Rep. Cleaver’s $48 Billion Earmark: Fact or Fiction?
- Posted on December 16, 2010 at 6:32pm by
Meredith Jessup
- Print »
- Email »
Most all members of Congress report back to their constituents with news of particular earmarks they fought for and won on behalf of their districts, but some — notably Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo. — post all earmark projects that have been requested by constituents. And as the congressman found out this week, this practice leaves the door open to rumors and widespread speculation.
The rumor mill started turning Wednesday afternoon after it was reported that Rep. Cleaver’s website listed an astoundingly large earmark request — $48 billion — from one constituent hoping to fund a massive anti-poverty/redistribution of wealth project out of his home-based non-profit child care center in Kansas City.
It was this particular request, listed at the tail end of an earmark request spreadsheet posted on Rep. Cleaver’s website, which caught the attention of Mike Jensen of the Southeast Missourian. In a column titled “Redistribution on Steroids,” Jensen correctly identified the $48 billion request as the “granddaddy of all earmarks.”
Proposed by a gentleman named Lamar Mickens, president of the not-for-profit Quality Day Campus, the $48 billion earmark would funnel money into the inner cities to give money to the poor and thereby produce a much larger consumer class to buy the goods and services produced in this country.
Just call this redistribution on steroids. …
It didn’t take long for this unreal story of government-gone-bad to light fire on the blogosphere. A number of conservative bloggers echoed the story, claiming Rep. Cleaver had proposed the earmark request to be appropriated with taxpayer money. But Cleaver’s office vehemently denies the report.
Cleaver’s communications director, Danny Rotert, told The Blaze Thursday that the story is a case of the blogosphere run amok and the notion the congressman would ask such an appropriation is ridiculous. According to Rotert, the $48 billion request was posted on the congressman’s website in accordance with his commitment to transparency for his constituents.
Indeed, the Wall Street Journal also confirmed with press assistant Mary Petrovic that the earmark request was never given a second thought. “We did not propose it, we do not promote it, and we did not submit it to the House Appropriations Committee,” Petrovic said.
Lamar Mickens, the head of the non-profit that made the request, said he wants the money to construct apartments, museums and social services centers in the eastern urban core of Kansas City, but said he did not know if Mr. Cleaver acted on the request. Mr. Cleaver’s office also declined to tell Taxpayers for Common Sense whether the congressman asked for the money.
But after a state newspaper columnist described the earmark as something Mr. Cleaver had “proposed,” a Cleaver spokeswoman said today that he hadn’t done so. “We did not propose it, we do not promote it, and we did not submit it to the House Appropriations Committee,” said Mary Petrovic.
All this is not to say that Congress doesn’t have an addiction to earmarks. The omnibus proposal currently up for consideration includes thousands of earmarks worth billions of dollars of taxpayer money. But rest assured, the reported $48 billion earmark from Cleaver’s office is not one of them.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (94)
jb1972
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:36pmBeing from KC, I would be ashamed if this were to happen! Its a waste of “more” money we have already spent to make the criminals a happier place to live and work. It would be cheaper to give every resident (97% black) in the area this is for, a $100,000.00 and tell them to walk away! Cleaver is an idiot, bigot, race baitor! BTW…Cleaver, wheres the video of someone spitting in your face during the HC vote. POS!
Report Post »Lotus503
Posted on December 17, 2010 at 4:33pmI’m from KC, too…and I’m looking forward to a redrawing of the Missouri 5th Congressional District by the new Congress, so this bozo doesn’t get back in office again. Gerrymandering works both ways, you know.
Report Post »Mojoron
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:34pmCleaver was mayor of Kansas City when the State Supreme Court forced the legislature to spend $1Billion dollars on KC’s miserable school system. During the process of rebuilding schools, 30% of students fled the system. Now nearly 15 years later the school system is having to close 1/3 rd of the schools to consolidate the teachers and students. So Cleaver knows how to spend money, waste money and screw the taxpayer.
