O’Reilly Was Right About Muslims Attacking on 9/11 Says…Bill Maher

Comments (156)

1 2 3 4
  • CanadianTory
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 9:38am

    It’s perfectly fair for Mahr and his panel to disagree with the conclusion that can be reached ie) Muslims attacked us on 9/11 thus . However as has been mentioned before it is bizarre that b/c you don’t like the conclusion you disregard the facts. You could even say that the truth is a tad bit inconvenient for themt.

    Report Post »  
  • Winghunter
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 9:37am

    O’Reilly had a Dr. Yasser on last night in an apparent attempt to show there are a handful of Muslims wishing to speak out against terrorism. Yasser offers that ‘their’ effort is to Americanize Muslims but, did they Frenchanize Muslims? Britainize Muslims? See for yourself exactly what they’ve done in history:
    What Islam Isn’t By Dr. Peter Hammond
    http://tinyurl.com/62dxdg
    “Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.
    Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components….”

    Report Post » Winghunter  
  • Lessa Stone
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 9:35am

    He didn’t say they “shouldn’t be able to build it”, he said he felt it was inappriopriate..big difference.

    Report Post »  
  • dizzyinthedark
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 9:21am

    …..ZZZZZZZZZZZ Once again, his words still matter?! Who cares what he agrees with. His words do not matter nor do they amount to much. Go away Maher, what you say matters not!

    Mr. O’Reilly got it partially right. He and most still think there’s two groups of muslims–the peaceful ones and the radical ones. Unfortunately, until the so-called ‘peaceful’ ones stand up in great numbers to denounce what their brothers do to their so-called religion (ideology) I will not believe them. As their book tells them they must kill the infidels (us and Jews) so they can rule the world. Now, here in America as a Christian nation we welcome all religions to worship. We do not seek to ‘wipe out’ any religion so Christianity may rule the world, only islam says this. islam also encourages their followers to lie for the good of the cause. I‘m not convinced there are ’good’ muslims, ‘peaceful’ muslims Mr. O’Reilly. Watch out people! Don’t fall asleep with this one!

    Report Post » dizzyinthedark  
  • kennycannon
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:47am

    People need to realize a few things.

    First, the mosque is not a first amendment issue. It’s a private property rights issue. They own the building, they have the permits to do it, so LEGALLY they are allowed. Is it wrong…YES! Do I support it…NO!

    Second, during the segment Bill was talking about why Obama has a disconnect with the people. He was using the mosque as an example. They asked why people think that way about the Mosque and he said “Because Muslims killed us on 9/11.” All of that is 100% true.

    Third, no one is saying that they should be ALLOWED to build the Mosque. The people I know and hear are just saying that they shouldn’t do it.

    If the Government stepped in and said they weren’t allowed, I’d stand with the Muslims and protest that decision.

    Report Post » kennycannon  
  • The Judge
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:46am

    If maror agrees with you then you are on the wrong side and you are the problem. In this case he obviously hates anyone who will serve a statue, god, allah, but especially the One True Living Almighty Creator God and enjoys discrediting religion when he can. The Blaze becomes a spark when you think maroar adds a credential to a news story. Loved Fridays show Glen. Keep encouraging us to seek and serve God Almighty.

    Report Post »  
  • jacobstroubles
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:15am

    Is it true that FOX might lower the hammer down on Glenn, and that luckily he has the loving arms of the Alex Jones network to run too? Or is Alex Jones dreaming this will happen, as he’ looking for his
    own little piece of the psychological warfare tactics? Alex Jones sure seems to think the Glenn is finally coming around to “his” way of thinking and that Glenn is taking Alex Jones challenges on a lot of issues.

    Alex says he has the power of discernment, and started noticing this “change” in Glenn about 6 months ago. I’m sure they sell something over the counter for that.. Gas X?

    I’m sure AJ would love to have GB on his team, rather than his other believable regulars, like Charlie Sheen and Jessie Ventura.

    Report Post »  
  • azkmb
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:09am

    Glenn, Why Bill mayer, or whatever his name is. He is a non issue and completely irrelevant to society! I think this site can do without any press of this guy. THanx

    Report Post »  
  • Wenchypoo
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 7:04am

    Anything for ratings, Maher..you’ll say anything for ratings. Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg will walk anywhere for ratings, including off stage.

    Report Post »  
  • NASSAUPLAYER828
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 7:03am

    “Nonie Darwish is a woman of great courage with an amazing story to tell
    Her book
    Now they call me Infidel
    is a book that all americans need to read.
    It speaks volumes of muslims in america and abroad.

