Police: Man Dropped Crack Out of His Pants, Ate it in Front of Officers
- Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:53am by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »

Kenneth Dwayne Swann was arrested after police said he dropped a bag of crack cocaine in front of them and proceeded to eat it. (Salisbury Post)
A North Carolina man pulled over for having tinted windows dropped a bag of crack cocaine out of his undershorts and ate it in front of officers, police said.
According to the police report, 31-year-old Kenneth Dwayne Swann was walking “stiff-legged” when he got out of his car after officers pulled him over Thursday night. That’s when police said a small bag of crack fell out of his undershorts, WTSP 10 reported.
Swann then “bent down, grabbed it and ate the crack,” officers said.
According to the report, officers were unable to get the crack out of Swann’s mouth before he swallowed it. They searched him and found an additional baggie in his shorts, this one containing three grams of crack.
The Salisbury Post reported police also recovered 57 oxycontin pills and $223 from his vehicle, which smelled strongly of marijuana and air fresheners.
According to the Post, Swann was given medication to “help retrieve the bag,” as well as medication to prevent injury if it burst.
Swann was jailed under a $102,500 bond and charged with resisting, delaying or obstructing a public officer; two counts of felony trafficking opium derivatives; and maintaining a vehicle for keeping and storing prescription pills.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (74)
burr99
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 3:49pmMedication in case it bursts? I say feed the rest of the garbage to him, and then bury the whole mess when he kicks.
Report Post »db321
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 3:11pmHe’ll probably get off – we have bigger fish to fry – like get the Marines to stop farting in Afghanistan – it offends the enemy. Besides, Obama needs the vote.
Report Post »Unstable Phenomenon
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 2:53pmWhy is when a drug dealer gets busted the first thing they want to do is swallow the drugs. As if dying from a drug overdose is better than going to jail. On top of the fact they are still going to get charged with the drugs anyway, and still receive an additional charge for tampering with the evidence, so it’s like a double whammy.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on August 28, 2011 at 2:23amYou assume rationale thought on their part — big mistake.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on August 28, 2011 at 9:47amNo, it’s more like a quadruple or pentuple whammy.
The Feds make money moving the drugs in, make money keeping the drugs illegal and lucrative for the cartels and Taliban, demands more tax dollars to fight a war against it’s own people, uses the tax dollars to erect a police state around everyone, moves guns dope and cash for the cartels and Taliban, and then locks up low level users and pushers on the hind end in prison forever as a modern slave to the big banker owned prison industrial complex working for pennies on the dollar, stifling any competition.
Who can compete with government sponsored and sanctioned slavery? Ask China.
The glassmakers are running around smashing windows and you idiots keep praising him everytime he pops up with new windows to install like “Yayyy! Hurray for the glassmaker!”
Report Post »forthepeople
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 2:53pmmonkey see Monkey do …… and they teach US there is a ‘ Missing Link ’ in school ?……..hey.its not missing !
BONETRAUMA
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 2:48pmand ya know there are only 2 words that rhyme with french, stench and mother fckr. how strange is that?
Report Post »Gypsy123
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 2:16pmThe police should have let him eat it all and saved the taxpayers big money. Now we have to provide three hots and a cot phone service computers fun with the local community college groups,
Carnal visits, Free toothbrush and toilet items access to work out equipment, the list goes on and on
Besides that he is nasty don’t eat what falls out of your underwear
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 2:15pmAnyone who would ingest anything named after a part of your arse should be arrested.
Report Post »Gypsy123
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 2:10pmHey stupid you don’t eat what falls out of your underware!
Report Post »Charb
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 2:00pmThis guy was smoking air fresheners in his car? Man… hope he’s locked away where he can never touch a VanillaRoma for a long, long time.
Report Post »Rayblue
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 2:00pmNow really. Who of us have not done that ?
I guess I let the cat out of the bag there.
Report Post »LOJ
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:14pmWouldn’t eating that amount of cocaine make him sick? Yes, Obama has enabled some in the Black race to appreciate getting something for nothing on the backs of the Taxpayers who work and live Christian lives to help other, and they know a good thing when they see it….They got a taste of re-distribution of wealth and they like it, don’t care how they get that Obama money….just want to keep getting it!
