Romney Post SC Primary Speech: ‘This Election Is a Battle for the Soul of America’
- Posted on January 21, 2012 at 8:59pm by
Christopher Santarelli
- Print »
- Email »

(The Blaze/AP) — Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney told supporters Saturday he’s going to compete for every vote in every state after Newt Gingrich beat him in the South Carolina primary.
“Our campaign has fought very hard here in South Carolina and in the coming weeks and months, I’ll keep fighting for every single vote,” the former Massachusetts governor told supporters at the South Carolina State Fairgrounds, only mentioning Gingrich by name to congratulate him. “I will compete in every single state.”
Romney did criticize Gingrich without naming him, saying his opponent was joining in on a frontal assault on free enterprise when he castigated Romney’s time at a private equity firm.
“When my opponents attack success and free enterprise they are not only attacking me,” said Romney. “They are attacking every person who dreams of a better future. He’s attack you, I will support you I will help you have a better future.
“I will make sure that America is a place of opportunity for all.”
Romney also said his party couldn’t choose someone who has never run a business or has never run a state.
It was a preview of the next week as the race turns to Florida, with the stakes even higher than they were in South Carolina.
Full speech:



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (128)
321481
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:56pmCharacter and integity ceased to matter when we legalized abortion, banned the 10 Commandments from the public square, courts dictated that it was ok to divorce for “irreconilable differences” which all to often was code for adultery. This country’s slide down to the cesspool started years ago. People watch as another citizen is beat and robbed without helping. How dare a people that has sat back and allowed and participated in this decline expect they deserve better, they do not. Perry was the guy, traditional family man, conservative values, great executive experience but he was kicked to the curb. Now you want to complain about what is left. How hypocritical. Pick the best of what is left, don’t complain, you asked for it.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:01pm“Perry was the guy, traditional family man, conservative values, great executive experience but he was kicked to the curb.”
Romney has all of these qualities.
Report Post »KangarooJack
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:34pmPerry, was ‘my Guy’ too.
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:23amJUST A QUESTION: To all Gingrich supporters, how can you support a guy that supports FDR, Wilson, Progressive Movement, Federal Individual Mandate, Global Warming? How does a conservative knowing this support him?
I would like to know…
Report Post »SoulReaver
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:47amIn a dream world he might have won, but he floundered and flubbed himself by not preparing for the debates better. The obama camp will not be nice and the candidate had better get ready for a $billion dollar barrage of crap coming their way.
My choice was bachman but I am not even sure she could do it.
Romney is too soft and needs to get some tenacity to have any chance.
Rick showed that in the last debate .
We need a candidate that shows confidence, and can go at it with obama toe to toe.
I have seen this guy in action when he had no money watch out
Newt is the only one so far that has shown he can do it on a regular basis, so he deserves this win.
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 3:32amROMNEY is a PHONY. NOTE the FAUX little grin after he thinks he’s made a point. HE’S a “pleaser” who just hopes he ‘makes you like him’ instead of a man who knows and then speaks his own mind. That stupid little “see-how-humble-I-can-look” grin when he gets an applause line makes me ILL!!!
Report Post »NEWT, a real HISTORY teacher, a student of HISTORY knows that Woodrow Wilson apologized on his death bed for trying to help the middle class but did it wrong; FDR did some things right, Just because NEWT mentions a few of those Presidents does NOT make him one of them in philosophy. HE is a PATRIOT. A Constitutionalist PATRIOT. BECK is only about 5 years into this CONSTITUTION-History stuff. Newt’s been a History teacher for 30 years. GLENN needs to TALK to him and YOU People who are parroting “Progressive stuff” about NEWT need to LISTEN TO HIM> HE IS NO PROGRESSIVE. He’s just not a corporate raiding, tax-dodging “Conservative”. IS he perfect? HELL NO. CAN he Clean OBAMA’S CLOCK? HELL YES. THE MSM wants Romney. THEY are going after NEWT with every thing and the kitchen sink. 10 more months.
thegrassroots
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:13amRomney CAN’T Be SO OBTUSE, that he REALLY BELIEVES that it’s about “success and free enterprise.”
