Ron Paul: Angry Mobs in Europe a Sign of Things to Come
- Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:00pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
During an interview with Fox News’ Lou Dobbs, Texas Congressman Ron Paul, who gained momentum by finishing second in the Iowa straw poll, had words of caution for lawmakers Thursday when he asserted that the American public’s “anger” over fiscal reform is growing, and that there are likely to be angry mobs “in the streets” in the U.S. like there were in Europe.
Using a recent victory by Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker — who Dobbs claimed saved school districts and local communities hundreds of millions of dollars — to segue in to the topic of fiscal prudence, the Fox host claimed Walker “is prevailing on every quarter here.”
Paul praised Walker for his success in reducing spending in Wisconsin, but noted he was afraid that as lawmakers continue the necessary work of cutting entitlements and exercising fiscal restraint, the American people will grow increasingly hostile and could accuse such states of being “heartless.”
“I see the anger building and I see the problems getting worse too,” Paul stated. “I think there’s going to be an inflation tax to hit us and I am just afraid there will be people in the streets like they’ve been in other countries when they don’t get what they want.”
Paul added that he thinks “we’re in for some more problems” and therefore, “it will be difficult to satisfy anyone at all.”
The widespread riots in the U.K., which occurred earlier in the month, were reportedly caused by people who believed they were being shortchanged on government entitlements and who blamed the rich, and perhaps to an extent conservatism, for their lack financial success.
Do you think Paul is correct in his assertion that cuts, especially in entitlement programs, will enrage a certain portion of society so much that they would take to the streets and riot like was recently done in the U.K.?
Watch Paul’s interview below:
(h/t: Real Clear Politics)



















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (422)
Secessionista
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:05pmOf course, I am ready to riot against welfare queens right now. The anger is brewing and the frustration is at a fever pitch. This is what happens when conservatives throw in the towel and agree to have no surpluses for liberals to spend. Fiscal decimation.
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:19pmRon Paul 2012
Report Post »mharry860
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:22pmI didn’t know my grandfather was racist, but in the neighborhood we used to live in, that’s where they were. I’d leave for work, maybe come home for lunch and when I got home that’s where they were. The same place all the time, the porch, except 90% of these ones were white.
Report Post »missionarydad
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:35pmRon Paul is right on this issue, he must have been listening to Glenn. I like much about Ron Paul and agree he would be a thousand times better than Obama and probably better than any President since Ronald Reagan. Frankly my main issue is I believe we have an even better man in the race and that is Mitt Romney. Mitt has proven his shrewdness in negotiating to get his policies passed and when he says he will do away with Obamacare you can take that to the bank. Ron Paul supporters will actually get much more of what they want by supporting Mitt Romney than they ever will through Ron Paul. Mitt Romney is a very strong advocate of states rights, smaller government and the constitution.
LibertarianForLife
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:49pm@MissionaryMoron I’m assuming your christian, so i am going to speak real slowly and with a limited vocabulary in order to help you understand. Mitt Romney is the most liberal, establishment, status quo canidate there is in the race. He would be better then Obama, but only slightly. Ron Paul is the only chance to save this country fool, so wisen up.
Libertyisalwaystheanswer
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:58pmMissionaryDad, your support for Romney makes no sense! You give every reason on why you should support Ron Paul, then you turn around and give some political talking points on why you will be voting for Romney. That would be like a fat man saying all the right things about eating healthy, and then stuffing a 1/2 pound burger down his throat. The failed RomneyCare was Obama’s model for ObamaCare. You really think Romney wants to repeal Obamacare??? Then replace it with what, Romney Lite Care?? This election is way to important to simply believe the talking points of the candidates. It’s essential we look at their voting record, political history, and what they’ve said in the past. You want to know what someone stands for, use their own words as a track record. Ron Paul is the only candidate in this race who has been solid on his record since day one. Voting for President is not a beauty contest, its about hiring the candidate who most reflects the founders and their principles. George Washington warned us about the parties. Don’t let them manipulate your thinking….
Report Post »thradbore
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 11:14pmMissionaryDad, you are way off on Romney. Romney is the quintessential RINO who is now talking conservative to get the nod. Look at Romney’s record, then look at Ron Paul‘s record and you’ll see what the word “principled” actually means, and Romney knows nothing about it. He’s an opportunist and nothing else. Get schooled before you throw your vote to yet ANOTHER poser.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 11:46pm@Titan Ron Paul will never make President because of remarks like this one. Really? Have you seen the crowds on welfare? Have you seen the crowds that Maxine Waters appeases? Can you imagine what would happen with thesee crowds if they were denied welfare? Remember the lady who had her face ripped off by that chimp?
Report Post »fastfacts
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 11:59pmI WILL TAKE MISSIONARYDAD’S SIDE IN THIS ONE BECAUSE…
1. Ron Paul has done nothing in Congress over his many terms… term limits. He has no executive experience which was the problem with Obama and has only been a leader to his supporters, which I have to give him credit for because there are a lot, some would way radical, I would say ‘passionate,’ supporters. Sadly that does not make you presidential material.
Report Post »2. Though people love talking about how fiscally conservative/libertarian, there is very little to prove that in the past 10 years.
A. He fought for earmarks, an appropriation of funds used as bribery in other bills so that people will vote for your bill instead of clean bills. Do away with earmarks and put them in appropriation bills like they are suppose to. That is why we have appropriation bills, to appropriate funds.
B. He wants to audit the fed, pushing that bill for years and not accomplish much else. This is a good rule but it does not show fiscal responsibility.
C. He says he wants the gold standard, but then he said he wants to sell the gold in fort knox, there is no gold standard without that gold. Plus to back up the dollar with gold would mean you would have to confiscate all the gold from individuals, with all the money we have printed.The US government has the ‘right’ to purchase back all gold from citizens of this country. We don’t want that.
3. His foreign policy is scary, to say why can’t Iran ha
Red Meat
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 12:01amPaul, like most Libertarians, is nucking futs.
Report Post »SFsuper49er
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 12:23amNo that’s not the problem. The problem is America has been on easy street for so long they are spoiled compared to other countries and they don’t want to give up nothing to help the country get back on its feet but they are going to have to so we can get the economy back on track… Now that being said let me say this… I can understand why the American people are mad because the Government are the ones that wasted the taxpayers money on stupid programs and sending it overseas and all the other waste you can think of… Now we will be forced to do it! We must fix the Governments corruption and spending problem but we will have to stand up to do it…
Report Post »DTOM_Jericho (Creator vindicator)
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 12:37am@LIBERTARIANFORLIFE
Report Post »You are no libertarian. Being a libertarian you would not denigrate someone‘s religion even if you don’t agree with it. Also, the next time you attack someone’s “limited vocabulary”, make sure that YOUR vocabulary is large enough to use “you’re“ and ”your”; and correctly. DOH! Liberal troll.
Thomas Paine
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 1:42am@LibertariansUnite
Ron Paul 2012
Report Post »Shari law 2013
PAJoe
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 2:08am@RED MEAT
Report Post »“Nucking Futs!” The MOST accurate description of Ron Paul yet.
The-Monk
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 2:17am@Thomas Paine
Report Post »You hit the head right on the nail… Sharia law in 2013 if Ron Paul is elected.
platitude
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 2:58amI believe king louis xvi would also reiterate this “everyone needs to take care of themselves” rhetoric. Most princes concur, the magnanimous private sector, unbridled, will lead us to utopia.
Modern day princes like romney (who inherited millions from his opulent father) likewise agree, “its all about everyone taking care of themselves, and not looking for a handout”.
Report Post »NuffSaid
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 6:13am@Secesh–
Report Post »You hit that nail on the head. Got an extra hammer?
The10thAmendment
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 6:16am@LibertarianForLife
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:49pm
@MissionaryMoron I’m assuming your christian, so i am going to speak real slowly and with a limited vocabulary in order to help you understand. Mitt Romney is the most liberal, establishment, status quo canidate there is in the race. He would be better then Obama, but only slightly. Ron Paul is the only chance to save this country fool, so wisen up.
———————————————————————————————————————————————-
While I believe that Ron Paul is the right answer I don’t understand why you felt the need to attack Christianity. What does Christianity have to do with Romney, or with a perceived shortfall in wisdom? I’m a Christian and a Constitutional Moderate, also happen to hold 3 Degree’s. I know several of my colleague’s are Christian, a couple who own EdD’s, and one a PhD.
If you’re going to attack something, attack what you know. Setting up a strawman based on a misconceived assumption tied to a personally held bias or prejudice weakens your entire point.
On topic, Ron Paul is correct that there’s trouble coming from angry entitlement parasites. That seems obvious. All societies decay from within and collapse under the weight of those who want something from nothing. More times than not the result is a wholesale collapse into an Oligarchy, or tyranny of the elite.
