‘One of the Most Despicable Things You Can Do’: What Made Arianna Huffington Take Romney’s Side Over Obama?
- Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:09pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »

Liberal commentator and online media entrepreneur Arianna Huffington appeared on CBS “This Morning” Monday, where she took a surprising stance on the so-called “spiking the football” ad focusing on the death of Osama bin Laden, released by the Obama campaign over the weekend.
“I agree with the Romney campaign, that using the Osama bin Laden assassination, killing, the great news that we had a year ago, in order to say basically that Obama did it and Romney might not have done it … .I don’t think there should be an ad about that,” Huffington told the panel, going on to say that she was not opposed to media coverage of the terrorist’s capture and death, “But to turn it into a campaign ad is one of the most despicable things you can do.”
The Obama campaign video in question features former President Bill Clinton applauding President Obama for the death of Osama bin Laden.
“That’s one thing that George Bush said that was right,” Clinton humbly opens the video with. “The president is the ‘decider-in-chief’, nobody can make that decision for you” Clinton says, as the video cuts between photos from within the situation room on that iconic day last May. Clinton says Obama took “the harder and more honorable path, that, in my opinion, produced the best result.“ The video than cuts to a screen that reads ”which path would Mitt Romney have taken?” followed by quotes from Romney insinuating that he would not have made the same call as President Obama.
On NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday, top Romney campaign adviser Ed Gillespie called the video and allegation a ”divisive, partisan, political attack.”
“I think most Americans will see it as the sign of a desperate campaign,” he continued.
On Monday, Huffington went on to compare the controversial video to the “3 a.m. call” ad released by Hillary Clinton attacking then candidate Obama during the 2008 Democratic primary campaign.
Huffington said such ads make “politicians and political leaders act irrationally when it comes to matters of war because they’re so afraid to be called wimps, that they make decisions, which are incredible destructive for the country.”
“I’m sure the president would not have escalated in Afghanistan if he was not as concerned, as Democrats are, that Republicans are going to use not escalating against him in a campaign,” she said.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (292)
LetsBeSmartAboutThis
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:51pmThat was actually a breath of fresh air for me. Seeing Arriana say that in front of liberals Gail & Charlie put a smile on my face. : )
Thank you, Blaze.
Report Post »MittensKittens
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:59pmI’d like to think of this as a growing trend. Even the rats know when to abandon ship!
Report Post »billmaherscombover
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 2:08pmThe Puffy Ho got it right this time.
Report Post »esv
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 2:43pmHaven’t seen the add, but I don’t have any issues with the Obama campaign talking about the killing of OBL. It did happen while he was president. BUT, liberals had issues whenever Bush would talk about 911. Good to see Arianna being consistent. If they thought it was wrong for Bush to talk about 911 then it should be wrong for BHO to talk about OBL.
As I said, I don’t have an issue with either one of those… as long as the things being said are honest. And with this president that’s a pretty tall order.
Report Post »D-Fence
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 2:49pmStill don’t like the “First Gener”.
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 3:07pmThis call attention to the fact that Bin laden may be his only accomplishment…yet still he chose to keep the proof hidden from the American people, making me wonder if even this is some sort of lie. Obama is the great deceiver and that’s the one thing we know for sure….fire him in November and end the darkest years in American history…..
Report Post »Alucard
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 3:29pmYep the liberal media types have watched their ratings plumet and realize they can’t sway public opinion like they once did. They are now attempting to come back to the center to save face. Keep in mind this is the same woman that said conservatives use their lizard brains. She has noticed what a lot of them have and is attempting to look more moderate in case the election rejects BO.
Report Post »buyundbuy
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 4:29pmThe rats know when to abandon ship.
Report Post »Treaty
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 5:34pmA Liberal supporting the republican nominee… kinda telling isn’t it? In case you can’t make the connection, Romney is a Liberal and all you RINOs are blindly following him.
Report Post »cuinsong
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 6:45pmSurprise surprise an ultra lib that actually has a little integrity! I am shocked at how fast the NObama ship rats are abandoning ship. I think the light is starting to shine through all the blackness after all!