Success and Wealth Are GOOD! May We ALL Be So Blessed!
The Questions Are: WHAT Is In Romney‘s Tax Returns That He’s Afraid Will Be Found Out? What Is Romney Hiding In The Cayman Islands?
Romney’s REFUSAL To Be ForthComing With The American People; Romney’s REFUSAL To Cooperate With Being VETTED By The American People By Releasing His Tax Returns Is What Cost Him South Carolina.
The Battle IS For The Soul Of America And AMERICA IS WINNING! Thank You Jesus!
NEWT 2012
Report Post »garyM
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 9:25amMy question is, who is the most ELECTABLE? Why does everyone in South Carolina say Newt is the most electable when the media said Romney was the most electable. That is explainable, the poll was a lie to lead the sheep. The sheep did not go, I’m hoping that people are starting to see how the media lies in order to lead people where they want them to go! If the conservative vote was not split between Newt and Santorum, it would have been a worse slaughter. Get out Romney, you can’t beat Obama anyway, you couldn’t beat McCain in 08. That should tell anyone all they need to know! Romney is just a wealthy man who has screwed people in business and made millions. Many people are for Capitalism but they are not for screwism. Romney is liken to the Bank of America CEO that decided he wanted to charge the debit card holders 5 dollars per withdrawal to up his bottom line. That’s how Romney got his wealth, now all he wants is power to go with it. I say if he had power, he’d use it in the same way that the Bank of America used his power to try and screw his own customers!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:13am“A battle for the soul of America” — and Gingrich is winning?
Report Post »Heaven help us!
fullblownjackass
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:05pmSorry I WILL NOT vote for Newt Gingrich. I will vote for OBIE. Better the devil I know than the Devil I really know. For all you people in SC, Newt is more dangerous than BHO could ever dream of and you mouth breathing knuckle draggers voted for him. Vote ROMNEY, vote SANTORUM, vote PAUL but for the love of all that is good and HOLY, DO NOT VOTE FOR SATAN…um…er …NEWT.
Report Post »http://voices.yahoo.com/newt-gingrich-conservative-futurist-10844011.html?cat=49
http://voices.yahoo.com/newt-gingrich-disturbing-history-hypocrisy-part-10858795.html?cat=9
http://voices.yahoo.com/why-2012-election-doesnt-matter-10867865.html?cat=62
Buck Shane
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:25pm@ TeaPartyForRomney
The Tea Party is not for Romney.
Romney is a big government progressive.
Romneycare.
Report Post »MS-GlenNBC
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:17pmWho cares what this guy reads…. READS yes he is reading from Two Teleprompters just like Obama.
Someone writes what to say…… Romney never speaks from his heart.
All talking point lines..
What have we learned about Romney since he started running for president.
1. He spent his life in the Private Sector.. ( 4 years in public though )
2. He is good at the Olympics ( i suppose there would be no olympics without Romney )
3. He is going to stand with our friends ( don’t know who they are )
4. He will never apologize for the greatest country in the world ( he never mentioned that country )
Romney has no knowledge of anything to pass on.
Report Post »Tear Em Up
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:54pmI could not agree with Mr. Romney more!! Sadly, politicians have no soul….
http://traffic.libsyn.com/mikeleeandterrymartin/Number_99_Jan._21st._2012.mp3
Report Post »fullblownjackass
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:13pmThis is why the 2012 election will not matter.
Report Post »http://voices.yahoo.com/why-2012-election-doesnt-matter-10867865.html?cat=62
FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:46pmStop feeding at the media trough, people. Romney has conservatism in his heart; Newt has conservatism at the tip of his forked tongue.
Report Post »zilla
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:11pmYawn!
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:57amRomney has more money than any other candidate. Why does he want to be president? He doesn’t need more money, does he?….I mean what does that leave for an accomplishment? It’s all about EGO. Just like Obama wanted to be the first black president, Romney wants to be the first Mormon president.
Romney seems like a pandering puppet. Always he’s smiling even when his getting harassed during a debate. He reminds me of a car salesman – dead inside with some phantom hand up his butt ala Jeff Dunham the ventriloquist.