Report Post »MrHr1207
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 6:21amThey are so stupid they would end up burning down their own homes and turning on themselves!
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 6:37am/facepalm
So, Sharia Law……because Ron Paul is elected? Anyone wanna give logical evidence on this, or do you guys work for FOX and are just smearing?
I mean, I don’t want to waste my time rebutting on someone making a false accusation simply to make an accusation.
Blazers here are full of ridiculous Ron Paul smears.
Report Post »gmoneytx
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 6:51amYou Ron Paul supporters are quite the passionate bunch. Paul does not have a chance, he is not electable. I know you folks really want this little guy in the White House, but it won’t happen…If he gets the GOP nomination, get ready for 4 more years of hope and change…Then we will be saying we HOPE you CHANGE your mind and support another candidate next time…
Report Post »MHP
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 6:58amI predicted this way back in 2007
Report Post »robstoddard
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:37am@FastFacts Sometimes “doing nothing” is the right thing to do. When the rest of the congress wants to do the wrong thing. The best president we had was Calvin Coolidge, and people in the establishment said “he did nothing.”
Report Post »Beansrock
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:51amHey Secessionista: So you want to hear something that will really set your hair on end over these welfare queens? My husband works with the wife of a police officer in our area. Her husband was recently told that these low income people will have access to high-speed internet for only $9.95 per month. This police officer was told by a young man on the street, and I quote, “That’s real good ’cause the Baby Mama needs to have that.”
Excuse me, but my family is really feeling the crunch right now because of inflation setting in. Our internet bill just went up to almost 60 bucks a month. And here are some deadbeats who get practically a free ride. When you call the mother of your child a “Baby Mama” instead of “my wife”, you reduce yourself down to the level of just a breeding animal. There will be an uprising because the hard working honest people of America are tired of handing over their hard earned money to people such as this.
And if you really want to get ticked, my neighbor’s daughter who is a teen just received a 5,337 dollar check from our governement because her deadbeat dad finally got disability. What did she do with the dollars we earned for her? She bought a nice computer to store her KISS pictures on, several video games for her family, and some other incidentals. Makes you feel real good to know that your money is being spent wisely. By the way, she lives with 3 other adults, and they are all on welfare.
Report Post »another_mormon_4_Ron_Paul
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:54amMissionary Dad, just because Mitt Romney is a Mormon doesn‘t make him God’s gift to the United States. He’s as wishy-washy as they come and changes his politics as the wind blows. We have been following Ron Paul‘s voting record for over 20 years and we don’t even live in Texas. He has a PROVEN record of following the Constitution and that’s what this country needs.
Report Post »Dustyluv
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 8:01amFastfacts…Where did you get your fiscal education? Must have been from a box of craackeracks…
Report Post »jjoy
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 8:11am“there are likely to be angry mobs “in the streets” in the U.S. like there were in Europe.”
Com’on Ron, it’s already started….
Haven’t you seen the videos of the “flash” mobs in Philly, Chicago, NYC, L.A. etc???
Didn’t you see the videos of whites being beaten at the Michigan State Fair???
Report Post »jkendal
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 8:46amOkay, Congressman Paul. What do you propose to do about it if you’re elected president???
Report Post »Phoenixsoulfire
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 9:54amGo away Ron Paul you want Iran to have nukes. Straight from your mouth. Also there already been mobs you big dummy. This guy is Brilliant
Report Post »proudpatriot77
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 9:58amI would like to know what President Paul would do if people began rioting in the streets.
Report Post »ChiefGeorge
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 11:06amYes Mr. Paul it is brewing up quite nicely thanks to stupid policies put forth by this administration and yes for Bush buying into the whole TARP idea. We papered over the problem without addressing it. No we address it here and there and and hell breaks loose. Lets face it, Americans have lived way beyond their means, borrowing money they do not have to pay for things they can do without all in the name of moving this fake economy forward based solely on consumerism. Its who we have become because we do not make anything in this country any longer and this is yet another organized deconstruction of American economic power by past admins. This president is going full speed ahead at total deconstruction and we get weaker by the day. Pretty soon even conservatives will be in the streets.
Report Post »Spero
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 12:31pm@MissionaryDad… I like Glenn Beck and all, but he’s not the first one to say these things. Ron Paul has been stating these things for years! Go back and read his congressional record and speeches. He’s been warning about these possibilities since before anyone had even heard of GB.
Report Post »veracity79
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 1:34pmRON PAUL 2012!! More people need to figure it out…if you love the Founding Fathers then you love Ron Paul…he’s the closest you got. Don’t be fooled by the handpicked “conservative” nominees of the elite trying to paint Ron Paul as crazy, especially the Rick Perry plant and all the morons on Fox News…remember The Overton Window? Case and Point. Do your research. Just because Fox News is more conservative in nature doesn’t make them the official word. Fair and Balanced…yet they continually dismiss and ignore Ron Paul, have you noticed? Why do you suppose that is?
Report Post »jhmdeuce
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 1:51pmSorry, missionnarydad, I could never vote for Mitt Romney, either. I was raised to believe you have to consider the whole man. His life, his practices and his beliefs. Mitt Romney is a Mormon. Mormon’s faith is based on a fairy tale, backed my no real evidence, The Book of Mormon. I could never vot for someone who believes in this cockeyed cross between Calvinism and Lord of the Rings. Sorry, Glen, that goes for you, too. In our earthly endevours we are charged, above all, to seek the truth. The LDS religion is pure hooey.
Report Post »jorge_washington
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 3:48pmIf the public in the US riots as Ron Paul suggests because of fiscal reform, believe me it will only be the T-Party crowd doing so. It will be another T-Party rally, though this time there will be more aggression. Those same conservative individuals who had no problems with President Bush racking up record deficits for 7 years are the same ones that decided to create the T-Party a few weeks after President Obama was elected. A few months into office, President Obama was pelted with his first T-Party protest rally against him and the dems to protest what a mess the country was in.
If you look at the news the only real protests going on are in states were T-Party governors were elected. People are revolting against these GOP governors that doing things they never campaigned on as taking away people’s rights. In most of these states the GOP governors have very low approval ratings.
How’s taking back your country working out for you?
Questioning with boldness.
Report Post »Hipshot60
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 4:25pmNone of this would have ever happened if there had been a REAL lock box for Social Security and Medicare. Mingling those funds with the general fund has caused all of this and I blaim the Democrats for not wanting the lock boxes. They would rather spend the money on BS instead of it’s intended use.
Report Post »BigKev
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 6:20pmI am confused, or perhaps maybe you are. How can you blame the republicans. (1) They have not been and are not in control and.. (2) When you are trillions over budget you need to balance the budget first before you can have a surplus.
Report Post »tifosa
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 4:06amHIPSHOT60, blame dems? Interesting. You should look closely at the 2000 election~ Gore exactly right on the climate, exactly right on Iraq, exactly right on the “locked box” for entitlements. Maybe you recall denigrating that term/concept along with the foxbots? ;^)
Report Post »abbygirl1994
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:05pmI like some of Ron Pauls ideas.. but others I worry about!! One of the big things I worry about is his age.. and would he help our allies if they needed it??
Report Post »SilenceDoesGood
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:13pmRon Paul has challenged the other contenders to a 20 mile bike race. He would show them who the youngest contender really is! Look at the age of Washington, Adams, and Jefferson compared to the average life expectancy in their time. Would you have said 1n 1789 that Washington is a good guy, but just too old for the job?
Report Post »jcizarter
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 11:00pmWe don’t have any allies except Israel. Ron Paul would, I think, bring all the troops home over a long period of time. They could defend THIS country. And defend us against Obama’s unions. That would be alright with me. I would welcome a force that would stop all illegal immigration and take the ones who are here and deliver them across the border, no matter what nationality they are. They could enjoy the hospitality of Mexico for a change. The reason for us to have troops in Germany, Japan, Iraq, Afghanistan, South Korea, and on and on adnauseum, is to build up their countries and spend my money over seas.
Report Post »We need our troops living over here and we could fight and defend ourselves without spending tons of money on our so called allies.
Stopit
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 11:49pmOne nuclear plus I just found out with Ron Paul is he has promised to pull us out of the UN and the WTO. I‘ve often thought any candidate who stands for that I’d support. Any other candidates pledging to pull the US OUT of the UN?
While I agree with Ron Paul, and the military footmen sent into harms way that are supporting him, about policing the world, I also agree with Herman Cain’s “if you mess with Isreal you mess with the USA” position. Israel is the one exception, where our nuclear capabilities should be brought to bear to protect…not our troops. Our troops should be to defend our homeland, except in all out declared war…but then if its all out everything should be on the table…not just troops. Troops last.
