O’Reilly: Conservative Talk Radio Opens Up on Obama

Comments (176)

1 2 3 ... 5
  • Arc
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 5:20am

    The American public was sold a “ bill of goods” during the Presidential election.
    Now that the sellers have made failed attempts to deliver, they increase their attacks on those who would point out their failures
    . This idiotic attack on the “ rich ” by the union supported “middle class” is simply another way to fan the flames of anger from those who have been “shortchanged” on this “change you can believe in” mantra.
    Common sense is shedding light on the “folly” of numerous programs sponsored by the present administration.
    WE MUST REMEMBER, the political apparatus that helped elect the President, wasn’t the least bit familiar with the “mechanics ” of politics.
    A complete TAKEOVER OF A SYSTEM with the intent to DRASTICALLY CHANGE that system, involves considerably more than “ get out the vote”.
    The “checks and balances” provided in the Constitution were the most remote concepts entertained by the radical left.
    Their approach was illustrated in Speaker Pelosi’s statement, “ we have to pass the bill to see whats in it”.
    Similar to building a coalition of people with bogus reasons for that coalition to exist.
    Or forming a committee for investigating. INVESTIGATING WHAT is IRRELAVANT to the left, just form it. We’ll worry about the proper use later. Just get them to vote for us, using empty promises and “half baked” ideas.
    For the sake of the union, I Think It is Time to Consider a Recall or an Impeachment, AND any Dimocrat, Repubican, or Interdependant that is found to be complicit, either passively or actively should also be removed.

    Report Post » Arc  
  • Ray2447
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 5:07am

    I would consider it the height of irony if Obama is impeached by the lunatic left before the right can bring it about. Now then, who would the loony left propose to take Obama’s place? Whoever it would be – God help us.

    Report Post »  
  • EP46
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 4:38am

    obama the Puppet is doing EXACTLY what he was put into office to do. He only dances at the ends of the strings. He does NOT make decisions..he follows the play book. We all know that obama is just the ‘face’ that is put in front of the cameras. obama is not making any decisions regarding America, he is carrying out the destruction of America as the New World Order calls all the shots from behind the curtain. I have continually said that America is being destroyed by a coup from within the White House and we are watching the destruction of our nation by outside forces who are using this puppet. The EVIL is within the walls of the White House and the Masters they are serving. Wake Up America, this is how a government is over taken. Slowly, piece by piece, from within.

    Report Post »  
  • Fina Biscotti
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 4:29am

    It is a violation of The US Constitution for Usurper President Obama/Soetoro to be sitting on The Security Council for The United Nations.

    No sitting US President can be involved with any governing authority that would affect the sovereignty of the United States of America.

    It is a CRIME against The US CONSTITUTION.

    Report Post »  
  • Bgroovy2
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 4:29am

    It does not matter that Qaddafi is a terrorist or not a “No Fly Zone” Is a PC way to say WAR. The USCON states that only the congress can declare war. I am so sick of the way these freaking politicians trash the Con. and expect us to go along for the ride. Time to throw them all out and start over!

    Report Post »  
  • tbear44
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 4:16am

    I don’t waste my time on BOR. Just watching that clip was painful.

    Report Post » tbear44  
  • lisalake
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 4:09am

    “Let me be Clear—I’m not new to this—I’m bombing lybia and traveling–and have stopped drilling here in the US, because I work for SEIU–and will do everything I can to SPEND YOUR MONEY and bring down our Country!”

    Report Post »  
  • JJCon
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 3:59am

    Of all the clips to use on this issue, they use ORLY?

    I do enjoy the headlines implication that conservative talk radio are just now criticizing Obama. Also Bill’s hiding behind talk radio to criticize Obama is nicely ironic.

    And we’ve got Farrakhan, Moore, and Kucinich to pick from and he uses Nadar as his example from the left? It’s maddening

    Report Post »  
  • 4stmichael
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 3:45am

    Thevoice
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:47am
    No Mr. Bill What you are seeing is the beginning of what and how the “New world order” runs things…
    ==
    Probably right voice!
    __incoherent policies
    __cherry picking winners
    __picking every penny out of the wallets of those who work hard and live responsibly

    check, check, check

    Report Post » 4stmichael  
  • 4stmichael
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 3:40am

    Diane TX
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 3:06am

    What kind of President allows Brazil to drill for oil in the Gulf of Mexico, while not allowing Americans to drill in the same Gulf? Then, America has to pay Brazil for our own oil, that Americans weren’t allowed to drill.
    ==
    ^5
    … what was that comedian O’Reilly mentioned?

