Republicans Introduce ‘Repeal of ObamaCare Act’
- Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:13pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor has introduced a bill to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. ObamaCare, and health care-related provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. The GOP proposal argues that Americans would like to keep their current health care coverage if they like it, and that under ObamaCare; Medicare is cut by more than one-half trillion dollars over 10 years and taxes increase by over $800 billion dollars, health care costs do not go down, the legislation creates a new entitlement program, as well as several other concerns.
“The path to patient-centered care and lower costs for all Americans must begin with a full repeal of the law,” the bill reads.
The Hill notes that the House is expected to vote on the bill Wednesday, July 11, and the House Rules Committee has set a Monday evening meeting to approve a rule for the bill. The bill is expected to pass in the GOP-controlled House, but die in the Democrat-controlled Senate.
The Supreme Court ruled last week that ObamaCare and it’s controversial “individual mandate” is constitutional under the taxing power,



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (176)
marcus_arealius
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:09pmDarn, the Obummercare mandates bacon flavored condoms.. now where the hell am I going to get those for free?
Report Post »almilford
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:42pmHey Marcus…the tenth amandment says that the government has NO business in healthcare atall!!!
Report Post »RLTW
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:44pmHey idiot who thinks he’s from a comic book, I have one question for you. Is it a tax or a penalty?
Report Post »IraRedDog
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:50pm@ redenblack; wrong!!!! America lost
Report Post »ReddenBlack
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:02pm@RLTW
It’s a tax, just like Mitt Romney said, and Justice Roberts said, and they argued in front of the Supreme Court. It’s a tax, does that clear it up for ya?
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:19pmSo @ Red how prepared and thrilled are you to pay more in taxes? And before you screech that I won’t have to pay because I have insurance… you may want to study up on the ins and outs of the 2700 pages along with the thousands of regulations yet to be written that will eliminate your current plan and will also (by design) eliminate all private insurance. Remember the idea is to force a single payor, gov’t controlled program.
And again, I caution, read the bill (I did) every other line begins, The secretary along with the program admin will determine……
How comforting is that? The gov’t deciding whether the ROI (return on investment) for your care is worth it? Exactly how valuable are you…. I don’t know but if I am the admin or the secretary, I think I will deem you hardly worth it…. but….but…. I hear you – sorry.
Again here is the difference between leftists and conservatives – even your miserable life is worth preserving to us.
Care to take your chances with the left?
Report Post »Ragnars Repos
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:21pmMore mealy-mouthed conservative BS.
Now, when these conservatives fail (and they will/want to fail), they can say they tried.
And sheepish Americans will buy it.
Enjoy your shackles, my fellow Americans.
You know, you could rise up and defend yourselves, but something tells me you won’t bother.
…and darkness falls on the land of the formerly-free and the home of the knaves.
Report Post »ReddenBlack
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:53pm@KAYDEEBEAU
First of all, yeah I would actually be happy paying higher taxes, cause we need to pay down the debt and our expectations for value are completely warped, but thats a nother discussion
Also, actually I have read up on the ACA and guess what? It doesn’t do any of that “eliminate your current plan and force a single payer.” I actually have read what is and isn’t in the law, and you just spat a bunch of lies in your comment.
Your not protecting anyones life, your not a heroic patriot, and the govt is not calculating a return on investment on anyones life. I actually have read those 2700 pages, and I know you either a) have not read it, or b) have read it and choose to lie to people
Report Post »Steelheadisadouche
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:08pmRedblackyellowsmileydude
Report Post »Have you read the newer, new improved 1300 additional pages? Do you like the smell of your farts? Why did you believe you mom when she said you were better than others? What about all the exemptions? Where is the special people exemption list and why are foreigners now go elsewhere for decent medical instead of here, pre-downgrade/food stamp era? Do you also enjoy dog on a stick?
bigben357mag
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:10pmreddenblack, if we repeal it, do we lose? Or do we win? seams to me that we win, we all win, less government intrusion into our lives! But then, you and your leftist buddies (who should all be runout of this country), want total government control of our lives. No thanks, I like my freedom!!
Report Post »ReddenBlack
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:21pm@BIGBEN
I’d love less govt intrusion in my life. For starters, stop telling me i cant smoke pot. Also, stop telling me I can’t bet on football games, and stop telling me I can’t buy alcohol on sunday, even tho I hate alcohol. Cut all medicare, cut all medicaid, and cut all veterans assitance programs. Cut millitary spending by 50 percent. Then we can talk about repealing the affordable care act.
