Politics

Cain Denies Report of Sexual Harassment

Female Employees Allegedly Accused Herman Cain of Sexually Suggestive Behavior in 1990s

An exclusive POLITICO report published Sunday night alleges that at least two female employees complained to colleagues and senior association officials about multiple instances of inappropriate behavior exhibited by Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain during his tenure as the head of the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s. Cain’s campaign has since denied allegations.

Sources told POLITICO that the women complained that Cain had exhibited sexually suggestive behavior towards them, and that they signed agreements with the restaurant group that gave them financial payouts in the five-figure range to leave the association. The payouts were reportedly made on the agreement that the women would not speak about their departures.

A Cain spokesman told POLITICO that the candidate indicated to campaign officials that he was “vaguely familiar” with the charges and that the restaurant association’s general counsel had resolved the matter.

POLITICO approached Cain in person on the sidewalk Sunday morning while the candidate was leaving the Washington bureau of CBS news following an interview on “Face the Nation.” POLITICO writes of the tense confrontation that progressed:

“He was then asked, ‘Have you ever been accused, sir, in your life of harassment by a woman?’

He breathed audibly, glared at the reporter and stayed silent for several seconds. After the question was repeated three times, he responded by asking the reporter, ‘Have you ever been accused of sexual harassment?’”

POLITICO claims to have known about the allegations against Cain for weeks, and has put together accounts of what happened by “talking to a lengthy roster of former board members, current and past staff and others familiar with the workings of the trade group at the time Cain was there.”

After questions from POLITICO regarding the allegations, Cain campaign vice president for communications emailed the publication on October 24, writing that any dispute about Cain’s conduct at the restaurant association “was settled amicably among all parties many years ago.”

Cain was president and CEO of the National Restaurant Association from late 1996 to mid-1999. Several board members of the National Restaurant Association mentioned in POLITICO’s story told the publication that they had never heard about any complaints regarding Cain making unwanted advances, and said that such behavior would be out of character based off of their experiences with the executive.

In a statement to The Associated Press Sunday night, Cain‘s campaign said that the POLITICO report isn’t true and represents unfair attacks.

Cain spokesman J.D. Gordon said the political press was “dredging up thinly sourced allegations” from Cain’s tenure leading the trade group in the 1990s. Gordon said the report includes “unsubstantiated personal attacks” and said the press is “casting aspersions on his character and spreading rumors that never stood up to the facts.”

Comments (948)

1 2 3 ... 19
  • Hickory
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:26pm

    Remember what they did to Clarence Thomas? Here we go again.

    Report Post » Hickory  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:37pm

      You guys are so blind in your man love for Cain it is pathetic.

      1. Wrote an article criticizing a national sales tax a year ago, then makes it part of his tax plan.

      2. Wrote an article two weeks before the collapse praising the economy.

      3. Voted for the bailouts, but now cries because he says he didn‘t know he couldn’t trust the government to allocate the money, but still agrees with the bailouts in general.

      4. Didn’t want to audit the Fed. Calling anyone who wanted to stupid. Then we find out that they shipped TRILLIONS over seas.

      5. Flip flop on abortion

      6. Flip flop on negotiating with terrorists.

      7. Paying off women to keep quite after he sexually harasses them.

      8. All conservatives scream at the libs when they want to raise taxes because we understand that SPENDING is the problem. But then Paul rolls out a plan based in SPENDING cuts and Cain rolls out a plan based on Taxes (not even tax cuts necessarily) and all us conservatives go head over heals for the TAX plan while kicking the SPENDING CUTS to the curb.

      So please tell me how this “man of integrity” is, in any way, the conservative we need???

      jmiller_42  
    • melindamcgeheewoodallanderson
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:46pm

      Our thought’s, exactly.

      Report Post » melindamcgeheewoodallanderson  
    • ILUVJESUS
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:48pm

      True. They are going after another black man. This is the left trying to lynch him.
      Now, we all know that in the 90s could say to a woman, “You look great!” and you could be accused of sexual harassment. It was the way working women could get empathy while making a fast buck. It was the in thing to do in the 90s.
      You know, the left has always hated blacks. They think that blacks are hopeless dolts. They use them. I know, I was a Dem who lived in the liberal Northeast. Northerners are more bigoted than Southerners. Liberal Northerners just hide stand denigh it.

      Report Post » ILUVJESUS  
    • swing
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:49pm

      Now you can tell he’s got the White Houses attention. The hatchets are starting to fly.

      Report Post »  
    • ILUVJESUS
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:50pm

      Forgive my typos and spell check!

      Report Post » ILUVJESUS  
    • macpappy
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:54pm

      @jmiller_42
      You keep posting the liberal talking points, how about backing it up with the links to the articles. I have an open mind, so show me.

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • RepubliCorp
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:04pm

      Mr Cain, asks them if okay to get a BJ in the oval office, have a gay lover or drive your girlfriend off bridge and do nothing to save her…….and then ask them when they started to care.

      Report Post » RepubliCorp  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:07pm

      Those aren’t liberal talking points MACPAPPY. Those are called facts that JMiller posted. Liberals have no clue what a fact is, so stop with the emotional baseless arguments. All the Cain supporters are trying to back their man against a tidal wave, not of ooooo ‘those bad Paul supporters’ or liberals, or Perry supporters, or Romney supporters; he’s fighting a tidal wave of facts.

      And Miller left one important fact out, Cain was the chair of the fed reserve. There is no larger conflict of interest than having a former head of the fed or fed branch, run our nation. What the hell, lets go get BERNANKE or GREENSPAN to be the President of the United States. ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! Oh ya those boys will for sure ‘fix’ the fed right up! What the hell is wrong with you Cain supporters?!

      A Conservatarian  
    • dontbotherme
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:08pm

      jmiller- Put up or shut up. You want to make potentially false or misleading statements as though they are fact you better be prepared to prove it or be prepared to be ignored as an irrelevant liar who supports Obama or Paul.

      Report Post »  
    • maharushi
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:08pm

      How did he vote for the bail outs?

      Report Post » maharushi  
    • BrandyWilson
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:10pm

      This Gordon fella just poured gasoline on a BS story with his ridiculous call to Geraldo…he should have stayed off the phone if he had no idea what to say!

      Report Post »  
    • VegasGuy
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:10pm

      Funny how the media would not report on Clinton’s epic dalliances, but will pull out all stops to go after a conservative black man.

      Report Post » VegasGuy  
    • thetreyman
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:11pm

      what bill did herman cain vote for as he was never a member of congress or the senate. and, was one of these women anita hill. and, have they opened themselves up to law suits if they signed a confidentiality agreement or did they just give there word never to bring it up.

      Report Post » thetreyman  
    • phillipwgirard
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:14pm

      Back it up JMILLER

      Report Post » phillipwgirard  
    • PROUD AMERICAN741776
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:15pm

      oh and by the way.. I was living IN KC during the times OF MR Cain‘s great work with Godfather’s and his ‘citizen seat on the Fed Res’…..

      George Wash from fb

      i just plugged in to yahoo SEARCH ENGINE…..”1990 KANSAS CITY STAR, Restaurant Association President charged with misconduct”"” AND

      NOTHING CAME UP…. from .139,000 results i found this.. >Cain seen by some as ‘force of nature’ | ajc.com
      … Restaurant Association, he became the face of opposition that killed President Bill Clinton’s health care plan, but a critic charged … Kansas City … Stars …
      http://www.ajc.com/news/cain-seen-by-​some-1212659.html

      HANG ON
      THE

      ‘hermancain’… is come to clear
      corruption, and ‘broken government’…in America.

      be gone..you liars, theives, and decievers who would lie about a GOOD MAN!

      Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:16pm

      It is my understanding that he served on a Fed Board and wasn’t even a voting member .. anyone have any information that shows otherwise I would like to see it.

      Report Post »  
    • KickinBack
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:18pm

      Trolls (Pro Obama Democrats) Infiltrate Cain’s campaign volunteers and cause havoc. Remember, Obama has never lost an election; and is known for throwing out his minions to either dig up or make up trash to his opponents. It’s the Chicago way.

      Report Post » KickinBack  
    • jujubeebee
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:19pm

      JMILLER_42: He is not a senator or congressman so how could he vote for the bailouts…like you stated here??????????

      Report Post »  
    • oldguy49
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:21pm

      if they caught him in a hotel room with a sheep, i would still vote for him…he would be an animal lover………………this is romney and the establishment republicans trying to keep out someone that would actually change things, look what they did to palin !!!

      Report Post »  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:21pm

      You only attack a threat! Who’s behind this? The Repubs or the Progs? Both have motive for sure..

      Report Post » ChiefGeorge  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:24pm

      You got it, HICKORY. Brings me back 20 years to the Thomas confirmation.

      Report Post »  
    • thetreyman
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:26pm

      good to see that i am not the only one who caught that voted for bailouts thing. also have any of you looked to see what the board of directors is at the federal reserve. some here make it seem like cain was on the phone with greenspan daily. if you dont know what they do look it up. it is not what the paul supporters want you to think it is.

      Report Post » thetreyman  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:28pm

      INCHARGE
      Wow what hate. I am none of those things but thanks for the persecution.

      MAC PAPPY
      Here are a couple links for you who doubt (although I stopped posting them because I thought you wouldn’t actually read them) so please read them now that I’ve spent the time to look them up for you.

      1. National sales tax article http://dailycaller.com/2010/11/22/dont-be-vat-stupid/

      2. Prasing economy and criticizing any who doubted its strength. http://004eeb5.netsolhost.com/hc126.htm

      3.TARP
      http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/herman-cain-my-support-for-tarp-could-be-a-problem.php

      4.Federal Reserve
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiAkeFJXwUk&feature=player_embedded
      http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/9207-herman-cain-denies-federal-reserve-flip-flop-economic-cluelessness

      Won’t post the links to the rest as they have been very recent and anyone that has been following the campaign should be aware of them. Their are more and better links but these are the best I could do on short notice.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • goodnessme
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:28pm

      Exactly – and Biden was the chief prosecutor.

      They are playing on a perception that Americans are so bigoted that they will always believe accusations like these made against black men. The irony is that it is chiefly the liberals (progressives) who still harbor these prejudices. Thus they believe this will work – –

      Report Post »  
    • FORLORNHOPE
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:30pm

      JMILLER_42 and A Conservatarian
      They are Ron Paul supporters they will kill their mother to get RP elected. Ronpaul suporters are the reason Ron Paul will never be president… nobody wants to be with them.

      Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:33pm

      Sorry for the word VOTE I should have said SUPPORTED. Now I backed up my claims. Please everyone tell me where I am wrong.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Talmid of Yeshua
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:33pm

      @ JMiller_42,

      How did Cain vote for the bailouts? He wasn’t in Congress. You’re smear machine is worse than the liberals.

      Report Post » Talmid of Yeshua  
    • slr4528
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:35pm

      If you read Politico you will see this is nothing like Justice Thomas’s high tech lynching. Thomas‘s case just involved one woman who had an allegation no charges were filed and the alleged incident never even was brought up during Justice Thomas’s entire career. It was only brought up by this woman when Justice Thomas was selected for the supreme court.

      The Cain incident involved multiple women and it appears pay outs were made. if anything, it sounds like Cain may have a Clintonian type history.

      Report Post »  
    • lylejk
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:35pm

      Your are either a too far Paul head or a George Soros plant JMiller. You have no creds; full of unsubstantiated accusations or should I say embellishments to be credible. Sometimes eagerness like your idiotic crusade can and does backfire. There is a saying that better to keep your mouth shut and have folk think you are an idiot, or open it and remove all doubt. In your case, typing your remarks that is. ‘Nough said. :)

      Report Post » lylejk  
    • goodnessme
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:41pm

      Let’s see… and even more irony
      What about Kennedy – yes, the president
      and his brother, Teddy
      and Clinton
      and …. on and on and on ????

      Anyone remember the Smith trial?

      The liberals protect their lotharios
      and dig deep and deviously to find a scoundrel willing to sell their soul for a moment of notoriety.
      their goal is to besmirch the honor and reputation of anyone standing in their way.

      This is good in the sense that they are showing their colors – true colors. They are most afraid of Cain – Most afraid.

      Report Post »  
    • thetreyman
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:46pm

      @FORLORNHOPE
      you are correct sir or mam. i personally have nothing against ron paul but his hard core supporters are so annoying it makes me want to never vote for him just to stick it to them. if they would tone it down a bit they might make some headway. but to insult everyone that doesnt agree with them 100% of the time as a marxist or progressive or warmonger or not following the constitution is why no one wants to listen to them. and it is the reason ron paul will not be president. they hurt him more than they help.

      Report Post » thetreyman  
    • Trenaway
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:51pm

      @ jmiller_42 Keep your Ron Paul cultist freakshow talking points to yourself. Exposing yourself as a liberal!

      Report Post » Trenaway  
    • tifosa
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:56pm

      Aren’t such things prerequisites for Republican candidates?

      Report Post » tifosa  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:57pm

      So far I have been called every name under the sun, but no one has argued any of my points (except for my use of the word vote instead of support) and no one has answered my original question. Why is this man called a conservative?

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Crakaveli
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:57pm

      Here’s some articles Cain wrote that show just how clueless he is on the economy.

      http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2005/Commentary_The_Media_Say_the_Economy_Is_Horrible_So_It_Must_Be_True.html
      http://www.mrc.org/bmi/commentary/2006/More_Economic_Bull_from_Media_Bears.html
      http://004eeb5.netsolhost.com/hc126.htm

      here’s the sales tax article Cain wrote.

      http://economicfreedomcoalition.com/news/press-opinion.asp?id=32

      Cain on TARP

      http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/05/flashback-2008-herman-cain-praised-tarp-chided-free-market-purist

      Cain on the FED

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiAkeFJXwUk
      http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/27/cain-annoyed-by-%E2%80%98stupid%E2%80%99-questions-from-ron-paul-supporters/

      Cain on abortion.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgKpZV39AKE
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WELkanHrSqw

      Cain flip flopping on negotiating with terrorists

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RtISrjYPOk

      I’m sure this post will go ignored.

      Report Post » Crakaveli  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:58pm

      Hickory,
      YOU NAILED IT!
      The SOB’s on the left are deathly afraid of Cain and now have decided to use the same method that almost destroyed a great SCOTUS. It didn‘t work the first time and it won’t work the second time.

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • Gerrymanderer
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:58pm

      Ugh. If it is true and the truth will be revealed (unless those alleged victims get big payouts from the Koch brothers). Then my suspicions are right …this guy is creepy, that is dirty old man creepy. Go NEWT 2012.

      Report Post » Gerrymanderer  
    • ltb
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:00am

      Liberals are such despicable pigs.

      Things the media ignored about Obama during the 2008 election:
      *He used to be a drug addict.
      *He launched his political career from the living room of a domestic terrorist.
      *He received real estate kickbacks from gangster friends like Tony Rezco.
      *He sat in a church for 20 years listening to a “pastor” who spewed hate-filled “sermons” about America and who preached hatred of white people.
      *He marched with the New Black Panthers.
      *His father was a communist and every single mentor he had was a Marxist.
      *”We need to spread the wealth around.”

      Things the media think are important about Rick Perry and Herman Cain:
      *30 years ago, on a 40,000 acre ranch, where Rick Perry occasionally hunted, there was a little rock with a painted-over racial slur on it.
      *20 years ago, two anonymous women accused Herman Cain of making inappropriate comments.

      Report Post » ltb  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:04am

      I fully understand what Herman means by his questions to the reporter when he asked “have you ever been accused of sexual harrassment”?
      I know because it happened to me. And the ONLY reason why it happened to me is because I gave a woman a FAIR job evaluation instead of an EXCELLENT one that she thought she deserved. It wasn’t until 2 years after the company settled out of court with her that we found out we had been the 4th company to have been sued for sexual harrassment by this nasty vile creature.

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:05am

      It is hard to believe the hate people get for supporting Paul and trying share why he is the best candidate. You will be met with such name calling lying hate, that you must know you are doing something right. If you would listen to those who discredit his supporters, you would believe that you should make your choice in a dark closet and make sure you don’t tell anyone what you know, even if they are about to walk off a cliff and elect Obama 2.0. Make sure you don’t show enthusiasm or explain why other candidates are not what they seem to be. Only watch main stream media and repeat their talking points.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:06am

      jmiller_42
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:37pm
      =============================
      Miller, you can list all his negatives you want (even if they are incorrect) but I will support him for the very best reason there is…. HE CAN BEAT OBAMA. None of the other candidates can claim that! And if they do, they are LYING.

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:11am

      CRAKAVELI

      I don’t ignore you!!!!! Keep up the good work! Eventually we will educate those who don’t know better and drown out the voices of the ones who falsely accuse us LOL

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • last frontier
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:12am

      Mr Cain! Mr Cain! do you beat your wife?………. No I don’t beat my wife?………….PMSNBC NEWS FLASH! REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HERMAN CAIN, DENIES BEATING HIS WIFE………………Stay tuned for moron this story from ed shultz.

      Report Post » last frontier  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:13am

      If and when this is found out to be true, I hope all you excuse makers find enough integrity to admit you were wrong and were fooled. You do not know what this man has done or not. Just as Democrats didn’t know what Clinton did or not. You are acting like Democrats. 