He’s posture toward the Globalizing UN is GREAT. No candidate will be perfect in all aspects…and for better or worse no candidate will be able to do all promised. We need to be leary of the ones whose campaign rhetoric is one thing, but once in does differently…(ie big government/globalist GW BUSH) (Democrats not mentioned because they are liars by trade)
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 11:54pm@TITAN Sorry,..I thought you were talking about the remark about the entitlement crowds. yep I don’t support not supporting Israel, and of course I don’t like Iran having nukes. As a matter of fact, I don’t much care for anyone having them with the exception of Israel. I asked someone the other day why all the other countries have them and they told me that when Clinton was in office that Richardson and Clinton took China and other countries through our compounds and sold or gave them all of our secrets. I know other countries like China would never do that. We have had traitors running our country..So sad
Report Post »bioengineer
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 12:05am@SilenceDoesGood, I hadn’t heard about this bike rice. Now that’s funny, I’d like to see that go down.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 12:46amHaven’t we wasted enough American blood and treasure in the Middle East? My god enoug is enough!
What in the hell have we accomplished? Nothing! As soon as we leave it will be even worse than it was before we arrived! It has been a complete disaster on the scale of Vietnam!
Russia tried it and went bankrupt! Now we are attempting the very same thing even as already are bankrupt! Do you think those Benjamins grow on trees or something abbygirl?
Neo-cons love to talk about taxes and spurring the economy but you never hear them bring up the fact that we’ve wasted over a trillion dollars in the Middle East do you? And again for what? What has our War gotten for us other than more death and more debt!
Report Post »Steve
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 2:17amtechengineer11
Cant believe I’m saying this but I agree with you. Although our opinions are the same I think our reasons are different. Putting that aside I agree with your entire post.
Report Post »LibertariansUnite
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 6:38am@TECH
We gotta kill all the Muslims remember? That is what Jesus wants?……
…..
?
Report Post »Scrubpuppy
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:53amLOL Really? Help our allies?
North Korea attacked our allies many times over the past couple of years, even torpedo’d their boat. Our Response? Nothing.
Pakistan (our so called ally) hid our worst enemy for a decade. They sure need our help.
We completely threw Israel to the wolves and asked them to move back to the 67 borders. I’m sure we helped them out there. Or screwed them over, royally.
Even little Georgia, who has men fighting beside our men in Afghanistan got pubstomped by Russia and we didn’t do a damn thing.
America lost the nuts to help its Allies a long time ago.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 8:56amYou worry about Ron Paul’s age when America is falling apart? Jeesh, okay — would it make you feel better to know that Rand Paul would make and excellent vice-president and things would continue.
Yes, there are going to be riots in the street. Always have been, always will be. I just think this go-round will be much, much worse. It’s just like the budget crisis — politicians too weak/stupid to make a decision let things get too far out of hand before tackling the problem.
Ron Paul was pleading his case many, many years before anyone began talking about America’s financial problems. Ron Paul is a Duke graduate, a medical doctor who began studying economics. Economics is why he entered politics in the first place.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 7:23amPaul is not a conservative http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4DRZP9JgBA
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:38pmRon Paul knows all of the intricacies of the Austrian School of economics vs. Keynsian Economics better than anyone who has run for president. It’s no wonder that all of his economic predictions prove to be so accurate. Of course you don‘t have to be an economist or a historian to figure out that an economy based on fiat money can’t be sustained. The collapse of our economy is the most realistic threat that faces America today. Ron Paul really is the best hope this country has of avoiding the worst.
Unrelated to the topic but a good article on Ron Paul to be in Time magazine.
http://pastebin.com/mxNbbDtY
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:44pm@cous1933
You may love him, but he does not have a chance. Old fashioned conservatives are not going to vote for this man. His stance on Iran and some of the moral issues make him unelectable. Just listen to what the majority on the blaze say about him. This is about as conservative a bunch as you will find. If most folks on here are not supporting him, then he does not have a chance in the big picture. that little straw pole deal gave many a false hope.
Report Post »titan
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:47pmRon Paul will never be president because of lame remarks like this one, ” I don’t care if Iran has nukes” wow that spoke volumes to me about him. Iran is the largest exporter of terrorism in the world and he could care less ??. :(
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:02pmYeah, we know. It has been 2000 years since a perfect man lived on this earth and now we have a second one – Ron Paul. Of course the leftists would argue that Obama is the only savior of the world but you Paulies know it’s really Ron Paul.
Good gracious!!! Don’t you people ever even listen to yourselves?
Report Post »Edct
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:07pmRon Paul is a great leader but there are too many stupid people in this country who do not know how good he would be for America. He is right about the anger building and everyone in this country should take out their anger against the political whores in Washington who sell our great country for votes and power.
Report Post »InfiniteSolutions
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:08pmRangerP – Let‘s vote for the best looking guy then and not worry about what’s underneath. Ron‘s electable if people think he’s electable. Your just repeating what you hear like so many other folks. As you stated and not factual, most people on this site don’t think he can be elected. I know, let’s go for the darling Romney, ya, status Quo.
This is my prediction: Ron will not get elected because people are afraid to change and they like to justify it by picking one or two cases to make him look bad. What is Obama doing about Iran that’s so great, NOTHING. So, basically the same policy Ron is espousing, I think he has a point! At least he’s not going to be apologizing and chumming up with all the communist. At least he‘s not the same idiots running for office and really don’t have the experience, including conservatives who think they are different. My Prediction: The media will win again at electing a president since people can be manipulated so easy. My Prediction: We can’t afford another Bush or Obama type administration, we need something differnent and I think Ron has demonstrated weather every agrees with a couple of his policies.
I will agree, his presentation needs to improve to beat OBAMA’s BS Appearances, this is what we vote for collectively, the best speaker. Ha!
Report Post »v-vet1968
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:08pmThey are called flash mobs Ron!!
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:09pmRangerP,
Sorry but I don’t buy into that “unelectable” nonsense. Ron Pauls poularity and message are growing constantly despite blatant and outrageous efforts by the status quo in both parties and main stream media (including Fox News). The reason is because he is right. Trust me I used to be one of the people you referred to as “old fashioned conservatives”. I was in lock-step with Rush, Hannity, Glenn, all of them. In 2008 I even believed that Ron Paul was unelectable and a little crazy. Shortly after that disasterous election (a lose-lose proposition with the candidates that we had pushed on us) I read an article by Ron Paul and much to my surprise, not only was he not crazy, he was brilliant. I then read more and more Ron Paul and at the same time became an avid student of Thomas Jefferson. I have since then studied many libertarian scholars and I now know what you call “old fashioned conservatives” are actually an exact contradiction of that term. A much more accurate definition is neo-conservative. If you research the term I think you’ll see what I mean.
Report Post »SilenceDoesGood
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:11pm@RangerP
Old fashioned conservatives are war-mongers? That’s news to me. Why get involved in world affairs that have no impact on the United States? Iran is all talk- all propaganda to create fear. Forget the fact that they don’t have the means for any type of attack; their entire country would be obliterated by Israel in minutes after any type of attack. I suppose the neo-con attitude (although you may refer to it as “old-fashioned conservatism”) would say that we need to invade Iran and keep them from doing what we do and exploring nuclear technology.
@Titan
Report Post »I ask you to view the nuclear capabilities of Iran in the same light as criminals and guns. Governments cannot prevent people from obtaining weapons. The best solution to keep peace is to arm yourself and be vigilant. Your beloved Israel can hold her own against Iran. We can surely hold our own against Iran. We need to get our nose out of the middle east, fix America, and stop pretending like the big-government establishment is the answer.
@Cous1933
Ron Paul is not the best hope for America….. he is the ONLY hope for America in this race.
cous1933
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:24pmSilencedoesgood,
You are right. I stand corrected. There is no other candidate who will make the necessary changes so Ron Paul is our only hope.
BTW
A little off topic but I would ask all of the war-hawk neocons to explain the huge disparity in military donations to Ron Paul compared to all of the other GOP candidates. Released today…
Dr. Paul was able to produce $36,739.79 in donations from U.S. military personnel. His closest Republican competitor was Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain, who raised $6,223.
The complete breakdown can be found below (in alphabetical order):
- Rep. Michelle Bachmann: $2,550
- Herman Cain: $6,223
- Rep. Newt Gingrich: $1,025
- Gov. Gary Johnson: $0
- Rep. Ron Paul: $36,739.79
- Gov. Tim Pawlenty (dropped out of race): $250
- Gov. Mitt Romney: $5,000
- Sen. Rick Santorum: $250
*Texas Governor Rick Perry was not included in the tallying.
Total GOP Military Donations without Paul: $15,298.00
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/310783#ixzz1W65Eujq5
Notice how Santorum who rolled his eyes and mocked Ron Pauls position on Iran got a total of $250 bucks from military compared to Pauls $37,000! To those who arrogantly call Ron Paul naive about our military actions, how do you explain this?