    Report Post » 4stmichael  
  • ANewActivist
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 3:31am

    Qadaffi AND Obama need to GO and, in my opinion, Oreilly needs to go also.

    Report Post »  
  • Diane TX
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 3:06am

    What kind of President allows Brazil to drill for oil in the Gulf of Mexico, while not allowing Americans to drill in the same Gulf? Then, America has to pay Brazil for our own oil, that Americans weren’t allowed to drill. This makes no sense at all – except if the President is a Marxist who believes that the USA has to be “leveled” down for being too successful.

    How about that speech by the Brazilian President where the “goal” is to make North and South America into one Union? The European Union is doing so well – not.

    The goal of these idiots is take what each American has earned during their lives and give it those that have done nothing to earn anything, so that everyone has the same amount of “stuff”. The ruling elite of the Socialist/Marxists, of course, are exempted from this “sharing”.

    Report Post »  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 3:47am

      Diane TX
      What kind of President allows Brazil to drill for oil in the Gulf of Mexico, while not allowing Americans to drill in the same Gulf?
      ————–
      He is FUNDING Brazil’s oil drilling with US taxdollars
      ( $ 2 Bil of which we know about , thru Sore@$$)
      so that they can they can SELL that oil to US ….
      If THIS doesn’t prove his deep seated animosity to this country, I don’t know what does

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
  • Just in time
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:52am

    Obama has ties with the dictator. I think that is why he won’t go after the person. Just his actions. I think secretly he BHO just wants this dictator to slow his roll. So he BHO won’t have to do what he is doing

    Report Post »  
  • Godzillalips
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:44am

    I think bill is missing the point here, Obama is doing what he does when it is time to be a leader. He jets off somewhere loser friendly.

    Report Post » Godzillalips  
  • Barry Soetoro
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:40am

    Obama, by his own admission, is clearly not a “natural-born citizen.” He was born to a British subject father. That by itself disqualifies him as an NBC, which further disqualifies him under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution to hold the office of the presidency.

    There is no verified document that shows where and when he was born. He is also using a Social Security number that has been shown to belong to other people.

    The Social Security # Issue:
    Obama is using SS number 042-68-4425, issued in CT in and around March 1977 to an elderly individual named John Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, who is presumed dead and whose death was either never reported to the SS administration or reported and deleted from the database by someone.

    How is this possible? Obama’s maternal grandmother Madelyn Dunham, worked as a part-timer or volunteer in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse and had access to the estate files of anyone who died there. The elderly Mr. Ludwig originally from CT died intestate in Hawaii with no known relatives, Grandma Dunham would have known this person is a prime candidate to steal the SSN of since there would be no known surviving family worrying about the death benefit from SSN and that the benefit was not likely applied for and thus SSA did not know he died. Thus the SSN remained active for the deceased person and Obama could “adopt” it as his own. This is a clear case of identity theft at the federal level.

    On January 21st, 2009, his very first day in office, Barack Obama implemented and signed into law Executive Order 13489. The Executive Order that states that only the records he chooses to be made public will be released?

    This is the subject that was at the absolute top of his agenda?

    He has completely hidden his past. The Obama records which have not been released include;
    • Passport records
    • Obama kindergarten records
    • Punahou School records
    • Occidental College records
    • Columbia University records
    • Columbia thesis
    • Harvard Law School records
    • Harvard Law Review articles
    • University of Chicago scholarly articles
    • Illinois State Bar Association records
    • Illinois State Senate records/schedules(said to be lost)
    • Medical records
    • Obama/Dunham marriage license
    • Obama/Dunham divorce documents
    • Soetoro/Dunham marriage license
    • Adoption records
    • Birth Certificate

    So far, no one really knows who this person who calls himself Obama really is.

    Georgia is the latest state to propose legislation that questions whether President Barack Obama was born in the U.S., joining the other states who have measures that want more proof before his name is put on the 2012 ballot.

    The 11 other states with similar pending bills include: Arizona, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Connecticut, Indiana, Nebraska, Tennessee, New Hampshire and Maine. The measure has failed this year in Montana.

    Was Obama Born in Kenya, Hawaii, Mars….I don’t know. A document or piece of paper from the 60s can be very easily forged. Record keeping then, wasn’t what it is today. The illegal’s in 2011 don’t seem to have a problem getting fake IDs, licences….

