Planned Parenthood Responds to Gendercide Expose, Refuses to Ban Sex-Selective Abortion
- Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:43pm by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
This morning, The Blaze brought you the undercover Live Action video showcasing a counselor at a Planned Parenthood in Austin, Texas, purportedly helping a faux patient who wanted a sex-selective abortion. Now, just hours after the disturbing video was published on numerous news sites and blogs, the controversial organization is responding.
In a statement to the Huffington Post, Planned Parenthood said that it does not discriminate against women who seek abortions, even if the basis for the procedure is gender. Despite this viewpoint, the organization did say that it condemns gender-based terminations. The Post has more:
A Planned Parenthood spokeswoman told The Huffington Post on Tuesday the staffer in the video “did not follow our protocol” for dealing with “a highly unusual patient scenario.”
“Planned Parenthood insists on the highest quality patient care, and if we ever become aware of a staff member not meeting these high standards we take swift action,” she said in a written statement. “Within three days of this patient interaction, the staff member’s employment was ended and all staff members at this affiliate were immediately scheduled for retraining in managing unusual patient encounters. Today opponents of Planned Parenthood are promoting an edited video of that hoax patient encounter.”
This spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood Federation of America also told The Huffington Post that the organization condemns seeking abortions on the basis of gender, but its policy is to provide “high quality, confidential, nonjudgmental care to all who come into” its health centers. That means that no Planned Parenthood clinic will deny a woman an abortion based on her reasons for wanting one, except in those states that explicitly prohibit sex-selective abortions (Arizona, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Illinois).
There’s no mention, though, of the regulations that Rebecca, the staffer named in the video, failed to follow properly. Here’s the original video that has Planned Parenthood on the defensive:
One could easily make the case that Planned Parenthood, pending the group truly is opposed to sex-selective abortion, could prevent women in all states from partaking in gender-based bias at its clinics. This is to say that if sex-selective abortions truly pose an ethical conundrum for the organization, disallowing them is an easy solution. It seems, though, that the group is only willing to take such a stand if the law requires it to do so.
LifeNews notes that Planned Parenthood followed this media appearance up with another statement that responds in more depth to the video expose. In it, Leslie Kantor, vice-president for Planned Parenthood Federation of America, provides insight on the situation and attempts to dismiss the video expose. In addition to claiming that the “entry-level” employee in the video was fired within days (as the organization told the Huffington Post), the group emphasized that Live Action’s video is “edited.”
“Recently, opponents of Planned Parenthood conducted hoax patient visits with hidden video cameras and are now using edited videotapes to promote false claims about our organization and patient services,” the statement reads. “In highly unusual and scripted scenarios, hoax patients sought services related to sex selection.”

LifeNews provides more from the release, which goes on to claim that Planned Parenthood stands firmly planted against gender bias:
“Gender bias is contrary to everything our organization works for daily in communities across the country. Planned Parenthood opposes racism and sexism in all forms, and we work to advance equity and human rights in the delivery of health care. Planned Parenthood condemns sex selection motivated by gender bias, and urges leaders to challenge the underlying conditions that lead to these beliefs and practices, including addressing the social, legal, economic, and political conditions that promote gender bias and lead some to value one gender over the other.”
“The world’s leading women’s health and rights organizations, including the World Health Organization, do not believe that curtailing access to abortion services is a legitimate means of addressing sex selection, and have made clear that gender bias can only be resolved by addressing the underlying conditions that lead to it. And we agree. We support efforts that ensure girls and women have access to economic opportunity, including fair wages, basic health care, political participation, education, and a life free of violence and discrimination. Planned Parenthood works to ensure women and their families have access to high-quality nonjudgmental health services free of coercion, supported by information and counseling.”
Conservatives who oppose abortion will surely find the portion of the statement that claims that Planned Parenthood works to help women achieve “a life free of violence and discrimination” ironic, especially considering that it is female babies who may sometimes undergo the violence of late-term abortion.
