Government

Proposal: Presidential Candidates Submit Handwritten Copy of Constitution

What if the president had to hand-write a copy of the Constitution before he took office?

That’s the question Dr. David Corbin and Dr. Matthew Parks of The King’s College-New York City are asking. Corbin is an associate professor of politics, while Parks is the assistant provost.

According to them, the presidential oath “to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States” is one that should be taken very seriously. But “you can’t do this if you don’t know the Constitution or aren’t willing to submit to it,” they say.

So, in a blog post on the First Things website, Corbin and Parks reveal a proposal that “each 2012 presidential candidate … adopt the ‘Constitution Pledge,’ promising to present a hand-written copy of the Constitution to the Chief Justice as he rises to take the oath of office.”

“We’re constantly looking for reminders of just what it is that makes America exceptional,” Corbin told The Blaze. “And our constitution is one of those things.”

But presidents today are too preoccupied with “big things” such as sweeping reforms, he says. Rather than focus on grand projects that may or may not fail, he would rather future presidents understand their job description. The president’s, he says, is “ready made” in the Constitution.

“And how would we know that you understand the job description [of president]?” Corbin asks, “By you reading and writing it down.”

The idea of the pledge is based on two examples: a biblical one and an historical one. The biblical passage of Deuteronomy 17:18-20, which instructs new kings to transcribe a copy of the law and keep it with him “all the days of his life,” was part of the impetus. The other inspiration comes from historical education: writing something out by hand tends to impress it upon your memory, like most of us experienced with spelling words or math problems.

Currently, no large-scale “pledge” campaign is scheduled. Corbin envisions the idea taking off when citizens in primary states start asking candidates if they’ve taken “the pledge.” And while he says it may make “too much sense for it to happen,” he asks “why couldn’t it?”

For now, he and Parks will volunteer as the first interrogators: “Any takers?”

Comments (156)

1 2 3 4
  • Waiting4George
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:24pm

    …and then pass an essay and oral exam by a panel of constitutional scholars from Hillsdale and Liberty U. The results to be published on the internet andin every newspaper left…

    Report Post »  
    • AstrOptika
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:37pm

      This is great!! But would it take a Constitutional amendment to get it done?? I hope not. I hope there is more faith and moral integrity in this country than resorting to amending the Constitution to force the issue. I am probably not right, though. The progressives have brainwashed for too long. It will take strong measures to get such requirements to be adhered to.

      Report Post »  
    • ltb
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 10:29pm

      There was a time, in the not too distant past, when reporters actually made sure that our representatives understood the Constitution by asking probing questions. Nowadays, the only time a “journalist” asks a candidate about the Constitution is if he is trying to shame a Conservative (e.g., Mr. Paul, do you believe that the 14th Amendment prohibits innocent babies, who are born to undocumented Mexican immigrants, from becoming U.S. citizens?).

      Report Post » ltb  
  • The Good Source 101
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:22pm

    The Best way to go about this would be to have anyone running for anything recite the Constitution (with Passion!) at a speech. No podium, no teleprompter, nothing to hide behind. Anyone can copy something down onto paper and just get it over with, but it’s hard for a liar to feel the passion and have the conviction to repeat and love what they are saying.

    Report Post » The Good Source 101  
    • NursingNerd2012
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:59pm

      And that way they‘d have to actually think about what it’s saying and the meaning behind the words- not listening to a few “friends” misquote and destroy the meanings.

      Report Post »  
  • phoenix110
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:15pm

    Great idea! And I would add that all congressional candidates should be required to submit to constitutional/government, US history and economic testing and be required to pass these tests to make sure we are not putting incompetent people into our congress. Anyone worthy of being in congress should have at least a college level of understanding in all these areas of study. And since these tests are a measure of a persons ability to study and learn, there can be no claims of gender, racial, age, ethnicity or religious descrimination. Taxation and budgeting are controlled by congress; the economic impact of there decisions impact the economy of our country in a very direct way. US history is important to know because we need to remember the past so we do not repeat the mistakes of the past. And since our constitution is the basis of our governement, they all should know the constitution and the roll of government in our country.

