Ron Paul on Romney Collusion Theory: Santorum‘s ’Super Involved in Conspiracy Theories’
- Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:01am by
Mytheos Holt
- Print »
- Email »
Following his third place finish in the Michigan Primary, Rep. Ron Paul, R-TX, gave an interview to Fox News’ Megyn Kelley and Brett Baier in which he emphatically denied any connection to the Romney campaign. Following the most recent debate, some observers had questioned whether Paul was secretly in cahoots with Romney, given the Texas Congressman’s outsized focus on rival Rick Santorum, almost completely the exclusion of Romney. It was this allegation that led Fox‘s Brett Baier to ask Paul whether his son’s political future factored at all into his calculus, as though a tie with Romney might bolster the younger Paul’s chances of future success. Paul shot the idea down flat.
“We don’t talk about it, we don’t think about it, I have my job and he has his job, and that just doesn’t seem to be appropriate. I have to see how well I can do in this campaign. But the last thing I’ve done is talk to Mitt Romney. Besides, he wouldn’t talk to me about that. I mean, that’s just fiction, and has mostly been promoted by someone who I guess is super involved in conspiracy theories,” Paul said. “Santorum’s doing that, but it doesn’t make any sense at all.”
Watch the clip here:
Whatever the truth of Paul’s words, his accusation is sure to strike supporters of his opponents as more than a little ironic, given similar accusations that have been leveled at the Texas Congressman himself regarding his views and supporters. Moreover, the political future of the younger Paul is an open question, given that he is seen by some as having a broader support base among conservatives than his father.
Popular Stories
Paper Details Obama Admin’s Alleged Secret Note Sent to Iran: If Israel Attacks, We Won’t Get Involved 583 Comments
‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Roseanne Barr: Most Billionaires ‘Violent Pedophiles’ & ‘Heartless’ Cocaine Addicts 374 Comments
President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 364 Comments
Faith
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
Pakistani Muslim Cleric Accused of Framing Disabled Christian Girl in Koran-Burning Case Read More- ‘Made Up Religion’: TV Historian Enrages Muslims, Receives Threats After Producing UK Documentary Questioning Islam’s Beginnings 412 Comments
Meet the Controversial German Imam Accused of Brutally Beating His Wife & Pushing Sharia Law Read More
‘Self-Proclaimed Messiah’ & Unification Church Leader the Rev. Sun Myung Moon Has Died — Here’s His Life Story Read More
Business
- President Obama Issues Major ‘Green Energy’ Executive Order 364 Comments
- Germany’s Upcoming Court Ruling Will be Huge for the EU Read More
Ford Looks to Beat Toyota for Best-Selling Car in 2012 With This Model 151 Comments
Bernanke & QE3: Here’s What You Need to Know Read More- ‘Extortion’: Why Did the Labor Department ‘Drop the Hammer’ on Oregon Farmers? 302 Comments
Technology
- This Is the Creationists‘ Response to Scientist Bill Nye’s Viral Pro-Evolution Video Claiming They Harm Children 408 Comments
‘TaserDrone’: Hackers Weaponize Quadcopter With Actual ‘Shocking’ Technology Read More
Ever Heard of the Wild ‘Burning Man’ Festival in the Middle of the Nev. Desert? Here’s Your Primer Read More
Stanford Develops Technology ‘Better Than Steroids’ for Athlete Recovery Read More
Have You Pretended to Know What ‘the Cloud’ Is? You’re Not Alone Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (179)
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:28am“….someone who I guess is super involved in conspiracy theories,”
LMAO! Dope, er, pot calling the kettle black.
No more appearing on Alex Jones for you Ron Paul! Talking about the collusion of conspiracy theorists.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:00amYep..they should take conspiracy out of the dictionary since none exists..there has never been a conspiracy..never will be..off to the psycho ward..a friend of mine’s daughter learned in college that Bin Laden was already dead before they killed him..imagine that! Teaching conspiracy theories in college. THen I just saw last night on video where special forces are reiterating that very thing..and they are also saying that the 9/11 thing,,they are belieiving the inside job thing because of a chemical they have found in the bdlgs of the trade tower..imagine that,,the special forces now believing conspiracy theories..looks like the non conspiratists are the only smart ones out here..Remember how Joan Behar and friends got up and walked out Bill Oreilly? Remember how the US team when in talks with the ME got up and walked out at the suggestion that 9/11 was an insided job? Well then..that settles it..it is all just theories..lol
Report Post »http://s117.photobucket.com/albums/o47/clanson/?action=view¤t=57674748.mp4
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:10amAs ASHES gloms onto a signal from the Little A‘Le’Inn near Area 51 he types….
Report Post »No Free Beer
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:15am@ Time for Ron…
What are you talking about? Please be more specific.
If anything, Gingrich is being paid by Romney to stay in so Santorum doesn’t beat Romney.
(sigh)
The Blaze is pathetic.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:16amTime2 end.. you should view the video smart -ss.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:26amWhat I’m writing about BEER is the fact that Ron Paul is calling Santorum someone “who is deeply involved in conspiracy theories.” Regardless of the topic at hand. I’ll type slower next time for you.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:28amASHES. The pithy answeR to your request…… is. NO!
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:36amTIME2END..Then remain clueless..
Report Post »Master_and_Commander
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:30amYeah, I mean, duh, @time_to_end, I mean like, America was totally behind 9/11 and all, so they could go rape the middle east for oil for all the rich billionaire oil barons, and like Iran doesn’t want to blow Israel or America up, DUHHHHH. The neocons just want an excuse to bomb Iran and kill millions of innocent people… And also, Conservatives like Rick Santorum are just so completely neocons and warmongers, they just want war and death, and like, killing people, and innocent people, and, and, ya know, they spend millions of dollars on air conditioning in Afghanistan, and so the military industrial complex just has too many troops around the world, and we should just mind our own business, ya know…
So yeah, RON PAUL 2012, RON PAUL 2012!!!!! RON PAUL 2012!!!!!! AHHHHHHH!!!!!!!! I’m now going to be the typical RP supporter and shout you down into submission!!! RON PAUL 2012!!!!! RON PAUL 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:37amRick Santorum robocalled Democrats in Michigan!
Said to defeat Romney’s chances — Democrats come vote for Santorum, and many did!
Mitt Romney charged Rick Santorum with using “dirty tricks” to win Michigan’s Tuesday primary.
Michael Moore claims his friends will be voting for Rick Santorum – calling it “Operation Hilarity”
Operation Hilarity is “an opportunity for Democrats to actually help prolong this election a little bit longer because we’ve seen that the longer this drags out, the worse it is for Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum and the best it is for Barack Obama.”
http://www.examiner.com/elections-2010-in-wilmington/rick-santorum-has-been-robocalling-democrats-michigan
Report Post »CptStubbing
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:47amSantorum:
Iran is going to take over the world if they get a nuke.
Iran is going to destroy the world if they get a nuke.
Iran will have a nuke in a few months. (He said this a few months ago.)
Islamo-fascists are in every country and we have to eradicate them.
Gays are going to destroy our country.
Obama is a Muslim.
Obama is a socialist.
Satan is working to destroy America.
Contraceptives caused the sexual revolution.
If you go to college, you will be turned into a liberal. (says the guy with a bachelors, a masters, and a Juris doctorate.)
