Rick Santorum Projected Winner of Louisiana Primary
- Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:15pm by
Erica Ritz
- Print »
- Email »

(The Blaze/AP) — Rick Santorum is the winner of the Louisiana Republican presidential primary, defeating GOP front-runner Mitt Romney in yet another conservative Southern state.
Santorum is Romney’s chief challenger and a former Pennsylvania senator who has won previous contests in Tennessee, Mississippi and Alabama.
The Louisiana victory was unlikely to change the overall dynamics of the race. Santorum still dramatically lags Romney – the former Massachusetts governor- in the hunt for delegate to the GOP’s summertime nominating convention. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia was far behind in the Louisiana vote count.
Exit polls from the Saturday primary found that voters were economy-focused, and strongly backed their candidate. Santorum secured his widest margins of victory over Mitt Romney among the conservatives and evangelicals who have lifted his campaign across the South.
“We’re still here. We’re still fighting. We still believe, as this race really shows,” Santorum told supporters in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
The Louisiana victory gives Santorum bragging rights and at least nine more delegates. Neither candidate was in the state as Louisiana Republicans weighed in. Nor was former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who was trailing in Louisiana. With half the precincts counted, Santorum had 49 percent to 26 percent for Romney. Gingrich was far back at 17 percent, followed by Ron Paul with 6 percent.
Romney took a rare day off Saturday, with no public events. Santorum spent the day campaigning in Pennsylvania and next-up Wisconsin, which votes April 3 and represents one of his last chances to beat Romney in a Midwestern state. Santorum told voters in Milwaukee that he expected their state to be “the turning point in this race.”
In an unmistakable jab at Romney, Santorum added: “Don’t make the mistake that Republicans made in 1976. Don’t nominate the moderate. When you do, we lose.” It was a reference to Ronald Reagan losing the 1976 Republican nomination to incumbent President Gerald Ford, and Democrat Jimmy Carter winning the White House. The next key fight comes April 3 in Wisconsin.
Romney’s campaign is airing TV ads in the state, and his super PAC allies have plowed more than $2 million into TV advertising there. Also voting April 3 are Maryland and the District of Columbia. There are 95 delegates combined at stake in the three contests.
Voters in New Orleans weigh in on what influenced their decision Saturday:



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (275)
lesliemj
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:23pmSay what?
Romney in ‘02: ‘Only Connection’ to the Republican Party Is My Party Registration
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/romney-in-02-only-connection-to-the-republican-party-is-my-party-registration/
Romney: “The Gay Community Needs More Support from the Republican Party’
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/romney-gay-community-needs-more-support-republican-party
Romney believes that strapping a dog to the roof of a car is just fine. Even more bizarre but revealing is that Romney is unwilling to admit wrong or apologize. How we treat animals reflects the core of our characters.
http://www.adn.com/2012/03/20/2384227/why-does-romney-defend-strapping.html#storylink=cpy
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:55amI’ve looked at the exit polling from a lot of states and romney always does well with the older people (65+). You could say old people are his ‘base’. Why do they support him? Here is my guess:
1. “He looks like a nice young man”
Report Post »2. He speaks well (meaning, he reads teleprompter well)
3. He wont touch my medicare and social security
4. I liked his progressive father – George Romney
5. I see him on the television and he calls me a lot
6. He seems like the guys we normally nominate
b.mclane
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:18am1) In 2002 Republicans were spending money stupidly fast. I changed my party affiliation cause of it. Romney was saying he is NOT in favor of spending money irresponsibly NOT that he did not agree with Party Policies.
Report Post »2) Ever heard of the LINCOLN LOG REPUBLICANS? They too think we should reach out to gays. The Republican Party is a big tent party. We should reach out to all who have a common political belief in fiscal responsibility and individual freedom.
3) Did not strap the dog to a roof. An Irish setter is a big dog and 7 people were in the car. Dog was inside a dog carrier with the opening toward the back. Crate tied to a roof rack. Much like tons of dogs are transported everyday via an airplane. Dog lived till he was 20 so I guess it did not bother him. THIS IS WAY BEFORE MINI VANS OR SUV’s. This was back when large families had a station wagon. Complaining about this story shows how lame some people are about Romney. That’s it? That’s all you got??
MS-GlenNBC
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:38amI think it is time that we all get behind Santorum.. Romney needs to drop out of the race….
Look at this video.. Rick Santorum has the courage to produce this video…. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DApjHZq9o7M
Romney can only produce videos against Republicans… Romney would be happy to produce a video like this if it was against Gingrich or Santorum, Bachmann Cain, Perry… etc.
Romney is a crustacean… NO SPINE….. Romney can’t even call Obama a Socialist.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqaWzpE1QFU
R O M N E Y ~ C A N ‘ T ~ C A L L ~ O B A M A ~ S O C I A L I S T ( because he is afraid)
All you Romney Supporters must NOT think Obama is a Socialist… Your Beloved Mitt doesn’t think Obama is a Socialist….
Santorum and Gingrich at least have a spine to take it right to Obama…… Romney is weak…
Report Post »danibalyeat
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:50amBMclane– Does this seem like a man who would complain about big government spending– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bM_si-JVfhI&feature=my_liked_videos&list=LLdpPXzXSDYlKtbjcWAuI_Cw
Report Post »As a matter of fact Romney nearly bankrupted Massachusetts with his big Government schemes.
The reason he did not want to identify with The Republican Party was because, even under George W. they were too Conservative for him. Romney is quite literally the most PERFECT example of a RINO (Republican in name only) that I have ever witnessed. If you look up RINO in the dictionary you see Romney’s picture.
Paul
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:51amYou all really think there is going to be an election “as usual?”
God Help Us…
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:50amUh, WE LIKE ROMNEY because he is not Bitter, vindictive, Catty, Shallow, or a Pretend “great guy”. We don’t like Santorum because he is thin-skinned, whiny, talks too much, doesn’t have the inner strength that ROMNEY shows. We were not always for ROMNEY, but given that Newt lived his life with no thought of self-discipline (until – maybe 4 months ago) and most of the rest were just not ready or ambitious interlopers like Michelle Bachmann who tried to co-opt the TEA party as her own devise (no it wasn’t). ROMNEY can take the punches, remain a gentleman, has the business and WINNING experience to turn this around…to stop Obama and drive the demons out of the WH.
Santorum just shoots off his mouth. The first parts of his speeches are good…then he just goes on and on and his ego gets in the way. WE have one of those now. We want ROMNEY to clean up the mess and set it right like he did the Olympics; like he did in Massachusetts and with a totally DEM constituency and legislature.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 3:00am@MS-GlenNBC,
“I think it is time that we all get behind Santorum.. Romney needs to drop out of the race….”
Hell no, I’m not getting behind Santorum.
See here.
Santorum campaign caught trying to foil county convention re-do
http ://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/santorum-campaign-caught-trying-to-foil-missouri-county-convention-re-do
And here.
Bryan Spencer Speaks about Rigging St. Charles Caucus
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuQIMfMVMYg
And here.