Needless to say, Live Action will surely have much to offer in response to Planned Parenthood’s statement. With more videos slated to emerge, the women’s rights group could find itself on the defensive once again in the coming days.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (77)
sldjulius
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 9:15pmNext on the PP agenda is sterilization. NEVER get yourself or your children tested for whether you are a carrier of a genetic disease. It will be on your permanent record, and I believe there will be a day when sterilization may not be optional. If you MUST go through the hospital system make sure they get as little info on you as possible. It is quickly becoming the world’s most in-depth database of personal information that may be used against you in ways you can’t imagine.
Report Post »JGraham III
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 10:15pmOne of the most egregious sins that a person can commit is the shedding of innocent blood. God told Cain that his brother’s blood cried out to Him from the ground. While sin is sin with God , nevertheless there are sins that set down consequences in the human blood line, called iniquities. There must be payment sooner or later. God does hold nations accountable for the sins committed by them as well not just individuals.
Report Post »Abortion is one of the most cold, calculated murders that can be committed, and there is nothing more innocent that an unborn child. If America does not repent and ask God for forgiveness then God may have no other choice but to allow America to be judged. Fortunately there is Jesus Christ; He is America’s way out of the hell she is preparing for herself.
scarebear83
Posted on May 30, 2012 at 12:38am“Within three days of this patient interaction, the staff member’s employment was ended and all staff members at this affiliate were immediately scheduled for retraining in managing unusual patient encounters.”
In other words, “How dare you allow someone to catch you off guard concerning our practices. Everybody’s getting retraining so you can catch these fools before they film and post what we really do here all over the internet and make us look bad.”
Report Post »mountainmover101
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 8:35pmIs anyone really usrprised by this? China has been doing this for years. China also has so many males they are exporting them in droves.
Where is NOW? I don’t know of one single instance where a male fetus would be aborted, other than a defect. Everyone knows that males are the perfered gender for children in most cultures, well in all cultures actually. I can’t think of a culture that values the female over the male.
Report Post »rickc34
Posted on May 30, 2012 at 9:13pmThe left wings war on women with Barack Obama as their General. Let’s kill off the females in the womb. Without male and female a race will eventually cease to survive. The reason the male child in some third world country is more valued is a beast of burden and girls are limited to the home. Hey I am a man with 4 granddaughters and 1 grandson and love them with all my heart. And planned parenthood is not known for effective cancer screening how many have the equipment or oncologists on staff ? I bet the answere is zero. The make their money performing abortions on the tax payers dime. I have known nurses that worked for planned parenthood and told me the truth.
Report Post »Lloyd Drako
Posted on May 31, 2012 at 11:17amMountainMover101:
“China has been doing this for years.”
No, China FORCES women who want more than 1 child to have abortions.
America ALLOWS women who want more than 1 child, or only 1, or none at all, to make that choice,
whether the choice is gender-selective or not.
You don’t see the difference?
Report Post »shandog
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 6:26pm“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
Report Post »Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.
pamela kay
Posted on May 30, 2012 at 12:11amSHANDOG, so this is what our society has come to? God help us.
Report Post »shandog
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 6:25pm“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying … demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism … [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”
Report Post »Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Chapter on “The Cruelty of Charity,” pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition.
shandog
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 6:24pm“The campaign for birth control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims of eugenics.”
Report Post »Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.
shandog
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 6:23pmAs an advocate of birth control I wish … to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit,’ admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation….
Report Post »On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.
Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.
shandog
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 6:23pm“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the ***** is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the ***** population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
Report Post »Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon‘s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.
Liberty1948
Posted on May 30, 2012 at 12:46pmThank you so much for displaying the horror that was the esteemed Margaret Sanger!
Report Post »Liberty1948
Posted on May 30, 2012 at 12:49pmThank you for exposing the horrow that was Margaret Sanger!