Romney is just false feeling to me. All Romney thinks he has to do is out last the other candidates’ money supply and win through attrition. Ain’t gonna happen.
Report Post »WhiteFall
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:46pmNewt the Grandiose Progressive who has Big Ideas, and a Big Ego to match has just set SC for a loss of their long record of choosing the nominee. Forget SC, overall Newt is more disliked in America then Obama. If Newt wins the nomination it will be a repeat of 2008 as inattentive voters don‘t look twice at the Republican nominee and will assume it’s the same old established here we go again candidate. A duplicate of the past election with a nominee perceived as old, short, fat white haired with life long political baggage. Newt even carries the same type of perception with a young bleached blonde wife hanging on his arm. The two couples (Gingrich-McCain) look almost identical. With the general perception on the national level we need a stark difference from the past, whereas there are far to many who vote in this country without reading anything. Newt is no more conservative then Romney is and with Santorum looking like he won’t last past Florida Mitt is the only chance we have to defeat Obama, Newt has way to much of a Washington past.
Report Post »CLS
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:22pmPut aside the physical attributes and blonde wives. Newt is very different from John McCain in that he will not be stifled by the MSM when it comes to Obama. Accusations of racism are meaningless. He‘s not afraid to rip the mask from Obama’s face. No holds barred.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:37pmAnd palin huffing and puffing right behind both of them. Pretty laughable.
Report Post »SoulReaver
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:54amMcCain was exactly what we don’t need. he was weak and basically got the nomination because he was a war hero. But the reality is that he lost every debate which is what we are in for unless newt is in there.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 10:17amHow is Gingrich going to win a debate with Obama when Gingrich’s past is filled with liberal-leaning dishonesty? Obama will shred him. Obama hasn’t forgiven Gingrich, link the Christians have. Gingrich will be toasted alive (and he well-deserves it)
Report Post »Jeff Barton
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:46pmMitt (it’s my turn ) Romney. we don’t think so. It takes a little more than not putting your foot in your mouth.
Report Post »321481
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:41pmRomney is the establishment pick, they must be really frustered by the way the people that they thought were sheeples didn’t fall right into line. The establishment wants Obama or Romney, they are so much a like it guarantees them more of the same. For the establishment when things are predictable they can screw the people easier.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:51pmThe Republican establishment has no power. You cannot believe that they are dramatically influencing the election on one hand, but are also powerless to influence legislation on the other.
It doesn’t matter who their “pick” is, and it doesn’t matter who the media is defending or attacking at the moment. Why don’t you try researching the candidates positions yourself, instead of eating the slop that other people feed you?
Report Post »zilla
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:12pmBingo!!!
Report Post »Ronin Gael
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:49amRepublican establishment has no power?
Bullwaffels……Am a spear carrier in the rooms where the checks change hands and principle and piety slaughtered on the alter of power and wealth. The going rate? 5 figures buys you a timeshare in a GOP Congresscritter. 6 for a GOP Senator, and 7 for a GOP Prez. State figures are fungible depending on size and are quoted separately.
Establishment picks
McCain, born to a professional military family who haven’t had a non-govt. between them in a 100 years? Gave us the “O”hole.
Bushie, Jr?…..son of a MA liberal tribe rebranded as a Big Sky manly Texican complete with Tex drawl and cowboy boots? Ruined the GOP and USA.
Old Man Bush. Got the Reagen VP slot not because he was conservative BUT for Establishment grudging support after the people kicked their and Old Man Bush’s butt.
Bobby Dole….last of WWII generation who got it because it was his “turn”….then we learn he had trouble “getting it up” and his limpness got us Clinton for 4 more years.
The Mittster…….for baby killing, now against it. For gun grabbing….now against it kinda…..for Nazi style health care now against it…except where it works like in MA????…give me a break.
The big money backroom boys want Mitt to protect their 15% unearned income tax rates and to keep looting the American Treasury and economy as they been for the last 40 years when in power.