St. Charles County Caucus RIGGED As Admitted on Talk Radio By Dokes
http ://www.dailypaul.com/221947/st-charles-county-caucus-rigged-as-admitted-on-talk-radio-by-dokes
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 3:06amRomney is a loser. He lost to McCain in 08. Looooserrr
Report Post »RonmeyPaulBotsrOdd
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 3:13amCongrats to Rick! Again, we here how loser Romney should be the nominee from Ron/meyPaulBots…laughable at best. We know Paul has already sold out to Romney, has Newt (we know he would not sell out, he supports Pelosi and Gore) Funny how with a win in a lib state skewed state like Illinois the the “door has been shut” and that everyone else should drop out. BTW – NYTimes has a piece revealing what is coming. Put that together with the slam from Axelrod about mormon women menstruation issues and you see the reelection of Obama. Kennedy vs. Romney will be just part of the playbook that is already written:
Report Post »http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/us/politics/ted-kennedy-helped-shape-mitt-romneys-career-and-still-haunts-it.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&=&pagewanted=all&adxnnlx=1332648330-mzt/U7OxW/JkWayEb8Fx8w
db321
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 3:57amRomney does well in States that allow both Democrats and Republican voters – to vote in an open primary. The Democratic voters vote for Romney – I wonder sometimes why the Liberal Media likes Romney so much – Even Chris Mathews got a trill up his leg the other day when he was talking about Romney.
Report Post »Inkmage
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 4:17amUh yes, I agree with Romney, that the Republican party needs to reach out to gays. There are a lot of gays out there, who are fiscally; and national security wise Conservative, have served this country, and don’t like left-wing governance … And when you get Republican Conservatives coming out, sounding like they are straight out of the 50′s.. It makes Republicans look out of touch with modern society, intolerant, and just stupid.
As far as Rick Santorum winning… Wow what a shock, a social Conservative, all caps “Christian” uptight twit- wins in a southern state. NOT! lol Romney will win the southern states in the general election- because those very same people who voted for Santorum, and hate Romney, will vote for him because they hate Obama more. Romney will also carry the states he’s been winning, states Santorum would get destroyed in.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 7:44amFor all the Romniacs:
Report Post »Mitt Romney: Your Pro-Choice or Pro-Life or Pro-Choice or Pro-Life Candidate
BuzzFeed’s Andrew Kaczynski compiled a video using several clips of Gov. Romney’s statements on being pro-choice and pro-life.
http://www.therightscoop.com/mitt-romney-your-pro-choice-or-pro-life-or-pro-choice-or-pro-life-candidate/
Bodwulf
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 9:04amIf we had a real news headline it would be “After Louisiana win Santorum gains only 5 delegates on Romney.Santorum received 10 and Romney received 5. Leaving Rick (273) with no chance vs Mitt (568).
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:38am“WE LIKE ROMNEY because he is not Bitter, vindictive, Catty, Shallow, or a Pretend ‘great guy’..”
Also his Saul Alinsky attacks on the other Republican candidates; his gutless, cowardly responses to those Progressive/left-wing Fascist tactics by saying, “Hey, it was the PACs, not me!”; and by spitting on the graves of every man, woman and child who died to createthis great nation by being the architect of the evil that is Obamacare.
And don’t forget about all of those great “Conservatives” who have endorsed him… The Bushes, McCain, Krispy Kreme Christie, Trump, etc., …
WOTTA GUY!!!
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:01pmBodwulf, If we counted the delegates the proper way, we would swee that Paul is second in delegates. When we get to the convention, we are going to see that no candidate has reached the 1144 delegate count. This will create a brokered convention, but because of new rules by the GOP, it is my understanding that it will be open. This means after the first round of votes not getting any candidate to that magical 1144 delegate number, the delegates will be freed to vote for anyuone they want, even someone who throws their hat into the ring at that time. Paul just may have 1144 supporters signed up as delegates from across the country as that has been our plan all along. In some primary contests, we have said we are for Romney in order to get delegate spots. One thing everyone knows about Paul supporters, they are loyal to the death. If he does end up with 1144 supporters as delegates, that second round of votes will make him the nominee. It will be a great day for America.
Report Post »Ron Paul 2012!
JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:21pmStuck-in-Cal… I find it kind of funny how the maker of that video felt the need to bounce the dates around. Why not go in chronological order? Was it by chance to make it seem like he’s a flip flopper??
Mitt has always said he was a pro life governor that upheld Massachusetts law–which were pro choice.
Report Post »In 2007, he then further enhanced his position, believing the laws were wrong.
That doesn’t sound much like flip flopping to me. It sounds more like he ran the state of Massachusetts being personally pro-life, but upholding Mass law to allow women the right to choose and only when he had a more clear vision did he realize abortion laws are bad.
This is old news and it keeps getting recyclyed like it’s something new.
donh2
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:15pmThe Etch A Sketch has only begun to erase Rmoney’s candidacy…Recall it was a very similar incident that killed off his father George’s presidential campaign. Poor George attributed his polar shift in position on the Vietnam War as being due to a complete brainwashing by military generals..Like father like son…It is programmed into your DNA..>>> http://youtu.be/fSdSiBehQpI
Report Post »eileen for freedom liberty
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:10pmBravo…to all ‘real’ conservatives from all parties in Louisiana that got it RIGHT and voted your convictions not who they told you to vote for!
Now listen up Gingrich and Paul…give it up already…and let the only two consistent front runners battle it out…and when you do get out…put YOUR support behind the only ‘real’ conservative…Rick Santorum to help us ‘real’ conservatives take back our government from those seeking to destroy her from within!
RICK SANTORUM CAN WIN!
RICK SANTORUM WILL WIN!
RICK SANTORUM IS GOING TO DO IT WITH OUR VOTES AND OUR MONEY…NOT THAT OF THE BIGWIG NWO/TRUMP MONEY!
BRAVO…LOUISIANA…BRAVO FOR A JOB WELL DONE
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:08amNot really sure you understand what a “real” conservative is. Glad, Santorum won, helps lead us to a brokered convention.
Ron Paul 2012. He is getting my vote in November.
Report Post »godlovinmom
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:47amI’m with you Eileen…word for word.
Report Post »b.mclane
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:27amDelusional………. .Non partisan people know Santorum is out of it. Illinois was his death blow…..Saint Santorum ONLY wins in heavy Evangelical/ Born Again states. He is out of those now. NOT ONE strategist thought Romney had a chance in heavy religious, including voodoo, Louisiana. This whining about Romney. Half the posts I read are repeated garbage.Based on rumors, not facts. Careful you may be eating up the MSM’s propaganda with a spoon. Plus, many devout religious people don’t think Mormons are Christians.( utter nonsense). Which is hilarious since Glen Beck is a Mormon.
Report Post »DownWithDems
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:16amSantorum Voters are totally out of touch with reality if they think he can win anything
other than right wing and evangelistic voters. All Santorum is doing, is helping Obama.
If every right winger and evangelist in this country voted for the wanna be Pope, he
still couldn’t come close to winning. So, enjoy cutting off your nose to spite your face.
If Obama wins as a result of Santorums craziness, I hope Santorums supporters;
Enjoy the Democrat House and Democratic Senate.