Report Post »ThomasUSA
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:16pmI was thinking the other day…. We are already a socialist nation… the Feds take ( From Each According to our abilities) our money in taxes and they redistribute it, via the congress back to the state (To each according to their needs)…. This crap has to stop… These bastards and bastardettes have not seen anything yet from the grassroots…
Report Post »Ashrak
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:39pmThat is what the 17th Amendment did to this country. The important check between state governments and the federal government was severed and the Republic effectively became a Democracy at that time. Certainly, the bicameral legislature was eliminated.
Report Post »Max jones
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:59pmINSANITY….This is not real, is it? I was thinking I was in an alternative universe….but it’s them…they have lost it and don’t know it. This whole bill must be defeated. They must understand that this is not a board game, this is the well being of the entire population of the nation.
Report Post »What the **** is going on in D.C.? This is madness and my senator WILL hear about it(yeah,one of them was on the list with 32 earmarks) Strangely the marxist coons did not have one!
The spending be put on hold until we get the economy back in shape. Get some people into REAL jobs, and then we might have some money for some pet projects…..Crazy!!
MrObvious
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 11:29pmHave you ever seen those fight flicks where they knock the guy out and he’s still standing there, like he’s still fighting?
Report Post »It’s kind of like that.
trilateral-my-ass
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:59pmBoycott Omaha Steaks – they‘ve just announced their cancellation of advertising on Glenn Beck’s show – http://mediamatters.org/blog/201012160028.
Report Post »People, time to make a difference in this world. Not just commenting. Organize, just like the left do. Contact Omaha Steaks and express your outrage –
http://www.omahasteaks.com/servlet/OnlineShopping?Dsp=25&RAND=L7740
LSX
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 9:01pmDone – who are their competitors? I have some money to spend!
Report Post »darkpool
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 10:38pmCompetitors:
.
Colorado Boxed Beef Co. Auburndale, FL
.
Dean & DeLuca New York, NY
.
Hickory Farms, Inc. Maumee, OH
mychicagosteak.com is totally EXCELLENT! They now
have SUPER deals going on until 12-31-10.
.
Report Post »1776LibertyBell
Posted on December 17, 2010 at 12:10amI agree with you totally. I have been waging an anti-stopbeck @stopbeck is the idiot Media Matters and George Soros just hired to continue the boycotting of advertisers. You should just check out the twitter stream of @stopbeck.
Please help me fight @stopbeck Angelo and put him and Media Matters out of business. My twitter account is 1776LibertyBell. Please help me put a stop to Media Matters & George Soros crap.
Thank You1
Report Post »LSX
Posted on December 17, 2010 at 4:56pmTheir response:
Dear Friend,
We felt that advertising on the Glenn Beck Program could be
mis-interpreted as an endorsement of Mr. Beck’s political views. Since
Omaha Steaks has no affiliation with Mr. Beck, nor do we ever endorse any
political affiliations, views or beliefs, we felt it was in our best
interest to discontinue these ads.
Sincerely,
Report Post »Julie Davis
Omaha Steaks Customer Care Representative
Paleo Archer
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:56pmOUT OF CONTROL….Wooo Hooo I am starting to see 2012….watch of ALL elected officials!
Report Post »LSX
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:54pmIs anyone building gallows in DC yet?
Report Post »TaterSalad
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:46pmOmnibus Pork by the Numbers: List of Senators and Their Earmark Count
Bipartisan pork!
Via Jamie Dupree
In fact, if you break down the number of earmarks for each Senator, you will see that the top two earmarkers in terms of pure numbers are the two GOP Senators from Mississippi, Thad Cochran and Roger Wicker. Cochran happens to be the top Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Note: Senator Orrin Hatch has since removed his one earmark.