Report Post »Doris
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 7:44pmYes but the article still leaves a lie on the books. Mitt Romney had a whole paragraph about this but the whole remark is not on here. thats whats dispicable.
Report Post »johnrussell
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 8:02pmFinally the lady is focus on the issues and getting it right! We may have a chance and a “Positive” change,
Report Post »catfish777
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 8:08pmGive Obama 5% of the credit. Obama and Jarrett were still pondering the political implications of to hit or not to hit when PANETTA DECIDED that to wait any longer would risk the chance of a leak and a lost opportunity. So HE gave the go ahead. Obama was on the golf course when he was told about the hit. He came in to view the video……….poor guy, NO MORE CHAIRS AVAILABLE. The video pic will show him on his haunches next to Hillary who was seated.
So Panetta, playing the good soldier, allowed the credit to go to the “boss”.
Report Post »mstrguns
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 8:33pmbe you republican or democrat bin laden is dead ,,the navy seals did it and obama didnt have anything to do with it,,the military commanders made it happen ,,nuff said
Report Post »Evantoo
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 8:35pmFinally! For ONCE I can agree with Adriana Huffington. NEVER thought I’d say it, let alone write it, but in this case I swallow my bile and say, “Good for you, Adriana!”
Report Post »Now let’s see if this shows up elsewhere on Huff Post or just simply is a blip on the screen. (I AM surprised that Mz. H didn‘t say it was the SEAL’s that did the job, and ANY President who was in office would have given the word to execute (meaning DO the mission) the operation. ANY President. Even the only generally accepted as spineless, Jimmy “Peanut Farmer” Carter. would have given the order.
So, NO accolades for the “born wherever” Prez, Obama.
jhaydeng
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 8:40pmThat was her stunt double c’mon!
Report Post »Marci
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 9:25pmObama forgets–his progressive worshippers do not like war of any kind and many of them are hung up on Bin Laden’s “civil rights”. Ha!
Report Post »Country Publius
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 10:03pmi agree with you, Letsbe. I’m perfectly willing to commend anyone who gets it right, whether i agree or am “normally” diametrically opposed to them philosophically.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 10:23pmI’m not too sure I agree with Arianna on this one. Republicans would like you to believe that President Obama is a Muslim, or sympathetic to Muslims. When Bin Laden was killed the right wing, including this website, said there was a military coup. The way the story goes is that President Obama nixed the operation, but the patriotic military went ahead anyway. You guys bought it, as you accept anything you hear that adds fuel to your hatred. You believed that a coup had taken place. But now you’ve erased that from your collective memories. “It never happened,” you say, “that we believed that President Obama tried to stop Bin Ladin’s assassination.”
The Republican agenda is complete. They have a zombie hoard under their control. When they say that Obama is weak on terrorism, you forget all the bad guys he’s killed. And when they tell you to believe that Romney save GM, you believe it. And you’ve forgotten your idea that Obama is ineligible to be President, right?
You don’t see to many birther threads here (have you forgotten those? There must have been hundreds). You believed the birther nonsense then, but now all but a few of you don’t now. The weird thing is that you’ve forgotten that you once believed that President Obama was born in Kenya. The brainwashing took place, you accepted it, and now that the issue has evaporated you not only believe now that the President was born in this country, you’ve forgotten altogether than you ever believe
Report Post »socialism.rocks
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 10:51pmshe was a right winger then turned left..became popular…. eh she is like romney flippppppppppflopppahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Report Post »StrongWesternbabeluvinherWesternMAN
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 11:14pmYes! She is definitely ‘In it to win it”! and no Michelle OB she is not joining…….she is about BUSINESS and HER CORPORATION!!!! She got a taste of free market CAPITALism and she likes it! No sir, no socialism for her…..freedom from the government is her leaning (she not going to lean FORWARD) …..her bottom line? Business success and she knows it aint gonna happen with the OBAMA group
Report Post »Parnell3rd
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 11:17pm@billmayercombover I was eathing cereal when I read your “puffy ho” comment. GREAT!!!! I almost had milk comming out of my nose from laughing so hard!!!!