      We do not know for sure either way. If you read how Cain responded, he hesitated. Why? 

      Second: His own campaign said they were vaguely familiar with the occurrence. How are they familiar about something not true? 

      Third: they said the National Restaurant Association handled it internally. Isn’t this the same as OWS handling stuff themselves internally? The ladies will talk I’m sure. 

       This will damage the Cain train and if true derail it. 

      TEA!!! 

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • Rene
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:13am

      Yeah, lies. We know where that comes from.
      Let’s pray:
      Father God, You’re bigger than the evil around this whole mess, give us a man in the White House that will bring You back as Lord and Savior of this country, whomever he maybe. And God Bless America once again. Please.

      Report Post »  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:15am

      ILUVJESUS
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:48pm
      “…They think that blacks are hopeless dolts. They use them. I know, I was a Dem who lived in the liberal Northeast. Northerners are more bigoted than Southerners. Liberal Northerners just hide stand denigh it….”
      =============================
      I grew up in the Liberal NorthEast myself (Mass & NJ) and what you said is 110% on target. In fact I was surprised when I moved to the South when I found out that Blacks and Whites got along extremely well. Much better than their counterparts in the NORTH. I have lived in the South for over 20 years now and cannot remember the last time I heard someone use the “N” word. Up North it was a daily occurance, but it was always done in very private settings where the person had no chance of being over-heard.

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • macpappy
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:16am

      @A Conservatarian
      Once again, please post links to your liberal talking points. If they are facts then please post the links where you get them. I bet you can’t

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • Red Meat
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:20am

      @jmiller_42

      Too funny. These Blaziac’s are an ignorant bunch.
      Please add # 9. Cain believes 2nd amendment rights should be regulated at the state level. FAIL.

      Cain is a barely functioning ****** and now a liar.

      Report Post » Red Meat  
    • rc30
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:22am

      If they can’t find dirt. They just make it up. This makes me sick. I pray for our country and try to have hope when there is nothing to hope for. All we can do is keep trying and push forward.

      Report Post » rc30  
    • patriotgal
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:25am

      You know the bias in the media is unreal. They attack everyone but thier own. In 2008 there was allegations that a man named Larry Sinclair had said that O was an closet homosexual and that his lover a member of Wrights church was murdered and some people believed it was to cover up what the truth was. I also seen an article posting of the Globe on line that had the mans mother fearing for her life in this matter. So why is the POLITICO and others not truly investigating this? and only tabloids will raise the issue??

      Report Post »  
    • Rabidconservative
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:27am

      WOW, Cain must have destroyed obama’s election plan. The left is going to start that racist crap again due to obama not being able to run on anything else. Go Cain, nevermind these bigoted know nothings, you can destroy the nightmare that is obama.

      Reme,ber Blaze readers we do not need another McCain. We heard this electibility crap in 08 an that woeked out terrible for the nation. The canidates who the MSM are behind are the ones we need to run like hell from.

      Report Post » Rabidconservative  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:30am

      Red meat

      LOL

      HMMMM still no one refuting any of my points or stating reasons that make Cain a conservative. How odd that they cannot point to his economic or foreign policies that show his conservatism. HMMM.. Maybe because HE IS NOT A CONSERVATIVE, and maybe not even a neocon. He could take his same policies and probably do alright if he ran as a democrat. He’d probably do the same as Huntsman does for the Republicans. LOL

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:36am

      ChiefGeorge
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:21pm
      You only attack a threat! Who’s behind this? The Repubs or the Progs? Both have motive for sure..
      ============================
      Best comment on this thread!

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:48am

      You Cain haters from the Left oppose him because you know he can beat Obama.
      You RP lovers hate Cain because he’s getting more attention than RP, and Cain can beat Obama.
      You Establishment Republicans hate Cain because he’s NOT a politician, and he can beat Obama.

      So we are right back to my 2 reason why I will support Cain… He’s NOT a politician and he CAN BEAT OBAMA! You can now throw out any and all insults about Herman Cain and waste your time. As for me, I’m voting for the non-politician that can beat Obama! Everything else is unimportant.

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • NOT A CRAZY
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:53am

      I don‘t know if he did or didn’t, but Clarence Thomas was my first thought also.

      Report Post » NOT A CRAZY  
    • ltb
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:58am

      jmiller_42, Ron Paul doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in Hell of being elected. Give it up. Ron Paul has some excellent ideas, but he can’t articulate them well enough to an ignorant public and he loses a lot of Conservatives when he starts saying things like “Why shouldn’t it be natural that [Iran] might want a [nuclear] weapon?” That is lunacy and if you don’t understand why, you have no business being anywhere near a voting booth on 11/6/12.

      Report Post » ltb  
    • Red Meat
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:58am

      @thepatriotdave
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:48am

      You Cain haters from the Left oppose him because you know he can beat Obama.

      First of all, I am not a ‘hater’. Now that we’ve cleared that up…would you not like to hear about these issues now and vet them during the primaries or wait until the general election -or- worse, during the first debate with the Indonesian Imbecile?

      Report Post » Red Meat  
    • BigSky
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:01am

      @jmiller_42: How could Cain vote for the banker bailouts?

      Report Post » BigSky  
    • ltb
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:08am

      Whatever, Okie from Muskogee. The media all but ignored Larry Sinclair’s allegations of a homosexual affair with Obama, but you expect me to care about some off-color comments that Herman Cain may have made that offended a couple of ladies? I couldn’t care less.

      Report Post » ltb  
    • PolitelyPlanning
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:09am

      Exactly. Now I donate to Herman Cain’s campaign. Can’t wait any longer to show my support! The more they attack, the more I believe Cain is the one we need….or else Politico and the left would let him just be the “flavor of the week”. Cain is a solid Christian man. America was founded on Christian principles by our God-fearing Founders. So I will support the good & moral man. (The attack is, of course, what you can expect from progressives- every time! The progressives never fail to live DOWN to my expectations!)

      Report Post »  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:13am

      @The PatriotDave

      Cain cannot beat Obama…Only a wacko would say that or believe that. Cain will guarantee another 4 years of Obama….You supporting Cain is supporting 4 mores years of Obama.

      Odd you and Cain both were “accused” of sexual harassment and then handled it “internally”…. Internally is how OWS handles their street perverts….

      Keep up supporting Cain and you will be responsible for four more years of Obama…. 

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • Red Meat
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:15am

      Cain’s spokesidiot JD on Geraldo this evening. Doesn’t look good for Hernan.

      http://politicons.net/video-cains-spokesman-jd-gordon-evades-claims-of-sexual-harassment-settlement/

      Report Post » Red Meat  
    • mend54jc
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:23am

      @JMiller_42

      Your number 3 fact seems to be a little off unless i missed a point in time where herman cain was in the House or the Senate. Or maybe he was? Or maybe he was just so powerful that he somehow had a vote for the bailout?

      Report Post »  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:28am

      @LTB

      No whatever LTB…

      If we complain as you just did about the left ignoring accusations then to do so by us would mean we are acting like the left…..

      Look how many above use the “race card” for all these attacks like the left….

      Look at how many use the same excuse the left used when it was Clinton, “it’s just left wing media bias or right wing media bias” 

      This only shows both sides are progressive and have no honor or responsibility…..All either side is concerned with is besting the other side, not voting by principle and values….Game over….Have a good night!! 

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • survivorseed
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:52am

      Sorry JMiller, Blazers will support Cain with all their heart and soul right up to the point when fox news or that dude who got fired from fox tells them to vote for someone else. In this election cycle alone they have changed from Bachmann to Perry to Cain and before that of course they liked Palin and Trump. Unfotunately, they don’t care about policies or any of your stinkin facts. I mean, who would have thought the tea party would support the former head of an organisation they hate and want shut down. You just can’t argue with that logic.

      Report Post »  
    • Shiroi Raion
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:10am

      Calling people Honey was a VERY common practice for both men and women when I was growing up. Too many women are out to sue the rich, hurt Conservatives, and some attack every man they can. These women have perverted the law to label every stupid detail “sexual harassment.” I think most people don’t even remember its original purpose anymore because it was twisted into something so different from its intent. The usual suspects, activist judges and greedy lawyers, promote expanding the term to an increasingly vague definition.
      Example: My mother told me of a woman that overheard a joke. She turned the man in for sexual harassment even though no one was even talking to her. I think the joke was:
      God created Adam and was lonely so he asked God, “Could I have a companion. I’m lonely.”
      God described the perfect companion and said, “…but that will cost an arm and a leg.”
      So Adam asked, “What could I get for a rib?”
      My mother and no one I’ve ever asked about it finds it offensive, but apparently any accusation at all is good enough to destroy a man’s reputation (except that Liberal women often defend Liberal men in power for FAR worse.)
      On the other hand, a woman that I worked with directed a truly offensive joke to a man walking by with some soap. She said, “Do you walk around dropping the soap in front of the fellas?” The company’s bosses thought that was fine. This is far more offensive than the man’s joke.
      It’s a HUGE double standard.

      Report Post » Shiroi Raion  
    • portague
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:12am

      1. Wrote an article criticizing a national sales tax a year ago, then makes it part of his tax plan.

      correction “It’s called the Fair Tax. It’s as easy to understand as ABC!” quated from the article that is suppose to damn him. he is for the fair tax and his plan is mid point to it if you took the time to listen you would know that. Is he taking a gamble to get their yes anyone got better way to move us their because flat out voting up and down on the fair tax will not happen with serious overhaul of who is in office. On the fair tax ron paul even likes it is it perfect no is it light years a head of what we have now yes.

      As for everything else he was wrong. The question is does he learn from it or keep repeating the same mistake like most politicians. Everyone makes mistakes if he learns from it and goes down the right path it is ok if not he is no better then the other politicians.

      Report Post »  
    • red1
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:18am

      Cain likes women? How is this a negative?

      Report Post »  
    • mend54jc
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:32am

      After reading all these Post this is exactly why our Nation is going into the pits. The Republicans have lost there way. See the Democrats come together for one thing. To overthrow our government and make it a Marxist Nation of redistributing of wealth. I have to say i agree with both sides of the argument. This is an attempt at taking down Cain. Clinton can “I didn’t know have sexual relations with that woman” and it be just fine. Here we have someone claim not sex but harassment. But i also agree with JMiller if you are going to vote for someone have we really become a party that VOTES just off someone that can beat Obama. How about we come together as a Party like the Democrats do and stand for the same ideas!!!! If those who don’t like Ron Paul please tell me why? Or how can we stand behind Cain this early in the race. I am no different then you all i want Obama out. But aren’t you all tired of just settling for the lesser of two evils? Where has Ron Paul ever been on the wrong side of conservative? What are Cain strong points and where are RP. But to be as low as the democrats and start throwing out name calling at JMiller because he is stating his opinion you have made yourselves no better then the Machine of Obama. If you are going to have a debate over which Republican you like then have an honest one geez.. I like Cain and i like RP but i am still learning about Cain. The more i hear him i like him but i DO NOT know enough about him yet.

      Report Post »  
    • king1
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:44am

      JMILLER_42 either works for obama, ron paul or romney. or all cause the dems hate this man and so does the old republican establishment.

      Report Post »  
    • Detroit paperboy
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 3:21am

      I wouldnt care if they had video of him butt f}*#%£ing goats in a hotel room , i would still vote for him over Obama……. Proudly !!!

      Report Post »  
    • Teaparty-grammy
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 3:34am

      You can tell the left is getting desperate when they trot out the sexual harrassment charges. That’s like their final fall-back position, isn’t it?

      Report Post » Teaparty-grammy  
    • colt1860
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 4:09am

      @thepatriotdave Where did Cain and Paul rank in these Polls against Obama?

      harrisinteractive.com/NewsRoom/HarrisPolls/tabid/447/ctl/ReadCustom%20Default/mid/1508/ArticleId/870/Default.aspx

      rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/obama_39_paul_38

      whiteoutpress.com/articles/wach/ron-paul-wins-independent-voters-poll378/

      gallup.com/poll/149114/Obama-Close-Race-Against-Romney-Perry-Bachmann-Paul.aspx

      economicsjunkie.com/ron-paul-head-to-head-with-obama-in-new-poll/

      finance.yahoo.com/news/Ron-Paul-Bests-Obama-in-bw-3821734650.html?x=0

      latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/07/ron-paul-polls-just-4-points-below-obama-if-the-two-ran-head-to-head.html

      ipsos-na.com/download/pr.aspx?id=10985

      ephraiyim.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/ron-paul-beats-obama-in-head-to-head-in-latest-harris-poll/

      reuters.com/article/2011/08/22/idUS202725+22-Aug-2011+BW20110822

      csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2011/0823/Has-Ron-Paul-become-electable

      ronpaul2012.com/2011/08/24/ron-paul-within-one-percent-of-obama-in-head-to-head-poll

      ronpaul2012.com/2011/07/27/ron-paul-splits-vote-versus-obama-in-new-poll

      Report Post »  
    • realindependent
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 5:04am

      PAALEASE,

      I hope Herman Cain wins the republican nom. He will loose so badly it wont even be close.

      secondly, Its so revealing that not one of your true called conservatives can win your nomination.

      When the American people listen to your tax plans and your social issues they call your stances crazy or out of the main stream thinking of average Americans. Why is it that a true conservative has never been elected president? Your hero Reagan would be a rhino today. he raised taxes 3 times, doubled the national debt, cut and run from Grenada, and sold missiles to the Iranians.

      The every day working Americans don’t side with corporations. Think the rich should pay more. and think that the poor and sick should be taken care of by the government, and think roe v‘s wade shouldn’t be over turned. and that is conservative to the core. the polls back this up every time. unless its done by a conservative pollster like frank luntz. Why do you think every “conservative” that gets elected turns there back on your “values” 1. money 2. power. 3. conservative values doesn’t sell to Americans. So let your Herman Cain,Michele Bachman, or Rick perry win the nom. Thats just 4 more years of O’bama. And the American people will be better off in the long run. At least this President says what he is and stands by it, unlike your flip flopping nom. Which will be Romney cause the big money is now flowing to him cause your others dont have a prayer in hell of winning the nom or be

      Report Post » realindependent  
    • colt1860
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 5:14am

      Cain flip flops on raising the debt ceiling
      youtube.com/watch?v=kPI8h79cunk

      Cain flip flops on killing Anwar al-Awalaki
      youtube.com/watch?v=NPQw1xkAEow

      Cain lied about the Federal Reserve. He said that an audit would not reveal anything and that there were no “hidden secrets”.
      youtube.com/watch?v=q18jMzTWJ9A

      Cain didn’t know about the housing bubble
      youtube.com/watch?v=Tn0EApd5wgw

      Cain denies we’re in a recession in 2008
      youtube.com/watch?v=IWHCDharO_k

      Cain flip flops in supporting TARP
      youtube.com/watch?v=A2EqhZND1_I

      Cain for bailing out banks
      004eeb5.netsolhost.com/hc133.htm

      Cain’s real buisness ventures
      jayraskin.wordpress.com/2011/06/09/complete-godfathers-pizza-sales-figure-from-the-herman-cain-years/

      motherjones.com/politics/2011/05/herman-cain-aquila-lawsuit-2012

      Report Post »  
    • Teaparty-grammy
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 5:34am

      @ jmiller_42 who Posted: “It is hard to believe the hate people get for supporting Paul and trying share why he is the best candidate. You will be met with such name calling lying hate, that you must know you are doing something right. If you would listen to those who discredit his supporters, you would believe that you should make your choice in a dark closet and make sure you don’t tell anyone what you know, even if they are about to walk off a cliff and elect Obama 2.0. Make sure you don’t show enthusiasm or explain why other candidates are not what they seem to be. Only watch main stream media and repeat their talking points.”

      For myself, I don’t “hate” Paul supporters, or even “hate” Ron Paul. But I DO hate all the attitude from ya’ll that “it’s”Ron Paul or nothin’!” and if you Paul supporters don’t get everything you want, you’ll sit and sulk in a corner and let the country go to hell.

      I believe if every Conservative takes this “more Conservative than thou” attitude about “their” candidate and refuses to support anybody else, we are DOOMED, and after the election (if ODUMBER does not declare martial law and suspend them), when he declares himself dictator for life, and we are all in FEMA camps, or kneeling in the basement of the American KGB waiting for that bullet in the back of the head, we can all rejoice in the knowledge that we were IDEALOGICALLY PURE to the end. How does that make any sense?

      Report Post » Teaparty-grammy  
    • UrsaMajor
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 5:34am

      HA! Ron Paul supporters criticizing others for being blindly, slavishly devoted to their candidate of choice… TOO FUNNY!!!

      Y’all keep it up. I haven’t laughed this hard since Paul said in the debates that there were only a few radical terrorists and that they were no threat to anyone.

