Rep. Pence Calls on Gov’t to Defund Planned Parenthood in House Speech
- Posted on February 9, 2011 at 11:46am by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) has seen the recent undercover videos showing Planned Parenthood coaching a fake pimp on how to bypass abortion laws — and they worry him. In a speech on the House floor Tuesday, Pence called on the government to “deny” all federal funding for the pro-abortion group, adding that the videos should be a “scandal to all Americans,” and calling on members to vote for his bill that would do just that:
Transcript via Pence’s website:
The time has come to deny all federal funding to Planned Parenthood of America. I’ve authored the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, which would deny Title X funds to Planned Parenthood or any other abortion provider and Congress must act and act now to move this important legislation. Pro-life Americans and all Americans should not be forced to subsidize America’s largest abortion provider or continue to provide federal taxpayer dollars to Title X clinics that engage in this abhorrent behavior. [Emphasis added]



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (171)
cemerius
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:28pm53 million and counting. I would think that number would be headlines somewhere for this “third rail birth control” **sic**……
Report Post »wampanoag
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:25pmGreat idea. Lets have 10 15 children per family again. Wonderful!
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:52pmThat’s pretty good, actually. Hungry? Slaughter some of the kids. Lil’ Billy has been getting bad marks lately.
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:11pmCut welfare and you wouldn‘t have irresponsible liberals having 10 or 15 kids they can’t afford to raise.
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:27pmBecause no money keeps irresponsible people from having sex.
Please read the above sentence until it sinks in. Concentrate on the word “irresponsible”
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:28pm@my previous post:
It should read HAVING no money. My apologies.
Report Post »vilaria
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 4:08pmWhy do you assume people would have fifteen kids? There are only about a million forms of contraception. You can get birth control pills at Walmart for $4 a month. Not all, but alot of people who have unplanned pregnancies must just be lazy, or ready to get their welfare checks.
Report Post »barbaraw62
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 4:29pmHey, ever hear of BIRTH CONTROL… the pill, condoms, so many ways……come on… you have dumb —excuse me very dumb reasoning!
Report Post »LadyLibertykicksASS
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:23pmGod will punish those who support this barbaric act.
Report Post »chuck_wagon
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:23pmCPB better known as PBS. Cut’em loose. What a waste of taxpayer money!
Report Post »LadyLibertykicksASS
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:21pmGod will not have mercy on people who support this barbaric act.
Report Post »ProudImmigrant
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:18pmAlthough I usually agree with most comments on this site, I disagree here. Im a pretty strict constitutionalist and feel that the government should stay out of the individuals lives in almost all cases. We had a surpreme court which ruled abortion to be legal. I agree with the surpreme court on this one. The people who have abortions are usually selfish people IMHO and if they dont allow these people to have an abortion they will end up raising children they did not want. I know im going to get the adoption arguement here but you have to step back and realize that the people who are willing to have an abortion are way too selfish to ever consider adoption. We end up with unwanted children who get abused and in turn they end up drains on society in their adult life. In my personal life abortion would not be an option but who am I to barge into your life….. I think that is the gateway to socialism? Maybe im wrong.
Report Post »RIGHTNOTLEFT
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:24pm@ProudImmigrant
All that is fine, but how can anyone expect people that, BELIEVES it is murder, be forced to pay into such an act by way of taxes?
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:33pmIf you’re “pretty strict constitutionalist,” then why don’t you believe in the right of a fetus to life (endowed by its Creator), liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? Where in the Constitution is Congress given the right to end a person’s life? What authorization for the use of tax dollars do you find for abortion?
Report Post »encinom
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:45pm@Showtime
Cause a fetus is not a person. It has no rights until such time as it is born.
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:46pmThis isn’t so much about abortions being legal or not. If a woman wants an abortion let her and the idiot that got such a selfish HO pregnant pay for it. The whole cost of it.
