US
Police Set Fire to Calif. Bomb House
- Posted on December 9, 2010 at 2:39pm by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
Here’s some background.
The video is a real “barn burner”:
Sign Up For Our Newsletter!
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 577 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 404 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 403 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 372 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 343 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 403 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 404 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 343 Comments- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 150 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 403 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Glenn Beck Radio
Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7
Listen Now
The Wire
- Clinton urges ASEAN unity on South China Sea
- Virginia Tech edges Georgia Tech in OT
- Hyundai Motor union approves deal, ends strike
- China's Baidu releases new mobile browser
- AP source: Bain-related workers to speak
- AP PHOTOS: The many roles of Michael Clarke Duncan
- Asia stocks stalled by global economic uncertainty
- Dems platform backs gay marriage, abortion rights





Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (51)
Bookworm
Posted on December 10, 2010 at 1:13amLet me see —– a man. his wife and their dog were living in the house for at least a year with no problem but the bomb squad can’t go in because it is too dangerous………… Something not adding up here.
Report Post »alcarfl
Posted on December 10, 2010 at 12:52amThe guy will walk due to NO EVIDENCE!
Report Post »biggreenboo
Posted on December 10, 2010 at 10:16amThey took out atleast 70 lbs of stuff… I‘m sure they’ll put him away for life. And slap him with a bill for environmental damage.
His Christmas is gonna suck.
Report Post »capnjack
Posted on December 10, 2010 at 12:08amWhat a great way to get rid of those scumbags at GITMO.
Report Post »samdryguy1
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 10:50pmI‘m sure glad the enviornment wasn’t harmed by all of the chemicals being burned. Explosions….still waiting.
Report Post »CaliforniaConservative
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 10:39pmI don’t get it. On many levels, I just don’t get it. Don’t even know where to start.
Report Post »dontbotherme
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 9:29pmI watched this on TV today between FOX & CNN. The firefighters in that area are well prepared & trained for fires of every type. It was a controlled burn with no wind (atmospheric conditions were right) EPA was there to take constant readings for hazardous chemicals in several locations. The homes around the area were behind a safe wall & treated with a fire retardant chemical. The burn was hot enough to destroy any gasses & chemicals (per a friend who is a chemical weapons expert). The man who lived in this condemned home (with his wife & dog) was out of work for 2 or 3 years… robbed a few banks…had several rubber facial masks & weapons… There were so many different explosives everywhere inside that it wasn’t safe for the bomb squad to continue to try to remove evidence. They were able to remove, I believe, 70 lbs of explosives before pulling out. The criminal wanted the judge to send the bomb squad back into the home a few days ago to get evidence for his defense. The judge refused, saying it was too dangerous for the men & neighborhood. I still wonder about the ashes that were spreading to the east. What was in them & where will they all end up?
Report Post »WAR PIGS CRAWLING
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 9:08pmIf you’re able, maybe you could join a local volunteer fire department, and the mystery of fire won’t perplex you so much….
Holy Crap…..way too many cat pictures being used for profile pictures.
Report Post »Plankchapel
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 8:13pmThe firemen did an excellent job and made the right decision. They protected the houses around it, and there was plenty of backup if something went wrong. Environmentalists were there to ensure that all went according to plan. How many agencies did they say were there? Can’t remember, but there were A LOT!
Better to burn the sucker down than to risk having the entire neighborhood be blown up.
Report Post »tinlizy
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 7:51pmwhat the heck? this is a police state.
Report Post »M4finny
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 7:37pmRiddle me this Batman, I thought that Kali was concerned with the size of everyone’s carbon footprint? I’d say that what the put up into the atmosphere today was more like a “feets-print”. Hypocrites, all of them!
Report Post »stopprintn
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 7:36pmWe here in the vol. fireservice have to remove all the shingles, tar paper and anything else that may be toxic before a live burn. Guess that doesn’t apply to the feds.
Report Post »teddie888
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 7:31pmThey reported they had to burn because it was too dangerous to go through everything while being in there. Well, then they don’t know what exactly they were burning. What chemicals were let loose in the air that floated and people are breathing? How did they know there wasn’t something like an an thrax burning in there? or what these chemicals would do to someone breathing the air to where ever it drifted?
Report Post »citygirl56
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 7:27pmThere is something VERY ODD about this. Wonder what they were covering up???
Report Post »Have-Gun-Will-Travel
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 6:03pmI will tell you what CA will always find the most expensive way to do something.
16′ fence all around the home
close the freeway
have around 300 public union member’s on the seen
state 150 billion in debt
Just priceless
Report Post »RobertCA
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 6:27pmSo sad but real .