    Report Post »  
  • ZeitgistBuster
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:09pm

    Maybe ALL candidates for federal jobs should do this! Congress and the Judiciary.

    While they are at it, maybe they should also follow Deut 17:18-20, and write out a copy of Genesis through Deutronomy.

    Look at WHY God said leaders of Israel should do it, “that his heart may not be lifted up above his brothers.”

    We could use some humility in our leaders. They need to STOP looking at themselves as above the rest of us. They haven’t parted the Red Sea, or had a hand in creating the universe, or suggested any improvements to the Ten Commandments.

    Making a handwritten copy of those books would bring them face to face with some humility, and perhaps give them a sense of awe at the responsibility of stewardship they have been entrusted with. And perhaps they would ask for some wisdom in leading a people so obviously blessed by God in our times.

    Report Post » ZeitgeistBuster  
    • kierstin1989
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:18pm

      It’s “Zeitgeist” BTW…unless you are referring to getting the “gist’ of the Zeit…which might actually work!

      Report Post » kierstin1989  
    • ZeitgeistBuster
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:50pm

      Thanks, got it changed. But what do you think of the article?

      Report Post » ZeitgeistBuster  
    • Workforit
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:01pm

      Zietgeist, I think I get your point and I agree! The political elite for the last one hundred years have been telling the masses how great, important, smart and wonderful they are, and we (the masses) the ones that actually do the work, buy it every time because, well… We are busy working! Well now the workers are starting to pay attention. It’s like a group of highly educated design engineers that have designed a new door. They are all busy patting themselves on the back on how great the new hinges are, how it seals tightly when it is closed, how it looks when it is open… it wins design awards, even a Pulitzer Prize! (Sound Familiar) Now they hand it down to the Machinist that is supposed to build it (the worker that actually does the work of the design elite), The machinist takes one look at the plans and says there is something wrong… The design elite don’t listen, the machinist tries to make them listen but the design elite know best… The machinist builds the door to spec. The design elite come down off their high horse to view this incredible new door they have labored months to create only to find no door handle… The machinist (the masses) said “I tried to tell you”…

      Well the Design Elite could not have made such an obvious mistake, they collect their original plans… March right back up to their offices whip out a new design with a handle and promptly file a law suit against the machinist. (Sound Familiar… think Arizona)

      We the people need to clip the wings of the elite in government and simplify government so any American with common sense, moral integrity, and a work ethic can run for any office he or she chooses. I think hand writing the constitution is a good a place to start as any, and defining a candidates moral code should be number two on the list if not number one. Anybody can copy the constitution… but do they have the integrity and mental fortitude to understand and uphold the document the just copied? A question for another day…

      Report Post »  
  • Workforit
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:06pm

    BRILLIANT! What a great idea! Now lets take it a step further… Every politician should have to do it! Lets not stop there… Lets have them commit their positions on key political issues and philosophy’s to hard copy; make it part of their “Resume”, make it available on line… for all to see. That might put an abrupt stop to this “flip-flopin” on issues… Lets make our elected officials ACCOUNTABLE for the agendas that got them elected in the first place! If they stray to far from the territory that got them elected use there own “Resume” as grounds for impeachment against them! No lengthy court battle, no argument… you committed yourself to this position when I voted for you and you did the exact opposite… YOU ARE FIRED! Accountability is a wonderful thing!

    Report Post »  
    • Maybe the GEESE Know More than the BEES Know
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:11pm

      I could not agree more! STAMP! :)

      Report Post » Maybe the GEESE Know More than the BEES Know  
    • kb1200cc
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:28pm

      Exactly! They are the EMPLOYEES of the American people NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND! Most high end positions necessitate a written employment contract. As in almost every case the President or CEO ect. has a direct responsibility to the board (congress) they in turn are working in the interests of the shareholders. THATS US. If these people dont do the job the contact lays out, or their conduct is unseemly. THEY ARE GONE. Granted this would require a huge shift in the paradigm and a level of humility and accountability thats not present right now. but its doable. Our founders started with less and accomplished more.