    Report Post »  
    • TrueGrit
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 10:39am

      IF everyone would just read the Koran… or at least skim through it.
      It’s all there.
      If a true believer cannot convert an infidel… he or she must kill the to be pure.

      Stop jaba-jawing and take a moment to do your homework… for real.
      ‘Good’ Muslims were celebrating and throwing candy while the Towers were burning
      IN DETROIT… DEARBORN… etc.

      If you bitch that Congress doesn’t read the Bills… how can you NOT READ THE KORAN
      and try to understand what you are dealing with. This is scary stuff.

      If you don’t know the enemy how can you expect all your high talk to have any meaning?

      Wolverine

      Report Post »  
  • NASSAUPLAYER828
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 7:00am

    Muslims: How do we spin this to make them look better for Whoopi and Bill and Jon and Behar

    1. 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by:
    A Muslim male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40

    2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by:
    a. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    3. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by:
    a. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    4. During the 1980′s a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by:
    a Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    5. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by:
    a. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    6. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by:
    a. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    7. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by:
    a.Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    8. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by:
    a. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    9. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by:
    a. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    10. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:
    a. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    11. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles
    to take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers.
    Thousands of people were killed by:
    a. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    12. In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against:
    a.Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    13. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by:
    a. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    14. And now we can add: In 2009, 31 people wounded and 13 American Soldiers murdered on base at Fort Hood by a Major that was known as…
    a: A Muslim male extremist between the age of 17 and 40.

    Report Post »  
    • 79USMC83
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 7:21am

      OOH RAH!!! and we are not at WAR!!! with MUSLIMS but the MUSLIM JIHADISTS have been at war with America for a LONG time!!

      Report Post »  
    • Rev. WC
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 7:40am

      2010 and now we can add: A President destroys the lives of 3 million people and takes down a country is known as…

      a: a Muslim male extremist between the age of 17 and 50…

      Report Post » Rev. WC  
    • jacobstroubles
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:22am

      Whoopi and Joy are not very bright people.
      Have you ever listened to them?
      They have their little niche audience that they pander too.
      Their demonstration was all about showing their feathers to their audience.
      It was the most hysterical thing on TV in a long, long time.
      For them to come back on before it was over, was even funnier, if it could get funnier.
      Bill O did the world a big favor that day.
      He afforded the viewing audience clear snap shot of
      “what they are”.
      It was hysterical!

      Report Post »  
  • Grandfather Z
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:53am

    I watched this and just loved the fact that two of these cluckers walked off the stage. To me, it would seem as though the American public eyes are starting to see the scales being dropped off to the floor, O’Riely, who I am no big fan of, really exposed the liars for what they truly are. Can’t handle the heat then get out of the kitchen, right. The fact of the matter seems as though they are not very good in the kitchen which is so obvious as to the fact they just talk, talk and talk some more knowing nothing fo facts, just feeeeeeeeeeeeelllllllllliiiiiiinnnnnnnggggggggs. Pathetic cluckers.

    Report Post »  
    • userfriendly
      Posted on October 18, 2010 at 12:59am

      Hahahaha- “…can’t handle the heat,…” Exactly that. Get their panties all in a twist because BO‘R didn’t specify EXTREMIST muslims. Well boo-hoo. Yet WG has no problem throwing out the, “Timothy McVeigh was a Christian” line, now does she? Doesn‘t qualify THAT statement with ’extremist’. Nevermind the fact that TMcV was NOT a Christian at all, he was a self-proclaimed atheist. But, hey, facts don’t matter when the proglibytes can use that line as a buffer against anyone speaking out against muslim terrorists, right?

      Report Post »  
  • BreeZee
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:34am

    This is what being “PC” has gotten us. No one can say anything without someone being offended. How thin skinned have we become?

    Report Post »  
  • warner
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:31am

    These people are totally ignorant in their analysis. The party of empathy and “feeling your pain” has forgotten its own political correctness. No one is saying that Muslims cannot practice their religion in the USA. Although, as a Christian man of many years I truly believe the religion has some major flaws in its doctrin. The crazy liberals cannot understand that this is our Pearl Harbor. You would not have seen ten years after Pearl Harbor a Japanese Community Center going up in Hawaii! Our people jumped from that building while it was burning them alive. Our fireman were crushed as the towers fell! And yet, you want the Muslims to build two blocks from this site. What is wrong with you people. If these liberals actually did their research on Islam and its true doctrin they would have a fit. The beating of wives, honor killings, the non-tolerance of any other religion to the point of murder. O’reilly was correct in stating that Muslims killed us on 9/11. It sure wasn’t the Jews, or Wiccans!