We need a warrior chief, but Newt or Ron will do. Burn it all. Rebuild i
Report Post »RedManWalking
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:41pmMr. Romney is so true about this battle for the “Soul of America.” Saving America is what all Patriotic Americans want. Now consider this my fellow Patritotic Americans. There is only one, a single difference between what the Italian Captain of the doomed cruise liner has done and what Obama has done to some 50 states we love so well. The difference is this. The name of the doomed cruise liner is the Costa Condordia. The name of the 50 states we love so well is called the United States of America and that is the one and only difference.
Report Post »Daveed
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:31pmWell, everything is up for grabs. Layers of Deceit and I am not sure the career politicians even know what they are anymore.
Report Post »I agree with Mr. Romney this a spiritual battle. I wonder if the these communist radical mercenaries we have in the Oval office ever second guess thier motives or ever have a moment of consternation on whether they are really on the right side of history or not? God help them. Losing your soul for global power grab is not worth it.
jzs
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:57pmIt’s true. Romney represents the average American, the average American who has a quarter of a billion bucks in an overseas bank and who says that $300,000 is speaking fees is “not much.” The average American who pays only 15% of his income in taxes because the millions of dollars he makes each year is from capital dividends. The average American who could never work again and never worry about having the money to buy that new Lear jet even if a venture capitalist like Romney swoops in, lays off half the companies’ workforce and walks home with a couple of 100 million dollars, taxed at 15% because he’s not working for a salary but instead as an investor.
Most people can identify with Romney, because he understands the pain the average American feels when Obama wants to tax the millions of dollars we all have stocked away in a third world country tax-free banks, you know, against a rainy day.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:28pmJZS
You should be ashamed of yourself.
You are spouting leftist propaganda, and you know you are doing it. That’s the sad part.
Watch this college girl speak for few minutes JZS, then come back and justify your post.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvzqa71plv4&feature=player_embedded
Report Post »jzs
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:01amHey Billy. I tried to respond to you on a couple of things, but wasn’t allowed, even when I tried the next day. Okay, mock me and say I‘m lying and say I didn’t look on the right page or whatever but don’t blame me when it happens to you.
You say, “You should be ashamed of yourself.. You are spouting leftist propaganda, and you know you are doing it. That’s the sad part.” Yes. I wouldn’t phrase it that way, but yes. My opinions are on the left.
As far as the video, it seems to make the point that that someone like Romney, who make most of his money from investments and pays only 15% tax on the millions he made last year, should be taxed even less. Billy, his income is already taxed at a rate way less than yours. And you think that’s fine.
You should have seen the graph I linked to. That’s why people at your income level are making little more than they were 40 years ago on average, and why those in the upper income levels are making almost twice what they were 40 years ago. To you, that’s fair. The rich are getting ever more smart and creating all those jobs (except not during the Bush administration), and they deserve it.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:11amWon’t blame you JZS, it does not happen to me.
14 months here, and never a dropped or censored post. Never a post on the wrong page. But I digress.
JZS, go back and watch it again, closely near the beginning. You missed the most important and obvious part. Or you are purposely ignoring it so as to be able go on spreading your dis-information.
I’m sure anyone here that watched it, or that already understood these principles knows that your marxist rants are just that.
Always the same with you You really sound like a bitter, envious person. Let the people do what they please with what they earn. Even if it sits in the bank, that is money that the banks will loan for new start-ups, or home buyers. It’s really an amazing system we have, if it were only left alone to work the way it should.
Quit trying to take others money. It’s not yours to take. Just worry about how you conduct your own life.
If you really have the need to meddle, why don’t you work on getting your fellow liberals to stop supporting the killing of millions of babies. That would be a noble cause JZS.
If you liberals stopped aborting your future replacements, you wouldn’t need to convert us to the dark side.
I did see your little WIKI graph. I won’t bother to rewrite my reply from yesterday, but you can see it here
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/fed-up-limbaugh-unleashes-firestorm-obama-pretends-to-care-about-the-middle-class-but-lives-like-a-king-at-the-public-trough/
Report Post »SpeckChaser
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:34am@BILLY
Let the record show that JZS, encinom, and tifosa do not process the intellect necessary to understand Romney’s tax situation and are sheepish enough to believe he pays no more than 15% in taxes.
Let the record show they condemn living off dividends, an option that sustains 80% of my lower-middle class grandfather’s retirement.