    Just the possibility that someone could so easily “infiltrate” our government is the scary thing for me. Pros and Cons have looked at this issue and both have come up with their form of proof that comes down to nothing more than just a piece of paper.

    I suggest no conclusion as to whether Obama is eligible or not. But the citizens whom the media and political pundits dismiss as “birthers” have raised legitimate questions. That legitimacy is fueled by Obama”s curious, even bizarre, refusal to consent to the release of the relevant records. Perhaps there is nothing to the issues raised. Or perhaps there is. This is potentially serious business. If it turns out that Obama knew he was ineligible when he campaigned and when he took the oath as President, it could be the biggest political fraud in the history of the world. As long as Obama refuses to disclose the records, speculation will grow and grow without any necessary relation to the truth. The first step toward resolving the issue is full discovery and disclosure of the facts.

    We need to make our states require transparency and proof of eligibility. Contact your local congressman and senators now. Let’s solicit our lawmakers to put this eligibility issue to rest before 2012.

    Report Post » taltmire  
    • tbear44
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 3:35am

      I betcha if Barry S. had a (R) after his name we would have all of that.

      Report Post » tbear44  
    • Odin64
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 4:01am

      very interesting indeed, but as things stand, too little, and too late. his term is almost up so frauding his presidency would be for little gain, but if we can get enough evidence to prove that he was knowingly frauding the US gov. and its people, we may be able to get him and his lackeys on conspiring against the US Constitution, that would mean treason and bring down some major key players…. but only if the evidence is strong. With out concrete evidence (ie his historical records) these accusations, are just that, crazy “Birther conspiracies”

      Report Post » Odin64  
    • sbleve
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 6:09am

      A lot of interesting questions-presumptions presented.

      SS# – there is no way of knowing how many of these numbers have been purchased by and are use to appear as an American citizen by illegal aliens. Some non government (gov’tment does not have a clue) estimates is as high as 20 million. The SS administration has been a disaster waiting to be recognised soon after the 1964 SNAFU as usual of Congressional ignorance. The SS# has not been secure for decades – nearly a ponzi numbers game. A direct intentional-stupidity on the part of Congress.

      Birth records of 1964 were not done digitally. All states had a form, pre printed, that was placed in a typewriter with the appropriate blank openings completed, with a Signature verifying same. This form is kept indefinitely in safe keeping. Some times the hall of record burns down and those historical forms are lost forever. A deposition/with supporting evidence is then required to recreate the authenticity of a persons birth. One very common, prior to the 1964 congressional snafu, was the use of a church certificate/baptism etc documentation. Same as pre 1900 certificate of marriage from a church or justice of the peace.

      Report Post » sbleve  
    • Clive
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:01pm

      he was born in hawaii. read snopes. get over it. the inability to move past this is pathetic, wreaks of sour grapes, makes you look stupid.

      Report Post »  
    • zman173rd
      Posted on March 24, 2011 at 1:08am

      666! He could be the beast. But my money is on his Honey. She scrres the daylights outta me.

      Report Post » zman173rd  
  • Texasbelle
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:21am

    Our President,(even though I did not vote for him),is an apologist for America, and does not believe in his own country. He is a good speaker (with a tele-prompter), not a real leader. He is a puppet for the “left”. I do not hate the man, but his political platform and policies. It is a hard job being President. Everyone of them have made terrible and tough decisions…but I think he is bent on the destruction of American way of life…I believe he is a socialist…just do your homework on his early life, family, education…and political, and personal influences….Anyway, Mr. O does a good job of reading the mood of the country, and I think ,conservative radio can go a bit too far. But the lame stream (left) media, leads us astray and r more hypocritical and hateful. President Obama needs to listen to the voices of all Americans, not just the ones he panders to…Qa“daffy” (yes, “daffy duck”) needs to be removed, anyone remember Pan Am 103? Let the people of Libiya decide what they want…help them if we need too..but lets not stay long term…

    Report Post »  
    • Rob
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 7:10am

      Not MY president, even though I didn’t vote for him.

      Report Post »  
  • Diane TX
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:05am

    I don’t know about the rest of you, but I find it disturbing that the USA is entering into “military actions” by consensus of the United Nations. Since when did the UN decide what the USA should do or not do?

    We have a legislative branch that is supposed to make Laws that govern us. The UN has no authority to send American military men and women to do anything.

    I know that it‘s the Left’s biggest aspiration to have the USA governed by what the “rest of the World” thinks how we should be governed, but I kinda like our representative Republic – where the people of the USA have a voice on how we should be governed.