Report Post »Oddness
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:08pmSo let me get this straight… is this a story in code to warn me that if my windows are tinted I will get pulled over? In FL too dark is probable cause, albeit rarely enforced, or is their something other that escalates this story to this level of news. If it read Police Man: … rather than Police: Man arrested I might see the significance. This kind of thing happens every night .. all night long in high drug traffic areas…help me out here blazers ??
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:20pmThe only part of the window that “should” be tinted is the 4 inches from the top of your windshield. Anything more than that could be construed as someone who has something to hide IMO. Get some sunglasses if you (not you in particular) feel the sun is too bright.
In this case, brother man had something to hide…. up his arse it seems. Good for the police. Get these POS off the roads, out of neighborhoods and put they’re drug abusing/ selling arses in jail.
Report Post »Brizz
Posted on August 29, 2011 at 2:48pmNot news. The flames at The Blaze are weak.
Report Post »thegreatcarnac
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:07pmExcuse me but I think that if one ate crack….ate crack…, it just may kill you. Crack can be smoked and snorted but directly ingested? I guess you can eat it if it is a very small piece.
Report Post »one years food ration like glenn says
Posted on August 28, 2011 at 8:27amHow come you have so much experience ??
Report Post »trooper
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:05pmJust another obama voter who will claim the cops were racist and acted stupid like and sheet!
Report Post »starman70
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:15pmI am disappointed! I was going to sing: “Yummy, yummy, yummy I’ve got CRACK in my tummy and it feels so good to me.” Unfortunately the police retreived it before he could swallow it so I can’t sing afterall.
Report Post »conservativeagent
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:04pmHuh? $102,500 bond? What a strange number, did they set bond based by the ounce?
Report Post »conservativeagent
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:02pmHow do they know it was crack? Could of been some Kool-aid flavored rock candy.
Report Post »Jim in Houston
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:55pmHe was only doing what the [pretend president has admitted doing.
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:42pmHad to do a double take on the headline. Don’t misread it ;)
Report Post »kickagrandma
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:48pm@KICKIN~~~ Same here, and I’m OLD!
Report Post »conservativeagent
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:00pmDitto
Report Post »Bill from NJ
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 9:36pmDon’t worry he will get his chance to eat plenty of crack and other things that flop/fall out of underwear in prison….
Report Post »Talmid of Yeshua
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:40pmLet me get this straight? Drug dealer or not…. he was pulled over for tinted windows? That alone seems like a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.
Really? The only thing the cops had on him was tinted windows?
Now, he did have cocaine on him, but tinted windows? I hope this case gets thrown out of court.
Report Post »S_Malc13
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:50pmIn some states, windows can’t be too dark. Gives police probable cause though.
Report Post »suran
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:57pmI guess you don’t live in California. It’s illegal to have darkly tinted windows here, but most of the drug dealers and small-tim criminals do anyway.
It seems you won’t mind, then, if one of them crashes into you while they’re driving high as a kite.
Report Post »Talmid of Yeshua
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 2:32pmIt is still a load of crap and unconstitutional. I don’t care if this guy is a criminal or not. If I put tinted windows on my home, does that give police “probable cause” to enter my house and arrest me.
Wake up America. Our freedom is being lost by the bucket loads.
Now, if they police would have pulled this alleged drug dealer over for a legitimate reason, and found crack on him, then I’d say throw the book at him.
I don’t agree with federal drug laws, they are unconstitutional. It is a states right issue. However, I do believe the states should have very severe punishments for drug offenses, along the line with Singapore’s drug laws: If you caught with drugs, you are put to death or face life in prison.
Report Post »Talmid of Yeshua
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 2:38pmAt Suran,
What does tinted windows have to do with driving while under the influence? They can do that with or without tinted windows, and they will do it regardless.
Do you ban steak knives because someone uses one as a weapon? Wake up, we are being overly-regulated on every aspect of our life. We are no longer free. Freedom is nothing more than an illusion now in our country.
Let the cops pull him over for a legitimate reason, not for tinted windows. The fourth amendment is being trashed here.
Report Post »Fina Biscotti
Posted on August 28, 2011 at 12:52amdark-tinted windows are a driving hazard at night.
