Report: Muslim Brotherhood Wants Egyptians to ‘Prepare for War With Israel’
- Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:39am by
Mike Opelka
- Print »
- Email »
Just two days after Mohamed ElBaradei declared that the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt was not an extremist organization and that any comparisons to extremist groups are “totally bogus,” reports are surfacing that high ranking members of this peaceful group are wishing that the citizens of Egypt would prepare for war with Israel.
“A leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt told the Arabic-language Iranian news network Al-Alam on Monday that he would like to see the Egyptian people prepare for war against Israel, according to the Hebrew-language business newspaper Calcalist.”
The report added;
Muhammad Ghannem reportedly told Al- Alam that the Suez Canal should be closed immediately, and that the flow of gas from Egypt to Israel should cease “in order to bring about the downfall of the Mubarak regime.” He added that “the people should be prepared for war against Israel,” saying the world should understand that “the Egyptian people are prepared for anything to get rid of this regime.”
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 581 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 410 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 407 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 373 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 361 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 407 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 410 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 361 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 407 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (241)
ares338
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:22amObama and his administration are not friends of Israel. Progressives and Democrats in general do not like Israel. Israel will defend itself, unlike the cowards in this administration who apologize to every world leader they can possibly apologize to and even bowing down to dictators. I am not ashamed of our country; why should our President be ashamed?
Report Post »EP46
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:28amBecause he is not an American. He does not love this country.
Report Post »Chicago Ray
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:32amHe** he’s not even a friend of America!! :(
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:21amKeep in mind that Israel is not the 51st state of the Union for all of you who all of suddenly so in love with the US Constitution. Besides, remember the Monroe Doctrine? America would be much better off if we stayed out of the Middle East completely, brought all soldiers home and guarded our Southern border!!! I assure you that’s what our Founding fathers would recommend.. No more Wars for the Jews please!! WW1, WW2, Iraq, Afhganistan, and Iran are quiet enough.. lol
Report Post »EP46
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:27amHey TECH………I think you are ‘lost in space’
Report Post »Israel is not the 51st state true…..Israel is the ENTIRE WORLD…….have you ever read the Bible. Turn on Israel and you exitst no more….but Israel wins in the end.
HippoNips
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:32amBull.
Report Post »We are not the country that abandons our allies in times of strife
Angelacw
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:40amWorld War 1 and 2 were not about the Jews. We shouldn’t have gotten involved in WW1, but that was Woodrow Wilson’s doing, because he wanted his League of Nations. In World War 2 the Jews were a bi-product of the Nazi occupation. We didn’t get dragged into the war to defend or liberate Jews – the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. Iraq & Afghanistan had nothing to do with Jews and we certainly aren’t at war with Iran.
Shame on you. This is the type of propaganda that George Sosros spreads in his efforts to destablize us. The Constitution doesn’t say a word about this. Yes, the founders including George Washington before Monroe encouraged us to stay out of the affairs of other nations, but we have treaties, and obligations to our allys. For the record, I would love for us to be out of every other country on Earth, and focusing on our own domestic issues, but we’re in this whether we like it or not. Besides our Dear Leader doesn’t want us out of this. This is exactly what he wants – the downfall of the imperialist United States and the in our place the spread of Islam.
Maybe we should stop playing piggy bank to dozens of corrupt nations and regimes.
Report Post »Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 1:17pm@Angelacw:
No, World War I was not about the Jews, and World War II was about the Jews only in Hitler’s fantasy world.
But you are wrong about Woodrow Wilson, who did not lead the US into World War I because he wanted a League of Nations. No President has been a more reluctant warrior than Wilson! Even after the Germans announced their intention to begin sinking US shipping early in 1917, he still hoped against hope that some sort of “armed neutrality” might induce them to recognize America’s neutral rights without the necessity of declaring war. Only when American vessels were actually sunk by German U-Boats–a virtual maritime act of war against the US–did Wilson ask Congress for war.
Further, Wilson was actually a rather late convert to the League of Nations idea. Before 1918, its leading advocate in the US had been none other than ex-President Taft. People here need to get over this Wilson-is-the-root-of-all-evil idea. Yes, he was a racist, but so was just about everybody back in the early 20th century. Yes, once the US went to war, civil liberties went out the window, but this was at a time when the population included millions of recent immigrants from the enemy empires, whose loyalty was suspect. Yes, he was a “progressive,” but a very special sort of progressive who for the most part upheld decentralization, free markets against monopolies and states’ rights.
As Glennie says, study and inform yourself!
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 1:26pmAngelacw: America entered WW1 as a result of the Balfour declaration. American entered WW2 as a result of Nuremberg.. We all know that the Marxist Jewish led Russians committed 100X more atrocities before WW2 and after than Germany did but we allied with them… Not about Jews eh? lol
Iraq was invaded simply because Saddamn was paying Palestinian suicide bombers families and acted as a balance against Israeli hegemony in the Middle East.. We are currently occupying both Iraq and Afhghanistan awaiting an invasion of Iran.. The Media is still stirring the folks up over Iran.. When they are through with their propaganda they’ll have all these Christian screwballs so messed up they will want to eat Iranian children for breakfast… Not about my Jews my buttocks!!! lol Don’t be so naive.
Report Post »Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 1:54pm@Techengineer11:
The US entered World War I in April 1917, the Balfour Declaration was in November 1917, so how did the later event cause the earlier one?
As for World War II, Stalin had killed millions of people before his pact with Hitler in 1939, but not as many as Hitler did in 1941 and after, even leaving aside military casualties. Only about half of the people killed by the Nazis through starvation, shooting or gassing were Jews. (See a recent work called “Bloodlands,” by Timothy Snyder, for further particulars.)
A disproportionate number of the personnel of Stalin’s NKVD were in fact Jews, but this does not mean that “the Jews” as such were responsible for Stalin’s atrocities.
You’re right about “Christian screwballs,” though. I have Evangelical Christian friends who positively salivate at the thought of how Jesus will come again when TSHTF.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 3:32pmLloyd Drako: Considering that the American Media which everyone knows is entirely Jewish controlled was almost 100% behind Germany at the outset of WW1 only to eventually begin running stories of Germans eating Red Cross nurses, harvesting babies… etc I ask what caused this change in sentiment and my answer is Balfour and only Balfour. Besides if as you suggest the Americans were supplying the British then they were already in the War and they were at that point. Germany had every right to sink every ship supplying their enemy.