      Report Post » kb1200cc  
    • kb1200cc
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:31pm

      Breach the contract?You`re done. Happens every day. Want to keep your job? Do what your “boss” says.

      Report Post » kb1200cc  
    • AstrOptika
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:22pm

      When our country was new your word was your bond. Unforntuately today this is not the case. MAKE EM SIGN OTHERWISE DON’T TRUST THEM WITH ANYTHING. It is really sad that this country has come this. We should lay this one at the Progressive’s feet. Their handiwork indeed.

      Report Post »  
  • SigP220C3-45-SSS
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:03pm

    B.S.!!!! DO NOT MESS WITH MY 200+ yr old Constitution!!!! ARE YOU INSANE!!!!

    How do you think we got to where we were (a few years ago)? CAPITALISM!!!!

    This is what we need

    A laissez-faire capitalism, the economic system which best allows man to create, trade and prosper. As our country loses its hard earned freedom to the increasing powers of the state, we must remember that freedom is an absolute. You are either free or you are not. As Aristotle said simply “A is A.” Now, more than ever, we must stand together to protect our inalienable rights.

    Report Post » SigP220C3-45-SSS  
  • aimeEIGHTTWOEIGHT
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:02pm

    Most may find this a funny idea, but IMHO it is a brilliant one. Audio-visual is one effective way of learning. Writing the oath or the pledge for the candidate to read aloud during oath taking would most likely sink in making the oath-taker more committed to uphold the ideals of the office of the President.

    Report Post »  
  • Steverino
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:01pm

    Amazona – That is a very good point. I agree.
    Ideally, they should read it from their own handwritten copy, but at least reading it may imprint it on their mind. I’m surprised I got the first comment in! GBIAD’s mother must have called him up from the basement for a delicious cheese and wonder bread sandwich.

    Report Post »  
    • GlennBeckIsADemagogue
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:05pm

      Actually it was peanut butter and jelly. Nobody makes ‘em like mom. Congrats on being first! I can‘t help but be reminded of Robert De Niro’s character, Rupert Pupkin, in Martin Scorsese’s “King of Comedy”. Not sure if that’s the image you were aiming for, but I’m honored, lol.

      Report Post » GlennBeckIsADemagogue  
    • kb1200cc
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:13pm

      Its true. His mom can cook. I usually dont stick around for dinner after though.

      Report Post » kb1200cc  
    • jebjennings
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:22pm

      I’m starting to think that Glennbeckisademagogue is really Chris Mathews or Keith Olberman. Either way really, really stupid.

      Report Post »  
    • Hugh Williams
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:11pm

      Please GlennBeckIsADemagogue can spell and is sometimes funny.
      Chris Mathews and Keith Olberman are much less intelligent than GlennBeckIsADemagogue.

      Report Post » Hugh Williams  
    • Steverino
      Posted on September 10, 2010 at 4:07pm

      GBIAD – I had forgotten about PB&J. My Mom always made the best as well. Moms rock!!!

      Report Post »  
  • patrioticcitizen
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:00pm

    And at the end, HAVE THEM SIGN IT. Then post it on line. I also would like to see if they would sign a copy of the Declaration of Independence. If they are not willing to commit to “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor”, they do not deserve to be in our government and I do not want them there!!

    Report Post »  
    • AstrOptika
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:15pm

      Amen to that.

      Report Post »  
    • patrioticcitizen
      Posted on September 10, 2010 at 11:17am

      Another thought – give them the chance to state with any portions that they disagree, on the front end. For instance, if I were to do this I would support the Constitution with the caveat that I support the repeal of the 17th amendment. Let them explain why. Then, let them govern in the way they laid their thoughts out. If we don’t agree with their thoughts, don’t vote for them!!

      Report Post »  
  • davecoolworld
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:00pm

    The finest idea I have ever heard!
    It would also make it easier to convict a traitor.