Report Post »Amber Largent
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:45pmThe problem, though, is that they must first admit that they are human if they are assigning gender… and if they are human – GIRLS or boys – the abortion must be murder. If you are arguing that embryos aren’t alive/human, then gender selection should be legal. You can’t say GENDERCIDE unless you admit they are human and alive – otherwise you aren’t “killing” anything – which means that PP can’t argue that gendercide is horrible without arguing that abortion is also, and neither can lawmakers. Or can they? Didn’t we have these same discussions when it became permissible to charge a criminal with a double homicide if a woman is pregnant – but cannot charge a woman with murder if she kills her baby en utero. SMH
Report Post »julie w
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 10:07pm@ Amber
“The problem, though, is that they must first admit that they are human if they are assigning gender… and if they are human – GIRLS or boys – the abortion must be murder.”
Great point!
Report Post »Liberty1948
Posted on May 30, 2012 at 12:45pmExcellent Amber! Planned Parenthood was created by an insane eugenist who only wanted a ‘superior’ race surviving on this planet. Margaret Sanger was a beast equalling Adolf Hitler in extermination of human beings!
Report Post »watt
Posted on May 31, 2012 at 11:32amWrong. Sex of a baby could be determined within as little as 15 weeks. With blood tests being developed in the hopes of being able to determine within 6 weeks. Therefore, using your logic, the baby is “human” at 15 weeks. In that case, why be pregnant for 9 months when you can have it over with after 15 weeks? The reason is because the fetus is not human and would not survive very long outside the womb. So no, it’s not human.
Report Post »LeadNotFollow
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:41pm…
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can; and wisdom to know the difference.
Courage-up folks, abortion is something we can change.
Report Post »It’s time to make abortion illegal.
LeadNotFollow
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:34pm…
Report Post »The employee at Planned Parenthood was so cold and casual about killing a baby girl, and her own two abortions.
The way she was talking and laughing, you would think she was just discussing what to have for dinner.
This is what America has become. God is not happy.
7thAvatar
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:21pmPlanned Parenthood must be outlawed. They are a conspiratorial, criminal organisation pursuing an agenda of mass murder and corruption. They are anti-Christ and anti-human. They exist solely to promote the anti-culture of death in this country and throughout the world. They are brazen, haughty enemies of God and humanity.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:37pmRomney supported infanticide before he sort of opposed it. How many babies were led to their death under his watch?
Report Post »Can you all still vote for him and sleep?
Not me
Mykelbe
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:18pmThe pro abortion folks would beg to differ http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/2012/gop-presidential-candidates/mitt-romney.html
Report Post »llotus
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:33pmDo these people not know they will have to answer for themselves someday? Lotus.
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:33pmThey will kill the girls to keep the competition down. The guys will want the girls killed so they can go gay and not have a nagging female wife to support and kids who are problems. It is just the regular war on femalehood by those inclined towards some kind of evil scheme rotting in the hearts of humankind, those who have a donut in place of a heart, maybe a rock or maybe a walnut. Whatever they have it is not working for the benefit of the unborn. These should be charged with murder.
Report Post »Thatsenough
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:06pmPeople who kill the preborn give up the natural virtues of their sex, basically you‘re dealing with androgynous zombies with the trappings of civilization but it’s starting to wear really thin….
Report Post »Metallicat
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:18pmI still believe Planned Parenthood is population control for whites,as they steer white females towards abortion and minority girls to the welfare lines to support their offspring.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:35pmGhandi hosted Margaret Sanger in his home.
Report Post »Cesium
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:39pmactually its the opposite. The conspiracy idea is that it enables poor minorities into having readily available abortions so that they don’t produce offspring that burden the system or become homicidal criminals. Read “Freakanomics.” There’s some data to back this up.
Report Post »Amber Largent
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:48pm“Metallicat
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:18pm
I still believe Planned Parenthood is population control for whites,as they steer white females towards abortion and minority girls to the welfare lines to support their offspring.”
YOU ARE SO WRONG. Number 1 user of abortion: minorities. Number 1 killer of black babies: abortion. Interesting you would ever think it’s a white thing… racism must be rotting your brain.
Report Post »sldjulius
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 9:06pmLiberty: Ghandi did and supported a LOT of evil in his time. The idea that he is up there as a modern saint just proves that people don’t do their homework and believe whatever they are told.