    Report Post »  
  • Jimmers46
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:29am

    Keep it in mind, The rest of the “Muslims” all support the extremists!

    Report Post »  
  • hamptonsurfer
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:28am

    maher is no dummy, he knows that o’reilly has 13x his viewers and since viewers = money, he might want to tap into some of that. slick.

    Report Post »  
    • OneRepublic4us
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 9:58am

      My guess it was a sick bet that Maher made with someone about getting air time on FOX and O‘Reilly’s show. He wants his face on one of the highest rated shows on the most popular network so he’ll be relevant again.

      Report Post » OneRepublic4us  
  • dextersl2
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:12am

    Does anyone remember why building seven of the world trade center fell down?

    Report Post »  
    • walkwithme1966
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:35am

      Please don’t tell me you are a 9/11 Truther – oh well it takes all kinds. So why don’t you enlighten us about building 7 oh wise one! http://wp.me/pYLB7-fg

      Report Post » walkwithme1966  
    • 79USMC83
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:38am

      WE do remember VIVIDLY, WE saw planes crash into the WTC’S on TV. It is burned into OUR minds and have wondered how many AMERICANS have PTSD from watching it!! Then WE saw these two buildings burn and melt down. Then WE saw this huge amount of debris and dust cloud. Then when the dust settled We saw a unbelievable site. JIHADIST have been KILLING INFIDELS for centuries!! I guess what WE all witnessed was an illusion???

      Report Post »  
    • Rev. WC
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:49am

      My guess is insurance money and way to get rid of a lot of CIA documents.

      Report Post » Rev. WC  
    • free2bme1961
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:51am

      Woa! To be able to truthfully answer this question, one would have to pretend, (just for a moment), that our government didn’t care about us. Sometimes the truth can be as overwhelming as, finding out someone you were married to, or had a relationship with,(that you were certain, you could trust); may have had an affair! You may have never, in a million years, believed this, without the proof. The proof, sometimes, takes a little detective work, on your part. And when you realize that it is possible, that someone you thought, loved you, IS capable of betraying you,…the thoughts of all the things that they said and displayed, as examples of caring about you are hard to erase. And sometimes you may realize that others knew of this “affair”, but they didn’t warn you; and then when you think back, there were sublte hints, you refused to acknowledge, at the time.
      Why is this? Because this means it will forever change your life as you know it! You will never see things the same again. And, if you are a fast learner, you won’t allow yourself to be caught with your “guard down” ever again.

      Report Post » free2bme1961  
    • Rev. WC
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:57am

      Free2bme Well Said!

      Report Post » Rev. WC  
    • Rev. WC
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 7:11am

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4

      Report Post » Rev. WC  
    • captquest
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:30am

      Building seven fell because it was severely damaged by the collapse of one of the towers, then fire in the basement area fueled by tanks of diesel for the generators burned for hours. The steel structure was softened by the fire enough to bring the whole building down at once. Firemen working on it saw that it was going to go and got out. I have read just about everything the truthers have claimed and fantasized and they can not prove any of it. Conventional demolition of the buildings would have been impossible with out detection and no building has ever been brought down with thermite. Ten years later no truther has proven their “theories”. no one has come out and admitted to any conspiracy. We were attacked by Muslim extremist and the planes brought down the buildings.

      http://www.debunking911.com/

      Report Post » captquest  
  • 79USMC83
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 5:37am

    DEATH TO JIHADIST!! Always Remember “The Peacekeepers” 241 Marines KIA on Oct.23,1983 in Beirut ,Lebanon while they slept. By a MUSLIM, Iran backed, Hezbollah, JIHADIST in the name of ISLAM!! The JIHAD started long before Sept.11,2001. Bush thank GOD, decided to fight back.Unlike the cowards Reagan and Clinton!!!

    Finally someone like O’Reily is saying the problem is the MUSLIMS. It will take a the moderate MUSLIMS to stop the JIHADIST and Sharia Law Cavemen. The middle-east is in a CIVIL-WAR already!!! Look at the MUSLIM on MUSLIM bombings that take place DAILY!!! But for some sick reason the JIHADIST say it is America’s policies for their attacks against us. The only policy the JIHADIST hate is our FREEDOM of RELIGION!!!