    Report Post » davecoolworld  
  • aprilp
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:59pm

    kb1200, you are too funny!

    Report Post »  
  • kb1200cc
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:59pm

    We went awry when our “public servants” became “self servants” ignoring both the will of the people AND the constitution. When I hire people I have a written list of whats expected of them and what the absolutely can expect of me in return. Each candidate MUST make a contract with the country at the beginning of their term. They break the contract. theyre fired thats it. No hard feelings

    Report Post » kb1200cc  
  • Mrdon5091
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:55pm

    Great idea……… It’ll never happen!

    Report Post »  
  • HonorInk
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:52pm

    This is a great idea! Just think back to those wondrous days in school where instead of getting slapped with a yard-stick you would write “I will follow the rules of the class”, or something like that a hundred times. That sure made an impression on me, so I think it is time to let the “Big Boss” better understand the ideals he is supposed to be protecting.

    Report Post »  
  • Maybe the GEESE Know More than the BEES Know
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:51pm

    it’s a feel good act for us.

    what we need is to find that person who TRULY BELIEVES in the Constitution and doesn‘t have to do a ’homework’ assignment to prove it to us.

    Report Post » Maybe the GEESE Know More than the BEES Know  
  • Ellie
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:51pm

    It is a great starting point but why just presidential canidates? How about all 2012 and future canidates for any state, local, or federal office?

    Report Post » Ellie  
    • kierstin1989
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:17pm

      I’m with Ellie on this one – anyone who holds Federal office should copy out the Constitution. If they hold State office, they should copy out their State Constitution as well!

      Report Post » kierstin1989  
    • Ellie
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 11:00pm

      Only one glitch with the idea of copying the state constitution, most of them take up entire shelving systems with individual volumes weighing in at 2-3 times the progressive health care bill. :D

      Report Post » Ellie  
  • TomBurpee
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:44pm

    Sounds good to me. We’ve got to have some kind of everyman system of vetting the candidates, the media won’t do it anymore.

    Report Post » TomBurpee  
  • Amazona
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:41pm

    I think I would rather they read it at the inaugural address. Anybody can write it for them.

    Report Post »  
  • GlennBeckIsADemagogue
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:41pm

    Perhaps we could solicit feedback on this concept from some of the “professors” at Glenn Beck University. I would love to be blissful.

    Report Post » GlennBeckIsADemagogue  
    • Desert Dweller
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:58pm

      Under the assumption that ignorance is bliss, I take it?

      That aside. Most politicians don’t write their own speeches much less something as fundamental and path altering a the Constitution. Would it help? Possibly. But understand that being able to memorize a speech does not a great leader make.

      The fundamental choices of said politico is not likely to change.

      Nor sadly is your snipping.

      Report Post » Desert Dweller  
    • Sheepdog911
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:59pm

      And you are a moron.

      Report Post » Sheepdog911  
    • Buck Bagaw
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:13pm

      Dummygag’s real name is Richard Cranium.

      Report Post »  
    • TomBurpee
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:20pm

      @GLENNBECKISADEMAGOGUE

      “Perhaps we could solicit feedback on this concept from some of the “professors” at Glenn Beck University.”
      Naturally, because they still have a soul, unlike most of the Progressive dirt bags preprogramming the youth of America like 90‘s Samsung VCR’s.

      “I would love to be blissful.”
      Maybe if you removed your blinders of hatred, malice, and distain bliss would find your heart, and show you the true path to proper enlightenment.

      Report Post » TomBurpee  
    • Hugh Williams
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:01pm

      I have a copy of the Constitution right here. What would you like to know?

      Report Post » Hugh Williams  
    • Hugh Williams
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:05pm

      GlennBeckIsADemagogue
      Are tired tonight? Sometimes you actually engage in discussion, but tonight you are just regurgitating leftist talking points. So sad.

      Report Post » Hugh Williams  
  • Laus Deo Too
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:40pm

    Asking a politician to pledge anything is a stretch. Imagine…it depends on what the definition of pledge is.