Report Post »hypnos
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:32pm@reddenblack it raises taxes and cripples small buisness and investment income through higher taxes and with new rules and restrictions on private insurance it insidiously erodes the private insurance market and less choice and Medicaid rolls increased by 300%. So when you pinch at both ends you get a single payer turd by default.
Report Post »ReddenBlack
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:37pm@hypnos. no it doesn’t “errode private insurance by raising taxes and adding regulations.” it just means insurance is not as profitably a business as it used to be. Guess what? Neither is typewriter repair, or travel agents, or a film developer. Sometimes buisnesses arent as lucrative as they used to be. thats not an erosion of freedom, thats progress.
Report Post »hypnos
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:43pm@redennblack.rediculous comparison. Those other industries work under free market principles. Under Obamacare insurance are told who to cover how much to cover and for how long. So your full of crap.
Report Post »hypnos
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:51pmOh did I mention obama wanted to get rid of hsa,fsa he couldn’t but he severely crippled those also. Many small buisnesses use this for healthcare and now that will be taken away.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 11:23pmHey ReddenBlack,
You read all 2700 pages of the ACA (obama-scare) act?
I don’t think you did. Do you want to get into a discussion about it? I’ll be happy to debate you on the matter. Up for the challenge Red Coat?
Report Post »azcraigrr
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 11:30pmWhy is everyone feeding the troll? Every post is a contradiction of the previous ones.
Report Post »RLTW
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 11:47pmAt least you knew you were the idiot. Tax approval goes through the House not the senate; explain how you communists get around that?
Report Post »Obama_Sham
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 12:28amIt is amusing how the non-taxpayers, yes RedandDead I am referring to you, are always willing to pay more taxes… Now, go back to the bowl your smokin’ and reengage your stoned stupor…
Report Post »1casawizard
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 1:55am@REDDENBLACK. Is baconflavor your favorite? you sound like a poser on this venue. you posted that you don‘t mind paying more taxes and you indicated that you don’t mind smoking pot. You voted for obama cause he indicated at one time about legalizing pot in early 2008. Get out of ya mommas’ basement.
Report Post »KeystoneState
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 9:50amHey Red, I wish you could smoke pot while buying alcohol at the pro sports betting casino at 3 am Sunday morning, at the same time, don‘t wish gov healthcare on me if I don’t want it! Freedom and liberty for us both!
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 7:24pm@ReddenBlack
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:21pm
@BIGBEN
I’d love less govt intrusion in my life. For starters, stop telling me i cant smoke pot. Also, stop telling me I can’t bet on football games, and stop telling me I can’t buy alcohol on sunday, even tho I hate alcohol. Cut all medicare, cut all medicaid, and cut all veterans assitance programs. Cut millitary spending by 50 percent. Then we can talk about repealing the affordable care act
Report Post »***
Cut military spending by 50% and you’ll find out if the Iranians, Chinese, and Russians will let you do all the above! Didn’t you read about the Russian military planes violating airspace 2 times this month. You guys say they’re only trying to protect themselves. b o gave away the keys to the car in his nuclear proliferation treaty, (no caps no respect) and before it’s even through the senate(same here) they’re testing his resolve. But, hey, what’s his name probably told “vlad” he‘d give him the rest of the country once he doesn’t need to get elected anymore.
IF ANYONE’S PAYING ATTENTION..”I HAVEN’T NOTICED EVERYONE GOING TO CHINA, RUSSIA OR IRAN FOR TOP NOTCH HEALTHCARE!” If we can‘t defend ourselves they just let us die off and take everything they want that’s left behind!
Mil Mom
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 7:35pm@ReddenBlack
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:37pm
@hypnos. no it doesn’t “errode private insurance by raising taxes and adding regulations.” it just means insurance is not as profitably a business as it used to be. Guess what? Neither is typewriter repair, or travel agents, or a film developer. Sometimes buisnesses arent as lucrative as they used to be. thats not an erosion of freedom, thats progress
Report Post »***
And who uses typewriters, or film, or travel agents? Maybe a few throw away cameras, and independent agents, but the rest of the businesses are gone aren’t they. As will be the Insurance business, (non gubmint) and innovation in healthcare once they figure out that even a toothbrush becomes a “Healthcare device” and needs special permits to be produced and has special taxes on them! (Think I’m kidding do a web search on the guy who had invented a battery toothbrush for under $1 and had a factory up and running (in China because he couldn’t afford to make them here.) when they shut him down because he hadn’t applied to all the proper agencies, (not yet set up) and gotten all the proper permits (not yet set up by the secretary) and applied for the taxing ID#. (Not yet set up or written up) that were needed under the obamacare 2700 pages!!!!)
