Romney Campaign Sent Gingrich a Cake Marking Anniversary of House Reprimand
- Posted on January 21, 2012 at 6:19pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »

Surging Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has had his career altered on January 21 before, and the campaign of rival Mitt Romney sent the former Speaker of the House a reminder of that this Saturday on the day of the South Carolina Republican primary.
The Hill reports that Romney’s campaign sent a press release wishing Gingrich a “happy anniversary” for the House decision to reprimand him, which happened on January 21, 1997.
Headlined “Happy 15th Anniversary, Mr. Speaker,” the release said, “Fifteen years ago today, Newt Gingrich became the first House speaker in American history to be reprimanded by his colleagues.”
The Romney campaign told Fox News that they had planned to deliver an anniversary cake to Gingrich’s South Carolina headquarters to mark the occasion on Saturday. CNN’s Political Desk Editor Marlena Baldacci tweeted a picture of the cake at around 6p.m. Saturday.
Given that projections of the South Carolina GOP Primary have Gingrich ahead of Romney, the former Speaker may have the last laugh.



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (173)
calmandclear
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:16pmI will support whoever is nominated to run against President Obama. That said, I have always thought Romney was Obama-white, huh, I meant to say Obama-light, no, Obama-lite, yes, that’s it, Obama-lite. Coming from the same mind-set just much smarter and coming from a better family. On the plus side he doesn‘t hate business and doesn’t want to destroy the country, got to be grateful for what we can get. Don’t forget to vote, it’s important. Personally, I hope to be voting for Newt, he’s my kind of guy.
Report Post »grand slam grandam
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:46pmCalmandClear: Newt’s your kind of guy, eh? You cheat, sleaze around, make vows you can’t keep? Now Newt wants to take his latest squeeze to the Whitehouse and, boy, is she eager!!
Report Post »TruthHurts
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:07pmNewt is a big government progressive with an ego bigger than the country. Look at all of his “ideas”. They involve Government, Government, Government. Why? It is all he knows. Sure, he might be a smart guy… who only knows Government. We complain about Obama not having any experience running anything… well Newt was House Speaker and his own colleagues threw him out. This election should be a referendum on Barry, but with Newt running… it will not. It is far easier to spin this around and making it about Newt. Democrats and the media want Newt, it is their only hope.
Anyone but Obama… and anyone but Newt.
Report Post »jzs
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:25pmThat’s ancient history. The fact that Gingrich was fined by the House for ethical violations, and the fact that he was deposed as Speaker by his peers, including Boehner, is history. Gingrich has asked for and received God’s forgiveness for that as well as for the adulterous affairs. Clean slate. Nobody cares about the events of the last forty years of his life because, as someone said, he’s what a smart person sounds like to stupid people.
Tomorrow I’m starting my own PAC: Democrats for Gingrich. I for one think he has what it take to become the Republican nominee for President of the United States! Go Newt.
Report Post »mils
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:38pmI fully expect to see democrat groups/superpacs coming out to support Newt for the Republican nominee…
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:05amNeocons are liberals.
Liberals are neocons.
Both are progressives.
None of the above.
Ron Paul 2012.
Report Post »Patrick Henry II
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:17amDemocrats make crap up. Newt was found on the up and up in tht situation. We all know they are a bunch of ambulance chasers.
Report Post »Newt has other issues but he was clear on that.
ghostsouls
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:54amI don’t care if the nominee is a toad, that is who i am voting for, not obama. Any non vote, any 3rd party vote, is a vote for obama. This campaign should be entitled: Anyone but obama. Every candidate has said, that each of the other candidates would be preferable to obama. Even they know to vote for whom even the GOP nominee is.
Report Post »justin.blake
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 5:11pmThe false and hypocritical outcry about the release of damaging information regarding his ‘private life’ just sunk him in my book. When Herman Cain was going through the same thing, he was content to sit back and let him take the heat, knowing it would leave one less candidate for the nomination. Now when his chances are threatened by the same type of information, he calls its release despicable??!!! Sorry Newt, you are a dirtbag, no matter how well you debate and orate…sounds a little like the POTUS doesn’t it?
Report Post »MBA
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:04pmHow about sending that cake to the democrats and that swamp old nancy was going to clean up? Now that is a group of really ethically challenged morons (not mormons).
