Are Local Media Ignoring Firebombing of Pro-Life Catholic School Bus in Illinois?
- Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:02am by
Billy Hallowell
- Print »
- Email »
The local media in Rockford, Illinois, have been virtually silent about a firebomb attack on a Catholic school bus belonging to Our Lady of the Sacred Heart Academy. While the details and fuzzy, here’s what we know: There’s extensive damage to a pro-life bus — a vehicle that is widely-known in the community for showcasing messages on its exterior that defend unborn babies and stand in opposition to abortion.
A blog called Pro-life Corner claims that the bus was firebombed on Friday evening (an employee at the Rockford Fire Department confirmed that authorities arrived at the scene around 3 a.m.). In a description of the damage, the blog reports that the attack’s impact was substantial, leaving broken windows, burned and charred seats and a plethora of other major blemishes.

“It has been speculated that this bombing of a pro-life Christian school bus is in retaliation for the closing of the Rockford abortion mill that is located not far from where the school bus was attacked,” the outlet writes.
This, of course, is not confirmed. The Blaze has reached out to Mike Rotolo, the investigator handling the case for the Rockford Fire Department, and is awaiting comment regarding the suspected motivation for the attack.

Image Credit: Pro-Life Corner
While Rotolo has not yet been reached, on Monday morning, the Rockford Fire Department confirmed the attack with The Blaze. An employee also said that when authorities arrived at the scene to put out the fire, a bottle was found nearby. This fact, teamed with footage of broken windows and damage inside of the vehicle, seems to corroborate the notion that a firebomb (i.e. molotov cocktail) was employed.
Below, watch a video that showcases, in detail, the extreme damage the bus sustained:
Pro-Life Corner goes on to accuse the Rockford Register Star, a newspaper in the region, of holding an anti-Christian bias, as the story of the firebombed bus was not immediately published by the paper — or by any other local outlets, for that matter. In the newspaper’s defense, the incident occurred early in the morning on Saturday and it may not yet be on reporters’ radar.
The blog also notes that the Rockford Register ironically published new details about a priest who crashed his car into a local abortion clinic 12 years ago on the day before this attack took place. If this attack on a pro-life bus goes unreported, it’s likely that people will see an inherent bias present in the stories the newspaper chooses to report (again, this story was reported before the attack and there is no indication that the Rockford Register won’t be covering the crime).

Interestingly, the newspaper did mention another attack on a local vehicle that occurred on Friday — a suspected arson involving a molotov cocktail. However, there is no indication at this point that the incidents concerning the car and the bus are connected.
The Blaze has reached out to Our Lady of the Sacred Heart Academy for comment as well, but we have not yet heard back from administrators. We will report further details as they come in.
Update: Around 12:00 ET, the Rockford Register covered the incident, writing, in part:
Speculation was reported on an anti-abortion website that the fire may have been set as an anti-Catholic message or in retaliation against anti-abortion groups that campaigned to close the Northern Illinois Women’s Center in Rockford, which its owners closed earlier this year citing lack of support from the community, the political climate surrounding the abortion issue and the staffing challenges the clinic faced.
Bageanis said authorities may be able to determine why the fire was set if they can find who is responsible.
Rockford Fire Department investigator Mark Marinaro said there were no messages left at the scene and so far no evidence of a religious or political motivation.
Marinaro also said that although similar to another vehicle fire in the 600 block of North Winnebago Street a day earlier, there is no evidence the incidents are related.
This story has been updated.
All of the images present in this article were captured and published by Pro-Life Corner.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (120)
Individualism
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:46amhow can you neo cons say your pro life when your pro war and for getting our troops killed in non defense wars for banker corporate and other countries interests. you neo cons are hypocrites in that area.
Constitutionaleng
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:10pmFirst of all, you are assuming that being Pro Life means Pro War. Life must be very simple in your world to be able to conclude this is the case. Second, defending the rights of the unborn, a civil right, can never be equated to another violent act, war, or attacking another person, etc. Any statement to this effect is a farce, diversion, an excuse to avoid really reviewing the right to life argument. If you have an argument, offer it. At least attempt to have some intellectual honesty. Defend your cause on its merits, not via subterfuge. I am always amazed that pro choice supporters cannot offer a valid intellectual argument, only indirect deflected justification. The same sort of arguments used throughout history to justify harming the weak.
