Racy ‘Diesel’ Ads Embarrass Brooklyn Law School
- Posted on November 14, 2010 at 1:28am by
Scott Baker
- Print »
- Email »
I don’t buy the disingenuous complaining. If you allow any fashion line targeting young people to use your facilities for a photo shoot you have to expect the worst. But this was apparently a shock to the folks at the Brooklyn Law School:
Brooklyn Law School officials rented Diesel its library expecting a tasteful photo shoot for a jeans ad — but what they got was a steamy display of writhing young models in skimpy lingerie grinding against books and computers.
“It’s gross. I work on those computers every day!” fumed a female student, referring to a shot showing two bra- and panty-clad women climbing over the machines toward an open-mouthed man.
“Ugh. The library fantasies are now relentless.”
Red-faced school officials said they were duped by Diesel.
“We are as shocked and mortified as you must be by these photographs,” interim dean Michael Gerber wrote in an e-mail yesterday to students, faculty and staff.
Duped? Diesel?



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (52)
clrkrd
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 12:42pmI looked at the pics as part of “Research”. Nobody would know this was taken at the Brooklyn Law School if they hadn’t made such a big deal about it. You can not tell what school these were taken at in the pictures. By the way, this is not tax payers money. Do people even read the articles here before they post?
Report Post »garylee123
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 12:21pmDo those undies come in a size 54?
Report Post »heavyduty
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 11:46amJust think that all these lawyers will be coming to a courtroom near you. Would you want a lawyer that attended this school to represent you. The school evidently didn’t even do any research on this guy. I have never heard of him. I didn’t see much modeling going on. But I guess you get what you pay for.
Report Post »T.E.A.PARTNER
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 11:43amI overheard a couple kids talking about ‘diesel’. Turns out they were talking about some kind of marijuana. Might explain it.
Report Post »wiseguy33
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 10:36amThey look like students with a lot of ambition….. Huh?
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 10:11amIn other words… if you happen to find any reference material from BLS with the pages stuck together, now you know why.
Report Post »puck30
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 10:09amDarn! I should have went to Law School.
Report Post »lobster
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 9:28amStupid, but it’s not as graphic as the TSA junk….
Report Post »Johnnyp1958
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 8:51amGet rid of the dudes and its perfect
Report Post »betterthantv
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 8:37amSex sells. It’s that simple. Direct your anger at society and the lack of Faith in this country. Not Diesel. There just giving people what they want.
Report Post »Dawgnabox
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 8:21amThose have got to be the ugliest skivvies I have ever seen. I have seen better looking skivvies in the ER! What a joke……
Report Post »AR485
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 7:51amI think the law students are confused about their briefs.
Report Post »ItsallaboutJesus
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 8:03amI think you’re right!!
Report Post »burnteye86
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 4:54amEveryone (almost) seems to be moraly bankrupt
Report Post »ARCHON
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 4:08amain’t this the SAME PLACE THEY FILMED DEBBIE DOES DALLAS?
Report Post »RobR
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 3:44amWell it looks like diesel ain‘t your father’s Oldsmobile no mo……unless your dad’s now your mom.
Report Post »revelstoke92
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 2:59amThat’s the most respectable and classy thing any law school has produced in a quarter century. I can understand why they’re upset, Deisel just raised the bar. How can The Brooklyn Law School be expected to maintain these standards ?
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 5:18amI may be stating the obvious…. that’s funny!
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »joseph Fawcett
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 2:27amIf the school knew about the underware shoot then underware in a law school is open invitation to this kind of thing. The school says it thought it was going to be jeans, then why are they not taking the company to court in breach of contract. They would have grounds for the company defaming their reputation with such a shoot. They are a Law School and they would be doing something about it if it was not spelled out in the contract what articles of cothing were going to be used. Underware in a public place is nothing about anything else but sex.
http://www.josephfawcettart.com western artist
blacksmith
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 4:53amThey had to sign the contract to see what was in it! Maybe they have not had the course on contract law yet.
Report Post »TrueGrit
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 7:57amGood one Blacksmith! HA!
Report Post »Living In NYC
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 2:17amWould you expect egghead educators to know anything…get real they live in a world far, far away!
Report Post »green_manalishi
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 2:17amFrankly I was expecting to watch a advertisment featuring Womyn of the alternative lifestyle ( lipstick vs diesel) writhing around in various stages of undress. In that case I would complain tirelessly while not being able to tear my eyes away. What I saw where people of diversity complaining about an add containing non diverse people. The usual tripe. AL!, REV SHARPTON ! JEALOUS ! ( mommy!) Come running now. Didn‘t we march in the 60’s so we wouldn’t have to have white people in our library. The black model is just window dressing.
Report Post »ritamweep
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 2:16amThis is what happens to our country when children grow up with parents that don’t parent.
Report Post »vonryansexpress
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 2:14amWhat’s to respect about a law school?
Assorted individuals selling a degree to redistribute income using inflated govt. backed loans to create the market.
The pictures just show the innuendo of some models doing to each other what the law schools are doing to the rest of us.
Report Post »starman70
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 10:17amWHOOOEEE! My thoughts EXACTLY!
Report Post »SaintMichael
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 2:02amJ.D. increasingly the most worthless of the post undergrad degrees. I would know. Any fool can get one. This is my shocked face:|
Report Post »Okpulot Taha
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 1:58amShoot, those photos are PG rated. Only objection I have is the lousy fashion sense of this outfit Diesel. Those are awful looking undergarments; cheesy.
Okpulot Taha
Report Post »Choctaw Nation
snowleopard3200 {mix art}
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 3:24amI will summarize it like this “GROSS!!!”
No fashion sense indeed.
http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm
citizenoftexas
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 11:58am@ Snow Leper: A-hem, dude…I’ve seen your “work”. You may want to reconsider the fashion tips.
Report Post »flintandsteel
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 9:55pmOkpulot – well said – this is much ado about nothing. Just children playing at being fools ‘n tools.
Report Post »keepinupwithjones
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 1:35amThis is where our future judges come from. Lol.
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 1:44amThey should fit in well with the judicial activist who set on too many of our benches today.
Report Post »KenInIL
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 4:55amLawyers (Liars) – anything for a buck !!
Report Post »drattastic
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 1:34amI thought diesel was something you put in a VW rabbit or long haul truck,guess I’m not very hip.
Report Post »Dustyluv
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 4:18amOur tax dollars hard at work…
Report Post »rebel
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 5:16amthat’s not our tax dollars. that’s an ad company that rented the facility. And they must be hard up for cash if they don’t check into who they are renting too. you could‘ve said those were orgie pics found on facebook and i would’ve believed it
Report Post »Rev. WC
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 5:48amLawyers embarrassed? You’re kidding right?
Report Post »ozz
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 5:55amLong as it is not viewed by children I see no reason to be of concern. Jealous ugly people will though.
AR485
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 7:50amDon’t feel bad, Drattastic, I thought they were talking about the actor Van Diesel and remember thinking, “Why is he in law school?”!
TexasHillsPatriot
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 9:29amAR485: Ditto! I thought it might be a promo for a movie. I guess I have no fashion sense.
Report Post »DimmuBorgir
Posted on November 14, 2010 at 3:05pmthey look gay as hell to me
Report Post »