Romney and Perry Spar Over Whose Book is Worse Politically
- Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:05pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
In keeping true to their M.O.’s, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney were back at each other’s throats during the Fox News GOP debate Thursday evening. This time, the two presidential rivals sparred over their respective books.
Romney asked where the Rick Perry is who said in his book, “Fed Up!,” that the federal government “shouldn’t be in the Social Security business.”
“You better find that Rick Perry and get him to stop saying that,” Romney said.
Perry blasted back, accusing Romney of concealing his position on health care between the hard and paperback editions of his book. Perry claimed that in the hard-cover edition, Romney endorsed expanding the health care program he signed in Massachusetts — dubbed “Romneycare” — to the rest of the country.
“Then in your paperback you took that line out, so speaking of not getting it straight in your book, Sir,” Perry said.
“It’s like badminton.”
That’s when Romney quipped, “I actually wrote my book.”
Yes, no surprise here — a classic Romney-Perry exchange.
The heated part of their dialogue occurs at approximately the 1:20 mark:
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 583 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 363 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 363 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (90)
FugMan
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 1:03amI was a huge Perry or maybe Romney fan but after this debate Im really leaning towards Herman Cain.
Report Post »Patriot12
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:57amI hate these two candidates. How can our country have these two jackholes as the top two candidates? Is our country really that stupid?
Report Post »Grits21
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 1:21amSeriously????? Do I need to remind you who our country put in office in 2008????
Report Post »bolsen00
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:32pmI just laugh at the majority of the comments on this board. Glenn beck needs to get out of politics…even he admitted he’s never right about this stuff and always gets the nominee wrong, so I don’t give a rats…who Beck thinks the nominee should be. Beck’s anger and sarcasm are out of control these days, and his two cohorts don’t help the situation any. My family used to listen to his radio program all the time, but we all agree we’re tuning it out more and more. This morning was all Romney rant because Beck’s precious Perry is falling apart and having trouble explaining his record. Perry is a person who feeds off of applause and when it disappears, Perry’s lost. Perry is not ready for the presidency and leans too much on advisors. Romney is sharp, articulate, intelligent, understands his well thought out positions and can defend them. I agree with Romney’s positions and will vote for him again just like I did in 2008! He’s presidential, means what he says, and will turn this country around just like I watched him do with the Olympic Games and Massachusetts! He gets 5 votes in my household and if he wins this time…he’ll get 6 votes from my household next time! Romney is the president for our time! Romney 2012 knocked a homer out of the park last night! Go Mitt!!!
Report Post »Faith1029
Posted on September 24, 2011 at 3:09pmI wish all the candidates would stop fighting each other and spend the time telling us what they are going to do to better our country. These back and forth insults is a bit high school in my opinion. Don’t want to hear that anymore. Don’t tell me why the other candidates should not be running, tell me why YOU should be President.
Report Post »Mr. Oshawott
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:46amWhat a real joke these two front-runner Presidential candidates are! Our country is breaking apart, and Mitt Romney and Rick Perry are fighting over which book is worse. That’s the lame-stream media’s plan in maintaining the the status quo: exercise poll-fudging in favor of candidates that they deem “electable” while marginalizing the candidate that’s actually winning the polls. No way am I letting the progressive alphabet networks and the neo-conservative Fox News Channel brainwash me into choosing any one of those establishment RINO candidates that they think is “electable.” Instead, I’ll be voting for the only one candidate whose message and 30-plus-year voting record has been consistently in support of the Constitution.
Report Post »OurFoundingFather
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 5:57amLast I looked Rick and Mitt were winning the polls. Is this specific exchange about Rick and Mitt’s book not relevant to the question? I think it is.
Report Post »bolsen00
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:49pmIt’s all relevant and fair game…but these voters who think of themselves as purists really do themselves a disservice by going so far to the right that they’re over the perverbial cliff and so sure all the way to the bottom that they were just being principled…meanwhile nobody knows what happened to them because they became irrelevant when they stubbornly decided not consider anyone else’s thoughts but their own. I can’t imagine what it must be like for these people raising kids…I can just hear the conversations in their home with the my way or the highway attitude and fingers in their ears saying “I’m not listening”. I‘d imagine it doesn’t get very far with their teenagers. I‘ve successfully raised four children through the teenage period and those tactics wouldn’t have worked with my kids, yet people try this stuff with other adults and think this is going to be successful! Romney’s listening to people and considering the best approach to meet the goal. He’s opened his eyes to see the country and the world around him and has found great success working with people. Romney 2012 for sure!
