Partial-Birth Abortion Flashback: A Stop on the Slippery Slope to Smothering Children?

Comments (74)

1 2
  • flamingliberal
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 5:35pm

    Or you

    Report Post » flamingliberal  
  • flamingliberal
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 5:34pm

    Why is it that u protect life until birth, and then promote genocide based on political leaning? If you could abort ALL babies and/or children who would grow up to be progressives, would you? Based on your rhetoric, the answer is YES.

    Report Post » flamingliberal  
  • Freedomfromsocialist
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:46pm

    It’s been the problem since the fall of Adam and Eve, people who try to play God by deciding who lives and who dies.

    Report Post »  
  • Konservgrammy
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:36pm

    Obama believes in pre-mediated murder

    Report Post »  
  • wonderbug
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:31pm

    The woman is a product of her environment. God is a joke to her. The same is true for so many others, which is why I thank God for the turn out on 8/28. God is not a joke. Restore Honor.

    Report Post »  
  • Country
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:30pm

    Obama would not want to punish his girls with a baby so why would he care if a baby from a botched abortion lives just to die. It doesn’t mean anything to him, but if the baby cost money by calling in another doctor, well that is when his buddy, Dr. Easy Kill Emmauel’s Complete Lieves System comes in.

    Report Post »  
  • RKade
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:18pm

    I wonder it with this abortion revival and murder in and out of the Womb there will be a racial quota soon. so many of this kind can be murdered and only this many of that kind, those there need to make more babies to help redistribute the racial quotas.

    In this political climate it is probable all ready being done.
    HEADLINE:
    Abortionist Fined for Violation of Racial Quotas Murders 10 More Babies Above Allowed Number.”

    Report Post »  
  • jdawg
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:14pm

    This is all about death – nothing more. If this isn’t bad enough, how about voluntary human extinction? I’m serious:

    http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-spokane/movement-seeks-voluntary-human-extinction

    Report Post »  
  • LowIQGenius
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:13pm

    Any proponent of abortion should feel pretty darn lucky that they were “desirable” enough to their parents. What’s next, the postnatal abortion of orphans? Yet something tells me these people protest the death penalty…

    Report Post »  
  • skepticalbecausesomeoneneedstobe
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:01pm

    oh well

    want to stop abortion?
    get elected

    Report Post »  
    • Red1492
      Posted on October 7, 2010 at 1:27pm

      It still won’t stop abortion – no matter who you elect. Kind of like prohibition didn’t stop the sale and consumption of alcohol. It only made it more lucrative and violent and gave rise to organized crime. It won’t stop teenagers from giving birth to unwanted children and leaving them in garbage cans or bathroom stalls. Nor can you force someone to accept your religious dogma. However, abortion can be discouraged by not offering the government support systems that seem to reward irresponsibility.

      It is my hope that one day abortion will be obsolete due to infallible birth control – we’re almost there now. However, outlawing abortion can have just the opposite effect you wish it to:

      Where abortion is illegal, the rates often surpass that of the United States and can far surpass the rates in many other countries where abortion is legal.

      Most recent rates per 1,000 reproductive-age women
      Legal Illegal
      Belgium 7 Dominican Republic 47
      Germany 8 Peru 56
      Netherlands 9 Philippines 27
      Switzerland 9 Uganda 54
      United States 21

      Sources: Guttmacher Institute (The only institute in the U.S. that tracks abortion rates)

      Report Post » Red1492  
  • Oh, God!
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:51pm

    There are just no words in the English dictionary to describe these people. Pond scum is the only thing that is fitting and even that is being too nice. I went through 12 pregnancies to have 4 kids. I would have given my life to have been able to save those other 8. There is no justification for killing another life. Abortion deprives another of the ability to reach their end, that namely is happiness.

    Report Post » Oh, God!  
    • Wendy in FL
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:55pm

      I couldn’t agree more. I‘ve had 2 miscarriages in a row and can’t seem to get pregnant again to save my life. It is so painful to see women disregard the gift they carry inside of them as trash or “a couple of cells.” These babies are irreplaceable and who knows who they may have become.

      Report Post » Wendy in FL  
  • blacksmith
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:46pm

    I mispoke in my last post. It is not the master race but the “MASTER IDEOLOGY”

    Report Post »  
  • blacksmith
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:43pm

    The process of abortion and so called reproductive rights/health was originally based upon stopping the birth of undesirables. The idea is now becoming, with the climate change crowd is that all births are undesirable due to the increase in population and the consumption of resources.They only want the controlled births of right thinking people. Can you say “MASTER RACE?”

