Entertainment

‘We’ll Pay for Cocaine’: Oliver Stone Opens Up About His New Pro-Drug Action Flick

Oliver Stone Talks About New Pro Drug Movie Savages

Director Oliver Stone (Source: Shutterstock)

Just like many big Hollywood blockbusters, Oliver Stone’s new action flick, Savages, is intricately laced with a political agenda. Though Stone may deserve some credit for being honest enough to admit it openly.

He told Current TV, in an interview that airs tonight at 11 p.m., that his new pro-drug movie puts a spotlight on America’s “war on drugs,” which he says has been an absolute failure. Stone also says that his support of drug legalization played a part in the crafting of the film, as well as many of his previous ones. Here’s how he summarizes Savages:

“We have the best weed in the world — Cause I’m telling you that from my own experience for 40 years,” he told California’s Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom. “We started, I mean, Vietnamese weed, Thai weed, Jamaican weed, Sudanese weed and it was all great stuff. But now, actually, because Americans are so technically-minded and mad chemists — they have really taken the Afghan seeds from the Afghan war — that’s the hypothesis of our movie — and brought them to California, rededicated themselves and made the finest seeds in the world, the finest grass you could smoke.”

As a result, the Mexican cartels, who basically “produce a lot of ”s***“ such as ”insecticide weed”, want to go into business with the California drug dealers.

Got your ticket yet? But it didn’t take long before the conversation shifted from the cinema and weed to talks about cocaine and good old fashioned prescription drugs.

“It’s doubly ironic because our values are corrupted by the fact that our citizenry wants the drugs…And we’ll pay for grass, we’ll pay for cocaine, we’ll pay for – we’ll also pay heavily for prescription drugs as you know, Stone said. ”We have to come to terms with the fact that we have drives as human beings. It’s like prohibition in the 1919, didn’t work with alcohol. It’s not gonna work with drugs – it never will.”

Stone told Current TV that he has always attracted to the drug narrative and after “40 years of experience” he feels that doing drugs is just as much of a right as marriage and having sex. Perhaps there is a hidden Constitutional amendment he is privy to.

“I am the Timothy Leary generation, I’m all screwed up from that era…And I feel that it is part of our liberation, it is part of our right. You know, the right, as you know, to sex, to marriage. I really resent the government trying to tell us what to do with our lives,” he said.

You can watch a sneak preview of Stone’s interview with Current TV here:

To be fair, according to a Rasmussen poll released on May 23, 56 percent of likely U.S. voters support legalizing and regulating marijuana. There is a strong likelihood that a much smaller percentage supports cocaine legalization.

“This drug war is insane,” Stone continued. “I remember when…Nixon declared the war on drugs. Everything’s a war in America: war on poverty, war on drugs, war on terror – we are a war country. But it hasn’t worked, it has completely backfired.”

It seems odd that he lumped the war on poverty, which is not an actual war but rather an anti-poverty initiative, in with the other “wars.”

However, after hearing this, Newsom replied, “I, by the way, couldn‘t agree more and have been very aggressive in terms of my opposition and I’m proud to be aggressive as a sitting politician.”

Remember, Newsom is a sitting California politician, which is arguably the most pro-drug legalization state in America.

Another war that Stone is critical of is what he called the “war on the border,” likely referring to the Mexico border. Other than crediting California for having the “best weed on the planet,” most of Stone’s comments were extremely critical of the U.S.

“We can not tell other people what to do. And we keep doing that,” he explained. “We go to Afghanistan, we go to Iraq, we go to Vietnam and we try to impose our values on other people. It just doesn’t seem to work.”

For a film that supposedly supports legalizing the drug trade, it certainly paints a violent picture of the industry. Take a look at the Savages trailer – action-packed with drugs, Mexican drug cartels, federal agents and a lot of gun fire:

Comments (85)

1 2
  • Canada_Goose
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 5:05pm

    Soft drug glamorization movies are a already an established film genre pioneered by Cheech and Chong and artists like Dave Chappelle. In fact there was drug action movie released a couple of years called Pineapple Express which was very funny and did well at the box office.

    I would disagree with Mr. Stone on one point, the best pot these days comes from British Columbia.

    Cheers and don’t burn your fingers on the roach.

    Report Post » Canada_Goose  
    • lukerw
      Posted on June 9, 2012 at 1:56am

      The first US Drug Law was created in 1875. How did Humanity survive before that?

