Palin: America Out of Step With Reagan’s Values
- Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:01am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
SANTA BARBARA, Calif. (AP) – America is on a “road to ruin” because of misguided policies in Washington and needs to get back in step with the values of Ronald Reagan, Sarah Palin said at an event honoring the former president’s legacy.
The 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee delivered a stinging critique of Washington during her speech Friday, part of the national celebration marking the centennial of Reagan’s birth on Feb. 6.
Revisiting themes familiar from her 2008 campaign, she said the nation was being shackled by high debt and taxes, dense government regulation and rising spending, often for programs that don’t work. She said a rush toward green energy was overlooking the nation’s oil and natural gas reserves, a choice that will cost jobs and drive up pump prices.
She blamed Washington leaders—an apparent reference to the Obama administration—for doing “everything in their power to stymie responsible domestic drilling.”
“This is dangerous. This is insane,” she said. “This is not the road to national greatness, it is the road to ruin.”
She alluded to President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address last month, saying it amounted to a statement that “the era of big government is here to stay.”
Palin was asked to talk about Reagan’s 1964 speech, “A Time for Choosing,” which he gave on behalf of then-Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater. In it, he talks at length about the dangers of high taxes and encroaching big government, as well as the necessity of strong national security.
She said the stark choices the nation faces are not unlike those Reagan talked of in the 1960s, only the economy of today is worse, from home foreclosures to high unemployment.
She said Reagan saw the danger of President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society programs, and “he refused to sit down and be silent as our liberties were eroded by an out of control, centralized government that overtaxed and overreached in utter disregard of constitutional limits.”
“We could choose one direction or the other, socialism or freedom and free markets,” Palin said.
Palin received a roaring ovation, but Reagan‘s son told The Associated Press in an interview that he doesn’t see anything in common between his dad and the former Alaska governor, who was invited to speak by the event’s sponsor, the conservative Young America’s Foundation.
“Sarah Palin is a soap opera, basically. She’s doing mostly what she does to make money and keep her name in the news,” Reagan says.
“She is not a serious candidate for president and never has been,” said Reagan, a political independent whose politics lean left.
But former Reagan speechwriter Kenneth Khachigian praised the choice of Palin to discuss Reagan’s legacy.
Palin was a teenager when Reagan took office in 1981 and like many young people “their lives and philosophy and political fortunes were shaped by the Reagan era,” Khachigian says. “She can reflect on that as well as anyone could.”
Palin was introduced to the nation at the Republican National Convention in 2008, and her folksy, wisecracking style sometimes earned her comparisons to Reagan, who was known for his wit and appeal beyond the traditional Republican base, especially with blue-collar Democrats. She frequently referred to Reagan on the campaign trail, and in her debate with Vice President Joe Biden reprised Reagan’s famous rejoinder from his 1980 debate with Jimmy Carter, “There you go again.”
But Palin, now closely aligned with the tea party movement, has become for some a polarizing political figure.
Tea partiers rail against soaring public debt and sprawling government programs like Social Security and Medicare. But public debt roughly tripled on Reagan’s watch and he did not attempt to dismantle Social Security or Medicare during his term, says Reagan biographer Lou Cannon.
“He was no tea partier,” Cannon says.
The Young America’s Foundation was founded in the 1960s to promote conservative ideas on college campuses, and it purchased Reagan’s former ranch in 1998. The foundation is not connected with the Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley.
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 575 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 402 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 400 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 372 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 339 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 400 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 402 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 339 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 150 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 400 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (184)
football lady
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:13pmthe envy of Palin continues.
Report Post »AKMIIKEUS
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 3:25pmPalin is no Ronald Reagan, in any way shape or form.
Report Post »Reagan was a statesman, she’s a petulant child. Reagan was a leader, she’s just a fool. Ronald Reagan would never, ever say America is on the “road to ruin.” Reagan would lift the country up, not try to tear it down. Pathetic.
BUCKEYE_PATRIOT
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 8:48pm@AMK 12pm
Report Post »But, but, you said you have nothing against her. Shut up fool! Your words betray your words.
grandma7
Posted on February 6, 2011 at 12:45amEnvy & Fear!!
Report Post »Killa From Wasilla
Posted on February 6, 2011 at 2:14amYes Sarah. America is on the road to ruin.
Report Post »The $3 Trillion cost of the Iraq war and the 10 year cost of extending the Bush tax cut of $3.7 Trillion and of course the cost of the unfunded Medicare prescription drug plan, together account for half of our national debt.
And of course the misinformed voters who love you and buy your books. But Sarah, you’re doing extremely well under Obama. Perhaps you’re even secretly rooting for him to win in 2012 so that you can make even more money by continuing to talk about how America is going to ruin.
Showtime
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:08pm@DashRipRock –
Had to smile on that one about anyone driving the Liberals nuts can’t be all that bad.
Tell you what — you have an excellent point. If the Libs are dissing her, there is a solid reason behind it. The Libs are actually telling us who our next presidential nominee is. She surely put Alaska on solid ground financially, and I expect she will DRAIN SWAMP of Pelosi rats, Obama czars, and Reid leeches!
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:02pmWhat I think is so sick/sad and funny too are the “FACTS’ you anti-PALIN hacks try to conjure up to discredit her. But you forget…SARAH PALIN FOLLOWERS ARE PATRIOTS. WE KNOW HISTORY. WE KNOW THE FACTS – we research and we investigate. ALL YOU DOLTS do is parrot what you hear from the far left Marxist, Liberal, one-worlder wanna-bes.