Serenabit
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:02pmCongress should and needs to repeal the “Affordable Care Act” because nobody can afford it. Additionally they should implement this:
There are 3 simple steps of legislation that will render Obamacare useless AND create the true healthcare reform that we need. Definitely worth the 2 minute read … nathanbeman.blogspot.com
Please pass this on … we NEED Congress to act, and neither side of the isle can object because both political parties have campaigned on each of these points!
Report Post »gadgetninja
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:51pmhey reddenblack how about YOU pay for all the free loading ******** too lazy to get a damn job and buy their nown insurance instead of expecting the hard working taxpaying republicans,conservatives and teabaggers to
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:59pmREDDENBLACK, Hmmm Hawks fan, hunh? What’s this love affair that you have with Lou Ferigno, and did you get your camera yet? LOL!
Report Post »ReddenBlack
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:09pm@RJJINGGADSEN
Im honestly confused by your trolling, what hawks are red and black? Not atlanta, they are red and blue, so who are you talking about? Lou Ferigno was green, and I’m totally lost on the camera thing
Report Post »Diane TX
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:11pmReddenBlack
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:38pm
Uhm, I guess you didn’t get the memo…
YOU LOST, GET OVER IT!!!
YOU LOST, GET OVER IT!!!
YOU LOST, GET OVER IT!!!
LOL, jeez, I almost feel bad for t-baggggers, you can’t win anything, can you?
Report Post »=========================================================
How quickly you have forgotten Scott Walker and Wisconsin. Lol!
RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:19pmREDDENBLACK, C’mon, don’t play dumb. You know very well.
Report Post »Ragnars Repos
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:31pmREDDENBLACK seems to think he/she won’t suffer the same big government burden that the rest of we Americans will suffer.
This affects your freedom too, REDDENBLACK.
Please remember your gloating here when you face down law enforcement/some unsympathetic bureaucrat (the tip of YOUR beloved big government’s spear) one day soon, because you most certainly will, if your ilk wins this war.
Your beloved big government is nothing more than too powerful politicians (men and women) who will hold title to your existence.
Won’t you be surprised, when you‘re finished hating the ’other side’ of course, to find your life has changed for the worse.
Everyone suffers equally under tyranny, friend. Even the ‘useful idiots’ who helped make it a reality.
Report Post »Serenabit
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:59pmThere are 3 simple steps of legislation that will render Obamacare useless AND create the true healthcare reform that we need. Definitely worth the 2 minute read … nathanbeman.blogspot.com
Please pass this on … we NEED Congress to act, and neither side of the isle can object because both political parties have campaigned on each of these points!
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:48pmThis tyrannical law won’t be repealed until the Marxist POS is fired in four months so pulling this stunt is meaningless.If the republicans had control of both houses and a veto proof majority then yes they could kill the law,they don‘t so Barry’s firing is crucial.
Report Post »TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:39pmYes we do but we need to know how our reps vote in order to change the Senate. As well as the House.
Report Post »Watchman444
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:31pmYou are right, but I think the strategy will be to get it to the Senate at the 11th hour fence sitters.
Report Post »Inlightofthings
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 12:05pmIt’s a Tax…they are now forced to vote “yeah” on the single largest tax increase in history…
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 7:43pm@Kaydeebeau
Report Post »Once again if the Blaze had a “Like” button the counter couldn’t go high enough. Very Well said!
kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:47pmWhy do the Repubs have to replace this with anything? Why should the Fed Gov’t be involved at all?
Here’s a thought, you want something, petition your state legislature for it and leave the rest of us alone.
I realize we have all been “nudged” into believing that the Fed Gov’t is the end all, be all solution but that is WRONG. The Fed Gov’t is the problem.
Why do we have comprehensive health insurance anyway? Because it was an enticement for hiring when there was a dearth of workers. That was the free market dictating something.
What then happend, unions and the Fed Gov’t stuck their noses in and started to regulate and mandate. Then what happened, costs soared.
The Fed Gov’t (and any abolute power) can never leave well enough alone.
Well, the time has long passed where we need to be once again These United States rather than The United States and we put a muzzle on the Fed Gov’t.