Report Post »Dale Hogue
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 11:41pmDid you notice the looks of incongruity on the faces of the CBS morning news crew? The looks on the faces of the news crew said more about the attitude of the meainstream media than did any of the words Adrian Huffington might have spoken on the subject matter being discussed. Just saying :-)
Report Post »GeorgieJo
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 12:20amBJ Clinton had three chances to kill OBL
Report Post »HuffyPo is one progressive ______ I do not trust.
Glad the Seals are mad at Obummer for using OBL for POLITICAL reasons.
OMG 2012
Lamarr01
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 1:23amCatfish777: You’ve almost got it right.
Obama and Jarrett knew of Osama’s “location” since late August 2010. They had been postponing the operation for 8 months because Obama didn’t want to offend the anti-war and Muslim voters/donors. The mission was scrubbed but Hillary, Biden, Panetta and someone from “national security” restarted the clock.
A security leak a month ago says someone was killed in the compound and the body was sent to Dover AFB.
The mission could have been completed with a Predator drone. The Seals were sent in to capture vital intelligence. The intelligence must not have been worth much since the mission was “leaked” to the whole world a few hours later.
On August 8, 2011, a Chinook helicopter crashed in Afghanistan crashed killing 22 Seals from Seal Team 6. The helicopter was brought down by a “lucky shot” from a “Taliban” RPG. The deaths marked Nato’s heaviest loss of life in a single incident in the decade-long Afghan war.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 1:59amThis tells me a lot about you guys and your train of thought. It is easier for you to believe that a far left activist like Huffington, could be changing course, even the slightest, toward conservatism and not that she is OK with Romney? WOW. you guys are really into the MSM aren’t you? I bet all of you would go running up to O’Reilly, Hannity, Beck and the rest begging for their autograph. That is one of the problems with Americans today, they are so starstruck it isn’t funny. I met Clint Eastwood, one time when I was out fishing. He was fly fishing, I stopped and talked with him, he showed me his catch, I showed him mine and we parted company. I never even thought about asking him for his autograph. I believe he liked the fact that I was not stary eyed and fumbling all over him. Wake Up America. Romney might as well be running Democrat. He is not far left, but he is left.
Report Post »nzkiwi
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 2:11amThanks, Lamarr, for putting that together so succintly. I did not know all those details. Nice job.
Report Post »bachkhoabks
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 5:37amBạn nói rất tốt tôi cũng quan tâm nếu bạn bần một chia sẻ tôi sẵn sàng giúp bạn với một điều đơn giản
Report Post »Tại một công ty dịch vụ kỹ thuật tại việt nam luôn được mọi người mến mộ đây là bài viết hay nhất mà tôi từng đọc nếu bạn cảm nhận nó một cách chân thành thì mức độ ảnh hưởng của bài viết là rất hay
Với những điều mới mẻ nhất một nghề dịch vụ cực tốt đó là an toàn nhất sau 15 năm vì một cộng đồng được xã hội đánh giá hiệu quả thì giờ đây sua dieu hoa được coi như một uy tín duy nhất với mọi đảm bảo cho toàn việt nam được coi là chuyên nghiệp, nhiều hy vọng được mọi người châm trước luôn đi trước công khai với mọi nhà sự đánh giá của khách hàng đã chứng minh rằng sua dieu hoa thảo luận tốt về vần đề này bạn sẽ hiểu dõ thế nào là một dịch vụ bách khoa trên toàn lãnh thổ việt nam nơi mà mọi khoảng cách còn xa thì bạn cũng sẽ cảm thấy chúng tôi sẽ gần như cần tới mọi ý kiến của bạn cũng như bạn cần một ý kiến lời khuy
ruby5
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 7:13amDo you see how one person can dictate policy and lead opinion. Why is she given validity or recogintion? I find it strange, after all her history, now she is a pal. Oh, I don’t think so!
Report Post »Prudibel
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 7:46amIt is reprehensible. And it only makes Obama look all the more narcissistic.
Report Post »bdsconserv
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 8:20amalmost looks like charlie and gail want to cry! ” how dare arianna question our fearless leader?! he never does anything unfair.”
Report Post »AmazingGrace8
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 9:01am@buy
Agree! I wouldn’t let this woman babysit my cat! She is an “illustrious-twit”!!!