Gas prices caused the housing bubble to collapse. (I guess, that’s not a conspiracy, that is just a lack of any reasoning when it comes to simple economics.)
Oh yeah, Romney and Paul are colluding together to make some kind of deal at the convention.
Santorum is almost as dumb as the TIME 2 END guy. Almost.
Report Post »illferris
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:47amAlex Jones is the only talk show Ron Paul has the balls to go on. Ron Paul is a COWARD!! Do you want a COWARD as POTUS?
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:51amWhy didn’t Bush II close the border? Why didn’t Obama close the border?
Do you really believe Santorum will close the border? Think again………
Santorum’s Record on Immigration
Voted against increasing the number of immigration investigators.
Voted to allow illegal immigrants to receive the earned income credit before becoming citizens.
Voted to give SSI benefits to legal aliens.
Voted to give welfare benefits to naturalized citizens without regard to the earnings of their sponsors.
Voted against hiring an additional 1,000 border patrol agents, paid for by reductions in state grants.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:52amRick Santorum’s “Real Concerns” About The Tea Party
“I’ve got some real concerns about this movement in the Republican party, the Tea Party movement, to sort of re-fashion conservatism. And, um, I will vocally and publicly oppose it and do my best to correct the record.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLQnoVpkyqc
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:54amBeck says Santorum wrong about the Federal Reserve
video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ju7uS7TJiTU
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:54amSantorum’s shocking statements analyzed by Judge Napolitano
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=1Gwwmm-cQxU#t=85s
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:59amSantorum is not a conservative
video Jerry Doyle: http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=RTqIIoDALeA#t=0s
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:00amSantorum pro-UNION:
“Santorum is target-rich on his shameless support for unions in the past — including unforgiveable minimum wage legislation — which he excuses by his “political realities” in Pennsylvania. Uh, excuse me, Senator? On this issue alone, Santorum’s sanctimonious purity is destroyed. But there’s more. Much more.”
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/santorum_the_good_son_not_so_much.html
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:00amSantorum: “Government needs to be BIG if people don’t order their lives correctly”
video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=KjCZXfhjoWA#t=0s
Santorum’s anti-gun history
Report Post »http://www.nationalgunrights.org/rick-santorums-anti-gun-history/
Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:01amSantorum will end birth control?
“Santorum, who has also pledged to do what he can to put an end to contraception if elected president. Contraception changes “the way things ought to be,” he says. Santorum is self assured that he, and he alone, understands “the way things ought to be” and pledges to use the powers of the state to forcefully impose his “understanding” on the entire country.”
http://www.24hgold.com/english/news-gold-silver-ayatollah-santorum-the-sanctimonious-ass-.aspx?article=3800514004G10020&redirect=false&contributor=Tom+DiLorenzo
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:01amLMAO! MASTER. I get your drift and sarcasm! Pretty accurate assessment of their internet behavior…
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:01amSantorum: “Women shouldn‘t serve in combat because of ’other types of emotions’ ”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/santorum-says-other-types-of-emotions-could-preclude-women-in-combat/2012/02/09/gIQAkiya2Q_blog.html
———-
Santorum the Sanctimonious: Santorum statements can only be described as delusional and totalitarian.
http://www.24hgold.com/english/news-gold-silver-ayatollah-santorum-the-sanctimonious-ass-.aspx?article=3800514004G10020&redirect=false&contributor=Tom+DiLorenzo
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:02amSantorum lied about meeting with Lobbyists
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/08/AR2006030802449.html
Santorum Ripped Off American Veterans
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2012/01/how-rick-santorum-ripped-off-american-military-veterans
“Santorum” pushed a bill requiring an individual mandate like Obama while in congress”
Report Post »http://articles.mcall.com/1994-05-02/news/2979474_1_cooper-grandy-health-reform-employees-premiums/2
Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:02amSantorum Called for Economic Union with Central/South America — like Europe!
http://www.nolanchart.com/article9315-ron-paul-trounces-santorum-on-foreign-policy-in-cnn-debate.html
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:03am“special” loans for Santorum:
“Washington-based Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). Sloan said the senator’s unconventional mortgage is the latest in a series of actions — including his role in the so-called K Street Project to place Republicans in lucrative lobbying jobs — that show “he’s seriously ethically challenged.”:
http://prospect.org/article/little-help-his-friends
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:03amRick Santorum’s wife opted to sue her chiropractor for $500,000 because she “gained weight”.
Report Post »Senator Santorum was stumping for a $250,000 cap on medical malpractice suits. She settled for $350,000 reportedly.
Santorum is a serial hypocrite. “Do as I say, not as I did”
Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:10amSantorum said JFK’s Religion Speech Made Him Want to ‘Throw Up
..and then said he wished he hadn’t said it!
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/rick-santorum-regrets-saying-jfks-religion-speech-made-him-want-to-throw-up/
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:10amVECHORIK. I actually agree that Santorum pandering to Dems like Ron Paul does kinds of makes me sick to my stomach. But I still like the guy for a number of reasons.
You can post all the Santorum related articles you would like…. I’m here for you!! Get it off your bird chests.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:14amLosing our rights and trashing the Constitution with Santorum:
2001 – He voted for the USA PATRIOT Act.
2001 – He voted to bailout the airline industry with Federal tax-dollars.
2002 – He voted for the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.
2002 – He voted to create the TSA, which now unconstitutionally searches people in airports, bus stations, subways, train stations, on highways, and more.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:18amDemocrats and Republicans play a game to keep the public in line. Each candidate must fit a tight little box. No candidate dares cross the line into the “opposition territory.” If they do, they are demonized by BOTH political parties. Today, there’s not much difference in Democrats and Republicans when it comes to a world without borders and redistribution of wealth. They win, no matter which party is in office.
It will continue that way until America develops a strong 3rd party, or the current political parties GET BACK TO THE CONSTITUTION.
Report Post »CptStubbing
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:18am@Vechorik, Stop being a douche. Santorum supporters agree with his conspiracies about Satan and Muslims taking over the world.
Ron Paul doesn’t have wild conspiracy theories, his supporters do.
You fueling that fire, by spamming a board just makes you look as retarded as they are.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:22am2012 Presidential Candidates – Gun Owners Of America
http://gunowners.org/2012presidential.htm
Ron Paul A+
Rick Santorum B-
Newt Gingrich C
Mitt Romney D-
NRA does NOT protect gun rights! http://nrawol.net/
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:23amJames 1:25
Report Post »“Whoever looks into the perfect law of liberty,
and continues in it, he being not a forgetful hearer,
but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.”
Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:24amThis week, Sen. Jim DeMint offered some advice to the Republican Party: “The debate in the Republican Party needs to be between libertarians and conservatives. … There’s no longer room for moderates and liberals because we don’t have any money to spend, so I don’t want to be debating with anyone who wants to grow government.”