      Report Post » lukerw  
  • lukerw
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 5:01pm

    I think using Drugs… unless for a Medical Benefit… is Stupid. But… Freedom allows people to act Stupid… Fascists do not for they are Stupid also! So, what we really have… is a Battle between the Stupid… where the Stupid are Winning!

    Report Post » lukerw  
  • Ch
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:39pm

    What a guy.

    Report Post »  
  • EqualJustice
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:07pm

    Boy, does he look like CRAP. Maybe he better quit the drugs.

    Report Post » EqualJustice  
  • Reeferman
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:03pm

    Where is Stones little bum buddy Shawn Penn? I quit watching anything those two commies are involved in 30 years ago

    Report Post » Reeferman  
  • MBA
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:47pm

    Yep, overpaid, out of touch liberal psycho druggies wanting to run this country into the ditch,. Oh wait they already did. thanks liberals NOT!

    Report Post »  
  • nobull14
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:46pm

    I do not want drugs legalized .But you have to admit The was on drugs is a complete failure !!!. I have watched Government and police officials want more money and more officers to fight the war on drugs since the late 1970s and there is more drugs on the street than back then. The lesson to be learned is if a person wants the drugs they are going to get them know matter what someone says or what laws they make ? . They have spent billions and the more we spend the less they stop the flow of drugs .

    Report Post »  
    • EqualJustice
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:09pm

      What do you expect when drugs are glamorized and legal in some states? Undermining the war on drugs is what liberals do.

      Report Post » EqualJustice  
    • BlessedONE333
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 6:54pm

      you said “The was on drugs is a complete failure !!!.” lol yeah that ‘was’ on drugs was horrible

      hahhahahhaha

      80% of all accidents on the road happen to sober people -= work that one out in your pea brain!

      Report Post » BlessedONE333  
  • Sharon Rose
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:40pm

    People who take drugs do not have control of their lives, drugs control them.

    Report Post »  
  • Sharon Rose
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:38pm

    Wacked out jerk on drugs

    Report Post »  
  • Sue Dohnim
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:24pm

    It is the Progressive way, the art of the nudge,, an incremental destruction, demoralization and balkanization..

    In Canada they got legal heroin injection sites in, to keep junkies safe they claimed, NOW, the lefties want to supply them with free herion paid for by the taxpayers and they are screaming for legalization of pot. .. Whats next?

    Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
  • scootervanneuter
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:24pm

    Wonderful, just what our society is clamoring for – more sex and violence wrapped in a Godless liberal bow.

    Report Post » scootervanneuter  
  • Pontiac
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:11pm

    This is why I pirate movies… I’m not funding their liberal agenda. Ever.

    Report Post » Pontiac  
    • glennpatstu
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:23pm

      interesting that you think legalization is part of a liberal agenda. So, Beck and his minions are against stupid govt regulations, unless of course they aren’t. Like in this case. War on Drugs has been as big of a waste of taxpayers money as anything else in the last 20 years.

      Report Post »  
    • Pontiac
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:50pm

      Because these members of drug cartels would be NASA scientist and burger flippers once drugs are legalized, right? What better way to spread liberalism than to opiate the masses and make them dependent on government handouts.

      Report Post » Pontiac  
  • Ghandi was a Republican
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:05pm

    has anyone ever heard of a crazed weed addict shooting up the 7/11 at 3a in the morning because he needed a fix? Jails are full of people who are viewed as inventory in a business called incarceration that thrives on politics and federal revenue. Victimless crimes of possession are like profit after fixed costs have been met, for a variable cost of a couple stale bologna sandwiches.

    Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
    • EqualJustice
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:12pm

      You’ve never met my POTHEAD brother-in-law. First thing he does when he wakes up and last thing he does at night. ALL DAY LONG and can’t hold a job. WEED IS his life.

      Report Post » EqualJustice  
    • jrmhrpr78
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:28pm

      Equal, you obviously have not met me or any of my MANY friends and family members who smoke pot on a regular basis and who ALL hold jobs and take care of their families. Pot has nothing to do with the fact that your brother is a lazy punk who can’t hold a job. It does nothing to change the person that you are. Same with alcohol, some can drink a lot and keep a normal life in between, some can’t.