Report Post »Wayner
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 10:29amNotice that look on Charlie Rose’s face when she says that….. He looks like he’s going to be sick!!
Report Post »Buck Shane
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 10:51amBHO is spiking what ball? Is there anyone on this site who would not have croaked Osama?
Report Post »That BHO thinks this was a hard decision tells us about how little commitment he has to protect us, doesn’t it?
The intel that lead to the SEAL’s adventure came from waterboarding – wasn’t BHO against it?
Was the hard decision in his mind caused by having to admit the enhanced interrogations worked and that killing Osama would prove he was wrong again?
nzkiwi
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 11:02amGood grief, we’re being spammed in vietnamese now…
Report Post »cbrown
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 4:06pmGOP folks are getting suckered into the Obama trap. Why are we discussing Bin Laden killing (one of the few big achievements of Obama)? It is manufactured controversy and GOP folks are stupid to get into this. It is a win-win for Obama, any way you spin it.
He is driving the issues (Women, Student, Terror, …) The Romney campaign is on the defensive. In fact Gov Romney is on the sidelines these days. Obama is a master campaigner, I wish he could govern that way too.
Report Post »cbrown
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 4:12pmGOP folks are getting suckered into the Obama trap. Why are we discussing Bin Laden killing (one of the few big achievements of Obama)? Left of GOP and right of Arianna is manufactured controversy and GOP folks are stupid to get into this. It is a win-win for Obama, any way you spin it.
He is driving the issues (Women, Student, Terror, …) The Romney campaign is on the defensive. In fact Gov Romney is on the sidelines these days. Obama is a master campaigner, I wish he could govern that way too.
Report Post »jaylew
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 4:16pmThose of us who are old enough to remember the Clinton Era….remember full well just exactly how much Arianna Huffington despised Bill Clinton’s sexual escapades back then. In fact she was on Fox news then as much as anyone left or right ranting and railing about Clinton’s multiple swine-like situations and lying cheating piggery. Although I agree with most of her observations in this piece I am not convinced that she would have been as harsh in her words if Bill Clinton had not been the purveyor of the pathetic. Let it be heard here and around the block…..there are certain things that will tweak an apparent liberal right into a rabies foam session….that’s why they make such poor politicians…they all have to go through an “observation or quarantine” period before touching one of them….as a dog or cat or bat might have to be whenever a human is bitten. Liberals can become rabid in the twinkling of a fake Paula Jones eyelash. Snarling….and growling like wolves do when they twitch and lift up the side of their cheek to show some teeth.
Report Post »indigosky420
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 5:08pmI had to see it – 2 xs for it to sink in myself!!!
Report Post »oldguy99
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 10:53pmHuffington started out as a consv. found a way to make a fortune (capitalism) by exploiting the looie left, sold-out, and is coming full circle with millions in her purse. Why didn*t I do it-stupid me. Uncouth,unethical, but VERY Wall Street- see a hole and fill it-act the part. OWS bought it hook, line and sinker ,she*s their NEMISESUS-what are the type of people they hate,people like her (keep your enemys close and exploit them). She is in her Ivory Castle and laughing her ass off at both sides. ONLY IN AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »lukerw
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:50pmFEMA: Never look up… under her dress!
Report Post »Captain Crunch
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 4:04pmIt’s all a big lie. Osama bin Laden is still alive probably living under the White House. Show the body…oh that’s right…no body…that’s who they dumped over the side of that aircraft carrier…Nobody.
Report Post »Americans will believe anything they are told without a shred of evidence to back it up. NOBODY!
Soylent Red
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 7:47pmYes, It’s all based on a lie! To a point I agree with Huffington, but keep in mind she’s just another Leftwing gatekeeper who believe the official 911 narrative. Remember this woman invited Jesse Ventura to submit his comments to her column and when he spoke about 911 being based on lies she censored him.
Report Post »As for as bin Laden is concerned look up the name “Tim Osman”.
Was kiling bin Laden dispicable? [that is, if he were killed] Considering that he was never indicted for committing “911”, yes it is dispicable.