Report Post »YOU SHOULD THANK YOUR LUCKY STARS that AMERICA is still capable of producing PATRIOTS like PALIN, you poor thing… otherwise all TRULY would be lost and you’d be under Sharia Law/one world government. GOOD TRY C.Patriot 1776 (yeah, right) but NO CIGAR!
thebertmanlives
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:27pmPalin/Bachmann 2012-2014
Report Post »Winners never quit and quitters never win
gbeck2012
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:59pm”I’m very, very pleased to be cleared of any legal wrongdoing … any hint of any kind of unethical activity there. Very pleased to be cleared of any of that.”
—Sarah Palin, on a legislative report asserting that she‘d broken the state’s ethics law and abused her power in the Trooper-gate scandal, conference call with Alaska reporters, Oct. 12, 2008
Classic Palin. When the truth is uncomfortable, invent a new set of “facts”. It obviously works on her deluded followers.
Report Post »constitutionalpatriot1776
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:50amPerhaps a better headline for this story might be…. Reagan: Palin out of step with my values
Report Post »DashRipRock
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:03pmRON REAGAN jr. : PALIN OUT OF STEP WITH MY LIBERAL VALUES
FTFY
Report Post »constitutionalpatriot1776
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:48amIs this the same Sarah Palin that remodeled the Wasilla mayor’s office with $50,000 of the town’s money, without consulting the city council? Or the same Sarah Palin that spent $150,000 of the RNC’s money on clothes? Or is it the same Sarah Palin who somehow thought the Wall Street bailout was connected to health care reform? Or is ithe the same Sarah Palin who hides behind a twitter account, pre-recorded video responses to current events, or “interviews” with Sean Hannity? The Tea Party must be in very desperate shape to consider this money-grubbing idiot their darling.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:11pmor the same sarah that appointed the pro abortion judge or the same sarah that still has not released her emails from when she was governor after being request about 5 times or the same sarah that appeared to have disrespected our flag or the same sarah that trashes the “establishment” but then has the gall to take money from them to pay her legal bills or the same sarah who still hasn’t stepped forward to clarify her rt with Tammy on dadt – or at least I can’t find it and the list goes on and on,
Report Post »Fight for America
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:18pmGee, is our current president the one who thought we have ? 57 states? and piles of shovel ready projects? Is our current president the one where the long form of his birth certificate seems so hard to locate? And has he EVER stopped campaigning (I mean, when he wan’t golfing, playing basketball, on a vacation?) Is our current president now facing some, at best, unpleasant questions about today’s story re UK info supposedly being traded to the Russians – see recent Treaty he considers a feather in his cap – much like the don‘t read it just sign it Healthcare bill the American people don’t want and which promises to bankrupt our country if there is still anything left to worry about under this administration? There’s so much more, however, I have so much more to do today………
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:40pmAh yes, and then there are the politically spun LIES about Palin….
Report Post »theporch
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:43amNow that willy has spoken I guess the discussion on Sarah’s qualifications can be closed. When one starts out with an apology, one can know that this is going to be good and long. That could have been condensed into one paragraph. “You don’t think she is qualified but like her anyway”.
Report Post »theporch
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:38amYou know friends that if you would just ignore the obamabots on here they would not be able to keep up their drivel. You just encourage them to respond with their hate and venom. Please just ignore them and not play their game of “gotcha”.
Report Post »Juli
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:38amThank you Blaze. Back in the day no one would have been able to see the speach with out having cable now you can see what she really said.
Report Post »Once again Sarah is right on the mark. She is definatly not Regan but she as I and so many others were influenced by President Regan and his honest and humorous opinion. There are millions of us out there and she is our voice and we will not sit down and shut up any more. The voice of reason and common sense finally some sanity.
Who listens to Ron Jr.? He is the opposite of his father like many children and his addopted son Michael Regan is more like his dad in reason and common sense than any of his biological children.
Tankertony
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:34amOnly after she becomes President in 2012 will some see how wrong they were…And for the godless leftists who literally live in an alternate universe, we can pray for them.
Report Post »AKMIIKEUS
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 4:10pmI wish there was somwhere or some kind of online pool where we could all go and place bets if Sarah Palin is going to be president in 2012.
Report Post »Tea Baggers talk a good fight but you won’t put your money where your mouth is.
WillyGoode
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:29amOk…it has been LONG enough….this RANT needs to happen!!!
Report Post »I apologize if this rambles but all of these thoughts have been banging around in my head for some time now.
First off the facts: I am NOT a lefty troll. I am a 40yr. old male that lives in Minnesota and have been a conservative for as long as I can remember. Like many I assume my Shock & Awe came about when Palin was announced as the V.P. candidate, at first I thought WOW!!! bold move. (Well actually my first thought was “who the hell is this?”) But as things moved along I realized that this was a completely contrived political “Hail Mary” move on the part of the GOP. The could read the writing on the wall & knew they were going to get smacked down in the election, so they did something that MAY have given the smallest glimmer of hope for 2008. BUT more importantly was setting up the coming elections for the next several cycles.
This site is called the Blaze because the “fire” of the truth is supposed to survive. So I would like to know if the people on here REALLY believe that Palin would be or should be President??? If so, please explain. This is a person who was hand picked from obscurity and ELEVATED by a political party that is STILL run by the people we like to call RHINO’s. Why??? Does anyone actually think the powers that be believe this woman is capable of running a country??? Because after all that is what is implied if you are chosen to be V.P. Not only in terms of immediate succession but as the defacto candidate AFTER your guy has had 2 terms in office.