Cochran (R-MS) 230
Report Post »Wicker (R-MS) 199
Murray (D-WA) 172
Harkin (D-IA) 152
Reid (D-NV) 129
Menendez (D-NJ) 123
Feinstein (D-CA) 121
Lautenberg (D-NJ) 120
Lincoln (D-AR) 114
Inouye (D-HI) 113
Schumer (D-NY) 106
Johnson (D-SD) 105
Landrieu (D-LA) 104
Specter (D-PA) 103
Pryor (D-AR) 96
Levin (D-MI) 93
Stabenow (D-MI) 91
Boxer (D-CA) 90
Brown (D-OH) 87
Grassley (R-IA) 86
Bingaman (D-NM) 86
Durbin (D-IL) 86
Akaka (D-HI) 83
Wyden (D-OR) 83
Cardin (D-MD) 79
Merkley (D-OR) 79
Gillibrand (D-NY) 79
Bond (R-MO) 78
Bennett (R-UT) 76
Casey (D-PA) 76
Udall (D-NM) 73
Reed (D-RI) 70
Kerry (D-MA) 69
Cantwell (D-WA) 69
Hagan (D-NC) 69
Voinovich (R-OH) 68
Klobuchar (D-MN) 68
Rockefeller (D-WV) 67
Dodd (D-CT) 66
Mikulski (D-MD) 65
Tester (D-MT) 65
Lieberman (ID-CT) 64
Hutchison (R-TX) 63
Baucus (D-MT) 62
Dorgan (D-ND) 60
Warner (D-VA) 60
Webb (D-VA) 58
Franken (D-MN) 58
Collins (R-ME) 57
Leahy (D-VT) 56
Murkowski (R-AK) 55
Whitehouse (D-RI) 55
Kohl (D-WI) 54
Conrad (D-ND) 52
Vitter (R-LA) 48
Cornyn (R-TX) 45
Snowe (R-ME) 44
Nelson (D-FL) 43
Chambliss (R-GA) 42
Crapo (R-ID) 41
Risch (R-ID) 41
Bennet (D-CO) 40
Brownback (R-KS) 39
Carper (D-DE) 39
Burr (R-NC) 38
Begich (D-AK) 37
McConnell (R-KY) 35
Roberts (R-KS) 35
Sanders (I-VT) 33
Shelby (R-AL) 32
Inhofe (R-OK) 32
Shaheen (D-NH) 32
Alexander (R-TN) 30
Udall (D-CO) 30
Lugar (R-IN) 29
Graham (R-SC) 27
Thune (R-SD) 26
Isakson (R-GA) 24
Nelson (D-NE) 23
Sessions (R-AL) 21
Bunning (R-KY) 21
Ensign (R-NV) 20
Gregg (R-NH) 13
Barrasso (R-WY) 4
Enzi (R-WY) 3
Hatch (R-UT) 1
Bayh (D-IN) 1
Corker (R-TN) 1
Brown (R-MA) 1
McCain (R-AZ) 0
Feingold (D-WI) 0
Kyl (R-AZ) 0
DeMint (R-SC) 0
Coburn (R-OK) 0
McCaskill (D-MO) 0
Johanns (R-NE) 0
LeMieux (R-FL) 0
Manchin (D-WV) 0
Coons (D-DE) 0
Kirk (R-IL) 0
13thGenerationAmerican
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:16pmDoesn’t matter, President Obama will win reelection in 2012.
That’s 6 more years of you people bitching and for some of you, this might be the last President you will ever know.
Report Post »tbear44
Posted on December 17, 2010 at 4:12amIt might be the last president you ever know too. Ya never know. One thing for sure, we all gotta go someday.
Report Post »TaterSalad
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:45pmAs a Tea Party Nation member myself, this $1.1 Trillion Dollar “Omni-Bust Bill” should NOT be passed. Any Republicans who support and vote for this Bank Buster, Pork Barrel infested legislation put forth by the entitlement hungry Democrats should not be elected or re-elected in 2012 if they are running. We are watching who votes for this bill and the consequences will be the unemployment lines if they do. This is a promise!
http://sroblog.com/2010/12/16/mccotter-opposes-compromised-tax-bill-video/
Report Post »wash1776
Posted on December 18, 2010 at 8:51am13thGENERATION You are the meanest person on this site along with Broker0101. DO YOU EVER DO ANYTHING BESIDES INSULT PEOPLE? You are PATHETIC! Suggesting people might not be around in 6 years to bitch more—WITH LUCK YOU WILL BE ONE OF THEM. WE CAN ONLY HOPE YOU WILL GET TIRED OF KEEPING WATCH ON US LESSER MORTALS AND GO AWAY.
