Politics
Ron Paul Camp Mocks Huntsman on Twitter: ‘We Found Your One Iowa Voter’
- Posted on January 3, 2012 at 9:55pm by
Tiffany Gabbay
- Print »
- Email »
The following is an arguably sarcastic tweet issued from GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul’s official Twitter account mocking rival Jon Huntsman.
The berating tweet reads:
“We found your one Iowa voter, he’s in Linn precinct 5 you might want to call him and say thanks.”
After making its way through the blogosphere, the original tweet was subsequently deleted but someone from Paul’s camp must have thought twice and re-posted the tweet shortly after 9:00 p.m.
The Utah governor chose to skip Tuesday’s Iowa caucuses in lieu of next week’s New Hampshire Republican primary.
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 583 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 363 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 363 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (258)
Old_Bones
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:15amRon Paul is a space alien.
Report Post »Couple Hundy
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:34amyea. What a crazy guy he is with all his reducing the size of government talk? (rolls eyes)
Find me a candidate who has his fiscal sensibilities and a strong foreign policy and I will vote for them… Until then, I’d like to see four years of downsizing the fed…
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:47amHmmm,
Report Post »Ron Paul mentioned freedom, liberty, individual responsibility, and the Constitution in his Iowa caucus speech.
Gingrich couldn’t stop talking about War with Iran and about negative attack ads.
Romney also couldn’t stop talking about War with Iran. I can’t believe a word Romney says anymore though. He is the biggest flip-flopping progressive of them. Well or at least a close tie with Gingrich.
I’m not sure if I heard Perry, Romney, or Santorum mention the Constitution once.
Miami
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:51amWakingSheep
That would be Iran that keeps wanting war or haven’t you seen the news…?
Your name fits you well…
Report Post »Miami
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:54amOld_Bones
He‘s not a space alien but he believes he’s seen them
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:01am@Miami
Report Post »Have you ever seen a map of the U.S. military bases surrounding Iran?
Ever heard of the 1953 Iran coup? Did Iraq want to go to WAR with us when we invaded?
Were there Al-queda in Iraq when we invaded? Did you know the CIA were responsible for installing Saddam in Iraq? I have watched the news but I don’t BAAAAA to their war drums because I understand the past.
Wat Tyler
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:10amMiami- I see you have fallen for the hype, you gullible fool.
Iran is just posturing. They don’t want war. They are not strong and are not a viable threat to the US.
Let’s get to the truth. The only threat they are to is the bankster/Wall Street/ Tel Aviv axis that has a stranglehold on the “mainstream” media, and, hence, the simple minded, spoon fed fools like you.
Report Post »Miami
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:15amCouple Hundy
His opinions on the financial mess we’re in is not what makes him crazy.
His truther belief, his ignorance of the Islamist threat, his refusal to listen to the Iranian leader’s own words, the delusional belief that our enemies would not seize on our absence as if we weren’t already surrounded by enemies. As well the hoards of American loathing from with in, who would line up to collaborate with any external enemies.
Did you not see the German guy in LA that burned a bunch of homes and cars because his mom was getting deported….?
He was proud to say how much he hates the US
Ignorance of our enemies does not make them go away nor does it make them hate America any less. Many have been at it 235 years and have been against other beliefs 1600 to 1700 years. Funny the US was not around back then, yet they were still killing none Muslims….
Report Post »Wat Tyler
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:23amIran is the boogie man du jour. We’ve had so many in the last decade.
Read Orwell’s “1984”.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:29am@Miami
Report Post »So i take it as a no about my questions above? Read up and you will see; yes my name does fit me well.
Also, please educate me. Tell me when radical islam bombed the U.S. prior to our interventionism over seas.
Miami
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:36amWakingSheep
Really..?
The Iraq spew? Sure you’re not a Liberal?
Gee I was not aware the world history began in the twentieth century. You are aware Iran or Persia sided with Hitler’s Nazi regime as did the Muslim Brother Hood (founded in 1928 to recreate the caliphate) You do know that they fought against the US in WWII? You know the war Ron Paul said he would not have fought…
Good sheep, good sheep
Report Post »Miami
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:38amWakingSheep
That’s a good Idea, maybe you should do some reading
Report Post »Miami
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:46amWakingSheep
Gee, I don’t know since the Barbary War 1801–1805 or so. You know the Tripolitan War fought against North African Berber Muslim. You should take your advice and learn some history
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:47am@Miami
Report Post »So not only did you not answer any of the questions; you resort to calling me a liberal because i don’t take the idea of war lightly?
Well apparently it doesn’t matter if you are liberal or conservative; you are supposed to support any war because MSM says so. No matter if its true or not; SUPPORT WAR
CptStubbing
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:53amHow do we avoid WW3? Capitulate and allow Iran to have the Nuke or attack Iran and face Russia and China on foreign soil against 72 million people who will definitely not be seeing us as liberators.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/316943
Report Post »Miami
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:59amWat Tyler
Yes that’s what Tyrants do before they strike,For some reason you Ron Paul guys don’t know history. Makes me think you all voted for Obama and now regret it. So you flipped to the anti-Obama on finances without understanding the effects of foreign policy. Much less actual history
Hype that is funny, MSM if anything is downplaying the reality that Obama is clueless on foreign affaires.
Report Post »samuelwcordrey
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 2:00amcareful wakingsheep Hitler memorized the entire book of John. That didn’t make him a christian. You and I both know that Santorum is very strong on the constitution. By the way, many destructive policies are pushed by the dems in the name of freedom, and a devestating foreign policy is pushed by Ron Paul in the name of minding our own business. Pearl Harbor would not have happened if we had taken on the axis of evil when they promised to rule the world, but we always wait, because its always none of our business until we have another memorial day to remember. The day a power threatens to destroy us someday, he just became our business. How many people must die because you don’t want to deal with it?