    Report Post »  
    • Showtime
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:42am

      The UN does not have the authority to decide what the U.S. should or should not do. It’s also illegal for Obama to serve on the UN, I believe.

      Obama does not even have the authority to declare war. Congress has to do it. (Unless Obahmah decides to himself. That’s why everyone in Congress is raising hell about it. There are NINE Democrats who want him impeached!)

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • kickagrandma
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 6:48am

      @DIANE TX ~~~

      I agree with you! We should not be there at all. Read my lips: This is a set up. It was planned out and we are being led along like sheep to the slaughter. obamamama is part of the plan. his trips are always way away so he can meet with his handlers out of our sight.

      The sad part is we are taking this sitting down. We should have surrounded the WHITE HOUSE, OUR HOUSE, and taken it back while they were gone a-g-a-i-n!

      Our only, only, only hope at this point is GOD‘s redeeming grace and intervention on HIS kids’ behalf.

      PRAY ON, AMERICA.

      And, lock and load.

      Report Post »  
  • SilentReader
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:55am

    Obama is voting present. He’s abdicating his own responsibility to be the leader of the free world and dithering again. In other words this man is not a decision maker. He a community organizer. That’s why he left the “no fly” zone to some “international committee” to deal with.

    Obama is a multicultural elitist who would prefer to pass the buck to someone else to figure out, and take another vacation. Get used to it.

    When this coalition acted it was too late to do anything about Gadhafi. That’s the trouble with coalitions.

    There’s the other question too. Why didn’t we act in Iran, China, Bahrain and Yemen? There were alot of people murdered-by-government there too. So, why Libya? All the Islamic countries have rogue leaders. That’s a given.

    Our foreign policy is so messed up, it’s unbelievable.

    The fact of the matter is Libya is not a direct threat to America. Iran is.

    And, so we are left wondering again what will his next calamity be? And can America withstand another two years of Obamaudacity.

    Report Post » SilentReader  
  • leahasevedo
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:54am

    i love sam kinison, and we all know bill is just one of those people who think that the usa could never be brought down. he is one who sits silent in disbelief, and in fear. it is a scary and troubleing thing when you finally realize that all the hype is true. mr. o has not yet reached that point yet, and he may never.

    Report Post »  
    • Showtime
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:02pm

      Bill O’Reilly has been threatened. Look above and find where I gave the link to The Roth Show.

      Report Post » Showtime  
  • Rednugly
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:48am

    …not really…

    Report Post »  
  • Thevoice
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:47am

    No Mr. Bill What you are seeing is the beginning of what and how the “New world order” runs things…And when you had the opportunity to ask some real questions to Obama and press him on leadership ..You Mr. Bill failed miserably ….

    Report Post » Thevoice  
    • Showtime
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:43am

      YES, he DID fail miserably!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 4:46am

      And that is why the UN want to make a move on gun ownership in the US
      http://www.popmodal.com/video/5465/United-Nations-Ready-To-Globally-Ban-Guns

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • Marylou7
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 5:53am

      O’Reilly is too interested in kissing butt to ask any REAL questions. Can’t stand him or our vacationer in chief.

      Report Post » Marylou7  
    • NancyBee
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 10:11am

      I don‘t think O’reilly Believes in “the New World Govern” yet . If he does he won’t talk about it…and there’s proof all over the place….some days I think he gets it and then other days….I think Wow…he just doesn’t get it……….

      Report Post » NancyBee  
    • NancyBee
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 10:45am

      Republicorp…………thanks for the link………watched it………..everyone needs to watch it…..this is pretty scarey stuff………the UN is no friend to America…..

      Report Post » NancyBee  
    • psst
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 11:09am

      NancyBee
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 10:45am
      Republicorp…………thanks for the link………watched it………..everyone needs to watch it…..this is pretty scarey stuff………the UN is no friend to America…..

      Um. The UN was founded by Marxists, including ameriKan marxists.
      The Rockefellers, part of the NWO/OWG Cabal donated the land.
      The UN is the John the Baptist for the NWO/OWG. IOW,setting the stage, preaching the Gospel of World Governance.
      The UN works to destroy American Nationalism and weaken American sovereignty.Citizens of the World blah-blah garbage.
      America must be brought to heel for the NWO/OWG to come to fruition.
      Some opf our radical SCOTUS justices even wants to cite World’s Court opinions in their deliberations. That’s funny as hell, “Their deliberations”.. Wanting to cite opinions based on the courts /rulings in other nations. Like we don’t have Our Constitution.
      BTW. That thingy have died and been buried a long time ago. Just “axe” any socialist pols and or socialist judges.They will tell you may it rest in peace.