Report Post »Warpspeedpetey
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:15pmIt wasn’t pro life to stop Hitler? To stop Saddam? What about the Taliban? That’s ridiculous.
Report Post »shakedowncrews
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:15pmAs usual, Liberals are unable to grasp the complexities of reality.
Conservatives defend the right to life of infants, who are completely innocent of any wrongdoing and have no champions or defenders other than pro-life activists. Liberals see these unborn as “non-human” gobs of flesh, or dehumanize them by calling them to “parasites”, “fetuses” etc. and try to promote their killing by saying it is a “woman’s choice“ or ”right to privacy”, “stay out of our vaginas” and other absurd statements. In other words: liberals are doing to these unborn humans what slave owners did to Africans. Morally, you are on the same plane.
As for wars, (and let’s not forget the death penalty): conservatives, like everyone else, would prefer to avoid any kind of violence, including war. War is not an objective. But the world being what it is, there is evil in the world, and at times those evil doers intend to kill and destroy, and must be dealt with. Sadly, we can’t just play rock,paper scissors with al Qaeda or the Taliban, can we? Surely you are intelligent enough to recognize that the only solution for the fascists in Europe was to beat them into submission. The same is true of al Qaeda, and their primary supporters, the Taliban.
As for the death penalty: I think conservatives would be willing to make a deal. If Liberals will agree to ban abortions, we will agree to ban the death penalty.
Will you agree to that? Or do you insist on the right to kill unborn ba
Report Post »pearlnpeter
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:28pmYou are really a simpleton if you assume that pro-life = neocon. Conservatives are anything BUT neocon. Neocons are our mortal enemies, FYI. Before you make stupid comments, you ought o get some information.
Report Post »IlovemyAkita
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:32pmYou are a fidiot!
Report Post »VTPatriot44
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:33pmAll 9/11 truthers should be ignored at all costs. Let them speak and speak loudly so we, the informed, no where they are and avoid those places.
Report Post »gregjackie1
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:36pmNews flash!. WWI was presided over by Woodrow Wilson. A leftist democrat. WWII was presided over by two Democrat presidents. FDR and Truman. Vietnam War was presided over mostly by LBJ. A leftist president. All had mostly democrat congresses.
Now would you care to rethink your idiotic statement?
Report Post »SnowKalBebes
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:43pmBlazer Logic: I bet the bombers were part of the pro-life group. They are trying to start the religious war Glenn’s always warning us about. Wait, maybe Glenn was in on it…
Report Post »PSUMJ
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 1:45pmMost liberals are incapable (or unwilling) of critical thought.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 2:02pm@Constitutionaleng Interesting babble or a response. The point is for you to defend your position. The central argument by Pro Lift groups is that abortion is killing the unborn child. So a comparisons to other activities related to killing human beings seems to be right on the money. Either killing is wrong or it is right. It is the justifications and rationalizations employed relative to killing whether within war or under capital punishment which weaken the Pro Life stance. The only defense on needs to provide for the Pro Choice stance is that it has been reviewed and decided by the Supreme Court and is the law of the land. Roe v. Wade is the best we can expect from the government and it reflects the overriding truth. That being that your beliefs, opinions and civil rights end at the tip of the woman’s nose…. cause that‘s where her’s begin.
Report Post »JRook
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 2:05pmI would submit it has a lot to do with how Inflammatory the Pro Life messages were. If they were inflammatory in content and presentation then I guess they resulted in the desired response.
Report Post »M13
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 3:10pmOnce again jrook lies and shows us just what an idiot sounds like.