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 2:02amYou know, GLENN BECK, is starting to sound alot like the PTL CLUB of the Late 70s and 80s.
Report Post »The Crismil
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 2:11amJuveniles running that campaign.
BTW there WAKINGSHEEP. In case you didn‘t know it Iran declared war on the United States in 1979 and hasn’t rescinded it. They are still calling us the enemy. See:
http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL6E8C30GG20120103
If they get the nukes they’re seeking, they will use them.
I’m fed up with supposedly “educated” people thinking you can simply talk thugs into your way of thinking when they think they’ve got the upper hand.
Wake up yourself WakingSheep. Extrapolate the playground bully to the head of a nation-state.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isfn4OxCPQs&feature=related
The only thing you can use is the CREDIBLE threat of retaliation or intervention to prevent bully’s and thugs from harming peace-loving people.
Report Post »Miami
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 2:27amWakingSheep
Can you read…?
By the way, I spent 7 years in sevice of this nation that ended in the first Gulf war. You know when Saddam Hussein who invaded Kuwait.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 2:45am@miami… YeS! The same Saddam who was Donald Rumsfeld’s close friend and ally. The same Saddam who invaded kuwait using AMERICAN military components that WE sold him. The same Saddam who was going to quit trading oil in US dollars and switch to trade in the EURO? Why? So he could make more profits and so the American Dollar would dramtically decline.(aka the silent WMD). If the Arab oil suckers would have seen how much money Saddam would’ve made from the switch, most woulda followed suit. Thus crumbling the Dollars position as, THE currency, oil is traded by. Hmm…
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:16am*From pg 2, since, repost’d here since no one really reads past the 1st page anyways*
Tiffany Gabbay is an attack Journalist with an agenda. She obviously was implanted to write as MANY Ron Paul stories as possible. Her agenda. Stick to the Establishment talking points by insinuating he’s a racist, saying he’s anti-semitic, alledging and Insinuating he is funded by George Soros (next on the list), calling him dangerous, insinuating he is pro-palenstine, saying he parrots Osama, saying he will cower to Iran, claiming he wants Iran to build a bomb and nuke us along with Israel….
Seems like an Operation Endgame strategy. Fearmonger, Fearmonger, War, war, war…
Do you have the guts to say you support ushering the End of the World scenario? Dont you have to aid or provoke the enemy to make their so called messiah appear (our anti-christ)?
Report Post »JJ Coolay
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:31amI’m not sure if I heard Perry, Romney, or Santorum mention the Constitution once.
_____________________
That’s all well and good that Paul talks about the constitution, but seriously, what we need from the POTUS in the next 4 years is someone that will stop the bleeding. We need a guy that knows something about economics. Romney does and has a tract record for that.
Report Post »We’re 15 trillion $$ in debt. THAT HAS TO STOP.
THAT’S what I want from my next president.
Miami
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 5:52amCause4Liberty
What’s your point?
Rumsfeld wanted to ruin the US economy? Or that these Iraqis, Iranians or Muslims can’t be trusted…?
While I was no fan of the Bush administration I seriously doubt they were intentionally trying to undermine the US economy. That kind of sounds like truther spew, but that’s just me.
More likely is the fact Muslims cannot be trusted. If you wonder why I make such broad statement? Simple, it’s in the Quran, one who transgresses and lies. …. According to this verse a Muslim can pretend to befriend infidels. http://www.islamreview.com/articles/lyingprint.htm
Report Post »little big man
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 6:46amPaulBots should not be to thrilled with a 3rd place showing. you are about to get your A_ ses kicked in NH. then it’s down hill from there.
Report Post »Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:00amOLD bones- I noticed you made that exact point before on another article.
Report Post »short on wit?
Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:07amLittle Big man- if you want to call fellow conservatives “Paulbots” get ready for another Obama term.
Report Post »that should wipe that sniveling grin off your face. I won’t vote for the R candidate for the R.
I would rather have Obama than vote for Romney/Santorum. sorry
No Patriot Act supporters for me. Go ahead redistribute the Constitution.
I know many who ar sick of the “lesser of two evils” Who cares what beck does I don’t listen much to him- especially since he sometimes uses foul language and my kids hear it. Hypocritical for someone who is trying to be righteous..as we all are.
NHwinter
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:25amThese replies to each other sound exactly like the Republicans attacking each other. I used to enjoy the comments on here when they stayed on subject. Now, people just attack each other and I’ve had enough of that from Democrates. You can disagree with someone without calling each other names. Exactly what the Democrates do. Bahumbug.
Report Post »Dustoff
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 8:52amPssssss, hey Ron. With all your campaigning in Iowa, you still came in 3rd.
I’d be careful who you mock.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 10:13amIn 23 years in congress Ron Paul has sponsored 620 pieces of legislation, only ONE of which has been signed into Law. The sale of the old US customs house to the Galveston Historical Society.
Not a very impressive leader. But he will legalize Pot!
Report Post »CPT_GCF
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 10:16amI‘m tired of Ron Paul’s isolationist views and the Paulists who follow him. Anyone who thinks that Iran is no threat to the U.S. is a complete moron. Who is the number one terrorist sponsoring state? Who believes that they must wipe out the Jews and Christians? I can’t believe someone actually questioned if Al-Queda was in Iraq. Were we the only country who asserted that Iraq had WMDs? As a superpower, what would actually happen if we were to pull all troops out of the world? What does it say about Ron Paul when a majority of his supporters are OWS, conspiracy theorists and many supporters are anti-military? I’m all for his fiscal beliefs and I defend the Constitution, but I‘m also educated and know he would slit America’s throat with his foreign policy.
Report Post »CPT_GCF
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 11:18amLibertyluvnmomma would rather have Obama than Santorum? Wow, who do you think signed the extension? Uneducated.