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:28pmhaaa. I proved my own point. Nuff said. Time to start pulling for Perry
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:30pm@SilenceDoesGood
Conservatives are warmongers? OK, I am a warrior, been to three of them, spent ten years doing MMA and submission fighting tournaments, and now I am into 3-gun. No love lost on that one. Thanks,
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:36pmRangerP,
Report Post »I’m not sure what point you proved. (?)
And if you think Rick Perry is a real conservative, please do some research. Former Democrat, head of Al Gore campaign, Bilderberg 2007, Mandatory Gardasil vaccines, Trans Texas Corridor, please research before you vote for more big government.
TSUNAMI-22
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:37pm@ rangerp
You may love him, but he does not have a chance. Old fashioned conservatives are not going to vote for this man.
Report Post »~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bingo and correct. As far as potential rioters and vandals go, I’ll introduce them to my new LWRC M6A3, and I won’t discriminate.
cous1933
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:53pmRangerP,
I think you may have taken unnecessary offense at Silencedoesgoods post. I think he meant only that the traditional conservative position is non-intervention and anti-war. The neocons have hijacked the Republican party and used fear rhetoric and war propaganda along with insistance on cheering our aggressive military actions to prove patriotism, all in order to advance the big government Military Industrial Complex. There is big money in perpetual war, but it is morally abhorrent. I think that’s all he was saying.
Report Post »I don’t know what MMA and submission fighting has to do with being conservative, but…. whatever.
Carborendum
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:58pmApparently, the polls speak otherwise
http://reason.tv/video/show/emily-ekins-discusses-reason-r
75% of voters are open to 3rd party candidates. Ron Paul would be the man 3rd partiers would support more than anyone else.
Report Post »SkySoldier
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 11:14pm@RANGERP-As a fellow soldier and a guy who has been to Iraq and Afghanistan 3 times like you I can sympathize with your stance and confusion about Ron Paul. Dr. Paul has some very different points of view about the military. But he is 100% right on foreign policy because our current foreign policy makes no sense whatsoever.
Report Post »1) Foreign Aid: We borrow money from China (at interest) to GIVE it to some country that hates us but only tolerates us so long as WE pay them so that WE can PROTECT THEM! It is like a mob protection racket gone insane!
2) Israel: The US claims to support Israel but we give billions in foreign aid to every single muslim nation that surrounds Israel and has vowed to wipe them off the face of the earth. Then when they do attack every US president has “called for restraint”. Our foreign aid to Israel has made them into a dependent incapable to do anything without the permission from mommy and daddy. We need to let Israel off their leash to kick whose @ss they feel needs to be kicked.
3) Our troops on the DMZ in South Korea are speed bumps. We pay billions every year for bases around the globe and for what? a 12 hour faster response time. 82nd, 75th, 173rd are all ready to go in 24 hours or less. Does it make a difference if we arrive 12 hours later. Is it really worth the $
4) Every time we try to “fix” the worlds problems we just make it worse. Sometimes people just need to work (fight) things out for themselves.
5) We still have the bomb if all els
CrazyTexan
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 11:39pmCous,
Please explain Jefferson’s reasoning behind entering the First Barbary War, the one enshrined in this song?
From the Halls of Montezuma,
To the shores of Tripoli;
We fight our country’s battles
In the air, on land, and sea;
First to fight for right and freedom
And to keep our honor clean:
We are proud to claim the title
Of United States Marine!
Our flag’s unfurled to every breeze
From dawn to setting sun;
We have fought in every clime and place
Where we could take a gun;
In the snow of far-off Northern lands
And in sunny tropic scenes;
You will find us always on the job
The United States Marines!
Here’s health to you and to our Corps
Report Post »Which we are proud to serve;
In many a strife we’ve fought for life
And never lost our nerve;
If the Army and the Navy
Ever look on Heaven’s scenes;
They will find the streets are guarded
By The United States Marines!
Okie from Muskogee
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 12:05am@CrazyTexan
Because our ships were ATTACKED so we responded and cut their heads off and pounded them into the sand! Did we occupy and nation build? NOPE!!!!
Only 2 things come from Texas…..Just sayin!
@RangerP
Your for Amnesty? Rick Perry is……
How about we let the election speak for itself instead of you acting as a Prophet or fortuneteller by telling everyone Ron Paul is unelectable. You do not know, your guessing and assuming. Ron Paul not only came in second in Iowa, he came in 1st in New Hampshire young Republican Straw Poll with 45%… If you don‘t like Paul specifically state why but don’t play fortune teller.
Report Post »Firefight
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 12:09am@Rangerp take your own advice “Just listen to what the majority on the blaze say about him. This is about as conservative a bunch as you will find” take a look at the poll after the debate in Iowa
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/page/5/
Ron Paul 66.51% the next closest to him was newt at 10.05% the people have spoken now listen. If they disagreed so much, why did he win by such a huge margin? Just because the talking heads on FauxNews trumpet something doesn’t make it so. there are a lot more people that come to this site than the hand full of people commenting on a regular basis.
Report Post »CrazyTexan
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 1:07amOkie, you are right, we got out without nation building, but why? Answer; we were broke and Jefferson was forced to negotiate a ransom at a reduced cost. It was not a Constitutional issue, it was a financial one.
We were attacked on 9-11 but not allowed to fight a real war, our ex-pats, students and airplanes have been attacked for decades.
This has been a war of Political Correctness more concerned with our popularity rating overseas than taking care of the problem, and it has cost us. The solution is not to try to raise our popularity by withdrawing troops, but by FIGHTING like we mean it when we are attacked, and then yes, getting out once we have gotten the point across.
Report Post »libertarian8586
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 1:24am@Couse1933: I totally agree! I love all the people saying “Ron doesn’t care if Iran has nukes.” That is correct he did say that. However Israel has 300 of them. Do they really want to go suicidal? How many countries have they attacked militarily lately? None. Israel would massacre them. How many terrorist videos have we seen saying “we hate you because you are free and happy and you let women drive and you drink alcohol and eat pigs?” I haven’t seen any myself. Every single one I have ever seen where a terrorist explains how they would willingly end their lives to get back at us explains its our intervention in Muslim countries around the middle east. OSAMA specifically cited this many many many times, we are in the holy land, we are interfering with them, we MURDERED over 1 million Iraqi children, put sanctions on them and then cut off medical supplies and even jailed people trying to get supplies to the children and innocent people there. Do you think you would be angry if, lets say Russia, was doing this to us? You are damn right you would be. Stop with the Ron wants to see Iran nuke people demagoguery garbage. He simply listens to the attackers as to why they did it. Wow what a crazy idea. 15 of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia why aren’t we attacking them? Oh yea that’s right we are propping up and arming another dictatorship in that country so they will be “friendly to us.” Great foreign policy libs and neocons…keep up the good wor
Report Post »Steve
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 2:25amOkie from Muskogee
But one cannot get around what Jefferson heard when he went with John Adams to wait upon Tripoli’s ambassador to London in March 1785. When they inquired by what right the Barbary states preyed upon American shipping, enslaving both crews and passengers, America’s two foremost envoys were informed that
“it was written in the Koran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon whoever they could find and to make Slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
Ambassador Abd Al-Rahman did not fail to mention the size of his own commission, if America chose to pay the protection money demanded as an alternative to piracy
The level of tribute demanded began to reach 10 percent of the American national budget, with no guarantee that greed would not increase that percentage, while from the dungeons of Algiers and Tripoli came appalling reports of the mistreatment of captured men and women.
There were many Americans—John Adams among them—who made the case that it was better policy to pay the tribute. It was cheaper than the loss of trade, for one thing, and a battle against the pirates would be “too rugged for our people to bear.” Putting the matter starkly, Adams said: “We ought not to fight them at all unless we determine to fight them forever
Report Post »teapartyconservatism
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 3:42am@titan
You stated, “Ron Paul will never be president because of lame remarks like this one, ” I don’t care if Iran has nukes” wow that spoke volumes to me about him. Iran is the largest exporter of terrorism in the world and he could care less … .”
Your comment presumes we are currently preventing or intend to prevent Iran from finalizing the creation of their own nuclear arms arsenal.
Iran, essentially unaffected by sanctions and dismissive of western warnings, is merrily chugging right along with their nuclear enrichment and missile development programs. Indeed, Iran is unabated and apparently acting with absolute impunity as a primary exporter of terrorism. Iran also defiantly continues to fund and arm our enemy in both Iraq and Afghanistan. It seems Iran is unconcerned that America’s military might certainly long ago should have and still could be, brought to bear on them.
Granted Iraq and Afghanistan do bracket Iran on their east and western borders, which could be a huge militarily advantage to us, if we ever decide to actually stop their nuclear weapons development by striking them militarily.
Do you see that happening or is Ron Paul correct by default?
