Perry Under Fire for Offensive Hunting Camp Name, Cain Calls Him ‘Insensitive’ Toward Blacks
- Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:20pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »

(AP Photo)
Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry is on the defensive after the Washington Post published an extensive report about a family hunting camp that at one point was known as an offensive racial slur — and still is in some circles.
While Perry’s campaign insisted that a rock on the property bearing the name was painted over in the 1980s, the Post reported the rock is very much there, with the name still visible as recently as several months ago:
In the early years of his political career, Rick Perry began hosting fellow lawmakers, friends and supporters at his family’s secluded West Texas hunting camp, a place known by the name painted in block letters across a large, flat rock standing upright at its gated entrance.
“N—–head,” it read.
[...]
[T]he name of this particular parcel did not change for years after it became associated with Rick Perry, first as a private citizen, then as a state official and finally as Texas governor. Some locals still call it that. As recently as this summer, the slablike rock — lying flat, the name still faintly visible beneath a coat of white paint — remained by the gated entrance to the camp.
When asked last week, Perry said the word on the rock is an “offensive name that has no place in the modern world.”
[...]
“My mother and father went to the lease and painted the rock in either 1983 or 1984,” Perry wrote. “This occurred after I paid a visit to the property with a friend and saw the rock with the offensive word. After my visit I called my folks and mentioned it to them, and they painted it over during their next visit.”
“Ever since, any time I ever saw the rock it was painted over,” Perry said.
Perry’s version of events differs in many respects from the recollections of seven people, interviewed by The Washington Post, who spoke in detail of their memories of seeing the rock with the name at various points during the years that Perry was associated with the property through his father, partners or his signature on a lease.
Herman Cain was the first GOP candidate to attack Perry for the name, calling him “very insensitive” for continuing to hunt there and not acting sooner to remove the name.
“Since Gov. Perry has been going there for years to hunt, I think that it shows a lack of sensitivity for a long time of not taking that word off of that rock and renaming the place,” Cain told ABC’s “This Week.”
“Yes, it was painted over,” he said. “But how long ago was it painted over? So I’m still saying that it is a sign of insensitivity.”
Watch Cain’s interview below, via ABC. Discussion about the name begins at the 2:25 mark.
In a separate interview on Fox News Sunday, Cain addressed the name again, saying the Texas governor showed a lack of sensitivity toward black people.
“There isn’t a more vile, negative word than the ‘n word,’ and for him to leave it there as long as they did is just plain insensitive to a lot of black people in this country,” he said.
Perry‘s campaign hit back at the Post’s story, saying a number of claims made are “incorrect, inconsistent and anonymous, including the implication that Rick Perry brought groups to the lease when the word on the rock was still visible.”
“The one consistent fact in the story is that the word on a rock was painted over and obscured many years ago,” Perry spokesman Ray Sullivan said.
“Mr. Cain is wrong about the Perry family’s quick action to eliminate the word on the rock, but is right the word written by others long ago is insensitive and offensive. That is why the Perrys took quick action to cover and obscure it,” he said.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (647)
This_Individual
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:50pmThis only strengthens my decision about supporting Ron Paul.
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:58pmI agree with you, except for the fact that I could NEVER vote for R. Paul.
Report Post »The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:19pmIt only strengthens my belief that this pack of losers we’ve lined up, assures another 4 years for BO…and the end of our country as we knew it.
Report Post »motonutt
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:20pmRon Paul shot himself in the foot and not at Perry’s hunting camp. Not thinking it’s o.k. to kill the enemy????? I was considering the possibility of supporting him, but now he is a ruleout.
Report Post »The biggest use of the “N” word is by blacks. Period. Why is that o.k.?
LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:25pmYou could never vote for Ron Paul because you’re a tool of the system and therefore a useful idiot.
Report Post »Formula382
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:26pmRP isn’t a “real” candidate. Some good ideas but he’s certainly far from presidential. Of course so is Obummer and he won so I guess anything is possible!
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:32pm@motonutt – So you won’t for Ron Paul because he is a strict constitutionalist? I don’t doubt that man was guilty of his crimes, but he was still an American citizen. Just because someone is labeled a terrorist does not give Obama the right of Judge, Jury and Executioner. Under the sixth amendment he deserved to be put on trial. Homeland security called people at tea parties “domestic terrorists” and “right-wing extremests”; what is to stop them from targeting US next?!
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:39pmI would rather write-in my vote for Ron Paul than vote for one criminal or another. Having to choose between the lesser of two evils only leads to more of the same, and a continuation of the system of tyranny we have today. We shouldn’t even vote by these so called “debates” or what you heard someone say about a candidate; we should decide by their voting record alone. That is the only way you’ll find out if someone is just telling you what you want to hear, or if they say what they mean and mean what they say. Obama said all the right things and got elected, good luck with that strategy; it’s gotten us to where we are.
Report Post »IntegrityFirst08
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:57pm@ LIBERTYFADING – you wrote, “I would rather write-in my vote for Ron Paul than vote for one criminal or another.” Are you refering to BO, or Perry. Both AMERICAN citizens never convicted of a crime yet you smear their names by calling them criminals.
Wow liberty why cant we just haul them in and give them a trial first like american citizen Awalaki. You want to give him a trial, so i think before you call them Criminals you need to know innocent until proven guilty.
Report Post »VOTE FOR RON PAUL……lol no im kidding.
IntegrityFirst08
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:11pmI keep forgetting how smart Libertarians are. They have the power to convict people of crimes to prove a point and the power to deem something Unconstitutional to prove a point even though congress didnt see it the same way. Brilliant. What a failing contradiction liberty made. You must not be a tru constituionalist.
You call 2 American Citizens with no criminal record – CRIMINALS
You call for the trial of a AL QAEDA terrorist born in the us.
Can the 2 citizens not waging war against us get a trial too tough libertarian? Or is the point you want to made of smearing someone more important than their rights????
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:14pmI have no idea how any self respecting Conservative could have ever had this walking catastrophe as a serious candidate. Of course, every media outlet, including Fox and their mad hard push to the left, props up both Perry and another progressive, Romney.
People need to disassociate themselves from the agenda peddling media. We know for certain that CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and NBC are nothing but leftist propaganda peddlers. Throw in PBS, NPR, the History Channel, NOVA, HGTV, MTV, and many of the Cartoon Channels, including Disney, and Sesame Street, it’s plain to see that the communists have about every base covered.
Hannity on Fox peddles “The Architect” Carl Rove, and O’Reilly is all over the map as a phoney Independent stooge, who arrogantly talks over every person he can swindle into going on his program. At least Megyn Kelly (who’s a liberal) conducts actual fair and balanced interviews. Or at least tries to. I can respect her because she doesn’t peddle, she presents facts and truth about both sides. Dana Perino worked for Bush, who is a right wing progressive.
The internet can be a good research tool if people will unravel from the laziness that pervades our society regarding research. Ignore what the media peddles and dig into becoming personally informed about our politicians. From local to national candidates the information is there.
No idea why Beck dumped Bachmann in favor of that turd.
PAUL/CAIN FOR PRESIDENT AND VP 2012
runaway_slave
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:17pmRun Paul make conservatives look like kooks.
Report Post »Bum thrower
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:18pmA vote for Ron Paul will assure Obama a second term!!
Report Post »Libertarian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:24pm@IntegrityFirst08,
Careful with that broad brush about libertarians. I would gladly debate you about any topic; I do wish we had a more adequate forum to debate on.
Take care
Report Post »Cat
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:39pmWhile we bicker about Mr. Paul’s rocks and Mr. Perry’s rock, Harry Reid is planning on ways to get a tax increase before cutting spending and he’s going to do it with the super committee and Nancy Pelosi breathing down his neck.
We’re about to be screwed tighter.
They desperately want this country closed down BEFORE the election.
The socialists MUST have chaos to impose martial law.
They know they’ll lose most of the Senate so they need to make as many deals as possible there to increase revenue for stimuli, to stock the slush fund for socialist’s campaigns.
They may not lose the administrative office if conservatives are pulled apart by a swing vote so why spend the energy on Soetoro.
The socialists are silently pushing Mr. Paul on us while at the same time blaming Republicans for not working with them on tax increases.
On the other side;
Report Post »Wish all you want …
The Republican nominee will be Romney … That’s all there is to it.
The establishment has control over that selection, not us.
The10thAmendment
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:47pm@ Bum thrower
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:18pm
A vote for Ron Paul will assure Obama a second term!!
————————————————————————————————————————————————-
Really? A vote for Perry, Romney, or Huntsman is a certain nudge further left in ideals of political trim.
My dog could defeat Obama in the 2012 election.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:55pmHmmmm, are we going to apply the same sort of logic to everyone else.
Will you stop shopping at any store that sells rap music DVDs that use the “N” word?
Does Perry own the land or the rock? Did he paint the rock?
If I go to a place you like to visit and paint a word that is offensive on a rock, will you stop going there?
Report Post »stifroc
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:03pmI don’t really CARE who is selected as the GOP nominee!!!!