Report Post »YouAreMistakenSir
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 3:26pmCan we agree on something? Pro-choice cannot possibly consider a fetus a human life. Because if they did it would be psychotic to consider abortion ok. That’s the real argument: “Is a fetus a human life?” That’s hard to define, for me at least. Full set of human DNA? That’s tricky. Each cell in my hand has a full set of human DNA and I’m not committing mass murder whenever I cut myself on accident. How about “Has potential to become human”? Is that human life? Well if that’s the case every egg and sperm are given the same protection as a regular human. Heck, get the appropriate chemicals together and under that definition you’ve got a human because the chemicals could be arranged into a human. That’s clearly nonsense as definitions go. “A self sustaining entity”? No fetuses don’t do that. Although if it were a late term abortion that survived for some time you could slap em with involuntary manslaughter under that definition I suppose. “Possessing a degree of intelligence”? Infants would be considered animals under that definition.
That’s really the problem with the pro-life movement. They have a strong definition of life that suits their goals but lack a substantive explanation for that definition other than “X said so.” X typically being the bible or a representative there of like a priest. Perhaps someone could give me a good logical or scientific reason to consider a fertilized egg a human life? Its one of the issues where I legitimately fence sit.
Report Post »Basharr
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 3:46pmCan it buddy! Would you rather we just laid down and let terrorists destroy us and our nation. Because people have sacrificed everything, you have the freedom to speak like an idiot and not get arrested for it. Plenty of places you can go live but you have to be willing to give up the right to act like a fool.
Report Post »MiddleAmerica2012
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 3:47pmLet me answer this for everyone…. Ready… Baby’s dont try to KILL YOU!!!! Dumb!@!!
Report Post »e7705
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 3:54pmyou’re
Report Post »Dano.50
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 3:55pmHow can Idividualism understand the aforementioned differences when he/she doesn’t even seem to grasp the difference between “your” and “you’re?”
Or the intricate complexities of capitalization at the beginning of a sentence?
Typos are one thing but this is basic grammer and if his/her comphrehension level is stuck around the Grade 1 or 2 level, surely we can’t expect it to be any higher when it comes to worldly matters.
Jrook,
It’s not killing the unborn, it’s killing the defenseless and the innocent. THAT is the difference between abortion, and war and capital punishment.
Hitler started with abortion, then ended with the Jews. In between were the misfits and any deemed unworthy. (Which, if you happened to hear about the Dr. Phil episode some time back, apparently some 90% of his audience felt it okay to kill mentally handicapped people.)
And haven’t you been paying attention to the gender based abortion?
I have yet to come across any about “Ah it’s a boy. Well we don’t want one of those around so…”
Pro abortion is just an attempt to “Sweeping the dirt under the rug.” because a living child would be a lifetime reminder that one has abandoned one of the major responsibilities of being an adult.
Report Post »constitutionsupporter
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 4:01pmYou are the hypocrite, you are against the death penalty’s killing of murdering, raping, child killing pedophiles, but you support killing innocent babies through abortion. How about this, I will support ending the death penalty if you support ending abortion – how is that for compromise.
Report Post »rightofright
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 5:03pmI live near Rockford, Il and have seen the abortion clinic that closed and it took many years before the clinic was ever inspected and when it was, it was fined and closed. It was an awful looking dump. The Rockford Star has a poor history of reporting pro-life views and includes many left leaning writers in their regular newspaper and the surrounding area as well.
Report Post »Joey Odendahl
Posted on June 19, 2012 at 3:03am1- You’re not following the logic of your own argument. If a moral equivalency exists between abortion and war… And if opposition to one means you must oppose the other… Then conservatives could easily turn the question around on you: “How can you be anti-war yet pro choice on abortion?”
2- As for me, I am NOT “pro war.” So your blanket assumption about conservatives is wrong. I believe only in self defense… And war as a last resort.
Report Post »MSimon
Posted on June 19, 2012 at 4:19amAny government strong enough to outlaw abortion is strong enough to make it mandatory.
Which is why I support Rockford Pro Life. They do not want a government solution.
Report Post »piper60
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:24amAnd, the next time this occurs, there might be children or people on board the bus when the bomb hits.
Report Post »normalmom
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:45pmThat’s the scary part, thank God there wasn’t anyone on the bus.
Report Post »65Mustang
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:14amIt is against the liberal media to report the truth.
Report Post »mikem1969
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:39amYou said it. If this would have been a firebomb on a pro–choice bus or property, it would be all over the lame stream news.