At least, he cannot pretend the traffic stop was racially-motivated……
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on August 28, 2011 at 9:50am“Probable cause” is now more deliberately ambiguous and vague so they can trample on your rights further.
They now call it “reasonable suspicion”.
LOL.
Welcome to 1984.
We have idiots calling waterboarding torture “enhanced interrogations”.
Next, we’ll have idiots calling highway robbery by the cops “enhanced revenue collection”.
Report Post »OldVietVet
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:32pmBetter yet, just let his bag alone–maybe it will rupture!
Report Post »Captain Crunch
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:31pmWhat is it they say in thier posts? Some BS about “Ron Paul is the only one who can fix America.“ or ”I wont vote for anyone but Ron Paul…” I’d bet money this crack head is a Ron Paul supporter.
I think the Ron Paul election campaign symbol needs to be a well burnt crack pipe.
Ron “the rock” Paul 2012
lol…i crack myself up!
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:56pmRP supporters seem to have the same ” You don’t know Jack” attitude that All Barry and DEMOCRAT butt kissers have.
Report Post »Steverino
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:12pmThis mutton head probably couldn’t even spell “politics”, let alone be aware of Ron Paul.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:39pmLol. What does it mean to be “aware of Ron Paul?” He’s a Neo-Liberal. Has a couple good Conservative ideas, but mostly stinks of Liberalism and dangerous niavety. Is that aware enough?
Report Post »Al Sharptongue
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:12pmTrap or die my brother, get that money and dont pay taxes.
Report Post »Obama and Holder will free you …lol
YepImaConservative
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:05pmNow just think about this for a minute. If Ron Paul were elected… this cat could eat coke out of his arse all day long without any explanation… cuz he’s in control of his own body. Hmmmm, smells like Chickin’!
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:06pmEr, sorry… eat CRACK out his CRACK all day long…
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:45pmNot…he believes it should be a State issue…not a Federal issue…and besides, Constitutionally, a President doesn’t have that much power. The Constitution, by design, protects us from ideological extremes.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:02pmLike Barry’s idealogical extermes
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:12pmLMAO >RISE. Libertarianism isn’t an ideological extreme? Gimme a break with the “States Rights” garbage when it comes to drugs, prostitution and other social ills that the Liberals and Libertarians seem to have no problem with and want to make a buck off of.
The Fed (POTUS) needs to lead the “war” on these social ills because they are a nation killer, a society destroyer. Sheer lunacy to look at it any other way, but then again I’m dealing with a Liberal-tarian point of view.
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:15pmYou couldn’t pay me enough to vote for Barry
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:30pm@Yep…I agree with you on the societal decay that these drugs cause…and to tell you the truth, I’m more of a Constitutionalist than a Libertatarian. I’m more concerned with corruption in government than anything else right now.
Report Post »YepImaConservative
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 1:42pmFair enough RISE.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on August 28, 2011 at 9:37amMaybe the president ought to start by stopping the Military and Feds from shipping in the DANGEROUS drugs from abroad (like Cocaine and Heroin) and letting the pharmaceutical industry stop creating new addicts by modifying opium into “new drugs”.
States rights means the people VOTE whether or not the people can get high off of drugs not created by Big Pharma, not the Feds DICTATING to the people from on high as if they’re OUR masters. No, we’re THEIR masters.
Master, servant. Master, servant. Some brainwashed sheep and corrupt government troglodytes don’t understand that concept.
Your “you’re a neo-liberal if you’re for states rights” argument holds no water whatsoever. We want personal, financial, and religious freedom from authoritarian rule. Period. Ron Paul‘s stance on drugs doesn’t make him even remotely “liberal” in the modern context of the term.
Neocons just want to tell everybody what to do with their body by imposing their morals and values on everyone else.
The POTUS needs to lead a war against it’s own people getting high?
Nobody grows coca and poppy here…
Report Post »NickDeringer
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:04pmGood to see the Blaze focusing on real news.
Report Post »Flybot
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:06pmRofl it wash Bushes fault for not sending checks minoritys for tighter fitting pants
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 11:59amBrings a whole new meaning to “just say no to crack”.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:19pmBe glad your not the one who had to sort throught the…biproducts, shall we say, to retrieve the bag once it left his body.
Report Post »