Report Post »CLS
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:34pmI think I finally figured out why “old Nancy” has been unable to fulfill her promise to drain the swamp .. after many, many, many, even numerous, expensive and exhaustive studies, the EPA found there to be no place suitable in which Nancy might deposit her toxic waste.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:48amIf you think Romney is not like Obama just think of how similar they act.
Rahm Emanual Mailed a Dead Fish
Romney Mailed a Cake
Romney should have run as a Democrat..
Negative attacks
never answers a question
Romneycare
Liberal Judges
Stutters almost worse than Obama
Oh… Without Romney the Olympics would be over for all time. Thanks, ( I stoped watching them in Utah… I think that was Mitts year, too much fluff not enough sports like Romney)
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:19pmNo you are wrong. Nancy couldn’t drain the swamp because the EPA would had to come in and file a motion for her to put the swamp back. You can’t destroy a wetland, even if it is on land you own. The EPA knows best and only they have the foresight to a wetland when they see it. In fact, if they whipped out their male anatomy and took a pee, that would constitute a wetland.
Report Post »ScarletRose
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:42pmYeah! Just like newt!
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:00pmWhy do they think Newt eats cake?
TEA
Report Post »Living In NYC
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:42amMonicne…I agreed with you .. does Gingrich eat cake? As a conservative I have held my nose every presidental election since I voted for Ronald Reagn in his first term when I was 18…these canidates all sink!!
Romney and Gingrich are both NCA (No Class Acts) and embarassment to conseratives, like me who believe in free will, opportunity and capitalism! This act and their on-going childish behavior is foolish.
They both need to go after to the source of the United States ills and attack Obama! Then they can push harder at each other! Romney is a want-a-bee “Chicken in Chief’”, sending a cake rather than openly getting the report on Gingrich and commenting on it!
These two “CIC” (Chickens in Chiefs) are going to lose this election to the socialist dicator .. Emperor Barry if they don’t get their message out there! Close to 80% of this country believe in free will and hate class-warfare!
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:59pmIt is sad when a big government progressive wins in a conservative state. It is sad that an anti-free market capitalist wins the Republican vote. It is sad that someone that praises FDR, Wilson, and the progressive movement wins the conservative vote.
Here is Kudlow speaking after interviewing Newt about how he is not a free-market capitalist. Kudlow is right, Newt is not what he says he is: http://url2it.com/lisd
Report Post »garyM
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:13pmRomney didn’t win, check again Newt won! You been watching Beck and was just so sure you had not checked I guess!
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:18pmSo you support one big government progressive and criticize another big government progressive? Why not take some of that irrational anger out on the third big government progressive in the race?
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:01pmRomney is not a big government progressive. Implying so is absurd on its face and shows incredible ignorance of his actual record. Try researching for yourself instead of eating up the garbage the media feeds you for once.
Newt, on the other hand, has a solid record of progressive tendencies, and he did in fact state that the best president in history was FDR. You know, the same FDR that ushered in the current welfare state.
Report Post »Roaran
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:03pm“Teapartyforromney”
Tea Party supporting Romney is about as big of a joke as Newt Gingrich being an honest/decent/conservative.
They’re both cut from the same cloth, Newt’s just been sitting in a pile of slime for the past twenty years.
Report Post »kaygee
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:10pmYes, I agree with you. Unfortunately it is the dumb tea party hat supported Andy Stern loving Progressive Newt, and also thanks to Sarah Palin and Glenn beck.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:18pmRomney not a progressive? His record as governor of Mass speaks for itself. You need no more than romneycare and the individual mandate to pin him down.
Report Post »ScarletRose
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:41pmYou are dead right. Newt is Death on the GOP. Millions of us will vote for write-ins and third parties, but we won’t vote for that sleazeball Liberal anti-Capitalist RINO, NEWT.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:46amAgree with Kudlow
Report Post »reform
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:46amFreedom you may want to look up when Mitt Romney was running against Kennedy in 1991 I believe where he states the is a moderate Republican and he is a progressive it‘s on YouTube pull it up notice the word progressive in the man’s own words. And why am I to believe there’s more in the ethics charges through the lips of Nancy Pelosi the truth finder you remember her have to pass this bill to see what is in it. Or our current House Speaker who was behind the original plot to out the then speaker of the house Newt Gingrich along with Tom DeLay Bill Paxton and Dick Armey. And as far as John Sununu did he not have his own ethics filings and and resign? And tea party for Romney being of the tea party I don’t recall seeing your famous Mitt Romney standing up for the middle class in the last election cycle photos anyone? I don‘t ever recall seeing him at any events if he was really for the small peons and wanted the presidency so bad I would think he would have made it a point to help out a just cause don’t you concur?