Some estimate that Lenin and Stalin may have been responsible for some 20 million deaths before the outbreak of WW2 including 7-10 million Ukrainians which the NKVD Jew Beria ordered the forced starvation of in a time of peace?? Atrocities never even imagined but was America bothered? Hell no. Even after the discovery of the Katyn massacre did our leaders tell us who was responsible? Absolutely not! As a matter of fact the NY Times blamed it on the Germans and ran so many propaganda articles on it that the GIs were stirred up to the point that they were ready to annihilate the entire German race.. Of course isn’t that what Roosevelt’s Jewish sec of state recommended before WW2? No, we all know that WW2 was about Nuremberg.. Take the Jew away from the Media again and you will have WW3!!! lol
I don’t understand the Hitler comment from 1941 but Jews were not only prevalent in the NKVD they were the back bone of the Marxist system. I’ve read over and over again that some 300 of 360 commissars back in the early 1920s were Jews.
Today we see who controls America’s foreign policy.. We are drenched in blood and we wonder why the Muslims hate us.. The amount of ignorance which I find on this blog is almost laughable! As far as the comment on Evangelicals goes, no one understands the mentality of an Evangelical better than I. As recent as 5 years ago I would have physically struck anyone that spoke maliciously of the Jew.. I’d read so many prophecy books, the Bible and had heard so many Evangelical sermons that I was ready to go over to the Middle East and take out every single last Muslim with my bare hands…lol But my eyes were eventually opened…
Report Post »Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 4:43pm@Techengineer11:
You’re right about the ignorance displayed by a lot of the people here, but not about the Jews.
First, as to World War I. At the time, US firms had a perfect right under international law to sell arms to the British. (Note: not the US government, which did not do so until after the declaration of war.) The Germans had a perfect right to confiscate those arms shipments, but not to sink American ships without warning. Again, “Balfour” cannot possibly have been the cause of America’s going to war because Balfour did not issue his pro-Zionist message until after the US was already in the war. Chronology isn’t all there is to history, but it’s basic to a proper understanding!
Then, as to World War II. By “Nuremberg” you must mean the 1946 trials rather than the prewar Nazi Party rallies held in that city. There was little reference to the Jews as such during the trials, rather, the emphasis was on how the Nazi hierarchy had plotted aggressive war. FDR’s Secretary of State throughout the entire period 1933-1944 was Cordell Hull, who was not Jewish, so perhaps you’re thinking of his Secretary of the Treasury Henry Morgenthau, who was. Katyn was indeed swept under the rug in the interest of “Allied harmony,” something Poles have not forgotten even to this day.
But what does any of this has to do with “the Jews?” If in the early 1920s much of the Soviet leadership had been Jewish, by the time of World War II this was no longer the case: Stalin saw to that in the purges of 1936-1938, which eliminated most of the “Old Bolshevik” cadres, including Jews like Zinoviev and Kamenev. Beria, who did not take over the NKVD until 1939, was close to Stalin more because he was Georgian than because he was Jewish.
My “Hitler comment” refers to the fact that until 1941, Hitler seems to have uncertain how he wanted to eliminate the Jews: by expelling them from Europe or by killing them? Until a month or so into the invasion of the USSR, the Nazis had killed “only” perhaps 100,000 Jews; the really large-scale shootings and gassings only began in late 1941, especially after it became evident that the USSR would fight on, and that there was no prospect of dumping Jews into Siberia as originally conceived.
I have elsewhere suggested that the best “Final Solution to the Jewish Question” would be for the US to grant all Israelis American citizenship and offer them a refuge in America from the oncoming Muslim hordes. Talk about the “homeless, tempest-tossed!” I feel quite sure they’d make exemplary citizens.
It was wise of you to give up fixating on all the blood-drenched prophecies and end-times Bible nonsense, but I’m not sure whatever it was that “opened your eyes” and made you an anti-Semite was any improvement!
Report Post »absolutely
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:17amI think Beck is beating Rush’s 99.6% accuracy record.
Absolutely
Report Post »MR.CONSERVATIVENEGRO
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:17amBrigitte Gabriel “They Need To Be Stopped” explained all about the Muslim Brotherhoods ideologies. It is to kill Israel, close off the Suez Canal, and destabalize the whole region for its calaphate. Hmm, the religion of peace…I’m in.
Report Post »EP46
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:24amDont forget they have vowed to kill us too. It is not just Israel. We are 2nd on the list.
Report Post »Quad1995
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:16amIt is futile for the brotherhood to go to war Israel.. Because the One True GOD-ADONAI is with Israel. Israel is protected and will never be destroyed.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:23amSyria? Babylon? Persia? Rome? lol You don’t read very much do you?
Report Post »davecoolworld
Posted on February 3, 2011 at 4:05amTECHENGINEER11…..is a bigot. Do you have any Jewish friends? Don’t answer, it was rhetorical.
Here’s something for you to ponder engineer…Did you know the koran was dictated to and written by Rabbi because muhammed was illiterate, among other deficiencies? On the front of every koran ever published are 3 letters. Ask a muslim what it says and they will tell you, that is for allah to know. The 3 letters are Hebrew. They loosely translate to “This is not to be believed” or “This is not true”. That’s right, the Rabbi that was ordered to transcribe the words of a murdering, pedophile, rapist, illiterate, insane MAN, got the final laugh by inscribing those 3 words for the world to see. Although the Rabbi could not have known this ruse of a “religion” would be around this long.
Something else for you to put in your pipe and smoke other than meth, the Jewish calendar is currently at 5,771 lunar years. Predates, oh I don’t know….everything else! The Last Supper made famous by Leonardo DaVinci’s painting, depicts a Passover Seder. All at the table including Jesus were Jewish.
Final bit of important relevant FACT. In Jerusalem there is a mosque, built upon a destroyed church, which was built upon the destroyed Second Jewish Temple. The Western or Wailing Wall is all that remains. My point, Jews were there first, until the dawn of Christianity. The New Testament picks up where The Old Testament left off. Jews recognize Jesus as a prophet, but do not think he is the Messiah. Jews believe that The Messiah has not come yet.
islam only destroys everything then builds a mosque on rubble. Read the koran, educate yourself. If you’re an engineer, you’re capable of great knowledge. The koran is nothing but contradictions in bizarre writings. If page 35 says to be a peaceful people and page 322 says to kill infidels…well you must kill infidels and forget about the peace bit. You see, all subsequent pages supersede the previous pages as if they were never written. The latter verses rule over the previous verses. That is why some people can find the peace part and ignore the killing parts. But, they are wrong. They want to be “good muslims” and probably want to be good people. But, if you are a follower of islam, you do not have that choice.
Report Post »Mackerel
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:14amIt’s OK, heaven will be free from all of this crap……………..including progressives.