WHOEVER gets the nod gets my vote!
ANYONE… even my freakin cat would be better than P.B.O.
So I hope that AFTER the nomination is selected, EVERYONE gets behind that candidate!!!
Report Post »However until then, push and pull for the candidate you want.
ashestoashes
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:08pmI wouldn’t want that name on any rock of mine. Landscaping is best left to nature. Grafitti is very unattractive.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:14pm@CAT I belive you are right. But what do you think of Romney?
Report Post »RabidPatriot
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:19pmJohn Kerry has a better chance of winning the Republican nomination than Ron Paul. Paul is a mix of genius and mentally ill. He is a political rain man. He has a cult like following of very vocal, intense, quick to anger and yet tiny segment of America.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:24pmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niggerhead
Study english language people. The N word has a history long before it was a racial term for black folks. It was originally used for a charred piece of wood. When used with N—-head, it refered to a black iron ball, a rock hill top, and other meanings. this had nothing to do with black people,
If you are gong to get upsed over this, then you better be prepared to boycot a whole lot of stores out there that sell rap music CDs. It is load with the N word, the F word, the B word, and a whole lot of racist stuff.
It is funny how the N word has sort of become the most powerful word in our language. Blacks can use it, and not one cares. tell me what one word will end your career, destroy your reputation faster than the N word?
I can also tell you this. I know a lot of folks who have used the word at one point and time, and are not near as racist as some of the goody two shoes people who have never used it.
Do you believe in free speech? then get real.
I can tell you this much. If a chunk of land has a good dear population, you can call it ******* rock, honkey rock, spick rock. *** rock, dago rock, ***** rock, jigaboo rock, jungle bunny rock, taco rock, zipper head rock, ************ rock, Mic rock, yankee rock, indian rock, coon rock…… I could give a flip of a wooden nickel what you call it, Ranger P will be glad to hunt on it.
I am disapointed in Herman Cain. He should know better
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:24pmBad judgement for sure. Paint the rock. Call the landlord. Hunt somewhere else. Make a stand Rick! It doesn’t take much and the liberals will always find something to b!tch about, but not good. I personally wouldn’t care, I’d hunt. But I am not planning on running for Potus. I think Perry is a little slow, I couldn’t see Romney making that mistake.
Cain/Rubio 2012
Report Post »Romney/Cain 2012
Romney/Rubio 2012 – All fine by me.
The10thAmendment
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:29pm@ RabidPatriot
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:19pm
John Kerry has a better chance of winning the Republican nomination than Ron Paul. Paul is a mix of genius and mentally ill. He is a political rain man. He has a cult like following of very vocal, intense, quick to anger and yet tiny segment of America.
———————————————————————————————————————————————-
So you believe that America has failed, and that the Governance given to us by the blood of the Founders of the Nation, was in vain? Submission to less than we were given at Founding is a capitulation to an Oligarchy under the rule of the elite, where rights are those given by Government. That’s what Romney and Perry certainly represent. They are little better than Obama, if at all, and maybe worse. At least Obama has exposed the line in the sand and is forcing people to decide between a Republic, or a quick death. Romney and perry represent a death by slow doses of poison. Either way, death of the Republic is assured. We have a choice. Freedom, or surrender, there is no medium.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DioQooFIcgE
Report Post »RabidPatriot
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:29pmEven if the story is only half right, Rick Perry is completely out of the race. Expect a precipitous drop in the polls as donors and supporters run for the exits. His opponents on both sides of the isle will be screaming racist until he bows out.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:30pmAlthough I’m not a doctor I have diagnosed the Ron Paul critics on The Blaze as suffering from chronic PDS. Please read this link for symptoms and treatment.
http://thenewamerican.com/opinion/jack-kerwick/9206-paul-derangement-syndrome
Speaking of doctors, that is exactly what this country needs to cure the progressive disease we are all suffering from. Dr. Ron Paul.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:30pmNiggerhead hunting camp, the former name of a hunting camp of Texas governor Rick Perry, renamed to “North Camp Pasture” in 1983 by the family that owns the land
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:33pmSupports my decision of not supporting Perry from from the get go..
Report Post »teamarcheson
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:36pmI DON’T CARE IF PERRY HAS BOXES OF DELICIOUS NIGG– BABY LICORICE CANDIES IN HIS DESK
I only care about who his first US Supreme Court nominee will be?
Report Post »ZZBlueComet
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:48pmI thought Cain was different, a black conservative who wouldn’t stoop to the race card, I should’ve known.
Report Post »IntegrityFirst08
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:51pm@ Libertarian – “Careful with that broad brush about libertarians.” My appologies if its offensive, its not personal to you. But i will not be careful in stating something i feel as fact and these forums are littered with so many examples of know it all libertarians smearing people with spun and false accusations. Its just everything you people say is basically law. If its not comming from your mouth or from ron paul then people get shouted down and told they abandoned their values and that they are wrong.
One eg from this post alone. “Hannity on Fox peddles “The Architect” Carl Rove, and O’Reilly is all over the map as a phoney Independent stooge, who arrogantly talks over every person he can swindle into going on his program. At least Megyn Kelly (who’s a liberal) conducts actual fair and balanced interviews. Or at least tries to. I can respect her because she doesn’t peddle, she presents facts and truth about both sides. Dana Perino worked for Bush, who is a right wing progressive.”
This Libertarian knows all of these peoples political affiliation apparently and talks like his written word is sent from heaven itself. Although his information is mostly all wrong. Giving your opinion about a topic is one thing, but when you fear monger people into your spin game for ron paul thats where i draw my line. I know what RP is and what he is not. he is not my cannidate. never will be
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:52pm@ teamarcheson
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:36pm
I DON’T CARE IF PERRY HAS BOXES OF DELICIOUS NIGG– BABY LICORICE CANDIES IN HIS DESK
I only care about who his first US Supreme Court nominee will be?
———————————————————————————————————————————————-
Until the 17th Amendment is repealed, the Supreme Court is a waste of time. They have become in essence, servants of politics and no longer fulfill the proper role of confining the Politicians under the rule of Law, thus protecting the rights of the people.
I want to know what regulations the next president will eliminate, and what Federal bureaucracy he or she will eliminate. Such as the Labor Relations Board, the EPA, FEMA, Health and Human Services, and Education.
Report Post »IntegrityFirst08
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:56pm@ Libertarian – I will now just ask you to read COUS1933′s post. This is why you all get lumped into the same boat. Because your all the same bitter nut jobs that will never see a ron paul presidency.
Report Post »LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:03pmSorry it took so long to get back, but in response to INTEGRITYFIRST08. I must say that is quite the spin of my words you got there… I can see you’ve learned a lot from MSN in the past few years. So because I call for a “terrorist” to NOT be murdered but instead be put on trial, and that I would not vote for either criminal (which you assumed it was BO or Perry), that somehow shows that I contradict myself. In the words of your fellow so called “conservative” republican presidential candidate, “Nice try…”
Report Post »I meant the above statement about criminals as more of a broad statement of current and past presidents and presidential candidates. If you do not follow the constitution, then you are a criminal. Period. And in case you were wondering, if I could, I WOULD prosecute all of them to the furthest extent of the law. From overbearing executive orders, to illegal wars, to entitlement programs and affirmative action, I would prosecute ANYONE in the political class. Apply the constitution to everything and you’ll get your answer.
LIBERTYFADING
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:09pmWhen you choose to compromise instead of sticking to your principles and beliefs, and deciding to elect someone because they are the most electable, you become part of the problem of this current system. Vote on principle. Vote on record. But please don’t vote on perceived electablility.
Report Post »Faith in God
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:10pmRPaul is a doofus…anyone in our country who isn’t for the killing of traitors turned terrorist…doofus.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:21pm@ LIBERTYFADING
Report Post »Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:03pm
And in case you were wondering, if I could, I WOULD prosecute all of them to the furthest extent of the law. From overbearing executive orders, to illegal wars, to entitlement programs and affirmative action, I would prosecute ANYONE in the political class. Apply the constitution to everything and you’ll get your answer.
————————————————————————————————————————————————
In general I think that’s right. But prosecuting them for philosophy isn’t really criminal. The Founders and those who ratified the Constitution/Bill of Rights called that practice, “Bad Behavior”, and prescribed the remedy. That penalty was impeachment (which includes every member of the Federal system in the 3 divisions of governance, Executive, Legislative and the Courts). If they then take that same message to the place they decide to live in they can be then charged with sedition, or High Treason.
walkyrie
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:44pmThe Perry’s never owned this land. There were hundreds of places in the US with this placename, most changed and painted over just like on the hunting lease – that the Perry‘s didn’t own. If you guys focus on the irrelevant BS long and hard enough, we’ll just destroy all the viable conservative leaders (Christie ain’t one) and we will get what we deserve. Hope ya’ll are happy now.
What a bunch of style over substance nonsense. Guess we better get back to Hoping and Changing
Report Post »Thoughts_From_The_Shack
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:46pmPerry is your typical BS RINO A-hole. Just a thought, try covering black lettering with black paint. Then if you want it painted white… Paint over the black. Morons.
