‘One Determined Little Person’: A Family Shares How Fetal Surgery Helped Improve Their Daughter’s Life
- Posted on July 11, 2012 at 3:05pm by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »
Editor’s Note: This is the third in a five part series where The Blaze has looked into a newer treatment for children diagnosed with spina bifida. While most would have the hole exposing his or her spine closed after birth, more than a decade ago surgeries that were considered controversial at the time began where the hole was closed in utero in the hopes of reversing some of the disabling effects of the disorder.
The first results of a federally funded human trial were released in 2011, showing the success seen in the new treatment thus far. We’ve talked to families who had the elective surgery before it ever entered a formal human trial and those who more recently have had the surgery since the period trial ended. We’ve timed this series to specifically run close to Glenn Beck’s Restoring Love as the parents of children who underwent the surgery, many of whom still have some disability, want the world to know the blessing of celebrating differences.
When Bill Andrews found out the little girl his wife was carrying in the early 1990s had a severe form of spina bifida, he learned she could be paralyzed from the waist down and could have hydrocephalus — fluid on the brain — to a degree that could render her mentally retarded.
What he didn’t know at the time was that he and his wife, Maggie, would opt to have a surgery — one that would seem to take a village to help get them through. It was a surgery that would allow let his daughter to not only walk but later climb rock walls and go surfing. Mary, named after her mother and Mary Magdalene, would also become a top student and a go-getter in student leadership activities.
Click through this slideshow showing Mary’s growth and progress:
Saying ‘yes’
“When my wife had an ultrasound at 19 weeks, it took 45 minutes – in silence – as compared to the ultrasounds of our first two kids, which usually took about five minutes and were filled with exchanges between ourselves and the technicians. This time the technician didn’t say a word until she finished with ‘you’ll have to talk to the doctor.’ We were told by the doctor then that our baby has spina bifida,” Bill recounted.
“I was laying on the table — thank God,” Maggie said. “I was in shock. He showed us the spine and showed us where it opened. I thought I was going to faint.”
It was at the doctor’s office on a Friday that one of the staff members mentioned an experimental surgery taking place at Vanderbilt at the time. On Monday, Maggie called the university’s medical center and was asked if she and Bill could make it out to Nashville from California the following week.
For a family going through financial hardship at the time, it was a request that seemed impossible. But Bill told his wife to say ‘yes’ anyway. They would go and work it out from there.
“One of my friends came forward and said, ‘I have air miles. Here’s a plane ticket.’ Another friend said here’s money for a hotel, rental car, whatever,” Bill said.
At the time it was a $40,000 surgery with $18,000 due up front. They had already been turned down by two insurance agencies. Still, they went.
The Andrews, who have since separated, attended an evangelistic Christian church that was going to take a special offering to help them with the initial down payment for the surgery, but it would turn out they wouldn’t need it. The day before the operation, they learned the insurance company approved their coverage.
Things had worked out so far and the surgery went well, but his wife went into labor early at 25 weeks — usually doctors try to get the child to 37 weeks of gestation before birth. When Mary was born, she weighed less than two pounds.
‘Sometimes it just hurts to be different’
Now at 10 years old, Mary walks, albeit with ankle braces, and does other activities similar to children her own age — although sometimes with her own twist.
Like many children with spina bifida, Mary finds it a condition that can be easy to hide. Bill explains she doesn’t necessarily like to wear the braces on her legs, and she tries to cover them.
“She doesn’t want people to know she wears braces, but she doesn’t like to wear her glasses either,” Bill said, illustrating the point.
Maggie described how her daughter wants to be a dancer — it is a goal that isn’t impossible but she wouldn’t dance “like the other girls.” Recently seeing a group of girls in a restaurant‘s ladies’ room after a recital, Mary had a moment.
“They all looked so cute,” Maggie said referring to their costumes. “The look on Mary’s face. Disappointment. It broke her heart to see those girls. Kids like Mary know that sometimes it just hurts to be different.”
It breaks Maggie’s heart when her daughter doesn’t get invited to things like birthday parties as well.
“Kids like her don’t get invited to those parties,” Maggie said. “Most people don’t know, so they don’t even bother checking with Mom to see if it would be OK. [Mary] has disappointments, but she often holds them in.” Maggie explained that when invites do come in the mail or take-home folder, she and other parents of children with disabilities celebrate these moments.
Still, like many parents with children who have undergone fetal surgery as a treatment for spina bifida, the Andrews are amazed at how their daughter progressed.
“This little girl is one determined little person,” Maggie said. “She keeps going at something until she can get it. She may not do jumping jacks like you and I, but she did them. For her, it is just the joy.”