Report Post »jmrec100
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 5:59pmSo it was ok to burn the house and release hazardous gases and chemicals into the air to deposit on the surroundings? Hmm, so if I lived there and my pet dog happened to lick where the residues from the chemicals deposited, what would happen to him. How about my garden where I grew vegetables for my family to eat. This is realy questionable in a state where you can’t burn simple trash. I wonder what the real motive was?
Report Post »GMAN455
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 5:13pmwheres Janet Reno ? this is weird have to burn the house??????
Report Post »cemerius
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:57pmSo one house that doesn’t need to be on the “foreclosure” list…..
Report Post »cemerius
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 5:00pmDoes the wife get a new house? Looks like she is on the street today while he is locked up….
Report Post »WBOB
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:15pmsomething about this doesn’t feel right……spidey senses maybe.
Report Post »alcarfl
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:00pmI sure hope there was no snail darters or spotted owls in that poor, unfortunate domicile.
Report Post »SgtB
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:00pmThe ignorant reporter woman said that they had hoped the “grenades” would implode instead of explode like they are meant to. Since when does any type of explosive device that is thrown into a fire not do what it is supposed to unless it is a plastic explosive like c-4 that takes heat and pressure to set it off?
Report Post »oldoldtimer
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:10pmMelt them before they explode.
Report Post »clasea
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 3:53pmthis is weird!!!! they could not remove the contents? they had to burn it?????
Report Post »american1st
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:02pmpack rat house filled to capacity with junk… with bombs and chemicals mixed in…. according to CA news.
Report Post »pavnvet
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:33pmThis is weird????? Nope, this is Southern California.. Paradise found……Paradise lost…
Report Post »stacybernardslay
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 3:24pmBurnin’ Down the House !!!!!!!! do do do do dodo ,peopkle on their way to work and baby what did you expect, – Sorry I just couldn’t resist.
Report Post »Konservative PUNK
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 3:29pmU R the NARD-Dog!
Report Post »CaptGregg
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 3:21pmWhere are the envirowackos protesting the carbon footprint the police caused here?
Report Post »squeaker
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:11pm!!!…Very Good Question….!!!
Report Post »CaptGregg
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:17pmQuestion #2 — Did the police purchase carbon offsets from Al Gore? If not, how long before he accuses them of killing polar bears?
Report Post »RobertCA
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:28pm@ CAPTGREGG
Yep the wackos are bitching :)
Report Post »GeauxAlready
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 2:52pmObama’s fingerprints are all over this………
Report Post »firstHat
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 6:30pmWell gee. I don’t know. what’s the name of this web site again? :-)
Report Post »walkwithme1966
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 8:31pmThe question should be why the house was full of explosives – the whole story doesn’t make sense to me. Isn’t it more dangerous to burn up a house full of explosives? Its everything in that house evidence? Something is really wrong here? http://maboulette.wordpress.com
Report Post »Konservative PUNK
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 2:45pmDestuction of a crime scene…who knows what evidence was lost.
Report Post »VoiceofReason
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 3:00pmIt does make one wonder……
Report Post »menotyou
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 3:27pmThey were afraid if left alone the house would blow up most of the homes around it, to the solution was to set the house on fire?
Report Post »Konservative PUNK
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 3:28pmSo what happens to the landlord who rented his home to this Unabomber wannabe? Does homeowner’s insurance cover legalized arson?
Report Post »RobertCA
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 3:34pmCops said it was too dangerous for them to remove bomb materials , isn’t it more dangerous to set a fire for a house full of chemicals in a residential area .
Report Post »Who knows .
oldoldtimer
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:09pmMost are missing the whole point. How did this guy amass all those different explosives? Even if he made them buying those chemicals should have raise Big Red Flags!
Report Post »Al Otto
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 4:40pmDid They get EPA Approvals to destroy ?
Report Post »Independent Tess
Posted on December 9, 2010 at 8:10pmI believe the house was declared a nuisance, or uninhabitable, or somethin’, and the house owner is out of luck. I heard on the news that she will not get anything back for the house.
Report Post »bigcop2150
Posted on December 10, 2010 at 2:04pmWe had this same thing in Cleveland. The explosives are so volatile they can explode if you move them so its safer to burn it.
Report Post »patriot308
Posted on December 10, 2010 at 9:47pm47 comments and only five that show any sign of common sense. So…. the other 42 of you are volunteering to remove the next stockpile; with known unstable materials and most likely boobytrapped. You are all very brave with someone else’s life. Hey…. you can bring your children with you and show them how brillant you are, well at least until the one and only big boom. You should be all be Dummocrat politicians.
Report Post »