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 6:58am@cous1933
Prior to posting, I showed the article to my wife (she does not blog), and said “watch this”. I explained that I while I have always been very conservative, that I never paid a whole lot of attention to Libertarian side of the house. I then told her to watch what happens when a regular old conservative like myself posts anything that goes against the grain of the Ron Paul supporters. I told here that my comments would equal blog suicide, because I could get a small crowd of peole to write a huge response. I was right. He has a following that is almost cult like.
I want a candidate that is conservative on spending, shrinking the federal gov, getting rid of abortion, appointing the right judges to the supreme court, keeping our military strong, keeping the people and our interests safe from islamic terrorists, stops giving the sodomites and other wicked folks special rights and attention….. I want a president that is conservative fiscally and morally. Kind of like Reagan. Sorry, I do not think Paul is that man.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:31amCOUS1933 He is a Kook!
Report Post »Paul wants to get rid of the CIA. Are you kidding me? The CIA is vital to our national security. Ron Paul believes that the CIA “runs everything.” He has also suggested in the past that the CIA has conducted a “coup” in America
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dECSYm5bSM&feature=player_embedded#!
Windwalker
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:53amRangerp….you hit the nail on the head. His controversial changing stance on border control, and relaxed attitude for decriminalizing marijuana use doesn’t help his cause and will never attract the majority of the Republican base
Report Post »GUT_CHECK
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 8:29am@steve
please continue your magnificent retelling…
please dont leave out the building of “old ironsides” and the 200 year contract to leave U.S. alone
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 9:29am@SkySoldier
Report Post »I am with you Ranger buddy. I like your post
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 9:46am@RANGERP
Your comments to your wife are dead bang on. Being a conservative seems to veiwed as one tiny step away from being a flaming liberal.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:44pmRangerP,
Report Post »Unless I misunderstand your last post, I think you were trying to demonstrate for your wife how uncivil and irrational Ron Paul supporters are. However I would issue the same challenge to you that I’ve issued to others who make this claim… Read all of the posts on any Ron Paul story on The Blaze and keep an honest tally of name calling, and ad hominem attacks or any other uncivil behavior. I’m willing to bet that the numbers of those tactics will be much higher on the part of Ron Paul critics than Ron Paul supporters. In fact at the same time keep track of how many of those incidents are initiated and how many are replies to an initial uncivil post. I’ll also wager that by far the Ron Paul supporters only get rude in response to the rude and hostile slander directed at Ron Paul.
In regards to the second part of your post
“I want a candidate that is conservative on spending, shrinking the federal gov, getting rid of abortion, appointing the right judges to the supreme court, keeping our military strong, keeping the people and our interests safe from islamic terrorists, stops giving the sodomites and other wicked folks special rights and attention….. I want a president that is conservative fiscally and morally”
I promise you, Ron Paul is exactly that candidate. Some misguided neocons make it a habit to imply that Ron Paul is immoral. Nothing could be further from the truth. continued next post……
cous1933
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:57pmcontinued
Report Post »If you would take the time to research the man personally, I promise you will find that he is the most moral, humble, honest, Christian person to run for president in our lifetimes. If you are interested I will link you to some trustworthy sites that will give you the truth about Ron Paul, about the difference between neo-conservatives and traditional conservatives and about how immoral it is to legislate morality. The true Christian position is not one of aggressive or pre-emptive war, nor is it one of attempting to make people moral at the point of a gun.
Just one last thing. As far as giving sodomites and wicked people special rights and favors, there is absolutely no candidate who is more against special rights or favors to ANYONE, than Ron Paul. On a personal and religious level, I’m sure he agrees with you about immoral people, but on a governmental level every person is equal and gets the same rights and the same liberty.
SkySoldier
Posted on August 27, 2011 at 12:44am@RANEGRP-Glad you like my post. Ron Paul has a different position for sure and as one of his supporters some of us can be a bit over the top. That said I have to make this very valid and often over looked point. Assuming for a moment that we pulled out of every nation on earth tomorrow and brought all of our troops home:
1) we still have the most powerful Navy on the planet and protected by two vast oceans
2) an Air Force that is unmatched in power and presence
3) a Marine Corps that will kill anything that moves
3) and an Army that will dominate any conceivable land battle
4) But most importantly we still have NUKES.
If Iran (or anyone else) touched off a dirty bomb or nuke in an american city it would be the last thing they ever did. I don’t care who is president the outcry to turn that country into a giant glass parking lot would be deafening.
Dr. Paul is PRO-DEFENSE. Here is an except of his campaign website on his stance on National Defense. http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
Report Post »* Make securing our borders the top national security priority.
* End the nation-building that is draining troop morale, increasing our debt, and sacrificing lives with no end in sight.
* Follow the Constitution by asking Congress to declare war before one is waged.
* Only send our military into conflict with a clear mission and all the tools they need to complete the job – and then bring them home.
* Revitalize the military for the 21st century by eliminating waste in a trillion-dollar
the58thstate
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:37pmtheres just one problem ron with what your saying. its already here so be bold and call it out since you brought it up. say its black on white violence and its the prompters fault.
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 11:49pmGood point!!
Report Post »southernORcobra
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:29pmif there is gonna be an angry mob it will be from his followers after he loses again
Report Post »Libertarian B 4 Libertarians Were Cool
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:35pmYuck, Yuck, You neo-cons are so funny!
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:38pm@southernORcobra
A few months ago, I would not have understood your post. I am new to the blaze, and even newer to reading stuff from the liberetarian crowd. Because of this, I now understand your post. They seem to be conservative, but have a strange loyalty to this man that baffles me a bit. I am about as conservative as you can get when it comes to small gov, low taxes, but the moral issues are just as important to me. This is were the libertarian (how the heck do you spell it anyway?) crowd and I split ways. Seems they are not real happy with people that see issues different than they do.
Report Post »Libertarian Infidel
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:49pm@RANGERP “Seems they are not real happy with people that see issues different than they do.” That about sums up conservative mind-sets, not libertarians…you have it backwards. Liberals too, but mostly conservatives. True libertarians respect the opinions of others and respect their right to have varying opinions. It‘s not that libertarians don’t have or agree with morals, they just respect people’s choice on morals. What make conservatives so scary (and I used to be one) is that you have to have THEIR set of morals or else you’re evil or bad. You have to agree with THEM or else they will judge you. And my God do they ever judge you. That;s about all they ever do..judge judge and judge some more. Libertarians don’t judge people on their beliefs or morals, and that is the main difference.
Report Post »techengineer11
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:54pmYou would think even the treasonous Israel 1st Glenn Beck following Neo-Con idiots would understand that as soon as the Welfare recipient is no longer subsidized they will rebel and well act as you would expect America’s typical Welfare recipients to act. Oh how the neat little fantasy world of the Neo-Con is about to be turned upside down and they are simply just not going to know what to do since after all they are about as damn dumb and uneducated as an Obama liberal.
Report Post »Jezreel
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:04pmThere are already internment camps built and ready for rioters and those who want to destroy and kill and rob and loot. Since there is not enough room in prisons for so many immoral liberals that will act up and blame everybody else for their own problems, they can all go to the interment camps. The elites that want to rule the world and have it all have known for quite some time on solving the problem with out of control crowds. Actually, it is a great idea. Stick all the liberal lefties that riot in the camps and lock them up and take them to the showers.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:15pmLIBERTARIAN INFIDEL: “Libertarians don’t judge people” Now that is laughable. Did you type that with a straight face? Read the comments here if anyone questions or disagrees with Ron Paul.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:24pmTECHENGINEER11 if a word of what you say was true, Paul wouldn’t live long enough to become president. The NWO would plant his as* next to JFK….
Report Post »Sagat
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:25pm“Libertarians don’t judge people on their beliefs or morals, and that is the main difference”
@Libertarian Infidel, that’s a terrible misrepresentation of libertarian thought. What you are spouting is Marxist cultural relativism. Libertarianism focuses on getting government out of the way of exercising personal choice. That doesn‘t mean that we can’t hold others to a moral standard. If a person chooses to shoot up heroine, then those that oppose his lifestyle can choose to not do business with that person, employ that person or interact with that person. Society is best at regulating morality, not government. Government, more often than not, gets in the way of individuals making moral choices. That‘s Ron Paul’s position, not the anything goes cultural Marxism that supposed libertarians like you profess.
Report Post »cous1933
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 11:18pmRangerP,
I don’t mean to seem focused on you but the blatant contradictions in your posts beg for response.
“They seem to be conservative, but have a strange loyalty to this man that baffles me a bit.”
Forgive me if this seems condescending but I think you’re baffled because you are confusing neo-conservatism with real conservatism. Ron Paul has been rated as the most conservative in Congress for years.
“I am about as conservative as you can get when it comes to small gov, low taxes, but the moral issues are just as important to me.”