The first step is to get rid of Obama and as many demonrats (as far down the ballot) as possible in this go round – not only to send a loud message that we strongly reject socialism, but for those left behind (think RINOS) – you are next.
It is going to take several election cycles and much wailing and gnashing of teeth. We must do it and we must not be discouraged and we must be realistic and take the gains where we can find them.
This stroll towards Central Planning has been going on for 100 years. It stops now and reverses course – there is no other op
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:07pmVery good and well put !
Report Post »Verceofreason
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:27pmDon’t worry.
Report Post »The Republicans have NOTHING to replace it with.
RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:31pmThe only thing that I can think of that the Republicans should do that in any way looks like a replacement. Is to use that Interstate Commerce Clause and open all of the states’ borders to allow health insurance to compete freely. Then step back and allow the market to correct itself. That will be a great start at bringing down the costs. Then start repealing law after law that interferes and increases our financial burdens.
Report Post »BloodSweatandTears
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:33pmWhen was anything the Fed government provided better? Only competition improves service and puts the client ahead of the corporation. With only one source as provider,in this case the government, quality and availability has nowhere to go but down. Have you heard the horror stories of women in England being left on sidewalks to deliver their own babies? or the Canadian system that offers state of the art hip replacement– for dogs, but not available to their owners? Or the 130,000 elderly that were euthanized, also in England? Google it. We are better than that.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:07pm@Ver…reading comprehension isn’t one of your strong suits huh? Since my first 2 question were ” Why do the Repubs have to replace this with anything? Why should the Fed Gov’t be involved at all?”
Let alone your failure to answer any of the other questions raised and the illustrative comment that makes no meaningful contribution to the debate but thanks for playing
Report Post »TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:25pmYou found my brain, didn’t you cause that is my thinking. That pre var i cat or , golf playing, star gazing, photo op specialist, vacating responsibility Bush blamer, gloating arrogant Europe loving liberal war lord (they don’t believe in war, whoops) flip floping prevaricator (whoops that is repititious, oh well it bears), Money spending, money spending, money spending (our money our money our money) tax tax tax tax. Wouldn’t we be cheered seeing a big family loving grandpa in office. I quite frankly think folks need tolet go the social issues–that won’t win this election. I vented so I’m outta here. Thanks.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:50pm@ Granny – I beg to differ – the root of all our financial problems is in social issues. What is Social Security or Medicare but a social issue regarding who is responsible for the care of the elderly?
When a society abandons the Bible, the commandment concerning honoring your father and mother goes by the way side – so your chuldren and grandchildren no longer understand their obligation to take care of you and then abandon you to be taken care of by the rest of us. Here is a news flash, we really don’t care about you and since your kids and grandchuldren have no compunction to, they don’t care about you either. So where do you suppose that leaves you?
And since another big social issue is abortion, guess what, the future workers who are required to maintain the ponzi scheme of your social secuirty and medicare do not exist because they have been aborted.
And as for homosexual perversion, guess what happens to earning potential of future tax payers raised without the benfit of a commited Mother and Father? Or kids raised in single mother households. Or kids raised in homosexual households?
They do not fair as well, finiancially or emotionally as those raised in a traditionaly heterosexual married household.
I have run out of room. The point is, everything is a social issue. Our financial troubles in this country are directly related to our failure to put social obligations in their rightful place.
With the Gov’t only $.30 of a dollar goes to care
Report Post »Fishmanone
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 6:33amSpot On!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Kaydeebeau
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:46pmUnfortunately, I believe this to be sheer window-dressing by the GOP:
——————————————————————
8 Republicans Who Supported The Individual Mandate
The Supreme Court ruled today that ObamaCare, and the individual mandate, are not unconstitutional. Republicans responded with calls for a full repeal. Here are nine Republicans who at one time supported an individual mandate.