Report Post »SHOWMESTATEGUY
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:21amWhen those two speak I could swear I was tuned into a democrat debate. Please don’t vote for either. They are bad news for the country.
We get one of these jokers into office it will be more of the same.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 3:50amGreat post. How is it that year after year, the Republicans manage to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Mark my words, if repealing Obamacare is important to you you better get behind Paul, Johnson, Bachmann, or even Palin if she runs. These liberal progressive Republicans Perry and Romney will go Boehner on the bit the instant they face blowback from the leftists and media about repealing Obamacare. We’ll get lectured that we only control three-thirds of the government and in order to do anything we need to have a super majority in the senate, so we’ll compromise, just like ***** did. It’s interesting how the liberals will use guerilla warfare to block any Republican legislation or judges when they control 0/3 of the government, but have a filibuster, but when Republicans actually control a full branch of the government they cave in like pansies. Not only do we need a conservative in there in 2012, we need to kick ***** to the curb along with the rest of the Republican leadership. Primaries, anyone?
Report Post »Any_One_But_Obama
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:43pmPerry had a chance to hit Romney hard and lost that chance. He has misquoted Romney’s book a few times during the last debate, this time he did the same. Romney on the other hand was backed by Fact Checkers.
I think it was also sad when Perry tried to steal Romney’s lost-Perry quote. By using someone elses quote it shows weakness.
While we are off the subject… at least Perry is endorsed by “Ahmed the Dead Terrorist”: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2011/sep/ahmed_endorses_perry.html
Report Post »ccr
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:20amPerry is in NEED of the NOTES his backers provide him………he doesn’t seem to do well on things of “depth” and outside of his one liners. He bumbled and flopped embarrassingly……..BUT……it DOES show how he would do as POTUS. And …………NOT THANKS!.
His childish attacks were lame and inarticulate. I‘ve been reading Romney’s book and am very impressed with the logic and expression in it. I will read Perry’s next.
I’m learning that Perry LIES. Like tonight……….the heart story of the girl on the HPV…..he met AFTER the mandate! Then……….he was not in favor of the AZ immigration law. And…..he said he was NOT for TARP, but there IS a letter he wrote encouraging the passage of it>!!
It AMAZES me that Perry has the nerve……or idiocy to self destruct his campaign……to regurgitate the OLD lame lines of flipping………..YET Perry HAS flipped (the Merck, the NY gay states’ rights are 2 recent ones!) and he LIES.
How DOES Beck who had the big “honor rally” (that I enjoyed when I was an avid Beck fan) “protect” a man like Perry………..and bash Romney???
Has Beck “lost his soul” in starting his own business with who knows what kind of pay to play deals in Texas??? I just am still trying to figure out HOW Beck‘s rhetoric lets him support Perry’s lies and numerous NOT conservative stands.
Report Post »The Eradicator
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 1:07amCCR… You, uh… Hired on there by Huffpo?…Politico?… Just sayin’.
Report Post »Stuck_in_CA
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 6:40am@ The Eradicator
Report Post »Perry DID lie! Those of us who are aware of who and what he is, will continue to try to expose the truth about him. However, with each debate appearance he makes, he will do it himself.
Todd P
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 10:17amCCR: You are correct. It is sad to see a front-runner self-destruct, but Perry is doing this to himself. I was a big Perry fan until last night; it was embarassing. I think Romney redeemed himself last night, and yes – he is electable. For those who are naieve enough to think that doesn’t matter, just go ahead and vote for Bachman, Paul, Cain, Gingrich, etc., and see them lose. Then what will you do in the general election? Vote for BHO?! Does anyone REALLY think that Bachman or Paul would win in a national campaign against BHO? No candidate is perfect, but we need to start rallying around someone who can win against the Democrat financers or face 4 more years of hell on earth.
Report Post »Vindex.Dogood
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 11:37amPeople, people, people. Stop cheering for a team with a D or an R in their name. Rather cheer for liberty! Does anyone understand the meaning of liberty anymore, or recognize when it has been lost?
“Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.”
- George Washington
The only candidate that will return us to liberty is Ron Paul. He as been consistently defending the constitution for years. Don’t listen to the MSM that Paul cannot win.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgMnJXD2Yes&feature=player_embedded
His voice on returning to liberty, sound money, and ending our global military adventurism is wildly popular.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyq1UUys9vQ&feature=related
He is the only candidate that will beat Obama that will make a difference. http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/7382-cnn-poll-ron-paul-stands-best-chance-against-obama
Vote your conscience and for liberty, rather than how the MSM would like you to vote. We may not see another free election in this country.