As far as I am concerned all these jokers in the mainstream media – on the left and on the right [including "The Blaze"], are in on the coverup.
As far as I am concerned it doesn’t matter who get elected [or selected], nothing is going to change – except for getting worse. And I’ve been saying for nearly a year now that the election will be between
Obama and Romney, and as of this moment the powers that be have a preference for Obama having a second term the same way the PTB did in 2004 with Bush over Kerry even though they had to use
the voting machines to insure the outcome as they preferred Bush. It’s all rigged!
justangry
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:46pmArianna sides with Romney… Told you he was a liberal.
Report Post »danieleseiler
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:58pmWell said.
Report Post »dixiedown
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 2:06pmAt this a point a liberal would be better then the freaking leftist in office now. Romney isnt my favorite either but he’s all we have now.
Report Post »b.mclane
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 2:58pmJustANGRY says the same thing every time they post. That Horse is dead. You can no longer ride it. Romney will be the nominee. Catch Up.
Report Post »GERATMO
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 3:03pmBut at least hes not a commie.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 3:27pmWhat is the difference between a Commie and a progressive conservative. I keep asking, but nobody will answer. Seriously, please someone tell me what the philosophical difference between the two are?
Report Post »Daniel
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 4:00pmI’ll tell you the difference. A commie believes in the destruction of the U.S. and in the destruction of capitalism. Commie’s believe everything should be “GIVEN” to them for free. You’re opine of a progressive conserative, believes in America, and in capitalism. Wants America to excel and be great as it once was, but also believes there should be a safety net to protect those who, no fault to themselves need to be helped. They should be helped and done so with dignity, while those looking for handouts are forced to grow and develop a calling that will allow them to find real employment.
So there, you have your answer.
Report Post »loggs14
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 4:10pmJust angry a progressive Conservative still believes in capitalism and you make your way, they are too free with spending and a little too much pro government. GWB was a little too progressive and sometimes you are victim of the majority like he had to deal with dimcrat majorities his last two years and the when the Senate switch due to a party change by that rino from North East.
Obama is pro communism which is anti capitalism and is not against the 1%, but they want to chose who the 1% are and the rest of use can stand in lines for bread or whatever the 1% will let us have. Complete or almost complete control over the population. Also notice communism and even working socialism requires population control, notice how dims are so pro abortion. Free regeneration can create free thinking conservatives… anything free will allow opposing points of view and critical thinking, all this is anti Obama and Socialism
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 4:30pmOh for Pete sake, if he were a capitalist he would want the market to control the economy instead of the state. That’s just crap!
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 5:11pmWe know for a fact Ron bin Paul would have given Osama a free pass…… Seeing he blames America for 911
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 6:02pm@Republicorp… What no “neolib”? LMAO @U not w/U
Report Post »maybeth
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 7:09pmEven if that is true, he HAS to be better than what we have now.
Report Post »Inlightofthings
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 9:26pmJUSTANGRY:
Report Post »Progressiveconservative is a conundrum and I’ve never heard of such a thing! Define that for me and I most certainly can answer your question relative to a communist.
Welcome Black Carter
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 9:28pmThen vote for the white liberal…
Report Post »BITETHENBARK
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 10:39pmStupidly said. If Hitler said the sky was blue, does that make everyone who agrees that it is a Nazi?
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 11:08pm@Inlightofthings… I don’t know, man. Thought I seen a video of him saying that, and wondered what the heck he meant by it too. Maybe it was Santorum. My brain is tired and they all seem the same to me.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 2:39amDixie, It ain’t over til the fat lady sings. The only way that Romney is to this point is because of election fraud throughout the process. Watch this thirty minute Reality Check from Ben Swan, a Fox affiliate anchor: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=347BJLhZkE4&feature=youtu.be
You have to skip through the commercials as it is the way it was broadcast. Sorry.
