do you expect industrial workers to work for the same wages, in the same conditions as the worker’s overseas? It happened over here in the late 19th century, early 20th century and the death, disregard for human life, poor wages, etc was exposed by Upton Sinclair. The FDA was created to make sure that people were not getting other American’s body parts as part of their ground up meat. These conditions bred unions, so that human life would be valued and not seen as an expense not worth the cost. Look up the triangle shirt waist factory fire, it will open your eyes.
Recent presidents have been tools? Really? With the switches in President every four to eight years, why would they continue the work of there predecessor? There are have been bitter battles between liberal and conservative ideologies, with the switches that have occurred running between liberal and conservative, why would they continue that work?
Report Post »Psychosis
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 5:47am@beacon yes the unions have a big part to play. not insomuch as the members but more the leaders of the unions. now that is said unions did have there part and were necessary and pushed for a lot of good things, but they are no longer needed as there are more laws now protecting workers than ever. wage laws / osha etc. so now yes they have a large part in any company deciding to leave the us. just look at us steel detroit auto industry the um light bulb manufacturing. cause we cant compete with other countries labor laws largely in cause because our government wont tax the incoming merchandise and allow our companies to prosper
( STILL GUESS YOU HAVENT WATCHED THE VIDEO)
Report Post »Ferrets
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 9:03amAh, try to blame outsourcing and loss of domestic jobs on the unions and the President–a trend that has been going on for decades. Good little Glenn Beck bottom-boy!
How about, unions have been a cornerstone of the rise of the middle class for decades?
How about, greedy capitalists will stop at nothing to take everything for themselves, without sharing the benefits conferred upon all of us by greater productivity, which is the common gift bestowed upon our great country, and was hard-won by our academic institutions, government-sponsored research, and the plain old work of our bare hands.
Report Post »Prospero
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 10:54amFerrets writes: “Ah, try to blame outsourcing and loss of domestic jobs on the unions and the President–a trend that has been going on for decades.”
Yes, noting that the sky is blue is also a “trend” that has been going on for decades. Though I wouldn’t, personally, characterize accurate observation as “a trend”….
Report Post »Prospero
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 10:55amFerrets blathers moronically: “How about, unions have been a cornerstone of the rise of the middle class for decades?”
Only 8% of private sector workers belong to a union. 92% of private sector workers *do not* belong to a union.
Pardon me while the 92% rolls on the floor laughing at the thought that there is any “cornerstone” other than us….
Report Post »rocktruth
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:41amI really do hope Christine O’Donnell wins Delaware.
Please support Christine O’Donnell:
Report Post »http://christine2010.com/
abc
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:34amSo we have known for generations that the best antidote to lies and inuendo is sunshine, the best way to counter false speech is a larger amount of true speech. So why would anyone believe that the reason O’Donnell is avoiding the media, including very sympathetic outlets like Fox (which has several employees underwriting her campaign), because she doesn’t have something to hide. The reality is quite the opposite, and she is rightly afraid that the truth will out.
What truth? That she really is “nutty,” as Karl Rove truthfully stated. That she dabbled in witchcraft as a young woman, which could drive the Christian Right crazy. That she lied and continues to lie about her tax violations and financial malfeasance, which drives me (and presumably Rove) crazy. That she knows so little about science that she claimed condoms don’t prevent AIDS and scientists have engineered mice with human brains, which also drives me crazy. That tea party members, who statistically have more money and higher educational attainment than the average American, cannot find more competent candidates to represent their interests, which drives me craziest of all.
Report Post »AsianForTeaPartyConservative
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:50amWhat crap are you spewing?
Report Post »realAmerican
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 3:04amHe is “spewing the truth” . Looks like you can’t handle it.
Report Post »treven
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 6:09amI‘m sure she made a concious decision not to appease the enemy because she thinks she’s “nutty”. As far as dabbling in witchcraft goes, a lot of people who honestly look for God look in all kinds of places before they find him. And if you think condoms stop AIDS, you are sadly mistaken http://www.dianedew.com/condom.htm
Report Post »Lets just face the fact that leftists “journalists” can‘t stand it when people don’t want to play by their condecending standard.