Report Post »EP46
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:22am@ Mackerel….you said it so simply. What some do not seem to understand is that this is all written out and we have read the ending.
Report Post »Marylou7
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:37pmVery well said……..we will finally be free of all the baby killers.
Report Post »sarahchar09
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:12amWait! what? I thought that they were peaceful ?!?!?!?!
Report Post »SND97
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:08amIsrael will not be destroyed. They will try of course, and all hell will break loose on the rest of the world, but Israel will not be destroyed. Isn’t it funny how for over 50 years of my life now, I heard about this happining way back then, and read about whats going on in a book written thousands of years ago. Ya know the one called the Bible?
Hope we’re all ready.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:23amYou know the truth my friend.
Tonio
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:07amthat brave little country Israel doesn’t need friends like Obuma and Bloomersberg
Report Post »jackact
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:06amWe are always so quick here in the USA to speak on behalf of what Israel will, or won’t do in terms of defending itself from potential nuclear war in the middle east.
Report Post »As the previous writer stated, “Israel will protect itself. We can count on that”!
I believe that as well.
The question is this; proceeding Obama’s world stage speeches in Germany & Cairo what would we do in a similar situation?
I, for one, as a responsible American will not feel safe until Nov. 2012.
EP46
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:14amWe have always had a strong military stand in the world…the U.S. was ‘feared’.
Report Post »Now we have a puppet in the oval office who is playing his part in the take over of the world. We will not have an election in 2012 if this is not stopped.
Angelacw
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:19amI’m with you. The Israeli army is no joke, unfortunately our president is. Barack Obama set the stage for this and he has demonstrated to the world that he will not stand with Israel. I’m not very religious, but this is escalating into a crisis of Biblical proportion – literally. God help us all.
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:42am“The Israeli army is no joke” is very true. I have trained with Israeli Special Forces. They are as good as any in the world and better than most. Look at the map: The Israelis are too few to fight a conventional war against more than a couple of those countries. They will almost certainly be forced to use the tactical nuclear weapons they have. Unless they are backed up by the U.S. and others I can see no alternative.
Report Post »Ella
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:05amIf they start a war with Israel they will be blown off the map. Obama hates Israel just like his pals do.
Report Post »Anyone who expects Obama to do anything in Israel’s favor against his Muslim brothers is deaf, dumb and blind. Wake-up America. The muslims are coming to try to overtake us next. Piece by
piece.
Gonzo
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:15amDon’t worry, Israel has an ally who is a lot more powerful than Obama.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:05amGood luck brotherhood. The outcome of that battle was decided a loooong time ago.
Report Post »matt708
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:03amdoesn’t the brotherhood realize that war with Israel is war with the US? I guess they can’t figure that out yet
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:09amI’m not at all sure that is the case anymore.
Report Post »wolverine
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:09amI don’t think Obama will support Israel in a war with the muslims
Report Post »EP46
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:19am2MATT708
Report Post »Don’t forget…they are not afraid of us anymore. Barry will let Americans die by the thousands so it will help with population control and the food supply. He does not care about America…it is the New World Order.
USA_DisabledVet
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:37amWhat if Turkey during the Gaza Flotilla fiasco had escalated by the Israelis attacking a Turkish warship? Imagine if Turkey had retaliated? The United States would have been forced to support their NATO ally Turkey because Israel is not a member of NATO. If the U.S. had failed to militarily support its NATO ally then in all likelihood we would probably not have a NATO.
Report Post »Cape_Lookout_RW_Extremist
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:09pmThink ur right 82nd. PeeBO has turned his back on Israel…we might be paying for that soon, if not already.
Report Post »chkiaar
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:21pmAnd don’t forget, it would reduce the ALL important carbon footprint.
Report Post »Lloyd Drako
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:28pmNo, they probably calculate that for the first time in a long time, war with Israel does not mean war with the US.
That said, we should recognize that the Muslim Brotherhood is a large organization, long suppressed, and that many of the Brothers are not especially radical, except in wanting to get rid of Mubarak.
Once Mubarak goes (if he goes: it doesn’t look as much a sure thing now as a day or so ago), look for a split between radicals and moderates over what to do next–about Egypt’s internal condition as well as relations with Israel.
But for the moment, I wouldn’t be wetting my pants about one report about what one Brotherhood leader may have said to an (Arabic-language) Iranian newspaper, according to a Hebrew newspaper, according to the Blaze! Aren’t you curious about the source of this report?
Report Post »ablisterin
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:30pmI believe obama has stated that he would side with muslims over Isreal, if I’m not mistaken.
Report Post »Topiary Lady
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:01amI find this frightening, although not at all surprising. We’ve been told for years now just how patient the Islamists are. The whole thing is a set-up.
It is also not surprising that Obama would make a statement about the inclusion of the MB in a new government in Egypt. I don’t buy into the “Obama is a Muslim” stories. But I do think that the agenda of the hard left fits in with that of the Islamists to a large degree. The call for violence comes from the left quite often. I have an entire thread called: Violent Liberals over at http://www.theamericanright.com
Report Post »heferwiz57
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:59amEgypt is the King of the South in Daniel 11…here it comes!
Report Post »UpstateNYConservative
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:07amLibya and Ethiopia have to fall in line, too. Give it time…
Report Post »EP46
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:17amBabylon will be rebuilt.
Report Post »USA_DisabledVet
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:55amI hope the Egyptians eventually get a president and government that represents their best interests but as for War with Israel, that’s inevitable.
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:52amI am not a conspiracy kind of guy. The Muslim extremists have a plan – conspiracy – whatever you want to call it. The jihad & the caliphate are major themes in their holy books and teachings. This situation could be really, really bad!
Israel will defend itself, make no mistake. When our government was a strong open supporter of Israel we had influence. When Mr. Obama openly praises Muslims and forces the Israeli PM come and go from the back door of the White House we lose that. They must feel as though they are alone and surrounded by hostile countries. (Because they are!) If you feel cornered and are regularly threatened with destruction what would you do? I would do anything to protect myself, my family and country.
Israel will protect itself. We can count on that!
Report Post »EP46
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:10amI agree totally. Israel has no other choice or they will be destroyed. This is all happening because before the U.S. was a strong force in the world and now the Muslims know that obama will do nothing to protect Israel.
Report Post »Also, China has to keep a tight grip on the people ….there are about 100 million Muslims in China…don’t want them to act up….they will be gunned down .
USA_DisabledVet
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:38amWhat Brigade are you?
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:51amMostly A Co. 2/325th
Report Post »Workforit
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:50amWatch Obama abandon Israel… Just watch.