      Report Post »  
    • Teaparty-grammy
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 5:54am

      @realindependent whoPosted: “Why do you think every “conservative” that gets elected turns there back on your “values” 1. money 2. power. 3. conservative values doesn’t sell to Americans. So let your Herman Cain,Michele Bachman, or Rick perry win the nom. Thats just 4 more years of O’bama. ”

      Gee, another “more Conservative than thou” who wants to commit idealogical suicide and take the rest of us down with him. I don’t know how you can can say that ANYBODY who is currently running for the GOP nomination would be “just 4 more years of Obama”. We have NEVER had a President who was a Communist/Muslim Brotherhood idealogue in the White House before Obama, and I hope to God we never have another one! Any of the GOP candidates –even Romney or Perry, who are too “mainstream politician” for my taste–would not be “Just 4 more years of Obama”. The ONLY thing that would be “4 more years of Obama”, Skippy, is 4 MORE YEARS OF OBAMA. Keep on with YOUR thinking, and that‘s just what we’ll get.

      The simple fact of the matter is, this country cannot AFFORD “just four more years of Obama”.

      Report Post » Teaparty-grammy  
    • Teaparty-grammy
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:06am

      @ jmiller_42 who posted: “LOL HMMMM still no one refuting any of my points or stating reasons that make Cain a conservative. How odd that they cannot point to his economic or foreign policies that show his conservatism.”

      Gee, Skippy, maybe nobody can “point to his economic or foreign policies that show his Conservatism” because HE IS NOT PRESIDENT or even IN THE GOVERNMENT, and therefore did not HAVE any “economic or foreign policies”. What part of NON-POLITICIAN don’t you Paul fanatics understand? You burble on about him “voting for this bill or that bill”, but HE WAS NEVER IN CONGRESS! For somebody who gets all righteous and “more Conservative than thou” and claims to base everything they say on facts, you sure don’t have yours very straight, do you!

      Report Post » Teaparty-grammy  
    • decendentof56
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:10am

      JMIller 42………
      Then, I guess, Cain would be just like Obama when Obama placed his hand on something and swore to defend this country and its ‘living’ Constitution.
      As to his sexual-harrassment accusations…..the Dem-Socialists already approve of sexual predators. Remember Clinton?

      I’m not neccessarily a Cain guy, but this only goes to show the depths Dems will go to deamonize.

      I can just see the mealy little ‘journalist’ researching all the women who ever worked with Cain.
      There is NO depth to which a Dem-Socialist will not sink. This is classic Alinsky, irregardless if there’s any truth to the report. And….remember, there’s lots of money in the war-chest of the people colluding to take us to Socialist paradise.

      Report Post »  
    • clarity2199
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:10am

      It’s so obvious that the news is desperate to find absolutely anything they can against Cain to drag him down. He’s doing too well, and they have to find a way to stop him. I feel bad for the guy, but I’m sure he had to know what he was going to face by going for this. And you know if he wasn’t on top, you wouldn’t even be hearing this, right now.

      Report Post »  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:14am

      @Tea Party Grammy

      You sure are contradicting your stance on this page compared to your two post rant against Ron Paul and his supporters as seen on page 7….

      You obviously miss the point Herman was very vocal in support or non support of Governmental policy that can be heard on his archived radio program. 

      If you would listen many can show his flip flops with HERMAN’S own WORDS….You don’t want to listen. You have no values or Principles and are simply for voting against Obama, even if it was Satan…..

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • decendentof56
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:17am

      Hickory……
      Yes we do!
      Prior to my earlier post, I had not even read the above article. I then read it, and it told me all I already knew…..that operatives of people colluding to take down the US have been busy at work.

      Funny, isn’t it, that these same people did not seem concerned about sexual- harrassment when Clinton was ‘interning’ at the WH.

      Report Post »  
    • Teaparty-grammy
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:21am

      @ Okie from Muskogee who Posted: “If and when this is found out to be true, I hope all you excuse makers find enough integrity to admit you were wrong and were fooled. ”

      I will if you will, but I‘m guessing you won’t. Don’t get your panties all in a bunch, Okie–we’re ALL supposed to be on the same side. But that does NOT mean saying “My way or screw you”, which you Paul supporters seem hellbent on doing, even if it throws the election to ODUMBER.

      For the record, I do NOT like Cain’s 9–9-9 plan, simply because the spendthrifts in Congress NEVER met a tax they did not like. And no matter how sincere Cain is, he would not be in office forever, and that 9-9-9 would soon turn into 20-20-20. I am not in favor of handing ANY major new tax base to Congress, because THEY CAN NOT BE TRUSTED NOT TO ABUSE IT. There. Happy? That being said, I would STILL support him, if he is nominated, because those issues are things that can be dealt with. A Communist idealogue who seizes more and more power on a daily basis in direct violation of the Constitution and gives no indication that he will stop short of declaring himself dictator-for-life, with a do-nothing Congress that does NOTHING to put a stop to the power grab is not an issue we can fix with political debate. If our country is to survive, HE MUST BE STOPPED. FIRST we survive–THEN we can argue all day about tax code and ideology.

      Report Post » Teaparty-grammy  
    • decendentof56
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:39am

      JMILLER……
      I’ve read the link where Cain repeatedly says “on top of”, or “in addition to” with regards to a VAT, or sales tax.

      Remember, Clinton and Obama have lowered the bar so much as to belief in a president telling the truth. If you dislike Cain so much, then you must really dislike the above-mentioned devils.

      Report Post »  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:39am

      @JMILLER
      Make sure you don’t show enthusiasm or explain why other candidates are not what they seem to be. Only watch main stream media and repeat their talking points.
      ———-
      That’s what YOU just did, lamebrain. You don’t know for sure that Cain harassed those women. Settling an allegation doesn’t necessarily imply that he was guilty. It could be he didn’t want his reputation dragged through the mud. Which party do you think people tend to believe in a sexual harassment case?

      => “In jury research conducted in conjunction with sexual harassment litigation, over half of the mock jurors felt sexual harassment is “common in the workplace” and three-fourths said they would tend to believe a woman who claimed she had been sexually harassed.” http://juries.com/9701art.html

      I don’t know whether these allegations are true, but just how does a man prove that he has NOT sexually harassed a woman? You saw what happened to Julian Assange with those two Swede b’s who accused him of rape. And that was Obama’s doing as well.

      The difference between most Paulists and conservatives is that we wouldn’t be celebrating this story if the accused man was Ron Paul. Some of you Paulists displayed the same spiteful delight when O‘Reilly’s book was allegedly burned. You fringe libertarians have much more in common with the likes of Geraldo than with us. That is why we dislike you.

      Report Post »  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:41am

      @Tea Party Grammy

      Alright now we are cooking with Crisco! 

      I believe innocent until proven guilty. With that said being Conservatives we must be responsible in holding ourselves and Party candidates to high standards. We must be responsible in finding the truth in accusations levied and not be like the left and just say it’s the media or it a racial thing and excuse  inappropriate behavior as such. 

      I will gladly converse with you over any candidates policy civilly. I will not stand by while people simply bash 15-20% of the conservative base and then not understand why that 15-20% will walk away. We can converse to find the best candidate thru trials of debate over policy. 

      As I said numerous times to you, any candidate is not better then Obama. A Progressive Republican will be equivalent to Obama. A progressive Republican will simply be  Republican Obama. We will be in the same shape. 

      A 9-9-9 plan would destroy our country. It’s a policy Obama would come up with as union destroyed cities would receive a 0% income tax while those that worked hard will pay tax. I cannot support that or someone proposing such. It’s the same as Obama. That eliminates Cain off my list. 

      I hope we can converse without bashing and insult. I’m glad you are willing to try to do so. 

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • keaton
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:48am

      I wonder where the media was when Larry Sinclair was making his accusations about Obama, and his homosexual liaisons.

      Report Post »  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:57am

      @Kryptonite

      You lie. You do everything you can to bash Ron Paul now. You can’t even talk about Ron Paul supporters with out saying insults like “Paulists” or “fringe”…. You are a joke….Just like you say people do not have the right to smoke cigarettes. You never know what you are talking about. 

      JMiller does an excellent job of using Cain’s own words to show his inconsistency. 

      You come on and just insult Ron Paul supporters. 

      If you do not value Ron Paul supporters and simply want to bash them then do not expect our 15-20% to support your progressive pick in the election. You will not deserve our vote. 

      Stop bashing Ron Paul supporters unless you want to be bashed backed. 

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • loriann12
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:10am

      FORLORNHOPE
      2JMILLER_42 and A Conservatarian
      They are Ron Paul supporters they will kill their mother to get RP elected. Ronpaul suporters are the reason Ron Paul will never be president… nobody wants to be with them.

      Exactly right. I might even agree with things Ron Paul says, but his zombies scare me. What are they going to do if Paul doesn’t get the nomination? Stay Home? That’s voting for Obama.

      Report Post »  
    • rangerp
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:16am

      Herman Cain is the best thing to happen to the Republican race.

      I highly doubt he will win, but having him in the race is a very good thing. He is not a politician, he speaks well, and he says things that Americans want to hear, but other politicians will not say. He changes the direction of the race.

      The fact that he has gained popularity (and is black) takes much wind from the sails of libs who always claim that tea party folks dislike of Obama are based on racism. Kind of hard to call people racist when on of their top candidates is a black man.

      In the end, it will come down to Romney or Perry. Bachman is fizzling, and RP’s to far from the main stream. The candidate that gets RP‘s and Cain’s support will be looking strong.

      Report Post » rangerp  
    • KwikKarl
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:23am

      As long as he didn’t pull a Clinton, I could care less….

      Report Post » KwikKarl  
    • cosette
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:25am

      @JMILLER- Re: Point #3 on your “list”of indictments- In what legislative capacity did Cain “vote” for bailouts? I was unaware that he ever held public office. Please educate me.

      Report Post »  
    • jens63
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:30am

      If we are concerned about Mitt being pres, we need to unite behind one other in the primary or the votes will be so split up it will be Mitt. So is it to be Cain, Newt, or Paul? I like Paul’s hands off everyting approach, but not sure if he will make it to the finish line. I kindof lean towards Newt as a problem solver and intellectual of the “right” kind. He proved himself with the Contract with America in the early 90s. I think his “baggage” is not that heavy. As someone else pointed out the left has more baggage than anyone! This can be gotten past.

      Report Post »  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:44am

      @Cosete

      If you notice JMiller posted another post saying he meant supported as in used his radio show to show favor or disapproval of Government policy. Instead of posting about semantics, why not post proof to repudiate JMillers post? 

      @Jens

      Simple question and my concern with Newt: didn‘t Newt favor the Heritage Foundation mandated healthcare bill that is very similar in mandate like Obama’s? Why would Newt favor such bill then and then rail against it now? I cannot trust or support someone that does that. 

      Does that bother you? 

      Hope your day is great.  

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • jblaze
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:44am

      Smear campaign.

      Report Post » jblaze  
    • jens63
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:55am

      To Okie, will study on the health care and newt info. Cain is up near the top of my list too. I agree with Anne Coulter the skewering of Conservative Black Men….

      Report Post »  
    • DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:02am

      Herman Cain is a criminal. He has worked for the Federal Reserve which is not legal because the constitution was never amended to allow anyone but the gov to coin money backed by silver or gold. You can try to make all the arguments you want to support the dollar. Nothing you say, not one argument will ever change the fact the constitution forbids FIAT. Thus, you are supporting a felon.

      Don’t start attacking me. All you have to do to prove me wrong(which should be your goal, not name calling) is to provide the amendment that overrides the constitution. Do that and I will agree with you. Until then, either you agree with me that you support mob rule or you have realized you were wrong.

      I would accept showing me the amendment or show me the statement of Cain renouncing the Fed Res as illegal and promising to end it. Do that and I will vote for him. Any other argument or ad hominem simply proves my point. The Fed and current dollar is illegal. It’s a very simple task. Which one of you Cain supporters can stick to that task?
      _____________________________
      Gold is the currency of royalty.
      Silver is the currency of gentlemen.
      Debt is the currency of slaves.

      Report Post » DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)  
    • goodnessme
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:03am

      hiraldo -

      what an idiot -

      But that being said, if this were true, it should better qualify him to be just one more candidate or president, legislator, etc. with similar histories.

      Sometimes it’s okay – The masses condone the philanderer…
      Sometimes not.

      Do we believe it?
      Only an idiot who can not see how the media operates to distort truth would pay much attention to this.

      Report Post »  
    • greensteam
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:10am

      @jmiller_42

      where was cain when he voted for the bailouts. i was under the impression by ron paul fans like yourself that he was not in political office at the time. the ron paul fans assured me, that he is so inexperienced that he could not possibly vote for such a bill since he didnt hold relative office at the time. were we being lied to by ron paul fans such as yourself. you keep brown nosing that old crazy ron paul. i’d take cain any day over paul. what is pauls foriegn policy? dont go overseas ever! that is his policy. i guess he liked the nazis and the japanese surrounding us during WW2. there is no way paul wouldve responded to pearl harbor. he wouldve said, this attack must of been our fault and we should focus on giving the japanese back hawaii so they will leave us alone.

      Ron Paul is not one to compare. he mustered up 12% in one national poll. good for him. a new record for the unlikable looney alledged libertarian.

      Report Post »  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:10am

      @Jens

      I like how Newt can talk but that tad bit about the Healthcare thing check him off my list as well as a few other things. 

      I honestly had hope for Cain but I try to vet each of them thru their own words and I’ve found him really inconsistent. I’m not sure I could vote for him due to the tax plan. The black part doesn’t factor in my pick but I hear you on Dems attacking conservative “blacks”… We should not give it any thought. I hate the use of the “race” card. That is weakness IMO. 

      I am a Paul supporter. If Ron Paul spoke like Cain, man…Everyone would vote for Paul I think. 

      Thank you for being civil and respectful.

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • demint.disciple
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:14am

      @JMILLER_42… Agreed TOTALLY !! This is how obama is sitting in there .. Same type of man love.

      Report Post » demint.disciple  
    • Mateytwo Barreett
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:21am

      If you were a male- involved with business of any type- interacted with females in any form- – you were a target for sexual harrassement charges- no m atter what color uou were in this country. Rhere were possibly hundreds of thousands of these things!

      Report Post » Mateytwo Barreett  
    • colt1860
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:38am

      @greensteam JJ had already stated he meant to write supported not voted. The statement still stands true.

      Cain denies we’re in a recession in 2008
      youtube.com/watch?v=IWHCDharO_k

      Cain flip flops in supporting TARP
      youtube.com/watch?v=A2EqhZND1_I

      Cain for bailing out banks
      004eeb5.netsolhost.com/hc133.htm

      Paul would not have ignored WW2. We entered into war through a Declaration of War passed by Congress, per the requirement of the federal Constitution. Paul is not against war. He has said that he is for just wars declared by Congress, especially for defense, or for war to counter any imminent threat or attack. All he asks of Government is what the federal Constitution requires. He is against any President arbitrarily dictating the terms of War. He is against a Dictator and Totalitarian Executive Power that decides when and where to go to War, without the approval of the People, our Congress. This is not an anti-war stance. Paul is for having a great military. He is very strong on National Defense. He wants to cut back on wasteful Militarism spending. Bringing our troops home to secure our own borders and protecting our own Land and People, is National Defense. Sending our troops to foreign lands to fight for other Nations and protect their Rulers and Citizens, on our dime and time, is Militarism. Sending our troops to Uganda serves no National Interest. Uganda nor Libya pose any sort of National threat or risk to our National security.

      Report Post »  
    • Emrys
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:40am

      JMiller_42

      You said, “3. Voted for the bailouts, but now cries because he says he didn‘t know he couldn’t trust the government to allocate the money, but still agrees with the bailouts in general.”. How could he vote for the bailouts if he was never a member of Congress? Might double-check to see if he said he Would Have voted for them had he been a member of Congress. Slight difference, but a difference, since you’re being picky. :)

      Report Post »  
    • ExpertShot
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:41am

      That was my first thought when I heard about this story Hickory. Whenever they can’t find “dirt” on a conservative, they make it up or greatly exagerrate it. Geraldo could barely contain his excitement abuot these allegations last night on Fox News. A guest on his show theorized it probably was some of the Republican establishment who brought this story out. The progressives (on both sides) are getting really really scared & desperate.

      Report Post » ExpertShot  
    • 100 Million Patriots Standing
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:52am

      As we attempt to discuss the pros and cons of each candidate…there is one undeniable fact…Any of the Republican candidates that go 3rd party will forever be remembered as the person that most helped Obama destroy the U.S. Constitutional Republic – because a split Republican ballot will ensure an Obama win.

      The progressives took decades to achieve what some on here want to undo with one election.

      Report Post » 100 Million Patriots Standing  
    • tradexpertbuysell
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:53am

      Hey Jay Miller,

      Up your A55! How’s that for sexual harassment. Maybe you should review the facts about the harrassment allegations on Clarence Thomas before shooting your mouth off. Sexual harassment is a tool of the liberals to get conservative blacks back on the plantation.

      It didn‘t work for Clarence and it won’t work for Herman! Especially now that we conservatives are wide awake and fully aware of such tactics. Also Herman unlike Clarence isn‘t facing a room full of Democrats to get confirmed but instead the voters who aren’t as stupid and won’t be fooled again!

      So put that up your pipe and smoke it! Sexual harassment. When a liberal (white or black) says to a woman “you are beautiful” it is a complement from the gods. When a conservative BLACK says it to a woman “you are beautiful” it is a suggestive sexual advance and (of course in their twisted minds) a clear case of SEXUAL HARASSMENT! As far as the large financial settlement when one gets fired it is called a severance package which if anything shows compassion. But of course your perverted mind sees it only as a BRIBE!