Report Post »Freedomluver
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:42pmThe Neo-Cons are back to their old Boggie Man routine that worked so well in Iraq, after all they were on the verge of going nuclear….right? How many times do you think you can fool everyone?
Where is your demand to level Pakistan who has all kinds of radicals and actually harbored Bin Laden?
How you can once again expect anyone to take you seriously with the flat out lies that got us into Iraq is beyond belief.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:48pm@miami. “What’s your point? Rumsfeld wanted to ruin the US economy? Or that these Iraqis, Iranians or Muslims can’t be trusted…? While I was no fan of the Bush administration I seriously doubt they were intentionally trying to undermine the US economy. That kind of sounds like truther spew, but that’s just me.”
————————————————————-
They say the truth hurts, but it will also set you free. I am no 9/11 Truther. But stating COMPLETE FACTS is truth.
Notice, I never said Rumsfeld wanted to ruin the economy. You put those words into my mouth. What I said was, Rumsfeld was close friends and allies with Saddam. During the Iraq-Iran conflict? Then didn’t we get caught trying to fund both sides, Iran-contra? Look up your recent history. I do believe our Country is exceptional, but not exceptional to the repercussions of secret doings on our behalf.
If you want a brief history lesson, Watch THIS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo
Even if you hate RP, at least watch the history lesson given by the Former CIA and author of the Book titled “Blowback.”
I bet $ you will not take the time to do so.
Report Post »pamela kay
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:34pmHe is acting like a kid in middle school. We needa mature and serious candidate, not a Mr. Rogers in a crumbled suit and tie playing on twitter.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 9:13pm@Miami
Sounds like somebody is scared of the boogie man. The Nazi’s could never come back. They didn’t have twitter back in the day. You still never answered any of my original posts. Yes I understand Iran declared war in 1979 but you didn’t answer me about the coup in 1953. Isn’t that before 1979?
We created this monster in the middle east way back and we continue the same path.
The people in most of the middle east don’t even know why we are over there!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1YAv_tPmho
BTW did you here about the LEAN military Obama is talking about? It is because we can’t afford it any longer. Would you rather have 50,000 extra troop ready to go here at home or in Germany? They have been closing bases here at home and opening more over seas for years.
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »spankadonkey
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:41pmWell, all you Paulbutz, what’s the spin now? All those people in Iowa are stupid. Or is it that there was massive voter fraud? Or all the Paul people were forbidden from voting? Or Iowa just isn’t that important? I’m sure you all will be very creative with your excuses. Ron FRAUD Paul what a guy.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:28amActually the media went crazy saying Iowa wasn’t important this year even though it meant everything four years ago. We should just go back to sleep. Iowa isn’t important because MSM says so.
BAAAAAA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwyqe9tf5Mc
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:50amWe will just have to see how the candidates do in the months to come. Ron Paul has more dedicated support across America, does Santorum? Only time will tell.
I’m still in it to win it.
RON PAUL 2012
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 2:00amYup, The media already said to look at who makes 2 and 3 not first. LOL The media said the Iowa caucus didn’t matter. LOL
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 2:56am@spank. Here’ an excuse for you wise guy. Considering the flavor of the week mentality of this race, It is no surprise that Mitt Romney and Santorum would be tied for first, in this starting line (Huckabee) Iowa Caucus. Where did santorum come from? It was his turn to be the flavor. Congrats, the media machine has effectivly rose another flavor of the week. WE ALL KNOW how long they last. The race has just BEGUN and it will get interesting. BTW, who was in strong 3rd at 21%? Thats what i thought, RON PAUL is a top tier candidate, and, he is ELECTABLE.
Report Post »TheWholeTruth
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:21amWell, you see. The Iowa Caucus really isn’t all that important. It’s really just another straw poll. Ron Paul came away the potential winner. Why?
“That’s because Iowa’s Republican caucuses are actually non-binding — it’s technically just a straw poll. The only thing that will get Paul’s — or any other candidate’s — Iowa supporters to Tampa next year is if they stuck around and volunteered, or were elected, as delegates.“ ”Senior advisors for Paul’s coalitions team told Business Insider this week that the campaign’s organizational strategy was focused not only on getting as many votes as they can, but in making sure that their volunteers stuck around after the voting to make sure that they were nominated as delegates to the county’s Republican convention — the first step towards being appointed as a delegate to the Republican National Convention.”
Yep, crazy like a fox.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:43amPalin: GOP better not marginalize Ron Paul and his supporters
http://www.therightscoop.com/palin-gop-better-not-marginalize-ron-paul-and-his-supporters/
Report Post »Morty48
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:38pmAnd of Course it’s Tiffany Gabbay who wrote this .With Her daily smear against the Paul Campaign..Isn’t their any openings at the Daily Kos or Newsweek Honey?
Report Post »Miami
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:59pmOkay Ronbots
You all spent 5years try to win Iowa, spent millions and got beat by a guy and a pickup truck ( Rick Santorum ) Its time to reevaluate your devotion and values…
Report Post »booger71
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:08amRon only got 14% of the Republican votes, the other 7% came from democrats which in Iowa you can do. Most of the states have closed primaries. He doesn’t have a chance.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:28am@MIAMI It will be cold day in hell!!!
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:32am@booger71
Report Post »probably want to check your numbers again.
Miami
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:49amashestoashes
So you’ll support another four years of Obama…?
Good grief you guys are dumber than I thought.
Cold day in hell?
Oh it will be, it will be with fuel prices will necessarily have to rise…
This country will be hell under another Obama administration and you won’t be able to keep warm.
So yeah it swill be a cold day in hell…!