Report Post »chkiaar
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:58amIsrael who????
Report Post »michael79
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:01amThat’s correct. He will go with the muslims if the wind blows that way. He is unacceptable. He’s not a leader. We don’t need him.
Report Post »EP46
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:05amHe already has he hates Israel. I have never seen anyone treated as badly as he treated Netanyah at the White House. The WH is the PEOPLE’s house and he embarrassed us all.
I think Israel will probably go ahead and take out Iran before Iran turns on them, and then they will take out the Gaza strip.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:16amHe is a politician and what do politicians do they protect their own self-interests by using the high school rule of conduct. Who are the cool kids? Who is the in-crowd? Who can help me the most? Not what is right what is moral. He is just going to do what politicians do. Just like a skunk stinks….its what they are.
Report Post »silentwatcher
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:19amIf Obamar abandons Israel, the majority of the U.S. citizens won’t,,,,but God will have his wrath on the United States for their treason.
Report Post »Untameable-kate
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:06pmsilentwatcher
Report Post »I don’t agree that we will be punished by God for the actions of the Godless left.
UpstateNYConservative
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:50amWhat? This can’t be true! Didn’t some MSNBC reporter fluff the Muslim Brotherhood the other night, all but getting down on his knees? How can this report be possible, given the Religion of Peace and all that?
Oh, wait; I know!
Liberals get everything wrong, every time. They’re useless to the world.
Okay–I’m back on track now. ;)
Report Post »Mustangdave
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:48amIn truth…the devil…SATAN has had his hands in this mess from the beginning of recorded time
Report Post »chkiaar
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:47amGOP, couldn’t have said it better. The beginning of the end.
Time to hunker down and prepare for the inevitable..it started over there and it looks like the end is going to come from over there too.
Report Post »MrButcher
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:41amEureka!!
An Egyptian autocrat falls and that, obviously (duh), means the end of the world is nigh.
Quick! Call the State Department and tell them to back off and leave it alone. They are interfering with celestial prophecy. Our Foreign Policy is now guided by the babblings of bronze age charlatans.
By all means, you should “prepare.”
You should prepare to look rather foolish if your death-wish-for-all-humanity-religious-delusion doesn’t come true and no three-headed beasts, white horses and risen dead people come galloping out of the sky.
Does this mean you can stop stocking up on food, gold and ammo?
Report Post »Nah, I doubt your faith is that strong.
chkiaar
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:44amDude, are you replying to the right post?????
Report Post »chkiaar
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:50amDude are you even replying to the right post??
Report Post »MrButcher
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:56amer, um, yes.
But you‘re not the only one who’s being addressed.
Report Post »Biminy
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:47amOk, I’m a little confused: How does going to war with another country get rid of your country‘s current gov’t? And the MB are just moderates looking out for the people of Egypt. How do people buy this crap? And if going to war with another country gets rid of your country‘s current gov’t maybe we need another….oh wait….we already have 2 going on and we still have ours. Damn it!!
Report Post »Untameable-kate
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:29amOf course the Muslim Brotherhood will save the Egyptian people from poverty and starvation, you see how all thos people in the Islamic countries are thriving:(
Report Post »When you look at those countries you wonder how so many people can think they are living the right way. They are starving, and yet we are the ones who are wrong in all things as we are worshipping the wrong God. Anyone think their god may be crazy?
sdranger
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:35amRe-read the article. It states that the Bro’s want to close the Suez Canal to shut down oil and gas going to Isreal. Their assumption is that Isreal would be the aggressor and attack Egypt. Showing the world that the Egyptions knew this would be the outcome but were prepared for the consequenses just to get rid of the Mubark regime.
I have no doubt that if the Bro’s get control they will attack Isreal however they have to have a few more dominos fall. Saudi Arabia and Jordan. At that time the rats will think they are strong enough to do it.
Report Post »Philo Beddoe
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:44amMission Accomplished Barky. Now go back under your rock
Report Post »ablisterin
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:27pmIsn’t Obama on record saying that he would side with muslims over Jews (Isreal)?
Report Post »Untameable-kate
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:43amWow who could have seen this one coming?? Except maybe EVERYONE. Maybe BO can fix it some more.
Report Post »Resolved
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:03amEh, he’s too busy dealing with greedy rich business owners (most of whom aren’t rich, and all of which drive the economy), climate change (that has nothing to do with us), and fixing a healthcare system that efficiently served 276 million people (for the sake of the other 30 mil, at least a third of which are illegal, and many of the others are willingly without insurance). Come on Kate, he only tackles BIG problems. The religion of peace… not so much.
Report Post »EP46
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:12amObama is part of this , that is why he was put into office as the Puppet.
Report Post »Creestof
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:32amOnly thing Obama will fix is the next election there…if he can.
Report Post »Templar Knight
Posted on February 3, 2011 at 4:08amGlenn saw it coming as well as all those who did their homework. But who didn’t see it coming was the morons from MSNBC, NYTimes, CBS, CNN, ABC, and all the other leftist media outlets who praise themselves as Obama lovers.
Report Post »gopsnativeson
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:42amAnd so it starts, the beginning of the end, as the devil throws his hat into the ring
Report Post »felina g
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:45amBeck was right again.
Report Post »SnapTie
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:48amCan we get the Libbys to admit they might not be peace loving origination?
Report Post »NickDeringer
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 10:58amGod save Israel. I think they will soundly defeat anyone who comes against them, but there will be lots of casualties.
To Christopher Hitchens and his atheist friends: the Bible predicted this more than 2,000 years ago.
Report Post »roxee
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:00amThe Muslim Brotherhood has Kabbal orgins under the guise of Freemasonary. The British seceret agent Mohammed Abdul Wahhab a fundamentalist. They would use heroin on recruits, then give these recurits food,women, music( sex ,drugs & rock-n-roll) essentially,then when they came down from the high,they were told they were in heaven,but, they must follow what the higher ups said to obtain this so called heaven. It was the first types of Mind Control.
cnsrvtvj
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:02amDoes this shock anyone but the liberals? Perhaps Chris Matthews thinks the tea party also supports this. This whole thing is getting uglier by the minute. The left has been defending this group all week now. I wonder what they will say throughout the days coverage of this story. That is if they report this at all.
http://www.donsmithshow.com – conservative news and videos
Report Post »grannyjojo
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:04amCan I say if it does happen it has already been predicted and so has the outcome. When you go against Israel you go against God and mmmmmmm, guess what? GOD WINS!
watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:11amWell it certainly didn’t take a visionary to figure out that the Muslim Brotherhood was obviously lying and wants to engage in the destruction of Israel and therefore the West (since they lump us together for our support of them). Please don’t be deceived by empty words. In their faith it is perfectly acceptable and commendable to deceive the “infidels” in order to gain the advantage. It’s what they believe, it’s what they do !!! Sunnis and Shias may hate each other, but the enemy (Israel, the West) of your enemy is your friend !!! They are encircling Israel (militant Sunni and Shia) and things are going to come to ahead. And as it does you will see political AND financial instability all over the globe. It is coming and it doesn’t take a genius to see it, just an informed person.