    Report Post »  
    • JEANNIEMAC
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 5:24pm

      AGENDA 21 was thought up at a meeting in the 1980s, when the heads of various nations met to plot the future of the planet. They intend to “decrease the surplus population” and render the planet back to a pristine condition, fit for the elite and their progeny. Some serfs will be educated to a level of service, and allowed to live for the convenience of the elites.
      The population will be decreased by encouraging homosexual unions, which are sterile. Also, promiscuity will be lauded, in the knowledge that it usually results in diseases which can render people sterile, or kill them off. If they do get pregnant, there are free abortions available.

      Report Post »  
  • wleeblake
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:39pm

    Any child in her care would be suffering.

    Report Post »  
  • Wendy in FL
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:34pm

    What exactly does this woman mean when she says “suffering child?” What is her definition of suffering? If she is referring to a Downs Syndrome child, they surely do not suffer but are in fact happy and good natured children. Is she referring to a child with a more severe mental or physical challenge? how does she know that the child is suffering?

    Report Post » Wendy in FL  
    • Mikee T
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:52pm

      Don’t you get it ? They think they can play “God”…….that’s the arrogance and moral turpitude of liberal / progressives that are now FINALLY BEING EXPOSED….. Darwin-ites…..agnostics….they all belong in Europe somewhere and then maybe then and only then can we have our Judao-Christian country back……….Please lord, send them all to their own state of sodom and gomora where they can live happily ever after……..

      Report Post »  
    • cheezwhiz
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:54pm

      how does she know that the child is suffering?
      ====================================
      She knows a child is suffering because its been allowed to be born ..
      Remember Hussain doesn’t even know when life begins because its above his pay grade,
      but he has no doubts about when a baby must be killed / allowed to die .
      In fact the only clarity of thought he has articulated in plain simple words has been his support of killing a baby rather than reviving it.

      Report Post » cheezwhiz  
    • Susan Harkins
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 5:20pm

      @Mikee T, who says: ‘…moral turpitude of liberal / progressives that are now FINALLY BEING EXPOSED….. Darwin-ites…..agnostics….they all belong in Europe somewhere and then maybe then and only then can we have our Judao-Christian country back.”

      Mikee, I fail to see where you are trying to make the connection that agnosticism and progressivism are almost interchangable. Your post is a bit biggoted toward agnostics, putting them in the same camp as progresso-********. Let me give you a quote from my own personal ancestry (speaking in defense of him, myself [as an agnostic], and my wonderful country that he helped to PRESIDE over).

      “The hocus-pocus phantasy of a God, like another Cerberus, with one body and three heads, had its birth and growth in the blood of thousands and thousands of martyrs.”

      “In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own. It is error alone that needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.”

      “The clergy, by getting themselves established by law and ingrafted into the machine of government, have been a very formidable engine against the civil and religious rights of man.”

      ~ Thomas Jefferson

      Mikee T, and lastly, to address your comment: “…they all belong in Europe somewhere…” , I believe that you have it wrong. They (we) were here LONG before you. Don‘t even presume to equate agnostics with being ’Anti-American’. You are completely off the issue, and your insult only reveals the depths of your ‘Christian character’.

      Susan Harkins  
    • Prospero
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 5:59pm

      Susan Harkins blathers: “The clergy, by getting themselves established by law and ingrafted into the machine of government, have been a very formidable engine against the civil and religious rights of man.”

      Always amusing when the ignoramuses employ an argument against theocracy as an argument against religion. Agnostic is, of course, the Greek for “ignoramus”.

      Since we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and that they are endowed by their *Creator* with certain unalienable rights….we can’t much rely on agnostics and atheists. As far as they are concerned we have no Creator, and thus our rights aren’t inalienable.

      Prospero  
    • Prospero
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 6:16pm

      Here we have Thomas Jefferson speaking about his actual faith, rather than orating in opposition to theocracies:

      “The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man. … Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus. … I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus.” – Thomas Jefferson

      “God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever.” – Thomas Jefferson

      Here are some of the other Founders:

      “It is the duty of mankind on all suitable occasions to acknowledge their dependence on the Divine being.” – Benjamin Franklin

      “Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak; and that it is doing God’s service, when it is violating all His laws.” – John Adams

      “The only foundation for a useful education in a republic is to be laid in religion. Without this there can be no virtue, and without virtue there can be no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all republican governments.” – Benjamin Rush

      “We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus!” – John Hancock

      “Let divines and philosophers, statesmen and patriots, unite their endeavors to renovate the age by impressing the minds of men with the importance of educating their little boys and girls, inculcating in the minds of youth the fear and love of the Deity… and leading them in the study and practice of the exalted virtues of the Christian system.” – Samuel Adams