      Report Post »  
    • AmazingGrace8
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 5:12pm

      @jrm

      Your post caught my eye and want to comment. I keep in touch with a former co-worker from years ago and she smokes pot frequently and has always held down a job and a very good employee. She is a grandmother and is a real great lady. She has (not the vulgar-humor) humor like Roseanne Barr and she kinda looks like the slimmed-down look of Roseanne. She lives in another town but we keep in touch. Unfortunately something happened to her because of her pot smoking. Years ago (she was single at the time) she was dating a fellow that was well-known in the community and when I saw them together, it looked like they were soul-mates. He was naive about pot etc. and just before he was going to ask her to marry him, he discovered her pot smoking. I don’t consider him to be “shallow” but just didn’t approve of illegal pot smoking (or even legal) and broke off with her. She is my friend, but I don’t like pot smoking around me and she never did it around me. The point is, she knew his feelings but she wants this habit instead of life with him. She made her choice.

      Report Post »  
    • sawbuck
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 8:16pm

      I would like to agree with you.. Pot =victimless crime…
      But that story of that woman getting stoned and leaving her child
      on the roof of her car ..keeps going trough my mind….

      But Then I go to my doctor and ask him to give me something for pain ..
      because of a old injury …and he gives me the stink-eye…
      Like I’m…Pablo Escobar…!

      Report Post » sawbuck  
  • freestaterev
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:54pm

    Stone must be permanently stoned- or just a typical leftwing hypocrite (probably a bit of both).

    The libertarian will jump on Stone’s drug-war propaganda films because they sound so damn tempting to lap up. But we’re talking about a guy who is buddies with Marxist dictators. So on one hand he thinks we all should be free to get stoned- but supports government who have total control of the people- and their speech, etc, etc.

    Stone is right when he says, “I’m all screwed up from that era” (the 60s).

    Imagine what a LARGE totalitarian government lead by a dictator- with cheap, and/or free drugs for all. When the people are numb, they lose their will to fight for real freedom and liberty. I know- I’m a recovering addict who spent 10 years of my life working, and being high- there was one thing that took first priority- numbing the brain.

    Report Post » freestaterev  
    • AScannerClearly
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 11:41pm

      Odd for one to think dictators would want drugs to be legal and cheap/free, when historically, dictators have always been the strictest of prohibitionists; the last thing they want is people to have the freedom to decide what happens to their own body or minds. It’s easier to make people lose the will to fight for freedom/liberty by using fear and brute force, to convince them such a fight would be futile… it’s always worked, so no need for dictators to change the formula now.

      Report Post » AScannerClearly  
  • Ghandi was a Republican
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:54pm

    Gary Johnson said it best. We need to stop treating drug addiction as a crime and treat it as a sickness. The addicts trying to support their habit are like ground zero for a virus.. Would you make the ebola virus illegal and expect to get it under control by rewarding those who spread it with money?

    Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
    • Sue Dohnim
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:11pm

      Wrong, labelling it a sickness or illness is a scam, If you define it, it is not a sickness. There is no illness that can be alleviated by the conscious decision to stop.

      the sickness label is propaganda… by both proponents of legalized drug use and the drug addiction industry.. BIG MONEY from the State…

      The drug addiction industry is like Planned Parenthood for drug addicts, They get power and money by expanding their client base and that is done by legalizing drugs and classifying it as an illness.

      Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
  • DesdemonasCrew
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:53pm

    I’ve seen too many families destroyed by drugs. This man is a whore.

    Report Post » DesdemonasCrew  
    • Naps
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:26pm

      Legalize it all. When one Drug Kingpin is jailed. Another one takes his place,and so on and so on. People are gonna get they’re narcotics no matter what. Politicians do em. Athletes do em. Cops do em. Doctors do em. I wish i could smoke weed but I can‘t or I’ll lose my job. There is absolutely nothing wrong with marijuana. Maybe if the cronies on Capitol Hill fired up a bone every once in a while,some important issues might get resolved. All the War on Drugs accomplishes is wasted taxpayer dollars spent to lock up drug addicts who the waste more of our money on 3 hots and a kot. The war on drugs will never end

      Report Post »  
  • SREGN
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:36pm

    I hate to say it, gang, but I’m kind of with him on this one, at least as far as marijuana goes. Government bans don’t get rid of anything. They just make whatever is banned more profitable and therefore more available. The government banned alcohol we got more of it, they banned pornography we got more of it, they banned poverty we got more of it, they banned drugs we got more of them. Better to use law enforcement and prisons to go after roving bands of hate criminals in the inner cities.