    Report Post »  
    • Rev. WC
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:28am

      Personally we should bring all of our young men and women home and let them blow the s**t out of each other.

      Report Post » Rev. WC  
    • 79USMC83
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 7:25am

      You might be right ,then we could put them on OUR southern border where there is another CIVIL WAR going on. Hey lets just put down the guns and HUG!! it is not the MUSLIMS,it is not the Drug Cartels. It is America that is EVIL and needs to be TRANSFORMED!!

      Report Post »  
  • tuffenough
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 5:15am

    All I needed to know about muslims — I learned on 9/11
    To forget or to play down the attempt to kill the infidels [ which is what we are seen as ] is an open invitation for another and another attack. Which is being planned as we blog, and the fact that libs want so badly to embrace ALL cultures will not save them. Liberal women like Joy and Whoopie do not realize how they would be treated under sharia law -

    Report Post »  
    • uneasyshadows
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 5:59am

      Exactly, and very well said.

      Report Post »  
    • RaisingANewLeader
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 10:17am

      what treatment. i dont think they would make it through the first wave of retraining.

      Report Post »  
    • Major Infidel
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 10:17am

      Well said Tuff.

      Report Post » Major Infidel  
    • jds7171
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 2:33pm

      Their are good muslims in the world. I met a lot of them when I served in iraq. They were just like us. They went to church, believed in god, but didn’t let it control their lives. There were a couple of weirdo’s. One wouldn’t drink water during ramadam, even though he was in full gear and doing checkpoints. He would pass out once a week. He was a good guy. None of them were bad. Its the idiots who are radical that are bad. That is in all religions. The idiot christians who think taking a morning after pill (or any birth control) is the same as an abortion, and the idiot muslims who threaten people. Wake up people and stop getting so but hurt about everything.

      Report Post »  
  • REDHOOK0u812
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 5:09am

    We‘ll’ I guess even a god hating atheist loony toons liberal get it right occasionally?

    Report Post »  
    • anadee
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 7:45am

      good point…..but doesnt make him less nasty……

      Report Post »  
    • LadyLiberty
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:59am

      Yes, but he previously stated not long ago that it wasn’t muslims that killed us it was “Extremists and Radicals”… Maher was only agreeing with O’Reilly in this segment in order to be able to call him a jackwagon immediately after on the Mosquer Bit.

      Maher is a jackwagon. T
      he mosque is inappropriate.
      Muslims DID kill us on 9/11, extremist of not, they were muslims.
      They aren’t done with us yet either.
      I don‘t believe in ’moderate’ muslims- there is NO such thing if you follow Islam and Sharia law. There are two kinds vocal and silent. Both are dangerous.

      Report Post » LadyLiberty  
  • 79USMC83
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 5:09am

    it was not so much the Muslim comment that made the ladies walk. It was FIGHT or FLIGHT. You have a LION like O’Reily and LAMBS waiting to be slaughtered. He comes across as a LOUD East coast ,my way or the highway type.The two women were scared LAMBS and ran!!!! Walters did not RUN,she fought back in her own feeable way and the other two just cowerd!!! This could be taken as SEXIST or it could be taken as weakness by two ladies that COME ACROSS as TOUGH LIBS!!!

    Report Post »  
    • Independent Tess
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 7:53am

      Interesting analysis. I had not thought of that.

      Report Post » Independent Tess  
    • thecommish58
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:03am

      I agree the 2 who walked off showed weakness and an inability to articulate their opinions, walking off the set is one step removed from breaking down and crying when you can’t think of logical retort…then coming back after wiping their tears and composing emotions made it even worse…the 2 came across as a couple of rookie hacks.

      Report Post »  
  • spikebu
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 4:45am

    Last I heard, most Muslims did not want a Mosque built at Ground Zero. How does my disagreement nullify your first amendment rights? Can we assume your disagreement with me nullifies MY first amendment rights? How many of the 9-11 terrorists were Catholic? Baptist? Mormon? Episcopalian? Protestant? Not even a freaking Jehovah’s Witness! Dude. If your idea is you can’t call a spade a spade, you seriously need to check out your brain tumor. You’ve got some epic blockage going on!

    Report Post »  
  • BobBlazeReader
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 4:11am

    “Not all Muslims are terrorists…but ALL 9/11 terrorists were Muslims.” Enough said.

    Report Post »  
    • Bob_R_OathKeeper
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 4:17am

      Nice!.

      Report Post » Bob_R_OathKeeper  
    • angrymob
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 4:47am

      A fact few liberals can deny.