Report Post »CatB
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:50am@MORTY48
Who wrote the “tweet”? … that is who you should be mad at .. but I don’t see much “class” coming from the Paul supporters .. mostly name calling and lies.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:59amMiami… without our Constituiton and our staying in these ridiculous wars what do you think is going to happen..If we go to war with Iran..we will be fighting Russia and China..oh but I guess we can just kick China ‘s a$$ and not worry about paying her those trillions back huh? And I suppose they can keep funding those wars on thin air!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:15amNo WONDER you Ron Paul guys would put the trust of running an ENTIRE NATION in the incompetent hands of three-decade Career Politician who didn’t even have a clue what was being written in his own newsletter.
Report Post »TheWholeTruth
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:25amMiami: I’m proud to be a RonBot programmed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights with Freedom and personal liberty as my prime directive. It sure beats being and EstaBot programmed by Establishment propaganda with doing the establishment’s will as a prime directive.
Report Post »Dougral Supports Israel
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:36pmRon Paul will have his brief moment in the sun then he will sink back into the shadows where he belongs.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:43pmYeah him and personal liberty, freedom, diplomacy, and the Constitution! Lock all those crazies up!
Report Post »Dougral Supports Israel
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:50pmHis foreign policy and world view give me the willies.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:53pmWOO WAR!!!!
WOO WAR!!!!
That foreign policy better?
Report Post »Dougral Supports Israel
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:07amIsolationism will not serve us well. We are a world power with world interests. If we pull back and ignore the world we will soon find it breaking down our doors.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:13amHow many foreign bases do the other world powers have? It pales in comparison. How much do they spend on their military? Our military budget is more than all of the other superpowers combined. This is non-sustainable, especially without drastic, and I do mean drastic, cuts to our social programs here at home. And that is something that neither Santorum nor Romney will do.
Report Post »Dougral Supports Israel
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:22amThe social programs are what is killing us, ratchet those back. We are becoming a nation of dependents which weakens us greatly. There is money that could be cut from the military but we don’t want to be found wanting in an increasingly chaotic world.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:26am@Dougral Supports Israel
I don’t believe you have really looked up his foreign policy beliefs. He is not an isolationist he could be considered a non-interventionist though. His beliefs are in line with our founding fathers. The founders warned us of everything that is going on right now. We have been ignoring what they said for over a century now and look at where we are. Most of these countries we are in do not want us there but we insist our military policing the globe. Watch Netanyahu speak at Congress about how we don’t need to bring democracy or military to Israel because they already have them and can take care of themselves. Ron Paul is the only candidate that ensures no more WARS. The other candidates have come out endorsing WAR with Iran. Look up the 1953 Iran coup d etat.
Did Iraq have WMD’s or Al-queda when we invaded? Osama was even found in a country we pay billions of dollars of foreign aid to who have WMD’s and are hostile to Israel.
If those don‘t get you believing we shouldn’t be invading other countries sovereignty then there is one cold hard fact that will. We cannot afford it any longer.
The dept rose to amounts I will never see go down in my lifetime under Bush and the dept rose to amounts my children will never see go down in their lifetime under Obama.
“Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations – entangling alliances with none.”
Report Post »-Thomas Jefferson-
Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:27amWe need to take a balanced approach and ratchet it all back. Our true military deterence comes from our Navy anyway with our aircraft carriers and ballistic missile submarines.
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:28amPlus Santorum and Romney are all about stripping you of your rights.
Report Post »P-51D
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:35amWe are a world super power and must protect are interest? I think some mad man with a little square mustache gave that same speech back in 1939. Then he attacked Poland.
Report Post »Dougral Supports Israel
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:06amFunny that you bring up Hitler P-51D. Where would we be now if we had taken a non-interventionist position with the Axis powers in WWII? Perhaps they would have gotten the bomb and nuked us while we thought we were safe because we weren’t involved? The Nazi’s were true evil and needed to be destroyed. Japan was almost as bad and if you don’t think so ask the Koreans and Chinese. American intervention stopped this evil cold in its tracks and now both Germany and Japan are peaceful allies of America. Would that have been so if we had not intervened in the war?
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:15am@DouglralSupportsIsrael
Many people believe that had Ron Paul been President during WW1 that Hitler never even would have rose to power.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:22am@Dougral Supports Israel
Report Post »So no argument with my post above?
Nazi’s are no longer a threat. The American empire is a threat to us and other nations. Look up NDAA (all in the name of terrorism).
Iran is almost 3rd world and their military would be crushed by us if needed but what about Russia and China?
jcannon98188
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 3:51am@DOUGRAL SUPPORTS ISRAEL
You do realize that in WW2, America did not ‘intervene’ militarily at all? We were attacked first by the Japanese, and the Germans follow suite declaring war against us (due to their treaty with Japan, requiring them to do so). It was not because America noticed this Great Evil coming from Europe, or because we wanted to save the Jews. We went to war, because we were attacked first. Then we went in, kicked butt, and won the day. That is what Ron Paul is all about. He is not against using our military when needed. What he is against is this “kinetic military action” and “police actions” that we have been involved in. The constitution says that the Military can only go to war if Congress votes on it. That is all he is asking for, a vote from our elected representatives authorizing America to declare war, just like the constitution says.
Report Post »Dismayed Veteran
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 10:31am@JCannon
The US intervened in both Europe and the Pacific prior to Pearl Harbor. We supplied the UK with food, munitions, armament and naval ships through the Lend Lease Program. We embargoed oil and steel to Japan. Remember filling the logistics chain is the most important weapon of war.
Report Post »UrsaMajor
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 7:13am“Yeah him and personal liberty, freedom, diplomacy, and the Constitution!”
‘… and rascist neslatters.”
You forgot the racist newslatters.
Report Post »Morty48
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:34pmThe latest salvo in that effort is Huntsman’s “The Ron Paul Chronicles,” a Web-based video series of out-of-context quotes from Paul and other observers designed to make Paul look like a conspiracy nut, complete with a Twilight Zone-themed introduction.