    Report Post » Laus Deo Too  
  • stinkybisquit
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:40pm

    Better yet, hand-transcribe any bill they pass.

    Report Post »  
    • ratfink
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:36pm

      Even better yet…………must pass FBI back ground checks

      Report Post »  
    • GeneralC_USA
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:25pm

      Background checks for the honorable elected? It has already been noted that Obama could not have passed a security clearance. He is personal friends with too many Communists and Terrorists.

      I like the idea of hand writing the bills and providing a hand written copy to each representative. It would take years to make that many hand copies of ObamaCare. Maybe someone might actually READ it while transcribing it. Then maybe we wouldn‘t have to pass it to find out what’s in it. What Bozos in CA elected her in the first place. Are they too stupid to vote her out now that everyone knows what a mistake it was voting her in?

      Report Post »  
    • Rose2010
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:48pm

      That’s what I was thinking – transcribe bills that they want passed. Until they can understand it, write it, and explain to someone else in plain simple English, then it shouldn’t be put up for vote.

      Report Post » Rose2010  
    • Skwerl
      Posted on September 10, 2010 at 2:14pm

      And a basic credit check. A bad credit rating is usually enough to knock someone out of the running for a job.

      Report Post »  
  • SgtBarrett
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:40pm

    I’m not sure, but wouldn‘t Obama’s teleprompter have to write it for him? If Obama went off teleprompt and tried to write it himself, he might add parts he thinks should be in there… Like spreading the wealth and health care for everybody…

    Report Post » SgtBarrett  
  • M31Sailor
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:38pm

    Obummer would have to transcribe the whole health care bill as part of the law.. he might ever find out what is actually in it

    Report Post » M31Sailor  
  • GlennBeckIsADemagogue
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:38pm

    Sarah Palin is ignorant.

    GlennBeckIsADemagogue  
    • kb1200cc
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:51pm

      DUDE, get out of your moms basement, get better rebuttals,get a job, and tell your sister to STOP CALLING ME!

      kb1200cc  
    • CrackerSmurf
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:51pm

      what? WTF are you talking about? Idiot, while I agree Sarah Palin is less than desired in anything but looks. She has nothing to do with it ya bucket head.

      Report Post » CrackerSmurf  
    • 2010 Patriot
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:13pm

      Based on what?

      Report Post »  
    • Buck Bagaw
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:19pm

      Unlike yourself, Sarah is a class act.

      Report Post »  
    • littlebin518
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 6:38pm

      Folks, don’t even respond to this guy. That’s what he wants. Don’t give it to him! Rise above.

      Report Post » littlebin518 ✟  
    • shotgun
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:09pm

      You posted this “Sarah Palin for President in 2012!” under the mosque article. ?????? Are you contradicting yourself for a reason????????

      Report Post » shotgun  
    • Beckofile
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:31pm

      All Palin knows is the Constitution and Declaration. Your just bummed she does not repeat Huffpo, newsweak, time, abc, nsmbc, cnn and all the other current indoctrination documentation.

      Report Post » Beckofile  
    • 912Cindy
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:48pm

      She’s rubber, you’re glue what you say bounces off of her and sticks on you …. (just as informed comment as yours I’m afraid). And I did it without your bragged about big college education!

      Report Post »  
    • Hugh Williams
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:56pm

      Oh I am sorry. I thought this story was about Presidential Candidates hand writing the Constitution to prove they have read it. I guess it was actually about Sarah Palin’s intelligence. My bad. In the future I will try to stay on subject like GlennBeckIsADemagogue.

      Report Post » Hugh Williams  
    • turf_dude
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:18pm

      Good one! Does Keith Olbermann know your stealing his material?

      Report Post »  
    • Sicboy
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:26pm

      Yes I have Hugh, I’m a Christian first a Conservative second. What does the Constitution have to do with quitters? Oh, I don’t drink cool-aid.

      Report Post » Sicboy  
    • 64wildcat
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:56pm

      His sister is calling me too…Get a life if none is available come up with something that pertains to the discussion

      Report Post »  
    • thunder4570
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 9:16pm

      more of the idiots who post, giggle then fondle their selves!