Report Post »KwikKarl
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:54pmNewt’s Ethics Records Publicly Available, IRS Ruled in His Favor
Report Post »http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/01/21/romney-backing-governor-sununu-release-your-ethics-records-newt-irs-later-ruled-in-gingrichs-favor-ethics-report-already-released/
TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:57pmSorry that is not the whole report. Here is the ABC report back 15 years ago talking to Republicans that want to see the whole Ethics Committee report that would not be released and should be. That is what Romney is asking for: http://url2it.com/lisc
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:39amI have friends who worked in Washington during this time and that is just the water down report. Old Newty cut a deal to only pay the largest ethics fine in U.S. Congressional history of $374,000 and was also forced to resign by his own party. This was absolutely no small ethics violation.
Why do you think Santorum‘s veins were about to pop out of his neck when he was discussing Newty’s tenure as Speaker of the House-the 3rd highest office in the land……and the loons in SC think he is the best GOP candidate to fill the highest office in the land as President?? Unbelievable!
Report Post »COFemale
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:47pmWell aren’t the Gringches followers a might testy that Romney sent Newt a anniversary cake. Aw, if you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. It is okay that Newt request Romney to release tax returns, but it is not okay that Romney asks Newt to release his ethics findings?
What’s that saying, oh yeah, “Your reap what you sow”.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:55pmNot just the Ethics Report, but also the Freddie Contract.
NEWT SUPPORTERS, ASK GINGRICH TO RELEASE HIS FREDDIE CONTRACT, IS HE A LOBBYIST
Report Post »fatjack
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:55pmHow come I can find the report and Romney can’t. That make Romney either a dumb ash or a smart ash.
http://ethics.house.gov/sites/ethics.house.gov/files/House%20Report%20105-1_1.pdf
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:57pmI am in no way a Gingrich supporter, I just think this was juvenile and just plain dumb. It makes Romney look pathetic.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:08pmFATJACK,
That is not the report, that is the public report. The Ethics Committee report is larger than that and 15 years ago the Republicans wanted the whole report and the ethics committee wouldn’t give it to them. Here are some of their responses to lack of transparency: http://url2it.com/lisc
Report Post »garyM
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:15pmfatjack
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:55pm
How come I can find the report and Romney can’t. That make Romney either a dumb ash or a smart ash
Report Post »___________________________________________________________________________
They don’t have to make Romney anything, he is both all by his self!
pamela kay
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:23amCOFEMALE, I don’t have a problem with asking for the records at all. However the cake was sooooooooo junior high like, it was tactless and not something you would expect from someone runing for president.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:47amYep!
Report Post »Captain Crunch
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:05amWell I hope Newts’ staff atliest ate the cake. Was it chocolate? Yummmmm!
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:45amI think Romney should have Newty release the financials for his 33 million dollar Healthcare think tank!
Report Post »I think Newty should also release multiple years of tax returns just like Romney.
reform
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:59amBecause obviously some of these people supporting Mitt Romney surely are being paid by George Soros that’s by the comments that they make in the lack of intellect fortitude to do some research on their own. Is Newt Gingrich perfect not but lies of many are abound. Has your fearless leader ever denounced all the czars as Newt Gingrich has? has he not asked the Congress repealing the Dodd Frank and Obama care law before and if he was elected president so that he could sign them? You really believe Mitt Romney would reverse Obama care as he says he would? Do you think all Americans should be uninsured or have insurance no matter their income? Are you willing to pay for abortions/drug addicts from overdoses/or alcoholics that require medical attention, or all the illegal immigrants and by illegal from all nations not just Mexico or South American countries?I learned in life you should not get something for nothing.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:54pmWhy don’t you save your vitriol for the real enemy? We’re all going to be on the same team soon enough and then you can let fly.
Report Post »American-first
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:43pmNewt’s starting to look better than Romney to me. Sending a cake how is this going to beat Obama?
Report Post »Was leaning towards Romney before the cake.
Shasta
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:48pmStill leaning towards Santorum, no Regan in sight.