Report Post »TheBMT
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:42pmRead “The Revolution: A Manifesto” by Ron Paul. Its a book that is timeless in the last election and now. I know some of you may roll your eyes on a Ron Paul book, but I encourage you to take the time.
Report Post »The Eradicator
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 1:10am*rolls eyes*
Ok…
*rolls eyes again*
No.
Report Post »TheBMT
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 10:46amyour loss
Report Post »moussiagilda
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:38pmSince Paul Ryan refused to run, for what I, childless, can only see as a totally inexplicable reason…like nothing in the whole world matters more than having more weekends with your children over the next year, like exactly what your children need is your example of not doing all you can to save your country…we need brains to fight this, not half-hearted I-guess-I’ll-try meaning well…
Frankly, I love Rick Perry and I’ll support him, but if only he had the quick brain and the grasp of principles to be a decent fighter in intellectual issues! He looks like, he looks like Alzheimer’s is starting to take over him already, he looks like he can’t even remember his talking points, and, Jay-Hova, that isn’t decent fighting. Brainiacs, we need you in politics, not people who have the problem of easily looking like dopes! Mitt? I say this in a spirit of full Christian charity, pretty much, more or less — Mitt is disgusting. Opportunist. Phony. Zero principles. If he thought Obamacare was just fine for Massachusetts, what doesn’t he think the government should do? Mitt is the ultimate fake-in-a-suit that always ends up winning the GOP nomination. I’d support Herman Cain if he could win, but as Obama has proven, comically, it is necessary to have executive experience in government. Or, at least, to not be an effortlessly double-talking phony, or to not have the problem of looking stupid.
Controversial statement: I don’t think Reagan was the ideal President either. No
Report Post »BellaMia7
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:32pmMaybe people from both parties shouldn‘t have aborted 50 million babies and we’d have more choices for president today.
Report Post »lvamervet
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:25pmThis is a little off point…….but I know why mr. obama bowed to leaders of other nations….
Report Post »HE WAS CHECKING OUT THEIR PACKAGE!!!
IntransigentMind
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:31pmOh boy… Cain was best, Gingrich next… Perry???
Report Post »Was this the Vice Presidential Debate?
http://markamerica.com/2011/09/22/romeny-bickers-with-perry-stumbled-cain-gingrich-shined/
mikenleeds
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:23pmclearly all media are trying to help out both Perry/Romney to force us to pick between these two R.H.I.N.O.S.
Michelle and Sarah palin are the only two Conservatives in the bunch …
folks research these two rhinos voting history and you ll see what am talking about
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:41amhow can you call cain a rino? MB lost me on the constinent attack on perry over the vaccine issue. and romney thinks health care is a state issue but social security/ retirement is not?
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:22pmThe fact that Perry and Romney are the front runners for the Republican nomination speaks volumes about the gullibility of many so-called conservatives.
These two candidates have histories of inconsistent conservatism at least, and outright big government progressivism in some cases. The only reason they are the front runners is cosmetics and polished talking points (usually contrary to their own past statements).
How can any self-respecting person seriously consider voting for someone with such obviously phony, flip-flopping, “say whatever’s popular” inconsistentcy.
That character flaw (flip-flopping on issues) is what saved us from a John Kerry presidency and I hope Republicans recognize it in these two and nominate the one candidate who has been 100% consistent as a constitutional conservative for over 40 years – Ron Paul.
Report Post »broker0101
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:36pmCOUS, just vote for Obama again. You’ll get 90% of what you want.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:54pmBroke,
I voted for the lesser of two evils (McCain) last time. I’ve become truly educated on the Constitution, Liberty, and false conservatism (like yours) since then and I will only vote for the authentic conservative Ron Paul – even if I have to write him in, and this time I will feel good about my vote. You can have your phonies.
Report Post »TheBMT
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 10:52amIm glad Obama won. He practically threw gasoline on what was brewing in this country, The Tea Party. If McCain had won we would have never seen the rise of the Tea party in such a manner, with such rapidness. McCain would have seen a slow rise of “Tea Party” types, since he was “our guy”. But many in this country would still be languishing in apathy or disinterest.
I wrote in Ron Paul for my first vote ever. I would never have changed it, for I voted with my heart and conscience. For when you do that, your vote is never wasted. It is only wasted when you decide that voting for the “lesser of two evils” will work out.
See if we vote for Perry or Romney, we are going to get what we were going to get with McCain. A sense of being content, since it is our guy. NOT somebody who will lead a charge for our govt in a different direction.
Report Post »ConservativeCharlie
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 10:58amI have to admit Paul is looking more appealing every debate, found this video pretty interesting.