Report Post »silentwatcher
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:11amThere it is,,,,didn’t even wait for the lie to settle in that they are peaceful. Don’t even have control of Egypt yet and ALREADY wanting to go to war with Israel. Man, are they eager,,,of course I’m pretty sure that not all those rioting and voicing their wants are NOT from Egypt….that many, many are from Iran, Syria,etc. Israel won’t wait for them to start ****…..Americans better get out of there post-haste.
Report Post »silentwatcher
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:13amAnd already wanting to close the Suez Canal……I say STOP ALL funding to Egypt TODAY>>
Report Post »EddardStark
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:18amYes, this time it is DEFINITELY the apocalypse, never mind that Israel has stood down a pan-Arab attack in ‘67 and ’73. So before you quite your job to prepare for the rapture, read a book other than the Bible.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:19amThey wouldn’t be from Iran. Iran is mainly Shia and Egypt is mainly Sunni. They hate each other. Now from Saudi Arabia or Tunisia or Libya maybe.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:28amEddardstark…….Although I am not calling this the apocalypse (many things yet to occur). I found it interesting your comment about reading a book. If you will recount history you will find that it was not a pan-Arab attack as you put it. Never has Israel been surrounded with the kind of political and military will to destroy it as is possessed by its current neighboring countries. Those Six day war of ‘67 was against Egypt, Syria, and Jordan…….’73 was a raid on 2 targets in Lebanon. Hardly what we are seeing on the political map of today. This is unprecedented in the modern history of Israel. This with the possibility of a Nuclear Iran shortly. C’mon man, if you don‘t see the significance of that you must be in da’nile !!!
Report Post »butler180
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:31amLike this is a surprise to us. Bet my last dollar that Prez Obama also knows and is backing it as he sides with the radicals around the world and spits on our allies
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:33amIf you are going to comment on history better make sure you give an accurate account of it not a generalized statement that’s not accurate simply to make someone else look kooky !!
Report Post »My Sacred Honor
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:33amEddardStark
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:18am
Yes, this time it is DEFINITELY the apocalypse, never mind that Israel has stood down a pan-Arab attack in ‘67 and ’73. So before you quite your job to prepare for the rapture, read a book other than the Bible.
This time is different. Maybe YOU should read a bible?
Report Post »TexasCommonSense
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:35amWho doubted this was coming? They will, of course, partner with Iran in this Endeavour. What lies between Egypt and Iran? Saudi Arabia and the Straight of Hormuz, the places from where a large percentage of our oil comes. There’s also the Suez Canal and the Suez Gulf running right through Egypt. This could get ugly and very expensive for us. Be prepared!
Report Post »independentvoteril
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:40amI could be wrong.. but isn’t Israel well armed?? can they NOT blow big holes in EGYPT..as well as a few other places???
Report Post »Independent Tess
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:40amWhoever touches Israel, touches “the apple of God’s eye”.
Report Post »independentvoteril
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:43am@grannyjojo.. EXACTLY.. guess they forgot to put that in the KORAN.. boy are they going to be SURPRISED as will all those in this country that keeps defending these nuts..LOL
Report Post »Ben41281
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:45am“Can we get the Libbys to admit they might not be peace loving origination?”
Snaptie, unfortunately we can not get them to admit their failings. Those who will not see, can not be made to see. Most of the libs are a lost cause. They wont admit that evil exists, even when the train they are riding is taking them to a gas chamber!
Report Post »TexasCommonSense
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:47amindependentvoteril, yes, they’re well armed, but so is Egypt and Iran. The problem with Iran is we don‘t know how well they’re armed. They have been producing highly-enriched uranium for “peaceful” purposes for a while now.
Report Post »davecoolworld
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:48amThe number one , card carrying, MB member (Obama) has aleady started a quiet war with Israel by isolating them and showing them the back door to OUR White House. Israel knows they are on their own for a while.
Report Post »TexasCommonSense
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:50amBen41281, you’re right. We had these people before both world wars. It took Japan to jar our collective heads out of our butts before we faced, and defeated, evil in WWII.
Report Post »jblaze
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 11:59amLuke 21:20 (King James Version)
20And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.
As must see video.
Report Post »http://www.theTrumpet.com/index.php?q=7925.6531.0.0
EddardStark
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:10pm@Watchtheotherhand…………….. Really? Nasser has a bone to pick with you. Perhaps in ‘67 it was a joint attack led by Egypt, Syria and Jordan because those are the countries that border Israel? You are clearly in “da’nile” if you believe that other Arab countries did not aid that PAN-ARAB assault on Israel. Even today, similar to then, to hint that Egypt, Jordan or Syria would allow large contingents of foreign military units onto their sovereign soil to aid in an invasion is delusional. ‘73 was exactly the same situation with even less success for Arab countries than in ’67. Yes they had limited aims, but they were also less committed after the trouncing six years earlier.
And if you are in the habit of parsing words, which apparently you are. Iran is not Arab and if you think for one second that Egypt and Jordan, even the most radical elements in those countries, want a nuclear Iran, or even worse a nuclear Iran that would use nuclear weapons on Israel you have deluded yourself with a fear of monolithic Islam that no words from me will ever clear up. Nuclear weapons are not tactical and Israel is not even the size of New Jersey. With Arab nations near by and Palestinian Arab contingents living within the confines of Israel it is blatantly fear mongering to suggest that Egypt or any other Arab nation wants Iran to use a Nuclear option. So I will rephrase my statement about a reading a book, because you are correct, it was uncivil. Please don’t read every book through a Biblical lens.
Report Post »EddardStark
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:13pm@sacredhonor – What makes you think that I haven’t?
Report Post »ablisterin
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:22pmLeft forms “unholy alliance” with radical islam.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:24pmMm mm mm. Certainly seems that there’s hypocrisy alright- but close to home. http://spitfirelist.com/news/murdoch-and-news-corp-aligning-with-muslim-brotherhood/
Report Post »My Sacred Honor
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:26pmEddardStark
Report Post »Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:10pm
Now THAT was an arguement, and well said! I have always said that Israel is in the best place possible if it were to be located in the middle east. ….Almost like God thought of that before hand, huh? You are absolutely correct, an nuke detonated in Israel would kill a vast majority of the arab states, and even be deadly in Persian Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan.
