Ron Paul Just Released a Big Statement — and Some are Saying It Means He‘s ’Out of the Race’
- Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:04pm by
Jonathon M. Seidl
- Print »
- Email »
Ron Paul just released an important campaign statement. And according to Politico and others, it’s a fancy way of saying his presidential campaign is “over.”
Here’s the statement from the Paul camp, which says he will not be campaigning in any states that have not already held their primaries:
As I reflect on our 2012 Presidential campaign, I am humbled by the supporters who have worked so hard and sacrificed so much. And I am so proud of what we have accomplished. We will not stop until we have restored what once made America the greatest country in human history.
This campaign fought hard and won electoral success that the talking heads and pundits never thought possible. But, this campaign is also about more than just the 2012 election. It has been part of a quest I began 40 years ago and that so many have joined. It is about the campaign for Liberty, which has taken a tremendous leap forward in this election and will continue to grow stronger in the future until we finally win.
Our campaign will continue to work in the state convention process. We will continue to take leadership positions, win delegates, and carry a strong message to the Republican National Convention that Liberty is the way of the future.
Moving forward, however, we will no longer spend resources campaigning in primaries in states that have not yet voted. Doing so with any hope of success would take many tens of millions of dollars we simply do not have. I encourage all supporters of Liberty to make sure you get to the polls and make your voices heard, particularly in the local, state, and Congressional elections, where so many defenders of Freedom are fighting and need your support.
I hope all supporters of Liberty will remain deeply involved – become delegates, win office, and take leadership positions. I will be right there with you. In the coming days, my campaign leadership will lay out to you our delegate strategy and what you can do to help, so please stay tuned.
For Liberty,
Ron Paul.”
[Emphasis added]
“It’s an original way of announcing that a presidential campaign is over, but that’s what the statement amounts to,” Politico writer Alexander Burns says.
Reacting to the news on Fox News Channel, Sheppard Smith said Ron Paul was “out of the race.”
But Business Insider isn‘t reading finality into Paul’s words, reporting “The statement makes it clear that Paul is not dropping out of the race.” It explains:
In some ways, the announcement merely formalizes the delegate strategy that the campaign has focused on for the past few months. But there is a finality in the language of today‘s statement that indicates that Paul’s longshot presidential bid may be nearing its inevitable end.
Still, the popular Drudge Report agreed with Smith, posting the headline “Paul Out:”




















Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (510)
progressiveslayer
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:36pmLook at all the RINOS that vote with the dems,they raise the debt ceiling and continue spending us into oblivion.Paul was my first choice because I like his fiscal policy and idea of smaller government.His foreign policy which some people irrationally thought would ensure our demise if he were elected is just that,irrational.So we’ll have a choice between a progressive atheist and a progressive Mormon.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:23pmIf he does get out I would like to thank all of you s@it for brains who stood against him. Your only chance for freedom and liberty and you mocked a good man as well as the Constitution…Good job MORONS!!!
When the SHTF i hope you are a looter…in my sights.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:33pm@progressiveslayer,
“His foreign policy which some people irrationally thought would ensure our demise if he were elected is just that,irrational.”
Ron Paul is still in the race: “We will continue to … win delegates …”.
As for his foreign policy, non-intervention was the foreign policy of Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and also the Republican Party in the past. The Republican Party has been co-opted by Progressives.
Also, see here.
Michigan Delegates Are UNBOUND After All – Romney May Lose Michigan
Report Post »http://www.dailypaul.com/233216/michigan-delegates-are-unbound-after-all-romney-may-lose-michigan
KC1
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:36pmAmerica will get what it deserves, you fake patriots supporting Romney are the ones that have doomed America. Thank you blaze and GB for selling out and smearing Paul every chance you get. Romney will lose and it will be because you didnt stick by your principals and nominate a constitutionalist, instead we got another Bush/Mcain GOP Progressive.
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:45pmI’m surprised NO ONE here at The Blaze has caught on… fellow Paul supporters, remember how weeks ago, Paul said he had something ‘very special’ planned for the campaign? And we all wondered if it were an event, or unveiling a big-name supporter? Well, this was it. This is better than anything for Paul.
The media is reporting “RP IS OUT”. But that’s okay, doubters and Fox Watchers, keep thinking Mitt won, tell all your friends he‘s won and Paul’s dropped out. Take the Mitt Romney blue pill and all will be well. No political false flags from Paul’s campaign here!
Heck, to all Romney supporters, why even attend your delegate conventions anymore? Why even go to Tampa? Everything‘s under Mitt’s control. Mitt’s won, you can all go home, us Paul supporters can attend the convention in your place and “ensure Mitt really wins” :)
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:45pm@doggy
LOL. Yeah I am guessing as you are that the people that are prepared for what is coming are mostly Ron Paul supporters. You cannot support Romney knowing what is coming.
Report Post »@leftfighter
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:48pmPaul was out of the race back in October of last year. Hell, he was out of the race for 2012 at the 2008 convention.
I love the guy but the truth is, if there’s a Paul who is presidential material, Ron isn’t the one.
He‘s going to make a great Treasury Secretary and I hope he gets Romney’s ear about at least investigating the Fed, if not shutting the damn thing down altogether.
Report Post »ProbIemSoIver
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:25pmI interpret this as saying his campaign has so much momentum behind the BS MSM curtain, that he doesn’t even have to waste his money anymore. He will have enough delegates to take the nomination.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:34pmWHOA! I see we Ron Paul-outers got pushed out of the first page of this thread already. I‘m thinking eventually we’ll end up on p. 15. Don’t you love how these libs unashamedly support Ron Paul?
Glenn, I love Bets and her lib moderators, too. I do. And like you and Bush, I believe in multiculturalism, EEO, tolerance, non-discrimination or scr*wing the Republic, however you choose to phrase it. Give The Blaze over to those precious, f*****-up libs, pleeeze.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:38pm@progressiveslayer
Report Post »Look at all the RINOS that vote with the dems,
——
I’ve got a better one: Look at all the OBAMANOTS that voted for Ron Paul.
soybomb315
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:43pmRon Paul is the first choice but he is not the ONLY choice. Come this fall, Gary Johnson will be worth voting for and the Constitution Party will probably nominate a high quality guy
Report Post »american1st
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:50pm“For we have entered the age of quantum politics; and Mitt Romney is the first quantum politician. In much the same way that light is both a particle and a wave, Mitt Romney is both a moderate and a conservative, depending on the situation. It is not that he is one or the other; it is not that he is one and then the other. He is both at the same time. No human being can ever simultaneously know both what Mitt Romney’s current position is and where that position will be at some future date. According to the latest theories, the “Mitt Romney” who seems poised to be the Republican nominee is but one of countless Mitt Romneys, each occupying his own cosmos, each supporting a different platform, all of them equally valid and all of them running for president at the same time, in their own alternative Romnealities, somewhere in the vast Romniverse. …And all of them losing to Barack Obama.”
Condensed from David Javerbaum, N.Y. Times, March 31
Report Post »The Realist
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:53pmWhy Romney is better than Obama-Why it DOES make a difference 1)Romney is not a Marxist-communist.2) Romney would not promise Russia “more flexibility 3)Romney does want to “fundamentally change” America 4) Romney would not trash the constitution, 5)Romney does not have a bunch of socialists, Marxists, communists, and even two Maoists working in his administration. He wasn’t reared buy them either. He didn’t have a communist father (Barack Sr.) or a communist childhood mentor (Frank Marshall Davis). Romney did not “seek out Marxist professors” while in college, and then write a book about it telling us he did so.6) Romney did not sit in a church for 20 years where a radical, racist, Marxist, anti-American so-called Pastor presided 7)Romney doesn’t/wouldn’t try to divide people by both class warfare and racial issues. He would not do countless things to incite jealousy, envy and covetousness. 8) Romney would not run up our national debt more than the first 43 U.S. presidents COMBINED, in ONE TERM. 9)Romney would not get on national television to claim capitalism a failure,10)Romney would not bend over backwards to please and appease Muslims both at home and abroad.11) Romney is far superior at running a business, while Obama was a “community organizer” (aka street hustler). Romney would be better for the economy in many ways.12) Romney would not be anti-drilling for our own oil, so we wouldn’t have to buy from terrorists who want to kill us.13)
Report Post »RailRoadCar9
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:58pmi have no faith romeny will be any different than obama i will be writing ron paul in no matter what
Report Post »The Realist
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:59pm13Romney would be much more likely to secure our borders. 14) Romney would not advance the Gay agenda, the abortion agenda, and the Atheist agenda that has become so prevalent with liberals. 15) Romney would not have the main stream liberal media covering up, or sugar-coating his every move 16) The Romney administration would not sue individual states for trying to secure their borders. 17) The Romney administration would not act as protectionists for the radical racist New Black Panther Party. The New Black Panthers had endorsed Obama, and at one time their seal was on the White House site. 18) The Romney administration would not give thousands of guns to Mexico, to create the illusion that tougher gun laws are needed. (Fast and Furious)19) Romney has no plans at decreasing our nuclear weapon stockpile.20) Romney did not start his political career in the home of a domestic, unrepentant terrorist named Bill Ayers. One of COUNTLESS, anti-capitalist, anti-American people in Obama’s life. 21) Romney would be very unlikely to get numerous endorsements from Muslim groups from 2008 to present day as well as Hamas (yes-THAT Hamas)22) The Muslim Brotherhood would not be working in the Mitt Romney administration23) Romney would not appoint radical, anti-constitution judges to the Supreme Court.24) Romney is not tied to voter fraud group Acorn (still around, just different name) and criminal thug unions. 25) Romney did not go on VIDEO, and say his cap and trade plans will
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:03pm@Doggy I‘m a Paul supporter and you’re threatening me? You’re F ing insane.
Report Post »mils
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:03pmlook for his dropping out to mean a third party run…and splintering of the conservative vote..whereas
Report Post »OBAMA WINS AGAIN…:(
PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:06pmBoy oh boy, your in for a treat at Tampa.
Report Post »The Realist
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:10pmwill cause electricity and all energy rates, REGARDLESS OF INDUSTRY, to SKYROCKET.26) Romney will most likely NOT get an endorsement from the communist Party USA (cpusa.org)27) Romney would most likely not get an endorsement from Columbian FARC Marxist terrorists.28) Romney is not responsible, nor does he support those (Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, Maxine Waters, et. al.) who were involved with the COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT, which is what caused the LARGEST PART of our financial crisis. 29) Romney is not a student of the teachings of Saul Alinsky, the radical socialist “community organizer” whose book “Rules for Radicals” was dedicated to no less than Lucifer himself. 30) Romney would treat our ally-Israel, GOD’S PEOPLE, much better.31) Romney would be very unlikely to have an ENEMIES LIST.32) Romney would not travel around the world and bow and apologize to leaders of other countries, including those who are hostile to us!
Report Post »The Realist
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:12pmRailRoadCar9
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:58pm
i have no faith romeny will be any different than obama i will be writing ron paul in no matter what
–Then you learned nothing from 2008. Do yourself a favor at and least be honest enough to vote for Obama, because that’s what you are doing traitor.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:35pm@The Realist
Then you learned nothing from 2008. Do yourself a favor at and least be honest enough to vote for Obama, because that’s what you are doing traitor.
——–
You are wasting your time, friend. I mean it when I tell you the Paul sheeple are a deluded bunch, and Paulists are dangerous neo-libs, aka anarchists, aka non-Marxist communists.
I’m not kidding. Don’t plead with them. It would be as useless as pleading with an Obamanot.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:37pmSo much for free speech here on the blaze. I tried to post a comment 7 times and nothing! Thanks editor! Youre very pro1st amendment. Gb must not like to be called the progressive globalist he is…. o well.
Dr. Paul isNOT suspending or resigning his campaign. This is propaganda to cover up his recent wins in Nevada and Maine. You narcissistic neocons will pull every dirty trick under the stars. Drudge HAS been pro–romney from the start.