Report Post »PubliusPencilman
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:51pmHa! My favorite responses here are the ones that complain that black people say the “n word” all the time but white people aren’t allowed to say it. This seems to be a constant complaint from conservatives, and its really kind of funny.
But OK–maybe one of you can tell me why it is that you resent not being able to use that word. In what context were you planning on using it?
In any case, it’s not a polite word. However, there is a very clear and obvious reason why rappers and other are able to use it. For a long time, the N word was primarily used by whites against blacks as a term to mark their inferiority. When a black person is uses it, then it is unlikely that the term is used to mark black people as inferior (you see, since they themselves are black; following?). See, it’s so simple!
Report Post »Anamah
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:00pmDo not need to go from bad to worst…!
Report Post »mils
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:18pmokay, “why” did his parents name it that? what did it mean to them?
Report Post »harley 98
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:25pmit shows your a morron
Report Post »Leader1776
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:27pm@The_Almighty_Creestof
Report Post »Granted, none of them are close to conservative enough except for Paul and Bachman, but losers? That’s a term you reserve for BHO (BS), not for these candidates. Or is your agenda something hidden?
missionarydad
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:32pmTHE_ALMIGHTY_CREESTOF
What are you talking about? Mitt Romney leads Obama consistently in most all of the polls that have been coming out. I wouldn’t call someone who has devoted his life to unpaid service, graduated from both Harvard Law and Business schools near the top of his class, and #1 in his BYU class a loser. Not to mention his achievements with the the 2002 Olympics and CEO of Bain and founder of Bain Capital. He has created more jobs in the private sector than Obama will have created in the entire nation during his 4 years. He and all 5 of his sons are Eagle Scouts. Unless your achievements are greater than this very much abbreviated list I think you just keep ignorant comments like that to yourself.
If you do not want to vote for him that is perfectly fine, but Mitt may be a lot of things but it is very close to the opposite of the spectrum from loser. That goes for most of the other candidates as well.
Besides Rick Perry everyone of them is much better than Obama and except Perry they are all better than John McCain as far as it pertains to POTUS. Even Perry is better than Obama just the word much better would be pushing it.
Report Post »mils
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:34pmrangerp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:24pm
****************http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niggerhead
Report Post »****************************************************************************
Please, save your time….People here don’t want to hear reason and facts.
Zer0
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:38pm@Liberty_Fading,
“I would rather write-in my vote for Ron Paul than vote for one criminal or another.” – I, and many of my Libertarian friends, took that same approach in ‘08. I feel that our current POTUS is such a detriment to our economy and civil liberties that it is absolutely necessary to vote him out of office. I don‘t think I’ll be able to vote for Perry or Romney in the primaries, but I may just make a strategic vote in an attempt to see that “the most Conservative nominee that can win” gets the nomination.
@PubliusPencilman…. C’mon. Not everybody on these boards or in the Conservative/Libertarian movement shares these “N” word sentiments. I grew up in a Southern family, and to use that kind of language is foul, vulgar, and ignorant. It would be deeply embarrassing to use such language privately or publicly. I utterly detest political correctness, the hypocrisy that springs forth from it, and its stifling of free speech. That being said, I don‘t lament the inability for anyone to use that kind of language because it’s simply vulgar. I don’t think many who defend its use (and claim to be Christian) realize that using such language runs contrary to Christ’s teachings.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:54pmA conservative can barely stand their leadership. Reagan had to prove himself and only at the end of the day was he highly admired. Cult worship of a man is not nor has it ever been part of conservatism. Paul is a charlatan, he runs on the republican ticket even though he is libertarian. Libertarians are actually just social liberals, they pretend to be conservatives. But conservatives are not necessarily republicans. They support conservative republicans and would support conservative Democrats if there were such a thing.
Report Post »Cat
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 7:06pm@ASHESTOASHES
Don’t trust the guy.
I’m a huge fan of a consumption tax with no income tax EVER again, he’s not even talking about it.
Trusting Supreme Court Justice Thomas can work his magic on the Affordable Heath Care Act.
If he does get a majority to agree with him, that issue is over until the socialists bring it up again, and they will.
What scares the crap out of me is the little stunt Governor Pudue pulled off last week.
Report Post »If Harry Reid and his ilk get their way and voting is suspended, we’re cooked and it won’t matter who the GOP nominates.
rdk
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 7:10pmSo you would vote for the nut because Perry stayed at a place with a pained rock? Lets see pictures of that rock; it is easy to criticize.
Report Post »jackal
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 7:15pmRanger:: I can tell you this much. If a chunk of land has a good dear population, you can call it ******* rock, honkey rock, spick rock. *** rock, dago rock, ***** rock, jigaboo rock, jungle bunny rock, taco rock, zipper head rock, ************ rock, Mic rock, yankee rock, indian rock, coon rock…… I could give a flip of a wooden nickel what you call it, Ranger P will be glad to hunt on it.
I am disapointed in Herman Cain. He should know better
I was thinking the same thing Ranger about Cain and was disappointed at his response all PC.Any other race can use the N word just about except a white person,Why??
Report Post »ying
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 7:17pmYes, now we know that Cain is against the First Amendment.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 7:19pm“Study english language people. The N word has a history long before it was a racial term for black folks. It was originally used for a charred piece of wood. When used with N—-head, it refered to a black iron ball, a rock hill top, and other meanings. this had nothing to do with black people,”
That is false, Rangerp. Even the wilipedia site doesn’t say that. The term is BASED on its use for black people, as all the things it is used for could be said to resemble a black person’s head. It is racist in its origin. There is no getting around that.
All these mental contortions just show that you know how embarrassing this is.
My advice to Perry would be to ride it out. The damage is done, and it wasn’t like he was going to get the black vote anyway.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 7:28pm@jackal and MILS
People have drank the PC kool aid till it comes out their ears. they are like mindless robots.
call the average white man a racist, sexist, or homophobe, and you own him. He is terrified.
call him lazy, liar, coward, gutless, queer,…. (all things that would make me punch you in the face), and he will not care.
You can call me a sexist, racist, homophobe in one sentence, and I will shake your hand, and take you to lunch as a thank you.
We are now a nation of gutless males.
Report Post »IntegrityFirst08
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 7:33pmIsels – The dammage is done when i heard out of Perrys mouth about the Illegal Alien getting in state tuition granted to them. Thats not conservative at all. I heard it from his mouth and i cant stand with him when there are others on the podium that are what i want in there.
RON PAUL………….haha never.
Ranger dont give up on Herman Cain bro. He was asked a bunch of tough questions and instead of bouncing around it he just answered them for how he felt and what he thinks. Its kind of a breath of fresh air. I dont think cain is pulling any race card, these reporters ask a question and he answers. I have to know more how his 999 plan with work out.
And no i dont listen to libertarians anylonger so dont even bother with your crying for RP speeches.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 7:50pm@ RepubliCorp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:54pm
A conservative can barely stand their leadership. Reagan had to prove himself and only at the end of the day was he highly admired. Cult worship of a man is not nor has it ever been part of conservatism. Paul is a charlatan, he runs on the republican ticket even though he is libertarian. Libertarians are actually just social liberals, they pretend to be conservatives. But conservatives are not necessarily republicans. They support conservative republicans and would support conservative Democrats if there were such a thing.
Report Post »———————————————————————————————————————————————–
???HUH??? So you’re trumpeting Republican progressives, as opposed to those who desire a return to Foundational doctrine? There’s nothing conservative in your position. The charlatans are known as RINO’s. Fake conservatives like Perry and Romney. Lay their message down next to the doctrines of Pure Socialism and you can check off every point of their agenda. Politicians like both of the Bush’s, Graham, Brown, McCain, Lieberman, Obama, Clinton, Carter, Johnson (hmmm wonder why JFK was murdered?), Truman, FDR, Wilson, Pierce, Jackson, Perry, and Romney were each cut from the same bolt of corrupt (and anti-American) bolt of fabric.
lillymckim
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:07pmBeing from a family of hunters a lease in a hunt camp means you pay to hunt the land it doesn’t mean you OWN the land it means you are paying to hunt the land…
Report Post »Ronko
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:22pmPaul will never get my vote, he’s too radical and too libertarian for my taste. He reminds me of the Articles Of Confederation and why they failed because they didn’t grant the central govt enough power.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:29pmTHE10THAMENDMENT Ron Paul is hardy the last word on founding doctrine. He is a cherry picker at best.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:34pm“Insensitive” isn’t the right word. I think it’s more like “bigoted.” You know, as is believing that whites are superior to blacks. Sure Perry “mentioned it” to his parents.
Perry’s parents are certainly old school. The military was integrated 30 years earlier and white folks stopped requiring black folks from sitting at the back of the bus 20 years before. Instead, they were proudly declaring their racial superiority with the N—–Head name of their property. I think Perry‘s claim that he really didn’t know about the name of his parents property, and he put a stop to it is false. I think the nut doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Report Post »amanfrafo
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:37pmChange it to honkiehead or crackerhead or hillbillyhead or whiteyhead and it won’t be a problem. If I were Perry, I would have a big new dedication of the rock, how about Barryhead?