Now I don’t have anything against Sarah Palin personally, she seems like a very nice lady, good wife & loving mother. BUT, this is NOT the person who should even be in the conversation for President. And if you think she should be then ask yourself “did I think that 4 yrs. ago? NO and why not? Because you had NO IDEA who she was. Palin has been gift wrapped. Teed up and smacked down the fairway as the beacon for all the conservatives to rally around. My gut feeling is she will drive the GOP to the Right (and that is fine) but at some point she will do/or say something that they will HAVE to distance themselves from and she will be dismissed just like the class troublemaker.
Many of my conservative friends like her & Bachmann for the same reason. “She speaks her mind” “She is a Rogue…blah blah blah. My response is not to contradict WHAT she or they (Palin/Bachmann) say….BUT how they say it. Make no mistake these ladies are PURE politicians…just watch HOW they answer simple questions. Like “what would you do to help the economy??“ The response is ALWAYS something like ”well what I wouldn’t do is follow along the same path as the Obama administration”. The classic “Politician Pivot” and then they expound for several minutes on how bad the “other” guy is…WITHOUT ACTUALLY ANSWERING THE QUESTION!!
If you doubt me just watch or listen to them in interviews.
I have much more to say on this, but would love some opinions from others to see if my litmus test stands up…please feel free to comment.
jijbarton
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:46amI grew up in a family heavily involved in politics, very conservative. And I can tell you her track record is a hell alot more immpressive than anyother person, Dem or Rep. Facts: She has fought her own party to make things right for Alaska, she has experience in the oil/gas industry and knows what we need to do to become more independant. Any good potential candidate surround themselves with good people who can help fill the the gaps of where they do not have the “so called” experience you are looking for. Fact: Sarah has vast more experience than our current dicator, I mean President. So we can stop the whole experience issue, in my opinion.
People complain all the time they are tired of the status quo of the normal politician. Yet when someone as fresh and honest as Sarah comes along you still are not happy. Why? Yes she may not give an entire break down of what she would do, but who does? And honestly you can’t give the exact details in an interview of what your going to do. There is information you do not have, if you are not the President or V.P. How can you lay out a complete detailed plan if you don’t have all the sensative information that the President/V.P. are privy too? You can’t!
I really like Sarah, she has guts and will not be beholden to special interest groups or lobbiests. She is in it to do the right thing for the American people based on our countries values that made this country so great to begin with. All you have to do is look at her track record to know what kind of leader she would be. And the current Republicans need to stop being “middle of the road” on issues. I am sick and tired of them trying to win the middle by bypassing our countries values to only get some votes. A real conservative knows this.
Report Post »BRAVEHEART
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:58amSarah Palin is the perfect match for someone who would follow after Ronald Reagan’s own heart. But the obstacles that Palin has to overcome are Staggering even when comparing the simple politics or the situation. The republican Party is fractured in ways now that Reagan never dreamed of and the left is stronger now than when Reagan began his assualt on the Presidency. The organized conservative movement over the last 15-20 years dropped the ball like a bunch of seriously braindead Homer Simpsons! Power greed and corruption seemed to win at every turn. Just some of my thoughts
Brave H.
Report Post »DashRipRock
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:58amWILLYGOODE
This is how I look at the whole matter.
There is absolutely NO ONE NOBODY ANYWHERE
That could do a WORSE JOB THAN OBAMA
And right now as far as I am concerned
Sarah Palins most redeeming quality is
SHE DRIVES LIBERALS CRAZY
and that cant be bad
Report Post »AKMIIKEUS
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:00pmNicely stated Willy
I have nothing against Sarah either but she’s a divider in this country.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:01pmYou are exactly right and so glad you posted this because many, many people feel exactly the same way. The right is doing the same thing to her as the left does to barry boy. It is pretty scarey because this can very well give us four more years of barry – then for sure it is goodbye America.
Report Post »enduro
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:26pmWillyGoode, I think your entire rant related to Obama. Sarah stands for everything i stand for so that is good enough for me. I have to give her credit. She takes the lefts best shots and gets back up swinging. That is someone i want leading me. An addition to that, I would rather have a goat serving as president than this socialist obama. Go Sarah!!!!
Report Post »PA PATRIOT
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:31pm@ WILLYGOODE
I agree with most of what you write,…except the fact that she and Bachman are pure politicians. I do think her expectations for this country are sincere. She is a true spokeswoman for less government and “We The People.”
I do not know how you derive your income, but my livelihood is generated from a small business that I operate and manage to keep 7 employees. I pay a TON of taxes. IT IS MY MONEY. NOT income for those (like many members of Congress) who have never had to make a weekly payroll, Sarah clearly drives this message home. That message means a great deal to me.
Perhaps it is the message of Sarah we should note, not the person.
She is a good messenger.
She speaks directly to the people.
She is not Presidential.
Sorry about the Minnesota thing.
Report Post »Angelacw
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:32pmI think Sarah Palin has a different calling than being president. Something more important, she has made mistakes but who hasn’t? She has also been dead on. Both of these things come from calling it as she sees it. The McCain campaign held her back in 2008. They tried to keep her withion some cookie cutter image the campaign team had laid out for her. If they had let her go her image wouldn’t have been made into what it was. She‘s blunt and she was trying to censor herself to accomodate McCain’s campaign. I think the McCain campaign owed it to the American people to show them EXACTLY who Barack Obama was, but they tip toed around that because they were afraid of the fact that he was black and they didn’t want to be accused of racism. Sarah Palin wanted to treat him just like any other candidate, and there was the break down. They told her to keep it all gum drops and lollipops, the media would only have gum drops and lollipops when it came to Barry and the American people are now suffering the results of the giant con job that was the 2008 elections.