There’s only one problem. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. I think he believes that if he nuked Israel, the almighty hand of allah will protect Iran, and maybe even bring about the 12th imam. That guy is crazy, and whole-heartedly believes this to be true, and who knows? Maybe it will. I believe this imam may be antichrist, and…and…and…
Just watching and seeing what happens next, I reckon.
democratgirl
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:30pmProtests in Egypt and the Middle East are ostensibly originating from pro-democracy groups. But this is much the same report that was given when the uprising in Iran occurred in 1978. It is in this deception that those in American leadership who promote global democracy hang their altruistic hope of establishing a peaceful world order. But organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, al Qaeda, Hizbollah and others prey on these situations and take advantage of passionate idealism to gain totalitarian power. With all the information available at their fingertips, American leadership should be able to discern this dire situation and see the similarities that could put Americans in harms way on our own soil.
There has been a lack of discernment for nearly a decade as Egyptian-born Islamist Mohamed El Baradei deceptively assisted Iran and others in gaining nuclear technology while he was presiding over the United Nations effort to limit nuclear proliferation. Additionally, there seems to be a lapse of good judgment by the White House in assisting the Muslim Brotherhood with its goals in Egypt. Will our leadership be so accommodating when the Muslim Brotherhood brings violence to our streets? This is the result of following leaders both nationally and within the church that lack Biblical truth and Holy Spirit guidance. Their discernment and judgment are weighed in the balance and “are found wanting.”
Upon delivering the Israelites from Egypt, the Lord gave Moses advice on choosing leadership. Exodus 18:21 says, “Moreover thou shall provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness: and place such over them to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens.” Americans have been conditioned for the past two generations that there must be separation of church and state. We have turned our back as a nation on this founding principle of good government. How can we then expect our leaders to have Holy Spirit discernment when we have chosen those who know neither God nor the Holy Scriptures?
Romans 10:14 says, “How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?” The Lord showed Ezekiel the abominations and idolatry as the elders and priests turned their backs on Him inside the temple and He said in 8:17, “for they have filled the land with violence.” Indeed, the strange fire of man-made doctrines falsely taught by the church in its self indulgence has caused this condition. And if we, who know the truth, do not stand in this very day and time, our land will also be filled with violence as the Muslim Brotherhood and others lie in wait as they did in Egypt. We must send sound men of God into leadership, but first we must teach them rightly and then demand of them righteousness.
Report Post »Rogue
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:31pmTime to prepare…. the US needs to start working on domestic oil sources asap, and get more US refineries online. Things can change very quickly in the middle east, and we are nowhere near prepared to sustain ourselves on our domestic reserves. Our economy would implode if we were forced to buy $8/gal gasoline.
Oh, and those nukes we trimmed down in the START treaty? I say we send them to Israel to use as they see fit, plus a few extras. If Israel is faced with the possibility of extinction, you can bet they will be willing to create some big glowing craters. I’m not sure Israel can survive an all out attack from unified Muslim nations due to sheer numbers, but before they go, they will make sure that the capitols of every attacking nation are leveled, as well as Mecca and maybe even the area of ancient Babylon.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:35pm@ gopsnativeson
Report Post »Yes , yes it does. This is what happens in the world with a weak America and poor monitary policies.
Squirrel Gravy
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:36pmBy chance, are you all as freaked out as I am? I’m having nightmares over this stuff! Yup, Beck was right again…
Report Post »Highland
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:41pmAnd Barack Hussein Soetero Obama supports the Muslim Brotherhood. What a putz.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 12:52pmeddardstark…….I commend you for retracting your “read a book statement”. That was a gracious act and appreciate your sincerity. Not really trying to parse words at all. I will apologize for my in da’nile comment. Thouhgt it was funny since we were talking about Egypt. My point isn‘t that perhaps others didn’t provide aid, but that is an entirely different thing than entering into a war on the front line. I know that Iran is not “Arab” in its strict since but I think you realize we are talking about Militant Islam not “Arabs” and since Iran is mostly Shia muslim you can appreciate the reason I mentioned them. I still don’t think you are acknowledging and I invite you to disprove me with facts that Israel has never never never faced the threat from surrounding neighbors as they do today. To equate ‘67 or ’73 to the current geopolitical events is apples and oranges.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 1:04pmeddardstark BTW……no where did I say Iran was going to use a nuclear weapon on Israel, but it is a very strong tool to be used in other ways other than detonation. I know you are aware of this. Why else has Iran gone to such links to develop it. I know all about the Sunni Shia hatred for one another in Islam.. I’m not an idiot. Saudi Arabia wanted the US to take out Iran because they didn’t want Iran to have nukes. But one powerful factor I think you are ignoring is that you are thinking like a westerner when you say they wont use any kind of force to destroy Israel. Some of these people in powerful positions are religious fanatics that believe their faith is calling them to this holy war and mind you they will resort to measures you consider ridiculous. Your perspective may be a little skewed because of your own culture. All these groups don’t call for the destruction of the west or Israel because they are reasonable. The same mentality that led to the towers on 911 and many other self-sacrificing terrorist missions is the same mindset that is trying to be in leadership positions in these countries (who leads politically in Palestine?). Yep a terrorist group.
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 1:21pmeddardstark…..final BTW……. everyone views, reads, or thinks on everything through some sort of lens. Its called a worldview and everyone has one whether they think they do or not. The most objective person in the world interprets their world through this worldview. So suggesting you are correct because you don’t read things through the lens of the Bible is hypocritical. You do read through your own bias whether its Bible based or not. I am not trying to put you down but to suggest someone who may believe the Bible cannot have a well informed or correct opinion is somewhat condescending.
Report Post »nineiron
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 1:43pmHe who hath an ear let him hear.
Report Post »docvet
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 1:50pmI’m not seeing this as widespread as some of you.right now, Egypt is more intersted in getting Mubarak out of office plus get some food and fuel to the people. The Muslim Brotherhood are trying to make it bigger than it is by calling for war with Israel. BIMINI made a good point: “How do you get food and fuel by staarting a war with a nuclear equipped country?” Egypt has too many internal problems to worry about Israel and I think the Muslim Brotherhood is, at least for now, spitting into the wind.