Report Post »ProudImmigrant
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:47pmI said nothing about taxpayers funding anything. That would be infringing on me. I understand your issue if you feel its a baby then you would consider it murder. What I have always considered really confusing is if you are for Capital Punishment you are against abortion in most cases and if you are against capital punishment you are for abortion……. Im for both…
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:55pm@encinom
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:45pm
@Showtime
Cause a fetus is not a person. It has no rights until such time as it is born.
——–
That’s YOUR opinion. It has a heartbeat.
Report Post »A heartbeat comes from within a living being. Except for a vile act of man, it would live the life that our Creator intended, Man says the fetus doesn’t have a right, when Gode says it does?
encinom
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:59pm@Showtime
If God wants to argue on behalf of a fetus, let him walk into open court. He has remained silent on the issue. Again, why are you and the religious fanatics of this country the ones who decide what rights women have?
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:00pm@ProudImmigrant –
You said, “The people who have abortions are usually selfish people IMHO and if they dont allow these people to have an abortion they will end up raising children they did not want.”
As adults we have to take RESPONSIBILITY for our actions, not pass the results of bad judgment and poor choices on to others to take care of for us.
Report Post »HillBillySam1
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:01pmI agree about an “individual’s” rights being granted by the Constitution…..however, when a woman is pregnant, she is not making an “individual” decision when it comes to an abortion…..you have those, like the secular-Progressive troll ENCINOM, who believe that an unborn child is ANYTHING but human….perhaps a tadpole, unicorn, or platypus…..so it is not immoral to destroy the life of that “fetus”…..these Progressive idealogues deny the scientific evidence that the child is “human” from the very moment of conception…..every bit of DNA is present at that time, according to science…..Progressives, like ENCINOM, call the child a “fetus” in order to deny it “status”…..just like African-American slaves were denied “status” and just like German/European Jews were denied “status”…..so who is on the “wrong” side of history, ENCINOM?
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:02pmYour argument makes no sense. How does Capital Punishment have anything to do with abortions? Capital Punishment is punishing a criminal for heinous crimes committed. Abortions are killing babies that have committed no crimes…… unless having stupid and selfish people breed together is a crime. It’s a shame but not a crime.
Report Post »ProudImmigrant
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:41pmThis is the only issue I know of where the Conservative acts like the progressive pushing their view on everyone else and the progressive acts like the conservative asking government to stay out of their business. Think about it for a second…..
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 2:44pmI know it would probably be to much to ask for you to please pull your head out from your fourth point of contact. The only time it seems a liberal wants the government to stay out of their business is when it comes to abortion. I don’t care how many liberals want the taxpayers to pay for their mistakes. I say defund all the liberal causes they refuse to pay for themselves. i.e Planned Parenthood.
Report Post »TexasCommonSense
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 4:02pmencinom, why are you and the non-religious fanatics of this country the ones who decide what rights unborn babies don’t have?
Report Post »barbaraw62
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 4:26pmYou are wrong … this is how many were aborted since the Supreme court ruled
50,766,331 abortions 1973–2008
Report Post »KL
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:18pmIt takes a Republican to do the right thing!! Democrats are corrupt!
Report Post »planter
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:18pmIt may be true that the Dems will not let this pass but they will be on the wrong side of another debate. Every little bit of erosion of support is good. Keep it up.
Report Post »Teapartywoman
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:12pmThat‘s it I’ve made up my mind. Please God stop the world I wont to get off. I have blood shooting from my eye’s over this. Glenn is going to have a hole hour on PP tomorrow should be a great teaching moment for our children.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:52pmTeaching what, how a Beck can distort the truth to demonize a group tha tis helping, how a activist with an agenda and a camera can through editing lie? How to present only one side of an argument and ignore the fact that Planned Parenthood did follow the law and report the actions upto the US Attorney General.
No, Beck is another dime store preacher, selling salvation for the price of gold and survival rations.
Report Post »HillBillySam1
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:17pmENCINOM: The Saddest Clown At the Circus……
Report Post »SimpleTruths
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:27pmLooks like you skipped the ‘teaching moment’ where spelling was being covered.