Rick Santorum has said: “I fight very strongly against libertarian influence within the Republican Party and the conservative movement.” Sen. DeMint says: “I’d like to see a Republican Party that embraces a lot of the libertarian ideas.” Not surprisingly, Santorum has spent most of his political career promoting big government. Not surprisingly, DeMint has spent most of his political career fighting it.
continued http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/13/jim-demints-libertarian-lesson/
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:25amBloomberg:
“Paul Is Only GOP Contender Whose Policies Would Pare Debt, Analysis Finds”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-23/paul-s-plan-would-lower-debt-while-rivals-wouldn-t-report-says.html
“New Report on GOP Primary Contenders Says Only Ron Paul Would Reduce the Federal Debt”
Report Post »http://reason.com/blog/2012/02/23/new-report-on-gop-primary-contenders-say
Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:26amRASMUSSEN POLL: Obama Approval at 45%, Lowest in Month—President Falls Behind Romney and Paul…
Romney 45% Obama 43%…
Paul 43% Obama 41%
Obama 45% Santorum 43%
Obama 49% Gingrich 39%… Developing…
It’s on DRUDGE :-) http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Ron Paul CAN win!
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:29amSantorum lost his senate seat in PA over scandals.
He wasn’t living in PA when he was senator. He bought a $700,000 mansion in VA and was living there. He claimed his residence was a $70,000 2 bedroom house outside Pittsburgh, he has 7 kids. It was on the news several times, run down grass not cut, no furniture. But he claimed to commute back there every week. He refused to back down.
Then he rented it out and bad for him, the renters registered to vote with Santorum’s address. Still Santorum wouldn’t back down and claimed to live there on tv. Well it gets better.
Santorum then enrolled his kids in some online charter school and billed the school district in PA $20,000 per kid per year for their education, while he was living in VA. The school district won against him, but missed some sort of legal deadline. Santorum has never paid the money back to date.
I’m sure this all will come out, it was all over the news here back then.
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:38amCPTSTUB. Golpher, I mean VECHORIK has no sense of what is right and wrong… he’s what can only be described as described in a story I provided once before called…
“The attraction of Ron Paul by the mediocre among us.”
You’re both pretty clueless regarding the lunacy of Ron Paul, but Golpher (VECHORIK)…. just a tad more so.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:38amCptStubbing, I’m just helping lazy people do their homework and have some truth to read before they get to all the lies listed below.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:41amTIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12, I’m posting facts with sources.
Report Post »You are simply name-calling.
techengineer11
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:49amTIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
This is a Blaze employee or one of Beck’s fools.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:59amWell, that’s misleading, because Glenn Beck led me to Ron Paul.
Report Post »martinez012577
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:15pm@vech
Its amazing people can see these things and honestly say Santorum is a conservative. Of course these are more than likely the same people that have kept voting for the same idiots over and over again thinking they will do whats right for our country. Romney and Gingrich are just as bad. It’s a sad state of affairs we are in. Our debt is crushing us and everyone in the race other than Ron Paul spends more money. Its honestly amazing. If any of you clowns voting for any of the clones claimed to be tea party people, please cease and desist.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:35pmI was once like that — believed as long as I pulled the Republican-lever to vote (like my mom and dad taught me) that everything would be okay. Glenn Beck changed that when he introduced me to United Nations Agenda 21. That led me to learning what a progressive Republican is (the same as a Democrat).
Ignorance is bliss and many Americans just haven’t taken the time to do the necessary homework.
They sit in front of the tv and allow the media to tell them what to think. It’s ruining America.
Democrats and Republicans have partnered for redistribution of wealth and a world without borders. The only way to stop them is to recognize CONSERVATIVES, regardless of the label: Democrat, Republican, Libertarian
Report Post »TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:40pmVECHORIK. Like CPTSTUB wrote… you are just spamming. I personally don’t care, but it seems STUBs called it as he saw it. I present my opinion and what I consider to be the facts all the time, but a Paul groupie would just call that Paul bashing, name calling and slander. LMAO!!
In all my life, I’ve never seen a bunch of bigger whiners in my life as I do with Paul groupies. Well, except for the Obama left. You sound like a bunch of Democrats! Hmmmmm, Paul supporters, Dmocrats… hmmmmm.
You don’t like how I post, what I post, and MY opinion and what I present? As always… too bad.
Report Post »Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 12:57pmI ignore name-callers. When facts are presented, I investigate them.
Report Post »Ruler4You
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:01pm“Conspiracy” theorists used to be considered bug-o.
Ron Paul seems to have moved them into the mainstream.
It‘s not a conspiracy if it’s out in the open. All you have to do is see and hear.
Report Post »common cents
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:12pmTime_2_put_u_out_of_our_misery
Report Post »time_2_get_a_clue
time_2_shut_ur_pie_hole_chump_
(What a whack job this dude is)
Vechorik
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 1:33pmWhy did Democrats vote for Rick Santorum in Michigan?
Ad by Mitt Romney: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P36GyQt4AgM#t=8s
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:09pmVechorik, keep up the good work my friend. Time_2 is a clueless dweeb. If you look at the difference in the crowds that come to the canidates rallies, you can see that there are two scenario’s. One is that our voting process is as corrupt as Russia’s, or Two, The majority of voters are like Time_2, they just sit around and listen to the media and vote for whoever the media says to vote for. They are not intelligent enough or are too lazy to actually research the candidates and they are definately too lazy to attend their candidates rallies. They just go like zombies when it is time to vote, then slink back to their couch to watch the skewed results. Pathetic.
Here is a picture comparison of the crowd difference between Paul and Romney: http://twitter.com/#!/WhereIsTheRage/status/174624897845305346/photo/1/large
I do not have a picture of Santorums but he did beat Mitt in supporter numbers at his rally with a whopping 600 attending. Pauls crowd was over 4000.
Report Post »guido.cavalcanti
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:17pm@ Vechorik Thank you for doing your own research and for trying to create an objective discussion that is based on factual information rather than mindless emotional rants by individuals like
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12 = DIVIDE_THE_GOP_VOTING_BASE
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12 = YOUR_GOP_ESTABLISHMENT_CANDIDATE_LOSES
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12 = BARACK_OBAMA_GETS_REELECTED
….and you guys thought he was one of you this whole time, didn’t you?
Vechorik, unfortunately I‘ve found the die hard GOP base doesn’t respond well to facts when presented with them. Usually they go into a mode of denial then accuse you of supporting Obama (instead of embracing the truth), because if you don’t support the establishment choice, then you must be for Obama.
No, the only way we get through to them is we write in our candidate’s name this time and get a third party going for next time. We‘ll suffer through another four years of Obama but at least we’ll have a voice. You know as well as I do the GOP doesn’t represent conservatism anymore, not even by an inkling.
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:20pmIs that all you do Nancy Pelosi go from page to page throwing bombs?
Report Post »jworkman
Posted on March 1, 2012 at 12:20pmSorry time 2, but I would bet Ron will be on the General Election ballot as a libertarian.
Report Post »Moshy1
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:18amYeah, Ron Paul is extremely skeptical about “conspiracy theories!” You can’t make this stuff up folks. It’s too bizarre. He actually said it. Ron Paul actually accused another person of being caught up in conspiracy theories.
Report Post »Tony
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:13amAgree, it is incredible that Ron Paul would actually accuse others of being caught up in conspiracy theories….If “conspiracy theories” are an issue for Paul, he needs to do some major house cleaning within his support. ..As I recall, one of his South Texas disciples running for TX governor a couple years back would not denounce the 9/11 “truthers” when asked on Beck’s radio show about her stance….