Let the record show their ideas of government seizing the wealth of individuals who have acquired to much and every other liberal talking point they post were rebuked by our forefathers.
“To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.” — Thomas Jefferson
“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” — Thomas Jefferson
“I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it.” — Benjamin Franklin
“The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.” — Benjamin Franklin
SpeckChaser
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 2:56am@JZS
Concerning Romney’s taxes you said to billy “And you think that’s fine.”
Yes, Billy thinks it fine, as did our founders. Are you aware that each point you made in you post were rebuked by our founders? You never seem to answer or acknowledge my questions but I’ll ask anyway.
Can you name ONE SINGLE IDEA you support and can back up with quotes from our founders that conservatives disagree with.
Your entitled to you opinions, but know they were rejected by our founders. God speed brother.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 4:57pmJZS
Just to be clear, and to keep you from accusing Speckchaser of putting words in my mouth………
He is correct.
I am fine with that.
Fine as a frog’s hair.
Report Post »ambrosia
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:24pmWillard Romney is a lightweight, he’s NOT going anywhere but DOWN.
The RNC roadkill should have been removed years ago.
No one needs them-
like Gingrich said, in his speech, this is ALL about doing it the American way,
not by dictated constraints of the RNC, jaded media, biased analysts
or anyone house….the PEOPLE hold the power.
Throw in the towel, Willard.
Quit running for a job, that will never be yours.
You have all the qualities, to be a Game Show host
but none, to be a game-changer.
Wink Martindale wouldn’t qualify for Commander-in-Chief…….NEITHER do you !
America’s Best
Report Post »Gingrich/West 2012
FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:34pmIf Newt Gingrich is “America’s best,” we are doomed indeed.
At what point, exactly, did character and integrity cease to matter? At what point did defending adultery make one a true conservative? At what point did conservatives decide that someone who praises the actions of FDR is qualified to represent them?
This is a sad day in American history.
Report Post »grand slam grandam
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:51pmYeah, you’re right, Mitt is a “lightweight”….just look at how trim and conditioned he keeps himself!!! What do you think gives him the strength to manage his excellent physical condition and everything else he is able to accomplish? Self-discipline and plenty of it! Stand back, Ambrosia, you haven’t seen anything yet!
Report Post »WhiteFall
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:57pmGreat Post FREEDOMPURVEYOR
Report Post »How can a man lead with no Character of Soul and Restore Character to America’s Soul
ROMNEY2012
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 1:25pmFour YEARS LATER STUPID AMERICANS support another CLOWN who SOUNDS GOOD but IS NOT QUALIFIED to be PRESIDENT.
WHY DOES Gingrich call Himself a “CONSERVATIVE FUTURIST”?
Why DOES Gingrich support Alvin TOFFLER’S “THIRD WAVE” and “NEW CIVILIZATION”?
In the final chapter of “The Third Wave,“ Toffler wrote a letter to ”our founding parents” that reads:
“For the system of government you fashioned, including the very principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented — a democracy for the twenty-first century…”
Toffler closed his letter to our founding parents with:
“For this wisdom, above all, I thank Mr. Jefferson, who helped create THE SYSTEM THAT SERVED US WELL FOR SO LONG, and that NOW MUST, in its turn, DIE AND BE REPLACED”
Gingrich WROTE the FORWARD to TOFFLER‘S’ book, “CREATING a NEW CIVILIZATION.” which suggests that the NEW CIVILIZATION will REPLACE CHRISTIANITY with secular humanism:
“I first began working with the Toffler’s in the early 1970s on a concept called anticipatory democracy.For twenty years we have worked to develop a future-conscious politics and popular understanding that would make it easier for America to make the transition from the Second Wave civilization – which is clearly dying – to the emerging, but in many ways undefined and not fully unders
Report Post »kaygee
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:15pmAndy Stern lover big govt progressive Newt won the Conservatives/tea party hearts of South Carloina. Thanks to Sarah Palin for her support to a Progreesive person, tells us all that none of the conservative have any personal/moral code…… Good luck to so called principled TEA party.
Report Post »MSGT
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:25pmHAHAHAHAHAHa you Glenbots are funny
Report Post »fatjack
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:33pmCry baby!
