Rahm Emanuel on Deficit: Obama Offered a Plan, Republicans Offered an Ideology
- Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:11pm by
Madeleine Morgenstern
- Print »
- Email »

Image source: ABC
Former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel said President Barack Obama won’t get the blame if the congressional supercommittee fails to cut $1.2 trillion from the federal budget, because Obama already offered his own plan while Republicans offered “an ideology.”
“He’s offered a plan — and what they’ve offered is an ideology,” the Chicago mayor told Christiane Amanpour on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday. “He’s offered a grand bargain, and they have refused a bargain.”
Back in April, Obama proposed cutting $4 trillion from the deficit in a plan that called for $1.5 trillion in tax increases and ultimately went nowhere. If the 12-member bipartisan panel does not reach consensus by Tuesday, an automatic series of $1.2 trillion cuts will be triggered to take place over the next 10 years.
Emanuel said the GOP has “refused to budge on a single piece of their agenda” which is “not how you get to an agreement.”
“The Senate leader for the Republican Party said my number one goal is to make President Obama a one-term president. Now, that’s very hard to bring bipartisanship when that’s the operating principle of the other side.”
“His number one goal is to how we make ourselves competitive in the 21st century,” he said. “Those are two different operating principles.”
Coming off a Saturday speech to Democratic activists in Iowa, which included what Amanpour described as a “hilarious if scathing send-up of a lot of the Republican candidates,” Emanuel also slammed the GOP presidential contenders vying for Obama’s job. He declared that Mitt Romney — who beat Obama 51 percent to 47 percent in a recent poll — cares nothing for the middle class.
“As the campaign continues” Emanuel said, “More and more people will see who [Romney] is willing to stand for and who he turns a blind eye towards — and that’s the middle class.”
Emanuel said the key to Obama winning again in 2012 is to “remind people of what was done three years ago,” and what is still left to be done.
Watch the full interview below, via ABC:



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (105)
OlefromMN
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:46pmThe deficit is all Obama’s. He is the one that approves spending beyond revenues. The DEBT is a shared liability, but Obama has taken that to a new extreme.
National debt in Jan. 2001 was $5.6T and in Jan. 2009 it was $10.5T. Bush added $4.9T of debt over 8 years or $600B/year in deficit spending. Today’s debt stands at $14.9T. Obama has deficit spent at a rate of $1.6T/year. How does Rahm plan on defending that FACT?
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:57pmBeware of DEMOCRATS bearing gifts. The Grand Plan. Spend our prosperity, steal our childrens prosperity, steal our great grand children’s prosperity. Incite Radical muslim terrorists, incite American terrorist’s. Destroy the housing market. Destroy the job market. Rape American Business. Kill American Babies. Yes, this is what I call a Grand Plan. Just as Marx envisioned it.
Crush Barry Nov 2012
Report Post »ripley
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:44pmWhat else would you expect Rahm Emanuel to say???
Report Post »Tear Em Up
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:48pmHe talks financial conservatism, now that he has a budget to address. Sadly, he will not admit the big O is not financially conservative. Rahmbo is pathetic..
http://traffic.libsyn.com/mikeleeandterrymartin/Number_90_Nov._20th._2011.mp3
Report Post »Arshloch
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:43pmObama’s plan is simple, so is obama, spend and increase the deficit until the systeme is in collapse, then change the name to Kenya Jr, appoint himself king, oppress the masses of ‘stupid churls’ and live happily ever after. P.S Emanuel will be the ‘enforcer’
Report Post »johjoh
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:43pmThis man make me SICK!!!!!
Report Post »smokeysmoke
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:34pmRahm needs Obama to get re-elected…. Otherwise He wont Get the bailout for chicago… AND WILL BE FACING MUNICIPAL BANKRUPTCY… ruh roe RAHM
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:33pmThe Republicans offered specifics proposals. That is a plan.
Rahm Emanuel is engaged ion sophistry. Two more years in Chicago without the city getting better & everyone will see what an empty suit, he is.
Report Post »NHABE64
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:30pmGive us a break Ramhm, do Americans are still falling for this crap ? Liar, liar pants on fire. Obama is running scared and is deperate. Republicans offer an ideology ? Ha! That is so laughable I almost want to puke. You are simply chaning the words around because ALL of America knows that Obama is the one with the ideology, and its a socialist/communist ideology. Get take a flying jump you wretched Obamanite. Obama’s days are numbered and maybe yours too. How despicable to say such things when we all know Obama is going down and I mean HARD. Better change ships there amigo.