Pauls campaign is continuing to the convention whether you aholes like it or not. Paul is walking the walk by being fiscally conservative. We the PEOPLE will continue the delegate strategy that the neocons are desperate to dull and avoid.
Take a vacation Dr. Paul! Get well rested for this summer! We’re taking this to the convention and Beyond!
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:42pmNo the choice is free market capitalism or communism. You could help by helping us get some conservative senators and congresspeople. Romney was first choice of only about 25 per cent, I cite the early primaries as evidence. However, most of us are realistic and adult enough to realize you take the best of whats left and strengthen your team with good defense and offensive line. You could help defeat a socialist/communist or you can proudly jump off the cliff, and drag the country with you, in the name of supporting Paul and “punishing” those who don’t vote to nominate “your” guy.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:45pm@The Realist, I got to number 4. Can you explain this? I’ve heard him say he supported the NDAA, Gun Control and Patriot Act. We can start with those blatant assaults to the Bill of Rights. Are you saying that he’s going to repeal these unconstitutional laws?
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:50pm‘Doing so with any hope of success would take many tens of millions of dollars we simply do not have.’
Report Post »This is a quote from RP in the article. He knows the score. Carefully read the sentence.
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:53pmBen Swann Chimes In on Ron Paul’s Email
http://www.dailypaul.com/233313/ben-swann-chimes-in-on-ron-pauls-email
“The article explains that Paul will abandon the game of going from state to state to trying to win a popular vote that doesn’t count for anything. Instead he will focus on the states that are currently holding delegate conventions.
“That strategy makes a lot of sense when you have the kind of fights in Oklahoma and Arizona we saw this weekend. The State Conventions is where the nomination will be won or lost not traveling from state to state for beauty contests.”
Report Post »The Realist
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:58pm“Lest you’re inclined to interpret this as anything other than a concession, here’s what his heir apparent had to say last week:For all practical purposes, it is over. The numbers are there and Mitt Romney’s going to win the nomination,” Rand Paul said during an interview Thursday. http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/14/ron-paul-kinda-sorta-ends-presidential-bid/
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:01pm@PoliticiansRCrooks
“Boy oh boy, your in for a treat at Tampa.”
You mean “you’re” going to learn to spell by then? Boy, oh boy….
If “you’re” going to threaten those you live in Tampa with treats, at least have the courtesy to spell correctly.
Report Post »FreedomPurveyor
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:04pmPaul supporters have been deluded into actually believing that 1,044+ delegates are going to go rogue and vote for Paul on the first vote despite being bound to another candidate.
Have you guys considered what would happen if this cunning plan were to succeed? Do you think everyone will say “wow cool, Ron Paul won exactly 0 contests and came away with the nomination. That is totally legit”?
Better yet, what would you think if it were the other way around – if Ron Paul won the vast majority of the contests, but then Romney ended up winning at the convention? Surely, there wouldn’t be conspiracy theories… Paul supporters would just jump right on the bandwagon..
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:09pmWhat’s a neolib?
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:09pmAll of the PAUL SUPPORTERS must be devastated because they were so emotionally invested in this man and what they believe he stood for. Paul is an American. We give him that and at least he is 180 degrees from Communism. I’ll give him that.
Next time you back a candidate, be more kind. Paul guys were like crazed game players whose Mom turned off the TV. They totally lost sight of the BIG PICTURE for AMERICA and tried to ridicule everyone who did not think JUST like they did. They hurt PAUL more than Paul hurt Paul.
I’m sure that some of his points will be gladly adopted by Mitt Romney. I would not be surprised to see PAUL put in charge of THE FED…that would be great justice, eh? So remember the GOAL is to have A COMMUNIST-FREE, MARXIST-FREE, SOCIALIST-FREE, MUSLIM TERRORISTS-FREE America. Help where you can and forget this “ states manipulation of delegates” you are spitting in the wind.
I wasn’t for ROMNEY at first, but as I watched him, watched his debate performance and got the facts, I’m very comfortable that he will be more than able to handle that twerp in any debate. It’s now or never. Obama is too brain-washed, too stupid and too coddled to know what he has done to this magnificent nation..His great grandchildren will know because he will live in infamy, but he won’t.
I hope you’ll come help us. We have this one shot.
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:11pmI’m not sure that what this means at all……however, the blaze has sure done its part to make sure that the republic has fallen into tyranny by reporting bogus stories or ignoring stories at all.
I was stupid for believing in you Glenn. I wish I could get my money back for the books I bought you lying sack of crap.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:14pm@PATTY HENRY
I agree and I think this article might set a record for Blaze posts. : )
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:20pm@ 3 MONKIESMOMMY or whatever you call yourself: You can disagree with GLENN BECK, but don’t call him the names you did. If you are disappointed because Paul dropped what he should habe dropped months ago, okay…but don’t attack the ONE MAN who had the GUTS to stop that B-tard in the WH who had NO ONE stopping him. 2009 would have given us total HealthCare by Obama, but also total enslavement to his government. Odope would be Dictator by now. The highway robbery on everything American from our treasury to our resources would have already happened. WITHOUT BECK’S GRAND Gatherings in DC and his huge following of Patriots, we would be already down the river. Beck is a great Patriot. He has risked his life, his families lives, his fortune, his future, his health…everything just to WARN us with information that no one else had the GUTS to report on. You need to apologize to this great American.
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:40pm@FREEDOMPURVEYOR Actually, that‘s not what we’re expecting. We’re expecting Romney enthusiasm to be so low that he does NOT make the 1,144 delegates needed to win on a first ballot, in which case the convention goes into a second round of voting where Romney’s delegates become unbound. All the while, Obama will have spent so much money on many trained ads against Romney, and the negative effects of being in the spotlight for 6 months will be sinking into Romney. Obama will have wasted his money, if the party decides to yank Romney and put Paul up at the last moment. It would be a genious façade that could turn the entire election around, without us having to sell out our values… well, that’s one scenario.
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:51pm@Patty Henry I agree with you mostly. Beck deserves respect. He spotlighted a lot of stuff that would’ve never caught on in time, he exposed the vitriol and corruption in not only the White House but the DOJ as well. It’s just, I don’t understand his conflict with Ron Paul. Does anyone really think that Paul supporters unanimously want the country to die, or want anarchy? If you do, please do some research, we want FREEDOM, just the same as anyone, including liberals and conservatives, would want for themselves. I had to break with Beck in his excoriations of Paul and blind support of Romney, but I‘ll respect the work he’s done.
Report Post »progressiveslayer
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:08pmGO-RIN-NO-SHO I sure hope it turns out that way because Paul is the best candidate.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:19pmFrom the Ron Paul Campaign.
See here.
Ron Paul Has Not Suspended His Campaign
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2012/05/14/ron-paul-has-not-suspended-his-campaign/
“Today from Buzzfeed:
““Asked if this is a dropout, Paul’s campaign manager Jesse Benton said ‘Absolutely not! We are focusing our efforts squarely on winning delegates and party leadership positions at state conventions.””
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:19pmLOL. Misinformation? Ron Paul Has Not Suspended His Campaign:
Today from Buzzfeed:
“Asked if this is a dropout, Paul’s campaign manager Jesse Benton said ‘Absolutely not! We are focusing our efforts squarely on winning delegates and party leadership positions at state conventions.”
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2012/05/14/ron-paul-has-not-suspended-his-campaign/
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:19pmI think the reason that BECK is so down on PAUL is several actually: Legalize Drugs…as a recovering alcoholic I am pretty sure they feel that legalization will lead to abuse. I think I agree with PAUL on this, but would have to really study other countries where this has happened. The other thing is Paul’s refusal to treat Israel like our most valued ALLY. Again, If were were moving toward energy INDEPENDENCE, those bloody SAUDI’S would be so obnoxiously controlling and would behave themselves. They wouldn’t dare be threatening Israel or let punks like that jerk in IRAN spout off about Israel either. SO Israel is very important to me for all types of reasons. Jerusalem as free city is #1. WE are under vicious attack by Muslims world wide. I don’t think PAUL gets that.
Be sure to watch this:
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid949801312001?bckey=AQ%7E%7E%2cAAAACEco_Vk%7E%2c9bOat4XcfB_88ri1a3UMdKnLpH9aM8Fv&bclid=0&bctid=1271237687001
Paul‘s refusal to encourage our support of ISRAEL is unrealistic on Paul’s part. Beck is a huge Israel defender. A lot of this comes from common sense, from historical knowledge and from our Religions. (I’m Catholic) Beck is Mormon (but born Catholic) …. Finally, Paul didn‘t seem at all realistic about actions he’d take. Romney will accomplish the same things but he’ll do it without burning down the house to do it.
Report Post »Romney is -0- like McCain, thanks be to GOD.
soybomb315
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:21pm@patty
Report Post »so if alcohol were illegal – it would not be abused? I couldn’t read past that irrational roadblock
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:45pm@PATTY HENRY,
“I think the reason that BECK is so down on PAUL is several actually: Legalize Drugs…as a recovering alcoholic I am pretty sure they feel that legalization will lead to abuse. I think I agree with PAUL on this, but would have to really study other countries where this has happened. The other thing is Paul’s refusal to treat Israel like our most valued ALLY.”
I can address all of these concerns, if you’re willing to listen.
Basically, with the drug issue, you don‘t give government the authority to tell you what you can or can’t put into your own body. You punish actual crimes instead of “might-entice-someone-to-commit-a-crime”(s).
As for Israel, to me they are the people of God – I’m a dispensationalist. But our nation is not a theocracy – we don’t get to force everyone to be Christian so that only theocratic-like laws get passed. We are a Constitutional Republic, in which decentralized power better protects individual liberty from encroachments of the national government.
The First Amendment was designed to allow freedom of religious belief (including no religious beliefs) and free speech, SO THAT it would be difficult for government to silence you.
Our Founders did NOT want America to partake in entangling alliances.
Again, I’d like to walk you through all of this, if you’ll let me.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:51pm@PATTYHENRY As a Christian, I support Israel. I also support Paul’s presidential candidacy. After doing my own homework, I’ve realized that the MSM and radio talking heads are full of hot air.
Here‘s what I’ve found:
Ron Paul Tells Newsmax: I Support Israel
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/paul-israel-support-wead/2011/12/07/id/420247
Many Zionists actually agree with Paul’s stance. In an op-ed written for Israeli National News, Shmuel Ben-Gad writes that “Dr. Paul’s position is based upon a principled, modest, non-interventionist foreign policy – not upon anti-Zionism” and the Republican candidate should be “the Zionist choice for President.”
Quoting the Bible, Paul said Christian evangelicals who want the current status of American-Israeli relations to continue should understand that “‘the borrower is servant to the lender’ and America should never be the master of Israel and its fate.”
Former Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Dore Gold, said, “Israel never asked the United States to risk the lives of American troops to defend it… We don’t want American troops or any other troops defending Israel. We want to fulfill the doctrine of the founder of Israel, David Ben-Gurion, of self-reliance– that Israel defends itself by itself. And what we ask for from the United States is diplomatic support so we can maintain that position.”
Ron Paul is pro-Israel. The MSM is anti-FreeMarkets and anti-ConstituitonalGovernment, and will ma
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:54pm@Patty Henry
I will NOT apologize! Beck spent years preaching to all of us about how concerned he was about the erosion of civil liberties in our nation but now he’s just fine with Romney who endorsed the NDAA which authorizes the indefinated detention of US citizens with no trial! Are you kidding me? If the real Patrick “Give me liberty or give me death” Henry were here he slap you upside your stupid head.
Shall I even bother to mention that the same big banks that were bailed out out by the Fed AND donate to Obama, also donated to Romney? How long did Beck piss and wail and moan about that? Its been a while since we‘ve heard a peep about any of that hasn’t it?
Beck has betrayed us. Face it. We were both stupid, I just realized it sooner.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:57pmPatty, Is your support for Israel based in religion?
Report Post »PATTY HENRY
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:01pmLook, LEGAL OR ILLEGAL, ALCOHOLICS will abuse it; I am merely expressing the reasons (you asked for them) that Beck may not be a PAUL supporter. BECK thinks that legalizing drugs will end up harming us.