Report Post »vtxphantom
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:14pmIt’s not about the soul. It’s about conservative values and the presidency. Romney still has not answered his views about Romneycare. I believe he still thinks it is and was a good plan. When I saw Romney on the stage with McCain a couple of weeks ago, I saw two establishment republicans. Establishment republicans and democrats are the problem.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:37pm“Romney still has not answered his views about Romneycare.”
Just because you refuse to accept the answer doesn’t mean he has not answered it.
I urge you to actually read about what he did in regards to Romneycare. It is not what the anti-Romney crowd have made it out to be. At the time, he actually was supported by the Heritage Foundation and other conservative groups. He vetoed 8 parts of it, all of which were put in anyway, because the legislature was 85% liberals. Give me a break.
Ignorance is bliss, I suppose.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:41pmIf you would open your ears and brain if you had one you would have heard him explain it and it is nothing even close to obamacare. Can you please pay attention?
Report Post »grannyrecipe
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 7:24amWhy is it that my stomach turns when I hear him say he will overturn Obamacare?
Report Post »Skrewedretiree
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:08pmYes it is a battle for the heart of America, and as for one American, I can say I am done with Republican Moderates, RINOs, Democrats and Socialists.
Santorum and Gingrich are true Conservatives, and may the best man win, and it sure as hell ain’t Romney.
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:06pmI would be very happy, delighted and proud to call Mitt Romney Mr. President. What a difference between blowhard newt and a very Presidential, intelligent, successful man like Romney. Even looking at his family tells me a lot about this man and if not Santorum then Mitt is our families man.
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:04pmMitt is the GOP establishment pick and Wall Street darling. Voting for Mitt will be a vote for more crony capitalism. Be astute vote for Newt!
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:05pmRewt for Newt
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:40pmVoting for Newt is a vote for… well, we don’t really know, do we? He promised two wives that he would be true to them, till death do they part. He broke that promise twice. His current wife was his mistress of 6 years. How can WE trust him to keep his promises?
Report Post »Tigress1
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:52pmAmerica IS Wall Street. Wall Street is the heart of American capitalism. There are hundreds of companies on Wall Street. These are the places that provide JOBS. Gingrich is a career politician and if anybody participates in “crony-anything” it is a career politician. By the way, true Conservatives don’t want CHANGE, they want “RESTORATION”. Only Progressives want “change”. Gingrich is a dinosaur in Washington. Whatever happened to “throw the bums out?”
Report Post »mbaird
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:51pmMit Romney is a fine man, husband and father. His MBA/Law degree from Harvard – top of class – has prepared him very well for the task of leading this nation. He has been cast as a moderate, but that just isn’t so. He is conservative and more than that – He can be trusted. Can’t say that about Newt. He’s just not of the moral code. Sure he can debate and give a good line, but he was thrown out of the congress by his own party because he was a loose cannon. He is dangerous. Mitt is the answer!!
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:55pmI couldn’t agree more.
Report Post »kaygee
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:01pmYou are absolutely right on Romney…..
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:06pmI agree
Report Post »LobsterBoy
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:16pmAfter Newt helped bring the republicans to a congressional majority and such things as a balanced budget and welfare reform under Clinton. The then suddenly eager to spend like a liberal “conservatives”, with the help of the Clintonian witch hunt attack mechanism, railroaded Newt with a bunch of trumped up charges, the majority of which he was later absolved. But you know how those “optics” work.
Looking back, if Newt and his alleged immoral conduct were the benchmark, there’s a whole lot of Dems still serving in congress today that should be long gone.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:58pmNewt always claims he “orchestrated” the Republican takeover of the house. Does that mean that John Boehner orchestrated the Republican takeover of the house in 2010? I don’t think so.
The reality is that when Newt was speaker, he lost 5 seats in the 1998 midterms. He attacked Clinton on his alleged adultery while in the midst of a 6 year affair himself. He was charged with 84 counts of ethics violations, censured by Congress (the first Speaker in history), and fined hundreds of thousands of dollars. Soon after, he resigned in shame. Now we want him to be president?