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SyjrxMgrDs
Bush Hating Conervatives make me sick
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:21pmI’m for Romney, he seems more Presidential! I like Romney/Gingrich. Cain has to have a spot in the administration. Perry no heart comment, sounded like a Liberal. Guess in 88 he did support Gore!! At the end of the day, I’ll vote for Mickey Mouse over BHO! BHO MUST GO
Report Post »Vindex.Dogood
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:09pmYou like Romney because he SEEMS more presidential! Are you kidding me? Zombies! Stop watching TV. Educate yourself. Study the constitution. Study the issues. Fight for liberty! I think you will see that Ron Paul is our only choice while we still have a choice.
Report Post »AxelPhantom
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:18pmThey all forgot to take their 5 hr energy tonight
Report Post »mrst
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:14pmRomney and Perry remind me of Bush 1 and Bush 2. All the media as usual will call this another Perry/Romney event–and frankly they were the least interesting debaters. The sad thing is for most voters–they‘ll just go with the media’s choice like when the media chose mccain.
Report Post »Grandmadar
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:24pmAgreed! Good point. If either of these two are on the ticket I am seriously considering not voting. There are tooooo many things set in place that need to be repealed. I don’t think either of them are heart set on doing this. They are too RINO. We learned our lesson with McCain. It will be same song, second verse.
Report Post »Yap
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:10amMRST, Seriously?! Perry does sound like Bush. Romney sounds nothing like Bush. I like Bush, think he is a great guy. Romney is totally different. He is an executive, turn around man. If there is someone who can turn the country in the right direction Romney is it…
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:14pmI say Perry and Romney settle their differences in a bare knuckle cage match. Last man standing!
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 12:47amthat would be perry. romney was quite ammusing tonight, the whole book debate was rather SNl
Report Post »jujubeebee
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:04pmI know Romney and Perry are being pushed to be the nominee…………….. I watched ALL debates and I have to say I like 5 of the other candidates better and have reasons for it. I have to say that Bachmann, Paul, Gingrich, and Santorum andf Cain would get my vote OVER romney and perry. I don’t like Perry over the immigration issues and suspect crony capitalism. I don‘t like Romney becuase he just is too politician and scares me on the fact that I don’t think he will repeal obamacare and that is is catering to middle income voters when he should be for all voters and not going to the majority voting population. I like the other 5. They are all more honest as far as my feeling goes. So hit me with that!.
Report Post »No Race Is Superior
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:15pmIf you want a President to MAKE everyone practice her witch doctor fake christianity religion, then go right ahead a vote for Prophet Bachman
Report Post »nowhereman
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 2:40amHonesty? Right. Like that has anything to do with who we vote for in an election.
Report Post »tkrnstr
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:01pmI don’t think Perry is soft on illegal immigration. I think he is trying to be productive when he is helping children with college who were brought here by there parents illegally. Would you rather them in welfare and jobless or would you rather them in college and have a good job ? Which one is better for the economy ? He is supportive of sending troops, technology, and drones to the boarder. The only thing he wouldn’t do the other candidates would do is put up a wall on the boarder. To be honest, a wall isn’t very effective… people dig… people climb… Rick Perry is strong enough on illegal immigration for me. He is definitly right on social security too.
Report Post »No Race Is Superior
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:13pmThen vote for him . oooopse, you won’t be able to because Mitt is getting the nomination. People are too afraid ofPerry and rightfully so.
I wonder what his prostitute lover and gay lover feels about his debates.
Report Post »lvamervet
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:49pmThe Ilegals do not have to be brought here by their parents in order to get a FREE ride to University.
Report Post »All they have to do is get across the border and then take the SAT’s. How well they have to score is a ???????????????
neverending
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 1:40amHe is right about the fence – and what people do not realize putting up the fence includes not only federal land but private land which has to be negotiated for. These clown dig hug tunnels far down under the ground – the fence does help but for people to think it only takes a fence needs to live on the border for awhile.
Report Post »No Race Is Superior
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:54pmI’m sitting here watching the Republican debate, lol. It’s so amusing watching a bunch of bozos try to seem relevant. They know absolutely nothing about running a STATE much less a country. Here they are EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM are trying to get applause by saying the same thing over and over and over . OBAMA CARE OBAMA CARE OBAMA CARE. They think that one point will get them elected. A lot of employers who are greedy and want to keep from giving health care to their employees, want Obama care gone. Employees who want and need health care LOOOOOOVE Obma care.
Guess who The President cares more about. And those are the ones who will be voting for him in 2012.