Report Post »scuba13
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 2:03pmOnce again Encinom shows us his complete stupidity.
Report Post »mikem1969
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 2:45pmOnce again the left troll encinijerk shows his total stupidity
Report Post »DANEgerus
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:11amBashir(D-MSNBC) video incitement?
Report Post »South Philly Boy
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:03amThat’s how DRIVE-BY MEDIA WORKS
Report Post »COLKURTZ
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:57amAnd I am an a-hole because I do not want babies murdered.
Report Post »phillyatheist
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 3:28pmbabies aren’t being murdered. babies cry, they count in the census, they have a name, and they breath air. feel free to argue that they are a form of human life – i disagree, but it’s a discussion worth having. until then, the two sides will never be able to have a serious discussion because the anti-abortion crowd it too convinced that their way is the only way. and i know where this comes from – the idea of a soul derived from your deeply religious beliefs. because you believe this you will never be convinced that you could be wrong. sad, IMO.
Report Post »Possessor
Posted on June 19, 2012 at 8:39pmOh on the contrary, babies are very much alive in the womb, because the Mother, herself is alive. Abort the baby,. you are aborting the Mother, herself, thus killing that part of herself that was alive inside herself.
Report Post »mlimberg
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:54amTic, tic, tic, tic, tic…..One day soon, the Liberal/Progressives will pick a fight with the wrong group…. I hate to see it happen, but it’s a coming…
Report Post »phillyatheist
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 3:31pmi‘m pretty sure it’s the religious zealots who have been “picking this fight” for decades since RvW. i don’t think they should stoop to the level of the clinic-bombing, doctor killing whackos, but you can’t say that THEY picked the fight.
Report Post »vaman
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:45amCalm down lunatics. So far there is not one fact to show the bus was even firebombed. Some pro-life blog is stating it was a bomb. Totally biased. That’s it. The fire investigators haven’t concluded anything yet. The blaze knows it will get a lot of you angry just because it has something to do with abortion. The blaze is at best a gossip rag intent on getting the fringe of society angry at most things. Consider it like the National Inquirer, nothing more.
Report Post »TheSoundOf Truth
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:49amYou are an idiot. Any ****** can see that this was bomb.
Report Post »vaman
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:57amUsing critical thinking doesn’t make me an idiot. Think before acting out like a child. The bus was on fire, but a fire is not a bomb. Even an angry little person like yourself can realize that. Exactly the fringe type of person I was talking about.
Report Post »dblaess
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:01amI think you are incorrect to a point. The Blaze is not like MSBC (gossip rag) and clearly stated in the article that no information of cause or possible motive are known yet. Unlike your friends in the MSM the Blaze does not make up information with the intent to incite. Most likely you did not fully read the article and got the Blaze mixed up with MSM outlets, who do not fact check. Those are the true lunatics as they do great damage to people and society.
Report Post »Wildblue3
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:06amVaMan the Demon Rat,
Report Post »This was likely a device of some sort given the location of the explosion. It’s away from most of the bus electronics in the front and the engine which might provide heat enough for a fire. The seat destroyed seem to be in middle of the bus next to that broken window. I think if you just realize it’s possible it was an anti catholic who might have done it, we might agree that there isn’t enough proof.
338lapua
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:11amYour lashing out in such a way indicates possible knowledge of and maybe some involvement in this incident. Anything you wish to add? You indicate that you are a male from Virginia. Have you done any vacationing in the Wisconsin area? Maybe around June 5, and maybe did things not turn out the way you wanted. Is it possible that maybe you just might have……..you know…….Well tell me your side of the story VAMAN
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:44amyeah basically raising christian radicals that could act like Al Qaeda.
Report Post »normalmom
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:49pmYou must have overlooked the photos. The pictures are pretty obvious on where the damage is placed, the drivers seat for one, the bus can’t go anywhere right now.
Report Post »phillyatheist
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 3:35pmVAMAN – i’ll go you one better, just to see how the Blazers like a taste of their own medicine:
could this be a pro-life group firebombed THEIR OWN bus to get media attention? they’ve even got their bots here to drive up the comment count. this reaks of a massive Romney neo nazi conspiracy to make our dear leader President look bad. bunch of skinhead thugs!!