Report Post »What I just adore about the PAUL folks is that they think they have ALL the answers. This is why he never got traction. From my POV he is an egomaniac who was ineffective all these years and couldn’t he have done a greater good by picking ONE cause and made sure he got the BILLS passed that were required to accomplish ONE thing and then gone on. The only time we ever heard about him was when he was running for PRESIDENT. I think we’ve said all we need to say. I have work to do…still.
recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:10pmWhen Cain was force out of the race………………..did the Paulist rub it in? NO!
Report Post »When Bachmann had a mental break down …….did the Paulists rub it in? NO!
When Santorum had to throw in the towel ………..did the Paulists rub it in? NO!
When Newt ran out of money …………………………..did the Paulist rub it in? NO!
When Ron Paul struggled…………………………………..Oh, don’t think we will forget.
recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:15pmEntertainment Caption that photo!: The winner
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2012/05/13/caption-that-photo-the-winner-14/
Paulist don’t forget this!!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:26pm@THEREALIST..Puu leeze..Romney is I believe in bed with the Federal Reserve..Romney is all about furthering his own financial success..Here is Romnae’s record.
Report Post »Supported Auto Bail Outs
Supports NDAA
Supported TARP
Supports Cap and trade
Supports The Patriot Act
Supports the Federal Reserve
Supports Big Government
Supports Big Taxes (Oh wait, he lowered taxes that right. Meanwhile raising every fee the government has in their grasp over $300,000 worth of fees including on used car sales)
Supports Big WARS
Signed assault rifle ban
Signed Romneycare
So how is that different than Obama? Huh? He is a liberal with a Conservative hat..no difference..The banks are calling the shots..Obomney is their man..either will do..heck..one could be the other’s VP
Remember TARP was given to Sharia compliant banks in which 2.5% of every envestment goes to fund terrorist organizations..and 7 % to them for breaking one Sharia Law..
ashestoashes
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:36pm@CAUSE4LIBERTY Hey Cause..long time no see..go to have you on again..are you keeping up with Sackcloth and Ashes..Did you see this one? The government actually changed the day for the internet doomsday from March 8 to July 9 2012 I saw it on Yahoo or MSN
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p63m8VNACtY
mtcountrygrl
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:38pmFavorite Ron Paul foreign policy quote “I would not have gotten involved in WWII, it was none of our business.” The guy is a nut when it comes to foreign policy. We are a global economy and have global trade and travel. During the time of our founders if a foreign nation wanted to mess with you it took weeks and a good navy and England was the only one with the power to reach us. Different world, different rules.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:41pm@PATTY HENRY,
“What I just adore about the PAUL folks is that they think they have ALL the answers. This is why he never got traction. From my POV he is an egomaniac who was ineffective all these years and couldn’t he have done a greater good by picking ONE cause and made sure he got the BILLS passed that were required to accomplish ONE thing and then gone on.”
What have we gotten wrong?
We’re right about earmarks. We’re right about non-intervention. We’re right about the Founders. We’re right about economics. We’re right about racism. We’re right about limited government. And on and on.
I’m not saying that we know it all, but honestly we deserve far more credit than has been given.
As for the argument that he’s “ineffective” that I hear over and over again: The role of government isn’t to “get stuff done”. The role of government is to adhere to the Constitution, which excludes MANY things that the government is involved with, today.
And our Constitutional Republic is actually DESIGNED to go into gridlock when representatives disagree. THAT’S A VERY GOOD THING, because helps keep factions under control.
If others are “getting along to get along”, then those are the people who are violating their oath to the Constitution. This does not bear on Ron Paul’s “effectiveness”.
Ron Paul isn’t the one violating his oath to the Constitution. Get mad at someone else.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:49pm@mtcountrygrl,
“Favorite Ron Paul foreign policy quote “I would not have gotten involved in WWII, it was none of our business.””
See here.
Ron Paul as a Stooge for Adolph Hitler
http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block190.html
“A Paul presidency in 1940 would have meant a war with Germany, but not Japan. However, a President Paul in 1917 would not have encouraged U.S. entry into that conflagration. If he was successful, there would have been no need for any declaration of war against Germany, as there would have been no Adolph Hitler and his Nazis in charge. He would have been, instead, an unknown house painter. With a President Paul at the helm, there would have been no holocaust; no 50 million people perishing during this war; no dropping of atomic bombs on innocent civilians, women and children, to our eternal shame.”
“The guy is a nut when it comes to foreign policy. We are a global economy and have global trade and travel. During the time of our founders if a foreign nation wanted to mess with you it took weeks and a good navy and England was the only one with the power to reach us. Different world, different rules.”
Are you promoting global government now? Or does national sovereignty still mean something to you?
Our Founders were global traders, too, you know.
See here.
Ron Paul Predicted 9/11 a Decade Ago!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hJTisovvjc
ashestoashes
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:52pm@PATTY HENRY.. Paul gets it Patty..he just wants us to start conducting ourselves as we should instead of meddling in everyone elses business..think about it Patty..Paul is one of a handful of Congressmen who voted that it was Israel’s right to attack Iran..Israel is capable..very capable..and the US has always given more money to her enemies than to her..We have actually empowered her enemies against her..When Israel asked permission to attack Iran after 9/11 Bush refused..were we standing by Israel? Were we blessed in “standing by Israel?” Is that blessing Barrack Obama for President? Are we being blessed by importing 11 thousand muslims a month. and and importation of tens of thousands by exectutive order? Are we blessed by going into total financial collapse? Can and will Romney save us? NO!! He is a progressive liberal Patty. Ron Paul will have us out of debt with the compliance of Congress in a short time..He will bring our men home and secure our borders. He will declare war by Congressional decision only..get in win get out..He will cut 5 communist government departments..He will give Israel her independence and help her if she asks..It is our duty to get Constitutionalists in the Congress and the Senate Patty to ensure what we want..We Will help Israel..but we need the strength..Paul can do it ..Romney is a flip flopper and about money..Paul has never been. He has voted our Constitutional right to bear arms..Romney has been against us..We need Paul at this time.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:58pm@PROGRESSIVESLAYER..Slayer..Doggy wasn’t talking to you..he was just upset at the ones bashing Paul and standing for the liberal Romney..please don’t take his rant as a threat to you..I don’t think he was threatening anyone..remember..he was just upset..and he knows who‘s side you’re on..We value you.. Slayer..Thank you for all you do.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:02pmReport: Ron Paul Signed Off on Incendiary Material in Newsletters
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-ron-paul-signed-off-on-incendiary-material-in-newsletters/
Paulist don’t forget this!!
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:04pmBusiness Glenn Beck to O’Reilly: Ron Paul Needs to ‘Shhhh
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/glenn-beck-on-the-oreilly-factor-paul-needs-to-shhhh-gingrich-is-big-government-progressive-and-romney-scares-me/
Paulist here a good one not to forget
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:16pmRon Paul Denies Saying He Wouldn’t Have Ordered Bin Laden Raid in Pakistan — But Here’s the Video
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ron-paul-denies-saying-that-he-would-not-have-ordered-bin-ladens-killing/
Paulist don’t forget this!! This one is when they booed the “Golden Rule”
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:20pmPolitics ‘Pimpin‘ for Paul’: CNN Interviews Prostitutes Endorsing Ron Paul
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/%e2%80%98pimpin-for-paul-cnn-interviews-prostitutes-endorsing-ron-paul/
And it only gets better Just Try to Forget this one!!!
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:22pmBusiness
Beck Radio Crew Cautions ‘Overzealous’ Paul Supporters: You Make Him Less Attractive to the Average Person
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/glenn-pat-stu-caution-overzealous-paul-supporters-you-make-him-less-attractive-to-the-average-person/
Forget? NOT!
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:24pm@recoveringneocon,
“Report: Ron Paul Signed Off on Incendiary Material in Newsletters” …
“Paulist don’t forget this!!”
Already been soundly dealt with.
See here.
Why the Beltway Libertarians Are Trying to Smear Ron Paul
Report Post »http://takimag.com/article/why_the_beltway_libertarians_are_trying_to_smear_ron_paul/#axzz1h0nfwejq
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:38pm@recoveringneocon,
“Business Glenn Beck to O’Reilly: Ron Paul Needs to ‘Shhhh”
Ron Paul is actually right about non-intervention. The Republican Party used to be non-interventionist; Thomas Jefferson and George Washington were non-interventionists.
And Ron Paul seems to understand the dangers of Radical Islam better than most; Though I will concede that I do not know where he stands on CAIR being a Muslim Brotherhood front group – and that does concern me, but like I said before if we got back to the constitution, our Constitutional Republic could handle CAIR.
See here.
Ron Paul Predicted 9/11 a Decade Ago!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hJTisovvjc
And here.
War and the Constitution | Ron PaulWar and the Constitution | Ron Paul
(at 34:36; On how our foreign policy helps Islamic Fundamentalists; From 1998)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qo4kdGhsbls#t=34m36s
And here.
Ron Paul on “Letters of Marque and Reprisal”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSP9NteApqI
And here.
How Ron Paul Would Defend America
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSP9NteApqI
recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:48pmA Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Report Post »I’m just reminiscing the treatment of Dr. Paul by “ezelB ehT” and it’s stooges.
Naps
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:50pmHAHA……Yes Beckistani’s. Ron Paul is out. Out indeed. Out for those DELEGATES baby. Tampa is going to be EPIC. I can’t wait to see the look on all of the yuppy Obamney supporters faces when we takeover the convention. Rush is gonna flip out so bad that the painkillers he shoves up his ass are gonna come flying out his nostrils. It’ll probably be too much for Glenn to handle that he might relapse on Smirnoff Ice during GBTV. God I love being a Paul supporter. There is a sense of pride I take in not being part of the flock being lead to the Slaughter.
Report Post »Romney/Goldman Sachs 2012
Obama/Socialism 2012
Paul/We The People 2012
colt1860
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:50pm@mtcountrygrl That’s taken out of context. Here’s a well written explanation: http://markamerica.com/2011/12/27/a-question-of-morality/
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:52pmFaith
‘Good Advice:’ Ron Paul Allegedly Approves of Anti-Zionist Rabbi’s Message During Campaign Run-In
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/good-advice-ron-paul-allegedly-approves-of-anti-zionist-rabbis-message-during-campaign-run-in/
I almost forgot this one…….but not anymore
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:56pmRuPaul announces he’s not Ron Paul
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2012/01/09/rupaul-announces-hes-not-ron-paul/
Paulists!! This one was classy. A must see before you go to the polls.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:00pmSantorum’s Quick Response to Ron Paul Mic Trouble: ‘It Caught You Not Telling The Truth’
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/santorums-quick-response-to-ron-paul-mic-trouble-%e2%80%98it-caught-you-not-telling-the-truth%e2%80%99/
Being Rude was just so funny. I wonder how rude tampa will be?? lol
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:03pmHindus Denounce Pro-Paul Ad Attacking Huntsman, Mary Kaye Huntsman Calls Ad ‘Disgusting’
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/hindus-denounce-pro-paul-ad-attacking-huntsman-mary-kaye-huntsman-calls-ad-disgusting/
Paulist did you forget …This is the Huntsman add that was proven to be false but not here on “ezalB ehT”
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:06pmRon Paul is not a drag queen
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2012/01/06/ron-paul-is-not-a-drag-queen/
Nice one “ezalB” Woo Woo How could we forget that?
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:10pm@recoveringneocon,
“Ron Paul Denies Saying He Wouldn’t Have Ordered Bin Laden Raid in Pakistan — But Here’s the Video”
I actually dealt with that one, myself, at the time.
I said:
“Wait a minute, now! Which is it?
“Are you accusing Ron Paul of saying that he would not have held bin Laden accountable, or just not held him accountable IN THE MANNER THAT OBAMA DID?”
Pakistan didn’t attack us, and we didn’t have a right to violate their national sovereignty in order to get bin Laden.
