Entertainment

Real or Fake? ‘Woolly Mammoth’ Spotted Crossing Siberian River

Viral Video: Woolly Mammoth Crosses Siberian River

It was a YouTube video destined to go viral from the get go. Show footage of what looks like an alien or Yeti and you’ll get thousands of hits within days — even hours. The latest viral footage is of a prehistoric woolly mammoth, thought to have been extinct, crossing a river in Siberia.

Watch the clip that already has more than half a million hits on YouTube and has spurred many into discussion if it’s real or hoax:

Before we get into the discussion the extreme likelihood that this clip was doctored in some way, let’s get some of the facts out there. According to The Sun, the beast was 1) thought to have gone extinct 4,000 years ago; 2) the river where footage was taken is located in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug region of Siberia; 3) it was taken last summer; and 4) it is reported that an engineer employed by the government filmed the scene.

The Sun also has the following comments from Michael Cohen, who is notorious for supporting theories of paranormal activity:

“Rumours of a handful of mammoths still kicking around in the vast wilderness of Siberia have been circulating for decades and occasionally sightings by locals have occurred.

“Siberia is an enormous territory and much of it remains completely unexplored and untouched by humans. ”

[...]

“It is highly possible that a number of species, extinct elsewhere, survive in the area.

“If surviving woolly mammoths were found in Siberia, it could run against Russia‘s plans to further develop and exploit the area’s considerable resources.

“It would be potentially one of the greatest discoveries ever.”

But here are the problems with the story circulating on the web. MSNBC reports that there are three opinions as to what could be going on this video — aside from mammoths really coming back to life. The first theory is that a creature was straight-up Photoshopped into the river scene. Others think the beast could really be a bear with a fish in its mouth. And the third thought is that it is both a bear and a Photoshopped fake. MSNBC has more:

Derek Serra, a Hollywood video-effects artist who has previously analyzed faked UFO videos, told Life’s Little Mysteries that the video, in his opinion, appears to have been intentionally blurred, probably to obscure the animal’s true identity.

“Even low-resolution cameras can focus fairly well on something,” Serra said. “But there’s really nothing in this video in focus. The rocks in the foreground have a blur to them that doesn’t seem natural.”

The Huffington Post has more thoughts on the fishiness of the video:

  • Why is the original video just 10 seconds long? Is that the only amount of time the videographer had left on his battery? Why couldn’t he have kept shooting to see what the animal would do when it reached the other side of the river?
  • Also, as pointed out by Kecia Stewart in The Fayetteville Observer, if you look closely at the full screen version of the video, the river wake appears to follow the animal’s legs, rather than moving briskly downstream.
  • If this video was shot last summer, why is it only now being revealed?
  • And how is it possible that, once again, a remarkable “smoking gun”-type video is presented to the world by the new P.T. Barnum of the modern era: Paranormal writer Michael Cohen, who claims the copyright on this mammoth video.

And might I also point out that for some reason all these Yeti and strange alien sightings always seem to come out of Siberia. What is going on here?


Comments (216)

  • Segue
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:17am

    This reminds me of Mitch Hedberg’s Bigfoot bit… “I think Bigfoot is blurry, that’s the problem. It‘s not the photographer’s fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that’s extra scary to me. There’s a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. Run, he’s fuzzy…” It’s obviously a bear carrying a fish…

    Report Post »  
    • Rational Man
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:48am

      If it was me taking the footage, I would have followed up by getting a shot of some of the enormous tracks it would have left behind when it came out of the water. Something that weighs that much would leave tracks the size and depth of a kiddie pool……..Well almost……….

      Report Post » Rational Man  
    • BehindBlueEyes
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:00am

      What a coincidence, UFO’s are always out of focus too. A very strange phenomenon.

      Report Post » BehindBlueEyes  
    • Twinspeedr
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:18am

      The shape of the head is all wrong, Mammoths had a much taller cranium. It’s also not terribly hairy, which seems like a requirement for a Siberian Mammoth to survive the cold.

      This is film trickery, using a unique piece of film of a small African or Asian elephant walking, merged with a film of the river in Siberia.

      Report Post » Twinspeedr  
    • KickinBack
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:24am

      Wookie! ARRRWWWAGGGG!

      Report Post » KickinBack  
    • OklahomaBound
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:27am

      Massive backside and big floppy ears? It’s Comrade Obama carrying Moochelle on his back across a river.

      Report Post » OklahomaBound  
    • satostud
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:32am

      Why do these videos and pitcures always come out blurry?
      I have a cheap little digital camera and it takes better video than this.
      Must be the same person taking all those UFO videos.

      Report Post » satostud  
    • AvengerK
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:15am

      It‘s curious isn’t it? They’re always out of focus and the cameraman never makes an attempt to follow.

      Report Post »  
    • NeoFan
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:20am

      What the heck is Michael Moore doing in Siberia?