Report Post »AOL_REFUGEE
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:42pmAnd so, in my book, Perry is out, and Romney is (still) in.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:52pm@ RepubliCorp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:29pm
THE10THAMENDMENT Ron Paul is hardy the last word on founding doctrine. He is a cherry picker at best.
————————————————————————————————————————————————
The Founding Doctrine is the last word on the Founding Doctrine. people need to read not only the Federalist Papers, but the Anti-Federalist Papers to get a good footing for the intent of what that Doctrine was meant to say. Paul most certainly is not the last word on Founding Doctrine, but he is the only candidate who is in the Ball Park.
Show me an instance where you think that Paul has diverged from original intent. If there‘s something there that I haven’t seen or overlooked I’d not only be surprised, but appreciative of the information. I would rather be over informed that choose unwisely. Even if I don‘t happen to believe that there’s such thing as a perfect political candidate.
Report Post »bmwrider
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 9:10pmCan’t blame Perry too much, he probably couldn’t read the rock anyways.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 9:15pmdid Rick Perry name that place?
Report Post »chfields62
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 9:41pmThis country is getting flushed down the toilet and your whining about a name on rock??? Did he put it there?? No, so get over it….While ron paul has some decent ideas, he not a serious candidate as his foreign policy views are outright dangerous. Anyone who thinks it’s ok for Iran to have Nukes is nuts. Anyone who thinks we should just take our ball and go home and let leave the rest of the world to fend for itself against tyranny and terrorism is nuts. Ron Paul would guarantee an Obama 2nd term….None of them are perfect and at first I liked Perry and Cain even more so. I don’t like Romney. I did like Bachman but she won’t answer straight questions….I think Cain is the best overall
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 9:43pmIntegrityfirst,
I knew that whatever reply was made to my post by someone who disagrees would include calling me a name. Nice integrity.
Everyone knows that the person on the wrong side of the argument always resorts to name-calling.
Did you even read the article? It could help you. Jack Kerwick is a brilliant guy.
What the Republican party needs to realize is that Ron Paul is absolutely the only candidate that can possibly beat Obama. Look at it like this; Ron Paul supporters currently make up about 15 – 20% of Republican voters and even more if you count Independents who support Paul more than any other Republican. If Paul doesn’t get the nomination and even half of his supporters write him in or vote third party in the general election (which is likely considering that Pauls supporters correctly recognize all of the mainstream candidates (both R & D) as just more of the same. One is no better than the other. If that happens the Republican candidate can not win. Now you would blame that Obama win on the Ron Paul supporters but we blame it on those of you who are ok with the status quo. Although I don’t want a second term for Obama, it‘s a risk I’m willing to take because no matter if it’s Obama, Perry, Romney, or one of the others, all are far worse than Paul so no one else gets my vote this time.
Ok. You can call me another name now.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 10:01pmTHE10THAMENDMENT Lets say you are right. Why Don’t you show me where Ron Paul has put his time, money and energy to make a legal challenge in any court. Or is he all talk and no show?
Report Post »lrgon
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 10:08pmGosh, who does Paul think he is? Does he think he is better than the rest of the 534 congressmen (435 in House 100 in senate) by taking his oath to the Constitution so serious that he sticks to it no matter the flak he will get by those who murder Muslims?
Paul should once ina while “think” and say something clever like the rest of the GOP front runners about how safe they feel after Obama killed an American on his Patriot Act “hit list.“ Paul would not lose the fence sitters who only look for political correction stumble from those they claimto respect or were ”thinking” about vorting for.
First you got grow a pair and then do a lot of reading about Constitutional principles and pray God left a spark of mahhood in you to cultivate. Then maybe you‘ll dare to speak out and defend this republic even when it isn’t popular!
Report Post »marjorie faye
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 10:24pmWhy does this non-story about a camp Rick Perry does not own strengthen your support for Ron Paul? I don’t see a connection.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 10:48pmWhat is this story about?
Report Post »Blacks (not all) use the word ALL the time within their own circles. What a freakin double standard.
Is the word insensitive or is it not? Let’s get real.
techengineer11
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 10:51pmSo as a society we are now suppose to be wholly intolerant of any perceived racial slurrs but it’s ok to promote Homosexuality and Murder? hmmmm Just whose values are we working with here?
Once again the two Pillars which the Apartheid stands upon are Diverstiy and Multiculturalism… That‘s why it’s ok to promote homsexuality and murder but racial intollerance is not well tolerated? lol think about it.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 11:21pm@ RepubliCorp
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 10:01pm
THE10THAMENDMENT Lets say you are right. Why Don’t you show me where Ron Paul has put his time, money and energy to make a legal challenge in any court. Or is he all talk and no show?
————————————————————————————————————————————————
He’s a member of the Legislative Branch of the Federal Government. The Legislative Branch IS the Lawgiver of the United States. He’s challenged many of the Laws/Regulations/Rules and Executive Orders, including Obamacare.
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 11:37pmThis only strengthens my decision about NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER supporting Ron Paul.
Voting for RP would be the biggest mistake this country could ever make. But as some will point out “it’s a free country, and you can vote for whomever you like” (even if it does hurt the country). It’s not exactly a good idea to elect a Pacifist to the most powerful nation on earth. The target on your back suddenly gets lit-up like the 4th of July!
Report Post »stopspendingourmoney
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 11:42pm“Those who would give up essential liberties to secure temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety” —- Ben Franklin.
Report Post »Uranium Wedge
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 11:42pmStick to the issues Cain. Don’t let us down.
Report Post »stopspendingourmoney
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 11:43pmIf we are to get our country back from socialists Ron Paul is the…..ONLY….candidate to vote for. For everyone concerned about the foreign policy, It’s impossible for us to truly aide other countries until we fix ourselves.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 11:54pm@ RepubliCorp
There are “many” votes in Congress that show Ron Paul is exactly who he claims to be. Here’s a good place to start with learning what CANDIDATE Ron Paul stands against. It narrows quickly to what he does stand for, which is the Constitution of the United States of America.
http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=296
Report Post »ishka4me
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 11:56pmGovernor perry won’t make it to friday if this is true.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 12:03am@ thepatriotdave
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 11:37pm
This only strengthens my decision about NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER supporting Ron Paul.
Voting for RP would be the biggest mistake this country could ever make. But as some will point out “it’s a free country, and you can vote for whomever you like” (even if it does hurt the country). It’s not exactly a good idea to elect a Pacifist to the most powerful nation on earth. The target on your back suddenly gets lit-up like the 4th of July!
———————————————————————————————————————————————–
Does this makes any kind of sense? Come on man, you seem more intelligent than this.
So Herman Cain believes Perry is wrong/insensitive for the rock, and this somehow equates to you never never, never, never, never, never voting for……….RON PAUL? What am I missing?
I’ve personally had 1 of 3 at the top of my list since Cain entered. In no particular order to my current leaning. Paul, Cain, Bachmann. Perry and Romney are both certain progressives. I do agree with Perry that Social Security is nothing more than a ponzi scheme, but the rest of his track record is a hard left shift. Still uncertain why this story would shape your opinion on Ron Paul.
Report Post »smokey888x2
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 12:29amWhat you say is very true, well part of it but I could never vote for Ronnie.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 1:54amDoesn‘t sound like he ’chose’ the name. Sounds more like it was given him. He is a bit hard headed, though.
Report Post »phil65
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 3:42amLIBERTYFADING
Report Post »Sorry I could never vote for Ron Paul and I am not and never have been a tool for the system or a useful idiot, I do however know a complete and total loony when I hear one and I have been listening to RP for an awful long time. You are no better than the libs if you call someone else names for not agreeing with you, definitely not a good libertarian anyway.
raw7n0
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 4:42amThat all we need another one wining about race. I’m really sick of it. No vote from me Herman Cain.
Report Post »Why are white people called racest and no one else is.
Bob
joepf
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 6:19amTo date, when I listened and watched Hermann Cain, the last thing I noticed was the color of his skin. I have had great admiration for him. Suddenly he has become a black man with this accusation.
Report Post »Jackers
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 6:24amAbsolutely! Ron Paul is an American patriot and stands by his convictions, which happen to be based on our Constitution.
Ron Paul offers real solutions to real problems… And only Ron Paul can be trusted to speak the truth. Don’t believe me? Check his record.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 7:17amI encourage you to vote for whomever you want in the primaries, just get behind the nominee…whoever it may be.
Report Post »SamIamTwo
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 7:46amAnyone who votes for Obama would be considered brain dead…so any rep dog can win this one. RP acts all whinny and jumps subjects like a scared little puppy that has been beat down.
The more I hear of Cain, the more I like him. He has the street smarts and knows the ills of big business…humble, sincere and a straight shooter. Read about his background @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Cain
He needs to give more detail about his 999 plan cause it sounds like we would be taxed more, unless of course you can deduct the fed tax of a purchased item or something like that.