Report Post »Government SNAFU
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:38pmI really believe there should be a flat tax – 8% to 10%. No more earmarks, must propose in front of committee vs. budget, then voted on.
Cut gov’t by 50%, I don’t see a use for Dept of Education, IRS, EPA, Homeland Security, as a matter of fact, just send Homeland Security and TSA to border patrol. Bring all troops home to defend the country.
Report Post »dirtypolitics
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:36pmPart of this will go…guess where……in 2012?
Report Post »Redistributor
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:27pmRedistro…now we’re talking!
Report Post »TheRealElvis
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:10pmDon’t you think its about Congress listening to the American people? No matter what the polls say, they seem to always have their own agenda. I say that since we live in a high tech age, why can’t we have a straw vote electronically on important issues and the elected person must lean toward the constituency demands. Problem solved on all fronts.
Report Post »SlimnRanger
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:15pmsounds good but Reid would find a way to change the votes in his favor
Report Post »troyvar
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:05pmThe SEIU tech’s maintain the equipment.
Report Post »JohnnyJT
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:10pmThe Fed Govt get too much tax money Period.
Report Post »seeker9
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:08pmCould this be an Overton Window tactic? The original request is really ridiculous, but follow it up with a much smaller amount, maybe $5B.
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:31pmI hate to visit this Rep.’s website, but is there any record of how much money the ( potential) recipient of this earmark has given to the Rep.’s campaign ?
Report Post »John Henry
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:06pmLet the goodtimes roll as we seem to not have made any impression on our elected reps and senators. Perhaps we should recall them and send someone else.
Report Post »temple62
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:03pmParasitic riff raff! One wonders why the country puts up with these “parasites” on mankind? America needs term limits to prevent this fiefdoms from happening and need a new election immediately as we do not have a responsible congress in spite of all the election rhetoric. All states are at fault and one term maximum needs to be implemented in both the house and senate with the senators being elected for 2 years not 6.
Report Post »DeltaHawk
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:03pmI’d like a Zillion $$ earmark to study if Democrats have any reasoning ability, Also to see if they are born with sticky fingers.
Report Post »SlimnRanger
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 6:59pmi wonder if i asked for 500,000 to study how my roosters top my hens would i get it?
Report Post »GeauxAlready
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 6:55pmI need an eramark to study if a quickie is the cause of stupid in democrates…………
Report Post »stopprintn
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 6:51pmLike to reditribute the Congressional Black ( socialist ) Caucus too Cuba.
Report Post »Ashrak
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 6:43pmWhat we see here, and what every Congressman must understand, is that their reputations are soooooo bad that when news of this entered the blogosphere it was not dismissed instantly as hogwash – meaning that they have proked it up soooo much that even this seemed in keeping with their oinkers.
Might this have been a trial balloon, bait? What?
Report Post »the_ancient
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 6:43pmI am really tired of hearing about Earmarks, they are just a distraction.
STOP TALKING ABOUT EARMARKS, ending 100% of earmarks WILL NOT DO ANYTHING DO THE BUDGET. it is a non-topic.
Report Post »Jsh1284
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:14pmIt’s not a non-topic .. because we’re still talking about tens of billions of dollars each year. Ending earmarks is NOT the final solution .. but it’s PART of the solution.
Report Post »Dale
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:29pmIt will have a tremendous effect on the budget! The way to get legislators on board is to ‘pay’ them with earmarks. If you vote for my pork, we’ll give you some too. If there is no pork, there will be fewer bribes. I get tired of hearing that it is too small an amount to be concerned with. The problem with that logic is that there is never anywhere to start. My problem with earmarks is that these funds are approved without knowing where the money will go. If there are no earmarks, these funds will not be approved.
Report Post »troyvar
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:00pm@Dale
Report Post »You are correct… Thye monetary value of earmarks is but a rounding error in the scheme of things. The morality, the ethicical responsiblity of not being able to “buy” someone’s vote, with someone else’s money, is the real issue.
guyperram
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:10pmYou are absolutely correct. The problem is huge and the cuts will have to be even huger! The problem is that these clowns won’t even stop throwing away the small money. They are a pack of crooks that do not even have a clue as to what their limits are supposed to be.