How would you like it if non-citizens just waltzed right on in to our country and started killing people?
See here.
Ron Paul on “Letters of Marque and Reprisal”
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSP9NteApqI
recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:26pmDid You Read About the Shrewd Move the Ron Paul Camp Pulled Last Night?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-you-read-about-the-sly-move-the-ron-paul-camp-pulled-last-night/
Playing by the rules make you Shrewd. Is this not a fun trip down memory lane?
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:30pm@recoveringneocon
Wow, so many posts. Like a drowning man grasping for air…
…and all the kings horses and all the kings men couldn’t put Ron Paul back together again.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:31pmDoes Ron Paul See Himself in the Oval Office? ‘Not Really’
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/does-ron-paul-see-himself-in-the-oval-office-%e2%80%98not-really%e2%80%99/
Another quote taken out of Constance by “ezalB ehT” but not forgoten
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:37pmO’Reilly Breaks Down Iowa Caucuses, Says Obama Would Beat ‘Outlandish’ Paul Like Barry Goldwater — ‘By a Colossal Margin’
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/oreilly-breaks-down-iowa-caucuses-says-obama-would-beat-outlandish-paul-like-barry-goldwater-by-a-colossal-margin/
O’ Reilly the king of Neo Cons
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:43pmWhat Did This Former Senior Staffer Have to Say About Ron Paul’s Denial of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/what-did-this-former-senior-staffer-have-to-say-about-ron-pauls-denial-of-911-conspiracy-theories/
This coming from a Guy that calkboard is full of lines connecting everyone to spookyman Sors.
Report Post »EndTheFedNOW
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:45pmThank you Blaze and Glenn Beck for selling out and supporting a goldman sachs big government do what hes told RINO.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:49pmDon’t bother Ron Paul while he eats breakfast
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2011/12/29/dont-bother-ron-paul-while-he-eats-breakfast/
Remember?
Report Post »EndTheFedNOW
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:52pmPATTY HENRY
Glenn Beck the one man to stand up to Obama?
Ever heard of the Obama Deception?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
Alex Jones was doing what beck is famous for 10 years ago.
We are mad at Beck cause he supports a Goldman Sachs back candidate who will sit by and let the Fed and the Bankers take over the world as they are in Europe.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:53pmDick Morris Calls Ron Paul ‘The Most Liberal, Radical Left-Wing Person to Run for President’
http://www.theblaze.com/page/21/?s=ron+paul
Priceless coming from a Clinton Adviser. Oh did we forget Dick worked for Slick Willy?
Paulist did not and will not forget.
Report Post »Cause4Liberty
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:58pm@ashes. Hello Ashes! Its great to see that you and others are continuing to keep up the good fight! Ive been boycotting this website and just reading the drudge or infowars. I feel that i dont need GB’s two cents since ive seen/heard his utter hypocrisy regarding small gov, founding fathers, constitution, fiscally conservativism, progressives, alinsky, soros, fed reserve, political manipulation, false reporting, bold-face misdirections, taking his eye off the banking globalists, off the communists, lieing about fema camps, etc. Also, its like he suffers from the god-complex! But as you know, there is only one God, and only one way for salvation! Glad to see you still follow KijaniAmariAk’s bible study/current event videos. His work is incredibly knowledgable and moving! God bless you and the others for keeping up the tough fight upstream! I, however, am sickened by the blissful ignorance and the mindless beck-zombies who spew his radio propaganda on this blog! Its a pointless battle sometimes, when some people are more than willing to go to a Fema Camp if beck told them to. I feel its just better for me, to part ways with beck and his bullcrap website!
Kudos and peace, friend!
Ron Paul 2012 – the delegate strategy is working. The MSM and neocons fear RonPaul.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:59pmPolitics
Watch Woman Cry Tears of Disgust Over Receiving Ron Paul Book for Christmas — Staged?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/watch-woman-cry-tears-of-disgust-over-receiving-ron-paul-book-for-christmas/
this one here was one of my favorites. It took all of about 15 mins to debunk the story.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:01am@recoveringneocon,
“I’m just reminiscing the treatment of Dr. Paul by “ezelB ehT” and it’s stooges.”
OH, I see. LOL.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:03amWant to Know What Ron Paul’s Investment Portfolio Looks Like? Here’s a Peek
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/want-to-know-what-ron-pauls-investment-portfolio-looks-like-heres-a-peek/
Wonder why “ezalB ehT” only did Pauls Investment Portfolio????
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:09amRon Paul Yanks Mic During CNN Interview After Reporter Presses Newsletter Questions
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ron-paul-storms-off-set-after-cnn-keeps-asking-newsletter-questions/
Another edited video on “ezalB ehT” Boy, this sure brings back good feelings.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:12amBill O‘Reilly Blasts Ron Paul’s Stance on Iran: ‘His Foreign Policy Disqualifies Him’
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/bill-oreilly-blasts-ron-pauls-views-on-iran-foreign-policy-disqualifies-him/
Oh Yes billy and your military service make you quialifed. What??? you did not Server??
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:21amCause4Liberty
Report Post »Nice to hear from you. Ash and the rest has been holding down the fort. Now I must get back to my remembering. take care
recoveringneocon
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:25amPolitics
Limbaugh Blasts Ron Paul for ‘Running to the Left of President Obama’ on Iran
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/limbaugh-blasts-ron-paul-for-%e2%80%98running-to-the-left-of-president-obama%e2%80%99-on-iran/
Another one of the NeoCons that never Served his country Hmmm just like Sean, “nnelG” Bill O’. and that little puke mark.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:29amDonald Trump Lashes Out: George Will Is ‘Third-Rate’ & Ron Paul a ‘Joke’
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/donald-trump-lashes-out-george-will-is-third-rate-ron-paul-a-joke/
This coming from a man that was going to run 3rd party. Good One. Remember the Trump 2012 folks. lol
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:30am@recoveringneocon
When Newt…………………………..did the Paulist rub it in? NO!
When Ron Paul struggled…………………………………..Oh, don’t think we will forget.
——–
No, dude. For starters, Newt is beating Paul in arrogance. Second, are you freaking kidding me? Yes, absolutely, you rubbed it in, every single time. See? You sheeple are so deluded you are not even aware of your actions.
It’s the WAY Paul has gone about leaving the race and the persistent denial on the part of his supporters, that others find annoying and disturbing. Just listen to yourself: “When Ron Paul struggled…”
Say it out loud: “It’s over.” Maybe then you will start to heal.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 3:28amI had to get in here. I have tried a couple posts but were denied. I did get some through on the second page. QUIT LISTENING TO THE MSM, and that includes Fox and The Blaze. Paul is not out, he has been planning this change in strategy for a few weeks. It is going to work, cannot give all details now, but stay tuned, it will progress. All Paul supporters, keep doing what you have been doing, continue to do all you can to get delegate seats. Go in numbers to ensure you have the power of the masses, it is the only way we will win. Paul has promised that more information on his delegate strategy will come forth in the near future. True Paul supporters know where to go to get this information, make sure you continue to check in.
I can tell you that this strategy came after it was apparent that Pual was in better shape than originally thought. Stop listening to the MSM.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 7:16am@Recovering, That’s awesome. Thanks for putting that together. Nah, the truth has no agenda…. Their sheep bought it too. What happens when they THINK he’s finally out, they gloat, poke fun and laugh… Tyranny sure is funny. Indefinite detention is halarious. Perverts feeling up granny on the way to Thanksgiving dinner… hysterical. Gun control… yup that’s a knee slapper. Financial collapse and take over by the international community… Stop it you’re killing me. Drones, war, central economic planning, nanny state, crony capitalism, internet censorship, arrested for peacefully assembling to protest… OMG I can’t take it anymore. This is some funny stuff. What’s even more funny is they think we have a choice between this with Obama, or this with Romney.
Report Post »c0mm0nsense
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 7:57amPaulist, Don’t forget the advertisers here on “ehT ezalB”
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 9:15am@recoveringneocon
It‘s petty and I’m actually kinda disgusted. Is this really how we would have treated Thomas Jefferson?
I WON’T FORGET
see you in Tampa
Report Post »UnreconstructedLibertarian
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 10:56amRon Paul discussions always prove one fact, the Neo-Con right is just as alinsky as the Progressive left. I see no difference in tactic, or position. The revelation has become that there is only a slight difference in who actually runs the plantation, but the end goal is the same for both sides of the faux debate – control the masses for the sake of the elite. This has become a struggle for supremecy using mobs on both sides:; whether they are right, wrong, or somewhere in between.
The revelation also shows that the mobs have devolved into a condition incapable of Liberty or the personal responsibility required by it.
The Beck and Bartons of the world will not tell you that the Federalist writers immediately passed laws in contradiction of their elegant prose – once they came into power under the Constitution. Judge Napolitano will tell you what they did, and just how the Anti-Federalists were right. Glenn will not tell you the whole truth, because it would garner him the same as Napolitano – forced silence.
Ron Paul has been telling the nation its failings, and the nation does not want to hear it. I have not wanted to hear it and struggled against it in ‘08; however, I now find myself incapable of disagreeing with Ron Paul when being honest with myself and the obvious facts. Facts that have existed since the success of the Revolution.
Slavery by any other name – is still slavery.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb8Rj5xkDPk&f
Report Post »3monkeysmomma
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:50pm@recoveringneocon
I know it took a long time for you to post all of that but thank for reminding us. The final straw wass this weekend when the wonderful Blaze here decided to repeat the LIE (I was there) That Josh Romney was booed off the stage by Paul supporters in AZ sat. He was NOT booed off the stage. He was booed because he violated party rules in his speech against specifically asking delegates to vote for Romney loyalist.
Further, the fraud, intimidation and corruption that went on in AZ at the convention wasn’t even reported and certainly not here at the Blaze. I also understand similar things happened in OK but I guess most of us will remain in the dark.
You can all think I’m some rabid “Paulbot” troublemaker if you like but I have been a registered republican since I was 18 and I am watching my party getting ready to nominate a guy as liberal as Bill Clinton…….and really, I am just scared for my country, sad at the rampant corruption in the GOP, and I feel like I want to cry.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 5:28pm@3Monkeys, It‘s kind of like when found out Santa wasn’t real. He had a lot of us fooled thinking he wasn’t just like every other propagandist media type. What worse is we have to admit to our ******* friends that they were right all along about him being a giant douche.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 7:08pm@The-Monk – I can type what ever I want and how ever I want. You piece of garbage.
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 7:14pm@The-Monk – Shut up you commie. How is some one saying, your in for a treat a threat. Your pathetic, go write on Obama’s blogs, ya loser.
Report Post »mils
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 8:03pmI disagree with a lot of you. This bs didn’t start with Obama..it’s been in the line for many years..one republican is not going to stop it. Infact I believe republicans have a hand in it.
Report Post »The first I remember about the “new world order” was with George 1..a thousand points of light etc..it has carried on, clinton,bush, obama…and you will remember, mccain didn’t even try to win..he didn’t try~.
The media is in lock step with what ever is going on.
Maybe Ron Paul is leaving now to take money and efforts to his third party that will assure obama’s win.
A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 16, 2012 at 2:53am@mils,
“Maybe Ron Paul is leaving now to take money and efforts to his third party that will assure obama’s win.”
First of all, Ron Paul did not leave the race for the Presidency.
Second, if your goal is to stop Marxism, you need to wise up about Romney, because he’s NOT a free market guy. He believes in government intervention, similar to Obama.
See here.
Mitt Romney Open To Value Added Tax (VAT) !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsMIa6E_KUk
And here.
Romney supports automatic hikes in minimum wage
Report Post »http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/02/01/romney-supports-automatic-hikes-in-minimum-wage/
RepubliCorp
Posted on May 16, 2012 at 7:42amRon Paul……the clear choice!