Anyhoo, Perry is DOA, RP son would do better, Romney is OK. Christie, should he jump in, would lose the conservative vote for his liberal leanings. The rest of the crowd should bow out and let the top 3 debate it out. JIMHO We need to get this over with real soon.
Report Post »txbigfoot
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 8:12amRon Paul is not a “A” player and never will be.
Report Post »In fact, he sickens me.
Zorro6821
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 8:23amRon Paul is a True American Patriot! As for Perry’s latest gaffe, now he says he would invade Mexico to get the Drug Cartel. I think he is is losing it. Yes that is all we need, another war. Is Canada next.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 8:53amActually, invading Mexico to get the cartel would be a good idea. The Mexican goverment and army is corrupt. We don’t need to declare war against Mexico. We don’t need to say anything publicly. We just communicate to the Mexican government that we are com ing in to “help” them deal with this problem on OUR border. If they are smart they will play along.
We could just move our effective border south for 20 miles and start cleaning up the towns inbetween our new border and the official one.
Report Post »MMaurer73
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 9:13amDon’t waste your vote like that. Might as well vote for Ralph Nader.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 9:13amNot Herman Cain pulling the race card .. Already ?? Yes, as I‘ve said before Vote for him if you want but you’re only getting a closet liberal in Conservatives clothing… The race card will be pulled by ALL blacks ( including Cain ) when they feel the need.. Well, I find the CBC very offensive since no whites are allowed.. They should be ashamed of themselves , Atleast Perry tried to paint the rock and also said it was offensive but the CBC do it all out in the open and are proud of their racism.. Just ask Al West he’s a member..
Report Post »AirtechJr
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 11:41amRick Perry had about as much control of this as Herman Cain would if a pizza cook used a racial slur while making a pie. Too bad, I thought Cain was above this.
Report Post »IntegrityFirst08
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 12:09pm@ Cous1933 – So i reverted to name calling thus all of my posts are beleived to be wrong. I called you all NUT JOBS. I stand by that fact. Hardly name calling, i think most of you are detached from reality and need to place yourself in a hospital. Thin skinned isnt the word for you taking offense to this phrase, more like BO said “soft”.
Yes i did read the article. The guy is a perfect example to show anyone that has not seen the true colors of the Ron Pual supporters. The Eleitist, my way or no way at all additude is right in there for all to see. All i see in the article is some guy who puts a bunch of big words together for INTELLECTUALS by INTELECTUALS to make fun the conservatives who disagree with Ron Paul. Its a Leftist tactic thats been used for decades, and something that if normal citizens would read would be turned off to. You make the best case to me through the use of the article why i was so right about all Libertaians. Thanks for making it easy. Some good Quotes form the text:
“More specifically, it is neoconservative men and women, especially those with a particularly powerful proclivity for “conservative” talk radio and Fox News, who are most susceptible to contracting PDS.”
“This in and of itself is sufficient to convict the Paulophobe of invincible irrationality.”
“The Paul Derangement Syndrome is a serious condition. Once it is identified, clear thinking should be sought immediately.”
What a joke you people are. T
Report Post »pbrenda51
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 12:28pmRon Paul does not have a chance….he is too far out there for most of us
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 1:06pmRon Paul 2012!
Report Post »JLGunner
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 1:20pmRon Paul believes 9-11 was an inside job. Yeah, we need him in office.
Report Post »SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 1:21pmY’all got it all wrong. Perry was a democrat back then and thus the reason it didn’t bother him. May have been hunting with mr. Byrd.
Report Post »db321
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 1:26pmFinally – we have a Republican Candidate that will expose all the Racist in America.
Herman Cain knows what it means to be controlled by a bunch or White Wealthy hate mongers.
Let not stop at a hunting lease let wipe out all of the racist that choose to live in:
Report Post »***** Bend, AR
***** Head Corner, AR
Negrotown Knoll, FL
***** Bend, OK.
***** Prairie, MT.
***** Gull, TN.
Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina – don’t be killing my Devil
Arab, Alabama – I don’t see anything wrong with this
Gay Meadows, AL. – See here is proof that Republicans hate Gay people
Gaylordsville, CT.
Gay, Idaho
Gayway Corner, ID.
Jewtown, GA. – The Republicans want to protect all the Jews
Democrat, Idaho – I know they are going to make fun of us somehow here – it Racist
Devils Ladder, ID. – I don’t see anything wrong here – as long as they don’t disrespect the devil
China Hat, ID. – Yea they do kind of have funny hats – this is ok
Whiteface, MN. – what if one does not have a white face – they can’t come in
White Earth, ND. – see how these Republican are
White Womans Town, OH. – They need to put all White women here
White Settlement, TX. – once again Republican ruled city
Welfare, TX. – don’t you be picking on my welfare now – you racist
***** Crossing, TX. – I’m to cross where – don’t think so you raciest
***** Foot, VA. – what?
Negros Liberty Settlement, TX. – see in Texas – this is where Perry also like to hunt
Isra
JLGunner
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 2:03pmRon Paul is not the answer.
Report Post »LookTowardsTheLight
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 3:45pm@LIBERTYFADING
Someone is a tool because they don’t support the same candidate as you? Seems to me only a tool would make a comment like that.
Report Post »ireport uderide
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 6:48pmWhat do you expect from the wacky left wing in this country, they act very niggardly when it comes to giving the benefit of the doubt to Republicans.
Report Post »Rocky_Top
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 7:01pmGee!, a campground close to Mexico named n____ head. I would guess that there is a spring fed pond or lake at this campground. The name of the Camp is black water beginning of river or stream.
Report Post »sodacrackers2
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 8:49pmShasta, I think that might mean you don’t agree. :)
Report Post »artistskeptic
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 9:56pmGood grief Individual, how can this Democrat BS have any siginficance? A hunting- rights lease does not give the leasee any right orobligation to modify or change the property but rather only to hunt and take game.
Report Post »Grey Eagle
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 10:16pmThe Washington Post article was nothing more than smears and libel. Perry apparently has not been there since 2006 and no longer has the lease. A hunting lease is exactly that, people go there to hunt. They have nothing to do with maintaining the property. Apparently it was painted over, but over time paint will rub off. The WP is trying to help Obama by trying to tarnish Perry in make people think he is a racist. Not true, Perry has appointed more African Americans to high positions than any other TX Governor.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 10:44pmTry using the word niggardly in a casual conversation. The reactions you get are from shock to laughter?
Report Post »nig·gard·ly [níggərdlee]
adj (comparative nig·gard·li·er, superlative nig·gard·li·est)
1. not generous: very reluctant to give or spend anything
2. small or inadequate: very small or inadequate in quantity
mamatango
Posted on October 5, 2011 at 2:04amThis only strengthens my decision to vote for Herman Cain. He is a successful, moral man, and IMHO the ONLY ONE who can beat Obama and the voter fraud that I expect –again. Obama is a former black panther, and what I see going on throughout the Middle East and now on Wall Street is a result of his “community organizing.” If he is re-elected, he will slip into high gear like no one expects, and our Republic won’t be around in another 4 years after that. It will have been destroyed.
His race war, class war and economic war is to divide and conquer this nation. We have no room for failure against all this deception and fraud. WE MUST WIN!
Report Post »mamatango
Posted on October 5, 2011 at 2:11amThis individual only strengthens my decision to vote for HERMAN CAIN.
He is the only one who can unite all classes and WIN!!! And we cannot afford to lose. To lose this election is to lose our entire Republic in less than 4 more years.
Report Post »OhSnappage
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:49pmAl little disappointed in Mr. Cain on this issue. Mr. Cain was baited in and got hooked, had an opportunity to come off much bigger here and came out short.
Mr. Cain should have taken Mr. Perry at his word for the reasoning. It was a camp ground that he has fond memories of spending time when time allows for it. It was previously painted over and believed to be resolved. Whenever I go to a park I go because of the joy it brings me not because of graffiti someone else leaves.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:59pmAgreed. Cain just shot himself in the arse with this one as far as I’m concerned.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:01pmOH GOOD GRIEF!!! CAIN has every right to say that the use of that word is offensive to Black people. That’s what he said. The fact that a word like that would be on any publicly viewed situation shows the backwards thinking of people who should know better. IF I’d BEEN PERRY I would have destroyed the rock..have no idea how large it is..or I’d have concreted over it etc. There are just too many “stories” about this Governor, aren’t there?
Report Post »timeout
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:02pmaltho i have found herman to be a fine man and candidate, i am noticing that he makes snap comments about perry (in particular) without researching the alleged misconduct by perry. he is completely off base with his assessment of perry’s instate tuition issues, and now this…he really needs to stop, and just say, that he has no comment. perry has been in politics a long time. if he were insensitive to blacks it would have surfaced decades ago….herman is famous for making the comment: i am herman cain, yes, i am here as boss: so get over it. he will be lunchmeat if he doesn’t stop this bashing….they ALL need to stop bashing….the goal is beat barack hussain obama.