posted Jun 28, 2012 3:58pm EDT
1. Mitt Romney
Report Post »2. Newt Gingrich
3. Tommy Thompson
4. Chuck Grassley
5. Bob Bennett
6. The Heritage Foundation
7. Orrin Hatch
8. Jim Demint
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/9-republicans-who-supported-the-individual-mandate
Verceofreason
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:28pmAlso Eric Cancer‘s ’medicaid cuts’ figures are a total fiction.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:38pmKIDCHARLEMAGNE, Where did you get the idea that The Heritage Foundation in any way supported the individual mandate? I’ve been getting there email bulletin for several years now and have never read any such mention. Furthermore, just in case I did make a mistake and missed something I ran their name and your accusation together through the search engine. Got a lot of hits back simply regarding The Heritage Foundation, but not a thing regarding their agreement with the individual mandate. One of is either mistaken or you are simply telling a lie.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:53pmOkay, I finally found another site that does talk about the HF single pic on the site you gave us the link too. That pic shows the date as back in 1992 when Hillary Care was being considered. Seems that they did fall for it back then. Everything that I get from illustrates that they are against 0bamacare.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:00pmHi RJJ,
I think he got it from this interview with Chris Matthews on MSNBC May 16, 2011.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43154089/ns/msnbc_tv-hardball_with_chris_matthews/t/hardball-chris-matthews-monday-may-th/
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:11pmHi Rjj,
Forgot to post this;
MATTHEWS: Somebody should straighten out Steve Doocy on this baby, too.
Anyway, two years ago, Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Ohio said, “I believe that there is a bipartisan consensus to have”—here it is—
“individual mandates.”
ANDREWS: Yes.
MATTHEWS: Republican support for a health care mandate has its roots in a proposal by the conservative Heritage Foundation that was meant as an alternative to the single-payer or the Canadian-style system.
The Heritage Foundation‘s plan said, “All heads of households would be required by law to obtain at least a basic health plan specified by Congress.”
Congressman, doesn‘t this just spin your head that they are so 180 on this now?
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:17pmHey MONK, Yeah, when I went to his provided link you can plainly see the 1992 date. I’ve been with HF for a number of years now, but was still in the Army in ‘92. In fact I was in Germany without internet access. Sort of scares me now considering if they were considering such a thing even shortly before Hillary kick her abomination off. Thanks for that link. Always a laughing pleasure to check out Miss Chrissy.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:27pmHi RJJ,
That “thrill UP her/his/its leg” must be going to that 4th location you mentioned before. Kind of like what Steelhead must experience on a regular basis.
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:32pmHey Monk, That paragraph is pretty much verbatim with what is on that HF pic in that link above. Now, he is right about the RINOs that he listed. The voters really do need to make this Jurassic era left overs become politically extinct in upcoming elections. For anything else I have never put it past Miss Chrissy or the rest of the BSNBC crew to pull anything. Chrissy and Madcow both put a new meaning on the word “spin.”
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:34pmMONK, That one made me laugh out loud to the point that a couple of the cats sat up to look at me.
Report Post »Grey Eagle
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:20pmMitt Romney supported a mandate in MA. However, a state is totally different from a Federal take over of 1/6th of our economy. SCOTUS ruling is that the so called mandate is a tax, which it is and collected by the IRS. The Mandate would NOT have been constitutional if under the Commerce Clause. Frankly, as far as I am concerned the entire law should have been tossed, because it is a total nightmare. Now as to the others on the list, they did NOT vote for Obamacare. No Republican did.
Report Post »Inlightofthings
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 12:33pmKID:
Report Post »We certainly are aware that window dressing works now aren’t we…you should not be so condescending of a tactic so widely employed…
Ponyexpress
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:33pmIt wil get be approved and tabled by the senate, but there are going to be a bunch of Democrat congresspeople whose sphincter muscles will quiver, as they will be on record as approving, or maybe not, a very unpopular law. .Their opponents will use this to hammer them in November.
Report Post »Their careers will now consist of either betting that Obama gets reelected or.likely, the return to a real life of working for a living. This will be fun to watch
The-Monk
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:49pm@Ponyexpress
“Their careers will now consist of either betting that Obama….”
Seen Obama’s new slogan yet? Yep, “Betting on America”.
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/LIPR
Report Post »RJJinGadsden
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:57pmMONK, Have caught that on Fox a couple of times today. My only question is: “Betting WHAT on America”?
Report Post »tharpdevenport
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:32pmThe only way this would pass the Senate is if it had a rider attached to it funding cowboy poetry for the remainder of Harry Reid’s life, and free botox injections for Pelosi for the last years of her life.
Report Post »uncleherbert
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:28pmI will vote republican everytime…
Report Post »Too_Far_Gone
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:21pmRepeal barry and his henchmen..
Put polosi in a home and drop reid in the amazon.