DeaconBlues
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:04amt Treven:
Your link to an obviously biased source from fifteen years ago, which itself references studies from the eighties, is sorely lacking.
Here’s one to a Catholic website which references modern studies:
http://www.condoms4life.org/facts/CondomsAndAIDS.htm
The important bit: “While condoms are not foolproof, they are highly effective in preventing HIV infection. According to the CDC, studies examining sexually active people at high risk for contracting HIV have found that “even with repeated sexual contact, 98-100% of those people who used latex condoms correctly and consistently did not become infected.”"
Another choice bit: “Claims that latex condoms allow HIV to pass through are unfounded. The pores of latex condoms are too small to allow HIV to pass through. Condoms have been shown to be effective barriers not only to HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, but also to herpes simplex, CMV, hepatitis B, chlamydia and gonorrhea.”
Keep in mind, this is not from the “liberal media” – this is from a website by Catholics for Catholics.
Report Post »treven
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:21amTo be honest, I googled the micron debate (which is factual) and linked to the first page that offered the evidence. There are many other articles and websites that back up this claim. Condoms were made to prevent semen to pass through, which is 2.5 to 3 microns in size. Viruses are much smaller, and not just the HIV. Your website isn’t exactly unbiased, it’s a pro condom Catholic (which in itself is contradictory) website, so of course they won’t publish damning information.
Report Post »bimmermatt
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:23amWhat prevents AIDS best? Condoms or abstinence? If you had cancer and there was a cure that was 100% successful, would you pick that, or some lesser fix? Why not promote the best?
Report Post »DeaconBlues
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:57amt Treven: You should work your opinions around the evidence, not vice versa. My source was biased, because all sources are biased (simply by choosing what information to report, you are also choosing what information NOT to report). Because all sources are biased, you should not discount them simply because they are biased in a direction you find unpleasant. My biased source used modern scientific studies. Your biased source used ones from twenty-five years ago. The “micron debate” is not a debate. Numerous scientific studies have shown: HIV can slip through a condom, the same way that fish occasionally slip through nets, but it is an utter falsehood to say that condoms do not protect against HIV. They significantly reduce the chances of contracting HIV.
t Bimmermatt: Nobody is suggesting that we should not tell people they can’t get HIV (or what have you) if you don’t take part in the necessary activity. The problem is telling people that is the ONLY option at their disposal for reducing their chances of pregnancy/contracting an STD. Humans work best when we have more information to base our decisions off of, and by withholding information from people, or spreading misinformation, you are doing them a great disservice.
Report Post »Prospero
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 10:51amDeconblues writes: “Because all sources are biased, you should not discount them simply because they are biased in a direction you find unpleasant.”
Mmmm hmmm….
Deaconblues wrote: “Your link to an obviously biased source … is sorely lacking.”
Typical ******* moron. Selects his arguments to suit the moment. No principles, no integrity, no intellectual honesty. Just a childish moron.
Report Post »DimmuBorgir
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 11:06am@ DEACONBLUES
Go ahead and have some sex with an aids ridden person, use condoms too. have fun dying while you’re at it. as for me i’m not going to even mess with someone deseased like that. I‘m sure after you’re taking your pill cocktail you‘ll be wishing you hadn’t relied on a condom to save your life from AIDS.
Report Post »Prospero
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 11:12amABC blathers hysterically: “she dabbled in witchcraft as a young woman, which could drive the Christian Right crazy.”
You mean, you’re not among the Christian Right? That’s odd, I am, as is most everyone involved with this board. You speak about us as if we are an alien factor. I guess you must be some seminar troll, right?
A lot of girls I grew up with “practiced withcraft” roflmao! We also played with Ouija boards, drove my mother crazy, she thought it was Satanic. I wish I could vote for Christine, she reminds me of all the little girls I grew up with.
ABC blathers: “That tea party members … cannot find more competent candidates to represent their interests, which drives me craziest of all.”