      Report Post » thunder4570  
    • Hugh Williams
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 9:19pm

      SICBOY
      I have read the article above several times and I did not see anything about Sarah Palin. It is obvious you are talking about her. I know she is very smart and very beautiful, but you need to quit obsessing about her. She is married and I don’t think she is interested in you. Maybe you can find a nice girl or boy your own age that will like you back.
      P.S. Cherry Kool Aid is my favorite.

      Report Post » Hugh Williams  
    • Hugh Williams
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 9:36pm

      SICKBOY
      Are you one of the uber rich(a little German lingo)? I only ask because those of us that have actually drank Kool Aid should know it is spelled with a k not a c. My guess not much Kool Aid is served at Marthas Vineyard where you grew up.

      Report Post » Hugh Williams  
  • Steverino
    Posted on September 9, 2010 at 5:38pm

    Brilliant idea. I would hazard a guess that there are very few members of Congress that have ever even read the Constitution. A great starting point, to be sure. Be aware of what you are swearing to uphold.

    Report Post »  
    • Sicboy
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:38pm

      I‘ll say sorry up front to the Phd’s who wrote this. But what a lame idea, what’s next? A polygraph test. Why don’t we vote for upstanding people. Then we won’t have to bother with the gimicks. Speaking of gimmicks, no public office quitters. Who believe they have a chance to promote conservative ideas by quitting a office they sought.

      Sicboy  
    • Hugh Williams
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 7:50pm

      I have a question for SICBOY have you ever read the Constitution?

      Report Post » Hugh Williams  
    • BinAZ
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:22pm

      To SICBOY – You bring up a good question however, I have found that it is very difficult to vote for someone who does not exist and who is not on the ballot. When you find an upstanding candidate, anywhere, please let us know so we can vote for him/her.

      Report Post »  
    • Juniemoon
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:45pm

      In the bible, Kings were required to write the whole 5 books of the Torah before two scribes,who watched while the King wrote it, every letter had to be spaced correctly, leaving nothing out. The purpose was so that the ruler understood he was not above the people, he had to follow the same law. He had to know the law. That’s the point with writing the constitution. Great idea..

      Report Post » Juniemoon  
    • ChuckieG
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 9:25pm

      You know. I think this is great. They have come up with a way that the next President can make sure he knows what he is protecting. I mean, right now the one in office is whipping his butt with it almost daily.

      Report Post »  
    • independentvoteril
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 10:07pm

      Sicboy.. did YOU not have to read and pass 2 Constitution tests before you could finish school??? the FIRST one is in 8th grade.. I can STILL say the preamble..So WHY should be so FAR FETCHED that someone who’s JOB it it is to FOLLOW it to be able to WRITE it.?. After all it‘s NOT anywhere near as long OR complicated as the HEALTHCARE bill that our current president couldn’t even READ..

      Report Post » independentvoteril  
    • Sicboy
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 11:09pm

      it’s a gimmick, and you can’t see pass the Constitution to understand it. I WANT REAL CONSERVATIVES TO RUN FOR OFFICE. I believe in EVERY word of the Constitution. Our Govt is out of control, but I was trying to say just because someone can hand write the Constitution doesn’t mean their worth a hill of beans. We have LIARS everywhere. Right now we can only look at a persons past to understand how they might act in the future. I am not the enemy, and I will not drink cool-aid just because someone can write the Constitution.

      Report Post » Sicboy  
    • Sicboy
      Posted on September 9, 2010 at 11:41pm

      No Hugh, I grew up poor. And now have a middle class life style. What does writing the Constitution have to do with this? Have you seen my posts or are you to busy with your personal attacks? Be specific if you can.