Two things.
Report Post »First when you say that you are about as conservative as it gets regarding small gov. and then (on another post) express support for Rick Perry, I think you will end up disappointed when you find out Perry is anything but a small gov. proponent. (he might say otherwise but his record speaks for itself.)
Second, when you try to legislate moral issues, it not only doesn’t work (a law can’t possibly make a person become moral), but it contributes to more crime. Prohibition and huge drug cartels are evidence of that. It is not the traditional conservative position to want to control other peoples lives, that is the precept of progressives, which, if you have done your research, you know includes neocons.
Steve
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 2:28amAlmost sounds like your speaking of Progressives.
Report Post »Scrubpuppy
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 8:10am@RangerP
First off, if you’re a ranger, I’d like to say I have some amount of respect for you.
Second, You’re a religious right wingnut. Your kind will cost conservatives the election, simply because you want some bible thumping barking mad theocrat to “get rid of all the sodomites” and “stop killing babies”. If Abortion rights and gays are what terrifies you in this election, then you’re way out of the loop anyways. We’ve got bigger fish to fry.
Report Post »Libertarian Infidel
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 8:27am@Sagat I’m sorry Sagat, but if you‘re telling me that libertarians judge other’s beliefs, then that person is not a libertarian. True libertarians do not judge people on what they believe…as YOU SAID YOURSELF, if we do not agree with a person’s beliefs, we won’t interact, do business, etc etc, but to sit there and imply that libertarians judge people on their beliefs goes against everything libertarian since libertarian by definition is freedom. That means freedom of choice. Freedom from a choice different that what we believe ourselves. If a satanist wants to date my daughter, I respect his decision to worship satan and I will not tell him he is wrong…but he won‘t be dating my daughter because it’s not what I believe would be best for my daughter.
Report Post »Libertarian Infidel
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 8:29am@RepubliCorp Then that person’s not a TRUE libertarian. Read my entire post before writing stupid responses please. Thanks.
Report Post »blaze7c
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 8:45amAll of you people who dislike RP so much for moral issues, he thinks they are not federal issues. These are issues for the state. If you don’t like what your state does, then you can always move to another state that does adopt your beliefs. As for Iran, do you honestly think that Israel will not protect itself if war was to break out against them. Iran would be a sheet of glass in minutes. The US is the reason that Israel doesn’t destroy Iran now anyway.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 9:24am@Scrubpuppy
I am no longer a Ranger, just a regular old wore out Infantry officer these days. Did spend my first five years enlisted in the 75th Ranger Reg (87-92). Scroll is on the right arm, tab is on the left, and heart is still in the regiment, my butt is in the regular Army.
Your post made me smile, and put warmth in my heart. Yes, the moral issues are just as important as the fiscal. The Bible is the standard that I use to define right and wrong. If the candidate is not against the homosexual movement, and stopping the murder of babies, then he does not get my vote. The cool thing about my vote, is that it is mine. I am not alone, we still have some old fashioned Bible thumpers left in this nation. While things may look bad, revival is still a possiblity.
Report Post »Sagat
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 10:18am@Libertarian Infidel
You don’t seem to understand your own stated positions. You state that you don’t judge others for their beliefs, but then give an example of how you would judge a Satanist to be unworthy of dating your daughter. Libertarianism is based mainly on not using force to impose your beliefs on others. It does not mean that you don’t have moral convictions, which would naturally lead to you making judgements about others’ beliefs. If you believe stealing is wrong and another person thinks stealing is okay, then you would judge that person to have morals that are incompatible with yours. Saying that you don’t judge him is just some leftist feel good BS. Of course you judge him. And you would take action to make sure that a person like that doesn’t negatively affect your life. Your idea of libertarianism seems to be posioned by cultural Marxist ideals, where you assume that all belief systems are inherently equal. That is not libertarianism.
Report Post »Libertarian Infidel
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:56pm@Sagat This country was founded on choice of religion, but if you want to sit there and spout idiocies like implying libertarians judge people based off their religious beliefs, then there’s really no hope for you, my friend. Perhaps you are pushing YOUR conservative ideas off as libertarian ones, I’m not sure. Maybe ignorantly calling my ideas “Marxist” over and over again gives you a warm fuzzy feeling, so you just go right ahead and keep doing that if that’s what makes you sleep better at night. You are somehow confusing the words “judge” and “tolerate”. Dictionaries are available online now-a-days…dictionary.com perhaps. You can not agree with someone, and not judge them because of it. As I said in the Satanist example, you can disagree with him and decide you do not want to associate with him, yet not sit there and say he‘s wrong or that he can’t chose to be a Satanist. I don’t know how else to explain this to you, you just will never get it. People have religious freedom…deal with it.
Report Post »sidewayssquare
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:28pmron paul is the best option we have, our country is ran by war mongers, gulf of tonkin anyone?
these days when the media says duck, i stand up, when they say left, i go right.
the media mocks ron paul, because they know that when he is elected, they are going to be out of a job, and lying actors are not good for anthing other than soaking up hot lead.
no matter who has been leading our country in recent history, they are all liars thats do not represent us, the only thing they stand for is playing catch with the other team.
the only thing that will save this country is when we bring treason back and we enforce it, if our so called leaders dont get thier heads out of thier butts, we will do it our selves. so when the crap hits the fan you better not be wearing a suit or a blue helmet.
god bless.
Report Post »Applehead
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:47pmTech11, You make some great points and are by far my favorite poster! We need pithy hero such as yourself to save America! I‘m a 40 some ex SEC linebacker for a team that won several SEC Championships and I’m tired of all these softies that bow to the establishment!! We need to take back America from all these Marxist Khazar freaks!!! I just want everyone American to be American!!! I put Jesus 1st and everything else 2nd! We need to take our country back regardless of the Zionist Wrath!!!
Report Post »FANGS
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:27pmThis is a beautiful topic. America is ready for this one. I just never thought I would have to defend America from her domestic enemies.We will bounce back, but mark my words we wont stop firing until all socialists are gone. Your demise is your own doing. Thanks for displaying your union fists in your windows. and your Socialist lawn signs in front of your houses. Mostly thanks for showing Your bitter pathetic face on mslsd and hating America. There definately wont be any shortage of targets. It’ll be kind of like going to the carnival.
Report Post »Steel Awesome
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:26pmUnfortunately, it won’t be that easy. The communists are cowards and will blend into the woodwork. We’re probably looking at a long and protracted gorilla war that will last for years to come.
Report Post »MrHr1207
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 6:16amLMAO Those will be the same ones rioting ! Then the light blue helmets will come in to control them. Wow doesn’t get any better than that!
Report Post »team1blazer
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 12:39pmYeah, but the carnival guns just shoot water and air
Report Post »palerider54
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:26pmCracks me up when EMCINOM and the rest of her ilk, complain about balancing the budget on the backs of the poor and middle class. They pay NO taxes now. How dare we put a few feathers on the backs of the many. NO NO NO, lets punish the successful people, lets take all their wealth and give it to the lazy.
Report Post »Yep that will teach them. uh huh, it will teach them to take what few jobs they still have here across the borders where the libprogs can’t rape them anymore.
Steel Awesome
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:20pmBingo.
Blood = money
Report Post »Turnips = poor and middle class
V-MAN MACE
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:23pmWell, like Alex told me, if it happens, it happens, and there’s nothing we can do except not participate in rioting by putting ourselves in a position to be able to help someone else instead of looting and plundering and exercize our 2nd Amendment rights in self defense, and use it to protect our other rights.
Report Post »IFORGOT
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:54pmGood comment – I couldn’t agree more.
Report Post »Not a sheepeople
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:18pmIt’s coming. Prepare yourself, the welfare crowd is going to get ugly. Eventually they will come out of this better people.
Report Post »Elena2010
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:17pmThe mobs won’t be Tea Party people — we are too civilized for that kind of behavior. The mobs will be fm the left side of the aisle.
Report Post »rangerp
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:46pmexactly – look at when mobs have reared their ugly heads in America. LA riots, Huricane Katrina are two good examples. Not a whole lot of tea party types, more like the off spring of lib welfare
Report Post »Parnell3rd
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 2:55amPlus the recent Wisconsin state fair, the flash mobs, being under reported by the media. The media is biased.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 5:40pmLet’s see how “civilized” Tea Party and Blaze people are when they can’t buy food because inflation is so bad. Believe me YOU WILL BE PROTESTING TOO, not just welfare-recipients and illegal aliens.
Report Post »Freebird
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:09pmIt‘s fairly obvious that there’s certain people,some in high places,who are stirring the pot.I believe these flash mobs we’ve seen lately,are just a warm-up for the 2012 elections.