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:14amSantorum is suggesting a link between Romney and Paul? The only link I have seen is that Romney would like to be like Ron Paul in matters of stopping of the policing of the world and bringing the military home..but the people are terrified of not policing the world.. some seem to think that China will do it and become the greatest nation..ha ha ..she might be because she probably wouldn’t be dumb enough to blow them up and rebuild them constantly..but regardless..I don’t see China wanting to spend all of her wealth doing it..THen she would be in our position..She’s too smart for that.
Report Post »GeorgieBaby
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:03pm@ASHESTOASHES – You need to do some research on China. China’s plan is world dominance. They are buying up the world’s energy and mining reserves one at a time. Do a search on who owns most of the ports in the U.S., the Caribbean, and in South America. It is people who do not think that this isn’t happening that are the problem.
Report Post »Lion420
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:12amThis from the 9-11 truther candidate. Dr. Paul, go away before you ruin everything. You publish racist campaign literature and don’t see a nuclear capable islamic theocracy as a threat. Obviously there’s something wrong with you, and are simply not fit to hold office. Go home before you hurt anyone else…PLEASE.
Report Post »hauschild
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:02amYeah, like the people currently in charge haven’t “hurt” anybody or anything yet.
Wow – some of you people are completely clueless.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:33am@LION (you don’t see a nuclear theocracy as a threat?) Okay..well what about the Islamic theocracy that is overtaking the world.. try checking out Muslim demographics. We are partnered as we speak with the Muslim Brotherhood right here in the states.. their stated goal is to infiltrate us through our government. (Presidency..Obama..Suprem Court Justice..Elena Kegan. Sharia Compliant Banks..funding terorrist organizations..EPA working through takeover of our lands and educatiing students to have onoly 1.3 children which cannot sustain a culture to make room for immigration. ..The FBI..CIA and Homeland Security..passing guns to Hezbollah in Mexico and keeing Arizona from illegal immigration law enforcement. through education and churches. Now there is no one with any plan to stop this but Paul with our Constitution..It would stop any foreign theocracy and Paul is the only one who can get us out of the 15 trillion dollar hole..None..I repeat None have a plan for helping our country but Paul
Report Post »Oh and don’t forget our military was used to usher in the Sharia Law Spring in the ME
MBA
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:12amWhat’s the difference between romney, paul, and obamy? Nothing except obamy is sitting where romney wants to be king. What a bunch of evil, lying, worthless pieces of crap this country has produced.
Report Post »Clutch
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:27amWith the exception of Ron Paul, we have candidates likes Mitt and Obama, thanks to lazy ignorant voters like yourself…
Report Post »Michigan Vacation
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:04amRP has ‘no path to victory’ in the primary, he should endorse Romney now.
Report Post »SgtB
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:02amWhy do you think that a person who stands for Liberty and the Constitution should completely turn his back on his beliefs and support a big government statist who does not believe in limited government? If you freaking morons elect some idiot who is not going to garner votes because he is such a big gov’t statist, then you should sleep in the bed you’ve made. And honestly, I sincerely hope that if you wind up with Romney in the primary, that you have the LOWEST VOTER TURNOUT IN HISTORY come the general election in November. If I cast a vote in November, it will be a write in vote for Paul in a no write in state. I hope that you get the next 4 years that your newconservatives deserve.
Report Post »NOITUloveR
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:23amIt does not matter if he endorses another candidate or does not run as a third party. Those who believe in what he stands for will still vote for him. I refuse to vote for someone just so Barack does not win re-election. I refuse to be a sheep and walk over the cliff.
Report Post »West Coast Patriot
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:43pmMichigan, If we have a brokered convention, Paul has a good chance at the nomination. Paul supporters are not lazy like all the media following sheeple. They are grabbing delegate spots in all the counties around the country. When we get to Florida, I am guessing that Paul supporters will have the higher percentage of delegate spots. The first vote will not fair well for the establishment picks, the second the majority will vote for Paul, all 1144 + of them. Do not say he does not have a chance with the most loyal supporters of all the candidates.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:01amRon Paul knows what he stands for and doesn’t waver. I can hardly say the same about Santorum or Romney. And of course, Gingrich is just a joke, I think of them all as the three stooges. Romney is Moe, Santorum is Larry, and Gingrich is Curly Joe.
I think the reason we have these gents is because America has lost her way. In trying to find her way, she is saying, “Anyone will do, as long as he doesn’t look like Satan”.
Well, Satan can take many guises. That’s how we got into this mess. Last time he shows up as George Bush, though there were many better candidates, the decepticons made us feel like winners when “triumphed” over the opposition and we avoid the big SATAN Al Gore. In retrospect, are any of us happy with the huge debt and warmongering and nation building that GW and his cronies led us into?
If you are, you still haven’t learned your lesson.
America needs help. Here is how you can do your part:
http://www.face.net
Report Post »Susie
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:57amI see the Ron Paul’ers are out in full force on this one. It is unfortunate for the candidate & his followers, but he simply does not have enough support to get the nomination. It is unfortunate, also, that his unwillingness to accept this reality has not led him to be part of the solution instead of part of the problem. His hate of Santorum is unfathomable. With everything that Obama is doing to destroy the United States – just the proposed military healthcare co-pay increases alone – you’d think he and his attack-dogs would have enough to feed on without the “sour grapes” which make him look very ineffectual.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:02amYou wish. This is exactly what is wrong with the Republicans. They revile good people. Instead of uniting, they are insistent upon persecuting the good while embracing the bad.
Blind leading the blind.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:05amI hate to burst your bubble,but Ron Paul’s disdain for Santorum is fathomable. Ron Paul stands by his principles and people trust his word….unlike Santorum. You may not agree with his views but the guy is certainly trustworthy and he would never sell out this country for a buck.
Report Post »NOITUloveR
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:37amI imagine that if a well known “conservative” talk show host, i.e. Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, Rusty Humphreys, Hannity, etc, would endorse Ron Paul and say he is the man who will take back our country, then you would be singing a different tune.
Report Post »ashestoashes
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:43amSUSIE..Face it ..you guys are just liberals in Republican clothing..voting for big spending..high taxing…big government control..NDAA .(.Marshall Law) PATRIOT ACT.SOPA which is already passed and just waiting for after the election to be passed..You are voting against yourselves…
Report Post »disenlightened
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:44amThis collusion theory is the absurd fruit of a twisted mind. Santorum should be ashamed of himself, if it were possible for him to feel shame. He spent half of his concession speech last night talking about the strong women in his life. I now understand why he’s such a drama queen.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:12amI agree..what people are missing is the fact that Ron Paul has worked with Santorum and Gingrich for decades..so he knows their views and voting records backwards and forwards. This is why he attacks them more than Romney. Paul has never worked with Romney and Romney was only a governor for 4 years and Romney never worked in the Federal government…..so that is probably why the attacks on Romney are less in number, than his attacks on Santorum and Gingrich.
Report Post »lordjosh
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:12amI think RP may be hitting Santorum and Gingrich because they are percieved as being supported by the more conservative side of the party. Those people are more likely to support Paul over Romney if those two chuckleheads were out of the race. Romney supporters are liberal trying to wear a conservative mask. Santorum and gingrich supporters(if there are any more) are conservatives who have yet to remove their heads from their ars. When they do, they’ll vote for RON PAUL!