Report Post »CyberJocky
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:10pmSo let me get this straight, Perry is getting a bad rap because of some graffiti on a rock on a piece of land he was RENTING. I think that‘s about normal for the pretzel logic that is today’s PC. Why isn’t the owner of the land being vilified? Or, hey here’s and idea, lets find the guy that wrote it in the first place and pillory him?
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:14pm>PATTYHENRY. In my 50 + plus years on this planet… I’ve never heard the “N’ word spoken and shouted (LOUDLY, very LOUDLY) as much as I’ve heard it spoken by the Black community (their reasoning for it aside).
If this word is so vile (which it is), I suggest that the Black community (who is it’s biggest abuser) lay it to rest permanently and LOUDLY.
Report Post »Prepared
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:25pmIt’s not even an issue
Report Post »CyberJocky
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:32pm@timeout
Report Post »Although, it took me a bit of time to decode your post. I find myself in agreement about the lack of vetting done by Hermann Cain. It reminds me of some of the comments in the Comments section of each story on TheBlaze. It’s a gut reaction and dripping in PC, it was also a cheap shot on Cain’s part. But, please understand this, Hermann Cain is running for President not God, he is not perfect, not an experienced politician and has a perfectly understandable reason to be offended by the term in question. The story that he was reacting to was misleading at best and probably designed to provoke just this reaction. There but for the grace of God go I. Lighten up folks.
MaxineH20Sux
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:46pmI agree with you too.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:49pmHere‘s where all you guys castigating Cain for his mild critique on this and rushing to say Perry’s history with this camp is no big deal, are totally wrong.
Racism WAS a big deal in this country and especially in the South. The use of this word was ubiquitous, so much so that it was used to name a landmark. Peopel in the South, and Perry and Cain are both Southerners of comparable age, experienced that word very differently. Perry was never called it. I bet Cain was multiple times. For Cain it represents something personal and offensive. Not so with Perry, and there lies a measure of the lack of sensitivity. Our racist past should be a mark of shame that we would want to expunge. I would have been repulsed by a camp that bore that name. Just knowing it was known by that name would have made me uncomfortable using it. Perry obviously was not made that uncomfortable by it. Merely painting it over seemed good enough. Given what blacks went through in the south I can see why some of them might think that merely painting over the word might be just a token gesture of repudiating the racism of the past.
That fact is, abd I’m taking Perry at his word, he didn’t feel the sting of that word deep enough to find another camp or to blast that rock to pieces.
If I found a piece of property I used was known as “Damned Jesus Hill” and that that name was on some rock, you can bet that I would have doen a whole lot more than just paint over it.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:53pmCain did seem to overreact to this to some extent. But thats what presidential candidates do. I think Cain is right, but may have taken it a little too far.
Report Post »I think Perry is done now anyway.
Woody WoodBecker
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:04pmThis is a stupid comment.
Cain was kind and called this insensitive.
I call it racist and Obama and his team will harp on this ad infinitum.
I’m not surprised that he was a democrat most of years he enjoyed this offensive hunting camp.
Ugh.
Report Post »hidden_lion
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:37pmStill….A little “white” paint over the words? Why does it have to be white? LOL..SHould have sand blasted it. It has been there since before the 80′s he had plenty of time to actually have it removed. Perry is an opportunist and a shill. He will float where the current takes him. We need an actual leader.
Report Post »ZZBlueComet
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:51pmCain has now shown, he’ll pull the race card to win – scratch him from my list, he’s just like Colin Powell who was a “conservative” until Obama ran for president (Powell supported him). And white’s are the racists……..lol.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:56pmHerman Cain is NOT a race baiting victim! He has never played the race card including here! Lighten up Y’all.
Report Post »db321
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:41pmCain – Soros is calling come get your Bonus Check – You are the Liberal Divider of the Month. Thanks for letting us know early – we almost got fooled twice. If I was Perry I would stick that Race Card up your a$$.
Report Post »db321
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:00pmNice sucker punch Cain – is this how it’s done. Right out of the Chicago Thuggery handbook.
If Perry would have carved that into the stone – I would have been the first to cast him out. The man that carved it is probably dead by now – he certainly acted stupidly. Perry’s family leases the property – they did not put it there and I assure you they do not support it.
But you sir just created Political Suicide on yourself with a self inflected wound – I guess your not effected when the Liberals call Tea Party supporters raciest – for all I know you probably agree with them. One thing I don’t want to see anymore coming out of the WH is accusations of racism over political differences.
If Perry is any kind of a man I would expect him to lay into you with both feet. You don’t care if you divide this country as long as you get the votes.
This one was way below the belt. Shame on you!
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 9:20pmAll these over the top reactions to Cain’s rather subdued reaction is so amuzing. What bluster. Pure defensiveness. I gaurantee you that Perry’s campaign and his serious backers are taking this issue more seriously than many of you are. I can also gaurantee you that the LAST thing they or Perry will do is try to turn the tables on Cain and accuse him of playing the race card. THAT would be political suicide. It would be sepuku.
Report Post »demint.disciple
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 9:24am@The10thAmendment.. Just wondering where on earth did you ever get that Megyn Kelly is a liberal..
Report Post »Texasczech63
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:48pmI liked Cain until he played the ‘race’ card. It took me all of 10 minutes to debunk this.
Governor Perry’s father painted over offensive language on the rock soon after leasing the 1,000-acre parcel in the early 1980s. Governor Perry was on the hunting lease from 1997 to 2007…. years after his father painted over it. The records are easily obtainable at the Throckmorton county courthouse for anybody to see.
The 42,000-acre ranch referenced in the Washington Post story is actually owned by the Hendricks Home for Children.
Surely the Washington Post would know all of this before printing the story or Herman Cain’s camp from jumping on it. Or are they really that inept.
Report Post »usaywhat
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:22pmI agree. This is a leased property, it does not belong to Perry. Thus Perry or his father do not have the right to change or alter or paint over things, unless permission to do so is written into the lease. The WaPost failed to do adequate research before publishing the story. OR they choose to deal in yellow journalism.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:06pmOK, so if it‘s leased they don’t have the right to chnage it without permission. I would have not leased it then if I wasn’t granted permission to blow the rock to pieces. Are there no hunting camps in Texas that AREN’T named with racial epithets?
IT does raise a relevant question about Perry’s sensitivity to racism and how much that word bothered and offended him that he still took people there after he was Governor. He couldn‘t find someplace that didn’t need its name to be covered up? Or maybe the word didn’t bother him enough that he just forgot about it. I can tell you that I would never forget.
Report Post »whatthecrazy
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:23pmIm curious as to who is it really that finds it so offensive .Seems to me the ones that use that word daily in thier lives. are the same ones that are offended.
Report Post »OlBlackCat
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 12:39amHere’s another fact that was over looked. The land was settled by several German imigrant families by the name of NIGGERHEAD. There are probably more rocks around with the same markings. Cain has really disappointed me by playing the race card. I am so tired of this.
Report Post »ipockpa
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:46pmCain‘s sun is on the rise while Perry’s is setting
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:34pmCain just caused himself a sun-spot with this one. I like Cain, but have no further use for the racial bickering… especially among our own in the name of getting elected and one-upsmanship.
Report Post »tobywil2
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:45pmWould this have made the news if the name had been Whitey Head, or Redneck Head?
Report Post »Chappy123
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:56pmNope!
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:50pmI heard on PBS last week that Obama hangs out at “Camp *******”.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 9:08pm@Isles Fordian//I am sick and tired of pandering to the blacks….Like I said…who cares who wrote the name on the rock. We got two birds for one price with Obama. A black man who just happens to be a muslim. This black man has imported not only black muslims, but black somalis and black Haitians. We have had blacks attacking our people at state fairs and where ever. You know that vision of sugar plums dancing in our heads around Christmas? Well I have visions of Cain bringing in boatload more blacks so we can support them too and they can wage a race war against us. Why don’t we just pick a President and spray paint the man black .Why don‘t we just spray paint all of us black I’m tired of this blck thing beiing rammed down my freakin throat…I will never vote black………..
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 1:50pmAshes, resisting the PC reverse racism of the left does not require that we become racists in reaction, just to show ‘em.
This story is not that big a deal and there is an easy way to get around it for Perry.: Just admit to a level of insensitivity. Being insensitive is not a moral failing because sensitivity comes from experience.
Perry should just apologize that his level of sensitivity to that word is not as great as a black man’s because he has never been called it, even though it is not a word that would ever cross hos lips. He just doesn’t feel the sting of it as deeply and so thought merely covering it up by painting over it was enough for him. If he had thought more work was needed to eradicate that word he would have done so.
That would do it. It would acknowledge the issue, and make a humble yet not groveling apology. That would inoculate him from any efective attack on this. The racists on the left would still try, but most Americans hate witchhunts.
The most effective way of dealing with controversies is to admit that your opponent has a point, that their is validity in his fear, while denying that his accusation is true. It‘s easier to make the argument that your opponent is fighting a real problem in the wrong way than to argue that there isn’t a problem at all. THAT requires more argument than any campaign has time for.
Report Post »TriforcePlayer
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:44pmUghhh PLEASE PLEASE DO NOT BRING RACE INTO THIS!!!