Report Post »And speaking of nukes, the Muslim Brotherhood may bite off more than they can chew if they try poking the U.S., Russia and China (India?) in the eye with a sharp stick. Keep it up and even oil may not save them. It will take a lot of provication, but Pakistan‘s and Iran’s nukes may be a bigger threat to the world than all the attempts to create a caliphate. They (the nukes) will be the first target and while a few mushoorm clouds will sove a few problems, a lot of clouds will solve a lot of problems. I hope Israel has a country-wide water washdown system or they will also glow in the dark (but not before they empty their arsenal in a 360 degree arc around their country). It may be a coming armageddon, but, hopefully it will be in the form of making sand into glass.
In any case, the U.S. better think seriously about getting our troops out of the Middle East area while we still can before they find themselves fighting for their lives against all the muslin hordes in the region. Or they find themselves doing a quick review of their courses in radiation fallout protection.
watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 2:28pm‘67 and ’73 conflicts also did not have Islamic countries that have the same military air strength that they possess today. That is why Israel ended the ‘67 conflict in 6 days they quickly assumed air superiority over the other countries. Today that scale is much more balanced thanks to China’s sale of fighters to some of these countries. So one doesn’t have to put troops on the ground inside other sovereign countries. Simply to have fly over permission and oh btw some of these countries also posses missiles that can easily reach Israel (they didn‘t posses this ability in ’67 or ‘73). Just explaining why you are comparing apples and oranges.
Report Post »Curator_JDR
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 2:32pmTbe only hope for the West now, and for good people everywhere is to know and understand Pre-Abrahamic history (through archeology and artifacts) and to know Islam as the reconstituted Baal worship under the guise of a monotheistic religion that it is. The bones have risen!
This historic interview on Israel National Radio explains all. http://www.marcrubin.com/judean-eve.ivnu
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 3:03pm…..possess …….
Report Post »AzDebi
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 5:10pm1/31/11 Interview with Walid Shoebat (former member of the PLO)
I transcribed this from a radio broadcast…if you are here at this site…you NEED to read this…if I’ve made some spelling errors, I apologize…I did my best…THIS IS A MUST READ…AN e2 moment! AND…I’m sorry for the length…but you need the info in its; entirety! If YOU read this…you WILL understand what’s going on!
“What is going on is a repetition of the “Carter Era” when they gave the cold shoulder to the Shah of Iran which introduced “inhumanism” which was the beginning of the problem. Had the US handled that revolution in Iran, we wouldn’t be dealing with the situation over in the Middle East with the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamism even in Turkey. Carter abandoned the Shaw just as the US is abandoning Mubarak. This is not ignoring the fact that Mubarak is a dictator and this is not the choice of the US to create dictatorships in the Middle East but this has been the status quo throughout history. The Middle East has always been Theocratic or Dictatorships or Socialistic. We are insisting on elections. Even Bush insisted on Palestinian elections in the past, which gave birth to Hamas in the Palestinian areas which caused nearly a civil war between Palestinian and Palestinian. Democracy in the Middle East is only used during the elections and is thrown out the window once someone is elected. Clinton, of course, insists that we need Democratic “reforms” and President Obama who is a “closet Socialist” insists that the Egyptians have a right to assembly, freedom of speech and Democracy…so on and so forth.
Yet, in all cases in the past, when we have Democratic elections, we have given birth to Tyrannies. Even in Algeria, which is next to Tunisia in 1991 they had elections in which the Islamist won and they had to dismantle the elections. The military had to intervene. Who was behind it? It wasn’t the Tea-Party movement…it was Socialists. The Socialists movements worked collectively and then Islam through El Baradei threw in the towel with the lot of Islamist. El Baradei held hands with the Muslim Brotherhood even prior to the Tunisian revolt when they ousted Zine El Abidine. And of course the situation in Tunisia needs to be addressed because in Tunisia you now have an open door for the Islamist. Rachid Ghannouchi who was exiled for 20 years in London, now is allowed to enter back into Tunisia. This is the same kind of thing that happened in Iran when the Shah ousted the Khomeni and then when the Shah was ousted, Khomeni went back to Iran to start a revolution. So, the Clinton and the Obama administration have been aiding the Islamic movement by stating that a Democracy is the solution. So, it is a problem. If the Palestinian election caused a civil war, it will also cause a civil war of a much larger scale in the country of Egypt. We need to look at past elections in the Middle East to see what happened. Now, this will open the door for a country like Turkey to basically spread its’ tentacles and gain momentum in the region. Amr Moussa , the Secretary General of the Arab League asked Turkey to intervene. Turkey will gain this momentum and begin to establish what they think is a peace resolution supporting the Islamist because Turkey has an Islamic sleeper cell as a government. Of course, the US position has been to return Middle East stability and also its’ support for Democratic principles. But, Americans have a problem because this determination is to avoid the rise of anti-US Islamic government in Cairo, potentially allied with Iran.
But, it is not only Iran that is the problem. It’s countries like Turkey that are the problem. Of course, Libya is sandwiched between Tunisia and Egypt. If and when the Muslin Brotherhood takes control of both states, then you have the ousting of Muammar al-Gaddafi, which also will have Libya join into this axis of evil. Let’s not forget the jest of the demonstrations in Egypt started, really on Friday. There was a small amount of demonstrations held by Communist movement. When the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood decided to jump in, on Friday and after the worship service on Friday, that is when you had the major jolt of the Egyptian revolution. Of course, the Muslim Brotherhood is trying to paint itself as a moderate organization. The leopard never changes its’ spots. The Muslin Brotherhood policy has always been that they will do what they call the Mateen Strategy . In other words, as Mohammad tried to establish Islam in Mecca they used a peaceful means until he went to Medina which basically will show the true colors of the leopard that never changed its’ spots. Mohammad El Baradei, of course, uses the Muslim Brotherhood just like before in history Jamal Badawi used the Muslim Brotherhood. Anwar Sadat used the Muslim Brotherhood because the Muslim Brotherhood is the largest block of any representation of Egyptians in the region. So, the Muslim Brotherhood basically will gain control in the elections and the Obama administration is allowing this to happen. If anything, for the best interest of the United States of America, the government should denounce El Baradei and his support for the Muslim Brotherhood. But, no such thing is happening.