Report Post »Truthurts
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:04amThe “chucklehead” supporters are more likely to switch to Romney than Paul, for one simple reason; they all want Obama defeated. Ron Paul doesn‘t stand a snowball’s chance in hell in winning the general election. There’s no way the majority of voters in America are going to choose a whiny crazy uncle to inhabit the White House. Keep in mind that the sheople see the election as a popularity contest and Paul looks like an ugly mutt.
Report Post »slr4528
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:18amLORDJOSH
I believe you are one of those chuckleheads who can’t think for yourself and you think that Santorum and Gingrich are conservative because FOX NEWS,Rush Limbaugh,Levin and Beck tell you they are conservative.
By the way what is your definition of conservative?
Report Post »WD0331
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:39am@ truthurts….
Report Post »You are absolutely wrong! Ron Paul is the only candidate (besides Romney) who CAN beat Obama in the general election. I bet Beck didn’t tell you about this one did he?
http://www.dailypaul.com/216984/ron-paul-ahead-in-new-rasmussen-poll-against-obama
THXll38
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:11amYou warmonger cons are not better than the liberals of this country. The only kooks I see these days are the ones that do not support classical liberalism.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:03amHear hear! I could not agree more profoundly.
Report Post »TJeff1
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:07amAgreed I would much rather support a neocon conservative than a liberal. Of course only Ron Paul has it all right. With the sound money and consitutional military policies.
But it pains me that the neocons usually have no clue that the Federal reserve taxes thru loss of purchasing power and market manipulation is much worse than the income taxes that they so much despise.
If only they could understand the implications of our central bank theft; they would be much more palatable to the true conservatives that love Ron Paul.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:14amI recommend to all of them, to watch and spread the YouTube video, “Creature From Jekyll Island”. If people really grasped what is at play here, and how critical it is to END THE FED, they may realize that ANY OTHER COURSE will eventually lead to their financial destruction, regardless of who is in office.
This bantering about Romney, or Santorum, or Gingrich, NONE OF WHOM has any inkling of the evil that is the FED, will be a moot point after they are elected and find they have no power to stop the central bankers.
This is perhaps the most important thing to do in the history of our nation and the only person who has a clue about it, among the candidates, is Ron Paul.
I think THAT is why the campaign to discredit and ridicule him began before the campaigns even started. The FED knows who it can tolerate and who it cannot.
Report Post »C1ppy
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:53amIt amazes me how many of you are following the “Anyone but Obama Routine”!? What did the “Anyone but Bush” get us? Open your eyes, research your candidates (ALL OF THEM!), “do your own homework”, do not trust anyone’s talking points, “Question with boldness”, and for our country’s sake choose the candidate that can give you 90% of what you believe! Do not settle for less, the time is now people! Find the candidate that exudes The Constitution, our Founding Father’s principles, Fiscal Responsibility, and Liberty. Anyone willing to do this can not objectively choose anyone else but Ron Paul. Stop the nonsense people. Stop the “he doesn’t support Israel B.S.!”
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:03amIf you had a pop quiz on the Constitution you would have about a 95% failure rate. That is why you get a Santorum Facist and Newt Big Government manipulator.
Report Post »The ONLY Candidate that truly understamds the Constitution is Ron Paul. Romney gives lip service to it. That is why I hope Ron paul and Romney talk to each other later in the campaign so Romney can get schooled on how to run a SMALL Government and turn this Nation around.
flipper1073
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:10amI have Researched the Candidates an Done my own Homework.
But I don’t come up with Ron Paul. I end up with Newt Gingrich
Report Post »Whom I’m not inclined to Support at this time.
Maybe Later
But then I Will Vote for anyone who’s not a Marxist/ Communist.
qpwillie
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:19am@C1ppy
People who have educated themselves on what 0bama is all about will vote to stop him. People who are brainwashed by the likes of Lew Rockwell and Alex Jones will write in Ron Paul thus helping 0bama finish implementing the plan to finish America off.
I‘ll be voting to help save America and you’ll be voting to help 0bama and company destroy it. It’s that simple.
Report Post »DRSAVAGE24
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:47am@QPWillie, no, the people who are voting to destroy the country and hand it over to Obama are the people right now who are voting to nominate Romney and Santorum, who aren’t all that much different from Obama. Don’t blame us if you nominate a terrible candidate to run against Obama.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:00am@DRSAVAGE24
There are no candidates helping 0bama implement his plan. Anybody who thinks they are is just plain ignorant of the facts.
What do you think your write in vote for Ron Paul will accomplish? If you have sense enough to know that it will help 0bama, then you’ll be knowingly voting for 0bama.
Please tell me what you think you will accomplish?
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:04amFlipper1073
Take the constitution quiz at nccs.net and then see if you still come up with Gingrich. Your comment has me rolling in the aisles.
Funniest joke of the day.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:08amQPWILLIE
You and your ideology are inarticulate. The candidate who gets the most votes will win. You are putting the cart before the horse. You are asking , who will win? and then casting your vote. It doesn’t work that way. You vote for the best candidate , according to your conscience, not according to “the collective”. Collectivism is what GOT us here. That’s WHY we have slid down the ravine into socialisim. We think like a herd, rather than according to principles and integrity.
Lemmings, all. Enjoy your “winnings”.
As for me and my house, we will vote for the best candidate, and to devil with “the popularity contest”.
God Bless You in your endeavors. Only if you are true to the light within can it guide you to the path of peace.
Report Post »justangry
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:32amHey QP, How about writing your candidate and your GOP representatives and asking them why they’re ******* off the libertarian base of the republican party by crapping all over the Bill of Rights instead of blaming us.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:00am@Abraham Young
You couldn’t be more wrong. We all have a favorite candidate which we support for the nomination. All of us except the Paulbots are also mature enough to realize that there is a possibility that candidate won’t get the nomination. That’s reality. You are disconnected from reality to the point that you can’t even comprehend the notion of not having things exactly as you want them. You’re like spoiled three year old children who say “if I can’t have what I want, I’ll just destroy everything.
Report Post »qpwillie
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:12am@justangry
What am I blaming you for that you’re not doing?
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:18am@ ABRAHAM YOUNG
Report Post »I am very well versed in the Constution an Bill of Rights.
Are you saying we should get rid of Social Security,
Medicare,Food Stamps,Veterans Benefits ?
Im a Conservative not a Libertarian
To close to Anarchy for Me
Smaller Government not No Government.
We can’t go from BIG Government
to No Government in one giant step.
Shrink the size an scope of Government.
Ronald Reagan style.
justangry
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 9:58amVoting on principle rather than against Barry.
Report Post »Unruled
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:47amI have been to every Tea Party in my area, stood on Capitol Hill the day before Obama Care passed, and pushed my way past assault rifle carrying Capitol police as we took the Rayburn building to try and defend liberty, not the Republican party! I stand with the constitution and freedom! If the Republican party wants my vote they have to come to me as I will not be going to them! Only Ron Paul stands for LIBERTY! You know, “LIBERTY and justice for all” and “land of the FREE and the home of the brave!” Remember those little gems? I do!!!! I also remember,” Give me LIBERTY, or give me death!” So I do not fear the consequences of voting my conscience as I am quite sure that our founders would never vote for the likes of Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich. Need I even mention Obama(hahahahahaha!) I will no longer choose the little glass of poison to avoid the big glass of poison! If we are done as nation, so be it. Let us rise from the ashes like a glorious phoenix and once again spread the wings of liberty! If we lack the courage of heart or the strength character to regain our freedom, then we are not worthy of it, and death it will be. If however, some shred of our former glory remains and we can put away our fears, we may just save this country and liberty for ourselves and future generations! Ron Paul 2012!