Report Post »Fonz777
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:16pmYes, repeal it – and I hope you guys have the guts.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:29pmAnd while we are at it, let’s repeal the 16th and especially the 17th amendments. Most of our ills (other than our falling asleep at the wheel) started with those 2 amendments
Report Post »cykonas
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:15pmThis is of no consequence. It‘s posturing for the election so the R’s can say, “Look what we did! The D’s blocked us but we really are on your side!” Poppycock. I hope Cantor loses his seat this November. It’s hard for me to believe that the voters of his district in the great Commonwealth of Virginia could possibly elect this putz. There has to be someone more qualified.
The D and R parties are completely impotent. Vote every one of them out. Their agenda is exactly the same, and it’s not our agenda.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:50pmDo you even know who his opponent is? Are you sure Canotr’s defeat is your desire? If it is, how does that help us?
If you are not part of the solution – you are the problem.
It has taken 100 years to get to this crossroads, what is your grand plan to correct it? Or are you advocating for still bigger Central Planning?
Report Post »Verceofreason
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:29pmYou insult Putzes everywhere.
Report Post »He is both vile and evil.
cykonas
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 12:32am@KAYDEEBEAU
No, I don’t know who his opponents are. What I said is that I can‘t believe that the Commonwealth can’t come up with a better alternative. Virginia is the home of Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe and many many other patriots. Now in the 21st century all we can come up with is Cantor? That is very difficult for me to believe.
Yes, I’m sure that I would like to see him defeated. This latest grandstand play (the subject of the article) just confirms my decision. I’m tired of politicians. I want leaders. Eric Cantor does not fit my description of a leader. He does what the party tells him to do. In short he is a shill. Not significantly different from Debbie Wasserman-Schultz on the other side of the aisle.
I‘m painfully aware of how long it’s taken to get to where we are and I’m sick of voting for the lesser of two evils. My “grand plan”, if that is what you want to call it, is to heed the advice that George Washington offered us in his farewell address. Specifically his warning concerning the dangers of political parties to the government and country as a whole. Our ancestors should have heeded the warning then, but they didn’t. We should heed it now. We need to forget party loyalty and vote for the candidate who most represents our vision for the Republic. If that makes me a part of the problem then so be it.
Report Post »zoro51
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:08pmrepeal IMPEACH repeal IMPEACH repeal IMPEACH repeal IMPEACH FIRE NAZI PELOSI RIED HOLDER OBAMA NOW
Report Post »ericsez
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:44pmthis person sums it all up…it’s the final solution to ALL our troubles….
Report Post »martyinhagerstown
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:10pmHa…GOP did not even care when O violated the constitution. They couldn’t even bring up to a vote articles of impeachment…crickets.
My congressman Goodlatte was outraged and sent a letter to the violation of the constitution (his own words)…nanny nanny boo boo. That really showed the executive branch what congress really thinks.
GOP is not D…that’s all but is it enough?
Vote Romney in then 3rd party.
Report Post »Mil Mom
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 7:54pm@ZORO51
Report Post »Agree it’s a good start, but then let’s get down to biz and have some “Treason” trials while we still have parts of a country left! (John Roberts may have earned his own on this one!)
jimgag
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:00pmWhy introduce the bill now? It won’t go anywhere. Even if it passes the senate,Obama will vetoe it. They should wait until after the election when we’ll have a new president and a majority in the senate (hopefully).
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:16pmMore ammunition ,,,,,
Report Post »Paul -Indiana
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:27pmPeople are asking what the Republicans have to replace obamacare. This is a first step. The Republicans should introduce a series of single-issue bills for each of the replacement actions they plan on implementing. Show the people what they can expect from a Romney Presidency and a Republican House and Senate. It doesn’t matter if the bills never get through the Senate. The Republicans must show what they are planning to do and also demonstrate that the Democrats are blocking it from happening.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:04pmWhy should the Repubs replace anything? Whya should the Fed Gov’t be involved at all? You have a plan, take it up with your state legislature – leave the rest of us alone.
I think you are starting from the wrong point with a wrong premise,
Report Post »Verceofreason
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:30pmBizzy work, like squirrels digging up and reburying nuts all Summer.
Report Post »On the taxpayers dime with bennies.
TEXASGRANNY73
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:35pmDisagee. Although we know Obama would veto, it is irrelevent if we learn how everyone votes and we vote accordingly. And who stands with him and who doesn’t. Who believes in tax mandates and who.does not.