Report Post »paulusmaximus
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:29pmRahm Emanuel is a lair and a crook who belongs in jail not in office. Obama has used a tired old trick to make his reelection and I fear there are enough stupid, lazy people who will believe this type of rhetoric and it will mean the end of this country as we know it! NO GOD NO PEACE KNOW GOD KNOW PEACE!
Report Post »smokeysmoke
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:23pmi mean did you see john kerry on MEET THE PRESS THISMORNING…. i mean so much agraculture product all over david gregory… that he almost stopped asking questions and just let JOHN KERRY RANT AND LIE ABOUT WHAT THE SUPERCOMMITTE IS DOING… lie about history… lie about the great depression.. lie about calvin cooldige… I MEAN JOHN KERRY WAS SO FULL OF IT THIS MORNING
Report Post »TexOkie
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:09pmWhat drags this POS out these days. Doesn’t he have a city to run?
Report Post »TheE
Posted on November 21, 2011 at 1:11amChicago has been pretty much run into the ground already. Not much left to do but demonize people responsible enough to propose cutting spending. What a horrible ideology?
Anyone but O – 2012!
Report Post »grayling646
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:09pmGrasping at straws, maybe? And I wouldn’t watch the video if The Blaze offered to pay me. Well, possibly if they paid me enough….
Report Post »Qoheleth
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:05pmThis is kind of funny, if you take him at face value (generally a losing proposition). He seems not to understand that “the plan” was based entirely on an ideology; an ideology, in fact, that has already failed miserably to fix the problem. Republicans, to an extent, are indeed offering a counter-ideology which, if used in creating a plan, has a good change of getting us out of this mess.
Report Post »The Democrat plan is basically to spend even more government money in order to artificially prop up the economy. This inevitably results in inflation and higher taxes (or fees, etc.) The Republican ideology states that the way to “fix” the economy is to free it from the overburdening regulation and taxes and it will fix itself.
showmerancher
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:59pmSeems to me the only real written plan Obama submitted was the 2011 Budget… which was soundly defeated… by Democrats!
Report Post »Mtroom
Posted on November 21, 2011 at 3:13amExactly,..All I have seen is the same plan over and over again from the dem’s…I hear them say “compromise ” What compromise have they made?…Does anyone know?…As the debate goes on, it’s always the same…rep‘s won’t compromise…Still, no matter whatever plan comes out will be shot down in the senate anyways…Because Harry Reid hasn’t seen his trees change colors this fall and needs a vacation…Looks like we have to face the fact that nothing will get done until the next election…I believe to many on both sides are worried for their jobs and don’t want to commit to anything at all..Which ironically is a commitment ..
Report Post »50BMG
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:58pmVery funny. And very true.
The problem is that there are so many tails up in government, we’re all getting covered in “agricultural products”.
Report Post »Noonien_Soong
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:57pmOle Rahmie may be partially right unless he believes in putting the cart before the donkey. The Repubs believe in placing a plan up first before the ideology is enacted, sort of as a guide..
Report Post »Obama’s plan is basically using a flawed ideology to enact his plan.
Hickory
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:48pmI think Rham is missing his girl friend Princess Nancy. He is getting a bit up tight lately.
Report Post »YoungBloodNews
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:46pmGo away Rahm, or should we analyze the great city you run???
Report Post »Walkabout
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 4:50pmRahm = High or Lofty in Hebrew
The dear man just knows so much more than the rest of us poor sots.
You’ll see. He will turn around Chicago in 4 years flat. He is soooooooooooooooooo shmart!
Report Post »jakartaman
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:44pmJoe the Plummer – nailed Barry – have we forgotten
Report Post »Joe – We need you buddy
jakartaman
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:42pm“Ask not what you can do for your country but what your country can do for you.”
Report Post »That does not sound right did I get it wrong?
OWS or TEA Hum!
The new democratic motto for 2012
HKS
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:46pmHow is that plan working for him in Chicago?
Report Post »Slayer
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:39pmA plan, huh Rahm? Let’s look at what the Obama PLAN got us these last three years:
- $15 trillion deficit
- 100% Debt to GDP
- US in a depression
- ruined economy
- US credit rating downgraded
- 20% real unemployment
- ignores the War Powers Act
- gas/food/clothing prices skyrocketing
- 5 wars, one with a record death toll
- foreign policy disasters
- raiding the public pension fund to avoid the debt ceiling
- lost 800+ seats for his own party
- Sends American troops to support the Lord’s Resistance Army in Africa
- poll numbers in the toilet
- 45 million Americans on food stamps
- Over half the states suing to get out of Obamacare
- 1 in 4 mortgages under water
- ATF gunrunning scandal unfolding
- Solyndra scandal unfolding
At this point, I’ll take an ideology any day.