      Report Post » angrymob  
    • GBMBulletsSKNRD
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 5:00am

      Perfectly said………………………………….

      Report Post »  
    • snowleopard3200
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 5:36am

      The terrorists indeed were extreme muslum radiacal terrorists!

      @Angrymob – they indeed cannot deny it; yet they will try to do so anyway in their usual way – lie, pervert, and twist the truth to the point it resembles whatever passes for the wildest of fiction in the soap operas nowdays.

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • leanright
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:20am

      The most important thing Billy ‘O called out and I REALLY hope it leads to national conversations is- Where are all the moderate Muslim voices? If they would band together with us for the peace effort, the terror groups would be done in purely by the numbers. 900 Million Muslims plus America and our allies calling for a stop to the mindless random murders would be a force and ideal that would crush the hate. I never understood why NOW or lib women in general won‘t speak out for Muslim women’s basic rights. Where are the moderate voices?

      Report Post »  
    • 338lapua
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:20am

      Snowleopard, I believe liberals call perverting a position “nuance”. Muslims did perpetrate 9/11……No nuance needed.

      Report Post »  
    • angrymob
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 1:07pm

      @ snowleopard3200

      Conservatives are right…a few “bad apples” in Islam…can spoil the whole barrel. This topic could open doors to discussions on how to better deal with Muslim extremists and how to get moderate Muslims involved, but people like Keith O. won‘t allow constructive criticism where it’s needed. What a shame. :(

      Report Post » angrymob  
    • angrymob
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 1:31pm

      Maher spoke the truth Muslims did kill people on 9/11, but building a mosque there is inappropriate and Muslims need to understand that just because you can build it there doesn’t mean you should.

      Report Post » angrymob  
    • Robert W
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:15pm

      Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

      Report Post »  
  • Bob_R_OathKeeper
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 4:03am

    Muslims did kill us on 9/11. That is FACT.

    Report Post » Bob_R_OathKeeper  
    • ruffnex
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 11:20am

      Hey, Major…I have been told those are not TOWELS on their heads, but LITTLE SHEETS. That makes them LITTLE SHEET HEADS.

       
    • *************************
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 5:05pm

      Before Bill Maher, I just wasn’t sure. But, bless you Bill Maher, for setting the record straight! You are the guiding light to all we dim-wit Americans.

      “You’ve got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know … morons.” -town drunk Jim, Blazing Saddles

      Report Post » WeDontNeedNoStinkinBadges  
    • tower7femacamp
      Posted on October 20, 2010 at 2:29pm

      http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html

      Report Post » tower7femacamp  
  • pillut48
    Posted on October 16, 2010 at 3:59am

    !!!

    Maher is at least HALFWAY right about the subject. O’Reilly IS correct about the inappropriateness of building a 9/11 Victory mosque/non-mosque/Muslim “Y” so close to Ground Zero.

    Wish whoever made this vid would have edited out that buzzing noise near the end, some guy named Kos or something? All I heard was buzz, buzz, buzz, buzzbuzz, buzz buzz….;-)

    Report Post » pillut48  
    • 79USMC83
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 4:35am

      Everyone is talking about the ladies walking out on O’Reily for saying Muslims. The ladies had their minds made up before he came on that they were not going to like WHAT he said. The bigger point is HOW O’Reily likes to FORCE his VIEW on others!! I look at this as an EAST coast character defect or like be LOUD family upbringing. You have to speak LOUDLY to be heard!!! LMAO!! Lets play amatuer PSYCO-analyist. It is a LION on a LADIES show. You either FIGHT like the(LION) EAST coast way or you FLIGHT like the lamb (LADY) way!!!

      Report Post »  
    • cruisemates
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 5:19am

      In the other thread about this a poster named ABC was trying to reverse the responsibility on us conservatives, saying O”Reilly was wrong and insensitive. Granted, he could have been more sensitive, but he didnt say anything millions of other Americans have not said. I don’t like Bill Mahar anymore, and I think he is one of the most uninformed people in media (does not even understand religion or capitalism so he speaks out against them). But at least he has some common sense on one issue.

      cruisemates  
    • snowleopard3200
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 5:33am

      On 9/11, as far as I am concerned it became ground sanctified by the loss of so many innocent lives at the hands of hostile terrorists. I will not condemn any religion in its entirity as extremists exist in all religions and beliefs. However, we must not forget it WAS a band of these extremists-terrorists, who DID both direct the attack on us (Usama) and carried out the attacks…these are the ones who need to be condembed by everyone of all the world, and when found delt with swiftly and decisivly.