(all sarcasm and in good fun, i promise)
Report Post »Alecto
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:43amIf this is true, then it’s a hate crime and has to be prosecuted by the DOJ. Gee, when do you think THAT will happen?
Report Post »normalmom
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 1:17pmIt sadly won’t because they only use the hate-crime card for race.
Report Post »NHwinter
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:41amFreedom of expression is only for Progressives. As all the Progressives say: there is no attack on freedom of religion. Its just amazing how lies flow out of their mouths. I pray to God this election (if it even happens) turns this country around and we throw out all the Progressives/Communists/Marxists!!
Report Post »And all the anti-American protestors are put in jail along with most of Congress.
ofallon
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:39amThis sounds like the same scenario that took place in Virginia. The two reporters were attacked by a mob and no one reported it except Bill O’Reilly. This will be hushed up too. Thank God for The Blaze.
Report Post »objectivetruth
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:35amThey did mention another car being bombed.They claim there is no connection.It might be that it is. They were requested not to report on the bus to protect the investigation.Remember folks any cause has the potential for lone nuts to act.Its also possible for a lone nut to attack and deflect on a cause.
Report Post »If nothing else is heard in a few days I will start agreeing with you that its a bias in reporting.
Note
Both sides using violence is wrong.They both should be prosecuted if found quilty of crimes to the other.
Magyar
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:33amNo matter who’s responsible–it’s an act against GOD—
He’s watching and taking copious notes!
Report Post »mike_trivisonno
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:38amIt may be an act against God. But we should wait to see what is revealed. I could be an act in celebration of the Allah.
Report Post »tomloy
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:32amIt doesn’t have to be pro choice activists. Whoever it was could have some grudge against the catholic church.
Report Post »palerider54
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:30amNow if this was a city bus with a Planned Parenthood advertisement on it, it would have been dominating all the news coverage all weekend.
“Crazy Christians attack innocent city bus, something must be done to protect the citizens.”
Report Post »lqtm
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:34amOh my gosh you Christians are so oppressed. It’s Obama, you know. He’s behind it all.
Report Post »RLTW
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:47amLQTM, admitting Obama is evil is one of the first steps of recovery, keep up the good work you’re almost there.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:16amLQT : Always “interesting” to hear from our Atheist Anarchist Lefties. Christianity and Cops: drives them even more mad…
Report Post »angelcat
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:26amLQ, I guess you can’t accept the truth of the bias against those who are pro0life in the media. You must be blind and deaf to not see it clearly day after day and week after week.
Report Post »john koenig
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 1:19pm@LQTM: Name any other group besides Catholics that Obama is targeting for revocation of their First Amendment right.
Report Post »Yes, lefty. Obama is attacking Catholics.
LeadNotFollow
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:26am…
Report Post »Leftist Liberal Baby Killers are sick, warped, perverted, violent people.
vaman
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:50amHow many abortion clinics have been firebomed and Dr’s killed by christians?
Report Post »338lapua
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:14amHow many MILLIONS of babies have been murdered?
Report Post »manjodad
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:42am@Vapidman Not as many as the babies killed by abortion clinics!
Report Post »Individualism
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:47amthere is no evidence it was them it could of been radical right ku klux klan people for all you know.
Report Post »phillyatheist
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 3:49pmcopied and pasted from my earlier response above:
babies aren’t being murdered. babies cry, they count in the census, they have a name, and they breath air. feel free to argue that they are a form of human life – i disagree, but it’s a discussion worth having. until then, the two sides will never be able to have a serious discussion because the anti-abortion crowd it too convinced that their way is the only way. and i know where this comes from – the idea of a soul derived from your deeply religious beliefs. because you believe this you will never be convinced that you could be wrong. sad, IMO.
Report Post »Baja
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:25amI’m sure Holder will be on this like a dog on a hot pork chop.
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:31amno he won’t this fits obama and his way of thinking
Report Post »manjodad
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:44am@AJAYW Your wrong, Obama won’t be on the pork chop.