Report Post »bdwatcher
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 8:10pmDon’t forget he forgoes decision on the pipeline until afte the elections. Political and Religious correctness…. EPA, NRLB, UNIONS, ACLU.. Who is benind the OWS? My friends we are in serious trouble. I hope we get to the elections..
Report Post »JakeEllis
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:31pmClass warfare, communist indoctrination, lie upon lie upon lie. Barry’s game plan.
Report Post »OlefromMN
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:23pmLet‘s take Obama’s plan and offer it right back at him. Rather than “tax the rich” we can offer a “tax the democrats”. There are far more democrats than rich and we could dig out of our debt a lot quicker by taxing that group.
Or was there another Obama “plan”?
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:25pmRahm Emanuel is a “stupid man”.
Report Post »AzDebi
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:30pmSo, let me see if I got this right…Obama slithers out of the country (his MO everytime there is a conflict brewing) and Rahm steps up and SPEAKS for him…OH…OKAY…NOW we get it! Shut up Rahm…and…butt out…Don’t you have a mob in Chick-aug-oo to run?
Report Post »OlefromMN
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:31pm@ 10th
That would be STUPID man. No quotes needed.
Report Post »The10thAmendment
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:59pm@ OlefromMN
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:31pm
@ 10th
That would be STUPID man. No quotes needed.
Report Post »———————————————————————————————————————–
I wasn’t sure whether to extoll virtue to the inference, or to ensure emphasis. I chose to post it the way Brad Pitt did in the movie “The Devils Own” when responding to a criminal thug.
audiemurphy
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:21pmHe offered a great plan……. ya like I remove the right eyeball or the left eyeball you choose.
Report Post »Obama cut deficit by 4 trillion ! ya right on the backs of the rich by increasing taxes and stifling job creation that’s why it was turned down! Rahm ya freaking clown!
The_Almighty_Creestof
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:18pmLOL…no. Obama offered smoke/mirrors/lies. Republicans offered reality.
Dear ol’ Rahm…I wonder if he is somewhere right now jabbing a steak knife into a table and yelling “die!”
Pathetic, cowardly liar. When the “day of the rope” comes…you’ll be swinging in the wind.
Report Post »On The Bayou
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:13pmHey RAHM we are all hip to Obama`s plan.
Report Post »truthseekerusa
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 3:20pmYeah, destroy the American economy and then turn the country of a replica of pre-WWII Germany. Any comparison between what Obama and his corrupt cronies have done? Maybe a combination of Communism/Socialism and Fascism?
Report Post »obamabirthcertificate.net
Posted on November 20, 2011 at 11:07pm15 trillion in debt is a plan for disaster.
Obama’s birth certificate contains many anomalies justifying further investigation by law enforcement, as does his social security number. Both are alleged to be fraudulent by numerous experts. However even if the alleged fraud had gone unnoticed and it’s assumed he was born in HI, Obama is still not Constitutionally eligible.
Article 2, Section 1, requires the President to be a natural born citizen. This involves two equally important prerequisites. The first is being born in the USA or sovereign US jurisdiction. The second is being born to US citizen parents (plural). Both prerequisites must be satisfied. Obama absolutely failed to meet one prerequisite at birth and maybe both. He does not have TWO US citizen parents! Therefore he is not eligible.[1]
Patriots love the truth! Progressive socialist democrats… not so much.
1. Well researched referenced explanations of both prerequisites: http://www.obamabirthcertificate.net
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on November 21, 2011 at 2:53amobamabirthcertificate.net
Report Post »Who says that being the child of two citizens is a requirement for establishing natural born citizenship? Not the Constitution, not any law or act of Congress, and definitely not the Supreme Court! When they finally ruled on the issue back in 1898, they said just the opposite – it doesn’t matter who your parents are as long as you‘re born here. I can’t see that any of the crackpots you reprint on your website have any source for this strange delusion other than their deliberate misinterpretation of an irrelevant Supreme Court decision that both predates their 1898 ruling, and specifically says that it is not setting a precedent or establishing a complete and exclusive definition of natural born citizenship.
obamabirthcertificate.net
Posted on November 21, 2011 at 5:15pm@ Chet Hempstead
Aka: Chester the Molester of truth (and creepy stalker).
Motto: “The Constitution, don’t examine it too closely.”