This is what the comment was in response too … and maybe also that Huntsman is a Progressive douchebag!!
Report Post »AquaBuddha
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:33pmI sure hope we’ve heard the last of Ron Paul
Report Post »Going from Commie to Crazy wasn’t what we need in the white House
db321
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:35pmPaul‘s crowd look a lot like OWSer’s.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:37pmYeah! We somebody to lead us to WAR in Iran! Hope you have face paint.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:45pm@DB321 Paul‘s crowd look a lot like OWSer’s. Yeah ..sure DB you keep telling yourself that when Obama gets back in or the RHINO of your choice..when they decide that this country goes into total collapse and you are under the control of the UN.. .You just keep telling yourself that..As a Christian I am not supposed to enjoy the fall of my enemy… but it seems that is all the pleasure that I would get even though we will all have to suffer is that all you ones who are so so stupendously clueless will know that you are responsible for your misery..
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:23amLOL They think Ron Paul is going to quit. They think Ron Paul Supporters just walk away after an Iowa Caucus. You will hear us all the way to the end partner spraying attack ads left and right. Since dirt is so easy find. Have fun with this lame media brainwashing victory.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:23amYeah..well you will play hell getting any Ron Paul person to vote for one of your NEO Con progressives..You can sink this ship all by yourselves.!!
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:31am@ashestoashes
Report Post »I’m writing in Ron Paul how about you?
The Constitution is the only path. Anything else ensures this countries destruction.
ashestoashes
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:45am@QAKINGSHEEP Count me in!!
Report Post »American Soldier (Separated)
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:54amI’ll be writing him in.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:31am3rd place in Iowa wasn’t quite what I was hoping for, but it’s a very close 3rd to the top 2 in the race. Nothing to be ashamed of at all and he still can win the nomination despite the uphill battle against the establishment. Judge Napolitano said it best: It’s we the people vs. the establishment.
If RP doesn’t get the nomination, I believe he should run 3rd party. He needs to get that message of liberty out there for the world to see. While the other two bozos are on the stage talking about which version of big government is better than the other, Ron will be there reminding them of the constitution and individual liberty. That is a debate this country needs to have and it needs to be done on a national level in debates and in a presidential campaign. This is bigger than winning an election; it’s about spreading the message of liberty in hearts and minds of the people. Running 3rd party against the two candidates from the big government party will surely help get that message out there.
Report Post »Love_John_Galt
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 7:33amI will definitely (and proudly) be voting for Ron Paul in November!
Go Constitutional or Go Bust!
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:31pmfor all the talk about independent thought, you would think there would be more respect for it on this site. But no, Glen leads the pack in unwarranted ridicule of a fine Constitutionalist.
Maybe the flash in the pan was fool’s gold.
Report Post »LastChanceToSaveOurRepublic
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:13amDid you watch GBTV tonight? not sure what to make of the George Sorros thing. If it is true I am kind of pissed that GB held back on us until today. I have not had time to verify (Not sure I know how).
RP 2012 …
Report Post »Marnin
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:06amHe doesn’t usually bring things up until he has fully verified it. Today was probably the first show he has done since he did. If you want to verify it, go look at the people on the committee, and find their background bios on the web. It is all accurate.
Report Post »Cymry
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:23pmThat’s actually funny. If the truth be told, I agree with about 80% of Ron Paul’s espoused policies, it’s just the other 20% (foreign policy, etc.) that runs the train off the track for me.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:25pmYou are getting sleepy……there is no new world order…. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtbmmYCQTbs
Report Post »Cymry
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:29pm@Abe,
Report Post »my uncle was part of the brain trust that helped set it up. yes, i used the past tense.
Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:32pmLoose lips sink ships.
Report Post »Cymry
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:38pmI belong to Jesus.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:17amSo you agree with policing the world and nation building other countries at a trillion a year..and knowing that we are 16 trillion in the hole with 1.5 trillion being sought after to keep the government running? You agree that we should maybe start WORLD WAR111 over Iran? You agree that it is a good policy to stay in continual wars and that bringing our military home to build it here and to concentrate on countering terrorrism is a bad idea? You agree that we should go under the NWO? Because that is what we are doing and we will be under the authority of the UN.. Yeah..I’m starting to see your point!!
Report Post »lel2007
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:13pmThe Ron Paul camp mocks anyone who is not in the Ron Paul camp. That’s what makes the Ron Paul camp so obnoxious.
Report Post »Ookspay
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:22pmONE?… Interesting coincidence. One, that is the number of pieces of legislation that Ron Paul has authored and has been passed in the House of Representatives in 30 years.
I will vote for Ron Paul against Obama if he is the nominee.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:26pmGo ahead, alienate the Ron Paul crowd.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtbmmYCQTbs
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:34pmThats okay. There time is coming. We will remember…………………….
Report Post »db321
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:36pmWhat makes Paul so obnoxious is that he looks like Elmer Fudd!
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:52pmTotally obnoxious! Pledging to have his salary in the white house match that of the household median income! $39,000 you dirty obnoxious arrogant @hole!
Report Post »Rational Man
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:05amMy last post above was posted abuot 30mins. ago. Now I see that Santorum, with 96% in at the caucus, he is 4 points ahead of Paul who has fallen into 3rd place and Santorum is in first.
It appears that the Paulistian’s time has come already!
Report Post »Let the mocking and I told you so’s begin…………………………..
Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:16amOh, please RM. The battle is far from over. McCain came in 3rd or 4th in Iowa last election and guess who the nominee was?