Enjoy the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi.
Enjoy what could become, a Liberal Supreme Court.
Enjoy the ruination of the country.
May you all be miserable every night and every day.
Report Post »You will have no one to blame but yourselves.
orkydorky
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:43am@ b.mclane,
Report Post »Maybe you could enlighten us with some facts of how Romney broke the state he was governing by pushing through Romney care. It’s really easy to put someone down and forget the facts. The facts are that Romney is no more than a big government progressive buying his way to the losing position for the Republican party, just like McCain, and insuring the people will have no choice again in the coming election, just another progressive Romney or Obama. Thank you very much Newt and Paul for splitting off the vote to insure the progressives stay in control of the White house. Maybe the next tea party supporters will have to get the attention of of the elite politicians with a full scale revolution.
ScreaminEagle
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:35pmSantorum is my pick because I don’t vote for the pig with lipstick applied by the R’s. Romney it a global government candidate, groomed to appeal to all those who think it’s just the economy and any CEO can fix it. The TEA Party is not the moderate wing of the R’s. Conservatives are becoming like the Progressives, people who have taken two great words in the English vocabulary and made people afraid to use them, because you no longer know how you will be taken. I’ll keep saying it, the TEA Party has been co-opted. Who was the leader of the original TEA Party? Just a bunch of Indians that made a statement then went on to fight the battle, not one stands out. TEA Party lives in your heart, not in some self appointed leader. I’m hoping Santorum rejects the global ideas. Romney Won’t.
Report Post »bigspike
Posted on March 26, 2012 at 6:13am(self)Righteous Ricky needs to get 74% of the remaining delegates to win the nomination-with NY, NJ, MA, CA, CT, and TX coming up, that’s just not going to happen
Report Post »waspanglosaxon
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:02pmPeople who don‘t like Romney are like those who don’t like Paul. They never give a concrete reason for feeling that way. Maybe it‘s just a ’feeling’ that they cannot articulate. Very similar to how the supporters of Nert can’t say exactly why.
Report Post »JL9999
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:15pmAbout Romney hate: For some, especially in the Deep South, they have been bombarded with anti-Mormon hate rhetoric for decades. When it comes from the pulpit it makes it doubly difficult to communicate with that part of the population who actually believe that trash. Add to that a real suspicion of anyone who is a “damned Yankee” and especially one from Boston, and there you have half the reasons. The rest likely is genuine concern over political positions.
Report Post »JL9999
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:26pmYou included Dr Paul in your remarks. as a Republican of the old school, Dr Paul’s world view is so foreign that I never took him seriously. We have a 20th century example in Neville Chamberlain as to what happens when we don’t hold monsters to account. We can’t deal with evil. We can‘t just allow it to put its evil hooks in a few weak nations then hope it won’t find us. Forty million dead between 1939 and 1945 prove that point.
The rest of the problems are just not supported such as the gold standard and hacking off one trillion dollars of the national budget in one felled swoop. That means another 1 million unemployed former Federal workers all at once. Reducing the budget is a process not an event. It has to be timed with a renewed economy which generates real jobs. Without that, which is Mitt Romney’s approach by the way, Obama is a show in for another four years. Paul’s ideas concerning the Fed are intriguing though.
Report Post »Liberal_Teacher
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:40pmI really hope for a Romney candidacy. I’d never vote for him, but if he wins at least I‘ll know that the White House isn’t inhabited by a complete nut. Romney‘s policies are almost the same as Obama’s, and while his party will drag him to the right a bit, at least he’s not going to destroy this country the way George W did.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:48pm@JL9999
“We have a 20th century example in Neville Chamberlain as to what happens when we don’t hold monsters to account.”
I would rather put my trust in George Washington who said that ‘America does not go around the world looking for monsters to destroy’. Even back then, Washington knew that there would always be bad guys in the world. We project greatness when we shine the brightest.
Good luck with more pre-emptive wars. Some day you will see the wisdom in the principles of Ron Paul – i just hope it isnt because we become completely bankrupt and not able to enforce the law in our own country.
Report Post »Racemosa7
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:12amHere is one very good reason not to vote for him. He believes that Satan is the brother of Jesus Christ. Proof, go to http://www.soulwinner.com. Don’t get mad, just check it out to see if this is true.
Report Post »jespasinthru
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:25amConservatives don‘t dislike Romney because he’s a Mormon. They dislike him because of:
Report Post »1. Romneycare. No explanation needed.
2. When he was governor of Massachusetts, he signed into law a permanent Assault Weapons Ban. In that state, you can go to prison for owning the wrong kind of rifle.
3. He believes in global warming, and has proposed the same kind of cap and trade scam for America that has already devastated economies all over Europe. And this same cap and trade scam has made a very small handful of international financiers extremely wealthy (including George Soros).
4. He has an unpleasant habit of telling every group what he thinks they want to hear, which makes him come across as a complete phony.
5. He flip-flopped on the immigration issue.
6. He flip-flopped on the abortion issue.
I could go on, but you get the picture. I don’t trust him. In my eyes, he’s just a white version of Obama.
RepubliCorp
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 3:46amI will articulate why I don’t like Paul. He is a 911 truther kook that blames America first. He and his supporters are NeoLibs.
Report Post »http://www.myspace.com/video/peace-freedom-are-achieved-through-understanding/ron-paul-meets-the-student-scholars-for-9-11-truth/28483925
justangry
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 6:43amYou’re a liar, Republicorp. Lot of people here think you’ll have to account for that some day.
Report Post »ianmc002
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 7:50amRepubliCorp
Report Post »lol you can’t even do any research can you? You do know that Ron has NEVER voted for an earmark don’t you? Prolly not. You do know that Ron supports TAX CREDITS (keeping more of what you make), and NOT subsidies (which is the corporate welfare you are referring to). Do a little research please before opening your gullet.
ianmc002
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 8:17amRepubliCorp
lol You’re funny. OMG Ron Paul would support a new non-partisan/unbiased investigation of 9/11 because the families of victims in 9/11 demand it? Because some of the 9/11 commissioners refused to endorse the official story? (I‘m sure they have ’tin foil’ hats to) Because Donald Henry Rumsfeld admittedly did allow the panel members to see ALL the evidence?
Just as Pat Tillman was killed in enemy fire. God forbid you question the official story…like the Gulf of Tonkin. lol you sheep.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 8:56am@jespasinthru
Report Post »Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:25am
Don’t confuse the bots with facts.
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:12amREPUBLICORP. Personally, I’m not sure if Ron Paul is a true blue “truther”… but he sure panders to and aligns himself with the worst elements that our society has to offer. I would put him in the “leaning truther” encampment. Paul tends to lean in the direction of conspiracy theorists, and that’s why the nuts love this guy.
Report Post »ianmc002
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:00pmTIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Conspiracy? lol Apparently you are a “conspiracy theorist” if you question anything the government tells you…like the official Pat Tillman story, like the Golf of Tonkin incident, like the official “Bin Laden body dumped at sea story”, “weapons of mass destruction” and on and on. Ever google “us government lies”? You truly are a ‘lemming’.
Report Post »alowe000
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:53pmCongratulations Sen. Santorum. Good win, but its not going to be good enough.