    Report Post »  
    • johnjamison
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:50pm

      Yes the government apparently never learned it’s lesson during prohabition. You can’t regulate morality however if they did legalize drugs they better change the law so that people can more easily defend themselves without fear of police and judical intimidation so when some whacked out coke head decides he wants to attack or rob someone they can double tap them and not go to jail. We should also establish that those who chose to do drugs aren’t guaranteed medical services the can afford when they od,or pull their own eyes out. Establish the consequence for your actions legislation.

      Report Post »  
    • Kaoscontrol
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:03pm

      The legal arguments aside, people who smoke weed are idiots. Oliver Stone is a prime example. Why can’t we live to a higher (no pun intended) standard with mental clarity, instead of altering our ability to think straight with drug abuse?

      Report Post » Kaoscontrol  
    • Naps
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:29pm

      KAOSCONTROL…….Why are people who smoke weed idiots? Are people who drink alcohol idiots?

      Report Post »  
    • SREGN
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:59pm

      Kaos – Good point. So we legalize it and institute stand your ground laws and right to carry laws. I’m in. Okay, now that that‘s settled let’s move on to abortion, marriage, small government, free speech……

      Report Post »  
  • patriotone
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:32pm

    Where in the revered Constitution is Congress (the Fed) granted the authority to regulate drugs? I am not arguing that any one substance should be made “legal”, but am merely wondering where the authority derives from.

    Report Post »  
  • progressiveslayer
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:29pm

    Nixon started the ‘war’ on drugs back in 1971 and we‘re still fighting it and losing it and the only thing they’ve accomplished is creating a black market to raise the price and all the violence that goes with the illegal drug trade.

    Police forces are essentially paramilitary outfits and with the advent of asset forfeiture laws they’ve become collection agency goons with weapons.All drugs will be in our society forever and all the laws in the world won’t make a bit of difference because prohibition never works,well it did give us Al Capone. I don‘t agree with Stone’s support of communist dictators but on this one he’s right.

    Report Post » progressiveslayer  
    • quiltgal
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:56pm

      Many drugs, like cocaine, are more addictive than alcohol. Most people can drink alcohol responsibly and don’t become slaves to it. This is apparently not so with cocaine, and certainly not with heroine. Nor with other weird drugs that make people eat other people’s faces off. That’s the difference between prohibition of alcohol and prohibition of drugs. Weed may be somewhat more benign than cocaine or heroine, but it can still cause hallucinations. For the sake of our children, who would then not only have easy access to alcohol but also to weed, wouldn’t it be better for our society to voluntarily agree to keep it out of our culture as much as possible? Couldn’t voters, as concerned and caring parents of the next generation, agree not to have it growing it our backyards where kids could have easy access to it? That’s the problem with Oliver Stoned. Apparently, he cares only for his own needs. This is not the mentality of an adult, much less one who cares about kids.

      Report Post »  
    • codefool
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:15pm

      Actually a lot of people’s reaction about drugs is the mind numb programming that they have been drummed with their whole lives. It‘s basically when people have the knee jerk reaction of drugs are bad m’kay.

      It’s really bull crap that anyone who touches drugs automatically becomes addicted to it. It’s the same nonsense mind set that says that if you touch alcohol you will become addicted, or if anyone touches a gun they automatically become a murderer. I would say of people who do drugs roughly 2% of them become addicted.

      And then there’s the whole hand wringing of oh but teenagers would have easy access to them. It’s the same old tired “It’s for the children” mantra that has been used forever to push bad polices on. us. Of course teenagers do everything in excess, they are teenagers. Teens will abuse and do everything to excess because they are well… morons. That’s why parents need to parent their children.

      Besides if you are a teen of any cunning you can get your drug of choice in a few hours, just takes knowing where to look.

      If your moron teen is desperate enough he can get high on lots of house hold things. Benydryl, DXM, dramamine, go to the flower shop and buy some poppy pods, shake some poppy seeds in water, morning glory seeds, nutmeg, kratom, etc.

      Report Post »  
    • liberte
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:26pm

      “For the sake of our children, who would then not only have easy access to alcohol but also to weed, wouldn’t it be better for our society to voluntarily agree to keep it out of our culture as much as possible? Couldn’t voters, as concerned and caring parents of the next generation, agree not to have it growing it our backyards where kids could have easy access to it?”