Report Post »Doctor Nordo
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:19amIt certainly wasn’t Huckabee, who did win Iowa.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:20amPaul’s support has been steady but surely growing. Expect Santorum to fall soon.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:41amTh Ron Camp are going to be the ones saying I told you so when your rights are being stripped away like no tomorow. There going to drive us into World War 3 with 15 trillion in debt.. hmm I guess Republicans are trying to destroy the Country just like Obama but in a different fashion. Maniac war mongers. Good Luck.. Oh and btw.. the army is waiting for your approval to join war mongers. Have fun with santorum.. oh and the draft too for your nice son & daughter too.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:53am@DB Intelligent people look at the substance of a man..and in Pauls case..this doctor has several degrees and is highly accomplished..He voted for us every step of the way in Congress..He has voted for our Constitutional rights..Oh but that’s right…according to you we should make voting some beauty contestant winners.for the President of the United States.. I would say that I cannot believe the naivety of this nation..but then again..nothing surprises me anymore…I can honestly say that you deserve what you are going to get.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:54am@PoliticiansRCrooks
Report Post »Amen! We obviously have done our homework and some.
THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:01pmHa ha..The TRUTH hurts doesn’t it you politically nuetered pansies..
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:35pmNice and i agree.
Report Post »I’m just got through listening to Dr. Paul speak about the Constitution, liberty, freedom, and no wars or militarism in his Iowa Caucus speech.
Gingrich couldn’t stop talking about the negativity of the t.v. ad’s against him, how the terrorists were going to get us if we don’t go get them, and the most important thing is to beat Obama.
They think I‘m crazy for supporting everything Ron Paul stands for and ignore the fact that Iraq did not have WMD’s or Al-queda when we invaded.
Where were they? What about Osama where was he? Oh yeah, he was in Pakistan who we give foreign aid to.
The wars will get us nowhere and an election of Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Perry, or Bachman guarantee us much more. The time has come to choose NDAA and WAR or choose Ron Paul and the Constitution. Looks like a close third in Iowa which the media told me was unimportant this year unlike four years ago. So, third is good but lets move on and get first in the states the media tells us are important.
Ron Paul 2012!
spankadonkey
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:35pmTTSMYF – Pop goes the weasel. Hurry and send him more money. Ron FRAUD Paul what a guy.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:08am@spankadonkey
Report Post »I have already maxed out my contributions and I don‘t believe Ron Paul has a super Pac like Romney so I can’t send anymore. I did buy his books to help out and I’m even looking into bumper stickers and copper coins with Dr. Paul.
I support freedom, individual responsibility, and the Constitution in whatever way I can.
BadgerBenson
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:29pmHarshness. I’m not a big Paul fan, but I don’t dislike him either. This tweet on the other hand is somewhat refreshing to me. It proves that the Paul camp is human, and does have a little humor.
Report Post »QuietBeige
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:49pmWhat are you typing about? Ron Paul is VERY humorous. Clearly you have never listened to or read anything regarding his foreign policy?!
Report Post »LibertyGoddess
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:54pmHumor? I don’t think it is appropriate for someone who wants to be president. This is not the kind of humor he should be tyring to pull off right now.
Report Post »V-MAN MACE
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:00pmAnytime they start going against and changing their own rules for counting votes, you know they’re about to cheat.
The media already is in the bag for the globalists, they always skew poll results.
But it doesn’t matter. Ron Paul wins anyway by injecting real issues.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:28pmMaybe you just aren’t aware of what is at stake
I know Romney isn’t.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel?feature=g-all-a#p/a/4DC30D7045E7F29F/0/x-CrNlilZho
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:29pmSome goof in the Paul camp makes a joke on this twitter thing and Ron Paul is a idiot? Maybe the media will make him denounce this comment 50 times or so.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:47pm@COMMON I saw where you laughed and I was all ticked off because they were making rude comments..then I went to another thread and I got tickled myself..I started thinking about a couple of guys laughing about Huntsman and doing that tweet..don’t you know that they were having a ball?
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:48pmSome goof in the Paul camp ??? I think that pretty much covers all of them….
Report Post »Thanks!
QuietBeige
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:54pmNah – nobody in the MSM really wants to talk about Paul. Unless something like this happens. Then he gets all kinds of attention.
His camp did it on purpose because they know it will draw attention to him (is mostly harmless) and he isn’t “all there” anymore so will take what he can get.
Sorry!!!
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:58pmashestoashes
Report Post »I had to read it twice to make sure I was not missing something. Its a Joke of a story. I laugh so loud I woke up Yepmitroll 3 trailers over.
Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:29pmGo ahead, alienate your allies. Good strategy.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel?feature=g-all-a#p/a/4DC30D7045E7F29F/0/x-CrNlilZho
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:38pm@ABRAHAMYOUNG Who are you talking to? Common and Me?
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:26pmDr. Paul doesn’t seem to mind who speaks for him or what they say.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:02pmas long as he rakes in the Cash……money bomb money bomb money bomb
Report Post »Suckers!
Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:16pmIt’s that pesky First Amendment. Maybe the next president will eradicate it, like this one did the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th just this past weekend. Who says Hawaii wasn’t a working vacation?
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:17pmMaybe he‘s just old school and doesn’t care what people have to say. Let them speak their mind, and don’t be a pansy about it. You know, back in the old day when political correctness and sensitivity was actually rare and looked down upon. This is (or was) a free country. Everyone had free speech. You can’t offend anyone today.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:57pmThank you Colt!
Report Post »I wasn’t around for that considering my age but I do know what freedom of speech is supposed to mean!
The Constitution allows controversy.
colt1860
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:04am@WakingSheep I’m only 23. However, I study a lot of history, and review and study lots of things from the “good old times”. I have a few collection of old books and movies from this by gone era. I have been told before though that I act or know more than my age actually is. A you can‘t restore a nation if you don’t know what it actually used to be.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:16am@colt1860
Report Post »I’m 26 but I have done my fair share of reading history and research myself.