Report Post »To bad Dr Ron was just playing wing-man for Romney. The bots cant see they have been scammed by a 30yr government hack. When it dawns on you, tear down your backyard alter and plant a nice garden. (Lew Rockwell 2016) The clear choice
West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 18, 2012 at 12:28amMitt is just like Obama, flip flopping on everything. You can tell when both of them are lying as their lips are moving.
http://www.fox19.com/story/18430692/reality-check-obama-and-romney-have-both-been-on-both-sides-of-same-sex-marriage
You all think that Romney will be good for the economy? Think again.
http://www.fox19.com/story/17096680/reality-check-fact-checking-mitt-romneys-budget-plan
I wish more people would wake up.
Report Post »staginglt
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:35pmWhy is there such a lack of reading comprehension? Ron Paul is NOT dropping out of the race. They are refocusing limited resources to winning delegates and positions of power in the party, which has been the stated goal since day one. Many states have already selected delegates *before* their primary, and with the lack of coverage and “inevitably” narrative that’s been built up for over a year, it does not make sense to spend money trying to win “beauty contest” straw polls. At least Paul walks the walk on fiscal conservatism, as opposed to the other candidates who claimed to be consersavtive and racked up millions in debt. There’s a bigger picture than the nomination. It’s about changing the direction of the party (also a stated goal since day one).
Funny how the media can pick up on this “story” instantly, yet spend months ignoring delegate wins, GOP chairmanship wins, and the crowds of thousands everywhere.
Come November, are you going to vote for the big government progressive, debt-raising, individual mandate-supporting, Patriot Act/NDAA-supporting, war-supporting, TARP-supporting, bailout-supporting guy or… wait, I forgot which guy I was referring to. Once we get Obama out of office, I hope you’ve got a plan to get rid of Romney.
Report Post »FROTHYDISCHARGE
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:42pmyou need help
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:43pmAbout the only comment I have seen on this thread that makes sense.
Report Post »staginglt
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:59pm@Frothy – What point are you refuting exactly, and why? I’m okay with agreeing to disagree, but I’d ask that if you have an opposing viewpoint, express that view and support it.
Report Post »9111315
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:14pmYour reality check light is flashing.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:19pmSarah Palin / Allen West 2016
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:54pmHaving read the posts on this page, it is apparent what is wrong with the republican party. Yes, Ron Paul has his faults and there is plenty of things the “average republican” can disagree with him on. However, how can people who want small government hate a guy like Ron Paul so much? You would expect that from the left and the socialists – but not republicans.
I would have thought the people who follow Glenn Beck would want small government even more than the average republican… but it is obvious they are driven by emotion and hate rather than principles. This is why the republican party is LOST and incapable of leading us out of this mess
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:51pmDoing so with any hope of success would take many tens of millions of dollars we simply do not have.
Report Post »RP from the article
The Realist
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:04pm“Lest you’re inclined to interpret this as anything other than a concession, here’s what his heir apparent had to say last week: For all practical purposes, it is over. The numbers are there and Mitt Romney’s going to win the nomination,” Rand Paul said during an interview Thursday.
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/14/ron-paul-kinda-sorta-ends-presidential-bid/ Time to pack it up.
Report Post »13th Imam
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:59pmWe don’t hate RP, just his rabid followers.
Report Post »Go-rin-no-sho
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:00pm#1, Rand is his own animal. #2, show me the proof. He has the numbers, what states, what delegates, and who? The truth is, both Romney and Paul have few truly, permanently bound delegates, as the selection process has just begun. Romney supporters should be AFRAID of the Ron Paul delegate victories so far. Almost every caucus state that’s come up for vote has gone Paul delegate wise, as reported by the media. Don’t you read your campaign mail?
Report Post »soybomb315
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:37pm@13th
Report Post »Thats strange cuz most of your ilk prefer to make personal attacks or mischaracterize Ron Paul’s positions. Its a good excuse but i dont buy it. You should support candidates for their positions, not their supporters (unless you liked that hope and change hype)
recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:19pmPolitics Ron Paul Supporters Boo Romney Son Off Stage at Ariz. GOP Convention
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ron-paul-supporters-boo-romney-son-off-stage-at-ariz-gop-convention/
Paulist don’t forget this!!
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:38pm13th, You hate the guys fighting the boogyman you’re so afraid of?
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 3:39am13th Imam, Rabid followers? You have no idea what it is like to be under pressure do you? I am a Vietnam Vet, and I have friends that will never be the same physically from that war. You have probably led a quaint life of luxury compared to the horrors of the Vietnam war. How petty people have become. A man that can get people excited about the prospect of freedom has rabid followers? There have been just a handful of people through the ages that can have the title of defenders of freedom. I doubt that you or anyone in your family will ever get to the point to have that honor. Paul is not out of the race, but you have shown that all you do is listen to the MSM for all your god given truth from evil people. That should tell you where I think you come from.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 7:00amHey West Coast… Think this is bad… Check out this clown. On the first page of comments, you can’t miss it.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/youre-fued-famed-beach-boys-singer-says-obamas-an-*****/
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:32pmUh-oh!…..looks like The Blaze propagandists made a false start…..they’ve already changed the headline:
http://www.theblaze.com/the-wire/13811639/paul-we-will-no-longer-spend-resources/
Report Post »Best_Patriot
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:52pmhaha, this site has more typos and missteps than Drudge, and that’s saying something!
Report Post »staginglt
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:55pmHere’s the original typo headline, before it gets changed… “Ron Paul Just Released a Big Statement — and Some are Sayig It Means He‘s ’Out of the Race’”
Nice that they can put “Some are Sayig(sic)” so they can point the finger at someone else for a misleading headline. Can we put “Some are Sayig(sic)” in every headline so it can be twisted with impunity? ;-)
Report Post »AvengerK
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:08pmthe “haha” makes you look like a bigger horse’s arse Horsie.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:34pmHey Horse,
You can criticize others when you can figure out how to make your complete photo appear in the widdle box.
Did you used to be the guy that had the “JETS” logo for his avatar?
He had the same problem.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:11pm@Therightsofbilly
“Hey Horse,”
Is he “Hey Horse” or “Horse hay”? I’m not going to “chew” on this too long. : )
Report Post »jcannon98188
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:13pmWhen the only attack you have on someone, is that their avatar does not look right, then you know you have lost…
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:21pmWrong end of the horse!
Report Post »The Realist
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:00pm“Lest you’re inclined to interpret this as anything other than a concession, here’s what his heir apparent had to say last week: For all practical purposes, it is over. The numbers are there and Mitt Romney’s going to win the nomination,” Rand Paul said during an interview Thursday.
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/14/ron-paul-kinda-sorta-ends-presidential-bid/ Time to pack it up boys and girls, and get behind the GOP candidate, unless those articles about you guys being former Obama voters are true…
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:13pm@JCANON90120
Yes, you are correct. The juvenile, and sometimes nonsensical rantings of the talking horse are just too much for me to counter.
He is so superior in every way, that instead instead of trying to offer up a rational argument to his biting commentary, it’s easier to just….wait a minute…..did horse say something intelligent that cried out for a thoughtful response?
Why no…….he didn’t……..as usual.
JCANNON……..tell me more about your ideas on disarmament.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ted-turner-wants-the-u-n-to-force-nuclear-disarmament-of-israel-america-and-everyone/
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:15pmSorry,
About 7 posts down from the top on that link.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:21pmEntertainment Caption that photo!: Ron Paul
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2012/05/11/caption-that-photo-ron-paul/
Paulist don’t forget this!!
Report Post »Naps
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:02pmThe Blaze is a friggin joke. Just like the “no spin zone” and “real time” with Bill Maher. Glenn is a sellout. What a shame. It makes me laugh. 6 months ago,Faux news and Beck were saying Romney isn’t conservative enough. And Romneycare this and Romneycare that. Now,Romney is our messiah.
Report Post »If Glenn had any marbles? He would of supported Dr. Paul from the jump. But he follows orders from the same powerful elite that Obama does.
Ron Paul 2012 or Financial enslavement.
Therightsofbilly
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 2:54amNAPS
You are in for an epic letdown come Tampa time.
The best laid plans of mice and men………….
If you do drugs………STOP
If you don’t………maybe you should start.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on May 16, 2012 at 8:00amNAPS put down the scissors
Report Post »RightPolitically
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:30pmOut of the race? He was NEVER in the race! And his followers act more like leftist street agitators than Republicans……… bye, bye.
Report Post »BehindBlueEyes
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:17pmExactly, these Ron Paul fanatics are cult like in their behavior and thinking. They remind me of the radical liberals we’re dealing with today. Call me paranoid but I think the Ron Paul movement has been infiltrated by people with insidious intentions.
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:53pmWell said. He will probably get 10% in 2016, 2020, 2024, 2028….
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:31pmPolitics ‘Real News From The Blaze’ Discusses What Exactly Is Ron Paul Still Doing Running for President
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/real-news-from-the-blaze-discusses-what-exactly-is-ron-paul-still-doing-running-for-president/
Paulist don’t forget this!!
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:41pmPolitics Ron Paul Supporters Allegedly Push Denver GOP Meeting ‘Into Madness’
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ron-paul-supporters-allegedly-push-denver-gop-meeting-into-madness/
Paulist don’t forget this!!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:22pmYou guys must be sitting around watching FAUX news..you know nothing..here..maybe you can catch a glimmer from Glenn on Ron Paul..even though Glenn hates Ron Paul’s foreingn policy he actually made some sense here THIS IS GLENN BECK TALKING ABOUT RON PAUL
Report Post »http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m75F5hWRgII
Todd P
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 7:48amI’ll kindof miss him though… He was like the AFLAC duck, with his sqawking and ability to make people laugh at him….
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on May 16, 2012 at 7:47amTo bad Dr Ron was just playing wing-man for Romney.
Report Post »FreeUsAll
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:27pmRand Paul 2016!
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:04pm@FreeUsAll
“Rand Paul 2016!”
And exactly how much did you contribute to RP?
Report Post »Not enough I guess…
dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:54pmMuch better Rand than Ron!
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:07pm@dmerwin
Rand’s not running… yet. Anyone but Obama…. now.
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:22pmMonk, I’m with you brother ABO-P
Report Post »FreeUsAll
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:26pm@RUFFNEX
Yes, freedom is rather senseless. It would better to be slaves to the Leviathan State.
Report Post »Carborendum
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:25pmIs that really what he’s saying? I’m not sure. Paul is running a very different kind of campaign. He understands fiscal responsibility, so he’s not going to go into debt for his campaign. He obviously can’t out raise or outspend Romney.
He’s not going to be advertising and campaigning anymore in the traditional sense. But he’s asking all of his supporters in the states yet to vote to do stuff for him. I don‘t really think that’s going to work. Except…he’s cheating.
His strategy has been to get his supporters to act like they support Romney so they can get chosen as delegates. Then at the convention, he will have a lot more delegates than is believed. We’ll see if those double agents are enough to swing the nomination his way.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:06pmYep, he is definitely a manipulator, the typical cult leader. Just as dangerous as Obama, since he is also an apologist to the Muslim world and denies American Exceptionalism.
Like you said, his tactics are similar to Obama’s. In fact, his campaign has bussed Obamanots to vote for him in the open primaries. Paul and Obama: one’s the snake, the other the scorpion. Take your pick, useful idiots.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:48pmI don’t think he denies American exceptionalism. I think that, like me, he believes our exceptionalism comes from our Constitution and freedom.
Report Post »Bete Noire
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:16pmDelegates are committed to vote for the candidate to whom they are pledged on the first vote.
So your Ron Paul Trojan Horse Delegates theory is nonsense.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:16pm@Carborendum
“His strategy has been to get his supporters to act like they support Romney so they can get chosen as delegates. Then at the convention, he will have a lot more delegates than is believed.”
I agree. RP’s campaign is just as dishonest as his voting record. RP likes to vote last. That way, if he wants a Bill to be passed but, it’s against his supporters will, he’ll vote no AFTER the Bill has enough votes to pass.
Just like Obama voting “present” 126 or 128 times; RP’s voting record is a sham. Or should I say “shamWOW”.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:26pm@justangry
Report Post »I don’t think he denies American exceptionalism. I think that, like me, he believes our exceptionalism comes from our Constitution and freedom.