Romney/Rubio 2012
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:06pmThis is his last stand. Romney wins from here on out.
ROMNEY / RUBIO 2012
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:31pmYou Democrat Liberals crack me up. Your trying to destroy the Republican party by throwing us some white Obama. Romney is a liberal. So get lost. Your all a bunch of retards. Your not going to win.
Report Post »JL9999
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:35pmLike him or not, Mitt Romney is going to be the Republican nominee. It is going to happen. Even Newt has come around is saying so and that is coming from a man who would like nothing more than to see Mitt Romney ruined.
I think Rick knows that too but just has to wind down with as much momentum for the next race as he can generate. It won’t happen though. Marco Rubio will be asked to be VP and he will be the nominee in 2020. (Rick just made too many enemies this time.)
Report Post »alowe000
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:22amLibertyorDeath:
Look, I didn‘t insult Santorum or you and I don’t care for you accusing me of being a Democrat. I have never in my life been a member of the Democrat Party nor do I ever intend to. My family have been conservative Republicans for at least 4 generations. During the FDR administration, my family opposed him while the South lapped him up. I neither voted for Huckabee nor McCain in 2008 in the primaries, but was forced to vote for McCain in the general because of the same evangelicals who couldn’t vote for the conservative because he was a Mormon. Now these same people are telling me that I am the moderate establishment because I support Romney. Now THEY are going to lecture me about conservatism? Please.
Look, I listen to Rush Limbaugh regularly and love him. I subscribe to GBTV and listen to Glenn as often as I can. I am no progressive, and I don’t believe Romney is one either. Romney is a conservative who has had to be so in liberal territory and has done pretty well with it, which is partially why I can relate to him. I understand him. He has been tested.
When are you going to understand that I don’t hate Santorum? I at least will vote for Santorum if he is the nominee, which is more than can be said for a lot of commentators on this thread if Romney ends up the nominee. I do believe, however, that Romney will be the nominee and I am quite happy with it.
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:29am@alowe000 – Than your watching too much TV. The main stream has bullied you into liking Romney. It is a brainwashing technique. The more than mention about him, the more it gets built in your head. I am a Ron Paul Supporter btw. I like SANTORUM but he needs to end the fed.
Report Post »alowe000
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:31amLibertyorDeath:
Wrong again. How could I have been brainwashed if I voted for Romney four years ago when Romney was running his campaign uphill against McCain. There was certainly no pressure then.
On the other hand, I have to admit that FACTS do have a tendency to brainwash, seeing as how Romney has more delegates than all of the other candidates combined.
Romney/Rubio 2012
Report Post »marvel
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:41amNo one bullied me into liking Romney, and I like him.
I think Santorum is a liar. For instance, he continues to use the etch-a-sketch comment to try to make Romney out to be someone who changes his policies on a whim just to win elections. What the Romney campaign was really referring to was their strategy, that they treat each primary or caucus individually and develop a new strategy depending on the demographics (as far as what ads to run, where to stump, etc…) Santorum knows that, and he is playing you all, knowing your tendency for knee-jerk reactions and small soundbites.
Romney has lived his life honorably, has kept his promises, been a successful capitalist, understands American capitalism and how it contrasts with European socialism, is faithful to his wife and religion, governed as a conservative, has fought for religious freedom, the unborn, and traditional marriage.
Santorum is a politician who simply plays on the emotions of the GOP electorate.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:50amRubio would ruin his career and reputation attaching himself to Romney….
If Romney gets the Nomination we will need to have some Conservatives in the Senate to fight against the liberal policies of Romney…
Here are some more likely matches…..
Romney/Kerry 2012
Romney/Gore 2012
Romney/Obama 2012
Romney/Edwards 2012
Romney/Clinton 2012
Romney/Christie 2012
Romney/Pawlenty 2012
Romney/Huntsman 2012
Romney/Todd P 2012
Romney/Reid 2012
Romney/Pelosi 2012
Rubio would never be president attaching himself to the failing policies of Romney….
RubioRomneyCare Run Away! Run Away! Run Away!
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:05amLiberty, you should really back down here. You’re not informed enough to accuse people of being retards, brainwashed or anything else.
Report Post »You can barely squeak out a grammatically correct sentence.
THEN, not THAN.
YOU’RE, not YOUR.
JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:07amBy the way, I‘m a conservative and I’m for Romney.
No brainwashing.
No liberal democrat streak.
Nope… just plain old believe he’s the best man for the job.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:59amNO. ROMNEY is NOT a Liberal. ROMNEY is a BUSINESSMAN, a FATHER, HUSBAND and PATRIOT and he sees the things that need to be done, like Decent Defense, Health Care (the right way, competing in the OPEN market place – not by BIGGER GOVT. enslavement) He believes in prosecuting FRAUD in Medicare, SS, and all the “hand outs” … HE KNOWS that while there are POOR in AMERICA, they don’t have to stay poor – in fact of the Millionaires/Billionaires we have in the USA today probably 90% of them were born in below poverty or lower middle class homes, no silver spoons. This one fact separates AMERICA from the rest of the world…and is the reason that people from all over the world want to live here. IT is CALLED FREEDOM. There are Far Right Nut Cases just like there are Far Left. The problem is the FAR LEFT also have the MSM and they want to destroy AMERICA…whereas the FAR RIGHT want to create what America is around the world. I’ll lean RIGHT, thankyouverymuch. REASONABLE people are going to vote for ROMNEY and will be glad they did. He’s very smart, very articulate and more than able to stand down, stare down that pipsqueak in the WH.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:12amALOWE000 : Well said. Sums it up for me to. I began noticing that Romney had very quick, concise and powerful comebacks to some of the stuff tossed at him by TV Commentators and other candidates. I thought “This guy has a good brain” and the more I see of him, the better I like him. I think he is, after all, the guy I loved who saved the Olympics. I think he will make a great President. I think there has been a large faction against him for years – knowing that HE knows the “Score” and will stop the wholesale ripping off of our Tax money … people need to know that WS gave the vast majority of it’s $ to Obama. There is a reason for this. Obama has done -0- to stop their greed. I believe that ROMNEY will.
Report Post »orkydorky
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:20pmWhen I look at and listen to Romney, all I see is a door to door shoe salesman. A slicker running a good con on people. I’m not a religious fanatic even though I do believe in God. I believe in the constitution and all it stands for, not for big government telling me how to live each moment of my life, and that‘s why I’d never vote for Romney!