You are %100 correct about restoring our nation.
People nowadays don’t even know what went down 10 years ago in Iraq!
It blows me away that the nation has such a short attention span we forgot what happened almost a decade ago. There are things that happened 100 years ago that still affect us today.
Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:25pmPlan for the NEOCONS — Say anything bad about Ron Paul.
Hey guess what!! Ron Paul MAY have called someone a poop-head in third grade.
OH MY GOD!!! I can’t vote for him NOW!!!!
The ONLY people that have bad things to say about Ron Paul are the ones who have not done their research. Go ahead – vote for the “same old thing” and you know what you will get? The “same old thing”. Just don’t bitch too loudly when we get John McCain II and Obama gets re-elected because the OTHER SHOE drops after we nominate someone like ROMNEY.
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:32pmI rest my case…
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:44pmI have done exhaustive research. None of the candidates are even close to perfect. I support the person that most closely matches my principles and world view. I would hope that could be said of every American voter. I sincerely believe that Paul’s foreign policy is not only dangerous but irresponsible.
The staunch, sometimes rabid, defenders of Ron Paul don’t help their own cause with the name calling aimed at his detractors. I think that Santorum would be a good POTUS. If you believe that Paul is better then you should support him – but do it in a civil, rational manner. By doing that you might even change some minds.
It seems to me that some Paul supporters are also his worst enemies.
Report Post »MeteoricLimbo
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:47pmwell said 82
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:51pm82dAirborne
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:06pm
I would expect nothing less from some Paulbots! (NOTE: I said SOME – not all.) Santorum is doing very well at the moment.
When you use the word “ Paulbots” is it a complement or do you mean it in a derogatory way?
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:58pmI aimed that at the fringe that wants me to believe that Paul is the only hope for the republic. The people who tout his many virtures – he has them – but refuse to see that he also has imperfections. I have never and would never march in lock step with a politician and I don;t trust others that do. If you (or anyone else) don‘t fall into that catagory then I wasn’t referring to you.
Report Post »Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:00pmWe should ALWAYS vote for the best candidate.
Report Post »Too bad they never run.
c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:04pm82dAirborne
Report Post »So your a name caller ?
82dAirborne
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:13pm@commonsense – I’m human I slip up. However I don’t say/type things like: moron, idiot, fool, s o B, jerk, insane, pos, nutjob, a -hole. All of these have been directed at me by Paul supporters on this website.
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:15pm@commonsense – And in some cases “Paulbot” is an accurate descriptive term for supporters who blindly follow him. So it would stand to reason that there are also Santorumbots or Perrybots……………
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:32pm@82 These are sometimes just the most vocal supporters, or internet savvy. When you go to a rally, it’s different. Its energetic, but you see your everyday American there. Everyone, of all shapes and sizes. I agree, some may express themselves to anxiously, but I don’t let anyone get to me. As for the name calling, it comes both ways.
What other candidate holds a message or platform that has been able to get many people thinking, researching, riled up, energetic, enthusiastic, and actually arguing and debating about Constitutional matters, foreign policy, free markets, capitalism, gun rights, private property rights, personal liberties, privacy rights, Big Government solutions, NDAA, Patriot Act, the Federal Reserve, troops, foreign relations, abortion, marriage, sound money, economics, Iraq War, Big Brother, DHS, TSA, Iran, Israel, Europe, Liberty, Independence, founding fathers, Jefferson, federalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Limited Government, public schools, UN, EPA, income tax, IRS, individual mandates, welfare, nanny state, CIA, US border security, state rights, militarism, defense, interventionism, non-interventionism, activism, legal research, republic, political systems, philosophical ideas, international affairs, Government corruption, FEMA, Government spending, war veterans, Constitutional oaths and adherence, strict interpretation of our organic laws, Declaration of Independence, and so many other topics?
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:33pmThose of you who sheepishly bleat the ron’s foreign policy is dangerous, need to follow Glen’s advice and study it for yourself.
You are quite missing the point in so many many ways.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:43pmContinued…
With those kinds of topics and subjects, you’re bound to find Americans from various backgrounds, religions, philosophies, ideologies, political spectrum, ethnicity, age, occupation, intelligence, education, enthusiasm, characteristics, attitudes, and personalities. The message of Liberty is a uniting factor and will have everyone talking. All sorts of people will join and initiate their own conversations. And not one will represent everyone, most or some. This kind of engagement will result in individuals freely expressing themselves, irregardless of what others may believe. Whether pro or con, both sides will defend, fight or come to common grounds regarding their positions and that of others. The American people are fed up. I don‘t expect them to talk so nicely when they’re mad as hell. I’m not condoning it, but I don’t let it bother me. I agree though. Civility, respect, maturity, discourse, manners, and peace are far better approaches. And that is how I try to conduct myself in conversations. I do realize though, that within these discussions, political exchange will always be a bit more heated than expected or desired, especially when talking about Government and personal liberties. As within everyone’s heart, freedom cries the loudest.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:48pmDoesn’t matter…..Paul took third place.
Report Post »Neo-cons 1 Paulbots 0
WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:08am@RepubliCorp
No the media said Iowa doesn’t matter. Four years ago Iowa mattered but apparently not so now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwyqe9tf5Mc
So, we can just move on and try to win first in the states that do matter.
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:16am@RepubliCorp It does matter. When you have both the Left and Right against you. When the MSM and radio talking heads are attacking you. When every smear, distortion and misinformation is thrown at you. When the media pinheads say you’re unelectable and crazy. When the bankers and Progressives endorse your Opponents. When distractions are thrown in to avoid discussing actual concerns and legitimate positions to arbitrarily discredit you. And yet you land in third place, in the top three, among the leading pack. That is freaking something. This battle does not end here. It only begins. It’s all about the message.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:22am@WakingSheep LOL. Good point. Iowa doesn’t matter. Santorum will soon decline.