      That’s the stated goal of prohibition: to prevent access to drugs. But look everywhere, it’s a huge fail. Drugs are available everywhere, and are cheap.
      Plus it provokes endless violence, sends hundreds of thousands to jail where they sit unproductive (to a cost of about 50.000$ per year to the taxpayer!), destroys entire countries etc etc.

      Whatever the goals of prohibition, it does not work. So let’s get rid of it. There are other means to control drugs. What if the 50.000$ per inmate per year were spent on medical care for addicts ? What if drug quality could be certified through testing, just like food, so consumers knew exactly that they dont ingest inhale etc bleach or whatever chemical their drug is currently mixed with ?

      Report Post »  
    • SREGN
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:17pm

      Those worried about the effect of marijuana legalization on young minds should also stop to consider the far more harmful and insidious programming of our childrens’ minds with socialist dogma and eco-terrorism being taught in schools and colleges. Let‘s get rid of that and maybe the kids won’t need to get high to escape it.

      Report Post »  
    • quiltgal
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:18pm

      @ progressiveslayer, codefool, and liberte

      I say the so-called “war” on drugs has amounted to little more than a hissy fit so far. We’ve wimped out in dealing with the Mexican border. Failure is almost guaranteed until we get serious.

      I don’t believe throwing up our hands in despair and saying “oh, kids will do everything because they are morons” is a good reason to make getting drugs easier for them, as if discipline was just too much trouble. Let’s not make it harder for parents.

      And as for ” What if drug quality could be certified through testing, just like food, so consumers knew exactly that they dont ingest inhale etc bleach or whatever chemical their drug is currently mixed with ?”: 1) Spend, spend, spend. Who cares about the deficit. 2) Where is the personal responsibility here? 3) Why should I be forced by government to pay for someone else’s bad choices? Weed, cocaine, and heroine are not even one of life’s essentials like food and water!!!!

      Report Post »  
  • quiltgal
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:23pm

    Oh yes, our country definitely needs easier access to addictive drugs, especially kids. We definitely need more people high and hooked on drugs, especially people who can’t afford them. We should be looking forward to the crimes they will commit to get the money for their fixes. And perhaps we should be looking forward to government using our taxes to give free drugs to the addicted so they won’t be committing crimes to pay for them.

    Report Post »  
    • Ghandi was a Republican
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:37pm

      Show me an addict, and I will show you someone who will push the drugs to support their habit (at least once they have expired their resources or to stretch their current ill gotten resources). We are talking hard addictive drugs here. Anytime an addict can piggyback on a new user- they will do it. That is where 100% of addicts are bred. We are creating the monster ourselves.
      This ‘war on drugs’ is like some pyramid scheme where the money involved surpasses the risk involved. It wouldn‘t be worth the risk any time of the day or night if the money wasn’t there, and the limited fools who would are standing in a laser target zone.

      Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
    • Slotback
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:57pm

      I’m looking forward to more impaired drivers on the road. That will make commuting fun!

      Report Post »  
    • glennpatstu
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:25pm

      yeah- i mean it’s not like anyone drives impaired now, or has access to drugs- legal and illegal.

      Report Post »  
    • Naps
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 3:47pm

      Quiltgal…..If heroin were legal tomorrow,would you start using it?

      Report Post »  
    • quiltgal
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 5:09pm

      @ naps

      You know I wouldn’t, and neither would a lot of other people who know better and are happy with themselves. But then there are those souls, especially uncertain and immature teenagers, who would interpret legality and easy availability of heroin as condoning it, as if it were a proper substance for personal experimentation. (Trying it out might seem even more attractive if gov’t provided free heroin to the hopelessly addicted out of “compassion.”)

      Report Post »  
  • jakartaman
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:17pm

    Hes got the right name!
    He is also an idiot commie

    Report Post »  
  • Sue Dohnim
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:14pm

    Promoting drug use in an action flick is one part of the “demoralization” of a nation and weakens the Nation State..

    Oliver Stoned and his argument fails to recognize the “Unseen” consequences, specifically how legalized drugs would effect the cultural framework that keeps individuals part of society. Drug use further balkanizes a Nation, the Left knows this, that is why they promote it. They don’t want freedom, they want division.