Yes, I’m sure as someone who refers to the “Christian Right” as something removed, I‘m sure you’re driven crazy that the Tea Party doesn’t produce to your liking……*yawn*
You’re missing the entire point, Seminar Troll. It’s the GOP that should be producing “better” candidates, lest they get trounced by such as Christine.
We’ve had 100 years now of clean, pure, college educated wonder phucks, and look where it’s gotten us. You know what I want? About 500 folks who might reek of vodka, or marijuana, who’ve paid off a tax lien once or twice, had some trouble before on their rent, got divorced once or twice maybe….
But who are *dedicated* to the advancement of limited government and traditional American values. I no longer have any faith in college-edumecated, brie-eating poseurs. I want people like me, and the folks I grew up with.
That would be Christine O’Donnel. Never trust anyone who hasn’t been late on their rent, bounced a check, or lit a candle for Satan once or twice lol!
Report Post »CarlRayLouk
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:26amHarry Reid Pet the bearded Marxist Chris Coon VS T.E.A. Party Patriot Christine O’Donnell
Report Post »How can anybody Delaware still be on the fence, it shouldn’t matter how bad you may think Christine O’Donnell maybe but at least she never described herself as a Bearded Marxist or been call my pet by Harry Reid as Chris Coons has done both. This is a simple choice between Chris Coon a Progressive Liberal Democrat and self described bearded Marxist and whom Harry Reid called his “Pet” that will vote to continue to pass the Obama, Reid, Pelosi progressive liberal out of control spending agenda or Christine O’Donnell who stand for lower taxes and fiscal responsibility, originalism, the rule of law, blind justice, equal protection under the law, strong national defense, limiting government to its assigned constitutional functions, the Second Amendment, the nondiscriminatory application of freedom of speech and expression, the free exercise clause, a reasonable — not unduly expansive — interpretation of the establishment and commerce clauses, protection for the unborn, judicial restraint, federalism, the separation of powers, the free market, racial colorblindness, the existence of good and evil in the world, equality of opportunity rather than of outcomes, law and order, immigration control and border protection. Delaware the line has been drawn where do you stand?
Psychosis
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:23amand you go girl we are all behind you i predict the biased left will try to tear you down but we are here holding you up
LETS GET IT DONE IN NOVEMBER AND PUT THOSE WHO EM-BATTLE AGAINST DIE IN THE FIRE OF TRUTH
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 6:55amPhew, much better. You had me worried.
Report Post »Psychosis
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:20amwhat EVERYONE IS MISSING………..the transfer of wealth that these people are talking about is not what Americans think it is. This is not a transference or redistribution of wealth from rich Americans to poor Americans….. dont seem to grasp the true concept. This is a redistribution of wealth FROM America to the rest of the poor……in the REST OF THE WORLD. You have to realize every American is considered rich compared to most median calculations of income to other countries. They have already started the machine by Obama shutting down drilling and giving upwards of 4 billion dollars to Brazil and Mexico to do exactly what Obama has shut down the U.S. from doing. In the same area in order to “save the world and environment.“ This was not done to ”save the environment”, but was done to limit our production and greatly assist in a poorer country to produce a product that we then will be forced to purchase from them. This has allready started with solar panels and light bulbs- (of all things……cheap to us right now, and you say so what, but everything is cheaper to make elswhere….mexico/ china etc. with the de- industrializing of our nation helped along by union reps (not union members mind you ) whose self stated goal is a world union….WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE……WORKING IN COLUSION WITH THIS OBAMA ADMINISTRATION and the FED in their goals to create a world bank and a world government that will strip America of its wealth and spread it around with them in control of everything this IS COMING AND MUCH SOONER THAN YOU THINK UNLESS WE STAND UP AND STOP IT
I do not believe our government has the countries best interests as a goal. I know these videos are kinda long but if you watch these videos and then look at the goals of the big union bosses words of a world government, the veiwpoints and ideologies of all the people working with this administration who controls the fed bank and glenn becks 9/21 show it will help you all to make a decision on what these peoples goals really are.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5232639329002339531#
Report Post »BeaconForTruth
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:38amWow, just wow. So, the de-industrialization and outsourcing that has been occurring for decades (since at least the 80′s) is Obama’s fault? Is it not possible that the economic drive of business is what has caused the de-industrialization of America?