Report Post »Warpspeedpetey
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:36pm@man
ROFL
Report Post »Mike777
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:19amOur Father, Who art in heaven,
Report Post »Hallowed be Thy Name.
Thy Kingdom come.
Thy Will be done, on earth as it is in Heaven. Give us this day our daily bread.
And forgive us our trespasses,
as we forgive those who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil. Amen.
lqtm
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:37amYeah Mike, you really dealt with that one appropriately. Hey ask God for a car for me would you?
Report Post »lqtm
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:38amMIKE- THIS IS GOD. BUY LQTM A CAR. lolkthxbai
Report Post »vaman
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:52amHa!
Report Post »VTPatriot44
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:30pm@Mike – Well done. The ilk of LQTM, Vamon, and Individualism will never get it and will be left out in the cold when it really matters. They need our prayers as much if not more as those who were negatively impacted by this event.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:19amPro “choice” = pro-murder
Report Post »encinom
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:38am“Pro-Life” are the pro-murder crowd, they are the one that have killed doctors and attacked clinics with people inside.
Report Post »manjodad
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:51am@ENCINOM That may be true, but the abortion clinics have attacked a whole lot more moms with babies inside.
Report Post »Tri-ox
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:16amThis is the ‘obama 2012’ campaign in all of its glory – things are going to get worse, much worse, as the election draws near.
Report Post »EqualJustice
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:15amThey ALWAYS do what they accuse the other side of, so it probably was them! Near an “ABORTION MILL” Good name for it! They will justify this violent act the same way they always justify killing babies.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:13amSounds more like something the “Pro-Life” groups do, the clinic attacks, the the murder, I woul dput nothing past these Christian Crazies.
Report Post »Mike777
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:21amLib Alert Lib Alert JERK online
Report Post »ShyMan
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:33amYou’re probably right encinoman. We like to defecate on cop cars too.
Report Post »Listen_then_think
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:35amTHanks for giving me a good laugh encino, just like you believe the tea party is more violent and filthy than the OWSers and white is black and the sun rises in the west.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:11amAm sure your Lefty Bud Troll , SURHANSURHAN, would agree with you .LOL
Report Post »reallyannoyed
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:31amNo, the difference is that “pro-life” extremists attack PEOPLE. Killing abortion providers, bombing clinics while they are open, etc. These pro-choice extremists (if the case ends up being tied to them, and not a ploy to get attention. I don’t put anything past these groups after they sent their activists into abortion clinics to pretend to be trying to get sex-selective abortions…) only damaged property.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:40amREALLY: so a fetus is not a person ? then what species is it ?
Report Post »manjodad
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 11:48amJust when you think you have heard all the foolishness, encinom speaks down. Keep it up. We love to see your posts but please get out for some fresh air once in a while.
Report Post »sndrman
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:12amrememebr nancy pee saying how dangerous the TEA PARTY was and the commie media was in lockstep with the commies in congress. these terriosts who terrorize Conservatives and the and seem to get away with it…..where is the doj come on holder don’t be so partisan and maybe be more judicial even fair as you lefties talk so much about.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:10amAre the Weatherman back – like the Black Panthers are ? Sounds just like the 1960s.
Report Post »IlovemyAkita
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:35pmThey are back & serving our King obama.
Report Post »Tigress1
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:06amPro-abortionists should be called “Pro-death”.
Report Post »Baja
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:26amI agree.
Report Post »AJAYW
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 10:29amYes and the same will support death panels.
Report Post »Warpspeedpetey
Posted on June 18, 2012 at 12:30pmThey should be called by their number. As in inmate number 12345 report to the chow hall! Everyone of those filthy pieces of sh*t are complicit in the murder of 50 million defenseless infants. From the coed chanting that a fetus is not a baby all the way up to Gloria Steinem should be tried for Crimes Against Humanity. It doesn’t matter if it is done to Jews, Gypsy’s, Gays, Tutsis, Serbs or Babies. The perpetrators are all guilty of genocide. Where is Justice?
Report Post »MSimon
Posted on June 19, 2012 at 4:26amAny Government strong enough to outlaw abortion is strong enough to make it mandatory. Are you willing to risk it?
Report Post »