Read this article from Boston Globe: http://articles.boston.com/2012-04-30/metro/31478610_1_romney-slate-mitt-romney-massachusetts-governor
Paul is down at this point, but I believe he can get enough delegates to cause a brokered convention. He just needs enough to keep Romney from 1144. You will see in the Boston Globe article, that Paul supporters are picking up delegate spots on Romney’s bound delegate count. If it goes brokered, the second round the delegates can vote for anyone, and Paul supporters are the most loyal. Get it? Do not count Paul out. It is not over. Remember, Warren Harding in 1920, went into the convention with only 39 delegates and came out the victor, why? The convention was brokered, delegates were free to vote for whoever. They ended up giving the delegates needed to Harding on the 10th vote. I think Paul will get it on the second.
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 3:16amHere is another tidbit of info that I came across. Rule 38 of the GOP primary process actually frees all delegates at the convention to vote their conscience on the first vote no matter what a state rule says about bound delegates. http://www.fairvote.org/response-to-a-rogue-convention-how-gop-party-rules-may-surprise-in-201#.T54GZFLOuSr
Would that not be a kick in the butt if Paul was to win on the first round?
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 3:34amHere is another eye opener: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK6k8M8Np_0&feature=youtu.be
Report Post »Dismayed Veteran
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:45pmClinton gave the “No Go” to a Special Operations sniper who could have taken bin Laden out in the 90′s. Asshat should retire.
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 2:27pmThey needed Bin Laden alive for the up and coming “war on terror”.
Report Post »wdittgasn
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 3:13pmThe war on terror is a warmonger’s dream come true…….It is a war that cannot be won…….Hence, perpetual WAR!!!…….Hence, perpetual monstrous profits for the war establishment!!!
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 4:06pmClinton did try to get him with Tomahawks.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 4:39pmThat statement proves that Just Hungry is a Liberal DEMOCRAT plant. Barry had to be yanked off the golf course by Hil to give the go to get OBL, and the molester in chief Clinton had to be pulled out of the broom closet with Monica to shoot up an aspirin factory.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 4:53pmOh that’s just stupid. I’m a Libertarian. I dislike Democrats and Republicans really. I think they’re on the same team. As for what I said… it’s the truth. I never claimed it was effective.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/527uwabl.asp
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 9:52pmYeah , that libertarian party. that stands for legalizing drugs, and umm, ah,, ehhh, Nothing. And your paragon , with 5 % of the delegates, stands for some good things, but while he votes against the earmarks, his district is one of the Greatest beneficiaries of the CASH. And it never is refused.. He’s the King of the hypocrite party.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 3:02am13th Imam, You really should try to know what you are talking about when you speak. Libertarian thinking is what started the Tea Party. Small government, balanced budget, low to no income tax, stop fedearl regulations, end the Patriot Act, End the FED, individual liberty, stop policing the world for the UN. Those are the stances of Libertarians, a true conservative stance. Republicans today are like the liberals of yesterday. Ronald Reagan said it best:
“I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals – if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.”
- Ronald Reagan
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:44pmAriana Huffington
Report Post »“I agree with the Romney Campaign” One lib supporting the other.
disenlightened
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 4:35pmhyperbole, hyperbole, wherefore art thou, hyperbole?
Report Post »ltcwilly
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:41pmShe’s right…for the wrong reasons.
Report Post »blanco5
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:41pmWell, if ariana huffington agrees with obamney then THAT changes EVERYTHING! (dripping in sarcasm)
Report Post »mcsledge
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:39pmClinton? Now there is some backing. It’s a good thing that 9/11 didn’t happen on his watch. He would have cowered under the Ovall Office desk not knowing what to do.
Report Post »makeemstop
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 2:10pmI’m only guessing here… but that space was probably already taken by Monica.
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:37pmI’d like to tape Mitt, Arrianna, and Barak together, drop them into the ocean and let them go find Bin Laden and get his opinion.
Report Post »b.mclane
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 3:01pmHow productive and insightful your comment is. So much for Free Speech for Momma Monkey.
Report Post »Cruelnunusual
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 3:49amAre we talking real monkeys?