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:31pmCould we please stop attacking spelling mistakes? It does nothing to move the discussion forward and makes you look like you have to attack the person because you cannot attack the argument, quite frankly.
Report Post »rodamaa
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 2:40pmENCINOM
Let’s take a look at the facts.
1 – Glenn’s videos are available in their entirety for anyone to see
2 – Quoted material is from credible news sources and can be verified
Other than this he makes very few allegations or statements without facts
So if you going to take a stab at someone facts would be appreciated. Do you have any particular instance where Glenn has lied.
If we look at ACORN for example beyond the videos there is literally tons of evidences of their action I would be willing to put on the table. Evidence that implicated president Obama. Do these guys sound familiar?
• Uno of Chicago
• Woods Fund (with that gentleman Bill Ayers)
• Midwest Academy (Alinsky at work with our tax dollars)
• Chicago Annenberg Challenge
All illegal actions that I can pull facts from the socialist archives, damming many member of what is now the White house administration. Would you like to see it? Oh, I guess this would be more demonic lies. Right!
If you can just site a real example where Glenn has been involved in lie. It has to be real documented not just platitude. I can give you evidence as I can give you anytime you ask Can you?
Here is my suggestion, either put up or shut up.
I am so tired you socialists making unfounded accusations.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 2:55pmFirst did you look at the full videos, did you read the press release by Planned Parenthood a week prior to the release of the highly edited tapes? PP did follow the law and contacted law enforcement after the anti-choice group sent the pimp in.
ACORN O’Keefe tape proved nothing, DA’s across the country after view the entire videos found NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. ACORN was defunded based on the lies of Fox News.
The rest of the Obama connections have been examined and found to be lacking in credibility. I am sorry but Beck’s conspiracy theories fall apart in the real world.
Report Post »barbaraw62
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 4:21pmSome abhorent, but real stats about Murder (abortion) on Demand:
50,766,331 abortions 1973–2008
Americans’ views concerning abortion:
•75% do not support the current abortion-on-demand policy, saying abortion should be legal only in some circumstances (53%), or illegal in all circumstances (22%).
Gallup Poll, May 2009
•78% believe that women who have abortions commonly experience moderately severe to very severe negative emotional reactions to abortion.
Medical Science Monitor, 2003
•95% of women want to be informed of all risks of a medical procedure; 69% want to be informed of all alternatives.
Journal of Medical Ethics, July 2006
•64% of women who experienced one or more abortions “felt pressured by others” to have the abortion.
Medical Science Monitor, Oct. 2004
Why do women have abortions?
•74% say having a baby would interfere with work, school, or other responsibilities.
Report Post »•73% say they cannot afford to have a child.
•48% say they do not want to be a single parent, or have relationship problems with husband or partner.
•Less than 2% say they became pregnant as a result of rape or incest.
RIGHTNOTLEFT
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:09pmThey want to say its a matter of a womans right to choose. But like healthcare it isnt so much about our health, as it is about control. Global warming isnt so much about the environment, as it is about control and redistribution of wealth. Then the whole abortion argument isnt based in a womans choice but based on some person you dont even know telling you “its not human yet”.
Life has to be made at conception. I mean its not goin to be a tv, car, toaster, shoes, etc….
ITS A HUMAN BEING!!!!!
Report Post »Non-sequitur
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:09pmThere are a lot of contra“ceptives” that don’t actually prevent conception but only prevent the fertilized egg from implanting in the womb. Do you want to ban them too?
Report Post »8jrts
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:08pmDem‘s won’t let it happen…it’s too close to their rock solid hateful hearts. Abortion is their biggest cause and they will go to any length to fund it.
Report Post »blue_collar_man
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:08pmIt is about time. I don’t think the average American knows the federal government subsidizes abortion. The lack of coverage by MSM and back door deals has kept this from the light of day. It is time to open the doors on these abortoraries and let the light shine in.