Tell me this, is there a single thing that Sarah Palin could possibly have done worse as president than Barack Obama? And doesn’t he sound like such a genious with all of his “uuuhhhhh, ummmmm, uhhhh, let me be clear”‘s? This man CLEARLY has no respect for the office of the presidency or the American people. He missed the wreath laying at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier so he could go see Paul McCartney. The President of the United States just should NOT do such things. 60‘s pop icons don’t dictate our President’s schedule, and I don’t want my president to be “One of the Guys”.
Like I said, Mrs. Palin has made mistakes, but I don’t think she would have made me ashamed of my own president the way this treasonous clown has, and I don‘t think she would have sold out the Brit’s to the RUSSIANS or honored the murderous Chinese dictator with a State dinner.
If nothing else, my core beliefs and values are much more in tune with Mrs. Palin’s than Mr. Obama’s. She can be irritating, but he scares the living heck out of me.
Report Post »HappyStretchedThin
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:57pmPoliticians are a necessary evil. they need to get elected to get things done. To get elected they need to please more people than they tick off. Sometimes that means performing rhetorical tricks to get people on their side who normally would be on the sidelines. This is not a good criteria for deciding presidentiality.
Report Post »On the other hand, I think Palin‘s got the right values and I’d trust her to govern if it came to that, but she wouldn’t have my vote in a primary.
@AKMiik > your post to Snow above reveals the lie behind your assertion that you have “nothing against Palin”. Be honest, even if you’re a troll.
chuck
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 5:38pmShe became the Gov of the State of Alaska (have you?), an administrative job that BHO has never held. She beat the Big oil companies at their own game and got a share of their profits for every Alaskan. She is a no nonsense, conservative, who speaks her mind, and she is a hunter, and preservationist, a truly liberated woman, who deserves respect, not dirision. She rose through the ranks, and pulled herself up by the bootstraps, all the while being a true blue American. God Bless Sarah Palin! God Bless America!
Report Post »mossbrain
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:29amWow, her hair looks extra sexy in those photos.
You know I have to believe that many of the people posting here are plants, shills for the wealthy, trying to influence you people not to raise taxes on the wealthy. Some of you are ready to give up your social security rather than raise taxes on the wealthy.
Report Post »hulagu
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:36pmYeah,put it to the wealthy,they deserve to pay for their success to make other people successful.Does that sum it up for you Mossbrain? There are more plants on this website from
Report Post »liberal sites like Huffington than wealthy fatcats. Try to get those cowards to admit that. How many jobs have you obtained from a poor person?
BUCKEYE_PATRIOT
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 8:19pm@ MOSSBRAIN
” from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs ” Karl Marx
Your hero, Marx, had it right huh? Let’s make everyone poor and redistribute the wealth.
Capitialism is the most compassionate system in any society.
Help the helpless but not the clueless.
Get the MOSS outta your brain.
Report Post »banjarmon
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:15amThe Barracuda knowes when to Strik….Run Sarah Run….Drill Babby Drill…!!!!!
Report Post »Killa From Wasilla
Posted on February 6, 2011 at 2:16amSarah, if you want to help keep America safe, sit on your porch every day and let the military know if Russian jets or missiles are on the way. That would be far more useful than your speechifying everywhere. You say that America is out of step with Reagan’s values? I say good; he was a terrible president.
Report Post »roxee
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:07amWhat has happed world wide is the leaders & banksters steal money from the treasuries,and then make the tax payers pay for this underhandedness! Reagan understood this, and did his best to fight these crooks at every level,he was not perfect,but he was able to hold the banksters at bay for awhile!
Report Post »BRAVEHEART
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:32amWhat your talking about is moral bankruptcy, which is the root cause of most of our national ills and destruction. We have liars, cheaters, cronnies and communist at every level of business and government but Sarah Palin is not one of them. Palin has real moral integrity something rarely seen in American politics today. I think one reason the left has such hatred for Palin is because they are morally bankrupt and don’t how to deal with someone with true honor and integrity.
Report Post »eat-more-bacon-USA
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:07amEstablishment Republicans, democrats, our failed “president” and his state-run media outlets recognize Sarah Palin as a threat to their power – Sarah Palin is a true reformer. Listen to what Sarah Palin’s detractors say, read their words and it becomes abundantly clear that they are scared to death – Sarah Palin is the voice of America – a very vocal, staunch advocate of American Exceptionalism. PALIN 2012!
Report Post »TANK3584
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:50amThank you palin…right on the money
Report Post »AKMIIKEUS
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:08pmI succeeded with Reagan as a president…
Report Post »And continued to be successful with Bush, Clinton, Bush and now Obama…..hell, most people did….how come you tea baggers couldn‘t or can’t?
AKMIIKEUS
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 3:55pmNo one wants to silience Palin,the more she opens her mouth, the bigger hole she digs.
Report Post »Helldogger
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:35amRonald Reagan was elected on a simple 3 point mandate.
Report Post »1. A strong economy through lower taxes & less regulation.
2. Piece through strenth.
3. The destruction of the empire of evil. Soviet Communism.
He delivered & it wasn’t easy.
Now 22 yrs later, the Bush-intons & the Clint-ushes have destroyed everthing he did & iced the cake by giving us their illigitamate love child. It’s time for another Reagan. Go Sarah Go!!
God Bless you President Reagan! You will never be forgotten. You will never be copied, but maybe your legacy can be continued.
UpstateNYConservative
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:34amYeah, well…Palin pees in bathrooms, so nothing she says should be listened to!
Regards,
The Left
/sarc
Report Post »jijbarton
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:30amYou are no conservative, as your name would suggest. You should change your name to Commie!
Report Post »UpstateNYConservative
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:04pm@jijbarton
*LMBO* I guess you missed my ‘/sarc’ tag there, if you’re serious. Tweaking the noses of liberals is my favorite sport, especially when I‘m in a bad mood and feel need to ’vent’.