Report Post »lylejk
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:36pmI knew BO would do this and, to be honest, I don‘t see an issue with it and many here already know I’m 1000% against his re-election. Only one thing really matters; the economy stupid. Bush did well after the Gulf War to and folks remember how good Bush had it until Clinton won a few months later. Bathing in past glory is just not enough. It’s always going to be about the economy. So long as gas is above $2.5/gal (and, to be honest, even that’s too high for my book when only a litte more then a decade ago it was less then $1/galllon), folks will hold BO’s feet to the fire. BO’s not done himself any favors either by not backing the Canadian pipe line. Personally, we should be drilling our own oil then I would care less for the pipeline since we have plenty of oil here, but the Democrats are preventing that; verdict is out w.r.t. the Republicans. I don’t really trust either party to be honest. Independent conservative I am and will remain. Despise neo-cons as much as I do liberals. Romney‘s a RiNO but if it’s between the RiNO Romney and the Socialist (well Communist in my opinion) O’Bama, I’ll have to pinch my nose by vise and pull the lever for the RiNO. At least Gingrich (Mr. NAFTA/GATT neocon himself) didn’t get the nod. ‘Nough said. :)
Report Post »Beckofile
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:40pmGas or oil is not more expensive it is just that your cotton coupon has been diluted by half or more.
Report Post »RightUnite
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:35pmWhat else does he have? He certainly can’t run on his record, he has absolutely nothing else! Hehehehehehehe!
Report Post »libbsrnuts
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:35pmI think the only reason she said that was to sink her claws in him for his swipe at her during the Washington Correspondents Dinner. Make him think twice about doing it again.
Report Post »MCDAVE
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 3:21pmObama has attacked everyone,in an election year,,Its beyond belief…He is either very stupid or he knows something which I do not…Is anyone doing anything to prevent a foreign country from counting the votes in an American election this November?…If these rumors are true“ we the people” must reject this and insist on fair elections.
Report Post »MiCurmudgeon
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:34pmThe Seals did it for us. Oblamer does it to us. He will always take credit for someone else’s work. He will never take blame for any of his many mistakes.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:31pmAmazing. Sometimes even the devils will admit to their own being wrong.
Report Post »17_tparty_patriot_76
Posted on May 2, 2012 at 6:00pmI really think we should give her credit for her statement, maybe she does see him for what he really is , someone who will say or do anything to get re-elected so he can finish the job of bringing down America……As a true capitalist , like the rest of us, she wants to keep what she earns , not let the gov’t take it and give it away to someone who just wants to leach off of the rest of us. Time will tell if she has seen the light, I’m one for giving her a chance. Thank You Arianna………..
Report Post »hawkeyez
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:28pmIt’s all Obuttma has, so let him have his little fake victory.
Report Post »Nevermind
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:26pmsWampy
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:19pm
It most certainly was an illegal assassination of a foreign leader, and should be treated as such.
****************
What Country was Bin Laden a leader of ? Please tell I would love to hear it. The truth is that he was a terrorist that led to the death of over 3000 Americans and has a nice dirt nap to show for it.
The GOP didnt catch or kill him in the 7 years they had but President Obama’s administration took care of it in less than 1 term as promised. No waterboarding led to his capture and if you think that you are a partsan hack. Facts show what led to his death and Bush had nothing to do with it. If he couldve he wouldve gotten him on his watch but was incapable.
Report Post »Beckofile
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:38pmYou think they did not know where he was all this time including during Bush? You idiot they needed him out there to keep the military industrial complex on cruise control. The only fact of this is that Obama has done such a poor job he had to take some low hanging fruit for his re-emaculation.
Report Post »RBaerwalde
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:43pmPlease… provide these facts of which you speak. Making an unfounded statement regarding something is what makes you a hack.
Report Post »Jim in Houston
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:47pm@Nevermind: You live in the liberal dream world where nothing is what it seems. O’Blamer waffled for more than16 hours before giving an order that should have taken less than a nano second. The dirt bag is a narcissistic, lying empty suit. Without the information obtained by making a few terrorists uncomfortable, Bin Laden would still be safe in Pakistan chasing his butt ugly women.
Report Post »grand slam grandam
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:48pmSo Nevermind knows all about it.
Report Post »b.mclane
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 3:06pmBeckofile: With all the negative harrassment the Media gave Bush for the Iraq War you still cling to your conspiracy nonsense and think Bush knew where Bin Laden was and did nothing?? MED TIME. Think what you will but he would not have another American troop suffer if he had known where he was.