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 3:40pm@PATTY HENRY
Warren Buffet is a business man and a Family Man
Bill Gates is a business man and a Family Man
what do they have in common with Romney
All three are Liberals.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:49pmAs long as Romney loses. That’s all I want to see. We cannot vote for Romney. He is another Obama. Exactly the same and he is also lying to all of us. I am not a huge fan of Santorum, but he is much much better than Romney. I don‘t agree with picking the lesser evil and I prolly won’t. I just wish Santorum would abolish the FED and repeal the NDAA & Hr347. If he is a true Christian than he should be standing up for Liberty like Ron Paul has. BTW, I am a Paul supporter and the media is straight lying to you about how many delegates Ron Paul is getting. He might not win, but he will be part of this defeat on Obama. So lets stop fighting with one another as Republicans and beat Obama. And when I mean let’s get together, I mean NEWT, RICK AND PAUL… Not Romney because he is a fraud.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:58pmAnother ron paul supporter – I agree. Romney is the only one of the 4 capable of getting the required # of delegates. First things first – romney should be stopped. We can figure this out in the next couple months – or the convention (palin?)
however, seems to me like santorum will only be able to compete with romney if newt drops out
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:08pmNewt isn’t going to drop out, unless all 3 are working together to beat Paul. I sure hope I am wrong on that.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:11pmI worry that Santorum will give up to Romney. We need them all to stay in the race. And that is including Ron Paul. There is no secret candidate. One of these 4 will be our President. But if there is a brokered convention. Ron Paul can easily win this, if not take a high second and go third party. Only if Romney is the nominee.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:24pmIf Ron Paul doesn’t miraculously come out of the brokered convention as the Republican nominee (saving the Republican Party from itself), then I certainly hope he will run third party. We desperately need a new political party. The two we have are both so corrupted that there is really no substantial difference between them.
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:25pmI think Newt, Rick and Romney are really “buddy”buddy” Or there is a secret candidate they have at the last minute.
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:45pm@cous1933 – If all fails, Paul snatches the most delegates but might lose, but will go third party. Green
Report Post »DownWithDems
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:25amYou are pathetic. You sound like Santorum.
If you would rather see Romney lose and Obama win,
Report Post »then go post on CNBC. You must be a Democrat on this
list in Drag.
PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 3:00am@DownWithDems – The only pathetic one is the one who takes the media’s advice. CNBC LOL I could care less about any of them. I’m not a sheep like you.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 3:54amCOUS1933 Dr Dead Last is going to win? What pharmacist do you use?
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:26pmThis is how it works! We go top Convention in Tampa, and we nominate the next president of the United States of America, Mrs. Sarah Palin!
A half hour later we approve her running mate, Colonel Allen West!
God Bless the Union under a Christian Woman/True Black administration!
With Marco Rubio for Secretary of the Border, Rick Perry as Secretary of War and Michele Bachmann as Secretary of Firing Czars.
TEA
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:50pmNot going to happen. I guess you pictured that in your dream.
Report Post »waspanglosaxon
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:59pmMarco Rubio as ‘Sec. of the Border’? Yeah, sure, right. How about Charles Manson as Commissioner of Prisons? Jeffrey Dahmer could be White House Chief. And Sgt. Robt. Bales could be Sec. of Defense? I only differ with you in that I think Bristol Palin would make a better prez than would Sarah, who‘s gettin’ a li’l long in the tooth.
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:26pmRubio won’t be involved at all, so stop dreaming.
Report Post »texrubarts
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:12amAwe your comments are very soothing!!! President Palin – WOW…. Would LOVE that to happen!!! Palin is NOT afraid of Obama – Obama IS afraid of Palin… LOL..
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:37pmDonald Trump would be Far better at Fireing CZAR’s
Report Post »“You’re Fired” is his most famous Line.
Just a Suggestion.
flipper1073
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:59pm@ MONICNE
Report Post »I know You’re being Sarcastic but on the other hand.
That Ticket might Scare Obama so Bad that He would Decide
Not to run an turn it over to Biden to lose.
Like LBJ did. Problem with that Senerio is we may end up with
another Richard Nixon (Worst Progressive/ Liberal Republican
President of the 20th Century)
flipper1073
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:11pm@ MONICNE
Report Post »I don’t generally respond to to Trolls but I do find you
Amusing an Humorous I guess that‘s what you’re going for Right ?
soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:25pmMitt romney went to puerto rico last week and told them they dont have to worry about speaking english to become a state. That would be like santorum going to New Orleans and telling them that God is OK with sin
not a perfect analogy but you get the point – romney will say anything to get elected
Report Post »b.mclane
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:45amHeck they don’t speak English in D.C. so it would be rude to tell a territory to change their language if they want to be a state. WHICH THEY DO NOT. Guess we should tell American Somoa, the Miranas and Guam they should only speak English too? We did that to Hawaii when we sucked them in and having lived there they STILL HATE MAINLAND USA for it, but love our welfare programs. There is no real need to change Puerto Rico’s main language officially to English.Most speak English anyway. Thought Paul fanatics were all about Freedom??? Bet Dr. Paul agrees with Romney on this .
Report Post »Thevoice
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:24pmMSM mind control… Mitt Romney ….Olymipics… Mitt Romney ….Olymipics… Mitt Romney ….Olymipics… Mitt Romney ….Olymipics… Mitt Romney ….Olymipics… Mitt Romney ….Olymipics… Mitt Romney ….Olymipics…Well hell it works on some ..lol….
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:09amI hope you only spelled olympics wrong one time and just copied and pasted the rest of them.
Report Post »Delores at CH WV
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:05pmGo Rick Go! My prayers are answered for tonight’s great win for the people. Don’t let the GOP Elitist get you down! We want our votes to count in the Primary. If the GOP doesn’t stop their interference; then, many Republicans will not show for the November election. You can take that to the bank; We conservatives are tired of a Elitist Group choosing our pick at the ballet box. I am not going to be pushed into voting for this turn coat. A third party sounds good to me.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:24pm@Delores at CH WV,
You should really reconsider your support for Rick Santorum.
See here.
Santorum campaign caught trying to foil county convention re-do
http ://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/santorum-campaign-caught-trying-to-foil-missouri-county-convention-re-do
Keep in mind that Eugene Dokes and Bryan Spencer have already admitted to rigging the St. Charles County, Missouri caucus.
See here.
Bryan Spencer Speaks about Rigging St. Charles Caucus
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuQIMfMVMYg
And here.
St. Charles County Caucus RIGGED As Admitted on Talk Radio By Dokes
Report Post »http ://www.dailypaul.com/221947/st-charles-county-caucus-rigged-as-admitted-on-talk-radio-by-dokes
PJL
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:03pmNow lets see if he’ll stop complaining and whining abut how much money Mitt has…doubt it.
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:55pmHe’ll be happy as a rat in the garbage until the next states vote – then he’ll be back to whinning again.
Report Post »HorseCrazy
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:21ami wish he would go away no one wants a whiner for president. the guy has problems I dont like him. way to go louisiana you blew it
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:12amI‘m surprised Louisiana didn’t bury him after his non stop whining, his childish behavior with the etch-a-sketch ploy and his comment that Barrack would be preferrable to Romney.