    Report Post » Sue Dohnim  
  • Ghandi was a Republican
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:02pm

    Legalize/decriminalize everything. It is the pushers who create the users. The war on drugs creates an inflated price point which creates the demand for pushers who then thrive on the availability of users.
    People do not get addicted because of availability. People get addicted to drugs because they are roped in by the pushers. Nobody sets out to become addicted. Pushers want the money (for their habit or whatever) and will play the user until they are depleted, at which time the user is discarded, or further exploited as a new pusher to support THEIR habit.
    The ‘war on drugs’ is inherently flawed. Perhaps limited allotments, supplemented with a market for other peoples allotments who may choose to take the money for their “allotment/stamp/etc” rather than the dope is a suitable alternative. The cartels lose everything, grandma gets a new LCD TV, and the money and jobs stay here among Americans. Let’s face it- We already do this with food stamps. Why not take out the middle man:?

    Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
    • M13
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:11pm

      So you are blaming the pusher because you needed drugs, went and sought him out, then took your own money and willfully gave it him. You are an idiot .

      Report Post »  
    • Ghandi was a Republican
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:21pm

      That’s not how it works idiot. Read it again. Who goes seeking drugs before they are addicted? It starts with the pusher who HAS THE DRUGS. Moroon! Are you really this detached from reality? People simply not get addicted to drugs unless they do them with the frequency required to become addicted. That goes for any drug. We will never fix stoopid, whether it be in the case of the irresponsible, or as in your case.

      Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
    • Ghandi was a Republican
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:26pm

      And I never heard of anyone seeking out a pusher until they were already a user!~ Come on man- git yo‘ head outta yo’ azz. I know a few D&A Counselors over the years. One a close friend. They miss it too at first. They are not trained to use their logic. They are trained to address the issue once it’s too late. What do you think drug dealers do without any customers? The same thing anyone other businessman does- seek out customers.

      Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
    • M13
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:28pm

      Do you blame someone else for all of your other problems in life too.? Stop visiting your pusher and maybe you can become something other than an idiot.

      Report Post »  
    • scuba13
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:41pm

      You two need to smoke the peace pipe.

      Report Post » scuba13  
    • Ghandi was a Republican
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 2:43pm

      You fail m13. No money in it- No pushers. No pushers, no drugs on the streets. No drugs on the streets – no new users. What you are really saying is that if drugs were decriminalized and actually CONTROLLED – that you cannot think beyond your weakness of character and become an addict simply because drugs were decriminalized? Most people would not. You need to get over that because most people are neither stoopid, nor weak. You say that you would fail in this scenario. Poor you. get a spine!

      Report Post » Ghandi was a Republican  
    • Titbit
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 4:16pm

      Legalization of drugs will lead to increased use and increased levels of addiction. As a society, we don’t want to go down that path.

      Report Post » Titbit  
    • AScannerClearly
      Posted on June 8, 2012 at 11:56pm

      @ Titbit: Yet Portugal decriminalized drug use about 11 years ago now, and have experienced a DECREASE of use and addiction. Now that addicts aren’t criminals anymore, more of them are going to rehab voluntarily to get the help they need. More money is saved, and more space exists in prison cells for violent criminals… sounds like something that we as a society, would prefer over our current status quo.

      Report Post » AScannerClearly  
    • Titbit
      Posted on June 9, 2012 at 6:57pm

      @AScannerClearly

      If it sounds too good to be true… . No, we don’t want to go there. Please read and heed my friend.
      http://www.justice.gov/dea/demand/speakout/speak_out_101210.pdf

      Report Post » Titbit  
  • Rajabear1
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:59pm

    Ok, ollie, I have and invitation for you to return to Venezuela asap. They said you are tops on their wish list as soon as your bud, chavez, kicks the bucket, they want you, you special little son of a—–, to take the job opening. Can you imagine? Your dream come true! Please take the offer, we’ll try not to shed too many tears (of joy) and we‘ll muddle on with our crazy little experiment called FREEDOM and LIBERTY with one less commie shoving their foul nastiness down our ’collective’ throat.
    Please leave and DO let the door hit you in the a@@–hard–on the way out. It is a one way ticket which should make you quite happy.

    Report Post »  
  • DimmuBorgir
    Posted on June 8, 2012 at 1:55pm

    i agree with him

    Report Post » DimmuBorgir  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love