      ““Why is it that, next to the birthday of the Savior of the world, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day [the Fourth of July]?” “Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the Gospel dispensation? Is it not that the Declaration of Independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer’s mission upon earth? That it laid the cornerstone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity?” – John Quincy Adams

      “Be religiously careful in our choice of all public officers . . . and judge of the tree by its fruits.” – Elias Boudinot

      “Without morals a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime and pure…are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of free governments.” – Charles Carroll

      “I have carefully examined the evidences of the Christian religion, and if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity I would unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor. I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man.” – Alexander Hamilton

      “It cannot be emphasized too clearly and too often that this nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religion, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.” – Patrick Henry

      “Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.” – John Jay

      “Public utility pleads most forcibly for the general distribution of the Holy Scriptures.” – James McHenry

      Report Post » Prospero  
  • wingedwolf
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:33pm

    Don’t worry, America, soon Uncle Barack will make those decisions for us. If our babies are deemed to be “undesirable,” something will be put in your food or vitamins that will make your body spontaneously abort them, no muss, no fuss. The medical takeover bill is truly frightening. There should be no late term abortions unless a doctor is willing to swear under penalty of perjury that the life of the mother is endangered and should have to present the medical records to back it up.

    Report Post » wingedwolf  
    • untameable-kate
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 6:38pm

      I have a little something to put in my 357 to make sure it doesen’t happen. If any one tried to touch my kid I’d skin him.

      Report Post » Untameable-kate  
  • tooky8
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:32pm

    People like this lady need to be smothered by a pillow. We need to get rid of this trash in this world. This woman is NUTS!!!!!!!!!!

    Report Post »  
  • wleeblake
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:31pm

    How can you love the child so much you dont want to see it suffer, but refer to it as a couple cells not a human being.She makes me sick.

    Report Post »  
  • carrera
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:31pm

    Depraved indifference to human life. Our own Government had to propose legislation so Progressives could no longer kill with impunity the babies they were “punished” with. “The Born Alive Infant Protection Act” was deemed appropriate to protect the innocents from vile Liberal/Progressives. Our very own President OPPOSED similar legislation, on more than one occasion. When an aborted child survives the procedure, our own President demanded that no medical intervention would occur to save the baby’s life. I will say in his defense, he did offer a “comfort room” so the baby can die a dwindling death in a scenic room. Insanity.

    Report Post »  
  • Mikee T
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:29pm

    What do you expect from a man that worships Alinksy and his principles…. Alinksy was nothing more than a criminal mind…….period……and he was Obama‘s hero as evidenced by Obama’s political way of life…… I don’t expect ANYTHING good from an Alinsky-ite like Obama and his cronies from Chicago…… Question is, HOW SOON CAN WE GET THE BUM OUT OF THE WH ?

    Report Post »  
  • Alvin691
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:27pm

    The look on the lady bishop’s face tells it all. “Did she just say what I think she said?”.

    Report Post »  
    • Independent Tess
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:34pm

      Deer in the headlights for sure. And if nothing is done the truck will run over us all.

      Report Post » Independent Tess  
  • Freedomfromsocialist
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:26pm

    If a baby is not a valuable human inside the womb, what makes it one outside the womb? Why are we so shocked that this attitude has reared it’s ugly evil head?

    Report Post »  
    • Chiron Pyrope
      Posted on October 8, 2010 at 1:45am

      First, it was legal abortions for fetuses who would, if carried to full term, would likely cause harm to the mother or, if born, would suffer with mental or health problems–these abortions could only be performed during the first trimester of pregnancy.

      Then, abortions in cases of rape or incest were legalized, but still, only in the first trimester of pregnancy.

      Next, abortions on demand were legalized, followed by partial birth abortions.

      Now, we see advocacy for euthanizing severely ill children. (Does this include those with mental problems? We must assume it does!)

      Soon to come will be euthanization of adults…especially the old and infirm. Shall we follow this reasoning by assuming people with severe retardation or Alzheimer’s, or Parkinson’s Disease?

      This all boils down to the “progressive” expansion of the legalized ending of human lives. Will it become “legal” to euthanize those whose thinking is contrary to the accepted norm? Can we not see where this is leading?

      Report Post »  
  • Susan Harkins
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:24pm

    Dear UK Pundit lady,

    Considering that we know that Progressive Radical Ideologies stem from a form of mental retardation [See: Liberalism is a Disease] then, you don‘t mind if we kindly consider your ’couple-of-cells’ self and put it out of its misery, do you?

    Report Post » Susan Harkins  
    • Libertarian
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 7:12pm

      I would say abortion is the new slavery.