Report Post »HappyStretchedThin
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:50pmI hear you upstater.
Report Post »And you snark is right on the money. Perfect illustration of the left’s logic-less anti-Palin reflexes.
rfycom
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:34amShe may be right, the US just might be on a road to ruin, but she is not that person to fix us.
Report Post »jimmythebullet
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:51amrfycom-
Report Post »i agree-she shouldn’t run for president.she’s better off going around the country speaking her mind, without mincing words,and talking to the american people like the adults we are supposed to be.
Helldogger
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:59amHey Ryfcom, so who is. Who has more qualifications than Sarah. Please don‘t waste my time with Dems that can’t pass a FBI background check, don’t waste my time with Republicans that act like Dems, don’t waste my time with good people who have already asked for & are serving in other offices, don’t waste my time with good people who are unknown & can do a lot better job in other areas.
Report Post »Who has these qualifications?
Most popular political figure in the nation & can raise tons of $$$$.
Most popular governor in the nation.
Cleaned up corruption in her own party.
Sold 1.5 mil copies of a book not yet in print.
Causes the libs to get so mad they lose their heads.
Head of Alaskan Energy Comm & knows about energy independence.
Knows how to get her hands dirty to make a dollar.
Put herself through college & IS NOT Ivy league, THANK GOD!
Knows the value of a dollar & will squeeze a quarter till the eagle screams thus will cut spending.
Has a son in a combat zone & knows what it is like to go to bed at night & pray “GOD please bring my sone home victorious”.
The list goes on.
Find me somebody with more qulifications but don’t waste my time.
BUCKEYE_PATRIOT
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 8:05pm@HELLDOGGER
Report Post »Very well said!
Proud American in Buffalo
Posted on February 6, 2011 at 9:42am@RYFCON—
Are you Saying Sarah shouldn‘t run because she’s unelectable? Doesn’t have the experience? or because she just can’t win? Your statement was kinda ambigous.
Report Post »Jimtt500
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:34amGreat speech!
Governor Palin offered many remedies to ills that face our nation.
Report Post »She mentioned domestic energy production, for one.
She mentioned cutting corporate tax rates. She also talked about cutting government “back down to size,” and cutting overall spending. She discussed reforming entitlement programs, reducing over-burdensome regulations, and ending the cronyism that is corrupting our system.
Killa From Wasilla
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:52amRon Reagan summed up Palin very well in remarks yesterday:
“Sarah Palin is a soap opera, basically. She’s doing mostly what she does to make money and keep her name in the news,” Reagan says.
She has simply learned how to turn fast bucks through agitating and riling up her worshipers … all in the name of patriotism, christianity, and motherhood … to feed her greed.
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:25pmTo the so-called “Killa from Wasilla: If all you have is simple agreement with a family “black sheep”, then you have nothing. Little Ronnie is using his small amount of fame to get his own name in the news for his OWN selfish reasons.
Report Post »His brother, Michael, needs to take him down and teach him some respect for his family, and his father. It’s evident he has neither…
moriarty70
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:28amAnyone else see this at the end of the article?
“Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.”
Cant help but wonder how often this really happens.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:00pmIf you click on “Click hrere to read Terms and Conditions for commenting on The Blaze,” you will find that The Blaze is very strict about copyrighted material. No doubt The Blaze obtained permission from AP before using it.
I have nothing for Sarah Palin except respect and admiration. I have nothing close to that for Obama/Soetoro, or whatever his name is.
Report Post »moriarty70
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:09pmMy issue is that it’s posted word for word from the AP story, but not under the name or giving credit to the original author.
Report Post »UpstateNYConservative
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:22pm@Showtime
Liberals look for anything to be able to call the Right into question, and make that thing relevant to the matter at hand. It’s their way, since they can’t really discuss an issue without bombing out. The cutest thing about them, when they say something like, “Well, Nixon did________”, is that they actually think they or their guy is somehow vindicated and off the hook.
Chrissy Matthews can say the most outrageous racist thing, but because Lincoln freed the slaves in 1863 instead of 1862, Lincoln is the racist and Chrissy is off the hook like he never spoke. Implied, a liberal adds a ‘so there!’.
There is something seriously wrong with liberals, as evidenced by their posts here. I don’t know about you, but I get a big kick out of it. I mean, circus clowns are intentionally funny. Liberals, thinking themselves serious arbiters and judges of all that’s sacrosanct, are a laugh riot and don’t even know how comical they are. My fave kind of humor is the ironic, unintentional kind.
Report Post »moriarty70
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:36pm@UPSTATENYCONSERVATIVE
My comment has nothing to do with my political view, I’m what you down in the States call an independent. My attitude would be the same if this were done on a liberal site. It’s the ethics and honor that come into question when someone is seen copy and pasting word for word someone elses article under their own name with no credit given.
Report Post »HappyStretchedThin
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:48pmUmmmm….Stating who the copyright belongs to at the end of the article IS proper attribution, silly.
Report Post »moriarty70
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:58pm@HAPPYSTRETCHEDTHIN
It would be, if it weren’t part of every other word copy and pasted from the original article. Every time in newspapers and the likes, they not only credit files from the AP, but also share the byline with the original author. NOw, without looking up the original post, can you tell me who wrote the article? Hint: The answer isn’t Scott Baker.
Report Post »HappyStretchedThin
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 1:16pmFair enough. I’ll verify standard practices on that and get back to you. Keep in mind we ARE dealing with electronic media here, which may have developed different standards than printed material.
Report Post »In my profession, however, we deal with copyrights on written material all the time, web-based or not, and attribution of this nature would clearly suffice.