Report Post »Pezman
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:07pmIs it called section 10? They can easily reorganize themselves to create a wall of seperation between the two. Whatever the case, Planned Parenthood does other things besides abortions, and will take legal steps to protect themselves. Yes I admit the abortions are their moneymaker. I really think we should only be looking to slap them on when they break the law. These tapes clearly show a lot of PP people breaking the law. Rather than try and defund them, giving the left ammo to attack the right, I would much rather deal with these things on a case by case basis. When they break the law, slap them down. Based on what they’ve done, I would love to see them lose a % (maybe 5%?) of their funding which would be given to advocacy groups like Live Action to help fund their sting operations. They’ve done a great deal on a shoestring, and would do a much better job than the ‘real media,’ or any government agency. Keep slapping them down when they break the law and you will greatly reduce the number f abortions. I acknowledge that this will not appeal to those who are pro-life on moral grounds. It will, however, IMHO, greatly reduce the number of abortions, and bring more from the middle to support the cause. Continue to attack ALL abortions, and you reach fewer and fewer minds, no matter your moral high ground. Continue to catch and slap those who break the law in the name of pro-choice principles and you will reduce abortions and win more hearts and minds.
Report Post »Blackhawk1
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:41pmMatter of fact why not enforce the funding law for them. By law, no Title X funds can be used for abortion services. If that is the case then Planned Parenthood should not be allowed to run any abortion clinics. If they do then pull all the funding.
Report Post »Pezman
Posted on February 10, 2011 at 9:53am@Black hawk1 The problem with trying to enforce or eliminate the title 10 funding, is that ANY organization can simply reorganize themselves and create legal barriers between their operations. You need only set up a different entity and bookeeping to do this. Ask your lawyer or tax person just how easy this is to do. All manner of businesses, non-profits, churches etc.. use these legal tools to legally seperate various activites from one another. Sad but true. Better to simply keep them as honest as you can.
Report Post »WILLIAM E.
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:06pmWe are trying to cut spending. Gee Wiz what is to be debated here. Cut it & forget it then move on to other atrosities as this !!
Report Post »DUMBASPELOSI
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:06pmWhy are so many liberal ideas ending up “evil” in their impact?
ACORN, NPR, Planned Parenthood, ACLU, NOW . . . what do they all share?
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:49pmMoney!
Report Post »BoilitDown
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:35pmThey all have the Liberal – Bureaucrat – Parasite Gene
Report Post »Xcori8r
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:05pmAbortion has been the springboard to cultural decline in the country for decades.
It‘s not a matter of women’s rights, it’s a matter of societal integrity.
That’s the secular argument. Of course there’s a moral one too.
Report Post »ENTITLEMENTSBLOW
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:05pmWay to go Pence! Indeed the videos are very disturbing. I would love for my tax dollars to be put to better use!
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:28pmYou should see the pictures of the live birth abortions, if you think Planned Parenthood videos are bad. Those pictures are photos of murder having been accomplished, and they are not pretty.
Obama voted for partial birth abortions as a senator.
Report Post »What's next
Posted on February 10, 2011 at 4:10amIf the gov.. Does not stop encouraging abortions, they will pay these women for the lies they have been feed, and the long term pain it causes! Wake up American scientific gov.
Report Post »tinydd
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:05pmFinally a voice of reason. We don’t have the money anyway, cut, cut, cut. The Nanny Gov‘t is killing our children’s future.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:09pmAnd our children.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 11:58amGee, I wonder when the Dems will start crying abot Republican’s punishing the poor. Same old broken record.
Report Post »scguitar
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 11:56amHAHA, I thought the title was “Defend” planned parenthood. I”m thinking what idiot congressmen would propose that? You would think the tolerant and loving liberals would want to defund an organization built on the basis of eugenics… Unless of course, they actually still believed in eugenics in some sort of way
Report Post »teachermitch32
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 2:25pmActually, many of them do…but would not call it that (Eugenics). They simply provide the arguement of “what would it cost us if these women were allowed to birth their children”. A sad and feeble arguement at best. I have even heard several supposed conservatives (fiscally only) propose this same arguement. Sad…no moral fortitude if it costs you….them. Most pro-abortion activists really do believe in reduction of the population, especially blacks and other minorities, and using abortion as a means of accomplishing their goal.