Report Post »Without a doubt only drastic action will wake these folks up to what they need to do. Failing that we will probably see a 20-50% inflation of the dollar in the next few months and that is if the actually have some idea of what they are doing (which I doubt).
Carter inflated the money supply by about 13%. That cause about 24% yr inflation. Just think of where we will be if you exterpolate the fact that they have increased the money supply by 300-400% so far. Work the math, you will love the answer. (300% / 13% = 23.08 x 24%= 553.92% oh, how delightful, or for every dollar you make now you will need $553.92 to stay even)
ETOOL USMC RECON
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:56pmBut it HAS TO START SOMEWHERE……Lets cut their salaries in HALF and see how they like it!
Report Post »Or better yet index them to the opposite of inflation.
the_ancient
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 9:16pmYes it is a non-topic, Earmarks make up 0.2 to 0.5% of any given budget or bill.
Earmarks in and of themselves are not the problem. Any person here that thinks anything will the solved magically by stopping them has obviously been listening too much to the Media and other reports vs looking at the ACTUAL BUDGETS, I have spent days, months, going over and reading the entire budget, taxation data from the IRS and thousands of actuary tables from different government agencies.
Earmarks are meaningless
Of the bill we are talking about it is (last I looked may be bigger or smaller now)
$1,270,000,000,000 <- Total
$ 8,300,000,000 <- Earmarks
that is 0.65% of the total bill…… POINT 65 PERCENT….
Yep that makes a big big difference. PLUS even if the earmarks go away, that DOES NOT MEAN the spending does, the money will more than likely be included in the overall budget of the given dept and that dept will then spend it as they see fit instead of as directed in a earmark, so for example if a FL congressman directs NASA to spend 270 Million for a new landing pad in FL in a earmark, now NASA will still get the 270 Million, but they can spend it wherever and on what ever they want.
STOP WORRYING ABOUT EARMARKS and solve the problem
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 9:50pmthe_ancient,
Baby steps do help. Its going to take a little time to get our Congresscritters to realize that we are watching how they spend our money, but it slowly turns the attitudes around. Slash and burn will NOT work, it only gives the government an excuse to shut us down and take over completely.
If you want to make a big difference in the shortest amount of time you have to get millions of taxpayers to stop paying taxes. Money is the life-blood in D.C. cut off the money and D.C. dies!
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »untameable-kate
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 10:06pmIt is a sorry state of affairs when we start thinking of $8,300,000,000 of our money as nothing, a drop in the bucket and nothing to be concerned. If ‘they’ waste one dollar they confiscate from me it is one darn dollar too much.
Report Post »EP46
Posted on December 17, 2010 at 5:20amOne small step at a time. Stopping ALL EARMARKS is the way to start responsible spending. It is also not the “”$100,000″” ear mark someone like Cleaver might get, it is that if he gets that earmark he will vote yes on a Bill that costs zillions of dollars. Earmarks are a way of BUYING VOTES in Congress.
Report Post »ETOOL USMC RECON
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 6:40pmIsn’t this the same guy that lied about being spat on and called names???
Report Post »Yea, I really trust him…..him and bin obama.
marhee9
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 6:45pmIt is the same guy.
Report Post »MHP
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:41pmYep same guy. He’s a friend of Obamadeninutjob
You should go visit Gunny Ermey’s site
http://www.rleeermey.com
Semper Fi to ya.
Report Post »lovenfl3
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:47pmCool site MHP. Check out donsmithshow.com when you get a chance.
Report Post »ETOOL USMC RECON
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:52pmThanks MHP. Gunny knows his part well. My dad and older brother and I were all Marines. We went together to see Full Metal Jacket…and laughed our heads off. That was the PI I went to…..
Report Post »Wait….. do you think little manning is getting some of that at Quantico right now?????