      As for these ladies walking off their own set, that is their choice and their problem. If they get angry that easily there is many types of therapy with dedicated professionals that could help.

      http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm (mixed art)

      Report Post » Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • Polwatcher
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:04am

      To be factual, is sometimes to offend. O’Reilly was completely factual. A group of Muslims destroyed the trade center on 9/11. A sub-group of Muslims called Muslim extremists (it can also be said) bombed the trade center that horrific day. We have been in a fight with that sub-group of Muslim Extremists ever since. Where is the exagerration or misstatement here?

      Report Post »  
    • Rev. WC
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:24am

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KGlBHyVeYU

      Report Post » Rev. WC  
    • Citizen7154
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:30am

      What I thought was particularly interesting about the panel is that they were willing to deny a fact (all agreed that it was true) simply because they did not like the conclusion that could be drawn from that fact. Some of the worst aspects of debating with liberals is that they’ll deny established facts or ignore them if it is inconvenient to their belief structure. There is no reason you couldn‘t disagree with O’Reilly on the issue of whether it is wise to build a mosque near ground zero, but why try and win the debate there when you can just be indignant at the facts he uses to support his argument. The indignation, as is evident by Behr and Goldberg’s reaction, is enough to end the debate for some and not have to deal with a challenge to their belief structure.

      Additionally, it is a surprising day when I agree with Bill Maher on anything.

      Report Post »  
    • An Arizonan
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 6:58am

      Maher is still a moron.

      Report Post » An Arizonan  
    • chernor alpha yayah bundu
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:05am

      leave it to bill maher to getner couple of dems that dont knoq about the constitution and still get it wroung

      Report Post »  
    • VanGrungy
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:07am

      http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/10/fort-hood-jihad-army-officer-ordered-destruction-of-video-evidence.html

      “Soldier says ordered to delete Fort Hood videos,” by Angela K. Brown and Michael Graczyk for Associated Press, October 15 (thanks to Roland):

      FORT HOOD, Texas – A soldier who recorded the terror of last year’s deadly shooting rampage in Fort Hood using his cell phone was ordered by an officer to delete both videos, a military court heard Friday.

      VanGrungy  
    • Marc Jacobs
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:09am

      Even a Blind Squirrel can find a nut. So, Maher thinks O’Reilly was right in his statement that Muslims attacked us…. Congratulations Mr. Maher on finding your nut today

      Report Post » Marc Jacobs  
    • MSG
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:15am

      Even a broken clock is right twice a day

      Report Post »  
    • Hokiedad
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 8:44am

      Not all Germans were Nazis either but they were all held complicit because they accepted what was done in their name. I see very few Muslims coming forth to deny what is taking place throughout the world in the name of Islam. As a matter of fact, the very precepts of their religion demand they carry out the jihad against ALL infidels. As a non-Muslim, that doesn‘t sound very ’moderate’ to me. If you look at Muslim behavior throughout history, they have built a mosque on the ground of conquered countries. A mosque at ground zero is NOT a display of Muslim diversity and good will as the dopey liberals in this country would have us believe. It is about putting a stick in the eye of America. We as a nation better wake up to this threat that has reared it’s ugly head. The Constitution that guarantees freedom of religion is not a suicide pact and Islam is not a religion, it is a political system that uses a type of religion to conquer and enslave mankind and it’s coming for us. Wake up America!!

      Report Post »  
    • H2OBoardem
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 9:22am

      Well said HokieDad. I don’t remember seeing a single moderate muslim march in solidarity of the victims of 9/11 in the days after 9/11. But I do remember coverage from many muslim nations, millions of them, out cheering the actions of those who carried pertertated it. U.S. muslim contributions toforeign terrorist-supporting “muslim charities” skyrocketed after 9/11. Aren‘t there any muslim charities that support poor muslims that don’t want to kill us? Didn’t think so. Islam requires that Infidels be converted, subjugated (brought under Sharia Law), enslaved or killed.

      Report Post » H2OBoardem  
    • Trance
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 10:18am

      Of course O’Reilly was right about the terrorists being Muslim. But I thought it was funny how they all mischaracterized the opposition to building the mosque. Most are not saying to take away the first amendment right. Most are saying that even though people have a right to say what they want, sometimes it’s inappropriate.