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:09amI agree about the Republican party. I think they court conservatives to get our votes then want us to sit down and shut up so they can run the country. They don’t want to hear our opinions after they get elected. Ron Paul is not a conservative, he’s a Libertarian. That said, I took a test to find out what I was and scored higher on the Libertarian side because I’m not willing to sacrifice freedom for conservatism. I like Ron Paul except for his foreign policy. Being an isolationist has, according to history, caused other countries to attack us. If you keep to yourself, you get bullied. I don‘t mind keeping out of other’s business, but we have to have a strong military. I heard Ron explain it himself, and it almost made sense. He basically said no more just going in for a military situation, we have to declare war. That would make Congress think long and hard about going in to a country, and remove the decision from the President, who could be swayed by things like protecting our oil overseas. All I know is I don’t want Romney. He’s Obama-light. I would actually take a Libertarian over Romney.
Report Post »BetterNTexas
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:21amLoriann no matter who gets elected President the TEA party or at least the people who make up the TEA party need to stay alert and active. No more going to sleep and trusting that the people we send to DC will “do the right thing.” DC is too corrupt and people too corruptible to 100% trust that even a good man or woman with the right intentions can’t fall.
And if we really want change in Washington we need to focus on Congress. It doesn‘t matter if we have a conservative President if we don’t have a conservative Congress. It does us no good if we are only focused on the who the Presidential nominee will be if we don’t take Congress–and I‘m worried that that’s what’s going on.
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:19amI like Glenn Beck, except for his misunderstanding of Ron Paul’s foreign policy. Since Ron Paul and George Washington agree, I have to fault Glenn Beck for his lie that Israel will die if Ron Paul is elected.
As individuals, we can freely support any country we wish, including Israel. What Ron Paul is saying, and he is correct, is that as a FEDERAL policy, we should be neutral. That’s what the Constitution says.
Even more importantly, the President doesn’t declare war. Congress does. So it doesn’t matter WHAT your foreign policy is with regard to who defends who. This entire debate is a red herring. Beck is wrong, Paul is right. And unfortunately we have a large group of lemmings who repeat mindlessly anything Glenn Beck says.
Report Post »Truthurts
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:21amLook, you can support Ron Paul all you want, but if all you Paul disciples write him in on your ballots, then you are signing the death certificate for America. Obama is already showing that he well lead by fiat and congress seams to show no power to stop him. If you want your vote to count and you truly want to save America, vote for Obama’s Republican opponent and focus your attention on your local candidates that support your ideology. One man in the White House will not make all the difference, but Obama out of the White House will make a huge difference.
Report Post »Pigpen
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:14amHere is the platform of that veteran, medical doctor, and elected official whom the mainstream media calls a “nut case”…
LOWER TAXES: “The power to tax is the power to destroy, which is why Ron Paul will never support higher taxes. Our national debt is currently over $14 trillion, with the government spending nearly $2 trillion more per year than it collects. The American people should not have to pay for Washington’s reckless and out-of-control appetite for debt. High taxes stifle innovation, prevent saving, destroy production, crush the middle class and the poor, and discourage investment. Every American is entitled to the fruits of his labor, especially during these tough economic times.”
WORKER’S RIGHTS: “While Ron Paul supports the right of every American to join a private sector union if they wish, he believes, like most Americans, that forcing workers to pay union dues just to get or keep a job is wrong.”
ECONOMIC CRISIS: As President, Ron Paul will lead the way out of this crisis by: Vetoing any unbalanced budget Congress sends to his desk. * Refusing to further raise the debt ceiling so politicians can no longer spend recklessly. * Legalizing sound money, so the government is forced to get serious about the dollar’s value. * Ending the corporate stranglehold on the White House. * Driving down gas prices by allowing offshore drilling, abolishing highway motor fuel taxes, increasing the mileage reimbursement rates, and offering tax credits.
An
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:09amListen to the folly bandied about by Fox News and now, even Blaze. The idea that either Paul would be selected to serve as VP is ludicrous. The VP is ALWAYS chosen as an inept idiot, someone that NO ONE wants to be VP. This protects the president from assassination. If either Paul were VP, Romney would be dead within the week.
Anyone who thinks there “might” be a shred of truth to these rumors is not a thinker, but rather, a sheep, willing to believe any lie told on the nightly news.
Paul will not be treasury secretary, VP, or any other subservient position, it would be fruitless and useless to everyone who loves the constitution. These secondary positions are forced to tow the line of the constitution-breaker-in-chief.
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:50amI Disagree with your statement that the VP
is always an Inept Idiot.
While I agree Joe Biden is an Inept Idiot.
John McCain was the Inept Idiot on the
Report Post »McCain/ Palin Ticket in 2008.
Texas Chris
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:04amDarth Cheney was far from inept. Evil, perhaps, which proves the point that the VP is a insurance policy against assassination, but he was far from inept.
Report Post »loriann12
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:16amAccording to establishment republicans, Palin was an idiot. Just not according to the American People.
I never thought about it that way, but the VP IS an insurance policy. That makes so much sense. If you pick a great VP, you run the risk of people liking the VP better than the President. Maybe that’s why they ruined Palin…..
Report Post »flipper1073
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:19amGeorge HW Bush was a Horrible Pick for VP
Report Post »Ronald Reagan should have went with
Jack Kemp. but he needed Texas.
justangry
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:51amYou all are just AFRAID of freedom. Like the loyalists who sat back while the REAL men were saying no to the king, or the jews who rebeled against Moses, wanting to return to their shackles in Egypt. You have one hand on your heart, the other behind your backs, with your fingers crossed, during the National Anthem’s last verse. Your mommas must be so proud.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:07amExcellent!
Report Post »Abraham Young
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 8:21amFantastic!
Report Post »BackstepAndShift
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:04amThe truth is Dr. Paul has not and does not push any conspiracy. I challenge ANYONE to prove your right when you run your mouth about the good doctor. WHERE’S THE PROOF?!!!
Report Post »I will counter ANYONE that has something to say that he or she OR it! thinks holds any valitity.
NOT ONE PEICE OF INFORMATION CAN BE SHOWN TO PROVE THE GOOD DOCTOR AS A CONSPIRACY THEORIST. HE SPEAKS ONLY THE TRUTH AND ALL OF YOU WHO FEEL IT IMPORTANT TO PURSUE SLANDERING THE GOOD DOCTOR I AM CONFIDENT BY YOUR EVIDENT DISPOSTION THAT YOU ARE NO MORE THAN A LITTLE MINDED ATTENTION SEEKER AND ABSENT OF A CONSCIENCE AND GOOD SENSE.
I am writing the good doctor in when I vote if he is NOT the canidate of choice due to a LACK OF GOOD JUDGEMENT BY OTHERS.