Maybe the fine Gunny could pay a visit to the little traitor and “get his mind right”???? (haha)
Semper Fi….Do or Die,
Etool
R635
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 9:29pmThis is a tax dodging degenerate that does not represent the people or values of Kansas City, MO.
link: http://www.pitch.com/2004-02-26/news/water-pressure/
Dave Helling at KCTV Channel 5 (one of the station’s reporters who, unlike the clowns baiting Internet perverts for ratings, does serious news) broke the story that a Cleaver-owned car wash owed more than $30,000 in back taxes. And voila! Just like that, after other media began jumping on the story, Cleaver made his problem go away — by finding someone to loan him the money to pay off his debt.
Report Post »Cemoto78
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 9:31pmDitto here, ETOOL
Report Post »Semper Fi, do or die
marhee9
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 6:37pmThese guys just don’t get it. donsmithshow.com had a special on this yesterday. These guys better knock this stuff off.
cnsrvtvj
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 6:46pmI heard they’re having Bill Clinton for the interview of the week. That should be a good one.
Report Post »Bad Thunder
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:02pmLeave it to Cleaver……just blame it all on Eddie Haskel
Report Post »cheezwhiz
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 7:28pmCleaver’s communications director, Danny Rotert, told The Blaze Thursday that the story is a case of the blogosphere run amok
Report Post »——————————
You mean like the story called ” TEA partiers spit on me and called me n-word 15 times ”
or
the story called “ Breitbart is racist because Hussain fired Surely Charade ”
or maybe
the story called “ Sarah Palin banned books and charged for rape kits” ….
l ‘ll believe this racist dolt when he collects his $ 100.000 reward..
broker0101
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:16pmAs has become sadly customary, The Blaze is hours behind actual, important news (Omnibus Spending Bill Pulled from the Senate Floor) but no one here cares. The Blaze is about a small group of Losers desperately seeking some form of human (albeit cyber) interaction and validation of their feeble thoughts and poorly written opinions. You embarrass the Conservative movement.
MHP
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:37pmYea I know this guy. He’s just another uppity gangbanger.
Report Post »I knew him when I lived in Kansas City off and on for over 20 years,
lovenfl3
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 8:48pmAnd yet you seem so “above it all” and mature Broker0101. You need help dude.
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 9:00pmThank you @broker0101, may peace be with you
Report Post »Bad Thunder
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 9:09pm@Broke…..
Is that you Dick? Damn you caught us again massa sir bossman ………
Report Post »thepatriotdave
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 9:38pmbroker0101,
I pray to God you don’t consider yourself a Conservative.
PatriotShops.com
Report Post »MrObvious
Posted on December 16, 2010 at 11:25pmThey pulled the thing – that’s cool and all; but, why aren’t the republicans filibustering?
I don’t just mean this or that bill, nomination or appropriation. I mean full out non-stop tag team filibuster – that should not stop until end of year, not even to hear motions to adjourn.
I don’t care if the government has to send all the park rangers home for a couple of weeks.
Report Post »mrfitman
Posted on December 17, 2010 at 8:30amIT DOESN’T matter ANYMORE!! Can’t “YOU” SEE?? Politicians ARE INSIGNIFICANT!! ALL they ARE doing IS GUTTING the Treasury!!! Overwhelm intitlements!!!! There you have it——The TOTAL COLLAPSE of OUR COUNTRY!!!! Clower and PIVEN!! Any questions?? Politicians ARE ROBBING, STEALING from the CANDY JAR!!! “Help the children my ASS!! Help THEMSELVES!!!
Report Post »CYCLONE
Posted on December 18, 2010 at 2:23amWhat the heck is that 2-nd Amendment for …?!?!?!?!? !!!!!
… OHHHHHHHHHhhh… YES…. NOW I REMEMBER…… SHOW ME !!!!!!
Report Post »wash1776
Posted on December 18, 2010 at 8:43amBROKER0101 You are your usual assine insulting self. As for putting people on the Blaze down, you are on here as much as anyone else, so your remarks must include you too. Feel free to stay off of the site. NO ONE WILL MISS YOU AND YOUR INSULTS. As for people here embarrasing the conservative movement–YOU EMBARRAS THE HUMAN RACE.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on December 19, 2010 at 1:23amits so funny how some criticize the blaze…but seem to be on it alot!!!
Report Post »