Other parents have recounted similar stories. Some credit the surgery with allowing them to avoid having to put a shunt in their child’s skull to drain the excess fluid on his or her brain and improve cognitive ability. Some believe their children could be wheelchair bound today without the treatment in utero. All are amazed — and thankful — at each milestone that is reached like any other child without a disability, such as walking, swimming and riding a bike.
Stay tuned for the fourth installation of this five part series tomorrow where the Blaze will cover some of the struggles and harder aspects of the condition and surgery that is a treatment — not quite a cure — for spina bifida, the most common neural disorder.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
RecoveringRepublican
Posted on July 18, 2012 at 6:51amFirst of all, I doubt that is a girl.
Second, “Thanks! Mom and Dad for a lifetime of of disability, the painful surgery, the mocking stares and the never ending debt that will follow me the rest of my lonely life.”
Good thing we have Obamacare to take care of these irresponsible families.
Report Post »ManassasGrandma
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 1:38pmYou go, girl!
Report Post »battles
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 7:12am“You’re welcome to your opinion though.” Thanks for your permission. His sinister eye fits his acceptance of infanticide quite well.
Report Post »IOWAGIR
Posted on July 12, 2012 at 4:57amCute girl and verry strong willed. Never give up!
Report Post »lokisince89
Posted on July 11, 2012 at 6:08pmJZS-
Report Post »Keep in mind when you look at the statistics that countries report their own numbers. The most important factor is the individual country’s definition of “Live Birth”. Most European countries do not report premature or problem births as well as babies born under certain size and weights. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infant_mortality#Comparing_infant_mortality_rates) This leads to the US dropping artificially in un-weighted lists like the one you mention.
jzs
Posted on July 11, 2012 at 10:16pmlokisince89, I appreciate your post. The definition of any measurment is critical regardless of what’s being measured (even in physics) and that is certainly the case here. Sadly, in addition, the willingness of any country to report accurate numbers regardless of definitions could be compromised for political reasons. Yes, the data is fuzzy.
But still, you have formulate ideas based on what evidence is available, and give that evidence weight based on an informed evaluation of how accurate and believable that data is. You can simply find a fault in measurement and reject all the data based on that fault (which you evidently aren’t doing), or you can use the information, properly considered and weighted, to make decisions and form opinions.
Wow, lokisince89, I don’t see many intelligent post here. Thanks for yours.
Report Post »battles
Posted on July 11, 2012 at 4:29pmLovely little girl: 1
Report Post »Abortionist: 0
jzs
Posted on July 11, 2012 at 4:54pmTry getting this surgery done if you can’t afford insurance, although most plans would probably consider this a pre-existing condition, because you‘re not covered until you’re borth. This surgery is a really nice thing if you’re rich. If you are poor you wouldn’t even know your child had the condition.
And by the way, 34 other countries in the world rank better than the US in terms of infant mortality. Looks like all those European countries and their socialized medicine do a lot better at keeping their children alive. Dang.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_mortality_rate
Report Post »SpeckChaser
Posted on July 11, 2012 at 5:34pmJZS
Is it a coincidence when you discuss healthcare you never mention the majority of the country does not want obamacare, or is it something else?
Report Post »jzs
Posted on July 11, 2012 at 9:41pmSpeckChaser, actually Americans are fairly evenly split on the Affordable Care Act which is to be expected given the 100s of millions of dollars spent by Conservatives opposed to it, and a popular news station whose agenda is to influence voters against the Act.
Regardless, the majority of Americans want to move on and not continue to re-litigate the issue:
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2012/07/02/americans-mood-on-health-care-move-on-poll/
Hate to tell you, but every modern industrialized country in the world has something similar to the ACA (not to mention the fact that they have better health care for the average person in their country than the US does). Those countries have decided to take care of their own citizens. They don’t have quite the same “every man for himself” attitude. We should do the same in my opinion. You’re welcome to your opinion though.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on July 11, 2012 at 10:51pmHey JZS,
It’s “OBAMACARE” and there is nothing affordable about it. (Up to 2.6 Trillion…..and counting)
BTW, good luck getting any surgery in a timely fashion when the few doctors that remain are unionized, and care is rationed.
Report Post »SpeckChaser
Posted on July 11, 2012 at 11:28pmJZS
Okay, so you are unaware that the healthcare law has never been approved by the majority of the country. No big suprise.
We all know that the end goal for Obama, who joined the New party socialist group, is single payer. We know that. So I have one question for you. What do you suppose we do when the interest on our debt exceeds our obligations. What do you suppose we do when the money is gone. As Billy pointed out, the projected cost of healthcare is getting close to three trillion for a ten year period, a projection we cant afford even if you seized the wealth of the rich. Have any comment on that?
Report Post »SpeckChaser
Posted on July 11, 2012 at 11:36pmhttp://money.cnn.com/2012/03/05/news/economy/national-debt-interest/index.htm
Report Post »