      Report Post »  
    • Clive
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 12:56pm

      Yes… the NWO! and the illuminati!!! and the boogey man!!!!
      I heard the whole world is secretly run by an alien sasquatch. Boogity boooo!

      Gosh, I really can’t understand why people have a hard time taking glenn beck and his fans seriously.

      Report Post »  
  • katzenbacker73
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:44am

    The headline seems a little mis-leading to me….from O‘Reilly’s own analysis he believes that Nadar wants the President impeached.

    Report Post » katzenbacker73  
    • Showtime
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:37am

      Ralph Nader does want the man impeached. (I’m sorry — I just cannot bring myself to say “president” and “Obama” together.)

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • banjarmon
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:34pm

      2 Show
      That is the reason I use “mr o’ and “potus” in lower case letters…I have no respect for that excuse for a person.

      Report Post » banjarmon  
    • Hephzibah
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 6:12pm

      The leftists rarely, if ever, called President Bush “President”. After eight years of that, even Republicans and Bush fans felt awkward calling him “President” Bush. I believe it’s a form of brainwashing…programming bias…showing disrespect by not addressing him by his earned title. (I won’t type what I call O.)

      Report Post » Hephzibah  
  • dr_funk
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:42am

    Wrong, Bill. He’s not a terrorist. He’s much worse.

    He’s a tyrant.

    Report Post »  
  • cheezwhiz
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:35am

    What did he say ? What did he say ??

    Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • Showtime
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:43am

      Didn’t you hear it?

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:48am

      Showtime
      Vid not playing ….
      but I’m guessing he is dissing on conservatives ..since BOR is so fair and balanced .

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • Showtime
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:22am

      He said that O is a wimp because he did not lead the attack, hiding behind the UN. Waited far too long to deal with Q. Would have been easier two weeks ago. (Well, I’ll transcribe from here.)

      Some conservatives believe Obama is hiding behind the UN and has no real plan in Libya. Talking Points believes some of the criticism is valid. The U.S. is tentative about what to do in Libya. .Getting Qadaffi out of power will be much harder than it would have been two weeks ago. No one knows what takes Qadaffi’s place, but he’s a terrorist and has to go. There are never any guarantees in any military action. This is another frustrating situation in the Arab world. After days of listening to the analysis, I feel like the late comedian Sam Kinison

      The whole thing is maddening. We are again spending a lot of money in a far away place with no end game in sight. The mainstream liberal media is generally supporting President Obama, while the far left despise the action. Ralph Nader even believes the president should be impeached. What’s best for the U.S.A.? The answer: Qadaffi has to go. What happens after that? God only knows.

      Showtime  
    • Showtime
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:22am

      I wouldn’t have done that for just anybody!

      Report Post » Showtime  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:50am

      Showtime
      Thanx a zillion…very kind of you.
      This man is stunnnnningly stupid .
      “Some conservatives believe Obama is hiding behind the UN and has no real plan in Libya”….some conservatives ? Really ? Its the conservatives’ fault that THAT IS THE FRIKIN TRUTH ?
      Obama IS HIDING behind the UN….prove us wrong BOR . Go ahead, prove it .
      In fact Obama has opened the door to US troops being used as mercenaries for the UN , putting them at UN’s disposal, with the US taxpayer funding the UN’s fantasies . I’m sure in a few months , our troops will answer to UN and then Obama will ‘organize’ his civilian national security force, just as well armed as the US military, as he had promised.
      BOR is waaaay behind the curve on this .

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • RLTW
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 10:41am

      While on his resent trip Obama was informed that 2 Brazilian skydivers had just perished.
      Obama shocked asked. “How many is a Brazilian?”

      Report Post »  
  • Showtime
    Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:34am

    Obama is hiding…period. And Qadaffi AND Obama need to GO!

    Report Post » Showtime  
    • AnAppealToGod
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:52am

      Obama isn’t hiding. He seriously just doesn’t know any better.

      Report Post » AnAppealToGod  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:59am

      Showtime
      Obama is hiding
      —
      I think he is mocking us—
      ..look at all those suckers working their @$$es off , I have them trapped

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 2:13am

      Between Quaddafi and Obama, then Obama has to be the first to go by impeachment and then face charges across the board with the rest of his administration.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • proudconservative
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 3:55am

      I agree with Ralph Nader, he does need impeached.