Report Post »Disappointing they didn’t finish him off tonight.
cous1933
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:57pmI’m actually glad that Santorum and Gingrich are staying in the race and getting some delegates. It almost assures a brokered convention and disgruntled conservative voters. Then after the convention Ron Paul can spring this on them…
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/hulsey9.1.1.html
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:12pmgingrich staying in the race increases the chances of a presumptive nominee (see my post below). It isnt even about getting enough delegates – it is about perception and people throwing in the towel. For instance, it seems like once mitt gets to 800ish delegates, people will accept that he has it won and quit supporting their candidate. In 2008, republican voters gave it to McCain after florida – even though he was only sitting on 150 delegates.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:48pmBoth Santorum and Gingrich insist that they are staying in the race all the way to the convention and that is exactly what I hope happens. When no candidate has the required 1144 delegates and we have a brokered convention and the first vote at the convention doesn’t select a nominee, the delegates are released from the pledged status assigned in the primaries and at that point Ron Pauls strategy will start to pay off. Paul will have a lot more delegates at the convention than people think. I suspect that regardless of how much support Ron Paul gets at the convention, the GOP will pull whatever shenanigans it has to, to make sure Paul is not the nominee.
At that point, after Paul has exhausted every attempt to work through the corruption of the two-party nomination process, he should run as either an independent or as the Constitution Party candidate.
Ron Paul is truly a Republican in the same sense that Thomas Jefferson was called a Republican (before it became a party). Unfortunately the Republican Party of today are not Jeffersonian Republicans, but big-government progressives who simply use the name Republican so that gullible voters can think that there are really two different parties. Anyone who looks at the R‘s and the D’s over the past several decades will see that the differences between them is very, very small.
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:57pmYEA!!! Very clever strategy!!!!
Ron Paul / Ross Perot 2020
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:02pmprobably not a good strategy to tell everyone the strategy
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:13pmIn 1992 Ross Perot got 19% of the vote in the general election. I’m positive that Ron Paul, as a third party candidate will do much better than that. In fact if conservatives realize that the third party run by Paul virtually guarantees that Romney (the pre-ordained nominee before this primary ruse ever began) cannot possibly win in this three-way race and thus the ONLY two options are Paul and Obama, they will have to vote for Paul.
Don’t worry or fuss – it’s for your own good. Won’t it be great to have a President who actually upholds his oath of office?
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:17pmSoybomb,
Not too worried about telling everyone the strategy. It will all boil down to Paul vs. Obama. If they choose Obama, I hope they can live with it.
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:32amcous is right… Why? Because Paul is the only candidate that will take liberal and independent vote. The numbers are wrong. There has been election fraud and lots of it. Videos are every where. The main Stream won’t talk about it because they are really in it for Obama. It’s all a scam. Remember, we now have a dictator in office. We have never saw something like this America. Well, Dictators control every thing, including your FOX NEWS.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:15amRon Paul can barely hold 10% of the republican vote. If he is “the most conservative” as some of you RP supporters say, he will NOT get any other votes in the general (Indys and Libs wont vote for a 3rd party conservative).
Report Post »So no chance Ron Paul even sniffs 19% let alone go above it.
Besides, RP is not running 3rd party. If he did, he would be going back on his own word.
cous1933
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 11:06amRon Paul would not be going back on his word because he has never said that he would not run third party. Fox News and many other partisan hacks have repeatedly tried to get him to promise that he wouldn’t (because they know for a fact that if he did it would virtually eliminate their guy), but he would only say that he’s “not planning to” or that he “doesn’t want to”. He never made a firm statement that he wouldn’t. Just watch. He has been do disrespected, marginalized, and outright cheated by the corrupt Republican Party, they deserve exactly what he’s going to do to them.
As far as getting the votes of the “indys and libs”, Ron Paul is the most popular candidate among independent voters and many liberals will gladly vote for Paul over Obama on the war issue alone. They know Obama talked a big game about getting out of wars but only got into more. Paul will actually bring the troops home. That might not sit well with you neocons, but it’s huge to a lot of independents and liberals. And of course the true traditional conservatives are already Ron Paul supporters because they care about the Constitution, sound money, and small government.
So when the general election realistically comes down to Paul vs. Obama – who are you going to vote for?
Report Post »Wdawg
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:38pmRomney will be the nominee.
Report Post »Restored One
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:05pmRick is a good man! Mitt is a good man! HOWEVER, something that I have learned in this past 3 1/2 years (years that I have actively been following politics) is that the POTUS does not actually run the country. It is the men and women that a POTUS assigns, i.e foreign policy, economics etc. It does not matter that Mitt is the economy guy. I believe it is the character of the man who will speak for country and assign those who actually run the country that matters this election. Obama is just a puppet to his Admin. I don’t think that Rick or Mitt would be such push overs. They will lead and not just let others make the decisions. But I would vote Rick at this point! He seems less of a pushover from what I have seen.
Report Post »Katydidnt
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:46pmRestored One, why would you say that Mitt is not a pushover. He changes his opinion all the time depending on who he is talking to. Obama is just a figurehead, whoever is on the other end of the blackberry is calling the shots. I know Ricks beliefs are what are calling the shots in his life. I am just so leery of the press and the establishments support of Mitt. I mean there are progressives in the republican party, Who are they supporting and more importantly Why?
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:59pmYes, Mitt will be the nominee, and then the President of the United States.
And he will win re-election in 2016. And that, my friend, is a fact.
ROMNEY / RUBIO 2012
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:01pmRick is Bad man. You morons. Stop it already. Romney is a straight liberal. DO NOT MAKE THE MISTAKE TWICE. He is another Mccain.
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:27pm@Wdawg – LOL… Riiight… If Romney wins, than the election is rigged. End of Discussion.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:47amThanks for the final word on that, Liberty.
Report Post »Didn’t know you were in charge here.
oneshiner
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:58pmI’ve read through most of the comments and WOW, such hatefulness for the dumbest things: dog in crate on top of car etc. I just realized, I’m sick of all of it. I don’t like any of them, but I do believe we need to put away the pettiness and come together or it will be BO’s for another 4 years.
Sure, Santorum won Louisiana. My mid-90′s mom said he would because so many Catholics in La. (my birth state) My first choice was Mr. Cain, then Newt and now, not a clue, don‘t like ’em at all.
Report Post »My choice will be who ever wins the nomination, period, like it or don’t like it because I would never vote for another term for that man who has skrewed up America the worst of all of the Presidents to date.
Racism is the worst it’s ever been, that obamanation of health care will put ius in poor house before Obama does, and it will send grannie over the cliff for being too old and we can’t spend any more medical money on her. Get wise, obama is a wannabe dictator and we‘ll pay for it like we’ve never done before.
MCLOVINIT
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:38pmPolitical Prayer:
Report Post »“It is January 20th, 2013.
Rick Santorum is being sworn in as the new President of the United States.
I give thanks to you Almighty God, for your blessings! Thank you, Lord.”
I see it. I feel it. I believe it. It is so.
LibertyGoddess
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:48pmThe only president position he is qualified for is the Christian Taliban. He has really turned his campaign upside down. We now see the real person. I for one am thankful this was a long primary season.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:20pmit is mitt romney supporters like this one that have pushed me over the edge
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:54pm@SOYBOMB315:
That must have been a very short push…..
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:10pmits short fuse – i havent been able to build my BS tolerance like you have
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:17amWhy does ANY supporter influence you??
Report Post »How about focusing on the candidate not the supporters?
LeadNotFollow
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:37pm…
Report Post »Santorum’s new campaign ad must be working.
Good job Rick.