      Report Post » Sicboy  
    • bnjmnwst
      Posted on September 10, 2010 at 2:32am

      SICBOY, would having them handwrite the Constitution somehow keep us from being able to determine if they are indeed fine, upstanding, straight-shooting candidates? What’s the problem. It is obviously not a gimmick. The guys who came up with the idea have clearly stated their reasoning. Nothing in there about a gimmick. No, we shouldn’t decide to vote for any candidate simply because he wrote out the Constitution, just like we shouldn’t decide to vote for any candidate simply because he has a particular party affiliation or any other single criteria. We should gather all of the information we can about a particular candidate and make our decision accordingly. Having them agree to write the Constitution will not deter me from doing my duty as a citizen and performing my due diligence. I think this is a fantastic idea, and I would certainly want to find out more about any candidate who would agree to do this.

      Report Post »  
    • watchmany2k
      Posted on September 10, 2010 at 4:06am

      They “write” out the constitution with their oath of office already.
      I would rather they write out an oath that states they will oppose sharia and international law being applied in the U.S. And that they persue and end the corruption that is progressivism starting with
      RICO investigations of this current congress associates and family’s with the aim of recouping “tarp” & “stimulus” monies. A freeze of Soros’ assets along with Cair would get my vote.

      Report Post » watchmany2k  
    • Mandiru
      Posted on September 10, 2010 at 5:22am

      In all honesty, I have to agree with Sicboy. Obama doesn’t believe in the Constitution, he thinks it‘s an outdated document that’s overdue for a revision. Anyone could copy word for word the Constitution, but in the end that won’t keep them from ignoring it after they have the job. Unless the candidate has the right mindset, the ability to keep his word, and always have at heart what‘s in this country’s best interest…writing on a piece of paper really won’t mean anything to them.

      Report Post » Mandiru  
    • numbat
      Posted on September 10, 2010 at 5:24am

      I have to agree with sicboy on this. It is a gimmick. Our current POTUS is a so called constitutional scholar. Do you think for a minute that he would not write out the Constitution all the while thinking how horrible it is. Maybe even with notes in the margins on where it should be improved.

      This is a gimmick politicians lie constantly. They will tell you what you want to hear so that they can feed their need to be in control of people. The trick is to find people who believe that the best leaders don’t command from on high but lead by example and also believe that that the best government is one that governs the least.

      Report Post » numbat  
    • Caffeinated Texan
      Posted on September 10, 2010 at 9:50am

      Sicboy: I think I am the only person who does not look down on Sarah Palin for stepping down as governor of Alaska.

      During the final months of her governorship, Palin was constantly defending herself against unfounded legal attacks waged by political enemies. Each accusation was proven false, but court costs were ridiculously high. In the end, Palin saw that the attacks would continue and the costs to her state would be enormous.

      By stepping down, she showed two things: 1) that she is not a typical power-hungry politician, and was willing to relinquish power if she felt it was the right thing to do. And 2) that she was willing to put her state ahead of herself, even if it meant having a reputation as a quitter.

      George Washington could have been president for life, and kings stood in awe as he relinquished power. Sarah Palin is derided for saving her state millions of dollars, at the expense of her reputation.

      I would vote for Palin if she were running against, say, McCain. Only because we already have enough progressives in high office. Against Romney or Huckaby, she wouldn’t get my vote. I like Sarah, but I don’t think she would make the best president in the world. But “because she’s a quitter”? No, I couldn’t care less about that.

      Report Post »  
    • Hugh Williams
      Posted on September 10, 2010 at 12:08pm

      SICBOY
      You started the personal attacks with your cheap shot at Sarah Palin. And yes now I have read a lot of your post on several stories. I do agree with you that our government is out of control and no longer works to serve the American People. I know having candidates hand write the Constitution does not ensure they will respect and follow it. But at least we will know they have actually read it. I doubt 50% of members of Congress have actually read the Constitution. When I read your shot at Sarah Palin I thought you were another leftist like Danglinbags. I have now read your post on several stories. I agree with you on more things than I disagree with you on. I like Sarah Palin and I think she is the real deal, you do not. To each his own.
      P.S. sometimes I can be a smart ass, just ask my wife……sorry.

      Report Post » Hugh Williams  
1 2 3 4

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love