      Report Post »  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 3:59am

      Yep. He’s hiding from Congress, gone AWOL like the Dims in WI. Impeach the tyrant wannabe.

      Report Post »  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 4:18am

      kryptonite
      Yep. He’s hiding from Congress, gone AWOL
      ——–
      Thats not the vibe I’m catching.
      What I feel is that a bunch of feudal lords and monarchs a k a the memebers of Security Council met up to shoot some breeze and France expressed its desire to kick some @$$ and the UK wanted to join in too. But they didn’t have servants to carry out their fantasies, so a Sheikh loaned them his posse of servants. Ofcourse the Sheikh is not going to hang around with the servants since now they are slaves to the Security Council . Once the servants are no longer needed, they will be returned to the Sheikh with thanx and gifts from the feudals, for the Sheikh and Sheikha .

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • Thatsitivehadenough
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 4:46am

      All these world affairs, international problems, terrorism, wars, revolutions, they are all interfering with Obama’s plan to FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA into some Marxist nightmare.

      He wasn’t ready to govern. Only to lead the REVOLUTION.

      He’s a complete, and total failure as leader of the free world. But, we knew that. Even before the election.

      Report Post » Thatsitivehadenough  
    • 912828Buckeye
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 5:51am

      Obama is not hiding…..
      He can be found on the golf course, on vacation and ESPN.

      Report Post » 912828Buckeye  
    • NickDeringer
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 6:38am

      O‘Reilly thinks he’s still on “Current Affair.” He just doesn’t get it. He has become part of the Pundit Industrial Complex and has lost touch with reality.

      Report Post » NickDeringer  
    • G.W. Dobbs
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 7:04am

      O’Reilly went after Jesse Jackson and openly proved that the IRS/Government were intentionally leaving Jackson alone in spite of obvious TAX matters. Give O’Reilly credit for honestly trying and exposing the “Rainbow Coalition”. But O’Reilly seems to have lost his ferver when it comes to Obama; I believe because they both are “Harvard Men”. I wish we had the O’Reilly of old but he is gone into Political Correctness and does not want to offend Obama with TRUTH. O’Reilly was not given a 25 Million dollar contract for nothing. He stays “safe” now that “he got his”.

      Report Post »  
    • Fletch
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 7:05am

      When you lose Ted Baxter’s lip prints on your butt you may have a problem

      Report Post » Fletch  
    • lovenfl3
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 7:56am

      @Fletch – I love the Ted Baxter tag. The first time I heard Rush call him that, it took me a while to figure out who he was talking about. I‘m sure we’ll hear it today.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwehWN4dXKg

      Report Post » lovenfl3  
    • WestOfThePecos
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 8:08am

      I agree with Snow (above). Obama has to go first and if that is the case, we will be in this non-war until 2012.

      Report Post » WestOfThePecos  
    • restorehope
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 12:27pm

      Obama is incapable of governing well because he cannot multi-task. He jumps from one crises to another without resolving anything. He doesn’t lead from the rear, he simply does not lead at all.

      As for O’Reilly, he is obviously an Obama devotee and no longer pretends otherwise. Last night, even Colmes criticized Obama for his Libya action and yet O’Reilly continued his Obama lovefest. O”Reilly better watch out because he is getting just as disgusting to watch as fellow Obama adorist Chris Matthews.

      Report Post »  
    • banjarmon
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:28pm

      “2012” Lets put “mr o” at the bottom of the landslide and make him stay there.

      Report Post » banjarmon  
    • smithclar3nc3
      Posted on March 23, 2011 at 1:37pm

      Restorehope,
      Idon’t know iot Oreilly is an Obama fan or just holds alot of respect for the Office of the President. Either way it’s is a good thing if anything to office of the president should be under more scrutiny not less as power is the father of corruption.

      Report Post »  
    • grandma7
      Posted on March 24, 2011 at 2:33am

      Agree One Hundred Percent = hiding!

      Report Post »  
    • jnobfan
      Posted on March 24, 2011 at 3:38am

      IMO we (hillary) got snookered by the French. Europe has gigantic energy problems – none of their own and the Japanese Nuke scare may reduce them to total dependency on the Arabs or Russians for 80 to 90% of their energy needs. France doesn’t go to war to save Africans or anybody else. This about oil.

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 5

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love