We will see how many of you war mongoring koolaid drinking Sean Hannity, Glen Beck back scratchers are crying over the loss of the white house due to YOUR poor judgement in NOT voting for the GOOD DOCTOR!
Too many of YOU! let OTHERS!! do your thinking for you…….
I see to many children here at this site WANNA BE ADULTS.
Please do your research and do it on everyone running for president, EVEN YOUR OWN GUY, SPECIALLY YOUR GUY. I have and I can live with myself and my choice.
Can you?
I also see a WHOLE lot of people letting their fear and emotions drive them instead of good caculation and logic and some real good wholesome COMMON SENSE!
Baddoggy
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:21am@Backstep. They will attempt to tie Dr Paul to any nutjob that walks up to him on the Camapign trail. He will talk to anyone and listen to their concerns as a good candidate should. There are a lot of followers of Dr Paul that totally misun\derstand his message because they have listened to the MSM that says he wants to legalize drugs and end all wars. Nothing could be furthur from the truth, but people do not understand because they have been brainwashed into believeing soundbites…
Dr Paul wants the STATES, not the FDA to handle thier own control and approval of drugs. Some States such as California, would legalize a lot of illegal drugs, put them under state control and tax them. Other States like Texas would probably keep a very tight reign on drugs, but maybe legalize some EXPERIMENTAL drugs that the FDA will not release. The FDA would be gone and that is a VERY good thing!
As far as foriegm policy. Ron Paul wants wars to be declared by Congress with a REAL enemy to be declared. Not just a boogey man “terrorist” but a Country we can go in quickly and kick it’s a@@ and stop rebuilding them after we destroy them. We would have and should have been out of Iraq as soon as Saddam was captured and hanged. Big difference? Yes I would say so!!
The mometum is building and he is gaining delegates behind the scenes. Yea…hes a nutjob…and I am so proud to follow him!
Report Post »MastrSSG
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:04amFrankly, I don’t think Ron Paul should get elected coffee maker in an AA meeting. I just don’t get it. Its amazing to me how people like him get elected to any office. He isn’t the only one either, there are many people in government that make me shake my head at the people who voted for them. Nancy Pelosi? really? Barny Frank, Chris Dodd…….
Report Post »Pigpen
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:29amI agree, it is AMAZING how a man like Dr. Paul who was a successful OB-GYN who served the nation honorably as a Flight Surgeon can be “electable”. I mean obviously only an Indonesian named Hussein who openly admits to being ashamed of this nation and who once won a Nobel PEACE Prize for defending, prolonging, and actively conducting a WAR he himself had denounced as UNJUST can be elected in the United States.
Nice try, Top, but Ron Paul may be a poor public speaker (even a little whiny) but he is the genuine article. Unlike President Hussein who is a hypocrite even by his own Leftist standards.
Report Post »Texas Chris
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:06amI like that you called him Top. Well done.
Moses wasn’t a great speaker. His brother Aaron had to do the talking. But Moses was a great leader because he obeyed the law laid out before him.
So does Ron Paul.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:27amRon Paul could be a teacher in a class on the Costitution…You should go if he were to ever do such a thing. As a matter of fact you should try to read it sometime. With a comment like that, I am sure you have spent your time watching Jersey Shore ans Americam Idol…maybe Family Guy too?
Reading the Constitution would show you how dumb your comment really is. Pick up a copy, they are only a few bucks…Read it. Then tell me who other than Ron Paul follows it.
Report Post »Simonne
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:59amThis is all about Santorum & the media wanting to believe this. I just love the way Paul responds with his no nonsense attitude. Until a couple of days, Newt & Sant didn’t attack each other either because they are friends. Paul & Mitt are very cordial to each other as their wives are friends. If Mitt is the noinee, he will have to make concessions to Paul at the convention trying to keep some percentage of his supporters.
Report Post »Pacman116
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:09amThis from a guy who believes 9-11 was an inside job. I’m not saying that I believe that Paul and Romney teamed up, but for this kook to make mention of “conspiracy” theories is the height of hypocrisy.
Report Post »Hossua
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:47amPaul never said it was an inside job. He said the Bush administration was gleeful, because it gave them an excuse to act in Iraq. That‘s Rahmbo’s “Never let a crisis go to waste.” on the Republican side.
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 6:39amPaul never said that 9-11 was an inside job. Some of his supporters might think so but that doesn’t mean that he does. Hmmm, it wasn’t that long ago that certain people who post on this site ( Beck fans ) were posting comments about how Obama blew up the oil rig to push his radical environmental agenda. Does that mean that Beck ( and Santorum, via Becks’s support ) support conspiracy theories?
Report Post »riseandshine
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 10:10am9/11 absolutely was an inside job.. apparently Paul doesn’t believe that…but I support him. He’s a Constitutionalist, and that’s what our country needs right now, before we lose everything.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:39amYou know what politician Paul ?.. the funny thing about conspiracy theories is that sometimes they turn out to be true … and you should not be pointing fingers at ANYONE ELSE regarding them.
Time will tell .. and then I am certain if proven Paul will deny deny … lie lie.
OMG 2012
Report Post »recoton1
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:49amRight.. because the guy holding “No One but Paul” Moneybombs and threatening to run 3rd party is in cohoots with the soul less banker from Michigan.. I mean New Hampshire.. I mean Utah.. hey.. isn’t there another politician that claims every state is her home state? Oh right.. the Sec. of State.. I‘m sure that’s just a coincidence. Run along back to sleep now, its getting late.
Report Post »CatB
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:00amWho can sleep with Obama destroying the country? .. everyday a new “program” that will help to bring down America .. I haven’t slept well in nearly 4 years … I will sleep better with a grown up in the White House and not the man child .. Obama.
OMG 2012!
Report Post »Blackjacx1
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:08amIt’s a non-issue. The fact that Paul has little; if anything, to gain from defeating Romney at this point couldn’t have ANYTHING… I mean nothing to do with the fact he doesn’t care to engage Romney the way he does candidates(Newt, Rick) that are pulling voters that would actually vote for him(Paul) instead of the GOP sheople.(you know the ones that would vote for a turnip on a stick if the GOP elites and pundits said it was the only candidate that COULD win.) Which is apparent since Romney is a GOP version of Pres. Obama.
Report Post »recoton1
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:30amWe live in a country where more people tune into American Idol than vote for their leadership
We live in a country where more people know Kim Kardashian is dating than who is Vice President
Where Crack-addled musical has-beens get more respect and reverence than our fallen military
Where our history is being forgotten and/or destroyed
Where our currency is being willfully destroyed
where prices are rising and no one wonders why the head on the TV won’t talk about it.
Where people are distracted by shining objects like contraception and bedroom regulations instead of a crushing and mounting debt that looks to wipe out 236 years of freedom and liberty.
A country that murders itself over sneakers
that begs for money from the government
that seeks hand outs
that is jealous and covetous
that is morally weak
that has given up on being better than their parents and has settled for the scraps
why do you think we deserve to keep our birthright?
Are we entitled to a life of leisure, taking the easiest possible way out and continuing to re-elect corrupt, villinous politicians that tell us exactly what we want to hear while picking our pockets and destroying our national soverignty.