TheBMT
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 7:22pmyou have to be careful with spreading things around. Sue happy companies take advantage of certain laws. For example:
http://breakthematrix.com/latest/the-daily-paul-is-being-sued/
The drudge report was also sued, by this same company.
Report Post »Beckofile
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:16amSo the left leaning young Reagan will be better able to expand on the liberties and freedoms his father worked for better then the liberty and freedom loving Palin? Young Reagan should marry a Kennedy and move to Massachusetts. I will not listen to those elites that got us off track and tend to live on the legacy of their father like a trustafarian.
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:18pmI don’t think any of the Kennedy BOYS are available to marry Little Ronnie right now.
Report Post »chuck
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 4:05pmRonnie is a pretty young girl, isn’t she?
Report Post »Hyena
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:11amThe pot calling the kettle black…………
Sarah Pallin has more in common with Reagan than his own son. Yet Ron Jr. has the stupidity to speak of it in public; therein proving the saying of it is best to remain quiet and thought a fool, versus opening his mouth and removing all doubt.
I don’t listen to Levin, Hannity, Beck or Limbaugh……don’t need to. I’ve been listening to 92.1 here in Madison, WI to hear what it is the other side is talking about and how they think……unbelievable intellectual corruption/bankruptcy!! The scary part is they actually believe what it is they are saying!
RJ was speaking about how at one point in time the country was “flourishing” with a 90% tax bracket. The country was doing great DESPITE the 90% tax rate…….not because of it!!! With the strained economy we have at the moment, try that $#i! now and see what a 90% tax rate will do for us…..dumba$$!!
Report Post »Killa From Wasilla
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:50amWhen Ronald Reagan came into office, the United States was the world’s largest importer of raw materials; the world’s largest exporter of finished, manufactured goods; and the world’s largest creditor.
Report Post »After 30 years of Reaganomics, we’ve completely flipped this upside down: we‘ve become the world’s largest exporter of raw materials, the world’s largest importer of finished goods, and the world’s largest debtor.
Reagan and Palin are both examples on how wealthy worship and pure hatred is destroying this nation.
chuck
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 3:54pmKilla, you forget a few things, like Carter before, set in motion the housing crisis with CRA 1977, and Clinton after, signing NAFTA, sent jobs overseas, that came after Reagan. So to blame America’s longest and best expansion over a 20 year period on Reagan, go ahead. Reagan built a strong military, CUT taxes and regulation, and we had a huge economic expansion, you should know that?? Perot was also correct, ‘do you hear that giant sucking sound’, yet????? Free trade agreements and higher taxes have sent jobs overseas, all born of a nobel liberal agenda…well thanks for that, the country is now in shambles. Muchas gracias!
Report Post »912828Buckeye
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:07amOn Target again.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:20amRight on the money.
Report Post »AKMIIKEUS
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:55amPalin is very good at doing what the right wing does best. Scaming money from the uneducated, uninformed and logically challenged.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:13pmNo I believe that was obama…97% of blacks voted for obama…due to his skin color…you tell me who’s uneducated..
Report Post »C. Schwehr
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:16pmAnd notice how the anti-Palin/anti-American trolls flock to this one story! I believe there are more lying trolls here than there are legitimate commenters!
Report Post »BUCKEYE_PATRIOT
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 7:29pm@AKM
Report Post »Youv’e donating to Palin? Shame on you and describing yourself so literally. We do appreciate your donation to the conservative cause though!
HappyStretchedThin
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:07amThanks for providing the anti-sans-Palin-month antidote, Blaze. This is great stuff!
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:21amI can think of one greater scene from the future…the attorneys for Mr Obama and confederates come to the new president in 2013 to beg for a pardon due to the merciful nature of the new president, and I would wonder what POTUS Sarah Palin would say…
“When bears fly…” would be a good beginning.
Report Post »chuck
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 3:42pmI went to see Sarah speak, she is a damn fine Patriot! A conservative oasis in the sea of liberal lies. I was the one in that audience shouting Obama is a marxist, that was back in 2008!! should have seen the looks I got then, now look at everyone saying the man is an islamo-fascist, or an outright marxist, IMO, the latter. Obama, you magnificent bastard, I read your books!
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:06amPalin is right on the money – the administration has signed off on an suicide pact for the country and will continue onward for as long as they can to destroy her completely. The administration most likely has a final ‘scorched earth’ plan ready for the eventuality their own master works failing and falling apart around them.
America is the greatest nation of the world, and of all times; we are a people who, individually, can set our minds to doing great things and make them happen. We are the great light on the world, and we have a higher calling, and greater times ahead.
Report Post »Jimtt500
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:31amMichael Reagan said it best- Ron was an embarrassment to their father when he was alive, and now he is an embarrassment to his mother. He is not worthy of having that name.
Report Post »valarie
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:34amSnow, I agree completely and definately couldn’t have said it better myself! If I may add….
To keep America strong and to get rid of the Anti-American Government leaders we have right now, we need to focus first on self-improvement. Get right Spiritually/Mentally/Physically so we can think clearly and be focused on the big jobs ahead. We also have to get ACTIVE. Support proper candidates or become one yourself!
Report Post »BRAWNDO1958
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:40amIf Sarah Palin’s brain was gasoline, it wouldn’t fuel a minibike around a BB
912828Buckeye
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:00am@ 1958 ….Funny, but look how far the Bamsters has gotten us.
Report Post »UpstateNYConservative
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:08am@BRAWNDO1958
Well, how about YOU enlighten us, oh wisest of the wise, what Palin said in this speech what was dumb?