Report Post »nptden
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:23pmI agree. There will be an increase like Watts and Bed Sty. The jungle bunnies in ACORN will stir the pot. The Marxist/progressive students will jump on the bandwagon. Think what the animals in San Francisco yelled when the cop shot a guy with a gun. ‘You can’t kill us all’. Fortunately we can, unless Commie Obama takes our arms away, for some trumped up reason. ‘
Report Post »FANGS
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:05pmENCINOM Name five rich millionairs that republicans gave money to, and how much they got.
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:12pmMark Levin is pretty angry with Ron over his stance on secession from the U.S. Anyway, Paul is saying some strange things lately. I like him, but I wonder where it’s coming from?
Report Post »I.Gaspar
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:04pm@JHAYDENG
Report Post »There are a bunch of commentators, Mike Church, in particular, who are trashing republicans and conservatives as if the were libs and democrats, all in an attempt to bring Ron Paul to the forefront.
They are secessionists and in Church’s case he is a cartoon character who comes across as an old 45 with a crack running through it.
I strongly agree with Levin and I would never want Paul in the White House.
Eighty percent of what he says is sound, but the remaining 20% is sheer lunacy, particularly when it comes to international issues and defense.
True conservatives should embrace key elements of his libertarian philosophy but to embrace his stance on defense would be suicidal.
I used to listen to Church but his Foghorn and Leghorn, good ole boy palaver, with the knee slapping, heehaw humor is tedious at best.
I’m glad Mark Levin is calling him out.
Crakaveli
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:01pmWe should not be surprised. There are millions of people who have been told they deserve handouts and cushy government benefits. When those are taken away because they are unsustainable for ANY country, the beneficiaries will not take it easily.
Report Post »Steel Awesome
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:09pmIt’s all part of the plan.
Report Post »FANGS
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:59pmOk, Obama destroyed the banking sector. Obama destroyed the Small business sector. This is where most of the tax money comes from to pay for entitlements,(welfare). So now, Americans aren’t making enough tax money to keep up anymore. So now, because of obama and democrats looting and pillaging all the money and giving it to the teachers unions. Welfare wont be paid, medi caid wont be paid. Numberous other things also wont be paid, and the poor just got poorer. White workers dont have anything left. we’ve lost everything because of obama. This I can guarantee, Any rioting will be met with deadly force. American spirit will destroy socialism.
Report Post »rienheart
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:57pmOf course It will happen here, it already has. In Wisconsin, Illinois, California, only it will get worse in all the leftists States that have Public Unions and Welfare Queens. When the money dries up and they don’t get their entitlements there will be hell to pay. Most Right to work States won’t have as big a problem, but will have to deal with the out of control leftists who will take to the streets just because they see their agenda falling down all around them. It can’t happen soon enough, because it will be the Death knell of the Communist Revolution. Obama, of course, will do everything including declaring Marshall Law and suspend the 2012 Election to stay in Power and keep his agenda of destroying the Economy. All part of the “Little Red Book” by Mao. The Bible of the Leftist/Communist/Socialist/Facist.
Report Post »COME AND TAKE IT 2121
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:11pmCouldnt agree with you more about obama putting off the election due to a “crisis.” I’ve thought that for some time now….
Report Post »sidewayssquare
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:47pmyou think your going to get out of this just fine? your playing sides, were all americans, some of you are just brain washed, you think its a right vs left situation, its not.
heres an analogy, the red team is strugling with the blue team on the 50 yard line, some of these players switch uniforms from time to time, every once in awhile the blue team advances and they get to the 55 yard line, then the red team advances and pushes it back to the 50 yard line and then eventuly to the 55 yard line, but while all of that is going on the referees have been changing the field from a football field to a soccer field, and suddenly you dont even know what game your playing anymore… all you know is your red and your aginst blue and you dont know why, meanwhile everything is getting worse and worse and worse no matter what side tells you they are going to fix the problem, the problem is your wealth and your freedom.
now those that depend on the government to exist, belng to the government, ans when the government tells thier slaves your in the way, what do you thinks going to happen?
the government and the ATF, FBI, DEA, AND CIA, are all involved in project gun runner they are currently in a trial for using your money to buy guns and give them to mexican gangsters, meanwhile the goons involved are getting raises and new job positions, and passing new gun laws, do you think criminals should be writing laws in the middle of a court case?
figure it out or perrish.
god bless
Report Post »Weiners Wiener
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:54pmWhen it all comes down, I’m outta here. Heading for the hills with a year’s supply of bacon and bullets.
Report Post »ratherbfishin
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:29pmwhen all come down to it we need to stand behind our God and guns..together. We are it. there is no place else to go.
Report Post »CrazyTexan
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:54pmWe have a society that destroys things when their sports teams don’t win….come to think of it, they destroy things when they do win. Of course they will find any excuse to riot if you dip into their entitled pockets.
Report Post »encinom
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:52pmGiven that Tea-PArty backed GOP politicians have sought to balance the budget on the backs of the working and middle class while they continue to roll out the gravey train for the rich, I will say they have a right ot be mad. But what Ohio and Wisconsin shows is that mad Americans demostrate, not act like angry mobs, they force recall elections and protest through the ballot box (the Ohio bill is certain to fail in November and in Wisconsin the Democrates picked up 2 seats in districts that only a few months earlier went for herr Walker).
Ron Paul is an old man and a fool. He is too wedded to the John Birch society and their paranoia. 2012 is going to be the Workers’ elections, whiel the Tea Party will see itself disappear from the political stage, much like the LaRouche cult and the John Birch Society.
Report Post »drago
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:58pmEncinom, i can only hope you hit the streets and riot, and pray you live near me…….
Report Post »MODEL82A1
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:01pmENCIDIOT, If you ever EARNED more than $100k per year, you’d be in for a rude awakening, as it is we who pay ALL Federal Income tax in the US. Sadly, you are a perpetual victim who will never earn anything. I thing I speak for the rest of your unwilling benefactors when I say, the next time I see your hand-out, prepare to have it severed at the elbow.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:08pmYou know, I hate to say this but I almost hope the liberals win!! They have created quite the mess and Paul is right in that people are going to be mad when the money flow stops. I have the means to move my family out of this country. We are already considering the options. It would almost be amusing to see the libs totally get their way. Punish the evil rich. And watch and see how long it takes them to do what I will do. All businesses will relocate to China or another easy to operate country. You will no longer have a GDP and all the money the government spends will have to be borrowed…Until the foreign countries cut the supply…Then…what? Keep printing worthless money? What happens when 50%…75% of the population is on foodstamps and welfare? What happens when employment is 20% or higher? Don’t think it can happen? Lol…
The people with the money will simply leave.
Report Post »momprayn
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:16pmHave you not heard the successful results of Walker’s bills? “..a state facing a projected $3 billion budget shortfall with no end in sight now has a projected $300 million budget surplus. The amazing successes in Wisconsin have emboldened the legislatures and political leaders of other states, who have seen the wonders resulting from a little political backbone and fiscal common sense.
The repeal of much of Wisconsin’s collective bargaining law has already improved the quality and lowered the cost of Wisconsin government exponentially.
Collective bargaining is harmful to schools and students, costs an exorbitant amount of money, and lowers the quality of education. If one listened to the violent rhetoric of the public employee unions, one would have expected today to be a dark day for education in Wisconsin. . Now the bill is law, and we have evidence of how wonderfully it is working. Instead of a catastrophe, it is a day of miraculous optimism, balanced budgets, educational improvement, and fiscal recovery.
There is a lot of speculation as to what the fallout will be in the wake of these conservative successes. Wis. residents witnessing the miracle may well vote to keep the state solidly conservative.”
Report Post »http://www.slantright.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3372
Elena2010
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:20pmTea Party tends toward the conservative libertarian side of the spectrum — hence why the Pauls are loved. Tea Party is not a wing of the GOP…in fact, we are only the tiniest bit happier w/the GOP than we are with the Dems! We don’t cotton to either of the spendthrift idiots inhabiting DC!
Report Post »palerider54
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:21pmIm with you DRAGO, man am I with ya.
Cracks me up when EMCINOM and the rest of her ilk, complain about balancing the budget on the backs of the poor and middle class. They pay NO taxes now. How dare we put a few feathers on the backs of the many. NO NO NO, lets punish the successful people, lets take all their wealth and give it to the lazy.