Report Post »notmeatglennbeckdotcom
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:58pmThis might have been funny if Mitt had won tonight, but the fact that he got waxed makes it look like high-school games and certainly beneath a candidate for President of the United States.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:03pmI am more for Romney now than ever because he is showing he is back and ready to attack. People keep saying that Romney holds back too much, such as calling Obama a socialist, this shows he is taking a step forward to go on offense instead of being just on defense. He needs to take this aggressiveness into Florida and on to Obama.
I found it interesting when Mark Levin finally attacked Newt on his Reagan rhetoric. He showed that Newt was lying about his credentials: http://url2it.com/lise
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:05pmI clearly remember what the press was saying about Reagan in 1979. Ex actor, ex Democrat, moderate…Republicans did not like Reagan and were upset when he won the nomination.
You never know…
Report Post »dnewton
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 8:53amThey need to send a whole bakery to Obama, mostly $16 cupcakes.
Report Post »LovingAmerica
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:37pmMitt Romney did not do himself any favors by resorting to a low class, immature, cheap shot such as this. He has been holding himself up as a God-fearing Mormon, a man with morals and character. This is proof that he is all talk and that he does not “walk the walk.”
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:58pmThis is so true, his advisors are trying to make him look like a typical mean spirited campaigner that would make Lee Atwater proud (kind of like Newt himself). But the majority of SC voters are God fearing Christians who have no love for holier than thou Mormons, so Mitt needs to act dirty to gain the trust of hard- fighting protestant campaigners.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:10pmPeople always criticize him for holding back, then they criticize him for attacking and being bold. Make up your mind. I hope he takes this fight to Florida and ultimately to Gingrich.
Report Post »irishman
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:31pmWhat Romney and his campaign did was childish and immature and shows just how petty he can be.I think Romney thought he had the nomination all rapped up and now he is acting litke the little spoiled rich kid thats not getting what he wants.
Report Post »LovingAmerica
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:04pmTeapartyforromney…. You need to understand the difference between an unnecessary, inappropriate, childish cheap shot and an intellectual act of being bold – which would fall into the category of enhancing a productive, intellectual debate of ideas and values. Regardless of your opinion, Mitt Romney disgraced himself with this distasteful prank. And by the way….. Mitt’s proclivity to “hold back” is represented by his disappointing unwillingness to fight Obama and to his continual kissing of Obama’s boots – not his childish ability to attack fellow Republicans. When it comes to Obama, he has a yellow streak down his back…. just like John McCain.
Report Post »marvel
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:47pmI don’t see how it was a childish cheap shot. Newt is an adulterer, and an unethical insider. Romney sent him a cake… Oh my goodness… That’s so evil!
Report Post »LovingAmerica
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:28amMarvel….. You are the one who said sending the cake was “evil.” I never said anything like that. And if you don’t get it, then you don’t get it. Sit and stew in your bewilderment.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:50amAnd you’re supporting newt???
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:02am@ Irish,
Romney is acting childish? Your supporting Newt? Hypocrisy. You see a trait you don’t like in the one you support and its understandable, you see something like this coming from Romney’s camp, and its downright deplorable. Sounds like your voting your feelings, may as well register as a Democrat. Newt will running on that ticket, too.
Report Post »LovingAmerica
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 11:25amNeverending….W.C. Fields once said, “I never vote for anybody. I always vote against.” Obamacare/Romneycare …. both are liberal progressives and perpetrated socialized medicine upon American citizens. Mitt Romney should not be our candidate unless we want another Establishment RINO John McCain wimp who will throw the election to Obama again. Or, if elected, finish the job Obama/Soros began.
Dr. Ron Paul – 2012
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:36pmThat‘s one of the most childish things I’ve ever heard of!!! I hope Romney condemns it. He’s never been one of my favorites but if he agrees with this, that will be unnervingly immature for a presidential candidate.
Report Post »gemmeri
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:32pmLet them eat cake… Maybe France had the right idea with that guillotine.
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:24pmDesperation.
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:31pmChildish.
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:05amSpot on. And it didn’t cost millions of dollars in commercials. The truth will come out about Newt, the bits and peaces are all over the place. When the picture is complete, South Carolina will recognize that they have wasted their vote and their support on a political amphibian, surprisingly enough with a name that serves like a label.
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:24pmI’ll be Callista could cut that cake with her hair.
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:28pmUmmmm . . . I’ll BET Callista could cut that cake with her hair.
Report Post »Exrepublisheep
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:31pmFunny both ways.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:53amThat hair could cut steel!!! It is absolutely hillarious.