Report Post »mauijonny
Posted on May 30, 2012 at 3:53amMETAL: Gandhi ARGUED w/Sanger before & after being open to discussion: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/love-lust-and-the-mahatma/1/119901.html
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:17pmI love the euphemisms lefties come up with to distract from the real problem…“unusual patient encounters”. Here’s to Planned Parenthood losing federal funding….they’ve been playing this game long enough.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:59pmNo question that late term abortions are both in violation of Roe v. Wade and opposed by virtually everyone. So no need to get fixated on that aspect here. As for reproductive decisions within the first and second trimester the law is clear. A woman can chose to have an abortion. It is her decision and the reason behind it are of concern to only her. Thus while the report provides an opportunity to churn up some anger, the specific issue is a mute point. Roe v. Wade is the best we can expect in terms of a framework, although the time periods needed to be adjusted downward due to medical technology.
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:09pmSo you’re all for eugenics JROOK? Killing a child based on it’s gender is fine with you?
Report Post »Amber Largent
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 5:58pm@JROOK – And that’s why this “gendercide” arguement is so tripe when spouted by supposed “pro-choice” people – anything ending in “cide” (a suffix) means kill/murder. (Homicide, patricide, suicide…) You have to fully embrace “cide” to embrace abortion and thus cannot argue it’s wrong to have a “faulty” reason. Why is gender an invalid reason and birth control not? If you are pro-choice, there’s no difference. They argue you should still have the choice. Which is why abortion should be called infanticide and treated accordingly – to prevent genocide, gendercide, and eugenics.
Report Post »keats5
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:11pmI can see it now.
The new sign to protest Planned Parenthood will be:
“Let the Baby Girls Live!”
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:42pmand where are these protesters? outside the clinic with a sign?
Report Post »completely ineffective.
Lila Rose is brilliant.
13th Imam
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:42pmPlanned Parent Hoodie and DEMOCRATS
Report Post »The Real War on Women
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:07pmNon judgmental. That is a problem right there. How can you not be judgmental about abortions necessitated by irresponsible sex? Oh- money in the pocket of course.. This is all far outside the questions of rape pregnancy the abortion mills like to fall back on.. With these people “rape” is diminished to an agenda for progressive ideologies.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:34pmGhandi was an enema pervert and a liar.
He adored Britain and was an officer in the army. Not a pacifist as he would have you believe.
He also hosted Margret Sanger- a eugenicist supporter if you will
Just sayin’
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:03pmLiberal morality has no bounds nor honor!
Report Post »oldguy49
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:06pmlibs also always throw someone under the bus and say thats not what we stand for………yea right
Report Post »Dr Vel
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:10pmPlanned Parenthood every day further magnifies its depravity and murder to ever descending depths of hell in the sight of God Almighty.
Report Post »Want our country back
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:57pmliberal mind set
support ABORTION
support GENDERCIDE (Sex-Selective Abortion)
support INFANTICIDE (not provide care for a full term baby that survives an abortion)
You have the right to make our own choices and live with the consequences, why are Conservatives criticized for our choices.
Vote GOP2012
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:32pmRomney defended ABORTION by defending a woman’s right to choose
Report Post »you must be joking -:“vote GOP 2012”
Romney has innoocent blood on his hands regardless of his now changed opinion.
Everything his does is for political expedience and it seems thats all conservatives want. Ear Candy
GOP=DNC
Truthbeliever2
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:51pmRNC = DNC
Romney = Obama
Have fun America. You deserve it!
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:52pmYour tax dollars at work.
Report Post »Texas Hills Patriot
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:52pm‘Planned ABORTION’ is just a plain evil organization.
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:51pmMaybe we should have a lottery for what kid gets aborted. Maybe institute a ratio maybe 3 girls to 1 boy. We can also set a ratio of nationalities that can be born, you know, let the government decide everything.
Sarcasm off.
Report Post »cassandra
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:50pmthese evil people could care less why you wanted an abortion it could be 1 week before your due to deliver and you could just say I changed my mind I don’t want the resposibilty and they would kill a baby, it’s all about money
Report Post »blackyb
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 3:49pmHello?? Women are just as mean to women as men are. The jealous natured winches are all over each other. They kill babies too. So who is the most vicious, again?
Report Post »