This is so very sad. And these are the very liberally minded that have a record of giving the smallest % of their incomes to charities who might take some of the tax burden off of our backs, currently going to “social programs”. Our government providing charitable services has become the church for the masses. It’s organised liberal religion. Forced humanism.
Report Post »integrican
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 11:56amMMMmmmmmm? looks like “Time Has Expired” on Planned Parenthood. One can only hope.
Report Post »Ballgame
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 11:55amAmen, Stop murdering innocent children as a form of birth control.
Report Post »Think4yourself
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 11:52amThere should be no tax payer funds going to them in the first place. Why should the money that a pro-life supporter pays in taxes go to fund an abortion? That should be funded by private donors only. Hey Mr. President, thats one more way to save us some money!
http://www.unsalvageable.org
Report Post »HillBillySam1
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:01pmI totally agree. If anyone supports what Planned Parenthood is doing, then they should write out a check for them each month……isn’t “empowerment” what Progressives are all about???
Report Post »JD Carp
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:51pmDeny all Federal Funding to all such title 10 programs.
Report Post »GeauxAlready
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 11:51am.
Report Post »Not only defund, but round-up and jail the whole lot for murder……………………
jaesplin
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:03pmWhether in this life or the next, they’ll get what they deserve. Matt 18:6
Report Post »DUMBASPELOSI
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:04pmAlong with ACORN and NPR!!!!
Report Post »SimpleTruths
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:23pmIt’s not a crime, much less murder.
Report Post »teachermitch32
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 2:11pmSimpleTruths
Report Post »Please splain Lucy….you would not know murder if it visited your daughter.
bobodu
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 2:50pmTaking into account that 36 percent of abortions are by black women….would you be willing to pay to raise those children out of your pocket ???
I didn’t think so.
Report Post »Kpax
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 3:09pmMatthews 18. Those who are involved in abortion in this life will receive special treatment in the next. With what is in store for these people they would be better off drowned in the depths of the sea with a great millstone around their neck.
Report Post »teachermitch32
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 6:02pmBobodu-
Considering that my tax dollars are already going to fund this murder mill, I would gladly have those dollars reappropriated into both adoption education and abstinence education. And, BTW, my wife and I are already involved in supporting foster concerns and our daughter is a blessing from a woman who made the right decision. This woman has now turned her life around and is walking in blessings of the Almighty Lord, and we are now proud parents of a 15 year old young lady. I will never forget the day God gave her to us. I guess you don’t have alternatives to your ideology of death as the answer, because you sure didn’t provide any offerings. Instead you put your energy into attacking me before you even knew me.
Report Post »What you have posted shows everyone which side of the eugenics pool you swim in. How sad! But there is hope for you, if you would just look in the right places.
Dustyluv
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 11:51amLong time coming…Now make murder of childern illegal…
Report Post »cnsrvtvj
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 11:59amI’m with him on this one. We need to stop funding these groups that claim to be protecting children when in fact they are exploiting them. I saw the video of the public relations guy saying the videos were doctored. When pressed, he admitted that he hadn’t actually watched the video, but was sure they were doctored. These libs are unreal.
http://www.donsmithshow.com – see the liberal mindset video
Report Post »TexasCommonSense
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 11:59amIt won’t happen; Obama will veto it.
Report Post »HillBillySam1
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:03pm“Population Control” at it’s worst…..
Report Post »DUMBASPELOSI
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:03pmAgreed.
Now let’s take all these “political guerilla welfare” groups OUT.
ACORN ! Make it go away . . .
Planned Un-Parenthood! Make it go away . . .
National Public Radio! Make it pay for itself.
Dept of Education! Shut er down!
Dept of Energy Shut er down!
Environmental Protection Agency Shut er down!
“That is all.”
Report Post »bobodu
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:07pmWhen abortion is illegal…only the wealthy will have abortions.