For example, Detroit‘s downfall started in the early 80’s. Auto manufacturers attempted to increase profit and began outsourcing production jobs to other countries, where workers will work for a fraction of the price of American workers.
Report Post »PostProgressiveAmerican
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 3:46amLOL. This has been the result of Progressive agendas, both Republican and Democrat, over the last few decades; Obama’s actions have only sped it along at a break-neck speed.
I also love how we blame the big bad companies for outsourcing to try and maximize profits…how about the socialist unions and oppressive Government regulations making it so difficult for the companies that they had to outsource to stay alive?
Report Post »DagneyT
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 6:53amWhat the heck are you rambling about, psycho….sis? Try to stay on topic.
Report Post »Freelancer
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 8:01amNice synopsis (with your own little twist) of Glenn’s show yesterday – almost word-for-word…. You do know that most of us here watch and/or listen to Beck right? Why waste space and reading time repeating his shows on his own site?
Report Post »Mikee T
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 8:59amNo…….it’s not the economic drive of business…….and, for your information, the attack on our internal industrialization started long before the 1980′s… Go ask he steel and mine workers how long this has been going on. The fact is we, our government, has regulated, obstructed and resisted american companies for so long with excessive taxes and governement agencies sticking their noses in their business that they could not operate profitably like so many years ago. Coupled with the “left wing” union leaders that have corrupted the unions and so together, between government henchmen and union leaders (all of which are progressives, basically) we have been under attack. I hope they are all very happy now…….we have turned into a “service oriented” nation……sad…..
Report Post »Prospero
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 10:47amBeaconfortruth blathers: “Is it not possible that the economic drive of business is what has caused the de-industrialization of America?”
America has not been de-industrialized, that’s a big labor myth that everyone on both sides of the aisle seems to want to buy into. Manufacturing as a percent of GDP has remained constant in America, reaching a record high in the year 2,000.
The US Automotive industry, like the coal industry before it, was destroyed by organized labor.
If you wish to ever do other than spew talking points and inanities, you actually have to learn things *on your own*. That means some work is involved, and some time.
The only thing you can do, in the absence of a long period of work, is sound like the compleat moron.
Report Post »staythecourse
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:19amO’Donnell, stay the course….on glide path on course….Good luck in the elections. (p.s. yes, folks seem to forget the president “doing drugs”.)
Report Post »Patriotbeliever
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 2:18amGood on you Christina for fighting back. I look forward to the libs trying to take this clip out of contest.
Report Post »Dolt
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 3:26amlmao. I love this comment.
Report Post »zoepatty
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:05amShe is wise not to give any national interviews. The national media is out to get her and it is reaaly sad considering the things her opponent has said and believes. Her opponent is the truly wacky. Yet, I don’t see the media looking at him.
Report Post »beekeeper
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 7:27amIt never made any sense to me that a race in DE got such a large amount of national interest. If O’Donnell has to convince residents of all 50 states that she deserves the chance to represent one state she can never win, her opponent only has to convince one state.
I am exposed to roughly 10x more information about this race in Delaware than I am about my local senate race here in NJ – why? I say good for Ms. O’Donnell for taking a stand on this.
The current and previous two Presidents have had self-admitted encounters with illegal drugs of varying severity, is the bar really that much higher for DE senate candidates?
Report Post »tobywil2
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 8:15amto paraphase Barry Goldwater extremism in the cause of liberty is not a vice. http://commonsense21c.com/
Report Post »keithwright
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 8:50amPlease, a little proof-reading before posting…it’s embarrassing.
Report Post »Ferrets
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 9:04amHer goose is cooked. She had better use the rest of her campaign money for food, rent, etc.
Report Post »Beckofile
Posted on September 22, 2010 at 12:50pmWow…She dabbled in witchcraft and we forgot Obama was doing cocaine and marxism? I will take her all day long over these loons.
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on September 23, 2010 at 12:33amWhat to say of her when she does another national interview? In the Political Theatre, Never say Never Anymore when including I or me.
Report Post »