Report Post »Dumbwhiteguy
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:23pmI didn’t realize he was doing george soros in that sustainable defense task force. Would cut 1trillion dollars from our budget but would work with barney frank’s panel of globalist.
ron paul could just be leaking out enough info on the secret society to lead us on he’s against it and could be an old school illuminati. Could be the master warlock.
My luck, I would see the clintons, soros, the bushs, the obamass and the pauls on my train ride.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:34pmNow who’s behaving like the crazy uncle in the attic?
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:57pmPaul was able to garner more than 300 congressman to co-sponsor a bill to audit the Federal Reserve, which included both Democrats and Republicans. The man doesn’t care who the person is, as long as the US Constitution is adhered to.
“I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend.” – Thomas Jefferson
He has joined with many to cut spending, here at home and abroad, audit the fed, secure our individual rights, and protect our personal privacy from Government invasion. He has never joined with anyone from the left to advance a Progressive (more Big Government) law or to advance a Marxist agenda. And that is a fact. No sponsored law by Paul has ever grown Government, unconstitutionally expanded federal powers, increased spending, infringed gun rights, limit state rights, or intrude into personal liberties.
Report Post »frank
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:20pmRonald is an idiot. He like to play games. He sucks.
Report Post »TXPilot
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:24pmThey found only one Huntsman voter? I have it on good authority that the sensors on Paul’s space ship are much more sensitive than that.
Report Post »mommaLION
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:49pm@TXPILOT
Report Post »Thanks for making me laugh! Great word picture :)
TXPilot
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:18pm@MOMMALION……lol….your word picture was Spock sitting there wearing that weird earpiece, wasn’t it?
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:25pmCome on, you know that earpiece was the first bluetooth, and on those little screens they were looking at, they were really playing angry Klingons. Star Trek was that much ahead of their time.
Report Post »TXPilot
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 12:41am@DARMOK…..judging from your handle, you realize that by the time ST-The Next Generation came along, their bluetooth had slid down onto their chest. I guess people in the future will make calls using their nipples….lol
Report Post »kralspaces
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:18pmWho writes this stuff for Paul. He needs to get them under control. This tweet was not necessary. I still support Paul’s policies.
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:17pm@All: Please use the new official phrase of the day when referring to Paul supporters.
Paulieitebotastinianists
Thanks you for your continued support. Tiffany appreciates the article hits.
Report Post »PossumRoadkill
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:23pmYou are just a horse‘s hind end aren’t you? The girl is just doing her job. How do you know if she even likes Ron Paul? That may just be her assignment. It seems like the longer I‘ve been on here the more jerks I’ve seen. I don’t think this is why Glenn started this. You disgrace this kind of place with your unwarranted attacks on the Blaze staff.
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:03pm@Possum: I’m sure your chivalry is noted. I was just trying to help everyone form a unified front, and become consistent in their use of insulting pseudo-humorus monikers. Carry on.
Report Post »modilly
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:09pmWow Blaze! That is some big news in this contest! Great journalism!
Maybe we could implement the Patriot Act against this guy?
Report Post »82dAirborne
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:13pmNaw. The truth will do Paul in.
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:20pmThe news is Rand Paul voted for Huntsmen.
Report Post »Guestabc123
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:03pmEven better, the NDAA
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:11pm@82nd: The truth is that the financial history of the past three decades has proven Paul right. I’m not a betting man (like Mitt Romney) but if I were, I‘d bet he’s right about the future of our country too. What’s that saying about being doomed to repeat history? Ever read about the decline of ancient Rome?
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:18pmLucky for us the huns aren’t still around, they are what did Rome in, but we do have our version of Nero, although he plays the fiddle like Henny Youngman.
Obama: I keep taking my wife places, and she keeps finding her way back.
Obama: Take my country, Please.
Obama: Everytime I pass a healthcare bill, my Doctor says it hurts. So I said, stop doing that.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:32pmhttp://www.votesmart.org/candidate/296/ron-paul
Report Post »HR 1540 – National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
Legislation (Did Not Vote)
WakingSheep
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:41am@82dAirborne
Report Post »What truth do you speak of? Are you talking actual legislation that affects me?
Are you talking about the truth of Ron Pauls strict following of the Constitution.
I believe the truth will continue to make Paul stronger and stronger.
Who is your candidate?
82dAirborne
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:06pmI would expect nothing less from some Paulbots! (NOTE: I said SOME – not all.) Santorum is doing very well at the moment.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:09pmHe sure is…he’s at #1 right now
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:19pmClara! Are you jumping ship on Gov. Perry?
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 5, 2012 at 2:48pmVeritas….NEVER :))
http://www.rickperry.org/
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:06pmI guess we just found out where Rational Man lives now! (LOL)
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:18pmlol
Report Post »Welcome Black Carter
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:05pmJon should tweet back – “good one. All Ron Paul supporters can now go back to whatever care facility they escaped from . Their votes have all been completely wasted…”
Report Post »kralspaces
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:15pmBe nice. You will need our vote this fall.
Report Post »Babeuf
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:06pmBe nice? Doesn’t that work both ways?
Report Post »possom
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:05pmThis election‘s full of class act’s, there’s not a one worth voting for. to hell with it “Me 2012”.
Report Post »Clara88
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:04pmConsider the source….enough said
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 10:02pmSuch class from the Paulies..
Report Post »Veritas Libertas
Posted on January 3, 2012 at 11:25pm@Shasta: Nice. Gotta’ show those Paulies that mocking and name calling are low class. Way to lead by example. Carry on.
Report Post »This_Individual
Posted on January 4, 2012 at 1:49amIt’s nothing more than just a ribbing.
Report Post »