“People deserve the government they get, and they deserve to get it good and hard”
I’d say that pretty much sums it up…
In November, I‘ll be writing in Ron Paul’s name on the ballot. Enjoy another 4 years of this terrible pox on America. Maybe in 2016, the scales will f
Report Post »CatB
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:51amIf you help bring down the country because you don’t get your way … how CHILDISH of you Paul supporters! .. I will vote FOR AMERICA and that means anyone but Obama … to save MY COUNTRY! Stop acting like 2 year olds .. put on your big boy/girl pants and start to take America BACK. If you aren’t part of the solution YOU are part of the problem .. this will NOT be solved in one or two election cycles .. even if you got your beloved Paul. You people are as cult like as Obamatrons … grow up.
OMG 2012
Report Post »recoton1
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:23amThe country’s going down anyway.. why prolong the inevitable. If the public is too stupid to vote in it’s own self interest, why would I vote to help it sputter along for another 3-4 years before eventually collapsing anyway. I’m at peace with my decision. It is your inflexibility to think for yourself and study the situation that has put us in this predicament. I voted for McCain in 2008 and now see that I was presented with 2 candidates that are vitually identical except for their corporate sponsors. This time around, I’m making a personal and learned decision. Maybe you should try that this time…
Report Post »Hossua
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 5:48amRather have this pos Obama for 4 more years than Santorum’s crazy ass.
Report Post »Baddoggy
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:37amI agree with you. However i will vote for Romney if it comes to that. I think he can be influenced by Dr Paul and the Constitutionality of what we are doing to ourselves. I think he would shrink Government…not as much as Dr Paul would of course…Newt and Santorum would be more big Government for sure, just coming from the right instead of the left.
If we dont go back to the Constitution there will be a civil war when the Government runs out of money. I will be on the side to restore the Constitution and unfortunately I will be in the minority unless there is a great awakening of sheeple soon…
Do us all a favor…before you vote. Go read the Constitution. Really read it. If you do, you will see what a REAL Government should look like…VERY SMALL…
Report Post »breakobamanow
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 11:31amI’m with you. Those who say that a vote for Paul is a vote for Obama, may be right, but I’ll still vote for Paul and can spin their vote for for Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich the same way. At least Ron Paul will tell you the truth and allow you to deal with it. The others only lie to you and tell you how the government needs to fix it, and that you will have to pay for it, or they’ll just borrow the money and your grandchildren can pay it back. We do not need more big governemnt at our service, when it is us who are footing the bill, and the Progressives, Communists, and Marxists, are enjoying their free benefits on the backs of those who still believe in captalism, free markets, and hard work to get what we want from a life without jeprodizing our freedom and liberty for it. I say we nix the social programs and lets go back to a time when Americans valued the family; when families and communities took care of their own and the government wasn’t envolved in the decisions.
Report Post »Boycott the Media Let the People Decide
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:19amMore truth about the fake Santorum….wait til his conspiracy theory gets posted about the jihadist boogyman coming to get you….it’s scaaaaaaaaaary!
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:24amSleep on this…….
http://www.ajuaa.com/lookme/play.php?vid=958
It may not be true here yet, but it’s true somewhere and getting closer.
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:59amPoor Ron Paul. I can just imagine if he were the nominee…………………
A debate would go like this:
Ron Paul: …blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,…..delegates….blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,….federal reserve, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,…..etc.
Obama: YES – WE – CAN ! ! ! ……crowd of idiots goes wild.
Why? Because only little kids can see him, like ET. Face it, the guy is past his shelf life.
Report Post »recoton1
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:13amYeah…It’s a shame that the American populous is too stupid and immature to listen to the lone voice of reason in the room. When it all comes crashing down, you people will only have yourselves to blame.
The tea party suppports big government Santorum
or
Bigger government Gingrich
or
Goldman Sach’s backed Romney
It would be funny if it weren’t so depressing.
Enjoy the slide.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:14amKooks Unite! http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rvMHopVwyXY#!
Report Post »TSUNAMI-22
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:22am@ recoton1
Enjoy the slide.
Report Post »~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Enjoy it? Heck, I’m counting on it.
RMTIV
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:35amAll Romney need do is say that 9/11 was America’s fault and Ron Paul would throw his support behind him. Thats all it took for Cynthia ( America needs a Quaddafi style government) Mckinney to get his endorsement in 08.
Report Post »Trading_barracuda
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:55amSantorum: “The Abramoff ‘K’ Street Candidate”
Rick Santorum has done well to pose as a candidate ‘for the people’.
Despite a long voting record that looks more like the rap sheet of a corrupt Washington insider, there is a significant amount of interest in Santorum’s campaign.
All of the usual suspects, Neo-Conservative radio talk show personalities give a well spun perspective on “Rick” as they call him. Even Glenn Beck who says he doesn’t endorse candidates… has in fact endorsed Rick Santorum!
Yet the facts don’t lie. Santorum was literally the liason to the K St. lobbyist groups — a sort of general manager of connections from lobbyists to Capitol Hill.
Former Abramoff-Linked Lobbyist Helps Santorum in South Carolina
A one-time Senate aide turned lobbyist who pleaded guilty to fraud in the wake of the Jack Abramoff scandal has been spearheading former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum’s presidential campaign in South Carolina in advance of the state’s pivotal Jan. 21 primary.
Norquist, however, claims that at a 2002 meeting with Santorum and lobbyists he described the project to them. A contemporary report says he described its goals and asked those present to help complete the project. He passed out a list of lobbyists the project was checking on. At that time Santorum did not comment.
Later that year, Norquist publicly commented, “Santorum has gotten me in to talk to all those guys.”
Report Post »http://www.dailypaul.com/217253/santorum-the-abramoff-
RepubliCorp
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:33amRMTIV True, here is Ron Kook Paul meeting with 911 truthers
http://www.myspace.com/video/peace-freedom-are-achieved-through-understanding/ron-paul-meets-the-student-scholars-for-9-11-truth/28483925
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:02amHe did not endorse her in ‘08. That is a lie. He endorsed Chuck Baldwin ( constitution party ). I am not going to let you idiots get away with just making stuff up.
Report Post »sillyfreshness
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:07amRon Paul in 2012. Ron’s da man.
Report Post »wbalzley
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 2:55amRon Paul accuses another candidate of engaging in “Conspiracy Theories”…Oh the IRONY!
Report Post »WAR PIGS CRAWLING
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 3:46am@ WBALZLEY…..Hahahahaha….thanks…..thinking the same thing.
Report Post »RepubliCorp
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 4:51amIt is funny seeing that is the base Dr Kook panders to
Report Post »http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PoliticalReportOctober1992.pdf
Baddoggy
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:05amLaugh it up chuckleheads…ou will not like going back to the Constitution when Dr Paul wins because he will throw you off welfare..
Report Post »dissentnow
Posted on February 29, 2012 at 7:11amI know, right? Conspiracy theories are for crazy people, not us smart Blaze folk. We would never support a conspiracy theory….Now, our secret Muslim plant of a president who was really born in Kenya and who is really the anti-Christ who is really the 12th Imam who is trying to destroy American with cloward piven who is really a terrorist even though he killed Bin Laden, who, for the record, wasn’t really killed; it was just a big cover up…….thats another story!
Report Post »