Rogue
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:07pmBad news is it’s doomed to fail. Good news is, it puts Dems and/or the President on record as supporting taxpayer funded abortions. The majority of Americans are pro-life, and even some of the pro-choice crowd don’t agree with taxpayers footing the bill.
Report Post »booger71
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:11pmDUMBASPELOSI
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:03pm
I would add
Report Post »Dept of AGriculture, (Forest Service can stand alone)
OSHA
Dept of Labor
Fish and Game
Cobra Blue
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:13pmGive the Republicans an A+ for effort, but this unfortunately will never happen. Planned Parenthood, the government funded murder organization, is a sacred cow of the liberal progressives. Just like social security.
Report Post »leftiesaredangerous
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:14pmPlanned Parenthood’s very existance is a scandle.
Report Post »BoiseBaked
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:14pmYEAH! While you’re at it, defund NPR. And all the other crappy taxpayer funded interest groups.
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:20pmIt seems I’m not the only one who has contacted Congress about defunding Planned Parenthood! I sent my Rep a list.
Report Post »cykonas
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:23pm@Dumbaspelosi
Report Post »Why such a short list? Let’s keep the Departments of Defense, Justice and Treasury for now. Get rid of everything else. That’s pretty much the limits set by our Constitution. That would go a long way toward solving the budget problems, and many, many other problems by getting all the money out of DC and back to the States and individuals it’s been stolen from.
cemerius
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:25pmlast I loked 53 MILLION and counting……who is “Hitler” now…..
Report Post »Miguelito
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:26pmWe need to look where all our tax money is going. My family has had to cut back, its time our elitist government cuts back and cuts out!
Report Post »independentvoteril
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:27pmwhile I have to say he’s right on the money about this.. taxpayer money should NOT be used for these things epically when they are withholding information from the parents..However.. all you out there that are against any abortion.. are you willing to put your money where your mouth is?? remember for every action there is an equal and OPPOSITE reaction.. How many are going to be in line for welfare?? TAXPAYERS will on the hook for supporting these children for the next 18 years.. and HOW they are raised will NOT be under TAXPAYER control.. therefore there is a high stat that these children will be having children of their own and collecting welfare.. there is also the point that they will be exploited by their families FOR the welfare check and the stats for abuse is higher.. I am NOT pro abortion.. however.. depending on the circumstances and within the first 2 months I am not totally against it.. I do not think it should be used for birth control.. Abortion has been around as long as Prostitution doesn’t make either right.. Perfect answer is no one has more kids than they can provide for.. are married.. and stable.. however.. we all know that is NOT always the case.. this also will give the Socialists a hand up on HOW badly those that have 6 or 7 kids need MORE free stuff cause they are underprivileged.. Wish there was an easy answer..but there’s not.. it’s one of those double edged sword things..
taskmaster78
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:28pmThis legislation could move through but I don‘t suppose they’ll hold a veto proof majority. The worse case is this administration wouldn’t sign it into law.
Report Post »joseph Fawcett
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:43pmI pray to God to make this come true, It would be a step in the right direction. It also would lower the spending if they don’t use the money to fund some other worthless and ungodly cause.
http://www.josephfawcettart.com Western artist
Report Post »Beckofile
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:46pmAnd…..How did they get the funding in the first place? Where in the Constitution is the authority to take from me and give to the Unplanned?
Report Post »Showtime
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 12:47pm@independentvoteril
Report Post »Welfare? That’s another entitlement that needs cutting.
getalong
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:00pmPlanned Parenthood did not notify my brother that his 17 year old daughter was set to have an abortion until the day before the abortion. He got a postcard in the mail. Thank God, he was able to talk her out of it. She now has a beautiful almost 4 year old little boy, and will be graduating with an RN degree next year. Her little boy is one of the greatest joys in her life.