      Report Post » Trance  
    • Peters
      Posted on October 16, 2010 at 11:42am

      Let’s get to the bottom of this issue; grab something to drink and settle in for a short while:

      There’s a fundamental logic usually missing from this conversation. In its simplest expression it goes like this: If French extremists bombed the World Trade Center, there is little doubt the French government and the people of France would denounce the action and would be eager to establish great amounts of distance between them and the people that carried out the terrorist’s act. This would come from the fundamental bond that we share in humanity despite our cultural differences.

      However, and in contrast, fundamental Muslims view the killing of other Muslims as an obligation under the sacred laws of Islam, of Shari’ah Law. The definition that makes ending human life justifiable under Shari’ah Law is starkly different from that of Judeo-Christian teachings that life on earth is sacred, cherished and therefore protected. Shari’ah Law on the other hand, rationalizes justifiable homicide as a primary deterrent in maintaining its rule of law and order of its society.

      The harshness of Shari’ah Law dictates. The tenets of a religion dictate the fundamental and traditional order of Muslim societies. To further contrast, contemporary liberals, comprised of mostly atheists, such as Bill Maher, are constantly fighting the so called separation of church and state. It is a wild contradiction for Liberalism then to embrace the ideas of Shari’ah Law as it is in much part synonymous with the Muslim faith. There is no separation of church and state in Shari’ah Law. To be sympathetic to this premise is a contradiction as it is a faith in a god dictating the actions and boundaries of a government. But if liberalism were to openly denounce the Muslim faithful on these same grounds as they openly denounce Christianity and Judaism, liberals would be a primary target of the Jihad, of the Shari’ah Law, of the Muslim extremist people. But liberals will not do that. Consistently they contradict themselves in this regard.

      Importantly then, this is very similar to how our liberals here in the US, those that claim to still be Judeo-Christian faithful, still support individuals like Bill Maher, who on a regular and perpetual basis denounce their faiths in their god. But liberals, the god faithful, they remain neutral on passing judgment on atheism, on Bill Maher, because they share alternative significant belief structures that are powerfully emotive. These powerful emotive structures are similar to the beliefs or the emotive structures that one would share with other human beings in god and in religion. To answer this dilemma, a substitution has been made for god as the bond that holds their coalition of Liberalism together. Maher’s devout faith in his belief, that there is no Creator, leaves him to believe only in him, his self, his ego, or some worldly possession; or some phenomenon. And then it is recognized that what liberals collectively believe in then, what they share and what illuminates their intense emotive bond, is nature and the environment.

      And in this regard, in this specific context, the Muslim religious faith and coalition, is all too similar to liberalism’s faith and coalitions. Even though groups of Muslims do not agree with the violence of the current Jihad, as religious liberals don’t agree with Maher’s atheism, they still share a strong emotive bond. Muslims holding to the ideas and principles of relative peace, have a significant bond with those that are disrupting the peace, carrying out the Jihad. This strong emotive bond, based on the religion of Allah, of the god that they share, establishes the same shadow of tolerance that exist between Bill Maher, the atheist, and the liberal religious faithful that will not denounce him. Both groups, the liberal religious faithful and the peace seeking Muslims, it is interesting to note have long histories of turning their backs to heinous and immoral acts when they are perpetrated against groups that do not share their common bonding phenomenon; in these circumstances, the ends justify the means. In simple terms, it becomes not unacceptable to kill westerners, it is merely unfortunate.

      Now, unfortunately and most dangerously, Liberalism in its current narcissistic state of being, believes that it has a common bond with the Muslim faith. Liberalism, through atheism, has evolved into believing that historic Judeo-Christian ambitions have not only dominated the world but have committed heinous crimes against the world. This is a bond that Liberalism is far too eager to embrace. What’s even more unfortunate is that individuals like Bill Maher ironically promote this notion even though they do not believe in Allah or the Jihad.

      And because we are only seeking truth here it must be stated that in some ways Bill Maher is absolutely correct, but only to a certain point; and then his logic disintegrates. But we must be careful to understand why it disintegrates. His logic veers off into the abyss because he is atheist, which establishes a significant contradiction of his liberalism. His faith in himself, in only nature and the environment, points the blame of all the world’s problems directly at himself, of his genetic and historic self, as in he is a man, a product of mankind; but he is a man without any benevolent guidance of God, of any god. He is guided by the will of man and the self.

      His logic disintegrates because it was and is mankind that has pillaged the world. God has not pillaged or set out to destroy the world; it was and still is man. It was narcissistic man that marched across Europe with shields and swords, battle axes and spears in the name of their narcissistic interpretation of God’s will to carry out selfish acts of murder, torture, rape, and enslavement. And when narcissistic man, the rulers of the ancient and evolving time, ran out of European real estate to conquer they took to the oceans in search of new worlds.