Report Post »Canibul
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:43pmWhy hasn‘t anybody bothered to look up the fact that the word ’niggerhead’ has been in use for a long time. It is a term for a rock outcropping. From the description I have seen, this is exactly what it was painted on.
You ignorant people who scream ‘racism’ without even knowing what you are talking about are the sad idiots who are so easily mislead as to elect one of the most obvious racists in the political business today.
Don’t be niggardly with your education. It just makes you look stupid.
Report Post »BeingThere
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:51pmExcellent post!
Report Post »variable51
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:01pmWell said Cann, well said!
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:17pmCome ON. The term may have existed for a long time, just like the term ni99er-rigging (which now is often called monkey-rigging) but that doesn’t mean it has no connection to the derogatory word for blacks. Why do you think such a term was used for a rocky outcropping? Because it looked like a black man’s head cropping out of the mountain.
I agree with Cain that it show a level of insensitivity about that word. That’s not a deal breaker because we all can be insensitive about some things. sensitivity comes from experience, and Perry may not have the experience that others do that would make him truly repulsed by the word being there even under a coat of paint. Maybe you don’t realize that Cain is old enough to have been called this word many times in his youth by people who really thought of him as inferior because of his skin color. He has a certain right to being sensitive about others’ insensitivity, as long as he doesn’t make it the central theme of his campaign. Just comment on it and move on. Let others judge for themselves.
Report Post »bestartist
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:30pmThank you!
Report Post »I am so TOTALLY SICK of whining…
how totally convenient it was to have a half white/half black president so everything and anything remotely connected to melanin could be made into a federal case and suck all the energy out of the room…and I am sorry to hear Cain get sucked into this obligatory nonsense because he has to weigh in as a potential candidate and because he has lots of melanin.
I don’t care if people are white or black, or if they are gay or straight…I’m sick of hearing about it all, I only care if people are stupid or not!
Mich ado about nothing! wah wah wah!
Cherynn
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:13pmThats also what some farmers used to call big rocks in thier fields that they would go through and clear out after plowing in the spring time.
Report Post »AZfreeman
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:29pmGood post Canibul.
Everyone is always concerned about saving our 1st amendment rights…. oh, except for this politically correct thing or except for that non-PC word. BS! As far as I’m concerned freedom of speech should have no limitations except personal responsibility. Should everyone be respectful with their speech..sure. Will people sometimes be offended.. sure. Is it really a good idea to place PC shackles on every man because some show bad judgment? Free speech comes with ‘responsibility’ and ‘accountability’ for your words, but without limitations, and that’s how it should be in a free society….(check my forum handle)
Anyway this story is not about racism or free speech. It‘s about the media promoting another ’GOT-CHA’ moment on a Republican candidate to discredit him and get the Republicans fighting among themselves. Don’t waste our time…we’ve got BHO to fry! ….rf
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:30pmAnd if those farmers were appalled at the racial epithet they wouldn’t use that term for those rocks. Obviously the word doesn’t bother them that much. You can bet that no BLACK farmer uses that term.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:02pmAnyone could have written that name on a rock.. There is waaaay too big of a deal being made out of this. Is Perry liable for every name he runs across.? Texas was right. It’s okay for a black to call another black by that name..and what’s a popular catch phrase now “N gg..r Please”. It’s just silly to make so much out of a name. You would not hear anything about this if the shoe were on the other foot. THe heck with what anyone thinks. There are plenty of things to attack Perry on but this is not it. As for voting for Cain….I’ve had a belly full of Obama and the NAACP and the “Black Panthers’ and the “Black Somali muslims and black Haitians shipped over here. I don’t think I want to see all of Africa and Jamaica relocate here. I used to be open to a Black president..but after Obama showed me what a “BLACK” President can do…..I’ll pass.
Report Post »Wayne
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:29pmI thank its racism to have a black college their motto is “A mind is a terrible thing to lose” vote for your “***** College Fund”, image if we had a white college fund Boy would bring the Ni##erheads out of the woods. Jackson, Sharpton, Wright and the other good Christian preachers. How about the Black Caucas, and many more. enough to make me sick.
Report Post »db321
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 6:48pmSo who is “Acting Stupidly” here! Vote for Cain – Obama has not divided us enough.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 7:34pm“Anyone could have written that name on a rock.. ”
I don’t understand the logic of this satement. No one is saying that Perry named the place niggerhead or that he painted the name on the rock.
The fact remains that the rock itself rmains with the word still somewhat visible. It may have been painted over but its existence does not seem to have bothered anyone enough to do more than paint it over. It might seem to some like a veneer of respectability was placed over a foul and racist name.
And here are some people trying to pretend that it isn‘t a racist word or that it is no big deal bicause words don’t matter or because blacks use that word too.
Those are arguments that will do nothing but confirm to blacks that conservatives don’t take racism seriously, when the opposite is true.
Perry is not our knight in shining armour, and if this blackmark (no pun intended) takes him out, so be it. Cain can beat Obama.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:12pmWalkyrie, give me a source that shows niggerhead existing before the 18th century for black slaves were called ni99er or some variant as far back as that. Obviously you’ve done some research, right?
What possible etimology would the term have if it wasn’t related to blacks?
Or are you just making it up?
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:19pm“someone who has actually run a major economy (15th largest in The World) and kept it growing ”
I have to side with Romney on this. If you draw four aces that doesn’t make you a great poker player. Perry did not create Texas’ economy, and when you look at the stats for his job growth-get read- most of the growth was in jobs taken by non-native born residents. Some may be legal immigrants, some may be illegal aliens, but the Texas economy hasn’t been any better for native born Americans that most other parts of the country. Is the Texas boom based on low income workers only?
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 9:37pmWalkyrie,
I actually rather like Perry, as a Governor, and I did as a Presidential candidate until he showed himself woefully unpreparred at his third debate. I expected him to improve, not get worse. He started to sound all hat and no cattle. Given that the Texas Governorship is one of the weakest in the Union I suppose that one could succeed as Governor being that light. But that won’t fly as a Republican Presidential Nominee. And there are soft spots in the Texas economy as a slam dunk selling point for Perry.
After this latest fiasco if he is going to survive he better step his game up hard
Report Post »AmeriCat
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 3:04amThank you, Canibul, for your much needed words of wisdom.
Report Post »sandrac
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:42pmCain I thought was above this gocha stuff, I am disappointed. What purpose does this serve…to say Perry is a racist? Do you really believe that? I would expect this from the other side of the aisle.
Report Post »Can we please talk about the IMPORTANT issues. JOBS, Taxes, The Fed, Regulations,
Depts to Eliminate, Medicare, Social Security, National Security, Foreign Policy,….
Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:56pmDid you listen to the entire segment with Cain?
Report Post »runaway_slave
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:12pmMr Cain, never said Mr Perry was raist he said the word was insensitive that’s it. So if what he said makes you ready to leave his camp then you all are just fearweather supporters, he is the only one with fire in the belly.
Report Post »Fed up in Bama
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:19pm@runaway slave
Report Post »Mr. Cain said this also……….”Since Gov. Perry has been going there for years to hunt, I think that it shows a lack of sensitivity for a long time of not taking that word off of that rock and renaming the place,” Cain told ABC’s “This Week.”
I‘m tired of the racist ’poor me’ comments. It’s time for them to stop.
He should of said, “Really? This may be something I need to discuss w/ Mr. Perry, but in the meantime….let’s get to the important issues that Americans face today, like unemployment!”
Who the crap cares what was wrote on a stinking rock years ago????????
He just lost my respect.
We need another hero in this race, cause they are all sounding stupid!!!
BeingThere
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:42pmObama was inaugurated with a racist speech and he is a racist, that’s a fact! This is just an allegation against Perry!!
http://redblueamerica.com/blog/2009-01-23/reverend-joseph-lowery-gives-racist-speech-obamas-inauguration-4789
Report Post »LoveBringsTruth
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:38pmTotally agree with Cain but when is Mr Cain going to mention he was Fed Chairman of a federal reserve bank for 7 years? A job he did not get on his merits but his skin color alone. Nor will the lying sack of media mention this ‘small’ detail. When the elite want to trash something they put a black in power. Why? Because they know their psyche and principles.
Until Cain becomes an honest man he has no place in my world.
Report Post »boston-rightwinger
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:38pmLet me point out that Perry‘s parent were Democrat’s and at the time Perry himself was a
Report Post »Democrat. This is a constant problem within the Democratic Party.
338lapua
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:37pmMr Cain may just be able to take the Repub nomination if he continues to deal responsibly with issues such as this. He isn’t overkilling it. Bravo Mr.(future president) Cain.
Report Post »Bearfoot
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:36pmFor crying out loud, just take a sandblaster out there and blast the rock to remove all the paint.
Report Post »This is such an easy fix! Stop crying!
helluvagoodgod
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:35pmHere we go again. Just make it all about racism. YOU PEOPLE JUST KEEP USING THE SAME TRICKS. Food stamps have fed your people for generations, affirmative action has gave you free college, and you still hate this country. You keep racism alive.