——–
Suuure. That’s why he made a friendly visit to Iran and did an interview with their state channnel, blaming us for (from his perspective) aiding and abetting the “atrocious massacre” beingcommitted by Israel in Gaza. This POS should move to Iran. He’s a hero there.
justangry
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:49pm@Kryptonite, You’re clueless. Ron Paul never did that.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:39pm@kryptonite Before you spout anymore BS, let me correct you on a few things:
Ron Paul has said,
“I do believe we are an exceptional nation. We’ve been exceptional in that we have an exceptional Constitution, we’ve enjoyed the benefits of liberty like no other nation ever did, we’ve had the largest middle class ever and the wealthiest middle class.”
“I believe we have been an exceptional country. When the example is set, others will emulate us.”
“Open primaries” means just that. They’re open to EVERYONE. That means Democrats, Independents, Republicans, Libertarians, ETC. can vote for whomever. That‘s not manipulation on Paul’s part. That’s campaigning. To call this some kind of “tactic” is ridiculous, especially since those are the rules. You seem dishonest in your analysis. And to think that somehow who can get lots of support from the general vote is somehow manipulative is ludicrous. No one wins in a general election by only having their party followers voting for them. You have to actually take support and votes away from your opposition. That’s Voting 101.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:46pm@justangry
You’re clueless. Ron Paul never did that.
——-
I mistakenly thought Paul had visited Iran in 2006. My bad. Fair’s fair, so thanks for pointing that out. However, while searching for the website where I thought I had read that info, I found this interesting article: “Ron Paul’s Remarkable No Votes: Holocaust Memorial Funding, Ethics Offices, Civil Rights Bills.”
Directly to my point: “On July 1, 2010, he [Paul] was one of four members who voted against a motion to suspend the rules and pass an amendment that prohibited “any person from performing lobbying activities on behalf of a client which is determined by the Secretary of State to be a State sponsor of terrorism.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/28/ron-paul-voting-record_n_1173255.html
There are four countries on said list: Iran, Syria, Sudan and Cuba. Except for Cuba (which has been replaced by Venezuela), those countries are all a threat to Israel’s existence. Do you see a pattern, chump?
The other three traitors, all Dims, were:
Report Post »-former Rep. Brian Baird, who wanted us to withdraw military aid to Israel
- Steve Cohen, who compared Obama to Jesus, and Repubs to Nazis (for opposing Obamacare)
- Dennis Kucinich, Paul’s buddy
justangry
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:28pmI‘ll look more into it when I’m not so tired, but my first thought is you’re mad at Ron Paul because he voted no on HILARY CLINTON (Secretary of State) having the power to decide who can and cannot establish lobbies? Seems it was more a vote to stop an executive power grab.
As for Israel, I’m an agnostic. There’s no religious attachment for me. I’m not pro or anti-Israel. However, considering Israel teamed up with Iranian TERRORISTS to kill scientists, and you think the current adminstration is anti-Israel, they would be able to stop AIPAC from lobbying, no?
Like, I said that’s just off the top of my head. I know there was a good reason for the Civil Rights legislation that had nothing to with racism, I’m just drawing a blank atm. Did you look into his reasoning for voting no on these things? I mean typically in instances like this, it‘s not the end result he’s opposed to, but rather how they propose to fix it. My best guess is he thought they were unconsititional for some reason. At least that’s his MO.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:06amcolt1860
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:39pm
@kryptonite Before you spout anymore BS, let me correct you on a few things:
Ron Paul has said,
“I do believe we are an exceptional nation. We’ve been exceptional in that we have an exceptional Constitution, we’ve enjoyed the benefits of liberty like no other nation ever did, we’ve had the largest middle class ever and the wealthiest middle class.”
——–
Come on, Colt. You know that is not how American Exceptionalism is defined:
“American exceptionalism is the theory that the United States is different from other countries in that it has a specific world mission to spread liberty and democracy.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_exceptionalism
You are letting him redefine the term, as cult leaders always do: “me, myself and I.”
And why are you rationalizing Paul’s dirty tactics, Colt? What has the man done to your conscience, brother? You justify everything he does, no matter how reprehensible. You KNOW those Dims were not won over. It just happened to be mutually beneficial for you guys and the Dims to rig the primaries.
Gotta go.
Report Post »colt1860
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 2:29pm@kryptonite LOL. No. The definition you provide is the redefinition made by the leftist Wilsonian policy of spreading “democracy” around the world. That’s a globalist viewpoint. It’s not Conservative or Constitutional. Get your facts straight. And learn some real history. Perhaps, you, or the MSM you listen to, just about maligns and distorts everything he says. I got more stuff to prove my claims, then you do. Search Youtube videos to see the thousands that show up at his rallies, which go purposely unreported by the MSM. Look at how the MSM is ignoring the real delegate count, or how the GOP establishment is ignoring the rules at conventions. ETC. Paul has not instigated any “dirty tactics”. No, that’s what the MSM and establishment has been doing. You are so misinformed and ignorant of what is going on. You have no knowledge, nor spirit of discernment. You profess to be Christian, yet you bear false witness against your neighbors, and go around as a talebearer spouting nonsense. That’s against the Word of God. You’ve been duped and fooled by the Marxist agenda. Paul is for free markets, and the Constitution. Of course they will demonize every one of his positions.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on May 16, 2012 at 9:35pm@COLT
Sorry, Colt, but exceptionalism in GOD’s eyes is measured by what you do for others. Yes, freedom is a better word than “democracy,” but that is what we have done, spread freedom. The day we stop sacrificing and giving freely, we will stop receiving freely from God. Let me remind you that the ONLY reason we have an exceptional Constitution is because of God. He inspired men who feared and revered Him, and they knew our calling as a nation was to be the salt of the earth and a light to the nations.
Paul’s definition — which you embrace — is as self-centered and selfish as he. We enjoy freedom because our military has always practiced sacrificial love, although Obama knows if he can destroy their vision, he can transform their mission to fit his anti-God agenda. Paul is helping Obama accomplish that, and he will be judged for it. As for wealth, it doesn’t make us exceptional, just enviable in a very wordly sense.
You are angry because I — and many others here — continue to expose Paul’s shenanigans, so you throw dumb accusations at me. That’s all right, brother. I don’t hold it against you, but I won’t be silent, either.
Know what, brother? You are coming dangerously close to erring like the Jews in Jesus time, who rejected the Christ because they were looking for an earthly king who would save the nation.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:24pmRon Paul doesn’t need to campaign. His worshipers would vote for him if he dropped dead, …. fully expecting that he would become president.
Just keep an eye on him. He’s a sleazy little fox and neither he nor his rabid cult followers care a flip about the will of the majority.
Report Post »ThurstonHowellIV
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:35pmYou got that last part right. Ron Paul followers care about the rule of law, not the will of the majority. After all, Democracy is nothing more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. A Representative Republic limits the power of government and prevents mob rule.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:45pm@ThurstonHowellIV
Have you ever heard of government of the people, by the people and for the people? It pretty much sums up what America is supposed to be about.
Of course, it‘s the duty of you brilliant Paulbots to decide what’s best for the rest of us and force your will upon us. You will get some competition from your likeness, 0bama though. He believes that’s his job.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:47pmAt least we know why we follow him other than MSM telling us he is the “inevitable”.
Why do you like Romney?
Report Post »What has he said about cutting the deficit?
What has he said about getting the government regulations out of our lives?
What has he said about executive orders or the Constitution?
What does he think about NDAA and the FED?
What does he truly believe and will he “flip-flop” again?
Important questions that I’m sure will be overlooked again and again.
Well by overlooking the important questions in 2008; We got Obama.
Truthbeliever2
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:49pmThe will of the majority? You mean mob rule. Oh that sounds like fun. You must be part of the 99%. Oh that poor poor majority.
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:53pm@QP – totally right. Remember when Obama thought he might not get enough votes to pass obamacare and was going to use rule technicalities to get around it? The libertarians are trying to use rule technicalities to ignore the will of the republican voters… they are trying to sabotage the republican convention. Most of them won’t even deny that they are libertarians rather than republicans. Maybe this is the way Gary Johnson is campaigning against Romney.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:58pm@WakingSheep
I’m not crazy about Romney but he would be better than 0bama. He would also be better than Ron Paul.
0bama is in the process of implementing a plane to bring America down and Ron Paul is the epitome of a 60s anti-war liberal. 0bama would bring the country down from within and Paul would let foreign powers do the job.
Report Post »TylerDante
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:01pm@QPWillie
So, let me get this straight, the United States is a democracy is ruled by the majority, i.e. mob rule (nevermind that the founders of the country never had that intention, nor desired it.) And yet the Ron Paul supporters who believe in individual liberty, individual rights, and individual responsibility are the ones forcing their will on the rest of the country even though you believe we should be ruled by the mob?
Abraham Lincoln said “government for the people, by the people, and of the people”…not any of the Founders. It is not in the Constitution, the Declaration, the Bill of Rights…anything. And people know that Abraham Lincoln was not really about the people, only using any means necessary to “keep the Union”.
The reason why the founders did not want a democracy is because it leaves individuals vulnerable against tyranny from the majority who can vote away rights (such as in the bans against same-sex marriage), or who can vote to mortgage the future generation’s livelihood (such as voting for Social Security, or Medicare, or Medicaid). Your complaint, then, is because Ron Paul supporters want to give people back their individual rights they’re “forcing” their will against you…
Well, if you don’t support individual rights, then I‘m not quite sure why you’re in the country.
Report Post »chalkdust
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:24pmwaking
“Why do you like Romney”? Because he’s not Obama
“What has he said about cutting the deficit”? Nothing specific
“What has he said about getting the government regulations out of our lives”? Nothing public
“What has he said about executive orders or the Constitution”? Nothing I know of
“What does he think about NDAA and the FED”? I’m sure he would like to avoid those questions
“What does he truly believe and will he “flip-flop” again”? What ever gets him elected and yes
And the 64 million dollar question: will Romney, if he wins, save us? Uh, probably not. Unless he has his agenda to reverse everything Obama and some other presidents hidden for political reasons I suspect he will be luke warm but not a communist.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:42pm@chalkdust
Report Post »Thank you! Somebody finally answered my questions! With the answers everybody else here on the blaze are either scared of or don’t care about.
What else is there to care about? The boogeyman in the middle east?
justangry
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:44pm@QP, LOL, you know I actually agree with you on this. He doesn’t have to do anything at this point because of his followers. Romney has to bribe people to say…. “meh whatever”. Texas hasn’t voted yet, but I hear Paul is poised to, or has already picked up 60% of the delegates there. I have to imagine that California will swing Paul’s direction as well without him lifting a finger, considering people locked out of his event at UCLA were climbing trees just to see him. LMAO and you’re probably also right about people still voting for him if he died. Ron Paul’s corpse is still better than Romney… probably wouldn’t even be as stiff. Ha!
Report Post »KC1
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:50pm@Wakingsheep Great questions but Im afraid they fall on deaf ears and dull minds.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:58pm@KC1
Report Post »I have been trying for months to get the GOP to wake up to what they are doing.
Your absolutely right though. It really is sad. The Constituion means nothing to Americans anymore.
Kim Kardashian is obviously more important to research in America than who will be the next President.
PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:08pm@qpwillie – The Government is Corrupt, Destroying our Country. I refuse to have this turn into a social welfare. Get up off your ass and get a job. You lazy Americans disgust me.
Report Post »kryptonite
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:54pm@P8riot
Report Post »Most of them won’t even deny that they are libertarians rather than republicans.
——–
Most of the sheeple are libertarians. The ones doing the dirty work for Paul are anarchists. Don‘t be fooled by Paul’s use of the Constitution. It’s a political tool to win followers, just like religious cult leaders use the Bible to win converts.
dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:56pmI like the first sentence. Not so much the second. I believe he believes in his cause and policies, I just don’t see him leading the country. He is not a bad man he just believes some kind of weird stuff about foreign policy and I kind of like his voice, very passionate.