      Report Post »  
    • CCulotta
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 12:06pm

      It was filmed by a Russian Government employee working in the wilds of Siberia. At best it was filmed from a distance with a crappy phone camera. If it was a crystal clear video I would be more suspicious. I think the head, neck and shoulders look to big to be a bear and the gait looks more like an elephant. Also if you look at the close up there seems to be a bit of white between the head and trunk (or fish) like there would be if the animal had small tusks. In my opinion it is either a genuine young mammoth, an elaborate mechanical dummy on a rail under the water, or a young elephant wearing a fur coat.

      Report Post » CCulotta  
    • Belchfire V-8
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 1:41pm

      Neofan, it’s too small to be Michael Moore.

      Report Post » Belchfire V-8  
    • USAMEDIC3008
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 3:21pm

      I would go with the fish story
      If it was a (trunk) It yould up out of water to breath???

      Report Post » USAMEDIC3008  
    • 2theADDLED
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:15pm

      Quick get Al Gore on the phone global warming is thawing out the dreaded wooly mammoths !

      Report Post »  
    • ILUVJESUS
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 4:33pm

      That’s a bear!

      Report Post » ILUVJESUS  
    • Zipit
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 5:20pm

      No! It’s MANBEARPIG. Call Algore!

      Report Post »  
    • Patrick Henry II
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:06pm

      The Russians are on the record that they are trying to clone Mamouths. Seems very possible to happen. As far a 4000 years extinct. I think that is in question. Some of these frozen momouths are in pretty good shape. Remember when Bill Clinton even had one for dinner. For real, actually happened.

      Report Post » Patrick Henry II  
    • BehindBlueEyes
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:22pm

      @PATRICK HENRY II
      Rumor has it Willy showed Monica his woolly mammoth.

      Report Post » BehindBlueEyes  
    • diablamonkey
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:44pm

      thats what I thought it looked like too

      Report Post »  
    • mattmo79
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:54pm

      Completely fake video!

      Report Post » mattmo79  
    • lodgerat
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:42pm

      When I took pictures of my x-wife they all came out blurry and hairy…coincidence?

      Report Post » lodgerat  
    • jb.kibs
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:37pm

      how about, “just an elephant”? LOL

      Report Post »  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 11:59pm

      Look again. That’s a Bear carrying a Salmon or some other big fish in its mouth. Nothing to see here… move along.

      Report Post » The-Monk  
    • The-Monk
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 12:14am

      Woolly Mammoths have been found frozen in the most remote and coldest regions of the Planet with grass still in their stomachs. Where did the grass come from. (Please, no pot jokes) Anyone ever spin a Signet Ring and watch it flip/spin over 90 degrees in a single turn? Guess where the grass came from and what’s headed our way?

      Report Post » The-Monk  
    • 4xeverything
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:36am

      I love Mitch Hedberg. Hilarious. “Do you need a receipt for that doughnut?”

      Report Post » 4xeverything  
  • whereareyourbrains
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:16am

    where are my posts? This will show up but nothing else…

    Report Post » whereareyourbrains  
  • whereareyourbrains
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:14am

    My little kodak would have brought that in clearer……….fake fake fake……………….where is a clear picture? dah

    Report Post » whereareyourbrains  
  • acovenantinblood
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:11am

    “But here are the problems with the story circulating on the web. MSNBC reports…”

    Catch that? “MSNBC reports.” I’d believe that mammoth over what they say.

    Report Post » acovenantinblood  
    • TheDM
      Posted on February 11, 2012 at 8:14am

      I’ll rely on MSNBC before Fox News any day of the week.

      Report Post » TheDM  
  • Xyskalla
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:10am

    Obviously, it’s a woolly mammoth. Because I believe everything I see on the internet. It must be true.

    It looks like a snuffleupagus.

    Report Post »  
  • liberalsarealiens
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:01am

    Compaired to the Mammonth the skull seems too small and not crowned. It would be nice but I think it’s a shop job!

    Report Post » liberalsarealiens  
    • lel2007
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:30am

      It’s difficult to see, but there is no splash or disruption of water as the creature walks. And at the end where the video stops, you can see the left front foot below the water ….. I’d put my money on FAKE.

      Report Post » lel2007  
  • tweetybird
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:58am

    Whatever……why is it when someone captures a UFO, Big Foot ect….they don’t know how to focus their camera.

    Report Post » tweetybird  
    • Darla_K
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 9:14am

      lol, so right you are.

      Report Post » Darla_K  
    • cyclops
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:17am

      I think the sith lord somehow is always able to make the auto-focus, not working……….LOL!!!!

      Report Post » cyclops  
  • Pat Alexander
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:57am

    Did you notice since everyone is carrying a video recorder of some kind, we don’t see many “UFO” pictures any more?

    Report Post »  
  • cemerius
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:54am

    Util I have eaten a Mammoth steak or Yeti chili ALL this crap is just that!!! More proof that the internet has a lot of crazy, tinfoil hat wearing, hot pocket eating, basement dwellers……

    Report Post » cemerius  
  • drifter09
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:50am

    Its a regular elaphant it packed its trunk and left home.

    Report Post »  
  • paleoman
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:46am

    Bear with a fish, but I did see a Dodo bird on the shore line.