These idiots are struggling with this debate and they are not even battling the other party yet. it is easy to attack someone who is not present to attack back. But just wait until the clown who gets the GOP nod goes against the President. You all will be sitting home scratching your eyes out that he is getting clobbered by An African American Man.
And what I as well as the rest of America will be saying to you all is.
SUFFER………… And deal with it
Report Post »broker0101
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:03pmThank you for that perfect teachable moment, NO RACE. See? That is the PERFECT illustration of what I’m talking about. If ANY of you think Obama in particular or any Democrat in general care a lick about “genuineness”, “honesty” or “integrity” you are SORELY mistaken. They care about POWER. And with that POWER, they will inflict their will upon you. Conservatives need to respond IN KIND. Elect leadership (in ALL branches of government) who will ruthlessly implement that in which WE believe. Sadly, we lack the balls.
Report Post »TINFOIL HATS
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:05pmYou are soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo weetaded, when your wrong and he looses I want you to look in the mirror and realize you are an idiot, oh and the white race is superior……we’ve been running the world for 2,000 years, deal with the facts
Report Post »Drugstore Patriot
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 1:07amYeah, but the sad thing is if Obama gets reelected, we ALL suffer and this nightmare never goes away!!!!
Report Post »broker0101
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:46pmGlenn Beck has done more to ensure Liberal/Progressive national leadership in America than any other individual in history. In his defense, that was not his intention, he’s simply not smart enough to know better. He has convinced just enough of you gullible pea-brains that things like “genuineness”, “honesty” and “integrity” are the only criteria by which to select a leader. in doing so, he has ensured the defeat of anyone he (and, therefor, all of you pea-brains) would ever support for the office of the President of the United States of America.
Report Post »Sadly, this statement will remain true (much to your whining, crying chagrin) for at least our and our children‘s’ lifetimes. Beyond that, 所有的賭注都關閉. (all bets are off)
Emrys
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:43pmPerry is very shakey in his responses tonight; he’s not finishing sentences or thoughts, he’s not making a lot of sense. Romney doing his usual good job of sounding presidential. Cain is great, love his responses. Wish I could match him and Santorum up as a team, one fiscally responsible and the other having experience in governing. We’ll see what comes out of the primaries.
Report Post »Grits21
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 1:14amYou are correct in saying that Perry is not nearly as polished as Romney. Romney does sound presidential, which is precisely why I would not support him. It shows he is a true POLITICIAN, just like Obama is. He is even starting to use canned phrases like Obama and his Hope and Change. He kept repeating something about America being the Hope of the Planet. I don’t like it one bit. Also, do a fact check, he did remove a line from his book. I just don’t trust Romney. Unfortunately, I think all the talking heads are trying to steer us toward Romney as the nominee. Not trying to bash you EMRYS, just worried about where our country is headed.
Report Post »KeithOlberdink
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:42pmPerry too soft on immigration. Can’t give him my vote….just can’t.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:40pmUnbelievable; people that claim to be conservative are actually giving credence to this group. This being the case, I can only see Perry as a good possibility to beat the “socialist-in-chieff”…
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:29pmThe way things are going right now, I wonder if any of them will emerge strong enough to stop Obama or Hillary if she runs.
Report Post »geonj
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:20pmi guess me might as well re-elect obama. the republican party cannot field a real presidential candidate.
Report Post »TRONINTHEMORNING
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:12pmI’m pretty much up to here with Romney. He is not genuine.
Report Post »Gerrymanderer
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:28pmIt’s RINO vs RINO. In the end you must decide. Popular sovereignty reigns in our blessed republic. Res Publica. The public thing prevails. God Bless America. Fight for freedom. Defend capitalism and abhor despotism. Break down oligarchs. Stay moderate my friends. Beware the of the leftists, both the ultra-conservatives and ultra-liberals.
Report Post »broker0101
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:30pmHe’s the GOP nominee. Has been since McCain lost in 2008. Get used to it. Or don’t. It makes no difference. (I wonder what’s on GBTV tonight?)
Report Post »vennoye
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 10:34pmHow sad to have so many people in this field–and not ONE that I really, really support!!
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on September 22, 2011 at 11:32pmRomney is a businessman who loves capitalism and free enterprise and will enforce immigration law…that sounds good to me.
Report Post »Grits21
Posted on September 23, 2011 at 1:18amAMEN!! I agree!! He scares me. Way to progressive. Someone earlier posted about how Perry lies, and Romney is sooo truthful….they need to do a fact check on Romney. He reminds me of Obama the way he changes his stance depending on what situation he is in!!
Report Post »