Report Post »rosegrower
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 5:04pm“Facts show that Bush had nothing to do with it.” I beg to differ – Obama retained the so-called “Bush Doctrine” and continued to follow Bush’s lead. If you remember, his campaign promise in 2008 was to scrap the whole mission. When the SEALS located Bin Ladin, they TOLD Obama and gave him the option to approve the kill or no. Obama realized that if he didn’t and the word got out that he allowed Bin Ladin to escape a second time (Clinton did initially) then all of the rumors of his Muslim affiliation would find new life and more than a little evidence. Thanks to Bush’s strategy, Obama is able to take credit for finding and killing Bin Ladin. Like most of Obama’s moves, it backfired with his base and still failed to convince independents and conservatives that he doesn’t hate America, so now he is trying to reinvent himself as a decisive, heroic figure.
Report Post »mavereik
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 7:13pmhey dumbass it was the bush policies that led to his killing…and odumbo knew where he was for 3 weeks…oh and since you have shown what a libtud you are why did clinton not take him out when he had the chance and then 9/11 never would have hapened!!
Report Post »BITETHENBARK
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 10:37pmThey found him by tracking one of his couriers. They got the identity of the courier by waterboarding KSM. Waterboarding that was authorized under GW Bush. Which means information that would not have been obtained following President Obama’s rules for interrogation. Which means if it wasn’t for Bush, OBL would still be sitting in Pakistan watching porn, and you and our president wouldn’t even have his death to brag about.
Report Post »Just in time
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:26pmValerie Jarrett was opposed to it and told BHO not to do it, and he hesitated. Panetta gave the order then told him about it. Therefore he cannot take credit for the killing of UBL.
Report Post »SquidVetOhio
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:26pmIf he’s lost Arianna, it’s over folks.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 1, 2012 at 3:05amShe would not care if Romeney was in, he is probably better suited for her than Obama.
Report Post »Beckofile
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:21pmWow a Communist leaning Forward and sticking to the Obummer
Report Post »Free2speakRN
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:21pmHuffington? A lie, or ……..common sense???
Report Post »theninthplanet
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:20pmThey say a broken clock is right twice a day…
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:19pmIt most certainly was an illegal assassination of a foreign leader, and should be treated as such.
Report Post »aChameleon
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:26pmYou might be able to make that case for Kdaffy since he was an actual leader of a country. Obl was just a terrorist.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 2:27pmHe was one of the leaders of the Muslim nation, a nation without borders.
Report Post »Fubared
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 3:59pmNah, he was propped up by a few wealthy mullahs from back home. He led a few maniacs, not a country or religion and only a few selected from a certain sect of a religion. The cnc got stuck in the middle with zero leadership skills and when obfuscation tacticts ran their course, he pulled the trigger, from DC. He pulled the trigger, from DC, and yet you bicker and dicker with his omnipotence. Take off those Obama knee pads, you do not deserve them.
Report Post »Texas Chris
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 4:09pmI disagree with the “leader” position, but I agree with the illegal assassination part.
You don’t just ride into a sovereign country and whack somebody. Terrorism is a crime, not an act of war. OBL should have been arrested, tried, and if found guilty, punished.
Killing him moves the government one step closer to killing YOU when they accuse you of a crime.
Remember, after they assassinated OBL, they murdered Al Awlaki and his 16 year old son, both US citizens. No charges, no trial, no conviction. Totally unconstitutional.
Report Post »75andkickin
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 9:12pmHe was the leader of a blood-thirsty, murderous terrorist group but NOT a leader of ANY country, real or in your imagination, Swampy.
Report Post »CougarNick78
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:18pmOK, more End of Times Signs….. Arriana Huffington is apparently turning AGAINST BHO.
Believe it, only if she actually votes against Barry Hussein.
Report Post »Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:17pmIt is not possible to sink lower than Barack Obama.
Report Post »HorseCrazy
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 1:15pmshe disgusts me along with most liberals.
Report Post »Juniemoon
Posted on April 30, 2012 at 6:41pmShe’s a 1 percenter now, where’s she gonna go? lol
Report Post »