      So once again “UP YOUR A55” and here’s smoke in your face to boot!

      Report Post »  
    • SamIamTwo
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:53am

      Typical of the democrats…and when they have indiscretions they get away with it…demoncrats politics are evil.

      Pull the plank out of your own eye…

      Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • JAYBECONSERVATIVE
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:08am

      get over your paulgasm. It would only take one disgruntled former employee to make a false accusation about Paul and we’d be reading about him. This happens every time a media darling candidate (Romney in this case) is challenged by a real conservative. I‘m surprised they didn’t interview someone from the library because he never turned in a book.

      Report Post »  
    • JAYBECONSERVATIVE
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:10am

      and one more thing, when he get‘s a BJ in the oval office and then lies about it to the nation i’ll criticize it. otherwise, it’s just accusations.

      Report Post »  
    • scwillard
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:13am

      sooooooo, Who’s the Anita Hill? and wanna bet that she works for George Soros?

      Report Post »  
    • Channel3
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:14am

      I will be sending another campaign donation to Herman Cain today.

      The more he is attacked and smeered, the more I will support.

      The leftist facists really need to get a new play book.

      Yes I am reminded of an alleged pubic hair on a coke can/Clarence Thomas.

      Report Post »  
    • Hickory
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:14am

      Oh my, JMiller has set a standard for Republicans. Oh well, I guess he had to find a group that have standards to slam. His group, the Democrats and Marxists have none.

      Report Post » Hickory  
    • robert
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:51am

      Unfortunately, the charges against him appear to be valid.

      But whether or not they will knock him out as the top contender remains to be seen.

      Personally, I think the community organizer will win the next election no matter who runs, because…again….like so many times, the Republicans do not have a charismatic, fire-in-the-belly candidate. Ron Paul is a good substitute, but he can’t get the Independant vote.

      Many people were appalled when McCain won the nomination last time, because he was obviously an empty suit, and his abysmal showing in the debates with the community organizer clearly proved that.

      Mitt Romney is a cut above McCain, mostly because he’s articulate while McCain is not, but he just doesn’t come across as a principled, conservative person. He’ll get votes, though, because it will be another election of the lesser of two evils.

      The party’s over, folks. This empire has been multiculturalized into a dysfunctional state and is no more than a conglomeration of squabbling tribes, each one trying to acquire power and control for its
      tribal brothers and sisters.

      Civil war is just ahead. I’ve seen nothing that will change that.

      Report Post »  
    • Fella
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:56am

      Dedicating this one to all the Cain supporters this morning…

      http://youtu.be/v4_M5PcJQmU

      Report Post »  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:04am

      @ JMILLER… Um… You are confused about your points.

      1) He was speaking about the VAT tax. A National Sales Tax is not a VAT tax. He was speaking about how a VAT tax would hide taxes within the price on various levels and that he was unwelcome to it due to the proposal was also including the current tax code. READ the ARTICLE. It clearly states that. His plane removes the current tax code and places the rate at 9% before adding a Sales Tax. This is vastly different than what you are implying.

      2) His praise of the Economy was based on the recent growth. You are bashing him on something that at the time he may have had limited knowledge. The issue with the collapse was due to the housing market and the collapse of the Financial sector. He was speaking, however, on the over outlook on the economy at the time. You are simply Monday Night quarterbacking on the economy point. Remember Barney Frank was stating everything was alright with Fannie and Freddie at this time. Though Bush and others called for investigations.

      3) Herman did not flip flop on Abortion. He was quite clear that while he is pro life, he feels the Goverment should stay out of it. This is not a flip flop, as he didn’t state that he supports abortion after saying he is pro-life PERSONALLY. So where is the flip flop?

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:11am

      AGAIN
      I should not have used the word VOTE, but what he did was even worse than voting IMO. He was so supportive of it, that he tried to spread the message to the american people that it was the right thing to do. So he indoctrinated his followers with this “it will be much worse if we don’t” lie. The same message the libs were selling.

      Thank you for all of those who think my posts (even with spelling errors) are good enough to have someone of such high character like Paul pay me to write them. It is quite flattering :) lol

      Thank you to the few of you who actually tried to support Cain’s national sales tax. Your arguments aren’t very good in my opinion, but at least you are debating on the issues rather than name call and moan. I respect that. I believe you are ignoring that Cain’s system would be even worse than the system he wrote about. But that is my opinion, and I think tinkering with taxes as the base of his plan shows his ignorance as to what the real problem is. It is not TAXES, it is SPENDING.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Veritas Libertas
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:15am

      I am shocked at all the allegations of racism.  This from so many who have been attacked as racist, not because President Obama is black, but merely because we disagree with his policies and direction for our country.  Look at yourselves, if you ever wanted proof of zombies and mob mentalities it has become us.  

      Someone even commented that if Cain were caught in a hotel with a sheep, he’d still vote for him.  I’m hopeful that was used for dramatic effect, but it shows the herd mentality that supporters of (then) candidate Obama when eyes glazed over at promises of “hope and change.”

      Conservatives, you are better than this.  Wake up recognize the facts and conduct yourselves accordingly.  Stop being Kool-Aid drinkers.

      Report Post »  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:15am

      honor007: So you are now getting behind a pro abortion sex offender former fed governor?

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:16am

      @ JMILLER
      4) The fed audit “flip flop” is a stretch. He stated he felt it was a waste of money, due to the fact the Fed has a large number of internal audits. He also stated that anyone could ask the Fed about how the operate. To his knowledge (as he stated in the article), there is no hidden agenda. He didn‘t we shouldn’t do it, but that right now there are more important things that need to be dealt with first.

      5) The Harassment issue is not a fact, to which you are referring to it as. You are seriously misguided in this point. Many people have been brought up on claims of harassment, but it doesn’t make the allegations true. If you read the articles on this, you would know the charges were based off the Southern tendency of people to call each other “honey child” and “sweetie”. None of the allegations had unwanted sexual advances, nor is a name grounds for a case. In fact today, the claims would be widely dismissed as false. However, this was made in the 90′s when society was highly sensitive due to Clinton and other similar cases. Rather than waste money fight a case that they could win, they paid. Much like Michael Jackson, it is cheaper to settle than fight it. Allegations are not proof that it was indeed sexual harassment.

      6) He could not vote on bailouts. He supported them only because the way they were written the public stood to make money on the loans to the financial district. It wasn’t just free money given, it was a loan from the Go

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:24am

      Johnny

      Cains article says the economy was moving in the right direction. It was not. Paul, and all the austrian economists, were saying that it was only a matter of time before we imploded. You can not read that article without thinking Cain thought we were on the verge of a huge economic boom. It is simple, Cain thought that Bush’s big spending on the wars was going to bring in a huge payday. Paul knew better, trying to convince congress that this endless meddling overseas was bankrupting us just like it did the Soviets.

      The tax issue, is ticky tack IMO. Yes he gets rid of the current tax code but there are A LOT of similarities to the his plan and the plan he renounces. He continues a new income tax, while adding a new sales tax. If you believe that you can trust the government with 999 then more power to you. I do not.

      Abortion. If that is what Cain means, he has a hard time communicating it. Paul believes the same way that you describe Cain does, but he comes out and says it. Cain just flip flops when asked questions so that it confuses the heck out of you. One minute he says that it should be left up to the mother to make that decision, but then he says that abortion should be illegal. Watch the Stossel interview, This does not sound like leaving it up to the states.

      Thanks for an honest argument

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • slickmeister
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:25am

      Yep – the old “high tech lynching”.

      DemocRAT (or maybe RINO) dirty tricks already out of the bag.

      Report Post » slickmeister  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:27am

      @ JMILLER

      As for your claim of raising taxes? That is not true.

      1) No payroll taxes would be experienced.
      2) An income tax of 9% would apply for everyone (which is the rate of Social Security and FICA).
      3) All deductions would be removed forcing a flat rate on the rich.
      4) The Sales Tax is optional. You have to buy something to pay it.
      5) The tax is not charged on used items (much like the fair tax – which is what Cain really wants).
      6) Economics shows that in free markets, competition is stiff and any ability to reduce prices and retain profitability would nigh immediately be experienced at the consumer level. The 26% variance in corporate tax, the removed payroll taxes, and removed luxury taxes would increase the profitability of all goods. Competition would mean that competitors would be pressured into reducing their prices in order to compete, else they competition would get an edge. The reduced prices would out way the amount paid by the end user.

      These are the facts of 9-9-9. It places the freedom of the taxes you pay, pretty much, in your hands. Don’t want to pay taxes? Don’t consume, or buy used. It liberates the market and the tax payer. However, the rates are subject to us voting as to keep them low.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:34am

      Johnny

      Looks like we are playing message tag :) You are the only one that is putting up coherent arguments. ( so far)

      4) The fact that he worked for the Fed as the KC chairman and still praises Greenspan tells you all you need to know. Saying that he didn‘t know about it’s underhanded dealings and the fact that he was so wrong should disqualify him on this alone IMO.

      5) Maybe I should not have included this in my list, but the fact that he paid these ladies 5 figures and now 12 years later says he “vaguely remembers” does not bode well. We will find out soon enough I’m sure. Even without this, I would never vote for him

      6) I have said numerous times now, I should not have used the word vote. He supported the bailouts, and admitted that he was wrong. He still, however, believes bailouts in general were the right thing to do. These issues are the bedrock of conservatism. I don’t understand why so many support him?

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:42am

      @ JMILLER
      “Cains article says the economy was moving in the right direction. It was not. Paul, and all the austrian economists, were saying that it was only a matter of time before we imploded. You can not read that article without thinking Cain thought we were on the verge of a huge economic boom. It is simple, Cain thought that Bush’s big spending on the wars was going to bring in a huge payday. Paul knew better, trying to convince congress that this endless meddling overseas was bankrupting us just like it did the Soviets.”

      Again, this was prior to the Housing crisis. Cain at the time may not have been aware on of the crisis. Also, no where does Cain state that Bush’s spending on the war was good. This was not mentioned anywhere in the article.

      Not to mention, you make it sound like the War is what caused the housing crisis. It didn’t. They are nowhere near the increased costs that have been added for the last three years since the Obama took office. The wars combined at the time were around $700-800 billion for 7 years of war. Not cheap, but the war was paid for and not necessarily part of the increasing debt.

      Here are the numbers on the cost of the war:
      http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/2010-05-12-afghan_N.htm

      Here is a story on the actual Debt spending and the impact of the Irag War:
      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/30/cbo-years-iraq-war-cost-stimulus-act/

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:44am

      Johnny

      I don’t know where I said that 999 would be a tax increase. I believe it would be for some and not for others. I would pay significantly less under 999 (until the government raised it that is) . Even Cain says his plan is revenue neutral. He is just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. My point was that SPENDING is the problem, and all he muster is a TAX plan.

      To all of you who read my arguments against Cain and immediately call me a lib, I laugh at you. Do you not look at my arguments? Why would I care that Cain is not against the FED, I should like him more if I’m a lib. Why care about promiscuity, libs loved Clinton? Why care about not cutting spending, the libs want more spending?

      Your blindness is mesmerizing. I have said more than once that I support RON PAUL. I am probably more conservative in my views than everyone who claims I’m a marxist or lib. I am for FREEDOM, NO GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • JohnnyMidknight
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:50am

      LOL… @JMILLER Yep… definitely messaging tagging.

      We’ll you are welcome to you freedom to vote. And vote for who you feel is best. If it isn’t Cain, than I can’t tell you differently, as that is your choice. I just need to clear some of the points you made. Yes he worked for the Fed. That doesn’t mean he is guilt, though. Anyone can raise a claim of harassment. He may know very little of the cases. HR generally handles these and will only ask him vague questions to get his position. He did not pay them, the company did. It could have been without his direct knowledge too (seeing as he was involved with the allegations.

      It is just unfair to place blame without the full knowledge. You have that right though. i just need to clear the air as to make people aware there is further information behind the story that needs to be released before we make a decision. I am familiar with these types of cases, and I am sure that he did not do anything wrong. However, if he did, I would agree that he will lose the race for nomination.

      Report Post » JohnnyMidknight  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:53am

      Johnny

      Great point. Yes, Paul recognized that housing was the main problem. But Bush’s big government spending overseas is what put it over the edge.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnuoHx9BINc

      You can put a learn as you go candidate like Cain in the office who will make huge mistakes like Bush, or you can put a guy who knows what is going on and can see things ahead of time like Paul. Cain is a follower not a leader.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Bill in Texas
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:54am

      Yup looks like they’re at it again! Please, give it a rest. The left is so despicable.

      Report Post »  
    • Bill in Texas
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:56am

      This is coming from the same side that gave us Slick Willy. lol

      Report Post »  
    • fcbs46
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:59am

      Because Jmiller: He is the only one (flawed or not) that is not a Romney. The tax plan is an idea, better then the muss up that Ron Paul delivers and would never get through as is. Every person has baggage probably even you.

      Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:09am

      FC

      Yes I have baggage, but that is beside the point. Paul has the least baggage of all the GOP candidates. Plus you say 999 could get through? Name 3 prominent conservatives who would vote for it? I hear all the other candidates say that it is majorly flawed. Paul’s plan has received nothing but praise from the GOP leaders, and even some from Libs (except the haters who try to say he is against education) His plan has far and away more support than Cain’s. Limbaugh and Hannity and others praise Paul’s plan, what do they say about Cain’s?

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Sheepdog911
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:09am

      Payments are made all the time to end allegations – and are not an admission of guilt. They also come with None Disclosure Agreements. Sounds like these two are going to be out “six-figures” here real soon.

      Report Post » Sheepdog911  
    • guntotinsquaw
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:15am

      JMiller…Cain was a volunteer to the public board of the Fed. Thomas Hoenig, who is a famous inflation hawk and president of the Kansas City Fed states :From 1992 to 1996, Herman served as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in the capacities of deputy chairman and then chairman of the Board. Fed directors are dedicated representatives of Main Street business, community development, organized labor and financial services sectors who agree to give their time to help the Federal Reserve understand the economy and to oversee our operations. It was my privilege to work with Herman very closely during his five years on the Kansas City board.

      I appreciate the opportunity to provide greater understanding of the role of Federal Reserve Bank directors because they provide a tremendous service to our country.

      The Kansas City Fed is one of twelve regional banks that advise the Federal Reserve Board and initiate changes in the discount rate. The Kansas City Fed in particular has a reputation for monetary conservatism and distrust of central authority.

      Report Post » guntotinsquaw  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:16am

      @100 MILLION PATRIOTS STANDING
      “Any of the Republican candidates that go 3rd party will forever be remembered as the person that most helped Obama destroy the U.S. Constitutional Republic”
      ———–
      That would be Ron Paul. No other candidate is so completely at odds with his own party.

      ==> “because a split Republican ballot will ensure an Obama win.The progressives took decades to achieve what some on here want to undo with one election.”
      ———
      Some on here see Paul as a messianic figure. He and he alone is without blemish. He and he alone can save America. Paul will lose and when he does they will commit political suicide and take the whole country with them. That is cult-like, wouldn’t you agree?

      Report Post »  
    • bigpew
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:19am

      His simple response to any reporter who asks him about this should be: Please, go ask your buddy Bill Clinton if he had sex with that woman?, in the White House! Then He can assure them that he won’t be getting a JB from an intern or staff member in his administration.

      Report Post »  
    • netmail
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:27am

      The country is burning down from corruption (and lies) and we’re still waiting for a DNA test to come back from a pubic hair on a coke can. Can we stop with the speculation, blind allegiance and condemnation and just get to the facts of the matter and deal with whatever they are? DEMAND factual details TODAY and let us move on from there. We are OUT of time folks.

      Report Post »  
    • OneTermPresident
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:27am

      @JMILLER_42… Pure Propaganda.

      Report Post » OneTermPresident  
    • noczars
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:55am

      @ Hickory = I just donated to Herman Cain and in my remarks I said the same thing. “Most American’s remember the lefty slandering The Honorabe Calarence Thomas”.

      Report Post » noczars  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 11:55am

      Oneterm

      This is not just small propoganda, it is fact based concerns.

      Even if you take Cain at his word and just look at his policies, just like the other establishment choices, he would not do anything to change the direction the country is heading in. He may prolong the decline a bit longer than Obama but his policies continue the role of big government.

      But even the things I agree with him on, I can easily find different times that he has contradicted his own positions. So which Cain do I believe? I would hate to be in the room with him and Mitt having a conversation. lol. I see the two as the same. We have Romain and not Romain.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • Welfare-Warfare State
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:02pm

      Cain supported the socialist solution of propping up failed firms, transferring debt to the American people and away from those who held it, bailouts, money printing, continued price fixing by the FED.

      We got into this mess by the FED’s cheap money/aritificially low interest rate policy. The interest rate is the most important price in the economy. It should be set by the market. In a free market this price would go up and down relative to the supply of savings and the demand for credit. Those who support the FED manipulating this price are giving sanction to central planning (an element of socialism).

      That FED policy resulted in a lot of debt and consumption financed by debt.