INTEGRITY MATTERS
Report Post »PJL
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:39pmEverybody who loves the bad boy and thinks if sloping down the media is the same as having a real road map for saving our country they’re truly nuts. Mitt has to take off the gloves and beat the arrogance out of Newt.
Report Post »asybot12
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:48pmHey guys maybe Cain should run again seeing that being an adulterer can win. At least he has a better knowledge of business than newt!!! And he is not a Mormon, is black (and his adultery is at least steady must take balls to keep it up for thirteen years !). Hey he is back in I could vote for him!
Report Post »grand slam grandam
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:53pmAmen!
Report Post »neverending
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:02pmAgree with you PJL.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:39pmTwo progressives fighting over who will preside over the next depression,it’ll be a progressive or the Marxist POS president.
Report Post »saranda
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:34pmThe soul is lost if the GOP can support Newt. The battle is over the shell at this point.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:47pmI agree. It is absolutely amazing that so many people can vote for Gingrich, especially considering the recent “Tea Party revolution.” He stands for everything that the Tea Party should be against.
It is also incredibly sad that people allow themselves to be manipulated so easily by the media. Does anyone actually think the Marianne interview was meant to HURT Gingrich? Do they think ABC didn’t anticipate the reaction by Republicans?
Why would the media want Gingrich to lose in SC? If Romney were to take it away quickly, they wouldn’t get their precious dollars from ad spending in every single state. They don’t care who wins, as long as the process goes on for the next 5 months. After that, they will start blaring the trumpets for Obama and bashing whoever the nominee is. Newt will be, by far, the easiest target. The “I find that question despicable” response won’t work against Obama, I guarantee it.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:26pmHe avoids his Corporate record, avoids his healthcare record as Governor, and avoids his Mormonism. So now he has his clock cleaned by an impulsive whiner who actually uses his unbridled contempt, monumentally egotistical shortcomings and lack of discipline to win!
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:24pmThe Anti-Christ is after your soul.
You see folks, Romney is no different than Obama, the difference is Obama became president.
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:24pmThe best man came in last.
Report Post »poverty.sucks
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:35pmHe makes a great loser. Everyone has their own special talents.
Report Post »MacPharlan
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:20pmSo much for Newt not winning by negativity. You cannot tell me that Newt and Perry attacking the free market work that Romney was part of did not turn folks against him. He lost in that area, the economy where that is where he was strongest.
Newt did his job, turned folks against the capitalist, so much for changing Washington.
Report Post »barber2
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:49pmAgree. And have you noticed all of the Lefty Trolls adding fire to the flames ? These sleaze dudes are even Occupying the Blaze. Total Lefty immersion..
Report Post »UBETHECHANGE
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:19pmIf we lose to Obama it will be because of the Paulbots and Independents. I will vote for ABO 2012!
Report Post »barber2
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:44pmAgree. And think both of those groups are doing some media Occupies – like here on the Blaze.
Report Post »chicago76
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:14pmRomney, a born and bread politician from birth trying to claim Gingrich is not a capitalist. Romney, is nothing like normal people. He has no idea what it is like for normal people. He is giant corporations and banks and big government rolled all into one person. It is the way he has lived and the way he made his money. To hear him say he will stop big government is almost laughable.
Report Post »Tigress1
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 11:08pmObama, is that you?
Report Post »garyM
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:12pmThere was a allot of trashing dollars went into trashing Newt so he would lose South Carolina and I’m sure many more will be spent before Florida, right Blaze?
Report Post »barber2
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:41pmWhat are you trying to prove? Newt won . Please explain to all of us dumb crackers.
Report Post »wntsmallgov
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 12:19amAnd most of it was done by the media and the racists that have a D as a mark of Dumb. I think the Socialists should start using the letters S for Scocialism M for Marxists, and C for being a Commie.
Report Post »Too bad the average child born after 1984 does not know what Russia was really like.
Pa7sy
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 9:10pmMit, Newt, Rick … Any one of you would be S.U.P.E.R.I.O.R to obama!
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on January 21, 2012 at 10:35pmThey’ll all get us to depression 2.0 a little slower than the Marxist POS in the white house.
Report Post »