Report Post »WH
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:20pmGet off of this website, there is no place for racism. Go away. By lumping together ‘you people’, you are, by definition, racist. The problem with our entitlement culture crosses all races in this country.
I repeat; go away.
Report Post »helluvagoodgod
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:21pmNo I won’t go away you coward.
Report Post »helluvagoodgod
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:23pmWhat’s WH stand for “whining honky”?
Report Post »Conservophiliac
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:35pmI’m not bothered by ethnic slurs against me … why should you be? It’s obviously just another thing to complain about and get an edge up on the competition. I‘m not racist and I really don’t care if you say I am. It doesn’t affect me one way or another, but sometimes things are just called something for decades and it takes time to change them … if they need changing. I don‘t’ like Perry anymore though so I guess it doesn’t matter. His immigration view put me in Cain’s camp.
Report Post »TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:35pmNot trying to be rude, but why does this mean anything?
Report Post »godhead
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:46pmWell, gee, why does Michelle Obama going to Target mean anything? Or her vegetable garden? Not sure, but they sure do give the right wing scream machine a lot to talk about, don’t they?
Yes, by all manners, let’s all be adults. Yes, Let’s do that. You first . . .
Report Post »Mandz81
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:22pmGODHEAD
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:46pm
Well, gee, why does Michelle Obama going to Target mean anything? Or her vegetable garden? Not sure, but they sure do give the right wing scream machine a lot to talk about, don’t they?
Really because I heard nothing about her shopping Target til you mentioned it and a quick google search showed nothing claiming “oh you know girl goin shopping at target cause she black” statements. I think it‘s a story because you don’t expect a first lady these days to be able to go shopping. I‘d rather her shop at target God knows they’ve blown through enough money with Ll the Marie Antoinette esque parties they’ve thrown.
Report Post »godhead
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:39pmMandz81 . . . “Really because I heard nothing about her shopping Target til you mentioned it ”
No kidding, and your google search showed up what, nothing. Funny thing, I googled Michelle Obama goes to Target and got 53million hits!
Here’s just two of them. . .
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/michelle-obama-tries-to-pass-as-everywoman-while-shopping-at-local-target/
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/hear-rush-limbaugh-blast-michelle-obamas-target-trip/
Holy what the . . . ! They’re on The Blaze!
Ah, the conservative mind – ragingly, relentlessly, regressively retarded.
Report Post »Mandors
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:34pmThe name was changed decades ago. It was his parents camp. That “old timers” still call it that, whatever, who cares. I’m not a Perry booster, but let’s stop grasping at straws to discredit people.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:22pmI think Cain has now gotten the Black voters attention … last week Obama was telling them to take off their “house slippers’ and “stop complaining” .. now another black man is telling a fellow Republican that a word has bad acts tied to it… I get it .. it means rocks .. but will black voters … or will they hear him and now pay attention to Herman Cain. He would be GOOD for the black community .. and the White and all Americans … perhaps now he has their attention!
TEA!
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:34pmI think I would chiseled that word off the rock, or blasted the rock.
Report Post »bestartist
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:38pmas a lease holder it wasn’t their rock…..since it’s not yours either…you probably can do it just as easily. Go for it.
Report Post »Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 3:47pmThey had the permission to paint over it obviously. Did they ask for permission to remove the rock and were denied? They also had the choice to find another property not owned by racists. I might have done that. But according to Perry his parents didn’t do anything to even paint over the name until he mentioned it. So it obviously didn’t bother his parents that much. He was in his mid thirties when they started leasing it and he used the place to bring people, propably for political purposes.
Report Post »loveliberty83
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:05pmmany languages are formed from latin -people were who early traders had strong foreign accents even English for us today would be hard to understand , the word nigre–means black in latin & apparently they were NOT called the slaves African also do you know there were non blacks slaves @ this time
Report Post »Beck Avoids Ineligibility
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:01pm@ Bestartist & LoveLiberty83
Please don’t feed the trolls. It just encourages them.
If you must play with your intellectual unequals, try this instead: Begone, foul Obot. Your very name screams treason and ignorance. Save your valuable time for worthwhile interactions; no muss, no fuss and no clean up afterwards!
And now for something completely different…
Want to hear what Rush had to say about Obama’s ineligibility, that Glenn was too chicken to report?
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbGpNnTrjuU&feature=youtu.be
Islesfordian
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:47pm“many languages are formed from latin”
What bearing does that have on anything? The N word is a form of ***** which is the Spanish word for black. There is no way to claim that niggerhead is derived from anything else.
Facts are facts.
Report Post »The Divided States of America
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:34pmThe truth will either set you free, or shine the spot light on your history !!!
Report Post »Chappy123
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:33pmLet’s not start a race war here boys.
Report Post »randy
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:33pm“There isn’t a more vile, negative word than the ‘n word,’ and for him to leave it there as long as they did is just plain insensitive to a lot of black people in this country,” he said.
Maybe they should tell that to all the Ghetto black rappers who use it every day.
I had hopes for Cain, but not so sure now.
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:40pmRandy- I understand where your coming from and agree , however can anyone explain to me why Blacks call each other that name all the time.
Report Post »krjones
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 8:00pmCain pandering to Blacks go figure! Also pandering to gays! I have seen enough.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 9:17pmyep, welcome to the double standard.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:33pmSo
This doesn’t give Herman “I worked for the Federal Reserve, don’t audit them” Cain anyu viability.
He’s a bigot who tried to pander to other bigots towards muslims.
Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »godhead
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:31pmLike taking candyyyy . . . from a babyyyyy!
Report Post »Californiasodbuster
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:51pm@Goodheadgiver
Report Post »Seek therapy as soon as posible.
Before obama care is fully implemented.
godhead
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:15pmMr.. California . . . Dreaming of me again?
Report Post »MARCH4HIM
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 4:53pmhey @ iheargivesgoodhead
Report Post »van jone is calling again needs his ass waxed agian
tharpdevenport
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:30pmNo, it’s far more “insensative”, it’s disgusting. Don’t worry about voting for PErry folks, he’s TOAST. With crackers.
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 5:37pmDisgusted that the paint job began to fade & he did not apply a second coat of paint?
” As recently as this summer, the slablike rock — lying flat, the name still faintly visible beneath a coat of white paint — remained by the gated entrance to the camp.”
I felt so much better with the Clintons in the Whitehouse. When they had a squabble they would call each other “Jews”. I wonder what else WHITE DEMOCRAT politicians say behind closed doors?
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:28pmWhat would politics be about if race wasn’t involved?
I like how Ron Paul doesn’t participate in class warfare. What’s good for America is good for blacks.
“Thy BlackMan.com” compares Cain to Paul and chooses Paul!
Google “Ron Paul & Herman Cain’s Different Philosophies” by Staff
Re: Israel, Google “Are Evangelical Christians Warmongers” by Pastor Chuck Baldwin
Report Post »http://thyblackman.com/2011/09/28/ron-paul-herman-cain%E2%80%99s-different-philosophies/
V-MAN MACE
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:34pmI’m a black man for Ron Paul.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 1:53pmRon Paul would not have voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act (free markets would take care of the Jim Crow laws Paul stated).
This guy Paul is the greatest friggin’ Monday morning quarterback known to mankind… lol. And he’s also a fortune teller if you ask some. Paul has some “racist” newsletters in his past which STILL haven‘t been totally ’splained away Lucy…
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 2:10pmI read the article by pastor Baldwin – he’s not totally correct about some things. Makes too many blanket statements. “Post millenialists” do not necessarily believe that the church replaced Israel, etc. b/c I am one & know quite a lot like me. Many Consvs. believe in many things that Ron Paul stands for, as I do, about protecting the sovereignty & independence of America, etc., not getting involved with nation building as Repubs. used to be, bringing all our troops home, letting Israel do what she deems necessary,but disagree about not helping Israel. Paul is naive & ignorant about the dangers of Iran, Islam, etc. And yes, vehemently against giving money to countries that hate us & are terrorists like the Palestinians, etc. He (Baldwin) apparently doesn’t believe verses in the Old Testament about whoever blesses Israel He will bless & curses those who don’t. “Bless” = help. I don’t think that ever ended. It doesn’t matter about how they treat Christians there. Irrevelant….read Romans 11. He is also wrong about John Hagee & shame on him. I have researched this & this is a huge misunderstanding. And NO, Christians aren’t “warmongers” – shame on him for saying that also. Always do your own research on these things. Many are sincerely wrong.
Report Post »jb.kibs
Posted on October 2, 2011 at 9:13pmlink some of these newsletters please.
Report Post »Delete the Elite
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 12:48am@MOMPRAYN,
Report Post »I respectively disagree. Israel has the strongest military in the Middle East, and is capable to take out any surrounding nations if warranted. But as it currently stands, America cannot afford to prop up its allies all the time. You have all of the united states weapon technology at your disposal. I just feel that Israel should worry about reaching a peace agreement with palestine. There is nothing America can do, if neither side will ever agree to peace. This is soley my opinion.