Report Post »recoveringneocon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:52pmPolitics Why Did Ron Paul Skip CPAC?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/why-did-ron-paul-skip-cpac/
Paulist don’t forget this!!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 10:05pmQP WIILY Most of us Paul supporters were just like you guys because we had no choice but to vote for the ones that the RNC?LIGBERAL party handed us..I voted for that POS bush because of that other lame brain they had running against him..But the Constitution has rung her bell and Ron Paul..the only man who has supported us and the Constitution for the last 10 yrs..although he and his wife could be retiring..decided to give us a choice to bring this country back to its roots..we are going for it Willy.. We like the country this country used to be..and we want it back..we don’t like what progressivism has done to her..we are going into Marxist Communism with an Islamic military..because they could not use our own people against us.. We are for freedom to worship as we please and to live without fear QP.. We are the people who would have left England to establish this great land.. we do not fear taking it back..
Report Post »Naps
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 6:44amRomney/Goldman Sachs 2012
Report Post »inblack
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:24pmAnother election bought and sold.
Ron Paul cannot afford to compete with Romney donors, who ever they are. But I would say no, he is not dropping out, he is just broke. His name is still on the ballot and he still wants the votes – he will be at the convention.
Did anyone actually want Romney? Please reply if you have been a Romney fan from the start, vs just settling on him since he destroyed and out spent your candidate 40:1.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:33pmI did not want ANY of them from the start. But such is life, something the dumber Paul supporters need to figure out.
Life goes on, whether it is Romney, Obama, or Paul we will get through it.
Report Post »jhaydeng
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:38pmINBLACK, I have asked myself this same question. I will vote for anyone just because it’s better than what we have, but I did not want Romney though. I will add, most Conservatives are still in the minority even though we know that it is the only true way that works! Romney has won big not because of money, but because he has grabbed ALL RINO’s in the US (majority). If we can turn the Senate into what the House is you could have Mickey Mouse sitting behind the desk and it wouldn’t matter! Keep the faith!
Report Post »P8riot
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:47pmI’ve supported him since 2008 and still going strong!
Romney/_____ 2012!
http://www.mittromney.com/issues
Report Post »ImMormon
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:51pmI’ve been a Romney since the beginning and proud to say it. I have a lot of confidence in him and believe he can get us back on track. If I’m wrong, I’m going for Rand in 2016, but if I’m right I hope some of the Paulistinians can give him credit, if/when credit is due.
Report Post »soundtracktowar
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:19pmI am. Paul is good fiscally, but other than that, hes a definite nutter butter.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:52pmRomney’s not a Communist
Report Post »Sorry that the best I can do.
Belwraith
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 9:54pm“If we can turn the Senate into what the House is you could have Mickey Mouse sitting behind the desk and it wouldn’t matter!”
Except that Mickey Mouse could abuse the same Executive Power in decision making that has been repeatedly abused in the current administration.
Report Post »huey6367
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:24pmIf he will only stay away from the Independent ticket then we have a chance to save this country.
Report Post »MONICNE
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:24pmWe need to draft Allen West as soon as possible to defeat the DemonRats.
Go Mitt Allen 2012!
Support Romney & West.
TEA – the game the whole family can play!
Report Post »MammalOne
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:35pmYour satire is weaker than your politics.
Report Post »floridacockleburr
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:23pmWhen was he in the race? Half the time he can’t even beat the ones that have dropped out already.
Report Post »Truthbeliever2
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:53pmYea, I bet your television told you that. Who would you be voting for if you had no television? Nobody. You would be totaly lost without the MSM telling you who the right candidate is.
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:08pmTruthbeliever2
Report Post »I call BS on your assertions. Where do you get your info? My guess is that you will send a link to a blog run by a Paul supporter. I look at all the media and do some googling to verify sources and they ALL point to the same conclusion. Only you folks come up with obscure websites as ABSOLUTE proof to back your claims. It is rather absurd. I would have chosen most of the candidates over Romney, but never would have supported Paul. I supported Perot and got “Slick Willie” you will support Paul in November WITH NO CHANCE OF WINNING to give us “Obama 2 the not so phantom menace”. Let me thank you and your ilk in advance for failing to learn from our (mine included) previous mistakes and actively participating in the destruction of our country. You do not know that Romney would not give the Dr a role in government, but I will guarantee that Obama won’t.
Truthbeliever2
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:23pmdmerwin
Look; you call the websites obscure and not ABSOLUTE proof of a “Paulbot’s” side of the argument. First off, we are not in a court of law here. This is the comments sections on a news site. Second; since when have you EVER recieved ABSOLUTE proof of any story from any media outlet? They all have an agenda that fits their way a thinking.
I listen to AM radio and up until a few months ago watched alot of news from every outlet in the beginning, finally settling on FOX. Now I watch none of the television news outlets b/c they are agenda driven propaganda machines for PROGRESSIVE Republicans and Democrats. (Establishment politicians) The people are herded by the MSM like a mindless herd of sheep driven back and forth between the two parties down the road of progressivism; CONSTITUTION BE DAMNED.
The main streem media held all of the other candidates in a semi-fair manner, and holding Romney and Gingrich up as the save the day men. Only one source on AM Radio gave Paul a fair shake. One; on AM Radio!
I was just a kid when Ross Perot was running for Pres., and I remember wanting him to win, that’s about it. I guess you think you wasted your vote by voting for Perot. I don’t I think the people who voted for Bush got it right. They voted for an aire to the throne; while you voted for an individual. Paul is an individual who is running on the platform of constitutional liberty. “Romneycare” cares nothing about that, and neither do any of the other progressive
Report Post »Truthbeliever2
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:25pmIf you still had an individual state of mind the Paul camp would have one more mind to turn the tides. You don’t and you will be on the side that votes in ANOTHER AIRE to the throne of the United States of America.
Report Post »MittensKittens
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:22pmRON PAUL JUST RELEASED A BIG STATEMENT — AND SOME ARE SAYIG IT MEANS HE‘S ’OUT OF THE RACE’
“SAYING” not sayig…come on Blaze, that’s what spell check is for, or your brain!
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:30pmMy question is who is saying it?
Report Post »justangry
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:12pm@Mutiny… Shhh let them have their fun.
Report Post »circleDwagons
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:30pmWho is Ron Paul?
Report Post »thriceconcussed
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:21pmYou guys aren’t republicans, you’re ignorant sheep. You’re going to reap what you sow when this country is reduced to shambles by the lesser evils.
Report Post »MittensKittens
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:33pmWell, if you live here, you too will be reaping what is sown!
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:35pmWe’re long passed the point of no return, Bubba. It’s pretty much over. Even Ron Paul wouldn’t have been able to reverse course at this point. Too many Americans are worthless sloths and don’t want real change.
Instead of fighting them, it’s time to think outside the box and determine the most logical course of action – not easiest, mind you.
Report Post »trolltrainer
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:44pmHauschild wins the prize! Bingo.
All you pault-a-r-d-s need to just relax. Paul was not going to ride in and save the US. What could he do? Even if he were to abuse Executive Orders like Obama and GW, you cannot buck congress to the extent you would need to fix things. And Paul, being the principled, moral constitutionalist that he is, is not about to use the power of the office like he would need to.
Face it, it is a wash. Better Romney than Obama. It might postpone the inevitable crash for a little while longer.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:12pmThe Paulbots are going to take over the Tampa convention and hang Romney from the nearest light pole. Then Paul will be king of America. We will have free pot… women will become prostitutes and will give free sex to the Bots. This is true freedom
Report Post »bigspike
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:21pmthe system works!
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:36pmI guess that depends on one’s definition of “works”.
Report Post »OutOfTheAether
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:19pmI guess that‘s one way of say you’re not campaigning any more, but still keeping your position to influence the GOP platform come the Convention time. nice chess move
Report Post »KidCharlemagne
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:18pmIt ain’t over ’til its over!:
http://www.writeinronpaul2012.org
Report Post »Madmilo
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:08pmYep, people like you will guarantee that this country is over as we know it. By guaranteeing Obummer’s reelection. Thanks alot DUMBA$$!
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:23pm@Kid Char le mangney
It’s over. RP for Sect of Treaury? I bet you’re an Obama supporter…. having read your posts in the past.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:17pmThis might be one of three Ron Paul statements I can get behind! Lmao.
But Paul also leaves some room for his supporters to continue to act stupidly.
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 4:53pmThe Paul campaign is an example of the Bolshevik media’s tail wagging the dog. The media brainwashed us that Ron Paul was “unelectable” so the masses listened and didn’t vote for him as a result. I think a civics test should be required before people can vote. Most people don’t have a clue about politics and just listen to Bill Maher or Jon Stewart (both Jews) and listen to what they tell them.
TIME_2_START_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_16
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:37pmSILLY. “The media [brainwashed us] that Ron Paul was “unelectable” so [the masses listened] and didn’t vote for him as a result.”
WE? Is that a mouse you have in your pocket, or a Ron Paul Action Figure?
What a weak argument, lol. But hey, I’m it sure sounded good bouncing off the interior of your cranium when you wrote it right?
Report Post »smartman
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:56pmlook at the website below. its a real-time delegate counter that is accurate. If RP speaks at the RNC he will embarrass Romney. MITT is a RINO GB has been saying it for a year, but has now tapered off in his declaration of the truth. Romney and Obama will be the same result that take different paths to get there. Can you trust a flip flopper like romney?
Real delegate counter found here: http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/
‘I think the minimum wage ought to keep pace with inflation.’ [1]
‘There’s no question raising the minimum wage excessively causes a loss of jobs.’
‘I will work and fight for stem cell research.’ [1]
‘In the end, I became persuaded that the stem-cell debate was grounded in a false premise.’ [2]
‘I respect and will protect a woman’s right to choose.’ [1]
‘I never really called myself pro-choice.’ [2]
‘Roe v. Wade has gone too far.’ [1]
‘I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain and support it.’ [2]
‘I saw my father march with Martin Luther King.’ [1]
‘I did not see it with my own eyes.’ [2]
‘It was not my desire to go off and serve in Vietnam.’ [1]
‘I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there.
READ MORE REALLY GOOD ROMNEY FLIP FLOPS HERE: http://www.mittromneyflipflops.com/
Report Post »smartman
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:58pmlook at the website below. its a real-time delegate counter that is accurate. If RP speaks at the RNC he will embarrass Romney. MITT is a RINO GB has been saying it for a year, but has now tapered off in his declaration of the truth. Romney and Obama will be the same result that take different paths to get there. Can you trust a flip flopper like romney?
Real delegate counter found here: http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/
‘I think the minimum wage ought to keep pace with inflation.’ [1]
‘There’s no question raising the minimum wage excessively causes a loss of jobs.’
‘I will work and fight for stem cell research.’ [1]
‘In the end, I became persuaded that the stem-cell debate was grounded in a false premise.’ [2]
‘I respect and will protect a woman’s right to choose.’ [1]
‘I never really called myself pro-choice.’ [2]
‘Roe v. Wade has gone too far.’ [1]
‘I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain and support it.’ [2]
‘I saw my father march with Martin Luther King.’ [1]
‘I did not see it with my own eyes.’ [2]
‘It was not my desire to go off and serve in Vietnam.’ [1]
‘I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there
READ MORE REALLY GOOD ROMNEY FLIP FLOPS HERE: http://www.mittromneyflipflops.com/
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:12pmhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/republican_delegate_count.html
Report Post »MammalOne
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:28pmHey, it‘s everyone’s favorite anti-libertarian RINO, Time_2_End. Just in time to slander Ron Paul supporters as a means of avoiding discussions about substantiative issues.
You know, I’m wondering: How does Mitt Romney go from denying he’s “a partisan Republican”, instead claiming to be a “moderate”, and someone whose “views are progressive” in 2002 and then turn around and say he’s a “staunch conservative” in 2011? Could it be that Romney is a chameleon who will say whatever it takes to get elected? That sounds like the kind of break we need from the business-as-usual politics in Washington.