LibertyGoddess
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:52pmAre you new to the primary? This was an evangelical paradise state. Nothing more. Rick is finished and will not surge from this. He is finished and only hurting the party with his nonsense. No worries, he doesn’t have a future with the GOP because of it.
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:32pm@liberty
Gotta Say —
You Are Very Entertaining!
But —
Romney doesn’t get to be president anymore than you get to be a goddess.
Romney’s outa supporters!
The Rest Of America Just Doesn’t Like Romney!
It’s Getting Down To Newt and Santorum Real Quick!
NEWT 2012
Report Post »http://www.newt.org
PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:04pm@LibertyGoddess – Awww are you mad Liberal? Do me a favor and stop screwing up the GOP with you white Obama. Get your Romney guy outa here. WE DONT WANT HIM!
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:05pmMitt will win the nomination, and will be elected President of the United States of America.
He will also be re-elected in 2016. Ricky was expected to do well in this state, but from here on out Mitt will do VERY well, just as he has up until now. Most people do not want a porn-addict (Santorum) or a cheater (Newt) for president. They want someone who is faithful to his wife (unlike Newt), and who is consistent with his Faith (e.g., tithing 15% instead of Ricky’s 4%). They also do not want to live in a theocracy – neither did the Founding Fathers. Ricky will appeal to the evangelicals, but not to most Americans. Mitt does, and will win because of it.
ROMNEY / RUBIO 2012
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:15pm@Todd P – Rubio can’t be in that position. Why don’t you get information on your candidate before you start spouting non sense.
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:28pm@Todd P – Hey liberal, go vote for Obama if you want Romney.
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:39pm@todd
You Romneys —
Desperation-Driven to Pushing and Shoving and BS-ing!
You know Romney’s at the end of his “support-bloc” = Romney’s “special-states!”
Soybomb315 very effectively pointed out, near the top of this thread —
WHY America Does Not Like Romney!
Puerto Rico Was The Sharp Contrast Between Santorum, The Man With Integrity —
And, Romney, the man with a zero moral compass = zero integrity!
Romney’s Headed Out and OnTo Our Turf Now!
The Vast and Immeasurable and Silent and Powerful Grassroots Majority Of American Patriots See Thru Romney and We Want None Of Him!
Romney’s Peaked!
Romney’s Done!
Newt and Santorum Are Just Getting Warmed Up!
Newt and Santorum Are Off and Running!
It’s Between Newt and Santorum!
Newt 2012
Report Post »http://www.newt.org
MandM
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:07amThegrassroots: I’m happy to hear that Newt still has 1 supporter left. You say Romney is done, really? Was that meant to be a joke? Last time I checked it’s Mitt that is receiving all the big endorsements, and what was it, oh yeah money. Oh and Newt’s broke. Rick got a nice win today, but it’s too little to late, oh and what’s with all the hatred here on the blaze?
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:19amIt’s Getting Down To Newt and Santorum Real Quick!
________________________
Down right Head-In-The-Sand comment right there.
Report Post »donh2
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:35pmI have recorded a message from the spirit of Barry Goldwater from beyond the grave. He says Governor Rmoney’s nomination would lead to the quote “ suicidal destruction of the Republican party ” …..>>> http://youtu.be/s9YA76sALk0 So even if you are a republican with serious doubts about Rmoney….you are in good company.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:42pmgood point. Goldwater won the republican primary and went up against LBJ in 1964. George Romney refused to endorse or support Goldwater because George Romney was more of a progressive in the party. Foreign policy aside, Goldwater stood for limited federal govt and more individual freedom.
Here we are in 2012 and another Romney stands in the way of a constitutional government. Lets not give the Romneys the satisfaction…
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:50pmHere’s what Santorum thinks of Goldwater….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-WezrKqUBQ
Report Post »donh2
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:51pmYes the key is Rick is being faulted for his etch a sketch “stick with Obama” comment when he is only repreating the sentiment expressed by Mitt Rmoney’s own father George against Goldwater. Problem is I don’t think Rick did it intentionally to make an historical point about who the Rmoney family really is .
Report Post »b.mclane
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:56amThis has got to be the lamest anti Mitt Romney comment yet. You are digging up his deceased Dad?? You do know Ronald Reagan ( who probably would not be Conservative enough for many here including Glen Beck ) has a natural son who is a flaming Liberal??? Ron Reagan, Jr.???? Humans are NOT cookie cut. Your point is irrational.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 7:31am@b.mclane
Report Post »The point was that history repeats itself. Mitt Romney has followed in his fathers footsteps
KangarooJack
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:30pmI thought is was brilliant when Santorum stated THE OBVIOUS regarding RomneyCare vs. Obamacare (gee, ObamaCare was based upon RomneyCare). Santorum stated this during one of the earlier debates. He had been polite, adhered to protocol-yet Romney and Newt kept spatting at one another. Santorum’s frustration finally showed through. PEOPLE – Mittens is just a few hairs shy of Obama. Don’t get me wrong-I’m ABO come November. {Still rue that Perry sucked at debates!}
Report Post »brntout
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:47pmTake heart sir /maam, God,guns,and bibles are still available,but for a limited time.
Report Post »LibertyGoddess
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:50pmKnow your constitution. Obamacare is unconstitutional. Romneycare was within the law, and constitutional in Mass. Every state has a right to care for their poor and reign in medical expenses. Anyone who has studied the plan knows it is not Obamacare and it is within the law.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:53pmlibertygoddess
if the federal mandate is unconstitutional then the state mandate is unconstitutional. constitution was ammended via the 14th ammendment to prevent states from infringing on our natural rights. That is why states cant ban speech, outlaw guns, establish religion, search without warrant, etc.
Dont feel bad – romney doesnt understand it either
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:10pm@ LIBERTYGODDESS:
You are absolutely correct, and anyone who has taken an objective look at this issue knows it to be true. But, there are some who purposely choose not to be honest about it, because that distorts their political agenda. “There are none so blind as those who WILL not see.”
Take heart – we will win in the end.
ROMNEY / RUBIO 2012
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:35pm@LibertyGoddess – I know my constitution do you? Romney care is unconstitutional. Stop forcing us to give money to somebody else. Go get your hand outs some where else. There are plenty of Countries that do that. You will never get my money.. any more. Your all a bunch of lazy Americans that want the Government to be your mommy and daddy. I know my constitution. NDAA, Hr-347, Patriot Act, step all over our Constitution. I guess you don’t care about life.
Report Post »1casawizard
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:30pmMy comment about this is I hope Rick will keep winning these little primarys to become a contender in the runoff. Mitt cannot be trusted. That is who bammer wants to run against. At this point, anything but mitt.
Report Post »LibertyGoddess
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:29pmYawn. He’s still a sore loser. He makes evangelicals look mean and bitter. Thank goodness this is the last of the those “special” states.
Report Post »1casawizard
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:48pm@the GODDESS. Which do you call the special states? I’d like to know.
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:58pmLiberty Means The Rest Of The USA!
Romney’s spent almost all of his “support bloc.”
Therefore —
Romney’s Quickly Coming To The End Of HIS “Special States!”
And —
The Romneys Know It!
The Romneys Are ALL Bluff!