Report Post »snapperman
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:55pmI think a bill aimed at placing Congress and federal employees on the same footing as us second class citizens – in other words that they have to go on Obamacare just like all the other residents of the country – might squeeze Claire McCaskill and maybe others to vote with the Repubs in the Senate…
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:24pmI have a better idea, how about Fed employees have to purchase private, individual policies….I would bet we would see real cost savings and meaningful reform then
Report Post »Paul -Indiana
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:31pmAmen to that!!!!!
Report Post »Globmgmt
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:46pmThe purpose is to force the House Democrats to show their Cards !!!!
Report Post »Paydert33
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:11pmYes, this is good that the Republicans in the House are going to vote to repeal the health care bill. This will set-up a lot of dems for the election in November and put them on record as true losers.
Report Post »I can see the tv ads now and hear the radio ads…..about .who voted against the repeal and who let it sit in the Senate. This will help with the votes from the Independents and maybe some…… come-to-your-senses-dems, to vote against o-loser.
Exrepublisheep
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:17pmThe Supreme Court ruled last week that ObamaCare and it’s controversial “individual mandate” is constitutional under the taxing power. Get over it and start doing SOMETHING to help America. Plotting against their “enemies” and showing off toothless bills is a waste of time and resources. It’s only purpose is “dog whistling” to their base, not contributing ANYTHING to America.
.
Report Post »Verceofreason
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:31pmThe did.
Report Post »ANd WON!
momprayn
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:38pmYes, D.O.A. in the Senate; however, had to be done anyway. Even if it passed in the Senate by a miracle, Obama would veto. They all know that. No – we have to have a sweep in the fall, IF we have the elections at all. Not only do we need to pray about us winning, but that whatever evil is planned and/or tried, we can thwart.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:58pmMaybe the dems will throw another temper fit .. and walk out on the vote .. show the American people again what thugs and cowards they are … people will REMEMBER in November and this law is VERY unpopular (especially as more is revealed) ;-)
Report Post »John 1776
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:36pmActually, Harry would simply not bring the bill to the floor of the Senate. (His typical MO) It would sit quietly on a shelf until the Senate changes hands, where it could be brought to the floor on the first day and passed. Mitt could then sign it into law on his first day in office.
That is provided Mitt wins and the Senate changes hands… And that’s up to us!
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:04pmAlso this assumes that Obama will peacefully give up power and control after his defeat (I hope he is defeated), which in his ever growing madness may not happen and plunge us into a civil war.
Report Post »MiCurmudgeon
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:30pmPelosi , Reid and Obama wasted two years NOT working on JOBS.
Report Post »Verceofreason
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:47pmYou are confused.
Report Post »ANd describing the Republicans
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:26pmGlad to see them heading forth with the legislation of repeal; understand this much though, the chances of it passing while Reid and Obama remain in office are nearly impossible barring the intervention of God Himself.
Reid will never allow this legislation to come to the floor for a vote, let alone for consideration; and Obama will veto it hands down.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:23pmThe GOP is wasting more of the tax payers time and money with political theatre. Instead of do somehting about jobs. The GOP wants to make it easy for insurance companies to deny coverage to Americans, to kick college attending sons and daughter off of plans and to ensure that the customer pays for more and more needless overhead and administrative costs, while getting less and less services.
Baddoggy
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:35pmReally? How many jobs bills are sitting on Harry worthless warbucks Reids desk waiting on the Liberals to do something with ANY of them? Probably 30-40 already. You want to talk about jobs? Really? You are an embicile.
Be careful you are gonna DROWN in Obama Koolaid!!
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:37pm“Instead of do somehting about jobs”
What is Obama doing about jobs? Golfing?
“while getting less and less services.”
You mean like in England, where old people are told to go off and die?
Report Post »Steelhead
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:37pmCantor is a big waste of time. He is the biggest wanker in the order of magnitude.
Report Post »loopy1
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:39pmYou may want to check the facts. The House Repubs. have sent over 30 jobs bills to the Senate only to be tabled by Sen. Reid. Also, Pres. Obama was in collusion with “big insurance” when Obamacare was written, so blame him for whatever you imagine to be a problem. Besides, insur. co’s deny fewer claims than do Medicare or Medicaid – plus its easier to appeal a co‘s decision than it is to appeal the gov’t. Wake up, girl. ( Please research the difference between the use of the word “less” and “fewer”. Thanks.)
Report Post »A.D.Hominem
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:05pm“Blah blah blahbiddy blah blah, evil GOP, blah de blah blah, corporate shills, blaaaah bla blah bla, save the children & minorities, blah blah blah, oh the inhumanity … wimper, Blahhhhhh.”