As I’ve demonstrated by well researched properly referenced facts presented in the context of accurate American history, a careful logical reading of Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution, contrasted 1790 1st Congress law repealed and replaced by the 3rd in 1795, Amendment 14 and Supreme Court findings, all confirm that a natural born citizen is one born within US jurisdiction of US citizen parents (plural).[1]
Proving there is a difference between a natural born citizen and a citizen, beyond excluding naturalized citizenship, proves Obama is an ineligible usurper!
America won’t be dissuaded from learning the truth by your inept Alinsky attacks obscuring facts with absurd unsupported contentions and previously answered perpetually preposterous questions. A recent thread offers extensive proof of your habitual misleading fraud: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/love-lost-obamas-personal-assistant-reggie-love-quitting/?corder=asc#commentsAlinsky
Dr. Savage, Ph.D., was certainly right when he wrote:
“Liberalism is a Mental Disorder”
Lamentably truth seldom accompanies subversive liberal bias by progressive socialist democrats.
1. TPC, “Obama is Not an Eligible Natural Born Citizen” http://www.ObamaBirthCertificate.net (July 4, 2011)
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on November 21, 2011 at 6:42pmobamabirthcertificate.net
I want people to examine the Constitution, that’s the only way they will know that nothing in it supports your claims about what it means. You should get a motto of your own, like “The Constitution, I’ll tell you what it should say.”
The “1790 1st Congress law” that you refer to was the NATURALIZATION Act. A more literate reader would have been able to figure out from the title alone that it had absolutely jack squat to do with the definition of natural born citizenship or the status of people born IN this country.
Report Post »obamabirthcertificate.net
Posted on November 21, 2011 at 11:44pm@ Chet Hempstead
Aka: Chester the Molester of truth (and creepy stalker).
Motto: “The Constitution, don’t examine it too closely.”
That issue was addressed, even under the minimal character restrictions of this site, in one of the comments included in the linked thread. Anyone interested in seeing the depths of your Alinsky lies and depravity can see the comment posted on November 13, 2011 at 2:36am.
Obviously, like every progressive socialist democrat, you can’t handle the truth!
However provided you even are an American citizen, if you have any interest in understanding the Constitution written to establish and preserve American liberty, try actually reading the article “Obama is Not, an Eligible Natural Born Citizen.”[1]
I’m not condensing pertinent aspects of the site point by point for you anymore. You just ignore the answers and then pretend your purposefully misleading contentions or questions haven’t previously been addressed. Just stop your deceit. You’re finished here.
You have been weighed, measured, and found wanting. In what world could you possibly justify such deceit? Begone, foul Obot. Your very name screams ignorance and treason.
1. TPC, “Obama is Not an Eligible Natural Born Citizen” http://www.ObamaBirthCertificate.net (July 4, 2011)
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on November 22, 2011 at 1:51amobamabirthcertificate.net
Report Post »I read your article and it doesn’t say anything meaningful. First it wastes a lot of space establishing that there must logically be some difference between a citizen and a natural born citizen, even though nobody ever said there wasn’t. Proving this, which nobody ever denied, is not the same as proving that there is any difference other than the exclusion of naturalized citizens born in other countries. Then there’s a lot of irrelevant gobbledygook about the Naturalization Act. The one thing I don’t see is any law or court decision establishing that anyone born in this country is not a natural born citizen. You have never been able to cite any such authority for this weird belief, and you never will, because there is none.
Chet Hempstead
Posted on November 23, 2011 at 5:28amBeckIgnoresConstitution
Report Post »I am not a follower of Mr. Alinsky as I am not a radical. I took another look at your arguments on that previous thread, but I’m at a loss to find the part where you factually refute anything I said. All I see is circular logic, irrelevant references to statutes dealing with citizenship status of people born in other countries, and increasingly pompous and overblown insults and abuse.
Troll Patrol
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 2:18am@ Chet Hempstead
Troll Patrol is watching you and is not happy with your Alinsky lies and libel.
Patriots are advised not to feed this anti-American progressive socialist troll.
“The worth of your opinion is in direct proportion to the number of people who have asked for it.”
How to quickly and correctly understand Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution.
Report Post »Now you can easily share the facts with fellow patriots who can handle the truth!
“Obama is Not an Eligible Natural Born Citizen”
http://www.ObamaBirthCertificate.net (July 4, 2011)
Chet Hempstead
Posted on November 24, 2011 at 4:16amTroll Patrol
Of what lies do you speak? I am quite sincere in my belief that the facts in this matter are clear, and clearly on my side. If there are any facts in the article to which you link that would support your contention, I am unable to discern them.
I am unaware of anyone having actually asked for your opinion either.
Report Post »