Grassroots American Patriots Don’t Like Romney!
So —
Newt and Santorum Get To Battle It Out In The Rest Of The United States!
While Romney Fades Away InTo Oblivion!
NEWT 2012
Report Post »http://www.newt.org
LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:39amLibertyGoddess has such a fraud of a name. You have no idea what liberty is.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:22amLibertyordeath… and your name isn’t fraudulant?
I suppose when you‘ve lost the rest of the freedoms you possess now when BO gets reelected you’ll be begging for a bullet in the head huh?
Bullcrap.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:29pmyes santorum won the state but as long as gingrich is in this race – it doesnt matter. Santorum will walk away with about 12-13 delegates and romney will have about 8. However, if newt were not in the race – santorum would have got over 50% of the vote which means he would have got ALLLL the delegates. This is how romney has built his big lead. By only getting 30% of the vote in many states – he still walks away with a bunch of delegates even though his supporters make a minority of the voters.
Here is the proof that santorum would have got over 50% with gingrich not in this race….Santorum 59% and romney only 36%.
Report Post »http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/epolls/la?hpt=hp_pc1
soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:36pmit should be obvious that gingrich is staying in this race to help romney
bachmann was right – “NewtRomney”
Report Post »TORCH9
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:23pmI wish he’d just step aside. He can’t win overall. Too whimpy…………..
Report Post »ShyLow
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:35pmHe nearly tore Ron Paul’s arm off with a handshake,how can you call that wimpy…and the way he is always grittin his teeth shows true leadership
Report Post »1casawizard
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:37pm@TORCH9. I agree. I wish Mitt would step aside. He’s too wimpy.
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:47pmi love when mitt romney stutters when he is not reading a teleprompter
Report Post »thegrassroots
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:05pmRomney’s going to have to step down pretty soon.
He’s running out of supporters.
It’s Between Newt and Santorum!
NEWT 2012
http://www.newt.org
http://www.exmormon.org
Report Post »TRONRADIO
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:07pmRomney really is a wuss; there’s not a touch of Reagan mindset in him. None.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:25amRomney’s going to have to step down pretty soon.
He’s running out of supporters.
_________________
Wishful thinking.
Report Post »He just mopped the floor with the other 3 candidates 4 days ago in Illinois and got 50 thousand votes in Louisiana–a state he really didn’t have a shot at.
Oh by the way, those 50 thousand votes were more than Newt and Ron Paul together, so I guess Newt is going to get it into gear—————————————————————————————- now?
JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:26am………………………now?
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:27am…… how about now?
<>
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:28amchirp…….. chirp……
Report Post »TRONRADIO
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:22pmI‘m glad he beat ole mom jeans wearin’ Mitt.
Report Post »brntout
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:22pmAnd the conservative hits keep coming. Etch-O-Sketch for president.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:19pmSo what…What ya gonna do about the States that you aren’t on the ballot Ricky?
Report Post »brntout
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:28pmDOGGY That is the point.To save this country is going to be to rally behind whoever wins because it will be ABO (Anyone But Obama) ….reguardless.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:39pm@BAD
What ya gonna do about the States that Wrong Paul hasn‘t won and the up and coming States that he can’t win.
BTW Pay tour taxes DEADBEAT.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:07pm@therealconservative – Do me a favor and change your name. Your not a true conservative if you believe the NDAA needs to stay in place. Or HR-347. Or Patriot ACT. You a coward if you don;t want Liberty.
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:30pmRon Paul is getting way more delegates than what the media is telling you. The mainstream are liars. I know for a fact now.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:20am@POL
Sorry the name stays, maybe you should changes yours to ‘Closet Liberal’
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:21am@Real…I pay all the Fing taxes I am supposed to pay. I dont take a dime from the Government either…Get your a@@ off welfare…
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:21am@Liberty
You need to join the real world
Report Post »LibertyOrDeath12
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 12:37am@therealconservative – The real world? I think your meaning your self. Your in the mainstreams medias world. You are what we call sheep. Your easy to manipulate. You follow the leader. So your saying you don’t care if a drone kills an American even if he was only a “Suspected” criminal? Let me guess, your the type of guy that worries Muslims are going to come after while your sleeping? And your telling me to join the real world? Keep letting that fear get to you. You need to understand that America is powerful police state controlled by dictators. You need to wake up. Your freedom of speech no longer matters. Your thrown in jail for protesting and you call that freedom? Why don’t go fly your self to Mars, because it seems to me your out of touch.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:31amLiberty, you’re a joke.
Report Post »RP has WAYYYYY more delegates huh?
And you know for a fact?
Please, enlighten us all.
PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 3:02am@JJ Coolay – Keep enjoying election fraud loser.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 3:03am@JJ Coolay – What makes you think Romney is winning. Enlighten me? Media? False Numbers? What else you got for me? We know our delegates. You just wait until Tampa.
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 6:40amUmm, the score.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:09am@BAD
Sorry but unlike you I’ve never been on welfare or unemployment, nor am I a phoney like you that ‘CLAIMS’ to have been the military.
You try to talk a good game, but don’t.
Report Post »therealconservative
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:12am@LIBERTY
Once a US citizen becomes a terrorist, in my book they give up all rights.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 10:19amREALCONSERVATIVE. For the most part you are dealing with Ron Paul acolytes here. They are behind a guy who insults the Military every chance he gets, and who supports a traitor to our Military and country in the name of Pvt Bradley Manning. Most of the Ron Paul Military posers on here are just that… poser. And the one’s who served? Pretty much a band of disgruntled Adam Kokesh types who probably had their arses handed to them in the Military… along with walking papers.
Report Post »GoodStuff
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:19pmSantorum is still in the race? I assumed he dropped out after he said Obama would be better than Romney.
Report Post »Polarized America
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:28pmSo if Romney wins the nomination is Santorum gonna back Obomber ..My God this has been a crazzzzy race
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 9:31pmhe said the voters will look at romney and then obama and figure at least they know what obama will give them. He is right
your argument for mitt romney all along was that he is best to beat obama – so why dont you refute santorum’s claim instead of acting like a baby about it
Report Post »food plot 7.62
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 10:04pmTill the bitter end. Rick’s gonna keep fighting. He’s gonna support the GOP nominey regardless of the winner
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:05pmObama is better than Romney. ANybody is better than Romney. Keep watching TV… Sheep. The media has played you!
Report Post »Todd P
Posted on March 24, 2012 at 11:16pmYeah, I thought he had dropped out and joined the Obama re-election campaign!!!
Well, since he’s not projected to win any of the remaining states, its still pretty much over for little Ricky. He’ll figure that out eventually. For now, he still likes the public attention he’s getting. Kinda sad, really.
ROMNEY / RUBIO 2012
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 2:35amPOL… you’ve LOST IT.
Report Post »Anyone is better than Romney?
How so sadly uninformed you are.
Romney ran a successful business.
Romney saved the Salt Lake game from embarrassment.
Romney turned Massachusetts’ economic disaster into surplus.
Your comments are pathetic.
resme
Posted on March 25, 2012 at 1:19pmYou can make anything look good with enough tax money, jj coolay.
Report Post »