Wow. I think I must have been possessed by the demon encinom or maybe just the teacher from peanuts. Talk about theatre of the macabre. Shiver.
Unlike the “do nothing” Senate with Stinky Harry Reid in charge, the House is attempting to do something good for the country. That even includes silly billy Trolls. And if you‘re so deluded as to believe that the yoke of Obamacare isn’t an economic burden – and therefore the repeal of it a boon – then you’re just another tool of the fools running this nightmare shindig. Nice job you got there.
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:22pmObamaTaxDoesn’tCare bill is a jobs killer, the thousands of pages of regulations written and still to be written are job killers, the Dodd-Frank bill is a job killer, everything the admin has done has killed jobs.
Encinomoron,when you get out of high school and if you ever get a job and you then realize you work 1/2 the year to pay the government perhaps you will understand. If having to pay excessive taxes harms your household budget, and if you add into that equation inflation, how do you suppose that same taxation (though greater) plus inflation, effects business?
Report Post »dblaess
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:34pm@Steelhead
Report Post »Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:37pm
Cantor is a big waste of time. He is the biggest wanker in the order of magnitude.
—————————————————————————————————-
No, No he’s not. Nancy Pelosi has this honor followed by Harry Reid, who blocks all jobs bills that are sent from the House for consideration. Therefore: It is the Democrat party that is blocking any attempt to get the economy moving and has made political theatre the way Washington works now.
encinom
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 1:18amBills to cut the taxes for the rich and to strip regulations from the industries of the big dollar donors to the GOP are not jobs bills no matter how times Cantor and the rest of the Republican lackies stomp their feet and say they are. Instead of passing actual bills that would create jobs, like the transportation bill, the GOP would rather give hand outs to the Koch Brothers and others of the 1%. Of course Beckerheads believe whatever Fox News and Beck reports regardless of the facts.
Report Post »A.D.Hominem
Posted on July 7, 2012 at 2:01am“Blah bla bla Blahhhhhh, republican lackies, bla blah bla bla, dastardly Koch Brothers, blah bla blah, 1%, blah blah blah blah, Beckerheads, BLAH!”
This incessant, irrational, irritating natter just won’t stop. Over and over and over again, the same spittle flecked class warfare, OWS nincompoopery. The disgusting droppings are starting to clog up the screen. Where did I put that damn Troll spray?
Report Post »King Labron
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:23pmD.O.A. in the Senate…..Dingy Harry will never let it make it to the floor.
Report Post »chips1
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:43pmI guess it’s time to whip out my Dingy Harry voodoo doll.
Report Post »Domandred
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:38pmYep and the GOP knows it. That’s why they doing it now instead of after the Senate flips and Obama is gone. The fix is in. You can put money on it not being done after cause they’ll say “we already tried but it was rejected”.
Report Post »Rayblue
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:17pmAll that’s missing is the third ring in this two ring maximus.
Report Post »Maximus_Delta
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:22pmGood, get rid of this taxation without representation…
Report Post »justangry
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:39pmYou don’t have a representative?
Report Post »brother_ed
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:04pm@JUSTANGRY
That was actually an excellent reply.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:54pmlol… “actually”?
Report Post »brother_ed
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 9:13pm@JUSTANGRY
Yes, in the 1st sense, not the 2nd.
actually
Report Post »adv.
1. In fact; in reality: That tree is actually a fir, not a pine.
2. Used to express wonder, surprise, or incredulity: I actually won the lottery!
justangry
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:13pmYeah, I know. I was just horsing around. I was laughing the whole time.
Report Post »brother_ed
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 10:33pm@JUSTANGRY
Just making sure you didn’t think I was being sarcastic.
We may not always agree, but I enjoy your comments.
Report Post »BurntHills
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:18pmhurrah for Congress having the testicular fortitude to act. only thing is they should have just shortened it to the ‘OBAMATAX’.
Report Post »Verceofreason
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 8:32pmYou are right this is only ACTING.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:18pmThis better be a complete repeal, not one of those parial repeals McConnell was talking about earlier in the week
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 6:38pmThis is the House, McConnell is in the Senate.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:01pmyea….i know
Was McConnell talking about a partial repeal or not??? Why is it so hard for you folks to follow a simple sentance
Report Post »kaydeebeau
Posted on July 6, 2012 at 7:27pmMcConnell was actually giving up without a fight – hello KY voters……….is there another Rand Paul anywhere in your midst?
Report Post »