    Report Post »  
  • CJohnWest
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:33am

    So what makes a picture of a bear (or large dog but come on it’s a bear) catching a fish, or possibly a piece of some cloth, a mammoth? The sea serpeant at least had a chance to be a life form. On an enviromental note: if we keep letting the bears and sharks populate themselves unchecked and preserved completely we will have no more fish; which will makeJeeves sad. Any responpsible ecologist( if an ecologist is the specialist society has manufactured for this field) should be able to point out one or two things on eco balance and population control, you know that thing about plains to brush to shrub to tree to over-grown to fire to plains… that sort of stuff says we are all going to regret our lack of proper curation.

    Report Post »  
    • ishka4me
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:46am

      Anybody who thinks the mammoth is extinct has not tried dating in Vermont. Bunch of large hairy women.

      Report Post »  
  • The Bushmaster
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:31am

    while anything is possible you will have to prove to me that the animal is not an elephant crossing a river somewhere else in the world..

    Report Post »  
    • 2theADDLED
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:49pm

      Notice the fuzzy pic is blurred so you can‘t identify the species of tree’s and foliage which appear to be some sort of pine.

      Report Post »  
  • countryfirst
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:25am

    It’s Michelle Obama crossing the Potomac. .

    If this is the only crossing of the Potomac noted in the History books, then maybe she will be proud of her country

    Report Post » countryfirst  
  • nuttyvet
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:24am

    It’s definately a Woolly Mammoth. I have one in my back yard named Derick. I bring him peanuts and apple cores. He loves ‘em!

    Report Post » nuttyvet  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:23am

    “If surviving woolly mammoths were found in Siberia, it could run against Russia‘s plans to further develop and exploit the area’s considerable resources.”
    Yea right, Putin will have it’s head on his wall and a Woolly Mammoth carpet in the Kremlin. They will exploit any recources they have, I assure you.

    Report Post » Gonzo  
    • Komponist-ZAH
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:37pm

      He’ll have of photo taken of him standing in front of it, shirtless, holding a crossbow, with the carpet draped around his shoulders….

      …And then decree every woman in Russia must have a copy of it…

      Report Post »  
  • Blazen420
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:18am

    Funny how these photos and videos of mysterious creatures are always fuzzy or blurred. That video is so fake I’d be embarrassed to post it on my site.

    Report Post »  
  • Speak without Fear
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:17am

    It is as fake as the P0S sitting in the WH……

    Report Post »  
  • Baddoggy
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:14am

    If the Dems and envirolmental whackjobs have their way, we will make the United States off limits to drilling because the Wooly Mammoth might return some day.

    In West Texas they are trying to shut down the oil fields due to a stupid little lizzard. If they succeed…we are done as a Nation. Gas would be 15.00 a gallon overnight.

    The oilfields of west Texas are booming now. If they do put the lizzard on the endangered species list, I hope texas seceeds from the Union. But we have Rick Perry as Governor. The spineless whimp…sigh.

    Report Post » Baddoggy  
  • TomFerrari
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:14am

    What a coincidence!
    Like all the other bigfoot, nessie videos,
    It is grainy, out of focus, long range, and very short.
    Also notice how the “haunches” / “back” do not go up and down with its “gait”.

    At best, it is Snuffaluffagus on vacation.

    Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • ron396
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 2:35pm

      There is just something wrong with the way the water swirls never seem to change. The same ripples seem to follow it all the way through the film. Got to be fake.

      Report Post »  
  • quicker
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:14am

    Bear with a fish.

    Report Post » quicker  
    • pamela kay
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:32am

      QUICKER, yup, bear with fish!

      Report Post » pamela kay  
    • drago
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:50am

      Agreed….

      Report Post »  
    • CorpsmanToPA
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:54am

      pretty much – when in full screen it is pretty easy to see.

      Report Post » CorpsmanToPA  
    • Twobyfour
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 10:43am

      Yeppers, a bear with fish in its mouth.

      That is not to say there aren’t mammoths still living in the region, it would have better chance than, say, plesiosaurus (presumed Nessie species).

      Report Post » Twobyfour  
    • Cat
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 6:42pm

      East Siberian brown bear with a nice taimen trout catch

      Report Post » Cat  
    • TwoMinuteMan
      Posted on February 10, 2012 at 7:14pm

      really looks like a bear with a fish since the “trunk” is a different color and all but i gotta say that is the weirdest walking bear i’ve ever seen. It doesn’t walk anything like a bear and lets face it, its freekin huge.

      Report Post » TwoMinuteMan  
  • SoupSandwich
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:13am

    Cg.

    Report Post »  
  • NC
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:12am

    The Article is quoting MSNBC and the Huffington Post as creditable sources,

    I need to go and see if the sun is rising in the west.

    NC ( I’ll be right back)

    Report Post » NC  
  • I.Gaspar
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:10am

    First thing that comes to mind…Has the FLOTUS vacationed in Siberia recently?

    Report Post »  
  • THXll38
    Posted on February 10, 2012 at 8:07am

    Fake and it looks like a baby elephant.

    Report Post » THXll38  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In