      So, what was Cain’s solution to a problem resultant from govt. central planning. Even more spending, artificially lowering interest rates further, bailouts, propping up failed firms, even more borrowing.

      Does any of this compute with bamboozled Cain supporters?

      Cain is not a free market man.

      What unconstitutional govt. dept.’s and programs has he proposed eliminating? He criticized the only guy in Ron Paul who nutted up and proposed a trillion in cuts. Even the fake conservative Limbaugh admitted that only Paul’s plan comes close to addressing the problem.

      Cain won’t change the govt.’s interventionist foreign policy. He isn’t a 10th Amendment man. He ignores the Consitution when it comes to fiat paper currency and the FED.

      Cain is a statist. Some of you are being conned

      Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:13pm

      Welfare Warfare

      Great Post

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • colt1860
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:21pm

      @kryptonite Paul’s top three donors are active Military personnel. They took an Oath to uphold the Constitution. They take their Oath very serious. I wouldn’t call them a cult.

      US Air Force $23,437
      US Army $23,053
      US Navy $16,973

      opensecrets.org/pres12/contriball.php?cycle=2012

      The GOP has been on a downhill road for more than a few years now. Rush has said in previous broadcasts that he would not rule out there being a third party run as an option if the Republicans didn’t get their act together, referring to the disaster that McCain was. Blaming Paul supporters for the failures of the Establishment Party is not fair. Paul does hold a solid base and should be given more credit or credibility in his concerns about our Nation. And, I humbly say, the arrogance of the modern (progressive) GOP to alienate and reject fellow voters that do not go with their status-quo will lead to their own demise. We do hold a Constitutional message of Liberty and Independence. Our mission is not based on Marxism or Anarchy in any way or form. Our true allegiance is to America. A return to a Republican Form of Government for our States is all we seek. We believe in the strength of a federal Union and will resist any progress to an all powerful central Government or National Union. Our desire is to preserve our American heritage and to return to a Constitutional Republic. The GOP has failed in all these aspects. They desire to lead among Progressives, to which we will not follow a

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:22pm

      I’ll bet Mr. Cain just “mis-spoke”

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:24pm

      *The GOP has failed in all these aspects. They desire to lead among Progressives, to which we will not follow along.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:24pm

      WOW, sure are a lot of posts considering we don‘t have a clue what’s going on.

      Report Post »  
    • jimjetearl
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:32pm

      I am with Miller Cain is a the wrong man especially because of his ties with the FED. There is only one real conservative in the race. He happens to also be a constitutionalist and that would be Ron Paul. The only one to propose actual spending cuts and pretty evenly across the board I might add.

      Report Post » jimjetearl  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:34pm

      Colt.

      That fired me up.

      In my best William Wallace voice “FRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDOOOOOMMMM!!”

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • offsir13
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:37pm

      Exactly, this just shows how scared they are! Herman stay strong!

      Report Post »  
    • tree65
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:39pm

      Surprise! J_MILLER42 is a Ron Paul supporter spitting out unsubstantiated claims against others. The statement that Cain called other people stupid for wanting to audit the Fed is fallacious. I went through this with another Ron Paul supporter (a close friend) who couldn’t catch the distinction in language between say a PERSON is stupid as opposed to stating that a THOUGHT is stupid. If you’re going to levy accusations, J_MILLER42, at least get your facts straight. I’ll make it clear that Cain is not my guy. I just can’t stand those who trump up charges to support their own agenda.

      Report Post » tree65  
    • qpwillie
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:42pm

      jmiller_42,
      So tell me how he voted for the bailouts. They didn’t let me vote on them. i wasn’t in congress and neither was Mr. Cain so how did he vote on them and I couldn’t?

      Report Post » qpwillie  
    • Kenai
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:44pm

      Who in their right mind could even believe what Politico says? You’d have to have kool-aid ousing out of your pores and completely delusional to even go to that website!

      Report Post » Kenai  
    • TheePolitinator
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:47pm

      Please don’t blanket people as “you guys”, I have said out loud, I have issues with cain because his stance on the fed, any candidate for the fed is against “the people”.

      Report Post » TheePolitinator  
    • colt1860
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:56pm

      @QPWILLIE Jmiller has already stated in numerous comments that he meant to write support not vote.

      Here are some links about his support for the bailouts.

      Cain said that an audit would not reveal anything and that there were no “hidden secrets”.
      youtube.com/watch?v=q18jMzTWJ9A

      Cain didn’t know about the housing bubble
      youtube.com/watch?v=Tn0EApd5wgw

      Cain, among other candidates, flip flops in supporting TARP
      youtube.com/watch?v=A2EqhZND1_I

      Cain denies we’re in a recession in 2008
      youtube.com/watch?v=IWHCDharO_k

      Cain for bailing out banks
      004eeb5.netsolhost.com/hc133.htm

      @JMiller Your heart is free. Have the courage to follow it. <–William Wallace's Father

      Report Post »  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:00pm

      I’ve noticed that it is rather difficult to get Christopher Santarelli to post much that is critical of the Israeli first Neo-con phony conservative agenda which the Blaze has adapted.. Why is that Christopher?

      I see a multitude of death threats to arabs and muslims daily but not much allowed crticall of our beloved Israel is there?

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • LifeDontWasteIt
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:02pm

      These allegations were made LONG LONG before he was known in politics, so they in no way had anything to do with something like Clarence Thomas. He paid them off – HELLO! I would never, ever pay someone off to lie about me* and am not impressed with the integrity of someone who would. So either way, is not a good thing.

      *I know of the one exceptinon: if I thought I might lose my kids over it even if lies, that would make me do anything, but that was not his situation.

      Report Post »  
    • chris.walker.pittsburgh
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:04pm

      JMILLER_42, you sir are dim witted and pathetic. How could Cain vote for the bank bailouts when he has never held a public office?

      Report Post »  
    • henryclay
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:08pm

      Kryptonite sounds like she is from the Obama cult. Kryptonite the bigot! Tells us how much Soros pays you to post here Kryptonite. 

      Herman admitted accusations were committed against him. If they were not true why did they settle with the ladies? I think Herm did it and is a perverted piece of crap and a fake christian who attended a liberal church. You CoCain people are such fools you would vote for Obama in a mask and say he was the best thing since sliced bread. You people are that stupid. 

      Report Post »  
    • BarbieDoll
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:14pm

      Cain probably made the unforgivable mistake of calling a woman “sweetheart” or commented on her appearance. In any case, I just don’t care what he said. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

      Report Post » BarbieDoll  
    • henryclay
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:16pm

      Chris.Walker

      Chris is to dumb to look at millers correction post. 

      Chris proves the point all CoCain supporters are dumb and like a cult that only say stupid mean commits. 

      Report Post »  
    • TPartyXpress
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:19pm

      jmiller_42 —- Does the ‘J’ stand for ‘jerkoff’ ?

      Report Post » TPartyXpress  
    • 2WarAbnVet
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:20pm

      Another “high-tech lynching” twenty years later.

      Report Post » 2WarAbnVet  
    • TPartyXpress
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:28pm

      @ jmiller_42
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:33pm

      Sorry for the word VOTE I should have said SUPPORTED. Now I backed up my claims. Please everyone tell me where I am wrong.
      ——————————————————————–
      The only thing you have ever backed up was a sewer system. Your parents didn’t have you aborted. One of the instances where I support abortion.

      TPartyXpress  
    • La Boca
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:30pm

      JMIller, Cain has a long way to go to catch Obama in the hypocracy department.

      Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:37pm

      la boca,
      I don’t understand what you are saying? I am not a supporter of Obama. I am not defending Obama. That said, Herman Cain is not going to be any better than Obama. Why would I ever vote for Cain? Please tell me that. What part of his plan is geared to limit the role of government in our lives? This is a simple question that I would think any true conservative would ask of all the candidates.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • weeblewacker1
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:37pm

      ya,this is a little old and out of date. need something newer! like how he has broken a crap-load of federal election laws this past spring and summer!! didn’t see that yet? wait a day or two.

      Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:44pm

      These are softball questions I am giving you guys BTW. Why do you like Cain? What part of his plan that he has written down, and you can post a link to, does he call for specific spending cuts? How does he balance the budget? These should be easy questions for a candidate that has so much support. I can answer these easily for my candidate, how about yours?

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • by faith
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:46pm

      On May 26, 2011 at 9:07pm HenryClay posted

      Romney is Obama’s little brother
      Newt is Romney’s sister
      Cain carries Obama’s water
      West lives in the wild west

      If any of these win the Republican nomination, I will stay home or vote for Obama.

      Now you claim other people belong to the “CULT OF OBAMA”

      Good job there cafateria catholic

      Report Post » by faith  
    • by faith
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:55pm

      henryclay
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:24pm
      cain probably tried to screw them like most piece of crap blacks do any woman that walks by.

      “like most piece of crap blacks ”

      rac·ism   [rey-siz-uhm] noun
      a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement

      Report Post » by faith  
    • henryclay
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:05pm

      Hey faith you are completely stupid cuz I said cocain cult. 

      statistics do not lie blacks can’t keep their junk in their pants you know it. which race has the most broken homes and least amount of daddys in the home, blacks. and as for the catholic part you do not no anything about being catholic. truth hurts sometimes and it must be said sometimes. 

      i see you have two screen names. what a sissy and coward you are. go play little kid

      Report Post »  
    • Hollywood
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:08pm

      The CRETINS and Trolls come out from under the bridge to practice character assassination. I hope there is a an especially hot place for then in HELL!

      Report Post » Hollywood  
    • joel beemer
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:10pm

      Yes, it is just like Justice Thomas. And it reminds us of the ugly truth about today’s mainstream journalism. The truth screams out after the deliberate character assassination carried out by a once-respected profession. I mourn because I earned a degree in journalism many years ago, when we were taught about the “watchdog” role of the press in monitoring the government. The press was given special status in the US Constitution, along with special trust from the American people.
      Our nation’s founders could not have imagined what would happen to a group of professional, responsible, truthful, objective, honorable people.
      Today’s mainstream journalists have become a cult, led by politically-correct elitists who reside on ivory towers. Because they are consumed by hate, they delight in character assassination. Their venom permeates our mainstream news media, which witholds real news from our citizens and feeds us trivia to distract us from the truth, and prevents poverty-level people from rising in society.
      I Hope Mr. Cain takes up the cry of many Americans because the time has arrived:
      “Hey you elitists! It’s YOU who are politically incorrect!

      Report Post »  
    • by faith
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:28pm

      HenryClay

      is a racits moron and I only have one screen name you idiot

      Still more insults from Henry
      Does that glass house you live in have any mirrors?
      And please tell me how you plan to carry out your threat.
      How do you slap someone over the internet?
      Is it Ctrl+Alt+#

      Report Post » by faith  
    • JMJ6391
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:48pm

      Exactly. They don’t have to prove anything, just put it out there.

      Sexual harassment today is anything “perceived” by the person doing the accusing. It can be anything that the person feels makes them uncomfortable.

      So if a man or woman tells someone that they look nice today and it makes that person “uncomfortable” then they can be accused. How do you proved you did nothing to what someone may perceive in their mind?

      Settlements do not always equal guilt.

      http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/sexual_harassment.cfm

      I am against real sexual harassment but it has gotten to the point that people can’t even say something nice to a coworker these days.

      Strange that he has been running for President for months yet this doesn’t come up until the usual Friday dump of another solar company going bankrupt.

      As all of you complain here about other conservative or republican presidential candidates that you don’t support, or provide links to other stories against the candidate you don’t like, and in doing so you are just playing into Obama’s hands and handing him the 2012 on a silver platter.

      Obama‘s campaign doesn’t even have to defend his bad policies because you are so busy fighting each other that you aren’t fighting him. All of this is giving him time to control the conversation.

      If you like one republican candidate over the other fine but quit smearing the others please! There are enough Obama supports doing that already!

      Unite, or we will lose 2

      Report Post »  
    • by faith
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:53pm

      HenryClay

      where did I say Jews are racist? I said YOU HENRY CLAY is a racist

      the blaze will not allow more than one screen name per email account
      I only have the one email account, so once again you idiot you have been proven wrong

      keep insulting me, and everyone else you ignorant half wit

      Report Post » by faith  
    • trickball
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 3:24pm

      Ditto!

      Report Post »  
    • Alvin691
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 3:37pm

      @J_MILLER42 You are getting your propaganda mixed up with other candidates and presidents. How did Cain VOTE for bailouts when he had never held office.

      Report Post »  
    • B_Obama
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 5:49pm

      LOL
      Did Jim Miller_ just say “Man Love”

      Report Post »  
    • techengineer11
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:28pm

      Absolutely incredible and mind boggling the degree to which you Neo-Con idiots have went in your pursuit of another anti-American Israel first fed lover to lead our country… You attack jmiller_42 for simply pointing out facts and even though he was technically incorrect on one point you attack that one point even though it’s true just not technically true???

      Cain by his own admission supported the Bailouts… lol You can’t deny it. He’s on record of stating it. He’s vascillated on the Life issue. He’s a supporter of the egregios and diabolical Federal Reserve. He’s for more War for Israel and the Neo-Cons, He’s for open borders…etc

      Now we find out that he’s also a sex pervert… Come on people! Get behind a real Constitutionalists’ who will fight for our Freedoms and our Liberty! Only one genuine candidate in this race and it’s Dr. Ron Paul! Vote for a perv and a Neo-Con if you like but I’ll vote for an America 1st candidate!

      Report Post » techengineer11  
    • JQP
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:15pm

      I have read many posts on many websites where RP lovers have posted and I have never read such hateful rhetoric as they post. This tells me all I need to know who these people are, and will NEVER vote for Ron Paul, and will be very skeptical of voting for any federalist. Thank you JMiller_42 for revealing what kind of people support RP. I think RP should change his name to RIP.

      Report Post »  
    • Jim AZ
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:54pm

      Most of you are desperate, and silly. Beck preached (at one time) the evils of the Fed. Cain, formerly in the #2 top office for non-stockholders within the fed, initially called anyone who wanted the Fed’s books opened as Kwazy people. If Beck had any damn consistency, he would fry Cain for that attitude.
      Glen says, NEVER trust government, but you want to trust them with a brand new tax structure, in addition to the old ones. Genius.
      BTW, Paul consistently polled as the only R to beat 0 in the generals–Herman’s polled ability to do that is new, and will not last–Because Paul is consistent and Cain is not.
      Call me all the names you like. Be anti-constitutional. Be pro-false-two-party. Be jerks. Be reactionary. Be unreasonable. Be unchristian. Be divisive. Be for larger government. Be losing the nation for your grandchildren. Dopes.

      Report Post »  
    • OmaB
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:06pm

      Alleged sexual misconduct back in the 90′s? Please tell me that thinking voters can see this smear for what it is and demand that the media stop persecuting every person who has a good chance of defeating the Obamination in the white house! No proof, and really, who cares? The same liberal media has been willing to overlook many indiscretions in previous candidates and office holders, much worse than a sexually degrading comment. I am an older woman who has fought for my equality with men and I think I am strong enough to get past a sexual comment to get someone in this office who can save my country.
      .

      Report Post »  
    • MySelf
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:29pm

      T0 JMiller_42: I read your links.
      Economy Link: Cain was not in the Housing industry, he was in the restaurant business. Like everyone else, the housing bubble hit him like a lead balloon because very few knew about the damage that was being done by the Community Reinvestment Act. Unless you were following the the housing market very closely, how would you know? Who suspected anything was wrong in 2006? Those whose job it was to closely monitor the situation should have, but he was not one of them.

      Sales Tax: The article stated that Herman Cain is against placing a sales tax ON TOP OF current taxes. No flip flop there. He still is. What he is proposing is a restructuring of taxes that provides for 3 and only 3 federal taxes. The federal tax resturcturing, which would dramatically reduce the federal income tax rate, would drive down the price of products such that adding the sales tax would result in a break even … the cost of products even with that tax added … would be no more than they are now. It also provides a nice transistion into the consumption tax only, which I am a huge supporter of.

      TARP: He admitted he supported it at first until he realized how it was being spent. He said that at the Republican debate … he did not try to wiggle his way out of it. No news here.

      Running out of characters. Will continue with next post.

      Report Post »  
    • Mr.Truth
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:57pm

      Yea we all listened to Rush today also….

      Report Post » Mr.Truth  
    • ClosetConservative
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:38pm

      JMILLER_42 must be a Rob Paul supporter.

      Report Post » ClosetConservative  
    • Cherieo3
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:41pm

      Yes, here we go again. Funny that the media can ‘dig’ but they can‘t find the time to ’dig‘ into Obama’s past…none of his past! Why is that?

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:07pm

      @MYSELF You asked, “Unless you were following the the housing market very closely, how would you know? Who suspected anything was wrong in 2006?” Well, a Doctor and Congressman (no businessman) named Paul was able to predict these coming events in in 2001, 2003, 2006, and 2008. All by studying Constitutional Law and Austrian Economics.

      youtube.com/watch?v=48Gfzgxh3ZQ
      youtube.com/watch?v=Tn0EApd5wgw

      You mention the national Sales Tax. Lets get this straight. The TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY Party was for cutting spending, not raising the debt ceiling, balancing the budget, lowering taxes, not raising taxes and creating no new taxes. Paul is the ONLY candidate with a Plan that does all of those things. Even Rush acknowledges this. Paul wants to end the federal Income Tax, end the IRS, and create no new bureaucratic Tax Code.

      ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/

      As far as TARP goes. Beck said that TARP was a socialism, period. It was big Government meddling in free markets, and giving handouts to private corporations, with our Tax money and leaving the risks of going into debt to our children’s future. Paul was among a FEW that did NOT support or voted for TARP.

      youtube.com/watch?v=NNzjor5oCT4
      youtube.com/watch?v=A2EqhZND1_I

      Report Post »  
    • dmgg711
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:59pm

      Thomas was a shoo-in conservative token for judge. It was what the Senate did to Prof. Anita Hill which was degrading for all women fighting against sexual harassment in the corporate world or any work place.

      Report Post »  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:01am

      To Okie and Others…

      For those of you that claim Cain cannot beat Obama are not using logic. So from this I can only assume that you are…
      1. An Obama supporter.
      2. An establishment Republican.
      3. A Ron Paul Loon.
      The truth is… Cain IS THE ONLY ONE out of all of the candidates that CAN beat Obama in the General election.
      None of the other candidates can strip 30% or more of the minority vote from Obama, and that my friends will be the deciding factor in this race. Plus the way this story about sexual harrassment got leaked now at this stage of the game is very telling. It tells me that the Obama camp is VERY WORRIED about Cain winning the Primary. As it should!
      Although there are many complimentary things I can say about Herman Cain, I have 2 main reasons why I will support him…
      1. He is NOT a politician.
      2. He can actually beat Obama.
      Those 2 reasons are enough for me. Everything else is just noise!

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • cyndlou
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:01am

      in response to jmiller_42 – where did Mr Cain supposedly vote on the bailouts – at his church, burger king, Godfathers or did someone sneak him in to Congress as a guest to vote? No one knows if this man sexually assaulted anyone – why won’t these women reveal themselves? It’s not like they are claiming rape – they are claiming harrassment and oh – they conveniently remembered when he moved into a front runner position? Not saying it didn’t happen but no one can say at this point it did. I’m smelling baracuda.

      Report Post »  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:15am

      Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:57am
      @Kryptonite You lie.
      ============================
      Okie,

      There may be once or twice where I have slightly disagreed with something Kryptonite has written, but never, not once, have I caught him in a lie or anything that resembled a lie. I find his postings to be truthful, factual, well-thought-out, mostly logical, and mostly Conservative. So unless you want to continue your slide downwards in the eyes of many of us here, I suggest you get that RP syringe out of your arm and come back down to earth.
      WE ALL KNOW YOU LOVE RON PAUL. And by now you should have realized that Ron Paul has a ZERO percent chance of winning the Primary. And according to a report that came out over the weekend, Ron Paul says he has no plans on running as a 3rd party candidate if he loses the primary. Feel free to support your candidate in any responsible way, but please don’t use the tactics of the far-left because you then end up looking like an Obama troll or trouble-maker.
      Play hard but play nice, and we will return the favor.

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 12:48am

      Ok, Ron Paul is a principled man. I get it. What has he done with it?

      Now will someone please tell me what landmark legislation did he write and championed into law in all of his 35 years as a politician!?
      The only thing he has accomplished in his 35 years as a POLITICIAN, is his ability to get re-elected year after year after year after year… Other than that, he’s got ZIP-ZERO-NADA!

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • gayla
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:51am

      Clarence Thomas was the first thing that crossed my mind and then immediately Bill Clinton. Nothing stuck to Bill for a long time and then that was rinsed right off. Wonder why it only works that way for the Dems?

      Report Post »  
    • One_Man_Army
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:39am

      Jmiller, you do realize that our economy WAS strong in 2008, don’t you. The article you provided even proved it. Our economy is actually still strong today. Even today we Americans have the strongest economy on the planet. It‘s just that the President certainly isn’t helping things. You can now mark that off of your smear list because that point is an out and out LIE on your part. Seeing how our economy WAS actually strong in 2008, how does it make Cain look bad when he said our economy was strong. Please, get a clue before you continue your idiotic smear tactics.

      Report Post »  
    • MrFungie
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 3:49am

      The only thing I don‘t like about ron paul is his claim that if he doesn’t with the nom. is that he will run third party… That right there shows A) poor loser status.. and B) that it will guarantee OBAMA 2012 victory… That is one of the things I have against ron paul. I also dislike his foreign policy.. I think it’s scary how he ignores everything and lets everyone do whatever they want. Now, by that I mean that I’m ok with countries doing stuff.. but not WHATEVER. By whatever I mean declaring to destroy certain races and countries (jews, americans) and threating those people and then building weapons and spreading hate around the world.. That stuff must be stopped. If Ron paul was to win, I would deffinently vote for him over obama hands down.. But I would prefer, over all the the other canadites, cain cause I like the stuff he offers. They aren‘t exactly what I’d like, but I wouldn’t care. For all the ron paul people, just tell him not to run third party please?? that would make me cry… And also, I laugh at the people who ignore how jmiller corrected what he said… just read a little down will ya? anyway, I know little about all the stuff talked so I can’t comment much on this… typical 20 year old right? haha. Anyway, I hope republicans get there act together and instead of bashing eachother canadites bash the lefts… that’s what we need. regardless of who wins the nom.. Can’t we all just get along?

      Report Post »  
    • HowardSternIsABigot
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 6:33am

      yup, when are we going to wise up, stand up, and push back? Mockery is the lefts favorite tool, lets turn it on them. Enough people laughing at the left and their pervert leaders, clinton, both of them, edwards, kennedy, obambi, what a joke the rapists are.

      Report Post »  
    • fiorgael
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 7:57am

      I concur heartily. I first thought of Clarence Thomas and all the good the publicity did to keep him from the bench. What about Robert Bork? I heard someone who should know say that he was the best candidate for the supreme court an absolutely brilliant man in the legal circles…I must revisit that. Sexual harassment is nothing more than refering to a person’s sexuality in word, look, innuendo, or request for sexual contact. A compliment is considered harassment. I was called into my supervisor’s office for complimenting a young woman on her appearance. The young woman had done a “makeover” either with help, or on her own and I was trying to encourage her to keep it up. She was offended. She misinterpreted my intentions by 180 degrees. So I am the bad guy.

      I don’t know where JMiller got his “facts”. Many of the unsuccessful in the world applauded FDR for giving them something when they had nothing with no regard for his sexual or emotional infidelities. JFK fell from my pedistal when I found out about his philandering. That did not have an affect on his handling of the Cuban missle crisis, but sainthood was out of the question for him.

      Herman Cain Says what I want my leader to say and do in the highest service office in the land. His personal life in the ‘90’s especially in light of the hypersensitivity of the time, is not as relevant has his ability to manage.

      Report Post » fiorgael  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:35am

      @COLT
      Paul’s top three donors are active Military personnel. They took an Oath to uphold the Constitution….I wouldn’t call them a cult.
      ———
      A couple of things to consider: First, according to that website, in June 2008 troops deployed abroad had donated significantly more to Obama than to Paul or McCain, like the article notes, probably from senior ranks. So I’m not impressed. http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/08/troops-deployed-abroad-give-61.html

      Second, although there is war fatigue among our troops, if Paul does not win most of them WILL support the Republican candidate against Obama. That is why their behavior is not cult-like. They know the Republic will not survive another four years of Obama.

      => “Paul does hold a solid base and should be given more credit or credibility in his concerns about our Nation.”
      ————-
      He does hold a solid base. However, in his 20 yrs.+ in Congress he has failed to get enough support from either side of the aisle to effect change. That shows a disturbing flaw either in his policies or his character or both. How then do you expect him to accomplish anything as prez? By executive order? Also, Paulists themselves discredit their dear leader. What happened to the “presumption of innocence” embodied in our law? So much for their belief in upholding individual rights.

      Left you a reply @Crakaveli – “Smoking Ad Is Paying Off” thread.

      Report Post »  
    • Pure American
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:02am

      How many times has Geraldo cheated on his wife ? Hey Geraldo how’s CiCI ? Geraldo assumes the man is guilty because he is black, pathetic.

      Report Post »  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:03am

      @PATRIOT DAVE
      Thanks for having my back, bud! Okie has some kind of sick fixation on me, ever since I said I didn’t want to debate a topic with her? or him, whatever. I just ignore, but thanks anyway.

      Report Post »  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:21am

      @HENRYCLAY
      Kryptonite sounds like she is from the Obama cult. Kryptonite the bigot! Tells us how much Soros pays you to post here Kryptonite.
      ————
      Hey, Henry, you sound like a hysterical Henrietta.

      Boob.

      Report Post »  
    • Jacque
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 10:54am

      That is because “they” are a bunch of racist who can’t handle a black conservative. Scares them to death to have a man who loves his family, his God and his country. They would rather keep the blacks down and angry at whitey for something that a black King in Africa started “slavery” 300 years ago. Slavery still exists in this world and you don’t see any black Americans screaming about those injustices and doing anything to end it, rape is occurring in their stupid “occupy” marches, no one says anything about that. That is happening right now today and none cares. Because “libs”can do no wrong, so just don’t report on it and it will go away.

      Why did the govt. controlled media hold on to the John Edwards story for 9 months while he ran for President? Thank God they are fair and balanced.

      You all are being lied to, wake up before we lose our great country to Marxists and slave owners.

      You are STILL a slave whether to a man or to a govt., they want all the blacks ‘to be slaves to the govt. so they can control them, they are so ignorant.

      Report Post »  
    • Jeremy_Eliot
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 11:59am

      I’m sorry but I think that Herman Cain is the straightest arrow in the bunch. Having said that, I don’t think he can win… In fact, I don’t think any of the current candidates can win. No, I’m not a Democrat… I’m a republican. Who should be President ? Well, if you ask me… the man for the job is Rudy Giuliani !! No, he’s not good looking… he does not look like a star… but isn’t it time that we look at the resume of the man and not how clever he or she look or sounds ?

      Report Post »  
    • Swalker
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 2:15pm

      This blogger has it right

      http://justrightofleft.blogspot.com/view/magazine

      Report Post » Swalker  
    • Okie from Muskogee
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 3:36pm

      @Patriot Dave

      No Dave, I will not stop going after Kryptonite until Kryptonite stops her drive by insults only. There is no Honor or integrity in that and I will expose Kryptonite in every post she bashes against the candidate I support. If you think that cause a bad image on me then I wish you could see my eyes for there is no concern in them of what you will think. 

      @Kryptonite

      You know damn well why I post against you. You just lack the honor to debate the issue and admit when you are shown wrong. Example one you think people do not have the right to smoke cigarettes. You post that and then run. So know if you decide to continue to insult, bash, ridicule and post lies I will becoming in behind you and exposing you as the liar you are. 

      Report Post » Okie from Muskogee  
    • colt1860
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:30pm

      @kryptonite Thanks for responding. I also left you a new reply @Crakaveli – “Smoking Ad Is Paying Off” thread. Let me know what you think.

      The article you have about Paul’s Military donors, as you said, is from 2008. Here is a recent and current review,

      ronpaul2012.com/2011/07/20/ron-paul-campaign-raises-most-donations-from-military/

      ronpaul2012.com/2011/10/18/ron-paul-campaign-tops-others-in-q3-active-military-donations/

      It is significant and impressive.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:34pm

      @kryptonite The only change that has occurred in Congress is Progressive. I’m glad Paul did not participate in any of those bills. He does stand out from the crowd and that is a plus in my book. You cannot deny that this Government has radically changed in the past 30 years. Paul has been the only one that has not gone along or compromised to advance this global agenda. If he hasn’t been able to effectively do anything, it only goes to show how moderate and progressive the GOP is, including the Democrat party. Paul has cosponsored and written bills to end the IRS, return to a sound monetary policy (as did Reagan youtube.com/watch?v=qxEq2LWUPzc ), get out of the UN, repeal Gun laws, protect Gun rights, get out of the IMF, audit the FED, secure the border, end Government run public schools, etc. All conservative goals. The fact that other members and fellow Republicans did not support these measures should tell you how corrupt and liberal our own Republican Party and Congress is. He has worked against the tide and has stood his ground. He has never compromised or given up. He will do the right thing because its the right thing to do, even if he is the only one. And its not to worship the man, but to respect his honesty and appreciate his stance against all measures to destroy this Nation. That is honor.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 4:35pm

      @kryptonite I do believe the time is right. Our Congress and Senate will be won by the TEA Party come 2012. As far as other Paul supporters go, this is America. With much freedom, comes much diversity.

      Report Post »  
    • stopspendingourmoney
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 5:49pm

      Well said jmiller_42, its like all of these Cain bots are blind to the facts. Ron Paul could have America out of debt in the first 3 years of his presidency, can you imagine what that would do for America’s economy? And that’s just one of his great plans he has a better tax plan than Cain, he is not a flip flopper and back tracker like Cain, do we really want another one of these as a pres I don’t .

      Ron Paul is still the man.

      Report Post »  
    • hikerblue
      Posted on November 7, 2011 at 5:20pm

      Where was Gloria A. when women accussed Bill Clinton?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsO_8xSB_r4

      Also…

      Gloria seems to engage in selective groping. ;)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lRGLjG3w3I

      Report Post »  
  • weneedrubio
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:26pm

    This election will be the worst in history and the libs will gladly destroy Herman Cain with everything they can think up. It is still more than a year until the election. It is going to be a long year.

    Report Post »  
    • dmforman
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:07am

      I am sick. The media has let the Obama, put men in Libya and another part of Africa with little concern or constant monitoring. He has put numerous people in position with executive orders and continues to by pass the Congress to keep his plans of destroying America in motion. His health care plan, has raised the health care rates of those of us who have health care to levels that my family and most likely others can barely afford, and who knows how much it will go up when it goes into effect. So far, we have had 20% increases the last two years. I know that my current HMO plan is done next year and I have 2 choices a nearly $600 a month PPO plan or a nearly $200 high deductible, and those are this years prices so who knows what will happen next year.

      I pray for our country every night and hope that a journalist or two will begin to see what is really happening and begin to speak out. Our country is really screwed if we are not able to get someone other than Romney in the White House. Something doesn’t feel right about Romney. Maybe it’s the media pushing him down my throat?

      I pray that Herman stands strong and is forthright and honest, as I know him to be. I pray for our country that it will be able to get strong after Obama has destroyed as much as he can, and I pray that more of the American people wake up and realize that our country is no longer what we were taught it was and that we must do whatever we can to make things right again.

      Report Post »  
    • GhostOfJefferson
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:36am

      I am NOT a Cain supporter. That said, I find that the Left is using the same tactics they use against any black man who dares not be a part of their “plantation”. They accuse him of being an out of control sexual monster. They‘re playing on 1920’s stereotypes and they believe for some reason that this is the way to go. If you ever need proof of the deep, inbred hatred of minorities that the Left has, just watch how they teach uppity blacks who don’t stay in their herd.

      Report Post » GhostOfJefferson  
    • demint.disciple
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:20am

      @DISENLIGHTENED
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:07pm
      JMILLER_42, take your racist rear end over to the Huffington Post with the other KKK folk…….

      Amazing , you do exactly what the libs did to us when we disagree with a black candidate (obama) and tried to shine light on his faults.. You pulled the race card.. Boy, the hypocrisy is unbelievable..
      So now because Cain (black) is your man now YOU have the right to pull the race card.. Get a life..

      Report Post » demint.disciple  
  • broker0101
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:24pm

    If the MSM had any credibility at all, we‘d be inundated by stories about the First Cow’s inappropriate and aggressive sexual behavior towards every stud bull from Chicago to DC.

    Report Post » broker0101  
    • BonnieBlueFlag
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:13pm

      The press had a systematic blackout of the absolutely true story told by Larry Craig in the 2008 election. Much more scandalous, much more convincing, but we darest not speak against the Golden One.

      Report Post » BonnieBlueFlag  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:34pm

      Bonnieblueflag. Are you thinking of Larry Sinclair? Or am I thinking of another story?

      Report Post »  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:56am

      The media also refused to go after Obama for attending a racist church for almost 20 years.
      We all know that Wright was the pastor at Trinity for 20 years and then he retired. His very first official act as the head of that Church was to kick out all the White members. Obama became a member shortly after that and stayed there until he was running for POTUS. In all that time he attended a no-Whites-allowed Church and yet NOT ONE REPORTER touched the story. Every member of the media should be ashamed of themselves!

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:11am

      @THEPATRIOTDAVE
      In all that time he attended a no-Whites-allowed Church and yet NOT ONE REPORTER touched the story. Every member of the media should be ashamed of themselves!
      ————-
      I was outraged that McCain said nothing. This time around our candidate had better tell it like it is.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:40am

      They did “the woman thing” with Newt too. Newt is so low in the polls, it hasn’t been brought up yet — but if he rises — he will get hit with his past too.

      Report Post »  
    • demint.disciple
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:27am

      @JUJUBEEBEE. HEY NUMB nutz ,numb nutz and the rest of you cain zombies.. He didn’t vote for ,he was IN FAVOR OF when asked his opinion.. Don’t be so stupid..