      Two places in the constitution refer to our natural rights of “life, liberty and property” (Amendments 5 & 14). These are the essence of what a limited government is to protect.

      Abortion has become a subject of indifference among the populace. Some do not consider the conception of a child a “life”, just as slaves were considered “property” in the US before the civil war. Categorizing an individual as “property” at any period in a person’s life is slavery; abortion is the usurpation of a life at the beginning stages.

      The government’s indifference of slavery allowed people to confiscate the labor and liberty of another under the guise of property ownership. There is no difference today; people are using the same methods of “property ownership” as a means to justify the killing of an individual, infanticide. It may be your body, but you do not own the natural rights of your fetus/baby.

      The other argument is that a fetus is not considered a “child” by definition. I would argue that a male’s contribution to an egg alone cannot produce a child; likewise an egg alone cannot produce an offspring. The act of fertilization is by definition a “life” because it has a sapien destiny. Every stage of life; conception, infant, toddler, child, teenager, adult are just categories or phases of human life.

      To sit at the sidelines apathetic to abortion is to sit at the sidelines of the civil war. Which side are you on?

      The role of government is to protect life, liberty and property.

      Report Post » Libertarian  
    • Verum Ad Potentia
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 9:31pm

      Susan, the term has been changed by law (this is what our leaders are working on?) to ” intellectual disability.”

      (sigh)

      Report Post » Verum Ad Potentia  
  • Contrarianthinker
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:24pm

    What’s wrong with killing a very burdened child since he/she is simply taking up space? Of course, that doesn‘t ever mean a Progressive’s baby

    Report Post »  
    • KenInIL
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:18pm

      Just the ugly ones? or the ones with too high a BMI?

      Report Post »  
    • Jim AZ
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 9:01pm

      Did you say “progressive’s“ or ”progressive”?

      Report Post »  
  • Flagwaver
    Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:21pm

    This is one of the most vile and evil things I have ever heard in my life. That woman, if any harm comes to children based on her despicable rhetoric, should be brought up on charges!

    Flagwaver  
    • RONALDREAGAN1980
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:28pm

      May I suggest “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift?

      Report Post » RONALDREAGAN1980  
    • tjdavid21444
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:33pm

      She’s also aligned with the socialist Fabian Society in the UK. Google it, it will open your eyes.

      Report Post »  
    • tjdavid21444
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:37pm

      RR, G.B. Shaw was one of them too, why not mention him? As was Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. What a lovely lady she was. Only wishing to rid society of “undesireables” which was her word for blacks. Yeah, heroic bunch, the whole lot. Who gets to decide, in this progressive new world that they envision, who is fit to live and who must die (for the common good, of course)? Are you ready to turn that power over to government bureaucrats?

      Report Post »  
    • Capitalist Mama
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:44pm

      TJ,

      Swift was not a progressive. “A Modest Proposal” is a satirical work written around the turn of the century which suggested several ways to cook and eat Irish babies. It was published in Great Britain to shock the English, because they treated the Irish very badly (like second class citizens).

      Your point is still valid about Sanger though.

      Report Post »  
    • carrera
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 3:48pm

      TJDAVID- Hillary Clinton was the proud recipient of the 2009 Margaret Sanger Award. It is amazing that we now have individuals eager and willing, feeling a sense of honor, receiving an award named after on the most reprehensible, eugenic minds who willfully committed black genocide and a host of other barbaric crimes against humanity.

      Report Post »  
    • RONALDREAGAN1980
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:08pm

      Capitalist Mama– BRAVO! i just wanted to see if anyone here knew that. Yeah, this UK lady is so out there, so unbelievable, that the only way i can wrap my brain around her is to think that she has to be satirist. She seems pretty serious though. She probably is not the kind of person to which a responsible news network would give air time to spread her viewpoint.

      Report Post » RONALDREAGAN1980  
    • Robert W
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 4:35pm

      Pro-death progressives always talk about the deaths of others for the common good, but never their own deaths. I love to see the look on a 40 yr old progressives face if when their 60 yr old mother says ” you know I thought about it and youve been to much of a burden, I want a really lte term abortion”

      Report Post »  
    • Relocated1
      Posted on October 6, 2010 at 5:19pm

      RR1980–Thanks for that great mental about eating children…yuck!

      Report Post » Relocated1  
    • gw76
      Posted on October 7, 2010 at 12:49am

      The problem with “A Modest Proposal” is these folks would take it literally!

      Report Post »  
    • Thommy
      Posted on October 7, 2010 at 8:59am

      She should be smothered from the Human Race… Please People.. Use Nov to bring humanity back to our Country,,,

      Report Post » Thommy  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love