How about YOU tell us why YOU are smarter than Sarah Palin, since you made such an obvious claim to your own personal greatness.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:15am@1985
If you have the best answers to the countries needs and problems, let us hear them and declare your intentions to run for the office of POTUS. Present them before the country, and let the best candidate be chosen by the people themselves.
Report Post »Intellectual Honesty
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:38amIf Sarah was unattractive what would she be doing right now?
A. Waitress.
B. A “Dilbert” style office cog.
C. The lady that answers the phone when you call Todd’s dirt moving company.
D. Salmon smoker and gift shop cashier.
E. Making $100,000 per speech reading notes off of her hand and considering a presidential run.
F. Selling Amway and raising children with her second husband (also a fisherman) in a double wide in
Palmer, AK.
All but one of these choices seems to fit….hmmm hard to decide….
1911a1
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:44am58 doesn’t have any answers , olbergoof is gone , and so he has lost his talking points , in dealing with Sarah P , one has to have a brain , and know their values , and understand what one truly believes , in their faith , themselves and their country . 1958 is clueless as most liberals are , someone has to give them their beliefs on a teleprompter or a TV show . that’s why they will never get it ! GO SARAH You are a Patriot , and i would stand with her any day of the week !
Report Post »Killa From Wasilla
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:49amThe government bureaucracy tripled under Reagan and he raised taxes 11 times, so I guess Palin is talking about the GOP/Tea Party being out of touch with Reagan.
Report Post »If Palin has one consistency is she has no clue of reality. This is what happens when your ego far exceeds your abilities.
1911a1
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:54amIntellectual Honesty (Intellectually bankrupt)
Report Post »LMAO that’s a laugh (Your user Name) , , what FACTS and Points of the speech do you disagree with? what facts do you have ? None….. all you have is tasteless immature comments and unfounded attacks ……Intellectually bankrupt !
AKMIIKEUS
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:54amThe only values Sarah is concerned about is using the name of Ronald Reagan to bring more value to her bank account.
Report Post »AKMIIKEUS
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:59amSarah still doesn’t understand all the Reagan facts. Remember this quote? :
“This is Reagan country (applause). Yeah! And perhaps it was destiny that the man who went to California’s Eureka College would become so woven within and inter-linked to the Golden State.” –Sarah Palin, blundering on Reagan’s education while speaking at a fundraiser at California State University-Stanislaus. Eureka College is in Illinois. (June 25, 2010)
===============
More priceless jewels from Sarah:
Katie Couric: “What other Supreme Court decisions do you disagree with?”
Sarah Palin: “Well, let’s see. There’s –of course –in the great history of America rulings there have been rulings, there’s never going to be absolute consensus by every American. And there are — those issues, again, like Roe v Wade where I believe are best held on a state level and addressed there. So you know — going through the history of America, there would be others but–”
Couric: “Can you think of any?”
Palin: “Well, I could think of — of any again, that could be best dealt with on a more local level. Maybe I would take issue with. But you know, as mayor, and then as governor and even as a Vice President, if I’m so privileged to serve, wouldn’t be in a position of changing those things but in supporting the law of the land as it reads today.” –unable to name any Supreme Court decisions other than Roe v. Wade, CBS News interview, Oct. 1, 2008
“Well, it certainly does because our — our next door neighbors are foreign countries. They’re in the state that I am the executive of. And there in Russia …
We have trade missions back and forth. We– we do– it’s very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where– where do they go? It’s Alaska. It’s just right over the border.
It is– from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to– to our state.” –Sarah Palin, asked by Katie Couric how Alaska’s proximity to Russia gives her foreign policy experience, CBS News interview, Sept. 24, 2008
==========
…and nothing has changed.
Love you Sister Sarah, I love you. No hate, nothing but love.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:01pmI try to stay away from you people they call trolls…but…intellectual honesty…so your saying a woman can’t be beautifull and smart…are all librals chauvinists or just you…is this why nancy and hillary have made it as far as they have…jeez buddy ….maybe you should move to the middle east…the muslim brotherhood would welcome you with open arms…you’d fit right in…you moron…
Report Post »Angelacw
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:06pm@ Intellectual Honesty – I encourage you to get out there and stand up for what you believe in, instead of hiding behind a screen name and bashing people who are at least TRYING to make a difference. If you’re so bold, tell us your real name. Say it loud and stand tall when people ridicule you for your beliefs, your looks, your clothes, your diet, the violent acts of a crazy person, and just about everything negative that occurs in the WORLD. Be a shining example of Progressive enlightenment when they attack your family. Show us all how much smarter and more dignified you are than Mrs. Palin. Surely this won’t be a challenge for you since you are so oboviously her intellectual superior.
Please get out there and show us how it’s done Intellectual Honesty; I’m very eager to see you in action.
Report Post »TAXLORDCOMETH
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:30pmSpeaking to my fellow conservatives — we really need to move on from Sara Palin. She is a creation of the media just like Obama was a media creation. Think about it — how many times have you ever seen a losing VP candidate get their name in the news every day for 2 years past the election? If you don’t trust the media, then you can‘t trust their choices for what is and isn’t news. There is an agenda in play. Ms. Palin is a good person and has a good heart, but she doesn’t have a clue how to run a nation, and we are desperate for a great leader. We the people need to select our next President — not the media.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:37pmWell said SNOWLEOPARD .. I watched the speech last night live and she was right on the money … I can’t wait for Cheney to speak tonight .. that should put many of these Obama loving facists right over the EDGE!