      Report Post » demint.disciple  
    • demint.disciple
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:53am

      @THEPATRIOTDAVE.. Hey moron I don’t like Cain and I think Paul is a Kook, so how about that ? You think that if someone doesn’t like cain that they are a paul supporter ? WOW !!! I don’t like both of them.. Bachmann is the real conservative there, and she doesn’t flip flop like a fish on a deck out of water when asked a question more than two times by two different people..

      Report Post » demint.disciple  
    • demint.disciple
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:09am

      DETROIT PAPERBOY
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 3:21am
      I wouldnt care if they had video of him butt f}*#%£ing goats in a hotel room , i would still vote for him over Obama……. Proudly !!! <<<<<<<< This is why you only made it as far as a paperboy in life, dummy

      Report Post » demint.disciple  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 1:01am

      demint.disciple
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:53am
      @THEPATRIOTDAVE.. Hey moron I don’t like Cain and I think Paul is a Kook,
      ========================================================
      And you are a rude little girl.
      My post evidently went waaay over your head. To help you with your disability I will type slower from now on. Ok?

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
  • Depressed_American
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:24pm

    Stick with it Mr. Cain. You have the Demwits and the ******** scared out of their wits because their man has nothing to compare to you. You know it is going to get worse, because their man has no record to stand on so all they know how to do is “Mud-Sling”……..

    Report Post » Depressed_American  
    • CatB
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:54pm

      Actually part of the problem Obama has is that he now has a RECORD .. and it is a sad thing to behold. Misery index UP –highest in years. Unemployement still high. Inflation rising. RECORD NUMBER of people on FOOD STAMPS. Home Forclosures still happening and House prices still dropping in most of the country … on and on and on …. MISERY!

      Cain is a man with a record of SUCCESS .. that is a big threat to Obama.

      TEA!

      Report Post »  
  • Leslie_Benedict
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:24pm

    Donate $9.99 to Herman Cain…if the $$ pours in, after this and each subsequent attack against him – the left‘s head’s will explode even more!
    https://www.hermancain.com/donate

    Report Post » Leslie_Benedict  
    • hi
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:34pm

      Great Idea!!

      Report Post » hi  
    • phil averbuck
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:41pm

      Great idea, done! :- )

      Report Post »  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:25pm

      That’s a great idea. I’ve been thinking that the little bit that I would be able to donate would be useless, but I can do 9.99, and if a lot of people donate 9.99 it could be huge. It would be great if Herman Cain could win the nomination on a 9.99 donation campaign.

      Report Post »  
    • GeorgieJo
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:43pm

      I donated to Cain’s campaign 3 months ago.
      The liberal left lynching has begun.

      GO HERMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • honor007
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:01am

      consider it done!!!
      $99.99

      Cain 2012~
      WE THE PEOPLE are tired of the silly games. Destroy the Marxist tactics. Kill them with donations to CAIN!!!!

      Report Post » honor007  
    • tifosa
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:41am

      Gotta love it!! ♫ “Don’t forget this fact ,you can’t get it back, KochCain” ♫

      Report Post » tifosa  
    • gypsyd
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:07am

      Already donated once, however that is a great idea. If I can afford it once my bills are paid next month i will donate $9.99 to Mr. Cains campaign as well. As for the allegations against him I will wait and see. Alleged miscondut does not make it so. I am a woman, I worked in a factory for years, and was there when a very nice man was accused of harassment by another woman. His offense he called all the women sweetie. He called all the men buddy. She felt harassed by the word sweetie? She was given a generous separation package. Why? Because he was guilty until proven innocent and it cost the company less to pay her off than go to court. She then went to another company and tried it again. That time she was fired for lying, to many witnesses the second time against her. That was in the 1990s(1994) to be exact. During the 1990s to many women used the harassment call to make a buck and didn’t give a crap about truth or the consequences of the damage to a decent persons reputation. I will keep an open mind.

      Report Post » gypsyd  
    • karenjerry
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:10am

      That was my first action
      Let the money flood his campaign

      Report Post »  
  • disenlightened
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:21pm

    Herman Cain predicted a “high tech lynching” months ago. Looks like the Democrat sons of George Wallace and Bull Connor are back, trying to keep an “uppity” black man in his place. There’s no word in our language to describe how vulgar these people are.

    Report Post » disenlightened  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:41pm

      That’s all he predicted correctly. He thought the economy was great two weeks before the huge collapse. Then he wanted to bail out the banks. Also predicted they wouldn’t find anything if they audited the fed. But maybe that is why he knew the assault would come, because he knew they would find out about all his dirty laundry.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • ILUVJESUS
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:51pm

      Amen!

      Report Post » ILUVJESUS  
    • disenlightened
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:04pm

      JMILLER_42, you‘re assuming Cain actually did something wrong just because he’s black. Hypersexual black, right? You people are so blatantly racist you could only stand to vote for half a black man. A fake black man who grew up in Hawaii and attended lilly white private schools.

      Report Post » disenlightened  
    • CatB
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:18pm

      JMILLER .. you make a lot of accusations .. anything to BACK THEM UP WITH??? We are waiting!

      Report Post »  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:50pm

      Jmiller_42. A lot of people thought that the economy was great two weeks before the bail-out announcement. That’s why so many people lost so much money in the stock market. We were lied to. Herman Cain, as far as I know, does not consult fortune tellers or a crystal ball. He does have good, common business sense and a love for his country. If you are so smart then why didn’t you warn everyone? Hindsight is always 20/20.

      Report Post »  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:20am

      I posted the links above for all you who have to resort to name calling and labeling because you have no other argument. I don’t have racist bone in my body, nor did I ever even consider voting for obama (which is a contradiction to your own accusation that I hate blacks)

      Oh, and one candidate knew the economy was going to collapse and has been preaching the truth since the 70s. His name is RON PAUL

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • tifosa
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:50am

      “was settled amicably between the parties” sure doesn‘t sound like it didn’t happen now, does it?

      Report Post » tifosa  
    • thepatriotdave
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:12am

      tifosa
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:50am
      =============================
      Most companies will settle out of court because it’s cheaper and they can keep the details out of the Newspapers. And it doesn’t matter of the accusation is true or not, and as I explained in one of my posts further up the thread, I had this happen to me. And having more than one female complain means nothing. Some women will team up to make the allegations seem more plausible. This way they get more $$$ in the settlement. Unfortunately most of the time these sorts of allegations are BOGUS, but thanks to Lawyers, accusing sexual harrassment has become an industry for con-artists looking for easy money.

      Report Post » thepatriotdave  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:14am

      Ron Paul also agreed with the 9/11 truthers that there was something fishy about 9/11. By his own admission, he has always been suspicious of everyone in government except himself. lol

      What do I care what Paul has predicted! He has never been capable of effecting change. The only change he will bring about this time is to divide the Republican vote when we need to boot a traitor out of the WH.

      Report Post »  
    • Vechorik
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:39pm

      kryptonite, Ron Paul agrees with 9/11 truthers? That is a LIE. You should be ashamed (of either lying or being so dumb as to believe that).

      Report Post »  
  • mattmo79
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:20pm

    Maybe they’ll bring back the pubic hair on the coke can line for old time sakes!

    Report Post » mattmo79  
    • Caniac Steve
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:34pm

      I had to laugh..as it reminded me of when “Arnold was a body builder and a film crew groopie accused the then body builder of looking at her funny…and mzde her feel uncomfortable back when Pumping Iron was being made…it turns out the woman in question had a boil like zit on her forehead…so what’s not to look at ? the point of that was..Now the Mr.Cain is getting popular…all the roaches,bed bugs,rats with fleas are all coming out after him..all because he is a “conservitive”..whodah thought ?? What a joke ..I gave up reading politico a long time ago…now you know why..

      Report Post » Caniac Steve  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:30pm

      I thought it was a Sprite can. . it didn‘t work then and it won’t work now. Herman Cain is a good man.

      Report Post »  
  • trolltrainer
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:20pm

    When asked by a reporter, Herman Cain responded, “When Herman Cain asks if you want to see his whopper it does not mean that Herman Cain wants it his way. Yes, I’m rolling in it. This is my juice and I’m hungry. Hermain Cain supports big potato moths. 999 y’all. Peace.”

    Report Post »  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:32am

      This post is beneath and unlike you Trolltrainer. You do know women read the Blaze right? I expect it from some others but not from you.

      Report Post »  
    • tifosa
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:58am

      MIMI, you call TT out but give BROKER101′s disgusting comment (”… stories about the First Cow’s inappropriate and aggressive sexual behavior towards every stud bull from Chicago to DC”) a pass?

      Report Post » tifosa  
    • ustabhip
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:24am

      LOL now THATS funny!

      Report Post » ustabhip  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:32am

      Tifosa. I don‘t read broker101’s posts. They give me nosebleeds. Not giving a pass. I like Trolltrainer. His posts are usually spot on.

      Report Post »  
    • macpappy
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:50am

      @Mimi24
      Like you I read TT’s post most all the time. However, this time I think you are OK, cuz I didn’t understand a word of it. The joke flew right over my head……don’t worry tho, I don’t want a translation. I think TT was just having fun.

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • Mohawk1773
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:06pm

      LOL! Props TT, I don’t see what the big deal is, y’all need to lighten up. He’s just running with the BLR spot on Cain.

      You know, Mr. Cain said that he was going to bring a sense of humor to the White House.

      What are we if we can’t laugh once in a while? Who the hell is laughing with Obama in office? No one except snarky little trolls like TIFOSA the fake a$$ fairy. You watch that BLR spot on Obama TIFOSA, watch it closely… Trick The Bridesmaid.

      Peace.

      Report Post » Mohawk1773  
  • beboc1
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:20pm

    In a world where we have to watch ads on TV about ED, ******, orgasm creams, dick exrenders, colon blow potions, etc., hearing this kind of tripe from the left means nothing. If their morals (HAH!) are so sensitive then they can clean up the net & airwaves. As a matter of fact, this kind of mud slinging will only serve to help Cain. It opens up the Clinton BJ for comparison. I just find it hard to believe how really dumb these rabid lefties are.

    Report Post »  
    • demint.disciple
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:40am

      @CRAKAVELI.. Only ignored by the massive Cain bots we have running around on this site.. I took notice, I also knew most of it but the terrorist negotiations I missed and thanks for sharing… This guy says what people want him to say it all depends on who he is talking to and when station he is on..

      Report Post » demint.disciple  
    • TPartyXpress
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:23pm

      @ TIFOSA — Nobody takes you Commie rhetoric seriously, so why don’t you just FO ?

      Report Post » TPartyXpress  
  • broker0101
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:20pm

    Seriously? You Beck-Bot Simpletons are taken aback by this kind of lame hit-piece? Seriously? If Beck isn’t smart enough to have warned you repeatedly that this IS the 2012 Obama campaign platform, then shame on Him for missing a HUGE business opportunity and shame on you for not having minds of your own.

    Report Post » broker0101  
    • macpappy
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:38pm

      I think I hear your mother calling you.

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • NOTAMUSHROOM
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:40pm

      Umm yeah. Beck did mention this many many times. Actually he’s the one who exposed the Saul Alinsky “isolate, marginalize and ridicule” tactics of the left.

      Report Post »  
    • SerikFox
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:23pm

      @notamushroom That fits pretty well. Step 1 “not authentically black”. Step 2 “we all know it’ll be Romney; Cain has no political experience”. Step 3 “He doesn‘t know what he’s doing; he’s a flip flopper; someone accused him of sexual harrassment sometime ago for money, it’s not like that ever happens”.

      Report Post »  
    • GeorgieJo
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:52pm

      RATHER BE A BECK BOT than a
      ROTTEN OBUMMER WORSHIPER……………

      Just Sayin’

      Report Post »  
    • DAGNY
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:14am

      Why are we Beck Bots but you’re here for every article and you are what? Superior and free-thinking. Your name calling cancels out anything intelligent you might actually say some day.

      Report Post »  
    • tifosa
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:59am

      “Beck…Actually he’s the one who exposed the Saul Alinsky “isolate, marginalize and ridicule” tactics of the left”
      The left, really? That’s EXACTLY the Beck tactic. This entire site is built on that, as is Fox. If the koolaid tastes funny, stop drinking it.

      Report Post » tifosa  
    • Mohawk1773
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 8:24pm

      @tifosa — There you go again TIFOSA. You are not really that ill-informed are you? You do know that Saul Alinsky was a leftist radical, right? You do know that Hillary studied under Uncle Saul, right? You do know that Obama trained as a Community Organizer in the Saul Alinsky tradition in Chicago, right?

      Please tell me you are not that oblivious. Oh that’s right, you can’t give up the game or the game is lost.

      Ain’t that right?

      Report Post » Mohawk1773  
  • 420 Patriot
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:15pm

    The last thing we need is to listen to the media and their “what if” news coverage. The only way to make an informed decision on anything, is to be informed. We must wait until all facts are out and all accusations have bee investigated completely before jumping to conclusions. I am not for Cain, I am for Paul, but I do not like jumping to conclusions about anything and wait to study the facts.

    Report Post »  
    • macpappy
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:49pm

      Would you vote Paul if he went Independent? That will be the easiest way for the Dems to win.

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • 420 Patriot
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:09pm

      @Mac
      Remember, you asked.
      Ron Paul and his supporters have an agenda; to get back the Individual Liberties we have lost over the decades. Ron Paul has stood up against lobbyists. They do not even approach him. Every vote he has done was based on Constitutional principles. He gives back money not needed in his district every year to the Treasury. He will only accept approx. $39,000.00 in salary for the office of President as that is the median wage of the average American. He fights our defunct Congress on Unconstitutional bills constantly to try and protect our freedoms. He had successful legislation to prevent eminent domain and transfer the ownership of a dam from the Fed Gov to the Texas Gov. He has helped to prohibit funding for a Natl I.D. card, the list goes on and on on how he tries to protect liberty and state’s rights. The Constitution! Go to the Congress website and check his voting record. He speaks the truth (found very little in Washington anymore) even though no one wants to hear the truth. I do not know anyone who could be considered closer to George Washington in the way he feels about his country. How long is everyone willing to wait for a George Washington? This election (if we have one) may be our last chance to protect our liberties from being gone forever. I just cannot believe that everyone does not see this!!?
      It will be the NEOCON/RINO votes that would do just what you say. We need to take back liberty not put another twist on taxation.

      Report Post »  
    • A Conservatarian
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:14pm

      Knocked it out of the park 420, cheers!

      Report Post » A Conservatarian  
    • 420 Patriot
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:24pm

      Thanks fellow conservative. I believe there are many out there that think they know liberty, but do not really know the Philosophy of Liberty. All can find out if they know by going here and watching this short clip:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muHg86Mys7I

      Report Post »  
    • 13th Imam
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:03am

      A Ron Paul circle jerk

      Report Post » 13th Imam  
    • macpappy
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:26am

      @420
      Yeah, I asked. You see I’m from Pauls district, I have voted for him for everytime. I think he is the most conservative candidate too. However, if he leaves the party he will draw so many votes from both conservatives and liberals that he will ensure the re-election of Obama. I will vote Paul in the primary, but if he leaves the reservation, he will never win the general election. I am not surprised that you can not believe that everyone does not agree with you; that 420 does that to you.

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • 420 Patriot
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:56am

      @Mac
      I am guessing that you are implying that I smoke the whacky weed, as you probably put it, but sorry to disappoint you, I put this handle on because my son asked me to. I am a caregiver, you see, I do not smoke but care for my son with his medical marijuana program. He suffers from seizures due to a traumatic brain injury. His Neurologist put him on marijuana when the other medicines were not working. He was having 2-3 seizures per month before marijuana, and now he only has one every 8-9 months. I consider myself very intelligent as I studied law with a 3.87 GPA and am a member of the natl. Society of Collegiate Scholars. What was your GPA?

      Report Post »  
    • 420 Patriot
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:14am

      @13th Imam
      Well, your name says it all.

      Report Post »  
    • UrsaMajor
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 5:48am

      “He speaks the truth…” like how Iran and Radical Islam is not a threat to us?

      As much as I absolutely love Ron Paul’s stand on domestic issues, he is as blind and dangerous as Prime Minister Chamberlain was when it comes to recognizing Evil.

      Report Post »  
    • kryptonite
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:42am

      420 Patriot
      @13th Imam
      Well, your name says it all.
      ———-
      Didn’t you just set someone straight on the real meaning of your name?

      Report Post »  
  • lylejk
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:15pm

    Talk about ugly Neocons digging up anything to stop Cain. My guts telling me this is either a Romney or Perry attack. The only candidate that has free money to do this attack is Romney since Perry has other issues that he need to save his money to do. Even the allegation, when researched, is lame in comparison to what we consider a scandel today, but of course the neocons don’t want Cain to win. I don’t blame the Dems on this one; this is definitely an attack from the Republican neocons knowing that Cain will be the potus if they don’t do anything. I wonder what Carl Rove’s part in this attack is? Mr. Cain; you just hang in there. The people know you are the best candidate within the group running now but so does the neocons. I have your back and so do millions more. :)

    Report Post » lylejk  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:24pm

      Cain IS a neocon

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • JustPeachy
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:30pm

      I‘m thinkin’ George Soros!

      Report Post » JustPeachy  
    • NOTAMUSHROOM
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:38pm

      I think you mean the Neo COMs!!!