Report Post »DashRipRock
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:02pmIndependent Voter
Newton’s priciples died a slow death in the face of Quantum Mechanics
ax Neils Bohr
Report Post »IronSights
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:15pm@independentvoteril
I understand your train of thought if there is no change in existing system, however if government aid/welfare remains an easy entitlement with these “pay-as-you-pop-a-kid” guideline it will be a problem either way. Welfare shouldn’t be a luxury for citizens. If you NEED to receive this type of support the recipient should also be REQUIRED to track the use of OUR money. It would force a level of responsibility on to the recipient and make it a less attractive option. Not to mention a may to instill a discipline that they didn’t have before. I do believe as a society we need to take care of the indigent, but there needs to be a level of shame associated with able bodies being on Welfare that fosters a desire to get off of it.
I believe this would be deterrent in “cash-for-kids” mentality, and would have an impact on kids born to house holds for profit. Be it a tough battle since our governing parties (on both sides) promoting that people are entitled to it.
Report Post »GODSAMERICA
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:41pmY’all forgot the one of the worst ones of all.
Defund the IRS
Report Post »missionarydad
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 1:42pmNot only should they be defunded they should be charged with federal crimes. Great job congressman you are absolutely right it is more than reprehensible.
Report Post »GymCy81
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 2:07pmAnother method:
When Congress prepares the budget, the line item $ related to PP should = 0
So, if the President vetoes, or approves, the budget, then there are no federal funds for PP.
p.s. Congress did not pass a budget last year…it is operating on a continuiing resolution.
imo, the next ‘continuiing resolution’ should include a discontinuiing of PP funds (and other items too)within the resolution.
p.s.s.
Report Post »Of course, the ‘health’ of women will be trumpeted, ad nauseum again, as a concern by some in the media.
But uhhh, didn’t their legislative passed / signed Obamacare get their Health all ‘fixed’ up – or did it get overlooked by the leaders that they support?
So, uhhh, really, just where should they (mis)point their fingers?
CultureWarriors
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 3:12pmDefund is not enough. Refund and jail time is a must!
Report Post »grandmaof5
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 3:37pmCNSRVTVJ, the reason they are so sure the tapes are doctored is because that is what they do to prove their points. The ends justify the means.
Report Post »SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 3:41pmdamn right. We need to start starving these pigs. If it ain’t acorn its another group. Start letting these groups raise private funds to do their work. If a private company operated in this fashion the left would be calling for an investigation. Defund all of these pigs.
Report Post »NoMoreGray
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 4:29pm@independentvoteril
and othrs who discuss this “logic”
Wow, I don’t quite know what to say. We should fund abortions because it is cheaper than funding them if they are kept alive? Aside from disgusting this is a false argument; if these women are willing to kill the baby to get out of raising it, then they should be more than willing to allow someone who wants a baby to have theirs. I have friends that have been waiting to adopt a baby for more than two years and I know they would take any of the ones (or 2 or 3) Planned Parenthood killed during that time. Perhaps if they “counseled” them in this direction couples that can’t have kids would have families, the children would be alive and thriving in homes that love and nurture them, and we would not have paid for the abortion or the welfare. Maybe we should put our efforts into simplifying and lowering the cost of this life saving option. Maybe if their were an adoption center on all the corners where PP dwells, such easy access would make this option available to those that have no idea how to begin to persue it.
Report Post »NoMoreGray
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 5:29pmJust checked PP in Indiana last year did nearly 5600 abortions, guess how many adoption referrals…
1 (one)
Guess what state my friends live in…
Yes, Indiana
Report Post »waggie
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 6:23pmamen brother Pence!
Report Post »DisillusionedDaily
Posted on February 9, 2011 at 9:22pmDefund them now! But do not try to make the government pass an anti abortion law, just get them to let the legislation of abortion fall to the states and handle it on a local level. There is nothing about abortion or anti-abortion that falls under the interstate commerce law, so the federal government should only get involved when illegal abortions are accessed across state lines. If the people keep pushing for a Federal law against abortion it will only serve to legitimize whatever the administration wants to do by acknowledging Federal authority in the matter!
Report Post »What's next
Posted on February 10, 2011 at 3:56amEvery woman who has had an abortion, should take the government to court for the killings it has encouraged in the pretense of intellectual advancement.
Report Post »