Report Post »dawg of gawd
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:43pmI find Ms. Palin wholly unremarkable. I look for but do not find originality, depth of geopolitical knowledge, consistency, or genuine conviction. I do, however, find a savvy self marketer who is making the most of our celebrity-based culture. Politics is no longer about policy or legislation or governing, it is theater . . . entertainment. And Ms. Palin is particularly good at making the most of this unfortunate reality. To hail her as a successful businesswoman is right and justified. To suggest she has the intellect, philosophical gravitas and communication skills to lead our nation is, with all due respect, ridiculous.
Report Post »HappyStretchedThin
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 12:43pmYup, Say the word “Palin” and all the trolls come out.
Report Post »Illogical Dishonesty > entertaining attack, I’ll grant you, but honest debate requires substance, and you have none
Brawndo > pithy, clever even, but even less substantial than Mr. Dishonest
Killa > Your very name is offensive. Your accusations are fallacious tripe – Palin talked about Reagan’s VALUES, not his record. Yes he DID expand govt and increase taxes. Now be honest about WHY, and maybe we can have a reasonable debate. Hint: it WASN’T because he believed the wrong things, and it WASN’T because he was a hypocrite (as you impute). It had a lot more to do with a “little” problem called the USSR, and a wonderfully “cooperative” party called the Democrats.
AKMiik > She’s guilty of a few gaffes, I’ll grant you. But your psychic skills are quite lacking if you think she has no real values. Her heart is in the right place on so much MORE and so much more SUBSTANTIAL things than the things you pointed out. America should be strong, its government should be limited, family values are good for all societies, equality under the law, lower taxes, individual liberty. These are some values, among others, that she shares with Reagan and the the country would do better adhering to. Argue with that (if you can) instead of lying in wait to find fault.
legendarytwo
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 1:07pmMy problem with her is supporting John Dumb Butt Mccain. Is that a “good ole boy”? She needs to get and sound serious…. way too cutesy.
Report Post »LOOKING_BOTH_WAYS
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 1:25pmevery one complains about our national Debt. but you have to look at history to find out how we got in this mess….and yes Reagan started it all.
In 1940 our Debt was 120% of GDP and went straight down ( with no increase) to 30% of GDP in 1980
then the Republicans came a along, and after the Reagan and Bush #1 12-year era the Debt climbed
to 65 % of GDP,
Clinton, after 8 yrs brought it back down to around 50 %
then Bushy # 2 brought it back up to 80 % !!! and now we are at 90 %
if Reagan and the Bushes had just kept the debt growing at the same rate as the economy.
today we would be around 30 % of GDP
by no means am i an expert on this stuff. but like Beck says …do your own home work.
and if you want to read my source. be my guest ….. ” http://zfacts.com/p/1195.html ”
btw the Rich just got Richer under the Republicans “economics”, and guess who is gonna pay this off…………. my Kids and Grand kids !!!!! so lets learn from History
from an Independent who is ” LOOKING_BOTH_WAYS to make sure my Vote counts.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 2:18pm@Valary
Agree, and thanks for mention of the rest of your post; well said, and well written.
Report Post »Lars Skipole
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 2:31pmGo Sarah, GO!
Report Post »LOOKING_BOTH_WAYS
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 2:49pmhummmmm … i wonder why my post was taken down ?
i guess some people can’t handle the truth !!!
Report Post »13thGenerationAmerican
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 3:48pmCommon Sense died the minute this feckless impostor was foisted upon the American public.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 4:41pm@BRAWNDO1958
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 10:40am
If Sarah Palin’s brain was gasoline, it wouldn’t fuel a minibike around a BB
And your source for that piece of brilliance is_____________?
Grammar lesson:
The correct verb is WERE. “If Sarah Palin’s brain WERE (but it is not) gasoline, ….”
Another example: If it WERE raining (but it is not), the dirt roads would be muddy.
On the other hand:
If Sarah Palin was born in Idaho, she would have her birth certificate registered there. (She was born there, and she does.)
Whose brain wouldn’t be enough to fuel as minibike around a BB? Careful — it might come back to bite you.
Report Post »ForeignWatcher
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 5:30pmCan you people show me the parallels between palin and reagan? For all i know reagan wasnt the least bit te party like, he was a spender, big goverment kind of guy, or where am i wrong?
I know, he is the old hero and palin the new, but they ARE not nearly the same…
Report Post »tjoholland
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 5:54pmI would vote for her, at least she’s honest and willing to defend herself with a gun. She’s a gun toting, pro-drilling, God fearing proud to be American. Just like me. She stands on freedom side of the isle not elite arrogant self-centered fat cat side, who thinks she knows whats best for the rest of us. She won’t try to tell us who to worship, what to eat or that government has the answer. But she knows, just like the rest of us that this admin. is putting us in danger.
Report Post »LibsRstupid
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 6:29pmI am afraid that Barry and his administration will ruin it to the point of nonrepair..
Report Post »d55may
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 9:45pmPLEASE PASS ALONG for SARAH.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8Ck4I_HPIQ
Report Post »d55may
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 9:46pmPLEASE PASS ALONG FOR SARAH PALIN. EXCELLENT VIDEO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8Ck4I_HPIQo
Report Post »1proudAmerican
Posted on February 5, 2011 at 11:12pmWe are so out of step, it makes me sick. Reagan was the first president that I was able to vote for and, in my opinion, he was one of the best presidents we ever had. He was a true patriot. Washington was the first and best, though. In his farewell address, he warned us AGAINST doing everything that has caused us problems. If our government had listened to him, we’d be a lot better off.
Report Post »middleclassprophet
Posted on February 6, 2011 at 1:24pmOne thing Reagan valued was civility. If anyone is out of step on that one, it is Palin.
Report Post »Rice Water
Posted on February 6, 2011 at 5:45pmAgreed! We should be trading MORE arms for hostages!!!
Report Post »