      Report Post »  
    • Islesfordian
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:42pm

      Jmiller,
      Do you even know what a Neocon is?

      Report Post » Islesfordian  
    • jmiller_42
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:03pm

      Isles
      Yes, do you?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism

      Cain Voted for bailouts
      Is for policing the world
      Does not have a spending cut plan, but elects to rearrange deck chairs on the titanic by messing with the taxes, while wanting to keep the FED.

      Sounds like a neocon to me. Please educate me otherwise.

      Report Post » jmiller_42  
    • 420 Patriot
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:12pm

      @JMiller
      You are right on!

      Report Post »  
    • lylejk
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:25pm

      Since when could Cain vote for any thing related to the job that Congress is responsible for Miller? Cain’s never held public office; just wanted to make sure that you knew this. ‘Nough said. :)

      Report Post » lylejk  
    • jujubeebee
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:27pm

      JMiller is drinking something or a coke head like Obama. If Republicans want to sling mud there is plenty of it to shove in Obama’s face. He has been protected by the main stream media but if they want to play ugly……..then let the games begin! There is plenty of truth to tell about the lying community aggistator in chief!

      Report Post »  
    • slr4528
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:45pm

      I would venture to guess it was a Perry not Romney. Perry is famous for his scorched earth politics. Romney’s being attacked by Perry,Obama,Rush,Levin,Beck,George Will,Brit Hume,Mike wallace and anything Fox, and Bachman just was attacked she claimed by one of Perry’s tea party members. They told her to get out of the race and made it appear that the message was coming from the national tea party. Perry is one dirty dog.

      Report Post »  
    • booger71
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:51pm

      Ron Paul is egotistical enough to run a an independent when he does not get the nomination. This will give the presidency back to Barry.

      Report Post » booger71  
    • lylejk
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:48am

      Based on the Paul supporters attacking Cain article and also the vitriol by the Paul supporters on this thread, now I‘m thinking maybe someone Paul’s committee is spreading this news. Paul would have the most to gain since Cain is getting most of the Tea Party support right now. Hmmmmm.

      Also, to those that commented why Cains rep wouldn’t answer Geraldo, it may be because he doesn’t know. It may also be because for legal reasons he can’t. Note that the only conspircy minded folks that tout this diatribe are the Paul guys again. I’m just stating what this story is leading into. :)

      Report Post » lylejk  
    • Islesfordian
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 8:42am

      Jmiller,
      I don’t need to go to wikipedia for my definition. became a conservative when that term was coming into fashion. But it was the older conseravtism of Buckley and Reagan that brought me out of liberalism.

      Neoconservatives are noted for their hawkishness on foreign policy with tolerance for mild liberal approaches on social policy. Cain has always been stronger on conservative social values while rather vague on foreign piolicy. The total opposite of the Neocon template. So unless you pick up the leftist use of “Neocon” as a pejorative and then attach it to those policies you are really obsessed about the descrtiption of him as a neoconservative makes no sense.

      Report Post » Islesfordian  
  • TeaPartyanimal
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:15pm

    Well, lets hear what these two women have to say?

    Karl Rove is loving this.

    But it wont work. Geraldo Rivera is loving reporting this too. But every time they attack Herman, it will come back to make it even worse.

    When skull dugery backfires, then people get pissed. These times are very important and Obama team is scared shirtless of Herman. This is nothing but opposition coming out of the woodwork. This is Clarence Thomas in the flesh.

    Its absolutely disgustin. But hey, Paulbots will have something to talk about for a while chasing non facts and inuendos again.

    Report Post » TeaPartyanimal  
    • Billofrights
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 1:36am

      I find it interesting that Friday when we were duking it out with the RonPaulotrons they didn’t know then that the mainstream media was about to launch a sex scandal attack. And now that the story breaks these libertarians try to tell us that Cain’s alleged misconduct is just another one of the many facts on their list of (100% truthful) allegations. Sadly, I think these Ron Paul fans are really just showing their butts. It‘s also starting to look like the whole libertarian thing where it’s all; hey man do whatever you want as long as you clean up the mess and everyone’s a consenting adult thing; also means (that the ends justify the means). That‘s too bad because what it really means is that just like dealing with leftists we can’t count on these guys being genuine. Which of course means we can‘t have a dialogue with them and I can’t learn from them and they can’t learn from me (of course I realize that your average Ron Paul fan has nothing to learn from me). Which of course is another thing these guys have in common with the lefties. I think all this points to the biggest problem I have with libertarians and that his morals and moral standards. I get the fiscal arguments they have; which is why at one time I called myself a libertarian but most fail to realize there’s true evil the world. And that a society with no social standards except “of course” individual responsibility; would last maybe hours. Here’s a link for all to check out. http://www.wallbuilders.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 4:27am

      @Billofrights I agree with the wallbuilders site. I’ve know about them for a long time now. Paul would be the closest to restoring America. Practically all these drugs today, be it hemp, cocaine, poppy, whatever, were legal during the times of the founding fathers. In fact, most of them would accuse each other of being on some sort of drug like poppy or something of that influence. Adams and Hamilton would all be accused of using these drugs. BUT, they would not criminalize each other. Another distinction to be made here; Though there are a few that want “weed” legal, most are for legalizing industrial hemp, which is pretty much impossible to get high on. Yes that natural plant, the one our Mayflower sails were made of, the one the Declaration of Independence was written on, and the one Franklin and Washington grew in their gardens. Take a look at our Society. We have some of the toughest drug laws right now. How has that helped to decrease immorality and drug use? It has only overpopulated our prisons, separated families, increased our State’s debt, increased the need for more Police officers, enlarged the wasteful spending of maintaining people in jail for non violent crimes, ruined the careers and life of many otherwise decent folk, etc. True morality lies within the people not the Government. It’s the Progressives which have pushed these prohibitionist “we know what’s best for you” regulations into our private lives. Only a revival can save us now, not more gove

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 4:33am

      *Only a revival can save us now, not more Government.

      Report Post »  
    • Billofrights
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 5:42am

      colt1860- I appreciate your comments about drug use and the failed “war on drugs”. I think that I understand the libertarian position. Of course you would consed that there are dozens of drugs from heroin to lsd ; angel dust and so on that were not around in the old days. But that aside. As I have said before I used to see myself as a Libertarian. I am all for reducing the amount of laws in general. Too many laws reduces the public respect for law and the rule of law (which is the goal of lefties). But these drugs weren’t legal cause the founders were socially liberal but cause they were not a problem for society at large. The fact is (here is were we part ways) that 18th century founding America was MORE moral, christian, and god centered society than America now. They dealt with it at all levels before a law had to be made.Gov didn’t fix it like now; you did. A public drunk when to the stocks for discomfort and humiliation while sobering up. If a stoner was caught breaking in to steal for money for drugs he got killed. No law suits; No police murder investigation. The fact he was climbing out your window and not in; So! It was your window. Let me just say what to me obvious. If you want to legalize drugs; Great, but there are many things that have to be changed first. Like; Civil law and the ambulance chasers. Christians need to have the same rights as atheists. The entitlement mentality; and identity politics and many more. You have the wagon in front of the horse is a

      Report Post »  
    • Billofrights
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 6:10am

      I agree that Law should not be the ONLY place America displays it’s social standards. It probably should be the last. But the libertarian position of legalized drugs among other things would leave this current American culture in chaos. Lower legal “hemp” (rolling my eyes) down on your priority list and you’ll get more bees with your personal liberty and personal responsibility honey. I know it’s sweet. Guys with 420 patriot user ID‘s don’t help your case (420 is police code for smoking pot). Legal drugs should not even be part of the conversation at this point. And one more thing. I would be the first to defend Ron Paul If his pole numbers were up and the MSM began to attack him to save barry. And here you guys are jumpin on every chunk of red meat the MSM troughs at you. lets talk about what Cain or Paul will do all day. But when the enemy pulls out the Clarance Thomas attack you give them a minute to find some evidence. At the end of the day we are pretty close to being on the same end of the political scale.

      Report Post »  
    • colt1860
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 7:25am

      @BillofRights You’re right. Our society is not up for the same freedom that our founding fathers had, but I can’t get over the fact that all these laws have not done anything to improve the situation. It seems the Government has taken the role of the Church and tried to fix everything the Church has abandoned. Justice, Charity, Correction, Instruction, Morality. Look at the welfare state, prisons, family courts, juvenile centers, public schools, etc. I ultimately blame the corruption in Government on the Progressives and Marxist first and the modern Churches second. You’re definably right about how immorality and ill behavior was dealt back then. They were serious about getting rid of evil in the Land. I so desire to restore our country to an unabashed Christian Nation.

      Report Post »  
    • KTsayz
      Posted on November 1, 2011 at 9:30am

      @Billofrights and Colt
      Alcohol and drugs were always a part of the American experience.

      http://www.heroinaddiction.com/heroin_hist.html

      Ben Franklin used opium because of all the pain he was in. Robert Louis Stevenson and Edgar Allen Poe were both opuim addicts.

      I would also like to say something about Paul’s stance on drugs. The cost of the war on drugs this year will be over $23BILLION. We really can’t waste that kind of money at the Federal level. Because the Constitution does not mention the fed gov regulating drugs, Paul holds up the 10th Amendment and, rightly, says it’s up to the states to regulate and make laws re: drugs. I don’t have a problem with that at all.

      Report Post »  
  • CicerosGhost
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:13pm

    Wow…. The Clarence Thomas approach? Seriously?

    Report Post »  
    • 1bambam
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:19pm

      Juan Williams is on Gerry Rivera’s show he is so naive….

      Report Post » 1bambam  
    • Ducky 1
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:40pm

      I agree……..this is very much recycled from the Clarence Thomas hearings……..not the truth but the seriousness of the charge.

      Report Post » Ducky 1  
  • steelers_fan_4ever
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:09pm

    a five figure pay out for sexual harassment? Seriously? And they signed non-disclosure agreements, which they violated. Guess that means the gold diggers will have to pay that back. Cain 2012, regardless. He is still a lot better than Obama.

    Report Post »  
    • CatB
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:57pm

      Don’t forget the Dems DEFENDED Clinton and his getting a Lewinsky in the Oval Office!

      TEA!

      Report Post »  
  • hi
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:08pm

    No female who was actually sexually harassed would take a payment to shut up. She would be so traumatized and then so appalled to be bribed.

    Obama had his gay lover murdered. He was a musician at his church.

    We are taking our country back. All humans have made mistakes. I’m judging him by his character now, not from lies of bimbos who were clearly after money.

    Report Post » hi  
    • macpappy
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:58pm

      I don‘t guess it’s harrassment if enough money is offered…..it’s solicitation.

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • demint.disciple
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 9:56am

      @HI.. Yeah, and no man would pay someone off if the charges were not true, they would go to court and fight to the death to keep their name clean..If I was accused of S.H and I wasn’t guilty (this goes for any crime) I would FIGHT TO DEATH against it ANYWHERE, ANYTIME, ANY PLACE .. It goes both ways, you’re just to Cainzombied to see it.. BTW, Micheal Jackson Pedophile or not ?? Course he wasn’t he payed them off to say otherwise.. Get the point ? Nah didn’t think so.. Your arms are straight infront of you, glossy eyed, walking straight the voting booth saying Cain 2012 ,cain 2012 ,cain 2012 like a good little zombie..

      Report Post » demint.disciple  
  • Veritas
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:06pm

    Well, they can’t call Cain a racist, even though that didn’t work. Then they said that republicans were supporting him because they were racists, once again that didn’t pass the smell test. Now they are taking the Clarence Thomas route and saying he is “oversexed”. Wow, liberals are really the true racists. They could care less about message, they just want to destroy a good man with any label they can attach!

    Herman Cain still has my vote!

    Report Post » Veritas  
    • drago
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:17pm

      @Veritas
      I agree, these claims and they are just that, claims,and are simply an attack by odumbos henchmen because he poses a threat to odumbo, nothing more. Now to wait for encinom to spout his puke….

      Report Post »  
    • CicerosGhost
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:19pm

      They thought it worked on Clarence Thomas……

      Guess they really are trying to see what they could possibly come up with that “sticks”…

      Smacks of absolute desperation……

      Report Post »  
    • tifosa
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 10:20am

      Who “says oversexed?”

      Report Post » tifosa  
  • Steev
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:06pm

    I’d say chances are that theres nothing to this, if there were i think he would have been forthcoming with the details Before he was blindsided – i could be wrong, but it sounds to me like years ago there was an incident regarding the two women that was spun to look like sexual misconduct on his part and he is wondering how to handle it.

    Report Post » Steev  
    • Mimi24
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:17am

      On a smaller scale, but I’m sure very important to the accused, just before the South Carolina primary a man accused Nikki Hailey, who was running for governor of having an affair. He said he had proof but produced none. She didn’t quite get the majority vote so just before the run-off, here he comes again. Allegations with no proof whatsoever. To this day he has produced no evidence but the character assault and accusations that he spewed could have cost her the election and her marriage. All with no proof. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? The charges always make the front page and the retractions, if they happen at all, are buried on the back page.

      Report Post »  
  • hauschild
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:03pm

    Herm‘s really got ’em riled.

    I think more than a few would be‘s feel it slippin’.

    Report Post »  
    • Redd
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:07pm

      It has been reported that hussein obama had larry sinclair in the back of a limo…
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MceFVpJ-Gyc

      Report Post »  
    • Annie Fields
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:44pm

      Not only is BamBam accused of that activity, but how did Jeremiah Wright know AND ANNOUNCE AT CHURCH that a young man who could OUT him turned up dead – BEFORE ANYONE KNEW? AND HOW he died BEFORE ANYONE KNEW? Hmmm?

      I SUPPORT HERMAN CAIN 100% and don’t believe this nonsense for a minute.

      Report Post » Annie Fields  
  • Frogginit
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 9:58pm

    He displayed inappropriate sexual behavior to me a couple of times. Damn, that was easy to make that up. Should I tell the press?

    Report Post » Frogginit  
  • Doug-a-Hole-Diggin-out
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 9:58pm

    They are coming at Cain from every angle.

    Report Post » Doug-a-Hole-Diggin-out  
  • macpappy
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 9:55pm

    Key word here is Allegedly. Also, although I am not a journalist the Headline is worded wrong, and leaves confusion. It should read…”Two Former Herman Cain Employees (were) Allegedly Paid to Leave Jobs After Inappropriate Behavior by Cain” One word left out changes the whole sentence. For a minute I thought they paid to leave.
    Picky I know, but where has quality in the job gone. These guys Beck hired are not so good at it.

    Report Post » macpappy  
    • dontbotherme
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:16pm

      macpappy- This was a Politico report. Check The Drudge report.

      Report Post »  
    • macpappy
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:41pm

      Maybe they should not cut and paste the headlines then, which brings us back to job performance.

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • macpappy
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:45pm

      @dontbotherme
      I did read the Drudge Report as you advised, thanks for that. However, the Politico article was much better written, and the headlines were correct. I am making the point that quality in journalism is not a strong point with these writers. I actually think that some of the posters here are better than the writers that Beck hired from Huffpost.

      Report Post » macpappy  
    • dontbotherme
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 11:15pm

      Macpappy – I’m sorry. You are right. Please accept my sincere apology.

      Report Post »  
    • DAGNY
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 12:03am

      And it should say, “…allegedly inappropriate behavior.”

      I know how easy it is for a man to look sideways at a woman nowadays and be charged with harassment. And it’s much cheaper to pay them off with an agreement to leave the company than to endure a long, costly lawsuit.

      Report Post »  
    • Chet Hempstead
      Posted on October 31, 2011 at 2:01am

      DAGNY
      And it should say, “…allegedly inappropriate behavior.”

      Actually it should say “alleged inappropriate behavior.” What is in question is whether it actually happened, not whether it was inappropriate if it did.

      Report Post »  
  • randy
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 9:55pm

    Yeah so? Obama is a freaking COMMIE!

    Report Post » randy  
  • NOTAMUSHROOM
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 9:52pm

    Get used to this. The Progressives will come out with all sorts of character assassinating lies a la Saul Alinsky.

    Yawn.

    Report Post »  
    • loriann12
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 9:57pm

      Could just be a misunderstanding. When I was active duty, I had a 1st class that was Puerto Rican. He was a very touch-feely person. He would put his hand on my shoulder whenever he looked at what I was doing. I felt sexually harrassed, so I went to my chief and told him I was thinking about pressing charges. he said, first, catch him and tell him what he’s doing makes you uncomfortable. He probably doesn‘t even realize he’s doing it, due to his being a person that touches. I did just that, and he never did it again. I could have ruined his Navy career had I just gone ahead and pressed charges. I wish more women would do just that, stand up say it makes you uncomfortable, and most men will stop. I think we (women) are conditioned to just press charges first, and that’s such a shame.

      Report Post »  
    • hi
      Posted on October 30, 2011 at 10:11pm

      I remember that is just how men and women acted back then. Now they have to be robots around each other.

      Report Post » hi  
  • NOTAMUSHROOM
    Posted on October 30, 2011 at 9:51pm

    Ah. Are they relatives of Anita Hill?

    Report Post »  
1 2 3 ... 19

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love