Report Post »Yep that will teach them. uh huh, it will teach them to take what few jobs they still have here across the borders where the libprogs can’t rape them anymore.
booger71
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:23pmGOP politicians have sought to balance the budget on the backs of the working and middle class while they continue to roll out the gravey train for the rich,”
Report Post »——————————————————————————–
The “Bush” tax cut let the lower and middle class keep about 2 trillion of their tax money, and the upper class (top 5%) 800 billion. Now we have about 50% of the “workers” not paying a dime in federal income taxes, thus not paying their part of in the defense, law enforcement, etc cost that they enjoy, but reap the benefits of entitlements such as welfare, section 8 housing, the works. Now take me, who has not missed a year where I have paid a positive amount in taxes, but do not qualify for any entitlements such as government subsidized housing, food, education. Now ENCINOMOM, IN YOUR INFINITE WISDOM, EXPLAIN TO ME HOW THIS IS FAIR>
cous1933
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:55pmElena2010,
Thank you for an accurate and concise description of the Tea Party. It seems that about 9 out of 10 times the media talks about the Tea Party they either intentionally lie about it or completely misunderstand the message. Personally it drives me nuts every time I hear or read the words “Tea Party favorite Rick Perry”.
Report Post »Welfare-Warfare State
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:07pmLooks like the Birchers were prescient from here. Ron Paul is trying to help the poor. He understands that the paper money/Federal Reserve system is a tool of govt. and the financial services sector. It concentrates power and wealth.
We used to take care of the poor with charity, cooperatives, mutual-aid societies, churches, neighbors, etc. The welfare state metastized to include the middle and upper income groups. It always does.
What about all of those workers who had to pay much higher taxes because govt. unions and politicians ‘negotiated’ self-serving sweetheart contracts? Those workers far outnumber the government employees? Aren’t they the forgotten man? Govt. union workers were getting far more for comparable work that their productive sector counterparts. That is due to a collusion between the poltical class and govt. workers.
Many of these “workers” are administrative people who staff bureaucracies that are duplicative or are unnecessary in many instances. There is so much pork in government. Why do you ignore all of this? Why do you ignore all of those real workers who have to pay higher taxes and fees to support govt. union/politician corruption. Why?
Report Post »Lone Wolf
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:12pmI’m with you, Drago.
Report Post »Steve
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 2:34amencinom or monicne spelled backwards what ever . LOL. clown troll.
Report Post »MHP
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:38amencinom,
You guys are not peaceful. Your union thugs shot a non-union business owner, and he damn well could have died, but you don’t give a crap.
You’ve forced the patriots of this country to go buy guns and carry them.
War is coming, and you’ll lose.
Everything that has gone on I predicted in 2007, so my predictions are 100% correct.
Report Post »MHP
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 7:44amencinom
I’d be happy to become a John Bircher. Which BTW is not a racist group. They have thousands of blacks in it, as hispanics and other minorites.
Report Post »They don’t allow communists tho.
ashestoashes
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 9:34amTrollTrainer May I ask where you would take your family?..I have researched this and I don’t know that there is anywhere on earth harboring sanctuary.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 9:58amIt is interesting that we have never read any Encinom posts that threaten others in here, but in this thread alone there are lots of veiled and straight out threats against him. Lots of big tough guys.
Do our Taxed Enough Already brothers and sisters act out these violent fantasies? Or are you all a bunch of tough talking wussies.
I do not know your “body count’ but I can say from experience taking out a human being in conflict, while unavoidable, is humbling and reflective afterward. Big talk does not go along with the dutiful taking of a human life.
You say you are wise, rational and balanced grass roots patriot organizations, but you continue to spew hate for the poor and weak. Those folks you say you hate are authentic Americans that you have mentally demonized and vilified without facts.
BTW, you can say I am in Mom’s basement all you want. I have paid more than $100,00.00 in income taxes for the past 7 years. I do love this country, and put my fair share of taxes up for it!
TEA
Report Post »encinom
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 10:14amWhat is sad is how fooled the fools of the Blaze are. The Polls and the recent evens are proving that the American Middle Class and Working Class are waking up and sick and tired of the useful idiots of the Tea Party tell them to bend over for the corporate masters. From Ohio, to Florida to Wisconsin the Tea Party politicans are taking cover as the storm they unleashed turns on them. Yet, the mindless drones of Fox News and Beck still act against their interests and as along as god and guns are left alone, willing turn over the rest of their rights.
The Tea-PArty is nothing more than a gathering of the ignorant and paranoid. As this truth is exposed they are shrinking from the scene. The Blaze is the Alamo of the moon bats and bigots.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 10:46amashestoashes,
I am at early retirement age. I would go where I could live in relative peace and enjoy myself. Possibilities we have tossed around are New Zealand or any of the “going bamboo” south pacific island spots. Also, being from Florida we have done a bit of sailing and there are many Caribbean hotspots. Granted some of the governments of these countries is…questionable…but for the most part they treat Americans like royalty and someone with a moderate nest egg could live like a king.
Of course we are just toying with the idea. We are happy here and no matter what the government does we still have more freedom here than most places in the world. Obama will not be around long and while DC will always be a swamp life does go on. I was more making the point to our friendly troll that the people who are supporting his/her lazy azz do not have to stay here. We already see this happening.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 10:55amTrollTrainer, The United States is like a country club with annual dues, not sure you have those in Florida. You can bluster about going to a different club, and godspeed. I patriotically love this country, I like the features and benefits here, I fought for our nation, and willingly put up my fair share of taxes for the privilege of being a full member of the greatest country club on earth!
Report Post »ALEXANDERHAMILTON
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:52pmI fear for the time from Election Night 2012 when Obama is defeated to Inauguration Day 2013 . I can see the Dems and Obama encouraging protests and demonstrations during those 10 weeks. I can honestly see a scenario, especially if the election is razor close and he loses, where Obama will not physically leave the office because of the riots and protests. Obama not only needs to defeated, but it needs to be by such a wide margin that will also sweep the Dems out of Senate control. Wisconsin is so much better off since Walker took office, but does the media do any reporting on that??
Report Post »KickinBack
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:22pmI agree. Though not so much the Dems and Obama but the unions, acorn, and any of the many Soros funded groups.
Report Post »biblegeek119
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:51pmBlaze.
THANK YOU for giving room to Ron Paul. Good Job!
Report Post »db321
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:51pmWe will show our anger at the Polls. Ron Paul is just feeding the Liberal Media – We do not need this type of talk at all right now.
Report Post »ILUVAMERICA
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:59pm@db321
Report Post »Ron Paul was asked the question and he gave his HONEST answer
It was a Dumb Question
Of course it will, the socialist/progressives will see that it does, just like in WI
only when the riots happen from funds drying up, the rioters will be out for blood and what ever goods they can steal
UlyssesP
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:22pmWho made you the “We do not need this type of talk at all right now” Police?
Report Post »Steel Awesome
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:05pmCan’t we all just get along?
Report Post »AlienEarthling
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:49pmRon Paul is the most sane person running for president. I’m worried
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:40pmAgree..
Report Post »SHOWMESTATEGUY
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:46pmI Know there is an anger building, from who and the direction it’s going to take is lost on you, Mr.Paul. You only address a small part of the problem.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 8:58am….a small part of the problem? INFLATION is the most-cruel tax to all of us. Every time money is printed, your dollar buys less. If entitlements were never cut –people are still going to riot because INFLATION is eating them alive!
Report Post »MODEL82A1
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 8:41pmHasn’t Glenn Beck been prophesying precisely this for years?
Report Post »SavingtheRepublic.com
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:07pm~v~^~v~^~v~^~
Report Post »Yea he has and anyone with a clue didnt need to hear it from Beck or Paul. There is no special sight or skill needed to see what happens when the nanny state fails and one spends more than they make. Collapse is part of this dangerous game. Question really if but when ths will happens and exactly WHO will start it!
Some like myself will argue it has already started with uprising in Wisc and Philly. While others will say its crazy or go as far to say “it wont happen here”. Those that think myself and others are wrong that it has started have this imaginary image in their head, expecting a shock and awe moment. Im sorry to tell you when that happens the ‘S’ will already ‘HTF’! As for the wont happen here folks, well they will be the ones screaming and whining “why didnt anyone warn us” Well we are/ did you just dont want to listen! Get your houses in order its just a question of time now…. Stop playing their game start playing their game http://SavingtheRepublic.com
IntransigentMind
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 9:45pmRon Paul is right on economics, but that’s where it ends, more or less:
Report Post »http://markamerica.com/2011/07/19/the-undeniable-truth-about-ron-paul/
Clean House
Posted on August 25, 2011 at 10:02pmThe Seals just got rid of one Anti American set on our demise.
Now It‘s up to the Voter’s to get rid of another.
Ron Paul just may be the Hope for Change we need.
Report Post »Eff the Poor
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 9:37am@ Clean House.. Remember a vote for Ron Paul is really a vote for Barry…
Report Post »beingjohngalt
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 1:38pmSure Glen has been… for the last couple years. Paul has known this for well before that and was being called crazy for it.
Report Post »myway
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 9:56amProfessional Politician! He is fading away.
Report Post »GPDARRAH
Posted on August 26, 2011 at 5:05pmRomney is not my first choice for presidential candidate.
Report Post »I don’t think he will be the Rebublican nominee.
I like Herman Cain and possibly Perry