      In the environment of honesty and empathy, mankind can and should acknowledge the historic relevance of religion and war, of gods and war, of death and suffering. But where Bill Maher goes off into the abyss is when he fails to make this critical distinction: He does not recognize that sects of evolving mankind hijacked the name and the Word of God many times over in the course of our history. These historical sects, to instill the intense emotive powers needed to move armies against neighboring civilizations, to wage war and to sacrifice life, to take life, these sects of mortal corrupt men needed a common and significant bond with the psychology of the general public, of the people; they needed to motivate, to manipulate, and to corrupt. The emotive power of religious faith was their answer. But God is not to blame. God’s words do not corrupt man. Man corrupts the word of God with narcissistic interpretations. Our warring history as a species can be defined by this phenomenon; but it cannot be defined by the purity and true teachings of God.

      So, in this context, it is somewhat understandable why liberals such as Maher believe that under Judeo-Christian teaching that Shari’ah Law, the Muslim faithful, was but a lamb wondering peacefully in the valley of life until Christianity showed up. In other words, to Bill Maher, Judeo-Christian motivations and ambitions antagonized sects of Muslims to take up the Jihad in their own defense. Bill Maher ignores the evolution of man. In all his self proclaimed wisdom, Bill Maher ignores the fact that man, simple narcissistic man carried out the historic ill acts of Christian movements; that it was not God. It was man and the corrupt nature of Liberalism, historically.

      But we can extend an olive branch to Mr. Maher; after all, he is still our brother in the realm of mankind. All he has to do is lay down his rhetorical weapons of Liberalism and evolve, to have an honest at length conversation with us, and himself. But until honesty is the foundation of your thought, Mr. Maher, your atheism aside, your personal evolution will be stunted and you will travel down the roads of those narcissistic individuals of the past, the ones that led armies against civilizations because they did not share the same bonds, the same beliefs; but that was because these leaders, they purposefully misinterpreted, corrupted and promoted the word and intent of God.

      Mr. Maher, it would be in everyone’s best interest if you and your sect of mankind that is intent on wiping out Judaism and Christianity, if you would take some time to re-think your positions, to start intellectually evolving again. Being funny and sarcastic is far too easy for someone of your potential; why are you wasting your life waging war under the banner of your religion that you establish in mankind’s ego and nature? Isn’t that a contradiction to your liberal premise? Are you not simply another leader of sorts motivating populations to decimate and destroy things that you do not agree with or understand? Are you not by default then joining in the violence of Jihad as you have a common and significant bond that allows heinous things to exist in the shadows, that when they emerge to carry out their bidding you turn your back? You are allowing your intellect to be corrupted by incomplete truths and fundamental misunderstandings of the world in which we share.

      Bill, you are promoting a very rudimentary understanding, perhaps narcissistically a selective understanding of the issue of building a mosque, a cultural safe house for the bond that unites peace seeking Muslims and Jihad seeking Muslins in the shadows where over 3000 human beings were put to their death.

      And Mr. Maher, in your vision of America, why do we have to fear for the safety of our families if we speak these truths? All we ask Mr. Maher is for you to evolve . . . to answer these things for us, for you and your sect. We are eagerly waiting for you to catch up on the evolutionary scale of intellectual development so that we can move on . . . You could be a great communicator and a great peaceful leader even if you chose to remain an atheist; God is patient, and He has a great sense of humor.

      Report Post »  
    • always watching
      Posted on October 17, 2010 at 1:29am

      What do you call a “liberal muslim”?
      Corpse.

      Report Post »  
    • ARCHON
      Posted on October 17, 2010 at 1:56am

      hey JOHN LEGEND(in your own mind)…is it APPROPRIATE TO BUILD A CONFEDERATE ARMY MEMORIAL next to a ***** SLAVE GRAVEYARD or maybe NAZI WAR MEMORIAL next to THE HOLOCAUST MUSEUM?

      Report Post » ARCHON  
    • tower7femacamp
      Posted on October 17, 2010 at 12:26pm

      anything about 911 as long as it’s not the TRUTH !

      Report Post » tower7femacamp  
    • pajamash
      Posted on October 18, 2010 at 3:01pm

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-S77CUFQPPg

      Why would anyone of faith have anything to do with Maher?

      Report Post »  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love