Report Post »Ailina
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 5:04amNo worries, we can do a remake on Calista’s hair when she becomes First Lady..you know like how they transformed that angry black lady.
Report Post »TJexcite
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:22pmThey need to send a cake in the shape of the couch that Newt and Nancy sat on.
Report Post »larrylarrylarry
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:15pmSomeone should send Newt a dozen boxes of rubbers. Being on the campaign trail he’s bound to see some old hag that catches his eye.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:54amThat need to send him cartons of them.
Report Post »DD313
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:49pmBill Clinton must have a pretty good stash, maybe he could send Newt some as a goodwill gesture.
Report Post »tketterer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:04pmGingrich should send a cake to romney”s wife wishing her luck in that her salvation into the celestial mormon heaven is dependent on if her husband wants her there or not. Who treats their women as subservient? Which is worse, divorce or your salvation dependent on your mormon man?
Report Post »Common.Cents
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:31pmWrong.
Report Post »tketterer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:58pmNice answer common…… Explain? Maybe, oh wait, they could be called up in ressurection by the man or not. Or Not? So the resurrection, especially into the hihgest level of celestial IS dependent on what the man wants.
Report Post »tketterer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:08pm@commoncents….. LDS Apostle Erastus Snow preached the following on Sunday, Oct. 4, 1857:
Do the women, when they pray, remember their husbands?… Do you uphold your husband before God as your lord? “What!—my husband to be my lord?” I ask, Can you get into the celestial kingdom without him? Have any of you been there? You will remember that you never got into the celestial kingdom [during the temple ceremony] without the aid of your husband. If you did, it was because your husband was away, and some one had to act proxy for him. No woman will get into the celestial kingdom, except her husband receives her, if she is worthy to have a husband; and if not, somebody will receive her as a servant. (Journal of Discourses, vol. 5, p. 291)
Report Post »grand slam grandam
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:37pmTKETTERER: What form of Christianity collar do you wear? Sounds like you have a bug under your collar against Mormons. Why might anyone’s forthcoming “hereafter” concern you at a time when our country is in serious peril? Obviously the Romney family stands strong in their faith and provide a wonderful example to us all. We should all be so exemplary.
Report Post »tketterer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:47pmgrandam,,,,you obviously have fallen for the facade of mormonism. You haven’t had to deal with their underhanded “lying for the lord” or their ‘milk before meat.“ Until you actually research what this ”faith” is all about, and not just from someone on a bike at your door, since they have no clue either, then you can talk to me about mormonism.
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:18am@tk
You can quote comments made by individual members of the church, even our apostles and prophets, all you like, but they are just men with high callings and even higher expectations, and as such, just like Moses, Jonah, Peter, Paul, and John, they bring their opinions and personal interpretations to the table, and at times will be mistaken. (We do not believe in infallibility.) These statements have to be canonized by unanimous vote to be considered doctrine for the church, otherwise they are merely indicators of their personal faith at the time they opened their mouths.
Having said that, and having read what you wrote, I find it disheartening that a Christian (I can only assume your status by the degree of concern you have regarding Mormon doctrine) would wholesale swallow such a poor excuse for a man as Newt Gingrich, and think, fully knowing his history of infidelity, not only to his legal spouses, but to his party and to conservatism as a whole, that he is your guy. It is apparent that your principles have been put away for the time being as you consume yourself with defeating Romney.
Please, all those who feel the same way, don’t coalesce behind Gingrich, at least vote Santorum, he is a better man, and would make a better President than Newt could ever have a grandiose dream, or use grandiose legislation, to become.
Report Post »CaliforniaD
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:30amYou are a despicable religious bigot. Romney is an extremely intelligent, talented and capable leader. He has the best organized campaign. He has considerable business and government executive experience. His business, political, and personal life are outstanding. He is a very well qualified candidate who only desires to serve his country, never having accepted pay for public service. The Constitution forbids consideration of a candidate’s religion as a prerequisite for office. You, sir, are an un-American bigot to condemn Romney due to his religion. Reagan surrounded himself with hardworking, honest Mormons in his administration. Enough said.
Report Post »Grannie4news
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:42am@TEAKETTERER: More ignorant, uninformed untrue hateful propaganda on a subject you know nothing about except all of the uneducated rumors you have heard or red. Let Heavenly Father be the judge of the LDS Church. Last I heard, He is still in charge and fully capable of doing his job without the help of the likes of you.