Why? It is not naivete that the current American administration, led by Socialists supporting the electorate process in Egypt to establish Democratic process for the gain of the Muslim Brotherhood that they think is moderate is not naivete at all. It is because even in the West, if you look at the Liberal movement and the Progressive movement, they have always supported the Islamic movement. Why? It is not by coincidence that you have Al Gore complimenting Islam. It is because that in Al Gore’s view, Islam supports environmentalism. In Islam they have something which is hima which is the protection of the environment. Also, Islam also tickles the ears of the abortionists because even in Islam life doesn’t begin at the moment of conception. Even in Islam there is something called “al-takaful al-ijtimai” which means Islamic Socialism. In fact, Libia and Egypt are Socialistic societies. And Savyid Qutb , the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood preferred Marxist ideology over Capitalism. This is a stated fact in the annals of Islamist movement in Egypt. So in the same way Progressives in the West would tend to support the Islamist movement. If you look at somebody like Keith Ellison (first Muslim to be elected to the US Congress), he doesn’t support the Tea Party, he supports all of the agenda of President Obama. The Muslims in America by far support Obama’s medical health care plan and the socialist issues in this country.
IN FACT, ALL OF THE ISLAMIST ORGANIZATIONS IN AMERICA ARE BRANCHES OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. The main stream media here in America are in support of the Revolutionary Islamist in Egypt because they have a goal that they do not want to lose what they consider the moderate Islamist voices in the Middle East and so for that the Muslim Brotherhood was very quick to basically disguise itself and cover its’ true intent, calling itself a moderate Muslim movement and they have been working with many of their apparatuses in the West. Mohammad El Baradei who declared in the Arabic language that Osama Bin Laden is a jihadist. He is a vital, intricate part of Islamic movement (of course he says that in the Arabic language). In the English language, they have been dealing with Condoleezza Rice in the past and they have been dealing with the Secretary Department in the past to try to say that they want a Democratic process. They denounce terrorism. Of course, you have even Imams in the West like Imam Anwar Al-Awlaki denounces terrorism. Yet, you have US drones looking for him. I wonder why? Because they believe in what is called “taqiyya and kitman”. The Muslim Brotherhood are notorious about lying because in the Islamist movement you can lie to the enemy, smile to their faces while you harbor inner animosity toward them. This is not from me. This is from the annals of the Muslim Brotherhood itself. So they have been duped basically to think that the way to have peace in the Middle East is by moderating the Muslim Brotherhood and by including them in the election process and Democratic process hoping to gain momentum toward basically reforming the Middle East. So they began to see the Muslim Brotherhood as an apparatus for that reformation. When in reality, the leopard never changes his spots. The future of Egypt and the future of the Middle East is known in the past. Keep in mind that the fire that engulfs the revolution in Egypt was ignited by Socialists. Later embraced by the Islamist, of course. It is true that the Muslim Brotherhood was banned as an organization in 1954. But, it has been tolerated and has forged alliances with legal and political groups in the past two decades. The Liberal Socialists, the Wafd and other Socialist Labor Parties have been allies. The Muslim Brotherhood has allied with Socialists. There is no Right-wing movement in Egypt as we think of the Right. The Right is the Islamic Fundamentalist which is really no Right but a Left combined with Islamist ideology. Of course, the US policy, led by the closet Socialist, President Obama has been publically supporting the Egyptian people. Obama wants rights of assembly and elections in Egypt. Americans need to realize that Democratic elections in the Middle East have never resulted in Western-style freedom. The rule in any Muslim majority nation is that Democracy is used, as I said before, is used only during the election period. What did the elections in Muslim majority do? In Iran, we have chaos, we have a Theocracy.
The most plausible outcome of Egypt’s chaos a future election as demanded by world opinion, the outcome of which can be seen from the experience we had in the Palestinian election on which President George Brush insisted that we must have elections which caused a divide and this divide will cause civil unrest in the country of Egypt. Whether it is Iranian Shiite or Sunni Revolution the way to victory will not be only by stepping over Israel but also over Saudi Arabia. The cradle of Wahhabism that started the trouble in the first place. As a consequence, the world will kiss its’ addiction to Arab oil goodbye. After this, I predict that Iran must hit Arabia. If anyone thinks that this is madness…look at Saddam Hussein. Had he had nuclear weapons, he would have lobed them in the First Gulf War at Saudi Arabia and if anybody from the Progressive movement keeps talking about that Iraq never had weapons of mass destruction, they just seem to have to move a little further to its neighboring Iran which does work on establishing its nuclear ability.
Shoebat.com
Report Post »ozz
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 5:36pmThey are not extremists their Qur’an tells them they must do these things. Islam a religion of peace my A$$!
Report Post »watchtheotherhand
Posted on February 2, 2011 at 6:17pmThank you ozz….I have said that for years. Islam is not peaceful if it is practiced as it is written out.
Report Post »Puddle Duck
Posted on February 3, 2011 at 3:03amUh Eddardstark you might want to check your own history the incursion into Lebanon happened in 1981 not 1973. The 73 Yom Kipur war caught the Isrealis flat footed even though they had intelligence from a spy in Cairo that the combined forces of Jordan, Syria dn Egyt were about to attack…the attack almost suceeded in it’s aim of wiping out Isreal…a brigade of Centurion heavy battle tanks was all that was standing between the Syrians (on the Golan Heights) and victory….it was one of the most amazing stands by a military unit ever witnessed. The Isreali tankers managed to stop the Syrians (equipped with hundreds of T-72 tanks) cold while in the Sinai desert the Isreali air force was taking a beating from Egytian anti aircraft surface to air missile batteries….that front was also in doubt until Sadat grew impatient and ordered his armor forward without giving his new air defense tech an opportunity to relocate…the Isrealis took full advantgae of the mistake and delivered a massive blow to the Egytian army (combined air and ground assault). It was a desperate measure and a huge gamble by the Osreali forces since they were commiting what they had left (in reserve) to the battle.
As the old saying goes “fortune favors the bold” but IMO without sound tactical and strategic planning (the move by Sadat to leave his air cover behind) that bold move can easily backfire. Such are the fortunes of war. The 67 six day war was a total ass kicking delivered to the Egyptians by the Isrealis…the lessons learned from that experience (by Sadat and the army) almost allowed the Arab alllies in 73 to gain victory….the turning point for the 73 conflict came down to impatience, poor coordination (of arab allied forces) combined with a command structure that required centralized direction vs the sheer tenacity, audacity and free reign of the officer core of the Isreali forces to determine the best tactical appraoch without having to waste valuable time asking for permission to act. The Isreali hardware and technology along with the quality training of their personel showed just how effective a much smaller force ably led can defeat a much larger foe.
Report Post »OUTRIDER WRITER
Posted on February 3, 2011 at 7:59amChristians, wherever they live, must humanely pray for Israel, as well as Middle East stabilization (access to Suez Canal and flow of oil); but, NOT because of DISPENSATIONAL MISINTERPRETATION OF THE BOOK OF REVELATION.
Report Post »