Report Post »It‘s too bad there’s no one running for president who doesn’t flip flop their views every time it becomes politically popular to do so. Oh well, ANYONE but Obama, right?
Gonzo
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 3:02pmYou did it Time_2! You single handedly stopped the Paul campaign! Now, insert Obama where Paul once was.
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:17pmPresidential candidates don’t normally campaign in every state. Same principle.
Ron Paul is still in the race for the Presidency. He will just not be VISITING states, to give speeches, which have not already had their primaries.
Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »bigspike
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:22pmahhh…i just KNEW the Rontards would play the ‘Black Knight’ card…
Report Post »A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:52pm@bigspike,
“ahhh…i just KNEW the Rontards would play the ‘Black Knight’ card…”
Learn to parse English, please. “… we will no longer spend resources campaigning in primaries in states that have not yet voted“ does not mean ”we have ended our campaign”.
In fact, “We will continue to … win delegates” implies that he is STILL in the race for the Presidency.
Also, see here.
Michigan Delegates Are UNBOUND After All – Romney May Lose Michigan
Report Post »http://www.dailypaul.com/233216/michigan-delegates-are-unbound-after-all-romney-may-lose-michigan
dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:20pmBut no one drops out of the big states that are left, California, Texas and New York. All of the states left are NOT caucuses and most are winner take all or “proportional” which means that with Romney taking over 50% the same as winner take all. Romney has 949 and only needs 200 he will get those in Texas and California alone. No real drama at the convention as he will be over the threshold. Now I know that MUTINY and the posse will say “hey what about rule 38?“ and my response will be ”what about it?’ Has it ever turned SEVERAL hundred delegates before? It’s been there for a long time.
Report Post »Mutiny
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:17pmActually, he secured the five states he needed to be on the floor in Tampa. He knows spending money in the remaining states is pointless for he and Romney. The delegate campaign will continue because that is free ( except the sweat equity ) put in by his supporters who will continue to do it.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:09pm@TEAPARTYFORROMNEY You mean there is a Communist Tea Party now? I doubt very seriously is Ron Paul would stoop so low as to be a part of Romney’s cabinet..Ron Paul is a Constituionalist..no a big government schilling for the un Federal Reserve Rothchilds.. None of Ron Paul supporters would be into that and it is an insult to Dr Paul to insiunuate it..We want freedom and we want out of debt..You people can be happy with the unConstitutionalist who has voted against your right to arm yourselves..to take your freedom with the 40 thousand new laws that they have enacted ..your taxes with the Global Warming Scam which Romney was touting and all of his other liberal progressive Communist ideas oh yeah and obomneycare..
Report Post »TeaPartyForRomney
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:16pmRon Paul is out and I hope Romney picks him up for his cabinet. That or his son.
We need to work on the debt and deficit and Ron Paul would be great. Here is the new RNC ad against Obama’s national debt, hard hitting: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2012/may/rnc_ad_debt.html
Report Post »NOBALONEY
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:16pmLet the fat lady sing.
Report Post »Shasta
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:13pmThat was the absolute right thing for Paul to do. Now if we could only stop his supporters from acting like democrats.
Report Post »sWampy
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:17pmSo Paul’s supporters act like democrats, and Mitt’s supporters are democrats, man we are screwed.
Report Post »OutOfTheAether
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:20pmoh here, here. Booing speakers off the podium is a bit despicable, to say the least
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:22pmAnd Republicans should stop acting like illiterate zombies.
Report Post »staginglt
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:41pmTurn off the TV. Despite the video snippet accompanying the popular narrative, Josh Romney was not “booed off stage”. He concluded his speech to applause, and then he returned to the mic to push a particular slate of delegates, which is against convention rules. That was the source of the outcry. http://youtu.be/YIX2tpXV74Y
Report Post »inblack
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:47pmYou right – buying elections is what we republicans believe in.
The unions and global marxists bought Obama his presidency, who bought Romney’s?
I’m going to have to go with the military industry, banking and investment and the world government crowd.
What Glenn got right is that a govt as big as ours is a threat to liberty.
Report Post »What Glenn missed is that a govt that controls as many trillions of dollars as ours will not be run by us, but rather by the people that it has enriched.
dmerwin
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 11:13amChet, forgot to mention that a sizable portion of the stimulus went to prop up local governments so THEY didn’t raise taxes on the recipients in states that voted for Obama, another bit of pay to play and liberal hypocrisy.
Report Post »ruffnex
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:12pmRon Paul drops out! Great news…Now if only his followers will get some sense. (Is that possible?)
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:22pmGuess there’s always the Constitution Party, since the Repugnicans haven’t learned how important it is.
Report Post »WakingSheep
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:50pmdid you read the statement? Hardly means he is out of the race.
Now I know why the GOP blindly follows Romney; Read the headline MSM dishes out and the GOP doesn’t even comprehend.
They say Romney is “inevitable”; it must be true.
They say Romney is conservative; it must be true.
BAAAAAAAAAAA
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:08pmGoodbye, Ron Paul. Ready for Sect of Treasury?
Report Post »Mark0331
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:18pmMy thoughts exactly….
Report Post »johnjamison
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:19pmExactly Paul could do more good in that position than he could as a President.
Report Post »bigspike
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:20pmno, he’s just waiting for the Mother Ship to whisk him away
Report Post »the_system_disconnect
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:27pmYes, please, Mitt, make Paul the Secretary of Treasury….
Report Post »OutOfTheAether
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:31pm@JOHNJAMISON Exactly what I was thinking
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 3:31pm“Mr. President, I’d like to talk to you about the Federal Reserve.”
Report Post »“Mr. President, I’m hoping you could find some time to talk to me about the Federal Reserve.”
“Mr. President, when are we going to talk about the Federal Reserve.”
“Ron, shut the hell up! We’re not going to abolish the damn Federal Reserve!”
“Mr. President, I have the Secretary of the Treasury on line 2.”
“Tell him I’m not home.”
The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 5:43pm@Chet Hempstead
Ron Paul is dropping out because he’s out of money.
Chet, exactly how much did you contribute to RP?
Not enough I guess, just like (most) all the other RP supporters that were too busy spending their money on hemp. Right, Chet HEMPstead?
Report Post »PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:09pmKeep acting like you got this game all won. Man, you Republicans are so easy to manipulate. It’s quite saddening.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:49pmThe-Monk
Report Post »I’m not a Ron Paul supporter, I’m an Obama supporter. I admire Paul for at least being the only principled and logically consistent fiscal conservative, instead of a manure peddlar pushing a lie that we can cut taxes and spending, and reduce the size and authority of the federal government to eighteenth century levels, but still have an invincible army that will rule the rest of the world with an iron fist. But he’s still living in a daft fantasy. The idea of retroactively declaring the Federal Reserve and Social Security unconstitutional and eliminating them is about as realistic as declaring the Louisiana Purchase unconstitutional and claiming that everybody born in that part of the country is a French subject.
The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 6:50pm@PoliticiansRCrooks
Last time I checked…. Ron Paul was a politican. What does that say about your name?
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:25pmI’m down with that. Perfect choice.
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:37pmChet Hempstead
Report Post »Chet wake up and smell the coffee. Unless we reform the entitlements and shrink the government We will soon be bankrupt. I guess that the 5 trillion with t your guy overextended us with is monopoly money? We could grow the economy if we returned to reasonable regulations and produced our own energy. Your guy’s policies are a smorgasbord of liberal bumper sticker ideology. I really like uniting the environmentalists with the unions to ship jobs overseas, nicely done. Look to Europe where the European union is about to dissolve because those countries that imposed some fiscal discipline on themselves are now unwilling to fund the entitlement states of Greece, Spain and Italy. This is really no different than asking working people to “do your fair share” and “spreading it around”. I will ask all able bodied welfare recipients to do “their fair share” and paint the graffiti on building and pick up some trash for Christ’s sake. I am sure you are well intentioned, most liberals are. But I must use the cliche that “the road to hell is paved with good intentions” and we are speeding down that road in a handbasket.
The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:46pm@Chet Hempstead
“The-Monk I’m not a Ron Paul supporter, I’m an Obama supporter”
I already knew that. Check and Mate. You lose.
I just wanted you to come out of your Obama closet and admit it.
Report Post »The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 7:53pm@dmerwin
Nicely said and I got the sarcasm. : )
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:13pmThe-Monk
Report Post »What closet? I have always been a Democrat and an Obama supporter, and never tried to hide it.
Chet Hempstead
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:14pmdmerwin
Report Post »Step one in not going bankrupt, has to be raising taxes on the wealthy back to what they were before George W. Bush. I know that alone is not going to eliminate the deficit, but there’s no way we’re going to talk about more drastic measures until we all at least agree to do that. In case you never noticed, they just kept all that money and didn’t spend dime one on making jobs for other Americans.
The-Monk
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 8:15pm@bigspike
“no, he’s just waiting for the Mother Ship to whisk him away”
Sorry, the Mothership came and left May 3rd and took little Timmy away… Left RP to be Sect of the Treasury.
Too bad JZS didn’t hitch a ride. : )
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on May 14, 2012 at 11:28pm@CHET
Please explain why we must roll the tax rates back to pre GW levels first. Even knowing that it would accomplish almost nothing. It’s just an envy thing with you guys. Even while knowing that it won’t fix a damn thing, you just can’t help wanting to take.
Chet, how about we fisrt roll back all gov spending back to pre Obama levels. Just those from a mere 3 1/2 years ago.
Lets do that first, and then cut all politicians salaries by about 30%. Then reduce all gov agencies budgets by at least 15% across the board. Top to bottom, no if‘s and’s or but’s.
Do all those things FIRST, just to show the folks some good will, and then we’ll talk about increasing some taxes, maybe.
Report Post »Chet Hempstead
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 12:42amTherightsofbilly
Report Post »Let me think about it. No. Not one damn penny in cuts until you give up the stupid tax cuts for people who don’t need them.
Therightsofbilly
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 1:20am@CHET,
Sorry then, we‘ll have to call it a draw and let it play out to it’s natural conclusion.
It makes no sense whatsoever to raise any taxes, by any amount, on any person or business, when it’s a sure thing that at least 70% of it will go directly to waste, fraud, abuse, and lining the pockets of union thugs.
And I didn’t even mention the fiasco that is the UN.
You’ll see Chet…….Oh the times…..they are a changin.
Report Post »Therightsofbilly
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 1:24am@CHET,
I just noticed in your reply, it is Jealousy and Envy with you.
“They don’t NEED it……..I WANT it”
Gimmee
Very petty Chet, so very very petty.
Report Post »dmerwin
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 11:10amChet,
Report Post »So you are absolutely unwilling to cut govt and insist that the only deficit reduction will be in tax increases. I guess that is your “bi-partisan” position. Your parties inflexibility is the reason why conservatives do not want to “work” with the potus. Your solution has failed over and over. Why do you think jobs leave America, I know you don‘t know so I’ll give you a hint, high taxation and excessive regulations. That hampers job growth which in turn means that to raise revenue fewer people must pay more. It is a losing strategy and has proven not to work. A flat or fair tax with no loopholes or exemptions is the way to fix the tax side. Your guy and his pal Buffett used every tax strategy they could to lower their rates. Nice way to take the high ground. Obama’s favorite companies GM and GE paid zero taxes and increases in their work force took place overseas. Nice way to create jobs. Buffett’s company owes a Billion in back taxes which he is avoiding paying. Your’s is a party of hypocrites, another example, Pelosi supports unions except in her own family’s businesses. Become aware.
Chet Hempstead
Posted on May 15, 2012 at 3:31pmdmerwin
Report Post »No, I mean what I said ending the Bush tax cuts is the first step, if you do that we will see what else needs to be done. If you won’t do that, then it is hypocritical to complain about the inflexibility of the other side. This has nothing to do with job growth. Rich people don’t create jobs out of their personal income. They haven’t for the last 11 years, and they’re not going to start now. I’m all for lowering the corporate tax rate as long a we close loopholes at the same time, but your side protects every loophole like it was the Alamo.