Report Post »tketterer
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:14pm@readright…I will do whatever it takes to defeat romney and the government infiltration of mormonism, freemasonry and whatever else secret there is in that”faith.” Newt on his indescresitions doesn’t compare to romney on abortion in my opinion. You all can blast me all you want, but I have researched and researched because of what your “faith” has done to families that I know and the way i have been treated in business by you “faith”. I’m a bigot? So be it to defeat Satanism. Anit-mormon in 3…2…1
Report Post »Californiasodbuster
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:02pmRomney, what a flaming kook.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:53pmThese political candidates are almost as mean and nasty to each other as we are! I mean, I have read some heated comments today. Is all that really necessary?
Anyone who wants to be the president has to have more than one loose screw. I suppose some still feel a duty to serve. Serve what? The American people? The ones who spew such hatred at anything and everything? You try to do your best and you will only be hated and criticized.
Why would any sane person bother?
Report Post »Buttercup
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:51pmMean-spirited, if you ask me. Are we back in grade school?
Report Post »LuigiMucci
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:46pmRomney give me the impression of an off color Obama… no matter how many times he runs or what he says I have a hard time trusting him…
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:25amBut you trust Newt? The cake is funny, and fitting, and witty, and perfectly appropriate after using the debate stage to gang up on Romney to release his income tax returns, in front of the entire country, using the fear mongering rhetoric of “We need to know before its too late if we are going to have surprises…blah, blah, blah.” As if it wouldn‘t be even more useful to know what Newt’s skeletons look like.
Report Post »reform
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:08ammay want to do yourself a favor and go to Wikipedia punch in private equity firms and read up on it, there is a massive difference between being a venture capitalist and one who engages in private equity firms.For me I’m not worried about 2010 and 2009 tax returns insomuch as the ones from 1984 to 1999 when the gentleman was at the helm of this Corporation.
Report Post »Chappy123
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:41pmWho can beat the other party? That’s what you need to ask yourself.
The dems and MSM want Romney. That should give everyone a clue.
Remember McCain!!!!!
Report Post »LuigiMucci
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:43pmchappy you are right on the money… If the socialist Liberal Media is pushing a candidate that is the first reason to run from said candidate…
Report Post »DD313
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:53pmYou man that war hero senator who was too old in 2008, but was born the year after Ron Paul?
Report Post »Chappy123
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:39pmChildish BS!
When will these people grow up!!!!
Waiting to see who TP‘s who’s house first.
Report Post »Raven249
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:34pmHmm.. Real classy, Romney. Somehow, I doubt you’ll convince people to vote for you acting like that.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:32pmYup, he might have the last laugh. But I just had a laugh now. Speaking of laughs & Gingrich: the photo of him from the 1970′s in the Wall Street Journal looks a whole lot like Dwight Schrupe for “The Office”
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:37pmOthers have noticed the resemblance (and, on top of that, they can spell “Schrute” correctly!)
Report Post »See:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2089497/Separated-birth-Uncanny-resemblance-young-Newt-Gingrich-The-Offices-Dwight-Schrute.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
reform
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:10amI guess you graced the covers of GQ?
Report Post »TXPilot
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:30pmWell, now the Newtser can have his cake and eat it too…
Report Post »garyM
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 7:29pmThe records are on Newt’s web site, release 12 years of your tax records like your Dad did Romney, Romney is such a smart butt and arrogant!
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:35amThe public record isn’t what Romney is asking for. (IRS records aren’t public until a candidate releases them, either.) The threat was released, foolishly of course, by Pelosi. She was on that committee, and she knows things that would cripple Newt. Newt was right to threaten her with rule violations, but he could certainly choose to make the closed record public, just as he is asking Romney to do with his returns. Newsflash, If Nancy knows, than so do others. It will come out, and if Newt has already been crowned the victor and our Hail Mary pass to defeat Obama, and what surfaces is worse than oil in the gulf, were had. I like the cake, I like the joke and the taunt. Much better than using a national stage to pin Romney to the wall to have to release his returns sooner than normally expected. Newt played a game, and with cunning strategy turned the tables on Romney. He gets points for that. But is that the kind of guy you want reclining at the Big Desk? I sure as freak do not, and I find it quite telling that so many in SC have no scruples in supporting such a piece of political work.
Voting for Newt will be regretted, maybe even more so than voting for Obama.
Report Post »